Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 114 of 1979
date: 4 June 2026
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

4 June 2026
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments, applications, and modifications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the compilation as a whole.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: No temporal relation specified.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Commencement of the Act is conditional on another Act coming into operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-2-norm

4 Act binds the Crown
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-2
note: The Act binds the Crown in right of the Commonwealth, States, Australian Capital Territory, and Northern Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Act binds the Crown
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: binds
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the Crown
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4A Application of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4a
note: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4A Application of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4B Application to Norfolk Island
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4b
has part: 4B(1) Application to Norfolk Island
has part: 4B(2) Application to Norfolk Island
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.18

4B(1) Application to Norfolk Island
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4b-ss-1
part of: 4B Application to Norfolk Island
note: Prohibition on application to Norfolk Island
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 4B(1) Application to Norfolk Island
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Absolute prohibition
premise text: (1) This Act does not extend to Norfolk Island.
conclusion text: This Act does not apply to Norfolk Island.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4B(2) Application to Norfolk Island
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4b-ss-2
part of: 4B Application to Norfolk Island
note: Ceases to be in force when the Telecommunications Act 1992 (Norfolk Island) is repealed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-4b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Ceases to be in force
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) ceases to be in force when the Telecommunications Act 1992 (Norfolk Island) is repealed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Definitions and explanations of terms used in the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.19
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5-norm

5AA Eligible Commonwealth authority declarations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5aa
note: The Minister may declare a Royal Commission an eligible authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5aa-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5aa-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to declare
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

5AB Authorised officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5ab
has part: 5AB(1) Authorised officers
has part: 5AB(1A) Authorised officers
has part: 5AB(2) Authorised officers
has part: 5AB(3) Authorised officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.72

5AB(1) Authorised officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5ab-ss-1
part of: 5AB Authorised officers
note: Authorises management office or position for enforcement agency purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 5AB(1) Authorised officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
logic summary: Grants permission to authorise a management office or position.
premise text: (1) The head (however described) of an enforcement agency may, by writing...
conclusion text: ...authorise a management office or management position in the enforcement agency for the purposes of subparagraph (b)(iii)...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for authorisation.
premise text: (1) The head (however described) of an enforcement agency may, by writing...
conclusion text: ...authorise a management office or management position in the enforcement agency for the purposes of subparagraph (b)(iii)...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implicates that authorisation is necessary for management office or position.
premise text: (1) The head (however described) of an enforcement agency may, by writing...
conclusion text: ...authorise a management office or management position in the enforcement agency for the purposes of subparagraph (b)(iii)...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagates the authorisation to the management office or position.
premise text: (1) The head (however described) of an enforcement agency may, by writing...
conclusion text: ...authorise a management office or management position in the enforcement agency for the purposes of subparagraph (b)(iii)...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Represents knowledge about authorisation and management offices.
premise text: (1) The head (however described) of an enforcement agency may, by writing...
conclusion text: ...authorise a management office or management position in the enforcement agency for the purposes of subparagraph (b)(iii)...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

5AB(1A) Authorised officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5ab-ss-1a
part of: 5AB Authorised officers
note: Commissioner of Police may authorise AFP employee to be an authorised officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1a-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 5AB(1A) Authorised officers
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by the Commissioner of Police.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5AB(2) Authorised officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5ab-ss-2
part of: 5AB Authorised officers
note: Must provide a copy of authorisation to the Communications Access Coordinator.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5AB(2) Authorised officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide a copy of authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5AB(3) Authorised officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5ab-ss-3
part of: 5AB Authorised officers
note: An authorisation made under this section is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5AB(3) Authorised officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Rejection of legislative instrument status
premise text: (3) An authorisation made under this section is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5AC Authorisation of certifying officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5ac
has part: 5AC(1) Authorisation of certifying officers
has part: 5AC(2) Authorisation of certifying officers
has part: 5AC(3) Authorisation of certifying officers
has part: 5AC(4) Authorisation of certifying officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.73

5AC(1) Authorisation of certifying officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5ac-ss-1
part of: 5AC Authorisation of certifying officers
note: Authorisation to certify officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.73
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (1) The Commissioner of Police may authorise...
conclusion text: ...a senior executive AFP employee...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

5AC(2) Authorisation of certifying officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5ac-ss-2
part of: 5AC Authorisation of certifying officers
note: Authorisation of certifying officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.73
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Granting authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5AC(3) Authorisation of certifying officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5ac-ss-3
part of: 5AC Authorisation of certifying officers
note: Authorisation of certifying officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.73
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-3-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 5AC(3) Authorisation of certifying officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

5AC(4) Authorisation of certifying officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5ac-ss-4
part of: 5AC Authorisation of certifying officers
note: Authorises an AFP employee to be a certifying officer of the Police Force of the State.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.73
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 5AC(4) Authorisation of certifying officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grants permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5AD Authorisation of certifying person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5ad
note: Authorisation of certifying person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.75
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ad-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ad-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ad-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5AE Authorisation of members of the staff of a Commonwealth
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5ae
note: Authorisation of a person to be a member of the staff
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.75
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ae-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ae-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5ae-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5A Communicating etc. certain information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5a
note: A person who gives, makes use of, or produces a record obtained by interception must provide the relevant record in a proceeding.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.75
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5A Communicating etc. certain information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide relevant record
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5B Exempt proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5b
note: Exempt proceedings defined
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.76
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5B Exempt proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes various types of proceedings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5C Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5c
has part: 5C(1) Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman
has part: 5C(2) Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.80

5C(1) Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5c-ss-1
part of: 5C Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman
note: Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.80
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5C(1) Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: relevant_to
logic summary: Relevant information or question
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, information or a question is relevant to an inspection...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During inspection under Part 2-7 or Chapter 4A
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, information or a question is relevant to an inspection...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: about
logic summary: About agency's records
premise text: (b) in any case—any matter to which any of those records relates;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: If Ombudsman suspects contravention
premise text: if the Ombudsman suspects on reasonable grounds that an officer...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5C(2) Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5c-ss-2
part of: 5C Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman
note: Nothing in subsection (1) limits the generality of a reference to information or a question relevant to an inspection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.80
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5C(2) Information or question relevant to inspection by Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

5D Serious offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5d
note: Defines serious offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.81
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5D Serious offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes specific types of crimes
premise text: Division 307 of the Criminal Code
conclusion text: serious offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes specific types of crimes (continued)
premise text: Division 83 of the Criminal Code
conclusion text: serious offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal intervals for terrorism-related offences
premise text: Division 92A of the Criminal Code
conclusion text: serious offence
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5d-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes specific types of crimes (continued)
premise text: Section 104.27 of the Criminal Code
conclusion text: serious offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 Section 73
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73
note: List of sections prohibited from prosecution
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.84
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits listed sections from prosecution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5E Serious contraventions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5e
has part: 5E(1) Serious contraventions
has part: 5E(2) Serious contraventions
has part: 5E(3) Serious contraventions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.88

5E(1) Serious contraventions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5e-ss-1
part of: 5E Serious contraventions
note: Serious contraventions are defined as contraventions of a law that meet certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.88
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of serious contravention
premise text: A serious contravention is a contravention of a law...
conclusion text: This is a serious contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Conditions for seriousness
premise text: The contravention must be an offence punishable by imprisonment...
conclusion text: This contravention must meet the conditions for seriousness.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5E(2) Serious contraventions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5e-ss-2
part of: 5E Serious contraventions
note: A contravention is taken to be a contravention if it has been committed or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.88
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5E(2) Serious contraventions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: The state takes a contravention to be a contravention.
premise text: (2) Except so far as the contrary intention appears, a contravention...
conclusion text: A contravention is taken to be a contravention if it has been committed or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: has been committed or is being committed
logic summary: The state takes a contravention to be a contravention if it has been committed or is being committed.
premise text: (2) Except so far as the contrary intention appears, a contravention...
conclusion text: A contravention is taken to be a contravention if it has been committed or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: is being committed
logic summary: The state takes a contravention to be a contravention if it is being committed.
premise text: (2) Except so far as the contrary intention appears, a contravention...
conclusion text: A contravention is taken to be a contravention if it has been committed or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed
logic summary: The state takes a contravention to be a contravention if it is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed.
premise text: (2) Except so far as the contrary intention appears, a contravention...
conclusion text: A contravention is taken to be a contravention if it has been committed or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5E(3) Serious contraventions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5e-ss-3
part of: 5E Serious contraventions
note: Reference to penalty units includes reference to equivalent fine or pecuniary penalty amount.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.88
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 5E(3) Serious contraventions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Equivalent amounts are referenced
premise text: Section 4AA of the Crimes Act 1914
conclusion text: Equivalent fine or pecuniary penalty amount
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class/type/subclass hierarchy applied to definitions
premise text: Definition of 'number of penalty units'
conclusion text: Reference to equivalent fine or pecuniary penalty amount
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5F When a communication is passing over a telecommunications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5f
note: A communication is taken to start passing over a telecommunications system when it is sent or transmitted by the person sending the communication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.89
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5f-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5f-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5F When a communication is passing over a telecommunications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Establishes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5G The intended recipient of a communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5g
note: Defines intended recipient of communication
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5g-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5g-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5g-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5G The intended recipient of a communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Defines intended recipient of communication
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5H When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5h
has part: 5H(1) When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient
has part: 5H(2) When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90

5H(1) When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5h-ss-1
part of: 5H When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient
note: Communication is accessible if received or under control of intended recipient
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5H(1) When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasAccess
logic summary: Has access to communication
premise text: (a) has been received by the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient; or (b) is under the control of the intended recipient; or (c) has been delivered to the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient.
conclusion text: The communication is accessible if it meets one of these conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: hasReceived
logic summary: Communication received by intended recipient
premise text: (a) has been received by the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient; or (b) is under the control of the intended recipient; or (c) has been delivered to the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient.
conclusion text: The communication has been received
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Communication during intended recipient's control
premise text: (a) has been received by the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient; or (b) is under the control of the intended recipient; or (c) has been delivered to the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient.
conclusion text: The communication occurs during the intended recipient's control
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Communication diffuses if received by intended recipient
premise text: (a) has been received by the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient; or (b) is under the control of the intended recipient; or (c) has been delivered to the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient.
conclusion text: The communication diffuses
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Communication recognized by AI system
premise text: (a) has been received by the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient; or (b) is under the control of the intended recipient; or (c) has been delivered to the telecommunications service provided to the intended recipient.
conclusion text: The communication is recognized by the AI system
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5H(2) When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5h-ss-2
part of: 5H When a communication is accessible to the intended recipient
note: No limitation on accessibility for purposes of the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-5h-ss-2-norm

6 Interception of a communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
has part: 6(1) Interception of a communication
has part: 6(2A) Interception of a communication
has part: 6(2B) Interception of a communication
has part: 6(2C) Interception of a communication
has part: 6(2D) Interception of a communication
has part: 6(2E) Interception of a communication
has part: 6(2F) Interception of a communication
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90

6(1) Interception of a communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-1
part of: 6 Interception of a communication
note: Interception of communication without knowledge is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Interception without knowledge
conclusion text: Forbidden
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of interception
premise text: Interception type
conclusion text: Communication interception
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(2A) Interception of a communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-2a
part of: 6 Interception of a communication
note: Declaration of emergency service facility
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2a-norm

6(2B) Interception of a communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-2b
part of: 6 Interception of a communication
note: Minister may declare premises an emergency service facility.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2B) Interception of a communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(2C) Interception of a communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-2c
part of: 6 Interception of a communication
note: Minister's declaration is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2c-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2C) Interception of a communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Declares prohibition on Minister's declaration as a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(2D) Interception of a communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-2d
part of: 6 Interception of a communication
note: Specify name of force or service and geographical region.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must specify information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(2E) Interception of a communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-2e
part of: 6 Interception of a communication
note: Revocation of declaration upon disallowance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2E) Interception of a communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of declaration
premise text: (2E) If a House of the Parliament disallows...
conclusion text: The declaration is taken to have been revoked.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between disallowance and revocation
premise text: (2E) If a House of the Parliament disallows...
conclusion text: The declaration is taken to have been revoked.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
logic summary: Eventual revocation upon disallowance
premise text: (2E) If a House of the Parliament disallows...
conclusion text: The declaration is taken to have been revoked.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses revocation upon disallowance
premise text: (2E) If a House of the Parliament disallows...
conclusion text: The declaration is taken to have been revoked.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2e-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Asserts
logic summary: Asserts revocation upon disallowance
premise text: (2E) If a House of the Parliament disallows...
conclusion text: The declaration is taken to have been revoked.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(2F) Interception of a communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-2f
part of: 6 Interception of a communication
note: Duty to intercept and record communications in emergency services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2f-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2f-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2F) Interception of a communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to intercept and record communications
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6AA Accessing a stored communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6aa
note: Accessing stored communication without knowledge of recipient is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.94
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6aa-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6aa-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6aa-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6aa-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 6AA Accessing a stored communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits accessing stored communication without knowledge of recipient.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6aa-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies 'accessing a stored communication' as a prohibited action.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6A Investigation of an offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6a
has part: 6A(1) Investigation of an offence
has part: 6A(2) Investigation of an offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.94

6A(1) Investigation of an offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6a-ss-1
part of: 6A Investigation of an offence
note: Investigation of an offence by specified authorities or agencies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.94
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6A(1) Investigation of an offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
logic summary: Specifies the entities that must conduct an investigation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6A(2) Investigation of an offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6a-ss-2
part of: 6A Investigation of an offence
note: A reference in this Act to an investigation, in relation to an offence, is a reference to the investigation of the likely commission of that offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.94
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6A(2) Investigation of an offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers_to
logic summary: The text refers to an investigation in relation to an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6B Involvement in an offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6b
note: A person is taken to be involved in an offence if they have committed or are committing the offence, or are suspected of having committed it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.95
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6B Involvement in an offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: The state takes an obligation on the person to be involved in the offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6C Issue of warrant to agency or eligible authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6c
note: Warrant issuance obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.95
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Agency or eligible authority must receive warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6D Judges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6d
has part: 6D(1) Judges
has part: 6D(2) Judges
has part: 6D(3) Judges
has part: 6D(4) Judges
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96

6D(1) Judges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6d-ss-1
part of: 6D Judges
note: Definition of eligible Judge and Judge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-7

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6D(1) Judges
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of eligible Judge and Judge.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Judges are defined in relation to a warrant applied for by the National Anti-Corruption Commission.
conclusion text: The definition of Judge is based on a class hierarchy.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Subclass relationship
premise text: A Judge is defined as a person who is a Judge of a court created by the Parliament.
conclusion text: The definition of eligible Judge includes a subclass relationship with the general definition of Judge.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: A consent under subsection (2) and a declaration under subsection (3) are in force for an eligible Judge.
conclusion text: The definition of eligible Judge includes a temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: A warrant applied for by the National Anti-Corruption Commission is related to a superior Court Judge.
conclusion text: The definition of eligible Judge includes a temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: A Judge means a person who is a Judge of a court created by the Parliament.
conclusion text: The general definition of Judge is based on a class hierarchy.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: A Judge means a person who is a Judge of a court created by the Parliament.
conclusion text: The definition of Judge includes a subclass relationship with the general definition of eligible Judge.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6D(2) Judges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6d-ss-2
part of: 6D Judges
note: A Judge may consent to be nominated by the Attorney-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-2-norm

6D(3) Judges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6d-ss-3
part of: 6D Judges
note: Attorney-General may declare judges eligible for certain purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to declare judges eligible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6D(4) Judges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6d-ss-4
part of: 6D Judges
note: Protection and immunity for judges
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: Eligible Judge has protection and immunity
conclusion text: Protection and immunity for judges
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation to
logic summary: Temporal relation between functions or powers
premise text: Eligible Judge has protection and immunity in relation to performance or exercise of a function or power
conclusion text: Temporal relation between functions or powers
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: same
logic summary: Same argument for judges as for Justices of the High Court
premise text: Protection and immunity for judges
conclusion text: Same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: relation to
logic summary: Diffusion of protection and immunity
premise text: Eligible Judge has protection and immunity in relation to performance or exercise of a function or power
conclusion text: Diffusion of protection and immunity
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6d-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: relation to
logic summary: CogAI's understanding of protection and immunity for judges
premise text: Eligible Judge has protection and immunity in relation to performance or exercise of a function or power
conclusion text: CogAI's understanding of protection and immunity for judges
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6DA Nominated ART members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6da
has part: 6DA(1) Nominated ART members
has part: 6DA(2) Nominated ART members
has part: 6DA(3) Nominated ART members
has part: 6DA(4) Nominated ART members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96

6DA(1) Nominated ART members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6da-ss-1
part of: 6DA Nominated ART members
note: The Attorney-General may nominate a person to issue warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6DA(1) Nominated ART members
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6DA(2) Nominated ART members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6da-ss-2
part of: 6DA Nominated ART members
note: Cannot nominate a person without being enrolled as a legal practitioner for at least 5 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of nomination without proper qualifications
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1)
conclusion text: (a) is enrolled as a legal practitioner...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: for-not-less-than-5-years
logic summary: Temporal interval requirement for enrollment
premise text: (b) has been so enrolled for not less than 5 years.
conclusion text: ...and (b) has been so enrolled...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: for-not-less-than-5-years
logic summary: Temporal interval requirement for enrollment
premise text: (b) has been so enrolled for not less than 5 years.
conclusion text: ...and (b) has been so enrolled...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must-be-enrolled-as
logic summary: Mandatory enrollment requirement for nomination
premise text: (a) is enrolled as a legal practitioner...
conclusion text: ...and (b) has been so enrolled...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must-not-nominate-unless
logic summary: Nomination restriction based on enrollment status
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1)
conclusion text: ...the person: (a) is enrolled as a legal practitioner...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6DA(3) Nominated ART members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6da-ss-3
part of: 6DA Nominated ART members
note: Nomination ceases if nominated ART member ceases to hold appointment or Attorney-General withdraws nomination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-ltl-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CEASES
logic summary: Nomination ceases
premise text: (3) A nomination ceases to have effect if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: WITHDRAWAL
logic summary: Attorney-General can withdraw nomination
premise text: (3) A nomination ceases to have effect if... or (b) the Attorney-General, by writing, withdraws the nomination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CEASES_OF_APPOINTMENT
logic summary: Nomination ceases if nominated ART member ceases to hold appointment
premise text: (3) A nomination ceases to have effect if... (a) the nominated ART member ceases to hold an appointment...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: OVERLAPS
logic summary: Nomination and ceasing to have effect overlap in time
premise text: (3) A nomination ceases to have effect if... (a) the nominated ART member ceases to hold an appointment...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-3-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Nomination is contained in ceasing to have effect
premise text: (3) A nomination ceases to have effect if... (a) the nominated ART member ceases to hold an appointment...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6DA(4) Nominated ART members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6da-ss-4
part of: 6DA Nominated ART members
note: Protection and immunity for nominated ART members issuing warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Protection and immunity
premise text: ART member performing a function
conclusion text: same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6da-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: Performing a function of or connected with issuing a warrant
conclusion text: same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6DB Issuing authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6db
has part: 6DB(1) Issuing authorities
has part: 6DB(2) Issuing authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.97

6DB(1) Issuing authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6db-ss-1
part of: 6DB Issuing authorities
note: The Attorney-General may appoint a person as an issuing authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.97
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6DB(1) Issuing authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6DB(2) Issuing authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6db-ss-2
part of: 6DB Issuing authorities
note: A person who is a judge of a court created by the Parliament or a magistrate must issue an authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.97
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6DB(2) Issuing authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must issue an authority.
premise text: The person is a judge of a court created by the Parliament or a magistrate.
conclusion text: They must issue an authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be a judge of a court created by the Parliament or a magistrate.
premise text: The person is a judge of a court created by the Parliament or a magistrate.
conclusion text: They must be a judge of a court created by the Parliament or a magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The authority must be issued within a certain time frame.
premise text: The person is a judge of a court created by the Parliament or a magistrate.
conclusion text: The authority must be issued within a certain time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6db-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The authority must be issued within a certain time frame.
premise text: The person is a judge of a court created by the Parliament or a magistrate.
conclusion text: The authority must be issued within a certain time frame.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6dc
has part: 6DC(1) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
has part: 6DC(2) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
has part: 6DC(3) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
has part: 6DC(4) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.98

6DC(1) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6dc-ss-1
part of: 6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities
note: The Attorney-General may appoint a person as a Part 4-1 issuing authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6DC(1) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6DC(2) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6dc-ss-2
part of: 6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities
note: Consent to be appointed by the Attorney-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 6DC(2) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6DC(3) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6dc-ss-3
part of: 6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities
note: Appointment ceases if person is no longer eligible for appointment by Attorney-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 6DC(3) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits appointment if person is no longer eligible.
premise text: (3) A person’s appointment ceases to have effect...
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General, by writing, revokes the appointment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on Attorney-General to revoke appointment if person is no longer eligible.
premise text: (3) A person’s appointment ceases to have effect...
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General, by writing, revokes the appointment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines temporal overlap between appointment and eligibility.
premise text: (3) A person’s appointment ceases to have effect...
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General, by writing, revokes the appointment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship between appointment and eligibility.
premise text: (3) A person’s appointment ceases to have effect...
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General, by writing, revokes the appointment.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Grants permission to Attorney-General to revoke appointment if person is no longer eligible.
premise text: (3) A person’s appointment ceases to have effect...
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General, by writing, revokes the appointment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6DC(4) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6dc-ss-4
part of: 6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities
note: Part 4-1 issuing authorities have the same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6DC(4) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Protection and immunity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6E Lawfully intercepted information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6e
has part: 6E(1) Lawfully intercepted information
has part: 6E(2) Lawfully intercepted information
has part: 6E(2A) Lawfully intercepted information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.99

6E(1) Lawfully intercepted information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6e-ss-1
part of: 6E Lawfully intercepted information
note: Lawfully intercepted information is defined as information obtained by intercepting a communication passing over a telecommunications system without contravening subsection 7(1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.99
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6E(1) Lawfully intercepted information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Definition
logic summary: Defines the term 'lawfully intercepted information'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6E(2) Lawfully intercepted information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6e-ss-2
part of: 6E Lawfully intercepted information
note: Lawfully intercepted information must be referred to as obtained through intercepting a communication under a warrant or in accordance with section 65A or 63E.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.99
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6E(2) Lawfully intercepted information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: The provision imposes a duty on the agency or authority to refer to lawfully intercepted information in a specific way.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6E(2A) Lawfully intercepted information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6e-ss-2a
part of: 6E Lawfully intercepted information
note: Definition of lawfully intercepted information includes information obtained by accessing a stored communication under a section 31A authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.99
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-cogai-6

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6E(2A) Lawfully intercepted information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Definition of lawfully intercepted information includes
premise text: Information obtained by accessing a stored communication under a section 31A authorisation.
conclusion text: Lawfully intercepted information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Definition of lawfully intercepted information includes
premise text: Information obtained by accessing a stored communication under a section 31A authorisation.
conclusion text: Lawfully intercepted information
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Definition of lawfully intercepted information includes
premise text: Information obtained by accessing a stored communication under a section 31A authorisation.
conclusion text: Lawfully intercepted information
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Definition of lawfully intercepted information includes
premise text: Information obtained by accessing a stored communication under a section 31A authorisation.
conclusion text: Lawfully intercepted information
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: Definition of lawfully intercepted information includes
premise text: Information obtained by accessing a stored communication under a section 31A authorisation.
conclusion text: Lawfully intercepted information
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6e-ss-2a-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
logic summary: Definition of lawfully intercepted information includes
premise text: Information obtained by accessing a stored communication under a section 31A authorisation.
conclusion text: Lawfully intercepted information
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6EA Interception warrant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6ea
note: Reference to interception warrant information includes details about applications, warrants, and their existence/non-existence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.100
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ea-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ea-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ea-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6EA Interception warrant information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ea-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
logic summary: Describes the content of an interception warrant information reference.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6EB Stored communications warrant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6eb
note: Provides definition for stored communications warrant information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.101
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6eb-norm

6F Offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6f
note: Reference to an offence is a reference to an offence that has been committed or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having been committed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.101
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6f-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6f-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6f-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6F Offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
logic summary: Reference relation
premise text: An offence is referred to as an offence of that kind.
conclusion text: The reference is to the offence of that kind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6f-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: The offence has been committed during the period.
conclusion text: The offence occurred during the period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6G Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6g
has part: 6G(1) Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
has part: 6G(2) Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
has part: 6G(3) Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.102

6G(1) Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6g-ss-1
part of: 6G Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
note: Defines who is considered an officer of the Commonwealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-deontic-6

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies a specific class hierarchy
premise text: An officer of the Commonwealth includes...
conclusion text: ...a person holding an office or appointment
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for officers
premise text: A reference to an officer of the Australian Capital Territory includes...
conclusion text: ...an officer who is, or was, employed under a law of the Commonwealth
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Establishes a duty to include certain individuals in the definition
premise text: A reference to an officer of the Commonwealth includes...
conclusion text: ...a person who is, or is a member of, an authority or body established for a public purpose
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Establishes a duty to exclude certain individuals from the definition
premise text: A reference to an officer of the Commonwealth does not include...
conclusion text: ...an officer of the Northern Territory or of an external Territory
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Establishes a duty to include certain individuals in the definition
premise text: A reference to an officer of the Commonwealth includes...
conclusion text: ...an officer of the Australian Capital Territory
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Establishes a duty to exclude certain individuals from the definition
premise text: A reference to an officer of the Commonwealth does not include...
conclusion text: ...an officer of the Northern Territory
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6G(2) Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6g-ss-2
part of: 6G Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
note: Reference to an officer of a State includes references to certain individuals or authorities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6G(2) Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Reference to an officer of a State includes references to certain individuals or authorities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: State
conclusion text: includes
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Authority or body
premise text: authority or body established for a public purpose by or under a law of the State
conclusion text: is a member of
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6G(3) Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6g-ss-3
part of: 6G Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
note: Reference to an officer of a Territory includes a person holding or acting in an office or appointment, or employed under a law of the Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-deontic-6

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6G(3) Officer of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Person holding or acting in an office or appointment, or employed under a law of the Territory.
conclusion text: Reference to an officer of a Territory includes this person.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Person who is or is a member of an authority or body established for a public purpose by or under a law of the Territory.
conclusion text: Reference to an officer of a Territory includes this person.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
premise text: A reference in this Act to an officer of a Territory includes a person holding or acting in an office or appointment, or employed under a law of the Territory.
conclusion text: This person is included in the temporal interval of the reference.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Recurring trace relation
premise text: A reference in this Act to an officer of a Territory includes a person holding or acting in an office or appointment, or employed under a law of the Territory.
conclusion text: This person is included in the recurring trace of the reference.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Duty relation
premise text: A reference in this Act to an officer of a Territory includes a person holding or acting in an office or appointment, or employed under a law of the Territory.
conclusion text: This person is subject to the duty of being included in the reference.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6g-ss-3-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Duty relation
premise text: A reference in this Act to an officer of a Territory includes a person who is or is a member of an authority or body established for a public purpose by or under a law of the Territory.
conclusion text: This person is subject to the duty of being included in the reference.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6H Person to whom application relates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6h
note: Information must be provided to satisfy the Judge or nominated ART member about a particular person.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.103
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6h-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6h-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6h-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6H Person to whom application relates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6J Proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6j
note: A reference in this Act to a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence includes a reference to a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.103
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-deontic-6

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6J Proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes a reference to a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
premise text: A proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence includes a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
conclusion text: The reference includes a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes a reference to a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence.
premise text: A proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence includes a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
conclusion text: The description includes a reference to a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes a reference to a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
premise text: A proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence includes a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
conclusion text: The interval includes a reference to a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes a reference to a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence.
premise text: A proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence includes a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
conclusion text: The trace includes a reference to a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes a reference to a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
premise text: A proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence includes a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
conclusion text: The obligation includes a reference to a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6j-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes a reference to a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence.
premise text: A proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence includes a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
conclusion text: The duty includes a reference to a proceeding with a view to the committal of a person for trial for the offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6K Proceeding for confiscation or forfeiture or for pecuniary
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6k
note: Reference to confiscation or forfeiture proceedings includes condemnation or recovery of seized goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.103
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6k-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6k-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6k-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation for prohibitions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6k-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Classification of goods as subject to confiscation
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6L Relevant proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6l
note: A reference to a relevant proceeding is defined as a prosecution, confiscation, forfeiture, pecuniary penalty, taking of evidence, extradition, police disciplinary proceeding, or other proceeding related to alleged misbehaviour.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.104
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6l-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6l-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers_to
logic summary: The key refers to a relevant proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6M Terminating the appointment of an officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6m
note: Terminating appointment of officer due to misbehaviour or improper conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.107
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6m-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6m-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6m-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6m-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 6M Terminating the appointment of an officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6m-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits terminating appointment of officer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6m-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies as prohibition
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6N Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6n
has part: 6N(1) Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces
has part: 6N(2) Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces
has part: 6N(3) Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108

6N(1) Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6n-ss-1
part of: 6N Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces
note: This section applies to an agency that is the Police Force of a State.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6N(1) Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Section applies to an agency
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6N(2) Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6n-ss-2
part of: 6N Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces
note: The Minister must make a written declaration about staff members of State Police Forces.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Minister has an obligation to make a written declaration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Staff members of State Police Forces are included in the specified class of members.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6N(3) Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6n-ss-3
part of: 6N Declaration of staff members of State Police Forces
note: Staff members of State Police Forces are referred to as staff members in relation to the agency concerned.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers_to
logic summary: Referral of staff members as staff members.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6n-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is_a
logic summary: Staff members are a subclass of agency personnel.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6P Identification of service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6p
note: Service identification requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6p-norm

6Q Identification of telecommunications device
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6q
note: A telecommunications device may be identified by a unique number or factor.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6q-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6q-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6q-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6q-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6Q Identification of telecommunications device
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: A telecommunications device may be identified by a unique number or factor.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6q-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal relation between device assignments
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6R Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6r
has part: 6R(1) Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 6R(2) Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 6R(2A) Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 6R(2B) Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 6R(2C) Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 6R(3) Communications Access Coordinator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108

6R(1) Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6r-ss-1
part of: 6R Communications Access Coordinator
note: Definition of Communications Access Coordinator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6R(1) Communications Access Coordinator
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Communications Access Coordinator means...
conclusion text: ...the Secretary of the Department...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: ...if a person or body is covered by an instrument made under subsection (2)—that person or body.
conclusion text: ...a person or body.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6R(2) Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6r-ss-2
part of: 6R Communications Access Coordinator
note: Specify persons or bodies for Communications Access Coordinator purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2-norm

6R(2A) Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6r-ss-2a
part of: 6R Communications Access Coordinator
note: Minister must specify APS employees in an instrument
description: Functions or powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must specify APS employees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SPECIFY
logic summary: Specify certain functions or powers
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6R(2B) Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6r-ss-2b
part of: 6R Communications Access Coordinator
note: Must specify functions or powers of a Communications Access Coordinator
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2b-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6R(2B) Communications Access Coordinator
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify functions or powers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SPECIFY
logic summary: Functions or powers of a Communications Access Coordinator
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6R(2C) Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6r-ss-2c
part of: 6R Communications Access Coordinator
note: Restricts performance of functions or exercise of powers to those specified in an instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2c-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6R(2C) Communications Access Coordinator
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Limits actions to specific ones.
premise text: (2C) A person or body...
conclusion text: ...may only perform the functions...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-2c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Defines a class of persons or bodies.
premise text: (2C) A person or body...
conclusion text: ...or class of persons or bodies.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6R(3) Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6r-ss-3
part of: 6R Communications Access Coordinator
note: Act done by or in relation to the Coordinator is taken to be an act done on behalf of all agencies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extension
logic summary: Extension principle
premise text: Act done by or in relation to the Coordinator is an act done on behalf of all agencies.
conclusion text: All acts done by or in relation to the Coordinator are acts done on behalf of all agencies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6S Permitted purposes—integrity purposes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6s
note: Permitted purposes for integrity purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.109
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6s-norm

6T When a Part 5.3 supervisory order is taken to be in force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6t
note: A Part 5.3 supervisory order is taken to be in force in relation to a person if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.111
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6T When a Part 5.3 supervisory order is taken to be in force
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: The order is a control order that has been made but has not yet come into force.
conclusion text: The order is taken to be in force in relation to the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for detention
premise text: ...the person is detained in custody in a prison...
conclusion text: The order is taken to be in force during the period of detention.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval for supervision order
premise text: ...the period specified in the order under paragraph 105A.7A(4)(d) or...
conclusion text: The order is taken to be in force until the end of the specified period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Alternative condition for detention
premise text: ...the person is detained in custody in a prison...
conclusion text: The order is taken to be in force if the person is detained in custody.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6t-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Alternative condition for extended supervision order
premise text: ...the order is an extended supervision order or an interim supervision order...
conclusion text: The order is taken to be in force if the order is an extended supervision order or an interim supervision order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

105A Section 105A
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105a
note: Chapter 1 Introduction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.111
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105a-norm

6U Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6u
has part: 6U(1) Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
has part: 6U(2) Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
has part: 6U(3) Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.112

6U(1) Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6u-ss-1
part of: 6U Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
note: Each later control order is a succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order in relation to each earlier control order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6U(1) Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implication
logic summary: If an interim control order is confirmed, the confirmed control order is a succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order in relation to the interim control order.
premise text: Interim control order confirmed
conclusion text: Confirmed control order is a succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The confirmed control order overlaps with the interim control order.
premise text: Interim control order and confirmed control order
conclusion text: Confirmed control order overlaps with interim control order
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The confirmed control order is a succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order until the next control order.
premise text: Next control order
conclusion text: Confirmed control order is a succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order until next control order
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The confirmed control order diffuses to the earlier control order.
premise text: Earlier control order
conclusion text: Confirmed control order diffuses to earlier control order
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: The confirmed control order is inferred from the interim control order.
premise text: Interim control order
conclusion text: Confirmed control order is inferred from interim control order
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6U(2) Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6u-ss-2
part of: 6U Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
note: A succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order is a later extended supervision order in relation to an earlier interim supervision order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6U(2) Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If an interim supervision order is made, a succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order must be made in relation to the person.
premise text: interim supervision order
conclusion text: succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order is made during the extended supervision order in relation to the person.
premise text: extended supervision order
conclusion text: succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: The succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order is made until the extended supervision order in relation to the person.
premise text: extended supervision order
conclusion text: succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: The succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order diffuses the extended supervision order in relation to the person.
premise text: extended supervision order
conclusion text: succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognizes
logic summary: The succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order is recognized by the State as a later extended supervision order in relation to the person.
premise text: State
conclusion text: succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6U(3) Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6u-ss-3
part of: 6U Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
note: Each later extended supervision order or interim supervision order is a succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order in relation to each earlier extended supervision order or interim supervision order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6U(3) Succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implication
logic summary: If two or more successive extended supervision orders or interim supervision orders are made, then each later order is a succeeding supervisory order.
premise text: 2 or more successive extended supervision orders or interim supervision orders are made
conclusion text: Each later extended supervision order or interim supervision order is a succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order in relation to each earlier extended supervision order or interim supervision order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalSuccession
logic summary: The temporal interval between the two or more successive extended supervision orders or interim supervision orders is included in the Allen interval for each earlier order.
premise text: Two or more successive extended supervision orders or interim supervision orders are made
conclusion text: There exists a temporal interval between each pair of these orders.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.7000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalSuccession
logic summary: The temporal intervals between the two or more successive extended supervision orders or interim supervision orders form an LTL trace.
premise text: Two or more successive extended supervision orders or interim supervision orders are made
conclusion text: There exists a temporal interval between each pair of these orders.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.6000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6u-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: TemporalSuccession
logic summary: The diffusion of the supervisory orders is included in the Allen interval for each earlier order.
premise text: Two or more successive extended supervision orders or interim supervision orders are made
conclusion text: There exists a temporal interval between each pair of these orders.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6UA When a community safety supervision order is taken to be in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6ua
note: Order is in force until specified period begins.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ua-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ua-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ua-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6UA When a community safety supervision order is taken to be in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ua-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Describes the duration of the obligation
premise text: Period specified in the order
conclusion text: Has not yet begun
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6UB Succeeding community safety supervision orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6ub
has part: 6UB(1) Succeeding community safety supervision orders
has part: 6UB(2) Succeeding community safety supervision orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.112

6UB(1) Succeeding community safety supervision orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6ub-ss-1
part of: 6UB Succeeding community safety supervision orders
note: A succeeding community safety supervision order is a succeeding order in relation to an earlier order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6UB(1) Succeeding community safety supervision orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of 'succeeding'
premise text: Earlier order
conclusion text: Later order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6UB(2) Succeeding community safety supervision orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6ub-ss-2
part of: 6UB Succeeding community safety supervision orders
note: Each later community safety supervision order is a succeeding community safety supervision order if 2 or more successive community safety supervision orders are made in relation to the same person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6UB(2) Succeeding community safety supervision orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: 2 or more successive community safety supervision orders are made in relation to the same person.
conclusion text: Each later community safety supervision order is a succeeding community safety supervision order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship
premise text: 2 or more successive community safety supervision orders are made in relation to the same person.
conclusion text: Each later community safety supervision order is a succeeding community safety supervision order
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=>
logic summary: Temporal equivalence
premise text: 2 or more successive community safety supervision orders are made in relation to the same person.
conclusion text: Each later community safety supervision order is a succeeding community safety supervision order
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: ∀
logic summary: Universal quantification
premise text: 2 or more successive community safety supervision orders are made in relation to the same person.
conclusion text: Each later community safety supervision order is a succeeding community safety supervision order
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6ub-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: ⊃
logic summary: Implication
premise text: 2 or more successive community safety supervision orders are made in relation to the same person.
conclusion text: Each later community safety supervision order is a succeeding community safety supervision order
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6V Substitution of references to the Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6v
note: Prohibition on making substituted reference orders under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.113
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6v-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6v-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6v-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6v-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits the Governor-General from making substituted reference orders.
premise text: The Prime Minister is satisfied that exceptional circumstances exist.
conclusion text: The Governor-General must not make a substituted reference order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-6v-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Relates to exceptional circumstances.
premise text: Exceptional circumstances exist.
conclusion text: During exceptional circumstances, the Governor-General must not make a substituted reference order.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Telecommunications not to be intercepted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
has part: 7(1) Telecommunications not to be intercepted
has part: 7(2) Telecommunications not to be intercepted
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.114

7(1) Telecommunications not to be intercepted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-ss-1
part of: 7 Telecommunications not to be intercepted
note: No one can intercept or enable interception of communications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.114
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-7-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(1) Telecommunications not to be intercepted
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits interception.
premise text: (1) A person shall not:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(2) Telecommunications not to be intercepted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-ss-2
part of: 7 Telecommunications not to be intercepted
note: Exemptions from interception prohibition for certain employees and authorized persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.114
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Exemptions from interception prohibition
premise text: Reasonably necessary for employee to perform duties effectively
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Issue of telecommunications service warrants by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9
note: Attorney-General may issue warrant for interception of communications under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.119
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 9 Issue of telecommunications service warrants by Attorney-General
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to intercept communications under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Telecommunications service warrants issued by Attorney-General.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9A Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9a
has part: 9A(1) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
has part: 9A(1A) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
has part: 9A(1B) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
has part: 9A(1C) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.120

9A(1) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9a-ss-1
part of: 9A Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
note: Attorney-General must issue a warrant under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.120
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-6

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9A(1) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Attorney-General MUST issue a warrant.
premise text: (1) Upon receiving a request by the Director-General of Security for the issue of a warrant under this section in respect of a person, the Attorney-General may, under his or her hand, issue a warrant...
conclusion text: The Attorney-General MUST issue a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Attorney-General MUST be satisfied that certain conditions are met.
premise text: (1) Upon receiving a request by the Director-General of Security for the issue of a warrant under this section in respect of a person, the Attorney-General may, under his or her hand, issue a warrant...
conclusion text: The Attorney-General MUST be satisfied that certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Director-General of Security must request the issue of a warrant.
premise text: (1) Upon receiving a request by the Director-General of Security for the issue of a warrant under this section in respect of a person, the Attorney-General may, under his or her hand, issue a warrant...
conclusion text: The Director-General of Security MUST request the issue of a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Attorney-General must be satisfied that certain conditions are met before issuing a warrant.
premise text: (1) Upon receiving a request by the Director-General of Security for the issue of a warrant under this section in respect of a person, the Attorney-General may, under his or her hand, issue a warrant...
conclusion text: The Attorney-General MUST be satisfied that certain conditions are met before issuing a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Director-General of Security must reasonably suspect the person is engaged in activities prejudicial to security.
premise text: (1) Upon receiving a request by the Director-General of Security for the issue of a warrant under this section in respect of a person, the Attorney-General may, under his or her hand, issue a warrant...
conclusion text: The Director-General of Security MUST reasonably suspect the person is engaged in activities prejudicial to security.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Attorney-General must be satisfied that relying on a telecommunications service warrant would be ineffective.
premise text: (1) Upon receiving a request by the Director-General of Security for the issue of a warrant under this section in respect of a person, the Attorney-General may, under his or her hand, issue a warrant...
conclusion text: The Attorney-General MUST be satisfied that relying on a telecommunications service warrant would be ineffective.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9A(1A) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9a-ss-1a
part of: 9A Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
note: Authorises interception of communications under specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.120
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1a-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 9A(1A) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorises interception of communications.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies communications to be intercepted.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9A(1B) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9a-ss-1b
part of: 9A Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
note: Authorises entry on premises for equipment installation, maintenance, use or recovery.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.120
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1b-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 9A(1B) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grants permission
premise text: (1B) The warrant may authorise entry...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9A(1C) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9a-ss-1c
part of: 9A Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
note: Requires Attorney-General to issue named person warrants for interception of communications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.120
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1c-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9A(1C) Issue of named person warrants by Attorney-General
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Attorney-General has an obligation to issue named person warrants.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9a-ss-1c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: The Attorney-General is responsible for issuing named person warrants.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9B Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9b
has part: 9B(1) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
has part: 9B(2) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
has part: 9B(3) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
has part: 9B(3A) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
has part: 9B(4) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.123

9B(1) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9b-ss-1
part of: 9B Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
note: Request for warrant must be in writing and forwarded to Attorney-General
description: request in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.123
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide request in writing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9B(2) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9b-ss-2
part of: 9B Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
note: Warrant must state entry hours and may authorise measures without permission.
description: entry hours, measures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.123
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 9B(2) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits entry without permission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9B(3) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9b-ss-3
part of: 9B Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
note: Warrant revocation by Attorney-General before specified period ends
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.123
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits warrant revocation without Attorney-General's discretion
premise text: (3) A warrant under section 9 or 9A must specify the period for which it is to remain in force.
conclusion text: The warrant may be revoked by the Attorney-General at any time before the end of the specified period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Specifies temporal overlap between warrant revocation and specified period
premise text: (3) A warrant under section 9 or 9A must specify the period for which it is to remain in force.
conclusion text: The warrant may be revoked by the Attorney-General at any time before the end of the specified period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Specifies temporal relationship between warrant revocation and specified period
premise text: (3) A warrant under section 9 or 9A must specify the period for which it is to remain in force.
conclusion text: The warrant may be revoked by the Attorney-General at any time before the end of the specified period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permits Attorney-General's discretion over warrant revocation
premise text: (3) A warrant under section 9 or 9A must specify the period for which it is to remain in force.
conclusion text: The warrant may be revoked by the Attorney-General at any time before the end of the specified period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9B(3A) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9b-ss-3a
part of: 9B Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
note: Maximum duration for warrant issuance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.123
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits exceeding maximum duration
premise text: (3A) The specified period must not exceed:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Contains
logic summary: Specifies temporal interval for warrant duration
premise text: (3A) The specified period must not exceed:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9B(4) Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9b-ss-4
part of: 9B Provisions applying to warrants issued under section 9 or 9A
note: Issue of further warrant despite previous warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.123
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-9b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows issue of further warrant
premise text: (3) does not prevent the issue of a further warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
has part: 10(1) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
has part: 10(1A) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
has part: 10(2) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
has part: 10(3) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
has part: 10(4) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
has part: 10(5) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.124

10(1) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-ss-1
part of: 10 Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
note: Authorization for warrant issuance under section 9 or 9A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to issue warrant
premise text: (a) the Director-General of Security has forwarded or made a request...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(1A) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-ss-1a
part of: 10 Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
note: Interception of telecommunications not being accessed as stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits interception of stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies intercepted communications as not being accessed as stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(2) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-ss-2
part of: 10 Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
note: Authorization for entry without permission or demand
description: entry may be made without permission first being sought or demand first being made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to enter premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

10(3) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-ss-3
part of: 10 Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
note: Warrant revocation by Attorney-General within 48 hours
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits warrant revocation after specified period
premise text: (3) A warrant under this section shall specify the period for which it is to remain in force, being a period that does not exceed 48 hours,
conclusion text: The Attorney-General may revoke the warrant at any time before expiration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between warrant and revocation
premise text: (3) A warrant under this section shall specify the period for which it is to remain in force, being a period that does not exceed 48 hours,
conclusion text: The warrant's duration overlaps with the Attorney-General's power to revoke.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between warrant and revocation
premise text: (3) A warrant under this section shall specify the period for which it is to remain in force, being a period that does not exceed 48 hours,
conclusion text: The warrant's duration ends before the Attorney-General can revoke.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Warrant revocation diffuses to Attorney-General
premise text: (3) A warrant under this section shall specify the period for which it is to remain in force, being a period that does not exceed 48 hours,
conclusion text: The Attorney-General's power to revoke diffuses from the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Warrant revocation inference
premise text: (3) A warrant under this section shall specify the period for which it is to remain in force, being a period that does not exceed 48 hours,
conclusion text: The Attorney-General can infer their power to revoke from the warrant.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(4) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-ss-4
part of: 10 Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
note: Furnishing information to the Attorney-General upon issuing a warrant
description: a copy of the warrant and a statement of grounds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Imperative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(5) Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-ss-5
part of: 10 Issue of warrant by Director-General of Security in emergency
note: Copy of warrant must be given to Inspector-General within 3 working days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-10-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide copy of warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11A Telecommunications service warrant for collection of foreign
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11a
note: The Attorney-General must issue a warrant for the collection of foreign intelligence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.125
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11A Telecommunications service warrant for collection of foreign
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Attorney-General must issue a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11B Named person warrant for collection of foreign intelligence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11b
has part: 11B(1) Named person warrant for collection of foreign intelligence
has part: 11B(1A) Named person warrant for collection of foreign intelligence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.127

11B(1) Named person warrant for collection of foreign intelligence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11b-ss-1
part of: 11B Named person warrant for collection of foreign intelligence
note: The Attorney-General may issue a warrant for the collection of foreign intelligence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.127
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11B(1) Named person warrant for collection of foreign intelligence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Attorney-General has an obligation to issue a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: The warrant is issued for the collection of foreign intelligence.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11B(1A) Named person warrant for collection of foreign intelligence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11b-ss-1a
part of: 11B Named person warrant for collection of foreign intelligence
note: Authorises interception of telecommunications under specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.127
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1a-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 11B(1A) Named person warrant for collection of foreign intelligence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11b-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
logic summary: Authorisation to intercept
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

11C Foreign communications warrant for collection of foreign
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11c
note: Director-General of Security requests Attorney-General to issue warrant for intercepting communications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.129
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11C Foreign communications warrant for collection of foreign
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Request for a warrant
premise text: Director-General of Security gives notice to Attorney-General
conclusion text: Attorney-General must issue warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

11D Provisions applying to foreign intelligence warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11d
note: Warrant must state authorized entry times
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.133
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11d-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-11d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Warrant must state authorized entry times
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
has part: 12(1) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
has part: 12(2) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
has part: 12(3) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
has part: 12(4) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.135

12(1) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-1
part of: 12 Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
note: Authorizes persons to exercise authority on behalf of the Organisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.135
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(1) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
logic summary: Grants permission.
premise text: (1) The Director-General of Security...
conclusion text: ...may, by writing under his or her hand...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Describes the class of persons authorized.
premise text: ...as persons authorized to exercise...
conclusion text: ...the authority conferred by Part 2-2 warrants.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

12(2) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-2
part of: 12 Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
note: Approval extends to new offices or positions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.135
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(2) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

12(3) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-3
part of: 12 Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
note: No implication on other provisions of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.135
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-3-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(3) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

12(4) Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-4
part of: 12 Persons authorised to intercept communications for Organisation
note: Must create written records after authority is exercised
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.135
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-12-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to create written records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Discontinuance of interception before expiration of warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
note: Ensure discontinuation of interception upon warrant expiration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.135
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Imperative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Certain records retained by Organisation to be destroyed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
note: Destroy records no longer required for Organisation's functions or powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.136
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-14-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits destruction of records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 How warrants etc. to be dealt with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15
has part: 15(1) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
has part: 15(1A) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
has part: 15(1B) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
has part: 15(3) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
has part: 15(4) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.136

15(1) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-ss-1
part of: 15 How warrants etc. to be dealt with
note: Inform Director-General of Security about warrant issuance or revocation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.136
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(1) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to inform Director-General of Security.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(1A) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-ss-1a
part of: 15 How warrants etc. to be dealt with
note: Inform carrier about warrant issue and provide copy upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.136
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Director-General of Security must inform carrier.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(1B) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-ss-1b
part of: 15 How warrants etc. to be dealt with
note: Director-General of Security must inform authorized representative of warrant revocation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.136
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(1B) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(3) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-ss-3
part of: 15 How warrants etc. to be dealt with
note: The Attorney-General must record a decision on each warrant request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.136
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(3) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(4) How warrants etc. to be dealt with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-ss-4
part of: 15 How warrants etc. to be dealt with
note: Where warrants are to be dealt with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.136
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-15-ss-4-norm

16 Additional requirements for named person warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16
has part: 16(1) Additional requirements for named person warrants
has part: 16(1A) Additional requirements for named person warrants
has part: 16(2) Additional requirements for named person warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.139

16(1) Additional requirements for named person warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-ss-1
part of: 16 Additional requirements for named person warrants
note: Certifying person must provide description of service to authorised representative.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.139
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(1) Additional requirements for named person warrants
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY
logic summary: Service identification
premise text: (a) an authorised representative of a carrier has been given a copy of a warrant...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(1A) Additional requirements for named person warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-ss-1a
part of: 16 Additional requirements for named person warrants
note: Certifying person must provide description of device to authorised representative.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.139
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(1A) Additional requirements for named person warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY
logic summary: Device description
premise text: (device)
conclusion text: (description)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(2) Additional requirements for named person warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-ss-2
part of: 16 Additional requirements for named person warrants
note: Additional requirements for named person warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.139
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-16-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(2) Additional requirements for named person warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

17 Reports to be made to Attorney-General on results of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17
has part: 17(1) Reports to be made to Attorney-General on results of
has part: 17(2) Reports to be made to Attorney-General on results of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.140

17(1) Reports to be made to Attorney-General on results of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-1
part of: 17 Reports to be made to Attorney-General on results of
note: Report on results of interception under Part 2-2 warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.140
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(2) Reports to be made to Attorney-General on results of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-2
part of: 17 Reports to be made to Attorney-General on results of
note: Report details of intercepted communication source
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.140
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(2) Reports to be made to Attorney-General on results of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report details
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18
has part: 18(1) Evidentiary certificates
has part: 18(2) Evidentiary certificates
has part: 18(3) Evidentiary certificates
has part: 18(4) Evidentiary certificates
has part: 18(5) Evidentiary certificates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.140

18(1) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-1
part of: 18 Evidentiary certificates
note: Employees of carriers may issue written certificates for interception purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.140
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(1) Evidentiary certificates
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to issue certificates
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(2) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-2
part of: 18 Evidentiary certificates
note: Conclusive evidence of matters stated in the document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.140
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(2) Evidentiary certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide conclusive evidence
conclusion text: Conclusive evidence of matters stated in the document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(3) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-3
part of: 18 Evidentiary certificates
note: Issue written certificate with relevant facts for warrant execution
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.140
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Issuing a certificate is an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Certificate issued in connection with warrant execution
premise text: (3) The Director-General of Security or the Deputy Director-General of Security may issue a written certificate signed by him or her setting out such facts as he or she considers relevant...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Certificate issuance implies warrant execution
premise text: (3) The Director-General of Security or the Deputy Director-General of Security may issue a written certificate signed by him or her setting out such facts as he or she considers relevant...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Certificate issuance propagates to warrant execution
premise text: (3) The Director-General of Security or the Deputy Director-General of Security may issue a written certificate signed by him or her setting out such facts as he or she considers relevant...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Certificate issuance infers warrant execution
premise text: (3) The Director-General of Security or the Deputy Director-General of Security may issue a written certificate signed by him or her setting out such facts as he or she considers relevant...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(4) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-4
part of: 18 Evidentiary certificates
note: Issue written certificate with relevant facts about ASIO employee or affiliate activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.140
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(4) Evidentiary certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to issue certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(5) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-5
part of: 18 Evidentiary certificates
note: Exempt proceeding without Chapter 2 Interception of telecommunications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.140
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(5) Evidentiary certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-18-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Exempt proceeding without Chapter 2 Interception of telecommunications
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Emergency requests
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30
note: Request for interception of communication in emergency situations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.143
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-30-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-30-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 30 Emergency requests
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to intercept communication.
premise text: (caller is dying, is being seriously injured or has been seriously injured)
conclusion text: Request interception of communication.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Applications for authorisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31
has part: 31(1) Applications for authorisation
has part: 31(2) Applications for authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.145

31(1) Applications for authorisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-ss-1
part of: 31 Applications for authorisation
note: Request for Attorney-General authorization to intercept communications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.145
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 31(1) Applications for authorisation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
logic summary: Attorney-General must authorize interception
premise text: Request for authorization
conclusion text: Authorization granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31(2) Applications for authorisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-ss-2
part of: 31 Applications for authorisation
note: Request for authorisation must include specific details.
description: Details of development or testing, functions of authority, and grounds for seeking authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.145
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31(2) Applications for authorisation
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Request must include specific details.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31A Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31a
has part: 31A(1) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
has part: 31A(2) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
has part: 31A(3) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
has part: 31A(4) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
has part: 31A(4A) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
has part: 31A(4B) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
has part: 31A(4C) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
has part: 31A(5) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.146

31A(1) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31a-ss-1
part of: 31A Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
note: Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 31A(1) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: The Attorney-General may authorise interception.
conclusion text: Permission granted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31A(2) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31a-ss-2
part of: 31A Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
note: Interception of communications passing over a telecommunications system except for the purposes of development or testing of technologies is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 31A(2) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31A(3) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31a-ss-3
part of: 31A Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
note: Authorisation must be in writing and specify a period not exceeding 6 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31A(3) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Authorisation must be in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SPECIFY
logic summary: Specify a period not exceeding 6 months.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31A(4) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31a-ss-4
part of: 31A Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
note: Authority must keep copy of authorisation
description: authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31A(4) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must ensure
conclusion text: authorisation kept
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31A(4A) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31a-ss-4a
part of: 31A Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
note: Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4a-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4a-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 31A(4A) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

31A(4B) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31a-ss-4b
part of: 31A Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
note: Authorisation for interception for developing technologies or testing capabilities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4b-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 31A(4B) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grants permission to intercept information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31A(4C) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31a-ss-4c
part of: 31A Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
note: Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4c-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4c-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 31A(4C) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorisation is permitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-4c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Includes accessing stored communications.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31A(5) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31a-ss-5
part of: 31A Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
note: Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-5-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31a-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 31A(5) Attorney-General may authorise interception for developing
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

31AA Carrier to be notified of authorisation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31aa
note: Carrier must be notified of authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.147
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31aa-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31aa-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31aa-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31AA Carrier to be notified of authorisation etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify carrier
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31AB Access to stored communications under section 31A
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31ab
note: Authorises access to stored communications under section 31A authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31ab-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31ab-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31AB Access to stored communications under section 31A
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

31B Authorisation of employees of a security authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31b
has part: 31B(1) Authorisation of employees of a security authority
has part: 31B(2) Authorisation of employees of a security authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.148

31B(1) Authorisation of employees of a security authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31b-ss-1
part of: 31B Authorisation of employees of a security authority
note: Authorisation of employees for interception purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 31B(1) Authorisation of employees of a security authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to authorise employees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Temporal interval for authorisation
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Rationale for authorisation
premise text: The following persons:
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Spread of authorisation
premise text: (1) The following persons:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

31B(2) Authorisation of employees of a security authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31b-ss-2
part of: 31B Authorisation of employees of a security authority
note: Authorisation of employees of a security authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 31B(2) Authorisation of employees of a security authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to authorise employees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31C Destruction of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31c
has part: 31C(1) Destruction of records
has part: 31C(2) Destruction of records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.149

31C(1) Destruction of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31c-ss-1
part of: 31C Destruction of records
note: Destroy records obtained through interception of communications if no longer required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.149
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31C(1) Destruction of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must destroy records
premise text: (1) If...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31C(2) Destruction of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31c-ss-2
part of: 31C Destruction of records
note: Prohibition on accessing stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.149
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on accessing stored communications.
premise text: (2) The reference in paragraph (1)(a) to interception of communications passing over a telecommunications system includes a reference to the accessing of the communications as stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of accessed communications as stored communications.
premise text: (2) The reference in paragraph (1)(a) to interception of communications passing over a telecommunications system includes a reference to the accessing of the communications as stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Include
logic summary: Temporal inclusion of accessed communications in stored communications.
premise text: (2) The reference in paragraph (1)(a) to interception of communications passing over a telecommunications system includes a reference to the accessing of the communications as stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Apply
logic summary: Application of temporal logic to accessed communications.
premise text: (2) The reference in paragraph (1)(a) to interception of communications passing over a telecommunications system includes a reference to the accessing of the communications as stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Prevent
logic summary: Prevention of diffusion of accessed communications beyond their temporal scope.
premise text: (2) The reference in paragraph (1)(a) to interception of communications passing over a telecommunications system includes a reference to the accessing of the communications as stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31c-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Analysis of accessed communications by artificial intelligence.
premise text: (2) The reference in paragraph (1)(a) to interception of communications passing over a telecommunications system includes a reference to the accessing of the communications as stored communications after they have ceased to pass over a telecommunications system.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

31D Reports to the Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31d
note: Report on authorisation outcome and destruction of information
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.149
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31d-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31D Reports to the Attorney-General
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31E Employees of security authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31e
has part: 31E(1) Employees of security authorities
has part: 31E(2) Employees of security authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.150

31E(1) Employees of security authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31e-ss-1
part of: 31E Employees of security authorities
note: Employees of security authorities are taken to be employees of the Organisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.150
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31E(1) Employees of security authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Establishes a relationship between an individual and the Organisation.
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part:
conclusion text: an ASIO employee is taken to be an employee of the Organisation;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31E(2) Employees of security authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31e-ss-2
part of: 31E Employees of security authorities
note: Person is taken to be an employee of the security authority if they are a staff member and the agency is a security authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.150
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31e-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-31e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31E(2) Employees of security authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

34 Declaration of an eligible authority of a State as an agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34
note: Declaration of an eligible authority of a State as an agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.151
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-34-norm

35 Preconditions for declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35
note: The Minister must ensure that a State's law makes satisfactory provision before making a declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.151
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35 Preconditions for declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must ensure that the law makes satisfactory provision.
premise text: The Minister is making a declaration under section 34.
conclusion text: The State's law must make satisfactory provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The report must be given within 3 months after the warrant ceases to be in force.
premise text: The Minister is making a declaration under section 34.
conclusion text: The report must be given within 3 months after the warrant ceases to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The chief officer of the eligible authority must give a written report.
premise text: The Minister is making a declaration under section 34.
conclusion text: The chief officer of the eligible authority must give a written report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The chief officer of the eligible authority must impose requirements corresponding to those imposed on Commonwealth agencies.
premise text: The Minister is making a declaration under section 34.
conclusion text: The chief officer of the eligible authority must impose requirements corresponding to those imposed on Commonwealth agencies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-35-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The chief officer of the eligible authority must give a report about the use made by the eligible authority of information obtained by interceptions under the warrant.
premise text: The Minister is making a declaration under section 34.
conclusion text: The chief officer of the eligible authority must give a report about the use made by the eligible authority of information obtained by interceptions under the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 State laws requiring copies of documents to be given to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36
has part: 36(1) State laws requiring copies of documents to be given to
has part: 36(2) State laws requiring copies of documents to be given to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.154

36(1) State laws requiring copies of documents to be given to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36-ss-1
part of: 36 State laws requiring copies of documents to be given to
note: State must provide copies of documents to a specified Minister.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.154
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-36-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(1) State laws requiring copies of documents to be given to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State has an obligation to provide copies of documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(2) State laws requiring copies of documents to be given to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36-ss-2
part of: 36 State laws requiring copies of documents to be given to
note: State must provide documents to Minister for compliance with requirement.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.154
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-36-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(2) State laws requiring copies of documents to be given to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: State must provide documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Revocation of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37
has part: 37(1) Revocation of declaration
has part: 37(2) Revocation of declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.154

37(1) Revocation of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-1
part of: 37 Revocation of declaration
note: Minister must revoke declaration upon request from Premier of a State.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.154
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(1) Revocation of declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to revoke declaration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(2) Revocation of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-2
part of: 37 Revocation of declaration
note: The Minister may revoke a declaration in force under section 34 if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.154
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(2) Revocation of declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The Minister may revoke a declaration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: has been unsatisfactory
logic summary: The extent of compliance with a requirement has been unsatisfactory.
premise text: the extent of compliance with a requirement
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must revoke
logic summary: If certain conditions are met, the Minister must revoke the declaration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: has been unsatisfactory in so far as
logic summary: The extent of compliance with a requirement has been unsatisfactory in so far as the requirement relates to the authority.
premise text: the extent of compliance with a requirement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must provide
logic summary: The Minister must provide evidence that certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Effect of revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38
note: Continues to apply in relation to a warrant issued before revocation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.155
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38 Effect of revocation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Continues obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

38A Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38a
has part: 38A(1) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
has part: 38A(2) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
has part: 38A(3) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.155

38A(1) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38a-ss-1
part of: 38A Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
note: Authorisation for eligible authorities of a State
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.155
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38A(1) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Authority to apply for warrants
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38A(2) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38a-ss-2
part of: 38A Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
note: Minister must authorise eligible authority to apply for Part 5.3 warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.155
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38A(2) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must authorise.
premise text: Premier requests.
conclusion text: Declaration made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister is satisfied.
premise text: Section (4) of this section.
conclusion text: Eligible authority authorised.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38A(3) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38a-ss-3
part of: 38A Agencies authorised to apply for Part 5.3 warrants
note: The Minister must amend the declaration to authorise the eligible authority to apply for Part 5.3 warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.155
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must amend the declaration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38B Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38b
has part: 38B(1) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
has part: 38B(2) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
has part: 38B(3) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.157

38B(1) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38b-ss-1
part of: 38B Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
note: Authorisation for eligible authorities of a State
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.157
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38B(1) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Authority to apply for warrants
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38B(2) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38b-ss-2
part of: 38B Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
note: Minister must authorise eligible authority to apply for Part 9.10 warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.157
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38B(2) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must authorise.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38B(3) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38b-ss-3
part of: 38B Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
note: Minister must amend declaration to authorise eligible authority to apply for Part 9.10 warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.157
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38B(3) Agencies authorised to apply for Part 9.10 warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-38b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must amend declaration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Agency may apply for warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39
has part: 39(1) Agency may apply for warrant
has part: 39(2) Agency may apply for warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.160

39(1) Agency may apply for warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39-ss-1
part of: 39 Agency may apply for warrant
note: Agency may apply for warrant in respect of a telecommunications service or a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.160
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-39-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-39-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(1) Agency may apply for warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to apply for warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(2) Agency may apply for warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39-ss-2
part of: 39 Agency may apply for warrant
note: An application for a warrant must be made by an authorized person on behalf of the agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.160
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-39-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-39-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(2) Agency may apply for warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The application must be made by an authorized person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Form of application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40
has part: 40(1) Form of application
has part: 40(2) Form of application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.161

40(1) Form of application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40-ss-1
part of: 40 Form of application
note: Application for warrant must be in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.161
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(1) Form of application
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(2) Form of application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40-ss-2
part of: 40 Form of application
note: Permits telephone application under urgent circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.161
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows telephone application
premise text: (2) If the person making an application for a warrant on an agency’s behalf:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for telephone application
premise text: (2) If the person making an application for a warrant on an agency’s behalf: (a) is the chief officer of the agency or a person in relation to whom an authorisation by the chief officer is in force under subsection (3); and (b) thinks it necessary, because of urgent circumstances, to make the application by telephone;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for telephone application
premise text: (2) If the person making an application for a warrant on an agency’s behalf: (a) is the chief officer of the agency or a person in relation to whom an authorisation by the chief officer is in force under subsection (3); and (b) thinks it necessary, because of urgent circumstances, to make the application by telephone;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Describes diffusion of telephone application
premise text: (2) If the person making an application for a warrant on an agency’s behalf: (a) is the chief officer of the agency or a person in relation to whom an authorisation by the chief officer is in force under subsection (3); and (b) thinks it necessary, because of urgent circumstances, to make the application by telephone;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-40-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Describes classification of telephone application
premise text: (2) If the person making an application for a warrant on an agency’s behalf: (a) is the chief officer of the agency or a person in relation to whom an authorisation by the chief officer is in force under subsection (3); and (b) thinks it necessary, because of urgent circumstances, to make the application by telephone;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Contents of application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41
note: Agency must provide name and person's name in application.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.162
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-41-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-41-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41 Contents of application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Application must contain name and person's name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Affidavit to accompany written application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42
has part: 42(1) Affidavit to accompany written application
has part: 42(2) Affidavit to accompany written application
has part: 42(3) Affidavit to accompany written application
has part: 42(4) Affidavit to accompany written application
has part: 42(4A) Affidavit to accompany written application
has part: 42(5) Affidavit to accompany written application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.162

42(1) Affidavit to accompany written application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-1
part of: 42 Affidavit to accompany written application
note: Agency must provide affidavit with written application.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.162
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(1) Affidavit to accompany written application
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide affidavit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(2) Affidavit to accompany written application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-2
part of: 42 Affidavit to accompany written application
note: Affidavit must set out facts and grounds for application
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.162
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(2) Affidavit to accompany written application
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Affidavit is required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(3) Affidavit to accompany written application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-3
part of: 42 Affidavit to accompany written application
note: Affidavit must specify period and reason for warrant duration
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.162
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(3) Affidavit to accompany written application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Affidavit is required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(4) Affidavit to accompany written application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-4
part of: 42 Affidavit to accompany written application
note: Must provide information about previous applications and warrants.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.162
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(4) Affidavit to accompany written application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(4A) Affidavit to accompany written application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-4a
part of: 42 Affidavit to accompany written application
note: Affidavit requirements for a named person warrant
description: Details about the person, telecommunications services, and devices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.162
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(4A) Affidavit to accompany written application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Affidavit must be provided
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY
logic summary: Details must identify the person and services
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(5) Affidavit to accompany written application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-5
part of: 42 Affidavit to accompany written application
note: Allows multiple affidavits with written application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.162
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows multiple affidavits with written application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-42-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between sections
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Information to be given on telephone application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43
note: Provide information on telephone application
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.163
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-logic-diffusion-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 Information to be given on telephone application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval for urgent circumstances
premise text: (a) shall include particulars of the urgent circumstances because of which the person making the application on the agency's behalf thinks it necessary to make the application by telephone;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Recurring trace for matters requiring written application
premise text: (b) shall include each matter that, if the application had been made in writing, section 41, 42 or 48 would have required;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-43-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Diffusion of information to ART member
premise text: (a) shall include particulars of the urgent circumstances because of which the person making the application on the agency's behalf thinks it necessary to make the application by telephone;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Giving further information to Judge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44
has part: 44(1) Giving further information to Judge
has part: 44(2) Giving further information to Judge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.164

44(1) Giving further information to Judge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44-ss-1
part of: 44 Giving further information to Judge
note: A Judge or nominated ART member may require further information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses a possibility or permission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(2) Giving further information to Judge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44-ss-2
part of: 44 Giving further information to Judge
note: Provide further information on oath or otherwise as directed by the Judge or nominated ART member.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(2) Giving further information to Judge
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the LegalPerson to provide further information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44A Application by interception agency of Victoria
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44a
has part: 44A(1) Application by interception agency of Victoria
has part: 44A(2) Application by interception agency of Victoria
has part: 44A(3) Application by interception agency of Victoria
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.164

44A(1) Application by interception agency of Victoria
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44a-ss-1
part of: 44A Application by interception agency of Victoria
note: Application by interception agency of Victoria for a warrant in respect of a telecommunications service or a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44A(1) Application by interception agency of Victoria
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Application by interception agency of Victoria for a warrant in respect of a telecommunications service or a person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44A(2) Application by interception agency of Victoria
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44a-ss-2
part of: 44A Application by interception agency of Victoria
note: A Victorian PIM may make submissions to the Judge or nominated ART member about certain matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make submissions
premise text: The Victorian PIM may, orally or in writing...
conclusion text: make submissions to the Judge or nominated ART member about certain matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44A(3) Application by interception agency of Victoria
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44a-ss-3
part of: 44A Application by interception agency of Victoria
note: The Victorian PIM may question certain individuals in the presence of an eligible Judge or nominated ART member.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44A(3) Application by interception agency of Victoria
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-44a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to question individuals in the presence of an eligible Judge or nominated ART member
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Application by interception agency of Queensland
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45
has part: 45(1) Application by interception agency of Queensland
has part: 45(2) Application by interception agency of Queensland
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.165

45(1) Application by interception agency of Queensland
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45-ss-1
part of: 45 Application by interception agency of Queensland
note: Application by interception agency of Queensland for a warrant in respect of a telecommunications service or person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.165
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45(1) Application by interception agency of Queensland
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

45(2) Application by interception agency of Queensland
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45-ss-2
part of: 45 Application by interception agency of Queensland
note: A Queensland PIM may make submissions to the Judge or nominated ART member about specific matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.165
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45(2) Application by interception agency of Queensland
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Queensland PIM must make submissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45A State law not affected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45a
note: Notification requirements for interception agencies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.166
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45a-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 45A State law not affected
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-45a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
logic summary: Notification requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Issue of telecommunications service warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46
note: Issue of warrant for investigation of serious offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.167
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46 Issue of telecommunications service warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Issue of warrant for investigation
premise text: Division 3 has been complied with in relation to the application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46A Issue of named person warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46a
note: Issue of named person warrant for serious offences investigation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.179
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-cogai-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-shacl-6

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46A Issue of named person warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Issuance of warrant
premise text: The Judge or nominated ART member is satisfied that the conditions are met
conclusion text: A warrant authorising communications to be intercepted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of telecommunications services
premise text: The person is using or likely to use more than one telecommunications service
conclusion text: The warrant authorises interception of communications made to or from any telecommunications service
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Conditional commencement
premise text: Urgent circumstances necessitated the application by telephone
conclusion text: The warrant authorises interception of communications made to or from any telecommunications service at a later time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Ongoing investigation
premise text: The person is involved in serious offences
conclusion text: The warrant authorises interception of communications made to or from any telecommunications service during the ongoing investigation
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation for warrant issuance
premise text: The Judge or nominated ART member has assessed the information provided
conclusion text: The warrant authorises interception of communications made to or from any telecommunications service based on the assessment
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-shacl-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
logic summary: Validation of warrant issuance
premise text: The Judge or nominated ART member has validated the application
conclusion text: The warrant authorises interception of communications made to or from any telecommunications service based on validation
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Limit on authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47
note: Limit on warrant authority for telecommunications interception
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-47-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-47-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-47-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 47 Limit on authority conferred by warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits warrant-based interception without carrier notification
premise text: Notification required for warrant issuance
conclusion text: Interception prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Issue of warrant for entry on premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48
has part: 48(1) Issue of warrant for entry on premises
has part: 48(2) Issue of warrant for entry on premises
has part: 48(3) Issue of warrant for entry on premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.192

48(1) Issue of warrant for entry on premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48-ss-1
part of: 48 Issue of warrant for entry on premises
note: Agency may apply for warrant under section 46 that also authorises entry on premises.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(1) Issue of warrant for entry on premises
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Agency may apply for warrant under section 46 that also authorises entry on premises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(2) Issue of warrant for entry on premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48-ss-2
part of: 48 Issue of warrant for entry on premises
note: Affidavit must state why entry on premises is necessary and provide previous application numbers.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(2) Issue of warrant for entry on premises
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Affidavit must be provided.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of warrants based on application numbers.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(3) Issue of warrant for entry on premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48-ss-3
part of: 48 Issue of warrant for entry on premises
note: Issue of warrant for entry on premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to issue warrant
premise text: (3) Where...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49
has part: 49(1) Form and content of warrant
has part: 49(2) Form and content of warrant
has part: 49(2A) Form and content of warrant
has part: 49(3) Form and content of warrant
has part: 49(4) Form and content of warrant
has part: 49(5) Form and content of warrant
has part: 49(6) Form and content of warrant
has part: 49(6A) Form and content of warrant
has part: 49(6B) Form and content of warrant
has part: 49(7) Form and content of warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194

49(1) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-1
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant
note: Warrant must be signed by Judge or nominated ART member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49(1) Form and content of warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to sign warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49(2) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-2
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant
note: Conditions or restrictions for warrant interceptions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-2-norm

49(2A) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-2a
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant
note: Warrant does not authorise interception of communications made to or from a specified telecommunications service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits interception of communications.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49(3) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-3
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant
note: Warrant must specify period of force
description: Period for which warrant is to be in force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits warrant from being issued without specifying period of force
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49(4) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-4
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant
note: Cannot vary warrant by extending its period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-4-logic-deontic-3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of varying warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Form and content of warrant
premise text: (4) A Judge or nominated ART member shall not vary a warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot extend warrant period
premise text: (4) A Judge or nominated ART member shall not vary a warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49(5) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-5
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant
note: Allows for further warrants in respect of a service or person where previous warrants have been issued.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows further permits
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49(6) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-6
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant
note: Definition of warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49(6) Form and content of warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49(6A) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-6a
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant
note: Warrant remains in force despite changes to supervisory order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49(6A) Form and content of warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continuation
logic summary: Continues despite change in supervisory order.
premise text: Supervisory order ceases to be in force.
conclusion text: Warrant remains in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between warrant and supervisory order.
premise text: Warrant issued for period mentioned in subsection (3).
conclusion text: Warrant remains in force during this period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: Implications of warrant remaining in force despite supervisory order change.
premise text: Supervisory order ceases to be in force.
conclusion text: Warrant remains in force.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Spread of warrant's effect despite supervisory order change.
premise text: Warrant issued on basis of supervisory order.
conclusion text: Warrant continues to have effect.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive
logic summary: Cognitive implications of warrant remaining in force despite supervisory order change.
premise text: Supervisory order ceases to be in force.
conclusion text: Warrant remains in force.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49(6B) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-6b
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant
note: Warrant remains in force despite changes to community safety supervision order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49(6B) Form and content of warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
logic summary: Warrant continues in effect despite changes to underlying condition.
premise text: (6B) To avoid doubt, a warrant issued on the basis that a community safety supervision order is in force remains in force for the period mentioned in subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Warrant's temporal scope overlaps with changes to underlying condition.
premise text: (6B) To avoid doubt, a warrant issued on the basis that a community safety supervision order is in force remains in force for the period mentioned in subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Warrant's applicability ceases upon underlying condition's termination.
premise text: (6B) To avoid doubt, a warrant issued on the basis that a community safety supervision order is in force remains in force for the period mentioned in subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permissive
logic summary: Warrant's applicability is not restricted by changes to underlying condition.
premise text: (6B) To avoid doubt, a warrant issued on the basis that a community safety supervision order is in force remains in force for the period mentioned in subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-6b-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Conditional
logic summary: Warrant's applicability depends on underlying condition's continuation.
premise text: (6B) To avoid doubt, a warrant issued on the basis that a community safety supervision order is in force remains in force for the period mentioned in subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49(7) Form and content of warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-7
part of: 49 Form and content of warrant
note: Warrant must be issued under specific circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.194
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49(7) Form and content of warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-49-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ISSUE
logic summary: Issuing a warrant is an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Issue of warrant on telephone application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50
has part: 50(1) Issue of warrant on telephone application
has part: 50(2) Issue of warrant on telephone application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.197

50(1) Issue of warrant on telephone application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-1
part of: 50 Issue of warrant on telephone application
note: Inform applicant about warrant terms and signing date.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.197
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-50-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-50-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(1) Issue of warrant on telephone application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Informing applicant about warrant terms and signing date.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(2) Issue of warrant on telephone application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-2
part of: 50 Issue of warrant on telephone application
note: Keep a copy of the warrant issued on a telephone application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.197
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-50-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-50-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-50-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to keep a copy of the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51
has part: 51(1) Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
has part: 51(2) Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
has part: 51(3) Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.197

51(1) Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51-ss-1
part of: 51 Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
note: Comply with section within one day after warrant issuance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.197
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51(1) Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51(2) Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51-ss-2
part of: 51 Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
note: Affidavit requirement for information provided to the Judge or ART member
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.197
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51(2) Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide affidavit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51(3) Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51-ss-3
part of: 51 Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
note: Applicant must provide information to Judge or nominated ART member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.197
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51(3) Action by agency after warrant issued on telephone application
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide information
premise text: The applicant shall give to the Judge or nominated ART member
conclusion text: The applicant must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52
has part: 52(1) Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where
has part: 52(2) Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where
has part: 52(3) Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.198

52(1) Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52-ss-1
part of: 52 Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where
note: Revocation of warrant by Judge or ART member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.198
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 52(1) Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on revocation of warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(2) Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52-ss-2
part of: 52 Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where
note: Agency must provide revocation notice to Secretary upon warrant revocation.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.198
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Agency must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(3) Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52-ss-3
part of: 52 Judge or nominated ART member may revoke warrant where
note: Inform other agency or Director-General of Security about warrant revocation.
description: Copy of instrument of revocation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.198
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-52-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Inform other agency or Director-General of Security about warrant revocation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Entry into force of warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54
note: Entry into force of warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-54-norm

55 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55
has part: 55(1) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
has part: 55(3) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
has part: 55(4) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
has part: 55(5) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
has part: 55(6) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.199

55(1) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-1
part of: 55 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
note: Authority must be exercised with approval
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(1) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
logic summary: Conditional authority exercise
premise text: (warrant)
conclusion text: (exercise)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55(3) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-3
part of: 55 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
note: Agency may approve persons to exercise authority conferred by warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to exercise authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55(4) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-4
part of: 55 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
note: Appointment of an approving officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-4-norm

55(5) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-5
part of: 55 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
note: Permission for technical assistance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(5) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (5) In spite of subsection (1),
conclusion text: a designated officer, or an employee of a carrier, may provide technical assistance to a person who is exercising the authority conferred by a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
logic summary: Temporal relationship between provision and exercise
premise text: (5) In spite of subsection (1),
conclusion text: a designated officer, or an employee of a carrier, may provide technical assistance to a person who is exercising the authority conferred by a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring relationship between provision and exercise
premise text: (5) In spite of subsection (1),
conclusion text: a designated officer, or an employee of a carrier, may provide technical assistance to a person who is exercising the authority conferred by a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information sharing
logic summary: Sharing information between provision and exercise
premise text: (5) In spite of subsection (1),
conclusion text: a designated officer, or an employee of a carrier, may provide technical assistance to a person who is exercising the authority conferred by a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Artificial intelligence application
logic summary: Application of AI in provision and exercise
premise text: (5) In spite of subsection (1),
conclusion text: a designated officer, or an employee of a carrier, may provide technical assistance to a person who is exercising the authority conferred by a warrant.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

55(6) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-6
part of: 55 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
note: A reference to the doing of an act involved in the interception of a communication under a warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-6-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-55-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(6) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

57 Revocation of warrant by chief officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57
has part: 57(1) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
has part: 57(2) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
has part: 57(3) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
has part: 57(4) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
has part: 57(5) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
has part: 57(6) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
has part: 57(7) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.200

57(1) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57-ss-1
part of: 57 Revocation of warrant by chief officer
note: Chief officer must revoke warrant if grounds cease to exist.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.200
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57(1) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide revocation
premise text: Chief officer has obligation to revoke warrant
conclusion text: Revocation must occur
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57(2) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57-ss-2
part of: 57 Revocation of warrant by chief officer
note: Chief officer must inform other agency or Director-General of Security before revoking warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.200
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57(2) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57(3) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57-ss-3
part of: 57 Revocation of warrant by chief officer
note: Chief officer must inform and provide revocation instrument.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.200
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57(3) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must inform and provide revocation instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57(4) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57-ss-4
part of: 57 Revocation of warrant by chief officer
note: Delegation of power by chief officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.200
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-4-norm

57(5) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57-ss-5
part of: 57 Revocation of warrant by chief officer
note: Section does not apply in relation to a warrant that has ceased to be in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.200
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-5-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57(5) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

57(6) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57-ss-6
part of: 57 Revocation of warrant by chief officer
note: Ground ceases to exist if no Part 5.3 supervisory order is in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.200
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57(6) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ceasing
logic summary: Ground ceases to exist if no Part 5.3 supervisory order is in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57(7) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57-ss-7
part of: 57 Revocation of warrant by chief officer
note: Revocation of warrant by chief officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.200
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 57(7) Revocation of warrant by chief officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for revocation
premise text: (7) For the purposes of the application of subsection (1) to a community safety supervision order warrant issued on the ground that a community safety supervision order was in force, that ground is taken to have ceased to exist if, and only if, neither that community safety supervision order, nor any succeeding community safety supervision order, is in force.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship for revocation
premise text: (7) For the purposes of the application of subsection (1) to a community safety supervision order warrant issued on the ground that a community safety supervision order was in force, that ground is taken to have ceased to exist if, and only if, neither that community safety supervision order, nor any succeeding community safety supervision order, is in force.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Defines diffusion of revocation
premise text: (7) For the purposes of the application of subsection (1) to a community safety supervision order warrant issued on the ground that a community safety supervision order was in force, that ground is taken to have ceased to exist if, and only if, neither that community safety supervision order, nor any succeeding community safety supervision order, is in force.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-57-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Defines recognition of revocation
premise text: (7) For the purposes of the application of subsection (1) to a community safety supervision order warrant issued on the ground that a community safety supervision order was in force, that ground is taken to have ceased to exist if, and only if, neither that community safety supervision order, nor any succeeding community safety supervision order, is in force.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Discontinuance of interceptions under certain warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58
has part: 58(1) Discontinuance of interceptions under certain warrants
has part: 58(2) Discontinuance of interceptions under certain warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.201

58(1) Discontinuance of interceptions under certain warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58-ss-1
part of: 58 Discontinuance of interceptions under certain warrants
note: Agency must take steps to discontinue interceptions upon warrant revocation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.201
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-58-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-58-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(1) Discontinuance of interceptions under certain warrants
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must take action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(2) Discontinuance of interceptions under certain warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58-ss-2
part of: 58 Discontinuance of interceptions under certain warrants
note: Agency must take steps to ensure discontinuance of interceptions upon warrant revocation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.201
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-58-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-58-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(2) Discontinuance of interceptions under certain warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must take action
premise text: Revocation of warrant
conclusion text: Discontinuance of interceptions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 When revocation of certain warrants takes effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59
note: Revocation of warrant does not immediately cease its effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.201
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59-norm

59A Notification to Secretary of the Department
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59a
has part: 59A(1) Notification to Secretary of the Department
has part: 59A(2) Notification to Secretary of the Department
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.202

59A(1) Notification to Secretary of the Department
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59a-ss-1
part of: 59A Notification to Secretary of the Department
note: Agency must notify Secretary of Department upon issuance of warrant.
description: copy of the warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.202
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59A(1) Notification to Secretary of the Department
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must notify Secretary.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59A(2) Notification to Secretary of the Department
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59a-ss-2
part of: 59A Notification to Secretary of the Department
note: Chief officer must notify Secretary of Department with description of service sufficient to identify it.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.202
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59A(2) Notification to Secretary of the Department
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY
logic summary: Description of service sufficient to identify it
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59B Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59b
has part: 59B(1) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
has part: 59B(2) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
has part: 59B(3) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.202

59B(1) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59b-ss-1
part of: 59B Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
note: Chief officer must notify Ombudsman or Inspector-General of warrant issuance within 6 months.
description: Copy of warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.202
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59B(1) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify Ombudsman or Inspector-General
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59B(2) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59b-ss-2
part of: 59B Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
note: Notification of contravention to Ombudsman or Inspector-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.202
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59B(2) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Notification obligation
premise text: Agency officer must notify Ombudsman or Inspector-General of contravention
conclusion text: Notification required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59B(3) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59b-ss-3
part of: 59B Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
note: Notification obligation does not affect warrant validity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.202
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59B(3) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Notification obligation
premise text: (3) A failure to comply...
conclusion text: does not affect the validity of the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between failure and warrant validity
premise text: (3) A failure to comply...
conclusion text: does not affect the validity of the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59C Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59c
has part: 59C(1) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
has part: 59C(2) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.203

59C(1) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59c-ss-1
part of: 59C Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
note: Chief officer must notify Ombudsman or Inspector-General of warrant issuance within 6 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.203
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59C(1) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify Ombudsman or Inspector-General of warrant issuance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59C(2) Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59c-ss-2
part of: 59C Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General of
note: Notification to Ombudsman or Inspector-General upon contravention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.203
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Notification obligation
premise text: Agency must notify Ombudsman or Inspector-General
conclusion text: Chief Officer of the Agency must notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-59c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Notification must occur after contravention
premise text: Contravention occurs before notification
conclusion text: Notification occurs after contravention
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60
has part: 60(1) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
has part: 60(3) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
has part: 60(4) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
has part: 60(4A) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.204

60(1) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60-ss-1
part of: 60 Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
note: Notify carrier of warrant issue
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.204
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60(1) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Notification obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60(3) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60-ss-3
part of: 60 Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
note: Notify authorised representative of carrier upon warrant revocation.
description: Copy of instrument of revocation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.204
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60(3) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Notification obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60(4) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60-ss-4
part of: 60 Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
note: Certify service identification to authorised representative
description: Description of telecommunications service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.204
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60(4) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Certify service identification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Identify telecommunications service
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60(4A) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60-ss-4a
part of: 60 Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
note: Notify authorized representative of carrier about issue of named person warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.204
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60(4A) Notification to authorised representative of carrier of issue or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIG
logic summary: Notification obligation
premise text: (4A) Where...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-60-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS_OF
logic summary: Subclass of warrant-related provisions
premise text: (4A) Where...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61
has part: 61(1) Evidentiary certificates
has part: 61(2) Evidentiary certificates
has part: 61(4) Evidentiary certificates
has part: 61(4A) Evidentiary certificates
has part: 61(5) Evidentiary certificates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.206

61(1) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-1
part of: 61 Evidentiary certificates
note: Carrier employees must provide written certificates upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.206
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Carrier employees have an obligation to provide written certificates.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(2) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-2
part of: 61 Evidentiary certificates
note: Exempt proceeding conclusive evidence of matters stated in document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.206
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61(2) Evidentiary certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide conclusive evidence
premise text: Document purporting to be a certificate issued under subsection (1)
conclusion text: Exempt proceeding conclusive evidence of matters stated in document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap: Document issued under subsection (1) and exempt proceeding
premise text: Document purporting to be a certificate issued under subsection (1)
conclusion text: Document issued under subsection (1) overlaps with exempt proceeding
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Recurring trace: Document is conclusive evidence in exempt proceeding
premise text: Document purporting to be a certificate issued under subsection (1)
conclusion text: Document is conclusive evidence in exempt proceeding
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion: Document diffuses conclusive evidence in exempt proceeding
premise text: Document purporting to be a certificate issued under subsection (1)
conclusion text: Document diffuses conclusive evidence in exempt proceeding
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: CogAI recognizes document as conclusive evidence
premise text: Document purporting to be a certificate issued under subsection (1)
conclusion text: CogAI recognizes document as conclusive evidence
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

61(4) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-4
part of: 61 Evidentiary certificates
note: Certifying officer must issue written certificate with relevant facts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.206
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61(4) Evidentiary certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a written certificate.
premise text: Certifying officer has the authority to issue certificates.
conclusion text: A written certificate must be issued.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(4A) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-4a
part of: 61 Evidentiary certificates
note: Certifying person must issue written certificate with relevant facts.
description: written certificate signed by certifying person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.206
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Certifying person must issue written certificate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(5) Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-5
part of: 61 Evidentiary certificates
note: Prohibits issuing a document purporting to be a certificate without proper authorization.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.206
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of issuing a document without proper authorization.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61A Certified copy of warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61a
note: A document certified in writing by a certifying officer of an agency is admissible as evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.208
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61A Certified copy of warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-61a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Admissibility
logic summary: The provision establishes a rule for the admissibility of documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62
note: This Part applies in relation to certain types of information, interceptions, and proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.209
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-62-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-62-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62 Application of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The Part applies to the specified types of information, interceptions, and proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63 No dealing in intercepted information or interception warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63
has part: 63(1) No dealing in intercepted information or interception warrant
has part: 63(2) No dealing in intercepted information or interception warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.209

63(1) No dealing in intercepted information or interception warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-1
part of: 63 No dealing in intercepted information or interception warrant
note: No communication with intercepted information after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.209
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(1) No dealing in intercepted information or interception warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of communication with intercepted information.
premise text: (1) Subject to this Part and section 299, a person shall not...
conclusion text: ...communicate to another person, make use of, or make a record of...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of use, record, or evidence with intercepted information.
premise text: (1) Subject to this Part and section 299, a person shall not...
conclusion text: ...make use of, or make a record of; or give in evidence in a proceeding...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of giving evidence with intercepted information.
premise text: (1) Subject to this Part and section 299, a person shall not...
conclusion text: ...give in evidence in a proceeding; lawfully intercepted information or information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(2) No dealing in intercepted information or interception warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-2
part of: 63 No dealing in intercepted information or interception warrant
note: No communication, use, or record of interception warrant information after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.209
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(2) No dealing in intercepted information or interception warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (2) Subject to this Part and section 299, a person must not...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63AA Dealing in interception warrant information for the purposes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63aa
note: Communicate interception warrant information, make use of it, record it, or give it in evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63aa-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63aa-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63aa-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 63AA Dealing in interception warrant information for the purposes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to communicate interception warrant information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63AB Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63ab
has part: 63AB(1) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
has part: 63AB(2) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
has part: 63AB(3) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
has part: 63AB(3A) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.210

63AB(1) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63ab-ss-1
part of: 63AB Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
note: Authorizes communication of general computer access intercept information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 63AB(1) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grants permission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63AB(2) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63ab-ss-2
part of: 63AB Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
note: Permitted activities related to telecommunications interception and access
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63AB(3) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63ab-ss-3
part of: 63AB Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
note: Permits communication of information to a person or use of information in connection with official functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 63AB(3) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63AB(3A) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63ab-ss-3a
part of: 63AB Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
note: Permits inspection of telecommunications in connection with a function or duty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-3a-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 63AB(3A) Dealing in general computer access intercept information etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ab-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63AC Dealing in ASIO computer access intercept information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63ac
has part: 63AC(1) Dealing in ASIO computer access intercept information etc.
has part: 63AC(2) Dealing in ASIO computer access intercept information etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.213

63AC(1) Dealing in ASIO computer access intercept information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63ac-ss-1
part of: 63AC Dealing in ASIO computer access intercept information etc.
note: Authorises communication, use, recording, and evidence provision of ASIO computer access intercept information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.213
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ac-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 63AC(1) Dealing in ASIO computer access intercept information etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorises action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63AC(2) Dealing in ASIO computer access intercept information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63ac-ss-2
part of: 63AC Dealing in ASIO computer access intercept information etc.
note: Allow communication, use, or record of ASIO computer access intercept information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.213
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to communicate, use, or record ASIO computer access intercept information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63AD Dealing in data disruption intercept information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63ad
note: Authorises communication, use, and recording of data disruption intercept information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.215
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ad-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ad-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ad-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorisation to perform an action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63AE Dealing in network activity warrant intercept information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63ae
has part: 63AE(1) Dealing in network activity warrant intercept information etc.
has part: 63AE(2) Dealing in network activity warrant intercept information etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.219

63AE(1) Dealing in network activity warrant intercept information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63ae-ss-1
part of: 63AE Dealing in network activity warrant intercept information etc.
note: Authorizes communication, use, and recording of network activity warrant intercept information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.219
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ae-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ae-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 63AE(1) Dealing in network activity warrant intercept information etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grants permission to perform actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63AE(2) Dealing in network activity warrant intercept information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63ae-ss-2
part of: 63AE Dealing in network activity warrant intercept information etc.
note: A person may communicate, make use of, or record network activity warrant intercept information under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.219
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ae-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ae-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to perform an action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63ae-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: The information relates to or appears to relate to the involvement during a specific time period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63A Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63a
has part: 63A(1) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
has part: 63A(2) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
has part: 63A(3) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
has part: 63A(4) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.222

63A(1) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63a-ss-1
part of: 63A Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
note: Communicate with another person for a purpose connected to a proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 63A(1) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

63A(2) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63a-ss-2
part of: 63A Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
note: Prohibition on using defective warrants in proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 63A(2) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits using defective warrants
premise text: (2) Nothing in subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63A(3) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63a-ss-3
part of: 63A Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
note: A proceeding begins before a commencement if a related proceeding began earlier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63A(3) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63A(4) Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63a-ss-4
part of: 63A Dealing in connection with existing proceeding
note: Conditional commencement of a proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-4-norm

63B Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63b
has part: 63B(1) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
has part: 63B(2) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
has part: 63B(3) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.223

63B(1) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63b-ss-1
part of: 63B Dealing in information by employees of carriers
note: Employee may communicate or use information related to carrier operations or services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.223
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-cogai-6

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63B(1) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by the state for an agent to perform an action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: related to
logic summary: The information is related to carrier operations or services.
premise text: (a) the operation or maintenance of a telecommunications network operated by the carrier; or (b) the supply of services by the carrier by means of a telecommunications network.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during performance of duties
logic summary: The communication or use of information occurs during the employee's duties as an agent of the state.
premise text: in the performance of his or her duties as such an employee
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: for
logic summary: The employee may communicate or use information for a specific purpose.
premise text: (1) An employee of a carrier may, in the performance of his or her duties as such an employee
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: as part of job requirements
logic summary: The communication or use of information is part of the employee's job requirements.
premise text: (1) An employee of a carrier may, in the performance of his or her duties as such an employee
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: as part of job requirements
logic summary: The communication or use of information is part of the employee's job requirements.
premise text: (1) An employee of a carrier may, in the performance of his or her duties as such an employee
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63B(2) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63b-ss-2
part of: 63B Dealing in information by employees of carriers
note: Employee may communicate information to another carrier about its telecommunications network operation or service supply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.223
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to communicate information
premise text: Employee has lawful access to the information
conclusion text: May communicate the information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of communication purpose
premise text: Communication is for carrying on business relating to service supply
conclusion text: Relates to telecommunications network operation or service supply
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63B(3) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63b-ss-3
part of: 63B Dealing in information by employees of carriers
note: Employee may communicate interception warrant information in performance of duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.223
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63B(3) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permits action under certain conditions.
premise text: Employee has duty to intercept communications.
conclusion text: Employee may communicate interception warrant information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63C Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63c
has part: 63C(1) Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
has part: 63C(2) Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
has part: 63C(3) Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.224

63C(1) Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63c-ss-1
part of: 63C Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
note: Prohibits communication of unlawfully intercepted information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.224
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 63C(1) Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits the action
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), a person engaged in network protection duties...
conclusion text: may not communicate or make use of, or cause to be communicated unlawfully intercepted information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the timing of the prohibition
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), a person engaged in network protection duties...
conclusion text: while performing those duties
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Describes the duration of the prohibition
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), a person engaged in network protection duties...
conclusion text: until subsection (3) is repealed or revoked
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Describes the scope of the prohibition
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), a person engaged in network protection duties...
conclusion text: throughout the performance of those duties
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: by
logic summary: Describes the agent performing the action
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), a person engaged in network protection duties...
conclusion text: by that person
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63C(2) Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63c-ss-2
part of: 63C Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
note: A person engaged in network protection duties must communicate intercepted information to the responsible person for the network and another person if necessary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.224
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63C(2) Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must communicate information to the responsible person and another person if necessary.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63C(3) Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63c-ss-3
part of: 63C Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
note: Prohibiting communication of intercepted information in a specific form.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.224
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 63C(3) Dealing in information for network protection purposes etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63D Dealing in information for disciplinary purposes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63d
has part: 63D(1) Dealing in information for disciplinary purposes
has part: 63D(2) Dealing in information for disciplinary purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.225

63D(1) Dealing in information for disciplinary purposes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63d-ss-1
part of: 63D Dealing in information for disciplinary purposes
note: Duty to engage in network protection duties for certain networks.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.225
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to engage in network protection duties.
premise text: (1) This section applies...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63D(2) Dealing in information for disciplinary purposes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63d-ss-2
part of: 63D Dealing in information for disciplinary purposes
note: Subject to subsections (3) and (4), the person may communicate or make use of, or cause to be communicated lawfully intercepted information that was obtained by intercepting a communication under paragraph 7(2)(aaa)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.225
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63d-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63D(2) Dealing in information for disciplinary purposes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

63E Responsible person for a computer network may communicate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63e
note: Communicate intercepted information to an agency officer under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.226
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63e-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63e-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63e-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63e-logic-ltl-3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to communicate information
premise text: Reasonable grounds exist
conclusion text: Communicate information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63e-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Suspect relevant information exists
premise text: Reasonable grounds exist
conclusion text: Information is relevant
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-63e-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Trace of intercepted information
premise text: Intercepted information communicated
conclusion text: Information is traced
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64
has part: 64(1) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
has part: 64(2) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
has part: 64(3) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
has part: 64(4) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.226

64(1) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64-ss-1
part of: 64 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
note: Communicating intercepted information for security purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.226
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows communication of intercepted information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64(2) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64-ss-2
part of: 64 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
note: Communication with another person about foreign intelligence information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.226
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-2-norm

64(3) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64-ss-3
part of: 64 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
note: Exemptions from subsections (1) and (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.226
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-3-norm

64(4) Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64-ss-4
part of: 64 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
note: Allowing communication of information for investigation purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.226
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to communicate information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Specifying the temporal overlap of permitted communication
premise text: for a purpose or purposes connected with the investigation to which the warrant, under which the information was obtained, relates,
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Providing justification for permitted communication
premise text: and for no other purpose.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64A Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64a
has part: 64A(1) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
has part: 64A(2) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.227

64A(1) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64a-ss-1
part of: 64A Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
note: Permits communication with an IGIS official in connection with their functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.227
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 64A(1) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permits use of interception warrant information
premise text: (b) interception warrant information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64A(2) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64a-ss-2
part of: 64A Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
note: This section applies despite any other provision of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.227
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64A(2) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Section applies despite other provisions
premise text: Other provision
conclusion text: Section applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65
has part: 65(1) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 65(1A) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 65(1B) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 65(2) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 65(3) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 65(4) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 65(5) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.228

65(1) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-1
part of: 65 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
note: Prohibits communication of intercepted information without authorization.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(1) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) The Director-General of Security may, personally, or by a person authorised by the Director-General...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65(1A) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-1a
part of: 65 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
note: Prohibits communication of foreign intelligence information to unauthorized persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits action
premise text: (1A) The Director-General of Security may...
conclusion text: communicate foreign intelligence information to another person (the second person), other than a person to whom the Director-General could communicate the information under subsection (1) or 64(2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies timing of prohibition
premise text: (c) subject to the conditions (if any) specified by the Attorney-General in writing;
conclusion text: communicate foreign intelligence information to another person (the second person), other than a person to whom the Director-General could communicate the information under subsection (1) or 64(2).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Specifies duration of prohibition
premise text: (b) for the purposes (if any) approved by the Attorney-General in writing;
conclusion text: communicate foreign intelligence information to another person (the second person), other than a person to whom the Director-General could communicate the information under subsection (1) or 64(2).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits action
premise text: (1A) The Director-General of Security may:
conclusion text: communicate foreign intelligence information to another person (the second person), other than a person to whom the Director-General could communicate the information under subsection (1) or 64(2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits action
premise text: (c) subject to the conditions (if any) specified by the Attorney-General in writing;
conclusion text: communicate foreign intelligence information to another person (the second person), other than a person to whom the Director-General could communicate the information under subsection (1) or 64(2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65(1B) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-1b
part of: 65 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
note: Communicate foreign intelligence information to another person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65(2) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-2
part of: 65 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
note: A person may communicate, use, and make a record of foreign intelligence information under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(2) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to communicate, use, and make a record of foreign intelligence information.
premise text: The Attorney-General has approved the purposes and conditions.
conclusion text: The person may communicate, use, and make a record of the information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

65(3) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-3
part of: 65 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
note: Exemptions from subsections (1), (1A), (1B) and (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from certain subsections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65(4) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-4
part of: 65 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
note: Prohibition on communication of intercepted information to certain staff members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits communication of intercepted information to certain staff members
premise text: (4) If lawfully intercepted information was obtained under a section 31A authorisation...
conclusion text: ...unless the communication is for the purpose of the development or testing of technologies, or interception capabilities...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between Organisation's authority and communication of intercepted information
premise text: (4) If lawfully intercepted information was obtained under a section 31A authorisation...
conclusion text: ...unless the communication is for the purpose of the development or testing of technologies, or interception capabilities...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between Organisation's authority and communication of intercepted information
premise text: (4) If lawfully intercepted information was obtained under a section 31A authorisation...
conclusion text: ...unless the communication is for the purpose of the development or testing of technologies, or interception capabilities...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits staff members from communicating intercepted information to certain authorities
premise text: (a) a staff member of an authority of the Commonwealth; or (b) a staff member of an authority of a State;
conclusion text: ...unless the communication is for the purpose of the development or testing of technologies, or interception capabilities...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits Organisation from communicating intercepted information to certain staff members
premise text: (c) that authority; or (d) the Organisation.
conclusion text: ...unless the communication is for the purpose of the development or testing of technologies, or interception capabilities...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65(5) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-5
part of: 65 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
note: Prohibition on communication of intercepted information to staff members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits the communication of intercepted information to staff members
premise text: (5) If lawfully intercepted information was obtained under a section 31A authorisation...
conclusion text: ... subsection (1) of this section does not authorise the communication of the information in accordance with subsection 18(4A)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship
premise text: (5) If lawfully intercepted information was obtained under a section 31A authorisation...
conclusion text: ... subsection (1) of this section does not authorise the communication of the information in accordance with subsection 18(4A)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship
premise text: (5) If lawfully intercepted information was obtained under a section 31A authorisation...
conclusion text: ... subsection (1) of this section does not authorise the communication of the information in accordance with subsection 18(4A)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: doesNotApplyTo
logic summary: Describes a relationship between diffusion and the provision
premise text: (5) If lawfully intercepted information was obtained under a section 31A authorisation...
conclusion text: ... subsection (1) of this section does not authorise the communication of the information in accordance with subsection 18(4A)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

65A Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65a
has part: 65A(1) Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency
has part: 65A(2) Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.230

65A(1) Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65a-ss-1
part of: 65A Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency
note: Employee may communicate information to agency for specified purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.230
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 65A(1) Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted
premise text: Employee may communicate information
conclusion text: Agency permitted to receive information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65A(2) Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65a-ss-2
part of: 65A Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency
note: Employee of carrier must communicate information to agency under specified circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.230
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65A(2) Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
premise text: Employee of carrier may communicate information to agency
conclusion text: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal intervals for interception and access
premise text: Interception of telecommunications Chapter 2 Dealing with intercepted information etc. Part 2-6
conclusion text: Temporal intervals for interception
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Recurring trace for community safety supervision orders
premise text: Determining whether a community safety supervision order has been, or is being, complied with;
conclusion text: Recurring trace for compliance
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-65a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Obligation to comply with supervision orders
premise text: The performance of a function or duty, or the exercise of a power, by a person, court or other body under, or in relation to a matter arising under Division 395 of the Criminal Code (community safety orders).
conclusion text: Obligation to comply with supervision orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 Interceptor may communicate to officer who applied for warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66
has part: 66(1) Interceptor may communicate to officer who applied for warrant
has part: 66(2) Interceptor may communicate to officer who applied for warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.231

66(1) Interceptor may communicate to officer who applied for warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66-ss-1
part of: 66 Interceptor may communicate to officer who applied for warrant
note: Intercepted communication information may be communicated to the warrant applicant or authorized person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-66-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-66-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-66-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Intercepted communication information must be communicated.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66(2) Interceptor may communicate to officer who applied for warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66-ss-2
part of: 66 Interceptor may communicate to officer who applied for warrant
note: Authorise in writing a person (or class of person) to receive information obtained
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-66-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-66-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 66(2) Interceptor may communicate to officer who applied for warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

67 Dealing for permitted purposes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67
has part: 67(1) Dealing for permitted purposes
has part: 67(1A) Dealing for permitted purposes
has part: 67(1B) Dealing for permitted purposes
has part: 67(1C) Dealing for permitted purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.232

67(1) Dealing for permitted purposes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67-ss-1
part of: 67 Dealing for permitted purposes
note: Permitted communication of intercepted information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.232
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 67(1) Dealing for permitted purposes
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

67(1A) Dealing for permitted purposes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67-ss-1a
part of: 67 Dealing for permitted purposes
note: Exemptions from subsection (1) of section 67(1A)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.232
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1a-norm

67(1B) Dealing for permitted purposes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67-ss-1b
part of: 67 Dealing for permitted purposes
note: Permitted use of information for specified purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.232
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to use information
premise text: (1B) However, an officer or staff member of an agency may...
conclusion text: ...for a purpose or purposes set out in subsection (1C), and for no other purpose...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal scope of permitted use
premise text: (1B) However, an officer or staff member of an agency may...
conclusion text: ...for a purpose or purposes set out in subsection (1C), and for no other purpose...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring use of information
premise text: (1B) However, an officer or staff member of an agency may...
conclusion text: ...for a purpose or purposes set out in subsection (1C), and for no other purpose...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Spread
logic summary: Spread of information to others
premise text: (1B) However, an officer or staff member of an agency may...
conclusion text: ...for a purpose or purposes set out in subsection (1C), and for no other purpose...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Graph
logic summary: Knowledge graph representation
premise text: (1B) However, an officer or staff member of an agency may...
conclusion text: ...for a purpose or purposes set out in subsection (1C), and for no other purpose...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

67(1C) Dealing for permitted purposes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67-ss-1c
part of: 67 Dealing for permitted purposes
note: The purposes are purposes connected with the investigation, achieving a Part 5.3 object, determining compliance, or performing a function/duty related to specific laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.232
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67(1C) Dealing for permitted purposes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-67-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to investigate or comply with specific laws.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Chief officer may communicate information obtained by agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68
note: Chief officer may communicate information to Director-General of Security and Chief Executive Officer of ACC under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.235
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68 Chief officer may communicate information obtained by agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68A Communicating information obtained by the Secretary of the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68a
has part: 68A(1) Communicating information obtained by the Secretary of the
has part: 68A(2) Communicating information obtained by the Secretary of the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.241

68A(1) Communicating information obtained by the Secretary of the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68a-ss-1
part of: 68A Communicating information obtained by the Secretary of the
note: Obligation to provide information to the Secretary of the Department administered by the Attorney-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.241
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68A(1) Communicating information obtained by the Secretary of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68A(2) Communicating information obtained by the Secretary of the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68a-ss-2
part of: 68A Communicating information obtained by the Secretary of the
note: Permits communication of information to another person or entity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.241
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69 State authority may ask not to receive information under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69
has part: 69(1) State authority may ask not to receive information under
has part: 69(2) State authority may ask not to receive information under
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.241

69(1) State authority may ask not to receive information under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69-ss-1
part of: 69 State authority may ask not to receive information under
note: Request not to receive information under section 68.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.241
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-69-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-69-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 69(1) State authority may ask not to receive information under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

69(2) State authority may ask not to receive information under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69-ss-2
part of: 69 State authority may ask not to receive information under
note: Request revocation of information request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.241
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-69-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-69-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 69(2) State authority may ask not to receive information under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the chief officer from revoking the request
premise text: Chief officer of eligible authority
conclusion text: Request remains in force
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Communicating information obtained by interception under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70
note: Prohibition on communicating information obtained by interception under certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.242
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-70-norm

71 Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71
has part: 71(1) Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
has part: 71(2) Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
has part: 71(3) Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.242

71(1) Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-1
part of: 71 Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
note: Intercepted information may establish a suspected offence if reasonable grounds exist.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.242
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71(1) Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Establishing a suspected offence is an obligation.
premise text: Reasonable grounds exist for suspecting the offence.
conclusion text: The succeeding provisions of this section have effect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71(2) Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-2
part of: 71 Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
note: Who can be informed about suspected interception of information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.242
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Permission to communicate
premise text: The person may...
conclusion text: inform the specified authorities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71(3) Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-3
part of: 71 Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
note: Communicating relevant information for specific purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.242
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71(3) Dealing with information where interception suspected to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-71-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to communicate relevant information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Making record for purpose of permitted communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72
note: Making record for permitted communication
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.243
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-72-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-72-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-72-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72 Making record for purpose of permitted communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to make a record
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 Further dealing by recipient of certain information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73-2
note: Recipient of certain information must comply with subsections (1A), (2) and (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.243
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-2-logic-ltl-3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73 Further dealing by recipient of certain information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with subsections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Communicated for a certain period of time
premise text: Received communication
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-73-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURRING
logic summary: Recurring trace of communication
premise text: Received communication
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

74 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74
has part: 74(1) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
has part: 74(2) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
has part: 74(3) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.244

74(1) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-1
part of: 74 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
note: Permits giving lawfully intercepted information in evidence in exempt proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.244
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-74-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-74-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(1) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

74(2) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-2
part of: 74 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
note: Determine question whether communication was intercepted in contravention of subsection 7(1) on balance of probabilities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.244
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-74-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-74-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(2) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

74(3) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-3
part of: 74 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
note: Giving interception warrant information in evidence in exempt proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.244
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-74-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-74-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-74-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to give interception warrant information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75 Giving information in evidence where defect in connection with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-75
has part: 75(1) Giving information in evidence where defect in connection with
has part: 75(2) Giving information in evidence where defect in connection with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.245

75(1) Giving information in evidence where defect in connection with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-75-ss-1
part of: 75 Giving information in evidence where defect in connection with
note: Provide information obtained by interception in evidence if certain conditions are met.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.245
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75(1) Giving information in evidence where defect in connection with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75(2) Giving information in evidence where defect in connection with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-75-ss-2
part of: 75 Giving information in evidence where defect in connection with
note: Prohibition on issuing a document purporting to be a warrant with an irregularity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.245
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits issuing a document purporting to be a warrant with an irregularity.
premise text: (2) A reference in subsection (1) to an irregularity is a reference to a defect or irregularity...
conclusion text: ...or the purported execution of a document purporting to be a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the timing of the prohibited action.
premise text: (2) A reference in subsection (1) to an irregularity is a reference to a defect or irregularity...
conclusion text: ...in connection with the execution of a warrant, or the purported execution of a document purporting to be a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Describes the duration of the prohibited action.
premise text: (2) A reference in subsection (1) to an irregularity is a reference to a defect or irregularity...
conclusion text: ...or the purported execution of a document purporting to be a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits connection with issuing a document purporting to be a warrant.
premise text: (2) A reference in subsection (1) to an irregularity is a reference to a defect or irregularity...
conclusion text: ...in, or in connection with the issue of, a document purporting to be a warrant; or
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75A Evidence that has been given in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-75a
note: Permits later use of exempt proceeding evidence in other proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.245
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-75a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERMIT
logic summary: Allows later use of exempt proceeding evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 Giving information in evidence in criminal proceedings under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76
has part: 76(1) Giving information in evidence in criminal proceedings under
has part: 76(2) Giving information in evidence in criminal proceedings under
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.246

76(1) Giving information in evidence in criminal proceedings under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76-ss-1
part of: 76 Giving information in evidence in criminal proceedings under
note: Giving information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1) in evidence in a proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.246
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to give information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1) in evidence in a proceeding.
premise text: (1) A person may give information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1)
conclusion text: in evidence in a proceeding
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to authorise, suffer or permit, or do any act or thing to enable the interception.
premise text: (a) an offence against subsection 7(1) constituted by the interception, or by authorising, suffering or permitting, or doing any act or thing to enable, the interception;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to communicate to a person, making use of, making a record of, or giving in evidence in a proceeding, information obtained by the interception.
premise text: (b) an offence against section 63 constituted by communicating to a person, making use of, making a record of, or giving in evidence in a proceeding, information obtained by the intercepted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to do any act or thing to enable, the interception.
premise text: (c) an ancillary offence relating to an offence of a kind referred to in paragraph (a) or (b) of this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

76(2) Giving information in evidence in criminal proceedings under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76-ss-2
part of: 76 Giving information in evidence in criminal proceedings under
note: Allowing interception warrant information in evidence in criminal proceedings under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.246
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(2) Giving information in evidence in criminal proceedings under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

76A Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76a
has part: 76A(1) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
has part: 76A(2) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.246

76A(1) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76a-ss-1
part of: 76A Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
note: Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.246
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 76A(1) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to give information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1)
premise text: (1) A person may give information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Allowance to provide evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
premise text: (1) A person may give information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
logic summary: Tracing the provision to its application in civil proceedings for remedial
premise text: (1) A person may give information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
premise text: (1) A person may give information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on providing evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
premise text: (1) A person may give information obtained by intercepting a communication in contravention of subsection 7(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

76A(2) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76a-ss-2
part of: 76A Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
note: Allowing person to give interception warrant information in evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.246
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Intercepted material and interception warrant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77
has part: 77(1) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
has part: 77(2) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
has part: 77(3) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
has part: 77(4) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.247

77(1) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77-ss-1
part of: 77 Intercepted material and interception warrant information
note: Information obtained by interception is admissible in evidence under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.247
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(1) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide information in evidence under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(2) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77-ss-2
part of: 77 Intercepted material and interception warrant information
note: Prohibition on using intercepted material without permission from relevant sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.247
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(2) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits using intercepted material without permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(3) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77-ss-3
part of: 77 Intercepted material and interception warrant information
note: Exclusion of interception warrant information from evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.247
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-3-norm

77(4) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77-ss-4
part of: 77 Intercepted material and interception warrant information
note: A person may communicate interception warrant information to another person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.247
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(4) Intercepted material and interception warrant information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to communicate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Where evidence otherwise inadmissible
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78
note: No part of this Act renders information or a restricted record admissible in evidence to a greater extent than it would have been admissible if this Part had not been enacted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.248
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-78-norm

79 Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79
has part: 79(1) Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be
has part: 79(2) Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be
has part: 79(3) Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.248

79(1) Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79-ss-1
part of: 79 Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be
note: Destruction of restricted records not likely to be required for a permitted purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.248
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of destruction of restricted records.
premise text: (a) a restricted record (whether made before or after the commencement of this section) is in the possession of an agency...
conclusion text: ...the chief officer shall cause the restricted record to be destroyed forthwith.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for destruction of records.
premise text: (b) the chief officer of the agency is satisfied that the restricted record is not likely to be required for a permitted purpose in relation to the agency;
conclusion text: ...the chief officer shall cause the restricted record to be destroyed forthwith.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Temporal trace of record destruction.
premise text: (b) the chief officer of the agency is satisfied that the restricted record is not likely to be required for a permitted purpose in relation to the agency;
conclusion text: ...the chief officer shall cause the restricted record to be destroyed forthwith.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spread of knowledge about record destruction.
premise text: (b) the chief officer of the agency is satisfied that the restricted record is not likely to be required for a permitted purpose in relation to the agency;
conclusion text: ...the chief officer shall cause the restricted record to be destroyed forthwith.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
logic summary: Artificial intelligence reasoning about record destruction.
premise text: (b) the chief officer of the agency is satisfied that the restricted record is not likely to be required for a permitted purpose in relation to the agency;
conclusion text: ...the chief officer shall cause the restricted record to be destroyed forthwith.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79(2) Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79-ss-2
part of: 79 Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be
note: Destroying restricted records without permission is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.248
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of destroying restricted records.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79(3) Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79-ss-3
part of: 79 Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be
note: Exemption from destruction of intercepted records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.248
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79(3) Destruction of restricted records that are not likely to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
logic summary: Exempts restricted records from destruction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79AA Destruction of restricted records—information obtained
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79aa
note: Prohibition on possessing restricted records without authorization.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.249
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79aa-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79aa-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits possession of restricted records.
premise text: Agency possesses restricted record.
conclusion text: Possession is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79AB Destruction of restricted records—information obtained
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79ab
note: Prohibition on destroying restricted records obtained before a community safety supervision order came into force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.249
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79ab-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79ab-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79ab-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on destroying records
premise text: Restricted record in possession of agency
conclusion text: Cannot destroy record
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79A Responsible person for a computer network must ensure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79a
has part: 79A(1) Responsible person for a computer network must ensure
has part: 79A(2) Responsible person for a computer network must ensure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.250

79A(1) Responsible person for a computer network must ensure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79a-ss-1
part of: 79A Responsible person for a computer network must ensure
note: Responsible person for a computer network must ensure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.250
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79A(1) Responsible person for a computer network must ensure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
premise text: (1) This section applies if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79A(2) Responsible person for a computer network must ensure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79a-ss-2
part of: 79A Responsible person for a computer network must ensure
note: Responsible person must ensure restricted record is destroyed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.250
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79A(2) Responsible person for a computer network must ensure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-79a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must destroy restricted record
premise text: Responsible person for a computer network
conclusion text: must cause the restricted record to be destroyed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Commonwealth agencies to keep documents connected with issue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80
note: Commonwealth agencies must keep documents connected with issue.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.252
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-80-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-80-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-80-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80 Commonwealth agencies to keep documents connected with issue
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81 Other records to be kept by Commonwealth agencies in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81
note: Commonwealth agencies must keep records of interceptions and telecommunications.
description: Particulars of each telephone application for a Part 2-5 warrant, statement as to whether the application was withdrawn or refused, particulars of each interception under the warrant, etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.252
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81 Other records to be kept by Commonwealth agencies in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81AA Organisation to record particulars in relation to eligible
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81aa
note: Organisation must exercise authority conferred by a certain entity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.254
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81aa-norm

81A General Register of Warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81a
has part: 81A(1) General Register of Warrants
has part: 81A(2) General Register of Warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.255

81A(1) General Register of Warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81a-ss-1
part of: 81A General Register of Warrants
note: The Secretary of the Department must keep a General Register of Warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.255
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81A(1) General Register of Warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to keep a General Register of Warrants
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81A(2) General Register of Warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81a-ss-2
part of: 81A General Register of Warrants
note: Record particulars of warrant issuance in the General Register.
description: Particulars of warrant issuance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.255
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81A(2) General Register of Warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to record particulars
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81B Regular submission of General Register to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81b
has part: 81B(1) Regular submission of General Register to Minister
has part: 81B(2) Regular submission of General Register to Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.256

81B(1) Regular submission of General Register to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81b-ss-1
part of: 81B Regular submission of General Register to Minister
note: The Secretary of the Department must deliver the General Register to the Minister for inspection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.256
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81B(1) Regular submission of General Register to Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81B(2) Regular submission of General Register to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81b-ss-2
part of: 81B Regular submission of General Register to Minister
note: Regular submission of General Register to Minister
description: Information recorded since the last delivery
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.256
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81B(2) Regular submission of General Register to Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to submit information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81C Special Register of Warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81c
has part: 81C(1) Special Register of Warrants
has part: 81C(2) Special Register of Warrants
has part: 81C(3) Special Register of Warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.256

81C(1) Special Register of Warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81c-ss-1
part of: 81C Special Register of Warrants
note: The Secretary of the Department must keep a Special Register of Warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.256
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81C(1) Special Register of Warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to keep the register
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81C(2) Special Register of Warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81c-ss-2
part of: 81C Special Register of Warrants
note: Record particulars in relation to each registrable expired warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.256
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81C(2) Special Register of Warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide particulars
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81C(3) Special Register of Warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81c-ss-3
part of: 81C Special Register of Warrants
note: Duty to maintain a special register of warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.256
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81C(3) Special Register of Warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to maintain a special register
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81D Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81d
has part: 81D(1) Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
has part: 81D(2) Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
has part: 81D(3) Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.259

81D(1) Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81d-ss-1
part of: 81D Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
note: Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.259
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81D(1) Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81D(2) Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81d-ss-2
part of: 81D Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
note: Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.259
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81D(2) Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81D(3) Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81d-ss-3
part of: 81D Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
note: Ensure timely delivery of Special Register with General Register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.259
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81D(3) Regular submission of Special Register to Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to ensure timely delivery
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81E Provision of information by eligible authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81e
note: Eligible authorities must provide information when applicable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.259
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81e-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81e-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81E Provision of information by eligible authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-81e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83 Inspections
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83
note: Inspections of Commonwealth agencies, except ACC, are undertaken by the Ombudsman.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.260
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-83-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-83-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to inspect records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 July 1988;
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
has part: 1(2) July 1988;
has part: 1(3) July 1988;
has part: 1(4) July 1988;
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.260

1(2) July 1988;
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2-ss-2
part of: 1 July 1988;
note: The Ombudsman may inspect agency records to ensure compliance with specified sections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.260
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1(2) July 1988;
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship.
conclusion text: Any period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1(3) July 1988;
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2-ss-3
part of: 1 July 1988;
note: The Ombudsman may inspect records to ensure compliance with conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.260
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1(3) July 1988;
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: The Ombudsman has an obligation to ensure compliance.
premise text: The chief officer notifies the Ombudsman of a contravention.
conclusion text: The Ombudsman may inspect records.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The inspection occurs during a specific period.
premise text: The contravention occurred in that period.
conclusion text: The Ombudsman's inspection occurs during that period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
logic summary: The chief officer has permission to notify the Ombudsman.
premise text: The chief officer notifies the Ombudsman under subsection 59B(2).
conclusion text: The chief officer has permission to notify the Ombudsman.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: The agency has an obligation to comply with conditions.
premise text: The conditions mentioned in subsection 59B(2) are about Part 5.3 warrants.
conclusion text: The agency has an obligation to comply with conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: The Ombudsman has an obligation to ensure compliance.
premise text: The chief officer notifies the Ombudsman of a contravention.
conclusion text: The Ombudsman has an obligation to ensure compliance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1(4) July 1988;
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2-ss-4
part of: 1 July 1988;
note: Inspect records to ensure compliance with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.260
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1(4) July 1988;
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Ensure compliance with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
premise text: (4) If: ...
conclusion text: ... Ombudsman may inspect records.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establish temporal relation between agency's actions and Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
premise text: (b) a Commonwealth agency has records that relate to the performance of that function or the exercise of that power;
conclusion text: ... in order to ascertain the extent to which the agency’s officers have complied with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establish recurring trace between agency's actions and compliance with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
premise text: (b) a Commonwealth agency has records that relate to the performance of that function or the exercise of that power;
conclusion text: ... in order to ascertain the extent to which the agency’s officers have complied with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffuse information about agency's compliance with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
premise text: (b) a Commonwealth agency has records that relate to the performance of that function or the exercise of that power;
conclusion text: ... in order to ascertain the extent to which the agency’s officers have complied with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-1-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph
logic summary: Construct knowledge graph about agency's compliance with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
premise text: (b) a Commonwealth agency has records that relate to the performance of that function or the exercise of that power;
conclusion text: ... in order to ascertain the extent to which the agency’s officers have complied with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 Reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-84
has part: 84(1) Reports
has part: 84(1A) Reports
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.261

84(1) Reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-84-ss-1
part of: 84 Reports
note: The Ombudsman must report to the Minister within 3 months after each financial year.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.261
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-84-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-84-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 84(1) Reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84(1A) Reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-84-ss-1a
part of: 84 Reports
note: The Ombudsman must include specific information in each report.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.261
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-84-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-84-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-84-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 84(1A) Reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-84-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide specific information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85 Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85
has part: 85(1) Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
has part: 85(2) Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
has part: 85(3) Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.262

85(1) Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85-ss-1
part of: 85 Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
note: Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.262
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(1) Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May report on contravention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85(2) Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85-ss-2
part of: 85 Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
note: Contravention of a condition or restriction is also a contravention of the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.262
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(2) Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of obligation
conclusion text: X is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85(3) Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85-ss-3
part of: 85 Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for certain sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.262
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-3-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(3) Ombudsman may report on other breaches of this Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

85A Annual report may cover notified breaches in relation to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85a
note: Annual report may cover notified breaches in relation to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.262
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85a-norm

85B Annual report may cover notified breaches in relation to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85b
note: Annual report must cover notified breaches.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.263
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85B Annual report may cover notified breaches in relation to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-85b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 Ombudsman’s general powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86
note: Ombudsman's general powers for inspection of agency records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.263
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-86-norm

87 Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87
has part: 87(1) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 87(2) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 87(3) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 87(4) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 87(5) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 87(6) Power to obtain relevant information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.264

87(1) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-1
part of: 87 Power to obtain relevant information
note: The Ombudsman can compel an officer to provide relevant information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.264
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87(1) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87(2) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-2
part of: 87 Power to obtain relevant information
note: The Ombudsman may require an officer to provide information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.264
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87(2) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
premise text: The Ombudsman may require an officer to provide information.
conclusion text: The officer must provide the information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87(3) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-3
part of: 87 Power to obtain relevant information
note: The Ombudsman may require an officer to attend for inspection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.264
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87(3) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: The Ombudsman may require an officer to attend.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87(4) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-4
part of: 87 Power to obtain relevant information
note: The Ombudsman may require the chief officer to attend an inspection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.264
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87(4) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87(5) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-5
part of: 87 Power to obtain relevant information
note: The requirement must be reasonable having regard to the circumstances in which it is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.264
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87(5) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The requirement must be reasonable.
premise text: The place and period specified in a requirement under this section shall be reasonable.
conclusion text: The requirement is reasonable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The time and day specified in a requirement under this section overlap with the circumstances.
premise text: The period or time and day specified in a requirement under this section are reasonable having regard to the circumstances in which the requirement is made.
conclusion text: The time and day specified in a requirement under this section overlap with the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The period or time and day specified in a requirement under this section until the circumstances.
premise text: The place, and the period or the time and day, specified in a requirement under this section shall be reasonable having regard to the circumstances in which the requirement is made.
conclusion text: The period or time and day specified in a requirement under this section until the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The information about the requirements diffuses to the circumstances.
premise text: The place, and the period or the time and day, specified in a requirement under this section shall be reasonable having regard to the circumstances in which the requirement is made.
conclusion text: The information about the requirements diffuses to the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: The AI system infers the requirements from the circumstances.
premise text: The place, and the period or the time and day, specified in a requirement under this section shall be reasonable having regard to the circumstances in which the requirement is made.
conclusion text: The AI system infers the requirements from the circumstances.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87(6) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-6
part of: 87 Power to obtain relevant information
note: Must attend, give information, and answer questions when required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.264
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87(6) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-87-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must attend, give information, and answer questions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88 Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88
has part: 88(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
has part: 88(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
has part: 88(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.266

88(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88-ss-1
part of: 88 Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
note: Must provide information and access to documents upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.266
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information and access.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88-ss-2
part of: 88 Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
note: An officer of an agency must provide information to an inspecting officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.266
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88-ss-3
part of: 88 Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
note: An officer of an agency must make a record of information for the purposes of giving it to a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.266
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access notwithstanding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89 Dealing with information for the purposes of inspection and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89
note: Inspecting officer may communicate information to another inspecting officer for inspection purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.267
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-89-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-89-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-89-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 89 Dealing with information for the purposes of inspection and
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-89-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90 Ombudsman not to be sued
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90
note: No liability for acts done in good faith
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.267
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-90-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-90-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-90-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 90 Ombudsman not to be sued
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If an act is done in good faith, then no liability
premise text: Act done in good faith
conclusion text: No liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91 Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91
has part: 91(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
has part: 91(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.267

91(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91-ss-1
part of: 91 Delegation by Ombudsman
note: The Ombudsman may delegate powers to another inspecting officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.267
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-91-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-91-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to delegate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91-ss-2
part of: 91 Delegation by Ombudsman
note: Delegation of power by Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.267
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-91-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-91-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

92 Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92
has part: 92(1) Application of Ombudsman Act
has part: 92(2) Application of Ombudsman Act
has part: 92(3) Application of Ombudsman Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268

92(1) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92-ss-1
part of: 92 Application of Ombudsman Act
note: Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Section 11A is excluded from the Ombudsman's powers and functions.
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976
conclusion text: Section 11A does not apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: Section 11A does not apply during the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Part.
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976
conclusion text: Section 11A is excluded from the Ombudsman's powers and functions during certain periods.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: Section 11A does not apply during the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Part.
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976
conclusion text: Section 11A is excluded from the Ombudsman's powers and functions during certain periods.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: The Ombudsman may exercise or perform a power or function despite Section 11A.
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976
conclusion text: Section 11A does not prohibit the Ombudsman from exercising or performing a power or function.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Ombudsman is obligated to exercise or perform a power or function despite Section 11A.
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976
conclusion text: Section 11A does not relieve the Ombudsman of its obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

92(2) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92-ss-2
part of: 92 Application of Ombudsman Act
note: Exclusion of inspecting officer's actions from Ombudsman Act reference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92(2) Application of Ombudsman Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclude
logic summary: Excluding inspecting officer's actions from Ombudsman Act reference
premise text: (2) A reference in section 19 of the Ombudsman Act 1976 to the Ombudsman’s operations does not include a reference to anything that an inspecting officer has done or omitted to do under this Part.
conclusion text: An inspection officer's actions are excluded from the Ombudsman Act reference
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Justify
logic summary: Justification of exclusion as an obligation
premise text: (2) A reference in section 19 of the Ombudsman Act 1976 to the Ombudsman’s operations does not include a reference to anything that an inspecting officer has done or omitted to do under this Part.
conclusion text: The exclusion is justified as an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implication of exclusion on Ombudsman Act reference
premise text: (2) A reference in section 19 of the Ombudsman Act 1976 to the Ombudsman’s operations does not include a reference to anything that an inspecting officer has done or omitted to do under this Part.
conclusion text: The exclusion implies that the Ombudsman Act reference does not include the inspection officer's actions
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Justify
logic summary: Justification of exclusion as a prohibition
premise text: (2) A reference in section 19 of the Ombudsman Act 1976 to the Ombudsman’s operations does not include a reference to anything that an inspecting officer has done or omitted to do under this Part.
conclusion text: The exclusion is justified as a prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92(3) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92-ss-3
part of: 92 Application of Ombudsman Act
note: Application of Ombudsman Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92(3) Application of Ombudsman Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Ombudsman Act applies to this Part
premise text: (3) Subject to section 88 of this Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92A Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92a
has part: 92A(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
has part: 92A(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
has part: 92A(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
has part: 92A(4) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
has part: 92A(5) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268

92A(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92a-ss-1
part of: 92A Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
note: Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State inspecting authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State agency must exchange information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class
logic summary: Classification of State agencies and inspecting authorities
premise text: State agency means an eligible authority of a State that is an agency.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92A(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92a-ss-2
part of: 92A Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
note: The Ombudsman must provide information to the State inspecting authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92A(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92A(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92a-ss-3
part of: 92A Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
note: Ombudsman must provide information to authority under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
premise text: The Ombudsman may only give information...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92A(4) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92a-ss-4
part of: 92A Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
note: Exchange of information between IGIS and State inspecting authorities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-4-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92A(4) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

92A(5) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92a-ss-5
part of: 92A Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
note: Must provide information about a State agency obtained under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.268
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-5-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: under
logic summary: Under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986
premise text: (5) The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security may give information that: (a) relates to a State agency; and (b) was obtained by an IGIS official under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: under
logic summary: Under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986
premise text: (5) The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security may give information that: (a) relates to a State agency; and (b) was obtained by an IGIS official under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-92a-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information about a State agency
premise text: (5) The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security may give information that: (a) relates to a State agency; and (b) was obtained by an IGIS official under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93 Annual reports to Minister about interceptions under Part 2-3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93
note: Annual report on interceptions by employees
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.271
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-93-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-93-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-93-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-93-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-93-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for report submission
premise text: 30 June
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94 Annual reports regarding applications and warrants under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94
note: Annual reports regarding applications and warrants under
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.271
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94-norm

94A Reports regarding emergency interception action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94a
has part: 94A(1) Reports regarding emergency interception action
has part: 94A(2) Reports regarding emergency interception action
has part: 94A(3) Reports regarding emergency interception action
has part: 94A(4) Reports regarding emergency interception action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.272

94A(1) Reports regarding emergency interception action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94a-ss-1
part of: 94A Reports regarding emergency interception action
note: Chief officer must provide written report to Minister regarding emergency interception actions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.272
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 94A(1) Reports regarding emergency interception action
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94A(2) Reports regarding emergency interception action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94a-ss-2
part of: 94A Reports regarding emergency interception action
note: Report must be given within 3 months after specified events.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.272
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94A(3) Reports regarding emergency interception action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94a-ss-3
part of: 94A Reports regarding emergency interception action
note: Report requirements for emergency interception action
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.272
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 94A(3) Reports regarding emergency interception action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94A(4) Reports regarding emergency interception action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94a-ss-4
part of: 94A Reports regarding emergency interception action
note: Defines emergency interception action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.272
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-4-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 94A(4) Reports regarding emergency interception action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

94B Reports regarding named person warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94b
has part: 94B(1) Reports regarding named person warrants
has part: 94B(2) Reports regarding named person warrants
has part: 94B(3) Reports regarding named person warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.273

94B(1) Reports regarding named person warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94b-ss-1
part of: 94B Reports regarding named person warrants
note: Agency must report to Minister on action taken under warrant.
description: Written report
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.273
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 94B(1) Reports regarding named person warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must take action
conclusion text: Report to Minister
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94B(2) Reports regarding named person warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94b-ss-2
part of: 94B Reports regarding named person warrants
note: Chief officer must give a report within 3 months after warrant ceases to be in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.273
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 94B(2) Reports regarding named person warrants
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94B(3) Reports regarding named person warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94b-ss-3
part of: 94B Reports regarding named person warrants
note: Must provide information about intercepted communication
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.273
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 94B(3) Reports regarding named person warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-94b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95 Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95
has part: 95(1) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
has part: 95(2) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.274

95(1) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95-ss-1
part of: 95 Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
note: Minister may request specified information from Commonwealth agencies or authorities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.274
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-95-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-95-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-95-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to request specified information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

95(2) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95-ss-2
part of: 95 Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
note: Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.274
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-95-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-95-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-95-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95(2) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-95-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May comply with request
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96 Annual reports by State authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96
has part: 96(1) Annual reports by State authorities
has part: 96(1A) Annual reports by State authorities
has part: 96(2) Annual reports by State authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.274

96(1) Annual reports by State authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96-ss-1
part of: 96 Annual reports by State authorities
note: Annual reports by State authorities must be provided to the Minister within 3 months after each June 30th.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.274
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96(1) Annual reports by State authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual reports
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96(1A) Annual reports by State authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96-ss-1a
part of: 96 Annual reports by State authorities
note: Annual report must include statement of total expenditure incurred by eligible authority
description: Total expenditure (including capital nature) incurred during the year
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.274
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96(2) Annual reports by State authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96-ss-2
part of: 96 Annual reports by State authorities
note: Chief officer need not give report to Minister if Minister has received written report from Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.274
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96(2) Annual reports by State authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-96-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from reporting duty
premise text: Minister has received written report
conclusion text: Chief officer need not give report to Minister
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

97 Reports by Managing Directors about acts done in connection
type: Concept
realized by: sec-97
note: Report on acts done in connection with warrant
description: within 3 months after warrant ceases to be in force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.275
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-97-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-97-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-97-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 97 Reports by Managing Directors about acts done in connection
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-97-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99 Annual report by Minister about warrants under Part 2-5
type: Concept
realized by: sec-99
note: Annual report by Minister about warrants under Part 2-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.276
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-99-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-99-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-99-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100 Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100
note: Report on applications and warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.276
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-100-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-100-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-100-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100 Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-100-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101 Report to contain particulars about duration of warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-101
note: Report must contain particulars about duration of warrants
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.279
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-101-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-101-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-101-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 101 Report to contain particulars about duration of warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-101-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102 Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-102
has part: 102(1) Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants
has part: 102(2) Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.281

102(1) Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-102-ss-1
part of: 102 Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants
note: Report on arrests and prosecutions must be provided by Commonwealth agencies and authorities.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.281
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(1) Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(2) Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-102-ss-2
part of: 102 Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants
note: Report must contain information about effectiveness of warrants
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.281
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(2) Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102A Report regarding interceptions without warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-102a
note: Agency must report interceptions without warrant.
description: Number of occasions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.284
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102A Report regarding interceptions without warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102B Report regarding international requests
type: Concept
realized by: sec-102b
note: Report must provide information on intercepted communications with foreign countries and international courts.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.284
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102B Report regarding international requests
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-102b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103 Other information to be included in report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103
note: Must provide total warrant expenditure, number of warrants, and information about judges and interceptions.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.284
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide required information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
logic summary: Classifies as a report requirement.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103B Deferral of inclusion of information in report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103b
has part: 103B(1) Deferral of inclusion of information in report
has part: 103B(2) Deferral of inclusion of information in report
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.286

103B(1) Deferral of inclusion of information in report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103b-ss-1
part of: 103B Deferral of inclusion of information in report
note: The Minister must include certain information in the next report.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.286
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 103B(1) Deferral of inclusion of information in report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must include certain information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103B(2) Deferral of inclusion of information in report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103b-ss-2
part of: 103B Deferral of inclusion of information in report
note: Chief officer must be satisfied that information is Part 5.3 information or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.286
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103b-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-103b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 103B(2) Deferral of inclusion of information in report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

104 Annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-104
has part: 104(1) Annual reports
has part: 104(2) Annual reports
has part: 104(3) Annual reports
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.289

104(1) Annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-104-ss-1
part of: 104 Annual reports
note: Minister must lay a report before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.289
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has a duty to lay the report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104(2) Annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-104-ss-2
part of: 104 Annual reports
note: Annual reports must not enable identification of a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.289
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 104(2) Annual reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits reporting that enables identification of a person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104(3) Annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-104-ss-3
part of: 104 Annual reports
note: Deems a report as a periodic report that must be furnished to the Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.289
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104(3) Annual reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the person to furnish the report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105 Contravention of section 7 or 63
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105
has part: 105(1) Contravention of section 7 or 63
has part: 105(2) Contravention of section 7 or 63
has part: 105(3) Contravention of section 7 or 63
has part: 105(4) Contravention of section 7 or 63
has part: 105(5) Contravention of section 7 or 63
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.290

105(1) Contravention of section 7 or 63
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105-ss-1
part of: 105 Contravention of section 7 or 63
note: Guilty of an offence against subsection or section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.290
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 105(1) Contravention of section 7 or 63
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: guilty of an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105(2) Contravention of section 7 or 63
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105-ss-2
part of: 105 Contravention of section 7 or 63
note: Offence against subsection 7(1) or section 63 is punishable on conviction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.290
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 105(2) Contravention of section 7 or 63
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

105(3) Contravention of section 7 or 63
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105-ss-3
part of: 105 Contravention of section 7 or 63
note: Court may hear and determine proceedings in respect of an indictable offence under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.290
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Court has permission to hear proceedings
premise text: Proceedings brought in name of Attorney-General or Director of Public Prosecutions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

105(4) Contravention of section 7 or 63
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105-ss-4
part of: 105 Contravention of section 7 or 63
note: Imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months is prohibited for certain convictions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.290
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 105(4) Contravention of section 7 or 63
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months.
premise text: (4) Where, in accordance with subsection (3), a court of summary jurisdiction convicts a person of an offence against subsection 7(1) or section 63, the penalty that the court may impose is imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months.
conclusion text: Imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: The penalty overlaps with imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months.
premise text: (4) Where, in accordance with subsection (3), a court of summary jurisdiction convicts a person of an offence against subsection 7(1) or section 63, the penalty that the court may impose is imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months.
conclusion text: Imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: The penalty is recurring in the sense that it can be imposed multiple times.
premise text: (4) Where, in accordance with subsection (3), a court of summary jurisdiction convicts a person of an offence against subsection 7(1) or section 63, the penalty that the court may impose is imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months.
conclusion text: The penalty can be imposed multiple times
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: The penalty diffuses to other related penalties.
premise text: (4) Where, in accordance with subsection (3), a court of summary jurisdiction convicts a person of an offence against subsection 7(1) or section 63, the penalty that the court may impose is imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months.
conclusion text: The penalty diffuses to other related penalties
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies the penalty as a type of punishment.
premise text: (4) Where, in accordance with subsection (3), a court of summary jurisdiction convicts a person of an offence against subsection 7(1) or section 63, the penalty that the court may impose is imprisonment for a period not exceeding 6 months.
conclusion text: The penalty is a type of punishment
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105(5) Contravention of section 7 or 63
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105-ss-5
part of: 105 Contravention of section 7 or 63
note: Imposes obligation on the state to apply a specific provision of the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.290
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 105(5) Contravention of section 7 or 63
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-105-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: States an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106 Obstruction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106
has part: 106(1) Obstruction
has part: 106(2) Obstruction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.290

106(1) Obstruction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106-ss-1
part of: 106 Obstruction
note: No person shall obstruct or hinder a person acting under a warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.290
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 106(1) Obstruction
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of obstruction
premise text: (1) A person shall not obstruct or hinder a person acting under a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106(2) Obstruction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106-ss-2
part of: 106 Obstruction
note: A reasonable excuse is a valid reason for obstructing or hindering.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.290
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106(2) Obstruction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide a reasonable excuse.
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if the person obstructing or hindering has a reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: The defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State obligation to provide a reasonable excuse.
premise text: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (2).
conclusion text: The state must provide evidence of a reasonable excuse.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Definition of a temporal interval for a reasonable excuse.
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if the person obstructing or hindering has a reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: The definition is based on the concept of a reasonable excuse.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for a reasonable excuse.
premise text: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (2).
conclusion text: The recurring trace is based on the concept of a reasonable excuse.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-106-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about reasonable excuses.
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if the person obstructing or hindering has a reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: The diffusion is based on the concept of a reasonable excuse.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

107 Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107
has part: 107(1) Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
has part: 107(2) Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
has part: 107(3) Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.291

107(1) Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107-ss-1
part of: 107 Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
note: Refusal or failure to attend, furnish information, or answer questions when required under section 87.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.291
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 107(1) Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal or failure to attend, furnish information, or answer questions.
premise text: Section 87 requires attendance, furnishing of information, and answering of questions.
conclusion text: Refusal or failure is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to attend, furnish information, and answer questions when required under section 87.
premise text: Section 87 requires attendance, furnishing of information, and answering of questions.
conclusion text: The person shall attend, furnish information, and answer questions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between refusal or failure and section 87 requirements.
premise text: Section 87 requires attendance, furnishing of information, and answering of questions at some point.
conclusion text: Refusal or failure overlaps with the requirements of section 87.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Repeating pattern of refusal or failure in relation to section 87 requirements.
premise text: Section 87 requires attendance, furnishing of information, and answering of questions at some point.
conclusion text: Refusal or failure repeats in relation to the requirements of section 87.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal or failure to comply with section 87 requirements.
premise text: Section 87 requires attendance, furnishing of information, and answering of questions.
conclusion text: Compliance is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107(2) Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107-ss-2
part of: 107 Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
note: Prohibition on obstructing or providing false information during inspections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.291
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 107(2) Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on obstructing or providing false information.
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107(3) Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107-ss-3
part of: 107 Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to reasonable excuse.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.291
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107(3) Offences relating to inspections under Part 2-7
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden.
premise text: Subsection (3) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: Defendant must provide evidence of reasonable excuse.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Defendant believes they have a reasonable excuse.
premise text: Subsection (3) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: Defendant's belief is relevant to the matter in subsection (3).
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defendant's actions are part of a recurring pattern.
premise text: Subsection (3) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: Defendant's actions are relevant to the matter in subsection (3).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Inference
logic summary: Defendant's actions are inferred from their belief.
premise text: Subsection (3) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: Defendant's actions are relevant to the matter in subsection (3).
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defendant's actions occur within a specific time frame.
premise text: Subsection (3) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: Defendant's actions are relevant to the matter in subsection (3).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107A Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107a
has part: 107A(1) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
has part: 107A(2) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
has part: 107A(3) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
has part: 107A(4) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
has part: 107A(5) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
has part: 107A(6) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.292

107A(1) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107a-ss-1
part of: 107A Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
note: Prohibition on unlawful interception or communication
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.292
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 107A(1) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits interception of communications
premise text: Subsection 7(1)
conclusion text: No interception allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107A(2) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107a-ss-2
part of: 107A Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
note: Definition of aggrieved person for civil remedies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.292
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107A(2) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

107A(3) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107a-ss-3
part of: 107A Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
note: Grant remedial relief in respect of interception
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.292
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107A(3) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to grant remedial relief
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107A(4) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107a-ss-4
part of: 107A Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
note: Remedial relief for unlawful interception or communication
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.292
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107A(4) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to grant remedial relief
premise text: Section 63
conclusion text: Remedial relief
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107A(5) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107a-ss-5
part of: 107A Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
note: Court may grant remedial relief to aggrieved person if convicted of offence against subsection 7(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.292
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107A(5) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Granting obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107A(6) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107a-ss-6
part of: 107A Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
note: Court may grant remedial relief to aggrieved person if defendant is convicted of an offence against section 63
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.292
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107A(6) Civil remedies—unlawful interception or communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Granting remedial relief is an obligation on the court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107B Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107b
has part: 107B(1) Limitation periods etc.
has part: 107B(2) Limitation periods etc.
has part: 107B(3) Limitation periods etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.295

107B(1) Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107b-ss-1
part of: 107B Limitation periods etc.
note: Application for remedial relief must be made within 6 years after the end of interception.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.295
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107B(1) Limitation periods etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made within 6 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107B(2) Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107b-ss-2
part of: 107B Limitation periods etc.
note: Application for remedial relief must be made within 6 years after communication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.295
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107B(2) Limitation periods etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made within 6 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107B(3) Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107b-ss-3
part of: 107B Limitation periods etc.
note: Must be made as soon as practicable after conviction concerned.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.295
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107B(3) Limitation periods etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make application as soon as practicable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval of application must be contained within the temporal interval of conviction concerned.
premise text: Application made as soon as practicable after conviction concerned.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107C No limitation on other liability
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107c
note: No limitation on liability under other provisions of this Act or laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.295
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: No limitation implies no liability under other provisions
premise text: This Part does not limit any liability
conclusion text: Therefore, no limitation implies no liability under other provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107D Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107d
note: No exclusion or limitation of State/Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.296
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107d-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: No exclusion or limitation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107E State or Territory courts—jurisdictional limits
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107e
note: No remedial relief beyond what the State/Territory law allows
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.296
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107e-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107e-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: No remedial relief beyond what the State/Territory law allows
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107F Extended meaning of conviction—orders under section 19B of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107f
note: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.296
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-logic-ltl-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107F Extended meaning of conviction—orders under section 19B of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
conclusion text: The making of an order under section 19B is included in the reference.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
conclusion text: The making of an order under section 19B is included in the reference.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
conclusion text: The making of an order under section 19B is included in the reference.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107f-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
conclusion text: The making of an order under section 19B is included in the reference.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107G Outline of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107g
note: Carrier must preserve stored communications upon receipt of preservation notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.297
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107g-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107g-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107g-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107G Outline of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier has a duty to preserve communications.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107H Domestic preservation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107h
has part: 107H(1) Domestic preservation notices
has part: 107H(2) Domestic preservation notices
has part: 107H(3) Domestic preservation notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.299

107H(1) Domestic preservation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107h-ss-1
part of: 107H Domestic preservation notices
note: Carrier must preserve stored communications upon receipt of a domestic preservation notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.299
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107H(1) Domestic preservation notices
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must preserve stored communications.
premise text: The carrier receives a domestic preservation notice.
conclusion text: The carrier must preserve the stored communications.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107H(2) Domestic preservation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107h-ss-2
part of: 107H Domestic preservation notices
note: Agency must give notice only if conditions are satisfied.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.299
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107H(2) Domestic preservation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Agency can give notice.
conclusion text: Only if conditions are satisfied.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107H(3) Domestic preservation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107h-ss-3
part of: 107H Domestic preservation notices
note: Agency can only specify one or more telecommunications services in a notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.299
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-3-logic-deontic-3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
premise text: (3) In the notice, the agency can only specify: (a) one person; or (b) one or more telecommunications services; or (c) one person and one or more telecommunications services.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
premise text: (3) In the notice, the agency can only specify: (a) one person; or (b) one or more telecommunications services; or (c) one person and one or more telecommunications services.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107h-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Agency's specification is restricted
premise text: (3) In the notice, the agency can only specify: (a) one person; or (b) one or more telecommunications services; or (c) one person and one or more telecommunications services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107J Conditions for giving domestic preservation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107j
note: Conditions for giving domestic preservation notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.299
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107j-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107j-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107J Conditions for giving domestic preservation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

107K When a domestic preservation notice is in force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107k
note: A domestic preservation notice ceases to be in force after 90 days or upon revocation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.301
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-logic-diffusion-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107K When a domestic preservation notice is in force
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Ceases to be in force
premise text: The notice is in force until the end of the period.
conclusion text: The notice ceases to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During a period of 90 days
premise text: The notice is in force during a period of 90 days.
conclusion text: The notice ceases to be in force at the end of the period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Until the revocation or warrant expiration
premise text: The notice is in force until the revocation or warrant expiration.
conclusion text: The notice ceases to be in force at the earliest of the specified times.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107k-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses information about its duration
premise text: The notice diffuses information about its duration.
conclusion text: The notice's duration is publicly known.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107L Revoking a domestic preservation notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107l
note: Issuing agency may revoke domestic preservation notice at any time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.301
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107l-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107l-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107l-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107L Revoking a domestic preservation notice
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to revoke
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107M Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107m
has part: 107M(1) Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
has part: 107M(2) Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
has part: 107M(3) Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.302

107M(1) Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107m-ss-1
part of: 107M Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
note: Only issuing agency's authorized representative can give or revoke historic domestic preservation notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.302
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107M(1) Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Authorization requirement
premise text: Only authorized representative can act on behalf of issuing agency.
conclusion text: Only authorized representative can give or revoke historic domestic preservation notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Authorization requirement for criminal law-enforcement agencies
premise text: Only authorized representative can act on behalf of criminal law-enforcement agency.
conclusion text: Only authorized representative can give or revoke historic domestic preservation notice if issuing agency is a criminal law-enforcement agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Authorization requirement for Organisation
premise text: Only authorized representative can act on behalf of Organisation.
conclusion text: Only authorized representative can give or revoke historic domestic preservation notice if issuing agency is the Organisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for authorization
premise text: Authorization must be given before historic domestic preservation notice can be issued.
conclusion text: Authorization must be given before historic domestic preservation notice can be issued.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107M(2) Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107m-ss-2
part of: 107M Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
note: Only authorized officers can act on behalf of the issuing agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.302
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 107M(2) Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Authorized officers only
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107M(3) Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107m-ss-3
part of: 107M Persons who act on the issuing agency’s behalf
note: Revocation of domestic preservation notice requires specific agency authorization.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.302
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits revocation without proper authorization.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of revocation authorization.
premise text: (3) An ongoing domestic preservation notice may only be revoked on behalf of an issuing agency by: (a) if the issuing agency is a criminal law-enforcement agency that is an interception agency—an authorised officer of the agency; and (b) if the issuing agency is the Organisation—a certifying person. Chapter 3 Preserving and accessing stored communications
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between revocation authorization.
premise text: (3) An ongoing domestic preservation notice may only be revoked on behalf of an issuing agency by: (a) if the issuing agency is a criminal law-enforcement agency that is an interception agency—an authorised officer of the agency; and (b) if the issuing agency is the Organisation—a certifying person. Chapter 3 Preserving and accessing stored communications
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Spread
logic summary: Describes how revocation authorization spreads through the system.
premise text: (3) An ongoing domestic preservation notice may only be revoked on behalf of an issuing agency by: (a) if the issuing agency is a criminal law-enforcement agency that is an interception agency—an authorised officer of the agency; and (b) if the issuing agency is the Organisation—a certifying person. Chapter 3 Preserving and accessing stored communications
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107m-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Represents knowledge about revocation authorization.
premise text: (3) An ongoing domestic preservation notice may only be revoked on behalf of an issuing agency by: (a) if the issuing agency is a criminal law-enforcement agency that is an interception agency—an authorised officer of the agency; and (b) if the issuing agency is the Organisation—a certifying person. Chapter 3 Preserving and accessing stored communications
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107N When a foreign preservation notice can be given
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107n
has part: 107N(1) When a foreign preservation notice can be given
has part: 107N(2) When a foreign preservation notice can be given
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.304

107N(1) When a foreign preservation notice can be given
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107n-ss-1
part of: 107N When a foreign preservation notice can be given
note: Carrier must preserve stored communications upon receipt of foreign preservation notice.
description: Written notice (foreign preservation notice)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.304
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107n-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must preserve stored communications.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107N(2) When a foreign preservation notice can be given
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107n-ss-2
part of: 107N When a foreign preservation notice can be given
note: Specify one or more telecommunications services in a foreign preservation notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.304
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107n-ss-2-norm

107P Condition for giving a foreign preservation notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107p
has part: 107P(1) Condition for giving a foreign preservation notice
has part: 107P(2) Condition for giving a foreign preservation notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.304

107P(1) Condition for giving a foreign preservation notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107p-ss-1
part of: 107P Condition for giving a foreign preservation notice
note: Request for preservation of stored communications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.304
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107p-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must preserve stored communications
premise text: (1) An entity...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

107P(2) Condition for giving a foreign preservation notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107p-ss-2
part of: 107P Condition for giving a foreign preservation notice
note: Request for preservation notice must be in writing and specify certain information.
description: a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.304
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107p-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107P(2) Condition for giving a foreign preservation notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Entity must provide certain information in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107Q When a foreign preservation notice is in force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107q
note: Ceases when Chapter 3 is accessed or preserved
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.305
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107q-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107q-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Preservation and access
conclusion text: Chapter 3
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107R Revoking a foreign preservation notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107r
has part: 107R(1) Revoking a foreign preservation notice
has part: 107R(2) Revoking a foreign preservation notice
has part: 107R(3) Revoking a foreign preservation notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.306

107R(1) Revoking a foreign preservation notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107r-ss-1
part of: 107R Revoking a foreign preservation notice
note: Revocation of foreign preservation notice after 180 days without access request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.306
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Entity must revoke preservation notice after 180 days without access request
premise text: (a) an entity requests under section 107P the Australian Federal Police to arrange for the preservation of stored communications that are held by a carrier; and (b) in response to the request, the Australian Federal Police gives a foreign preservation notice to the carrier in relation to those stored communications under subsection 107N(1); and (c) during the period of 180 days starting on the day the carrier was given the notice, the entity did not make an access request to the Attorney-General to arrange for access to those communications;
conclusion text: then the Australian Federal Police must, by the third working day after the end of that period, revoke the preservation notice by giving the carrier to whom it was given written notice of the revocation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107R(2) Revoking a foreign preservation notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107r-ss-2
part of: 107R Revoking a foreign preservation notice
note: Must revoke foreign preservation notice within 3 working days after refusal of access request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.306
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must revoke foreign preservation notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107R(3) Revoking a foreign preservation notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107r-ss-3
part of: 107R Revoking a foreign preservation notice
note: Entity must revoke request for preservation notice revocation within three working days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.306
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Entity must revoke request
premise text: Entity requests preservation notice revocation
conclusion text: Australian Federal Police must revoke notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107r-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Until
logic summary: Revocation within three working days
premise text: Withdrawal notification given to Australian Federal Police
conclusion text: Revocation occurs on third working day
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107S Persons who act on the AFP’s behalf
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107s
note: Must provide foreign preservation notice on behalf of AFP
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.307
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107s-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107s-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107s-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107T Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107t
has part: 107T(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
has part: 107T(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
has part: 107T(3) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.308

107T(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107t-ss-1
part of: 107T Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
note: Authorized personnel may issue written certificates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.308
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 107T(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to issue certificates
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107T(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107t-ss-2
part of: 107T Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
note: Exempt proceeding evidence of document purporting to be a certificate issued under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.308
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107T(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to receive document in evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107T(3) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107t-ss-3
part of: 107T Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
note: Determination of corporate subsidiary relationship
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.308
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107T(3) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
logic summary: Determines the question whether a body corporate is a subsidiary of another body corporate
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, the question...
conclusion text: is to be determined in the same manner as...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

107U Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by issuing agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107u
has part: 107U(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by issuing agencies
has part: 107U(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by issuing agencies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.308

107U(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by issuing agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107u-ss-1
part of: 107U Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by issuing agencies
note: Issuing a written certificate by a certifying official of an issuing agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.308
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107u-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107u-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107U(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by issuing agencies
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: issue
logic summary: Issuing a written certificate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107U(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by issuing agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107u-ss-2
part of: 107U Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by issuing agencies
note: Exempt proceeding evidence of certificate matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.308
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107u-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107u-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107U(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by issuing agencies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107V Certified copies of preservation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107v
note: Exempt proceedings must receive certified copies of preservation notices as evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.309
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107v-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107v-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107v-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Exempt proceedings must receive certified copies of preservation notices.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107W How notices are to be given to carriers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107w
note: Notice must be given to an authorized representative of the carrier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.309
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107w-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107w-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107w-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 107W How notices are to be given to carriers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-107w-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits giving notices to carriers without authorization.
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108 Stored communications not to be accessed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-108
has part: 108(1) Stored communications not to be accessed
has part: 108(1A) Stored communications not to be accessed
has part: 108(2) Stored communications not to be accessed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.310

108(1) Stored communications not to be accessed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-108-ss-1
part of: 108 Stored communications not to be accessed
note: Accessing stored communications without knowledge of sender and recipient is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.310
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits accessing stored communications without knowledge of sender and recipient.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and (b) the person does so with the knowledge of neither of the following: (i) the intended recipient of the stored communication; (ii) the person who sent the stored communication.
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibits
logic summary: Prohibits accessing stored communications without knowledge of sender and recipient.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Accessing stored communications during knowledge of neither sender nor recipient.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Accessing stored communications until knowledge of neither sender nor recipient.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses knowledge of neither sender nor recipient.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person: (i) accesses a stored communication; or (ii) authorises, suffers or permits another person to access a stored communication; or (iii) does any act or thing that will enable the person or another person to access a stored communication; and
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108(1A) Stored communications not to be accessed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-108-ss-1a
part of: 108 Stored communications not to be accessed
note: Prohibition on accessing stored communications without notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.310
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits access to stored communications
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108(2) Stored communications not to be accessed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-108-ss-2
part of: 108 Stored communications not to be accessed
note: Exemptions from prohibition on accessing stored communications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.310
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-108-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negative of the general prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

109 Access to stored communications under Part 2-2 warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-109
note: Authorises interception of communications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.314
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-109-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-109-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-109-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 109 Access to stored communications under Part 2-2 warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-109-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Imposes duty on the state to authorise interception
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110 Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110
has part: 110(1) Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
has part: 110(2) Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
has part: 110(3) Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
has part: 110(4) Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.315

110(1) Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-1
part of: 110 Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
note: Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored communications warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.315
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(1) Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Agency may apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110(2) Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-2
part of: 110 Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
note: Application must be made on behalf of the agency by a person or officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.315
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made on behalf of the agency
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110(3) Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-3
part of: 110 Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
note: Nomination of office or position for agency management
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.315
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110-ss-3-norm

110(4) Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-4
part of: 110 Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
note: Nomination under subsection (3) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.315
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110-ss-4-norm

110A Meaning of criminal law-enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110a
note: Defines criminal law-enforcement agencies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.315
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110a-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110A Meaning of criminal law-enforcement agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

110B Declarations in relation to the Immigration and Border
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110b
has part: 110B(1) Declarations in relation to the Immigration and Border
has part: 110B(2) Declarations in relation to the Immigration and Border
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.319

110B(1) Declarations in relation to the Immigration and Border
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110b-ss-1
part of: 110B Declarations in relation to the Immigration and Border
note: The Minister may declare certain provisions do not apply to the Immigration and Border Protection Department.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.319
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110b-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 110B(1) Declarations in relation to the Immigration and Border
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by the Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110B(2) Declarations in relation to the Immigration and Border
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110b-ss-2
part of: 110B Declarations in relation to the Immigration and Border
note: The Minister may declare stored communications by legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.319
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110b-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 110B(2) Declarations in relation to the Immigration and Border
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-110b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to declare stored communications.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111 Form of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111
has part: 111(1) Form of applications
has part: 111(2) Form of applications
has part: 111(3) Form of applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.320

111(1) Form of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111-ss-1
part of: 111 Form of applications
note: Application must be in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.320
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 111(1) Form of applications
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111(2) Form of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111-ss-2
part of: 111 Form of applications
note: Telephone application permitted under urgent circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.320
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 111(2) Form of applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permits telephone application
premise text: Chief officer authorisation
conclusion text: Telephone application permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111(3) Form of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111-ss-3
part of: 111 Form of applications
note: Authorises persons for purposes of subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.320
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-3-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-111-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 111(3) Form of applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

112 Contents of written applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-112
note: Application must provide agency name and applicant's name.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.320
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-112-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-112-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-112-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 112 Contents of written applications
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-112-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Application must provide agency name and applicant's name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

113 Affidavits to accompany written applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-113
has part: 113(1) Affidavits to accompany written applications
has part: 113(2) Affidavits to accompany written applications
has part: 113(3) Affidavits to accompany written applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.320

113(1) Affidavits to accompany written applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-113-ss-1
part of: 113 Affidavits to accompany written applications
note: Affidavit must be provided with written application
description: affidavit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.320
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 113(1) Affidavits to accompany written applications
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Affidavit is required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

113(2) Affidavits to accompany written applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-113-ss-2
part of: 113 Affidavits to accompany written applications
note: Affidavits must set out facts and grounds for application
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.320
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 113(2) Affidavits to accompany written applications
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Affidavits must be provided
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

113(3) Affidavits to accompany written applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-113-ss-3
part of: 113 Affidavits to accompany written applications
note: Allow written applications with multiple affidavits
description: Affidavits accompanying written applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.320
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 113(3) Affidavits to accompany written applications
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-113-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allow written applications with multiple affidavits
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

114 Information to be given on telephone applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-114
note: Information must be provided on telephone applications.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.321
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-114-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-114-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-114-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 114 Information to be given on telephone applications
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-114-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

115 Giving further information to Judge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-115
has part: 115(1) Giving further information to Judge
has part: 115(2) Giving further information to Judge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.321

115(1) Giving further information to Judge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-115-ss-1
part of: 115 Giving further information to Judge
note: Issuing authority may require further information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.321
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 115(1) Giving further information to Judge
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

115(2) Giving further information to Judge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-115-ss-2
part of: 115 Giving further information to Judge
note: Must provide further information on oath or orally as directed
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.321
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 115(2) Giving further information to Judge
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide further information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-115-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: K
logic summary: Knowledge of requirement
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116 Issuing of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-116
has part: 116(1) Issuing of stored communications warrants
has part: 116(2) Issuing of stored communications warrants
has part: 116(2A) Issuing of stored communications warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.322

116(1) Issuing of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-116-ss-1
part of: 116 Issuing of stored communications warrants
note: Issuing authority must issue warrant if certain conditions met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.322
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 116(1) Issuing of stored communications warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Issuing authority must issue warrant.
premise text: Division 1 has been complied with in relation to the application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Issuing authority may issue warrant if certain conditions met.
premise text: b) ...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

116(2) Issuing of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-116-ss-2
part of: 116 Issuing of stored communications warrants
note: Authority must consider privacy impact and investigation methods when issuing stored communications warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.322
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 116(2) Issuing of stored communications warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Authority has an obligation to consider privacy impact and investigation methods.
premise text: (2) For an application other than an international assistance application, the matters to which the issuing authority must have regard are:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Authority considers investigation methods that do not involve stored communications warrant.
premise text: (d) to what extent methods of investigating the serious contravention that do not involve the use of a stored communications warrant in relation to the person have been used by, or are available to, the agency;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Authority considers investigation methods that do not involve stored communications warrant.
premise text: (d) to what extent methods of investigating the serious contravention that do not involve the use of a stored communications warrant in relation to the person have been used by, or are available to, the agency;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Influences
logic summary: Authority considers investigation methods that do not involve stored communications warrant.
premise text: (d) to what extent methods of investigating the serious contravention that do not involve the use of a stored communications warrant in relation to the person have been used by, or are available to, the agency;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Influences
logic summary: Authority considers investigation methods that do not involve stored communications warrant.
premise text: (d) to what extent methods of investigating the serious contravention that do not involve the use of a stored communications warrant in relation to the person have been used by, or are available to, the agency;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116(2A) Issuing of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-116-ss-2a
part of: 116 Issuing of stored communications warrants
note: Authority must have regard for certain matters when issuing stored communications warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.322
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 116(2A) Issuing of stored communications warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-116-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE REGARD FOR
logic summary: Authority must have regard for certain matters.
premise text: Chapter 3 Preserving and accessing stored communications
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117 What stored communications warrants authorise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-117
note: Authorises access to stored communications under specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.324
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-117-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-117-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-117-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 117 What stored communications warrants authorise
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-117-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118 Form and content of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-118
has part: 118(1) Form and content of stored communications warrants
has part: 118(2) Form and content of stored communications warrants
has part: 118(3) Form and content of stored communications warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.324

118(1) Form and content of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-118-ss-1
part of: 118 Form and content of stored communications warrants
note: Stored communications warrant must be in prescribed form and signed by issuing authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.324
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 118(1) Form and content of stored communications warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to preserve and access stored communications.
premise text: (1) A stored communications warrant...
conclusion text: ...must be in accordance with the prescribed form; and must be signed by the issuing authority who issues it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Stored communications warrant has a temporal relationship with the issuing authority.
premise text: (1) A stored communications warrant...
conclusion text: ...must be signed by the issuing authority who issues it.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Stored communications warrant has a temporal relationship with the issuing authority.
premise text: (1) A stored communications warrant...
conclusion text: ...must be signed by the issuing authority who issues it.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Stored communications warrant is a type of document that can be accessed and shared.
premise text: (1) A stored communications warrant...
conclusion text: ...must be in accordance with the prescribed form; and must be signed by the issuing authority who issues it.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Stored communications warrant is a type of document that can be analyzed and processed by artificial intelligence.
premise text: (1) A stored communications warrant...
conclusion text: ...must be in accordance with the prescribed form; and must be signed by the issuing authority who issues it.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

118(2) Form and content of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-118-ss-2
part of: 118 Form and content of stored communications warrants
note: Conditions or restrictions for accessing stored communications under the warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.324
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 118(2) Form and content of stored communications warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: specifies
logic summary: Specifying conditions or restrictions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(3) Form and content of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-118-ss-3
part of: 118 Form and content of stored communications warrants
note: Must set out short particulars of serious contraventions or foreign contraventions.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.324
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 118(3) Form and content of stored communications warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-118-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the issuing authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119 Duration of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119
has part: 119(1) Duration of stored communications warrants
has part: 119(2) Duration of stored communications warrants
has part: 119(3) Duration of stored communications warrants
has part: 119(4) Duration of stored communications warrants
has part: 119(5) Duration of stored communications warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.325

119(1) Duration of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119-ss-1
part of: 119 Duration of stored communications warrants
note: Stored communications warrant remains in force until executed or 5 days after issuance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.325
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 119(1) Duration of stored communications warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119(2) Duration of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119-ss-2
part of: 119 Duration of stored communications warrants
note: Warrant duration for multiple telecommunications services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.325
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 119(2) Duration of stored communications warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal limit on warrant duration
premise text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119(3) Duration of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119-ss-3
part of: 119 Duration of stored communications warrants
note: Cannot vary stored communications warrant duration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.325
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of varying warrant duration
premise text: (3) An issuing authority must not vary a stored communications warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for warrant duration
premise text: (3) An issuing authority must not vary a stored communications warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication of varying warrant duration on issuing authority's power
premise text: (3) An issuing authority must not vary a stored communications warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuse implications of varying warrant duration on issuing authority's power
premise text: (3) An issuing authority must not vary a stored communications warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognize implications of varying warrant duration on issuing authority's power
premise text: (3) An issuing authority must not vary a stored communications warrant by extending the period for which it is to be in force.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119(4) Duration of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119-ss-4
part of: 119 Duration of stored communications warrants
note: No prohibition on issuing further warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.325
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 119(4) Duration of stored communications warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: No prohibition on issuing further warrants.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119(5) Duration of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119-ss-5
part of: 119 Duration of stored communications warrants
note: No new warrant can be issued within 3 days of the previous warrant's execution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.325
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-119-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No new warrant can be issued within 3 days of the previous warrant's execution.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120 Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
type: Concept
realized by: sec-120
has part: 120(1) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
has part: 120(2) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
has part: 120(3) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
has part: 120(4) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.326

120(1) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
type: Concept
realized by: sec-120-ss-1
part of: 120 Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
note: Issuing authority must inform and provide warrant to applicant.
description: warrant terms, signing day, and time
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.326
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 120(1) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform and provide warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120(2) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
type: Concept
realized by: sec-120-ss-2
part of: 120 Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
note: Affidavits must be provided by the applicant within one day after a warrant is issued.
description: affidavit or affidavits, authorisation by the chief officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.326
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 120(2) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide affidavit and authorisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120(3) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
type: Concept
realized by: sec-120-ss-3
part of: 120 Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
note: Revocation of warrant issued on telephone application
description: inform the person who made the application and give the instrument of revocation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.326
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits issuing authority from revoking warrant without complying with subsection (2)
premise text: Subsection (2) has not been complied with in relation to the warrant
conclusion text: Revocation is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permits issuing authority to revoke warrant if subsection (2) has not been complied with
premise text: Subsection (2) has not been complied with in relation to the warrant
conclusion text: Issuing authority is permitted to revoke warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which issuing authority can revoke warrant
premise text: Revocation must occur within a certain time frame after subsection (2) has not been complied with
conclusion text: Revocation occurs within a certain time frame
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on issuing authority to inform person who made application and give instrument of revocation
premise text: Issuing authority must inform person who made application and give instrument of revocation upon revocation
conclusion text: Issuing authority has an obligation to inform person who made application and give instrument of revocation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on issuing authority to comply with subsection (2) before revoking warrant
premise text: Issuing authority must comply with subsection (2) before revoking warrant
conclusion text: Issuing authority has an obligation to comply with subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120(4) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
type: Concept
realized by: sec-120-ss-4
part of: 120 Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
note: Inform other agencies of warrant revocation
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.326
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 120(4) Stored communications warrants issued on telephone
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-120-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Agency must inform other agencies of warrant revocation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

121 What happens when stored communications warrants are
type: Concept
realized by: sec-121
note: Agency must inform carrier and provide copy of warrant.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.327
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-121-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-121-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-121-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 121 What happens when stored communications warrants are
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-121-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency has a duty to inform carrier and provide copy of warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122 Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-122
note: Chief officer must inform and revoke stored communications warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.327
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-122-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-122-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-122-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122 Revocation of stored communications warrants by chief officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-122-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Chief officer has an obligation to inform and revoke the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

123 What happens when stored communications warrants are
type: Concept
realized by: sec-123
has part: 123(1) What happens when stored communications warrants are
has part: 123(2) What happens when stored communications warrants are
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.328

123(1) What happens when stored communications warrants are
type: Concept
realized by: sec-123-ss-1
part of: 123 What happens when stored communications warrants are
note: Chief officer of one agency must inform other agencies of warrant revocation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.328
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-123-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-123-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-123-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 123(1) What happens when stored communications warrants are
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-123-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

123(2) What happens when stored communications warrants are
type: Concept
realized by: sec-123-ss-2
part of: 123 What happens when stored communications warrants are
note: Notify authorized representative of revocation of stored communications warrant.
description: Copy of instrument of revocation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.328
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-123-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-123-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-123-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 123(2) What happens when stored communications warrants are
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-123-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124 Access to additional telecommunications services under stored
type: Concept
realized by: sec-124
has part: 124(1) Access to additional telecommunications services under stored
has part: 124(2) Access to additional telecommunications services under stored
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.328

124(1) Access to additional telecommunications services under stored
type: Concept
realized by: sec-124-ss-1
part of: 124 Access to additional telecommunications services under stored
note: Carrier must provide description of telecommunications service to be accessed under warrant.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.328
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-124-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-124-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-124-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 124(1) Access to additional telecommunications services under stored
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-124-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must provide description.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(2) Access to additional telecommunications services under stored
type: Concept
realized by: sec-124-ss-2
part of: 124 Access to additional telecommunications services under stored
note: Notify authorized representative of stored communications access revocation
description: Confirmation in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.328
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-124-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-124-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-124-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 124(2) Access to additional telecommunications services under stored
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-124-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Notify authorized representative of stored communications access revocation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125 Entry into force of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125
note: Entry into force of stored communications warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.330
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-125-norm

126 Limit on authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-126
note: Stored communications warrant does not authorize access unless notification is received by authorized representative.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.330
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-126-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-126-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-126-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 126 Limit on authority conferred by warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-126-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits unauthorized access to stored communications.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

127 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-127
has part: 127(1) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
has part: 127(2) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
has part: 127(3) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.330

127(1) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-127-ss-1
part of: 127 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
note: Authority must be exercised with approval
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.330
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 127(1) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory authority exercise
premise text: (1) The authority conferred by a stored communications warrant may only be exercised...
conclusion text: ...by a person in relation to whom an approval under subsection (2) is in force in relation to the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: =>
logic summary: Authority exercise implies approval
premise text: (1) The authority conferred by a stored communications warrant may only be exercised...
conclusion text: ...by a person in relation to whom an approval under subsection (2) is in force in relation to the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between authority exercise and approval
premise text: (1) The authority conferred by a stored communications warrant may only be exercised...
conclusion text: ...by a person in relation to whom an approval under subsection (2) is in force in relation to the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

127(2) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-127-ss-2
part of: 127 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
note: Approval of persons to exercise authority conferred by warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.330
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 127(2) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency...
conclusion text: may approve any of the following persons to exercise the authority conferred by warrants
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap of authority
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency...
conclusion text: may approve any of the following persons to exercise the authority conferred by warrants at any time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication from approval
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency...
conclusion text: may approve any of the following persons to exercise the authority conferred by warrants.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusing authority to staff members
premise text: (b) staff members (or classes of staff members) of the agency or another criminal law-enforcement agency;
conclusion text: staff members (or classes of staff members) of the agency or another criminal law-enforcement agency.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of authority delegation
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency...
conclusion text: may approve any of the following persons to exercise the authority conferred by warrants.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

127(3) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-127-ss-3
part of: 127 Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
note: Chief officer may appoint an approving officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.330
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-3-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-127-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 127(3) Exercise of authority conferred by warrant
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

128 Provision of technical assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-128
has part: 128(1) Provision of technical assistance
has part: 128(2) Provision of technical assistance
has part: 128(3) Provision of technical assistance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.331

128(1) Provision of technical assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-128-ss-1
part of: 128 Provision of technical assistance
note: Carrier employees may provide technical assistance to criminal law enforcement officers/staff members with stored communications warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.331
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to provide technical assistance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128(2) Provision of technical assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-128-ss-2
part of: 128 Provision of technical assistance
note: Provision of technical assistance includes specific acts related to accessing stored communications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.331
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(2) Provision of technical assistance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Provision of technical assistance is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Technical assistance is a subclass of provision.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128(3) Provision of technical assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-128-ss-3
part of: 128 Provision of technical assistance
note: Declare persons designated officers for purposes of section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.331
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(3) Provision of technical assistance
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-128-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: declare
logic summary: Declare persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

129 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-129
note: Authorized personnel may issue written certificates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.331
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-129-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-129-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-129-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 129 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by carriers
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-129-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to issue certificates
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

130 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-130
has part: 130(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
has part: 130(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.332

130(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-130-ss-1
part of: 130 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
note: Certifying officer must issue written certificate with relevant facts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.332
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-130-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-130-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-130-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 130(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-130-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a written certificate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

130(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-130-ss-2
part of: 130 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
note: Exempt proceeding evidence of certificate matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.332
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-130-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-130-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-130-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 130(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-130-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide exempt proceeding evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131 Certified copies of stored communications warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-131
note: Exempt proceeding must receive certified copy of stored communications warrant as if it were the original.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.333
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-131-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-131-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-131-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131 Certified copies of stored communications warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-131-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on exempt proceedings to receive certified copies of stored communications warrants.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132 Obstruction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-132
has part: 132(1) Obstruction
has part: 132(2) Obstruction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.333

132(1) Obstruction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-132-ss-1
part of: 132 Obstruction
note: Obstructing another person acting under a stored communications warrant is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.333
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 132(1) Obstruction
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits obstructing another person acting under a stored communications warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to not obstruct another person acting under a stored communications warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implicates that obstructing another person acting under a stored communications warrant is an offence if the person commits an offence.
premise text: Obstruction
conclusion text: Offence
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132(2) Obstruction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-132-ss-2
part of: 132 Obstruction
note: A reasonable excuse is a valid reason for obstructing or hindering
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.333
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132(2) Obstruction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-132-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide a reasonable excuse
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if the person obstructing or hindering has a reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: The defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133 No dealing with accessed information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-133
has part: 133(1) No dealing with accessed information etc.
has part: 133(2) No dealing with accessed information etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.334

133(1) No dealing with accessed information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-133-ss-1
part of: 133 No dealing with accessed information etc.
note: No dealing with accessed information etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.334
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-133-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-133-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-133-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits accessing or using information
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...and the information is: ...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

133(2) No dealing with accessed information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-133-ss-2
part of: 133 No dealing with accessed information etc.
note: Permitted dealings with accessed information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.334
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-133-ss-2-norm

134 Dealing in preservation notice information or stored
type: Concept
realized by: sec-134
note: Communicate preservation notice information or stored communications warrant information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.335
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-134-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-134-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-134-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 134 Dealing in preservation notice information or stored
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-134-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Permission to communicate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135 Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-135
has part: 135(1) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
has part: 135(2) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.335

135(1) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-135-ss-1
part of: 135 Dealing in information by employees of carriers
note: An employee must communicate information to authorized law enforcement officers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.335
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-135-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-135-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-135-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
premise text: Employee accessed stored communications
conclusion text: Must communicate to authorized officers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135(2) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-135-ss-2
part of: 135 Dealing in information by employees of carriers
note: Authorisation of officers to receive information under stored communications warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.335
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-135-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-135-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-135-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 135(2) Dealing in information by employees of carriers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-135-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: Chief officer may authorise officers to receive information.
conclusion text: Officers are permitted to receive information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136
note: Permits communication of certain information in connection with Organisation's functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.337
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-136-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-136-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-136-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 136 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s functions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-136-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERMIT
logic summary: Permits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-137
has part: 137(1) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 137(1A) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 137(1B) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 137(2) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 137(3) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
has part: 137(4) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.338

137(1) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-137-ss-1
part of: 137 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
note: Prohibition on communicating certain information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.338
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits communication of certain information
premise text: (1) The Director-General of Security may...
conclusion text: ...communicate the following to another person:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137(1A) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-137-ss-1a
part of: 137 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
note: Prohibits communication of foreign intelligence information to unauthorized persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.338
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits action
premise text: (1A) The Director-General of Security may:
conclusion text: communicate foreign intelligence information to another person (the second person), other than a person to whom the Director-General could communicate the information under subsection (1) or 136(2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
premise text: (1A) The Director-General of Security may:
conclusion text: subject to the conditions (if any) specified by the Attorney-General in writing;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
premise text: (1A) The Director-General of Security may:
conclusion text: communicate foreign intelligence information to another person (the second person), other than a person to whom the Director-General could communicate the information under subsection (1) or 136(2).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Describes means of transmission
premise text: (1A) The Director-General of Security may:
conclusion text: communicate foreign intelligence information to another person (the second person), other than a person to whom the Director-General could communicate the information under subsection (1) or 136(2).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: using
logic summary: Describes means of processing
premise text: (1A) The Director-General of Security may:
conclusion text: for the purposes (if any) approved by the Attorney-General in writing;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

137(1B) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-137-ss-1b
part of: 137 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
note: Communicate accessed information to another person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.338
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1b-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 137(1B) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to communicate accessed information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137(2) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-137-ss-2
part of: 137 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
note: Authorisation for communication by Director-General or agent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.338
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to communicate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137(3) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-137-ss-3
part of: 137 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
note: A person may communicate and use foreign intelligence information under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.338
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 137(3) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to communicate and use information
premise text: Attorney-General's approval required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

137(4) Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-137-ss-4
part of: 137 Dealing in information obtained by Organisation
note: Dealing in information obtained by Organisation is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.338
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-137-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negates the existence of an approval or condition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138 Employee of carrier may communicate information to criminal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-138
note: Employee may communicate information to law enforcement agency for investigation purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.339
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-138-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-138-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-138-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted
premise text: Employee may communicate information
conclusion text: Authority may receive information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

139 Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139
has part: 139(1) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
has part: 139(2) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
has part: 139(3) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
has part: 139(4) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.340

139(1) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139-ss-1
part of: 139 Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
note: Communication of certain information to another person is allowed for specified purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.340
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 139(1) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between permitted purposes
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

139(2) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139-ss-2
part of: 139 Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
note: Purposes for which information can be dealt with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.340
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 139(2) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPurpose
logic summary: Information has a purpose
premise text: (2) In the case of information obtained by the agency other than through the execution of a warrant issued as a result of an international assistance application, the purposes are purposes connected with...
conclusion text: ...the making by an authority, body or person of a decision whether or not to begin a proceeding to which subsection (4) applies; or
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Purposes occur during investigation purposes
premise text: (2) In the case of information obtained by the agency other than through the execution of a warrant issued as a result of an international assistance application, the purposes are purposes connected with...
conclusion text: ...the making by an authority, body or person of a decision whether or not to begin a proceeding to which subsection (4) applies; or
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Purposes last until investigation purposes end
premise text: (a) an investigation by the agency or by another criminal law-enforcement agency of a contravention to which subsection (3) applies; or
conclusion text: ...the making by an authority, body or person of a decision whether or not to begin a proceeding to which subsection (4) applies; or
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
logic summary: Authority has permission to make decisions about information
premise text: (2) In the case of information obtained by the agency other than through the execution of a warrant issued as a result of an international assistance application, the purposes are purposes connected with...
conclusion text: ...the making by an authority, body or person of a decision whether or not to begin a proceeding to which subsection (4) applies; or
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Making decisions implies authority has permission
premise text: (2) In the case of information obtained by the agency other than through the execution of a warrant issued as a result of an international assistance application, the purposes are purposes connected with...
conclusion text: ...the making by an authority, body or person of a decision whether or not to begin a proceeding to which subsection (4) applies; or
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

139(3) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139-ss-3
part of: 139 Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
note: Prohibition of serious or punishable offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.340
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 139(3) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids serious or punishable offences
premise text: (3) A contravention to which this subsection applies is a contravention of a law...
conclusion text: ...render the person committing the contravention liable:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Defines the time period during which the contravention applies
premise text: (3) A contravention to which this subsection applies is a contravention of a law...
conclusion text: ...of at least 12 months;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Defines the time period until which the contravention remains in effect
premise text: (3) A contravention to which this subsection applies is a contravention of a law...
conclusion text: ...of at least 12 months;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Defines the conditions under which the contravention applies
premise text: (a) is a serious offence;
conclusion text: ...or (b) is an offence punishable...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasProperty
logic summary: Defines the properties of the contravention
premise text: (i) if the contravention were committed by an individual—
conclusion text: ...to pay a pecuniary penalty...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

139(4) Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139-ss-4
part of: 139 Dealing for purposes of investigation etc.
note: Restricts proceedings for certain offenses
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.340
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain proceedings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

139AA Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139aa
has part: 139AA(1) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
has part: 139AA(2) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.342

139AA(1) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139aa-ss-1
part of: 139AA Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
note: Permits communication with an IGIS official in connection with their functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.342
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

139AA(2) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139aa-ss-2
part of: 139AA Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
note: This section applies despite any other provision of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.342
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 139AA(2) Dealing in connection with Inspector-General’s functions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Section applies despite other provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

139A Dealing for integrity purposes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139a
has part: 139A(1) Dealing for integrity purposes
has part: 139A(4A) Dealing for integrity purposes
has part: 139A(2) Dealing for integrity purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.343

139A(1) Dealing for integrity purposes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139a-ss-1
part of: 139A Dealing for integrity purposes
note: An officer or staff member of a Commonwealth agency may perform certain actions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.343
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 139A(1) Dealing for integrity purposes
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

139A(4A) Dealing for integrity purposes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139a-ss-4a
part of: 139A Dealing for integrity purposes
note: Must communicate certain information to another person.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.343
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 139A(4A) Dealing for integrity purposes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to communicate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

139A(2) Dealing for integrity purposes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139a-ss-2
part of: 139A Dealing for integrity purposes
note: Permitted purpose for agency or Commonwealth agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.343
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has-permission
logic summary: Agency has permission to deal for integrity purposes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

139B Dealing for purposes relating to Part 5.3 orders or Part 9.10
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139b
note: Law enforcement officers can access and share information with others for specific purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.343
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139b-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 139B Dealing for purposes relating to Part 5.3 orders or Part 9.10
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-139b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Can
logic summary: Permission to access information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140 Dealing with information if access suspected to be unlawful
type: Concept
realized by: sec-140
has part: 140(1) Dealing with information if access suspected to be unlawful
has part: 140(2) Dealing with information if access suspected to be unlawful
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.344

140(1) Dealing with information if access suspected to be unlawful
type: Concept
realized by: sec-140-ss-1
part of: 140 Dealing with information if access suspected to be unlawful
note: Suspected offence reporting obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.344
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-140-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-140-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-140-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-140-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 140(1) Dealing with information if access suspected to be unlawful
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-140-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Reporting suspected offences
premise text: Reasonable grounds exist
conclusion text: Must report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-140-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Reasonable grounds for suspicion
premise text: Suspected offence
conclusion text: Believe
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140(2) Dealing with information if access suspected to be unlawful
type: Concept
realized by: sec-140-ss-2
part of: 140 Dealing with information if access suspected to be unlawful
note: Communicating information for investigation or decision-making purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.344
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-140-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-140-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-140-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to communicate information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

141 Making record for purpose of permitted communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-141
note: A person who is permitted by section 135, 137 or 138 or subsection 140(1) to communicate particular information to another person may make a record of the information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.345
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-141-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-141-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-141-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 141 Making record for purpose of permitted communication
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-141-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a record for permitted communication
premise text: Section 141
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142 Further dealing by recipient of certain information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142
has part: 142(1) Further dealing by recipient of certain information
has part: 142(2) Further dealing by recipient of certain information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.345

142(1) Further dealing by recipient of certain information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142-ss-1
part of: 142 Further dealing by recipient of certain information
note: Recipient of information may communicate it to another person or make use of it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.345
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 142(1) Further dealing by recipient of certain information
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to communicate information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142(2) Further dealing by recipient of certain information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142-ss-2
part of: 142 Further dealing by recipient of certain information
note: Exemption for ACC officers performing specific function
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.345
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 142(2) Further dealing by recipient of certain information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts ACC officers from subsection (1)
premise text: Paragraph 7A(da) of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142A Communicating information obtained as a result of an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142a
has part: 142A(1) Communicating information obtained as a result of an
has part: 142A(2) Communicating information obtained as a result of an
has part: 142A(3) Communicating information obtained as a result of an
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.346

142A(1) Communicating information obtained as a result of an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142a-ss-1
part of: 142A Communicating information obtained as a result of an
note: Restrictions on communication of information obtained through international assistance application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.346
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction
logic summary: Restricts communication of information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142A(2) Communicating information obtained as a result of an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142a-ss-2
part of: 142A Communicating information obtained as a result of an
note: Subsection (1) has effect despite subsection 139(4A) and section 142.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.346
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 142A(2) Communicating information obtained as a result of an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continues effect despite subsection 139(4A)
premise text: Subsection (1) has effect
conclusion text: Despite subsection 139(4A)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continues effect despite section 142
premise text: Subsection (1) has effect
conclusion text: Despite section 142
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

142A(3) Communicating information obtained as a result of an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142a-ss-3
part of: 142A Communicating information obtained as a result of an
note: A determination under paragraph (1)(c) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.346
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-3-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-142a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 142A(3) Communicating information obtained as a result of an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

143 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143
has part: 143(1) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
has part: 143(2) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
has part: 143(3) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.346

143(1) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143-ss-1
part of: 143 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
note: Allowing lawfully accessed information in exempt proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.346
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-1-norm

143(2) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143-ss-2
part of: 143 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
note: Determining access in contravention of subsection 108(1) on balance of probabilities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.346
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143(2) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
logic summary: Determining access in contravention of subsection 108(1)
premise text: (2) For the purposes of applying subsection (1) in relation to information
conclusion text: on the balance of probabilities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Access during contravention of subsection 108(1)
premise text: (2) For the purposes of applying subsection (1) in relation to information
conclusion text: on the balance of probabilities
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Access during contravention of subsection 108(1)
premise text: (2) For the purposes of applying subsection (1) in relation to information
conclusion text: on the balance of probabilities
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Access during contravention of subsection 108(1)
premise text: (2) For the purposes of applying subsection (1) in relation to information
conclusion text: on the balance of probabilities
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Access during contravention of subsection 108(1)
premise text: (2) For the purposes of applying subsection (1) in relation to information
conclusion text: on the balance of probabilities
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

143(3) Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143-ss-3
part of: 143 Giving information in evidence in exempt proceeding
note: Giving stored communications warrant information in evidence in exempt proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.346
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-143-ss-3-norm

144 Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully
type: Concept
realized by: sec-144
has part: 144(1) Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully
has part: 144(2) Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.347

144(1) Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully
type: Concept
realized by: sec-144-ss-1
part of: 144 Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully
note: Allowing access to stored communications in certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.347
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-144-ss-1-norm

144(2) Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully
type: Concept
realized by: sec-144-ss-2
part of: 144 Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully
note: Prohibiting communication of certain information in evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.347
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-144-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-144-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-144-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 144(2) Giving information in evidence if communication unlawfully
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-144-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: State prohibits communication of certain information in evidence
conclusion text: No communication is allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

145 Evidence that has been given in exempt proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-145
note: Permits later use of exempt proceeding evidence in other proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.347
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-145-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-145-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-145-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERMIT
logic summary: Permits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

146 Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-146
has part: 146(1) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
has part: 146(2) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.348

146(1) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-146-ss-1
part of: 146 Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
note: Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.348
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-146-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-146-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-146-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to give information in evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

146(2) Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-146-ss-2
part of: 146 Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
note: Giving information in evidence in civil proceedings for remedial
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.348
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-146-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-146-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-146-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to give information in evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

147 Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
type: Concept
realized by: sec-147
has part: 147(1) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
has part: 147(2) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
has part: 147(3) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.349

147(1) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
type: Concept
realized by: sec-147-ss-1
part of: 147 Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
note: Accessing stored communication information is generally inadmissible in evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.349
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits accessing stored communication information in evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

147(2) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
type: Concept
realized by: sec-147-ss-2
part of: 147 Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
note: Accessed material is admissible under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.349
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 147(2) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide accessed material under certain conditions.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) of this section applies...
conclusion text: ...stored communication was accessed in contravention of subsection 108(1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: interval relation
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for accessing stored communication.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) of this section applies...
conclusion text: ...stored communication was accessed in contravention of subsection 108(1).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: trace relation
logic summary: Defines the trace for accessing stored communication.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) of this section applies...
conclusion text: ...stored communication was accessed in contravention of subsection 108(1).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion relation
logic summary: Defines the diffusion of information about accessing stored communication.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) of this section applies...
conclusion text: ...stored communication was accessed in contravention of subsection 108(1).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive agent relation
logic summary: Defines the cognitive agent responsible for accessing stored communication.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) of this section applies...
conclusion text: ...stored communication was accessed in contravention of subsection 108(1).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

147(3) Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
type: Concept
realized by: sec-147-ss-3
part of: 147 Accessed material inadmissible except as provided
note: Permits communication, use, recording, or giving in evidence of accessed material
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.349
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-147-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Allows communication, use, recording, or giving in evidence of accessed material
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148 Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
type: Concept
realized by: sec-148
has part: 148(1) Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
has part: 148(2) Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.349

148(1) Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
type: Concept
realized by: sec-148-ss-1
part of: 148 Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
note: Stored communications warrant information is inadmissible in evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.349
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-148-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-148-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-148-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of stored communications warrant information in evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(2) Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
type: Concept
realized by: sec-148-ss-2
part of: 148 Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
note: Stored communications warrant information inadmissible
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.349
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-148-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-148-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-148-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits giving stored communications warrant information in evidence
premise text: (2) For the purpose of determining...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149 Evidence that is otherwise inadmissible
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149
note: Preserves admissibility of records obtained by accessing stored communications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.350
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-149-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-149-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-149-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits admissibility of records obtained by accessing stored communications
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

150 Destruction of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-150
has part: 150(1) Destruction of records
has part: 150(2) Destruction of records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.351

150(1) Destruction of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-150-ss-1
part of: 150 Destruction of records
note: Destroy records obtained by accessing stored communication if not required for law enforcement purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.351
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 150(1) Destruction of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must destroy records
premise text: Chief officer satisfied information is not required for law enforcement purposes
conclusion text: Information or record must be destroyed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Time of destruction must be after time of obtaining information
premise text: Chief officer caused information or record to be destroyed forthwith
conclusion text: Time of destruction is greater than or equal to the time of obtaining information
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Time of destruction must be before time of requirement for law enforcement purposes
premise text: Chief officer satisfied information is not likely to be required for a purpose referred in subsection 139(2) or (4A), 139A(2) or 139B(2)
conclusion text: Time of destruction is less than or equal to the time of requirement for law enforcement purposes
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Chief officer must cause information or record to be destroyed
premise text: Chief officer satisfied information or record is not likely to be required for a purpose referred in subsection 139(2) or (4A), 139A(2) or 139B(2)
conclusion text: Chief officer must destroy information or record
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Information or record must be destroyed if not required for law enforcement purposes
premise text: Chief officer satisfied information is not likely to be required for a purpose referred in subsection 139(2) or (4A), 139A(2) or 139B(2)
conclusion text: Information or record must be destroyed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

150(2) Destruction of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-150-ss-2
part of: 150 Destruction of records
note: Chief officer must provide a written report on record destruction within 3 months after June 30th.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.351
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 150(2) Destruction of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-150-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide a report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151 Obligation to keep records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151
note: The chief officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency must keep certain records.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.352
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-151-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-151-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-151-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151 Obligation to keep records
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-151-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The chief officer has a duty to keep the records.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158A Functions of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-158a
has part: 158A(1) Functions of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
has part: 158A(2) Functions of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.354

158A(1) Functions of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-158a-ss-1
part of: 158A Functions of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
note: The Inspector-General has functions in relation to preservation notices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.354
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has function
logic summary: The Inspector-General has a function.
premise text: (1) Under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986, the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security has functions in relation to preservation notices given by the Organisation.
conclusion text: The Inspector-General has a function.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The function is related to preservation notices during a certain period.
premise text: (1) Under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986, the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security has functions in relation to preservation notices given by the Organisation.
conclusion text: The function is related to preservation notices during a certain period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: The function is related to preservation notices during a certain period.
premise text: (1) Under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986, the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security has functions in relation to preservation notices given by the Organisation.
conclusion text: The function is related to preservation notices during a certain period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has duty
logic summary: The Inspector-General has a duty to preserve notices.
premise text: (1) Under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986, the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security has functions in relation to preservation notices given by the Organisation.
conclusion text: The Inspector-General has a duty to preserve notices.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: given
logic summary: Preservation notices are given by the Organisation.
premise text: (1) Under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986, the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security has functions in relation to preservation notices given by the Organisation.
conclusion text: Preservation notices are given by the Organisation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158A(2) Functions of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-158a-ss-2
part of: 158A Functions of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
note: Conducting inspections to give effect to the objects of that Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.354
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-158a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Inspector-General has a duty
premise text: Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security
conclusion text: to conduct inspections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

159 Annual reports regarding applications and warrants under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-159
note: Annual reports regarding applications and warrants under
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.355
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-159-norm

30 June, give to the Minister a written report that sets out such
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-2
note: Must provide written report with specified information by June 30th.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.355
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-30-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-30-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30 June, give to the Minister a written report that sets out such
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

160 Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
type: Concept
realized by: sec-160
has part: 160(1) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
has part: 160(2) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.355

160(1) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
type: Concept
realized by: sec-160-ss-1
part of: 160 Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
note: Minister may request specified information from chief officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.355
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-160-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-160-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-160-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to request specified information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

160(2) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
type: Concept
realized by: sec-160-ss-2
part of: 160 Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
note: Minister must comply with request for information from Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.355
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-160-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-160-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-160-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 160(2) Minister may seek further information from Commonwealth
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-160-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
premise text: Chief officer must comply with request.
conclusion text: Minister must comply with request for information from Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161 Annual report by Minister about stored communications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-161
note: Annual report by Minister about stored communications
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.356
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161A Report to contain information about preservation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-161a
has part: 161A(1) Report to contain information about preservation notices
has part: 161A(2) Report to contain information about preservation notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.356

161A(1) Report to contain information about preservation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-161a-ss-1
part of: 161A Report to contain information about preservation notices
note: Report must contain statistics about preservation notices given by the agency.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.356
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 161A(1) Report to contain information about preservation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report statistics
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161A(2) Report to contain information about preservation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-161a-ss-2
part of: 161A Report to contain information about preservation notices
note: Report must contain statistics about foreign preservation notices and revocation notices.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.356
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-161a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report statistics
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162 Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-162
has part: 162(1) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
has part: 162(2) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
has part: 162(3) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.356

162(1) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-162-ss-1
part of: 162 Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
note: Report on stored communications warrants applications
description: Statistics and offence information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.356
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 162(1) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162(2) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-162-ss-2
part of: 162 Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
note: Report on stored communications warrants applications
description: Statistics and information about warrant applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.356
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 162(2) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162(3) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-162-ss-3
part of: 162 Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
note: Report on international offences made by an enforcement agency during the year.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.356
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 162(3) Report to set out how many applications made and warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Agency must report on international offences
premise text: Enforcement agency made an international assistance application
conclusion text: Report on international offences made during the year
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-162-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Report must include offences committed during the year
premise text: Enforcement agency made an international assistance application
conclusion text: Report includes offences committed during the year
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

163 Report to contain information about effectiveness of warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-163
note: Report must contain information about effectiveness of warrants
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.358
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-163-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-163-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-163-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

163A Report regarding international requests
type: Concept
realized by: sec-163a
note: Report must set out number of occasions information was communicated under subsection 139(1) or section 142 to certain entities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.358
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-163a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-163a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-163a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 163A Report regarding international requests
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-163a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164 Annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-164
has part: 164(1) Annual reports
has part: 164(2) Annual reports
has part: 164(3) Annual reports
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.359

164(1) Annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-164-ss-1
part of: 164 Annual reports
note: Annual reports must be laid before each House of the Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.359
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to perform an action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164(2) Annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-164-ss-2
part of: 164 Annual reports
note: Annual reports must not enable identification of a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.359
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 164(2) Annual reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Report under Division 2
conclusion text: Must not enable identification of a person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164(3) Annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-164-ss-3
part of: 164 Annual reports
note: Annual reports must be given to the Minister by a certain date.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.359
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 164(3) Annual reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual reports.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between June 30th and the due date.
premise text: (3) For the purposes of section 34C of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, a report that Division 2 requires to be prepared...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between June 30th and the due date.
premise text: (3) For the purposes of section 34C of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, a report that Division 2 requires to be prepared...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between June 30th and the due date.
premise text: (3) For the purposes of section 34C of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, a report that Division 2 requires to be prepared...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-164-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between June 30th and the due date.
premise text: (3) For the purposes of section 34C of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, a report that Division 2 requires to be prepared...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-165
has part: 165(1) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
has part: 165(2) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
has part: 165(3) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
has part: 165(4) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
has part: 165(5) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
has part: 165(6) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.360

165(1) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-165-ss-1
part of: 165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
note: Prohibition on unlawful access or communication
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.360
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits accessing a stored communication in contravention of subsection 108(1)
premise text: (1) This section applies to an accessing of a stored communication if the access was in contravention of subsection 108(1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the person accessing the communication to comply with subsection 108(1)
premise text: (1) This section applies to an accessing of a stored communication if the access was in contravention of subsection 108(1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
logic summary: Traces the accessed communication back to its originator
premise text: (1) This section applies to an accessing of a stored communication if the access was in contravention of subsection 108(1).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits the person accessing the communication from disclosing its contents to others
premise text: (1) This section applies to an accessing of a stored communication if the access was in contravention of subsection 108(1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

165(2) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-165-ss-2
part of: 165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
note: Person is an aggrieved person if they were a party to the communication or the communication was made on their behalf.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.360
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 165(2) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of an aggrieved person
premise text: Person is an aggrieved person if...
conclusion text: ...they were a party to the communication or the communication was made on their behalf.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between communication and being a party
premise text: Person is an aggrieved person if...
conclusion text: ...they were a party to the communication or the communication was made on their behalf.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between communication and being a party
premise text: Person is an aggrieved person if...
conclusion text: ...they were a party to the communication or the communication was made on their behalf.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional relation between being a party and being an aggrieved person
premise text: Person is an aggrieved person if...
conclusion text: ...they were a party to the communication or the communication was made on their behalf.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional relation between being a party and being an aggrieved person
premise text: Person is an aggrieved person if...
conclusion text: ...they were a party to the communication or the communication was made on their behalf.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

165(3) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-165-ss-3
part of: 165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
note: Grant remedial relief in respect of access by defendant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.360
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 165(3) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to grant remedial relief
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

165(4) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-165-ss-4
part of: 165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
note: Grant remedial relief against defendant for unlawful access or communication
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.360
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 165(4) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to grant remedial relief
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

165(5) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-165-ss-5
part of: 165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
note: Court may grant remedial relief to an aggrieved person if convicted of unlawful access or communication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.360
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 165(5) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Court has an obligation to grant remedial relief.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

165(6) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-165-ss-6
part of: 165 Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
note: Remedial relief for unlawful access or communication
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.360
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 165(6) Civil remedies—unlawful access or communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to grant remedial relief
premise text: (6) If...
conclusion text: the court may, on the application of an aggrieved person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between access and communication
premise text: (a) information was obtained by accessing the communication;
conclusion text: the court may, on the application of an aggrieved person...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval until remedial relief is granted
premise text: (b) the information was communicated to a person in contravention of section 133;
conclusion text: the court may, on the application of an aggrieved person...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Permission to grant remedial relief
premise text: (c) a court convicts a person (in this subsection called the defendant)...
conclusion text: the court may, on the application of an aggrieved person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-165-ss-6-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: Implication of conviction on remedial relief
premise text: (c) a court convicts a person (in this subsection called the defendant)...
conclusion text: the court may, on the application of an aggrieved person...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166 Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-166
has part: 166(1) Limitation periods etc.
has part: 166(2) Limitation periods etc.
has part: 166(3) Limitation periods etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.363

166(1) Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-166-ss-1
part of: 166 Limitation periods etc.
note: Application for remedial relief must be made within 6 years after access took place.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.363
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(1) Limitation periods etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made within 6 years
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166(2) Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-166-ss-2
part of: 166 Limitation periods etc.
note: Application for remedial relief must be made within 6 years after communication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.363
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(2) Limitation periods etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made within 6 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166(3) Limitation periods etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-166-ss-3
part of: 166 Limitation periods etc.
note: Application for remedial relief must be made as soon as practicable after conviction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.363
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(3) Limitation periods etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make application as soon as practicable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

167 No limitation on other liability
type: Concept
realized by: sec-167
note: No limitation on liability under other provisions or laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.363
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-167-norm

168 Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168
note: No exclusion or limitation of State/Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.364
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-168-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-168-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-168-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: No exclusion or limitation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

169 State or Territory courts—jurisdictional limits
type: Concept
realized by: sec-169
note: No remedial relief beyond State/Territory law limits
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.364
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No remedial relief
premise text: Court's jurisdictional limits
conclusion text: Obligation to follow State/Territory law
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Remedial relief overlaps with State/Territory law
premise text: State/Territory law defines court's jurisdictional limits
conclusion text: Remedial relief is part of State/Territory law
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Remedial relief contains State/Territory law
premise text: State/Territory law defines court's jurisdictional limits
conclusion text: Remedial relief is contained in State/Territory law
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Remedial relief diffuses into State/Territory law
premise text: State/Territory law defines court's jurisdictional limits
conclusion text: Remedial relief is diffused into State/Territory law
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-169-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inferential
logic summary: CogAI infers remedial relief from State/Territory law
premise text: State/Territory law defines court's jurisdictional limits
conclusion text: Remedial relief is inferred from State/Territory law
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

170 Extended meaning of conviction—orders under section 19B of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-170
note: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.364
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-logic-ltl-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 170 Extended meaning of conviction—orders under section 19B of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to...
conclusion text: ...the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to...
conclusion text: ...the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to...
conclusion text: ...the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-170-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
premise text: A reference in this Part to the conviction of a person of an offence includes a reference to...
conclusion text: ...the making of an order under section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914 in relation to a person in respect of an offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

171 Outline of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-171
has part: 171(1) Outline of Part
has part: 171(2) Outline of Part
has part: 171(3) Outline of Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.365

171(1) Outline of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-171-ss-1
part of: 171 Outline of Part
note: Disclosure of information under certain circumstances is permitted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.365
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 171(1) Outline of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permits disclosure under certain circumstances.
premise text: Division 3 covers Organisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

171(2) Outline of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-171-ss-2
part of: 171 Outline of Part
note: Exemptions from prohibition on use of information or documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.365
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

171(3) Outline of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-171-ss-3
part of: 171 Outline of Part
note: Offences for certain disclosures and uses of information and documents created.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.365
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-171-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain disclosures and uses of information and documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172 No disclosure of the contents or substance of a communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-172
note: No disclosure of communication contents or substance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.366
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-172-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-172-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-172-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 172 No disclosure of the contents or substance of a communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-172-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of communication contents or substance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

173 Effect of Divisions 3 to 5
type: Concept
realized by: sec-173
note: Nothing in Divisions 3 to 5 limits the generality of anything else in those Divisions or in Subdivision A of Division 3 of Part 13 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.366
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-173-norm

174 Voluntary disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-174
has part: 174(1) Voluntary disclosure
has part: 174(2) Voluntary disclosure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.367

174(1) Voluntary disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-174-ss-1
part of: 174 Voluntary disclosure
note: Disclosure of information is permitted in connection with Organisation's functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.367
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-174-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-174-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-174-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

174(2) Voluntary disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-174-ss-2
part of: 174 Voluntary disclosure
note: Holder must disclose information or document if requested by ASIO employee or affiliate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.367
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-174-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-174-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-174-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 174(2) Voluntary disclosure
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-174-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

175 Authorisations for access to existing information or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-175
has part: 175(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or documents
has part: 175(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.367

175(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-175-ss-1
part of: 175 Authorisations for access to existing information or documents
note: Authorisation allows disclosure of information or document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.367
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-175-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-175-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-175-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 175(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-175-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows
premise text: Authorisation in force under subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

175(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-175-ss-2
part of: 175 Authorisations for access to existing information or documents
note: Authorized disclosure of specified information or documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.367
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-175-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-175-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-175-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176 Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176
has part: 176(1) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 176(2) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 176(3) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 176(4) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 176(5) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 176(6) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.368

176(1) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176-ss-1
part of: 176 Authorisations for access to prospective information or
note: Authorisation allows disclosure of information or document under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.368
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorisation permits disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

176(2) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176-ss-2
part of: 176 Authorisations for access to prospective information or
note: Authorized persons may disclose specified information or documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.368
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose
premise text: Authorized persons
conclusion text: Disclosure allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176(3) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176-ss-3
part of: 176 Authorisations for access to prospective information or
note: Authorisation for disclosure of specified information or documents that came into existence before the authorisation comes into force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.368
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorises disclosure of specified information or documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176(4) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176-ss-4
part of: 176 Authorisations for access to prospective information or
note: Must satisfy condition before authorizing disclosure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.368
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176(5) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176-ss-5
part of: 176 Authorisations for access to prospective information or
note: Authorisation under this section comes into force upon notification and ends at the specified time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.368
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 176(5) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Authorisation holds from the point of notification.
premise text: (a) comes into force at the time the person from whom the disclosure is sought receives notification of the authorisation;
conclusion text: The authorisation holds from the point of notification.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ends
logic summary: Authorisation ends at the specified time.
premise text: (b) unless it is revoked earlier, ends at the time specified in the authorisation;
conclusion text: The authorisation ends at the specified time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Time period for authorisation overlaps with the period specified under section 180N.
premise text: (ii) if the authorisation is made under a journalist information warrant—is no later than the end of the period specified under section 180N as the period for which the warrant is to remain in force.
conclusion text: The time period for authorisation overlaps with the period specified under section 180N.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: revokes
logic summary: Authorisation can be revoked earlier than the specified time.
premise text: Revoking the authorisation
conclusion text: The authorisation can be revoked earlier than the specified time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Authorisation is held by the State.
premise text: An authorisation under this section:
conclusion text: The authorisation is held by the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176(6) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176-ss-6
part of: 176 Authorisations for access to prospective information or
note: Revoke authorisation if disclosure is no longer required or warrant has been revoked.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.368
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 176(6) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Revoke authorisation if disclosure is no longer required or warrant has been revoked.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176A Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176a
has part: 176A(1) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(2) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(3) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(3A) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(3B) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(4) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(4A) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(5) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(6) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(7) Meaning of enforcement agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370

176A(1) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176a-ss-1
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency
note: Defines enforcement agencies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 176A(1) Meaning of enforcement agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

176A(2) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176a-ss-2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency
note: Request for Minister's declaration of authority as enforcement agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 176A(2) Meaning of enforcement agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: request
logic summary: Request for permission
premise text: (2) The head of an authority or body may request the Minister to declare...
conclusion text: ...the authority or body to be an enforcement agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: request timing
logic summary: Timing of request for declaration
premise text: (2) The head of an authority or body may request...
conclusion text: ...the Minister to declare the authority or body to be an enforcement agency.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: request justification
logic summary: Justification for request
premise text: (2) The head of an authority or body may request...
conclusion text: ...the Minister to declare the authority or body to be an enforcement agency.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: request propagation
logic summary: Propagation of request for declaration
premise text: (2) The head of an authority or body may request...
conclusion text: ...the Minister to declare the authority or body to be an enforcement agency.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: request analysis
logic summary: Analysis of request for declaration
premise text: (2) The head of an authority or body may request...
conclusion text: ...the Minister to declare the authority or body to be an enforcement agency.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

176A(3) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176a-ss-3
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency
note: Minister may declare authority or body as enforcement agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 176A(3) Meaning of enforcement agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration of authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176A(3A) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176a-ss-3a
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency
note: Declaration by Minister regarding request under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to make declaration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176A(3B) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176a-ss-3b
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency
note: Minister cannot make declaration without reasonable grounds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of making declaration
premise text: (3B) The Minister must not make the declaration...
conclusion text: ...unless the Minister is satisfied on reasonable grounds...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal interval check for authority or body
premise text: (a) enforcement of the criminal law; or (b) administering a law imposing a pecuniary penalty; or (c) administering a law relating to the protection of the public revenue.
conclusion text: ...the functions of the authority or body include...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Recurring trace for authority or body
premise text: (a) enforcement of the criminal law; or (b) administering a law imposing a pecuniary penalty; or (c) administering a law relating to the protection of the public revenue.
conclusion text: ...the functions of the authority or body include...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: Recurring trace for authority or body
premise text: (a) enforcement of the criminal law; or (b) administering a law imposing a pecuniary penalty; or (c) administering a law relating to the protection of the public revenue.
conclusion text: ...the functions of the authority or body include...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
logic summary: Recurring trace for authority or body
premise text: (a) enforcement of the criminal law; or (b) administering a law imposing a pecuniary penalty; or (c) administering a law relating to the protection of the public revenue.
conclusion text: ...the functions of the authority or body include...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176A(4) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176a-ss-4
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency
note: The Minister must consider certain factors when deciding whether to make a declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 176A(4) Meaning of enforcement agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must consider certain factors.
premise text: (4) In considering whether to make the declaration, the Minister...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The declaration must consider the authority or body's compliance with obligations over time.
premise text: (d) whether the authority or body proposes to adopt processes and practices that would ensure its compliance...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: The Minister's decision implies certain conditions about the authority or body's actions.
premise text: (e) whether the Minister considers that the declaration would be in the public interest;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
logic summary: The declaration must consider multiple factors simultaneously.
premise text: (f) any other matter that the Minister considers relevant.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176A(4A) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176a-ss-4a
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency
note: Protection of personal information must be comparable to the Australian Privacy Principles.
description: comparable protection, mechanism for monitoring compliance, and recourse for mishandled information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4a-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 176A(4A) Meaning of enforcement agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to protect personal information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-4a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for monitoring compliance
premise text: (4A) For the purposes of subparagraphs (4)(c)(ii) and (iii),
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176A(5) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176a-ss-5
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency
note: Consultation with certain persons or bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to consult
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176A(6) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176a-ss-6
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency
note: The declaration may be subject to conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-6-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 176A(6) Meaning of enforcement agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

176A(7) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176a-ss-7
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency
note: Authority or body is not to exercise a power conferred on an enforcement agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.370
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 176A(7) Meaning of enforcement agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-176a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of exercising a power
premise text: (7) Without limiting subsection (6),
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

177 Voluntary disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-177
has part: 177(1) Voluntary disclosure
has part: 177(2) Voluntary disclosure
has part: 177(3) Voluntary disclosure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.372

177(1) Voluntary disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-177-ss-1
part of: 177 Voluntary disclosure
note: Disclosure of information or document to enforcement agency is reasonably necessary for the enforcement of criminal law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.372
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 177(1) Voluntary disclosure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information or document
premise text: Reasonably necessary for the enforcement of criminal law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Disclosure is reasonably necessary for the enforcement of criminal law
premise text: Disclosures are permitted if reasonably necessary
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

177(2) Voluntary disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-177-ss-2
part of: 177 Voluntary disclosure
note: Disclosure of information to enforcement agency is allowed under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.372
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 177(2) Voluntary disclosure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permits disclosure of information to enforcement agency.
premise text: Reasonably necessary for enforcement of law or protection of public revenue.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Disclosure is allowed within reasonably necessary limits.
premise text: Disclosure is for enforcement of law or protection of public revenue.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

177(3) Voluntary disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-177-ss-3
part of: 177 Voluntary disclosure
note: Disclosure not required if requested by enforcement agency staff
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.372
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-177-ss-3-norm

178 Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178
has part: 178(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or
has part: 178(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or
has part: 178(3) Authorisations for access to existing information or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.373

178(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178-ss-1
part of: 178 Authorisations for access to existing information or
note: Authorisation allows disclosure of information or document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.373
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

178(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178-ss-2
part of: 178 Authorisations for access to existing information or
note: Authorized disclosure of specified information or documents before notification.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.373
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 178(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorizes disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178(3) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178-ss-3
part of: 178 Authorisations for access to existing information or
note: Authorised officer must not make authorisation unless satisfied disclosure is reasonably necessary for enforcement of criminal law or performance of ACC's function.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.373
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 178(3) Authorisations for access to existing information or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (3) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation unless...
conclusion text: ...the disclosure is reasonably necessary for...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178A Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178a
has part: 178A(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or
has part: 178A(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or
has part: 178A(3) Authorisations for access to existing information or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.374

178A(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178a-ss-1
part of: 178A Authorisations for access to existing information or
note: Authorisation allows disclosure of information or document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.374
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

178A(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178a-ss-2
part of: 178A Authorisations for access to existing information or
note: Authorisation for disclosure of specified information or documents
references: sec-184
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.374
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorisation for disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178A(3) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178a-ss-3
part of: 178A Authorisations for access to existing information or
note: Must not make authorisation unless satisfied disclosure is reasonably necessary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.374
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-178a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustNot
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179 Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-179
has part: 179(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or
has part: 179(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or
has part: 179(3) Authorisations for access to existing information or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.374

179(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-179-ss-1
part of: 179 Authorisations for access to existing information or
note: Authorisation allows disclosure of information or document under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.374
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorisation allows disclosure of information or document under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

179(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-179-ss-2
part of: 179 Authorisations for access to existing information or
note: Authorisation for disclosure of specified information or documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.374
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 179(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

179(3) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-179-ss-3
part of: 179 Authorisations for access to existing information or
note: Must not make authorisation unless satisfied disclosure is reasonably necessary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.374
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustNot
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: authorised officer must make authorisation
conclusion text: authorised officer must not make authorisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustNot
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: authorisation unless authorised officer is satisfied disclosure is reasonably necessary
conclusion text: authorised officer must not make authorisation unless satisfied disclosure is reasonably necessary
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-179-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval condition
premise text: authorisation must be made during reasonable necessity period
conclusion text: authorised officer must not make authorisation unless during reasonable necessity period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180 Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180
has part: 180(1) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 180(2) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 180(3) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 180(4) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.375

180(1) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180-ss-1
part of: 180 Authorisations for access to prospective information or
note: Authorisation allows disclosure of information or document under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.375
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorisation permits disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

180(2) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180-ss-2
part of: 180 Authorisations for access to prospective information or
note: Authorisation for access to specified information or documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.375
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 180(2) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grants permission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180(3) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180-ss-3
part of: 180 Authorisations for access to prospective information or
note: Authorisation for disclosure of specified information or documents that came into existence before the authorisation comes into force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.375
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-3-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 180(3) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

180(4) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180-ss-4
part of: 180 Authorisations for access to prospective information or
note: Must not make authorisation unless satisfied disclosure is reasonably necessary for investigation of serious offence or imprisonment offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.375
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (4) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation...
conclusion text: ...unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for investigation of serious offence
premise text: (4) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation...
conclusion text: ...unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for investigation of serious offence
premise text: (4) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation...
conclusion text: ...unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information for investigation of serious offence
premise text: (4) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation...
conclusion text: ...unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation for access to information
premise text: (4) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation...
conclusion text: ...unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180A Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180a
has part: 180A(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or
has part: 180A(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or
has part: 180A(3) Authorisations for access to existing information or
has part: 180A(4) Authorisations for access to existing information or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.377

180A(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180a-ss-1
part of: 180A Authorisations for access to existing information or
note: Authorisation allows disclosure of information or document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.377
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 180A(1) Authorisations for access to existing information or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows disclosure
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Authorisation is in force under subsection (2)
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Authorisation is in force under subsection (2)
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognise
logic summary: Authorisation is in force under subsection (2)
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
logic summary: Authorisation is in force under subsection (2)
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure...
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

180A(2) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180a-ss-2
part of: 180A Authorisations for access to existing information or
note: Authorisation for disclosure of specified information or documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.377
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180A(3) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180a-ss-3
part of: 180A Authorisations for access to existing information or
note: Must not make authorisation unless satisfied disclosure is reasonably necessary for specified purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.377
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustNot
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (3) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation...
conclusion text: ...unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary for...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: (3) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary for...
conclusion text: ...for the specified purposes.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: mustJustify
logic summary: Rationality requirement
premise text: (3) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary for...
conclusion text: ...the specified purposes.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: mustInform
logic summary: Transparency requirement
premise text: (3) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary for...
conclusion text: ...the specified purposes.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: mustExplain
logic summary: Explainability requirement
premise text: (3) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is reasonably necessary for...
conclusion text: ...the specified purposes.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180A(4) Authorisations for access to existing information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180a-ss-4
part of: 180A Authorisations for access to existing information or
note: Authorisation for disclosure of information to foreign law enforcement agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.377
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorisation for disclosure of information to foreign law enforcement agency
premise text: (4) If specified information or specified documents are disclosed because of an authorisation given under subsection (2)
conclusion text: An authorised officer of the Australian Federal Police may authorise the disclosure of the information or documents so disclosed to a foreign law enforcement agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180B Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180b
has part: 180B(1) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 180B(2) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 180B(3) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 180B(4) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 180B(5) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
has part: 180B(6) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.378

180B(1) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180b-ss-1
part of: 180B Authorisations for access to prospective information or
note: Authorisation for disclosure of information or document under subsection (2) of this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.378
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 180B(1) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information or document.
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure of information or a document if the information or document is covered by an authorisation in force under subsection (2) of this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between prospective authorisation and disclosure.
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure of information or a document if the information or document is covered by an authorisation in force under subsection (2) of this section.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Recurring trace of prospective authorisation and disclosure.
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure of information or a document if the information or document is covered by an authorisation in force under subsection (2) of this section.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of prospective authorisation and disclosure.
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure of information or a document if the information or document is covered by an authorisation in force under subsection (2) of this section.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognises
logic summary: Recognition of prospective authorisation and disclosure.
premise text: (1) Sections 276, 277 and 278 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 do not prevent a disclosure of information or a document if the information or document is covered by an authorisation in force under subsection (2) of this section.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180B(2) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180b-ss-2
part of: 180B Authorisations for access to prospective information or
note: Authorisation for disclosure of specified information or documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.378
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-2-norm

180B(3) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180b-ss-3
part of: 180B Authorisations for access to prospective information or
note: Authorized officer must obtain Attorney-General authorization before making an authorization.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.378
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: The authorized officer must obtain the Attorney-General's authorization.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180B(4) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180b-ss-4
part of: 180B Authorisations for access to prospective information or
note: Authorised officer must revoke authorisation if disclosure is no longer required.
references: sec-184
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.378
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
logic summary: Must revoke authorisation
premise text: Disclosure is no longer required
conclusion text: Authorised officer must revoke
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180B(5) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180b-ss-5
part of: 180B Authorisations for access to prospective information or
note: Authorisation under subsection (2) comes into force upon notification and ceases after a specified period or is revoked earlier.
references: sec-184
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.378
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Authorisation under subsection (2) permits disclosure.
premise text: (5) An authorisation under subsection (2):
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: The authorisation ceases to be in force during the specified period.
premise text: (b) ceases to be in force at the time specified in the authorisation,
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The authorisation ceases to be in force until the specified period or is revoked earlier.
premise text: (b) ceases to be in force at the time specified in the authorisation, which must not be more than 21 days after the day the authorisation is made,
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The authorisation diffuses to the person from whom the disclosure is sought.
premise text: (a) comes into force at the time the person from whom the disclosure is sought receives notification of the authorisation;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognises
logic summary: The legal system recognises the authorisation.
premise text: (5) An authorisation under subsection (2):
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180B(6) Authorisations for access to prospective information or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180b-ss-6
part of: 180B Authorisations for access to prospective information or
note: Extension of authorisation period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.378
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180b-ss-6-norm

180C Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180c
has part: 180C(1) Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
has part: 180C(2) Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.380

180C(1) Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180c-ss-1
part of: 180C Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
note: Authorise disclosure of information or documents to foreign law enforcement agencies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.380
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission
premise text: (1) If specified information or specified documents are disclosed...
conclusion text: An authorised officer of the Australian Federal Police may authorise...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180C(2) Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180c-ss-2
part of: 180C Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
note: Must not make authorisation unless satisfied disclosure is appropriate and necessary for specified purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.380
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustNot
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (2) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation...
conclusion text: ...unless he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is appropriate...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to enforcement of foreign criminal law
premise text: (2) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation unless...
conclusion text: ...the disclosure is appropriate in all the circumstances and that the disclosure is reasonably necessary for: ...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to investigation or prosecution of crime within ICC jurisdiction
premise text: (2) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation unless...
conclusion text: ...the disclosure is appropriate in all the circumstances and that the disclosure is reasonably necessary for: ...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180c-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustNot
logic summary: Prohibition of making authorisation without satisfaction
premise text: (2) The authorised officer must not make the authorisation unless...
conclusion text: ...he or she is satisfied that the disclosure is appropriate...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180D Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180d
has part: 180D(1) Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
has part: 180D(2) Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.381

180D(1) Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180d-ss-1
part of: 180D Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
note: Authorisation for disclosure of information or documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.381
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-ltl-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (1) If specified information or specified documents are disclosed because of an authorisation given under this Division...
conclusion text: An authorised officer of the Australian Federal Police may authorise the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Enabling action
premise text: (1) If specified information or specified documents are disclosed because of an authorisation given under this Division...
conclusion text: the disclosure of the information or documents to the Organisation or an enforcement agency;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (1) If specified information or specified documents are disclosed because of an authorisation given under this Division...
conclusion text: the use of the information or documents by the Australian Federal Police.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Temporal relationship
premise text: (1) If specified information or specified documents are disclosed because of an authorisation given under this Division...
conclusion text: an authorised officer of the Australian Federal Police may authorise the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal limitation
premise text: (1) If specified information or specified documents are disclosed because of an authorisation given under this Division...
conclusion text: the disclosure of the information or documents to the Organisation or an enforcement agency;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

180D(2) Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180d-ss-2
part of: 180D Authorisations to disclose information or documents—
note: Authorised officer must make disclosure only if necessary for Organisation's functions or enforcement of laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.381
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Authorised officer must make disclosure.
premise text: (2) The authorised officer...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Disclosure is necessary for Organisation's functions or enforcement of laws.
premise text: (a) in the case of a disclosure to the Organisation—...
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Disclosure must be made only if necessary for Organisation's functions or enforcement of laws.
premise text: (2) The authorised officer...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Disclosure is justified only if necessary for Organisation's functions or enforcement of laws.
premise text: (a) in the case of a disclosure to the Organisation—...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Disclosure must be made only if necessary for Organisation's functions or enforcement of laws.
premise text: (2) The authorised officer...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180E Disclosing information etc. to foreign countries or foreign law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180e
has part: 180E(1) Disclosing information etc. to foreign countries or foreign law
has part: 180E(2) Disclosing information etc. to foreign countries or foreign law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.382

180E(1) Disclosing information etc. to foreign countries or foreign law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180e-ss-1
part of: 180E Disclosing information etc. to foreign countries or foreign law
note: Disclosing information to foreign countries or law enforcement agencies without conditions is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.382
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180e-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 180E(1) Disclosing information etc. to foreign countries or foreign law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing information to foreign countries or law enforcement agencies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180E(2) Disclosing information etc. to foreign countries or foreign law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180e-ss-2
part of: 180E Disclosing information etc. to foreign countries or foreign law
note: Legislative instrument is not a determination made under paragraph (1)(c)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.382
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180e-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180E(2) Disclosing information etc. to foreign countries or foreign law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

180F Authorised officers to consider privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180f
note: Authorised officers must consider privacy before making an authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.383
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180f-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180f-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180F Authorised officers to consider privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consider privacy
premise text: Authorised officers must be satisfied on reasonable grounds
conclusion text: Privacy must be considered
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180G The Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180g
has part: 180G(1) The Organisation
has part: 180G(2) The Organisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.384

180G(1) The Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180g-ss-1
part of: 180G The Organisation
note: Eligible persons cannot make authorisations that would disclose information about a journalist or their employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.384
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: Eligible person knows or reasonably believes the person is a journalist or their employer.
conclusion text: Cannot make authorisation to disclose information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restriction on disclosure
premise text: Purpose of making authorisation would be to identify another person
conclusion text: Cannot disclose information about a journalist or their employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Restriction
logic summary: Temporal restriction on disclosure
premise text: Disclosure of information before a journalist information warrant is in force
conclusion text: Cannot disclose information after a journalist information warrant is in force.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Justification
logic summary: Justification for prohibition
premise text: Eligible person knows or reasonably believes the person is a journalist or their employer.
conclusion text: Prohibition justified by knowledge of journalist status.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Consequence
logic summary: Consequence of prohibition
premise text: Eligible person must not make authorisation
conclusion text: Disclosure of information about a journalist or their employer is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180G(2) The Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180g-ss-2
part of: 180G The Organisation
note: Nothing in this section affects by implication the kind of person in relation to whom a warrant may be issued under this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.384
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Describes a class of persons.
premise text: (2) Nothing in this section affects by implication the kind of person in relation to whom a warrant (other than a journalist information warrant) may be issued under this Act.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180H Enforcement agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180h
has part: 180H(1) Enforcement agencies
has part: 180H(2) Enforcement agencies
has part: 180H(3) Enforcement agencies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.384

180H(1) Enforcement agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180h-ss-1
part of: 180H Enforcement agencies
note: Authorized officer must not make authorization to disclose information about a journalist or their employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.384
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 180H(1) Enforcement agencies
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes the person is a journalist.
conclusion text: Must not make authorization to disclose information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure prohibition
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes the person is a journalist.
conclusion text: Prohibition applies until a journalist information warrant is in force.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibition to related persons
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes the person is an employer of a journalist.
conclusion text: Prohibition applies to all employees of the employer.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inference of prohibition based on knowledge
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes the person is a journalist.
conclusion text: Must not make authorization to disclose information about the journalist.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
logic summary: Validation of prohibition against related persons
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes the person is an employer of a journalist.
conclusion text: Prohibition applies to all employees of the employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180H(2) Enforcement agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180h-ss-2
part of: 180H Enforcement agencies
note: Authorized officer must not disclose information or documents of a particular person if they are a journalist or their employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.384
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes person is a journalist or their employer.
conclusion text: Disclosure must not be made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure prohibition
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes person is a journalist or their employer.
conclusion text: Disclosure must not be made within this temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of disclosure prohibition on authorized officer's actions
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes person is a journalist or their employer.
conclusion text: Authorized officer must not make authorisation under Division 4A.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagation of disclosure prohibition through authorized officer's actions
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes person is a journalist or their employer.
conclusion text: Disclosure must not be propagated by authorized officer's actions.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of journalists and employers in authorized officer's knowledge base
premise text: Authorized officer knows or reasonably believes person is a journalist or their employer.
conclusion text: Journalists and employers are represented in authorized officer's knowledge base.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180H(3) Enforcement agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180h-ss-3
part of: 180H Enforcement agencies
note: Nothing in this section affects by implication the kind of person in relation to whom a warrant may be issued under this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.384
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180h-ss-3-norm

180J Requesting a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180j
has part: 180J(1) Requesting a journalist information warrant
has part: 180J(2) Requesting a journalist information warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.385

180J(1) Requesting a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180j-ss-1
part of: 180J Requesting a journalist information warrant
note: Request for issuance of journalist information warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.385
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180j-ss-1-norm

180J(2) Requesting a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180j-ss-2
part of: 180J Requesting a journalist information warrant
note: Request must specify facts and grounds for issuing warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.385
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180j-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180J(2) Requesting a journalist information warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide request details
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180K Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180k
has part: 180K(1) Further information
has part: 180K(2) Further information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.386

180K(1) Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180k-ss-1
part of: 180K Further information
note: The Attorney-General may require the Director-General of Security to provide further information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.386
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180k-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180K(1) Further information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180K(2) Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180k-ss-2
part of: 180K Further information
note: Refuse to consider or take action on a request if the Director-General breaches the requirement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.386
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180k-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of action by Attorney-General
premise text: Director-General breaches requirement
conclusion text: Refuse to consider or take action on request
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180L Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180l
has part: 180L(1) Issuing a journalist information warrant
has part: 180L(2) Issuing a journalist information warrant
has part: 180L(3) Issuing a journalist information warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.386

180L(1) Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180l-ss-1
part of: 180L Issuing a journalist information warrant
note: Attorney-General must issue a journalist information warrant or refuse to issue one.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.386
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180L(1) Issuing a journalist information warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Attorney-General must take action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180L(2) Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180l-ss-2
part of: 180L Issuing a journalist information warrant
note: The Attorney-General must satisfy certain conditions before issuing a journalist information warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.386
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180L(2) Issuing a journalist information warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: The Attorney-General has an obligation to satisfy certain conditions before issuing a journalist information warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: The excerpt classifies the issuance of a journalist information warrant as an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180L(3) Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180l-ss-3
part of: 180L Issuing a journalist information warrant
note: Conditions or restrictions for issuing authorisations under a warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.386
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180L(3) Issuing a journalist information warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: specifies
logic summary: Specifying conditions or restrictions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180M Issuing a journalist information warrant in an emergency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180m
note: The Director-General must issue a journalist information warrant in an emergency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.387
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180m-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180m-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180m-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Director-General must issue a journalist information warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180N Duration of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180n
note: A journalist information warrant must specify a duration of up to 6 months.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.389
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180n-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180n-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180n-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180N Duration of a journalist information warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a duration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180P Discontinuance of authorisations before expiry of a journalist
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180p
note: Ensure discontinuation of authorisations upon warrant expiry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.390
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180p-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180p-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to ensure discontinuation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180q
has part: 180Q(1) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
has part: 180Q(2) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
has part: 180Q(3) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
has part: 180Q(4) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
has part: 180Q(5) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.390

180Q(1) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180q-ss-1
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
note: Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.390
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 180Q(1) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permits enforcement agency to apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180Q(2) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180q-ss-2
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
note: Application must be made by a person or officer of the agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.390
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made by a person or officer of the agency
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180Q(3) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180q-ss-3
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
note: Agency chief officer may nominate an office or position for agency management
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.390
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-3-norm

180Q(4) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180q-ss-4
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
note: Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.390
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-4-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180Q(4) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

180Q(5) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180q-ss-5
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
note: Application for journalist information may be made in writing or any other form.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.390
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-5-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180q-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 180Q(5) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

180R Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180r
has part: 180R(1) Further information
has part: 180R(2) Further information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.391

180R(1) Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180r-ss-1
part of: 180R Further information
note: Agency must provide further information to Part 4-1 issuing authority
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.391
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180r-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must provide further information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180R(2) Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180r-ss-2
part of: 180R Further information
note: Breaching requirement results in breach of obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.391
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180r-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180R(2) Further information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: breach
logic summary: Obligation breach
premise text: (2) If the chief officer or other person breaches the requirement
conclusion text: the chief officer or other person is in breach of obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180S Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180s
has part: 180S(1) Oaths and affirmations
has part: 180S(2) Oaths and affirmations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.391

180S(1) Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180s-ss-1
part of: 180S Oaths and affirmations
note: Information must be verified on oath or affirmation when applying for Part 4-1 issuing authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.391
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180S(1) Oaths and affirmations
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to verify information on oath or affirmation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180S(2) Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180s-ss-2
part of: 180S Oaths and affirmations
note: Authority to administer oath or affirmation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.391
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 180S(2) Oaths and affirmations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting authority
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the Part 4-1 issuing authority may:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation of oath or affirmation administration method
premise text: The oath or affirmation may be administered in person, or by telephone, video call, video link or audio link.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of oath or affirmation administration method
premise text: The oath or affirmation may be administered in person, or by telephone, video call, video link or audio link.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of oath or affirmation administration method
premise text: The oath or affirmation may be administered in person, or by telephone, video call, video link or audio link.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
logic summary: Cognitive AI application of oath or affirmation administration method
premise text: The oath or affirmation may be administered in person, or by telephone, video call, video link or audio link.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180T Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180t
note: Authority must issue a journalist information warrant upon application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.391
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180t-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180t-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180t-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180T Issuing a journalist information warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180t-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must issue a warrant
premise text: Application under section 180Q
conclusion text: Warrant issued
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180u
has part: 180U(1) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
has part: 180U(2) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
has part: 180U(3) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
has part: 180U(4) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
has part: 180U(5) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.393

180U(1) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180u-ss-1
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant
note: A journalist information warrant must be in accordance with the prescribed form and signed by the issuing authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.393
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180U(1) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with prescribed form and signature
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180U(2) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180u-ss-2
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant
note: Conditions or restrictions for making authorisations under the warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.393
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180U(2) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: specifies
logic summary: Specifies conditions or restrictions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180U(3) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180u-ss-3
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant
note: Journalist information warrant must specify a period of up to 90 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.393
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180U(3) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST_SPECIFY
logic summary: Must specify a period of up to 90 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180U(4) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180u-ss-4
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant
note: No variation of a journalist information warrant is allowed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.393
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 180U(4) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (4) A Part 4-1 issuing authority must not vary a journalist information warrant issued under this Subdivision by extending the period for which it is to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: No variation of a provision is allowed
premise text: (4) A Part 4-1 issuing authority must not vary a journalist information warrant issued under this Subdivision by extending the period for which it is to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180U(5) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180u-ss-5
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant
note: Allows for multiple warrants to be issued under the same Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.393
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180U(5) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180u-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Permits further warrants under the same Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180V Entry into force of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180v
note: Entry into force of a journalist information warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.393
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180v-norm

180W Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180w
note: Prohibits chief officer of an enforcement agency from revoking a journalist information warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.393
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180w-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180w-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180w-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 180W Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180w-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits chief officer from revoking warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180X Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180x
has part: 180X(1) Public Interest Advocates
has part: 180X(2) Public Interest Advocates
has part: 180X(3) Public Interest Advocates
has part: 180X(4) Public Interest Advocates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.394

180X(1) Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180x-ss-1
part of: 180X Public Interest Advocates
note: The Prime Minister must declare one or more persons to be Public Interest Advocates.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.394
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180X(1) Public Interest Advocates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180X(2) Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180x-ss-2
part of: 180X Public Interest Advocates
note: Submit matters relevant to decisions about journalist information warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.394
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Public Interest Advocate must submit matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180X(3) Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180x-ss-3
part of: 180X Public Interest Advocates
note: Regulations may prescribe matters relating to the performance of a Public Interest Advocate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.394
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-3-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180X(3) Public Interest Advocates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

180X(4) Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180x-ss-4
part of: 180X Public Interest Advocates
note: A declaration under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.394
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-180x-ss-4-norm

181 Uses of telecommunications data connected with provision of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-181
note: Use of telecommunications data for disclosure purposes is permitted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.395
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to use telecommunications data.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

181A Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-181a
has part: 181A(1) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
has part: 181A(2) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
has part: 181A(3) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
has part: 181A(4) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
has part: 181A(5) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.396

181A(1) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-181a-ss-1
part of: 181A Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
note: Disclosing certain information is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.396
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 181A(1) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain information.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person discloses information; (b) the information is about any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain information.
premise text: (b) the information is about any of the following: (i) whether an authorisation under Division 3 has been, or is being, sought; (ii) the making of such an authorisation;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain information.
premise text: (b) the information is about any of the following: (iii) the existence or non-existence of such an authorisation; (iv) the revocation of such an authorisation;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain information.
premise text: (b) the information is about any of the following: (v) the notification of such a revocation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

181A(2) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-181a-ss-2
part of: 181A Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
note: Disclosing certain documents is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.396
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 181A(2) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain documents.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if:...
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

181A(3) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-181a-ss-3
part of: 181A Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
note: Disclosure of information or document is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.396
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Indicates permission or prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

181A(4) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-181a-ss-4
part of: 181A Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
note: Using certain information is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.396
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits using certain information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

181A(5) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-181a-ss-5
part of: 181A Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
note: Using a document with certain authorisations is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.396
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 181A(5) Disclosure/use offences: authorisations under Division 3
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits using a document with certain authorisations.
premise text: (5) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person uses a document; and (b) the document consists (wholly or partly) of any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

181B Disclosure/use offences: certain authorisations under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-181b
note: Disclosure/use offences: certain authorisations under
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.398
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-181b-norm

182 Secondary disclosure/use offence: disclosures under Division 4
type: Concept
realized by: sec-182
has part: 182(1) Secondary disclosure/use offence: disclosures under Division 4
has part: 182(2) Secondary disclosure/use offence: disclosures under Division 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.401

182(1) Secondary disclosure/use offence: disclosures under Division 4
type: Concept
realized by: sec-182-ss-1
part of: 182 Secondary disclosure/use offence: disclosures under Division 4
note: Disclosing or using information without permission is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.401
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 182(1) Secondary disclosure/use offence: disclosures under Division 4
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
premise text: (a) information or a document is disclosed to the person as permitted by Division 4 or 4A; and (b) the person discloses or uses the information or document.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
premise text: (b) the person discloses or uses the information or document.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication from permitted disclosure to committing an offence.
premise text: (a) information or a document is disclosed to the person as permitted by Division 4 or 4A; and (b) the person discloses or uses the information or document.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval within which disclosure is permitted.
premise text: (a) information or a document is disclosed to the person as permitted by Division 4 or 4A; and (b) the person discloses or uses the information or document.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
premise text: (b) the person discloses or uses the information or document.
conclusion text: The penalty is Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182(2) Secondary disclosure/use offence: disclosures under Division 4
type: Concept
realized by: sec-182-ss-2
part of: 182 Secondary disclosure/use offence: disclosures under Division 4
note: Disclosure of non-missing person information is permitted under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.401
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182-ss-2-norm

182A Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-182a
has part: 182A(1) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
has part: 182A(2) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.404

182A(1) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-182a-ss-1
part of: 182A Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
note: Disclosing or using journalist information warrants is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.404
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 182A(1) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure or use of journalist information warrants.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implicates that disclosure or use of journalist information warrants is an offence.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182A(2) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-182a-ss-2
part of: 182A Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
note: Disclosing or using a journalist information warrant without permission is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.404
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 182A(2) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing or using a journalist information warrant.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...discloses or uses a document; and (b) the document consists wholly or partly of any of the following: ...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure/use and journalist information warrant.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...discloses or uses a document; and (b) the document consists wholly or partly of any of the following: ...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure/use and journalist information warrant.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...discloses or uses a document; and (b) the document consists wholly or partly of any of the following: ...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spread of disclosure/use to journalist information warrant.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...discloses or uses a document; and (b) the document consists wholly or partly of any of the following: ...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph
logic summary: Knowledge graph representation of disclosure/use and journalist information warrant.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...discloses or uses a document; and (b) the document consists wholly or partly of any of the following: ...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182B Permitted disclosure or use: journalist information warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-182b
note: Disclosure or use of information is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.405
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-182b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Indicates that disclosure or use is not prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

183 Form of authorisations and notifications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-183
has part: 183(1) Form of authorisations and notifications
has part: 183(2) Form of authorisations and notifications
has part: 183(3) Form of authorisations and notifications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406

183(1) Form of authorisations and notifications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-183-ss-1
part of: 183 Form of authorisations and notifications
note: Written form or electronic form of authorisation and revocation notifications must comply with requirements.
description: written form or electronic form
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-183-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-183-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-183-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 183(1) Form of authorisations and notifications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-183-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written form or electronic form
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

183(2) Form of authorisations and notifications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-183-ss-2
part of: 183 Form of authorisations and notifications
note: Determine requirements for purposes of paragraph (1)(f)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-183-ss-2-norm

183(3) Form of authorisations and notifications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-183-ss-3
part of: 183 Form of authorisations and notifications
note: Must consult ACMA and Information Commissioner on privacy matters before making a determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-183-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-183-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-183-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consult ACMA and Information Commissioner on privacy matters before making a determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184 Notification of authorisations or revocations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-184
has part: 184(1) Notification of authorisations or revocations
has part: 184(2) Notification of authorisations or revocations
has part: 184(3) Notification of authorisations or revocations
has part: 184(4) Notification of authorisations or revocations
has part: 184(5) Notification of authorisations or revocations
has part: 184(6) Notification of authorisations or revocations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406

184(1) Notification of authorisations or revocations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-184-ss-1
part of: 184 Notification of authorisations or revocations
note: Notification of authorisations or revocations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 184(1) Notification of authorisations or revocations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify the person from whom disclosure is sought
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
logic summary: Temporal relation to authorisation
premise text: (1) If a person makes an authorisation under Division 3 of Part 4-1, an ASIO employee or ASIO affiliate must notify the person from whom disclosure is sought.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal relation to authorisation
premise text: (1) If a person makes an authorisation under Division 3 of Part 4-1, an ASIO employee or ASIO affiliate must notify the person from whom disclosure is sought.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Relates to authorisation notification
premise text: (1) If a person makes an authorisation under Division 3 of Part 4-1, an ASIO employee or ASIO affiliate must notify the person from whom disclosure is sought.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Relates to authorisation notification
premise text: (1) If a person makes an authorisation under Division 3 of Part 4-1, an ASIO employee or ASIO affiliate must notify the person from whom disclosure is sought.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

184(2) Notification of authorisations or revocations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-184-ss-2
part of: 184 Notification of authorisations or revocations
note: Notification of revocation of authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify
premise text: (2) If, under subsection 176(6), a person revokes an authorisation
conclusion text: An ASIO employee or ASIO affiliate must notify the person who was notified of the authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184(3) Notification of authorisations or revocations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-184-ss-3
part of: 184 Notification of authorisations or revocations
note: Staff member must notify person from whom disclosure is sought after authorization.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184(4) Notification of authorisations or revocations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-184-ss-4
part of: 184 Notification of authorisations or revocations
note: Notification of revocation of authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify
premise text: (4) If, under subsection 180(7), an authorised officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency revokes an authorisation...
conclusion text: a relevant staff member of the enforcement agency must notify the person who was notified of the authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: (4) If, under subsection 180(7), an authorised officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency revokes an authorisation...
conclusion text: a relevant staff member of the enforcement agency must notify the person who was notified of the authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Recurring trace
premise text: (4) If, under subsection 180(7), an authorised officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency revokes an authorisation...
conclusion text: a relevant staff member of the enforcement agency must notify the person who was notified of the authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: (4) If, under subsection 180(7), an authorised officer of a criminal law-enforcement agency revokes an authorisation...
conclusion text: a relevant staff member of the enforcement agency must notify the person who was notified of the authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184(5) Notification of authorisations or revocations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-184-ss-5
part of: 184 Notification of authorisations or revocations
note: Notification of authorisations or revocations
description: notification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184(6) Notification of authorisations or revocations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-184-ss-6
part of: 184 Notification of authorisations or revocations
note: Notification of revocation of authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.406
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-184-ss-6-norm

185 Retention of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185
has part: 185(1) Retention of authorisations
has part: 185(2) Retention of authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.407

185(1) Retention of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185-ss-1
part of: 185 Retention of authorisations
note: Head of enforcement agency must retain authorisation for 3 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.407
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 185(1) Retention of authorisations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185(2) Retention of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185-ss-2
part of: 185 Retention of authorisations
note: The Commissioner of Police must retain an authorisation made under Division 4A of Part 4-1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.407
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 185(2) Retention of authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to retain authorisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185A Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by carriers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185a
note: Authorized personnel may issue written certificates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.408
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185a-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 185A Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by carriers
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to issue certificates
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185B Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by the Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185b
has part: 185B(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by the Organisation
has part: 185B(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by the Organisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.409

185B(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by the Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185b-ss-1
part of: 185B Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by the Organisation
note: Director-General of Security or Deputy Director-General may issue a written certificate setting out relevant facts regarding ASIO employee or affiliate actions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.409
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 185B(1) Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by the Organisation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Director-General of Security or Deputy Director-General may issue a written certificate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185B(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by the Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185b-ss-2
part of: 185B Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by the Organisation
note: Exempt proceeding evidence of certificate matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.409
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 185B(2) Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by the Organisation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Receives in evidence without proof
premise text: (2) A document purporting to be a certificate...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185C Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by enforcement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185c
note: Certifying officer must issue written certificate setting out relevant facts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.409
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 185C Evidentiary certificates relating to acts by enforcement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Certifying officer has an obligation to issue a written certificate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185d
has part: 185D(1) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
has part: 185D(2) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
has part: 185D(3) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
has part: 185D(4) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
has part: 185D(5) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.410

185D(1) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185d-ss-1
part of: 185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
note: Notify Inspector-General and Attorney-General upon issuing a journalist information warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.410
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGATE
logic summary: Notification obligation
premise text: Journalist information warrant issued
conclusion text: Notify Inspector-General and Attorney-General
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: KNOW
logic summary: Knowledge of warrant issuance
premise text: Director-General of Security knows warrant issued
conclusion text: Notify Inspector-General and Attorney-General
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: NEXT
logic summary: Temporal relation between notification and warrant issuance
premise text: Warrant issued at time t
conclusion text: Notify Inspector-General and Attorney-General at time t+1
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185D(2) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185d-ss-2
part of: 185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
note: Must notify Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security after warrant expiry
description: Copy of authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.410
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185D(3) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185d-ss-3
part of: 185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
note: Must provide report to Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security upon receiving certain reports from the Inspector-General.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.410
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185D(4) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185d-ss-4
part of: 185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
note: Request for briefing from Inspector-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.410
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-4-norm

185D(5) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185d-ss-5
part of: 185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
note: Chief officer of ACC must notify Minister and Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security upon issuing a journalist information warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.410
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 185D(5) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Chief officer of ACC must notify Minister and Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185E Reports on access to retained data
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185e
note: Reports on access to retained data are required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.413
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185e-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185e-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 185E Reports on access to retained data
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-185e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide reports
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186 Report to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186
note: Agency must report to Minister on authorisations made during the year.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.414
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186 Report to Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must report to Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186A Obligation to keep records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186a
note: Agency must keep records of authorisations and revocations.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.417
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186A Obligation to keep records
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must keep records.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186B Inspection of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186b
has part: 186B(1) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(1A) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(1B) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(2) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(3) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(4) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(5) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(6) Inspection of records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.421

186B(1) Inspection of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186b-ss-1
part of: 186B Inspection of records
note: The Ombudsman must inspect records of an enforcement agency to determine compliance with Chapter 4 and Chapter 3.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.421
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186B(1) Inspection of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inspect records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186B(1A) Inspection of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186b-ss-1a
part of: 186B Inspection of records
note: The Ombudsman may inspect records to determine compliance with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.421
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186B(1A) Inspection of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Obligation to provide records
premise text: The Ombudsman may inspect records.
conclusion text: There is an obligation to provide records.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Records must be related to the performance of a function or exercise of power within a certain time frame
premise text: (b) an enforcement agency, except the ACC or any agency, or part of an agency performing any functions, prescribed by regulations made under the Ombudsman Act 1976 for the purposes of subsection (1B) of this section, has records that relate to the performance of that function or the exercise of that power;
conclusion text: The records are related to the performance of a function or exercise of power within a certain time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: OR
logic summary: Records must be related to the performance of a function or exercise of power in at least one of two possible ways
premise text: (a) the performance of a function, or the exercise of a power, conferred by Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 is in connection with...
conclusion text: The records are related to the performance of a function or exercise of power in at least one of two possible ways.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
logic summary: Records must be related to the performance of a function or exercise of power and also meet certain conditions
premise text: (a) the performance of a function, or the exercise of a power, conferred by Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 is in connection with...
conclusion text: The records are related to the performance of a function or exercise of power and also meet certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Records must be related to the performance of a function or exercise of power in order to determine compliance with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997
premise text: (b) an enforcement agency, except the ACC or any agency, or part of an agency performing any functions, prescribed by regulations made under the Ombudsman Act 1976 for the purposes of subsection (1B) of this section, has records that relate to the performance of that function or the exercise of that power;
conclusion text: The records are related to the performance of a function or exercise of power in order to determine compliance with Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186B(1B) Inspection of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186b-ss-1b
part of: 186B Inspection of records
note: Regulations may prescribe certain agencies or functions for the purposes of this subsection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.421
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1b-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186B(1B) Inspection of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

186B(2) Inspection of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186b-ss-2
part of: 186B Inspection of records
note: Ombudsman may enter premises, access records, and require staff information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.421
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Ombudsman has permission to enter premises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May require
logic summary: Ombudsman may require staff information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186B(3) Inspection of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186b-ss-3
part of: 186B Inspection of records
note: Ombudsman must give reasonable notice before inspecting records.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.421
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186B(3) Inspection of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186B(4) Inspection of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186b-ss-4
part of: 186B Inspection of records
note: Chief officer must assist Ombudsman with inspection of records.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.421
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to assist Ombudsman
premise text: Chief officer has a duty to assist the Ombudsman
conclusion text: The chief officer must ensure that members of staff of the agency give the Ombudsman any assistance the Ombudsman reasonably requires.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between actions
premise text: The chief officer must ensure that members of staff of the agency assist the Ombudsman with inspection of records within a reasonable timeframe.
conclusion text: The assistance provided by the chief officer is contained within the timeframe of the inspection of records.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Inference from premises to conclusion
premise text: If the chief officer has a duty to assist the Ombudsman, then they must provide assistance within a reasonable timeframe.
conclusion text: The chief officer's provision of assistance implies that they have met their obligation.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Spread of information or influence
premise text: The chief officer's provision of assistance spreads to the Ombudsman and other relevant parties.
conclusion text: The assistance provided by the chief officer diffuses to the Ombudsman and other relevant parties.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNIZES
logic summary: Recognition of patterns or relationships
premise text: The chief officer recognizes their responsibility to assist the Ombudsman.
conclusion text: The chief officer's recognition of their responsibility implies that they have met their obligation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186B(5) Inspection of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186b-ss-5
part of: 186B Inspection of records
note: No requirement to inspect all records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.421
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-5-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186B(5) Inspection of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

186B(6) Inspection of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186b-ss-6
part of: 186B Inspection of records
note: The Ombudsman may refrain from inspecting records relevant to the obtaining or execution of a warrant or authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.421
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-6-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186b-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186B(6) Inspection of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

186C Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186c
has part: 186C(1) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 186C(2) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 186C(3) Power to obtain relevant information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.423

186C(1) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186c-ss-1
part of: 186C Power to obtain relevant information
note: The Ombudsman may require an officer to provide information or attend a meeting.
description: Information, Attendance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.423
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186C(1) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: The Ombudsman has the power to require an officer to provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: KNOWS
logic summary: The Ombudsman knows the identity of the officer if required.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: AT
logic summary: The information must be provided within a specified period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The officer is required to provide the information or attend the meeting.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186C(2) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186c-ss-2
part of: 186C Power to obtain relevant information
note: Specify a place and time for attendance under inspection.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.423
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186C(2) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires specification of a place and time for attendance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186C(3) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186c-ss-3
part of: 186C Power to obtain relevant information
note: Must attend, give information, and answer questions when required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.423
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186C(3) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must attend, give information, and answer questions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Requires attendance during a specific time period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186d
has part: 186D(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 186D(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 186D(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 186D(4) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.424

186D(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186d-ss-1
part of: 186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
note: Must provide information despite other laws or public interest concerns.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.424
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186D(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186D(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186d-ss-2
part of: 186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
note: Prohibition on using information obtained as a consequence of giving access to a document in certain proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.424
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of information obtained as a consequence of giving access to a document in certain proceedings.
premise text: (2) However: (a) ...; (b) ...
conclusion text: ... except in a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence against section 133, 181A, 181B or 182, or against Part 7.4 or 7.7 of the Criminal Code.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
logic summary: Traces the information obtained as a consequence of giving access to a document through its direct and indirect consequences.
premise text: (2) However: (a) ...; (b) ...
conclusion text: ... except in a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence against section 133, 181A, 181B or 182, or against Part 7.4 or 7.7 of the Criminal Code.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restricts the use of information obtained as a consequence of giving access to a document in certain proceedings.
premise text: (2) However: (a) ...; (b) ...
conclusion text: ... except in a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence against section 133, 181A, 181B or 182, or against Part 7.4 or 7.7 of the Criminal Code.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps the information obtained as a consequence of giving access to a document with certain proceedings.
premise text: (2) However: (a) ...; (b) ...
conclusion text: ... except in a proceeding by way of a prosecution for an offence against section 133, 181A, 181B or 182, or against Part 7.4 or 7.7 of the Criminal Code.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186D(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186d-ss-3
part of: 186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
note: An officer of an enforcement agency must give information to an inspecting officer and access to records.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.424
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186D(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information and access.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186D(4) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186d-ss-4
part of: 186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
note: Enforcement agency must provide information to a person upon request.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.424
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186D(4) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186E Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186e
has part: 186E(1) Application of Ombudsman Act
has part: 186E(2) Application of Ombudsman Act
has part: 186E(3) Application of Ombudsman Act
has part: 186E(8) Application of Ombudsman Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.425

186E(1) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186e-ss-1
part of: 186E Application of Ombudsman Act
note: Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Chapter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.425
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Exclusion of Section 11A application
premise text: (1) Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to...
conclusion text: ...the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Chapter.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalExclusion
logic summary: Temporal exclusion of Section 11A application
premise text: (1) Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to...
conclusion text: ...the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Chapter.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalExclusion
logic summary: Temporal exclusion of Section 11A application
premise text: (1) Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to...
conclusion text: ...the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Chapter.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission to exclude Section 11A application
premise text: (1) Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to...
conclusion text: ...the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Chapter.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to exclude Section 11A application
premise text: (1) Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to...
conclusion text: ...the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Chapter.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

186E(2) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186e-ss-2
part of: 186E Application of Ombudsman Act
note: Exclusion of inspecting officer's actions from Ombudsman Act reference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.425
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186E(2) Application of Ombudsman Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclude
logic summary: Exclusion of inspecting officer's actions
premise text: Section 19 Ombudsman Act 1976
conclusion text: Ombudsman Act reference does not include inspecting officer's actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186E(3) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186e-ss-3
part of: 186E Application of Ombudsman Act
note: Subject to section 186D of this Act, subsections 35(2), (3), (4) and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.425
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186E(3) Application of Ombudsman Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT_TO
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Section 186D of this Act
conclusion text: Subsections 35(2), (3), (4) and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship
premise text: Section 186D of this Act
conclusion text: Subsections 35(2), (3), (4) and
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

186E(8) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186e-ss-8
part of: 186E Application of Ombudsman Act
note: Application of Ombudsman Act to this Chapter
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.425
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-8-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186e-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186E(8) Application of Ombudsman Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

186F Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186f
has part: 186F(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
has part: 186F(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
has part: 186F(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
has part: 186F(4) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.426

186F(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186f-ss-1
part of: 186F Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
note: Exchange of information with inspecting authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.426
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to share information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186F(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186f-ss-2
part of: 186F Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
note: Ombudsman must provide information if necessary to perform functions.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.426
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186F(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186F(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186f-ss-3
part of: 186F Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
note: Ombudsman may receive information from inspecting authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.426
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186F(4) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186f-ss-4
part of: 186F Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
note: Must provide information about performance of functions of an intelligence agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.426
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
premise text: IGIS official has obtained information
conclusion text: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186G Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186g
has part: 186G(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
has part: 186G(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.427

186G(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186g-ss-1
part of: 186G Delegation by Ombudsman
note: The Ombudsman may delegate certain powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.427
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186g-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186G(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to delegate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186G(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186g-ss-2
part of: 186G Delegation by Ombudsman
note: Delegate must provide instrument of delegation upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.427
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186g-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186G(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186H Ombudsman not to be sued
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186h
note: No liability for acts done in good faith while performing a function or power under the Chapter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.428
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186h-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186h-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186h-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186h-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186H Ombudsman not to be sued
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If an act is done in good faith, then no liability.
premise text: Act done in good faith
conclusion text: No liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186h-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Entails
logic summary: If an act is done in good faith, then it entails no liability.
premise text: Act done in good faith
conclusion text: No liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186J Reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186j
has part: 186J(1) Reports
has part: 186J(2) Reports
has part: 186J(3) Reports
has part: 186J(4) Reports
has part: 186J(5) Reports
has part: 186J(6) Reports
has part: 186J(7) Reports
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.428

186J(1) Reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186j-ss-1
part of: 186J Reports
note: The Ombudsman must report to the Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.428
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186J(1) Reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: The Ombudsman must report to the Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186J(2) Reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186j-ss-2
part of: 186J Reports
note: Report must be given to Minister after financial year end.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.428
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: The report must be given.
conclusion text: Minister must receive the report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186J(3) Reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186j-ss-3
part of: 186J Reports
note: Report must be laid before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.428
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186J(4) Reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186j-ss-4
part of: 186J Reports
note: The Ombudsman must report to the Minister in writing about the results of an inspection.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.428
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186J(4) Reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186J(5) Reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186j-ss-5
part of: 186J Reports
note: Ombudsman may include report on contravention in inspection report.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.428
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186J(5) Reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to provide report on contravention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186J(6) Reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186j-ss-6
part of: 186J Reports
note: The Ombudsman must give a copy of a report to the chief officer of any enforcement agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.428
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186J(6) Reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide a copy of a report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186J(7) Reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186j-ss-7
part of: 186J Reports
note: Report cannot include information that could endanger a person's safety, prejudice an investigation or prosecution, or compromise enforcement agency activities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979.pdf, p.428
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 186J(7) Reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of report content
premise text: (7) A report under this section must not include information which...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-act-1979-sec-186j-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: OverlapsWith
logic summary: Temporal overlap between report and sensitive activities
premise text: (7) A report under this section must not include information which...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed