134 Section 134
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
note: List of offences against federal laws
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-134-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-134
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-134-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 134 Section 134

15G Objects of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.17
note: Exempts law enforcement officers and certain other persons from criminal liability and civil liability in the course of a controlled operation.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15g
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption overlaps with the course of this operation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The exemption applies to the course of a controlled operation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The text mentions a 'controlled operation'

crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: They must be involved in the commission of an offence to be exempt from liability.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The exemption implies that law enforcement officers and certain other persons are involved in the commission of an offence
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Law enforcement officers and certain other persons take an active part in, or are otherwise involved in, the commission of a Commonwealth offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exemption is implied by this definition.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The exemption can be inferred from the definition of a controlled operation
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: The text defines a 'controlled operation'

crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: They are exempt from criminal liability and civil liability.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts individuals from liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Law enforcement officers and certain other persons are involved in the commission of an offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: All individuals within this operation are exempt from liability.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The exemption propagates to all individuals within the controlled operation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: The text defines a 'controlled operation'

crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15G Objects of Part

15GA Relationship to other laws and matters
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.17
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GA(1) Relationship to other laws and matters
has part: 15GA(2) Relationship to other laws and matters
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ga
schema version: 2

15GA(1) Relationship to other laws and matters
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.17
note: Court discretion not limited by this Part
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ga-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GA Relationship to other laws and matters

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GA(1) Relationship to other laws and matters

15GA(2) Relationship to other laws and matters
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.17
note: Disregard evidence obtained from criminal activity in proceedings.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ga-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GA Relationship to other laws and matters

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the fact that the evidence was obtained as a result of a person engaging in criminal activity is to be disregarded if:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between exclusion and criminal activity
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) In determining whether evidence should be admitted or excluded in any proceedings...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the fact that the evidence was obtained as a result of a person engaging in criminal activity is to be disregarded if:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal relationship between exclusion and criminal activity
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (2) In determining whether evidence should be admitted or excluded in any proceedings...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the fact that the evidence was obtained as a result of a person engaging in criminal activity is to be disregarded.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of evidence based on criminal activity
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
premise text: (2) In determining whether evidence should be admitted or excluded in any proceedings...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the fact that the evidence was obtained as a result of a person engaging in criminal activity is to be disregarded if:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal relationship between exclusion and criminal activity
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (2) In determining whether evidence should be admitted or excluded in any proceedings...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the fact that the evidence was obtained as a result of a person engaging in criminal activity is to be disregarded if:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between exclusion and criminal activity
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) In determining whether evidence should be admitted or excluded in any proceedings...

15GB Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.18
note: Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gb-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gb
schema version: 2

15GC Definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.18
note: Definitions for controlled operations and authorising officers.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gc-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gc-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gc
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of key terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

15GD Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GD(1) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
has part: 15GD(2) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gd
schema version: 2

15GD(1) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.24
note: Defines controlled operation and major controlled.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GD Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GD(1) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled

15GD(2) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.24
note: Defines a major controlled operation
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gd-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GD Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GD(2) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled

15GE Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.25
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GE(1) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
has part: 15GE(2) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ge
schema version: 2

15GE(1) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.25
note: Defines serious Commonwealth offence for purposes of this Part.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ge-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GE Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to definitions and descriptive clauses.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: applies to

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GE(1) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State

15GE(2) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.25
note: List of serious Commonwealth offences and serious State offences
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ge-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GE Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a specific point in time
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: (2) The matters are as follows:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: theft is a serious Commonwealth offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: List of prohibited actions
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (a) theft;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GE(2) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State

15GF Meaning of authorising officer etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.27
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GF(1) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
has part: 15GF(2) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
has part: 15GF(3) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gf
schema version: 2

15GF(1) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.27
note: Defines who is an authorising officer for a controlled operation.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GF Meaning of authorising officer etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner or a Deputy Commissioner is an authorising officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the bearer of an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1) Any of the following is an authorising officer for a controlled operation:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Any AFP authorising officer is an authorising officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the holder of an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (b) if the operation is not a major controlled operation, but the investigation of the offence to which the controlled operation relates is within the functions of the Australian Federal Police—any AFP authorising officer;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Any ACC authorising officer is an authorising officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the holder of an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (c) if the investigation of the offence to which the controlled operation relates is within the functions of the ACC—any ACC authorising officer;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Any NACC authorising officer is an authorising officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the holder of an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (d) if the controlled operation relates to the conduct of a corruption investigation (within the meaning of the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2022)—any NACC authorising officer;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GF(1) Meaning of authorising officer etc.

15GF(2) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.27
note: List of AFP authorising officers
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GF Meaning of authorising officer etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The senior executive AFP employee was authorised by the Commissioner during their employment.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between authorisation and employment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (c) a senior executive AFP employee who is a member of the Australian Federal Police and who is authorised in writing by the Commissioner for the purposes of this paragraph.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The senior executive AFP employee is an AFP authorising officer.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation by the Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) The following are AFP authorising officers:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Deputy Commissioner is an AFP authorising officer.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation by the Deputy Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) The following are AFP authorising officers:

15GF(3) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.27
note: List of ACC authorising officers
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GF Meaning of authorising officer etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: List of ACC authorising officers
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GF(3) Meaning of authorising officer etc.

15GG ART Minister may nominate ART members
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GG(1) ART Minister may nominate ART members
has part: 15GG(2) ART Minister may nominate ART members
has part: 15GG(3) ART Minister may nominate ART members
has part: 15GG(4) ART Minister may nominate ART members
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gg
schema version: 2

15GG(1) ART Minister may nominate ART members
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.28
note: The ART Minister may nominate a person to deal with applications under subsection 15GU(1).
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GG ART Minister may nominate ART members

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The nomination is made by writing.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WithinTemporalInterval
premise text: (1) The Minister administering the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (the ART Minister) may, by writing,

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The nomination is made to deal with applications under subsection 15GU(1).
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (a) Deputy President;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The nomination is made to extend authorities for controlled operations beyond 3 months.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (1) The Minister administering the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (the ART Minister) may, by writing,

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The ART Minister may nominate a person.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The nomination is made by the ART Minister.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (1) The Minister administering the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (the ART Minister) may, by writing,

15GG(2) ART Minister may nominate ART members
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.28
note: Must not nominate a person without being enrolled as a legal practitioner for at least 5 years.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GG ART Minister may nominate ART members

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ART Minister must not nominate outside this timeframe
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Nomination is contingent on enrollment during a specific period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: ART Minister must nominate within a certain timeframe

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ART Minister must nominate this person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Nomination is implied by enrollment and meeting conditions
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Person to be nominated has been enrolled for at least 5 years

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ART Minister must not nominate without meeting these conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Enrollment and conditions are inferred from the nomination process
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: ART Minister must nominate a person

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ART Minister must not nominate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on nomination without meeting conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: ART Minister must nominate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ART Minister must not nominate any other person without meeting this condition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditions propagate to the entire class of nominees
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: Person to be nominated has been enrolled for at least 5 years

15GG(3) ART Minister may nominate ART members
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.28
note: Nomination ceases to have effect under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gg-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GG ART Minister may nominate ART members

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the ART Minister, by writing, withdraws the nomination.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal overlap between conditions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) the nominated Tribunal member ceases to hold an appointment described in subsection (1); or

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the nominated Tribunal member ceases to hold an appointment described in subsection (1); or
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes recognition of a nomination's effect by the ART Minister.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (b) the ART Minister, by writing, withdraws the nomination.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the ART Minister, by writing, withdraws the nomination.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the nomination from having effect.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) A nomination ceases to have effect if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the ART Minister, by writing, withdraws the nomination.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes diffusion of information about a nomination's effect.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (a) the nominated Tribunal member ceases to hold an appointment described in subsection (1); or

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the ART Minister, by writing, withdraws the nomination.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between conditions.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (a) the nominated Tribunal member ceases to hold an appointment described in subsection (1); or

15GG(4) ART Minister may nominate ART members
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.28
note: Protection and immunity for nominated Tribunal members
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gg-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15GG ART Minister may nominate ART members

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protection and immunity
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (4) A nominated Tribunal member has...

15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GH(1) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
has part: 15GH(2) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
has part: 15GH(3) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
has part: 15GH(4) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
has part: 15GH(5) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
has part: 15GH(6) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gh
schema version: 2

15GH(1) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.30
note: Application for authority to conduct controlled operation
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GH(1) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

15GH(2) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.30
note: Application for authority may be made in writing or orally/urgently.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Application can be made during a specific time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (2) An application for an authority may be made: (a) by means of a written document signed by the applicant (such an application is a formal application); or (b) if the applicant has reason to believe that the delay caused by making a formal application may affect the success of the controlled operation—orally in person, or by telephone or any other means of communication (such an application is an urgent application).

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Application can be made with various tools.
modality: CogAI
operator: With
premise text: (2) An application for an authority may be made: (a) by means of a written document signed by the applicant (such an application is a formal application); or (b) if the applicant has reason to believe that the delay caused by making a formal application may affect the success of the controlled operation—orally in person, or by telephone or any other means of communication (such an application is an urgent application).

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make an application.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Application is a formal or urgent application.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: HasPart
premise text: (a) An application for an authority may be made: (a) by means of a written document signed by the applicant (such an application is a formal application); or (b) if the applicant has reason to believe that the delay caused by making a formal application may affect the success of the controlled operation—orally in person, or by telephone or any other means of communication (such an application is an urgent application).

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Application can be made through various channels.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
premise text: (2) An application for an authority may be made: (a) by means of a written document signed by the applicant (such an application is a formal application); or (b) if the applicant has reason to believe that the delay caused by making a formal application may affect the success of the controlled operation—orally in person, or by telephone or any other means of communication (such an application is an urgent application).

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Application must be made before a certain time.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (2) An application for an authority may be made: (a) by means of a written document signed by the applicant (such an application is a formal application); or (b) if the applicant has reason to believe that the delay caused by making a formal application may affect the success of the controlled operation—orally in person, or by telephone or any other means of communication (such an application is an urgent application).

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GH(2) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

15GH(3) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.30
note: Subsequent application for authority must be formal.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gh-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a formal application.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GH(3) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

15GH(4) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
description: sufficient information, earlier application details, proposed period of effect
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.30
note: Application requirements for controlled operations
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gh-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must provide required information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GH(4) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

15GH(5) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.30
note: An authorising officer may require an applicant to provide additional information.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gh-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The authorising officer requires the applicant to provide additional information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Require

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GH(5) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

15GH(6) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.30
note: Applicant must make a written record of the application and give a copy to the authorising officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gh-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to make a written record and provide a copy.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GH(6) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations

15GI Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.31
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GI(1) Determination of applications
has part: 15GI(2) Determination of applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gi
schema version: 2

15GI(1) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.31
note: Authorise controlled operation with conditions or refuse application.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gi-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GI Determination of applications

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority granted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant authority with conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
premise text: Application for authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application refused
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Deny application
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse
premise text: Application for authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GI(1) Determination of applications

15GI(2) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.31
note: Authorising officer must not grant authority to conduct controlled operation without reasonable grounds
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gi-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GI Determination of applications

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the authorising officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for Controlled Operations
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) An authorising officer must not grant an authority to conduct a controlled operation unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the authorising officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of Controlled Operations by CogAI
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: (2) An authorising officer must not grant an authority to conduct a controlled operation unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the authorising officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (2) An authorising officer must not grant an authority to conduct a controlled operation unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the authorising officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of Controlled Operations
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (2) An authorising officer must not grant an authority to conduct a controlled operation unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the authorising officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for Controlled Operations
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) An authorising officer must not grant an authority to conduct a controlled operation unless...

15GJ Manner of granting authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.33
note: Authority to conduct controlled operation may be granted by written document or formal application with authorising officer's satisfaction.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gj-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gj-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gj-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gj
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority to conduct controlled operation may be granted.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gj-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Formal authority is a written document signed by the authorising officer.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gj-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GJ Manner of granting authority

15GK Form of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GK(1) Form of authority
has part: 15GK(2) Form of authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gk
schema version: 2

15GK(1) Form of authority
type: Concept
description: All required details for the controlled operation
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
note: Formal authority requirements
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gk-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GK Form of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: All required details for the controlled operation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Formal authority requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GK(1) Form of authority

15GK(2) Form of authority
type: Concept
description: a, b, c, d, da
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
note: Authority requirements for urgent operations
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gk-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gk-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GK Form of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GK(2) Form of authority

15GL Written record of urgent authority must be issued
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.36
note: Authorising officer must issue written record of urgent authority within 7 days.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gl-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gl-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gl
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorising officer must issue written record.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15GM Change of principal law enforcement officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.37
note: Authorising officer may nominate another person as principal law enforcement officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gm-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gm
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gm-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GM Change of principal law enforcement officer

15GN Commencement and duration of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.37
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GN(1) Commencement and duration of authorities
has part: 15GN(2) Commencement and duration of authorities
has part: 15GN(3) Commencement and duration of authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gn
schema version: 2

15GN(1) Commencement and duration of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.37
note: Commencement of authority upon grant
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gn-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gn-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GN Commencement and duration of authorities

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gn-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The controlled operation is taken to commence.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Authority during grant time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) An authority to conduct a controlled operation comes into force,

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The controlled operation is taken to commence.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority begins at grant time
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
premise text: (1) An authority to conduct a controlled operation comes into force,

15GN(2) Commencement and duration of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.37
note: Granting of urgent authority upon oral request.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gn-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GN Commencement and duration of authorities

15GN(3) Commencement and duration of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.37
note: Authority duration and cancellation
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gn-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gn-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GN Commencement and duration of authorities

15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.38
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GO(1) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GO(2) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GO(3) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GO(4) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GO(5) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GO(6) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15go
schema version: 2

15GO(1) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.38
note: Authority may be varied by authorising officer
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15go-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority variation obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GO(1) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer

15GO(2) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.38
note: Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15go-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal extension of authority
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation between temporal intervals
premise text: (2) A variation may:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extension or modification of authority
modality: Deontic
operator: variation
premise text: (2) A variation may:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GO(2) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer

15GO(3) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.38
note: Cannot extend urgent authority period
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15go-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval logic for 'extension'
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) A variation cannot be made that has the effect of extending the period of effect of an urgent authority.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive AI logic for 'extension'
modality: CogAI
operator: cannot
premise text: (3) A variation cannot be made that has the effect of extending the period of effect of an urgent authority.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of extending urgent authority period
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (3) A variation cannot be made that has the effect of extending the period of effect of an urgent authority.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion logic for 'extension'
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (3) A variation cannot be made that has the effect of extending the period of effect of an urgent authority.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Linear temporal logic for 'extension'
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (3) A variation cannot be made that has the effect of extending the period of effect of an urgent authority.

15GO(4) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.38
note: No variation of formal authority can exceed 3 months in effect.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15go-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4) A formal authority must not be varied...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

15GO(5) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.38
note: Authority variation must be justified by the authorising officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15go-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits unauthorized variation of authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GO(5) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer

15GO(6) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.38
note: A variation is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15go-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A variation is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.39
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GP(1) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(2) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(3) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(4) Application to appropriate authorising officer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gp
schema version: 2

15GP(1) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.39
note: May apply to an authorising officer for a variation of authority.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to an appropriate authorising officer for a variation of an authority in respect of a matter mentioned in subsection 15GO(2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During: Application to an authorising officer.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) The principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation, or any other Australian law enforcement officer acting on behalf of the principal law enforcement officer, may apply under this section...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to an appropriate authorising officer for a variation of an authority in respect of a matter mentioned in subsection 15GO(2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: May apply: Application to an authorising officer.
modality: CogAI
operator: may
premise text: (1) The principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation, or any other Australian law enforcement officer acting on behalf of the principal law enforcement officer, may apply under this section...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to an appropriate authorising officer for a variation of an authority in respect of a matter mentioned in subsection 15GO(2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May apply to an authorising officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
premise text: (1) The principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation, or any other Australian law enforcement officer acting on behalf of the principal law enforcement officer, may apply under this section...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to an appropriate authorising officer for a variation of an authority in respect of a matter mentioned in subsection 15GO(2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: May diffuse: Application to an authorising officer.
modality: Diffusion
operator: may
premise text: (1) The principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation, or any other Australian law enforcement officer acting on behalf of the principal law enforcement officer, may apply under this section...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to an appropriate authorising officer for a variation of an authority in respect of a matter mentioned in subsection 15GO(2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: During: Application to an authorising officer.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) The principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation, or any other Australian law enforcement officer acting on behalf of the principal law enforcement officer, may apply under this section...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GP(1) Application to appropriate authorising officer

15GP(2) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.39
note: No application for variation can extend the period of effect beyond 3 months.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No variation can extend the period of effect beyond 3 months.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on extending the period of effect beyond 3 months.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) An application cannot be made under subsection (1)

15GP(3) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.39
note: Application method for variation
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gp-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer

15GP(4) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.39
note: Multiple applications for variation under section 15GP(4) are allowed.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gp-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows multiple applications for variation under section 15GP(4)
modality: Deontic
operator: Allowance

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GP(4) Application to appropriate authorising officer

15GQ Requirements for variation of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GQ(1) Requirements for variation of authority
has part: 15GQ(1A) Requirements for variation of authority
has part: 15GQ(2) Requirements for variation of authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gq
schema version: 2

15GQ(1) Requirements for variation of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.40
note: Authority may be varied in accordance with an application.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GQ Requirements for variation of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority may be varied
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to vary authority
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Application for variation of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GQ(1) Requirements for variation of authority

15GQ(1A) Requirements for variation of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.40
note: An authorising officer must refer an application for a variation of authority to the Commissioner or a Deputy Commissioner.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gq-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 15GQ Requirements for variation of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must refer an application for a variation of authority to the Commissioner or a Deputy Commissioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1A) Despite subsection (1),

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GQ(1A) Requirements for variation of authority

15GQ(2) Requirements for variation of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.40
note: No variation of authority allowed without reasonable grounds and justification.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GQ Requirements for variation of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No variation allowed without reasonable grounds and justification.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GQ(2) Requirements for variation of authority

15GR Manner of varying authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.43
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GR(1) Manner of varying authority
has part: 15GR(2) Manner of varying authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gr
schema version: 2

15GR(1) Manner of varying authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.43
note: Authority may be varied by an appropriate authorising officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GR Manner of varying authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (a) in the case of a variation on the authorising officer’s own initiative or on a formal variation application (other than a variation referred to in subparagraph (b)(ii))—by means of a written document, signed by the authorising officer

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (i) an urgent variation application; or (ii) the authorising officer’s own initiative or a formal variation application, if the authorising officer is satisfied that the delay caused by granting a formal variation of authority may affect the success of the controlled operation;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (ii) the authorising officer’s own initiative or a formal variation application, if the authorising officer is satisfied that the delay caused by granting a formal variation of authority may affect the success of the controlled operation;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Variation on formal application
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: (a) in the case of a variation on the authorising officer’s own initiative or on a formal variation application (other than a variation referred to in subparagraph (b)(ii))—by means of a written document, signed by the authorising officer

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GR(1) Manner of varying authority

15GR(2) Manner of varying authority
type: Concept
description: written document
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.43
note: Authorising officer must prepare and give written document to applicant or principal law enforcement officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GR Manner of varying authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorising officer must perform action.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15GS Form of variation of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GS(1) Form of variation of authority
has part: 15GS(2) Form of variation of authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gs
schema version: 2

15GS(1) Form of variation of authority
type: Concept
description: a, b, c, d, e, f
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.44
note: Variation of authority must provide specific details.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gs-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GS Form of variation of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide specific details.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GS(1) Form of variation of authority

15GS(2) Form of variation of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.44
note: Maximum period for extension of authority beyond 3 months
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gs-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GS Form of variation of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f), the period of the extension must not exceed:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval is an Allen interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: the period of the extension must not exceed: (a) in the case of a formal variation of authority—the period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 3 months (including any previous extensions); and (b) in the case of an urgent variation of authority—the lesser of: (i) 7 days; and (ii) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 3 months (including any previous extensions);

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f), the period of the extension must not exceed:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Period of effect must not exceed 3 months
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
premise text: (a) in the case of a formal variation of authority—the period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 3 months (including any previous extensions);

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f), the period of the extension must not exceed:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Period of effect must not exceed 3 months
modality: Deontic
operator: <=
premise text: (b) in the case of an urgent variation of authority—the lesser of: (i) 7 days; and (ii) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 3 months (including any previous extensions);

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f), the period of the extension must not exceed:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval is a diffusion interval
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: the period of the extension must not exceed: (a) in the case of a formal variation of authority—the period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 3 months (including any previous extensions); and (b) in the case of an urgent variation of authority—the lesser of: (i) 7 days; and (ii) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 3 months (including any previous extensions);

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f), the period of the extension must not exceed:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval is a linear time interval
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: the period of the extension must not exceed: (a) in the case of a formal variation of authority—the period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 3 months (including any previous extensions); and (b) in the case of an urgent variation of authority—the lesser of: (i) 7 days; and (ii) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 3 months (including any previous extensions);

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GS(2) Form of variation of authority

15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GT(1) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
has part: 15GT(2) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
has part: 15GT(3) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
has part: 15GT(4) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gt
schema version: 2

15GT(1) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
note: A nominated Tribunal member may vary a formal authority on application under subsection 15GU(1).
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gt-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to vary formal authority
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GT(1) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect

15GT(2) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
note: May extend period of effect of authority
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gt-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect

15GT(3) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
note: Maximum extension period for formal authority
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gt-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The extension period is less than or equal to 3 months or 24 months
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Extension period cannot exceed 3 months or 24 months
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <=
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The extension period is less than or equal to 3 months and greater than or equal to 0 months
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Extension period has a lower bound of 3 months and an upper bound of 24 months
modality: CogAI
operator: <=
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The extension period must be less than or equal to 24 months
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Period of effect must not exceed 24 months
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The extension period is less than or equal to 3 months and greater than or equal to 0 months
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Extension period has a lower bound of 3 months and an upper bound of 24 months
modality: Diffusion
operator: <=
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The extension period is less than or equal to 3 months and greater than or equal to 0 months
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Extension period has a lower bound of 3 months and an upper bound of 24 months
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GT(3) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect

15GT(4) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
note: Limitation on variation of formal authority
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gt-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: of the authority
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval restriction
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: (4) A nominated Tribunal member may only vary a formal authority during the period of 2 weeks before the end of the period of effect

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: of the authority
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal interval restriction
modality: CogAI
operator: within
premise text: (4) A nominated Tribunal member may only vary a formal authority during the period of 2 weeks before the end of the period of effect

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: during the period of 2 weeks before the end of the period of effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restriction on action
modality: Deontic
operator: only
premise text: (4) A nominated Tribunal member may only vary a formal authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: of the authority
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval restriction
modality: Diffusion
operator: within
premise text: (4) A nominated Tribunal member may only vary a formal authority during the period of 2 weeks before the end of the period of effect

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: of the authority
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval restriction
modality: LTL
operator: within
premise text: (4) A nominated Tribunal member may only vary a formal authority during the period of 2 weeks before the end of the period of effect

15GU Application to nominated Tribunal member
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
note: Application for variation of authority period
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gu-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gu-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gu
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gu-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to apply for authority variation
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gu-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GU Application to nominated Tribunal member

15GV Determination of application
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.47
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GV(1) Determination of application
has part: 15GV(2) Determination of application
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gv
schema version: 2

15GV(1) Determination of application
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.47
note: Tribunal member may vary formal authority subject to conditions or refuse application.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gv-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GV Determination of application

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Variation of formal authority is permitted.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GV(1) Determination of application

15GV(2) Determination of application
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.47
note: Granting variation without reasonable grounds is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gv-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GV Determination of application

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the variation is granted on reasonable grounds within a specific time frame.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for granting variation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) The nominated Tribunal member must not grant the variation unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the suspected criminal activity are such as to justify the variation using cognitive AI.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive AI application for granting variation.
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
premise text: (2) The nominated Tribunal member must not grant the variation unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the variation is granted on reasonable grounds.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of granting variation without reasonable grounds.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) The nominated Tribunal member must not grant the variation unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the suspected criminal activity are such as to justify the variation in a diffuse manner.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of conditions for granting variation.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (2) The nominated Tribunal member must not grant the variation unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the suspected criminal activity are such as to justify the variation in a recurring pattern.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for granting variation.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) The nominated Tribunal member must not grant the variation unless...

15GW Manner of varying formal authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.49
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GW(1) Manner of varying formal authority
has part: 15GW(2) Manner of varying formal authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gw
schema version: 2

15GW(1) Manner of varying formal authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.49
note: Variation of formal authority by nominated Tribunal member
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gw-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gw-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gw-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GW Manner of varying formal authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by means of a written document...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to vary formal authority
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1) A formal authority may be varied...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gw-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by means of a written document...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of variation method
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) in the case of a formal variation application...

15GW(2) Manner of varying formal authority
type: Concept
description: yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.49
note: Must provide written document to applicant
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gw-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gw-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GW Manner of varying formal authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written document
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gw-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GW(2) Manner of varying formal authority

15GX Form of variation of formal authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GX(1) Form of variation of formal authority
has part: 15GX(2) Form of variation of formal authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gx
schema version: 2

15GX(1) Form of variation of formal authority
type: Concept
description: a, b, c, d, e, f
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
note: Variation of formal authority must provide specific information
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gx-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GX Form of variation of formal authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide required information
modality: Deontic
operator: must

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gx-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GX(1) Form of variation of formal authority

15GX(2) Form of variation of formal authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
note: Maximum period for extension of authority
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gx-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GX Form of variation of formal authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not exceed...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Period must not exceed
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
premise text: (2) The period of the extension:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GX(2) Form of variation of formal authority

15GY Cancellation of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GY(1) Cancellation of authorities
has part: 15GY(2) Cancellation of authorities
has part: 15GY(3) Cancellation of authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gy
schema version: 2

15GY(1) Cancellation of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
note: Authority to conduct controlled operation can be cancelled by authorising officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gy-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GY Cancellation of authorities

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval of authority cancellation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer may, by order in writing given to the principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Provides justification for cancelling authority.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer may, by order in writing given to the principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applies reasoning to authority cancellation.
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer may, by order in writing given to the principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conducting controlled operation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer may, by order in writing given to the principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses authority cancellation information.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer may, by order in writing given to the principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GY(1) Cancellation of authorities

15GY(2) Cancellation of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
note: Request for cancellation of authority at any time.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gy-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GY Cancellation of authorities

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to cancel authority
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GY(2) Cancellation of authorities

15GY(3) Cancellation of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
note: Cancellation of authority takes effect at specified time.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gy-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GY Cancellation of authorities

15GZ Effect of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15GZ(1) Effect of authorities
has part: 15GZ(2) Effect of authorities
has part: 15GZ(3) Effect of authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gz
schema version: 2

15GZ(1) Effect of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
note: Authorises law enforcement participants to engage in controlled conduct.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gz-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15GZ Effect of authorities

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on authorities.
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GZ(1) Effect of authorities

15GZ(2) Effect of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
note: Authorisation for controlled conduct
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gz-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15GZ Effect of authorities

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for the period of effect of the authority...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between authority and authorisation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) A person identified in an authority as being authorised to engage in controlled conduct...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for the period of effect of the authority...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justifying the authorisation
modality: Argumentation
operator: justification
premise text: (2) A person identified in an authority as being authorised to engage in controlled conduct for the purposes of the controlled operation is authorised to do so...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) the authority specifies a shorter period during which the person is so authorised; or (b) the authority is varied to provide that the person is no longer so authorised; or (c) the authority is cancelled before the end of that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognising the authority
modality: CogAI
operator: recognise
premise text: (2) A person identified in an authority as being authorised to engage in controlled conduct for the purposes of the controlled operation is authorised to do so for the period of effect of the authority...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is authorised to do so for the period of effect of the authority...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
premise text: (2) A person identified in an authority...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) the authority specifies a shorter period during which the person is so authorised; or (b) the authority is varied to provide that the person is no longer so authorised; or (c) the authority is cancelled before the end of that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreading the authorisation
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuse
premise text: (2) A person identified in an authority as being authorised to engage in controlled conduct for the purposes of the controlled operation is authorised to do so for the period of effect of the authority...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GZ(2) Effect of authorities

15GZ(3) Effect of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
note: Authority cannot delegate controlled conduct to others.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15gz-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15GZ Effect of authorities

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: cannot be delegated to any other person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on delegation
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (3) The authority to engage in controlled conduct given to a participant

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15GZ(3) Effect of authorities

15H Defect in authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
note: No defect in authority invalidates an application or granted authority.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15h-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15h-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15h
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No defect in authority necessitates invalidation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15h-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15H Defect in authority

15HA Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.52
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HA(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
has part: 15HA(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
has part: 15HA(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ha
schema version: 2

15HA(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.52
note: Participant in controlled operation must comply with Commonwealth/State law
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ha-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HA Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...conduct in the course of, and for the purposes of, the controlled operation;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between conduct and controlled operation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (1) This section applies if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a participant in a controlled operation engages in conduct in the course of, and for the purposes of, the controlled operation;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence classification of controlled operation participants
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: (1) This section applies if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...engaging in that conduct is a Commonwealth offence or an offence against a law of a State or Territory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (1) This section applies if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...engaging in that conduct is a Commonwealth offence or an offence against a law of a State or Territory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagating effect of Commonwealth/State law on participants
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (1) This section applies if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...conduct in the course of, and for the purposes of, the controlled operation;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of conduct in controlled operation
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (1) This section applies if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HA(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct

15HA(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.52
note: Participant not criminally responsible for offence if conduct is in accordance with authority and meets certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ha-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HA Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Controlled operation overlaps with participant's engagement in controlled conduct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Controlled operations are defined as those that involve the participant engaging in controlled conduct for the purposes of the controlled operation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Participant engages in controlled conduct for the purposes of the controlled operation.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Participant is recognised as a civilian participant in the operation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Participant is recognised as a civilian participant in the operation if they act in accordance with instructions of a law enforcement officer.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognises
premise text: Participant acts in accordance with instructions of a law enforcement officer.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Participant is not criminally responsible for offence if conduct meets conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant has an obligation to conduct controlled operation in accordance with authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Authority authorises participant to engage in controlled conduct.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Controlled operation diffuses to participant's engagement in controlled conduct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Controlled operations diffuse to other participants who engage in controlled conduct.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Participant engages in controlled conduct.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Participant is not criminally responsible for offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Participant is not criminally responsible for offence if they repeat the controlled operation.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: Participant repeats the controlled operation.

15HA(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.52
note: Participant must not deal with material depicting a sexual offence against any person.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ha-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15HA Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Dealing with material depicting a sexual offence against any person must occur before the participant is protected from criminal responsibility.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalInclusion
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, nothing in subparagraph (2)(d)(ii)

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with material depicting a sexual offence against any person.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, nothing in subparagraph (2)(d)(ii)

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with material depicting a sexual offence against any person and facilitating a person to deal with such material.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Conjunction
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, nothing in subparagraph (2)(d)(ii)

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HA(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct

15HB Indemnification of participants against civil liability
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.53
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HB(1) Indemnification of participants against civil liability
has part: 15HB(2) Indemnification of participants against civil liability
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hb
schema version: 2

15HB(1) Indemnification of participants against civil liability
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.53
note: The Commonwealth must indemnify a participant in a controlled operation against civil liability.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HB Indemnification of participants against civil liability

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...engaging in any conduct that is likely to cause the death of, or serious injury to, any person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The conduct does not involve the participant engaging in any conduct that is likely to cause the death of, or serious injury to, any person.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
premise text: (d) The conduct does not involve the participant...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...against any civil liability...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commonwealth has an obligation to indemnify a participant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) The Commonwealth must indemnify...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as a person authorized to engage in controlled conduct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The participant is authorized to engage in controlled conduct for the purposes of the controlled operation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (b) The participant is identified in the authority...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...have been met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The requirements (if any) specified in the regulations have been met.
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalRepetition
premise text: (f) The requirements (if any) specified...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HB(1) Indemnification of participants against civil liability

15HB(2) Indemnification of participants against civil liability
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.53
note: Participant must be indemnified against civil liability if conduct involves participant
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HB Indemnification of participants against civil liability

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant has an obligation to be indemnified against civil liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HB(2) Indemnification of participants against civil liability

15HC Effect of sections 15HA and 15HB on other laws relating to
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
note: Exemptions from sections 15HA and 15HB
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hc-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hc-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hc
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from sections 15HA and 15HB
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hc-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HC Effect of sections 15HA and 15HB on other laws relating to

15HD Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HD(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
has part: 15HD(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
has part: 15HD(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
has part: 15HD(4) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hd
schema version: 2

15HD(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
note: Participant must continue to comply with the regulation despite a variation in authority scope.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HD Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The regulation continues to apply despite a change in authority scope, as it overlaps with the participant's actions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
premise text: Participant takes actions under the original authority scope.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The regulation continues to apply despite a change in authority scope, as it is based on the participant's actions.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Inference
premise text: Participant takes actions under the original authority scope.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The regulation continues to apply despite a change in authority scope.
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
premise text: Authority to conduct a controlled operation is varied.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part does not apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Participant must be unaware of the variation for it not to affect their obligations.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Ignorance
premise text: Participant is aware of the variation.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part does not apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Participant must not be reckless about the existence of the variation for it not to affect their obligations.
modality: LTL
operator: Recklessness
premise text: Participant is reckless about the existence of the variation.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HD(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

15HD(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
note: Continue applying to a person unaware of cancellation
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HD Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...this Part continues to apply...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Consequence of cancellation on obligation
modality: Argumentation
operator: CONSEQUENCE
premise text: (2) If an authority to conduct a controlled operation is cancelled...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...this Part continues to apply...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues application despite cancellation
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUE
premise text: (2) If an authority to conduct a controlled operation is cancelled...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for so long as the person:...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Awareness of cancellation affects obligation
modality: Epistemic
operator: AWARENESS
premise text: (a) is unaware of the cancellation;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for so long as the person:...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recklessness about cancellation affects obligation
modality: LTL
operator: RECKLESSNESS
premise text: (b) is not reckless about the existence of the cancellation.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HD(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

15HD(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
note: Reckless about variation or cancellation of authority
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15HD Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is reckless about the existence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reckless behavior
modality: Deontic
operator: recklessness
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must avoid taking the risk
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to avoid risk
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person has a duty to avoid taking the risk
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to avoid risk
modality: Deontic
operator: duty
premise text: (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is aware of the variation or cancellation...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Aware of substantial risk
modality: Epistemic
operator: awareness
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person takes the risk
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Unjustifiable to take risk
modality: LTL
operator: trace
premise text: (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HD(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

15HD(4) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
note: A reference to a cancelled authority includes a reference to an authority that has stopped being in effect.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hd-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15HD Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion of a cancelled authority reference.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes a cancelled authority reference in the definition.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HD(4) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

15HE Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.55
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HE(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
has part: 15HE(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15he
schema version: 2

15HE(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.55
note: Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary conduct
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15he-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HE Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HE(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

15HE(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.55
note: Belief of authorized participant excuses ancillary conduct
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15he-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HE Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ancillary conduct overlaps with related controlled conduct in time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between ancillary conduct and related controlled conduct
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Belief of authorized participant at time of ancillary conduct

crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exemption from criminal responsibility is inferred from the belief of the authorized participant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inference from belief of authorized participant to exemption from criminal responsibility
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: Belief of authorized participant at time of ancillary conduct

crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exemption from criminal responsibility
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excuses ancillary conduct based on belief of authorized participant
modality: Deontic
operator: Excuse
premise text: Belief of authorized participant

crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ancillary conduct is diffused with respect to the related controlled conduct
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of belief from authorized participant to ancillary conduct
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Belief of authorized participant at time of ancillary conduct

crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ancillary conduct is recurrent with respect to the related controlled conduct
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace between ancillary conduct and related controlled conduct
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: Belief of authorized participant at time of ancillary conduct

crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HE(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

15HF Compensation for property loss or serious damage
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HF(1) Compensation for property loss or serious damage
has part: 15HF(2) Compensation for property loss or serious damage
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hf
schema version: 2

15HF(1) Compensation for property loss or serious damage
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
note: Liability for compensation in case of property loss or personal injury
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HF Compensation for property loss or serious damage

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Liability for compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

15HF(2) Compensation for property loss or serious damage
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
note: Exemptions from subsection (1)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hf-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HF Compensation for property loss or serious damage

15HG Notification requirements
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HG(1) Notification requirements
has part: 15HG(2) Notification requirements
has part: 15HG(3) Notification requirements
has part: 15HG(4) Notification requirements
has part: 15HG(5) Notification requirements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hg
schema version: 2

15HG(1) Notification requirements
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
note: Principal law enforcement officer must report loss, damage or injury to chief officer of the law enforcement agency.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HG Notification requirements

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must report loss, damage or injury.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HG(1) Notification requirements

15HG(2) Notification requirements
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
note: Chief officer must notify owner of loss or damage to property.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HG Notification requirements

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chief officer must notify owner of loss or damage to property
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Chief officer reports loss or damage to property

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HG(2) Notification requirements

15HG(3) Notification requirements
type: Concept
description: Notification
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
note: Chief officer must notify person of injury reported under subsection (1)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hg-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15HG Notification requirements

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Chief officer must notify person within a reasonable timeframe after reporting injury
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) If a personal injury is reported to the chief officer under subsection (1),

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Chief officer's notification implies that they have taken reasonable steps
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (3) If a personal injury is reported to the chief officer under subsection (1),

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Chief officer's notification requires human oversight and review
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
premise text: (3) If a personal injury is reported to the chief officer under subsection (1),

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chief officer must notify person of injury reported under subsection (1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer must take action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Notification spreads to person affected by injury
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
premise text: (3) If a personal injury is reported to the chief officer under subsection (1),

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HG(3) Notification requirements

15HG(4) Notification requirements
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
note: Notification requirements under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hg-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15HG Notification requirements

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (4) The chief officer is not required to give a notification...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HG(4) Notification requirements

15HG(5) Notification requirements
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
note: Delegation of powers or functions
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hg-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15HG Notification requirements

15HH Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.58
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HH(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
has part: 15HH(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
has part: 15HH(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hh
schema version: 2

15HH(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.58
note: Participant must comply with Commonwealth offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hh-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HH Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...engaging in that conduct is a Commonwealth offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant has a duty to comply.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (1) This section applies...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HH(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a

15HH(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.58
note: Participant must act in accordance with instructions of a law enforcement officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hh-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HH Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: the participant must act in accordance with the instructions of a law enforcement officer.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HH(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a

15HH(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.58
note: Same meanings as in corresponding State controlled operations law
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hh-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hh-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15HH Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a

15HI Effect of section 15HH on other laws relating to criminal
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.59
note: Section 15HH does not apply to certain criminal investigation activities.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hi-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hi-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hi
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hi-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Certain criminal investigation activities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excluded activities
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
premise text: Section 15HH

15HJ Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.59
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HJ(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
has part: 15HJ(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hj
schema version: 2

15HJ(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.59
note: Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary conduct
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HJ Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HJ(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

15HJ(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.59
note: Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary conduct
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HJ Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person who engaged in the ancillary conduct is not criminally responsible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal overlap with protected conduct
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) Despite any law of the Commonwealth

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person who engaged in the ancillary conduct is not criminally responsible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits criminal responsibility
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) Despite any law of the Commonwealth

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person who engaged in the ancillary conduct is not criminally responsible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes obligation to protect
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) Despite any law of the Commonwealth

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person who engaged in the ancillary conduct is not criminally responsible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses protection to related conduct
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) Despite any law of the Commonwealth

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person who engaged in the ancillary conduct is not criminally responsible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal containment with protected conduct
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
premise text: (2) Despite any law of the Commonwealth

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HJ(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary

15HK Unauthorised disclosure of information
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.61
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HK(1) Unauthorised disclosure of information
has part: 15HK(1A) Unauthorised disclosure of information
has part: 15HK(1B) Unauthorised disclosure of information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hk
schema version: 2

15HK(1) Unauthorised disclosure of information
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.61
note: Disclosing unauthorized information is an offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HK Unauthorised disclosure of information

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (c) the person discloses the information;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Relates to a controlled operation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (d) the information relates to a controlled operation.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...discloses the information;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (d) the information relates to a controlled operation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information by entrusted persons
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) Information came to the knowledge or into the possession of the person in the person’s capacity as an entrusted person;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Recklessness is the fault element...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information by persons with recklessness
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1)(b) and (d)—see section 5.6 of the Criminal Code;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imprisonment for disclosure of unauthorized information
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HK(1) Unauthorised disclosure of information

15HK(1A) Unauthorised disclosure of information
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.61
note: Prohibition on unauthorized disclosure of information
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hk-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 15HK Unauthorised disclosure of information

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty to refrain from action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HK(1A) Unauthorised disclosure of information

15HK(1B) Unauthorised disclosure of information
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.61
note: Disclosing controlled operation information without authorization is an offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1b-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hk-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 15HK Unauthorised disclosure of information

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosing controlled operation information without authorization is an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1B) A person commits an offence...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1b-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HK(1B) Unauthorised disclosure of information

15HM Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.65
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HM(1) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
has part: 15HM(1A) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
has part: 15HM(2) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hm
schema version: 2

15HM(1) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.65
note: Chief officers must submit reports to the Ombudsman on a 6 monthly basis.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HM Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide reports
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HM(1) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or

15HM(1A) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.65
note: Authorising agency is ACC, or Ombudsman for other agencies.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hm-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 15HM Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: Authorising agency is ACC.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HM(1A) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or

15HM(2) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.65
note: Agency must provide formal authority reports to Ombudsman
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HM Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must provide formal authority reports to Ombudsman
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HM(2) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or

15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.69
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HN(1) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and
has part: 15HN(2) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and
has part: 15HN(3) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hn
schema version: 2

15HN(1) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.69
note: Chief officers must submit annual reports to the Minister.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HN(1) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and

15HN(2) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.69
note: Chief officers must advise the Minister about information to be excluded from reports.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister must be advised.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officers must advise the Minister.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Chief officer is a chief officer.

15HN(3) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.69
note: Minister must exclude information from report if advised by chief officer
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hn-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister must exclude information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a duty to exclude information from report
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Chief officer advises Minister

15HO Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HO(1) Annual report by Ombudsman
has part: 15HO(2) Annual report by Ombudsman
has part: 15HO(3) Annual report by Ombudsman
has part: 15HO(4) Annual report by Ombudsman
has part: 15HO(5) Annual report by Ombudsman
has part: 15HO(6) Annual report by Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ho
schema version: 2

15HO(1) Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
note: The Ombudsman must prepare and provide a report to the Minister and law enforcement agency.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ho-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HO Annual report by Ombudsman

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HO(1) Annual report by Ombudsman

15HO(2) Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
note: Report cannot include information that could endanger a person's safety, prejudice an investigation or prosecution, or compromise law enforcement activities.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ho-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HO Annual report by Ombudsman

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...information which, if made public...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain information from being included in a report.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A report under this section must not include...

15HO(3) Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
note: Annual report by Ombudsman must be laid before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ho-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15HO Annual report by Ombudsman

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to lay report before Parliament
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15HO(4) Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
note: Annual report by Ombudsman must include comments on comprehensiveness and adequacy of reports provided to the Ombudsman.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ho-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15HO Annual report by Ombudsman

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HO(4) Annual report by Ombudsman

15HO(5) Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
note: Report cannot disclose information that identifies a person involved in an operation.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ho-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15HO Annual report by Ombudsman

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information that identifies a person involved in an operation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

15HO(6) Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
description: Particulars of a controlled operation
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
note: Annual report by Ombudsman must include particulars of a controlled operation when completed.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ho-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15HO Annual report by Ombudsman

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide particulars
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HO(6) Annual report by Ombudsman

15HP Keeping documents connected with controlled operations
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.71
note: Must keep certain documents connected with controlled operations.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hp-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hp-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hp
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide documents
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hp-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HP Keeping documents connected with controlled operations

15HQ General register
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.72
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HQ(1) General register
has part: 15HQ(2) General register
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hq
schema version: 2

15HQ(1) General register
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.72
note: Chief officer must cause a general register to be kept.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HQ General register

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HQ(1) General register

15HQ(2) General register
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.72
note: Requires specification of application and authority details
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HQ General register

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for operation commencement and cessation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Yes
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires specification of application and authority details
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HQ(2) General register

15HR Appointment of inspecting officers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.75
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HR(1) Appointment of inspecting officers
has part: 15HR(2) Appointment of inspecting officers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hr
schema version: 2

15HR(1) Appointment of inspecting officers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.75
note: The Ombudsman may appoint members of the Ombudsman’s staff to be inspecting officers.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hr-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HR Appointment of inspecting officers

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to appoint
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HR(1) Appointment of inspecting officers

15HR(2) Appointment of inspecting officers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.75
note: Appointment under subsection (1) must be in writing.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hr-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HR Appointment of inspecting officers

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written appointment
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HR(2) Appointment of inspecting officers

15HS Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.75
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HS(1) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
has part: 15HS(3) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hs
schema version: 2

15HS(1) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.75
note: The Ombudsman must inspect records of authorising agencies at least once every 12 months.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hs-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hs-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HS Inspection of records by the Ombudsman

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inspect records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hs-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HS(1) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman

15HS(3) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.75
note: Ombudsman may enter premises, access records, and require staff information.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hs-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hs-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hs-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15HS Inspection of records by the Ombudsman

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to enter premises
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hs-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to request staff information
modality: Deontic
operator: may require

15HT Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.76
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HT(1) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 15HT(2) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 15HT(3) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 15HT(4) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 15HT(5) Power to obtain relevant information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ht
schema version: 2

15HT(1) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.76
note: Ombudsman can compel law enforcement officer to provide relevant information.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ht-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Can

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HT(1) Power to obtain relevant information

15HT(2) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.76
note: The Ombudsman may require law enforcement officers to provide information.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ht-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HT(2) Power to obtain relevant information

15HT(3) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.76
note: The Ombudsman may require a law enforcement officer to attend an inspection.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ht-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The officer must answer questions within a specified time frame.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within a specified period

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Ombudsman has a duty to require the officer's attendance.
modality: Deontic
operator: require

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HT(3) Power to obtain relevant information

15HT(4) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.76
note: The Ombudsman may require a chief officer to attend an inspection.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ht-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer must attend the inspection.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: The Ombudsman has reasonable grounds to believe...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HT(4) Power to obtain relevant information

15HT(5) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.76
note: Requirement must be reasonable
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ht-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be reasonable
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HT(5) Power to obtain relevant information

15HU Offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.77
note: Refusal to attend before an inspecting officer is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hu
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refusal to attend is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal to attend before an inspecting officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Section 15HT requires attendance before an inspecting officer.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person has an obligation to attend before an inspecting officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: There is an obligation on a person to attend before an inspecting officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 15HT requires attendance before an inspecting officer.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 6 months is prohibited as a penalty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision prohibits imprisonment for 6 months as a penalty.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Imprisonment for 6 months is the penalty for an offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace of refusal or failure to attend.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The provision creates a recurring trace of refusal or failure to attend.
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
premise text: Refusal or failure to attend is prohibited.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HU Offence

15HV Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.77
note: Must provide information, answer questions, or give access to documents despite other laws.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hv-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hv-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hv
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hv-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information, answer questions, or give access to documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hv-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HV Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

15HW Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.79
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HW(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
has part: 15HW(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
has part: 15HW(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hw
schema version: 2

15HW(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.79
note: Definitions for State or Territory agency and inspecting authority
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hw-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hw-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HW Exchange of information between Ombudsman or

15HW(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.79
note: Ombudsman must provide information to State or Territory inspecting authority.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hw-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hw-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HW Exchange of information between Ombudsman or

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

15HW(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.79
note: Ombudsman must provide information to authorities under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hw-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hw-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15HW Exchange of information between Ombudsman or

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
premise text: The Ombudsman may only give information...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hw-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HW(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or

15HX Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.80
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15HX(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
has part: 15HX(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hx
schema version: 2

15HX(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.80
note: Delegation of powers to APS employee
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hx-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hx-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15HX Delegation by Ombudsman

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hx-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Delegation is effective from specified date
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal scope of delegation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Written instrument specifies effective date

15HX(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.80
note: Delegate must provide instrument of delegation upon request.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hx-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15HX Delegation by Ombudsman

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HX(2) Delegation by Ombudsman

15HY Ombudsman not to be sued
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.81
note: No liability for acts done in good faith while performing official duties.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hy-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hy-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hy-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hy-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hy
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hy-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman must act in good faith.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No liability implies duty to act in good faith.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: The Ombudsman is not liable for acts done in good faith.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hy-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman performs official duties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Good faith entails official duties.
modality: Deontic
operator: Entails
premise text: The Ombudsman acts in good faith.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hy-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman is not liable.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Official duties imply no liability.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: The Ombudsman performs official duties.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hy-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HY Ombudsman not to be sued

15HZ Evidence of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.82
note: A document purporting to be an authority granted under section 15GI is admissible in legal proceedings.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hz-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hz-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15hz
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hz-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to admit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Admission of documents as evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: admission
premise text: Section 15GI

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hz-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15HZ Evidence of authorities

15J Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.82
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15J(1) Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
has part: 15J(2) Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
has part: 15J(3) Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15j
schema version: 2

15J(1) Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.82
note: Authority granted under section 15GI by an AFP authorising officer, ACC authorising officer or NACC authorising officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15J Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The AFP authorising officer, ACC authorising officer or NACC authorising officer has the authority to grant the authority.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Occurs during the operation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The applicant for the authority believes that illicit goods involved in the conduct of the operation may be dealt with by an officer of Customs.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The applicant for the authority believes that illicit goods involved in the conduct of the operation may be dealt with by an officer of Customs.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has authority to grant the authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasAuthority
premise text: The AFP authorising officer, ACC authorising officer or NACC authorising officer has the authority.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The AFP authorising officer, ACC authorising officer or NACC authorising officer has the authority to grant the authority.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has belief about the nature of the goods.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasBelief
premise text: The applicant for the authority believes that illicit goods involved in the conduct of the operation may be dealt with by an officer of Customs.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The AFP authorising officer, ACC authorising officer or NACC authorising officer has the authority to grant the authority.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has permission to deal with the goods.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
premise text: The applicant for the authority believes that illicit goods involved in the conduct of the operation may be dealt with by an officer of Customs.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The AFP authorising officer, ACC authorising officer or NACC authorising officer has the authority to grant the authority.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Occurs if the condition is met.
modality: LTL
operator: occursIf
premise text: The applicant for the authority believes that illicit goods involved in the conduct of the operation may be dealt with by an officer of Customs.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15J(1) Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to

15J(2) Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
type: Concept
description: yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.82
note: Notify the Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department or a nominated person in writing of certain information.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15J Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15J(2) Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to

15J(3) Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.82
note: Failure to comply does not affect authority validity
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15j-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15J Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The validity of an authority is unaffected by a failure to comply with this section.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority validity unaffected by non-compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (3) A failure to comply with this section does not affect the validity of an authority.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15J(3) Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to

15JA Integrity testing—simplified outline
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.84
note: Authorisation required for integrity testing operations
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ja-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ja-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ja
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ja-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ja-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JA Integrity testing—simplified outline

15JB Integrity testing—concurrent operation of State and Territory
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.85
note: Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws with this Part is not excluded.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jb
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to the extent that the law is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Intersection of concurrent operation intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: intersection
premise text: This Part is not to apply to the exclusion of a law of a State or Territory

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to the extent that the law is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inference of concurrent operation
modality: CogAI
operator: inference
premise text: This Part is not to apply to the exclusion of a law of a State or Territory

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to the extent that the law is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of concurrent operation
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
premise text: This Part is not to apply

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to the extent that the law is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of concurrent operation
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
premise text: This Part is not to apply to the exclusion of a law of a State or Territory

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to the extent that the law is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Intersection of concurrent operation intervals
modality: LTL
operator: intersection
premise text: This Part is not to apply to the exclusion of a law of a State or Territory

15JC Integrity testing—definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.85
note: Defines terms for integrity testing operations.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jc-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jc-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jc-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jc
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines terms for integrity testing operations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jc-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subclass of definitions for integrity testing operations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
premise text: Definitions for integrity testing operations.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jc-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JC Integrity testing—definitions

15JD Integrity testing—meaning of integrity testing operation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.87
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15JD(1) Integrity testing—meaning of integrity testing operation
has part: 15JD(2) Integrity testing—meaning of integrity testing operation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jd
schema version: 2

15JD(1) Integrity testing—meaning of integrity testing operation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.87
note: Defines integrity testing operation
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15JD Integrity testing—meaning of integrity testing operation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) An integrity testing operation is an operation conducted in relation to a target agency using controlled or simulated situations to test the integrity of a staff member of the agency.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes when the operation occurs
modality: AllenInterval
operator: has temporal relationship

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) An integrity testing operation is an operation conducted in relation to a target agency using controlled or simulated situations to test the integrity of a staff member of the agency.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishes a connection between terms
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) An integrity testing operation is an operation conducted in relation to a target agency using controlled or simulated situations to test the integrity of a staff member of the agency.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines a term with AI relevance
modality: CogAI
operator: is defined as

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) An integrity testing operation is an operation conducted in relation to a target agency using controlled or simulated situations to test the integrity of a staff member of the agency.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) An integrity testing operation is an operation conducted in relation to a target agency using controlled or simulated situations to test the integrity of a staff member of the agency.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes how the term is used
modality: Diffusion
operator: is related to

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JD(1) Integrity testing—meaning of integrity testing operation

15JD(2) Integrity testing—meaning of integrity testing operation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.87
note: Staff members cannot engage in conduct that contravenes principles of behaviour required by law or otherwise.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15JD Integrity testing—meaning of integrity testing operation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct that contravenes principles of behaviour required by law or otherwise.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) An integrity testing operation includes an operation that offers the staff member an opportunity to engage in conduct, whether lawful or unlawful...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies 'conduct' as conduct that contravenes principles of behaviour required by law or otherwise.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (2) An integrity testing operation includes an operation that offers the staff member an opportunity to engage in conduct, whether lawful or unlawful...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JD(2) Integrity testing—meaning of integrity testing operation

15JE Integrity testing authorities—circumstances in which
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.88
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15JE(1) Integrity testing authorities—circumstances in which
has part: 15JE(2) Integrity testing authorities—circumstances in which
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15je
schema version: 2

15JE(1) Integrity testing authorities—circumstances in which
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.88
note: An agency staff member may apply for authority for an integrity testing operation.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15je-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15je-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15je-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15JE Integrity testing authorities—circumstances in which

crimes-act-1914-sec-15je-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Staff members of agencies may apply for authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

15JE(2) Integrity testing authorities—circumstances in which
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.88
note: Application of integrity testing table items does not prevent application of other items.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15je-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15je-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15JE Integrity testing authorities—circumstances in which

crimes-act-1914-sec-15je-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JE(2) Integrity testing authorities—circumstances in which

15JF Integrity testing authorities—application
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.90
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15JF(1) Integrity testing authorities—application
has part: 15JF(2) Integrity testing authorities—application
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jf
schema version: 2

15JF(1) Integrity testing authorities—application
type: Concept
description: sufficient information to enable the authorising officer to decide
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.90
note: Application requirements for integrity testing authorities
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15JF Integrity testing authorities—application

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must provide sufficient information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JF(1) Integrity testing authorities—application

15JF(2) Integrity testing authorities—application
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.90
note: Applicant must provide additional information for proper consideration.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15JF Integrity testing authorities—application

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JF(2) Integrity testing authorities—application

15JG Integrity testing authorities—grant
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.90
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15JG(1) Integrity testing authorities—grant
has part: 15JG(2) Integrity testing authorities—grant
has part: 15JG(3) Integrity testing authorities—grant
has part: 15JG(4) Integrity testing authorities—grant
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jg
schema version: 2

15JG(1) Integrity testing authorities—grant
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.90
note: Grant authority for integrity testing operation
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15JG Integrity testing authorities—grant

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority issued
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority granted
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
premise text: Application considered

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JG(1) Integrity testing authorities—grant

15JG(2) Integrity testing authorities—grant
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.90
note: Grant authority to conduct integrity testing operation only under specified conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15JG Integrity testing authorities—grant

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority granted only under specified circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Authority granted only during specified circumstances
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Authorising officer must be satisfied that specified conditions are met before granting authority.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority granted only under specified conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory authority grant
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Authorising officer must not grant authority unless specified conditions are met.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority granted only under specified circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on authorising officer to ensure specified conditions are met before granting authority
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Authorising officer must be satisfied that specified conditions are met before granting authority.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JG(2) Integrity testing authorities—grant

15JG(3) Integrity testing authorities—grant
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.90
note: Granting of integrity testing authority
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jg-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15JG Integrity testing authorities—grant

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to grant
modality: Deontic
operator: grant

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JG(3) Integrity testing authorities—grant

15JG(4) Integrity testing authorities—grant
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.90
note: Granting authority for integrity testing authorities
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jg-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15JG Integrity testing authorities—grant

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the scope of integrity testing authorities
modality: Deontic
operator: hasGrantingAuthority

15JH Integrity testing authorities—form
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.91
note: An integrity testing authority must state the name and rank or position of the appropriate authorising officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jh-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jh-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jh
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must state the name and rank or position of the appropriate authorising officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jh-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JH Integrity testing authorities—form

15JI Integrity testing authorities—notice to National
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.93
note: Must provide copy of integrity testing authority to staff member and National Anti-Corruption Commissioner
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ji-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ji-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ji
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ji-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide copy of integrity testing authority
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

15JJ Integrity testing authorities—duration
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.93
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15JJ(1) Integrity testing authorities—duration
has part: 15JJ(2) Integrity testing authorities—duration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jj
schema version: 2

15JJ(1) Integrity testing authorities—duration
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.93
note: Authority comes into force when granted
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jj-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15JJ Integrity testing authorities—duration

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority comes into force at some point in the future
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal interval of authority's coming into force
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Authority is granted

15JJ(2) Integrity testing authorities—duration
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.93
note: Authority duration
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jj-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15JJ Integrity testing authorities—duration

15JK Integrity testing authorities—variation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.93
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15JK(1) Integrity testing authorities—variation
has part: 15JK(2) Integrity testing authorities—variation
has part: 15JK(3) Integrity testing authorities—variation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jk
schema version: 2

15JK(1) Integrity testing authorities—variation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.93
note: Variation of integrity testing authority by authorising officer or staff member.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15JK Integrity testing authorities—variation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of variation by authorising officer or staff member.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (a) at any time on the authorising officer’s own initiative;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to vary authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer for an integrity testing operation...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to vary authority by staff member.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (b) on application, in writing, by the responsible staff member for the operation.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of permission to vary authority.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (b) on application, in writing, by the responsible staff member for the operation.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of variation on integrity testing authority.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer for an integrity testing operation...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JK(1) Integrity testing authorities—variation

15JK(2) Integrity testing authorities—variation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.93
note: Authority may extend period of effect up to 12 months.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jk-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15JK Integrity testing authorities—variation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority may extend period of effect.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JK(2) Integrity testing authorities—variation

15JK(3) Integrity testing authorities—variation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.93
note: Authorising officer must give a copy of variation to integrity testing authorities.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jk-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15JK Integrity testing authorities—variation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide variation to integrity testing authorities.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JK(3) Integrity testing authorities—variation

15JL Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.94
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15JL(1) Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
has part: 15JL(2) Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
has part: 15JL(3) Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jl
schema version: 2

15JL(1) Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.94
note: Cancellation of integrity testing authority by authorising officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jl-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15JL Integrity testing authorities—cancellation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The cancellation can occur at any time and for any reason.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of cancellation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer for an integrity testing operation may, by order in writing given to the responsible staff member for...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The cancellation authority is represented as a knowledge entity.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of cancellation authority.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer for an integrity testing operation may, by order in writing given to the responsible staff member for...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authority at any time and for any reason may be cancelled.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of cancelling integrity testing authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer for an integrity testing operation may, by order in writing given to the responsible staff member for the operation...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The cancellation is communicated to the responsible staff member.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of cancellation information.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Spread
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer for an integrity testing operation may, by order in writing given to the responsible staff member for...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The cancellation is a recurring event.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal trace of cancellation.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer for an integrity testing operation may, by order in writing given to the responsible staff member for...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JL(1) Integrity testing authorities—cancellation

15JL(2) Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.94
note: Staff member can request cancellation of integrity testing authority.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jl-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15JL Integrity testing authorities—cancellation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JL(2) Integrity testing authorities—cancellation

15JL(3) Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.94
note: Cancellation of integrity testing authority takes effect at specified time.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jl-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15JL Integrity testing authorities—cancellation

15JM Integrity testing authorities—defects
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.94
note: An application for an integrity testing authority or for the variation of an authority, and any integrity testing authority or variation granted on the basis of such an application, is not invalidated by any defect.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jm-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jm-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jm
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jm-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a = application ∨ a = authority ∨ a = variation) → ¬(application is invalidated by defect(a))
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If a defect affects the application, authority or variation in a material particular, then the application is invalidated.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: defect(a) ∧ (a = application ∨ a = authority ∨ a = variation)

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jm-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JM Integrity testing authorities—defects

15JN Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.95
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15JN(1) Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
has part: 15JN(2) Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
has part: 15JN(3) Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jn
schema version: 2

15JN(1) Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.95
note: Authorises participants to take part in integrity testing operation
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15JN Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: each person identified in the authority as a participant
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorises participants to take part in integrity testing operation
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
premise text: integrity testing authority for an integrity testing operation

15JN(2) Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.95
note: Participant authorized to take part in integrity testing operation for a specified period.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15JN Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The participant's authorization overlaps with the specified period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifying a temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) A participant is authorized to take part in the integrity testing operation for the period of effect of the authority.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorization is related to a cognitive agent.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Specifying a cognitive agent relation
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
premise text: (2) A participant is authorized to take part in the integrity testing operation for the period of effect of the authority, unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The participant is permitted to take part in the integrity testing operation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) A participant is authorized to take part in the integrity testing operation.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorization diffuses to other participants.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Specifying a diffusion relation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) A participant is authorized to take part in the integrity testing operation for the period of effect of the authority, unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The participant's authorization is valid until the specified condition is met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifying a temporal condition
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (2) A participant is authorized to take part in the integrity testing operation for the period of effect of the authority, unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JN(2) Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct

15JN(3) Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.95
note: An integrity testing authority does not authorise a participant to delegate participation.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jn-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15JN Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits delegation of participation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JN(3) Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct

15JO Integrity testing operations—indemnity against civil liability
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.95
note: Commonwealth must indemnify participant in integrity testing operation against civil liability.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jo-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jo-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jo
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jo-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...against any civil liability...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commonwealth has an obligation to indemnify participant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The Commonwealth must indemnify...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jo-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JO Integrity testing operations—indemnity against civil liability

15JP Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.96
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15JP(1) Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
has part: 15JP(2) Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
has part: 15JP(3) Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jp
schema version: 2

15JP(1) Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.96
note: Participant must continue to comply with integrity testing operation despite scope variation.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15JP Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for so long as...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Continuity despite scope variation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues to apply despite scope variation
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: for so long as...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant must comply with integrity testing operation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for so long as...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Continuity despite scope variation
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JP(1) Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of

15JP(2) Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.96
note: Continue applying provisions despite cancellation of integrity testing authority
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15JP Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Excerpt applies despite cancellation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap with cancellation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Cancellation occurred before or during testing operation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Provisions continue to apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues to apply provisions despite cancellation
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: Cancellation of authority does not affect obligations

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JP(2) Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of

15JP(3) Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.96
note: Be aware of substantial risk that variation or cancellation has happened and unjustifiable to take the risk.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jp-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15JP Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to be aware of substantial risk
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Be aware of substantial risk that variation or cancellation has happened
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JP(3) Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of

15JQ Integrity testing operations—disclosure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.98
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15JQ(1) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
has part: 15JQ(2) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
has part: 15JQ(3) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
has part: 15JQ(4) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jq
schema version: 2

15JQ(1) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.98
note: Disclosing information about integrity testing operations is an offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15JQ Integrity testing operations—disclosure

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...discloses information; and...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JQ(1) Integrity testing operations—disclosure

15JQ(2) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.98
note: Disclosure exceptions for integrity testing operations
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15JQ Integrity testing operations—disclosure

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts disclosure from integrity testing operations
modality: Deontic
operator: !

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JQ(2) Integrity testing operations—disclosure

15JQ(3) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.98
note: Disclosure of information to the National Anti-Corruption Commissioner is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jq-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15JQ Integrity testing operations—disclosure

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Disclosure is permitted under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: >

15JQ(4) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.98
note: Disclosure of information to IGIS official for exercising power or performing duty is exempt from subsection (1)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jq-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15JQ Integrity testing operations—disclosure

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Disclosure to IGIS official for exercising power or performing duty is permitted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: IGIS official has knowledge of disclosure purpose
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JQ(4) Integrity testing operations—disclosure

15JR Integrity testing operations—disclosure endangering safety
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.99
note: Disclosing information about integrity testing operations that endangers safety is an offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jr
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The disclosure of information about integrity testing operations that endangers safety overlaps with the effective conduct of an integrity testing operation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Disclosing information about integrity testing operations that endangers safety overlaps with the effective conduct of an integrity testing operation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: the person intends to endanger the health or safety of any person or prejudice the effective conduct of an integrity testing operation;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information is classified as relating to an integrity testing operation using artificial intelligence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies information as relating to an integrity testing operation using artificial intelligence.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: the information relates to an integrity testing operation;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information about integrity testing operations that endangers safety.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The person discloses information; and the information relates to an integrity testing operation; and either the person intends to endanger the health or safety of any person or prejudice the effective conduct of an integrity testing operation;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The disclosure of information about integrity testing operations that endangers safety spreads to other persons or entities.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Disclosing information about integrity testing operations that endangers safety spreads to other persons or entities.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
premise text: the person discloses information; and the information relates to an integrity testing operation; and either the person intends to endanger the health or safety of any person or prejudice the effective conduct of an integrity testing operation;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The disclosure of information about integrity testing operations that endangers safety repeats the action of endangering health or safety.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Disclosing information about integrity testing operations that endangers safety repeats the action of endangering health or safety.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: the person intends to endanger the health or safety of any person or prejudice the effective conduct of an integrity testing operation;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JR Integrity testing operations—disclosure endangering safety

15JS Integrity testing operations—annual reports
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15JS(1) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
has part: 15JS(2) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
has part: 15JS(3) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
has part: 15JS(4) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
has part: 15JS(5) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15js
schema version: 2

15JS(1) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
type: Concept
description: Details of integrity testing operations authorized during the previous 12 months
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
note: Annual report on integrity testing operations must be submitted to the Law Enforcement Minister.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15js-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15JS Integrity testing operations—annual reports

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During the previous 12 months
modality: AllenInterval
operator: DURING
premise text: (1) As soon as practicable after 30 June in each year, the chief officer of each integrity testing agency must submit a report to the Law Enforcement Minister setting out...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Submission of annual report implies compliance with obligation
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (1) As soon as practicable after 30 June in each year, the chief officer of each integrity testing agency must submit a report to the Law Enforcement Minister setting out...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Annual report is a structured document containing details of integrity testing operations
modality: CogAI
operator: IS
premise text: (2) in relation to integrity testing operations authorized by an authorising officer of the agency during the previous 12 months.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to submit annual report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Details of integrity testing operations are included in annual report
modality: Diffusion
operator: IN
premise text: (2) in relation to integrity testing operations authorized by an authorising officer of the agency during the previous 12 months.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JS(1) Integrity testing operations—annual reports

15JS(2) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
type: Concept
description: Details of granted authorities, suspected criminal activity, and authority periods
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
note: Annual report requirements for integrity testing authorities
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15js-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15JS Integrity testing operations—annual reports

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual reports
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JS(2) Integrity testing operations—annual reports

15JS(3) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
note: No disclosure of person identities in integrity testing reports.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15js-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15JS Integrity testing operations—annual reports

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of personal information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JS(3) Integrity testing operations—annual reports

15JS(4) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
type: Concept
description: Particulars of an integrity testing operation
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
note: Annual report must include particulars of an integrity testing operation if completed by the end of the year.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15js-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15JS Integrity testing operations—annual reports

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide particulars if completed by the end of the year.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JS(4) Integrity testing operations—annual reports

15JS(5) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
type: Concept
description: annual reports
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
note: Annual reports must be provided by integrity testing agencies.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15js-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15JS Integrity testing operations—annual reports

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide annual reports.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of integrity testing agencies.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JS(5) Integrity testing operations—annual reports

15JT Evidence of integrity testing authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.104
note: A document purporting to be an integrity testing authority is admissible in legal proceedings.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jt-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jt-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15jt
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jt-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Admissible in legal proceedings
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Admission of documents
modality: Deontic
operator: admission
premise text: Document purporting to be an integrity testing authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jt-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15JT Evidence of integrity testing authorities

15K Definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.105
note: Defines terms related to assumed identities
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15k-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15k-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15k-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15k
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15k-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusive definition of agency
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

crimes-act-1914-sec-15k-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for assumed identities
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf

crimes-act-1914-sec-15k-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15K Definitions

15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.111
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KA(1) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
has part: 15KA(2) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
has part: 15KA(3) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
has part: 15KA(3A) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
has part: 15KA(4) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ka
schema version: 2

15KA(1) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.111
note: Law enforcement officer may apply for authority to acquire or use assumed identity.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ka-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to do something
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KA(1) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity

15KA(2) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.111
note: Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ka-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chief officer of the law enforcement agency must receive application before deadline
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for application submission
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Application must be submitted within a certain time frame

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chief officer of the law enforcement agency must consider justification before granting authority
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Reasoning for authority request
modality: Argumentation
operator: mustJustify
premise text: Applicant must justify reason for requesting assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chief officer of the law enforcement agency must process application before making decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Processing of application
modality: CogAI
operator: mustProcess
premise text: Application must be processed by chief officer of law enforcement agency

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application must be made to the chief officer of the law enforcement agency
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority to acquire or use assumed identity
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligationTo
premise text: Law enforcement agency has obligation to provide authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chief officer of the law enforcement agency must notify applicant of decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Notification of decision
modality: Diffusion
operator: mustInform
premise text: Applicant must be informed of decision on authority request

15KA(3) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.111
note: Authority to acquire or use assumed identity
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ka-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority for the officer or any other person (including a foreign officer) to do either or both of the following:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence recognition
modality: CogAI
operator: cognizes
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority for the officer or any other person (including a foreign officer) to do either or both of the following:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority granted
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority for the officer or any other person (including a foreign officer) to do either or both of the following:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information dissemination
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority for the officer or any other person (including a foreign officer) to do either or both of the following:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal limit
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority for the officer or any other person (including a foreign officer) to do either or both of the following:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KA(3) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity

15KA(3A) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.111
note: Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity is restricted to ONI intelligence officers.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ka-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application is restricted to ONI intelligence officers.
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction
premise text: None

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KA(3A) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity

15KA(4) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.111
note: Separate application must be made for each assumed identity.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ka-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide separate application
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KA(4) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity

15KB Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.113
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KB(1) Determination of applications
has part: 15KB(2) Determination of applications
has part: 15KB(3) Determination of applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kb
schema version: 2

15KB(1) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.113
note: Grant authority to acquire or use assumed identity with conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KB Determination of applications

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority granted with conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Application considered

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority refused
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission denied
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse
premise text: Application not approved

15KB(2) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.113
note: Authority to acquire or use assumed identity may not be granted unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KB Determination of applications

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for one or more of the following purposes:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for which assumed identity can be acquired or used
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (ii) the exercise of powers and performance of functions...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for one or more of the following purposes:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive AI application for assumed identity management
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
premise text: (a) that the assumed identity is necessary...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the chief officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of acquiring or using assumed identity
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) An authority to acquire or use an assumed identity may not be granted...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for one or more of the following purposes:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of assumed identity to authorized person
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (v) any administrative function in support of any of the...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for one or more of the following purposes:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for training persons for purposes mentioned in subparagraphs (i) to (iii)
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (iv) the training of persons for any of the purposes...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KB(2) Determination of applications

15KB(3) Determination of applications
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.113
note: Chief officer must appoint an officer to supervise
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KB Determination of applications

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chief officer must appoint...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) If an authority is granted...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KB(3) Determination of applications

15KC Form of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.115
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KC(1) Form of authority
has part: 15KC(2) Form of authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kc
schema version: 2

15KC(1) Form of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.115
note: Authority must be in writing and signed by the person granting it.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KC Form of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority must be in writing
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST BE IN WRITING

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority must be signed by the person granting it
modality: Deontic
operator: SIGNED BY THE PERSON GRANTING IT

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KC(1) Form of authority

15KC(2) Form of authority
type: Concept
description: Details of assumed identity, evidence, and conditions
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.115
note: Authority must state certain details
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KC Form of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must state details
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KC(2) Form of authority

15KD Period of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KD(1) Period of authority
has part: 15KD(2) Period of authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kd
schema version: 2

15KD(1) Period of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116
note: Authority remains in force until cancelled under section 15KE.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KD Period of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds true
modality: Deontic
operator: holds

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KD(1) Period of authority

15KD(2) Period of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116
note: Authority remains in force until specified end date unless cancelled sooner.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KD Period of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authority remains in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds true
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (2) An authority for an authorised civilian...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KD(2) Period of authority

15KE Variation or cancellation of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.117
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KE(1) Variation or cancellation of authority
has part: 15KE(2) Variation or cancellation of authority
has part: 15KE(3) Variation or cancellation of authority
has part: 15KE(4) Variation or cancellation of authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ke
schema version: 2

15KE(1) Variation or cancellation of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.117
note: Chief officer may vary or cancel authority at any time.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ke-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KE Variation or cancellation of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to vary or cancel authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KE(1) Variation or cancellation of authority

15KE(2) Variation or cancellation of authority
type: Concept
description: written notice
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.117
note: Chief officer must give written notice of variation or cancellation to authorised person and supervisor.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ke-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KE Variation or cancellation of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KE(2) Variation or cancellation of authority

15KE(3) Variation or cancellation of authority
type: Concept
description: Reason
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.117
note: Notice must state reason for varying or cancelling authority
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ke-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KE Variation or cancellation of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notice must state why the authority is varied or cancelled.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide reason
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KE(3) Variation or cancellation of authority

15KE(4) Variation or cancellation of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.117
note: Variation or cancellation of authority takes effect on a specified day.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ke-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15KE Variation or cancellation of authority

15KF Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KF(1) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(2) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(3) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(4) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(5) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(6) Yearly review of authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kf
schema version: 2

15KF(1) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
note: Agency must review authority periodically.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to review authority
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KF(1) Yearly review of authority

15KF(2) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
note: Review authority at least once every 3 years for delegated officers, or 12 months otherwise.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must conduct review
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) A review of an authority under this section is to be conducted:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KF(2) Yearly review of authority

15KF(3) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
note: Determine whether use of assumed identity is still necessary
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to review authority
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) The purpose of a review is...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KF(3) Yearly review of authority

15KF(4) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
note: Cancel authority if necessary
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kf-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: he or she must cancel the authority under section 15KE.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory cancellation
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (4) If the chief officer is satisfied...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KF(4) Yearly review of authority

15KF(5) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
description: Opinion and reasons
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
note: Chief officer must record opinion and reasons if use of assumed identity is necessary.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kf-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to record opinion and reasons
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KF(5) Yearly review of authority

15KF(6) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
note: Failure to comply does not invalidate an authority or lawful action.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kf-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

15KG Making entries in register of births, deaths or marriages
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.119
note: Permits chief officers of law enforcement agencies or intelligence agencies to apply for an order in the Supreme Court of a State or Territory.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kg-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kg-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kg
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows action
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kg-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KG Making entries in register of births, deaths or marriages

15KH Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.119
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KH(1) Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,
has part: 15KH(2) Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kh
schema version: 2

15KH(1) Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.119
note: Authority ceasing to be in force on register of births
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KH Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During the authority ceasing to be in force
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) an authority for an assumed identity ceases to be in force;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Has assumed identity law
modality: CogAI
operator: hasAssumedIdentityLaw
premise text: (b) there is an entry in relation to that assumed identity in a register of births, deaths or marriages because of an order under a corresponding assumed identity law.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds true
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (a) an authority for an assumed identity ceases to be in force;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Because of the entry in register of births, deaths or marriages
modality: Diffusion
operator: becauseOf
premise text: (b) there is an entry in relation to that assumed identity in a register of births, deaths or marriages because of an order under a corresponding assumed identity law.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Until the authority ceasing to be in force
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (a) an authority for an assumed identity ceases to be in force;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KH(1) Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,

15KH(2) Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.119
note: Cancel entry from register of births within 28 days after authority ceases to be in force.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KH Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: within 28 days after the day the authority ceases to be in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Entry on register of births is created before authority ceases to be in force
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >P
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency or an intelligence agency...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must apply for an order under the corresponding assumed identity law
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must apply for order to cancel entry
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency or an intelligence agency...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must apply for an order under the corresponding assumed identity law to cancel the entry within 28 days after the day the authority ceases to be in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must cancel entry within 28 days after authority ceases to be in force
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency or an intelligence agency...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: within 28 days after the day the authority ceases to be in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Entry on register of births is created before authority ceases to be in force
modality: LTL
operator: >P
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency or an intelligence agency...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KH(2) Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,

15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KI(1) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(2) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(2A) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(3) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(4) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(5) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(6) Request for evidence of assumed identity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ki
schema version: 2

15KI(1) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
note: Authority must provide evidence of assumed identity.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ki-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KI(1) Request for evidence of assumed identity

15KI(2) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ki-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KI(2) Request for evidence of assumed identity

15KI(2A) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
note: List of persons who may make a request for evidence of assumed identity.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ki-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between granting authority and making a request.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) the chief officer of a law enforcement agency who granted the authority; or

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or (c) if the chief officer of the Office of National Intelligence granted the authority—the chief officer of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation or the Australian Secret Intelligence Service; or
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of the scope of persons who may make a request.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
premise text: (a) the chief officer of a law enforcement agency who granted the authority; or (b) the chief officer of an intelligence agency (other than the Office of National Intelligence or the Australian Signals Directorate) who granted the authority; or

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of the scope of persons who may make a request.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
premise text: (d) if the chief officer of the Australian Signals Directorate granted the authority—the chief officer of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation or the Australian Secret Intelligence Service.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KI(2A) Request for evidence of assumed identity

15KI(3) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity must state a reasonable period for compliance.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ki-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide evidence of assumed identity within a reasonable period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) The request must state a reasonable period for compliance with the request.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KI(3) Request for evidence of assumed identity

15KI(4) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity must include specific details.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ki-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KI(4) Request for evidence of assumed identity

15KI(5) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
note: Request for entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ki-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making a request for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) A request must not be made under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Prohibits making a request for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) A request must not be made under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.

15KI(6) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
note: Definition of evidence for issuing agency
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ki-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to evidence class
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KI(6) Request for evidence of assumed identity

15KJ Government issuing agencies to comply with request
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.121
note: Must comply with request within reasonable period
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kj-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kj-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kj
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15KK Non-government issuing agencies may comply with request
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.121
note: Non-government issuing agencies must comply with requests.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kk-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kk-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kk-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kk
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Comply with request
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Request under section 15KI

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kk-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Comply with request
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Can comply with request
modality: Deontic
operator: CAN
premise text: Request under section 15KI

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kk-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KK Non-government issuing agencies may comply with request

15KL Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.121
note: Chief officer must cancel evidence of assumed identity upon written direction.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kl-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kl-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kl
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kl-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KL Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity

15KM Return of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.122
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KM(1) Return of evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KM(2) Return of evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KM(3) Return of evidence of assumed identity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15km
schema version: 2

15KM(1) Return of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.122
note: Section applies if authority ceases to be in force.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15km-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15km-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KM Return of evidence of assumed identity

15KM(2) Return of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.122
note: Request for return of evidence of assumed identity
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15km-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15km-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KM Return of evidence of assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15km-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KM(2) Return of evidence of assumed identity

15KM(3) Return of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.122
note: Failure to comply with a request for identity evidence is an offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15km-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15km-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15km-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KM Return of evidence of assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15km-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a request
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (2)

crimes-act-1914-sec-15km-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KM(3) Return of evidence of assumed identity

15KN Protection from criminal liability—officers of issuing agencies
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.122
note: Protection from criminal liability for officers of issuing agencies
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kn-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kn-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kn
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state to protect officers from criminal liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kn-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KN Protection from criminal liability—officers of issuing agencies

15KO Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.122
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KO(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
has part: 15KO(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ko
schema version: 2

15KO(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.122
note: Chief officer of an issuing agency must provide indemnity if requested by a law enforcement or intelligence agency chief officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ko-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KO Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request made before indemnity provided
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Request made before indemnity provided
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Chief officer of an issuing agency makes a request under section 15KI or gives a direction under section 15KL to the chief officer of an issuing agency.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must provide indemnity
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide indemnity
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Chief officer of an issuing agency makes a request under section 15KI or gives a direction under section 15KL.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must provide indemnity if requested
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide indemnity if requested by a law enforcement or intelligence agency chief officer
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Chief officer of an issuing agency must provide indemnity if requested by a law enforcement or intelligence agency chief officer.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chief officer of an issuing agency must provide indemnity
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer of an issuing agency must provide indemnity
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: This section applies to the chief officer of an issuing agency.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Indemnity must be provided if request is made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Indemnity must be provided if request is made
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: Chief officer of an issuing agency makes a request under section 15KI or gives a direction under section 15KL to the chief officer of an issuing agency.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KO(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers

15KO(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.122
note: Commonwealth must indemnify issuing agency or officer for liability incurred in course of duty to comply with request or direction.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ko-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KO Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commonwealth has an obligation to indemnify issuing agency or officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KO(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers

15KP Assumed identity may be acquired and used
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.124
note: Acquiring or using an assumed identity is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kp-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kp-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kp-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kp-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kp
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person may acquire or use an assumed identity if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to acquire or use an assumed identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: The person is an authorised person (other than an authorised civilian) and the acquisition or use is in accordance with an authority; and

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kp-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person may acquire or use an assumed identity if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Acquiring or using an assumed identity is permitted under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: The person is an authorised civilian and the acquisition or use is in accordance with an authority; and

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kp-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person may acquire or use an assumed identity if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Acquiring or using an assumed identity is permitted under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Any direction by the person’s supervisor under the authority.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kp-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KP Assumed identity may be acquired and used

15KQ Protection from criminal liability—authorised persons
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.124
note: An authorised person is not criminally responsible for an offence if they act in accordance with authority.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kq-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kq-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kq-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kq
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kq-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: They are not criminally responsible for the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The action overlaps with the duty.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The person is acting in their duty.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: They are not criminally responsible for the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to act in accordance with authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The person is acting in accordance with authority.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kq-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KQ Protection from criminal liability—authorised persons

15KR Protection from criminal liability—third parties
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.125
note: Protection from criminal liability for third parties performing official duties.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kr-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kr-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kr
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kr-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state to protect third parties performing official duties.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kr-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KR Protection from criminal liability—third parties

15KS Indemnity for authorised persons
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.125
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KS(1) Indemnity for authorised persons
has part: 15KS(2) Indemnity for authorised persons
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ks
schema version: 2

15KS(1) Indemnity for authorised persons
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.125
note: Authority granted by chief officer
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ks-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KS Indemnity for authorised persons

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer has authority to grant
modality: Deontic
operator: has

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KS(1) Indemnity for authorised persons

15KS(2) Indemnity for authorised persons
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.125
note: Commonwealth must indemnify authorised persons for liability incurred due to actions taken in accordance with authority.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ks-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KS Indemnity for authorised persons

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval overlaps with liability incurred
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals overlap for liability incurred
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Liability incurred due to actions taken

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Liability incurred
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commonwealth owes obligation to indemnify authorised persons
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Authority prescribed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KS(2) Indemnity for authorised persons

15KT Particular qualifications
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.126
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KT(1) Particular qualifications
has part: 15KT(2) Particular qualifications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kt
schema version: 2

15KT(1) Particular qualifications
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.126
note: Exemption from sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS for authorised persons without a particular qualification.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kt-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KT Particular qualifications

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the exemption of authorised persons from sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS without a particular qualification.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) Sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS do not apply to anything done by an authorised person if:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Represents the exemption of authorised persons from sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS without a particular qualification.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (1) Sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS do not apply to anything done by an authorised person if:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts authorised persons from sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS without a particular qualification.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: (a) a particular qualification is needed to do the thing; and (b) the person does not have that qualification.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagates the exemption of authorised persons from sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS without a particular qualification.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (1) Sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS do not apply to anything done by an authorised person if:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the exemption of authorised persons from sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS without a particular qualification.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) Sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS do not apply to anything done by an authorised person if:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KT(1) Particular qualifications

15KT(2) Particular qualifications
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.126
note: No one authorized to fly a plane without actual qualification.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kt-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KT Particular qualifications

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No one authorized to fly a plane without actual qualification.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits flying without qualification.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not the person has acquired...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KT(2) Particular qualifications

15KU Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.126
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KU(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
has part: 15KU(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
has part: 15KU(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ku
schema version: 2

15KU(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.126
note: Continue to apply despite variation in authority scope
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ku-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KU Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Continue application despite variation in authority scope
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Counter rebuttal to variation in authority scope
modality: Argumentation
operator: Rebuttal
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continue application despite variation
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Continue application despite lack of knowledge of variation
modality: Epistemic
operator: Ignorance
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Continue application despite variation in authority scope
modality: LTL
operator: Continuation
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KU(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

15KU(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.126
note: Continue to apply despite cancellation
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ku-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KU Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...this Part continues to apply...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continue to apply despite cancellation
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUE
premise text: (2) If an authority has been cancelled...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KU(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

15KU(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.126
note: Reckless about variation or cancellation of authority
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ku-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KU Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the risk assessment leads to recklessness.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Assessing the risk
modality: Argumentation
operator: risk assessment
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the variation or cancellation has happened; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is reckless about the existence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reckless behavior
modality: Deontic
operator: recklessness
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Justifiability of taking the risk
modality: Deontic
operator: justifiability
premise text: (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is aware of the variation or cancellation...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Aware of substantial risk
modality: Epistemic
operator: awareness
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person takes the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Tracing the variation or cancellation
modality: LTL
operator: trace
premise text: (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KU(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of

15KV Transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.127
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KV(1) Transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KV(2) Transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KV(3) Transfer of control of authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kv
schema version: 2

15KV(1) Transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.127
note: Chief officer of an intelligence agency may agree to transfer control of authority.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kv-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KV Transfer of control of authorities

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if: (a) the authority was granted by the chief officer of...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Transfer of control is a temporal relation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (1) The chief officer of an intelligence agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to transfer control of an authority to the chief officer of the receiving agency.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer agrees to transfer control.
modality: Deontic
operator: Agreement
premise text: (1) The chief officer of an intelligence agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if: (a) the authority was granted by the chief officer of...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority was granted by the chief officer of the originating agency.
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorization
premise text: (a) the authority was granted by the chief officer of...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer delegates functions under this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: Note: The chief officer may delegate functions under this section—see section 15LH.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...under a previous application of this subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Control of the authority was transferred to the chief officer of the originating agency.
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorization
premise text: (b) control of the authority was transferred to the chief officer of...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KV(1) Transfer of control of authorities

15KV(2) Transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.127
note: Chief officer may agree to transfer control of authority.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kv-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KV Transfer of control of authorities

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Transfer agreement has a temporal relation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing with the chief officer of another law enforcement agency (the receiving agency) to transfer control of an authority...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Transfer agreement is a claim.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Claim
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing with the chief officer of another law enforcement agency (the receiving agency) to transfer control of an authority...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer may delegate functions under this section—see section 15LH.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Transfer agreement is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Agreement
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing with the chief officer of another law enforcement agency (the receiving agency) to transfer control of an authority...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer has permission to delegate functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: The chief officer may delegate functions under this section—see section 15LH.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Transfer agreement has a recurring trace.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing with the chief officer of another law enforcement agency (the receiving agency) to transfer control of an authority...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KV(2) Transfer of control of authorities

15KV(3) Transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.127
note: Chief officer of originating agency must provide written document to chief officer of receiving agency with certain information.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kv-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KV Transfer of control of authorities

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...when a review was last conducted; and...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for review and transfer information
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) The chief officer of the originating agency must give...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...whether control of the authority has previously been transferred under this section,...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Transfer of control implies review and transfer information
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (3) The chief officer of the originating agency must give...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a written document setting out: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Requiring written document for transfer control
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
premise text: (3) The chief officer of the originating agency must give...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a written document setting out...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written document
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) The chief officer of the originating agency must give...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the name of the originating agency and receiving agency in relation to each such transfer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Transfer information spreads to receiving agency
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
premise text: (3) The chief officer of the originating agency must give...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KV(3) Transfer of control of authorities

15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KW(1) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KW(2) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KW(3) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KW(4) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KW(5) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kw
schema version: 2

15KW(1) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128
note: Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kw-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities

15KW(2) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128
note: Authority continues in force after transfer
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kw-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authority must continue in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to maintain authority
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
premise text: (2) The authority continues...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KW(2) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities

15KW(3) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128
note: Provisions have effect as if chief officer of receiving agency granted authority instead of originating agency
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kw-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities

15KW(4) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128
note: Chief officer of receiving agency must review authority within specified timeframes.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kw-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer has an obligation to review authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KW(4) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities

15KW(5) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128
note: Chief officer of receiving agency must make request under section 15KI.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kw-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Chief officer of receiving agency must make request under section 15KI.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KW(5) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities

15KX Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.130
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KX(1) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
has part: 15KX(2) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
has part: 15KX(2A) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
has part: 15KX(3) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
has part: 15KX(4) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kx
schema version: 2

15KX(1) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.130
note: Authority must provide evidence upon request
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kx-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KX Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KX(1) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

15KX(2) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.130
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kx-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KX Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to request evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KX(2) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

15KX(2A) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.130
note: Identifies who may make a request for evidence under subsection (2)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kx-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 15KX Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies who may perform an action
modality: Deontic
operator: whoMay

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KX(2A) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

15KX(3) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.130
note: Request must state it is a request under this section.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kx-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KX Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must state
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KX(3) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

15KX(4) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.130
note: Request for entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kx-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15KX Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making a request for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

15KY Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.131
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KY(1) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
has part: 15KY(2) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
has part: 15KY(3) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ky
schema version: 2

15KY(1) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.131
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity from a Commonwealth government issuing agency.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ky-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KY Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a reasonable period for compliance with the request;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval: Request -> Reasonable Period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (c) the request states a reasonable period for compliance with the request.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the giving of evidence of the assumed identity to the authorised person named in the authority;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of authority and request on Commonwealth government issuing agency.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
premise text: (a) an authority under a corresponding assumed identity law authorises a request for...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the giving of evidence of the assumed identity to the authorised person named in the authority;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inference of authority and request on Commonwealth government issuing agency.
modality: CogAI
operator: inference
premise text: (a) an authority under a corresponding assumed identity law authorises a request for...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the giving of evidence of the assumed identity to the authorised person named in the authority;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence of assumed identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (a) an authority under a corresponding assumed identity law authorises a request for...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the production of evidence of an assumed identity from a Commonwealth government issuing agency;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information: Request -> Authority -> Commonwealth Government Issuing Agency.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
premise text: (b) the request is made to the chief officer of the Commonwealth government issuing agency;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KY(1) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

15KY(2) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.131
note: Agency must comply with request for evidence within a reasonable period.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ky-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KY Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must comply with request.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KY(2) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

15KY(3) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.131
note: Exemptions from compliance with a request made under section (1)(b)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ky-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15KY Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KY(3) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of

15KZ Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.132
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15KZ(1) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
has part: 15KZ(2) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kz
schema version: 2

15KZ(1) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.132
note: Chief officer must cancel evidence upon written direction from authorized chief officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kz-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kz-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15KZ Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kz-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KZ(1) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence

15KZ(2) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.132
note: Definition of cancel includes delete or alter an entry in a record of information.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kz-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15kz-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15KZ Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kz-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15KZ(2) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence

15L Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.132
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15L(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
has part: 15L(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15l
schema version: 2

15L(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.132
note: Chief officer of an issuing agency must provide indemnity to chief officer of a requesting agency.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15l-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15L Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers

crimes-act-1914-sec-15l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-act-1914-sec-15l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15L(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers

15L(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.132
note: Agency must indemnify issuing agency and officers for liability incurred while complying with request.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15l-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15L Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers

crimes-act-1914-sec-15l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to indemnify issuing agency and officers.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15L(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers

15LA Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.132
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15LA(1) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
has part: 15LA(2) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15la
schema version: 2

15LA(1) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.132
note: Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15la-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15la-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15LA Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding

crimes-act-1914-sec-15la-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LA(1) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding

15LA(2) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.132
note: Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15la-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15la-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15la-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15LA Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding

crimes-act-1914-sec-15la-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to anything done in relation to a corresponding authority
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applying the provisions of this Part to authorities
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
premise text: (2) Sections 15KN, 15KQ and 15KR apply

crimes-act-1914-sec-15la-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LA(2) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding

15LB Misuse of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.134
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15LB(1) Misuse of assumed identity
has part: 15LB(2) Misuse of assumed identity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lb
schema version: 2

15LB(1) Misuse of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.134
note: Acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15LB Misuse of assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (d) the person is reckless as to the circumstance mentioned in paragraph (c).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the person is an authorised person (other than an authorised civilian); and (b) the person acquires evidence of, or uses, an assumed identity;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (d) the person is reckless as to the circumstance mentioned in paragraph (c).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority is prohibited.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the person is an authorised person (other than an authorised civilian); and (b) the person acquires evidence of, or uses, an assumed identity;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LB(1) Misuse of assumed identity

15LB(2) Misuse of assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.134
note: Acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15LB Misuse of assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action is prohibited at all times.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between the action and the prohibition.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) An authorised civilian commits an offence...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of acquiring or using an assumed identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) An authorised civilian commits an offence...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LB(2) Misuse of assumed identity

15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.134
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15LC(1) Disclosing information about assumed identity
has part: 15LC(2) Disclosing information about assumed identity
has part: 15LC(3) Disclosing information about assumed identity
has part: 15LC(4) Disclosing information about assumed identity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lc
schema version: 2

15LC(1) Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.134
note: Disclosing information about assumed identity is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the conduct causes the disclosure of information; and (c) the information reveals, or is likely to reveal...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with temporal intervals related to assumed identities.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the conduct causes the disclosure of information; and (c) the information reveals, or is likely to reveal...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analyzes cognitive aspects of assumed identities.
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the conduct causes the disclosure of information; and (c) the information reveals, or is likely to reveal...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information about assumed identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the conduct causes the disclosure of information; and (c) the information reveals, or is likely to reveal...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Influences diffusion of information about assumed identities.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Influence
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the conduct causes the disclosure of information; and (c) the information reveals, or is likely to reveal...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace related to assumed identities.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LC(1) Disclosing information about assumed identity

15LC(2) Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.134
note: Disclosing information about assumed identity is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information about assumed identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LC(2) Disclosing information about assumed identity

15LC(3) Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.134
note: Disclosing information about assumed identity is prohibited. Disclosing information about assumed identity is prohibited unless specified conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or of any report of any such proceedings;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure and legal proceedings
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2)(c) or (3)(c) (as the case may be)

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information about assumed identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the disclosure is: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) if the person causes the disclosure...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the disclosure is: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about assumed identity
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (3)(c) (as the case may be)

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or of any report of any such proceedings;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace between disclosure and legal proceedings
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (b) for the purposes of any legal proceeding...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LC(3) Disclosing information about assumed identity

15LC(4) Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.134
note: No offence under subsections (1), (2) or (3)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lc-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LC(4) Disclosing information about assumed identity

15LD Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.136
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15LD(1) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
has part: 15LD(2) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
has part: 15LD(3) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ld
schema version: 2

15LD(1) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.136
note: Chief officer must submit report to NACC Minister with specific information about authorities and assumed identities.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ld-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15LD Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer must submit report.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Report includes specific information about authorities and assumed identities.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBJECT

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LD(1) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law

15LD(2) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.136
note: Exclusion of information from reports to protect safety and investigations.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ld-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15LD Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exclusion of information may occur before the report is laid before Parliament.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between exclusion and reporting requirements.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The report must be laid before Parliament within a certain timeframe;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exclusion patterns are recognized by AI systems.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence recognizes exclusion patterns in reports.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: The chief officer uses AI to analyze the report;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer must not include this information in the report.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents disclosure of sensitive information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) endanger a person’s safety; or (b) prejudice an investigation or prosecution;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exclusion requirements diffuse to other relevant parties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads exclusion requirements to related entities.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: The report must be laid before Parliament and the NACC Minister;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exclusion may occur eventually, after investigation outcomes are determined.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conditional commencement of exclusion based on investigation outcomes.
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
premise text: The chief officer must advise the NACC Minister about potential exclusions;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LD(2) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law

15LD(3) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
type: Concept
description: Report
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.136
note: Must exclude information from report if certain grounds are met and provide a copy to Parliament within 15 days.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ld-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15LD Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

15LE Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.137
note: Intelligence agencies must submit annual reports to the Inspector-General.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15le-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15le-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15le-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15le
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15le-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15le-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBJECT

crimes-act-1914-sec-15le-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LE Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—

15LF Record keeping
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.138
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15LF(1) Record keeping
has part: 15LF(2) Record keeping
has part: 15LF(3) Record keeping
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lf
schema version: 2

15LF(1) Record keeping
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.138
note: Agency must keep records about operation of Part.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15LF Record keeping

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must keep records.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LF(1) Record keeping

15LF(2) Record keeping
type: Concept
description: a) the date on which an authority was granted, varied or cancelled and the name of the person who granted, varied or cancelled it;
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.138
note: Records must be kept for authorities granted, varied or cancelled.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15LF Record keeping

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to keep records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LF(2) Record keeping

15LF(3) Record keeping
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.138
note: Records must be kept for authorities transferred to or from the chief officer of an agency.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15LF Record keeping

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LF(3) Record keeping

15LG Audit of records
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.139
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15LG(1) Audit of records
has part: 15LG(2) Audit of records
has part: 15LG(3) Audit of records
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lg
schema version: 2

15LG(1) Audit of records
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.139
note: Audit records of intelligence agencies every 6 months and after cancellation/expiry.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15LG Audit of records

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to audit records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LG(1) Audit of records

15LG(2) Audit of records
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.139
note: The audit must be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15LG Audit of records

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The audit MUST OCCUR BETWEEN two dates.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The audit must occur between two dates.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: IF THE CHIEF OFFICER APPOINTS A PERSON, THEN THAT PERSON MUST CONDUCT THE AUDIT.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: If the chief officer appoints a person, then that person must conduct the audit.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person appointed by the chief officer MUST conduct the audit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The audit must be conducted.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person appointed by the chief officer MUST conduct the audit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The audit must be conducted BY a person appointed by the chief officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: BY
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: THE AUDIT IS A PART OF THE PROVISION.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The audit is a part of the provision.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LG(2) Audit of records

15LG(3) Audit of records
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.139
note: The person appointed to conduct the audit must not be a person with assumed identities.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lg-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15LG Audit of records

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The auditor must not be a person with assumed identities.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotBe
premise text: (3) The person appointed to conduct the audit:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LG(3) Audit of records

15LH Delegation of chief officer’s functions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.141
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15LH(1) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
has part: 15LH(2) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
has part: 15LH(3) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lh
schema version: 2

15LH(1) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.141
note: Functions of a chief officer under this Part may not be delegated to any other person.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15LH Delegation of chief officer’s functions

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the functions of a chief officer under this Part may not be delegated to any other person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of delegation
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (1) Except as provided by this section (and despite any other Act or law to the contrary)

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the functions of a chief officer under this Part may not be delegated to any other person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No delegation allowed
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) Except as provided by this section (and despite any other Act or law to the contrary)

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the functions of a chief officer under this Part may not be delegated to any other person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Delegation is excluded from the scope of this section
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Not
premise text: (1) Except as provided by this section (and despite any other Act or law to the contrary)

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LH(1) Delegation of chief officer’s functions

15LH(2) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.141
note: A chief officer may delegate certain functions to a senior officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15LH Delegation of chief officer’s functions

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Senior officer assumes delegated function during chief officer's term
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Delegation occurs during chief officer's term
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Chief officer has authority to delegate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Senior officer assumes delegated function
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer delegates function
modality: Deontic
operator: delegate
premise text: Chief officer has authority to delegate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LH(2) Delegation of chief officer’s functions

15LH(3) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.141
note: Defines senior officer roles in various agencies.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15lh-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15LH Delegation of chief officer’s functions

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Establishes a class hierarchy for senior officers.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15LH(3) Delegation of chief officer’s functions

15M Definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.143
note: Defines terms for Part IACA
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15m-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15m-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15m
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15m-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies definitions as part of a class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

crimes-act-1914-sec-15m-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15M Definitions

15MA Meaning of criminal proceeding
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.145
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MA(1) Meaning of criminal proceeding
has part: 15MA(2) Meaning of criminal proceeding
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ma
schema version: 2

15MA(1) Meaning of criminal proceeding
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.145
note: Defines criminal proceeding
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ma-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ma-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MA Meaning of criminal proceeding

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Establishes class hierarchy for criminal proceeding
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

15MA(2) Meaning of criminal proceeding
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.145
note: Defines what constitutes a criminal proceeding.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ma-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ma-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MA Meaning of criminal proceeding

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ma-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MA(2) Meaning of criminal proceeding

15MB Meaning of civil proceeding
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.146
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MB(1) Meaning of civil proceeding
has part: 15MB(2) Meaning of civil proceeding
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mb
schema version: 2

15MB(1) Meaning of civil proceeding
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.146
note: Defines civil proceeding for the purpose of this Part.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MB Meaning of civil proceeding

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: civil proceeding
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: requires
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: civil proceeding
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Applies to the meaning of terms used in legal contexts.
modality: Argumentation
operator: applies to
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: civil proceeding
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: civil proceeding
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: civil proceeding
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class/type/subclass hierarchies.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: applies to
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: civil proceeding
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Applies to ordered or recurring traces.
modality: LTL
operator: applies to
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.

15MB(2) Meaning of civil proceeding
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.146
note: Defines what constitutes a civil proceeding.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MB Meaning of civil proceeding

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes various types of proceedings in the definition.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, each of the following is part of a civil proceeding:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MB(2) Meaning of civil proceeding

15MC When a charge is outstanding or pending
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.146
note: A charge against a person for an offence is outstanding until it is finally dealt with in one of the following ways: withdrawal, dismissal by court, discharge by court, or acquittal/conviction by court.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mc-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mc-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mc
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds true for charges against individuals.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mc-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MC When a charge is outstanding or pending

15MD Application of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MD(1) Application of Part
has part: 15MD(2) Application of Part
has part: 15MD(3) Application of Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15md
schema version: 2

15MD(1) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
note: This Part applies to a proceeding in which an operative is, or may be, required to give evidence obtained as an operative.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15md-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MD Application of Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Part applies to a proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MD(1) Application of Part

15MD(2) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
note: No effect on laws protecting evidence-giving persons
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15md-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MD Application of Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No effect on laws
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excluded from Part's operation
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
premise text: Part does not affect laws protecting evidence-giving persons

crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MD(2) Application of Part

15MD(3) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
note: Court control over proceedings is not limited by this Part.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15md-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15MD Application of Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part does not limit court control.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court control is implied if not limited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, this Part does not...

15ME Witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15ME(1) Witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15ME(2) Witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15ME(3) Witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15ME(4) Witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15ME(5) Witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15ME(6) Witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15ME(7) Witness identity protection certificate
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15me
schema version: 2

15ME(1) Witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
note: Chief officer may give witness identity protection certificate.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15me-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15ME Witness identity protection certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15ME(1) Witness identity protection certificate

15ME(2) Witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
note: Chief officer must make reasonable enquiries to ascertain required information.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15me-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15ME Witness identity protection certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chief officer MUST make reasonable enquiries.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Chief officer must make reasonable enquiries.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15ME(2) Witness identity protection certificate

15ME(3) Witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
description: Statutory declaration from operative
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
note: Chief officer must obtain statutory declaration from operative before issuing certificate.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15me-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15ME Witness identity protection certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chief officer must obtain statutory declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15ME(3) Witness identity protection certificate

15ME(4) Witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
note: Cannot be appealed against, reviewed, called into question, quashed or invalidated in any court.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15me-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15ME Witness identity protection certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (4) A decision to give a witness identity protection certificate:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of review
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (b) cannot be appealed against, reviewed, called into question, quashed or invalidated in any court.

15ME(5) Witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
note: A decision to give a witness identity protection certificate can be called into question in disciplinary proceedings.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15me-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15ME Witness identity protection certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...being called into question
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The certificate can be called into question during disciplinary proceedings
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: In the course of any proceedings...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...being called into question
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to call the certificate into question
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: Subsection (4) does not prevent...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15ME(5) Witness identity protection certificate

15ME(6) Witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
note: A witness identity protection certificate must be taken as properly issued and prima facie evidence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15me-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15ME Witness identity protection certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15ME(7) Witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
note: A witness identity protection certificate is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15me-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 15ME Witness identity protection certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A witness identity protection certificate is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of a property
modality: Deontic
operator: not

15MF Statutory declaration by operative
type: Concept
description: a statutory declaration of the following matters
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.149
note: Statutory declaration by operative regarding convictions and charges.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mf-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mf-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mf
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mf-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Statutory declaration is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15MG Form of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.150
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MG(1) Form of witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15MG(2) Form of witness identity protection certificate
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mg
schema version: 2

15MG(1) Form of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.150
note: Witness identity protection certificate requirements
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MG Form of witness identity protection certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Operative's involvement period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (b) the period the operative was involved in the investigation to which the proceeding relates;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide grounds for certificate issuance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (e) the grounds for giving the certificate;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information about convictions and charges
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (f) whether the operative has been convicted or found guilty of an offence and, if so, particulars of each offence;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MG(1) Form of witness identity protection certificate

15MG(2) Form of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.150
note: Prohibits revealing an operative's identity or where they live in a witness identity protection certificate.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MG Form of witness identity protection certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MG(2) Form of witness identity protection certificate

15MH Filing and notification
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.151
note: Witness must file identity protection certificate before giving evidence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mh-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mh-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mh
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Witness must file identity protection certificate before giving evidence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mh-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MH Filing and notification

15MI Leave for non-compliance
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.152
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MI(1) Leave for non-compliance
has part: 15MI(2) Leave for non-compliance
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mi
schema version: 2

15MI(1) Leave for non-compliance
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.152
note: Leave to not comply with a requirement
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mi-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MI Leave for non-compliance

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MI(1) Leave for non-compliance

15MI(2) Leave for non-compliance
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.152
note: Court cannot give leave for non-compliance unless it was not reasonably practicable to comply.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mi-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MI Leave for non-compliance

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Leave application is outside the temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for leave application overlaps with requirement to comply.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Leave application was made after requirement to comply was due.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Leave application requires a more nuanced evaluation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Excerpt recognizes the need for a more nuanced approach to leave applications.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: Court must not give leave unless it was not reasonably practicable to comply.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Leave must be refused.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court cannot give leave for non-compliance.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Requirement to comply was not reasonably practicable.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Responsibility for non-compliance is diffused among multiple parties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Excerpt diffuses the responsibility for non-compliance.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Court must not give leave unless it was not reasonably practicable to comply.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Non-compliance is a recurring issue.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Excerpt implies a recurring pattern of non-compliance.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: Court must not give leave unless it was not reasonably practicable to comply.

15MJ Effect of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.152
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MJ(1) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15MJ(2) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15MJ(3) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mj
schema version: 2

15MJ(1) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.152
note: Witness identity protection certificate applies to proceedings.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MJ Effect of witness identity protection certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Section relates to proceedings.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relatesTo
premise text: Section applies under certain conditions.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: Witness identity protection certificate filed in court.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MJ(1) Effect of witness identity protection certificate

15MJ(2) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.152
note: No question may lead to disclosure of operative's identity or where they live.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MJ Effect of witness identity protection certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No question may lead to disclosure of operative's identity or where they live.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MJ(2) Effect of witness identity protection certificate

15MJ(3) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.152
note: List of entities that must be included in a proceeding
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mj-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15MJ Effect of witness identity protection certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entities must be included in a proceeding
modality: Deontic
operator: Inclusion

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Entity classification
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MJ(3) Effect of witness identity protection certificate

15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MK(1) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
has part: 15MK(4) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
has part: 15MK(5) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
has part: 15MK(6) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mk
schema version: 2

15MK(1) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153
note: Court may make order to protect witness identity.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MK(1) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.

15MK(4) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153
note: Court must make order suppressing publication of certain information.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mk-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to suppress publication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MK(4) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.

15MK(5) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153
note: Court may make an order for how a transcript is to be dealt with, including suppressing its publication.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mk-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MK(5) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.

15MK(6) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153
note: Engaging in conduct after an order has been made under subsection (1), (4) or (5)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mk-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MK(6) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.

15ML Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15ML(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
has part: 15ML(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
has part: 15ML(3) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ml
schema version: 2

15ML(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
note: Witness must disclose operative's identity to presiding officer if certificate filed.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ml-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15ML Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must disclose operative's identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15ML(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer

15ML(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
note: The operative must disclose their true identity to the presiding officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ml-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15ML Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The operative must disclose their true identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15ML(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer

15ML(3) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
note: Presiding officer must not record or retain information disclosed under subsection (2).
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ml-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15ML Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of recording information
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15ML(3) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer

15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MM(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
has part: 15MM(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
has part: 15MM(3) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
has part: 15MM(4) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
has part: 15MM(5) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
has part: 15MM(6) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
has part: 15MM(7) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mm
schema version: 2

15MM(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
note: Witness must disclose operative's identity despite certificate
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MM(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate

15MM(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
note: Request for leave to ask a question or request an order requiring disclosure of operative's identity.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request for permission to ask a question or request an order requiring disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

15MM(3) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
note: The person involved in the proceeding must disclose their identity.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mm-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MM(3) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate

15MM(4) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
note: Court may give leave or make order for witness to do something.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mm-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may give leave or make order.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MM(4) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate

15MM(5) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
note: Court must satisfy conditions before giving leave or making an order regarding operative's identity.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mm-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must satisfy conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: must

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Court must be satisfied about each of the following conditions.
modality: Epistemic
operator: satisfies

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conditions apply until disclosure is made or operative's identity is revealed.
modality: LTL
operator: until

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MM(5) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate

15MM(6) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
note: Application must be heard in absence of jury.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mm-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Application must be heard in absence of jury.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MM(6) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate

15MM(7) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
note: Court must be closed under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mm-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court must be closed during certain periods.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for court closure
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (7) Unless the court considers that the interests of justice require otherwise...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the court considers the interests of justice, it must be closed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication for court closure
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (7) Unless the court considers that the interests of justice require otherwise...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The operative's identity must be disclosed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of operative's identity disclosure
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (7) Unless the court considers that the interests of justice require otherwise...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court must be closed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of court closure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (7) Unless the court considers that the interests of justice require otherwise...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information must be provided.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about court closure
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (7) Unless the court considers that the interests of justice require otherwise...

15MN Application for leave—joinder as respondent
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MN(1) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
has part: 15MN(2) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
has part: 15MN(3) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mn
schema version: 2

15MN(1) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156
note: Application for leave—joinder as respondent
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MN Application for leave—joinder as respondent

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MN(1) Application for leave—joinder as respondent

15MN(2) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156
note: Allow person to join application as respondent under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MN Application for leave—joinder as respondent

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court must consider the timing of the person's application when determining whether to allow them to join.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specify temporal conditions for joining application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: require
premise text: (b) the person applies to be joined to the application as a respondent; and (c) the person has sufficient interest in the subject matter of the application.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court may allow a person to join the application as a respondent.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
premise text: (a) the person is: (i) the operative in relation to whom the witness identity protection certificate is given; or (ii) the chief officer of the agency who gave the witness identity protection certificate;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court may only allow a person to join the application if they apply under these conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify conditions for joining application
modality: Deontic
operator: require
premise text: (b) the person applies to be joined to the application as a respondent; and (c) the person has sufficient interest in the subject matter of the application.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court may only allow a person to join the application if they have a sufficient interest.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify conditions for joining application as respondent
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
premise text: (c) the person has sufficient interest in the subject matter of the application.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court must consider the ongoing nature of the person's interest when determining whether to allow them to join.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specify recurring conditions for joining application
modality: LTL
operator: require
premise text: (b) the person applies to be joined to the application as a respondent; and (c) the person has sufficient interest in the subject matter of the application.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MN(2) Application for leave—joinder as respondent

15MN(3) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156
note: Court must allow person or legal representative to appear and be heard if joined as respondent.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mn-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15MN Application for leave—joinder as respondent

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must allow person or legal representative to appear and be heard.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MN(3) Application for leave—joinder as respondent

15MO Directions to jury
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.157
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MO(1) Directions to jury
has part: 15MO(2) Directions to jury
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mo
schema version: 2

15MO(1) Directions to jury
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.157
note: Witness must provide evidence if operative gives testimony and there is a jury in the proceeding.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mo-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MO Directions to jury

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval: operative gives evidence -> witness provides evidence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court; and (b) there is a jury in the proceeding; and (c) the operative gives evidence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The witness must provide evidence if the conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court; and (b) there is a jury in the proceeding; and (c) the operative gives evidence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace: witness provides evidence -> operative gives evidence -> jury exists
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court; and (b) there is a jury in the proceeding; and (c) the operative gives evidence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MO(1) Directions to jury

15MO(2) Directions to jury
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.157
note: Court must not draw adverse inferences against defendant or another party due to witness identity protection certificate or court order.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mo-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MO Directions to jury

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Court's duty to direct jury not to draw adverse inferences overlaps with its duty under section 15MK or subsections 15MM(8), (9), or (10).
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) the court has made an order under section 15MK or subsections 15MM(8), (9), or (10).

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must not draw adverse inferences.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (2) The court must (unless it considers it inappropriate)

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must not draw adverse inferences due to witness identity protection certificate.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (a) there is a witness identity protection certificate for the operative.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Court's duty to direct jury not to draw adverse inferences overlaps with its duty under section 15MK or subsections 15MM(8), (9), or (10).
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) the court has made an order under section 15MK or subsections 15MM(8), (9), or (10).

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MO(2) Directions to jury

15MP Appeals and adjournments
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.157
note: Original court must give or refuse leave for witness identity protection certificate.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mp-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mp-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mp
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Original court must give or refuse leave
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide leave
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 15MI or 15MM applies

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mp-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MP Appeals and adjournments

15MQ Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MQ(1) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
has part: 15MQ(2) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
has part: 15MQ(3) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mq
schema version: 2

15MQ(1) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
note: Cancellation of witness identity protection certificate
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mq-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MQ Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation

15MQ(2) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
note: Cancellation of witness identity protection certificate
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MQ Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to cancel certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes duty
premise text: (2) The chief officer must...

15MQ(3) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
type: Concept
description: Notice in writing
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
note: Chief officer must give notice to court and parties if certificate is cancelled.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mq-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mq-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15MQ Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Chief officer must give notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mq-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MQ(3) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation

15MR Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MR(1) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
has part: 15MR(2) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
has part: 15MR(3) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mr
schema version: 2

15MR(1) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
note: Permits giving information disclosing operative's identity
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mr-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MR Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to give information
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mr-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MR(1) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity

15MR(2) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
note: Chief officer may permit person to give information disclosing operative's identity.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mr-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MR Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by chief officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mr-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MR(2) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity

15MR(3) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
note: Requirements for giving information disclosing operative's identity
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mr-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mr-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15MR Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity

15MS Disclosure offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MS(1) Disclosure offences
has part: 15MS(2) Disclosure offences
has part: 15MS(3) Disclosure offences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ms
schema version: 2

15MS(1) Disclosure offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
note: Disclosing operative identity without authorization is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ms-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MS Disclosure offences

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between cancellation and disclosure
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (b) the certificate has not been cancelled under section 15MQ;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding has been given; and (b) the certificate has not been cancelled under section 15MQ;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to cancel certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (b) the certificate has not been cancelled under section 15MQ;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission for disclosure under certain conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (i) the conduct is required by section 15ML; (ii) the conduct is authorised by leave or by an order under section 15MM; (iii) the conduct is permitted under section 15MR;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure offences
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (d) the conduct results in the disclosure of the operative’s identity or where the operative lives;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MS(1) Disclosure offences

15MS(2) Disclosure offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
note: Disclosing operative identity without proper protection is an offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ms-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MS Disclosure offences

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosing operative identity without proper protection is an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MS(2) Disclosure offences

15MS(3) Disclosure offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
note: Disclosing operative identity or location without authorization is an offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ms-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15MS Disclosure offences

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosing operative identity or location without authorization is an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MS(3) Disclosure offences

15MT Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.161
note: Chief officer may sign certificate stating witness identity protection for operatives
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mt-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mt-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mt
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mt-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May sign certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: can

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mt-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MT Evidentiary certificates

15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.162
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MU(1) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
has part: 15MU(2) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
has part: 15MU(3) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
has part: 15MU(4) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mu
schema version: 2

15MU(1) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.162
note: Chief officer must submit report about witness identity protection certificates to Minister.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mu-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to submit report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MU(1) Reports about witness identity protection certificates

15MU(2) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.162
note: Report requirements for witness identity protection certificates
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mu-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MU(2) Reports about witness identity protection certificates

15MU(3) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.162
note: Prohibition on disclosing witness identity protection certificate information
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mu-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of sensitive information
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MU(3) Reports about witness identity protection certificates

15MU(4) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.162
note: Report must be laid before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mu-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15MW Recognition of witness identity protection certificates under
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.164
note: Recognition of witness identity protection certificates under corresponding laws
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mw-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mw
schema version: 2

15MX Delegation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.165
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15MX(1) Delegation
has part: 15MX(2) Delegation
has part: 15MX(3) Delegation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mx
schema version: 2

15MX(1) Delegation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.165
note: No delegation of chief officer functions is allowed.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mx-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15MX Delegation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits delegation
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MX(1) Delegation

15MX(2) Delegation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.165
note: A chief officer may delegate certain functions to a senior officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mx-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15MX Delegation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Delegation occurs during the Chief Officer's Term.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Delegation occurs during the chief officer's term.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Chief Officer serves for a term.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Senior Officer may perform delegated functions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the chief officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Chief Officer has authority to delegate.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MX(2) Delegation

15MX(3) Delegation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.165
note: Defines senior officer roles in various agencies.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15mx-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15MX Delegation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Establishes a hierarchical relationship between terms.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15MX(3) Delegation

15Y Proceedings to which this Part applies
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.166
note: Special rules for children involved in proceedings
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15y-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15y-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15y-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15y
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15y-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to protect vulnerable persons
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to protect vulnerable persons
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: This Part contains special rules for children involved in proceedings

crimes-act-1914-sec-15y-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offences against children are classified as such
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of offences against children
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: The subsection applies to proceedings for any of the following offences:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15y-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15Y Proceedings to which this Part applies

15YA Definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.170
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YA(1) Definitions
has part: 15YA(2) Definitions
has part: 15YA(3) Definitions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ya
schema version: 2

15YA(1) Definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.170
note: Defines a vulnerable adult complainant in relation to a vulnerable adult proceeding. Court may declare a person special witness if unlikely to give evidence in ordinary manner due to disability, intimidation, distress or emotional trauma.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ya-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YA Definitions

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Special witness declaration based on these factors
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between factors and person's ability to give evidence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: because of
premise text: Person's age, cultural background or relationship to party, nature of evidence, or other factor

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
premise text: (1) A vulnerable adult complainant, in relation to a vulnerable adult proceeding...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with implications for obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies to
premise text: (1) A vulnerable adult complainant, in relation to a vulnerable adult proceeding...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with ethical consequences.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines a term with moral implications
premise text: (1) A vulnerable adult complainant, in relation to a vulnerable adult proceeding...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Special witness declared
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration of special witness
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Court has discretion to declare a person special witness

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court obligation to declare special witness under these conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must declare special witness if certain conditions met
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Court has discretion to declare special witness

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Special witness declaration discretionary under these conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may decline to declare special witness if certain conditions not met
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Court has discretion to declare special witness

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YA(1) Definitions

15YA(2) Definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.170
note: Adult can opt out of being treated as a vulnerable adult complainant.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ya-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YA Definitions

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Adult is not a vulnerable adult complainant if they so choose.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to opt out
modality: Deontic
operator: OptOut
premise text: Adult informs court of desire not to be treated as vulnerable adult complainant.

15YA(3) Definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.170
note: A vulnerable adult complainant need not be involved in the proceeding.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ya-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15YA Definitions

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A vulnerable adult complainant need not be involved in the proceeding.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to involve a complainant
modality: Deontic
operator: needNot
premise text: (3) A vulnerable adult complainant need not be involved in the vulnerable adult proceeding or the initiation of that proceeding.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YA(3) Definitions

15YB Evidence of sexual reputation—child proceedings
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
note: Evidence of sexual reputation is inadmissible in child proceedings.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yb-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yb-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yb
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits evidence of sexual reputation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yb-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YB Evidence of sexual reputation—child proceedings

15YC Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YC(1) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
has part: 15YC(2) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
has part: 15YC(3) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
has part: 15YC(4) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
has part: 15YC(5) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yc
schema version: 2

15YC(1) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
note: Evidence of sexual experience is inadmissible in child proceedings unless the court gives leave. Evidence of sexual experience is inadmissible unless court gives leave.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YC Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits evidence of sexual experience in child proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YC(1) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings

15YC(2) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
note: Court must not give leave unless certain conditions are met. Court must not give leave to admit evidence unless it meets certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YC Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Evidence is of sexual activity that occurred or was recent at the time of the commission of the alleged offence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (c) either (i) the evidence is of sexual activity...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court is prohibited from giving leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) The court must not give leave unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court must not give leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court is prohibited from giving leave to admit evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) The court must not give leave unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court may give leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may give leave to admit evidence if it meets certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (2) The court must not give leave unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Evidence relates to sexual activity that occurred or was recent at the time of the commission of the alleged offence.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (c) either (ii) if the evidence is of sexual activities...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YC(2) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings

15YC(3) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
note: Evidence of sexual experience is not to be treated as substantially relevant to facts in issue Do not treat evidence as substantially relevant to facts in issue merely because of inferences it may raise about the child witness' or child complainant's general disposition.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15YC Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of using evidence for a specific purpose
modality: Deontic
operator: not

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YC(3) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings

15YC(4) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
note: Court must consider factors when deciding whether evidence has substantial probative value in child proceedings.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yc-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15YC Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to consider factors
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must consider factors
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Paragraph (2)(b)

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YC(4) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings

15YC(5) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
note: Prohibition on using evidence of sexual experience in child proceedings
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yc-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15YC Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidence of sexual experience is inadmissible during child proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Prohibition applies during child proceedings
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The section does not apply if the child is a defendant in the proceeding.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidence of sexual experience is inadmissible during child proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Prohibition applies during child proceedings
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: The section does not apply if the child is a defendant in the proceeding.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidence of sexual experience is inadmissible in child proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits using evidence of sexual experience in child proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: The section does not apply if the child is a defendant in the proceeding.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidence of sexual experience is inadmissible during child proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Prohibition applies during child proceedings
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: The section does not apply if the child is a defendant in the proceeding.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidence of sexual experience is inadmissible during child proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Prohibition applies during child proceedings
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: The section does not apply if the child is a defendant in the proceeding.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YC(5) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings

15YD Leave under this Division
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YD(1) Leave under this Division
has part: 15YD(2) Leave under this Division
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yd
schema version: 2

15YD(1) Leave under this Division
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
note: Application for leave under this Division must be in writing and determined by the court after considering submissions and evidence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YD Leave under this Division

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be in writing
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be determined by the court
modality: Deontic
operator: DURING

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YD(1) Leave under this Division

15YD(2) Leave under this Division
type: Concept
description: Reasons for leave
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
note: Court must state reasons in writing and record them.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YD Leave under this Division

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court must state reasons in writing and record them.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must perform action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YD(2) Leave under this Division

15YE Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.182
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YE(1) Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
has part: 15YE(2) Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
has part: 15YE(3) Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ye
schema version: 2

15YE(1) Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.182
note: Court must disallow inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination questions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ye-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YE Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must prohibit
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) The court must disallow a question...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YE(1) Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination

15YE(2) Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.182
note: Court must consider personal characteristics when evaluating cross-examination
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ye-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YE Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consider personal characteristics
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider personal characteristics
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Court must evaluate cross-examination

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YE(2) Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination

15YE(3) Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.182
note: Specifies persons subject to disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ye-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15YE Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to prevent inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YE(3) Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination

15YF Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of child
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.182
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YF(1) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of child
has part: 15YF(2) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of child
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yf
schema version: 2

15YF(1) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of child
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.182
note: Defendant cannot cross-examine vulnerable adult complainant without counsel. Defendant cannot cross-examine child complainant without counsel.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YF Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of child

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits cross-examination of vulnerable adult complainant without counsel.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YF(1) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of child

15YF(2) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of child
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.182
note: Court-appointed person must ask vulnerable adult complainant questions requested by defendant. Court-appointed person must ask child questions requested by defendant.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YF Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of child

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must ask vulnerable adult complainant questions requested by defendant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to ask questions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Court-appointed person appointed by the court

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YF(2) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of child

15YG Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.183
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YG(1) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
has part: 15YG(1A) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
has part: 15YG(2) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
has part: 15YG(3) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
has part: 15YG(4) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yg
schema version: 2

15YG(1) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.183
note: Defendant cannot cross-examine vulnerable person without court leave.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YG Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits cross-examination of vulnerable person
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YG(1) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable

15YG(1A) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.183
note: Child witnesses in certain proceedings must be cross-examined.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yg-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 15YG Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Child witness must be cross-examined
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide cross-examination for child witnesses
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Subsection applies to child witness

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YG(1A) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable

15YG(2) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.183
note: Court must ensure vulnerable person's ability to testify under cross-examination is not adversely affected.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YG Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must ensure vulnerable person's ability to testify under cross-examination is not adversely affected.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YG(2) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable

15YG(3) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.183
note: Court must consider trauma caused by defendant's cross-examination
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yg-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15YG Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must consider trauma caused by defendant's cross-examination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YG(3) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable

15YG(4) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
type: Concept
description: Writing
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.183
note: Application for leave under section 15YG(4) may be made by or on behalf of the defendant or vulnerable person.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yg-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15YG Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make an application
modality: Deontic
operator: May

15YH Represented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.184
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YH(1) Represented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
has part: 15YH(2) Represented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yh
schema version: 2

15YH(1) Represented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.184
note: Prohibition on cross-examining vulnerable persons Defendant cannot cross-examine vulnerable person without counsel.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YH Represented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person is not to cross-examine...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (2) applies

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot cross-examine vulnerable person without counsel.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits cross-examination of vulnerable person without counsel.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Defendant represented by counsel

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot cross-examine vulnerable person without counsel.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts defendant's right to cross-examine vulnerable person.
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
premise text: Defendant represented by counsel

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot cross-examine vulnerable person without counsel.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits cross-examination of vulnerable person at committal proceedings or similar kind.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 15YHA

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot cross-examine vulnerable person without counsel.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Restricts defendant's ability to cross-examine vulnerable person through LTL.
modality: LTL
operator: Restrict
premise text: Defendant represented by counsel

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YH(1) Represented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable

15YH(2) Represented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.184
note: Vulnerable persons must be cross-examined in committal proceedings. Vulnerable persons must be protected during cross-examination.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YH Represented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval for protection of vulnerable persons.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for protection of vulnerable persons.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: Section 15YHA(2)

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide cross-examination for vulnerable persons.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) This subsection applies to the following persons:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to protect vulnerable persons.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide protection for vulnerable persons.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 15YHA(2)

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YH(2) Represented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable

15YI Closed-circuit television
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.186
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YI(1) Closed-circuit television
has part: 15YI(1A) Closed-circuit television
has part: 15YI(2) Closed-circuit television
has part: 15YI(3) Closed-circuit television
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yi
schema version: 2

15YI(1) Closed-circuit television
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.186
note: Vulnerable person must give evidence by closed-circuit television unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yi-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YI Closed-circuit television

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide evidence by closed-circuit television.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of vulnerable person as a 'vulnerable person'
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YI(1) Closed-circuit television

15YI(1A) Closed-circuit television
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.186
note: List of persons subject to the subsection's application
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yi-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 15YI Closed-circuit television

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YI(1A) Closed-circuit television

15YI(2) Closed-circuit television
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.186
note: Court cannot make order unless vulnerable person's evidence is not in the interests of justice via closed-circuit television.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yi-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YI Closed-circuit television

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Closed-circuit television
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YI(2) Closed-circuit television

15YI(3) Closed-circuit television
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.186
note: Preserves competence of persons to give evidence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yi-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15YI Closed-circuit television

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Preserves the competence of a person to give evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Preservation

15YJ Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.187
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YJ(1) Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
has part: 15YJ(2) Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
has part: 15YJ(3) Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yj
schema version: 2

15YJ(1) Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.187
note: Court may order presence of court officer or another person with vulnerable witness.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YJ Giving evidence by closed-circuit television

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may order presence of court officer or another person.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Location is taken to be part of the courtroom.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YJ(1) Giving evidence by closed-circuit television

15YJ(2) Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.187
note: No limitation on accompanying adults for orders under section 15YO
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YJ Giving evidence by closed-circuit television

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YJ(2) Giving evidence by closed-circuit television

15YJ(3) Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.187
note: Court may adjourn proceeding to a place equipped for closed-circuit television under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yj-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15YJ Giving evidence by closed-circuit television

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Facilities required for closed-circuit television
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has facilities for

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YJ(3) Giving evidence by closed-circuit television

15YK Viewing evidence given by closed-circuit television
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.187
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YK(1) Viewing evidence given by closed-circuit television
has part: 15YK(2) Viewing evidence given by closed-circuit television
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yk
schema version: 2

15YK(1) Viewing evidence given by closed-circuit television
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.187
note: Facilities used for closed-circuit television must be operated to allow interested parties to see vulnerable persons and any accompanying person.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YK Viewing evidence given by closed-circuit television

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Facilities must be operated in a certain way.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of facilities based on their operation.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YK(1) Viewing evidence given by closed-circuit television

15YK(2) Viewing evidence given by closed-circuit television
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.187
note: Allow vulnerable persons and their representatives to view evidence on television monitors.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yk-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YK Viewing evidence given by closed-circuit television

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YK(2) Viewing evidence given by closed-circuit television

15YL Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.188
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YL(1) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
has part: 15YL(2) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
has part: 15YL(3) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
has part: 15YL(4) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yl
schema version: 2

15YL(1) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.188
note: Court must order recording of evidence given by vulnerable persons under certain conditions. Court must make arrangements to restrict contact with defendant and public while giving evidence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yl-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YL Alternative arrangements for giving evidence

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Restrict contact with defendant and public
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: RESTRICTS

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YL(1) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence

15YL(2) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.188
note: Alternative arrangements for giving evidence may include planning seating arrangements. Specifies persons subject to this subsection
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yl-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YL Alternative arrangements for giving evidence

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May provide alternative arrangements
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YL(2) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence

15YL(3) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.188
note: Exemptions from giving evidence for certain persons Recording may be a video or audio recording.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yl-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15YL Alternative arrangements for giving evidence

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for exemptions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal interval
premise text: (c) for a special witness proceeding—a special witness for whom an order under subsection 15YAB(3) is in force for this section;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between recording and evidence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts child witnesses, vulnerable adult complainants, and special witnesses from giving evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (3) This subsection applies to the following persons:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines recurring traces for exemptions
modality: LTL
operator: recurring trace
premise text: unless that person is at least 16 and chooses not to give evidence under the arrangements.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YL(3) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence

15YL(4) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.188
note: Subsection (1) applies regardless of evidence transmission method
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yl-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15YL Alternative arrangements for giving evidence

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory application
modality: Deontic
operator: Always

15YM Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YM(1) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
has part: 15YM(1A) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
has part: 15YM(2) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
has part: 15YM(4) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
has part: 15YM(5) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
has part: 15YM(6) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ym
schema version: 2

15YM(1) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
note: A constable or a person of a kind specified in the regulations must conduct an interview for a video or audio recording to be admitted as evidence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ym-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YM Use of video or audio recordings of interviews

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must conduct an interview
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YM(1) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews

15YM(1A) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
note: List of persons subject to the provision
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ym-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 15YM Use of video or audio recordings of interviews

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YM(1A) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews

15YM(2) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
note: Prohibition on admitting audio recordings only under extraordinary circumstances.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ym-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YM Use of video or audio recordings of interviews

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits admission of audio recordings only under extraordinary circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: not allow

15YM(4) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
note: Must be available for cross-examination and re-examination if a video or audio recording of an interview is admitted as evidence in chief.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ym-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15YM Use of video or audio recordings of interviews

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be available for cross-examination and re-examination.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YM(4) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews

15YM(5) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
note: Making, possessing, or supplying recordings of interviews without lawful authority is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ym-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15YM Use of video or audio recordings of interviews

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YM(5) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews

15YM(6) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
note: The fault element for paragraph (5)(a) is intention.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ym-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15YM Use of video or audio recordings of interviews

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: intention
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The fault element is specified.
modality: Deontic
operator: is

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YM(6) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews

15YN Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.191
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YN(1) Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio
has part: 15YN(2) Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio
has part: 15YN(3) Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yn
schema version: 2

15YN(1) Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.191
note: The admissibility of video or audio evidence is not affected by previous representations.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YN Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The admissibility is not affected by previous representations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity

15YN(2) Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.191
note: Evidence given by video or audio recording under section 15YM is not admissible if the court is satisfied that certain conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YN Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...during this time, the recording is not admissible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which the conditions must be met.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The court is satisfied that...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...recognizes this condition, the recording is not admissible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines how the conditions are recognized by the AI system.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: The court is satisfied that...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the recording is not admissible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits admissibility of evidence under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: The court is satisfied that...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...diffuses to this time, the recording is not admissible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines how the conditions affect the admissibility of evidence.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: The court is satisfied that...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...until this time, the recording is not admissible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the temporal relationship between the conditions and the admissibility of evidence.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: The court is satisfied that...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YN(2) Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio

15YN(3) Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.191
note: Court may refuse to admit part of recording as evidence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yn-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15YN Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio

15YO Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.195
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YO(1) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
has part: 15YO(1A) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
has part: 15YO(2) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
has part: 15YO(3) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
has part: 15YO(4) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
has part: 15YO(5) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yo
schema version: 2

15YO(1) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.195
note: Adults accompanying vulnerable persons may choose an adult to accompany them while giving evidence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yo-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YO Adults accompanying vulnerable persons

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YO(1) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons

15YO(1A) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.195
note: This subsection applies to specific persons
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yo-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 15YO Adults accompanying vulnerable persons

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applies to specified persons
modality: Deontic
operator: applies_to

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YO(1A) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons

15YO(2) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.195
note: Court determines it is not appropriate for the adult to accompany the person.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yo-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YO Adults accompanying vulnerable persons

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YO(2) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons

15YO(3) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.195
note: Court may permit more than one adult to accompany a person in the interests of justice.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yo-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15YO Adults accompanying vulnerable persons

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YO(3) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons

15YO(4) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.195
note: Adults accompanying vulnerable persons must not prompt or disrupt questioning.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yo-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15YO Adults accompanying vulnerable persons

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Adults accompany vulnerable persons during questioning.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (4) An adult accompanying the person under this section must not:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of influencing vulnerable persons' answers.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (4) An adult accompanying the person under this section must not:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YO(4) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons

15YO(5) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.195
note: Adults accompanying vulnerable persons must be able to be heard by the judge and jury members.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yo-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15YO Adults accompanying vulnerable persons

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for adults accompanying vulnerable persons
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: The text specifies a temporal interval for adults accompanying vulnerable persons to be able to be heard by the judge and jury members.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive AI application for adults accompanying vulnerable persons
modality: CogAI
operator: APPLIES
premise text: The text applies cognitive AI logic to analyze the obligation of adults accompanying vulnerable persons to be able to be heard by the judge and jury members.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to be heard
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Adults accompanying vulnerable persons must be able to be heard by the judge and jury members.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to adults accompanying vulnerable persons
modality: Diffusion
operator: APPLIES
premise text: The text applies diffusion logic to spread the obligation to be heard by the judge and jury members to all adults accompanying vulnerable persons.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal logic for adults accompanying vulnerable persons
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: The text applies temporal logic to specify a temporal interval for adults accompanying vulnerable persons to be able to be heard by the judge and jury members.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YO(5) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons

15YP Excluding people from the courtroom
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.196
note: Excluding people from the courtroom
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yp-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yp-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yp
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits excluding people from the courtroom
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yp-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YP Excluding people from the courtroom

15YQ Warnings etc. not to be given about vulnerable persons
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.196
note: Judge must not warn jury about vulnerable persons
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yq-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yq-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yq-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yq
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Vulnerable persons are protected
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of warning
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Judge must not warn jury

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yq-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Reliable class of witness
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of vulnerable persons
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: Persons to whom subsection (2) applies

15YR Publication identifying another person as a child witness,
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.197
note: Publishing matter without court leave can lead to identification of vulnerable persons.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yr-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yr-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yr
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yr-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on publishing matter without court leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

15YS General powers of a court
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.200
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YS(1) General powers of a court
has part: 15YS(2) General powers of a court
has part: 15YS(3) General powers of a court
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ys
schema version: 2

15YS(1) General powers of a court
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.200
note: Court's power to control proceeding is not affected by this Part.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ys-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YS General powers of a court

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues existing obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YS(1) General powers of a court

15YS(2) General powers of a court
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.200
note: Court's power to control questioning of witnesses is not affected.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ys-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YS General powers of a court

15YS(3) General powers of a court
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.200
note: Court has power to give leave subject to conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ys-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15YS General powers of a court

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court can give leave subject to conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Court has power to give leave.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has power

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YS(3) General powers of a court

15YT Other video link evidence provisions are unaffected
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.201
note: No effect on Division 279 of Criminal Code regarding video link evidence in offences against humanity.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yt-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yt
schema version: 2

15YU Proceedings to which this Part applies
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.202
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YU(1) Proceedings to which this Part applies
has part: 15YU(2) Proceedings to which this Part applies
has part: 15YU(3) Proceedings to which this Part applies
has part: 15YU(4) Proceedings to which this Part applies
has part: 15YU(5) Proceedings to which this Part applies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yu
schema version: 2

15YU(1) Proceedings to which this Part applies
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.202
note: Proceedings for specified offences apply to this Part.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yu-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YU Proceedings to which this Part applies

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: This Part applies to the specified offences.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YU(1) Proceedings to which this Part applies

15YU(2) Proceedings to which this Part applies
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.202
note: Proceedings under this Part also apply to proceedings under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Extended meaning of prosecutor and defendant
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yu-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YU Proceedings to which this Part applies

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply
modality: Deontic
operator: also applies
premise text: (2) This Part also applies to:

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The extended meaning applies to proceedings instituted before or after the commencement of this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extends the definition of prosecutor and defendant
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
premise text: (2) were instituted before or after the commencement of this Part.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YU(2) Proceedings to which this Part applies

15YU(3) Proceedings to which this Part applies
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.202
note: Proceedings covered by subsection (1) are not relevant to the determination of materiality.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yu-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15YU Proceedings to which this Part applies

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proceedings covered by subsection (1) are not relevant to the determination of materiality.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Materiality is determined regardless of proceedings covered by subsection (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (3) It is immaterial whether proceedings covered by subsection (1) or

15YU(4) Proceedings to which this Part applies
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.202
note: Transfers responsibility between authorities under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yu-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15YU Proceedings to which this Part applies

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Responsibility can be transferred between these authorities (see section 315B of that Act).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Transfers responsibility
modality: Deontic
operator: Transfer
premise text: (a) the responsible authority for the proceeding under that Act were the prosecutor;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Assigns responsibility to the prosecutor
modality: Deontic
operator: Assignment
premise text: (b) each other party to the proceeding were a defendant in the proceeding.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YU(4) Proceedings to which this Part applies

15YU(5) Proceedings to which this Part applies
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.202
note: Definition of PMV-related questioning warrant
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yu-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15YU Proceedings to which this Part applies

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: PMV-related questioning warrant is a type of questioning warrant
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: PMV-related questioning warrant is defined in Division 3 of Part III of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YU(5) Proceedings to which this Part applies

15YV When court may take evidence by video link
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.204
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YV(1) When court may take evidence by video link
has part: 15YV(2) When court may take evidence by video link
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yv
schema version: 2

15YV(1) When court may take evidence by video link
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.204
note: Court must direct or allow witness to give evidence by video link under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yv-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yv-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YV When court may take evidence by video link

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must direct or allow witness to give evidence by video link.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YV(1) When court may take evidence by video link

15YV(2) When court may take evidence by video link
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.204
note: Court must direct or allow witness to give evidence by video link under specified conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yv-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yv-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YV When court may take evidence by video link

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation to direct or allow witness
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 15YV(2)

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YV(2) When court may take evidence by video link

15YW Observers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.205
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YW(1) Observers
has part: 15YW(2) Observers
has part: 15YW(3) Observers
has part: 15YW(4) Observers
has part: 15YW(5) Observers
has part: 15YW(6) Observers
has part: 15YW(7) Observers
has part: 15YW(8) Observers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yw
schema version: 2

15YW(1) Observers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.205
note: Witness must be physically present at the place of evidence giving.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yw-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YW Observers

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits witness from giving evidence remotely.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YW(1) Observers

15YW(2) Observers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.205
note: Witness must be physically present at the place where evidence is given when giving evidence by video link.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yw-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YW Observers

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the witness can give evidence under the direction or order only if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for physical presence at the place where evidence is given.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) If a section 15YV direction or order is in force...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the witness can give evidence under the direction or order only if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal interval for physical presence at the place where evidence is given.
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) If a section 15YV direction or order is in force...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the witness can give evidence under the direction or order only if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide physical presence at the place where evidence is given when giving evidence by video link.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If a section 15YV direction or order is in force...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the witness can give evidence under the direction or order only if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval for physical presence at the place where evidence is given.
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) If a section 15YV direction or order is in force...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the witness can give evidence under the direction or order only if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for physical presence at the place where evidence is given.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) If a section 15YV direction or order is in force...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YW(2) Observers

15YW(3) Observers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.205
note: Court may vary direction or order to substitute another specified person.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yw-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15YW Observers

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court may vary the direction or order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Direction or order is in force under section 15YV.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (a) a direction or order is in force under section 15YV;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...so as to substitute another specified person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Court justifies varying direction or order.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
premise text: (3) If...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...so as to substitute another specified person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Court infers permission to vary direction or order.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (3) If...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court may vary the direction or order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has permission to vary direction or order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (3) If...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court may vary the direction or order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Direction or order is propagated under section 15YV.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (a) a direction or order is in force under section 15YV;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YW(3) Observers

15YW(4) Observers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.205
note: List of persons who may be specified for the purposes of this section
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yw-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15YW Observers

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YW(4) Observers

15YW(5) Observers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.205
note: Court must ensure observer is independent of prosecutor and defendants.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yw-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15YW Observers

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court is satisfied that the person is independent of the prosecutor and defendants.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must ensure observer is independent.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (5) The court must not specify a person for the purposes of this section unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court is satisfied that the person is independent of the prosecutor and defendants, and in a position to give a report to the court about what the person observes in relation to the giving of evidence by the witness.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Observer must be reasonably available to observe evidence giving.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (5) The court must not specify a person for the purposes of this section unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court is satisfied that the person is independent of the prosecutor and defendants, in a position to give a report to the court about what the person observes in relation to the giving of evidence by the witness, and reasonably available to observe the giving of evidence by the witness.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Observer must be an appropriate person for the purposes of this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (5) The court must not specify a person for the purposes of this section unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YW(5) Observers

15YW(6) Observers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.205
note: A person's status as an Australian diplomatic officer or consular officer does not imply independence from the prosecutor.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yw-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 15YW Observers

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The intervals overlap.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The excerpt defines a temporal interval (being an Australian diplomatic officer or consular officer) that overlaps with another interval (independence from the prosecutor).
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (6) For the purposes of this section, the mere fact that a person is an Australian diplomatic officer or Australian consular officer does not mean that the person is not independent of the prosecutor.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The concept is recognized.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The excerpt defines a concept (independence from the prosecutor) recognized by an artificial agent (the law).
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (6) For the purposes of this section, the mere fact that a person is an Australian diplomatic officer or Australian consular officer does not mean that the person is not independent of the prosecutor.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person's independence is not guaranteed by their status.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Independence is not guaranteed by being an Australian diplomatic officer or consular officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implication
premise text: (6) For the purposes of this section, the mere fact that a person is an Australian diplomatic officer or Australian consular officer does not mean that the person is not independent of the prosecutor.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The concepts diffuse.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The excerpt defines a concept (independence from the prosecutor) that diffuses through another concept (being an Australian diplomatic officer or consular officer).
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (6) For the purposes of this section, the mere fact that a person is an Australian diplomatic officer or Australian consular officer does not mean that the person is not independent of the prosecutor.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The relationship holds until the event.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The excerpt defines a temporal relationship (independence from the prosecutor) that holds until another event (being an Australian diplomatic officer or consular officer).
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (6) For the purposes of this section, the mere fact that a person is an Australian diplomatic officer or Australian consular officer does not mean that the person is not independent of the prosecutor.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YW(6) Observers

15YW(7) Observers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.205
note: Court may direct or allow specified person to provide report about video link evidence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yw-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 15YW Observers

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...within a specified time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Report is provided within a specific time frame.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: by such time as the court requires,

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court considers appropriate...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Court's decision to admit evidence is based on report.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: ...for the purpose of deciding whether...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court may...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may direct or allow specified person to provide report.
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: (7) If...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YW(7) Observers

15YW(8) Observers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.205
note: Definition of Australian consular officer and diplomatic officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yw-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 15YW Observers

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YW(8) Observers

15YX Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.207
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YX(1) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
has part: 15YX(2) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
has part: 15YX(3) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
has part: 15YX(4) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
has part: 15YX(5) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yx
schema version: 2

15YX(1) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.207
note: A defendant may apply for an adjournment to decide whether to appeal against a court direction or order.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yx-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YX Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A defendant may apply for an adjournment.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YX(1) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.

15YX(2) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.207
note: Prosecutor must apply for adjournment if court gives direction or order and defendant applies.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yx-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YX Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prosecutor must apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply for adjournment
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Court gives direction or order

15YX(3) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.207
note: Prosecutor may apply for adjournment to decide on appeal or withdrawal.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yx-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15YX Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YX(3) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.

15YX(4) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.207
note: Grant of adjournment for appeal decision
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yx-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15YX Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows defendant to request adjournment
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

15YX(5) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.207
note: Court must grant adjournment upon application.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yx-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15YX Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court must grant adjournment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to grant adjournment
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Application made under section.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YX(5) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.

15YY Technical requirements for video link
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.209
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YY(1) Technical requirements for video link
has part: 15YY(2) Technical requirements for video link
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yy
schema version: 2

15YY(1) Technical requirements for video link
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.209
note: Witness must give evidence under video link with specified facilities.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yy-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YY Technical requirements for video link

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Video facilities must be available during evidence giving.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (c) enable appropriate persons at the courtroom point to see and hear the witness give the evidence; (d) enable appropriate persons at the witness point to see and hear appropriate persons at the courtroom point.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide evidence under video link.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) A witness can give evidence under a section 15YV direction or order only if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Courtroom and witness points must have video facilities.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) the courtroom or other place where the court is sitting (the courtroom point); (b) the place where the evidence is given (the witness point); (c) enable appropriate persons at the courtroom point to see and hear the witness give the evidence; (d) enable appropriate persons at the witness point to see and hear appropriate persons at the courtroom point.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Witness must be able to see and hear at both points.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (c) enable appropriate persons at the courtroom point to see and hear the witness give the evidence; (d) enable appropriate persons at the witness point to see and hear appropriate persons at the courtroom point.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Video facilities must be available during evidence giving.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (c) enable appropriate persons at the courtroom point to see and hear the witness give the evidence; (d) enable appropriate persons at the witness point to see and hear appropriate persons at the courtroom point.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YY(1) Technical requirements for video link

15YY(2) Technical requirements for video link
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.209
note: Court considers appropriate persons for a specific purpose.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yy-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YY Technical requirements for video link

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YY(2) Technical requirements for video link

15YZ Direction to jury
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.209
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15YZ(1) Direction to jury
has part: 15YZ(2) Direction to jury
has part: 15YZ(3) Direction to jury
has part: 15YZ(4) Direction to jury
has part: 15YZ(5) Direction to jury
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yz
schema version: 2

15YZ(1) Direction to jury
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.209
note: Defendant may appeal against section 15YV direction or order. Ensure equal weight to witness evidence in jury proceedings. A person must give evidence at the courtroom or other place where the court is sitting.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-8
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-ltl-9
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-diffusion-10
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-cogai-11
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yz-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15YZ Direction to jury

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the judge must give the jury such direction as the judge thinks necessary to ensure that the jury gives the same weight to the evidence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of witness evidence in jury proceedings
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (a) a proceeding involves a jury; (b) a witness gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order; (c) the evidence is admissible in the proceeding;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-8
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval of the direction to jury contains the courtroom and other place where the court is sitting.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of direction to jury
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) A person who gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order is taken to give it at the courtroom or other place where the court is sitting.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the judge must give the jury such direction as the judge thinks necessary to ensure that the jury gives the same weight to the evidence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Argumentation scheme of witness evidence in jury proceedings
modality: Argumentation
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (a) a proceeding involves a jury; (b) a witness gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order; (c) the evidence is admissible in the proceeding;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-cogai-11
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The CogAI application contains the courtroom and other place where the court is sitting.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI application for direction to jury
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) A person who gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order is taken to give it at the courtroom or other place where the court is sitting.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant has a right to appeal.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the judge must give the jury such direction as the judge thinks necessary to ensure that the jury gives the same weight to the evidence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide equal weight
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) a proceeding involves a jury; (b) a witness gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order; (c) the evidence is admissible in the proceeding;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person must give evidence at the courtroom or other place where the court is sitting.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must give evidence at a specific place
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) A person who gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order is taken to give it at the courtroom or other place where the court is sitting.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-diffusion-10
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The diffusion of the direction to jury contains the courtroom and other place where the court is sitting.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of direction to jury
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) A person who gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order is taken to give it at the courtroom or other place where the court is sitting.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the judge must give the jury such direction as the judge thinks necessary to ensure that the jury gives the same weight to the evidence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of witness evidence in jury proceedings
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (a) a proceeding involves a jury; (b) a witness gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order; (c) the evidence is admissible in the proceeding;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the judge must give the jury such direction as the judge thinks necessary to ensure that the jury gives the same weight to the evidence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of witness evidence in jury proceedings
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (a) a proceeding involves a jury; (b) a witness gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order; (c) the evidence is admissible in the proceeding;

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-ltl-9
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal trace of the direction to jury contains the courtroom and other place where the court is sitting.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal trace of direction to jury
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) A person who gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order is taken to give it at the courtroom or other place where the court is sitting.

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YZ(1) Direction to jury

15YZ(2) Direction to jury
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.209
note: Ignore judge directions and weight given to video link evidence in proceedings not covered by this Part. Prosecutor may appeal against a section 15YV direction or order. Subsection (1) has effect for the purposes of laws relating to evidence, procedure, contempt of court and perjury.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yz-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15YZ Direction to jury

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disregard judge directions and weight given to video link evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Ignore
premise text: (2) Disregard subsection (1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Court refuses to give a direction or make an order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the prosecutor from appealing against a section 15YV direction or order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) If: ...; the prosecutor may appeal...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision has a direct effect on other laws.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YZ(2) Direction to jury

15YZ(3) Direction to jury
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.209
note: Prosecutor may appeal against refusal of section 15YV direction or order.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yz-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15YZ Direction to jury

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YZ(3) Direction to jury

15YZ(4) Direction to jury
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.209
note: Right to appeal against refusal of section 15YV direction or order
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yz-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15YZ Direction to jury

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the defendant may appeal against the refusal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant has a right to appeal against refusal of section 15YV direction or order
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (4) If...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YZ(4) Direction to jury

15YZ(5) Direction to jury
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.209
note: Court jurisdiction for appeals under this section
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15yz-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15YZ Direction to jury

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...hear and determine any appeal under this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
premise text: (5) A court that has jurisdiction...

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YZ(5) Direction to jury

16 Interpretation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.213
note: Defines aggregate imprisonment term
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a key concept
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to definitions and class hierarchies
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: applies to

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Interpretation

16A Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.219
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16A(1) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
has part: 16A(2) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16a
schema version: 2

16A(1) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.219
note: Court must impose a sentence of appropriate severity when passing sentence for a federal offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 16A Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence

crimes-act-1914-sec-16a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must impose a sentence of appropriate severity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-act-1914-sec-16a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16A(1) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence

16A(2) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.219
note: Court must consider certain matters when passing sentence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 16A Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence

crimes-act-1914-sec-16a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider certain matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-16a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16A(2) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence

16AA Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.223
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16AA(1) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
has part: 16AA(2) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
has part: 16AA(3) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16aa
schema version: 2

16AA(1) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.223
note: Court must not consider customary law or cultural practice when passing sentence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 16AA Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence

crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must not consider customary law or cultural practice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16AA(1) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence

16AA(2) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.223
note: Court must have regard to certain laws when passing sentence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 16AA Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence

crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court must have regard to certain laws
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider specific laws
modality: Deontic
operator: regard
premise text: Court must pass sentence

crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16AA(2) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence

16AA(3) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.223
note: Criminal behaviour includes
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16aa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 16AA Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence

crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies criminal behaviour
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies

crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16AA(3) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence

16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.230
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16AB(1) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(2) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(3) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(4) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(5) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(6) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(7) Matters relating to victim impact statements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16ab
schema version: 2

16AB(1) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.230
note: This section applies in relation to victim impact statements made known to a court.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16AB(1) Matters relating to victim impact statements

16AB(2) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.230
note: Only one victim impact statement may be made for each victim of an offence, unless the court gives leave.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making multiple victim impact statements for the same victim.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16AB(2) Matters relating to victim impact statements

16AB(3) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.230
note: No implication from absence of victim impact statement for a victim.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16ab-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No implication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implication from absence of statement
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (3)

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No implication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative implication
modality: Deontic
operator: ImpliesNot
premise text: (3)

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16AB(3) Matters relating to victim impact statements

16AB(4) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.230
note: Victim impact statement may be read to court by or on behalf of the victim.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16ab-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16AB(4) Matters relating to victim impact statements

16AB(5) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.230
note: Excluding certain types of victim impact statements from consideration by the court.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16ab-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between conditions for excluding victim impact statements.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account, to the extent that: (a) it expresses an opinion about an appropriate sentence; or (b) it is offensive, threatening, intimidating or harassing; or (c) admitting it into evidence would otherwise not be in the interests of justice.

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Rebutting exclusion of victim impact statements with counterarguments.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Rebuttal
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account, to the extent that: (a) it expresses an opinion about an appropriate sentence; or (b) it is offensive, threatening, intimidating or harassing; or (c) admitting it into evidence would otherwise not be in the interests of justice.

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents reading or considering victim impact statements under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account, to the extent that: (a) it expresses an opinion about an appropriate sentence; or (b) it is offensive, threatening, intimidating or harassing; or (c) admitting it into evidence would otherwise not be in the interests of justice.

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreading exclusion of victim impact statements to related contexts.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account, to the extent that: (a) it expresses an opinion about an appropriate sentence; or (b) it is offensive, threatening, intimidating or harassing; or (c) admitting it into evidence would otherwise not be in the interests of justice.

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring exclusion of victim impact statements under certain conditions.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account, to the extent that: (a) it expresses an opinion about an appropriate sentence; or (b) it is offensive, threatening, intimidating or harassing; or (c) admitting it into evidence would otherwise not be in the interests of justice.

16AB(6) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.230
note: The person convicted of the offence may only test the facts in a victim impact statement.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16ab-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May only test the facts
modality: Deontic
operator: may_only
premise text: (6) The person convicted of the offence may only test the facts in a victim impact statement:

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May only test the facts
modality: Deontic
operator: may_only
premise text: (a) by way of cross-examining the maker of the statement;

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May only test the facts
modality: Deontic
operator: may_only
premise text: (b) if the court gives leave to do so.

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16AB(6) Matters relating to victim impact statements

16AB(7) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.230
note: Part IAD protections apply to readings and cross-examinations.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16ab-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Part IAD protections apply to readings and cross-examinations
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16AB(7) Matters relating to victim impact statements

16AC Reduction for cooperation with law enforcement agencies
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.231
note: Cooperation with law enforcement agencies is required for reduced sentence or order.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ac-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ac-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16ac
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ac-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires cooperation with law enforcement agencies.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

16B Court to have regard to other periods of imprisonment required
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
note: Court must consider previous sentences when sentencing a person convicted of a federal offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16b-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16b
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-16b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...consider previous sentences when sentencing a person...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider previous sentences
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Court must have regard to...

crimes-act-1914-sec-16b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16B Court to have regard to other periods of imprisonment required

16BA Taking other offences into account
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
note: Requires filing of document with list of other federal offences.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ba-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ba-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16ba
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ba-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires the filing of a document.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ba-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16BA Taking other offences into account

16C Fines
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16C(1) Fines
has part: 16C(2) Fines
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16c
schema version: 2

16C(1) Fines
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
note: Court must consider financial circumstances before imposing a fine.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 16C Fines

crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider financial circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16C(1) Fines

16C(2) Fines
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
note: Court may impose fine regardless of offender's financial circumstances.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 16C Fines

crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A court may impose a fine.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: Nothing prevents a court from imposing a fine.

crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court has the authority to impose a fine.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May impose fine
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: A court may impose a fine on a person.

crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16C(2) Fines

16D No corporal punishment
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16D(1) No corporal punishment
has part: 16D(2) No corporal punishment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16d
schema version: 2

16D(1) No corporal punishment
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
note: No corporal punishment for federal offences
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 16D No corporal punishment

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prohibition on corporal punishment is within the temporal interval of the federal offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between prohibition and corporal punishment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (1) A court must not impose any form of corporal punishment for a federal offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prohibition on corporal punishment is a key aspect of the federal offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analysis of prohibition on corporal punishment
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
premise text: (1) A court must not impose any form of corporal punishment for a federal offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No corporal punishment for federal offences
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of corporal punishment
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A court must not impose any form of corporal punishment for a federal offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a court imposes corporal punishment, it is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of prohibition on corporal punishment
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (1) A court must not impose any form of corporal punishment for a federal offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prohibition on corporal punishment is valid and enforceable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validation of prohibition on corporal punishment
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
premise text: (1) A court must not impose any form of corporal punishment for a federal offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16D(1) No corporal punishment

16D(2) No corporal punishment
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
note: No corporal punishment for federal sentence holders.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 16D No corporal punishment

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No corporal punishment for federal sentence holders.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits corporal punishment
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person serving a federal sentence must not be subjected to any form of corporal punishment.

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition on corporal punishment for federal sentence holders.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on corporal punishment
modality: Deontic
operator: Impose
premise text: (2) A person serving a federal sentence must not be subjected to any form of corporal punishment.

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition on corporal punishment for federal sentence holders.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Justifies prohibition on corporal punishment
modality: Deontic
operator: Justify
premise text: (2) A person serving a federal sentence must not be subjected to any form of corporal punishment.

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition on corporal punishment for federal sentence holders.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies prohibition on corporal punishment
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (2) A person serving a federal sentence must not be subjected to any form of corporal punishment.

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16D(2) No corporal punishment

16E Commencement of sentences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16E(1) Commencement of sentences
has part: 16E(2) Commencement of sentences
has part: 16E(3) Commencement of sentences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16e
schema version: 2

16E(1) Commencement of sentences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
note: Law of a State or Territory applies to federal offence sentencing
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 16E Commencement of sentences

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The law applies during sentencing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Law applies during sentencing
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the law of a State or Territory relating to the commencement of sentences...

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The law implies application to persons sentenced in that State or Territory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Law implies application to persons sentenced in that State or Territory
modality: Argumentation
operator: entails
premise text: (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the law of a State or Territory relating to the commencement of sentences...

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The law applies to AI systems sentencing persons in that State or Territory.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Law applies to AI systems sentencing persons in that State or Territory
modality: CogAI
operator: applies
premise text: (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the law of a State or Territory relating to the commencement of sentences...

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The law of a State or Territory applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Law applies
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the law of a State or Territory relating to the commencement of sentences...

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The law implies diffusion to persons sentenced in that State or Territory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Law implies diffusion to persons sentenced in that State or Territory
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
premise text: (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the law of a State or Territory relating to the commencement of sentences...

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16E(1) Commencement of sentences

16E(2) Commencement of sentences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
note: Law applies to federal sentences imposed on a person in a State or Territory.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 16E Commencement of sentences

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Federal sentence is subject to State law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Law applies to federal sentences.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: State law applies to persons within its territory.

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16E(2) Commencement of sentences

16E(3) Commencement of sentences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
note: Court must consider previous custody period when imposing federal sentence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 16E Commencement of sentences

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a court (including a federal court) in that State or Territory that imposes a federal sentence on a person or fixes a non-parole period in respect of such a sentence must take into account any period that the person has spent in custody in relation to the offence concerned.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship between previous custody and current sentence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) Where the law of a State or Territory does not have the effect mentioned in subsection (2),

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a court (including a federal court) in that State or Territory that imposes a federal sentence on a person or fixes a non-parole period in respect of such a sentence must take into account any period that the person has spent in custody in relation to the offence concerned.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for classification and diffusion.
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) Where the law of a State or Territory does not have the effect mentioned in subsection (2),

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a court (including a federal court) in that State or Territory that imposes a federal sentence on a person or fixes a non-parole period in respect of such a sentence must take into account any period that the person has spent in custody in relation to the offence concerned.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider previous custody period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) Where the law of a State or Territory does not have the effect mentioned in subsection (2),

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a court (including a federal court) in that State or Territory that imposes a federal sentence on a person or fixes a non-parole period in respect of such a sentence must take into account any period that the person has spent in custody in relation to the offence concerned.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation from State to court.
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) Where the law of a State or Territory does not have the effect mentioned in subsection (2),

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a court (including a federal court) in that State or Territory that imposes a federal sentence on a person or fixes a non-parole period in respect of such a sentence must take into account any period that the person has spent in custody in relation to the offence concerned.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship between previous custody and current sentence.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) Where the law of a State or Territory does not have the effect mentioned in subsection (2),

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16E(3) Commencement of sentences

16F Court to explain sentence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16F(1) Court to explain sentence
has part: 16F(2) Court to explain sentence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16f
schema version: 2

16F(1) Court to explain sentence
type: Concept
description: Explanation of non-parole period purpose and consequences
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
note: Court must explain purpose and consequences of non-parole period to the person.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16f-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 16F Court to explain sentence

crimes-act-1914-sec-16f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must provide explanation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-16f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16F(1) Court to explain sentence

16F(2) Court to explain sentence
type: Concept
description: Explanation of purpose and consequences of recognizance release order
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
note: Court must explain sentence to person before release.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16f-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 16F Court to explain sentence

crimes-act-1914-sec-16f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to explain sentence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-16f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16F(2) Court to explain sentence

17A Restriction on imposing sentences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
note: Court cannot pass sentence of imprisonment for certain federal offences or external Territory offences without considering other options.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17a
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-17a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court cannot pass sentence of imprisonment
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Court passes sentence of imprisonment

crimes-act-1914-sec-17a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17A Restriction on imposing sentences

17B Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
curation status: Proposed
has part: 17B(1) Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
has part: 17B(2) Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
has part: 17B(3) Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17b
schema version: 2

17B(1) Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
note: Court must not pass sentence of imprisonment unless exceptional circumstances warrant it.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 17B Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences

crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the offence occurred before the sentence was passed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The offence occurred before the sentence was passed
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) the person has not previously been sentenced to imprisonment for any federal, State or Territory offence;

crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court convicting the person is not to pass a sentence of imprisonment for that offence, or for any of those offences, unless the court is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances that warrant it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must not pass sentence of imprisonment unless exceptional circumstances warrant it.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) a person is convicted of one or more section 17B offences relating to property, money or both, whose total value is not more than $2,000;

crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court may pass a sentence if exceptional circumstances warrant it
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The court may pass a sentence if exceptional circumstances warrant it
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (b) the person has not previously been sentenced to imprisonment for any federal, State or Territory offence;

crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court must satisfy itself that there are exceptional circumstances before passing the sentence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The court must satisfy itself that there are exceptional circumstances before passing the sentence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (b) the person has not previously been sentenced to imprisonment for any federal, State or Territory offence;

crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the sentence must be passed after the offence occurred
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The sentence must be passed after the offence occurred
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (b) the person has not previously been sentenced to imprisonment for any federal, State or Territory offence;

crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17B(1) Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences

17B(2) Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
note: Court must consider section 17B offence in calculating total value for sentence purposes.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 17B Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences

17B(3) Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
note: Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 17B Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences

crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17B(3) Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences

18 Sentence of imprisonment
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
curation status: Proposed
has part: 18(1) Sentence of imprisonment
has part: 18(2) Sentence of imprisonment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18
schema version: 2

18(1) Sentence of imprisonment
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
note: Imprisonment may be imposed with or without hard labour.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Sentence of imprisonment

crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposition of imprisonment is permitted.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(1) Sentence of imprisonment

18(2) Sentence of imprisonment
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
note: Imprisonment in corresponding cases
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Sentence of imprisonment

crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in corresponding cases, be imprisoned in the kind or class of prison appropriate to the circumstances.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (2) Where under the law of a State or Territory...

crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in corresponding cases, be imprisoned in the kind or class of prison appropriate to the circumstances.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI through laws
modality: CogAI
operator: through
premise text: (2) Where under the law of a State or Territory...

crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a person convicted of an offence against the law of the Commonwealth may, in corresponding cases...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Corresponding circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: corresponding
premise text: (2) Where under the law of a State or Territory...

crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...be imprisoned in the kind or class of prison appropriate to the circumstances.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class of prison
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class
premise text: ...in particular cases be imprisoned in a particular kind or class of prison...

crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in corresponding cases, be imprisoned in the kind or class of prison appropriate to the circumstances.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion through laws
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: (2) Where under the law of a State or Territory...

crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in corresponding cases, be imprisoned in the kind or class of prison appropriate to the circumstances.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (2) Where under the law of a State or Territory...

19 Cumulative, partly cumulative or concurrent sentences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
note: Court must direct when federal sentence commences, ensuring it does not later than the end of other sentences.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must direct when federal sentence commences.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-act-1914-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19 Cumulative, partly cumulative or concurrent sentences

19A Detention of person in State or Territory prisons
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
note: Federal offender may be detained in any prison in a State or Territory.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19a
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-19a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

19AB When court must fix non-parole period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AB(1) When court must fix non-parole period
has part: 19AB(2) When court must fix non-parole period
has part: 19AB(3) When court must fix non-parole period
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ab
schema version: 2

19AB(1) When court must fix non-parole period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
note: Court must fix non-parole period for federal sentences
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AB When court must fix non-parole period

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Non-parole period must be fixed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to fix non-parole period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Court must impose sentence

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AB(1) When court must fix non-parole period

19AB(2) When court must fix non-parole period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
note: Court must fix non-parole period for federal sentences.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19AB When court must fix non-parole period

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court must fix a non-parole period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AB(2) When court must fix non-parole period

19AB(3) When court must fix non-parole period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
note: Court must fix non-parole period under this section.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ab-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19AB When court must fix non-parole period

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to fix non-parole period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AB(3) When court must fix non-parole period

19AC When court must fix a recognizance release order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AC(1) When court must fix a recognizance release order
has part: 19AC(2) When court must fix a recognizance release order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ac
schema version: 2

19AC(1) When court must fix a recognizance release order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
note: Court must fix a recognizance release order under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ac-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AC When court must fix a recognizance release order

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Sentence duration must be between 3 years.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (b) the court imposes on the person a federal sentence that does not exceed, or...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must fix a recognizance release order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) Subject to subsections (3) and (4), where...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must fix a recognizance release order under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (c) at the time the sentence or sentences are imposed the person is not already serving...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Sentence duration must be between 3 years.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (b) the court imposes on the person a federal sentence that does not exceed, or...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AC(1) When court must fix a recognizance release order

19AC(2) When court must fix a recognizance release order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
note: Court must fix a recognizance release order under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ac-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19AC When court must fix a recognizance release order

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must fix a recognizance release order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4), where...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AC(2) When court must fix a recognizance release order

19AD Persons already subject to a non-parole period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AD(1) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
has part: 19AD(2) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
has part: 19AD(3) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
has part: 19AD(4) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ad
schema version: 2

19AD(1) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
note: Applicable to persons serving existing non-parole period when further sentence is imposed.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ad-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AD Persons already subject to a non-parole period

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The existing and imposed sentences overlap in time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship between existing and imposed sentences.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) while the offender is serving the existing non-parole period, a court imposes a further federal sentence on the person;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on the state to consider existing non-parole period when imposing further sentence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) a non-parole period (in this section called the existing non-parole period) has been fixed in respect of a federal sentence or federal sentences;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court may impose a further sentence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows state to impose further sentence without violating existing non-parole period.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (b) while the offender is serving the existing non-parole period, a court imposes a further federal sentence on the person;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is part of a recurring trace of persons subject to non-parole periods.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines recurring trace of persons subject to non-parole period.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (a) a non-parole period (in this section called the existing non-parole period) has been fixed in respect of a federal sentence or federal sentences;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AD(1) Persons already subject to a non-parole period

19AD(2) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
note: Court must consider circumstances and decide on a non-parole period.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ad-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19AD Persons already subject to a non-parole period

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must consider circumstances and decide on a non-parole period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AD(2) Persons already subject to a non-parole period

19AD(3) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
note: Supersedes existing non-parole period if new sentence is imposed
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ad-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19AD Persons already subject to a non-parole period

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it: (a) is to be treated as having superseded the existing non-parole period;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between two intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (3) Where, under paragraph (2)(e), the court fixes a new single non-parole period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) is to be treated as having superseded the existing non-parole period;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Describes a logical relationship between two statements
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (3) Where, under paragraph (2)(e), the court fixes a new single non-parole period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) is to be treated as having superseded the existing non-parole period;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Supersedes existing non-parole period
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (3) Where, under paragraph (2)(e), the court fixes a new single non-parole period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) must not be such as to allow the person to be released on parole earlier then would have been the case if the further sentence had not been imposed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must not allow parole earlier than would have been the case if further sentence had not been imposed
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (3) Where, under paragraph (2)(e), the court fixes a new single non-parole period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) must not be such as to allow the person to be released on parole earlier then would have been the case if the further sentence had not been imposed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes a process of spreading or disseminating information
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (3) Where, under paragraph (2)(e), the court fixes a new single non-parole period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AD(3) Persons already subject to a non-parole period

19AD(4) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
note: Court must not make a recognizance release order.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ad-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 19AD Persons already subject to a non-parole period

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prohibition applies to all temporal intervals where this section applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Application of the prohibition to specific temporal intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ApplyTo
premise text: (4) Where this section applies, the court must not make a recognizance release order.

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision has implications for artificial agents.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analysis of the provision's implications on artificial agents.
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
premise text: (4) Where this section applies, the court must not make a recognizance release order.

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court must not make a recognizance release order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making a recognizance release order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) Where this section applies, the court must not make a recognizance release order.

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court is obligated to refrain.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court's obligation to refrain from making a recognizance release order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) Where this section applies, the court must not make a recognizance release order.

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court's action is implied to be prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of the prohibition on the court's actions.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (4) Where this section applies, the court must not make a recognizance release order.

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AD(4) Persons already subject to a non-parole period

19AE Persons already subject to recognizance release order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AE(1) Persons already subject to recognizance release order
has part: 19AE(2) Persons already subject to recognizance release order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ae
schema version: 2

19AE(1) Persons already subject to recognizance release order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
note: A person subject to a recognizance release order must comply with the existing order if a further federal sentence is imposed.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ae-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AE Persons already subject to recognizance release order

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with the existing recognizance release order.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (1) Where...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court may impose a further federal sentence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to impose further federal sentences on persons subject to recognizance release orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: (b) before the person is released under that order, the court imposes a further federal sentence on the person;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to release persons subject to recognizance release orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: (1) Where...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must comply with the existing recognizance release order if a further federal sentence is imposed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of further federal sentences on persons subject to recognizance release orders.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implication
premise text: (b) before the person is released under that order, the court imposes a further federal sentence on the person;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AE(1) Persons already subject to recognizance release order

19AE(2) Persons already subject to recognizance release order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
note: Court must consider circumstances and decide one of the following things: confirm existing recognizance release order, make new recognizance release order, fix non-parole period, or neither.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ae-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19AE Persons already subject to recognizance release order

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must consider circumstances and decide one of the following things.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AE(2) Persons already subject to recognizance release order

19AF Non-parole period or pre-release periods not to exceed
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AF(1) Non-parole period or pre-release periods not to exceed
has part: 19AF(2) Non-parole period or pre-release periods not to exceed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19af
schema version: 2

19AF(1) Non-parole period or pre-release periods not to exceed
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
note: Court must fix non-parole period or make recognizance release order not later than the end of the sentence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19af-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AF Non-parole period or pre-release periods not to exceed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must fix non-parole period or make recognizance release order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AF(1) Non-parole period or pre-release periods not to exceed

19AF(2) Non-parole period or pre-release periods not to exceed
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
note: Restricts non-parole period or pre-release periods for life sentences
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19af-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19AF Non-parole period or pre-release periods not to exceed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the length of the non-parole period or...the pre-release period in respect of a life sentence or sentences that include such a sentence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship between non-parole period and life sentence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) This section does not restrict...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the length of the non-parole period or...the pre-release period in respect of a life sentence or sentences that include such a sentence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines inference rule for restriction on non-parole period or pre-release periods
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (2) This section does not restrict...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in respect of a life sentence or sentences that include such a sentence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits non-parole period or pre-release periods
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction
premise text: (2) This section does not restrict...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the length of the non-parole period or...the pre-release period in respect of a life sentence or sentences that include such a sentence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines propagation of restriction to related periods
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (2) This section does not restrict...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the length of the non-parole period or...the pre-release period in respect of a life sentence or sentences that include such a sentence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship between non-parole period and life sentence
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (2) This section does not restrict...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AF(2) Non-parole period or pre-release periods not to exceed

19AG Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AG(1) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
has part: 19AG(2) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
has part: 19AG(3) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
has part: 19AG(4) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ag
schema version: 2

19AG(1) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
note: Sentence for minimum non-parole offence is a federal sentence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ag-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AG Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The sentence for the terrorism offence and the sentence for the offence against Division 80 occur during the same period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between offences
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) a terrorism offence; (c) an offence against Division 80 (other than Subdivision CA) of the Criminal Code;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A sentence for a minimum non-parole offence is a federal sentence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Sentence classification
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1) This section applies if a person is convicted of one of the following offences (each of which is a minimum non-parole offence) and a court imposes a sentence for the offence:

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A sentence for the offence is a federal sentence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Sentence classification
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (b) a terrorism offence;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A sentence for a minimum non-parole offence is a federal sentence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Sentence classification
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (a) This section applies if a person is convicted of one of the following offences (each of which is a minimum non-parole offence) and a court imposes a sentence for the offence:

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AG(1) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences

19AG(2) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
note: Court must fix a single non-parole period of at least 3/4 of the sentence for minimum non-parole offence or aggregate of those sentences.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ag-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19AG Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must fix a non-parole period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AG(2) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences

19AG(3) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
note: Sentence of imprisonment for life for a minimum non-parole offence is taken to be a sentence of imprisonment for 30 years for the offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ag-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19AG Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: whether or not all the federal sentences mentioned in that subsection are for minimum non-parole offences.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between two events
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) For the purposes of subsection (2):

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) a sentence of imprisonment for life for a minimum non-parole offence is taken to be a sentence of imprisonment for 30 years for the offence;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
premise text: (3) For the purposes of subsection (2):

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) it does not matter:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (3) For the purposes of subsection (2):

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it does not matter whether or not the convictions giving rise to those sentences were at the same sitting;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (3) For the purposes of subsection (2):

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: whether or not all the federal sentences mentioned in that subsection are for minimum non-parole offences.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between two events
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (3) For the purposes of subsection (2):

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AG(3) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences

19AG(4) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
note: Supersedes recognizance release order if non-parole period applies
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ag-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 19AG Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: supersedes

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AG(4) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences

19AH Failure to fix non-parole period or make recognizance release
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
note: Court must fix non-parole period or make recognizance release order.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ah-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ah-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ah
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ah-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must fix non-parole period or make recognizance release order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ah-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AH Failure to fix non-parole period or make recognizance release

19AJ Court may only fix non-parole periods or make recognizance
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
note: Court cannot fix non-parole periods or make recognizance release orders for federal sentences of imprisonment.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aj-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aj-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19aj
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court cannot fix non-parole periods or make recognizance release orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

19AK Possible deportation no impediment to fixing non-parole
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
note: Court may fix non-parole period despite deportation risk
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ak-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ak-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ak
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ak-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May impose obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ak-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AK Possible deportation no impediment to fixing non-parole

19AL Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AL(1) Release on parole—making of parole order
has part: 19AL(1A) Release on parole—making of parole order
has part: 19AL(2) Release on parole—making of parole order
has part: 19AL(2A) Release on parole—making of parole order
has part: 19AL(3) Release on parole—making of parole order
has part: 19AL(3A) Release on parole—making of parole order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19al
schema version: 2

19AL(1) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
note: The Attorney-General must make or refuse to make a parole order before the end of a non-parole period.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19al-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General must make or refuse to make a parole order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AL(1) Release on parole—making of parole order

19AL(1A) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
note: Release on parole—making of parole order
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19al-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The non-parole period must be completed before a parole order can be made.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Non-parole period must be completed before parole order can be made
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (1A) If the Attorney-General does not, under subsection (1), make, or refuse to make, a parole order for a person before the end of the non-parole period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General MUST make, or refuse to make, a parole order for the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must make a parole order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1A) If the Attorney-General does not, under subsection (1), make, or refuse to make, a parole order for a person...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General MUST make, or refuse to make, a parole order for the person after the end of the non-parole period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must make a parole order after non-parole period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1A) If the Attorney-General does not, under subsection (1), make, or refuse to make, a parole order for a person before the end of the non-parole period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General MUST refuse to make a parole order for the person if required by subsection (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must refuse to make a parole order if not required by subsection (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1A) If the Attorney-General does not, under subsection (1), make, or refuse to make, a parole order for a person before the end of the non-parole period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AL(1A) Release on parole—making of parole order

19AL(2) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
description: written notice with reasons and effect of refusal
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
note: The Attorney-General must reconsider the making of a parole order for a person within 12 months after refusal.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19al-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General must reconsider the making of a parole order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The parole order is subject to reconsideration within 12 months.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AL(2) Release on parole—making of parole order

19AL(2A) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
note: Reconsideration of parole order within a specified timeframe.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19al-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must reconsider and either make or refuse to make a parole order for the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to reconsider parole order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Attorney-General must reconsider the making of a parole order.

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AL(2A) Release on parole—making of parole order

19AL(3) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
description: (a) A parole order must be in writing; (b) specify whether or not the person is to be released subject to supervision; (c) if it is proposed that the supervision period for a person released on parole subject to supervision should end before the end of the person’s parole period—specify the day on which the supervision period ends.
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
note: Parole order must be in writing and specify supervision conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19al-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for supervision period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) A parole order must: (c) if it is proposed that the supervision period for a person released on parole subject to supervision should end before the end of the person’s parole period—specify the day on which the supervision period ends.

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Parole order must be in writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) A parole order must: (a) be in writing;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify supervision conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) A parole order must: (b) specify whether or not the person is to be released subject to supervision;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify end date for supervision period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) A parole order must: (c) if it is proposed that the supervision period for a person released on parole subject to supervision should end before the end of the person’s parole period—specify the day on which the supervision period ends.

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Comply with conditions during parole period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: A person released on parole must comply with any conditions of the parole order during the parole period (see sections 19AMA, 19AN and 19AU).

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AL(3) Release on parole—making of parole order

19AL(3A) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
note: Specify parole order release date within 30 days before non-parole period end
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19al-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify parole order release date
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3a-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AL(3A) Release on parole—making of parole order

19AM Release on parole—when is a person released
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AM(1) Release on parole—when is a person released
has part: 19AM(2) Release on parole—when is a person released
has part: 19AM(3) Release on parole—when is a person released
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19am
schema version: 2

19AM(1) Release on parole—when is a person released
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
note: Defines parole period for a person for whom a parole order has been made. A person must be released from prison on parole in accordance with a parole order.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19am-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AM Release on parole—when is a person released

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the last day of the non-parole period or an earlier day specified in the parole order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Release on parole after non-parole period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: for a parole order made before the end of the non-parole period;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: on parole in accordance with a parole order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to release on parole
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: A person must be released from prison.

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must certify his or her acceptance of the parole order conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to certify acceptance of parole order conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: before he or she may be released.

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must comply with the parole order conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to comply with parole order conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: before he or she may be released.

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the day after the parole order is made or a later day specified in the parole order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Release on parole after parole order made
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: for a parole order made after the end of the non-parole period;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AM(1) Release on parole—when is a person released

19AM(2) Release on parole—when is a person released
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
note: A person must be released from prison on parole if imprisoned for a State or Territory offence on the day they would otherwise be eligible for release.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19am-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19AM Release on parole—when is a person released

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person must be released from prison on parole in accordance with the parole order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Release on parole occurs after imprisonment for State or Territory offence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (2) However, if the person is imprisoned for a State or Territory offence on the day he or she would otherwise be eligible for release...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person must be released from prison on parole in accordance with the parole order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide parole release on same day as eligibility
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) However, if the person is imprisoned for a State or Territory offence on the day he or she would otherwise be eligible for release...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person must be released from prison on parole in accordance with the parole order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Release on parole is a necessary condition for parole release
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND
premise text: (2) However, if the person is imprisoned for a State or Territory offence on the day he or she would otherwise be eligible for release...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AM(2) Release on parole—when is a person released

19AM(3) Release on parole—when is a person released
type: Concept
description: Certification of acceptance of conditions
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
note: Release on parole is prohibited unless a person certifies acceptance of conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19am-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19AM Release on parole—when is a person released

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AM(3) Release on parole—when is a person released

19AN Parole order is subject to conditions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.260
note: Must behave and obey directions during parole period.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19an-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19an-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19an
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-19an-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must behave and obey directions during parole period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Moral obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Parole order is subject to conditions

19AP Release on licence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AP(1) Release on licence
has part: 19AP(2) Release on licence
has part: 19AP(3) Release on licence
has part: 19AP(4) Release on licence
has part: 19AP(4A) Release on licence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ap
schema version: 2

19AP(1) Release on licence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
note: The Attorney-General may grant a licence for a person to be released from prison.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ap-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AP Release on licence

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General may grant a licence.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AP(1) Release on licence

19AP(2) Release on licence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
note: A person may apply to the Attorney-General for a licence under this subsection.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ap-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19AP Release on licence

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AP(2) Release on licence

19AP(3) Release on licence
type: Concept
description: exceptional circumstances
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
note: Application must be in writing and specify exceptional circumstances.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ap-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19AP Release on licence

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be in writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify exceptional circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: SPECIFY

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AP(3) Release on licence

19AP(4) Release on licence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
note: Attorney-General must be satisfied of exceptional circumstances before granting a licence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ap-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 19AP Release on licence

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General must be satisfied of exceptional circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AP(4) Release on licence

19AP(4A) Release on licence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
note: Attorney-General may have regard to extensive cooperation by the person with law enforcement agencies before or after sentencing.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-4a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ap-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 19AP Release on licence

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AP(4A) Release on licence

19AQ Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.265
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AQ(1) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
has part: 19AQ(2) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
has part: 19AQ(3) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
has part: 19AQ(4) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19aq
schema version: 2

19AQ(1) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.265
note: Revocation of parole order following further offence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19aq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AQ Parole order or licence revoked following further offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with parole period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (1) If a person to whom a parole order relates is sentenced...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes revocation time as relevant
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (1) If a person to whom a parole order relates is sentenced...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of parole order
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) If a person to whom a parole order relates is sentenced...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses revocation time across parole period
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (1) If a person to whom a parole order relates is sentenced...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Contains revocation time
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
premise text: (1) If a person to whom a parole order relates is sentenced...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AQ(1) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence

19AQ(2) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.265
note: Revocation of parole licence upon new offence conviction
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19aq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19AQ Parole order or licence revoked following further offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with sentence duration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (2) If a person to whom a licence relates is sentenced to life imprisonment...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of licence upon new offence conviction
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) If a person to whom a licence relates is sentenced...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Overlaps with sentence duration
modality: LTL
operator: Overlap
premise text: (2) If a person to whom a licence relates is sentenced to life imprisonment...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AQ(2) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence

19AQ(3) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.265
note: Revocation time for parole order or licence must be determined by court
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19aq-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19AQ Parole order or licence revoked following further offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) the time at which the court determines the new offence was most likely to have been committed;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for revocation times
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) the time at which the court determines the new offence was committed;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for revocation times
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (c) the time at which the court determines the new offence was most likely to have first begun to have been committed.

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revocation time determination
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) the time at which the court determines the new offence was most likely to have been committed;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for revocation times
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (a) the time at which the court determines the new offence was committed;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AQ(3) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence

19AQ(4) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.265
note: Person becomes liable to serve if parole order or licence is revoked
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19aq-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 19AQ Parole order or licence revoked following further offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person becomes liable to serve
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The parole order or licence revocation and the person becoming liable to serve occur at the same time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (4) If the parole order or licence relating to a person is taken to have been revoked under subsection (1) or (2),

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person becomes liable to serve
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the parole order or licence is revoked, then the person becomes liable to serve
modality: Deontic
operator: →
premise text: (4) If the parole order or licence relating to a person is taken to have been revoked under subsection (1) or (2),

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person becomes liable to serve
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The person's parole order or licence revocation and the person becoming liable to serve are related by diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: ⊕
premise text: (4) If the parole order or licence relating to a person is taken to have been revoked under subsection (1) or (2),

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person becomes liable to serve
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: The person's parole order or licence is both revoked and the person becomes liable to serve
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ∧
premise text: (4) If the parole order or licence relating to a person is taken to have been revoked under subsection (1) or (2),

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person becomes liable to serve
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The person's parole order or licence revocation and the person becoming liable to serve are logically equivalent
modality: LTL
operator: <→>
premise text: (4) If the parole order or licence relating to a person is taken to have been revoked under subsection (1) or (2),

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AQ(4) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence

19AR Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.266
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AR(1) Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
has part: 19AR(3) Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
has part: 19AR(4) Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ar
schema version: 2

19AR(1) Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.266
note: Court must fix a single new non-parole period in respect of the new sentence or sentences and the outstanding sentence or sentences having regard to the total period of imprisonment that the person is liable to serve.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ar-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AR Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must fix a single new non-parole period.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AR(1) Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken

19AR(3) Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.266
note: Court must not make a recognizance release order when imposing new sentence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ar-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19AR Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must not make a recognizance release order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AR(3) Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken

19AR(4) Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.266
note: A court may decline to fix a non-parole period if certain conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ar-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 19AR Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to fix a non-parole period
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to decline fixing a non-parole period
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Court discretion

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AR(4) Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken

19AS Court to issue warrant of detention where person required to
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.268
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AS(1) Court to issue warrant of detention where person required to
has part: 19AS(2) Court to issue warrant of detention where person required to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19as
schema version: 2

19AS(1) Court to issue warrant of detention where person required to
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.268
note: Court must issue warrant of detention for parole or licence revocation
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19as-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AS Court to issue warrant of detention where person required to

crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must issue warrant of detention
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) If...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AS(1) Court to issue warrant of detention where person required to

19AS(2) Court to issue warrant of detention where person required to
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.268
note: Director of Public Prosecutions may apply for warrant if court fails to issue one.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19as-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19AS Court to issue warrant of detention where person required to

crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court's decision on the warrant occurs after this
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The application for warrant must occur before the court's decision on the warrant
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
premise text: The Director of Public Prosecutions applies for a warrant

crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: With this classification, we can reason about their obligations
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifying the Director of Public Prosecutions as a legal person with an obligation to apply for a warrant
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
premise text: The Director of Public Prosecutions is a legal person

crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Director of Public Prosecutions may apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply for warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Court fails to issue warrant

crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Then the Director of Public Prosecutions may apply for a warrant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: If the court fails to issue a warrant, then the Director of Public Prosecutions may apply
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: The court fails to issue a warrant

crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court's decision on the warrant occurs after this
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The application for warrant must occur before the court's decision on the warrant
modality: LTL
operator: before
premise text: The Director of Public Prosecutions applies for a warrant

crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AS(2) Court to issue warrant of detention where person required to

19AT What happens when later conviction is quashed?
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.269
note: Revocation of parole order or licence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19at-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19at-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19at
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-19at-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revoking parole order or licence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) Where...

19AU Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.271
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AU(1) Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
has part: 19AU(2) Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
has part: 19AU(3) Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19au
schema version: 2

19AU(1) Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.271
note: Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19au-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AU Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence

crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with parole period or licence period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: Revocation may occur before the end of the parole period or licence period.

crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation must specify the condition that was breached or is suspected of having been breached.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revocation without specified conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obliges Attorney-General to revoke parole order or licence under specified conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
premise text: The Attorney-General may, by instrument in writing, revoke a parole order or licence at any time before the end of the parole period or licence period:

crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AU(1) Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence

19AU(2) Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
type: Concept
description: Notice in the prescribed form
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.271
note: The Attorney-General must notify the person to whom the order or licence relates of certain conditions before revoking it.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19au-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19AU Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence

crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General must provide notice before revoking a parole order or licence.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AU(2) Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence

19AU(3) Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.271
note: Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence under certain circumstances.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19au-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19AU Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence

crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General has the power to revoke parole order or licence.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AU(3) Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence

19AV Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AV(1) Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
has part: 19AV(2) Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
has part: 19AV(3) Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19av
schema version: 2

19AV(1) Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272
note: Constable may arrest person whose parole order or licence revoked by Attorney-General.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19av-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AV Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by

crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AV(1) Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by

19AV(2) Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272
note: The Attorney-General or Director of Public Prosecutions may apply for a warrant to arrest a person whose parole order or licence has been revoked.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19av-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19AV Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by

crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AV(2) Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by

19AV(3) Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272
note: Must be brought before a prescribed authority after arrest.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19av-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19AV Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by

crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to be brought before a prescribed authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AV(3) Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by

19AW Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AW(1) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
has part: 19AW(2) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
has part: 19AW(3) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
has part: 19AW(3A) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
has part: 19AW(4) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19aw
schema version: 2

19AW(1) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272
note: Revocation of parole or licence requires notification and warrant.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19aw-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AW Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must fix a non-parole period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for non-parole period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (f) subject to subsections (3) and (3A), fixing a non-parole period in respect of the outstanding sentence or sentences.

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must issue a warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on revoking parole or licence without notification.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) that the person is the person named in that revocation order;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must issue a warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on taking a person to prison without warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (d) authorising any constable to take the person to a specified prison;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must fix a non-parole period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on detaining a person in prison without fixing a non-parole period.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (e) directing that the person be detained in prison;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must fix a non-parole period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on releasing a person from parole or licence without fixing a non-parole period.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (f) subject to subsections (3) and (3A), fixing a non-parole period;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AW(1) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation

19AW(2) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272
note: Authority must issue warrant for remand pending hearing completion.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19aw-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19AW Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant must be issued within a certain timeframe.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for warrant issuance
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) If the prescribed authority cannot complete the hearing under subsection (1) immediately...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prescribed authority must issue a warrant for the remand of the person in custody pending completion of the hearing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If the prescribed authority cannot complete the hearing under subsection (1) immediately...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prescribed authority has the power to issue a warrant.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority to issue warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If the prescribed authority cannot complete the hearing under subsection (1) immediately...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person in custody must be remanded within a certain timeframe.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for remand
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) If the prescribed authority cannot complete the hearing under subsection (1) immediately...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AW(2) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation

19AW(3) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272
note: Authority not required to fix non-parole period under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19aw-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19AW Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: authority not required
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority exempt from fixing non-parole period due to serious breach.
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: serious nature of the breach

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AW(3) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation

19AW(3A) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272
note: Authority must consider parole period before revoking parole order or licence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19aw-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 19AW Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority MUST have regard to the period of time spent by the person on parole or licence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Authority must consider parole period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (3A) Before fixing a non-parole period under paragraph (1)(f)...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority MUST have regard to the period of time spent by the person on parole or licence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority must consider parole period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3A) Before fixing a non-parole period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority MUST have regard to the period of time spent by the person on parole or licence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority must consider parole period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3A) Before fixing a non-parole period under paragraph (1)(f)...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority MUST have regard to the period of time spent by the person on parole or licence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Authority must consider parole period.
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: (3A) Before fixing a non-parole period under paragraph (1)(f)...

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AW(3A) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation

19AW(4) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
type: Concept
description: Particulars of unserved sentence parts and non-parole period (if applicable)
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272
note: Authority must specify particulars of unserved sentence parts in warrant.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19aw-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 19AW Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority must specify particulars
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AW(4) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation

19AX Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.274
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AX(1) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
has part: 19AX(2) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
has part: 19AX(3) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
has part: 19AX(4) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
has part: 19AX(5) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
has part: 19AX(6) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ax
schema version: 2

19AX(1) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.274
note: Notify Attorney-General of person brought before prescribed authority
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ax-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AX Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Immediate notification is a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AX(1) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation

19AX(2) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
type: Concept
description: written submission within 14 days
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.274
note: Notify person of parole order or licence revocation and request written submission.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ax-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19AX Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify and request written submission.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AX(2) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation

19AX(3) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.274
note: Notify prescribed authority of decision not to rescind revocation order within 14 days.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ax-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19AX Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision not to rescind revocation order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: State must notify prescribed authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AX(3) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation

19AX(4) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
type: Concept
description: Decision on revocation order
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.274
note: The Attorney-General must decide on a written submission within 14 days of revocation notification.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ax-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 19AX Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must decide.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to decide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AX(4) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation

19AX(5) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.274
note: Must notify prescribed authority of revocation decision.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ax-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 19AX Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AX(5) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation

19AX(6) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.274
note: Notify prescribed authority of revocation decision to authorize warrant issuance.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ax-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 19AX Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorize warrant issuance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Prescribed authority notified of revocation decision.

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AX(6) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation

19AY Appeals in respect of warrants issued under
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.275
note: Right to appeal against warrant issuance, calculation of unserved sentence, or fixing of non-parole period.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ay-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ay-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19ay
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ay-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has the right to appeal.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ay-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 19AY Appeals in respect of warrants issued under

19AZ Evidence before prescribed authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.277
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AZ(1) Evidence before prescribed authority
has part: 19AZ(2) Evidence before prescribed authority
has part: 19AZ(3) Evidence before prescribed authority
has part: 19AZ(4) Evidence before prescribed authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19az
schema version: 2

19AZ(1) Evidence before prescribed authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.277
note: Must appear before prescribed authority Authority may administer oath or affirmation for evidence purposes.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19az-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AZ Evidence before prescribed authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to appear
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority obligation to administer oath or affirmation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AZ(1) Evidence before prescribed authority

19AZ(2) Evidence before prescribed authority
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.277
note: Must produce document or article to prescribed authority. Authority may summon a person to give evidence and produce documents.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19az-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19AZ Evidence before prescribed authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority may summon a person.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AZ(2) Evidence before prescribed authority

19AZ(3) Evidence before prescribed authority
type: Concept
description: True
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.277
note: A summons under this section shall be served in the same manner as a summons to a witness to appear before a court of summary jurisdiction in the State or Territory where the summons under this section is issued. Refusal to provide evidence under prescribed authority is penalized.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19az-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19AZ Evidence before prescribed authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to serve summons in a specific manner.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AZ(3) Evidence before prescribed authority

19AZ(4) Evidence before prescribed authority
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.277
note: No obligation to provide evidence if reasonable excuse exists.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19az-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 19AZ Evidence before prescribed authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AZ(4) Evidence before prescribed authority

19B Discharge of offenders without proceeding to conviction
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.279
note: Court may dismiss or discharge charges under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19b
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court may, by order, dismiss the charge or charges in respect of which the court is so satisfied;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Discharge may occur during certain conditions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (i) the character, antecedents, age, health or mental condition of the person;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court may, by order, dismiss the charge or charges in respect of which the court is so satisfied;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May dismiss charges
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: (i) the character, antecedents, age, health or mental condition of the person;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court may, by order, dismiss the charge or charges in respect of which the court is so satisfied;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May discharge charges under certain conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: (ii) the extent (if any) to which the offence is of a trivial nature; or (iii) the extent (if any) to which the offence was committed under extenuating circumstances;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court may, by order, dismiss the charge or charges in respect of which the court is so satisfied;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide security for discharge
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (d) discharge the person, without proceeding to conviction in respect of any charge referred to in paragraph (c), upon his or her giving security, with or without sureties, by recognizance;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court may, by order, dismiss the charge or charges in respect of which the court is so satisfied;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Discharge may occur until certain conditions are met
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (ii) the extent (if any) to which the offence is of a trivial nature; or (iii) the extent (if any) to which the offence was committed under extenuating circumstances;

crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19B Discharge of offenders without proceeding to conviction

20 Conditional release of offenders after conviction
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.282
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20(1) Conditional release of offenders after conviction
has part: 20(1A) Conditional release of offenders after conviction
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20
schema version: 2

20(1) Conditional release of offenders after conviction
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.282
note: Conditional release of offenders after conviction
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Conditional release of offenders after conviction

crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

20(1A) Conditional release of offenders after conviction
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.282
note: Prohibition on traveling interstate or overseas without permission
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Conditional release of offenders after conviction

crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During specified period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1A) Subject to subsection (1B), if the court specifies under paragraph (1)(a) or (b), as mentioned in subparagraph (1)(a)(iv), the condition that the person will, during the specified period:

crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: During specified period
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (1A) Subject to subsection (1B), if the court specifies under paragraph (1)(a) or (b), as mentioned in subparagraph (1)(a)(iv), the condition that the person will, during the specified period:

crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids travel without permission
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: During specified period
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (1A) Subject to subsection (1B), if the court specifies under paragraph (1)(a) or (b), as mentioned in subparagraph (1)(a)(iv), the condition that the person will, during the specified period:

crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: During specified period
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1A) Subject to subsection (1B), if the court specifies under paragraph (1)(a) or (b), as mentioned in subparagraph (1)(a)(iv), the condition that the person will, during the specified period:

crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(1A) Conditional release of offenders after conviction

20A Failure to comply with condition of discharge or release
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.285
note: Failure to comply with condition of discharge or release obligation
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20a
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Magistrate may issue a summons directing the person to appear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Failure to comply with condition of discharge or release during specified time period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Subsection 19B(1) and subsection 20(1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Magistrate may issue a summons directing the person to appear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Failure to comply with condition of discharge or release if information is laid on oath
modality: CogAI
operator: if
premise text: Subsection 19B(1) and subsection 20(1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Magistrate may issue a summons directing the person to appear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with condition of discharge or release
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Subsection 19B(1) and subsection 20(1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Magistrate may issue a summons directing the person to appear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Failure to comply with condition of discharge or release if information is laid on oath
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: Subsection 19B(1) and subsection 20(1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Magistrate may issue a summons directing the person to appear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Failure to comply with condition of discharge or release during specified time period
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Subsection 19B(1) and subsection 20(1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20A Failure to comply with condition of discharge or release

20AA Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.290
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20AA(1) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
has part: 20AA(2) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
has part: 20AA(3) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
has part: 20AA(4) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
has part: 20AA(5) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
has part: 20AA(6) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20aa
schema version: 2

20AA(1) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.290
note: Any person may apply to the court for discharge or variation of recognizance.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20AA Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Anyone can apply for discharge or variation of recognizance.
modality: Deontic
operator: anyoneCanApply

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20AA(1) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance

20AA(2) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.290
note: Court may discharge recognizance under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20AA Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Discharge recognizance
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May discharge recognizance
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: Notice given and conduct unnecessary

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20AA(2) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance

20AA(3) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.290
note: Court may vary terms of recognizance
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20aa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20AA Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Duration overlap established
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Variation overlaps with original recognizance duration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (a) by extending or reducing the duration of the recognizance;

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Variation permitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court permits variation of recognizance terms
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Notice given as required by subsections (5) or (6)

20AA(4) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.290
note: Court cannot extend recognizance duration beyond specified periods.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20aa-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 20AA Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court action is prohibited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20AA(4) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance

20AA(5) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.290
note: Authorized person must serve notice on surety or probation officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20aa-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 20AA Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice to surety or probation officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20AA(5) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance

20AA(6) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.290
note: Notice must be served on the Director of Public Prosecutions or Director of Legal Services in a specific manner.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20aa-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 20AA Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notice must be served on the Director of Public Prosecutions or Director of Legal Services.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to serve notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The person making the application shall cause notice...

20AB Additional sentencing alternatives
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.293
note: Court may pass sentence or make order in respect of federal offence if certain conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ab-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ab-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20ab
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ab-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has the power to pass sentence or make order.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ab-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20AB Additional sentencing alternatives

20AC Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.296
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20AC(1) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
has part: 20AC(2) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
has part: 20AC(3) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
has part: 20AC(4) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
has part: 20AC(5) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
has part: 20AC(6) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20ac
schema version: 2

20AC(1) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.296
note: Failure to comply with sentence or order under subsection 20AB(1) is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20ac-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20AC Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the provisions of the laws of a State or Territory that apply...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of failure to comply with sentence or order
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) In this section, the applied provisions...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20AC(1) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under

20AC(2) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.296
note: Failure to comply with sentence or order may result in summons or warrant.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20ac-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20AC Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Failure to comply may result in summons or warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with sentence or order.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Sentence or order has been passed or made.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Magistrate may issue summons or warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission for magistrate to issue summons or warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: Information is laid before magistrate.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20AC(2) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under

20AC(3) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.296
note: Failure to comply with summons or bail condition
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20ac-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20AC Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...issue a warrant for the apprehension of the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits failure to comply with summons or bail condition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) Where: ...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...issue a warrant for the apprehension of the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies that failure to comply with summons or bail condition leads to warrant issuance
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (3) Where: ...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20AC(3) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under

20AC(4) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.296
note: Detention of person until release by court order or subsection (5) order
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20ac-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 20AC Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Detention obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20AC(4) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under

20AC(5) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.296
note: Person must appear before court on specified date and time after being admitted to bail.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20ac-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 20AC Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to appear before court
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20AC(5) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under

20AC(6) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.296
note: Failure to comply with sentence or order may impose a pecuniary penalty.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20ac-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 20AC Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must comply with the sentence or order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with sentence or order.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: The court may impose a pecuniary penalty.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20AC(6) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under

20B Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.300
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20B(1) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
has part: 20B(2) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
has part: 20B(3) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
has part: 20B(4) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
has part: 20B(5) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
has part: 20B(6) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
has part: 20B(7) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20b
schema version: 2

20B(1) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.300
note: Must refer proceedings to court if person's fitness is raised
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20B Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to the court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must refer proceedings to court
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The magistrate must refer the proceedings.

20B(2) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.300
note: Court must remit proceedings to magistrate if person is deemed fit for trial.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20B Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The remittal of proceedings occurs between these two entities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Remittal occurs between the court and the magistrate
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The court has jurisdiction over the case, but must remit proceedings to the magistrate

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court's obligation to remit proceedings follows from the fact that the person is deemed fit for trial and the need to respond accordingly
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Remittal is a response to the person's fitness for trial
modality: Argumentation
operator: ⇒
premise text: If the person is deemed fit for trial, then the court must remit proceedings as a response

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proceedings must be remitted to magistrate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation to remit proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Court has jurisdiction over the case

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The remittal of proceedings has implications for the actions of other courts and authorities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Remittal spreads to other courts and authorities
modality: Diffusion
operator: ⇒
premise text: The court's obligation to remit proceedings implies that this action will be taken by other courts and authorities

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court's obligation to remit proceedings follows from the fact that the person is deemed fit for trial
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Court obligation implies remittal
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
premise text: If the person is deemed fit for trial, then the court must remit proceedings

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20B(2) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be

20B(3) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.300
note: Court must determine if prima facie case has been established for unfit person to be tried.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20B Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if prima facie case has been established
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Court must determine

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20B(3) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be

20B(4) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.300
note: Magistrate may order detention in prison or hospital for a reasonable period.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 20B Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate may order detention.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20B(4) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be

20B(5) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.300
note: Court may order detention for a person unfit to be tried.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 20B Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20B(5) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be

20B(6) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.300
note: Establishes prima facie case for trial based on evidence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20b-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 20B Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidence provides sufficient grounds within the scope of subsection (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Within the scope of subsection (3)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: Subsection (3) applies to this context

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Duty to put person on trial
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implies a duty to put person on trial
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: Prima facie case established

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to put person on trial
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes prima facie case
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
premise text: Evidence provides sufficient grounds for trial

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20B(6) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be

20B(7) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.300
note: Person may give evidence or make an unsworn statement in proceedings.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20b-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 20B Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Person may give evidence or make an unsworn statement.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20B(7) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be

20BA Upon determining prima facie case, court to dismiss charge or
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.301
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BA(1) Upon determining prima facie case, court to dismiss charge or
has part: 20BA(2) Upon determining prima facie case, court to dismiss charge or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20ba
schema version: 2

20BA(1) Upon determining prima facie case, court to dismiss charge or
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.301
note: Court must dismiss charge and order release if prima facie case not established.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20ba-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BA Upon determining prima facie case, court to dismiss charge or

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court must, by order, dismiss the charge against the person and, if the person is in custody, order the release of the person from custody.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between prima facie case determination and dismissal.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (1) Where the court determines that there has not been established a prima facie case that the person committed the offence, the court must, by order, dismiss the charge against the person...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court must, by order, dismiss the charge against the person and, if the person is in custody, order the release of the person from custody.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Dismissal implies release.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) Where the court determines that there has not been established a prima facie case that the person committed the offence, the court must, by order, dismiss the charge against the person...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court must, by order, dismiss the charge against the person and, if the person is in custody, order the release of the person from custody.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must dismiss charge and order release.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (1) Where the court determines that there has not been established a prima facie case that the person committed the offence, the court must, by order, dismiss the charge against the person...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court must, by order, dismiss the charge against the person and, if the person is in custody, order the release of the person from custody.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval until dismissal.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (1) Where the court determines that there has not been established a prima facie case that the person committed the offence, the court must, by order, dismiss the charge against the person...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BA(1) Upon determining prima facie case, court to dismiss charge or

20BA(2) Upon determining prima facie case, court to dismiss charge or
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.301
note: Court must dismiss charge or take further action if prima facie case is established.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20ba-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BA Upon determining prima facie case, court to dismiss charge or

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Dismiss charge or take further action
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must take action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Prima facie case established

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BA(2) Upon determining prima facie case, court to dismiss charge or

20BB Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.302
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BB(1) Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
has part: 20BB(2) Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
has part: 20BB(3) Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bb
schema version: 2

20BB(1) Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.302
note: Court must determine if person is suffering from a mental illness and objects to being detained in a hospital.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BB Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court MUST determine...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must determine
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BB(1) Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12

20BB(2) Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.302
note: Court must order person to be taken and detained in a hospital or another place.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BB Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must order person to be taken and detained.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BB(2) Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12

20BB(3) Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.302
note: Continue proceedings if person becomes fit to be tried within 12 months after finding unfit.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20BB Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the proceedings on the indictment must be continued as soon as practicable; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of 12 months.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
premise text: (3) Where a court determines, under subsection 20BA(4), that a person charged with a federal offence who was found unfit to be tried will become fit to be tried within 12 months after that finding...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the proceedings on the indictment must be continued as soon as practicable; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continue proceedings as soon as practicable.
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUE
premise text: (3) Where a court determines, under subsection 20BA(4), that a person charged with a federal offence who was found unfit to be tried will become fit to be tried within 12 months after that finding...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...those proceedings must be continued as soon as practicable as if they had not been so referred.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continue proceedings as soon as practicable.
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUE
premise text: (3) Where a court determines, under subsection 20BA(4), that a person charged with a federal offence who was found unfit to be tried will become fit to be tried within 12 months after that finding...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...those proceedings must be continued as soon as practicable as if they had not been so referred.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of person becoming fit to be tried.
modality: LTL
operator: RECURRING
premise text: (3) Where a court determines, under subsection 20BA(4), that a person charged with a federal offence who was found unfit to be tried will become fit to be tried within 12 months after that finding...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BB(3) Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12

20BC Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.305
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BC(1) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
has part: 20BC(2) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
has part: 20BC(3) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
has part: 20BC(4) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bc
schema version: 2

20BC(1) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.305
note: Court must determine if person is suffering from mental illness and objects to hospital detention.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BC Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must determine
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) Where a court determines...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BC(1) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12

20BC(2) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.305
note: Court must order person to be detained in a hospital or prison for a specified period.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BC Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must order person to be detained.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) Where a court has made a determination under subsection (1), the court must:

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must order person to be detained in a hospital or prison.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) Where a court has made a determination under subsection (1), the court must: (a) if the court has determined that the person is suffering from a mental illness, or a mental condition, for which treatment is available in a hospital and that the person does not object to being detained in a hospital—order that the person be taken to and detained in a hospital, or continue to be detained in a hospital, as the case requires; or

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BC(2) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12

20BC(3) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.305
note: Attorney-General may vary hospital or place of detention
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20BC Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General has the power to vary hospital or place of detention
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BC(3) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12

20BC(4) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
type: Concept
description: Notification to Attorney-General
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.305
note: Notify Attorney-General of variation in detention place and reason for variation.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bc-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 20BC Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between notification and variation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notification required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BC(4) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12

20BD Review by Attorney-General
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.306
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BD(1) Review by Attorney-General
has part: 20BD(2) Review by Attorney-General
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bd
schema version: 2

20BD(1) Review by Attorney-General
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.306
note: The Attorney-General must review the detention of a person every 6 months.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BD Review by Attorney-General

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to review detention
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

20BD(2) Review by Attorney-General
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.306
note: Attorney-General must consider reports from psychiatrists and psychologists when deciding to release a person from detention.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-epistemic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BD Review by Attorney-General

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must obtain and consider reports from psychiatrists and psychologists.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General has an obligation to consider reports from psychiatrists and psychologists.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about the release of federal offenders.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must take into account any representations made to the Attorney-General by the person or on the person's behalf.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General has an obligation to take into account representations made by the person or on their behalf.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about the release of federal offenders.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General may obtain and consider such other reports as the Attorney-General considers necessary.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General may obtain and consider additional reports as necessary.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about the release of federal offenders.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-epistemic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General ought to obtain and consider a report from a duly qualified psychiatrist or psychologist.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Attorney-General ought to consider reports from psychiatrists and psychologists based on their expertise.
modality: Epistemic
operator: OUGHT_TO
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about the release of federal offenders.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must take into account any representations made to the Attorney-General by the person or on the person's behalf at some point in time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Attorney-General must take into account representations made by the person or on their behalf within a certain timeframe.
modality: LTL
operator: AT
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about the release of federal offenders.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BD(2) Review by Attorney-General

20BE Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.307
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BE(1) Attorney-General may order release
has part: 20BE(2) Attorney-General may order release
has part: 20BE(3) Attorney-General may order release
has part: 20BE(4) Attorney-General may order release
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20be
schema version: 2

20BE(1) Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.307
note: Attorney-General may order release of a person from detention.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20be-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BE Attorney-General may order release

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BE(1) Attorney-General may order release

20BE(2) Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.307
note: The Attorney-General must not order a person's release from detention unless satisfied the person is not a threat or danger.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20be-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BE Attorney-General may order release

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Release is ordered within a specified temporal interval after Attorney-General's satisfaction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between Attorney-General's satisfaction and ordering of release.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: Attorney-General must be satisfied before ordering release.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Attorney-General must not order release unless satisfied person is not a threat or danger.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on ordering release without satisfaction of conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: Attorney-General must order release only if person is not a threat or danger.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Attorney-General must satisfy conditions before ordering release.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on Attorney-General to ensure conditions are met before ordering release.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Attorney-General has authority to order release.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Release is ordered until a specified temporal interval after Attorney-General's satisfaction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between Attorney-General's satisfaction and ordering of release.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: Attorney-General must be satisfied before ordering release.

20BE(3) Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.307
note: Attorney-General must order release in writing with specified conditions and duration.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20be-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20BE Attorney-General may order release

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General must order release
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BE(3) Attorney-General may order release

20BE(4) Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.307
note: Conditions for release order
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20be-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 20BE Attorney-General may order release

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State obligation to specify conditions for release order
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BE(4) Attorney-General may order release

20BF Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.308
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BF(1) Release order may be revoked
has part: 20BF(2) Release order may be revoked
has part: 20BF(3) Release order may be revoked
has part: 20BF(4) Release order may be revoked
has part: 20BF(5) Release order may be revoked
has part: 20BF(6) Release order may be revoked
has part: 20BF(7) Release order may be revoked
has part: 20BF(8) Release order may be revoked
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bf
schema version: 2

20BF(1) Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.308
note: Revocation of release order
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BF Release order may be revoked

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of release order
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BF(1) Release order may be revoked

20BF(2) Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.308
note: Attorney-General must make enquiries before revoking a release order.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BF Release order may be revoked

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General must make enquiries before revoking a release order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BF(2) Release order may be revoked

20BF(3) Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.308
note: Revocation of release order requires arrest without warrant or warrant application.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20BF Release order may be revoked

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of release order without arrest warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) Where a release order in relation to a person is revoked:

20BF(4) Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.308
note: A person arrested must be brought before a prescribed authority as soon as practicable.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bf-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 20BF Release order may be revoked

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Time frame for bringing before authority is specified
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for bringing before authority
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: Person must be brought before authority within a certain time frame

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority's decision has implications for person's rights
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Authority's decision affects person's rights
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: Person's rights depend on being brought before authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: System is designed to manage arrests and bring before authorities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: System for managing arrests and bringing before authorities
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: System has a duty to manage arrests and bring before authorities

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to bring before authority
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to bring before authority
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Arrested person must be brought before authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information about arrest and bringing before authority is relevant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information about arrest and bringing before authority
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: Person's information is subject to duty to be brought before authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BF(4) Release order may be revoked

20BF(5) Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.308
note: Revocation of release order requires warrant and detention direction.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bf-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 20BF Release order may be revoked

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the period of detention under subsection 20BC(2) as had not elapsed at the time of the making of the release order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for revocation of release order.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (5) Subject to subsection (6), where a prescribed authority in a State or Territory before whom a person is brought under subsection (4) is satisfied that...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority must issue a warrant: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of release order without warrant and detention direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) Subject to subsection (6), where a prescribed authority in a State or Territory before whom a person is brought under subsection (4) is satisfied that...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority must issue a warrant: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on prescribed authority to issue warrant and detention direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (5) Subject to subsection (6), where a prescribed authority in a State or Territory before whom a person is brought under subsection (4) is satisfied that...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the warrant: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal trace for revocation of release order.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (5) Subject to subsection (6), where a prescribed authority in a State or Territory before whom a person is brought under subsection (4) is satisfied that...

20BF(6) Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.308
note: Authority may issue warrant for remand pending hearing completion
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bf-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 20BF Release order may be revoked

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority may issue a warrant for the remand of the person in a prison or hospital in the State or Territory pending completion of the hearing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for warrant issuance
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (6) If the prescribed authority in the State or Territory before whom the person is brought under subsection (4) cannot complete the hearing under subsection (5) immediately...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority may issue a warrant for the remand of the person in a prison or hospital in the State or Territory pending completion of the hearing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Incorporates AI reasoning in warrant issuance
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
premise text: (6) If the prescribed authority in the State or Territory before whom the person is brought under subsection (4) cannot complete the hearing under subsection (5) immediately...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority may issue a warrant for the remand of the person in a prison or hospital in the State or Territory pending completion of the hearing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits issuing warrant without hearing completion
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (6) If the prescribed authority in the State or Territory before whom the person is brought under subsection (4) cannot complete the hearing under subsection (5) immediately...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority may issue a warrant for the remand of the person in a prison or hospital in the State or Territory pending completion of the hearing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses responsibility for warrant issuance
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (6) If the prescribed authority in the State or Territory before whom the person is brought under subsection (4) cannot complete the hearing under subsection (5) immediately...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority may issue a warrant for the remand of the person in a prison or hospital in the State or Territory pending completion of the hearing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal trace for warrant issuance
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (6) If the prescribed authority in the State or Territory before whom the person is brought under subsection (4) cannot complete the hearing under subsection (5) immediately...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BF(6) Release order may be revoked

20BF(7) Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.308
note: The Attorney-General may revoke a release order in writing.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bf-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 20BF Release order may be revoked

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for revocation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (7) The Attorney-General may, at any time, by order in writing, vary the prison or hospital at which a person is detained under this section.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Attorney-General's ability to revoke
modality: Argumentation
operator: can
premise text: (7) The Attorney-General may, at any time, by order in writing, vary the prison or hospital at which a person is detained under this section.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Attorney-General's ability to process information
modality: CogAI
operator: can
premise text: (7) The Attorney-General may, at any time, by order in writing, vary the prison or hospital at which a person is detained under this section.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General's power to revoke
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Attorney-General's ability to diffuse information
modality: Diffusion
operator: can
premise text: (7) The Attorney-General may, at any time, by order in writing, vary the prison or hospital at which a person is detained under this section.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BF(7) Release order may be revoked

20BF(8) Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
description: Reasons for variation
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.308
note: Notify Attorney-General of variation in detention facility
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bf-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 20BF Release order may be revoked

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BF(8) Release order may be revoked

20BG Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BG(1) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
has part: 20BG(2) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
has part: 20BG(3) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bg
schema version: 2

20BG(1) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
note: Attorney-General must reconsider detention of persons taken back every 6 months.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BG Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must, while the person is in detention, reconsider the matter at least once...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Regular review every 6 months.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: ...at least once in each period of 6 months after the initial consideration.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must reconsider the matter at least once in each period of 6 months after the initial consideration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Attorney-General's duty to review detention decisions.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Duty
premise text: (1) Where, under subsection 20BF(5), a prescribed authority directs that a person be detained...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must reconsider the matter at least once in each period of 6 months after the initial consideration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regular review of detention decisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Reconsideration Obligation
premise text: (1) Where, under subsection 20BF(5), a prescribed authority directs that a person be detained...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must reconsider the matter at least once in each period of 6 months after the initial consideration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General's duty to review detention decisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) Where, under subsection 20BF(5), a prescribed authority directs that a person be detained...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must reconsider the matter at least once in each period of 6 months after the initial consideration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Regular review every 6 months.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (1) Where, under subsection 20BF(5), a prescribed authority directs that a person be detained...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BG(1) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back

20BG(2) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
note: Applicability of subsections to reconsideration
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BG Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back

20BG(3) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
note: Amends subsection 20BE(1) to reference this section instead of subsection 20BD(1)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bg-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20BG Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back

20BH State or Territory mental health authorities to be notified of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
note: Notify mental health authorities of proposed release
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bh-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bh-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bh
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BI(1) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
has part: 20BI(2) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
has part: 20BI(3) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
has part: 20BI(4) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
has part: 20BI(5) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
has part: 20BI(6) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bi
schema version: 2

20BI(1) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
note: Right to appeal against unfitness to be tried
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bi-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a jury finds that the accused is unfit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) This section applies if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BI(1) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be

20BI(2) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
note: Appeal against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bi-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BI(2) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be

20BI(3) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
note: Allow appeal if finding is unreasonable or unsupported by evidence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bi-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court must allow the appeal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must allow appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court must allow the appeal if the finding is unreasonable or cannot be supported
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must allow appeal if finding is unreasonable or unsupported by evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal must allow...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court must allow the appeal if there was a miscarriage of justice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must allow appeal if there was a miscarriage of justice
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal must allow...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court must set aside the finding if the order is wrong on law
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must set aside finding if order is wrong on law
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal must allow...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court must set aside the finding if it is unreasonable or cannot be supported by evidence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must set aside finding if it is unreasonable or cannot be supported by evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal must allow...

20BI(4) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
note: Must dismiss appeal
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bi-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Court of Appeal MUST dismiss the appeal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to dismiss appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) Otherwise, the Court of Appeal must dismiss the appeal.

20BI(5) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
note: Court of Appeal may dismiss appeal if no substantial miscarriage of justice has occurred.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bi-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May dismiss appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: may

20BI(6) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
note: The accused may be tried for the federal offence if the appeal is allowed.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bi-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the accused may be tried for the federal offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision applies to the period during which the appeal is allowed.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (6) If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the accused may be tried for the federal offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allowing the appeal imposes an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
premise text: (6) If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Court of Appeal may make orders for the custody or bail of the accused.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Court of Appeal may make orders for the custody or bail of the accused.
modality: Deontic
operator: make orders
premise text: (6) If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the accused may be tried for the federal offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The provision diffuses the obligation to try the accused if the appeal is allowed.
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: (6) If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the accused may be tried for the federal offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The provision applies to the period during which the appeal is allowed.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (6) If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BI(6) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be

20BJ Acquittal where person mentally ill
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.313
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BJ(1) Acquittal where person mentally ill
has part: 20BJ(2) Acquittal where person mentally ill
has part: 20BJ(3) Acquittal where person mentally ill
has part: 20BJ(4) Acquittal where person mentally ill
has part: 20BJ(5) Acquittal where person mentally ill
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bj
schema version: 2

20BJ(1) Acquittal where person mentally ill
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.313
note: Court order to detain acquitted person in safe custody
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BJ Acquittal where person mentally ill

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must order detention
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BJ(1) Acquittal where person mentally ill

20BJ(2) Acquittal where person mentally ill
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.313
note: Authority to vary detention facility
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BJ Acquittal where person mentally ill

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority to act
modality: Deontic
operator: May

20BJ(3) Acquittal where person mentally ill
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.313
note: Officer may vary detention facility under urgent medical or security reasons.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bj-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20BJ Acquittal where person mentally ill

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permissive action
modality: Deontic
operator: May

20BJ(4) Acquittal where person mentally ill
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.313
note: Court may order release from custody under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bj-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 20BJ Acquittal where person mentally ill

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BJ(4) Acquittal where person mentally ill

20BJ(5) Acquittal where person mentally ill
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.313
note: Condition for acquittal where person mentally ill
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bj-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 20BJ Acquittal where person mentally ill

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory condition for acquittal
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The conditions may include:

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BJ(5) Acquittal where person mentally ill

20BK Review by Attorney-General
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.314
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BK(1) Review by Attorney-General
has part: 20BK(2) Review by Attorney-General
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bk
schema version: 2

20BK(1) Review by Attorney-General
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.314
note: Attorney-General must reconsider detention after 6 months.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BK Review by Attorney-General

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Release decision made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Attorney-General weighs release options.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Reasoning about release
premise text: Person is detained.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Attorney-General must reconsider.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regular review of detention decisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Reconsideration Obligation
premise text: Court orders detention.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Attorney-General must consider release.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Initial consideration and periodic reviews.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Uncertainty about release
premise text: Person is detained.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Reconsideration required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Regular reviews after 6 months.
modality: LTL
operator: Periodic review
premise text: Initial consideration made.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BK(1) Review by Attorney-General

20BK(2) Review by Attorney-General
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.314
note: Attorney-General must consider reports and representations when deciding to release a person from custody.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bk-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BK Review by Attorney-General

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must obtain and consider reports from a duly qualified psychiatrist or psychologist within a certain timeframe.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Attorney-General must consider reports within a certain timeframe.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about custody releases.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must obtain and consider relevant reports.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General has an obligation to consider reports and representations.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about custody releases.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must consider any representations made to them.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General has an obligation to take into account representations made by the person or on their behalf.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about custody releases.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General may obtain and consider other reports as necessary.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General has permission to obtain and consider additional reports.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about custody releases.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must consider reports from a duly qualified psychiatrist or psychologist, but also other reports as necessary.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Attorney-General's decision-making process involves considering multiple reports.
modality: LTL
operator: BUT
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about custody releases.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BK(2) Review by Attorney-General

20BL Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.314
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BL(1) Attorney-General may order release
has part: 20BL(2) Attorney-General may order release
has part: 20BL(3) Attorney-General may order release
has part: 20BL(4) Attorney-General may order release
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bl
schema version: 2

20BL(1) Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.314
note: Attorney-General may order release of a person from custody.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bl-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BL Attorney-General may order release

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BL(1) Attorney-General may order release

20BL(2) Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.314
note: Attorney-General must not order release unless satisfied the person is no threat or danger.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bl-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BL Attorney-General may order release

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Attorney-General must not order release.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: Attorney-General must order release.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BL(2) Attorney-General may order release

20BL(3) Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.314
note: Attorney-General may not order release without written order and specified conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bl-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20BL Attorney-General may order release

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of release without written order
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BL(3) Attorney-General may order release

20BL(4) Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.314
note: Conditions for release order
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bl-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 20BL Attorney-General may order release

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify conditions for release order
modality: Deontic
operator: may specify

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BL(4) Attorney-General may order release

20BM Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.315
note: Revocation of release order
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bm
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of release order revocation
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Release order may be revoked

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation of release order is permitted under certain conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to revoke release order under certain conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: The Attorney-General may revoke the release order

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to comply with the condition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with conditions of release order
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The person concerned must comply with the condition

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation occurs until the release order is no longer in force
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between revocation and release order
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: The revocation takes effect while the release order remains in force

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BM Release order may be revoked

20BN Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.317
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BN(1) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
has part: 20BN(2) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
has part: 20BN(3) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bn
schema version: 2

20BN(1) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.317
note: Attorney-General must reconsider detention of persons taken back every 6 months.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BN Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must reconsider the matter at least once in each period of 6 months...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: 6-month review period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: ...once in each period of 6 months after the initial consideration.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must reconsider the matter at least once in each period of 6 months after the initial consideration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regular review of detention decisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Reconsideration Obligation
premise text: (1) Where, under subsection 20BM(5), a prescribed authority directs that a person be detained...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must consider (in this section called the initial consideration)...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General's discretion to release or detain.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (1) Where, under subsection 20BM(5), a prescribed authority directs that a person be detained...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must reconsider the matter at least once in each period of 6 months after the initial consideration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General's duty to reconsider detention decisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) Where, under subsection 20BM(5), a prescribed authority directs that a person be detained...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must reconsider the matter at least once in each period of 6 months after the initial consideration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Regular review of detention decisions.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (1) Where, under subsection 20BM(5), a prescribed authority directs that a person be detained...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BN(1) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back

20BN(2) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.317
note: Applicability of subsections to reconsideration under subsection (1)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BN Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Relation between initial consideration and reconsideration under subsection (1)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: requires relation between temporal intervals
premise text: (2) Subsection 20BK(2) and, subject to the modification in subsection (3), section 20BL

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsections apply
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability of subsections to reconsideration under subsection (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
premise text: (2) Subsection 20BK(2) and, subject to the modification in subsection (3), section 20BL

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ordered trace required
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Ordered trace required for reconsideration under subsection (1)
modality: LTL
operator: requires ordered trace
premise text: (2) Subsection 20BK(2) and, subject to the modification in subsection (3), section 20BL

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BN(2) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back

20BN(3) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.317
note: Attorney-General must review detention of persons taken back
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bn-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20BN Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to review detention
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BN(3) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back

20BP State or Territory authorities to be notified of certain releases
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.318
note: Notify mental health authorities of proposed release
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bp-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bp-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bp
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

20BQ Person suffering from mental illness or intellectual disability
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.319
note: Court may dismiss charge and discharge person into care or on condition for assessment/treatment.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bq-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bq-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bq
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may dismiss charge and discharge person.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bq-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BQ Person suffering from mental illness or intellectual disability

20BR Means by which court may be informed
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.320
note: Court may inform itself as it thinks fit, but not to require self-incrimination.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20br-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20br-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20br-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20br
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20br-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may inform itself
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-20br-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Informing itself is permissible
modality: Epistemic
operator: Can

20BS Hospital orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.321
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BS(1) Hospital orders
has part: 20BS(2) Hospital orders
has part: 20BS(3) Hospital orders
has part: 20BS(4) Hospital orders
has part: 20BS(5) Hospital orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bs
schema version: 2

20BS(1) Hospital orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.321
note: Court may order detention in a hospital for treatment of mental illness
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bs-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BS Hospital orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court obligation to order detention in a hospital
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BS(1) Hospital orders

20BS(2) Hospital orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.321
note: Court cannot make hospital order unless person would have been imprisoned for mental illness.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bs-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BS Hospital orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person to a term of imprisonment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court cannot make hospital order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (2) A court must not...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the mental illness of the person, the court would have sentenced the person to a term of imprisonment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has an obligation to consider imprisonment before making a hospital order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) A court must not...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the mental illness of the person, the court would have sentenced the person to a term of imprisonment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court cannot make hospital order unless person would have been imprisoned for mental illness.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A court must not...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the mental illness of the person, the court would have sentenced the person to a term of imprisonment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has permission to make hospital order if person would not have been imprisoned for mental illness.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (2) A court must not...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the mental illness of the person, the court would have sentenced the person to a term of imprisonment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Person has a right to be considered for imprisonment before making a hospital order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
premise text: (2) A court must not...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BS(2) Hospital orders

20BS(3) Hospital orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.321
note: Court cannot specify a period of detention longer than the imprisonment term.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bs-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20BS Hospital orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person would have been sentenced...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court cannot specify a period of detention.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (3) A court must not...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BS(3) Hospital orders

20BS(4) Hospital orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.321
note: Court may fix lesser period of detention during which person is not eligible to be released from hospital.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bs-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 20BS Hospital orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may impose obligation on state.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BS(4) Hospital orders

20BS(5) Hospital orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.321
note: Court must obtain information before forming opinion on a person.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bs-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 20BS Hospital orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to inform
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to obtain information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Court must obtain information before forming opinion.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BS(5) Hospital orders

20BT Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.322
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BT(1) Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
has part: 20BT(2) Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
has part: 20BT(3) Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bt
schema version: 2

20BT(1) Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.322
note: Attorney-General must obtain and consider reports of psychiatrists to determine release from detention.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bt-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BT Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General must perform action.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BT(1) Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders

20BT(2) Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.322
note: The Attorney-General must order release on conditions if reports recommend continued hospital treatment or a federal sentence remains.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bt-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BT Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must order release on conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to order release on conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Reports recommend continued hospital treatment or a federal sentence remains.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BT(2) Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders

20BT(3) Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.322
note: Sections 20BM and 20BN apply in relation to a person released from involuntary hospitalisation.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bt-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20BT Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sections 20BM and 20BN apply during the period of detention in a hospital specified in the order under subsection 20BS(1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the release from hospitalisation and the application of sections 20BM and 20BN.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The person is released from involuntary hospitalisation by order under subsection (2).

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sections 20BM and 20BN apply in relation to the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application of sections 20BM and 20BN to a person released from involuntary hospitalisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
premise text: Sections 20BM and 20BN apply in relation to a person released from involuntary hospitalisation by order under subsection (2).

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sections 20BM and 20BN apply to the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application of sections 20BM and 20BN to a person released from involuntary hospitalisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
premise text: The references in each of those sections to detention in a prison or a hospital were references only to detention in a hospital.

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sections 20BM and 20BN apply to the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application of sections 20BM and 20BN to a specific context.
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
premise text: The reference in subsection 20BM(5) to the period of detention in safe custody under subsection 20BJ(1) were a reference to the period of detention in a hospital specified in the order under subsection 20BS(1).

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sections 20BM and 20BN apply during the period of detention in a hospital specified in the order under subsection 20BS(1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the release from hospitalisation and the application of sections 20BM and 20BN.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: The person is released from involuntary hospitalisation by order under subsection (2).

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BT(3) Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders

20BU Discharge of hospital orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.323
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BU(1) Discharge of hospital orders
has part: 20BU(2) Discharge of hospital orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bu
schema version: 2

20BU(1) Discharge of hospital orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.323
note: Discharge of hospital orders
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bu-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bu-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BU Discharge of hospital orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bu-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BU(1) Discharge of hospital orders

20BU(2) Discharge of hospital orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.323
note: Court must be satisfied before discharging a hospital order.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bu-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bu-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BU Discharge of hospital orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to satisfy court's satisfaction before discharging hospital order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BU(2) Discharge of hospital orders

20BV Psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.324
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BV(1) Psychiatric probation orders
has part: 20BV(2) Psychiatric probation orders
has part: 20BV(3) Psychiatric probation orders
has part: 20BV(4) Psychiatric probation orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bv
schema version: 2

20BV(1) Psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.324
note: A court may make a psychiatric probation order for a person convicted of a federal offence if they are suffering from a mental illness and consent to the treatment.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bv-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BV Psychiatric probation orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The person's mental illness contributed to the commission of the offence by the person
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a psychiatric probation order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The court may make an order
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a psychiatric probation order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The court must make an order if certain conditions are met
modality: Deontic
operator: must

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BV(1) Psychiatric probation orders

20BV(2) Psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.324
note: Court must obtain consent before making psychiatric probation orders.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bv-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BV Psychiatric probation orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...consent to the proposed treatment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to obtain consent
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Court must not make an order unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person, or the person’s legal guardian, consents to the proposed treatment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on state to obtain consent
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The court must not make an order unless...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BV(2) Psychiatric probation orders

20BV(3) Psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.324
note: Probation order conditions
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bv-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20BV Psychiatric probation orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Probation order obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BV(3) Psychiatric probation orders

20BV(4) Psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.324
note: Court may vary treatment under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bv-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 20BV Psychiatric probation orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies possibility of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BV(4) Psychiatric probation orders

20BW Breach of psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.325
note: Magistrate may take action if person fails to comply with condition of order.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bw-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bw-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bw
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate may take action.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bw-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BW Breach of psychiatric probation orders

20BX Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.327
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BX(1) Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
has part: 20BX(2) Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
has part: 20BX(3) Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bx
schema version: 2

20BX(1) Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.327
note: Court may impose pecuniary penalty, discharge order, revoke order, or take no action if person fails to comply with condition of psychiatric probation order.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bx-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BX Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person may be subject to pecuniary penalty
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposition of pecuniary penalty
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Court has authority to impose penalties

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order may be discharged
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Discharge of order
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Court has authority to discharge orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order may be revoked
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Revocation of order
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Court has authority to revoke orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BX(1) Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders

20BX(2) Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.327
note: Court must consider order made when dealing with person
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bx-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BX Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court must take into account the fact that the order was made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Court must deal with person under subsection (1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BX(2) Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders

20BX(3) Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.327
note: Rights of appeal for dealing with an offender under psychiatric probation orders
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bx-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20BX Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person has such rights of appeal in respect of the way in which the person was dealt with for that offence as the person would have if...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Appeal rights apply during the period of psychiatric probation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) Where a person who has been released in accordance with an order under section 20BV is dealt with under subsection (1) for the offence in respect of which the order was made...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person has such rights of appeal in respect of the way in which the person was dealt with for that offence as the person would have if...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Appeal rights are recognized by AI systems
modality: CogAI
operator: everywhere
premise text: (3) Where a person who has been released in accordance with an order under section 20BV is dealt with under subsection (1) for the offence in respect of which the order was made...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person has such rights of appeal in respect of the way in which the person was dealt with for that offence as the person would have if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Person has rights of appeal for dealing with the offender
modality: Deontic
operator: has right to
premise text: (3) Where a person who has been released in accordance with an order under section 20BV is dealt with under subsection (1) for the offence in respect of which the order was made...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person has such rights of appeal in respect of the way in which the person was dealt with for that offence as the person would have if...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Appeal rights diffuse to all relevant authorities
modality: Diffusion
operator: everywhere
premise text: (3) Where a person who has been released in accordance with an order under section 20BV is dealt with under subsection (1) for the offence in respect of which the order was made...

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person has such rights of appeal in respect of the way in which the person was dealt with for that offence as the person would have if...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Appeal rights apply everywhere during the period of psychiatric probation
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: (3) Where a person who has been released in accordance with an order under section 20BV is dealt with under subsection (1) for the offence in respect of which the order was made...

20BY Program probation orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.328
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20BY(1) Program probation orders
has part: 20BY(2) Program probation orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20by
schema version: 2

20BY(1) Program probation orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.328
note: Court may order release on condition of undertaking education program or treatment.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20by-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20by-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20BY Program probation orders

20BY(2) Program probation orders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.328
note: Applicability of program probation orders
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20by-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20by-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20BY Program probation orders

crimes-act-1914-sec-20by-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20BY(2) Program probation orders

20BZ Definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.329
note: Definitions for authorized officer and relevant person.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bz-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bz-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bz-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20bz
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bz-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Lists individuals and organizations with specific roles.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bz-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines classes of persons.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass

20C Offences by children and young persons
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.334
note: Child or young person charged with an offence may be tried and punished as if the offence were against a law of the State or Territory.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20c-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20c
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-20c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20C Offences by children and young persons

21B Reparation for offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.334
curation status: Proposed
has part: 21B(1) Reparation for offences
has part: 21B(2) Reparation for offences
has part: 21B(3) Reparation for offences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21b
schema version: 2

21B(1) Reparation for offences
type: Concept
description: Reparation to the Commonwealth or a public authority, by way of money payment or otherwise
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.334
note: Reparation for federal offences
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 21B Reparation for offences

crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make reparation
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21B(1) Reparation for offences

21B(2) Reparation for offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.334
note: No imprisonment for failure to pay order
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 21B Reparation for offences

crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Payment implies no imprisonment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imprisonment implies payment
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies

crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21B(2) Reparation for offences

21B(3) Reparation for offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.334
note: Reparation for offences
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 21B Reparation for offences

crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repayment obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) Where...

crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21B(3) Reparation for offences

21D Prerogative of mercy and other Commonwealth laws unaffected
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.335
curation status: Proposed
has part: 21D(1) Prerogative of mercy and other Commonwealth laws unaffected
has part: 21D(2) Prerogative of mercy and other Commonwealth laws unaffected
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21d
schema version: 2

21D(1) Prerogative of mercy and other Commonwealth laws unaffected
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.335
note: Nothing in this Part affects the Governor-General's power of mercy.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21d-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 21D Prerogative of mercy and other Commonwealth laws unaffected

crimes-act-1914-sec-21d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Nothing in this Part affects the Governor-General's power of mercy.
modality: Deontic
operator: Affects

crimes-act-1914-sec-21d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21D(1) Prerogative of mercy and other Commonwealth laws unaffected

21D(2) Prerogative of mercy and other Commonwealth laws unaffected
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.335
note: No effect on other laws regarding offender release
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21d-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 21D Prerogative of mercy and other Commonwealth laws unaffected

crimes-act-1914-sec-21d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No effect on other laws regarding offender release
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation negation
modality: Deontic
operator: does not affect
premise text: (2) This Part does not affect the operation of any other law...

crimes-act-1914-sec-21d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21D(2) Prerogative of mercy and other Commonwealth laws unaffected

21F Prescribed authorities and parole officers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.335
curation status: Proposed
has part: 21F(1) Prescribed authorities and parole officers
has part: 21F(2) Prescribed authorities and parole officers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21f
schema version: 2

21F(1) Prescribed authorities and parole officers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.335
note: The Governor-General may arrange with other authorities to perform certain functions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21f-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 21F Prescribed authorities and parole officers

crimes-act-1914-sec-21f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Other authorities must perform certain functions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the Governor-General
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: The Governor-General may arrange with other authorities.

21F(2) Prescribed authorities and parole officers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.335
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21f-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 21F Prescribed authorities and parole officers

22 Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.336
curation status: Proposed
has part: 22(1) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
has part: 22(2) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
has part: 22(3) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
has part: 22(4) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
has part: 22(5) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
has part: 22(6) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
has part: 22(7) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22
schema version: 2

22(1) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.336
note: Court may order a person to do certain things after conviction of serious drug offence or prescribed offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between obligation and actions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) Where a court makes a relevant order or passes a relevant sentence in respect of a person charged with, or convicted of:

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Describes the relationship between obligation and actions
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (1) Where a court makes a relevant order or passes a relevant sentence in respect of a person charged with, or convicted of:

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes the recognition of obligation by AI system
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (1) Where a court makes a relevant order or passes a relevant sentence in respect of a person charged with, or convicted of:

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the spread of obligation to others
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (1) Where a court makes a relevant order or passes a relevant sentence in respect of a person charged with, or convicted of:

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(1) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders

22(2) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.336
note: Court may specify duration of order
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court may specify duration of order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court specifies duration
modality: Deontic
operator: specifies
premise text: Order has effect during specified period

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(2) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders

22(3) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.336
note: Court may revoke or vary certain orders.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(3) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders

22(4) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
type: Concept
description: copy of the order
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.336
note: Court must notify Secretary of Department administered by Minister administering Australian Passports Act 2005 of order
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(4) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders

22(5) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.336
note: Australian travel document must be given to the Registrar or other appropriate officer of the court.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide Australian travel document
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(5) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders

22(6) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.336
note: Return of Australian travel document upon request
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to return document
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(6) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders

22(7) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.336
note: Court may impose conditions on certain offenders
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies relevant order and sentence
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has part

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(7) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders

22A State orders relating to Australian travel documents
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.338
curation status: Proposed
has part: 22A(1) State orders relating to Australian travel documents
has part: 22A(2) State orders relating to Australian travel documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22a
schema version: 2

22A(1) State orders relating to Australian travel documents
type: Concept
description: Australian travel document
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.338
note: Must surrender Australian travel document to court upon order.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 22A State orders relating to Australian travel documents

crimes-act-1914-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide Australian travel document
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-22a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22A(1) State orders relating to Australian travel documents

22A(2) State orders relating to Australian travel documents
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.338
note: Investigation of Commonwealth offences
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 22A State orders relating to Australian travel documents

crimes-act-1914-sec-22a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22A(2) State orders relating to Australian travel documents

23 Outline of this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.339
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23(1) Outline of this Part
has part: 23(2) Outline of this Part
has part: 23(3) Outline of this Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23
schema version: 2

23(1) Outline of this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.339
note: Imposes obligations on investigating officials.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Outline of this Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on investigating officials
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (b) imposes obligations on investigating officials in relation to: (i) people arrested for Commonwealth offences; and (ii) certain other people who are being investigated for Commonwealth offences;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on investigating officials (ii)
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (b) imposes obligations on investigating officials in relation to: (ii) certain other people who are being investigated for Commonwealth offences;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on investigating officials (i)
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (b) imposes obligations on investigating officials in relation to: (i) people arrested for Commonwealth offences;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23(1) Outline of this Part

23(2) Outline of this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.339
note: No power to arrest a person
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Outline of this Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits arresting a person
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, this Part does not confer any power to arrest a person.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23(2) Outline of this Part

23(3) Outline of this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.339
note: Only a person arrested for a Commonwealth offence may be detained under this Part.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Outline of this Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Detained under this Part during the arrest
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval: ArrestedForOffence -> DetentionUnderThisPart
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Person arrested for a Commonwealth offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Arrested for a Commonwealth offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Detention under this Part implies being arrested for a Commonwealth offence
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: Person detained under this Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: May be detained under this Part
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
premise text: Person arrested for a Commonwealth offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23(3) Outline of this Part

23A Application of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.339
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23A(1) Application of Part
has part: 23A(2) Application of Part
has part: 23A(3) Application of Part
has part: 23A(4) Application of Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23a
schema version: 2

23A(1) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.339
note: No effect on laws inconsistent with this Part
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23A Application of Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents inconsistent laws from applying
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) Any law of the Commonwealth...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23A(1) Application of Part

23A(2) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.339
note: Law of a State or Territory can operate concurrently with this Part.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23A Application of Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Concurrent operation allowed
modality: Deontic
operator: can

23A(3) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.339
note: Law of a State or Territory includes such a law that is given a particular application by a law of the Commonwealth.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23A Application of Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: such a law that is given a particular application by a law of the Commonwealth.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion relation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: Law of a State or Territory

crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: given a particular application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Particular application relation
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasApplication
premise text: Law of the Commonwealth

crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23A(3) Application of Part

23A(4) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.339
note: Electronic recording of confessional required for laws of a State or Territory
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23A Application of Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires electronic recording of confessional
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

23AA How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.340
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23AA(1) How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
has part: 23AA(2) How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
has part: 23AA(3) How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23aa
schema version: 2

23AA(1) How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.340
note: This Part applies in relation to a person as if they were arrested on arrival in a State or Territory.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23AA How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision applies during the period of arrest.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlap between arrest and application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Overlap
premise text: (b) the person was brought, while under arrest, to the State or Territory;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision applies to the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application of the provision to a person
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: (1) This Part applies in relation to a person as if he or she were arrested on arrival in a State or Territory.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision applies in the specified state or territory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application of the provision in a state or territory
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: (c) this Part applies in the State or Territory.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision affects the person's rights and duties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application of the provision to a person's rights and duties
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: (1) This Part applies in relation to a person as if he or she were arrested on arrival in a State or Territory.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision imposes obligations on the state or territory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application of the provision to a state or territory's obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: (c) this Part applies in the State or Territory.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23AA(1) How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories

23AA(2) How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.340
note: This Part applies in relation to a person as if he or she first became a protected suspect on arrival in a State or Territory.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23AA How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: this Part applies
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the person was a protected suspect within the Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands, then this Part applies.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (a) the person was a protected suspect within the Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: this Part applies
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the person travelled, while a protected suspect, to the State or Territory, then this Part applies.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (b) the person travelled, while a protected suspect, to the State or Territory;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: this Part applies
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If this Part applies in the State or Territory, then this Part applies in relation to a person as if he or she first became a protected suspect on arrival in a State or Territory.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: this Part applies in the State or Territory;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23AA(2) How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories

23AA(3) How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.340
note: This Part does not apply within the Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23aa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23AA How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval: Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: (3) This Part does not otherwise apply within the Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: No cognitive AI application
modality: CogAI
operator: does not apply
premise text: (3) This Part does not otherwise apply within the Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: does not apply
premise text: (3) This Part does not otherwise apply within the Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Does not diffuse to other sections
modality: Diffusion
operator: does not diffuse
premise text: (3) This Part does not otherwise apply within the Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal logic: Does not hold within the specified intervals
modality: LTL
operator: does not hold
premise text: (3) This Part does not otherwise apply within the Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23AA(3) How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories

23B Definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.341
note: Defines terms for Aboriginal legal assistance organisation, arrested person, and authorising officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-descriptionlogic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23b
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines terms for Aboriginal legal assistance organisation, arrested person, and authorising officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (Aboriginal legal assistance organisation) = (an organisation that is funded by the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory to provide legal assistance to Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders.)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines terms for Aboriginal legal assistance organisation
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: (Aboriginal legal assistance organisation means an organisation that is funded by the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory to provide legal assistance to Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders.)

crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (arrested: a person is arrested if: (a) the person is arrested for a Commonwealth offence; and (b) the person’s arrest has not ceased under subsection (3) or (4); and (c) the person has not been released.)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines terms for arrested person
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: (arrested: a person is arrested if: (a) the person is arrested for a Commonwealth offence; and (b) the person’s arrest has not ceased under subsection (3) or (4); and (c) the person has not been released.)

crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (authorising officer, in relation to an investigating official, means: (a) if the investigating official is a member or special member of the Australian Federal Police—a person for the time being holding office or acting as: (i) the Commissioner; or (ii) a Deputy Commissioner; or (iii) a member or special member of the Australian Federal Police who is of the rank of superintendent or higher; or (b) if the investigating official is a member of the police force of a State or Territory—a person for the time being holding office or acting as: (i) the Commissioner or the person holding equivalent rank; or (ii) an Assistant Commissioner or a person holding equivalent rank; or (iii) a superintendent or a person holding equivalent rank; of the police force of that State or Territory.)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines terms for authorising officer
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: (authorising officer, in relation to an investigating official, means: (a) if the investigating official is a member or special member of the Australian Federal Police—a person for the time being holding office or acting as: (i) the Commissioner; or (ii) a Deputy Commissioner; or (iii) a member or special member of the Australian Federal Police who is of the rank of superintendent or higher; or (b) if the investigating official is a member of the police force of a State or Territory—a person for the time being holding office or acting as: (i) the Commissioner or the person holding equivalent rank; or (ii) an Assistant Commissioner or a person holding equivalent rank; or (iii) a superintendent or a person holding equivalent rank; of the police force of that State or Territory.)

crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (Commonwealth offence) = (...)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines term for Commonwealth offence
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: (Commonwealth offence means: ...)

23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23C(1) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
has part: 23C(2) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
has part: 23C(2A) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
has part: 23C(3) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
has part: 23C(4) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
has part: 23C(5) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
has part: 23C(6) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
has part: 23C(6A) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
has part: 23C(7) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23c
schema version: 2

23C(1) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
note: Provisions apply if arrested for a Commonwealth offence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: provisions apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: arrested for a Commonwealth offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23C(1) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence

23C(2) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
note: Person may be detained for investigation of Commonwealth offences
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to detain
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23C(2) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence

23C(2A) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
note: Cessation of subsection (2) at the end of investigation period
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-2a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23c-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence

23C(3) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
note: Must be brought before a bail authority within the investigation period or as soon as practicable after.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Must be brought before bail authority within the investigation period or as soon as practicable after
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
premise text: (3) If the person is not released within the investigation period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Must be brought before bail authority within the investigation period or as soon as practicable after
modality: CogAI
operator: ⊆
premise text: (3) If the person is not released within the investigation period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be brought before a bail authority
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) If the person is not released within the investigation period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Must be brought before bail authority within the investigation period or as soon as practicable after
modality: Diffusion
operator: ⊆
premise text: (3) If the person is not released within the investigation period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must be brought before a bail authority
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: If not released, must be brought before bail authority
modality: LinearLogic
operator: →
premise text: (3) If the person is not released within the investigation period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23C(3) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence

23C(4) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
note: Investigation period begins when arrested and ends at a reasonable time, not exceeding 2 hours for minors or 4 hours in other cases.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence

23C(5) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
note: Consider complexity of matters when ascertaining time for investigation purposes.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23c-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the number and complexity of matters being investigated during the investigation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Complexity is a temporal property.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (5) In ascertaining any period of time for the purposes of this section,

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the number and complexity of matters being investigated during the investigation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Complexity is a temporal property.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (5) In ascertaining any period of time for the purposes of this section,

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: regard shall be had to the number and complexity of matters being investigated.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consideration of complexity is obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: regard
premise text: (5) In ascertaining any period of time for the purposes of this section,

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the number and complexity of matters being investigated during the investigation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Complexity is a temporal property.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (5) In ascertaining any period of time for the purposes of this section,

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the number and complexity of matters being investigated during the investigation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Complexity is a temporal property.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (5) In ascertaining any period of time for the purposes of this section,

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23C(5) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence

23C(6) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
note: Reduction of investigation period for repeated arrests within 48 hours
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23c-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits repeated arrests within 48 hours
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (6) If the person has been arrested more than once...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23C(6) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence

23C(6A) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
note: Disregard subsection (6) for any later arrest if certain conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-logic-linearlogic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23c-ss-6a
schema version: 2
part of: 23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (6) should be disregarded.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disregard subsection (6)
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The state is obligated to disregard subsection (6) for any later arrest if certain conditions are met.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (6) may be disregarded.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disregard subsection (6)
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: The state is permitted to disregard subsection (6) for any later arrest if certain conditions are met.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (6) and Obligation to disregard subsection (6) are true.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Conjunction: Subsection (6) and Obligation to disregard subsection (6)
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Conjunction
premise text: Subsection (6) is a subclass of Obligation to disregard subsection (6).

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (6) or Obligation to disregard subsection (6) are true.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Disjunction: Subsection (6) or Obligation to disregard subsection (6)
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Disjunction
premise text: Subsection (6) is a subclass of Obligation to disregard subsection (6).

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23C(6A) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence

23C(7) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
note: Disregard reasonable time for questioning suspension or delay
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23c-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...disregard any reasonable time...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disregard time
modality: Deontic
operator: Ignore
premise text: (7) In ascertaining any period of time...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23C(7) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence

23D Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.349
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23D(1) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
has part: 23D(2) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
has part: 23D(3) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
has part: 23D(4) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23d
schema version: 2

23D(1) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.349
note: Application for extension of investigation period may be made.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23D Application may be made for extension of investigation period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply for extension
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23D(1) Application may be made for extension of investigation period

23D(2) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.349
note: Application must be made before the magistrate.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23D Application may be made for extension of investigation period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The application must be made before the magistrate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be done
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23D(2) Application may be made for extension of investigation period

23D(3) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
description: yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.349
note: Application for extension of investigation period must include certain statements.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23D Application may be made for extension of investigation period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23D(3) Application may be made for extension of investigation period

23D(4) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.349
note: No information is required if disclosure is likely
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23D Application may be made for extension of investigation period

23DA Magistrate may extend investigation period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.350
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23DA(1) Magistrate may extend investigation period
has part: 23DA(2) Magistrate may extend investigation period
has part: 23DA(3) Magistrate may extend investigation period
has part: 23DA(4) Magistrate may extend investigation period
has part: 23DA(5) Magistrate may extend investigation period
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23da
schema version: 2

23DA(1) Magistrate may extend investigation period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.350
note: Magistrate may extend investigation period for a serious Commonwealth offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23da-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23DA Magistrate may extend investigation period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate may extend investigation period
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: (1) This section applies if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DA(1) Magistrate may extend investigation period

23DA(2) Magistrate may extend investigation period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.350
note: Magistrate may extend investigation period under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23da-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23DA Magistrate may extend investigation period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Further detention necessary during investigation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during investigation period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate may extend investigation period
modality: Deontic
operator: may

23DA(3) Magistrate may extend investigation period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.350
note: Magistrate may extend investigation period
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23da-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23DA Magistrate may extend investigation period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Extension period is specified

23DA(4) Magistrate may extend investigation period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.350
note: Disclosure of certain information is not required.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23da-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23DA Magistrate may extend investigation period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DA(4) Magistrate may extend investigation period

23DA(5) Magistrate may extend investigation period
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.350
note: Must provide a copy of the instrument to the investigating official.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23da-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23DA Magistrate may extend investigation period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of the instrument.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

23DB Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.352
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23DB(1) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
has part: 23DB(2) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
has part: 23DB(3) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
has part: 23DB(4) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
has part: 23DB(5) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
has part: 23DB(6) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
has part: 23DB(7) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
has part: 23DB(8) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23db
schema version: 2

23DB(1) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.352
note: Provisions apply if arrested for a terrorism offence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23db-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23DB Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: provisions apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: arrested for a terrorism offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DB(1) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence

23DB(2) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.352
note: Person may be detained for investigation of terrorism offence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23db-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23DB Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DB(2) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence

23DB(3) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.352
note: Cessation of subsection (2) at the end of investigation period does not affect other powers to detain.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23db-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23DB Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence

23DB(4) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.352
note: Must be brought before a bail authority within the investigation period or as soon as practicable after.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23db-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23DB Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval between release and investigation end is between 0 and the investigation period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between release and investigation end
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (4) If it is not practicable to do so within the investigation period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must be brought before a bail authority.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be brought before a bail authority
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) If the person is not released within the investigation period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must be brought as soon as practicable after the end of the investigation period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be brought as soon as practicable after the end of the investigation period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) If it is not practicable to do so within the investigation period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must be brought before a bail authority or as soon as practicable after.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be brought before a bail authority or as soon as practicable after
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) If the person is not released within the investigation period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval between release and investigation end is between 0 and the investigation period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval between release and investigation end
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (4) If it is not practicable to do so within the investigation period...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DB(4) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence

23DB(5) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.352
note: Investigation period duration after arrest for terrorism offence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23db-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23DB Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence

23DB(6) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.352
note: Consider complexity of matters when ascertaining time periods.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23db-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 23DB Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider complexity
modality: Deontic
operator: regard

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DB(6) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence

23DB(7) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.352
note: Reduction of investigation period for repeated arrests within 48 hours
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23db-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 23DB Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...within that 48 hours:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Reduction applies to temporal intervals within 48 hours
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) any earlier investigation period or periods under section 23C.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the investigation period for each arrest other than the first is reduced by so much of any of the following periods as occurred within that 48 hours:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Reduction applies to repeated arrests with similar characteristics
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (7) If the person has been arrested more than once within any period of 48 hours...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the investigation period for each arrest other than the first is reduced...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reduces investigation period for repeated arrests
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (7) If the person has been arrested more than once within any period of 48 hours...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the investigation period for each arrest other than the first is reduced by so much of any of the following periods as occurred within that 48 hours:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Reduction applies to repeated arrests within a short time frame
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (7) If the person has been arrested more than once within any period of 48 hours...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the investigation period for each arrest other than the first is reduced by so much of any of the following periods as occurred within that 48 hours:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Reduction applies until the end of the 48-hour period
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (7) If the person has been arrested more than once within any period of 48 hours...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DB(7) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence

23DB(8) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.352
note: Disregard subsection (7) for any later arrest if certain conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23db-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 23DB Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for any later arrest if:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disregard subsection (7)
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (8) However, in relation to each first arrest...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DB(8) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence

23DC Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.356
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23DC(1) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
has part: 23DC(2) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
has part: 23DC(3) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
has part: 23DC(4) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
has part: 23DC(5) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23dc
schema version: 2

23DC(1) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.356
note: Suspension or delay of questioning may be specified during an investigation into a terrorism offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23dc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23DC Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The period during which suspension or delay of questioning may be applied starts when the person is arrested and ends when the investigation is completed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval during which suspension or delay of questioning may be applied.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an investigation is being conducted into whether the person committed that terrorism offence or another terrorism offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state must specify the period during which suspension or delay of questioning may be applied because both conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Draws a conclusion based on the premises.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Therefore
premise text: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an investigation is being conducted into whether the person committed that terrorism offence or another terrorism offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state must specify the period during which suspension or delay of questioning may be applied.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to specify the period during which suspension or delay of questioning may be applied.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an investigation is being conducted into whether the person committed that terrorism offence or another terrorism offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation applies if both conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Specifies the conditions under which the obligation applies.
modality: Diffusion
operator: If
premise text: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an investigation is being conducted into whether the person committed that terrorism offence or another terrorism offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The period during which suspension or delay of questioning may not be applied starts when the investigation is completed and ends at the end of the relevant temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval until which suspension or delay of questioning may not be applied.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an investigation is being conducted into whether the person committed that terrorism offence or another terrorism offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DC(1) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

23DC(2) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.356
note: Specifies period for requesting a magistrate's extension of the investigation period.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23dc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23DC Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

23DC(3) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.356
note: Application must be authorized in writing by an authorizing officer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23dc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23DC Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorization is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Application must be authorized in writing by an authorizing officer.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorization from an authorizing officer is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization from an authorizing officer is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: Requires
premise text: The application must not be made unless the application is authorized, in writing, by an authorizing officer.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorization requirement imposed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposition of authorization requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Imposes
premise text: The application must not be made unless the application is authorized, in writing, by an authorizing officer.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorization requirement enforced.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enforcement of authorization requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Enforces
premise text: The application must not be made unless the application is authorized, in writing, by an authorizing officer.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorization guarantee provided.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Guarantee of authorization.
modality: Deontic
operator: Guarantees
premise text: The application must not be made unless the application is authorized, in writing, by an authorizing officer.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DC(3) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

23DC(4) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
description: yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.356
note: Application must include certain statements
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23dc-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23DC Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide application
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DC(4) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

23DC(5) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.356
note: No information must be included in the application if disclosure is likely to cause harm.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23dc-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23DC Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No obligation to disclose information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No information must be included in the application.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Disclosure of information is likely to cause harm.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DC(5) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

23DD Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.358
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23DD(1) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
has part: 23DD(2) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
has part: 23DD(3) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
has part: 23DD(4) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
has part: 23DD(5) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
has part: 23DD(6) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23dd
schema version: 2

23DD(1) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.358
note: Specifies period for suspension or delay of questioning in terrorism cases.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23dd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23DD Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies temporal interval for suspension or delay.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an application has been made under subsection 23DC(2) to a magistrate in respect of the person. Specification of period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes the specified period.
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an application has been made under subsection 23DC(2) to a magistrate in respect of the person. Specification of period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds true for the specified period.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an application has been made under subsection 23DC(2) to a magistrate in respect of the person. Specification of period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about the specified period.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an application has been made under subsection 23DC(2) to a magistrate in respect of the person. Specification of period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies end of temporal interval.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an application has been made under subsection 23DC(2) to a magistrate in respect of the person. Specification of period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DD(1) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

23DD(2) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.358
note: The magistrate may specify a period for suspension or delay of questioning.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23dd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23DD Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

23DD(3) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.358
note: Specify period, day and time of signing, and reasons for specifying the period.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23dd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23DD Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DD(3) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

23DD(4) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.358
note: Disclosure of certain information is not required.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23dd-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23DD Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DD(4) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

23DD(5) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
description: instrument, matters included in instrument
references: sec-23E
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.358
note: Magistrate must provide information to investigating official
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23dd-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23DD Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must provide information to investigating official
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of instrument and matters included in instrument
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

23DD(6) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.358
note: The investigating official must take a specific action.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23dd-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 23DD Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The investigating official must take the specified action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DD(6) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be

23DE Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.360
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23DE(1) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
has part: 23DE(2) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
has part: 23DE(3) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
has part: 23DE(4) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
has part: 23DE(5) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
has part: 23DE(6) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
has part: 23DE(7) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23de
schema version: 2

23DE(1) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.360
note: Application for extension of investigation period
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23de-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23DE Application may be made for extension of investigation period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DE(1) Application may be made for extension of investigation period

23DE(2) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.360
note: Application must be authorized in writing by an authorizing officer before making a request for extension of investigation period.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23de-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23DE Application may be made for extension of investigation period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be authorized in writing by an authorizing officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DE(2) Application may be made for extension of investigation period

23DE(3) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
description: yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.360
note: Application for extension of investigation period must include certain statements.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23de-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23DE Application may be made for extension of investigation period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DE(3) Application may be made for extension of investigation period

23DE(4) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.360
note: Application for extension of investigation period may be made under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23de-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23DE Application may be made for extension of investigation period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application for extension of investigation period may be made under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DE(4) Application may be made for extension of investigation period

23DE(5) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
description: yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.360
note: Investigating official must provide application copy and inform applicant of right to representation.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23de-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23DE Application may be made for extension of investigation period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide application copy and inform applicant of right to representation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DE(5) Application may be made for extension of investigation period

23DE(6) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.360
note: Official may remove information from application copy if it contains certain kinds of data.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23de-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 23DE Application may be made for extension of investigation period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Official may remove information from application copy.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DE(6) Application may be made for extension of investigation period

23DE(7) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.360
note: Allow person or legal representative to make representations to magistrate about application.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23de-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 23DE Application may be made for extension of investigation period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-7-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DE(7) Application may be made for extension of investigation period

23DF Magistrate may extend investigation period
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.361
note: Magistrate may extend investigation period for terrorism offence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23df
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...extend investigation period
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between arrest and application may be relevant
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...extend investigation period
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal interval between arrest and application may be relevant for CogAI analysis
modality: CogAI
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...extend investigation period
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate obligation to extend investigation period
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: (1) This section applies...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...extend investigation period
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval between arrest and application may be relevant for diffusion analysis
modality: Diffusion
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...extend investigation period
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval between arrest and application may be relevant for LTL analysis
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23DF Magistrate may extend investigation period

23E Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.363
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23E(1) Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
has part: 23E(2) Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
has part: 23E(3) Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23e
schema version: 2

23E(1) Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.363
note: Magistrate must inform investigating official of matters included in an instrument.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23E Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means

crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must inform investigating official.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23E(1) Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means

23E(2) Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
type: Concept
description: a form of the instrument with the name of the magistrate and particulars given by him or her
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.363
note: Investigating official must complete a form and forward it to the magistrate.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23E Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means

crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to complete a form and forward it to the magistrate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23E(2) Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means

23E(3) Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.363
note: Instrument with incorrect terms has no effect if not signed by magistrate
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23E Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means

crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits incorrect instrument from having effect
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

23F Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.365
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23F(1) Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
has part: 23F(2) Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
has part: 23F(3) Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23f
schema version: 2

23F(1) Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.365
note: Cautioning persons under arrest or protected suspects before questioning.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23F Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cautioning occurs before questioning.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between questioning and cautioning
modality: AllenInterval
operator: STARTS BEFORE
premise text: Questioning starts before the person is cautioned.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cautioning is obligatory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to caution
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Investigating official must question the person.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23F(1) Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects

23F(2) Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.365
note: Investigating official must inform person of caution in writing if most appropriate.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23F Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform person of caution.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Informing in writing is a subclass of informing.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23F(2) Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects

23F(3) Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.365
note: Exempts persons from answering questions under certain circumstances.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23F Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Exemptions overlap with other laws
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Another law requires the person to answer questions

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Exemptions are recognized in other laws
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: Another law requires the person to answer questions

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts persons from answering questions
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Another law requires the person to answer questions

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Exemptions diffuse in other laws
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Another law requires the person to answer questions

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Exemptions repeat in other laws
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: Another law requires the person to answer questions

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23F(3) Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects

23G Right to communicate with friend, relative and legal
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.365
note: Right to communicate with friend, relative and legal practitioner during questioning.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23g
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The investigating official must inform the person of their right to communicate with a friend or relative.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform the person of their right to communicate with a friend or relative.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 23G(1)(a)

crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The investigating official must defer questioning for a reasonable time to allow the person to make communication arrangements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must allow the person to make communication arrangements.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 23G(1)(b)

crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The investigating official must allow the person to arrange for a legal practitioner to be present during questioning.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must arrange for a legal practitioner to be present during questioning.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 23G(1)(b)

crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The investigating official must allow the person to choose their own legal practitioner.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must respect the person's choice of legal practitioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 23G(1)(b)

crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The investigating official must allow the person to make communication arrangements within a reasonable time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a reasonable time for communication arrangements.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 23G(1)(b)

crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The investigating official must allow the person to communicate with their chosen legal practitioner.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must respect the person's right to communicate with their legal practitioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 23G(1)(b)

crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23G Right to communicate with friend, relative and legal

23H Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.366
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23H(1) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
has part: 23H(1A) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
has part: 23H(2) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
has part: 23H(2A) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23h
schema version: 2

23H(1) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
type: Concept
description: Notification to representative of Aboriginal legal assistance organisation
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.366
note: Notify Aboriginal legal assistance organisation of person under arrest or protected suspect.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23H Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23H(1) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders

23H(1A) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.366
note: Official must not question Aboriginal person until notified representative has communicated or 2 hours have passed.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23h-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 23H Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the earlier of the following times: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: 2 hours have passed since representative was notified.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (1AB) If a representative of an Aboriginal legal assistance organisation is notified under subsection (1), the investigating official must not question the person until...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the earlier of the following times: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Official must not question Aboriginal person.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (1AB) If a representative of an Aboriginal legal assistance organisation is notified under subsection (1), the investigating official must not question the person until...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the earlier of the following times: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: 2 hours have passed since representative was notified.
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: (1AB) If a representative of an Aboriginal legal assistance organisation is notified under subsection (1), the investigating official must not question the person until...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23H(1A) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders

23H(2) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.366
note: Official must not question Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander without interview friend present.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23H Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Interview friend must be present before questioning.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (c) an interview friend is present while the person is being questioned and, before the start of the questioning...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Official must allow person to communicate with interview friend.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (c) an interview friend is present while the person is being questioned and, before the start of the questioning...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Official must not question Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) Subject to subsection (7) and section 23L, if an investigating official...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Person can waive right to have interview friend present.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (d) the person has expressly and voluntarily waived his or her right to have such a person present.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23H(2) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders

23H(2A) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.366
note: Right to choose an interview friend under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23h-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 23H Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exercise of the right occurs within this interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Exercise of the right must occur within a reasonable period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The person has a reasonable period to exercise the right

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: NaturalPerson can exercise this right
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to choose an interview friend
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
premise text: State grants this right

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Waiver of the right is not permitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Waiver of the right is not allowed
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: The person must exercise the right if they choose to do so

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State must ensure the chosen interview friend arrives within 2 hours
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State has an obligation to ensure the chosen interview friend arrives on time
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The state is responsible for ensuring the person's rights are respected

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Arrival of the chosen interview friend occurs within this interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Chosen interview friend must arrive within 2 hours
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: The person has a reasonable period to exercise the right

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 23H(2A) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders

23K Persons under 18
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.369
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23K(1) Persons under 18
has part: 23K(2) Persons under 18
has part: 23K(3) Persons under 18
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23k
schema version: 2

23K(1) Persons under 18
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.369
note: Official must have interview friend present when questioning a minor under 18.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23K Persons under 18

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Communication occurs during questioning.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Communication must occur during questioning.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: Questioning begins after allowing communication.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Official must have interview friend present.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Official must have interview friend present.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Interviewing a minor under 18.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23K(1) Persons under 18

23K(2) Persons under 18
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.369
note: Excluding an interview friend from questioning if they unreasonably interfere.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23K Persons under 18

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: [Unreasonable Interference] is a temporal interval for exclusion.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defining a temporal interval for exclusion based on unreasonable interference.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) An interview friend may be excluded from the questioning if he or she unreasonably interferes with it.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: [Exclusion] is represented by [Unreasonable Interference].
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Representing knowledge about exclusion based on unreasonable interference.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (2) An interview friend may be excluded from the questioning if he or she unreasonably interferes with it.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An interview friend may be excluded from the questioning if they unreasonably interfere.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to exclude an interview friend.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) An interview friend may be excluded from the questioning if he or she unreasonably interferes with it.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: [Exclusion] spreads to others through [Unreasonable Interference].
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describing how exclusion based on unreasonable interference spreads to others.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (2) An interview friend may be excluded from the questioning if he or she unreasonably interferes with it.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: [Unreasonable Interference] is a temporal trace.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defining a temporal trace for exclusion based on unreasonable interference.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (2) An interview friend may be excluded from the questioning if he or she unreasonably interferes with it.

23K(3) Persons under 18
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.369
note: Defines acceptable interviewers for a person under 18
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23k-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23K Persons under 18

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes obligation for interviewers
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: None

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
premise text: None

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23K(3) Persons under 18

23L Exceptions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.370
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23L(1) Exceptions
has part: 23L(2) Exceptions
has part: 23L(3) Exceptions
has part: 23L(4) Exceptions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23l
schema version: 2

23L(1) Exceptions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.370
note: Official exemption from requirement under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23L Exceptions

crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Official exemption from requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Reasonable grounds for believing non-compliance will result in harm to others.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Official's belief on reasonable grounds.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
premise text: The official believes on reasonable grounds that...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23L(1) Exceptions

23L(2) Exceptions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.370
note: Exceptions for application of subsection (1)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23L Exceptions

crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23L(2) Exceptions

23L(3) Exceptions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.370
note: Record of investigating official's grounds for belief must be made and complied with.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23l-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23L Exceptions

crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide record of grounds for belief
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23L(3) Exceptions

23L(4) Exceptions
type: Concept
description: Services of another legal practitioner
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.370
note: Offer services of another legal practitioner if communication or attendance is delayed.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23l-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23L Exceptions

crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State must offer services
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23L(4) Exceptions

23M Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.371
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23M(1) Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest
has part: 23M(2) Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest
has part: 23M(3) Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23m
schema version: 2

23M(1) Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.371
note: Informing a person under arrest of their whereabouts by relatives, friends or legal representatives.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23M Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest

crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23M(1) Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest

23M(2) Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.371
note: Must provide information to the other person unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23M Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest

crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory provision of information
modality: Deontic
operator: must

crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Investigating official's belief about the other person's relationship
modality: Epistemic
operator: believes
premise text: the investigating official believes on reasonable grounds that...

23M(3) Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.371
note: Section has effect subject to section 23L.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23m-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23M Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest

23N Right to interpreter
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.371
note: Right to interpreter for persons under arrest or protected suspects
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23n-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23n-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23n
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Right to interpreter exists
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right exists
modality: Deontic
operator: has right
premise text: Person under arrest or protected suspect has right to interpreter

crimes-act-1914-sec-23n-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 23N Right to interpreter

23P Right of non-Australian nationals to communicate with
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.372
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23P(1) Right of non-Australian nationals to communicate with
has part: 23P(2) Right of non-Australian nationals to communicate with
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23p
schema version: 2

23P(1) Right of non-Australian nationals to communicate with
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.372
note: Non-Australian nationals have right to communicate with consular office.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23P Right of non-Australian nationals to communicate with

crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she may communicate with, or attempt to communicate with, that consular office; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform non-Australian nationals of their right to communicate with consular office.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) Subject to section 23L, if a person who is under arrest or a protected suspect is not an Australian citizen...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...give the person reasonable facilities to do so; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide reasonable facilities for non-Australian nationals to communicate with consular office.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) Subject to section 23L, if a person who is under arrest or a protected suspect is not an Australian citizen...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...forward any written communication from the person to that consular office; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must forward written communication from non-Australian nationals to consular office.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) Subject to section 23L, if a person who is under arrest or a protected suspect is not an Australian citizen...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...allow the person a reasonable time to, or to attempt to, communicate with that consular office.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must allow non-Australian nationals a reasonable time to communicate with consular office.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) Subject to section 23L, if a person who is under arrest or a protected suspect is not an Australian citizen...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that consular office will be notified accordingly; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify consular office of non-Australian nationals' arrest or detention.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) Subject to section 23L, if a person who is under arrest or a protected suspect is not an Australian citizen...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the person so requests—notify that consular office accordingly; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform non-Australian nationals of their right to request notification.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) Subject to section 23L, if a person who is under arrest or a protected suspect is not an Australian citizen...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23P(1) Right of non-Australian nationals to communicate with

23P(2) Right of non-Australian nationals to communicate with
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.372
note: Must comply with paragraphs (1)(c), (d) and (f) before questioning a person.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23P Right of non-Australian nationals to communicate with

23Q Treatment of persons under arrest
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.373
note: Must treat persons under arrest with humanity and respect for human dignity.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23q-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23q-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23q
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must treat persons under arrest with humanity and respect for human dignity.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23q-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23Q Treatment of persons under arrest

23S Right to remain silent etc. not affected
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.373
note: Right to remain silent not affected by this Part.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23s-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23s-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23s
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23s-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No obligation to answer questions or participate in an investigation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

23T Acts authorised under other laws
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.373
note: An investigating official can ask or cause a person to do something under another law.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23t-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23t-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23t
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23t-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ability to perform an action
modality: Deontic
operator: can

crimes-act-1914-sec-23t-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23T Acts authorised under other laws

23U Tape recording of information required to be given to person
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.373
note: Must provide certain information to a person under arrest or protected suspect.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23u-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23u-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23u
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23u-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide certain information to a person under arrest or protected suspect.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

crimes-act-1914-sec-23u-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23U Tape recording of information required to be given to person

23V Tape recording of confessions and admissions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.374
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23V(1) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
has part: 23V(2) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
has part: 23V(4) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
has part: 23V(5) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23v
schema version: 2

23V(1) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
type: Concept
description: A record in writing, a copy of the record, and an explanation of the procedure to be followed.
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.374
note: Tape recording of confessions and admissions is required for certain circumstances.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23v-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23V Tape recording of confessions and admissions

crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The state must provide a written record and an explanation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23V(1) Tape recording of confessions and admissions

23V(2) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.374
note: Must provide access to recording within 7 days
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23v-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23V Tape recording of confessions and admissions

crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide access
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23V(2) Tape recording of confessions and admissions

23V(4) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.374
note: This section applies to certain offences under a law applied by the Commonwealth Places (Application of Laws) Act 1970.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23v-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23V Tape recording of confessions and admissions

crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The section applies to certain offences
modality: Deontic
operator: applies to

crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23V(4) Tape recording of confessions and admissions

23V(5) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.374
note: Court may admit evidence despite non-compliance with section requirements.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23v-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23V Tape recording of confessions and admissions

crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to deviate from requirements.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23V(5) Tape recording of confessions and admissions

23W Proof of belief
type: Concept
description: Evidence of investigation and belief
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.376
note: Prosecution must prove investigating official had reasonable grounds for belief.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23w-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23w-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23w-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23w
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23w-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prosecution has an obligation to prove...
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-23w-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Investigating official must have reasonable grounds for belief.
modality: Epistemic
operator: epistemic-possibility

crimes-act-1914-sec-23w-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23W Proof of belief

4 June 2026
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments, applications, and modifications.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The text is a descriptive classification.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the text as a compilation of the Crimes Act 1914.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text describes the compilation date and contents.

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The text provides information on the volume structure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies the volumes and sections included in the compilation.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text mentions Volume 1 to Volume 3.

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The text provides context for understanding the law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Notes on amendments, applications, and modifications.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text includes notes on amending laws and amendment history.

80 Section 80
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.222
curation status: Proposed
has part: 80(2B) Section 80
has part: 80(3) Section 80
has part: 80(4) Section 80
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80
schema version: 2

80(2B) Section 80
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.222
note: Defines criminal behaviour in subsection (2A)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-2b-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Section 80

crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes conduct, omission, circumstance or result in the physical element of the offence
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (2B) criminal behaviour includes:

crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80(2B) Section 80

80(3) Section 80
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.222
note: Court must consider nature and severity of conditions when determining sentence or order.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Section 80

crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sentence or order must be determined with consideration for conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Court must have regard to the nature and severity of the conditions.

crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80(3) Section 80

80(4) Section 80
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.222
note: Defines family members for a reference in this Part.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Section 80

crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80(4) Section 80

Crimes Act 1914
type: Document
date: 4 June 2026
identifier: No. 12 of 1914
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU