Crimes Act 1914
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 12 of 1914
date: 4 June 2026
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

4 June 2026
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments, applications, and modifications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the text as a compilation of the Crimes Act 1914.
premise text: The text describes the compilation date and contents.
conclusion text: The text is a descriptive classification.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Identifies the volumes and sections included in the compilation.
premise text: The text mentions Volume 1 to Volume 3.
conclusion text: The text provides information on the volume structure.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Notes on amendments, applications, and modifications.
premise text: The text includes notes on amending laws and amendment history.
conclusion text: The text provides context for understanding the law.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15G Objects of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15g
note: Exempts law enforcement officers and certain other persons from criminal liability and civil liability in the course of a controlled operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15G Objects of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts individuals from liability
premise text: Law enforcement officers and certain other persons are involved in the commission of an offence.
conclusion text: They are exempt from criminal liability and civil liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The exemption applies to the course of a controlled operation
premise text: The text mentions a 'controlled operation'
conclusion text: The exemption overlaps with the course of this operation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: The exemption implies that law enforcement officers and certain other persons are involved in the commission of an offence
premise text: Law enforcement officers and certain other persons take an active part in, or are otherwise involved in, the commission of a Commonwealth offence.
conclusion text: They must be involved in the commission of an offence to be exempt from liability.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: The exemption propagates to all individuals within the controlled operation
premise text: The text defines a 'controlled operation'
conclusion text: All individuals within this operation are exempt from liability.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15g-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: The exemption can be inferred from the definition of a controlled operation
premise text: The text defines a 'controlled operation'
conclusion text: Exemption is implied by this definition.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GA Relationship to other laws and matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ga
has part: 15GA(1) Relationship to other laws and matters
has part: 15GA(2) Relationship to other laws and matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.17

15GA(1) Relationship to other laws and matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ga-ss-1
part of: 15GA Relationship to other laws and matters
note: Court discretion not limited by this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-1-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GA(1) Relationship to other laws and matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15GA(2) Relationship to other laws and matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ga-ss-2
part of: 15GA Relationship to other laws and matters
note: Disregard evidence obtained from criminal activity in proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion of evidence based on criminal activity
premise text: (2) In determining whether evidence should be admitted or excluded in any proceedings...
conclusion text: ...the fact that the evidence was obtained as a result of a person engaging in criminal activity is to be disregarded.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between exclusion and criminal activity
premise text: (2) In determining whether evidence should be admitted or excluded in any proceedings...
conclusion text: ...the fact that the evidence was obtained as a result of a person engaging in criminal activity is to be disregarded if:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between exclusion and criminal activity
premise text: (2) In determining whether evidence should be admitted or excluded in any proceedings...
conclusion text: ...the fact that the evidence was obtained as a result of a person engaging in criminal activity is to be disregarded if:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between exclusion and criminal activity
premise text: (2) In determining whether evidence should be admitted or excluded in any proceedings...
conclusion text: ...the fact that the evidence was obtained as a result of a person engaging in criminal activity is to be disregarded if:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ga-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between exclusion and criminal activity
premise text: (2) In determining whether evidence should be admitted or excluded in any proceedings...
conclusion text: ...the fact that the evidence was obtained as a result of a person engaging in criminal activity is to be disregarded if:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GB Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gb
note: Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gb-norm

15GC Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gc
note: Definitions for controlled operations and authorising officers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gc-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gc-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Definition of key terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15GD Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gd
has part: 15GD(1) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
has part: 15GD(2) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.24

15GD(1) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gd-ss-1
part of: 15GD Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
note: Defines controlled operation and major controlled.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GD(1) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GD(2) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gd-ss-2
part of: 15GD Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
note: Defines a major controlled operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gd-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GD(2) Meaning of controlled operation and major controlled
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15GE Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ge
has part: 15GE(1) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
has part: 15GE(2) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.25

15GE(1) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ge-ss-1
part of: 15GE Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
note: Defines serious Commonwealth offence for purposes of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GE(1) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to definitions and descriptive clauses.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GE(2) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ge-ss-2
part of: 15GE Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
note: List of serious Commonwealth offences and serious State offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GE(2) Meaning of serious Commonwealth offence and serious State
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (2) The matters are as follows:
conclusion text: a specific point in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ge-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: List of prohibited actions
premise text: (a) theft;
conclusion text: theft is a serious Commonwealth offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GF Meaning of authorising officer etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gf
has part: 15GF(1) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
has part: 15GF(2) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
has part: 15GF(3) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.27

15GF(1) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gf-ss-1
part of: 15GF Meaning of authorising officer etc.
note: Defines who is an authorising officer for a controlled operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GF(1) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the bearer of an obligation.
premise text: (1) Any of the following is an authorising officer for a controlled operation:
conclusion text: The Commissioner or a Deputy Commissioner is an authorising officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the holder of an obligation.
premise text: (b) if the operation is not a major controlled operation, but the investigation of the offence to which the controlled operation relates is within the functions of the Australian Federal Police—any AFP authorising officer;
conclusion text: Any AFP authorising officer is an authorising officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the holder of an obligation.
premise text: (c) if the investigation of the offence to which the controlled operation relates is within the functions of the ACC—any ACC authorising officer;
conclusion text: Any ACC authorising officer is an authorising officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the holder of an obligation.
premise text: (d) if the controlled operation relates to the conduct of a corruption investigation (within the meaning of the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2022)—any NACC authorising officer;
conclusion text: Any NACC authorising officer is an authorising officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GF(2) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gf-ss-2
part of: 15GF Meaning of authorising officer etc.
note: List of AFP authorising officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Authorisation by the Commissioner
premise text: (2) The following are AFP authorising officers:
conclusion text: The senior executive AFP employee is an AFP authorising officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Authorisation by the Deputy Commissioner
premise text: (2) The following are AFP authorising officers:
conclusion text: The Deputy Commissioner is an AFP authorising officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between authorisation and employment
premise text: (c) a senior executive AFP employee who is a member of the Australian Federal Police and who is authorised in writing by the Commissioner for the purposes of this paragraph.
conclusion text: The senior executive AFP employee was authorised by the Commissioner during their employment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15GF(3) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gf-ss-3
part of: 15GF Meaning of authorising officer etc.
note: List of ACC authorising officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GF(3) Meaning of authorising officer etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
logic summary: List of ACC authorising officers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GG ART Minister may nominate ART members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gg
has part: 15GG(1) ART Minister may nominate ART members
has part: 15GG(2) ART Minister may nominate ART members
has part: 15GG(3) ART Minister may nominate ART members
has part: 15GG(4) ART Minister may nominate ART members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.28

15GG(1) ART Minister may nominate ART members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gg-ss-1
part of: 15GG ART Minister may nominate ART members
note: The ART Minister may nominate a person to deal with applications under subsection 15GU(1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The ART Minister may nominate a person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WithinTemporalInterval
logic summary: The nomination is made by writing.
premise text: (1) The Minister administering the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (the ART Minister) may, by writing,
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: The nomination is made to deal with applications under subsection 15GU(1).
premise text: (a) Deputy President;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: The nomination is made by the ART Minister.
premise text: (1) The Minister administering the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (the ART Minister) may, by writing,
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: The nomination is made to extend authorities for controlled operations beyond 3 months.
premise text: (1) The Minister administering the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (the ART Minister) may, by writing,
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15GG(2) ART Minister may nominate ART members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gg-ss-2
part of: 15GG ART Minister may nominate ART members
note: Must not nominate a person without being enrolled as a legal practitioner for at least 5 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on nomination without meeting conditions
premise text: ART Minister must nominate
conclusion text: ART Minister must not nominate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Nomination is contingent on enrollment during a specific period
premise text: ART Minister must nominate within a certain timeframe
conclusion text: ART Minister must not nominate outside this timeframe
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Nomination is implied by enrollment and meeting conditions
premise text: Person to be nominated has been enrolled for at least 5 years
conclusion text: ART Minister must nominate this person
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Conditions propagate to the entire class of nominees
premise text: Person to be nominated has been enrolled for at least 5 years
conclusion text: ART Minister must not nominate any other person without meeting this condition
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Enrollment and conditions are inferred from the nomination process
premise text: ART Minister must nominate a person
conclusion text: ART Minister must not nominate without meeting these conditions
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GG(3) ART Minister may nominate ART members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gg-ss-3
part of: 15GG ART Minister may nominate ART members
note: Nomination ceases to have effect under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits the nomination from having effect.
premise text: (3) A nomination ceases to have effect if...
conclusion text: ...the ART Minister, by writing, withdraws the nomination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes temporal overlap between conditions.
premise text: (a) the nominated Tribunal member ceases to hold an appointment described in subsection (1); or
conclusion text: ...the ART Minister, by writing, withdraws the nomination.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between conditions.
premise text: (a) the nominated Tribunal member ceases to hold an appointment described in subsection (1); or
conclusion text: ...the ART Minister, by writing, withdraws the nomination.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Describes diffusion of information about a nomination's effect.
premise text: (a) the nominated Tribunal member ceases to hold an appointment described in subsection (1); or
conclusion text: ...the ART Minister, by writing, withdraws the nomination.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Describes recognition of a nomination's effect by the ART Minister.
premise text: (b) the ART Minister, by writing, withdraws the nomination.
conclusion text: ...the nominated Tribunal member ceases to hold an appointment described in subsection (1); or
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15GG(4) ART Minister may nominate ART members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gg-ss-4
part of: 15GG ART Minister may nominate ART members
note: Protection and immunity for nominated Tribunal members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Protection and immunity
premise text: (4) A nominated Tribunal member has...
conclusion text: ...the same protection and immunity as a Justice of the High Court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gh
has part: 15GH(1) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
has part: 15GH(2) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
has part: 15GH(3) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
has part: 15GH(4) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
has part: 15GH(5) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
has part: 15GH(6) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.30

15GH(1) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gh-ss-1
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
note: Application for authority to conduct controlled operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-1-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GH(1) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15GH(2) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gh-ss-2
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
note: Application for authority may be made in writing or orally/urgently.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GH(2) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make an application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: HasPart
logic summary: Application is a formal or urgent application.
premise text: (a) An application for an authority may be made: (a) by means of a written document signed by the applicant (such an application is a formal application); or (b) if the applicant has reason to believe that the delay caused by making a formal application may affect the success of the controlled operation—orally in person, or by telephone or any other means of communication (such an application is an urgent application).
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Application can be made during a specific time period.
premise text: (2) An application for an authority may be made: (a) by means of a written document signed by the applicant (such an application is a formal application); or (b) if the applicant has reason to believe that the delay caused by making a formal application may affect the success of the controlled operation—orally in person, or by telephone or any other means of communication (such an application is an urgent application).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Application must be made before a certain time.
premise text: (2) An application for an authority may be made: (a) by means of a written document signed by the applicant (such an application is a formal application); or (b) if the applicant has reason to believe that the delay caused by making a formal application may affect the success of the controlled operation—orally in person, or by telephone or any other means of communication (such an application is an urgent application).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
logic summary: Application can be made through various channels.
premise text: (2) An application for an authority may be made: (a) by means of a written document signed by the applicant (such an application is a formal application); or (b) if the applicant has reason to believe that the delay caused by making a formal application may affect the success of the controlled operation—orally in person, or by telephone or any other means of communication (such an application is an urgent application).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: With
logic summary: Application can be made with various tools.
premise text: (2) An application for an authority may be made: (a) by means of a written document signed by the applicant (such an application is a formal application); or (b) if the applicant has reason to believe that the delay caused by making a formal application may affect the success of the controlled operation—orally in person, or by telephone or any other means of communication (such an application is an urgent application).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GH(3) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gh-ss-3
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
note: Subsequent application for authority must be formal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GH(3) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a formal application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GH(4) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gh-ss-4
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
note: Application requirements for controlled operations
description: sufficient information, earlier application details, proposed period of effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GH(4) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must provide required information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GH(5) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gh-ss-5
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
note: An authorising officer may require an applicant to provide additional information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GH(5) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Require
logic summary: The authorising officer requires the applicant to provide additional information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GH(6) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gh-ss-6
part of: 15GH Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
note: Applicant must make a written record of the application and give a copy to the authorising officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GH(6) Applications for authorities to conduct controlled operations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gh-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to make a written record and provide a copy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GI Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gi
has part: 15GI(1) Determination of applications
has part: 15GI(2) Determination of applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.31

15GI(1) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gi-ss-1
part of: 15GI Determination of applications
note: Authorise controlled operation with conditions or refuse application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GI(1) Determination of applications
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Grant authority with conditions
premise text: Application for authority
conclusion text: Authority granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse
logic summary: Deny application
premise text: Application for authority
conclusion text: Application refused
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GI(2) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gi-ss-2
part of: 15GI Determination of applications
note: Authorising officer must not grant authority to conduct controlled operation without reasonable grounds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (2) An authorising officer must not grant an authority to conduct a controlled operation unless...
conclusion text: ...the authorising officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for Controlled Operations
premise text: (2) An authorising officer must not grant an authority to conduct a controlled operation unless...
conclusion text: ...the authorising officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for Controlled Operations
premise text: (2) An authorising officer must not grant an authority to conduct a controlled operation unless...
conclusion text: ...the authorising officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of Controlled Operations
premise text: (2) An authorising officer must not grant an authority to conduct a controlled operation unless...
conclusion text: ...the authorising officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gi-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classification of Controlled Operations by CogAI
premise text: (2) An authorising officer must not grant an authority to conduct a controlled operation unless...
conclusion text: ...the authorising officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GJ Manner of granting authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gj
note: Authority to conduct controlled operation may be granted by written document or formal application with authorising officer's satisfaction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.33
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gj-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gj-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gj-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gj-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GJ Manner of granting authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Authority to conduct controlled operation may be granted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gj-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Formal authority is a written document signed by the authorising officer.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GK Form of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gk
has part: 15GK(1) Form of authority
has part: 15GK(2) Form of authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34

15GK(1) Form of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gk-ss-1
part of: 15GK Form of authority
note: Formal authority requirements
description: All required details for the controlled operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gk-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GK(1) Form of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Formal authority requirements
conclusion text: All required details for the controlled operation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GK(2) Form of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gk-ss-2
part of: 15GK Form of authority
note: Authority requirements for urgent operations
description: a, b, c, d, da
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gk-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GK(2) Form of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Authority requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GL Written record of urgent authority must be issued
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gl
note: Authorising officer must issue written record of urgent authority within 7 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gl-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gl-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Authorising officer must issue written record.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GM Change of principal law enforcement officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gm
note: Authorising officer may nominate another person as principal law enforcement officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gm-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gm-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GM Change of principal law enforcement officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15GN Commencement and duration of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gn
has part: 15GN(1) Commencement and duration of authorities
has part: 15GN(2) Commencement and duration of authorities
has part: 15GN(3) Commencement and duration of authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.37

15GN(1) Commencement and duration of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gn-ss-1
part of: 15GN Commencement and duration of authorities
note: Commencement of authority upon grant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gn-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gn-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Authority begins at grant time
premise text: (1) An authority to conduct a controlled operation comes into force,
conclusion text: The controlled operation is taken to commence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gn-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Authority during grant time
premise text: (1) An authority to conduct a controlled operation comes into force,
conclusion text: The controlled operation is taken to commence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15GN(2) Commencement and duration of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gn-ss-2
part of: 15GN Commencement and duration of authorities
note: Granting of urgent authority upon oral request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gn-ss-2-norm

15GN(3) Commencement and duration of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gn-ss-3
part of: 15GN Commencement and duration of authorities
note: Authority duration and cancellation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gn-ss-3-norm

15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15go
has part: 15GO(1) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GO(2) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GO(3) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GO(4) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GO(5) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GO(6) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.38

15GO(1) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15go-ss-1
part of: 15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
note: Authority may be varied by authorising officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GO(1) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Authority variation obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GO(2) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15go-ss-2
part of: 15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
note: Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GO(2) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: variation
logic summary: Extension or modification of authority
premise text: (2) A variation may:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation between temporal intervals
logic summary: Temporal extension of authority
premise text: (2) A variation may:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GO(3) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15go-ss-3
part of: 15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
note: Cannot extend urgent authority period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of extending urgent authority period
premise text: (3) A variation cannot be made that has the effect of extending the period of effect of an urgent authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval logic for 'extension'
premise text: (3) A variation cannot be made that has the effect of extending the period of effect of an urgent authority.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Linear temporal logic for 'extension'
premise text: (3) A variation cannot be made that has the effect of extending the period of effect of an urgent authority.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion logic for 'extension'
premise text: (3) A variation cannot be made that has the effect of extending the period of effect of an urgent authority.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cognitive AI logic for 'extension'
premise text: (3) A variation cannot be made that has the effect of extending the period of effect of an urgent authority.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GO(4) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15go-ss-4
part of: 15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
note: No variation of formal authority can exceed 3 months in effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: (4) A formal authority must not be varied...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GO(5) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15go-ss-5
part of: 15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
note: Authority variation must be justified by the authorising officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GO(5) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits unauthorized variation of authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GO(6) Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15go-ss-6
part of: 15GO Variation of authority by appropriate authorising officer
note: A variation is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15go-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of obligation
conclusion text: A variation is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gp
has part: 15GP(1) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(2) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(3) Application to appropriate authorising officer
has part: 15GP(4) Application to appropriate authorising officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.39

15GP(1) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gp-ss-1
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer
note: May apply to an authorising officer for a variation of authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GP(1) Application to appropriate authorising officer
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: May apply to an authorising officer.
premise text: (1) The principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation, or any other Australian law enforcement officer acting on behalf of the principal law enforcement officer, may apply under this section...
conclusion text: ...to an appropriate authorising officer for a variation of an authority in respect of a matter mentioned in subsection 15GO(2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During: Application to an authorising officer.
premise text: (1) The principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation, or any other Australian law enforcement officer acting on behalf of the principal law enforcement officer, may apply under this section...
conclusion text: ...to an appropriate authorising officer for a variation of an authority in respect of a matter mentioned in subsection 15GO(2).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: During: Application to an authorising officer.
premise text: (1) The principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation, or any other Australian law enforcement officer acting on behalf of the principal law enforcement officer, may apply under this section...
conclusion text: ...to an appropriate authorising officer for a variation of an authority in respect of a matter mentioned in subsection 15GO(2).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: may
logic summary: May diffuse: Application to an authorising officer.
premise text: (1) The principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation, or any other Australian law enforcement officer acting on behalf of the principal law enforcement officer, may apply under this section...
conclusion text: ...to an appropriate authorising officer for a variation of an authority in respect of a matter mentioned in subsection 15GO(2).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: may
logic summary: May apply: Application to an authorising officer.
premise text: (1) The principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation, or any other Australian law enforcement officer acting on behalf of the principal law enforcement officer, may apply under this section...
conclusion text: ...to an appropriate authorising officer for a variation of an authority in respect of a matter mentioned in subsection 15GO(2).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GP(2) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gp-ss-2
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer
note: No application for variation can extend the period of effect beyond 3 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on extending the period of effect beyond 3 months.
premise text: (2) An application cannot be made under subsection (1)
conclusion text: No variation can extend the period of effect beyond 3 months.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GP(3) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gp-ss-3
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer
note: Application method for variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-3-norm

15GP(4) Application to appropriate authorising officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gp-ss-4
part of: 15GP Application to appropriate authorising officer
note: Multiple applications for variation under section 15GP(4) are allowed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GP(4) Application to appropriate authorising officer
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gp-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allowance
logic summary: Allows multiple applications for variation under section 15GP(4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GQ Requirements for variation of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gq
has part: 15GQ(1) Requirements for variation of authority
has part: 15GQ(1A) Requirements for variation of authority
has part: 15GQ(2) Requirements for variation of authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.40

15GQ(1) Requirements for variation of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gq-ss-1
part of: 15GQ Requirements for variation of authority
note: Authority may be varied in accordance with an application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.40
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GQ(1) Requirements for variation of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to vary authority
premise text: Application for variation of authority
conclusion text: Authority may be varied
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15GQ(1A) Requirements for variation of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gq-ss-1a
part of: 15GQ Requirements for variation of authority
note: An authorising officer must refer an application for a variation of authority to the Commissioner or a Deputy Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.40
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GQ(1A) Requirements for variation of authority
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must refer an application for a variation of authority to the Commissioner or a Deputy Commissioner.
premise text: (1A) Despite subsection (1),
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GQ(2) Requirements for variation of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gq-ss-2
part of: 15GQ Requirements for variation of authority
note: No variation of authority allowed without reasonable grounds and justification.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.40
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GQ(2) Requirements for variation of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No variation allowed without reasonable grounds and justification.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GR Manner of varying authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gr
has part: 15GR(1) Manner of varying authority
has part: 15GR(2) Manner of varying authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.43

15GR(1) Manner of varying authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gr-ss-1
part of: 15GR Manner of varying authority
note: Authority may be varied by an appropriate authorising officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.43
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GR(1) Manner of varying authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Variation on formal application
premise text: (a) in the case of a variation on the authorising officer’s own initiative or on a formal variation application (other than a variation referred to in subparagraph (b)(ii))—by means of a written document, signed by the authorising officer
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (a) in the case of a variation on the authorising officer’s own initiative or on a formal variation application (other than a variation referred to in subparagraph (b)(ii))—by means of a written document, signed by the authorising officer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (i) an urgent variation application; or (ii) the authorising officer’s own initiative or a formal variation application, if the authorising officer is satisfied that the delay caused by granting a formal variation of authority may affect the success of the controlled operation;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (ii) the authorising officer’s own initiative or a formal variation application, if the authorising officer is satisfied that the delay caused by granting a formal variation of authority may affect the success of the controlled operation;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GR(2) Manner of varying authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gr-ss-2
part of: 15GR Manner of varying authority
note: Authorising officer must prepare and give written document to applicant or principal law enforcement officer.
description: written document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.43
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Authorising officer must perform action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GS Form of variation of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gs
has part: 15GS(1) Form of variation of authority
has part: 15GS(2) Form of variation of authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.44

15GS(1) Form of variation of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gs-ss-1
part of: 15GS Form of variation of authority
note: Variation of authority must provide specific details.
description: a, b, c, d, e, f
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GS(1) Form of variation of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide specific details.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GS(2) Form of variation of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gs-ss-2
part of: 15GS Form of variation of authority
note: Maximum period for extension of authority beyond 3 months
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GS(2) Form of variation of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Period of effect must not exceed 3 months
premise text: (a) in the case of a formal variation of authority—the period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 3 months (including any previous extensions);
conclusion text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f), the period of the extension must not exceed:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <=
logic summary: Period of effect must not exceed 3 months
premise text: (b) in the case of an urgent variation of authority—the lesser of: (i) 7 days; and (ii) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 3 months (including any previous extensions);
conclusion text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f), the period of the extension must not exceed:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal interval is an Allen interval
premise text: the period of the extension must not exceed: (a) in the case of a formal variation of authority—the period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 3 months (including any previous extensions); and (b) in the case of an urgent variation of authority—the lesser of: (i) 7 days; and (ii) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 3 months (including any previous extensions);
conclusion text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f), the period of the extension must not exceed:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal interval is a linear time interval
premise text: the period of the extension must not exceed: (a) in the case of a formal variation of authority—the period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 3 months (including any previous extensions); and (b) in the case of an urgent variation of authority—the lesser of: (i) 7 days; and (ii) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 3 months (including any previous extensions);
conclusion text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f), the period of the extension must not exceed:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gs-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal interval is a diffusion interval
premise text: the period of the extension must not exceed: (a) in the case of a formal variation of authority—the period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 3 months (including any previous extensions); and (b) in the case of an urgent variation of authority—the lesser of: (i) 7 days; and (ii) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 3 months (including any previous extensions);
conclusion text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f), the period of the extension must not exceed:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gt
has part: 15GT(1) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
has part: 15GT(2) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
has part: 15GT(3) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
has part: 15GT(4) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45

15GT(1) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gt-ss-1
part of: 15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
note: A nominated Tribunal member may vary a formal authority on application under subsection 15GU(1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GT(1) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to vary formal authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GT(2) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gt-ss-2
part of: 15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
note: May extend period of effect of authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-2-norm

15GT(3) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gt-ss-3
part of: 15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
note: Maximum extension period for formal authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GT(3) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Period of effect must not exceed 24 months
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months
conclusion text: The extension period must be less than or equal to 24 months
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <=
logic summary: Extension period cannot exceed 3 months or 24 months
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months
conclusion text: The extension period is less than or equal to 3 months or 24 months
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Extension period has a lower bound of 3 months and an upper bound of 24 months
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months
conclusion text: The extension period is less than or equal to 3 months and greater than or equal to 0 months
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: <=
logic summary: Extension period has a lower bound of 3 months and an upper bound of 24 months
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months
conclusion text: The extension period is less than or equal to 3 months and greater than or equal to 0 months
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: <=
logic summary: Extension period has a lower bound of 3 months and an upper bound of 24 months
premise text: (a) 3 months; and (b) a period that would result in the period of effect of the authority exceeding 24 months
conclusion text: The extension period is less than or equal to 3 months and greater than or equal to 0 months
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GT(4) Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gt-ss-4
part of: 15GT Variation of formal authority to extend period of effect
note: Limitation on variation of formal authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: only
logic summary: Restriction on action
premise text: (4) A nominated Tribunal member may only vary a formal authority
conclusion text: during the period of 2 weeks before the end of the period of effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal interval restriction
premise text: (4) A nominated Tribunal member may only vary a formal authority during the period of 2 weeks before the end of the period of effect
conclusion text: of the authority
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal interval restriction
premise text: (4) A nominated Tribunal member may only vary a formal authority during the period of 2 weeks before the end of the period of effect
conclusion text: of the authority
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal interval restriction
premise text: (4) A nominated Tribunal member may only vary a formal authority during the period of 2 weeks before the end of the period of effect
conclusion text: of the authority
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gt-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal interval restriction
premise text: (4) A nominated Tribunal member may only vary a formal authority during the period of 2 weeks before the end of the period of effect
conclusion text: of the authority
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GU Application to nominated Tribunal member
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gu
note: Application for variation of authority period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gu-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gu-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gu-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GU Application to nominated Tribunal member
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gu-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to apply for authority variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GV Determination of application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gv
has part: 15GV(1) Determination of application
has part: 15GV(2) Determination of application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.47

15GV(1) Determination of application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gv-ss-1
part of: 15GV Determination of application
note: Tribunal member may vary formal authority subject to conditions or refuse application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GV(1) Determination of application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Variation of formal authority is permitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GV(2) Determination of application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gv-ss-2
part of: 15GV Determination of application
note: Granting variation without reasonable grounds is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of granting variation without reasonable grounds.
premise text: (2) The nominated Tribunal member must not grant the variation unless...
conclusion text: ...the variation is granted on reasonable grounds.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for granting variation.
premise text: (2) The nominated Tribunal member must not grant the variation unless...
conclusion text: ...the variation is granted on reasonable grounds within a specific time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for granting variation.
premise text: (2) The nominated Tribunal member must not grant the variation unless...
conclusion text: ...the suspected criminal activity are such as to justify the variation in a recurring pattern.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of conditions for granting variation.
premise text: (2) The nominated Tribunal member must not grant the variation unless...
conclusion text: ...the suspected criminal activity are such as to justify the variation in a diffuse manner.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gv-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
logic summary: Cognitive AI application for granting variation.
premise text: (2) The nominated Tribunal member must not grant the variation unless...
conclusion text: ...the suspected criminal activity are such as to justify the variation using cognitive AI.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15GW Manner of varying formal authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gw
has part: 15GW(1) Manner of varying formal authority
has part: 15GW(2) Manner of varying formal authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.49

15GW(1) Manner of varying formal authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gw-ss-1
part of: 15GW Manner of varying formal authority
note: Variation of formal authority by nominated Tribunal member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.49
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gw-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gw-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to vary formal authority
premise text: (1) A formal authority may be varied...
conclusion text: ...by means of a written document...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gw-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of variation method
premise text: (a) in the case of a formal variation application...
conclusion text: ...by means of a written document...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15GW(2) Manner of varying formal authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gw-ss-2
part of: 15GW Manner of varying formal authority
note: Must provide written document to applicant
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.49
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gw-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gw-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GW(2) Manner of varying formal authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide written document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GX Form of variation of formal authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gx
has part: 15GX(1) Form of variation of formal authority
has part: 15GX(2) Form of variation of formal authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50

15GX(1) Form of variation of formal authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gx-ss-1
part of: 15GX Form of variation of formal authority
note: Variation of formal authority must provide specific information
description: a, b, c, d, e, f
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gx-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GX(1) Form of variation of formal authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Must provide required information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GX(2) Form of variation of formal authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gx-ss-2
part of: 15GX Form of variation of formal authority
note: Maximum period for extension of authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GX(2) Form of variation of formal authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Period must not exceed
premise text: (2) The period of the extension:
conclusion text: must not exceed...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GY Cancellation of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gy
has part: 15GY(1) Cancellation of authorities
has part: 15GY(2) Cancellation of authorities
has part: 15GY(3) Cancellation of authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50

15GY(1) Cancellation of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gy-ss-1
part of: 15GY Cancellation of authorities
note: Authority to conduct controlled operation can be cancelled by authorising officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GY(1) Cancellation of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conducting controlled operation.
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer may, by order in writing given to the principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval of authority cancellation.
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer may, by order in writing given to the principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Provides justification for cancelling authority.
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer may, by order in writing given to the principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses authority cancellation information.
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer may, by order in writing given to the principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
logic summary: Applies reasoning to authority cancellation.
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer may, by order in writing given to the principal law enforcement officer for a controlled operation...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15GY(2) Cancellation of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gy-ss-2
part of: 15GY Cancellation of authorities
note: Request for cancellation of authority at any time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GY(2) Cancellation of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to cancel authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GY(3) Cancellation of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gy-ss-3
part of: 15GY Cancellation of authorities
note: Cancellation of authority takes effect at specified time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gy-ss-3-norm

15GZ Effect of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gz
has part: 15GZ(1) Effect of authorities
has part: 15GZ(2) Effect of authorities
has part: 15GZ(3) Effect of authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51

15GZ(1) Effect of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gz-ss-1
part of: 15GZ Effect of authorities
note: Authorises law enforcement participants to engage in controlled conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GZ(1) Effect of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Imposes duty on authorities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15GZ(2) Effect of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gz-ss-2
part of: 15GZ Effect of authorities
note: Authorisation for controlled conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GZ(2) Effect of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (2) A person identified in an authority...
conclusion text: ...is authorised to do so for the period of effect of the authority...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between authority and authorisation
premise text: (2) A person identified in an authority as being authorised to engage in controlled conduct...
conclusion text: ...for the period of effect of the authority...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: justification
logic summary: Justifying the authorisation
premise text: (2) A person identified in an authority as being authorised to engage in controlled conduct for the purposes of the controlled operation is authorised to do so...
conclusion text: ...for the period of effect of the authority...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuse
logic summary: Spreading the authorisation
premise text: (2) A person identified in an authority as being authorised to engage in controlled conduct for the purposes of the controlled operation is authorised to do so for the period of effect of the authority...
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) the authority specifies a shorter period during which the person is so authorised; or (b) the authority is varied to provide that the person is no longer so authorised; or (c) the authority is cancelled before the end of that period.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognise
logic summary: Recognising the authority
premise text: (2) A person identified in an authority as being authorised to engage in controlled conduct for the purposes of the controlled operation is authorised to do so for the period of effect of the authority...
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) the authority specifies a shorter period during which the person is so authorised; or (b) the authority is varied to provide that the person is no longer so authorised; or (c) the authority is cancelled before the end of that period.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15GZ(3) Effect of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15gz-ss-3
part of: 15GZ Effect of authorities
note: Authority cannot delegate controlled conduct to others.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15GZ(3) Effect of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15gz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on delegation
premise text: (3) The authority to engage in controlled conduct given to a participant
conclusion text: cannot be delegated to any other person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15H Defect in authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15h
note: No defect in authority invalidates an application or granted authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15h-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15h-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15h-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15H Defect in authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: No defect in authority necessitates invalidation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HA Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ha
has part: 15HA(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
has part: 15HA(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
has part: 15HA(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.52

15HA(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ha-ss-1
part of: 15HA Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
note: Participant in controlled operation must comply with Commonwealth/State law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HA(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
premise text: (1) This section applies if...
conclusion text: ...engaging in that conduct is a Commonwealth offence or an offence against a law of a State or Territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Temporal relationship between conduct and controlled operation
premise text: (1) This section applies if...
conclusion text: ...conduct in the course of, and for the purposes of, the controlled operation;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of conduct in controlled operation
premise text: (1) This section applies if...
conclusion text: ...conduct in the course of, and for the purposes of, the controlled operation;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagating effect of Commonwealth/State law on participants
premise text: (1) This section applies if...
conclusion text: ...engaging in that conduct is a Commonwealth offence or an offence against a law of a State or Territory.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Artificial intelligence classification of controlled operation participants
premise text: (1) This section applies if...
conclusion text: ...a participant in a controlled operation engages in conduct in the course of, and for the purposes of, the controlled operation;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15HA(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ha-ss-2
part of: 15HA Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
note: Participant not criminally responsible for offence if conduct is in accordance with authority and meets certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Participant has an obligation to conduct controlled operation in accordance with authority.
premise text: Authority authorises participant to engage in controlled conduct.
conclusion text: Participant is not criminally responsible for offence if conduct meets conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Controlled operations are defined as those that involve the participant engaging in controlled conduct for the purposes of the controlled operation.
premise text: Participant engages in controlled conduct for the purposes of the controlled operation.
conclusion text: Controlled operation overlaps with participant's engagement in controlled conduct.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Participant is not criminally responsible for offence if they repeat the controlled operation.
premise text: Participant repeats the controlled operation.
conclusion text: Participant is not criminally responsible for offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Controlled operations diffuse to other participants who engage in controlled conduct.
premise text: Participant engages in controlled conduct.
conclusion text: Controlled operation diffuses to participant's engagement in controlled conduct.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognises
logic summary: Participant is recognised as a civilian participant in the operation if they act in accordance with instructions of a law enforcement officer.
premise text: Participant acts in accordance with instructions of a law enforcement officer.
conclusion text: Participant is recognised as a civilian participant in the operation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HA(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ha-ss-3
part of: 15HA Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
note: Participant must not deal with material depicting a sexual offence against any person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HA(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for controlled conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with material depicting a sexual offence against any person.
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, nothing in subparagraph (2)(d)(ii)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Conjunction
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with material depicting a sexual offence against any person and facilitating a person to deal with such material.
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, nothing in subparagraph (2)(d)(ii)
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ha-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalInclusion
logic summary: Dealing with material depicting a sexual offence against any person must occur before the participant is protected from criminal responsibility.
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, nothing in subparagraph (2)(d)(ii)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HB Indemnification of participants against civil liability
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hb
has part: 15HB(1) Indemnification of participants against civil liability
has part: 15HB(2) Indemnification of participants against civil liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.53

15HB(1) Indemnification of participants against civil liability
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hb-ss-1
part of: 15HB Indemnification of participants against civil liability
note: The Commonwealth must indemnify a participant in a controlled operation against civil liability.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HB(1) Indemnification of participants against civil liability
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Commonwealth has an obligation to indemnify a participant.
premise text: (1) The Commonwealth must indemnify...
conclusion text: ...against any civil liability...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: The conduct does not involve the participant engaging in any conduct that is likely to cause the death of, or serious injury to, any person.
premise text: (d) The conduct does not involve the participant...
conclusion text: ...engaging in any conduct that is likely to cause the death of, or serious injury to, any person.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalRepetition
logic summary: The requirements (if any) specified in the regulations have been met.
premise text: (f) The requirements (if any) specified...
conclusion text: ...have been met.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: The participant is authorized to engage in controlled conduct for the purposes of the controlled operation.
premise text: (b) The participant is identified in the authority...
conclusion text: ...as a person authorized to engage in controlled conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HB(2) Indemnification of participants against civil liability
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hb-ss-2
part of: 15HB Indemnification of participants against civil liability
note: Participant must be indemnified against civil liability if conduct involves participant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HB(2) Indemnification of participants against civil liability
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Participant has an obligation to be indemnified against civil liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HC Effect of sections 15HA and 15HB on other laws relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hc
note: Exemptions from sections 15HA and 15HB
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hc-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hc-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hc-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HC Effect of sections 15HA and 15HB on other laws relating to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from sections 15HA and 15HB
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HD Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hd
has part: 15HD(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
has part: 15HD(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
has part: 15HD(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
has part: 15HD(4) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54

15HD(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hd-ss-1
part of: 15HD Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
note: Participant must continue to comply with the regulation despite a variation in authority scope.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HD(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
logic summary: The regulation continues to apply despite a change in authority scope.
premise text: Authority to conduct a controlled operation is varied.
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Ignorance
logic summary: Participant must be unaware of the variation for it not to affect their obligations.
premise text: Participant is aware of the variation.
conclusion text: This Part does not apply.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recklessness
logic summary: Participant must not be reckless about the existence of the variation for it not to affect their obligations.
premise text: Participant is reckless about the existence of the variation.
conclusion text: This Part does not apply.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Inference
logic summary: The regulation continues to apply despite a change in authority scope, as it is based on the participant's actions.
premise text: Participant takes actions under the original authority scope.
conclusion text: This Part applies.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
logic summary: The regulation continues to apply despite a change in authority scope, as it overlaps with the participant's actions.
premise text: Participant takes actions under the original authority scope.
conclusion text: This Part applies.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HD(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hd-ss-2
part of: 15HD Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
note: Continue applying to a person unaware of cancellation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HD(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUE
logic summary: Continues application despite cancellation
premise text: (2) If an authority to conduct a controlled operation is cancelled...
conclusion text: ...this Part continues to apply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: AWARENESS
logic summary: Awareness of cancellation affects obligation
premise text: (a) is unaware of the cancellation;
conclusion text: ...for so long as the person:...
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECKLESSNESS
logic summary: Recklessness about cancellation affects obligation
premise text: (b) is not reckless about the existence of the cancellation.
conclusion text: ...for so long as the person:...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: CONSEQUENCE
logic summary: Consequence of cancellation on obligation
premise text: (2) If an authority to conduct a controlled operation is cancelled...
conclusion text: ...this Part continues to apply...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HD(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hd-ss-3
part of: 15HD Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
note: Reckless about variation or cancellation of authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HD(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: recklessness
logic summary: Reckless behavior
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk...
conclusion text: the person is reckless about the existence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: awareness
logic summary: Aware of substantial risk
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk...
conclusion text: the person is aware of the variation or cancellation...
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: trace
logic summary: Unjustifiable to take risk
premise text: (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.
conclusion text: the person takes the risk
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to avoid risk
premise text: (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.
conclusion text: the person must avoid taking the risk
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: duty
logic summary: Duty to avoid risk
premise text: (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.
conclusion text: the person has a duty to avoid taking the risk
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HD(4) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hd-ss-4
part of: 15HD Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
note: A reference to a cancelled authority includes a reference to an authority that has stopped being in effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HD(4) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion of a cancelled authority reference.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hd-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes a cancelled authority reference in the definition.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HE Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15he
has part: 15HE(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
has part: 15HE(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.55

15HE(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15he-ss-1
part of: 15HE Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
note: Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.55
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-1-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HE(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15HE(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15he-ss-2
part of: 15HE Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
note: Belief of authorized participant excuses ancillary conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.55
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HE(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Excuse
logic summary: Excuses ancillary conduct based on belief of authorized participant
premise text: Belief of authorized participant
conclusion text: Exemption from criminal responsibility
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between ancillary conduct and related controlled conduct
premise text: Belief of authorized participant at time of ancillary conduct
conclusion text: Ancillary conduct overlaps with related controlled conduct in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Recurring trace between ancillary conduct and related controlled conduct
premise text: Belief of authorized participant at time of ancillary conduct
conclusion text: Ancillary conduct is recurrent with respect to the related controlled conduct
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of belief from authorized participant to ancillary conduct
premise text: Belief of authorized participant at time of ancillary conduct
conclusion text: Ancillary conduct is diffused with respect to the related controlled conduct
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15he-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inference from belief of authorized participant to exemption from criminal responsibility
premise text: Belief of authorized participant at time of ancillary conduct
conclusion text: Exemption from criminal responsibility is inferred from the belief of the authorized participant
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HF Compensation for property loss or serious damage
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hf
has part: 15HF(1) Compensation for property loss or serious damage
has part: 15HF(2) Compensation for property loss or serious damage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56

15HF(1) Compensation for property loss or serious damage
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hf-ss-1
part of: 15HF Compensation for property loss or serious damage
note: Liability for compensation in case of property loss or personal injury
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Liability for compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HF(2) Compensation for property loss or serious damage
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hf-ss-2
part of: 15HF Compensation for property loss or serious damage
note: Exemptions from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hf-ss-2-norm

15HG Notification requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hg
has part: 15HG(1) Notification requirements
has part: 15HG(2) Notification requirements
has part: 15HG(3) Notification requirements
has part: 15HG(4) Notification requirements
has part: 15HG(5) Notification requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56

15HG(1) Notification requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hg-ss-1
part of: 15HG Notification requirements
note: Principal law enforcement officer must report loss, damage or injury to chief officer of the law enforcement agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HG(1) Notification requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must report loss, damage or injury.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HG(2) Notification requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hg-ss-2
part of: 15HG Notification requirements
note: Chief officer must notify owner of loss or damage to property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HG(2) Notification requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
premise text: Chief officer reports loss or damage to property
conclusion text: Chief officer must notify owner of loss or damage to property
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HG(3) Notification requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hg-ss-3
part of: 15HG Notification requirements
note: Chief officer must notify person of injury reported under subsection (1)
description: Notification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HG(3) Notification requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Chief officer must take action
conclusion text: Chief officer must notify person of injury reported under subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Chief officer must notify person within a reasonable timeframe after reporting injury
premise text: (3) If a personal injury is reported to the chief officer under subsection (1),
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Chief officer's notification implies that they have taken reasonable steps
premise text: (3) If a personal injury is reported to the chief officer under subsection (1),
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
logic summary: Notification spreads to person affected by injury
premise text: (3) If a personal injury is reported to the chief officer under subsection (1),
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
logic summary: Chief officer's notification requires human oversight and review
premise text: (3) If a personal injury is reported to the chief officer under subsection (1),
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15HG(4) Notification requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hg-ss-4
part of: 15HG Notification requirements
note: Notification requirements under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HG(4) Notification requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Notification requirements
premise text: (4) The chief officer is not required to give a notification...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HG(5) Notification requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hg-ss-5
part of: 15HG Notification requirements
note: Delegation of powers or functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hg-ss-5-norm

15HH Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hh
has part: 15HH(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
has part: 15HH(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
has part: 15HH(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.58

15HH(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hh-ss-1
part of: 15HH Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
note: Participant must comply with Commonwealth offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hh-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HH(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Participant has a duty to comply.
premise text: (1) This section applies...
conclusion text: ...engaging in that conduct is a Commonwealth offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HH(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hh-ss-2
part of: 15HH Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
note: Participant must act in accordance with instructions of a law enforcement officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hh-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HH(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory action
premise text: the participant must act in accordance with the instructions of a law enforcement officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HH(3) Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hh-ss-3
part of: 15HH Protection from criminal responsibility for conduct under a
note: Same meanings as in corresponding State controlled operations law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hh-ss-3-norm

15HI Effect of section 15HH on other laws relating to criminal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hi
note: Section 15HH does not apply to certain criminal investigation activities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hi-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hi-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hi-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Excluded activities
premise text: Section 15HH
conclusion text: Certain criminal investigation activities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HJ Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hj
has part: 15HJ(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
has part: 15HJ(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.59

15HJ(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hj-ss-1
part of: 15HJ Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
note: Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-1-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HJ(1) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15HJ(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hj-ss-2
part of: 15HJ Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
note: Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HJ(2) Protection from criminal responsibility for certain ancillary
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits criminal responsibility
premise text: (2) Despite any law of the Commonwealth
conclusion text: the person who engaged in the ancillary conduct is not criminally responsible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Establishes obligation to protect
premise text: (2) Despite any law of the Commonwealth
conclusion text: the person who engaged in the ancillary conduct is not criminally responsible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines temporal overlap with protected conduct
premise text: (2) Despite any law of the Commonwealth
conclusion text: the person who engaged in the ancillary conduct is not criminally responsible
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Defines temporal containment with protected conduct
premise text: (2) Despite any law of the Commonwealth
conclusion text: the person who engaged in the ancillary conduct is not criminally responsible
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hj-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses protection to related conduct
premise text: (2) Despite any law of the Commonwealth
conclusion text: the person who engaged in the ancillary conduct is not criminally responsible
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HK Unauthorised disclosure of information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hk
has part: 15HK(1) Unauthorised disclosure of information
has part: 15HK(1A) Unauthorised disclosure of information
has part: 15HK(1B) Unauthorised disclosure of information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.61

15HK(1) Unauthorised disclosure of information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hk-ss-1
part of: 15HK Unauthorised disclosure of information
note: Disclosing unauthorized information is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HK(1) Unauthorised disclosure of information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...discloses the information;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information by entrusted persons
premise text: (b) Information came to the knowledge or into the possession of the person in the person’s capacity as an entrusted person;
conclusion text: ...and (d) the information relates to a controlled operation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information by persons with recklessness
premise text: (1)(b) and (d)—see section 5.6 of the Criminal Code;
conclusion text: ...Recklessness is the fault element...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Relates to a controlled operation
premise text: (d) the information relates to a controlled operation.
conclusion text: ...and (c) the person discloses the information;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imprisonment for disclosure of unauthorized information
premise text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HK(1A) Unauthorised disclosure of information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hk-ss-1a
part of: 15HK Unauthorised disclosure of information
note: Prohibition on unauthorized disclosure of information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HK(1A) Unauthorised disclosure of information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a duty to refrain from action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HK(1B) Unauthorised disclosure of information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hk-ss-1b
part of: 15HK Unauthorised disclosure of information
note: Disclosing controlled operation information without authorization is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1b-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1b-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HK(1B) Unauthorised disclosure of information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hk-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: (1B) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: Disclosing controlled operation information without authorization is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HM Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hm
has part: 15HM(1) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
has part: 15HM(1A) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
has part: 15HM(2) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.65

15HM(1) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hm-ss-1
part of: 15HM Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
note: Chief officers must submit reports to the Ombudsman on a 6 monthly basis.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.65
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HM(1) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide reports
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HM(1A) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hm-ss-1a
part of: 15HM Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
note: Authorising agency is ACC, or Ombudsman for other agencies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.65
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HM(1A) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Authorising agency is ACC.
conclusion text: Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HM(2) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hm-ss-2
part of: 15HM Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
note: Agency must provide formal authority reports to Ombudsman
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.65
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HM(2) Chief officers’ 6 monthly reports to Ombudsman or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must provide formal authority reports to Ombudsman
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hn
has part: 15HN(1) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and
has part: 15HN(2) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and
has part: 15HN(3) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.69

15HN(1) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hn-ss-1
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and
note: Chief officers must submit annual reports to the Minister.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HN(1) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HN(2) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hn-ss-2
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and
note: Chief officers must advise the Minister about information to be excluded from reports.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Chief officers must advise the Minister.
premise text: Chief officer is a chief officer.
conclusion text: Minister must be advised.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HN(3) Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hn-ss-3
part of: 15HN Chief officers’ annual reports to Minister, and
note: Minister must exclude information from report if advised by chief officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Minister has a duty to exclude information from report
premise text: Chief officer advises Minister
conclusion text: Minister must exclude information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HO Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ho
has part: 15HO(1) Annual report by Ombudsman
has part: 15HO(2) Annual report by Ombudsman
has part: 15HO(3) Annual report by Ombudsman
has part: 15HO(4) Annual report by Ombudsman
has part: 15HO(5) Annual report by Ombudsman
has part: 15HO(6) Annual report by Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70

15HO(1) Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ho-ss-1
part of: 15HO Annual report by Ombudsman
note: The Ombudsman must prepare and provide a report to the Minister and law enforcement agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HO(1) Annual report by Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HO(2) Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ho-ss-2
part of: 15HO Annual report by Ombudsman
note: Report cannot include information that could endanger a person's safety, prejudice an investigation or prosecution, or compromise law enforcement activities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain information from being included in a report.
premise text: (2) A report under this section must not include...
conclusion text: ...information which, if made public...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HO(3) Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ho-ss-3
part of: 15HO Annual report by Ombudsman
note: Annual report by Ombudsman must be laid before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to lay report before Parliament
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HO(4) Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ho-ss-4
part of: 15HO Annual report by Ombudsman
note: Annual report by Ombudsman must include comments on comprehensiveness and adequacy of reports provided to the Ombudsman.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HO(4) Annual report by Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HO(5) Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ho-ss-5
part of: 15HO Annual report by Ombudsman
note: Report cannot disclose information that identifies a person involved in an operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information that identifies a person involved in an operation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HO(6) Annual report by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ho-ss-6
part of: 15HO Annual report by Ombudsman
note: Annual report by Ombudsman must include particulars of a controlled operation when completed.
description: Particulars of a controlled operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HO(6) Annual report by Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ho-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide particulars
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HP Keeping documents connected with controlled operations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hp
note: Must keep certain documents connected with controlled operations.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hp-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hp-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hp-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HP Keeping documents connected with controlled operations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HQ General register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hq
has part: 15HQ(1) General register
has part: 15HQ(2) General register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.72

15HQ(1) General register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hq-ss-1
part of: 15HQ General register
note: Chief officer must cause a general register to be kept.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HQ(1) General register
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HQ(2) General register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hq-ss-2
part of: 15HQ General register
note: Requires specification of application and authority details
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HQ(2) General register
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Requires specification of application and authority details
conclusion text: Yes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for operation commencement and cessation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HR Appointment of inspecting officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hr
has part: 15HR(1) Appointment of inspecting officers
has part: 15HR(2) Appointment of inspecting officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.75

15HR(1) Appointment of inspecting officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hr-ss-1
part of: 15HR Appointment of inspecting officers
note: The Ombudsman may appoint members of the Ombudsman’s staff to be inspecting officers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hr-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HR(1) Appointment of inspecting officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Obligation to appoint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HR(2) Appointment of inspecting officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hr-ss-2
part of: 15HR Appointment of inspecting officers
note: Appointment under subsection (1) must be in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hr-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HR(2) Appointment of inspecting officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written appointment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HS Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hs
has part: 15HS(1) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
has part: 15HS(3) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.75

15HS(1) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hs-ss-1
part of: 15HS Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
note: The Ombudsman must inspect records of authorising agencies at least once every 12 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hs-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hs-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HS(1) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inspect records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HS(3) Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hs-ss-3
part of: 15HS Inspection of records by the Ombudsman
note: Ombudsman may enter premises, access records, and require staff information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hs-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hs-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to enter premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hs-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may require
logic summary: Permission to request staff information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HT Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ht
has part: 15HT(1) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 15HT(2) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 15HT(3) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 15HT(4) Power to obtain relevant information
has part: 15HT(5) Power to obtain relevant information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.76

15HT(1) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ht-ss-1
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information
note: Ombudsman can compel law enforcement officer to provide relevant information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HT(1) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Can
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HT(2) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ht-ss-2
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information
note: The Ombudsman may require law enforcement officers to provide information.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HT(2) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HT(3) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ht-ss-3
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information
note: The Ombudsman may require a law enforcement officer to attend an inspection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HT(3) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: The Ombudsman has a duty to require the officer's attendance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within a specified period
logic summary: The officer must answer questions within a specified time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HT(4) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ht-ss-4
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information
note: The Ombudsman may require a chief officer to attend an inspection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HT(4) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
premise text: The Ombudsman has reasonable grounds to believe...
conclusion text: The chief officer must attend the inspection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HT(5) Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ht-ss-5
part of: 15HT Power to obtain relevant information
note: Requirement must be reasonable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HT(5) Power to obtain relevant information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ht-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be reasonable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HU Offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hu
note: Refusal to attend before an inspecting officer is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.77
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HU Offence
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal to attend before an inspecting officer.
premise text: Section 15HT requires attendance before an inspecting officer.
conclusion text: Refusal to attend is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: There is an obligation on a person to attend before an inspecting officer.
premise text: Section 15HT requires attendance before an inspecting officer.
conclusion text: A person has an obligation to attend before an inspecting officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
logic summary: The provision creates a recurring trace of refusal or failure to attend.
premise text: Refusal or failure to attend is prohibited.
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace of refusal or failure to attend.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hu-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: The provision prohibits imprisonment for 6 months as a penalty.
premise text: Imprisonment for 6 months is the penalty for an offence.
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 6 months is prohibited as a penalty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HV Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hv
note: Must provide information, answer questions, or give access to documents despite other laws.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.77
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hv-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hv-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hv-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HV Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hv-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information, answer questions, or give access to documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HW Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hw
has part: 15HW(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
has part: 15HW(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
has part: 15HW(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.79

15HW(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hw-ss-1
part of: 15HW Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
note: Definitions for State or Territory agency and inspecting authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.79
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hw-ss-1-norm

15HW(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hw-ss-2
part of: 15HW Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
note: Ombudsman must provide information to State or Territory inspecting authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.79
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hw-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HW(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hw-ss-3
part of: 15HW Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
note: Ombudsman must provide information to authorities under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.79
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hw-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hw-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HW(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
premise text: The Ombudsman may only give information...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HX Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hx
has part: 15HX(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
has part: 15HX(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.80

15HX(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hx-ss-1
part of: 15HX Delegation by Ombudsman
note: Delegation of powers to APS employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.80
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hx-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hx-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal scope of delegation
premise text: Written instrument specifies effective date
conclusion text: Delegation is effective from specified date
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HX(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hx-ss-2
part of: 15HX Delegation by Ombudsman
note: Delegate must provide instrument of delegation upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.80
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HX(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HY Ombudsman not to be sued
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hy
note: No liability for acts done in good faith while performing official duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.81
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hy-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hy-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hy-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hy-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hy-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HY Ombudsman not to be sued
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hy-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: No liability implies duty to act in good faith.
premise text: The Ombudsman is not liable for acts done in good faith.
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman must act in good faith.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hy-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Entails
logic summary: Good faith entails official duties.
premise text: The Ombudsman acts in good faith.
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman performs official duties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hy-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Official duties imply no liability.
premise text: The Ombudsman performs official duties.
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman is not liable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15HZ Evidence of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15hz
note: A document purporting to be an authority granted under section 15GI is admissible in legal proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.82
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hz-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15hz-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hz-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15HZ Evidence of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15hz-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: admission
logic summary: Admission of documents as evidence
premise text: Section 15GI
conclusion text: Obligation to admit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15J Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15j
has part: 15J(1) Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
has part: 15J(2) Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
has part: 15J(3) Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.82

15J(1) Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15j-ss-1
part of: 15J Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
note: Authority granted under section 15GI by an AFP authorising officer, ACC authorising officer or NACC authorising officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.82
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15J(1) Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasAuthority
logic summary: Has authority to grant the authority.
premise text: The AFP authorising officer, ACC authorising officer or NACC authorising officer has the authority.
conclusion text: The applicant for the authority believes that illicit goods involved in the conduct of the operation may be dealt with by an officer of Customs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasBelief
logic summary: Has belief about the nature of the goods.
premise text: The applicant for the authority believes that illicit goods involved in the conduct of the operation may be dealt with by an officer of Customs.
conclusion text: The AFP authorising officer, ACC authorising officer or NACC authorising officer has the authority to grant the authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Occurs during the operation.
premise text: The applicant for the authority believes that illicit goods involved in the conduct of the operation may be dealt with by an officer of Customs.
conclusion text: The AFP authorising officer, ACC authorising officer or NACC authorising officer has the authority to grant the authority.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occursIf
logic summary: Occurs if the condition is met.
premise text: The applicant for the authority believes that illicit goods involved in the conduct of the operation may be dealt with by an officer of Customs.
conclusion text: The AFP authorising officer, ACC authorising officer or NACC authorising officer has the authority to grant the authority.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
logic summary: Has permission to deal with the goods.
premise text: The applicant for the authority believes that illicit goods involved in the conduct of the operation may be dealt with by an officer of Customs.
conclusion text: The AFP authorising officer, ACC authorising officer or NACC authorising officer has the authority to grant the authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15J(2) Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15j-ss-2
part of: 15J Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
note: Notify the Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department or a nominated person in writing of certain information.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.82
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15J(2) Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15J(3) Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15j-ss-3
part of: 15J Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
note: Failure to comply does not affect authority validity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.82
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15J(3) Secretary of Immigration and Border Protection Department to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Authority validity unaffected by non-compliance
premise text: (3) A failure to comply with this section does not affect the validity of an authority.
conclusion text: The validity of an authority is unaffected by a failure to comply with this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15JA Integrity testing—simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ja
note: Authorisation required for integrity testing operations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.84
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ja-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ja-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ja-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JA Integrity testing—simplified outline
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ja-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires authorisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JB Integrity testing—concurrent operation of State and Territory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jb
note: Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws with this Part is not excluded.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.85
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Exclusion of concurrent operation
premise text: This Part is not to apply
conclusion text: to the extent that the law is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: intersection
logic summary: Intersection of concurrent operation intervals
premise text: This Part is not to apply to the exclusion of a law of a State or Territory
conclusion text: to the extent that the law is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: intersection
logic summary: Intersection of concurrent operation intervals
premise text: This Part is not to apply to the exclusion of a law of a State or Territory
conclusion text: to the extent that the law is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of concurrent operation
premise text: This Part is not to apply to the exclusion of a law of a State or Territory
conclusion text: to the extent that the law is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jb-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: inference
logic summary: Inference of concurrent operation
premise text: This Part is not to apply to the exclusion of a law of a State or Territory
conclusion text: to the extent that the law is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JC Integrity testing—definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jc
note: Defines terms for integrity testing operations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.85
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jc-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jc-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jc-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jc-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JC Integrity testing—definitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Defines terms for integrity testing operations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jc-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Definitions for integrity testing operations.
conclusion text: Subclass of definitions for integrity testing operations.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JD Integrity testing—meaning of integrity testing operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jd
has part: 15JD(1) Integrity testing—meaning of integrity testing operation
has part: 15JD(2) Integrity testing—meaning of integrity testing operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.87

15JD(1) Integrity testing—meaning of integrity testing operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jd-ss-1
part of: 15JD Integrity testing—meaning of integrity testing operation
note: Defines integrity testing operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.87
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JD(1) Integrity testing—meaning of integrity testing operation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: (1) An integrity testing operation is an operation conducted in relation to a target agency using controlled or simulated situations to test the integrity of a staff member of the agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: has temporal relationship
logic summary: Describes when the operation occurs
conclusion text: (1) An integrity testing operation is an operation conducted in relation to a target agency using controlled or simulated situations to test the integrity of a staff member of the agency.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Establishes a connection between terms
conclusion text: (1) An integrity testing operation is an operation conducted in relation to a target agency using controlled or simulated situations to test the integrity of a staff member of the agency.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: is related to
logic summary: Describes how the term is used
conclusion text: (1) An integrity testing operation is an operation conducted in relation to a target agency using controlled or simulated situations to test the integrity of a staff member of the agency.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines a term with AI relevance
conclusion text: (1) An integrity testing operation is an operation conducted in relation to a target agency using controlled or simulated situations to test the integrity of a staff member of the agency.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15JD(2) Integrity testing—meaning of integrity testing operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jd-ss-2
part of: 15JD Integrity testing—meaning of integrity testing operation
note: Staff members cannot engage in conduct that contravenes principles of behaviour required by law or otherwise.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.87
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JD(2) Integrity testing—meaning of integrity testing operation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conduct that contravenes principles of behaviour required by law or otherwise.
premise text: (2) An integrity testing operation includes an operation that offers the staff member an opportunity to engage in conduct, whether lawful or unlawful...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jd-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies 'conduct' as conduct that contravenes principles of behaviour required by law or otherwise.
premise text: (2) An integrity testing operation includes an operation that offers the staff member an opportunity to engage in conduct, whether lawful or unlawful...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JE Integrity testing authorities—circumstances in which
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15je
has part: 15JE(1) Integrity testing authorities—circumstances in which
has part: 15JE(2) Integrity testing authorities—circumstances in which
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.88

15JE(1) Integrity testing authorities—circumstances in which
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15je-ss-1
part of: 15JE Integrity testing authorities—circumstances in which
note: An agency staff member may apply for authority for an integrity testing operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.88
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15je-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15je-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15je-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Staff members of agencies may apply for authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JE(2) Integrity testing authorities—circumstances in which
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15je-ss-2
part of: 15JE Integrity testing authorities—circumstances in which
note: Application of integrity testing table items does not prevent application of other items.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.88
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15je-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15je-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JE(2) Integrity testing authorities—circumstances in which
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15JF Integrity testing authorities—application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jf
has part: 15JF(1) Integrity testing authorities—application
has part: 15JF(2) Integrity testing authorities—application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.90

15JF(1) Integrity testing authorities—application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jf-ss-1
part of: 15JF Integrity testing authorities—application
note: Application requirements for integrity testing authorities
description: sufficient information to enable the authorising officer to decide
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.90
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JF(1) Integrity testing authorities—application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must provide sufficient information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JF(2) Integrity testing authorities—application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jf-ss-2
part of: 15JF Integrity testing authorities—application
note: Applicant must provide additional information for proper consideration.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.90
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JF(2) Integrity testing authorities—application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JG Integrity testing authorities—grant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jg
has part: 15JG(1) Integrity testing authorities—grant
has part: 15JG(2) Integrity testing authorities—grant
has part: 15JG(3) Integrity testing authorities—grant
has part: 15JG(4) Integrity testing authorities—grant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.90

15JG(1) Integrity testing authorities—grant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jg-ss-1
part of: 15JG Integrity testing authorities—grant
note: Grant authority for integrity testing operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.90
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JG(1) Integrity testing authorities—grant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
logic summary: Authority granted
premise text: Application considered
conclusion text: Authority issued
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JG(2) Integrity testing authorities—grant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jg-ss-2
part of: 15JG Integrity testing authorities—grant
note: Grant authority to conduct integrity testing operation only under specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.90
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JG(2) Integrity testing authorities—grant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory authority grant
premise text: Authorising officer must not grant authority unless specified conditions are met.
conclusion text: Authority granted only under specified conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Authority granted only during specified circumstances
premise text: Authorising officer must be satisfied that specified conditions are met before granting authority.
conclusion text: Authority granted only under specified circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Obligation on authorising officer to ensure specified conditions are met before granting authority
premise text: Authorising officer must be satisfied that specified conditions are met before granting authority.
conclusion text: Authority granted only under specified circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JG(3) Integrity testing authorities—grant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jg-ss-3
part of: 15JG Integrity testing authorities—grant
note: Granting of integrity testing authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.90
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JG(3) Integrity testing authorities—grant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
logic summary: Permission to grant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JG(4) Integrity testing authorities—grant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jg-ss-4
part of: 15JG Integrity testing authorities—grant
note: Granting authority for integrity testing authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.90
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasGrantingAuthority
logic summary: Defines the scope of integrity testing authorities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JH Integrity testing authorities—form
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jh
note: An integrity testing authority must state the name and rank or position of the appropriate authorising officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.91
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jh-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jh-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jh-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JH Integrity testing authorities—form
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state the name and rank or position of the appropriate authorising officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JI Integrity testing authorities—notice to National
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ji
note: Must provide copy of integrity testing authority to staff member and National Anti-Corruption Commissioner
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.93
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ji-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ji-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ji-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide copy of integrity testing authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JJ Integrity testing authorities—duration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jj
has part: 15JJ(1) Integrity testing authorities—duration
has part: 15JJ(2) Integrity testing authorities—duration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.93

15JJ(1) Integrity testing authorities—duration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jj-ss-1
part of: 15JJ Integrity testing authorities—duration
note: Authority comes into force when granted
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.93
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jj-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes temporal interval of authority's coming into force
premise text: Authority is granted
conclusion text: Authority comes into force at some point in the future
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JJ(2) Integrity testing authorities—duration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jj-ss-2
part of: 15JJ Integrity testing authorities—duration
note: Authority duration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.93
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jj-ss-2-norm

15JK Integrity testing authorities—variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jk
has part: 15JK(1) Integrity testing authorities—variation
has part: 15JK(2) Integrity testing authorities—variation
has part: 15JK(3) Integrity testing authorities—variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.93

15JK(1) Integrity testing authorities—variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jk-ss-1
part of: 15JK Integrity testing authorities—variation
note: Variation of integrity testing authority by authorising officer or staff member.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.93
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JK(1) Integrity testing authorities—variation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to vary authority.
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer for an integrity testing operation...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to vary authority by staff member.
premise text: (b) on application, in writing, by the responsible staff member for the operation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of variation on integrity testing authority.
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer for an integrity testing operation...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval of variation by authorising officer or staff member.
premise text: (a) at any time on the authorising officer’s own initiative;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of permission to vary authority.
premise text: (b) on application, in writing, by the responsible staff member for the operation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JK(2) Integrity testing authorities—variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jk-ss-2
part of: 15JK Integrity testing authorities—variation
note: Authority may extend period of effect up to 12 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.93
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JK(2) Integrity testing authorities—variation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Authority may extend period of effect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JK(3) Integrity testing authorities—variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jk-ss-3
part of: 15JK Integrity testing authorities—variation
note: Authorising officer must give a copy of variation to integrity testing authorities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.93
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JK(3) Integrity testing authorities—variation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide variation to integrity testing authorities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JL Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jl
has part: 15JL(1) Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
has part: 15JL(2) Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
has part: 15JL(3) Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.94

15JL(1) Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jl-ss-1
part of: 15JL Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
note: Cancellation of integrity testing authority by authorising officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.94
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JL(1) Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of cancelling integrity testing authority.
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer for an integrity testing operation may, by order in writing given to the responsible staff member for the operation...
conclusion text: The authority at any time and for any reason may be cancelled.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval of cancellation.
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer for an integrity testing operation may, by order in writing given to the responsible staff member for...
conclusion text: The cancellation can occur at any time and for any reason.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Temporal trace of cancellation.
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer for an integrity testing operation may, by order in writing given to the responsible staff member for...
conclusion text: The cancellation is a recurring event.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Spread
logic summary: Spread of cancellation information.
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer for an integrity testing operation may, by order in writing given to the responsible staff member for...
conclusion text: The cancellation is communicated to the responsible staff member.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of cancellation authority.
premise text: (1) An appropriate authorising officer for an integrity testing operation may, by order in writing given to the responsible staff member for...
conclusion text: The cancellation authority is represented as a knowledge entity.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15JL(2) Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jl-ss-2
part of: 15JL Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
note: Staff member can request cancellation of integrity testing authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.94
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JL(2) Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15JL(3) Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jl-ss-3
part of: 15JL Integrity testing authorities—cancellation
note: Cancellation of integrity testing authority takes effect at specified time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.94
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jl-ss-3-norm

15JM Integrity testing authorities—defects
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jm
note: An application for an integrity testing authority or for the variation of an authority, and any integrity testing authority or variation granted on the basis of such an application, is not invalidated by any defect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.94
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jm-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jm-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jm-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JM Integrity testing authorities—defects
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jm-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If a defect affects the application, authority or variation in a material particular, then the application is invalidated.
premise text: defect(a) ∧ (a = application ∨ a = authority ∨ a = variation)
conclusion text: (a = application ∨ a = authority ∨ a = variation) → ¬(application is invalidated by defect(a))
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15JN Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jn
has part: 15JN(1) Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
has part: 15JN(2) Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
has part: 15JN(3) Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.95

15JN(1) Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jn-ss-1
part of: 15JN Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
note: Authorises participants to take part in integrity testing operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.95
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Authorises participants to take part in integrity testing operation
premise text: integrity testing authority for an integrity testing operation
conclusion text: each person identified in the authority as a participant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15JN(2) Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jn-ss-2
part of: 15JN Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
note: Participant authorized to take part in integrity testing operation for a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.95
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JN(2) Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (2) A participant is authorized to take part in the integrity testing operation.
conclusion text: The participant is permitted to take part in the integrity testing operation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Specifying a temporal interval
premise text: (2) A participant is authorized to take part in the integrity testing operation for the period of effect of the authority.
conclusion text: The participant's authorization overlaps with the specified period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Specifying a temporal condition
premise text: (2) A participant is authorized to take part in the integrity testing operation for the period of effect of the authority, unless...
conclusion text: The participant's authorization is valid until the specified condition is met.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Specifying a diffusion relation
premise text: (2) A participant is authorized to take part in the integrity testing operation for the period of effect of the authority, unless...
conclusion text: The authorization diffuses to other participants.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
logic summary: Specifying a cognitive agent relation
premise text: (2) A participant is authorized to take part in the integrity testing operation for the period of effect of the authority, unless...
conclusion text: The authorization is related to a cognitive agent.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15JN(3) Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jn-ss-3
part of: 15JN Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
note: An integrity testing authority does not authorise a participant to delegate participation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.95
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JN(3) Integrity testing operations—authorised conduct
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits delegation of participation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JO Integrity testing operations—indemnity against civil liability
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jo
note: Commonwealth must indemnify participant in integrity testing operation against civil liability.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.95
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jo-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jo-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jo-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JO Integrity testing operations—indemnity against civil liability
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jo-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Commonwealth has an obligation to indemnify participant.
premise text: The Commonwealth must indemnify...
conclusion text: ...against any civil liability...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JP Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jp
has part: 15JP(1) Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
has part: 15JP(2) Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
has part: 15JP(3) Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.96

15JP(1) Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jp-ss-1
part of: 15JP Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
note: Participant must continue to comply with integrity testing operation despite scope variation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.96
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-logic-ltl-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JP(1) Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
logic summary: Continues to apply despite scope variation
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Participant must comply with integrity testing operation
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.
conclusion text: for so long as...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Continuity despite scope variation
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.
conclusion text: ...for so long as...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Continuity despite scope variation
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.
conclusion text: ...for so long as...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JP(2) Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jp-ss-2
part of: 15JP Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
note: Continue applying provisions despite cancellation of integrity testing authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.96
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JP(2) Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continues to apply provisions despite cancellation
premise text: Cancellation of authority does not affect obligations
conclusion text: Provisions continue to apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap with cancellation
premise text: Cancellation occurred before or during testing operation
conclusion text: Excerpt applies despite cancellation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JP(3) Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jp-ss-3
part of: 15JP Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
note: Be aware of substantial risk that variation or cancellation has happened and unjustifiable to take the risk.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.96
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JP(3) Integrity testing operations—participants unaware of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to be aware of substantial risk
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jp-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge
logic summary: Be aware of substantial risk that variation or cancellation has happened
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JQ Integrity testing operations—disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jq
has part: 15JQ(1) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
has part: 15JQ(2) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
has part: 15JQ(3) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
has part: 15JQ(4) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.98

15JQ(1) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jq-ss-1
part of: 15JQ Integrity testing operations—disclosure
note: Disclosing information about integrity testing operations is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.98
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JQ(1) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...discloses information; and...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JQ(2) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jq-ss-2
part of: 15JQ Integrity testing operations—disclosure
note: Disclosure exceptions for integrity testing operations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.98
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JQ(2) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Exempts disclosure from integrity testing operations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JQ(3) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jq-ss-3
part of: 15JQ Integrity testing operations—disclosure
note: Disclosure of information to the National Anti-Corruption Commissioner is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.98
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Disclosure is permitted under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JQ(4) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jq-ss-4
part of: 15JQ Integrity testing operations—disclosure
note: Disclosure of information to IGIS official for exercising power or performing duty is exempt from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.98
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JQ(4) Integrity testing operations—disclosure
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Disclosure to IGIS official for exercising power or performing duty is permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jq-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge
logic summary: IGIS official has knowledge of disclosure purpose
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JR Integrity testing operations—disclosure endangering safety
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jr
note: Disclosing information about integrity testing operations that endangers safety is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.99
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JR Integrity testing operations—disclosure endangering safety
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information about integrity testing operations that endangers safety.
premise text: The person discloses information; and the information relates to an integrity testing operation; and either the person intends to endanger the health or safety of any person or prejudice the effective conduct of an integrity testing operation;
conclusion text: A person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Disclosing information about integrity testing operations that endangers safety overlaps with the effective conduct of an integrity testing operation.
premise text: the person intends to endanger the health or safety of any person or prejudice the effective conduct of an integrity testing operation;
conclusion text: The disclosure of information about integrity testing operations that endangers safety overlaps with the effective conduct of an integrity testing operation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Disclosing information about integrity testing operations that endangers safety repeats the action of endangering health or safety.
premise text: the person intends to endanger the health or safety of any person or prejudice the effective conduct of an integrity testing operation;
conclusion text: The disclosure of information about integrity testing operations that endangers safety repeats the action of endangering health or safety.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: Disclosing information about integrity testing operations that endangers safety spreads to other persons or entities.
premise text: the person discloses information; and the information relates to an integrity testing operation; and either the person intends to endanger the health or safety of any person or prejudice the effective conduct of an integrity testing operation;
conclusion text: The disclosure of information about integrity testing operations that endangers safety spreads to other persons or entities.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jr-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies information as relating to an integrity testing operation using artificial intelligence.
premise text: the information relates to an integrity testing operation;
conclusion text: The information is classified as relating to an integrity testing operation using artificial intelligence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JS Integrity testing operations—annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15js
has part: 15JS(1) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
has part: 15JS(2) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
has part: 15JS(3) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
has part: 15JS(4) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
has part: 15JS(5) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102

15JS(1) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15js-ss-1
part of: 15JS Integrity testing operations—annual reports
note: Annual report on integrity testing operations must be submitted to the Law Enforcement Minister.
description: Details of integrity testing operations authorized during the previous 12 months
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JS(1) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to submit annual report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: DURING
logic summary: During the previous 12 months
premise text: (1) As soon as practicable after 30 June in each year, the chief officer of each integrity testing agency must submit a report to the Law Enforcement Minister setting out...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Submission of annual report implies compliance with obligation
premise text: (1) As soon as practicable after 30 June in each year, the chief officer of each integrity testing agency must submit a report to the Law Enforcement Minister setting out...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IN
logic summary: Details of integrity testing operations are included in annual report
premise text: (2) in relation to integrity testing operations authorized by an authorising officer of the agency during the previous 12 months.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS
logic summary: Annual report is a structured document containing details of integrity testing operations
premise text: (2) in relation to integrity testing operations authorized by an authorising officer of the agency during the previous 12 months.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JS(2) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15js-ss-2
part of: 15JS Integrity testing operations—annual reports
note: Annual report requirements for integrity testing authorities
description: Details of granted authorities, suspected criminal activity, and authority periods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JS(2) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual reports
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JS(3) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15js-ss-3
part of: 15JS Integrity testing operations—annual reports
note: No disclosure of person identities in integrity testing reports.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JS(3) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of personal information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JS(4) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15js-ss-4
part of: 15JS Integrity testing operations—annual reports
note: Annual report must include particulars of an integrity testing operation if completed by the end of the year.
description: Particulars of an integrity testing operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JS(4) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide particulars if completed by the end of the year.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JS(5) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15js-ss-5
part of: 15JS Integrity testing operations—annual reports
note: Annual reports must be provided by integrity testing agencies.
description: annual reports
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JS(5) Integrity testing operations—annual reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide annual reports.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15js-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of integrity testing agencies.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15JT Evidence of integrity testing authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15jt
note: A document purporting to be an integrity testing authority is admissible in legal proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.104
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jt-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15jt-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jt-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15JT Evidence of integrity testing authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15jt-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: admission
logic summary: Admission of documents
premise text: Document purporting to be an integrity testing authority
conclusion text: Admissible in legal proceedings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15K Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15k
note: Defines terms related to assumed identities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.105
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15k-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15k-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15k-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15k-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15K Definitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15k-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
logic summary: Class hierarchy for assumed identities
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15k-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusive definition of agency
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ka
has part: 15KA(1) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
has part: 15KA(2) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
has part: 15KA(3) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
has part: 15KA(3A) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
has part: 15KA(4) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.111

15KA(1) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ka-ss-1
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
note: Law enforcement officer may apply for authority to acquire or use assumed identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.111
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KA(1) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to do something
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KA(2) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ka-ss-2
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
note: Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.111
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligationTo
logic summary: Authority to acquire or use assumed identity
premise text: Law enforcement agency has obligation to provide authority
conclusion text: Application must be made to the chief officer of the law enforcement agency
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for application submission
premise text: Application must be submitted within a certain time frame
conclusion text: Chief officer of the law enforcement agency must receive application before deadline
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: mustJustify
logic summary: Reasoning for authority request
premise text: Applicant must justify reason for requesting assumed identity
conclusion text: Chief officer of the law enforcement agency must consider justification before granting authority
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: mustInform
logic summary: Notification of decision
premise text: Applicant must be informed of decision on authority request
conclusion text: Chief officer of the law enforcement agency must notify applicant of decision
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: mustProcess
logic summary: Processing of application
premise text: Application must be processed by chief officer of law enforcement agency
conclusion text: Chief officer of the law enforcement agency must process application before making decision
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KA(3) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ka-ss-3
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
note: Authority to acquire or use assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.111
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KA(3) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
logic summary: Authority granted
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority for the officer or any other person (including a foreign officer) to do either or both of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority for the officer or any other person (including a foreign officer) to do either or both of the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal limit
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority for the officer or any other person (including a foreign officer) to do either or both of the following:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Information dissemination
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority for the officer or any other person (including a foreign officer) to do either or both of the following:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognizes
logic summary: Artificial intelligence recognition
premise text: (3) An intelligence officer of an intelligence agency may apply to the chief officer of the agency for an authority for the officer or any other person (including a foreign officer) to do either or both of the following:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KA(3A) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ka-ss-3a
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
note: Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity is restricted to ONI intelligence officers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.111
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KA(3A) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction
logic summary: Application is restricted to ONI intelligence officers.
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KA(4) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ka-ss-4
part of: 15KA Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
note: Separate application must be made for each assumed identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.111
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KA(4) Application for authority to acquire or use assumed identity
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ka-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide separate application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KB Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kb
has part: 15KB(1) Determination of applications
has part: 15KB(2) Determination of applications
has part: 15KB(3) Determination of applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.113

15KB(1) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kb-ss-1
part of: 15KB Determination of applications
note: Grant authority to acquire or use assumed identity with conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.113
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted
premise text: Application considered
conclusion text: Authority granted with conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse
logic summary: Permission denied
premise text: Application not approved
conclusion text: Authority refused
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KB(2) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kb-ss-2
part of: 15KB Determination of applications
note: Authority to acquire or use assumed identity may not be granted unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.113
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KB(2) Determination of applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of acquiring or using assumed identity
premise text: (2) An authority to acquire or use an assumed identity may not be granted...
conclusion text: ...unless the chief officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for which assumed identity can be acquired or used
premise text: (ii) the exercise of powers and performance of functions...
conclusion text: ...for one or more of the following purposes:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for training persons for purposes mentioned in subparagraphs (i) to (iii)
premise text: (iv) the training of persons for any of the purposes...
conclusion text: ...for one or more of the following purposes:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of assumed identity to authorized person
premise text: (v) any administrative function in support of any of the...
conclusion text: ...for one or more of the following purposes:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
logic summary: Cognitive AI application for assumed identity management
premise text: (a) that the assumed identity is necessary...
conclusion text: ...for one or more of the following purposes:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KB(3) Determination of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kb-ss-3
part of: 15KB Determination of applications
note: Chief officer must appoint an officer to supervise
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.113
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KB(3) Determination of applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
premise text: (3) If an authority is granted...
conclusion text: Chief officer must appoint...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KC Form of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kc
has part: 15KC(1) Form of authority
has part: 15KC(2) Form of authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.115

15KC(1) Form of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kc-ss-1
part of: 15KC Form of authority
note: Authority must be in writing and signed by the person granting it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.115
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KC(1) Form of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST BE IN WRITING
logic summary: Authority must be in writing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SIGNED BY THE PERSON GRANTING IT
logic summary: Authority must be signed by the person granting it
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KC(2) Form of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kc-ss-2
part of: 15KC Form of authority
note: Authority must state certain details
description: Details of assumed identity, evidence, and conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.115
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KC(2) Form of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state details
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KD Period of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kd
has part: 15KD(1) Period of authority
has part: 15KD(2) Period of authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116

15KD(1) Period of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kd-ss-1
part of: 15KD Period of authority
note: Authority remains in force until cancelled under section 15KE.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KD(1) Period of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KD(2) Period of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kd-ss-2
part of: 15KD Period of authority
note: Authority remains in force until specified end date unless cancelled sooner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KD(2) Period of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true
premise text: (2) An authority for an authorised civilian...
conclusion text: The authority remains in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KE Variation or cancellation of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ke
has part: 15KE(1) Variation or cancellation of authority
has part: 15KE(2) Variation or cancellation of authority
has part: 15KE(3) Variation or cancellation of authority
has part: 15KE(4) Variation or cancellation of authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.117

15KE(1) Variation or cancellation of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ke-ss-1
part of: 15KE Variation or cancellation of authority
note: Chief officer may vary or cancel authority at any time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.117
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KE(1) Variation or cancellation of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to vary or cancel authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KE(2) Variation or cancellation of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ke-ss-2
part of: 15KE Variation or cancellation of authority
note: Chief officer must give written notice of variation or cancellation to authorised person and supervisor.
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.117
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KE(2) Variation or cancellation of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KE(3) Variation or cancellation of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ke-ss-3
part of: 15KE Variation or cancellation of authority
note: Notice must state reason for varying or cancelling authority
description: Reason
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.117
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KE(3) Variation or cancellation of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide reason
conclusion text: The notice must state why the authority is varied or cancelled.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KE(4) Variation or cancellation of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ke-ss-4
part of: 15KE Variation or cancellation of authority
note: Variation or cancellation of authority takes effect on a specified day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.117
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ke-ss-4-norm

15KF Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kf
has part: 15KF(1) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(2) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(3) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(4) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(5) Yearly review of authority
has part: 15KF(6) Yearly review of authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118

15KF(1) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kf-ss-1
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority
note: Agency must review authority periodically.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KF(1) Yearly review of authority
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to review authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KF(2) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kf-ss-2
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority
note: Review authority at least once every 3 years for delegated officers, or 12 months otherwise.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KF(2) Yearly review of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must conduct review
premise text: (2) A review of an authority under this section is to be conducted:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KF(3) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kf-ss-3
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority
note: Determine whether use of assumed identity is still necessary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KF(3) Yearly review of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to review authority
premise text: (3) The purpose of a review is...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KF(4) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kf-ss-4
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority
note: Cancel authority if necessary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KF(4) Yearly review of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory cancellation
premise text: (4) If the chief officer is satisfied...
conclusion text: he or she must cancel the authority under section 15KE.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KF(5) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kf-ss-5
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority
note: Chief officer must record opinion and reasons if use of assumed identity is necessary.
description: Opinion and reasons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KF(5) Yearly review of authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to record opinion and reasons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KF(6) Yearly review of authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kf-ss-6
part of: 15KF Yearly review of authority
note: Failure to comply does not invalidate an authority or lawful action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kf-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from obligations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KG Making entries in register of births, deaths or marriages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kg
note: Permits chief officers of law enforcement agencies or intelligence agencies to apply for an order in the Supreme Court of a State or Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.119
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kg-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kg-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kg-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KG Making entries in register of births, deaths or marriages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KH Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kh
has part: 15KH(1) Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,
has part: 15KH(2) Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.119

15KH(1) Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kh-ss-1
part of: 15KH Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,
note: Authority ceasing to be in force on register of births
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.119
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KH(1) Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true
premise text: (a) an authority for an assumed identity ceases to be in force;
conclusion text: This section applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During the authority ceasing to be in force
premise text: (a) an authority for an assumed identity ceases to be in force;
conclusion text: This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Until the authority ceasing to be in force
premise text: (a) an authority for an assumed identity ceases to be in force;
conclusion text: This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: becauseOf
logic summary: Because of the entry in register of births, deaths or marriages
premise text: (b) there is an entry in relation to that assumed identity in a register of births, deaths or marriages because of an order under a corresponding assumed identity law.
conclusion text: This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasAssumedIdentityLaw
logic summary: Has assumed identity law
premise text: (b) there is an entry in relation to that assumed identity in a register of births, deaths or marriages because of an order under a corresponding assumed identity law.
conclusion text: This section applies if...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KH(2) Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kh-ss-2
part of: 15KH Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,
note: Cancel entry from register of births within 28 days after authority ceases to be in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.119
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KH(2) Effect of authority ceasing to be in force on register of births,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must apply for order to cancel entry
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency or an intelligence agency...
conclusion text: must apply for an order under the corresponding assumed identity law
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must cancel entry within 28 days after authority ceases to be in force
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency or an intelligence agency...
conclusion text: must apply for an order under the corresponding assumed identity law to cancel the entry within 28 days after the day the authority ceases to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >P
logic summary: Entry on register of births is created before authority ceases to be in force
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency or an intelligence agency...
conclusion text: within 28 days after the day the authority ceases to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kh-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >P
logic summary: Entry on register of births is created before authority ceases to be in force
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency or an intelligence agency...
conclusion text: within 28 days after the day the authority ceases to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ki
has part: 15KI(1) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(2) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(2A) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(3) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(4) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(5) Request for evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KI(6) Request for evidence of assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120

15KI(1) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ki-ss-1
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity
note: Authority must provide evidence of assumed identity.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KI(1) Request for evidence of assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KI(2) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ki-ss-2
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KI(2) Request for evidence of assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15KI(2A) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ki-ss-2a
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity
note: List of persons who may make a request for evidence of assumed identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KI(2A) Request for evidence of assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Definition of the scope of persons who may make a request.
premise text: (a) the chief officer of a law enforcement agency who granted the authority; or (b) the chief officer of an intelligence agency (other than the Office of National Intelligence or the Australian Signals Directorate) who granted the authority; or
conclusion text: or (c) if the chief officer of the Office of National Intelligence granted the authority—the chief officer of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation or the Australian Secret Intelligence Service; or
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Definition of the scope of persons who may make a request.
premise text: (d) if the chief officer of the Australian Signals Directorate granted the authority—the chief officer of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation or the Australian Secret Intelligence Service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between granting authority and making a request.
premise text: (a) the chief officer of a law enforcement agency who granted the authority; or
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KI(3) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ki-ss-3
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity must state a reasonable period for compliance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KI(3) Request for evidence of assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide evidence of assumed identity within a reasonable period.
premise text: (3) The request must state a reasonable period for compliance with the request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KI(4) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ki-ss-4
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity must include specific details.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KI(4) Request for evidence of assumed identity
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KI(5) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ki-ss-5
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity
note: Request for entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making a request for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
premise text: (5) A request must not be made under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making a request for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
premise text: (5) A request must not be made under this section for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KI(6) Request for evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ki-ss-6
part of: 15KI Request for evidence of assumed identity
note: Definition of evidence for issuing agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KI(6) Request for evidence of assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ki-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Applies to evidence class
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KJ Government issuing agencies to comply with request
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kj
note: Must comply with request within reasonable period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.121
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kj-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kj-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KK Non-government issuing agencies may comply with request
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kk
note: Non-government issuing agencies must comply with requests.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.121
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kk-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kk-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kk-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kk-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KK Non-government issuing agencies may comply with request
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide compliance
premise text: Request under section 15KI
conclusion text: Comply with request
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kk-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CAN
logic summary: Can comply with request
premise text: Request under section 15KI
conclusion text: Comply with request
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KL Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kl
note: Chief officer must cancel evidence of assumed identity upon written direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.121
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kl-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kl-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kl-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KL Cancellation of evidence of assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KM Return of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15km
has part: 15KM(1) Return of evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KM(2) Return of evidence of assumed identity
has part: 15KM(3) Return of evidence of assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.122

15KM(1) Return of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15km-ss-1
part of: 15KM Return of evidence of assumed identity
note: Section applies if authority ceases to be in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.122
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15km-ss-1-norm

15KM(2) Return of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15km-ss-2
part of: 15KM Return of evidence of assumed identity
note: Request for return of evidence of assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.122
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15km-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15km-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KM(2) Return of evidence of assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15KM(3) Return of evidence of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15km-ss-3
part of: 15KM Return of evidence of assumed identity
note: Failure to comply with a request for identity evidence is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.122
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15km-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15km-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15km-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KM(3) Return of evidence of assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15km-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a request
premise text: (2)
conclusion text: (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KN Protection from criminal liability—officers of issuing agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kn
note: Protection from criminal liability for officers of issuing agencies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.122
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kn-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kn-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kn-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KN Protection from criminal liability—officers of issuing agencies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state to protect officers from criminal liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KO Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ko
has part: 15KO(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
has part: 15KO(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.122

15KO(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ko-ss-1
part of: 15KO Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
note: Chief officer of an issuing agency must provide indemnity if requested by a law enforcement or intelligence agency chief officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.122
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KO(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide indemnity
premise text: Chief officer of an issuing agency makes a request under section 15KI or gives a direction under section 15KL.
conclusion text: Must provide indemnity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide indemnity if requested by a law enforcement or intelligence agency chief officer
premise text: Chief officer of an issuing agency must provide indemnity if requested by a law enforcement or intelligence agency chief officer.
conclusion text: Must provide indemnity if requested
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Request made before indemnity provided
premise text: Chief officer of an issuing agency makes a request under section 15KI or gives a direction under section 15KL to the chief officer of an issuing agency.
conclusion text: Request made before indemnity provided
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Indemnity must be provided if request is made
premise text: Chief officer of an issuing agency makes a request under section 15KI or gives a direction under section 15KL to the chief officer of an issuing agency.
conclusion text: Indemnity must be provided if request is made
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Chief officer of an issuing agency must provide indemnity
premise text: This section applies to the chief officer of an issuing agency.
conclusion text: Chief officer of an issuing agency must provide indemnity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KO(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ko-ss-2
part of: 15KO Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
note: Commonwealth must indemnify issuing agency or officer for liability incurred in course of duty to comply with request or direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.122
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KO(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ko-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Commonwealth has an obligation to indemnify issuing agency or officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KP Assumed identity may be acquired and used
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kp
note: Acquiring or using an assumed identity is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.124
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kp-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kp-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kp-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kp-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kp-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KP Assumed identity may be acquired and used
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to acquire or use an assumed identity.
premise text: The person is an authorised person (other than an authorised civilian) and the acquisition or use is in accordance with an authority; and
conclusion text: The person may acquire or use an assumed identity if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kp-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Acquiring or using an assumed identity is permitted under certain conditions.
premise text: The person is an authorised civilian and the acquisition or use is in accordance with an authority; and
conclusion text: The person may acquire or use an assumed identity if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kp-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Acquiring or using an assumed identity is permitted under certain conditions.
premise text: Any direction by the person’s supervisor under the authority.
conclusion text: The person may acquire or use an assumed identity if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KQ Protection from criminal liability—authorised persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kq
note: An authorised person is not criminally responsible for an offence if they act in accordance with authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.124
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kq-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kq-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kq-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kq-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KQ Protection from criminal liability—authorised persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to act in accordance with authority.
premise text: The person is acting in accordance with authority.
conclusion text: They are not criminally responsible for the offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kq-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The action overlaps with the duty.
premise text: The person is acting in their duty.
conclusion text: They are not criminally responsible for the offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KR Protection from criminal liability—third parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kr
note: Protection from criminal liability for third parties performing official duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.125
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kr-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kr-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kr-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KR Protection from criminal liability—third parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kr-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state to protect third parties performing official duties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KS Indemnity for authorised persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ks
has part: 15KS(1) Indemnity for authorised persons
has part: 15KS(2) Indemnity for authorised persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.125

15KS(1) Indemnity for authorised persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ks-ss-1
part of: 15KS Indemnity for authorised persons
note: Authority granted by chief officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.125
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KS(1) Indemnity for authorised persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Chief officer has authority to grant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KS(2) Indemnity for authorised persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ks-ss-2
part of: 15KS Indemnity for authorised persons
note: Commonwealth must indemnify authorised persons for liability incurred due to actions taken in accordance with authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.125
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KS(2) Indemnity for authorised persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Commonwealth owes obligation to indemnify authorised persons
premise text: Authority prescribed
conclusion text: Liability incurred
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ks-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal intervals overlap for liability incurred
premise text: Liability incurred due to actions taken
conclusion text: Temporal interval overlaps with liability incurred
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KT Particular qualifications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kt
has part: 15KT(1) Particular qualifications
has part: 15KT(2) Particular qualifications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.126

15KT(1) Particular qualifications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kt-ss-1
part of: 15KT Particular qualifications
note: Exemption from sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS for authorised persons without a particular qualification.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.126
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KT(1) Particular qualifications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts authorised persons from sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS without a particular qualification.
premise text: (a) a particular qualification is needed to do the thing; and (b) the person does not have that qualification.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the exemption of authorised persons from sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS without a particular qualification.
premise text: (1) Sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS do not apply to anything done by an authorised person if:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the exemption of authorised persons from sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS without a particular qualification.
premise text: (1) Sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS do not apply to anything done by an authorised person if:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagates the exemption of authorised persons from sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS without a particular qualification.
premise text: (1) Sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS do not apply to anything done by an authorised person if:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Represents the exemption of authorised persons from sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS without a particular qualification.
premise text: (1) Sections 15KQ, 15KR and 15KS do not apply to anything done by an authorised person if:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KT(2) Particular qualifications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kt-ss-2
part of: 15KT Particular qualifications
note: No one authorized to fly a plane without actual qualification.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.126
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KT(2) Particular qualifications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits flying without qualification.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not the person has acquired...
conclusion text: No one authorized to fly a plane without actual qualification.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KU Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ku
has part: 15KU(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
has part: 15KU(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
has part: 15KU(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.126

15KU(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ku-ss-1
part of: 15KU Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
note: Continue to apply despite variation in authority scope
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.126
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KU(1) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continue application despite variation
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Ignorance
logic summary: Continue application despite lack of knowledge of variation
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continue application despite variation in authority scope
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Rebuttal
logic summary: Counter rebuttal to variation in authority scope
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Continue application despite variation in authority scope
premise text: (a) is unaware of the variation; and (b) is not reckless about the existence of the variation.
conclusion text: This Part continues to apply...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KU(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ku-ss-2
part of: 15KU Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
note: Continue to apply despite cancellation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.126
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KU(2) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUE
logic summary: Continue to apply despite cancellation
premise text: (2) If an authority has been cancelled...
conclusion text: ...this Part continues to apply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KU(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ku-ss-3
part of: 15KU Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
note: Reckless about variation or cancellation of authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.126
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KU(3) Effect of being unaware of variation or cancellation of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: recklessness
logic summary: Reckless behavior
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk...
conclusion text: the person is reckless about the existence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: awareness
logic summary: Aware of substantial risk
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk...
conclusion text: the person is aware of the variation or cancellation...
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: trace
logic summary: Tracing the variation or cancellation
premise text: (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.
conclusion text: the person takes the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: justifiability
logic summary: Justifiability of taking the risk
premise text: (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.
conclusion text: it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ku-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: risk assessment
logic summary: Assessing the risk
premise text: (a) the person is aware of a substantial risk that the variation or cancellation has happened; and (b) having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk that the authority has not been varied or cancelled.
conclusion text: the risk assessment leads to recklessness.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KV Transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kv
has part: 15KV(1) Transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KV(2) Transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KV(3) Transfer of control of authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.127

15KV(1) Transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kv-ss-1
part of: 15KV Transfer of control of authorities
note: Chief officer of an intelligence agency may agree to transfer control of authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.127
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KV(1) Transfer of control of authorities
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Agreement
logic summary: Chief officer agrees to transfer control.
premise text: (1) The chief officer of an intelligence agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing...
conclusion text: ...to transfer control of an authority to the chief officer of the receiving agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorization
logic summary: Authority was granted by the chief officer of the originating agency.
premise text: (a) the authority was granted by the chief officer of...
conclusion text: ...if: (a) the authority was granted by the chief officer of...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Transfer of control is a temporal relation.
premise text: (1) The chief officer of an intelligence agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing...
conclusion text: ...if: (a) the authority was granted by the chief officer of...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Chief officer delegates functions under this section.
premise text: Note: The chief officer may delegate functions under this section—see section 15LH.
conclusion text: ...if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorization
logic summary: Control of the authority was transferred to the chief officer of the originating agency.
premise text: (b) control of the authority was transferred to the chief officer of...
conclusion text: ...under a previous application of this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15KV(2) Transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kv-ss-2
part of: 15KV Transfer of control of authorities
note: Chief officer may agree to transfer control of authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.127
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KV(2) Transfer of control of authorities
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Agreement
logic summary: Transfer agreement is an obligation.
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing with the chief officer of another law enforcement agency (the receiving agency) to transfer control of an authority...
conclusion text: The chief officer may delegate functions under this section—see section 15LH.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Transfer agreement has a temporal relation.
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing with the chief officer of another law enforcement agency (the receiving agency) to transfer control of an authority...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Transfer agreement has a recurring trace.
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing with the chief officer of another law enforcement agency (the receiving agency) to transfer control of an authority...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Chief officer has permission to delegate functions.
premise text: The chief officer may delegate functions under this section—see section 15LH.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Claim
logic summary: Transfer agreement is a claim.
premise text: (2) The chief officer of a law enforcement agency (the originating agency) may agree in writing with the chief officer of another law enforcement agency (the receiving agency) to transfer control of an authority...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15KV(3) Transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kv-ss-3
part of: 15KV Transfer of control of authorities
note: Chief officer of originating agency must provide written document to chief officer of receiving agency with certain information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.127
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KV(3) Transfer of control of authorities
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written document
premise text: (3) The chief officer of the originating agency must give...
conclusion text: ...a written document setting out...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for review and transfer information
premise text: (3) The chief officer of the originating agency must give...
conclusion text: ...when a review was last conducted; and...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Transfer of control implies review and transfer information
premise text: (3) The chief officer of the originating agency must give...
conclusion text: ...whether control of the authority has previously been transferred under this section,...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Transfer information spreads to receiving agency
premise text: (3) The chief officer of the originating agency must give...
conclusion text: ...the name of the originating agency and receiving agency in relation to each such transfer.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kv-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
logic summary: Requiring written document for transfer control
premise text: (3) The chief officer of the originating agency must give...
conclusion text: ...a written document setting out: ...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kw
has part: 15KW(1) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KW(2) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KW(3) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KW(4) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
has part: 15KW(5) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128

15KW(1) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kw-ss-1
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
note: Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-1-norm

15KW(2) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kw-ss-2
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
note: Authority continues in force after transfer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KW(2) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Obligation to maintain authority
premise text: (2) The authority continues...
conclusion text: The authority must continue in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KW(3) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kw-ss-3
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
note: Provisions have effect as if chief officer of receiving agency granted authority instead of originating agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-3-norm

15KW(4) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kw-ss-4
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
note: Chief officer of receiving agency must review authority within specified timeframes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KW(4) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Chief officer has an obligation to review authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KW(5) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kw-ss-5
part of: 15KW Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
note: Chief officer of receiving agency must make request under section 15KI.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KW(5) Consequences of transfer of control of authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kw-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
premise text: Chief officer of receiving agency must make request under section 15KI.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KX Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kx
has part: 15KX(1) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
has part: 15KX(2) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
has part: 15KX(2A) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
has part: 15KX(3) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
has part: 15KX(4) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.130

15KX(1) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kx-ss-1
part of: 15KX Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
note: Authority must provide evidence upon request
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.130
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KX(1) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KX(2) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kx-ss-2
part of: 15KX Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.130
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KX(2) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to request evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KX(2A) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kx-ss-2a
part of: 15KX Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
note: Identifies who may make a request for evidence under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.130
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KX(2A) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: whoMay
logic summary: Identifies who may perform an action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KX(3) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kx-ss-3
part of: 15KX Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
note: Request must state it is a request under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.130
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KX(3) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KX(4) Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kx-ss-4
part of: 15KX Requests to a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
note: Request for entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.130
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kx-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making a request for an entry in a register of births, deaths or marriages.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KY Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ky
has part: 15KY(1) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
has part: 15KY(2) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
has part: 15KY(3) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.131

15KY(1) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ky-ss-1
part of: 15KY Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
note: Request for evidence of assumed identity from a Commonwealth government issuing agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.131
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KY(1) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence of assumed identity.
premise text: (a) an authority under a corresponding assumed identity law authorises a request for...
conclusion text: ...the giving of evidence of the assumed identity to the authorised person named in the authority;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval: Request -> Reasonable Period.
premise text: (c) the request states a reasonable period for compliance with the request.
conclusion text: ...a reasonable period for compliance with the request;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: Implication of authority and request on Commonwealth government issuing agency.
premise text: (a) an authority under a corresponding assumed identity law authorises a request for...
conclusion text: ...the giving of evidence of the assumed identity to the authorised person named in the authority;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information: Request -> Authority -> Commonwealth Government Issuing Agency.
premise text: (b) the request is made to the chief officer of the Commonwealth government issuing agency;
conclusion text: ...the production of evidence of an assumed identity from a Commonwealth government issuing agency;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: inference
logic summary: Inference of authority and request on Commonwealth government issuing agency.
premise text: (a) an authority under a corresponding assumed identity law authorises a request for...
conclusion text: ...the giving of evidence of the assumed identity to the authorised person named in the authority;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KY(2) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ky-ss-2
part of: 15KY Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
note: Agency must comply with request for evidence within a reasonable period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.131
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KY(2) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must comply with request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KY(3) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ky-ss-3
part of: 15KY Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
note: Exemptions from compliance with a request made under section (1)(b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.131
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-3-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ky-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KY(3) Requests from a participating jurisdiction for evidence of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15KZ Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kz
has part: 15KZ(1) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
has part: 15KZ(2) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.132

15KZ(1) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kz-ss-1
part of: 15KZ Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
note: Chief officer must cancel evidence upon written direction from authorized chief officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.132
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kz-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kz-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KZ(1) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KZ(2) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15kz-ss-2
part of: 15KZ Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
note: Definition of cancel includes delete or alter an entry in a record of information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.132
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15kz-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15kz-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15KZ(2) Directions from a participating jurisdiction to cancel evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15L Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15l
has part: 15L(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
has part: 15L(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.132

15L(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15l-ss-1
part of: 15L Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
note: Chief officer of an issuing agency must provide indemnity to chief officer of a requesting agency.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.132
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15l-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15L(1) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15L(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15l-ss-2
part of: 15L Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
note: Agency must indemnify issuing agency and officers for liability incurred while complying with request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.132
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15l-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15L(2) Indemnity for issuing agencies and officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to indemnify issuing agency and officers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LA Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15la
has part: 15LA(1) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
has part: 15LA(2) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.132

15LA(1) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15la-ss-1
part of: 15LA Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
note: Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.132
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15la-ss-1-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15la-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LA(1) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15LA(2) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15la-ss-2
part of: 15LA Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
note: Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.132
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15la-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15la-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15la-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LA(2) Application of this Part to authorities under corresponding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15la-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Applying the provisions of this Part to authorities
premise text: (2) Sections 15KN, 15KQ and 15KR apply
conclusion text: to anything done in relation to a corresponding authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15LB Misuse of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lb
has part: 15LB(1) Misuse of assumed identity
has part: 15LB(2) Misuse of assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.134

15LB(1) Misuse of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lb-ss-1
part of: 15LB Misuse of assumed identity
note: Acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.134
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LB(1) Misuse of assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority.
premise text: (a) the person is an authorised person (other than an authorised civilian); and (b) the person acquires evidence of, or uses, an assumed identity;
conclusion text: (d) the person is reckless as to the circumstance mentioned in paragraph (c).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority is prohibited.
premise text: (a) the person is an authorised person (other than an authorised civilian); and (b) the person acquires evidence of, or uses, an assumed identity;
conclusion text: (d) the person is reckless as to the circumstance mentioned in paragraph (c).
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LB(2) Misuse of assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lb-ss-2
part of: 15LB Misuse of assumed identity
note: Acquiring or using an assumed identity without authority is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.134
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LB(2) Misuse of assumed identity
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of acquiring or using an assumed identity.
premise text: (2) An authorised civilian commits an offence...
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between the action and the prohibition.
premise text: (2) An authorised civilian commits an offence...
conclusion text: The action is prohibited at all times.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lc
has part: 15LC(1) Disclosing information about assumed identity
has part: 15LC(2) Disclosing information about assumed identity
has part: 15LC(3) Disclosing information about assumed identity
has part: 15LC(4) Disclosing information about assumed identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.134

15LC(1) Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lc-ss-1
part of: 15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity
note: Disclosing information about assumed identity is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.134
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LC(1) Disclosing information about assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information about assumed identity.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the conduct causes the disclosure of information; and (c) the information reveals, or is likely to reveal...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with temporal intervals related to assumed identities.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the conduct causes the disclosure of information; and (c) the information reveals, or is likely to reveal...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace related to assumed identities.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the conduct causes the disclosure of information; and (c) the information reveals, or is likely to reveal...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Influence
logic summary: Influences diffusion of information about assumed identities.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the conduct causes the disclosure of information; and (c) the information reveals, or is likely to reveal...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Analyzes cognitive aspects of assumed identities.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the conduct causes the disclosure of information; and (c) the information reveals, or is likely to reveal...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15LC(2) Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lc-ss-2
part of: 15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity
note: Disclosing information about assumed identity is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.134
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LC(2) Disclosing information about assumed identity
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information about assumed identity.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LC(3) Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lc-ss-3
part of: 15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity
note: Disclosing information about assumed identity is prohibited. Disclosing information about assumed identity is prohibited unless specified conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.134
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LC(3) Disclosing information about assumed identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information about assumed identity.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: (3) if the person causes the disclosure...
conclusion text: ...and the disclosure is: ...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure and legal proceedings
premise text: (2)(c) or (3)(c) (as the case may be)
conclusion text: ...or of any report of any such proceedings;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace between disclosure and legal proceedings
premise text: (b) for the purposes of any legal proceeding...
conclusion text: ...or of any report of any such proceedings;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about assumed identity
premise text: (3)(c) (as the case may be)
conclusion text: ...and the disclosure is: ...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LC(4) Disclosing information about assumed identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lc-ss-4
part of: 15LC Disclosing information about assumed identity
note: No offence under subsections (1), (2) or (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.134
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-4-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LC(4) Disclosing information about assumed identity
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15LD Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ld
has part: 15LD(1) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
has part: 15LD(2) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
has part: 15LD(3) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.136

15LD(1) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ld-ss-1
part of: 15LD Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
note: Chief officer must submit report to NACC Minister with specific information about authorities and assumed identities.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.136
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LD(1) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Chief officer must submit report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBJECT
logic summary: Report includes specific information about authorities and assumed identities.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LD(2) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ld-ss-2
part of: 15LD Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
note: Exclusion of information from reports to protect safety and investigations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.136
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LD(2) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents disclosure of sensitive information.
premise text: (a) endanger a person’s safety; or (b) prejudice an investigation or prosecution;
conclusion text: The chief officer must not include this information in the report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between exclusion and reporting requirements.
premise text: The report must be laid before Parliament within a certain timeframe;
conclusion text: Exclusion of information may occur before the report is laid before Parliament.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
logic summary: Conditional commencement of exclusion based on investigation outcomes.
premise text: The chief officer must advise the NACC Minister about potential exclusions;
conclusion text: Exclusion may occur eventually, after investigation outcomes are determined.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Spreads exclusion requirements to related entities.
premise text: The report must be laid before Parliament and the NACC Minister;
conclusion text: Exclusion requirements diffuse to other relevant parties.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Artificial intelligence recognizes exclusion patterns in reports.
premise text: The chief officer uses AI to analyze the report;
conclusion text: Exclusion patterns are recognized by AI systems.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LD(3) Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ld-ss-3
part of: 15LD Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—law
note: Must exclude information from report if certain grounds are met and provide a copy to Parliament within 15 days.
description: Report
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.136
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ld-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LE Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15le
note: Intelligence agencies must submit annual reports to the Inspector-General.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.137
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15le-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15le-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15le-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15le-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LE Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15le-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15le-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBJECT
logic summary: Reports about authorities for assumed identities etc.—
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LF Record keeping
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lf
has part: 15LF(1) Record keeping
has part: 15LF(2) Record keeping
has part: 15LF(3) Record keeping
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.138

15LF(1) Record keeping
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lf-ss-1
part of: 15LF Record keeping
note: Agency must keep records about operation of Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.138
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LF(1) Record keeping
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must keep records.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LF(2) Record keeping
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lf-ss-2
part of: 15LF Record keeping
note: Records must be kept for authorities granted, varied or cancelled.
description: a) the date on which an authority was granted, varied or cancelled and the name of the person who granted, varied or cancelled it;
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.138
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LF(2) Record keeping
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to keep records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LF(3) Record keeping
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lf-ss-3
part of: 15LF Record keeping
note: Records must be kept for authorities transferred to or from the chief officer of an agency.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.138
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LF(3) Record keeping
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LG Audit of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lg
has part: 15LG(1) Audit of records
has part: 15LG(2) Audit of records
has part: 15LG(3) Audit of records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.139

15LG(1) Audit of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lg-ss-1
part of: 15LG Audit of records
note: Audit records of intelligence agencies every 6 months and after cancellation/expiry.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.139
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LG(1) Audit of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to audit records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LG(2) Audit of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lg-ss-2
part of: 15LG Audit of records
note: The audit must be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.139
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LG(2) Audit of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The audit must be conducted.
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.
conclusion text: A person appointed by the chief officer MUST conduct the audit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: BY
logic summary: The audit must be conducted BY a person appointed by the chief officer.
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.
conclusion text: A person appointed by the chief officer MUST conduct the audit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The audit must occur between two dates.
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.
conclusion text: The audit MUST OCCUR BETWEEN two dates.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: If the chief officer appoints a person, then that person must conduct the audit.
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.
conclusion text: IF THE CHIEF OFFICER APPOINTS A PERSON, THEN THAT PERSON MUST CONDUCT THE AUDIT.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: The audit is a part of the provision.
premise text: (2) The audit is to be conducted by a person appointed by the chief officer.
conclusion text: THE AUDIT IS A PART OF THE PROVISION.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LG(3) Audit of records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lg-ss-3
part of: 15LG Audit of records
note: The person appointed to conduct the audit must not be a person with assumed identities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.139
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LG(3) Audit of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotBe
logic summary: The auditor must not be a person with assumed identities.
premise text: (3) The person appointed to conduct the audit:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LH Delegation of chief officer’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lh
has part: 15LH(1) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
has part: 15LH(2) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
has part: 15LH(3) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.141

15LH(1) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lh-ss-1
part of: 15LH Delegation of chief officer’s functions
note: Functions of a chief officer under this Part may not be delegated to any other person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.141
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LH(1) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of delegation
premise text: (1) Except as provided by this section (and despite any other Act or law to the contrary)
conclusion text: the functions of a chief officer under this Part may not be delegated to any other person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No delegation allowed
premise text: (1) Except as provided by this section (and despite any other Act or law to the contrary)
conclusion text: the functions of a chief officer under this Part may not be delegated to any other person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Not
logic summary: Delegation is excluded from the scope of this section
premise text: (1) Except as provided by this section (and despite any other Act or law to the contrary)
conclusion text: the functions of a chief officer under this Part may not be delegated to any other person.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LH(2) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lh-ss-2
part of: 15LH Delegation of chief officer’s functions
note: A chief officer may delegate certain functions to a senior officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.141
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LH(2) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: delegate
logic summary: Chief officer delegates function
premise text: Chief officer has authority to delegate
conclusion text: Senior officer assumes delegated function
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Delegation occurs during chief officer's term
premise text: Chief officer has authority to delegate
conclusion text: Senior officer assumes delegated function during chief officer's term
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15LH(3) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15lh-ss-3
part of: 15LH Delegation of chief officer’s functions
note: Defines senior officer roles in various agencies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.141
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15LH(3) Delegation of chief officer’s functions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term with specific meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15lh-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Establishes a class hierarchy for senior officers.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15M Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15m
note: Defines terms for Part IACA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.143
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15m-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15m-logic-descriptionlogic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15m-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15M Definitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15m-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Classifies definitions as part of a class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MA Meaning of criminal proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ma
has part: 15MA(1) Meaning of criminal proceeding
has part: 15MA(2) Meaning of criminal proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.145

15MA(1) Meaning of criminal proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ma-ss-1
part of: 15MA Meaning of criminal proceeding
note: Defines criminal proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.145
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ma-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ma-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Establishes class hierarchy for criminal proceeding
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MA(2) Meaning of criminal proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ma-ss-2
part of: 15MA Meaning of criminal proceeding
note: Defines what constitutes a criminal proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.145
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ma-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ma-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MA(2) Meaning of criminal proceeding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15MB Meaning of civil proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mb
has part: 15MB(1) Meaning of civil proceeding
has part: 15MB(2) Meaning of civil proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.146

15MB(1) Meaning of civil proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mb-ss-1
part of: 15MB Meaning of civil proceeding
note: Defines civil proceeding for the purpose of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.146
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.
conclusion text: civil proceeding
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to explicit class/type/subclass hierarchies.
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.
conclusion text: civil proceeding
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals.
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.
conclusion text: civil proceeding
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to ordered or recurring traces.
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.
conclusion text: civil proceeding
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.
conclusion text: civil proceeding
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to the meaning of terms used in legal contexts.
premise text: (1) In this Part, civil proceeding means any proceeding in a court of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory, other than a criminal proceeding.
conclusion text: civil proceeding
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15MB(2) Meaning of civil proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mb-ss-2
part of: 15MB Meaning of civil proceeding
note: Defines what constitutes a civil proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.146
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MB(2) Meaning of civil proceeding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes various types of proceedings in the definition.
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, each of the following is part of a civil proceeding:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MC When a charge is outstanding or pending
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mc
note: A charge against a person for an offence is outstanding until it is finally dealt with in one of the following ways: withdrawal, dismissal by court, discharge by court, or acquittal/conviction by court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.146
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mc-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mc-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mc-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MC When a charge is outstanding or pending
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true for charges against individuals.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MD Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15md
has part: 15MD(1) Application of Part
has part: 15MD(2) Application of Part
has part: 15MD(3) Application of Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148

15MD(1) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15md-ss-1
part of: 15MD Application of Part
note: This Part applies to a proceeding in which an operative is, or may be, required to give evidence obtained as an operative.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MD(1) Application of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The Part applies to a proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MD(2) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15md-ss-2
part of: 15MD Application of Part
note: No effect on laws protecting evidence-giving persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MD(2) Application of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Excluded from Part's operation
premise text: Part does not affect laws protecting evidence-giving persons
conclusion text: No effect on laws
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MD(3) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15md-ss-3
part of: 15MD Application of Part
note: Court control over proceedings is not limited by this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15md-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Court control is implied if not limited.
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, this Part does not...
conclusion text: This Part does not limit court control.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15ME Witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15me
has part: 15ME(1) Witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15ME(2) Witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15ME(3) Witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15ME(4) Witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15ME(5) Witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15ME(6) Witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15ME(7) Witness identity protection certificate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148

15ME(1) Witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15me-ss-1
part of: 15ME Witness identity protection certificate
note: Chief officer may give witness identity protection certificate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-1-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15ME(1) Witness identity protection certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15ME(2) Witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15me-ss-2
part of: 15ME Witness identity protection certificate
note: Chief officer must make reasonable enquiries to ascertain required information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15ME(2) Witness identity protection certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
premise text: Chief officer must make reasonable enquiries.
conclusion text: Chief officer MUST make reasonable enquiries.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15ME(3) Witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15me-ss-3
part of: 15ME Witness identity protection certificate
note: Chief officer must obtain statutory declaration from operative before issuing certificate.
description: Statutory declaration from operative
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15ME(3) Witness identity protection certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Chief officer must obtain statutory declaration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15ME(4) Witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15me-ss-4
part of: 15ME Witness identity protection certificate
note: Cannot be appealed against, reviewed, called into question, quashed or invalidated in any court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-4-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of appeal
premise text: (4) A decision to give a witness identity protection certificate:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of review
premise text: (b) cannot be appealed against, reviewed, called into question, quashed or invalidated in any court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15ME(5) Witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15me-ss-5
part of: 15ME Witness identity protection certificate
note: A decision to give a witness identity protection certificate can be called into question in disciplinary proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15ME(5) Witness identity protection certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Permission to call the certificate into question
premise text: Subsection (4) does not prevent...
conclusion text: ...being called into question
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The certificate can be called into question during disciplinary proceedings
premise text: In the course of any proceedings...
conclusion text: ...being called into question
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15ME(6) Witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15me-ss-6
part of: 15ME Witness identity protection certificate
note: A witness identity protection certificate must be taken as properly issued and prima facie evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15ME(7) Witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15me-ss-7
part of: 15ME Witness identity protection certificate
note: A witness identity protection certificate is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15me-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of a property
conclusion text: A witness identity protection certificate is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MF Statutory declaration by operative
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mf
note: Statutory declaration by operative regarding convictions and charges.
description: a statutory declaration of the following matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.149
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mf-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mf-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mf-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Statutory declaration is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MG Form of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mg
has part: 15MG(1) Form of witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15MG(2) Form of witness identity protection certificate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.150

15MG(1) Form of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mg-ss-1
part of: 15MG Form of witness identity protection certificate
note: Witness identity protection certificate requirements
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.150
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MG(1) Form of witness identity protection certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide grounds for certificate issuance
premise text: (e) the grounds for giving the certificate;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information about convictions and charges
premise text: (f) whether the operative has been convicted or found guilty of an offence and, if so, particulars of each offence;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Operative's involvement period
premise text: (b) the period the operative was involved in the investigation to which the proceeding relates;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MG(2) Form of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mg-ss-2
part of: 15MG Form of witness identity protection certificate
note: Prohibits revealing an operative's identity or where they live in a witness identity protection certificate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.150
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MG(2) Form of witness identity protection certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MH Filing and notification
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mh
note: Witness must file identity protection certificate before giving evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.151
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mh-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mh-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mh-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MH Filing and notification
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
premise text: Witness must file identity protection certificate before giving evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MI Leave for non-compliance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mi
has part: 15MI(1) Leave for non-compliance
has part: 15MI(2) Leave for non-compliance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.152

15MI(1) Leave for non-compliance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mi-ss-1
part of: 15MI Leave for non-compliance
note: Leave to not comply with a requirement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.152
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MI(1) Leave for non-compliance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MI(2) Leave for non-compliance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mi-ss-2
part of: 15MI Leave for non-compliance
note: Court cannot give leave for non-compliance unless it was not reasonably practicable to comply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.152
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Court cannot give leave for non-compliance.
premise text: Requirement to comply was not reasonably practicable.
conclusion text: Leave must be refused.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal interval for leave application overlaps with requirement to comply.
premise text: Leave application was made after requirement to comply was due.
conclusion text: Leave application is outside the temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Excerpt implies a recurring pattern of non-compliance.
premise text: Court must not give leave unless it was not reasonably practicable to comply.
conclusion text: Non-compliance is a recurring issue.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Excerpt diffuses the responsibility for non-compliance.
premise text: Court must not give leave unless it was not reasonably practicable to comply.
conclusion text: Responsibility for non-compliance is diffused among multiple parties.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mi-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Excerpt recognizes the need for a more nuanced approach to leave applications.
premise text: Court must not give leave unless it was not reasonably practicable to comply.
conclusion text: Leave application requires a more nuanced evaluation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MJ Effect of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mj
has part: 15MJ(1) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15MJ(2) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
has part: 15MJ(3) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.152

15MJ(1) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mj-ss-1
part of: 15MJ Effect of witness identity protection certificate
note: Witness identity protection certificate applies to proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.152
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MJ(1) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Section applies under certain conditions.
premise text: Witness identity protection certificate filed in court.
conclusion text: This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relatesTo
logic summary: Section relates to proceedings.
premise text: Section applies under certain conditions.
conclusion text: This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MJ(2) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mj-ss-2
part of: 15MJ Effect of witness identity protection certificate
note: No question may lead to disclosure of operative's identity or where they live.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.152
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MJ(2) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: No question may lead to disclosure of operative's identity or where they live.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MJ(3) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mj-ss-3
part of: 15MJ Effect of witness identity protection certificate
note: List of entities that must be included in a proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.152
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MJ(3) Effect of witness identity protection certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Entity classification
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mj-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Inclusion
logic summary: Entities must be included in a proceeding
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mk
has part: 15MK(1) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
has part: 15MK(4) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
has part: 15MK(5) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
has part: 15MK(6) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153

15MK(1) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mk-ss-1
part of: 15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
note: Court may make order to protect witness identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MK(1) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MK(4) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mk-ss-4
part of: 15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
note: Court must make order suppressing publication of certain information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MK(4) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to suppress publication
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MK(5) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mk-ss-5
part of: 15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
note: Court may make an order for how a transcript is to be dealt with, including suppressing its publication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MK(5) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MK(6) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mk-ss-6
part of: 15MK Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
note: Engaging in conduct after an order has been made under subsection (1), (4) or (5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-6-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mk-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MK(6) Orders to protect operative’s identity etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15ML Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ml
has part: 15ML(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
has part: 15ML(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
has part: 15ML(3) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154

15ML(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ml-ss-1
part of: 15ML Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
note: Witness must disclose operative's identity to presiding officer if certificate filed.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15ML(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must disclose operative's identity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15ML(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ml-ss-2
part of: 15ML Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
note: The operative must disclose their true identity to the presiding officer.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15ML(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The operative must disclose their true identity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15ML(3) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ml-ss-3
part of: 15ML Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
note: Presiding officer must not record or retain information disclosed under subsection (2).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15ML(3) Disclosure of operative’s identity to presiding officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ml-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of recording information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mm
has part: 15MM(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
has part: 15MM(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
has part: 15MM(3) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
has part: 15MM(4) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
has part: 15MM(5) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
has part: 15MM(6) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
has part: 15MM(7) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154

15MM(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mm-ss-1
part of: 15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
note: Witness must disclose operative's identity despite certificate
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MM(1) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MM(2) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mm-ss-2
part of: 15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
note: Request for leave to ask a question or request an order requiring disclosure of operative's identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Request for permission to ask a question or request an order requiring disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MM(3) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mm-ss-3
part of: 15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
note: The person involved in the proceeding must disclose their identity.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MM(3) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MM(4) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mm-ss-4
part of: 15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
note: Court may give leave or make order for witness to do something.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MM(4) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Court may give leave or make order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MM(5) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mm-ss-5
part of: 15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
note: Court must satisfy conditions before giving leave or making an order regarding operative's identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-5-logic-ltl-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MM(5) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Court must satisfy conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: satisfies
logic summary: Court must be satisfied about each of the following conditions.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Conditions apply until disclosure is made or operative's identity is revealed.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MM(6) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mm-ss-6
part of: 15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
note: Application must be heard in absence of jury.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MM(6) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Application must be heard in absence of jury.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MM(7) Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mm-ss-7
part of: 15MM Disclosure of operative’s identity etc. despite certificate
note: Court must be closed under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.154
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of court closure
premise text: (7) Unless the court considers that the interests of justice require otherwise...
conclusion text: The court must be closed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for court closure
premise text: (7) Unless the court considers that the interests of justice require otherwise...
conclusion text: The court must be closed during certain periods.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication for court closure
premise text: (7) Unless the court considers that the interests of justice require otherwise...
conclusion text: If the court considers the interests of justice, it must be closed.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of information about court closure
premise text: (7) Unless the court considers that the interests of justice require otherwise...
conclusion text: The information must be provided.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mm-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognition of operative's identity disclosure
premise text: (7) Unless the court considers that the interests of justice require otherwise...
conclusion text: The operative's identity must be disclosed.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MN Application for leave—joinder as respondent
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mn
has part: 15MN(1) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
has part: 15MN(2) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
has part: 15MN(3) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156

15MN(1) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mn-ss-1
part of: 15MN Application for leave—joinder as respondent
note: Application for leave—joinder as respondent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-1-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MN(1) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15MN(2) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mn-ss-2
part of: 15MN Application for leave—joinder as respondent
note: Allow person to join application as respondent under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MN(2) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
logic summary: Grant permission
premise text: (a) the person is: (i) the operative in relation to whom the witness identity protection certificate is given; or (ii) the chief officer of the agency who gave the witness identity protection certificate;
conclusion text: The court may allow a person to join the application as a respondent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Specify conditions for joining application
premise text: (b) the person applies to be joined to the application as a respondent; and (c) the person has sufficient interest in the subject matter of the application.
conclusion text: The court may only allow a person to join the application if they apply under these conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: require
logic summary: Specify temporal conditions for joining application
premise text: (b) the person applies to be joined to the application as a respondent; and (c) the person has sufficient interest in the subject matter of the application.
conclusion text: The court must consider the timing of the person's application when determining whether to allow them to join.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: require
logic summary: Specify recurring conditions for joining application
premise text: (b) the person applies to be joined to the application as a respondent; and (c) the person has sufficient interest in the subject matter of the application.
conclusion text: The court must consider the ongoing nature of the person's interest when determining whether to allow them to join.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
logic summary: Specify conditions for joining application as respondent
premise text: (c) the person has sufficient interest in the subject matter of the application.
conclusion text: The court may only allow a person to join the application if they have a sufficient interest.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MN(3) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mn-ss-3
part of: 15MN Application for leave—joinder as respondent
note: Court must allow person or legal representative to appear and be heard if joined as respondent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MN(3) Application for leave—joinder as respondent
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must allow person or legal representative to appear and be heard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MO Directions to jury
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mo
has part: 15MO(1) Directions to jury
has part: 15MO(2) Directions to jury
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.157

15MO(1) Directions to jury
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mo-ss-1
part of: 15MO Directions to jury
note: Witness must provide evidence if operative gives testimony and there is a jury in the proceeding.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.157
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MO(1) Directions to jury
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide evidence
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court; and (b) there is a jury in the proceeding; and (c) the operative gives evidence.
conclusion text: The witness must provide evidence if the conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval: operative gives evidence -> witness provides evidence
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court; and (b) there is a jury in the proceeding; and (c) the operative gives evidence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Recurring trace: witness provides evidence -> operative gives evidence -> jury exists
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding is filed in a court; and (b) there is a jury in the proceeding; and (c) the operative gives evidence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MO(2) Directions to jury
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mo-ss-2
part of: 15MO Directions to jury
note: Court must not draw adverse inferences against defendant or another party due to witness identity protection certificate or court order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.157
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MO(2) Directions to jury
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Court must not draw adverse inferences.
premise text: (2) The court must (unless it considers it inappropriate)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Court must not draw adverse inferences due to witness identity protection certificate.
premise text: (a) there is a witness identity protection certificate for the operative.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Court's duty to direct jury not to draw adverse inferences overlaps with its duty under section 15MK or subsections 15MM(8), (9), or (10).
premise text: (b) the court has made an order under section 15MK or subsections 15MM(8), (9), or (10).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mo-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Court's duty to direct jury not to draw adverse inferences overlaps with its duty under section 15MK or subsections 15MM(8), (9), or (10).
premise text: (b) the court has made an order under section 15MK or subsections 15MM(8), (9), or (10).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MP Appeals and adjournments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mp
note: Original court must give or refuse leave for witness identity protection certificate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.157
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mp-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mp-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mp-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MP Appeals and adjournments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide leave
premise text: Section 15MI or 15MM applies
conclusion text: Original court must give or refuse leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MQ Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mq
has part: 15MQ(1) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
has part: 15MQ(2) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
has part: 15MQ(3) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159

15MQ(1) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mq-ss-1
part of: 15MQ Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
note: Cancellation of witness identity protection certificate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mq-ss-1-norm

15MQ(2) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mq-ss-2
part of: 15MQ Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
note: Cancellation of witness identity protection certificate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes duty
logic summary: Duty to cancel certificate
premise text: (2) The chief officer must...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15MQ(3) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mq-ss-3
part of: 15MQ Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
note: Chief officer must give notice to court and parties if certificate is cancelled.
description: Notice in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mq-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mq-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MQ(3) Witness identity protection certificate—cancellation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
conclusion text: Chief officer must give notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MR Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mr
has part: 15MR(1) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
has part: 15MR(2) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
has part: 15MR(3) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159

15MR(1) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mr-ss-1
part of: 15MR Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
note: Permits giving information disclosing operative's identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mr-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mr-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MR(1) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission to give information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MR(2) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mr-ss-2
part of: 15MR Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
note: Chief officer may permit person to give information disclosing operative's identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mr-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mr-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MR(2) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by chief officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MR(3) Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mr-ss-3
part of: 15MR Permission to give information disclosing operative’s identity
note: Requirements for giving information disclosing operative's identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mr-ss-3-norm

15MS Disclosure offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ms
has part: 15MS(1) Disclosure offences
has part: 15MS(2) Disclosure offences
has part: 15MS(3) Disclosure offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160

15MS(1) Disclosure offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ms-ss-1
part of: 15MS Disclosure offences
note: Disclosing operative identity without authorization is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MS(1) Disclosure offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: (a) a witness identity protection certificate for an operative in relation to a proceeding has been given; and (b) the certificate has not been cancelled under section 15MQ;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between cancellation and disclosure
premise text: (b) the certificate has not been cancelled under section 15MQ;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure offences
premise text: (d) the conduct results in the disclosure of the operative’s identity or where the operative lives;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to cancel certificate
premise text: (b) the certificate has not been cancelled under section 15MQ;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission for disclosure under certain conditions
premise text: (i) the conduct is required by section 15ML; (ii) the conduct is authorised by leave or by an order under section 15MM; (iii) the conduct is permitted under section 15MR;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15MS(2) Disclosure offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ms-ss-2
part of: 15MS Disclosure offences
note: Disclosing operative identity without proper protection is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MS(2) Disclosure offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: Disclosing operative identity without proper protection is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MS(3) Disclosure offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ms-ss-3
part of: 15MS Disclosure offences
note: Disclosing operative identity or location without authorization is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MS(3) Disclosure offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ms-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: Disclosing operative identity or location without authorization is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MT Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mt
note: Chief officer may sign certificate stating witness identity protection for operatives
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.161
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mt-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mt-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mt-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MT Evidentiary certificates
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mt-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: May sign certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mu
has part: 15MU(1) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
has part: 15MU(2) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
has part: 15MU(3) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
has part: 15MU(4) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.162

15MU(1) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mu-ss-1
part of: 15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates
note: Chief officer must submit report about witness identity protection certificates to Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.162
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MU(1) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to submit report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MU(2) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mu-ss-2
part of: 15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates
note: Report requirements for witness identity protection certificates
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.162
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MU(2) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MU(3) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mu-ss-3
part of: 15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates
note: Prohibition on disclosing witness identity protection certificate information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.162
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MU(3) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of sensitive information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MU(4) Reports about witness identity protection certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mu-ss-4
part of: 15MU Reports about witness identity protection certificates
note: Report must be laid before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.162
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MW Recognition of witness identity protection certificates under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mw
note: Recognition of witness identity protection certificates under corresponding laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.164
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mw-norm

15MX Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mx
has part: 15MX(1) Delegation
has part: 15MX(2) Delegation
has part: 15MX(3) Delegation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.165

15MX(1) Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mx-ss-1
part of: 15MX Delegation
note: No delegation of chief officer functions is allowed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.165
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MX(1) Delegation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits delegation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MX(2) Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mx-ss-2
part of: 15MX Delegation
note: A chief officer may delegate certain functions to a senior officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.165
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MX(2) Delegation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by the chief officer.
premise text: Chief Officer has authority to delegate.
conclusion text: Senior Officer may perform delegated functions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Delegation occurs during the chief officer's term.
premise text: Chief Officer serves for a term.
conclusion text: Delegation occurs during the Chief Officer's Term.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15MX(3) Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15mx-ss-3
part of: 15MX Delegation
note: Defines senior officer roles in various agencies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.165
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15MX(3) Delegation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15mx-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Establishes a hierarchical relationship between terms.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15Y Proceedings to which this Part applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15y
note: Special rules for children involved in proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.166
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15y-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15y-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15y-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15y-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15Y Proceedings to which this Part applies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15y-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to protect vulnerable persons
premise text: This Part contains special rules for children involved in proceedings
conclusion text: There is an obligation to protect vulnerable persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15y-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of offences against children
premise text: The subsection applies to proceedings for any of the following offences:
conclusion text: Offences against children are classified as such
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YA Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ya
has part: 15YA(1) Definitions
has part: 15YA(2) Definitions
has part: 15YA(3) Definitions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.170

15YA(1) Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ya-ss-1
part of: 15YA Definitions
note: Defines a vulnerable adult complainant in relation to a vulnerable adult proceeding. Court may declare a person special witness if unlikely to give evidence in ordinary manner due to disability, intimidation, distress or emotional trauma.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.170
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-7

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YA(1) Definitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
premise text: (1) A vulnerable adult complainant, in relation to a vulnerable adult proceeding...
conclusion text: ...is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies to
logic summary: Defines a term with implications for obligations.
premise text: (1) A vulnerable adult complainant, in relation to a vulnerable adult proceeding...
conclusion text: ...is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines a term with moral implications
logic summary: Defines a term with ethical consequences.
premise text: (1) A vulnerable adult complainant, in relation to a vulnerable adult proceeding...
conclusion text: ...is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration of special witness
premise text: Court has discretion to declare a person special witness
conclusion text: Special witness declared
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: because of
logic summary: Temporal relation between factors and person's ability to give evidence
premise text: Person's age, cultural background or relationship to party, nature of evidence, or other factor
conclusion text: Special witness declaration based on these factors
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Court must declare special witness if certain conditions met
premise text: Court has discretion to declare special witness
conclusion text: Court obligation to declare special witness under these conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Court may decline to declare special witness if certain conditions not met
premise text: Court has discretion to declare special witness
conclusion text: Special witness declaration discretionary under these conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YA(2) Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ya-ss-2
part of: 15YA Definitions
note: Adult can opt out of being treated as a vulnerable adult complainant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.170
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OptOut
logic summary: Right to opt out
premise text: Adult informs court of desire not to be treated as vulnerable adult complainant.
conclusion text: Adult is not a vulnerable adult complainant if they so choose.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YA(3) Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ya-ss-3
part of: 15YA Definitions
note: A vulnerable adult complainant need not be involved in the proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.170
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YA(3) Definitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ya-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: needNot
logic summary: Obligation to involve a complainant
premise text: (3) A vulnerable adult complainant need not be involved in the vulnerable adult proceeding or the initiation of that proceeding.
conclusion text: A vulnerable adult complainant need not be involved in the proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YB Evidence of sexual reputation—child proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yb
note: Evidence of sexual reputation is inadmissible in child proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yb-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yb-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yb-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YB Evidence of sexual reputation—child proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits evidence of sexual reputation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YC Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yc
has part: 15YC(1) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
has part: 15YC(2) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
has part: 15YC(3) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
has part: 15YC(4) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
has part: 15YC(5) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174

15YC(1) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yc-ss-1
part of: 15YC Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
note: Evidence of sexual experience is inadmissible in child proceedings unless the court gives leave. Evidence of sexual experience is inadmissible unless court gives leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YC(1) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits evidence of sexual experience in child proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YC(2) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yc-ss-2
part of: 15YC Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
note: Court must not give leave unless certain conditions are met. Court must not give leave to admit evidence unless it meets certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YC(2) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court is prohibited from giving leave.
premise text: (2) The court must not give leave unless...
conclusion text: ...the conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court is prohibited from giving leave to admit evidence.
premise text: (2) The court must not give leave unless...
conclusion text: ...the court must not give leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Evidence is of sexual activity that occurred or was recent at the time of the commission of the alleged offence.
premise text: (c) either (i) the evidence is of sexual activity...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Evidence relates to sexual activity that occurred or was recent at the time of the commission of the alleged offence.
premise text: (c) either (ii) if the evidence is of sexual activities...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Court may give leave to admit evidence if it meets certain conditions.
premise text: (2) The court must not give leave unless...
conclusion text: ...the court may give leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YC(3) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yc-ss-3
part of: 15YC Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
note: Evidence of sexual experience is not to be treated as substantially relevant to facts in issue Do not treat evidence as substantially relevant to facts in issue merely because of inferences it may raise about the child witness' or child complainant's general disposition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YC(3) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition of using evidence for a specific purpose
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YC(4) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yc-ss-4
part of: 15YC Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
note: Court must consider factors when deciding whether evidence has substantial probative value in child proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YC(4) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider factors
premise text: Paragraph (2)(b)
conclusion text: Obligation to consider factors
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YC(5) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yc-ss-5
part of: 15YC Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
note: Prohibition on using evidence of sexual experience in child proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YC(5) Evidence of sexual experience—child proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits using evidence of sexual experience in child proceedings
premise text: The section does not apply if the child is a defendant in the proceeding.
conclusion text: Evidence of sexual experience is inadmissible in child proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Prohibition applies during child proceedings
premise text: The section does not apply if the child is a defendant in the proceeding.
conclusion text: Evidence of sexual experience is inadmissible during child proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Prohibition applies during child proceedings
premise text: The section does not apply if the child is a defendant in the proceeding.
conclusion text: Evidence of sexual experience is inadmissible during child proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Prohibition applies during child proceedings
premise text: The section does not apply if the child is a defendant in the proceeding.
conclusion text: Evidence of sexual experience is inadmissible during child proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yc-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Prohibition applies during child proceedings
premise text: The section does not apply if the child is a defendant in the proceeding.
conclusion text: Evidence of sexual experience is inadmissible during child proceedings.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YD Leave under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yd
has part: 15YD(1) Leave under this Division
has part: 15YD(2) Leave under this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176

15YD(1) Leave under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yd-ss-1
part of: 15YD Leave under this Division
note: Application for leave under this Division must be in writing and determined by the court after considering submissions and evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YD(1) Leave under this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be in writing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: DURING
logic summary: Application must be determined by the court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YD(2) Leave under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yd-ss-2
part of: 15YD Leave under this Division
note: Court must state reasons in writing and record them.
description: Reasons for leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YD(2) Leave under this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must perform action
conclusion text: Court must state reasons in writing and record them.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YE Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ye
has part: 15YE(1) Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
has part: 15YE(2) Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
has part: 15YE(3) Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.182

15YE(1) Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ye-ss-1
part of: 15YE Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
note: Court must disallow inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination questions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.182
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YE(1) Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court must prohibit
premise text: (1) The court must disallow a question...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YE(2) Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ye-ss-2
part of: 15YE Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
note: Court must consider personal characteristics when evaluating cross-examination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.182
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YE(2) Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider personal characteristics
premise text: Court must evaluate cross-examination
conclusion text: Consider personal characteristics
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YE(3) Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ye-ss-3
part of: 15YE Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
note: Specifies persons subject to disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.182
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YE(3) Disallowing inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ye-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to prevent inappropriate or aggressive cross-examination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YF Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of child
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yf
has part: 15YF(1) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of child
has part: 15YF(2) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of child
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.182

15YF(1) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of child
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yf-ss-1
part of: 15YF Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of child
note: Defendant cannot cross-examine vulnerable adult complainant without counsel. Defendant cannot cross-examine child complainant without counsel.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.182
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YF(1) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of child
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits cross-examination of vulnerable adult complainant without counsel.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YF(2) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of child
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yf-ss-2
part of: 15YF Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of child
note: Court-appointed person must ask vulnerable adult complainant questions requested by defendant. Court-appointed person must ask child questions requested by defendant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.182
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YF(2) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of child
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to ask questions
premise text: Court-appointed person appointed by the court
conclusion text: Must ask vulnerable adult complainant questions requested by defendant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YG Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yg
has part: 15YG(1) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
has part: 15YG(1A) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
has part: 15YG(2) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
has part: 15YG(3) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
has part: 15YG(4) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.183

15YG(1) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yg-ss-1
part of: 15YG Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
note: Defendant cannot cross-examine vulnerable person without court leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.183
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YG(1) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits cross-examination of vulnerable person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YG(1A) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yg-ss-1a
part of: 15YG Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
note: Child witnesses in certain proceedings must be cross-examined.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.183
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YG(1A) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide cross-examination for child witnesses
premise text: Subsection applies to child witness
conclusion text: Child witness must be cross-examined
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YG(2) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yg-ss-2
part of: 15YG Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
note: Court must ensure vulnerable person's ability to testify under cross-examination is not adversely affected.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.183
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YG(2) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must ensure vulnerable person's ability to testify under cross-examination is not adversely affected.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YG(3) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yg-ss-3
part of: 15YG Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
note: Court must consider trauma caused by defendant's cross-examination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.183
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YG(3) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider trauma caused by defendant's cross-examination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YG(4) Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yg-ss-4
part of: 15YG Unrepresented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
note: Application for leave under section 15YG(4) may be made by or on behalf of the defendant or vulnerable person.
description: Writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.183
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make an application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YH Represented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yh
has part: 15YH(1) Represented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
has part: 15YH(2) Represented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.184

15YH(1) Represented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yh-ss-1
part of: 15YH Represented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
note: Prohibition on cross-examining vulnerable persons Defendant cannot cross-examine vulnerable person without counsel.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.184
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YH(1) Represented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (2) applies
conclusion text: A person is not to cross-examine...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits cross-examination of vulnerable person without counsel.
premise text: Defendant represented by counsel
conclusion text: Cannot cross-examine vulnerable person without counsel.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restricts defendant's right to cross-examine vulnerable person.
premise text: Defendant represented by counsel
conclusion text: Cannot cross-examine vulnerable person without counsel.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restricts defendant's ability to cross-examine vulnerable person through LTL.
premise text: Defendant represented by counsel
conclusion text: Cannot cross-examine vulnerable person without counsel.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits cross-examination of vulnerable person at committal proceedings or similar kind.
premise text: Section 15YHA
conclusion text: Cannot cross-examine vulnerable person without counsel.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YH(2) Represented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yh-ss-2
part of: 15YH Represented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
note: Vulnerable persons must be cross-examined in committal proceedings. Vulnerable persons must be protected during cross-examination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.184
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YH(2) Represented defendants—cross-examination of vulnerable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide cross-examination for vulnerable persons.
premise text: (2) This subsection applies to the following persons:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide protection for vulnerable persons.
premise text: Section 15YHA(2)
conclusion text: Obligation to protect vulnerable persons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yh-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for protection of vulnerable persons.
premise text: Section 15YHA(2)
conclusion text: Temporal interval for protection of vulnerable persons.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YI Closed-circuit television
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yi
has part: 15YI(1) Closed-circuit television
has part: 15YI(1A) Closed-circuit television
has part: 15YI(2) Closed-circuit television
has part: 15YI(3) Closed-circuit television
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.186

15YI(1) Closed-circuit television
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yi-ss-1
part of: 15YI Closed-circuit television
note: Vulnerable person must give evidence by closed-circuit television unless certain conditions are met.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.186
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YI(1) Closed-circuit television
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide evidence by closed-circuit television.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of vulnerable person as a 'vulnerable person'
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YI(1A) Closed-circuit television
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yi-ss-1a
part of: 15YI Closed-circuit television
note: List of persons subject to the subsection's application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.186
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-1a-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YI(1A) Closed-circuit television
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15YI(2) Closed-circuit television
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yi-ss-2
part of: 15YI Closed-circuit television
note: Court cannot make order unless vulnerable person's evidence is not in the interests of justice via closed-circuit television.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.186
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YI(2) Closed-circuit television
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Closed-circuit television
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YI(3) Closed-circuit television
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yi-ss-3
part of: 15YI Closed-circuit television
note: Preserves competence of persons to give evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.186
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Preservation
logic summary: Preserves the competence of a person to give evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YJ Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yj
has part: 15YJ(1) Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
has part: 15YJ(2) Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
has part: 15YJ(3) Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.187

15YJ(1) Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yj-ss-1
part of: 15YJ Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
note: Court may order presence of court officer or another person with vulnerable witness.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.187
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YJ(1) Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Court may order presence of court officer or another person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Location is taken to be part of the courtroom.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YJ(2) Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yj-ss-2
part of: 15YJ Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
note: No limitation on accompanying adults for orders under section 15YO
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.187
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YJ(2) Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15YJ(3) Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yj-ss-3
part of: 15YJ Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
note: Court may adjourn proceeding to a place equipped for closed-circuit television under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.187
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YJ(3) Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yj-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has facilities for
logic summary: Facilities required for closed-circuit television
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YK Viewing evidence given by closed-circuit television
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yk
has part: 15YK(1) Viewing evidence given by closed-circuit television
has part: 15YK(2) Viewing evidence given by closed-circuit television
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.187

15YK(1) Viewing evidence given by closed-circuit television
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yk-ss-1
part of: 15YK Viewing evidence given by closed-circuit television
note: Facilities used for closed-circuit television must be operated to allow interested parties to see vulnerable persons and any accompanying person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.187
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YK(1) Viewing evidence given by closed-circuit television
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Facilities must be operated in a certain way.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of facilities based on their operation.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YK(2) Viewing evidence given by closed-circuit television
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yk-ss-2
part of: 15YK Viewing evidence given by closed-circuit television
note: Allow vulnerable persons and their representatives to view evidence on television monitors.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.187
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YK(2) Viewing evidence given by closed-circuit television
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YL Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yl
has part: 15YL(1) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
has part: 15YL(2) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
has part: 15YL(3) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
has part: 15YL(4) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.188

15YL(1) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yl-ss-1
part of: 15YL Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
note: Court must order recording of evidence given by vulnerable persons under certain conditions. Court must make arrangements to restrict contact with defendant and public while giving evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.188
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YL(1) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: RESTRICTS
logic summary: Restrict contact with defendant and public
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YL(2) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yl-ss-2
part of: 15YL Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
note: Alternative arrangements for giving evidence may include planning seating arrangements. Specifies persons subject to this subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.188
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YL(2) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May provide alternative arrangements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YL(3) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yl-ss-3
part of: 15YL Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
note: Exemptions from giving evidence for certain persons Recording may be a video or audio recording.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.188
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YL(3) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts child witnesses, vulnerable adult complainants, and special witnesses from giving evidence
premise text: (3) This subsection applies to the following persons:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal interval
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for exemptions
premise text: (c) for a special witness proceeding—a special witness for whom an order under subsection 15YAB(3) is in force for this section;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: recurring trace
logic summary: Defines recurring traces for exemptions
premise text: unless that person is at least 16 and chooses not to give evidence under the arrangements.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between recording and evidence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15YL(4) Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yl-ss-4
part of: 15YL Alternative arrangements for giving evidence
note: Subsection (1) applies regardless of evidence transmission method
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.188
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yl-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Always
logic summary: Mandatory application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YM Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ym
has part: 15YM(1) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
has part: 15YM(1A) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
has part: 15YM(2) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
has part: 15YM(4) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
has part: 15YM(5) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
has part: 15YM(6) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190

15YM(1) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ym-ss-1
part of: 15YM Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
note: A constable or a person of a kind specified in the regulations must conduct an interview for a video or audio recording to be admitted as evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YM(1) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must conduct an interview
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YM(1A) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ym-ss-1a
part of: 15YM Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
note: List of persons subject to the provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-1a-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YM(1A) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15YM(2) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ym-ss-2
part of: 15YM Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
note: Prohibition on admitting audio recordings only under extraordinary circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not allow
logic summary: Prohibits admission of audio recordings only under extraordinary circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YM(4) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ym-ss-4
part of: 15YM Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
note: Must be available for cross-examination and re-examination if a video or audio recording of an interview is admitted as evidence in chief.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YM(4) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be available for cross-examination and re-examination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YM(5) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ym-ss-5
part of: 15YM Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
note: Making, possessing, or supplying recordings of interviews without lawful authority is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YM(5) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YM(6) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ym-ss-6
part of: 15YM Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
note: The fault element for paragraph (5)(a) is intention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YM(6) Use of video or audio recordings of interviews
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ym-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: The fault element is specified.
conclusion text: intention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YN Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yn
has part: 15YN(1) Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio
has part: 15YN(2) Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio
has part: 15YN(3) Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.191

15YN(1) Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yn-ss-1
part of: 15YN Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio
note: The admissibility of video or audio evidence is not affected by previous representations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.191
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: The admissibility is not affected by previous representations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YN(2) Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yn-ss-2
part of: 15YN Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio
note: Evidence given by video or audio recording under section 15YM is not admissible if the court is satisfied that certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.191
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YN(2) Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits admissibility of evidence under certain conditions.
premise text: The court is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...the recording is not admissible.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which the conditions must be met.
premise text: The court is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...during this time, the recording is not admissible.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Defines the temporal relationship between the conditions and the admissibility of evidence.
premise text: The court is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...until this time, the recording is not admissible.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Defines how the conditions affect the admissibility of evidence.
premise text: The court is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...diffuses to this time, the recording is not admissible.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Defines how the conditions are recognized by the AI system.
premise text: The court is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...recognizes this condition, the recording is not admissible.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YN(3) Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yn-ss-3
part of: 15YN Admissibility of evidence given using video or audio
note: Court may refuse to admit part of recording as evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.191
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yn-ss-3-norm

15YO Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yo
has part: 15YO(1) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
has part: 15YO(1A) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
has part: 15YO(2) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
has part: 15YO(3) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
has part: 15YO(4) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
has part: 15YO(5) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.195

15YO(1) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yo-ss-1
part of: 15YO Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
note: Adults accompanying vulnerable persons may choose an adult to accompany them while giving evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.195
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-1-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YO(1) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15YO(1A) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yo-ss-1a
part of: 15YO Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
note: This subsection applies to specific persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.195
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YO(1A) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies_to
logic summary: Applies to specified persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YO(2) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yo-ss-2
part of: 15YO Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
note: Court determines it is not appropriate for the adult to accompany the person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.195
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YO(2) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15YO(3) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yo-ss-3
part of: 15YO Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
note: Court may permit more than one adult to accompany a person in the interests of justice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.195
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-3-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YO(3) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15YO(4) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yo-ss-4
part of: 15YO Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
note: Adults accompanying vulnerable persons must not prompt or disrupt questioning.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.195
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YO(4) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of influencing vulnerable persons' answers.
premise text: (4) An adult accompanying the person under this section must not:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Adults accompany vulnerable persons during questioning.
premise text: (4) An adult accompanying the person under this section must not:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YO(5) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yo-ss-5
part of: 15YO Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
note: Adults accompanying vulnerable persons must be able to be heard by the judge and jury members.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.195
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YO(5) Adults accompanying vulnerable persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to be heard
premise text: Adults accompanying vulnerable persons must be able to be heard by the judge and jury members.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for adults accompanying vulnerable persons
premise text: The text specifies a temporal interval for adults accompanying vulnerable persons to be able to be heard by the judge and jury members.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal logic for adults accompanying vulnerable persons
premise text: The text applies temporal logic to specify a temporal interval for adults accompanying vulnerable persons to be able to be heard by the judge and jury members.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: APPLIES
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to adults accompanying vulnerable persons
premise text: The text applies diffusion logic to spread the obligation to be heard by the judge and jury members to all adults accompanying vulnerable persons.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yo-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: APPLIES
logic summary: Cognitive AI application for adults accompanying vulnerable persons
premise text: The text applies cognitive AI logic to analyze the obligation of adults accompanying vulnerable persons to be able to be heard by the judge and jury members.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YP Excluding people from the courtroom
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yp
note: Excluding people from the courtroom
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.196
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yp-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yp-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yp-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YP Excluding people from the courtroom
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits excluding people from the courtroom
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YQ Warnings etc. not to be given about vulnerable persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yq
note: Judge must not warn jury about vulnerable persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.196
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yq-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yq-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yq-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of warning
premise text: Judge must not warn jury
conclusion text: Vulnerable persons are protected
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yq-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of vulnerable persons
premise text: Persons to whom subsection (2) applies
conclusion text: Reliable class of witness
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YR Publication identifying another person as a child witness,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yr
note: Publishing matter without court leave can lead to identification of vulnerable persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.197
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yr-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yr-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yr-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on publishing matter without court leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YS General powers of a court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ys
has part: 15YS(1) General powers of a court
has part: 15YS(2) General powers of a court
has part: 15YS(3) General powers of a court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.200

15YS(1) General powers of a court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ys-ss-1
part of: 15YS General powers of a court
note: Court's power to control proceeding is not affected by this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.200
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YS(1) General powers of a court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continues existing obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YS(2) General powers of a court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ys-ss-2
part of: 15YS General powers of a court
note: Court's power to control questioning of witnesses is not affected.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.200
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-2-norm

15YS(3) General powers of a court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ys-ss-3
part of: 15YS General powers of a court
note: Court has power to give leave subject to conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.200
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YS(3) General powers of a court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Court can give leave subject to conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15ys-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has power
logic summary: Court has power to give leave.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YT Other video link evidence provisions are unaffected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yt
note: No effect on Division 279 of Criminal Code regarding video link evidence in offences against humanity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.201
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yt-norm

15YU Proceedings to which this Part applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yu
has part: 15YU(1) Proceedings to which this Part applies
has part: 15YU(2) Proceedings to which this Part applies
has part: 15YU(3) Proceedings to which this Part applies
has part: 15YU(4) Proceedings to which this Part applies
has part: 15YU(5) Proceedings to which this Part applies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.202

15YU(1) Proceedings to which this Part applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yu-ss-1
part of: 15YU Proceedings to which this Part applies
note: Proceedings for specified offences apply to this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.202
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YU(1) Proceedings to which this Part applies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: This Part applies to the specified offences.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YU(2) Proceedings to which this Part applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yu-ss-2
part of: 15YU Proceedings to which this Part applies
note: Proceedings under this Part also apply to proceedings under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Extended meaning of prosecutor and defendant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.202
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YU(2) Proceedings to which this Part applies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: also applies
logic summary: Obligation to apply
premise text: (2) This Part also applies to:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extends the definition of prosecutor and defendant
premise text: (2) were instituted before or after the commencement of this Part.
conclusion text: The extended meaning applies to proceedings instituted before or after the commencement of this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15YU(3) Proceedings to which this Part applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yu-ss-3
part of: 15YU Proceedings to which this Part applies
note: Proceedings covered by subsection (1) are not relevant to the determination of materiality.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.202
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Materiality is determined regardless of proceedings covered by subsection (1)
premise text: (3) It is immaterial whether proceedings covered by subsection (1) or
conclusion text: Proceedings covered by subsection (1) are not relevant to the determination of materiality.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15YU(4) Proceedings to which this Part applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yu-ss-4
part of: 15YU Proceedings to which this Part applies
note: Transfers responsibility between authorities under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.202
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-4-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YU(4) Proceedings to which this Part applies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Transfer
logic summary: Transfers responsibility
premise text: (a) the responsible authority for the proceeding under that Act were the prosecutor;
conclusion text: Responsibility can be transferred between these authorities (see section 315B of that Act).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Assignment
logic summary: Assigns responsibility to the prosecutor
premise text: (b) each other party to the proceeding were a defendant in the proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15YU(5) Proceedings to which this Part applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yu-ss-5
part of: 15YU Proceedings to which this Part applies
note: Definition of PMV-related questioning warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.202
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YU(5) Proceedings to which this Part applies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yu-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: PMV-related questioning warrant is defined in Division 3 of Part III of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.
conclusion text: PMV-related questioning warrant is a type of questioning warrant
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15YV When court may take evidence by video link
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yv
has part: 15YV(1) When court may take evidence by video link
has part: 15YV(2) When court may take evidence by video link
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.204

15YV(1) When court may take evidence by video link
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yv-ss-1
part of: 15YV When court may take evidence by video link
note: Court must direct or allow witness to give evidence by video link under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.204
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yv-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YV(1) When court may take evidence by video link
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must direct or allow witness to give evidence by video link.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YV(2) When court may take evidence by video link
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yv-ss-2
part of: 15YV When court may take evidence by video link
note: Court must direct or allow witness to give evidence by video link under specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.204
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yv-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YV(2) When court may take evidence by video link
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court obligation to direct or allow witness
premise text: Section 15YV(2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YW Observers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yw
has part: 15YW(1) Observers
has part: 15YW(2) Observers
has part: 15YW(3) Observers
has part: 15YW(4) Observers
has part: 15YW(5) Observers
has part: 15YW(6) Observers
has part: 15YW(7) Observers
has part: 15YW(8) Observers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.205

15YW(1) Observers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yw-ss-1
part of: 15YW Observers
note: Witness must be physically present at the place of evidence giving.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.205
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YW(1) Observers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits witness from giving evidence remotely.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YW(2) Observers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yw-ss-2
part of: 15YW Observers
note: Witness must be physically present at the place where evidence is given when giving evidence by video link.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.205
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YW(2) Observers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide physical presence at the place where evidence is given when giving evidence by video link.
premise text: (2) If a section 15YV direction or order is in force...
conclusion text: ...the witness can give evidence under the direction or order only if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for physical presence at the place where evidence is given.
premise text: (2) If a section 15YV direction or order is in force...
conclusion text: ...the witness can give evidence under the direction or order only if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for physical presence at the place where evidence is given.
premise text: (2) If a section 15YV direction or order is in force...
conclusion text: ...the witness can give evidence under the direction or order only if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for physical presence at the place where evidence is given.
premise text: (2) If a section 15YV direction or order is in force...
conclusion text: ...the witness can give evidence under the direction or order only if...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for physical presence at the place where evidence is given.
premise text: (2) If a section 15YV direction or order is in force...
conclusion text: ...the witness can give evidence under the direction or order only if...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YW(3) Observers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yw-ss-3
part of: 15YW Observers
note: Court may vary direction or order to substitute another specified person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.205
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YW(3) Observers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Court has permission to vary direction or order.
premise text: (3) If...
conclusion text: ...the court may vary the direction or order...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Direction or order is in force under section 15YV.
premise text: (a) a direction or order is in force under section 15YV;
conclusion text: ...the court may vary the direction or order...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Court justifies varying direction or order.
premise text: (3) If...
conclusion text: ...so as to substitute another specified person.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Direction or order is propagated under section 15YV.
premise text: (a) a direction or order is in force under section 15YV;
conclusion text: ...the court may vary the direction or order...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Court infers permission to vary direction or order.
premise text: (3) If...
conclusion text: ...so as to substitute another specified person.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YW(4) Observers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yw-ss-4
part of: 15YW Observers
note: List of persons who may be specified for the purposes of this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.205
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-4-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YW(4) Observers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15YW(5) Observers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yw-ss-5
part of: 15YW Observers
note: Court must ensure observer is independent of prosecutor and defendants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.205
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-5-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YW(5) Observers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Court must ensure observer is independent.
premise text: (5) The court must not specify a person for the purposes of this section unless...
conclusion text: ...the court is satisfied that the person is independent of the prosecutor and defendants.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Observer must be reasonably available to observe evidence giving.
premise text: (5) The court must not specify a person for the purposes of this section unless...
conclusion text: ...the court is satisfied that the person is independent of the prosecutor and defendants, and in a position to give a report to the court about what the person observes in relation to the giving of evidence by the witness.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Observer must be an appropriate person for the purposes of this section.
premise text: (5) The court must not specify a person for the purposes of this section unless...
conclusion text: ...the court is satisfied that the person is independent of the prosecutor and defendants, in a position to give a report to the court about what the person observes in relation to the giving of evidence by the witness, and reasonably available to observe the giving of evidence by the witness.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YW(6) Observers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yw-ss-6
part of: 15YW Observers
note: A person's status as an Australian diplomatic officer or consular officer does not imply independence from the prosecutor.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.205
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YW(6) Observers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Independence is not guaranteed by being an Australian diplomatic officer or consular officer.
premise text: (6) For the purposes of this section, the mere fact that a person is an Australian diplomatic officer or Australian consular officer does not mean that the person is not independent of the prosecutor.
conclusion text: The person's independence is not guaranteed by their status.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The excerpt defines a temporal interval (being an Australian diplomatic officer or consular officer) that overlaps with another interval (independence from the prosecutor).
premise text: (6) For the purposes of this section, the mere fact that a person is an Australian diplomatic officer or Australian consular officer does not mean that the person is not independent of the prosecutor.
conclusion text: The intervals overlap.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The excerpt defines a temporal relationship (independence from the prosecutor) that holds until another event (being an Australian diplomatic officer or consular officer).
premise text: (6) For the purposes of this section, the mere fact that a person is an Australian diplomatic officer or Australian consular officer does not mean that the person is not independent of the prosecutor.
conclusion text: The relationship holds until the event.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The excerpt defines a concept (independence from the prosecutor) that diffuses through another concept (being an Australian diplomatic officer or consular officer).
premise text: (6) For the purposes of this section, the mere fact that a person is an Australian diplomatic officer or Australian consular officer does not mean that the person is not independent of the prosecutor.
conclusion text: The concepts diffuse.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The excerpt defines a concept (independence from the prosecutor) recognized by an artificial agent (the law).
premise text: (6) For the purposes of this section, the mere fact that a person is an Australian diplomatic officer or Australian consular officer does not mean that the person is not independent of the prosecutor.
conclusion text: The concept is recognized.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15YW(7) Observers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yw-ss-7
part of: 15YW Observers
note: Court may direct or allow specified person to provide report about video link evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.205
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YW(7) Observers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Court may direct or allow specified person to provide report.
premise text: (7) If...
conclusion text: ...the court may...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Report is provided within a specific time frame.
premise text: by such time as the court requires,
conclusion text: ...within a specified time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Court's decision to admit evidence is based on report.
premise text: ...for the purpose of deciding whether...
conclusion text: ...the court considers appropriate...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YW(8) Observers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yw-ss-8
part of: 15YW Observers
note: Definition of Australian consular officer and diplomatic officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.205
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-8-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yw-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YW(8) Observers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15YX Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yx
has part: 15YX(1) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
has part: 15YX(2) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
has part: 15YX(3) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
has part: 15YX(4) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
has part: 15YX(5) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.207

15YX(1) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yx-ss-1
part of: 15YX Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
note: A defendant may apply for an adjournment to decide whether to appeal against a court direction or order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.207
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YX(1) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: A defendant may apply for an adjournment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YX(2) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yx-ss-2
part of: 15YX Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
note: Prosecutor must apply for adjournment if court gives direction or order and defendant applies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.207
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to apply for adjournment
premise text: Court gives direction or order
conclusion text: Prosecutor must apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YX(3) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yx-ss-3
part of: 15YX Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
note: Prosecutor may apply for adjournment to decide on appeal or withdrawal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.207
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YX(3) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YX(4) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yx-ss-4
part of: 15YX Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
note: Grant of adjournment for appeal decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.207
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows defendant to request adjournment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YX(5) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yx-ss-5
part of: 15YX Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
note: Court must grant adjournment upon application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.207
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YX(5) Adjournment after a section 15YV direction or order etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yx-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to grant adjournment
premise text: Application made under section.
conclusion text: Court must grant adjournment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YY Technical requirements for video link
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yy
has part: 15YY(1) Technical requirements for video link
has part: 15YY(2) Technical requirements for video link
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.209

15YY(1) Technical requirements for video link
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yy-ss-1
part of: 15YY Technical requirements for video link
note: Witness must give evidence under video link with specified facilities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.209
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YY(1) Technical requirements for video link
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide evidence under video link.
premise text: (1) A witness can give evidence under a section 15YV direction or order only if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Video facilities must be available during evidence giving.
premise text: (c) enable appropriate persons at the courtroom point to see and hear the witness give the evidence; (d) enable appropriate persons at the witness point to see and hear appropriate persons at the courtroom point.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Video facilities must be available during evidence giving.
premise text: (c) enable appropriate persons at the courtroom point to see and hear the witness give the evidence; (d) enable appropriate persons at the witness point to see and hear appropriate persons at the courtroom point.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Courtroom and witness points must have video facilities.
premise text: (a) the courtroom or other place where the court is sitting (the courtroom point); (b) the place where the evidence is given (the witness point); (c) enable appropriate persons at the courtroom point to see and hear the witness give the evidence; (d) enable appropriate persons at the witness point to see and hear appropriate persons at the courtroom point.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Witness must be able to see and hear at both points.
premise text: (c) enable appropriate persons at the courtroom point to see and hear the witness give the evidence; (d) enable appropriate persons at the witness point to see and hear appropriate persons at the courtroom point.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YY(2) Technical requirements for video link
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yy-ss-2
part of: 15YY Technical requirements for video link
note: Court considers appropriate persons for a specific purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.209
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yy-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YY(2) Technical requirements for video link
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15YZ Direction to jury
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yz
has part: 15YZ(1) Direction to jury
has part: 15YZ(2) Direction to jury
has part: 15YZ(3) Direction to jury
has part: 15YZ(4) Direction to jury
has part: 15YZ(5) Direction to jury
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.209

15YZ(1) Direction to jury
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yz-ss-1
part of: 15YZ Direction to jury
note: Defendant may appeal against section 15YV direction or order. Ensure equal weight to witness evidence in jury proceedings. A person must give evidence at the courtroom or other place where the court is sitting.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.209
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-8
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-ltl-9
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-diffusion-10
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-cogai-11

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YZ(1) Direction to jury
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Defendant has a right to appeal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide equal weight
premise text: (a) a proceeding involves a jury; (b) a witness gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order; (c) the evidence is admissible in the proceeding;
conclusion text: the judge must give the jury such direction as the judge thinks necessary to ensure that the jury gives the same weight to the evidence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval of witness evidence in jury proceedings
premise text: (a) a proceeding involves a jury; (b) a witness gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order; (c) the evidence is admissible in the proceeding;
conclusion text: the judge must give the jury such direction as the judge thinks necessary to ensure that the jury gives the same weight to the evidence...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Recurring trace of witness evidence in jury proceedings
premise text: (a) a proceeding involves a jury; (b) a witness gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order; (c) the evidence is admissible in the proceeding;
conclusion text: the judge must give the jury such direction as the judge thinks necessary to ensure that the jury gives the same weight to the evidence...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Diffusion of witness evidence in jury proceedings
premise text: (a) a proceeding involves a jury; (b) a witness gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order; (c) the evidence is admissible in the proceeding;
conclusion text: the judge must give the jury such direction as the judge thinks necessary to ensure that the jury gives the same weight to the evidence...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Argumentation scheme of witness evidence in jury proceedings
premise text: (a) a proceeding involves a jury; (b) a witness gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order; (c) the evidence is admissible in the proceeding;
conclusion text: the judge must give the jury such direction as the judge thinks necessary to ensure that the jury gives the same weight to the evidence...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must give evidence at a specific place
premise text: (1) A person who gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order is taken to give it at the courtroom or other place where the court is sitting.
conclusion text: A person must give evidence at the courtroom or other place where the court is sitting.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-8
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval of direction to jury
premise text: (1) A person who gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order is taken to give it at the courtroom or other place where the court is sitting.
conclusion text: The temporal interval of the direction to jury contains the courtroom and other place where the court is sitting.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-ltl-9
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal trace of direction to jury
premise text: (1) A person who gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order is taken to give it at the courtroom or other place where the court is sitting.
conclusion text: The temporal trace of the direction to jury contains the courtroom and other place where the court is sitting.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-diffusion-10
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Diffusion of direction to jury
premise text: (1) A person who gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order is taken to give it at the courtroom or other place where the court is sitting.
conclusion text: The diffusion of the direction to jury contains the courtroom and other place where the court is sitting.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-1-logic-cogai-11
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: CogAI application for direction to jury
premise text: (1) A person who gives evidence under a section 15YV direction or order is taken to give it at the courtroom or other place where the court is sitting.
conclusion text: The CogAI application contains the courtroom and other place where the court is sitting.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YZ(2) Direction to jury
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yz-ss-2
part of: 15YZ Direction to jury
note: Ignore judge directions and weight given to video link evidence in proceedings not covered by this Part. Prosecutor may appeal against a section 15YV direction or order. Subsection (1) has effect for the purposes of laws relating to evidence, procedure, contempt of court and perjury.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.209
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YZ(2) Direction to jury
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Ignore
logic summary: Obligation to disregard judge directions and weight given to video link evidence.
premise text: (2) Disregard subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the prosecutor from appealing against a section 15YV direction or order.
premise text: (2) If: ...; the prosecutor may appeal...
conclusion text: ...Court refuses to give a direction or make an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: The provision has a direct effect on other laws.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YZ(3) Direction to jury
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yz-ss-3
part of: 15YZ Direction to jury
note: Prosecutor may appeal against refusal of section 15YV direction or order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.209
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YZ(3) Direction to jury
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to appeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YZ(4) Direction to jury
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yz-ss-4
part of: 15YZ Direction to jury
note: Right to appeal against refusal of section 15YV direction or order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.209
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YZ(4) Direction to jury
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant has a right to appeal against refusal of section 15YV direction or order
premise text: (4) If...
conclusion text: the defendant may appeal against the refusal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15YZ(5) Direction to jury
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15yz-ss-5
part of: 15YZ Direction to jury
note: Court jurisdiction for appeals under this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.209
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YZ(5) Direction to jury
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-15yz-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals
premise text: (5) A court that has jurisdiction...
conclusion text: ...hear and determine any appeal under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16
note: Defines aggregate imprisonment term
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.213
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Interpretation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a key concept
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to definitions and class hierarchies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16A Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16a
has part: 16A(1) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
has part: 16A(2) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.219

16A(1) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16a-ss-1
part of: 16A Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
note: Court must impose a sentence of appropriate severity when passing sentence for a federal offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.219
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-16a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16A(1) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Court must impose a sentence of appropriate severity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16A(2) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16a-ss-2
part of: 16A Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
note: Court must consider certain matters when passing sentence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.219
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-16a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16A(2) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider certain matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80
has part: 80(2B) Section 80
has part: 80(3) Section 80
has part: 80(4) Section 80
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.222

80(2B) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80-ss-2b
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Defines criminal behaviour in subsection (2A)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.222
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-2b-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(2B) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes conduct, omission, circumstance or result in the physical element of the offence
premise text: (2B) criminal behaviour includes:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(3) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80-ss-3
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Court must consider nature and severity of conditions when determining sentence or order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.222
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(3) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider conditions
premise text: Court must have regard to the nature and severity of the conditions.
conclusion text: Sentence or order must be determined with consideration for conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(4) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80-ss-4
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Defines family members for a reference in this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.222
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-4-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-80-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(4) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

16AA Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16aa
has part: 16AA(1) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
has part: 16AA(2) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
has part: 16AA(3) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.223

16AA(1) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16aa-ss-1
part of: 16AA Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
note: Court must not consider customary law or cultural practice when passing sentence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.223
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 16AA(1) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court must not consider customary law or cultural practice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16AA(2) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16aa-ss-2
part of: 16AA Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
note: Court must have regard to certain laws when passing sentence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.223
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16AA(2) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: regard
logic summary: Must consider specific laws
premise text: Court must pass sentence
conclusion text: Court must have regard to certain laws
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16AA(3) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16aa-ss-3
part of: 16AA Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
note: Criminal behaviour includes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.223
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16AA(3) Matters to which court to have regard when passing sentence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Classifies criminal behaviour
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16aa-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16ab
has part: 16AB(1) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(2) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(3) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(4) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(5) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(6) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(7) Matters relating to victim impact statements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.230

16AB(1) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16ab-ss-1
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements
note: This section applies in relation to victim impact statements made known to a court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.230
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16AB(1) Matters relating to victim impact statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Section applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16AB(2) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16ab-ss-2
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements
note: Only one victim impact statement may be made for each victim of an offence, unless the court gives leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.230
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 16AB(2) Matters relating to victim impact statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits making multiple victim impact statements for the same victim.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16AB(3) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16ab-ss-3
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements
note: No implication from absence of victim impact statement for a victim.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.230
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16AB(3) Matters relating to victim impact statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Implication from absence of statement
premise text: (3)
conclusion text: No implication
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ImpliesNot
logic summary: Negative implication
premise text: (3)
conclusion text: No implication
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16AB(4) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16ab-ss-4
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements
note: Victim impact statement may be read to court by or on behalf of the victim.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.230
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16AB(4) Matters relating to victim impact statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16AB(5) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16ab-ss-5
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements
note: Excluding certain types of victim impact statements from consideration by the court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.230
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-argumentation-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents reading or considering victim impact statements under certain conditions.
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account, to the extent that: (a) it expresses an opinion about an appropriate sentence; or (b) it is offensive, threatening, intimidating or harassing; or (c) admitting it into evidence would otherwise not be in the interests of justice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between conditions for excluding victim impact statements.
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account, to the extent that: (a) it expresses an opinion about an appropriate sentence; or (b) it is offensive, threatening, intimidating or harassing; or (c) admitting it into evidence would otherwise not be in the interests of justice.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring exclusion of victim impact statements under certain conditions.
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account, to the extent that: (a) it expresses an opinion about an appropriate sentence; or (b) it is offensive, threatening, intimidating or harassing; or (c) admitting it into evidence would otherwise not be in the interests of justice.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreading exclusion of victim impact statements to related contexts.
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account, to the extent that: (a) it expresses an opinion about an appropriate sentence; or (b) it is offensive, threatening, intimidating or harassing; or (c) admitting it into evidence would otherwise not be in the interests of justice.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Rebuttal
logic summary: Rebutting exclusion of victim impact statements with counterarguments.
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account, to the extent that: (a) it expresses an opinion about an appropriate sentence; or (b) it is offensive, threatening, intimidating or harassing; or (c) admitting it into evidence would otherwise not be in the interests of justice.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16AB(6) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16ab-ss-6
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements
note: The person convicted of the offence may only test the facts in a victim impact statement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.230
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16AB(6) Matters relating to victim impact statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may_only
logic summary: May only test the facts
premise text: (6) The person convicted of the offence may only test the facts in a victim impact statement:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may_only
logic summary: May only test the facts
premise text: (a) by way of cross-examining the maker of the statement;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may_only
logic summary: May only test the facts
premise text: (b) if the court gives leave to do so.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16AB(7) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16ab-ss-7
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements
note: Part IAD protections apply to readings and cross-examinations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.230
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16AB(7) Matters relating to victim impact statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ab-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Part IAD protections apply to readings and cross-examinations
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16AC Reduction for cooperation with law enforcement agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16ac
note: Cooperation with law enforcement agencies is required for reduced sentence or order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.231
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ac-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ac-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ac-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires cooperation with law enforcement agencies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16B Court to have regard to other periods of imprisonment required
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16b
note: Court must consider previous sentences when sentencing a person convicted of a federal offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16b-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16b-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-16b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16B Court to have regard to other periods of imprisonment required
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider previous sentences
premise text: Court must have regard to...
conclusion text: ...consider previous sentences when sentencing a person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16BA Taking other offences into account
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16ba
note: Requires filing of document with list of other federal offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ba-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16ba-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ba-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16BA Taking other offences into account
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16ba-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires the filing of a document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16C Fines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16c
has part: 16C(1) Fines
has part: 16C(2) Fines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236

16C(1) Fines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16c-ss-1
part of: 16C Fines
note: Court must consider financial circumstances before imposing a fine.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16C(1) Fines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider financial circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16C(2) Fines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16c-ss-2
part of: 16C Fines
note: Court may impose fine regardless of offender's financial circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16C(2) Fines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: May
premise text: Nothing prevents a court from imposing a fine.
conclusion text: A court may impose a fine.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16c-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May impose fine
premise text: A court may impose a fine on a person.
conclusion text: The court has the authority to impose a fine.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16D No corporal punishment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16d
has part: 16D(1) No corporal punishment
has part: 16D(2) No corporal punishment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237

16D(1) No corporal punishment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16d-ss-1
part of: 16D No corporal punishment
note: No corporal punishment for federal offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 16D(1) No corporal punishment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of corporal punishment
premise text: (1) A court must not impose any form of corporal punishment for a federal offence.
conclusion text: No corporal punishment for federal offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implication of prohibition on corporal punishment
premise text: (1) A court must not impose any form of corporal punishment for a federal offence.
conclusion text: If a court imposes corporal punishment, it is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal relation between prohibition and corporal punishment
premise text: (1) A court must not impose any form of corporal punishment for a federal offence.
conclusion text: The prohibition on corporal punishment is within the temporal interval of the federal offence
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Analysis of prohibition on corporal punishment
premise text: (1) A court must not impose any form of corporal punishment for a federal offence.
conclusion text: The prohibition on corporal punishment is a key aspect of the federal offence
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
logic summary: Validation of prohibition on corporal punishment
premise text: (1) A court must not impose any form of corporal punishment for a federal offence.
conclusion text: The prohibition on corporal punishment is valid and enforceable
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16D(2) No corporal punishment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16d-ss-2
part of: 16D No corporal punishment
note: No corporal punishment for federal sentence holders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 16D(2) No corporal punishment
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits corporal punishment
premise text: (2) A person serving a federal sentence must not be subjected to any form of corporal punishment.
conclusion text: No corporal punishment for federal sentence holders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Impose
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on corporal punishment
premise text: (2) A person serving a federal sentence must not be subjected to any form of corporal punishment.
conclusion text: Prohibition on corporal punishment for federal sentence holders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies prohibition on corporal punishment
premise text: (2) A person serving a federal sentence must not be subjected to any form of corporal punishment.
conclusion text: Prohibition on corporal punishment for federal sentence holders.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16d-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Justify
logic summary: Justifies prohibition on corporal punishment
premise text: (2) A person serving a federal sentence must not be subjected to any form of corporal punishment.
conclusion text: Prohibition on corporal punishment for federal sentence holders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16E Commencement of sentences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16e
has part: 16E(1) Commencement of sentences
has part: 16E(2) Commencement of sentences
has part: 16E(3) Commencement of sentences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238

16E(1) Commencement of sentences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16e-ss-1
part of: 16E Commencement of sentences
note: Law of a State or Territory applies to federal offence sentencing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16E(1) Commencement of sentences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Law applies
premise text: (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the law of a State or Territory relating to the commencement of sentences...
conclusion text: The law of a State or Territory applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Law applies during sentencing
premise text: (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the law of a State or Territory relating to the commencement of sentences...
conclusion text: The law applies during sentencing.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: entails
logic summary: Law implies application to persons sentenced in that State or Territory
premise text: (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the law of a State or Territory relating to the commencement of sentences...
conclusion text: The law implies application to persons sentenced in that State or Territory.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
logic summary: Law implies diffusion to persons sentenced in that State or Territory
premise text: (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the law of a State or Territory relating to the commencement of sentences...
conclusion text: The law implies diffusion to persons sentenced in that State or Territory.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: applies
logic summary: Law applies to AI systems sentencing persons in that State or Territory
premise text: (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the law of a State or Territory relating to the commencement of sentences...
conclusion text: The law applies to AI systems sentencing persons in that State or Territory.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

16E(2) Commencement of sentences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16e-ss-2
part of: 16E Commencement of sentences
note: Law applies to federal sentences imposed on a person in a State or Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16E(2) Commencement of sentences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Law applies to federal sentences.
premise text: State law applies to persons within its territory.
conclusion text: Federal sentence is subject to State law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16E(3) Commencement of sentences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16e-ss-3
part of: 16E Commencement of sentences
note: Court must consider previous custody period when imposing federal sentence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16E(3) Commencement of sentences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider previous custody period.
premise text: (3) Where the law of a State or Territory does not have the effect mentioned in subsection (2),
conclusion text: a court (including a federal court) in that State or Territory that imposes a federal sentence on a person or fixes a non-parole period in respect of such a sentence must take into account any period that the person has spent in custody in relation to the offence concerned.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship between previous custody and current sentence.
premise text: (3) Where the law of a State or Territory does not have the effect mentioned in subsection (2),
conclusion text: a court (including a federal court) in that State or Territory that imposes a federal sentence on a person or fixes a non-parole period in respect of such a sentence must take into account any period that the person has spent in custody in relation to the offence concerned.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship between previous custody and current sentence.
premise text: (3) Where the law of a State or Territory does not have the effect mentioned in subsection (2),
conclusion text: a court (including a federal court) in that State or Territory that imposes a federal sentence on a person or fixes a non-parole period in respect of such a sentence must take into account any period that the person has spent in custody in relation to the offence concerned.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation from State to court.
premise text: (3) Where the law of a State or Territory does not have the effect mentioned in subsection (2),
conclusion text: a court (including a federal court) in that State or Territory that imposes a federal sentence on a person or fixes a non-parole period in respect of such a sentence must take into account any period that the person has spent in custody in relation to the offence concerned.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16e-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for classification and diffusion.
premise text: (3) Where the law of a State or Territory does not have the effect mentioned in subsection (2),
conclusion text: a court (including a federal court) in that State or Territory that imposes a federal sentence on a person or fixes a non-parole period in respect of such a sentence must take into account any period that the person has spent in custody in relation to the offence concerned.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16F Court to explain sentence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16f
has part: 16F(1) Court to explain sentence
has part: 16F(2) Court to explain sentence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238

16F(1) Court to explain sentence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16f-ss-1
part of: 16F Court to explain sentence
note: Court must explain purpose and consequences of non-parole period to the person.
description: Explanation of non-parole period purpose and consequences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16f-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-16f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16F(1) Court to explain sentence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must provide explanation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16F(2) Court to explain sentence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16f-ss-2
part of: 16F Court to explain sentence
note: Court must explain sentence to person before release.
description: Explanation of purpose and consequences of recognizance release order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16f-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-16f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16F(2) Court to explain sentence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to explain sentence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17A Restriction on imposing sentences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17a
note: Court cannot pass sentence of imprisonment for certain federal offences or external Territory offences without considering other options.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-17a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 17A Restriction on imposing sentences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-17a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Court cannot pass sentence of imprisonment
premise text: Court passes sentence of imprisonment
conclusion text: Imprisonment is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17B Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17b
has part: 17B(1) Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
has part: 17B(2) Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
has part: 17B(3) Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240

17B(1) Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17b-ss-1
part of: 17B Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
note: Court must not pass sentence of imprisonment unless exceptional circumstances warrant it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17B(1) Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court must not pass sentence of imprisonment unless exceptional circumstances warrant it.
premise text: (a) a person is convicted of one or more section 17B offences relating to property, money or both, whose total value is not more than $2,000;
conclusion text: the court convicting the person is not to pass a sentence of imprisonment for that offence, or for any of those offences, unless the court is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances that warrant it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The offence occurred before the sentence was passed
premise text: (b) the person has not previously been sentenced to imprisonment for any federal, State or Territory offence;
conclusion text: the offence occurred before the sentence was passed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The sentence must be passed after the offence occurred
premise text: (b) the person has not previously been sentenced to imprisonment for any federal, State or Territory offence;
conclusion text: the sentence must be passed after the offence occurred
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: The court may pass a sentence if exceptional circumstances warrant it
premise text: (b) the person has not previously been sentenced to imprisonment for any federal, State or Territory offence;
conclusion text: the court may pass a sentence if exceptional circumstances warrant it
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The court must satisfy itself that there are exceptional circumstances before passing the sentence
premise text: (b) the person has not previously been sentenced to imprisonment for any federal, State or Territory offence;
conclusion text: the court must satisfy itself that there are exceptional circumstances before passing the sentence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17B(2) Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17b-ss-2
part of: 17B Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
note: Court must consider section 17B offence in calculating total value for sentence purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-2-norm

17B(3) Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17b-ss-3
part of: 17B Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
note: Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-3-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-17b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17B(3) Restriction on imposing sentences for certain minor offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

134 Section 134
type: Concept
realized by: sec-134
note: List of offences against federal laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-134-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-134-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134 Section 134
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

18 Sentence of imprisonment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18
has part: 18(1) Sentence of imprisonment
has part: 18(2) Sentence of imprisonment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241

18(1) Sentence of imprisonment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-1
part of: 18 Sentence of imprisonment
note: Imprisonment may be imposed with or without hard labour.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(1) Sentence of imprisonment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Imposition of imprisonment is permitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(2) Sentence of imprisonment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-2
part of: 18 Sentence of imprisonment
note: Imprisonment in corresponding cases
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: corresponding
logic summary: Corresponding circumstances
premise text: (2) Where under the law of a State or Territory...
conclusion text: a person convicted of an offence against the law of the Commonwealth may, in corresponding cases...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class
logic summary: Class of prison
premise text: ...in particular cases be imprisoned in a particular kind or class of prison...
conclusion text: ...be imprisoned in the kind or class of prison appropriate to the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (2) Where under the law of a State or Territory...
conclusion text: ...in corresponding cases, be imprisoned in the kind or class of prison appropriate to the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (2) Where under the law of a State or Territory...
conclusion text: ...in corresponding cases, be imprisoned in the kind or class of prison appropriate to the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Diffusion through laws
premise text: (2) Where under the law of a State or Territory...
conclusion text: ...in corresponding cases, be imprisoned in the kind or class of prison appropriate to the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-18-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: through
logic summary: CogAI through laws
premise text: (2) Where under the law of a State or Territory...
conclusion text: ...in corresponding cases, be imprisoned in the kind or class of prison appropriate to the circumstances.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

19 Cumulative, partly cumulative or concurrent sentences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19
note: Court must direct when federal sentence commences, ensuring it does not later than the end of other sentences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 Cumulative, partly cumulative or concurrent sentences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Court must direct when federal sentence commences.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19A Detention of person in State or Territory prisons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19a
note: Federal offender may be detained in any prison in a State or Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AB When court must fix non-parole period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ab
has part: 19AB(1) When court must fix non-parole period
has part: 19AB(2) When court must fix non-parole period
has part: 19AB(3) When court must fix non-parole period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244

19AB(1) When court must fix non-parole period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ab-ss-1
part of: 19AB When court must fix non-parole period
note: Court must fix non-parole period for federal sentences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AB(1) When court must fix non-parole period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to fix non-parole period
premise text: Court must impose sentence
conclusion text: Non-parole period must be fixed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AB(2) When court must fix non-parole period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ab-ss-2
part of: 19AB When court must fix non-parole period
note: Court must fix non-parole period for federal sentences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AB(2) When court must fix non-parole period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court obligation
conclusion text: The court must fix a non-parole period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AB(3) When court must fix non-parole period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ab-ss-3
part of: 19AB When court must fix non-parole period
note: Court must fix non-parole period under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AB(3) When court must fix non-parole period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to fix non-parole period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AC When court must fix a recognizance release order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ac
has part: 19AC(1) When court must fix a recognizance release order
has part: 19AC(2) When court must fix a recognizance release order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245

19AC(1) When court must fix a recognizance release order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ac-ss-1
part of: 19AC When court must fix a recognizance release order
note: Court must fix a recognizance release order under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AC(1) When court must fix a recognizance release order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must fix a recognizance release order.
premise text: (1) Subject to subsections (3) and (4), where...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Sentence duration must be between 3 years.
premise text: (b) the court imposes on the person a federal sentence that does not exceed, or...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Sentence duration must be between 3 years.
premise text: (b) the court imposes on the person a federal sentence that does not exceed, or...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must fix a recognizance release order under certain conditions.
premise text: (c) at the time the sentence or sentences are imposed the person is not already serving...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AC(2) When court must fix a recognizance release order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ac-ss-2
part of: 19AC When court must fix a recognizance release order
note: Court must fix a recognizance release order under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AC(2) When court must fix a recognizance release order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must fix a recognizance release order.
premise text: (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4), where...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AD Persons already subject to a non-parole period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ad
has part: 19AD(1) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
has part: 19AD(2) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
has part: 19AD(3) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
has part: 19AD(4) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247

19AD(1) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ad-ss-1
part of: 19AD Persons already subject to a non-parole period
note: Applicable to persons serving existing non-parole period when further sentence is imposed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AD(1) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on the state to consider existing non-parole period when imposing further sentence.
premise text: (a) a non-parole period (in this section called the existing non-parole period) has been fixed in respect of a federal sentence or federal sentences;
conclusion text: This section applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship between existing and imposed sentences.
premise text: (b) while the offender is serving the existing non-parole period, a court imposes a further federal sentence on the person;
conclusion text: The existing and imposed sentences overlap in time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Defines recurring trace of persons subject to non-parole period.
premise text: (a) a non-parole period (in this section called the existing non-parole period) has been fixed in respect of a federal sentence or federal sentences;
conclusion text: The person is part of a recurring trace of persons subject to non-parole periods.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Allows state to impose further sentence without violating existing non-parole period.
premise text: (b) while the offender is serving the existing non-parole period, a court imposes a further federal sentence on the person;
conclusion text: The court may impose a further sentence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AD(2) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ad-ss-2
part of: 19AD Persons already subject to a non-parole period
note: Court must consider circumstances and decide on a non-parole period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AD(2) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider circumstances and decide on a non-parole period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AD(3) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ad-ss-3
part of: 19AD Persons already subject to a non-parole period
note: Supersedes existing non-parole period if new sentence is imposed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AD(3) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Supersedes existing non-parole period
premise text: (3) Where, under paragraph (2)(e), the court fixes a new single non-parole period...
conclusion text: (a) is to be treated as having superseded the existing non-parole period;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Must not allow parole earlier than would have been the case if further sentence had not been imposed
premise text: (3) Where, under paragraph (2)(e), the court fixes a new single non-parole period...
conclusion text: (b) must not be such as to allow the person to be released on parole earlier then would have been the case if the further sentence had not been imposed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between two intervals
premise text: (3) Where, under paragraph (2)(e), the court fixes a new single non-parole period...
conclusion text: it: (a) is to be treated as having superseded the existing non-parole period;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Describes a logical relationship between two statements
premise text: (3) Where, under paragraph (2)(e), the court fixes a new single non-parole period...
conclusion text: (a) is to be treated as having superseded the existing non-parole period;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Describes a process of spreading or disseminating information
premise text: (3) Where, under paragraph (2)(e), the court fixes a new single non-parole period...
conclusion text: (b) must not be such as to allow the person to be released on parole earlier then would have been the case if the further sentence had not been imposed.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AD(4) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ad-ss-4
part of: 19AD Persons already subject to a non-parole period
note: Court must not make a recognizance release order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AD(4) Persons already subject to a non-parole period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of making a recognizance release order.
premise text: (4) Where this section applies, the court must not make a recognizance release order.
conclusion text: The court must not make a recognizance release order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court's obligation to refrain from making a recognizance release order.
premise text: (4) Where this section applies, the court must not make a recognizance release order.
conclusion text: The court is obligated to refrain.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implication of the prohibition on the court's actions.
premise text: (4) Where this section applies, the court must not make a recognizance release order.
conclusion text: The court's action is implied to be prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ApplyTo
logic summary: Application of the prohibition to specific temporal intervals.
premise text: (4) Where this section applies, the court must not make a recognizance release order.
conclusion text: The prohibition applies to all temporal intervals where this section applies.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ad-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Analysis of the provision's implications on artificial agents.
premise text: (4) Where this section applies, the court must not make a recognizance release order.
conclusion text: The provision has implications for artificial agents.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AE Persons already subject to recognizance release order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ae
has part: 19AE(1) Persons already subject to recognizance release order
has part: 19AE(2) Persons already subject to recognizance release order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248

19AE(1) Persons already subject to recognizance release order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ae-ss-1
part of: 19AE Persons already subject to recognizance release order
note: A person subject to a recognizance release order must comply with the existing order if a further federal sentence is imposed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AE(1) Persons already subject to recognizance release order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with the existing recognizance release order.
premise text: (1) Where...
conclusion text: This section applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Permission to impose further federal sentences on persons subject to recognizance release orders.
premise text: (b) before the person is released under that order, the court imposes a further federal sentence on the person;
conclusion text: The court may impose a further federal sentence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Permission to release persons subject to recognizance release orders.
premise text: (1) Where...
conclusion text: This section applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implication
logic summary: Implication of further federal sentences on persons subject to recognizance release orders.
premise text: (b) before the person is released under that order, the court imposes a further federal sentence on the person;
conclusion text: The person must comply with the existing recognizance release order if a further federal sentence is imposed.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AE(2) Persons already subject to recognizance release order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ae-ss-2
part of: 19AE Persons already subject to recognizance release order
note: Court must consider circumstances and decide one of the following things: confirm existing recognizance release order, make new recognizance release order, fix non-parole period, or neither.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AE(2) Persons already subject to recognizance release order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider circumstances and decide one of the following things.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AF Non-parole period or pre-release periods not to exceed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19af
has part: 19AF(1) Non-parole period or pre-release periods not to exceed
has part: 19AF(2) Non-parole period or pre-release periods not to exceed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249

19AF(1) Non-parole period or pre-release periods not to exceed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19af-ss-1
part of: 19AF Non-parole period or pre-release periods not to exceed
note: Court must fix non-parole period or make recognizance release order not later than the end of the sentence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AF(1) Non-parole period or pre-release periods not to exceed
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must fix non-parole period or make recognizance release order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AF(2) Non-parole period or pre-release periods not to exceed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19af-ss-2
part of: 19AF Non-parole period or pre-release periods not to exceed
note: Restricts non-parole period or pre-release periods for life sentences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AF(2) Non-parole period or pre-release periods not to exceed
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction
logic summary: Limits non-parole period or pre-release periods
premise text: (2) This section does not restrict...
conclusion text: ...in respect of a life sentence or sentences that include such a sentence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship between non-parole period and life sentence
premise text: (2) This section does not restrict...
conclusion text: ...the length of the non-parole period or...the pre-release period in respect of a life sentence or sentences that include such a sentence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship between non-parole period and life sentence
premise text: (2) This section does not restrict...
conclusion text: ...the length of the non-parole period or...the pre-release period in respect of a life sentence or sentences that include such a sentence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Defines propagation of restriction to related periods
premise text: (2) This section does not restrict...
conclusion text: ...the length of the non-parole period or...the pre-release period in respect of a life sentence or sentences that include such a sentence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19af-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Defines inference rule for restriction on non-parole period or pre-release periods
premise text: (2) This section does not restrict...
conclusion text: ...the length of the non-parole period or...the pre-release period in respect of a life sentence or sentences that include such a sentence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AG Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ag
has part: 19AG(1) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
has part: 19AG(2) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
has part: 19AG(3) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
has part: 19AG(4) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250

19AG(1) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ag-ss-1
part of: 19AG Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
note: Sentence for minimum non-parole offence is a federal sentence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AG(1) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Sentence classification
premise text: (1) This section applies if a person is convicted of one of the following offences (each of which is a minimum non-parole offence) and a court imposes a sentence for the offence:
conclusion text: A sentence for a minimum non-parole offence is a federal sentence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Sentence classification
premise text: (b) a terrorism offence;
conclusion text: A sentence for the offence is a federal sentence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Sentence classification
premise text: (a) This section applies if a person is convicted of one of the following offences (each of which is a minimum non-parole offence) and a court imposes a sentence for the offence:
conclusion text: A sentence for a minimum non-parole offence is a federal sentence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between offences
premise text: (b) a terrorism offence; (c) an offence against Division 80 (other than Subdivision CA) of the Criminal Code;
conclusion text: The sentence for the terrorism offence and the sentence for the offence against Division 80 occur during the same period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AG(2) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ag-ss-2
part of: 19AG Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
note: Court must fix a single non-parole period of at least 3/4 of the sentence for minimum non-parole offence or aggregate of those sentences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AG(2) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must fix a non-parole period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AG(3) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ag-ss-3
part of: 19AG Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
note: Sentence of imprisonment for life for a minimum non-parole offence is taken to be a sentence of imprisonment for 30 years for the offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AG(3) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Implies a duty
premise text: (3) For the purposes of subsection (2):
conclusion text: (a) a sentence of imprisonment for life for a minimum non-parole offence is taken to be a sentence of imprisonment for 30 years for the offence;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Implies a duty
premise text: (3) For the purposes of subsection (2):
conclusion text: (b) it does not matter:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between two events
premise text: (3) For the purposes of subsection (2):
conclusion text: whether or not all the federal sentences mentioned in that subsection are for minimum non-parole offences.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between two events
premise text: (3) For the purposes of subsection (2):
conclusion text: whether or not all the federal sentences mentioned in that subsection are for minimum non-parole offences.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Implies a duty
premise text: (3) For the purposes of subsection (2):
conclusion text: it does not matter whether or not the convictions giving rise to those sentences were at the same sitting;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AG(4) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ag-ss-4
part of: 19AG Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
note: Supersedes recognizance release order if non-parole period applies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AG(4) Non-parole periods for sentences for certain offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ag-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: supersedes
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AH Failure to fix non-parole period or make recognizance release
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ah
note: Court must fix non-parole period or make recognizance release order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ah-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ah-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ah-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AH Failure to fix non-parole period or make recognizance release
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ah-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must fix non-parole period or make recognizance release order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AJ Court may only fix non-parole periods or make recognizance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19aj
note: Court cannot fix non-parole periods or make recognizance release orders for federal sentences of imprisonment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aj-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aj-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Court cannot fix non-parole periods or make recognizance release orders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AK Possible deportation no impediment to fixing non-parole
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ak
note: Court may fix non-parole period despite deportation risk
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ak-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ak-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ak-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AK Possible deportation no impediment to fixing non-parole
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ak-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May impose obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

19AL Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19al
has part: 19AL(1) Release on parole—making of parole order
has part: 19AL(1A) Release on parole—making of parole order
has part: 19AL(2) Release on parole—making of parole order
has part: 19AL(2A) Release on parole—making of parole order
has part: 19AL(3) Release on parole—making of parole order
has part: 19AL(3A) Release on parole—making of parole order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254

19AL(1) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19al-ss-1
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order
note: The Attorney-General must make or refuse to make a parole order before the end of a non-parole period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AL(1) Release on parole—making of parole order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Attorney-General must make or refuse to make a parole order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AL(1A) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19al-ss-1a
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order
note: Release on parole—making of parole order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AL(1A) Release on parole—making of parole order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must make a parole order
premise text: (1A) If the Attorney-General does not, under subsection (1), make, or refuse to make, a parole order for a person...
conclusion text: The Attorney-General MUST make, or refuse to make, a parole order for the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must make a parole order after non-parole period
premise text: (1A) If the Attorney-General does not, under subsection (1), make, or refuse to make, a parole order for a person before the end of the non-parole period...
conclusion text: The Attorney-General MUST make, or refuse to make, a parole order for the person after the end of the non-parole period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Non-parole period must be completed before parole order can be made
premise text: (1A) If the Attorney-General does not, under subsection (1), make, or refuse to make, a parole order for a person before the end of the non-parole period...
conclusion text: The non-parole period must be completed before a parole order can be made.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-1a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must refuse to make a parole order if not required by subsection (1)
premise text: (1A) If the Attorney-General does not, under subsection (1), make, or refuse to make, a parole order for a person before the end of the non-parole period...
conclusion text: The Attorney-General MUST refuse to make a parole order for the person if required by subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

19AL(2) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19al-ss-2
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order
note: The Attorney-General must reconsider the making of a parole order for a person within 12 months after refusal.
description: written notice with reasons and effect of refusal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AL(2) Release on parole—making of parole order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Attorney-General must reconsider the making of a parole order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: The parole order is subject to reconsideration within 12 months.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AL(2A) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19al-ss-2a
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order
note: Reconsideration of parole order within a specified timeframe.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AL(2A) Release on parole—making of parole order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to reconsider parole order
premise text: The Attorney-General must reconsider the making of a parole order.
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must reconsider and either make or refuse to make a parole order for the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AL(3) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19al-ss-3
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order
note: Parole order must be in writing and specify supervision conditions.
description: (a) A parole order must be in writing; (b) specify whether or not the person is to be released subject to supervision; (c) if it is proposed that the supervision period for a person released on parole subject to supervision should end before the end of the person’s parole period—specify the day on which the supervision period ends.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AL(3) Release on parole—making of parole order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Parole order must be in writing.
premise text: (3) A parole order must: (a) be in writing;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify supervision conditions.
premise text: (3) A parole order must: (b) specify whether or not the person is to be released subject to supervision;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify end date for supervision period.
premise text: (3) A parole order must: (c) if it is proposed that the supervision period for a person released on parole subject to supervision should end before the end of the person’s parole period—specify the day on which the supervision period ends.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for supervision period.
premise text: (3) A parole order must: (c) if it is proposed that the supervision period for a person released on parole subject to supervision should end before the end of the person’s parole period—specify the day on which the supervision period ends.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Comply with conditions during parole period.
premise text: A person released on parole must comply with any conditions of the parole order during the parole period (see sections 19AMA, 19AN and 19AU).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AL(3A) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19al-ss-3a
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order
note: Specify parole order release date within 30 days before non-parole period end
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3a-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AL(3A) Release on parole—making of parole order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19al-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Specify parole order release date
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AM Release on parole—when is a person released
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19am
has part: 19AM(1) Release on parole—when is a person released
has part: 19AM(2) Release on parole—when is a person released
has part: 19AM(3) Release on parole—when is a person released
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258

19AM(1) Release on parole—when is a person released
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19am-ss-1
part of: 19AM Release on parole—when is a person released
note: Defines parole period for a person for whom a parole order has been made. A person must be released from prison on parole in accordance with a parole order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AM(1) Release on parole—when is a person released
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to release on parole
premise text: A person must be released from prison.
conclusion text: on parole in accordance with a parole order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Release on parole after non-parole period
premise text: for a parole order made before the end of the non-parole period;
conclusion text: the last day of the non-parole period or an earlier day specified in the parole order
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Release on parole after parole order made
premise text: for a parole order made after the end of the non-parole period;
conclusion text: the day after the parole order is made or a later day specified in the parole order
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to certify acceptance of parole order conditions
premise text: before he or she may be released.
conclusion text: the person must certify his or her acceptance of the parole order conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to comply with parole order conditions
premise text: before he or she may be released.
conclusion text: the person must comply with the parole order conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AM(2) Release on parole—when is a person released
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19am-ss-2
part of: 19AM Release on parole—when is a person released
note: A person must be released from prison on parole if imprisoned for a State or Territory offence on the day they would otherwise be eligible for release.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AM(2) Release on parole—when is a person released
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide parole release on same day as eligibility
premise text: (2) However, if the person is imprisoned for a State or Territory offence on the day he or she would otherwise be eligible for release...
conclusion text: ...the person must be released from prison on parole in accordance with the parole order...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Release on parole occurs after imprisonment for State or Territory offence
premise text: (2) However, if the person is imprisoned for a State or Territory offence on the day he or she would otherwise be eligible for release...
conclusion text: ...the person must be released from prison on parole in accordance with the parole order...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND
logic summary: Release on parole is a necessary condition for parole release
premise text: (2) However, if the person is imprisoned for a State or Territory offence on the day he or she would otherwise be eligible for release...
conclusion text: ...the person must be released from prison on parole in accordance with the parole order...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AM(3) Release on parole—when is a person released
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19am-ss-3
part of: 19AM Release on parole—when is a person released
note: Release on parole is prohibited unless a person certifies acceptance of conditions.
description: Certification of acceptance of conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AM(3) Release on parole—when is a person released
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19am-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AN Parole order is subject to conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19an
note: Must behave and obey directions during parole period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.260
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19an-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19an-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19an-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Moral obligation
premise text: Parole order is subject to conditions
conclusion text: Must behave and obey directions during parole period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AP Release on licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ap
has part: 19AP(1) Release on licence
has part: 19AP(2) Release on licence
has part: 19AP(3) Release on licence
has part: 19AP(4) Release on licence
has part: 19AP(4A) Release on licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261

19AP(1) Release on licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ap-ss-1
part of: 19AP Release on licence
note: The Attorney-General may grant a licence for a person to be released from prison.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AP(1) Release on licence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Attorney-General may grant a licence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AP(2) Release on licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ap-ss-2
part of: 19AP Release on licence
note: A person may apply to the Attorney-General for a licence under this subsection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AP(2) Release on licence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AP(3) Release on licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ap-ss-3
part of: 19AP Release on licence
note: Application must be in writing and specify exceptional circumstances.
description: exceptional circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AP(3) Release on licence
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SPECIFY
logic summary: Specify exceptional circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AP(4) Release on licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ap-ss-4
part of: 19AP Release on licence
note: Attorney-General must be satisfied of exceptional circumstances before granting a licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AP(4) Release on licence
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Attorney-General must be satisfied of exceptional circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AP(4A) Release on licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ap-ss-4a
part of: 19AP Release on licence
note: Attorney-General may have regard to extensive cooperation by the person with law enforcement agencies before or after sentencing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-4a-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ap-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AP(4A) Release on licence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

19AQ Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19aq
has part: 19AQ(1) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
has part: 19AQ(2) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
has part: 19AQ(3) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
has part: 19AQ(4) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.265

19AQ(1) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19aq-ss-1
part of: 19AQ Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
note: Revocation of parole order following further offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.265
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AQ(1) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of parole order
premise text: (1) If a person to whom a parole order relates is sentenced...
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with parole period
premise text: (1) If a person to whom a parole order relates is sentenced...
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Contains revocation time
premise text: (1) If a person to whom a parole order relates is sentenced...
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses revocation time across parole period
premise text: (1) If a person to whom a parole order relates is sentenced...
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes revocation time as relevant
premise text: (1) If a person to whom a parole order relates is sentenced...
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

19AQ(2) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19aq-ss-2
part of: 19AQ Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
note: Revocation of parole licence upon new offence conviction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.265
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AQ(2) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of licence upon new offence conviction
premise text: (2) If a person to whom a licence relates is sentenced...
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with sentence duration
premise text: (2) If a person to whom a licence relates is sentenced to life imprisonment...
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with sentence duration
premise text: (2) If a person to whom a licence relates is sentenced to life imprisonment...
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AQ(3) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19aq-ss-3
part of: 19AQ Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
note: Revocation time for parole order or licence must be determined by court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.265
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-ltl-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AQ(3) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits revocation time determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for revocation times
premise text: (a) the time at which the court determines the new offence was committed;
conclusion text: (b) the time at which the court determines the new offence was most likely to have been committed;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for revocation times
premise text: (c) the time at which the court determines the new offence was most likely to have first begun to have been committed.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for revocation times
premise text: (a) the time at which the court determines the new offence was committed;
conclusion text: (b) the time at which the court determines the new offence was most likely to have been committed;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AQ(4) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19aq-ss-4
part of: 19AQ Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
note: Person becomes liable to serve if parole order or licence is revoked
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.265
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AQ(4) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: →
logic summary: If the parole order or licence is revoked, then the person becomes liable to serve
premise text: (4) If the parole order or licence relating to a person is taken to have been revoked under subsection (1) or (2),
conclusion text: the person becomes liable to serve
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ∧
logic summary: The person's parole order or licence is both revoked and the person becomes liable to serve
premise text: (4) If the parole order or licence relating to a person is taken to have been revoked under subsection (1) or (2),
conclusion text: the person becomes liable to serve
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: The parole order or licence revocation and the person becoming liable to serve occur at the same time
premise text: (4) If the parole order or licence relating to a person is taken to have been revoked under subsection (1) or (2),
conclusion text: the person becomes liable to serve
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <→>
logic summary: The person's parole order or licence revocation and the person becoming liable to serve are logically equivalent
premise text: (4) If the parole order or licence relating to a person is taken to have been revoked under subsection (1) or (2),
conclusion text: the person becomes liable to serve
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: ⊕
logic summary: The person's parole order or licence revocation and the person becoming liable to serve are related by diffusion
premise text: (4) If the parole order or licence relating to a person is taken to have been revoked under subsection (1) or (2),
conclusion text: the person becomes liable to serve
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

19AR Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ar
has part: 19AR(1) Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
has part: 19AR(3) Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
has part: 19AR(4) Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.266

19AR(1) Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ar-ss-1
part of: 19AR Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
note: Court must fix a single new non-parole period in respect of the new sentence or sentences and the outstanding sentence or sentences having regard to the total period of imprisonment that the person is liable to serve.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.266
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AR(1) Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Court must fix a single new non-parole period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AR(3) Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ar-ss-3
part of: 19AR Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
note: Court must not make a recognizance release order when imposing new sentence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.266
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AR(3) Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Court must not make a recognizance release order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AR(4) Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ar-ss-4
part of: 19AR Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
note: A court may decline to fix a non-parole period if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.266
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AR(4) Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ar-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to decline fixing a non-parole period
premise text: Court discretion
conclusion text: Obligation to fix a non-parole period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

19AS Court to issue warrant of detention where person required to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19as
has part: 19AS(1) Court to issue warrant of detention where person required to
has part: 19AS(2) Court to issue warrant of detention where person required to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.268

19AS(1) Court to issue warrant of detention where person required to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19as-ss-1
part of: 19AS Court to issue warrant of detention where person required to
note: Court must issue warrant of detention for parole or licence revocation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.268
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AS(1) Court to issue warrant of detention where person required to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must issue warrant of detention
premise text: (1) If...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AS(2) Court to issue warrant of detention where person required to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19as-ss-2
part of: 19AS Court to issue warrant of detention where person required to
note: Director of Public Prosecutions may apply for warrant if court fails to issue one.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.268
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AS(2) Court to issue warrant of detention where person required to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to apply for warrant
premise text: Court fails to issue warrant
conclusion text: Director of Public Prosecutions may apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
logic summary: The application for warrant must occur before the court's decision on the warrant
premise text: The Director of Public Prosecutions applies for a warrant
conclusion text: The court's decision on the warrant occurs after this
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: before
logic summary: The application for warrant must occur before the court's decision on the warrant
premise text: The Director of Public Prosecutions applies for a warrant
conclusion text: The court's decision on the warrant occurs after this
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: If the court fails to issue a warrant, then the Director of Public Prosecutions may apply
premise text: The court fails to issue a warrant
conclusion text: Then the Director of Public Prosecutions may apply for a warrant
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19as-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
logic summary: Classifying the Director of Public Prosecutions as a legal person with an obligation to apply for a warrant
premise text: The Director of Public Prosecutions is a legal person
conclusion text: With this classification, we can reason about their obligations
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AT What happens when later conviction is quashed?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19at
note: Revocation of parole order or licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.269
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19at-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19at-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19at-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits revoking parole order or licence
premise text: (1) Where...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AU Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19au
has part: 19AU(1) Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
has part: 19AU(2) Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
has part: 19AU(3) Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.271

19AU(1) Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19au-ss-1
part of: 19AU Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
note: Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.271
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AU(1) Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits revocation without specified conditions.
premise text: Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence.
conclusion text: Revocation must specify the condition that was breached or is suspected of having been breached.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Obliges Attorney-General to revoke parole order or licence under specified conditions.
premise text: The Attorney-General may, by instrument in writing, revoke a parole order or licence at any time before the end of the parole period or licence period:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with parole period or licence period.
premise text: Revocation may occur before the end of the parole period or licence period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AU(2) Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19au-ss-2
part of: 19AU Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
note: The Attorney-General must notify the person to whom the order or licence relates of certain conditions before revoking it.
description: Notice in the prescribed form
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.271
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AU(2) Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Attorney-General must provide notice before revoking a parole order or licence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AU(3) Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19au-ss-3
part of: 19AU Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
note: Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.271
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AU(3) Attorney-General may revoke parole order or licence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19au-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Attorney-General has the power to revoke parole order or licence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

19AV Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19av
has part: 19AV(1) Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
has part: 19AV(2) Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
has part: 19AV(3) Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272

19AV(1) Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19av-ss-1
part of: 19AV Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
note: Constable may arrest person whose parole order or licence revoked by Attorney-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AV(1) Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AV(2) Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19av-ss-2
part of: 19AV Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
note: The Attorney-General or Director of Public Prosecutions may apply for a warrant to arrest a person whose parole order or licence has been revoked.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AV(2) Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AV(3) Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19av-ss-3
part of: 19AV Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
note: Must be brought before a prescribed authority after arrest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AV(3) Arrest of person whose parole order or licence revoked by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19av-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to be brought before a prescribed authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AW Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19aw
has part: 19AW(1) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
has part: 19AW(2) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
has part: 19AW(3) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
has part: 19AW(3A) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
has part: 19AW(4) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272

19AW(1) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19aw-ss-1
part of: 19AW Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
note: Revocation of parole or licence requires notification and warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AW(1) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on revoking parole or licence without notification.
premise text: (a) that the person is the person named in that revocation order;
conclusion text: must issue a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on taking a person to prison without warrant.
premise text: (d) authorising any constable to take the person to a specified prison;
conclusion text: must issue a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on detaining a person in prison without fixing a non-parole period.
premise text: (e) directing that the person be detained in prison;
conclusion text: must fix a non-parole period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on releasing a person from parole or licence without fixing a non-parole period.
premise text: (f) subject to subsections (3) and (3A), fixing a non-parole period;
conclusion text: must fix a non-parole period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for non-parole period.
premise text: (f) subject to subsections (3) and (3A), fixing a non-parole period in respect of the outstanding sentence or sentences.
conclusion text: must fix a non-parole period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

19AW(2) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19aw-ss-2
part of: 19AW Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
note: Authority must issue warrant for remand pending hearing completion.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AW(2) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide warrant
premise text: (2) If the prescribed authority cannot complete the hearing under subsection (1) immediately...
conclusion text: The prescribed authority must issue a warrant for the remand of the person in custody pending completion of the hearing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for warrant issuance
premise text: (2) If the prescribed authority cannot complete the hearing under subsection (1) immediately...
conclusion text: The warrant must be issued within a certain timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for remand
premise text: (2) If the prescribed authority cannot complete the hearing under subsection (1) immediately...
conclusion text: The person in custody must be remanded within a certain timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Authority to issue warrant
premise text: (2) If the prescribed authority cannot complete the hearing under subsection (1) immediately...
conclusion text: The prescribed authority has the power to issue a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

19AW(3) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19aw-ss-3
part of: 19AW Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
note: Authority not required to fix non-parole period under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AW(3) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Authority exempt from fixing non-parole period due to serious breach.
premise text: serious nature of the breach
conclusion text: authority not required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

19AW(3A) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19aw-ss-3a
part of: 19AW Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
note: Authority must consider parole period before revoking parole order or licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AW(3A) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Authority must consider parole period.
premise text: (3A) Before fixing a non-parole period...
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority MUST have regard to the period of time spent by the person on parole or licence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Authority must consider parole period.
premise text: (3A) Before fixing a non-parole period under paragraph (1)(f)...
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority MUST have regard to the period of time spent by the person on parole or licence...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Authority must consider parole period.
premise text: (3A) Before fixing a non-parole period under paragraph (1)(f)...
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority MUST have regard to the period of time spent by the person on parole or licence...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-3a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Authority must consider parole period.
premise text: (3A) Before fixing a non-parole period under paragraph (1)(f)...
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority MUST have regard to the period of time spent by the person on parole or licence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AW(4) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19aw-ss-4
part of: 19AW Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
note: Authority must specify particulars of unserved sentence parts in warrant.
description: Particulars of unserved sentence parts and non-parole period (if applicable)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.272
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AW(4) Where person on parole or licence notified of revocation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19aw-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Authority must specify particulars
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AX Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ax
has part: 19AX(1) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
has part: 19AX(2) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
has part: 19AX(3) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
has part: 19AX(4) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
has part: 19AX(5) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
has part: 19AX(6) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.274

19AX(1) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ax-ss-1
part of: 19AX Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
note: Notify Attorney-General of person brought before prescribed authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.274
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AX(1) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Immediate notification is a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AX(2) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ax-ss-2
part of: 19AX Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
note: Notify person of parole order or licence revocation and request written submission.
description: written submission within 14 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.274
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AX(2) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify and request written submission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AX(3) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ax-ss-3
part of: 19AX Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
note: Notify prescribed authority of decision not to rescind revocation order within 14 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.274
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AX(3) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Notification obligation
premise text: State must notify prescribed authority
conclusion text: Decision not to rescind revocation order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AX(4) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ax-ss-4
part of: 19AX Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
note: The Attorney-General must decide on a written submission within 14 days of revocation notification.
description: Decision on revocation order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.274
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AX(4) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to decide
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must decide.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AX(5) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ax-ss-5
part of: 19AX Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
note: Must notify prescribed authority of revocation decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.274
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AX(5) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AX(6) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ax-ss-6
part of: 19AX Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
note: Notify prescribed authority of revocation decision to authorize warrant issuance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.274
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AX(6) Where person on parole or licence not notified of revocation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ax-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Notification obligation
premise text: Prescribed authority notified of revocation decision.
conclusion text: Authorize warrant issuance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AY Appeals in respect of warrants issued under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19ay
note: Right to appeal against warrant issuance, calculation of unserved sentence, or fixing of non-parole period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.275
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ay-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19ay-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ay-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AY Appeals in respect of warrants issued under
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19ay-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Has the right to appeal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AZ Evidence before prescribed authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19az
has part: 19AZ(1) Evidence before prescribed authority
has part: 19AZ(2) Evidence before prescribed authority
has part: 19AZ(3) Evidence before prescribed authority
has part: 19AZ(4) Evidence before prescribed authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.277

19AZ(1) Evidence before prescribed authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19az-ss-1
part of: 19AZ Evidence before prescribed authority
note: Must appear before prescribed authority Authority may administer oath or affirmation for evidence purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.277
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AZ(1) Evidence before prescribed authority
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to appear
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Authority obligation to administer oath or affirmation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AZ(2) Evidence before prescribed authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19az-ss-2
part of: 19AZ Evidence before prescribed authority
note: Must produce document or article to prescribed authority. Authority may summon a person to give evidence and produce documents.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.277
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AZ(2) Evidence before prescribed authority
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Authority may summon a person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AZ(3) Evidence before prescribed authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19az-ss-3
part of: 19AZ Evidence before prescribed authority
note: A summons under this section shall be served in the same manner as a summons to a witness to appear before a court of summary jurisdiction in the State or Territory where the summons under this section is issued. Refusal to provide evidence under prescribed authority is penalized.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.277
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AZ(3) Evidence before prescribed authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to serve summons in a specific manner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AZ(4) Evidence before prescribed authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19az-ss-4
part of: 19AZ Evidence before prescribed authority
note: No obligation to provide evidence if reasonable excuse exists.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.277
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-4-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-19az-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AZ(4) Evidence before prescribed authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

19B Discharge of offenders without proceeding to conviction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19b
note: Court may dismiss or discharge charges under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.279
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-ltl-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19B Discharge of offenders without proceeding to conviction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May dismiss charges
premise text: (i) the character, antecedents, age, health or mental condition of the person;
conclusion text: the court may, by order, dismiss the charge or charges in respect of which the court is so satisfied;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May discharge charges under certain conditions
premise text: (ii) the extent (if any) to which the offence is of a trivial nature; or (iii) the extent (if any) to which the offence was committed under extenuating circumstances;
conclusion text: the court may, by order, dismiss the charge or charges in respect of which the court is so satisfied;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Must provide security for discharge
premise text: (d) discharge the person, without proceeding to conviction in respect of any charge referred to in paragraph (c), upon his or her giving security, with or without sureties, by recognizance;
conclusion text: the court may, by order, dismiss the charge or charges in respect of which the court is so satisfied;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Discharge may occur during certain conditions
premise text: (i) the character, antecedents, age, health or mental condition of the person;
conclusion text: the court may, by order, dismiss the charge or charges in respect of which the court is so satisfied;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-19b-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Discharge may occur until certain conditions are met
premise text: (ii) the extent (if any) to which the offence is of a trivial nature; or (iii) the extent (if any) to which the offence was committed under extenuating circumstances;
conclusion text: the court may, by order, dismiss the charge or charges in respect of which the court is so satisfied;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Conditional release of offenders after conviction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20
has part: 20(1) Conditional release of offenders after conviction
has part: 20(1A) Conditional release of offenders after conviction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.282

20(1) Conditional release of offenders after conviction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-ss-1
part of: 20 Conditional release of offenders after conviction
note: Conditional release of offenders after conviction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.282
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(1A) Conditional release of offenders after conviction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-ss-1a
part of: 20 Conditional release of offenders after conviction
note: Prohibition on traveling interstate or overseas without permission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.282
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(1A) Conditional release of offenders after conviction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids travel without permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During specified period
premise text: (1A) Subject to subsection (1B), if the court specifies under paragraph (1)(a) or (b), as mentioned in subparagraph (1)(a)(iv), the condition that the person will, during the specified period:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: During specified period
premise text: (1A) Subject to subsection (1B), if the court specifies under paragraph (1)(a) or (b), as mentioned in subparagraph (1)(a)(iv), the condition that the person will, during the specified period:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: During specified period
premise text: (1A) Subject to subsection (1B), if the court specifies under paragraph (1)(a) or (b), as mentioned in subparagraph (1)(a)(iv), the condition that the person will, during the specified period:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: During specified period
premise text: (1A) Subject to subsection (1B), if the court specifies under paragraph (1)(a) or (b), as mentioned in subparagraph (1)(a)(iv), the condition that the person will, during the specified period:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20A Failure to comply with condition of discharge or release
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20a
note: Failure to comply with condition of discharge or release obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.285
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20A Failure to comply with condition of discharge or release
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with condition of discharge or release
premise text: Subsection 19B(1) and subsection 20(1)
conclusion text: Magistrate may issue a summons directing the person to appear
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Failure to comply with condition of discharge or release during specified time period
premise text: Subsection 19B(1) and subsection 20(1)
conclusion text: Magistrate may issue a summons directing the person to appear
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Failure to comply with condition of discharge or release during specified time period
premise text: Subsection 19B(1) and subsection 20(1)
conclusion text: Magistrate may issue a summons directing the person to appear
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Failure to comply with condition of discharge or release if information is laid on oath
premise text: Subsection 19B(1) and subsection 20(1)
conclusion text: Magistrate may issue a summons directing the person to appear
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if
logic summary: Failure to comply with condition of discharge or release if information is laid on oath
premise text: Subsection 19B(1) and subsection 20(1)
conclusion text: Magistrate may issue a summons directing the person to appear
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20AA Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20aa
has part: 20AA(1) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
has part: 20AA(2) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
has part: 20AA(3) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
has part: 20AA(4) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
has part: 20AA(5) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
has part: 20AA(6) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.290

20AA(1) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20aa-ss-1
part of: 20AA Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
note: Any person may apply to the court for discharge or variation of recognizance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.290
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20AA(1) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: anyoneCanApply
logic summary: Anyone can apply for discharge or variation of recognizance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20AA(2) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20aa-ss-2
part of: 20AA Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
note: Court may discharge recognizance under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.290
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20AA(2) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: May discharge recognizance
premise text: Notice given and conduct unnecessary
conclusion text: Discharge recognizance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20AA(3) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20aa-ss-3
part of: 20AA Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
note: Court may vary terms of recognizance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.290
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Court permits variation of recognizance terms
premise text: Notice given as required by subsections (5) or (6)
conclusion text: Variation permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Variation overlaps with original recognizance duration
premise text: (a) by extending or reducing the duration of the recognizance;
conclusion text: Duration overlap established
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20AA(4) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20aa-ss-4
part of: 20AA Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
note: Court cannot extend recognizance duration beyond specified periods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.290
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20AA(4) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Court action is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20AA(5) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20aa-ss-5
part of: 20AA Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
note: Authorized person must serve notice on surety or probation officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.290
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20AA(5) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice to surety or probation officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20AA(6) Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20aa-ss-6
part of: 20AA Power to discharge or vary conditions of recognizance
note: Notice must be served on the Director of Public Prosecutions or Director of Legal Services in a specific manner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.290
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20aa-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to serve notice
premise text: The person making the application shall cause notice...
conclusion text: Notice must be served on the Director of Public Prosecutions or Director of Legal Services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20AB Additional sentencing alternatives
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20ab
note: Court may pass sentence or make order in respect of federal offence if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.293
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ab-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ab-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ab-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20AB Additional sentencing alternatives
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ab-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Court has the power to pass sentence or make order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20AC Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20ac
has part: 20AC(1) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
has part: 20AC(2) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
has part: 20AC(3) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
has part: 20AC(4) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
has part: 20AC(5) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
has part: 20AC(6) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.296

20AC(1) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20ac-ss-1
part of: 20AC Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
note: Failure to comply with sentence or order under subsection 20AB(1) is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.296
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20AC(1) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of failure to comply with sentence or order
premise text: (1) In this section, the applied provisions...
conclusion text: ...the provisions of the laws of a State or Territory that apply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

20AC(2) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20ac-ss-2
part of: 20AC Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
note: Failure to comply with sentence or order may result in summons or warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.296
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20AC(2) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with sentence or order.
premise text: Sentence or order has been passed or made.
conclusion text: Failure to comply may result in summons or warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Permission for magistrate to issue summons or warrant.
premise text: Information is laid before magistrate.
conclusion text: Magistrate may issue summons or warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20AC(3) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20ac-ss-3
part of: 20AC Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
note: Failure to comply with summons or bail condition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.296
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20AC(3) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits failure to comply with summons or bail condition
premise text: (3) Where: ...
conclusion text: ...issue a warrant for the apprehension of the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies that failure to comply with summons or bail condition leads to warrant issuance
premise text: (3) Where: ...
conclusion text: ...issue a warrant for the apprehension of the person.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20AC(4) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20ac-ss-4
part of: 20AC Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
note: Detention of person until release by court order or subsection (5) order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.296
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20AC(4) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Detention obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20AC(5) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20ac-ss-5
part of: 20AC Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
note: Person must appear before court on specified date and time after being admitted to bail.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.296
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20AC(5) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to appear before court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20AC(6) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20ac-ss-6
part of: 20AC Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
note: Failure to comply with sentence or order may impose a pecuniary penalty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.296
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20AC(6) Failure to comply with sentence passed, or order made, under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ac-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with sentence or order.
premise text: The court may impose a pecuniary penalty.
conclusion text: The person must comply with the sentence or order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20B Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20b
has part: 20B(1) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
has part: 20B(2) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
has part: 20B(3) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
has part: 20B(4) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
has part: 20B(5) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
has part: 20B(6) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
has part: 20B(7) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.300

20B(1) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20b-ss-1
part of: 20B Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
note: Must refer proceedings to court if person's fitness is raised
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.300
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must refer proceedings to court
premise text: The magistrate must refer the proceedings.
conclusion text: to the court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20B(2) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20b-ss-2
part of: 20B Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
note: Court must remit proceedings to magistrate if person is deemed fit for trial.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.300
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20B(2) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court obligation to remit proceedings
premise text: Court has jurisdiction over the case
conclusion text: Proceedings must be remitted to magistrate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
logic summary: Court obligation implies remittal
premise text: If the person is deemed fit for trial, then the court must remit proceedings
conclusion text: The court's obligation to remit proceedings follows from the fact that the person is deemed fit for trial
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Remittal occurs between the court and the magistrate
premise text: The court has jurisdiction over the case, but must remit proceedings to the magistrate
conclusion text: The remittal of proceedings occurs between these two entities
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: ⇒
logic summary: Remittal is a response to the person's fitness for trial
premise text: If the person is deemed fit for trial, then the court must remit proceedings as a response
conclusion text: The court's obligation to remit proceedings follows from the fact that the person is deemed fit for trial and the need to respond accordingly
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: ⇒
logic summary: Remittal spreads to other courts and authorities
premise text: The court's obligation to remit proceedings implies that this action will be taken by other courts and authorities
conclusion text: The remittal of proceedings has implications for the actions of other courts and authorities
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20B(3) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20b-ss-3
part of: 20B Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
note: Court must determine if prima facie case has been established for unfit person to be tried.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.300
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20B(3) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court obligation
premise text: Court must determine
conclusion text: if prima facie case has been established
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20B(4) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20b-ss-4
part of: 20B Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
note: Magistrate may order detention in prison or hospital for a reasonable period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.300
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20B(4) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Magistrate may order detention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

20B(5) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20b-ss-5
part of: 20B Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
note: Court may order detention for a person unfit to be tried.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.300
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20B(5) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20B(6) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20b-ss-6
part of: 20B Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
note: Establishes prima facie case for trial based on evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.300
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20B(6) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
logic summary: Establishes prima facie case
premise text: Evidence provides sufficient grounds for trial
conclusion text: Obligation to put person on trial
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Within the scope of subsection (3)
premise text: Subsection (3) applies to this context
conclusion text: Evidence provides sufficient grounds within the scope of subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implies a duty to put person on trial
premise text: Prima facie case established
conclusion text: Duty to put person on trial
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20B(7) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20b-ss-7
part of: 20B Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
note: Person may give evidence or make an unsworn statement in proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.300
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20B(7) Consequences of preliminary finding that person unfit to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Person may give evidence or make an unsworn statement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BA Upon determining prima facie case, court to dismiss charge or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20ba
has part: 20BA(1) Upon determining prima facie case, court to dismiss charge or
has part: 20BA(2) Upon determining prima facie case, court to dismiss charge or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.301

20BA(1) Upon determining prima facie case, court to dismiss charge or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20ba-ss-1
part of: 20BA Upon determining prima facie case, court to dismiss charge or
note: Court must dismiss charge and order release if prima facie case not established.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.301
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BA(1) Upon determining prima facie case, court to dismiss charge or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Court must dismiss charge and order release.
premise text: (1) Where the court determines that there has not been established a prima facie case that the person committed the offence, the court must, by order, dismiss the charge against the person...
conclusion text: ...the court must, by order, dismiss the charge against the person and, if the person is in custody, order the release of the person from custody.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Temporal interval between prima facie case determination and dismissal.
premise text: (1) Where the court determines that there has not been established a prima facie case that the person committed the offence, the court must, by order, dismiss the charge against the person...
conclusion text: ...the court must, by order, dismiss the charge against the person and, if the person is in custody, order the release of the person from custody.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal interval until dismissal.
premise text: (1) Where the court determines that there has not been established a prima facie case that the person committed the offence, the court must, by order, dismiss the charge against the person...
conclusion text: ...the court must, by order, dismiss the charge against the person and, if the person is in custody, order the release of the person from custody.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Dismissal implies release.
premise text: (1) Where the court determines that there has not been established a prima facie case that the person committed the offence, the court must, by order, dismiss the charge against the person...
conclusion text: ...the court must, by order, dismiss the charge against the person and, if the person is in custody, order the release of the person from custody.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BA(2) Upon determining prima facie case, court to dismiss charge or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20ba-ss-2
part of: 20BA Upon determining prima facie case, court to dismiss charge or
note: Court must dismiss charge or take further action if prima facie case is established.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.301
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BA(2) Upon determining prima facie case, court to dismiss charge or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must take action
premise text: Prima facie case established
conclusion text: Dismiss charge or take further action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BB Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bb
has part: 20BB(1) Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
has part: 20BB(2) Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
has part: 20BB(3) Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.302

20BB(1) Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bb-ss-1
part of: 20BB Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
note: Court must determine if person is suffering from a mental illness and objects to being detained in a hospital.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.302
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BB(1) Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must determine
conclusion text: The court MUST determine...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BB(2) Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bb-ss-2
part of: 20BB Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
note: Court must order person to be taken and detained in a hospital or another place.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.302
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BB(2) Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must order person to be taken and detained.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BB(3) Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bb-ss-3
part of: 20BB Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
note: Continue proceedings if person becomes fit to be tried within 12 months after finding unfit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.302
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-logic-ltl-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BB(3) Persons found by a court to be likely to be fit within 12
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUE
logic summary: Continue proceedings as soon as practicable.
premise text: (3) Where a court determines, under subsection 20BA(4), that a person charged with a federal offence who was found unfit to be tried will become fit to be tried within 12 months after that finding...
conclusion text: ...the proceedings on the indictment must be continued as soon as practicable; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUE
logic summary: Continue proceedings as soon as practicable.
premise text: (3) Where a court determines, under subsection 20BA(4), that a person charged with a federal offence who was found unfit to be tried will become fit to be tried within 12 months after that finding...
conclusion text: ...those proceedings must be continued as soon as practicable as if they had not been so referred.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Temporal interval of 12 months.
premise text: (3) Where a court determines, under subsection 20BA(4), that a person charged with a federal offence who was found unfit to be tried will become fit to be tried within 12 months after that finding...
conclusion text: ...the proceedings on the indictment must be continued as soon as practicable; and
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bb-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURRING
logic summary: Recurring trace of person becoming fit to be tried.
premise text: (3) Where a court determines, under subsection 20BA(4), that a person charged with a federal offence who was found unfit to be tried will become fit to be tried within 12 months after that finding...
conclusion text: ...those proceedings must be continued as soon as practicable as if they had not been so referred.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BC Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bc
has part: 20BC(1) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
has part: 20BC(2) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
has part: 20BC(3) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
has part: 20BC(4) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.305

20BC(1) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bc-ss-1
part of: 20BC Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
note: Court must determine if person is suffering from mental illness and objects to hospital detention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.305
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BC(1) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must determine
premise text: (1) Where a court determines...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BC(2) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bc-ss-2
part of: 20BC Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
note: Court must order person to be detained in a hospital or prison for a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.305
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BC(2) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must order person to be detained.
premise text: (2) Where a court has made a determination under subsection (1), the court must:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must order person to be detained in a hospital or prison.
premise text: (2) Where a court has made a determination under subsection (1), the court must: (a) if the court has determined that the person is suffering from a mental illness, or a mental condition, for which treatment is available in a hospital and that the person does not object to being detained in a hospital—order that the person be taken to and detained in a hospital, or continue to be detained in a hospital, as the case requires; or
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BC(3) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bc-ss-3
part of: 20BC Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
note: Attorney-General may vary hospital or place of detention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.305
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BC(3) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Attorney-General has the power to vary hospital or place of detention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BC(4) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bc-ss-4
part of: 20BC Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
note: Notify Attorney-General of variation in detention place and reason for variation.
description: Notification to Attorney-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.305
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BC(4) Persons found by a court not to be likely to be fit within 12
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
conclusion text: Notification required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bc-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between notification and variation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

20BD Review by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bd
has part: 20BD(1) Review by Attorney-General
has part: 20BD(2) Review by Attorney-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.306

20BD(1) Review by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bd-ss-1
part of: 20BD Review by Attorney-General
note: The Attorney-General must review the detention of a person every 6 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.306
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to review detention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BD(2) Review by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bd-ss-2
part of: 20BD Review by Attorney-General
note: Attorney-General must consider reports from psychiatrists and psychologists when deciding to release a person from detention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.306
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-epistemic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-ltl-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BD(2) Review by Attorney-General
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Attorney-General has an obligation to consider reports from psychiatrists and psychologists.
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about the release of federal offenders.
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must obtain and consider reports from psychiatrists and psychologists.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Attorney-General has an obligation to take into account representations made by the person or on their behalf.
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about the release of federal offenders.
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must take into account any representations made to the Attorney-General by the person or on the person's behalf.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Attorney-General may obtain and consider additional reports as necessary.
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about the release of federal offenders.
conclusion text: The Attorney-General may obtain and consider such other reports as the Attorney-General considers necessary.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-epistemic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: OUGHT_TO
logic summary: Attorney-General ought to consider reports from psychiatrists and psychologists based on their expertise.
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about the release of federal offenders.
conclusion text: The Attorney-General ought to obtain and consider a report from a duly qualified psychiatrist or psychologist.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bd-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: AT
logic summary: Attorney-General must take into account representations made by the person or on their behalf within a certain timeframe.
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about the release of federal offenders.
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must take into account any representations made to the Attorney-General by the person or on the person's behalf at some point in time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BE Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20be
has part: 20BE(1) Attorney-General may order release
has part: 20BE(2) Attorney-General may order release
has part: 20BE(3) Attorney-General may order release
has part: 20BE(4) Attorney-General may order release
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.307

20BE(1) Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20be-ss-1
part of: 20BE Attorney-General may order release
note: Attorney-General may order release of a person from detention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.307
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BE(1) Attorney-General may order release
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BE(2) Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20be-ss-2
part of: 20BE Attorney-General may order release
note: The Attorney-General must not order a person's release from detention unless satisfied the person is not a threat or danger.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.307
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on ordering release without satisfaction of conditions.
premise text: Attorney-General must order release only if person is not a threat or danger.
conclusion text: Attorney-General must not order release unless satisfied person is not a threat or danger.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Obligation on Attorney-General to ensure conditions are met before ordering release.
premise text: Attorney-General has authority to order release.
conclusion text: Attorney-General must satisfy conditions before ordering release.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Temporal interval between Attorney-General's satisfaction and ordering of release.
premise text: Attorney-General must be satisfied before ordering release.
conclusion text: Release is ordered within a specified temporal interval after Attorney-General's satisfaction.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between Attorney-General's satisfaction and ordering of release.
premise text: Attorney-General must be satisfied before ordering release.
conclusion text: Release is ordered until a specified temporal interval after Attorney-General's satisfaction.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BE(3) Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20be-ss-3
part of: 20BE Attorney-General may order release
note: Attorney-General must order release in writing with specified conditions and duration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.307
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BE(3) Attorney-General may order release
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Attorney-General must order release
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BE(4) Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20be-ss-4
part of: 20BE Attorney-General may order release
note: Conditions for release order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.307
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BE(4) Attorney-General may order release
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20be-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State obligation to specify conditions for release order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BF Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bf
has part: 20BF(1) Release order may be revoked
has part: 20BF(2) Release order may be revoked
has part: 20BF(3) Release order may be revoked
has part: 20BF(4) Release order may be revoked
has part: 20BF(5) Release order may be revoked
has part: 20BF(6) Release order may be revoked
has part: 20BF(7) Release order may be revoked
has part: 20BF(8) Release order may be revoked
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.308

20BF(1) Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bf-ss-1
part of: 20BF Release order may be revoked
note: Revocation of release order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.308
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BF(1) Release order may be revoked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of release order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BF(2) Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bf-ss-2
part of: 20BF Release order may be revoked
note: Attorney-General must make enquiries before revoking a release order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.308
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BF(2) Release order may be revoked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Attorney-General must make enquiries before revoking a release order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BF(3) Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bf-ss-3
part of: 20BF Release order may be revoked
note: Revocation of release order requires arrest without warrant or warrant application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.308
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of release order without arrest warrant.
premise text: (3) Where a release order in relation to a person is revoked:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BF(4) Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bf-ss-4
part of: 20BF Release order may be revoked
note: A person arrested must be brought before a prescribed authority as soon as practicable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.308
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BF(4) Release order may be revoked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to bring before authority
premise text: Arrested person must be brought before authority
conclusion text: Obligation to bring before authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for bringing before authority
premise text: Person must be brought before authority within a certain time frame
conclusion text: Time frame for bringing before authority is specified
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Authority's decision affects person's rights
premise text: Person's rights depend on being brought before authority
conclusion text: Authority's decision has implications for person's rights
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Information about arrest and bringing before authority
premise text: Person's information is subject to duty to be brought before authority
conclusion text: Information about arrest and bringing before authority is relevant
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: System for managing arrests and bringing before authorities
premise text: System has a duty to manage arrests and bring before authorities
conclusion text: System is designed to manage arrests and bring before authorities
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BF(5) Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bf-ss-5
part of: 20BF Release order may be revoked
note: Revocation of release order requires warrant and detention direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.308
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-5-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of release order without warrant and detention direction.
premise text: (5) Subject to subsection (6), where a prescribed authority in a State or Territory before whom a person is brought under subsection (4) is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority must issue a warrant: ...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for revocation of release order.
premise text: (5) Subject to subsection (6), where a prescribed authority in a State or Territory before whom a person is brought under subsection (4) is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...the period of detention under subsection 20BC(2) as had not elapsed at the time of the making of the release order.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Defines temporal trace for revocation of release order.
premise text: (5) Subject to subsection (6), where a prescribed authority in a State or Territory before whom a person is brought under subsection (4) is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...the warrant: ...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on prescribed authority to issue warrant and detention direction.
premise text: (5) Subject to subsection (6), where a prescribed authority in a State or Territory before whom a person is brought under subsection (4) is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority must issue a warrant: ...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BF(6) Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bf-ss-6
part of: 20BF Release order may be revoked
note: Authority may issue warrant for remand pending hearing completion
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.308
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BF(6) Release order may be revoked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits issuing warrant without hearing completion
premise text: (6) If the prescribed authority in the State or Territory before whom the person is brought under subsection (4) cannot complete the hearing under subsection (5) immediately...
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority may issue a warrant for the remand of the person in a prison or hospital in the State or Territory pending completion of the hearing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for warrant issuance
premise text: (6) If the prescribed authority in the State or Territory before whom the person is brought under subsection (4) cannot complete the hearing under subsection (5) immediately...
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority may issue a warrant for the remand of the person in a prison or hospital in the State or Territory pending completion of the hearing.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Defines temporal trace for warrant issuance
premise text: (6) If the prescribed authority in the State or Territory before whom the person is brought under subsection (4) cannot complete the hearing under subsection (5) immediately...
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority may issue a warrant for the remand of the person in a prison or hospital in the State or Territory pending completion of the hearing.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses responsibility for warrant issuance
premise text: (6) If the prescribed authority in the State or Territory before whom the person is brought under subsection (4) cannot complete the hearing under subsection (5) immediately...
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority may issue a warrant for the remand of the person in a prison or hospital in the State or Territory pending completion of the hearing.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
logic summary: Incorporates AI reasoning in warrant issuance
premise text: (6) If the prescribed authority in the State or Territory before whom the person is brought under subsection (4) cannot complete the hearing under subsection (5) immediately...
conclusion text: ...the prescribed authority may issue a warrant for the remand of the person in a prison or hospital in the State or Territory pending completion of the hearing.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BF(7) Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bf-ss-7
part of: 20BF Release order may be revoked
note: The Attorney-General may revoke a release order in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.308
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BF(7) Release order may be revoked
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Attorney-General's power to revoke
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for revocation
premise text: (7) The Attorney-General may, at any time, by order in writing, vary the prison or hospital at which a person is detained under this section.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: can
logic summary: Attorney-General's ability to revoke
premise text: (7) The Attorney-General may, at any time, by order in writing, vary the prison or hospital at which a person is detained under this section.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: can
logic summary: Attorney-General's ability to diffuse information
premise text: (7) The Attorney-General may, at any time, by order in writing, vary the prison or hospital at which a person is detained under this section.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: can
logic summary: Attorney-General's ability to process information
premise text: (7) The Attorney-General may, at any time, by order in writing, vary the prison or hospital at which a person is detained under this section.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BF(8) Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bf-ss-8
part of: 20BF Release order may be revoked
note: Notify Attorney-General of variation in detention facility
description: Reasons for variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.308
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BF(8) Release order may be revoked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bf-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Notification obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BG Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bg
has part: 20BG(1) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
has part: 20BG(2) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
has part: 20BG(3) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310

20BG(1) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bg-ss-1
part of: 20BG Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
note: Attorney-General must reconsider detention of persons taken back every 6 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BG(1) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Reconsideration Obligation
logic summary: Regular review of detention decisions.
premise text: (1) Where, under subsection 20BF(5), a prescribed authority directs that a person be detained...
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must reconsider the matter at least once in each period of 6 months after the initial consideration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Regular review every 6 months.
premise text: ...at least once in each period of 6 months after the initial consideration.
conclusion text: ...must, while the person is in detention, reconsider the matter at least once...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Regular review every 6 months.
premise text: (1) Where, under subsection 20BF(5), a prescribed authority directs that a person be detained...
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must reconsider the matter at least once in each period of 6 months after the initial consideration.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Attorney-General's duty to review detention decisions.
premise text: (1) Where, under subsection 20BF(5), a prescribed authority directs that a person be detained...
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must reconsider the matter at least once in each period of 6 months after the initial consideration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Duty
logic summary: Attorney-General's duty to review detention decisions.
premise text: (1) Where, under subsection 20BF(5), a prescribed authority directs that a person be detained...
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must reconsider the matter at least once in each period of 6 months after the initial consideration.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BG(2) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bg-ss-2
part of: 20BG Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
note: Applicability of subsections to reconsideration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-2-norm

20BG(3) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bg-ss-3
part of: 20BG Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
note: Amends subsection 20BE(1) to reference this section instead of subsection 20BD(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bg-ss-3-norm

20BH State or Territory mental health authorities to be notified of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bh
note: Notify mental health authorities of proposed release
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bh-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bh-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bi
has part: 20BI(1) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
has part: 20BI(2) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
has part: 20BI(3) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
has part: 20BI(4) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
has part: 20BI(5) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
has part: 20BI(6) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310

20BI(1) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bi-ss-1
part of: 20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
note: Right to appeal against unfitness to be tried
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BI(1) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to appeal
premise text: (1) This section applies if...
conclusion text: ...a jury finds that the accused is unfit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BI(2) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bi-ss-2
part of: 20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
note: Appeal against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BI(2) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Legal obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BI(3) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bi-ss-3
part of: 20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
note: Allow appeal if finding is unreasonable or unsupported by evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Court must allow appeal
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal...
conclusion text: The court must allow the appeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Court must allow appeal if finding is unreasonable or unsupported by evidence
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal must allow...
conclusion text: The court must allow the appeal if the finding is unreasonable or cannot be supported
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Court must allow appeal if there was a miscarriage of justice
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal must allow...
conclusion text: The court must allow the appeal if there was a miscarriage of justice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Court must set aside finding if order is wrong on law
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal must allow...
conclusion text: The court must set aside the finding if the order is wrong on law
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Court must set aside finding if it is unreasonable or cannot be supported by evidence
premise text: (3) The Court of Appeal must allow...
conclusion text: The court must set aside the finding if it is unreasonable or cannot be supported by evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BI(4) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bi-ss-4
part of: 20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
note: Must dismiss appeal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to dismiss appeal
premise text: (4) Otherwise, the Court of Appeal must dismiss the appeal.
conclusion text: The Court of Appeal MUST dismiss the appeal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BI(5) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bi-ss-5
part of: 20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
note: Court of Appeal may dismiss appeal if no substantial miscarriage of justice has occurred.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May dismiss appeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BI(6) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bi-ss-6
part of: 20BI Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
note: The accused may be tried for the federal offence if the appeal is allowed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.310
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BI(6) Appeals against some Victorian jury findings of unfitness to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
logic summary: Allowing the appeal imposes an obligation.
premise text: (6) If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:
conclusion text: the accused may be tried for the federal offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: make orders
logic summary: The Court of Appeal may make orders for the custody or bail of the accused.
premise text: (6) If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:
conclusion text: the Court of Appeal may make orders for the custody or bail of the accused.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The provision applies to the period during which the appeal is allowed.
premise text: (6) If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:
conclusion text: the accused may be tried for the federal offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: The provision applies to the period during which the appeal is allowed.
premise text: (6) If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:
conclusion text: the accused may be tried for the federal offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bi-ss-6-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: The provision diffuses the obligation to try the accused if the appeal is allowed.
premise text: (6) If the Court of Appeal allows the appeal:
conclusion text: the accused may be tried for the federal offence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BJ Acquittal where person mentally ill
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bj
has part: 20BJ(1) Acquittal where person mentally ill
has part: 20BJ(2) Acquittal where person mentally ill
has part: 20BJ(3) Acquittal where person mentally ill
has part: 20BJ(4) Acquittal where person mentally ill
has part: 20BJ(5) Acquittal where person mentally ill
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.313

20BJ(1) Acquittal where person mentally ill
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bj-ss-1
part of: 20BJ Acquittal where person mentally ill
note: Court order to detain acquitted person in safe custody
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.313
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BJ(1) Acquittal where person mentally ill
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must order detention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BJ(2) Acquittal where person mentally ill
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bj-ss-2
part of: 20BJ Acquittal where person mentally ill
note: Authority to vary detention facility
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.313
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Authority to act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BJ(3) Acquittal where person mentally ill
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bj-ss-3
part of: 20BJ Acquittal where person mentally ill
note: Officer may vary detention facility under urgent medical or security reasons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.313
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permissive action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BJ(4) Acquittal where person mentally ill
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bj-ss-4
part of: 20BJ Acquittal where person mentally ill
note: Court may order release from custody under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.313
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BJ(4) Acquittal where person mentally ill
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

20BJ(5) Acquittal where person mentally ill
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bj-ss-5
part of: 20BJ Acquittal where person mentally ill
note: Condition for acquittal where person mentally ill
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.313
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BJ(5) Acquittal where person mentally ill
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bj-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory condition for acquittal
premise text: The conditions may include:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BK Review by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bk
has part: 20BK(1) Review by Attorney-General
has part: 20BK(2) Review by Attorney-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.314

20BK(1) Review by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bk-ss-1
part of: 20BK Review by Attorney-General
note: Attorney-General must reconsider detention after 6 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.314
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BK(1) Review by Attorney-General
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Reconsideration Obligation
logic summary: Regular review of detention decisions.
premise text: Court orders detention.
conclusion text: Attorney-General must reconsider.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Uncertainty about release
logic summary: Initial consideration and periodic reviews.
premise text: Person is detained.
conclusion text: Attorney-General must consider release.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Periodic review
logic summary: Regular reviews after 6 months.
premise text: Initial consideration made.
conclusion text: Reconsideration required.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Reasoning about release
logic summary: Attorney-General weighs release options.
premise text: Person is detained.
conclusion text: Release decision made.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BK(2) Review by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bk-ss-2
part of: 20BK Review by Attorney-General
note: Attorney-General must consider reports and representations when deciding to release a person from custody.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.314
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BK(2) Review by Attorney-General
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Attorney-General has an obligation to consider reports and representations.
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about custody releases.
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must obtain and consider relevant reports.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Attorney-General has an obligation to take into account representations made by the person or on their behalf.
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about custody releases.
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must consider any representations made to them.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Attorney-General must consider reports within a certain timeframe.
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about custody releases.
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must obtain and consider reports from a duly qualified psychiatrist or psychologist within a certain timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BUT
logic summary: Attorney-General's decision-making process involves considering multiple reports.
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about custody releases.
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must consider reports from a duly qualified psychiatrist or psychologist, but also other reports as necessary.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bk-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Attorney-General has permission to obtain and consider additional reports.
premise text: The Attorney-General is responsible for making decisions about custody releases.
conclusion text: The Attorney-General may obtain and consider other reports as necessary.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BL Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bl
has part: 20BL(1) Attorney-General may order release
has part: 20BL(2) Attorney-General may order release
has part: 20BL(3) Attorney-General may order release
has part: 20BL(4) Attorney-General may order release
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.314

20BL(1) Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bl-ss-1
part of: 20BL Attorney-General may order release
note: Attorney-General may order release of a person from custody.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.314
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BL(1) Attorney-General may order release
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BL(2) Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bl-ss-2
part of: 20BL Attorney-General may order release
note: Attorney-General must not order release unless satisfied the person is no threat or danger.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.314
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BL(2) Attorney-General may order release
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Attorney-General must order release.
conclusion text: Attorney-General must not order release.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BL(3) Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bl-ss-3
part of: 20BL Attorney-General may order release
note: Attorney-General may not order release without written order and specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.314
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BL(3) Attorney-General may order release
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of release without written order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BL(4) Attorney-General may order release
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bl-ss-4
part of: 20BL Attorney-General may order release
note: Conditions for release order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.314
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BL(4) Attorney-General may order release
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bl-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may specify
logic summary: Specify conditions for release order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BM Release order may be revoked
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bm
note: Revocation of release order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.315
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BM Release order may be revoked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of release order revocation
premise text: Release order may be revoked
conclusion text: Revocation is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission to revoke release order under certain conditions
premise text: The Attorney-General may revoke the release order
conclusion text: Revocation of release order is permitted under certain conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between revocation and release order
premise text: The revocation takes effect while the release order remains in force
conclusion text: Revocation occurs until the release order is no longer in force
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bm-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with conditions of release order
premise text: The person concerned must comply with the condition
conclusion text: There is an obligation to comply with the condition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BN Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bn
has part: 20BN(1) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
has part: 20BN(2) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
has part: 20BN(3) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.317

20BN(1) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bn-ss-1
part of: 20BN Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
note: Attorney-General must reconsider detention of persons taken back every 6 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.317
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BN(1) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Reconsideration Obligation
logic summary: Regular review of detention decisions.
premise text: (1) Where, under subsection 20BM(5), a prescribed authority directs that a person be detained...
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must reconsider the matter at least once in each period of 6 months after the initial consideration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: 6-month review period
premise text: ...once in each period of 6 months after the initial consideration.
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must reconsider the matter at least once in each period of 6 months...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Regular review of detention decisions.
premise text: (1) Where, under subsection 20BM(5), a prescribed authority directs that a person be detained...
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must reconsider the matter at least once in each period of 6 months after the initial consideration.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Attorney-General's discretion to release or detain.
premise text: (1) Where, under subsection 20BM(5), a prescribed authority directs that a person be detained...
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must consider (in this section called the initial consideration)...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Attorney-General's duty to reconsider detention decisions.
premise text: (1) Where, under subsection 20BM(5), a prescribed authority directs that a person be detained...
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must reconsider the matter at least once in each period of 6 months after the initial consideration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BN(2) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bn-ss-2
part of: 20BN Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
note: Applicability of subsections to reconsideration under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.317
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BN(2) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Applicability of subsections to reconsideration under subsection (1)
premise text: (2) Subsection 20BK(2) and, subject to the modification in subsection (3), section 20BL
conclusion text: Subsections apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: requires relation between temporal intervals
logic summary: Relation between initial consideration and reconsideration under subsection (1)
premise text: (2) Subsection 20BK(2) and, subject to the modification in subsection (3), section 20BL
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: requires ordered trace
logic summary: Ordered trace required for reconsideration under subsection (1)
premise text: (2) Subsection 20BK(2) and, subject to the modification in subsection (3), section 20BL
conclusion text: Ordered trace required
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

20BN(3) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bn-ss-3
part of: 20BN Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
note: Attorney-General must review detention of persons taken back
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.317
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BN(3) Attorney-General to review detention of persons taken back
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to review detention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BP State or Territory authorities to be notified of certain releases
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bp
note: Notify mental health authorities of proposed release
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.318
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bp-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bp-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BQ Person suffering from mental illness or intellectual disability
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bq
note: Court may dismiss charge and discharge person into care or on condition for assessment/treatment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.319
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bq-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bq-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bq-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BQ Person suffering from mental illness or intellectual disability
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Court may dismiss charge and discharge person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BR Means by which court may be informed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20br
note: Court may inform itself as it thinks fit, but not to require self-incrimination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.320
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20br-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20br-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20br-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20br-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Court may inform itself
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20br-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Can
logic summary: Informing itself is permissible
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BS Hospital orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bs
has part: 20BS(1) Hospital orders
has part: 20BS(2) Hospital orders
has part: 20BS(3) Hospital orders
has part: 20BS(4) Hospital orders
has part: 20BS(5) Hospital orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.321

20BS(1) Hospital orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bs-ss-1
part of: 20BS Hospital orders
note: Court may order detention in a hospital for treatment of mental illness
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.321
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BS(1) Hospital orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Court obligation to order detention in a hospital
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BS(2) Hospital orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bs-ss-2
part of: 20BS Hospital orders
note: Court cannot make hospital order unless person would have been imprisoned for mental illness.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.321
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BS(2) Hospital orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Court cannot make hospital order.
premise text: (2) A court must not...
conclusion text: ...the person to a term of imprisonment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court has an obligation to consider imprisonment before making a hospital order.
premise text: (2) A court must not...
conclusion text: ...the mental illness of the person, the court would have sentenced the person to a term of imprisonment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Court cannot make hospital order unless person would have been imprisoned for mental illness.
premise text: (2) A court must not...
conclusion text: ...the mental illness of the person, the court would have sentenced the person to a term of imprisonment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Court has permission to make hospital order if person would not have been imprisoned for mental illness.
premise text: (2) A court must not...
conclusion text: ...the mental illness of the person, the court would have sentenced the person to a term of imprisonment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
logic summary: Person has a right to be considered for imprisonment before making a hospital order.
premise text: (2) A court must not...
conclusion text: ...the mental illness of the person, the court would have sentenced the person to a term of imprisonment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BS(3) Hospital orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bs-ss-3
part of: 20BS Hospital orders
note: Court cannot specify a period of detention longer than the imprisonment term.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.321
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BS(3) Hospital orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Court cannot specify a period of detention.
premise text: (3) A court must not...
conclusion text: ...the person would have been sentenced...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BS(4) Hospital orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bs-ss-4
part of: 20BS Hospital orders
note: Court may fix lesser period of detention during which person is not eligible to be released from hospital.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.321
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BS(4) Hospital orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Court may impose obligation on state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BS(5) Hospital orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bs-ss-5
part of: 20BS Hospital orders
note: Court must obtain information before forming opinion on a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.321
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BS(5) Hospital orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bs-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to obtain information
premise text: Court must obtain information before forming opinion.
conclusion text: Obligation to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BT Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bt
has part: 20BT(1) Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
has part: 20BT(2) Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
has part: 20BT(3) Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.322

20BT(1) Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bt-ss-1
part of: 20BT Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
note: Attorney-General must obtain and consider reports of psychiatrists to determine release from detention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.322
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BT(1) Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Attorney-General must perform action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BT(2) Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bt-ss-2
part of: 20BT Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
note: The Attorney-General must order release on conditions if reports recommend continued hospital treatment or a federal sentence remains.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.322
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BT(2) Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to order release on conditions
premise text: Reports recommend continued hospital treatment or a federal sentence remains.
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must order release on conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BT(3) Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bt-ss-3
part of: 20BT Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
note: Sections 20BM and 20BN apply in relation to a person released from involuntary hospitalisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.322
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BT(3) Lesser periods of imprisonment fixed under hospital orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Application of sections 20BM and 20BN to a person released from involuntary hospitalisation.
premise text: Sections 20BM and 20BN apply in relation to a person released from involuntary hospitalisation by order under subsection (2).
conclusion text: Sections 20BM and 20BN apply in relation to the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the release from hospitalisation and the application of sections 20BM and 20BN.
premise text: The person is released from involuntary hospitalisation by order under subsection (2).
conclusion text: Sections 20BM and 20BN apply during the period of detention in a hospital specified in the order under subsection 20BS(1).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the release from hospitalisation and the application of sections 20BM and 20BN.
premise text: The person is released from involuntary hospitalisation by order under subsection (2).
conclusion text: Sections 20BM and 20BN apply during the period of detention in a hospital specified in the order under subsection 20BS(1).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Application of sections 20BM and 20BN to a person released from involuntary hospitalisation.
premise text: The references in each of those sections to detention in a prison or a hospital were references only to detention in a hospital.
conclusion text: Sections 20BM and 20BN apply to the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bt-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Application of sections 20BM and 20BN to a specific context.
premise text: The reference in subsection 20BM(5) to the period of detention in safe custody under subsection 20BJ(1) were a reference to the period of detention in a hospital specified in the order under subsection 20BS(1).
conclusion text: Sections 20BM and 20BN apply to the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BU Discharge of hospital orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bu
has part: 20BU(1) Discharge of hospital orders
has part: 20BU(2) Discharge of hospital orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.323

20BU(1) Discharge of hospital orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bu-ss-1
part of: 20BU Discharge of hospital orders
note: Discharge of hospital orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.323
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bu-ss-1-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bu-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BU(1) Discharge of hospital orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

20BU(2) Discharge of hospital orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bu-ss-2
part of: 20BU Discharge of hospital orders
note: Court must be satisfied before discharging a hospital order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.323
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bu-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BU(2) Discharge of hospital orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to satisfy court's satisfaction before discharging hospital order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BV Psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bv
has part: 20BV(1) Psychiatric probation orders
has part: 20BV(2) Psychiatric probation orders
has part: 20BV(3) Psychiatric probation orders
has part: 20BV(4) Psychiatric probation orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.324

20BV(1) Psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bv-ss-1
part of: 20BV Psychiatric probation orders
note: A court may make a psychiatric probation order for a person convicted of a federal offence if they are suffering from a mental illness and consent to the treatment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.324
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BV(1) Psychiatric probation orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The court may make an order
conclusion text: a psychiatric probation order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: The court must make an order if certain conditions are met
conclusion text: a psychiatric probation order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: The person's mental illness contributed to the commission of the offence by the person
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BV(2) Psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bv-ss-2
part of: 20BV Psychiatric probation orders
note: Court must obtain consent before making psychiatric probation orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.324
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BV(2) Psychiatric probation orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to obtain consent
premise text: Court must not make an order unless...
conclusion text: ...consent to the proposed treatment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation on state to obtain consent
premise text: The court must not make an order unless...
conclusion text: ...the person, or the person’s legal guardian, consents to the proposed treatment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BV(3) Psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bv-ss-3
part of: 20BV Psychiatric probation orders
note: Probation order conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.324
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BV(3) Psychiatric probation orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Probation order obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BV(4) Psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bv-ss-4
part of: 20BV Psychiatric probation orders
note: Court may vary treatment under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.324
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BV(4) Psychiatric probation orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies possibility of obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

20BW Breach of psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bw
note: Magistrate may take action if person fails to comply with condition of order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.325
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bw-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bw-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bw-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BW Breach of psychiatric probation orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Magistrate may take action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BX Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bx
has part: 20BX(1) Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
has part: 20BX(2) Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
has part: 20BX(3) Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.327

20BX(1) Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bx-ss-1
part of: 20BX Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
note: Court may impose pecuniary penalty, discharge order, revoke order, or take no action if person fails to comply with condition of psychiatric probation order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.327
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BX(1) Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Imposition of pecuniary penalty
premise text: Court has authority to impose penalties
conclusion text: Person may be subject to pecuniary penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Discharge of order
premise text: Court has authority to discharge orders
conclusion text: Order may be discharged
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Revocation of order
premise text: Court has authority to revoke orders
conclusion text: Order may be revoked
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BX(2) Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bx-ss-2
part of: 20BX Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
note: Court must consider order made when dealing with person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.327
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BX(2) Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider order
premise text: Court must deal with person under subsection (1)
conclusion text: Court must take into account the fact that the order was made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20BX(3) Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bx-ss-3
part of: 20BX Enforcement of psychiatric probation orders
note: Rights of appeal for dealing with an offender under psychiatric probation orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.327
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has right to
logic summary: Person has rights of appeal for dealing with the offender
premise text: (3) Where a person who has been released in accordance with an order under section 20BV is dealt with under subsection (1) for the offence in respect of which the order was made...
conclusion text: ...the person has such rights of appeal in respect of the way in which the person was dealt with for that offence as the person would have if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Appeal rights apply during the period of psychiatric probation
premise text: (3) Where a person who has been released in accordance with an order under section 20BV is dealt with under subsection (1) for the offence in respect of which the order was made...
conclusion text: ...the person has such rights of appeal in respect of the way in which the person was dealt with for that offence as the person would have if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Appeal rights apply everywhere during the period of psychiatric probation
premise text: (3) Where a person who has been released in accordance with an order under section 20BV is dealt with under subsection (1) for the offence in respect of which the order was made...
conclusion text: ...the person has such rights of appeal in respect of the way in which the person was dealt with for that offence as the person would have if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Appeal rights diffuse to all relevant authorities
premise text: (3) Where a person who has been released in accordance with an order under section 20BV is dealt with under subsection (1) for the offence in respect of which the order was made...
conclusion text: ...the person has such rights of appeal in respect of the way in which the person was dealt with for that offence as the person would have if...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bx-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Appeal rights are recognized by AI systems
premise text: (3) Where a person who has been released in accordance with an order under section 20BV is dealt with under subsection (1) for the offence in respect of which the order was made...
conclusion text: ...the person has such rights of appeal in respect of the way in which the person was dealt with for that offence as the person would have if...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

20BY Program probation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20by
has part: 20BY(1) Program probation orders
has part: 20BY(2) Program probation orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.328

20BY(1) Program probation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20by-ss-1
part of: 20BY Program probation orders
note: Court may order release on condition of undertaking education program or treatment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.328
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20by-ss-1-norm

20BY(2) Program probation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20by-ss-2
part of: 20BY Program probation orders
note: Applicability of program probation orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.328
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20by-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-20by-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20BY(2) Program probation orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

20BZ Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20bz
note: Definitions for authorized officer and relevant person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.329
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bz-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bz-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20bz-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bz-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
logic summary: Defines classes of persons.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20bz-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Lists individuals and organizations with specific roles.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20C Offences by children and young persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20c
note: Child or young person charged with an offence may be tried and punished as if the offence were against a law of the State or Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.334
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20c-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20c-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20C Offences by children and young persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-20c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21B Reparation for offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21b
has part: 21B(1) Reparation for offences
has part: 21B(2) Reparation for offences
has part: 21B(3) Reparation for offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.334

21B(1) Reparation for offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21b-ss-1
part of: 21B Reparation for offences
note: Reparation for federal offences
description: Reparation to the Commonwealth or a public authority, by way of money payment or otherwise
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.334
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21B(1) Reparation for offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to make reparation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21B(2) Reparation for offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21b-ss-2
part of: 21B Reparation for offences
note: No imprisonment for failure to pay order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.334
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21B(2) Reparation for offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Imprisonment implies payment
conclusion text: Payment implies no imprisonment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21B(3) Reparation for offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21b-ss-3
part of: 21B Reparation for offences
note: Reparation for offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.334
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21B(3) Reparation for offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-21b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Repayment obligation
premise text: (3) Where...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21D Prerogative of mercy and other Commonwealth laws unaffected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21d
has part: 21D(1) Prerogative of mercy and other Commonwealth laws unaffected
has part: 21D(2) Prerogative of mercy and other Commonwealth laws unaffected
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.335

21D(1) Prerogative of mercy and other Commonwealth laws unaffected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21d-ss-1
part of: 21D Prerogative of mercy and other Commonwealth laws unaffected
note: Nothing in this Part affects the Governor-General's power of mercy.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.335
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21d-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-21d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21D(1) Prerogative of mercy and other Commonwealth laws unaffected
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-21d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Affects
logic summary: Nothing in this Part affects the Governor-General's power of mercy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21D(2) Prerogative of mercy and other Commonwealth laws unaffected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21d-ss-2
part of: 21D Prerogative of mercy and other Commonwealth laws unaffected
note: No effect on other laws regarding offender release
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.335
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21d-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-21d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21D(2) Prerogative of mercy and other Commonwealth laws unaffected
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-21d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not affect
logic summary: Obligation negation
premise text: (2) This Part does not affect the operation of any other law...
conclusion text: No effect on other laws regarding offender release
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21F Prescribed authorities and parole officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21f
has part: 21F(1) Prescribed authorities and parole officers
has part: 21F(2) Prescribed authorities and parole officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.335

21F(1) Prescribed authorities and parole officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21f-ss-1
part of: 21F Prescribed authorities and parole officers
note: The Governor-General may arrange with other authorities to perform certain functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.335
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21f-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-21f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by the Governor-General
premise text: The Governor-General may arrange with other authorities.
conclusion text: Other authorities must perform certain functions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21F(2) Prescribed authorities and parole officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21f-ss-2
part of: 21F Prescribed authorities and parole officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.335
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21f-ss-2-norm

22 Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22
has part: 22(1) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
has part: 22(2) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
has part: 22(3) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
has part: 22(4) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
has part: 22(5) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
has part: 22(6) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
has part: 22(7) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.336

22(1) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-ss-1
part of: 22 Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
note: Court may order a person to do certain things after conviction of serious drug offence or prescribed offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.336
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(1) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between obligation and actions
premise text: (1) Where a court makes a relevant order or passes a relevant sentence in respect of a person charged with, or convicted of:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Describes the relationship between obligation and actions
premise text: (1) Where a court makes a relevant order or passes a relevant sentence in respect of a person charged with, or convicted of:
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Describes the spread of obligation to others
premise text: (1) Where a court makes a relevant order or passes a relevant sentence in respect of a person charged with, or convicted of:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Describes the recognition of obligation by AI system
premise text: (1) Where a court makes a relevant order or passes a relevant sentence in respect of a person charged with, or convicted of:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

22(2) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-ss-2
part of: 22 Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
note: Court may specify duration of order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.336
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(2) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: specifies
logic summary: Court specifies duration
premise text: Order has effect during specified period
conclusion text: Court may specify duration of order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(3) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-ss-3
part of: 22 Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
note: Court may revoke or vary certain orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.336
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(3) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(4) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-ss-4
part of: 22 Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
note: Court must notify Secretary of Department administered by Minister administering Australian Passports Act 2005 of order
description: copy of the order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.336
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(4) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(5) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-ss-5
part of: 22 Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
note: Australian travel document must be given to the Registrar or other appropriate officer of the court.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.336
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(5) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide Australian travel document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(6) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-ss-6
part of: 22 Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
note: Return of Australian travel document upon request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.336
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(6) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to return document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(7) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-ss-7
part of: 22 Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
note: Court may impose conditions on certain offenders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.336
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(7) Conditions etc. that a court may impose on certain offenders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Imposes obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has part
logic summary: Classifies relevant order and sentence
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22A State orders relating to Australian travel documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22a
has part: 22A(1) State orders relating to Australian travel documents
has part: 22A(2) State orders relating to Australian travel documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.338

22A(1) State orders relating to Australian travel documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22a-ss-1
part of: 22A State orders relating to Australian travel documents
note: Must surrender Australian travel document to court upon order.
description: Australian travel document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.338
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-22a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22A(1) State orders relating to Australian travel documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-22a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide Australian travel document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22A(2) State orders relating to Australian travel documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22a-ss-2
part of: 22A State orders relating to Australian travel documents
note: Investigation of Commonwealth offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.338
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22a-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-22a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22A(2) State orders relating to Australian travel documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23 Outline of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23
has part: 23(1) Outline of this Part
has part: 23(2) Outline of this Part
has part: 23(3) Outline of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.339

23(1) Outline of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-ss-1
part of: 23 Outline of this Part
note: Imposes obligations on investigating officials.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.339
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(1) Outline of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation on investigating officials
premise text: (b) imposes obligations on investigating officials in relation to: (i) people arrested for Commonwealth offences; and (ii) certain other people who are being investigated for Commonwealth offences;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation on investigating officials (ii)
premise text: (b) imposes obligations on investigating officials in relation to: (ii) certain other people who are being investigated for Commonwealth offences;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation on investigating officials (i)
premise text: (b) imposes obligations on investigating officials in relation to: (i) people arrested for Commonwealth offences;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(2) Outline of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-ss-2
part of: 23 Outline of this Part
note: No power to arrest a person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.339
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(2) Outline of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits arresting a person
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, this Part does not confer any power to arrest a person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(3) Outline of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-ss-3
part of: 23 Outline of this Part
note: Only a person arrested for a Commonwealth offence may be detained under this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.339
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(3) Outline of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Person arrested for a Commonwealth offence
conclusion text: May be detained under this Part
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval: ArrestedForOffence -> DetentionUnderThisPart
premise text: Person arrested for a Commonwealth offence
conclusion text: Detained under this Part during the arrest
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Detention under this Part implies being arrested for a Commonwealth offence
premise text: Person detained under this Part
conclusion text: Arrested for a Commonwealth offence
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23A Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23a
has part: 23A(1) Application of Part
has part: 23A(2) Application of Part
has part: 23A(3) Application of Part
has part: 23A(4) Application of Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.339

23A(1) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23a-ss-1
part of: 23A Application of Part
note: No effect on laws inconsistent with this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.339
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23A(1) Application of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prevents inconsistent laws from applying
premise text: (1) Any law of the Commonwealth...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23A(2) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23a-ss-2
part of: 23A Application of Part
note: Law of a State or Territory can operate concurrently with this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.339
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Concurrent operation allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23A(3) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23a-ss-3
part of: 23A Application of Part
note: Law of a State or Territory includes such a law that is given a particular application by a law of the Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.339
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23A(3) Application of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
premise text: Law of a State or Territory
conclusion text: such a law that is given a particular application by a law of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasApplication
logic summary: Particular application relation
premise text: Law of the Commonwealth
conclusion text: given a particular application
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23A(4) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23a-ss-4
part of: 23A Application of Part
note: Electronic recording of confessional required for laws of a State or Territory
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.339
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires electronic recording of confessional
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23AA How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23aa
has part: 23AA(1) How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
has part: 23AA(2) How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
has part: 23AA(3) How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.340

23AA(1) How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23aa-ss-1
part of: 23AA How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
note: This Part applies in relation to a person as if they were arrested on arrival in a State or Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.340
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23AA(1) How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Application of the provision to a person
premise text: (1) This Part applies in relation to a person as if he or she were arrested on arrival in a State or Territory.
conclusion text: The provision applies to the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Overlap
logic summary: Overlap between arrest and application
premise text: (b) the person was brought, while under arrest, to the State or Territory;
conclusion text: The provision applies during the period of arrest.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Application of the provision in a state or territory
premise text: (c) this Part applies in the State or Territory.
conclusion text: The provision applies in the specified state or territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Application of the provision to a person's rights and duties
premise text: (1) This Part applies in relation to a person as if he or she were arrested on arrival in a State or Territory.
conclusion text: The provision affects the person's rights and duties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Application of the provision to a state or territory's obligations
premise text: (c) this Part applies in the State or Territory.
conclusion text: The provision imposes obligations on the state or territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23AA(2) How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23aa-ss-2
part of: 23AA How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
note: This Part applies in relation to a person as if he or she first became a protected suspect on arrival in a State or Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.340
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23AA(2) How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If the person was a protected suspect within the Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands, then this Part applies.
premise text: (a) the person was a protected suspect within the Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands;
conclusion text: this Part applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If the person travelled, while a protected suspect, to the State or Territory, then this Part applies.
premise text: (b) the person travelled, while a protected suspect, to the State or Territory;
conclusion text: this Part applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If this Part applies in the State or Territory, then this Part applies in relation to a person as if he or she first became a protected suspect on arrival in a State or Territory.
premise text: this Part applies in the State or Territory;
conclusion text: this Part applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23AA(3) How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23aa-ss-3
part of: 23AA How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
note: This Part does not apply within the Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.340
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23AA(3) How this Part applies to the Antarctic Territories
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not apply
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (3) This Part does not otherwise apply within the Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal interval: Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands
premise text: (3) This Part does not otherwise apply within the Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: does not hold
logic summary: Temporal logic: Does not hold within the specified intervals
premise text: (3) This Part does not otherwise apply within the Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: does not diffuse
logic summary: Does not diffuse to other sections
premise text: (3) This Part does not otherwise apply within the Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23aa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: does not apply
logic summary: No cognitive AI application
premise text: (3) This Part does not otherwise apply within the Australian Antarctic Territory or the Territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23B Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23b
note: Defines terms for Aboriginal legal assistance organisation, arrested person, and authorising officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.341
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-descriptionlogic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Defines terms for Aboriginal legal assistance organisation, arrested person, and authorising officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines terms for Aboriginal legal assistance organisation
premise text: (Aboriginal legal assistance organisation means an organisation that is funded by the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory to provide legal assistance to Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders.)
conclusion text: (Aboriginal legal assistance organisation) = (an organisation that is funded by the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory to provide legal assistance to Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders.)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines terms for arrested person
premise text: (arrested: a person is arrested if: (a) the person is arrested for a Commonwealth offence; and (b) the person’s arrest has not ceased under subsection (3) or (4); and (c) the person has not been released.)
conclusion text: (arrested: a person is arrested if: (a) the person is arrested for a Commonwealth offence; and (b) the person’s arrest has not ceased under subsection (3) or (4); and (c) the person has not been released.)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines terms for authorising officer
premise text: (authorising officer, in relation to an investigating official, means: (a) if the investigating official is a member or special member of the Australian Federal Police—a person for the time being holding office or acting as: (i) the Commissioner; or (ii) a Deputy Commissioner; or (iii) a member or special member of the Australian Federal Police who is of the rank of superintendent or higher; or (b) if the investigating official is a member of the police force of a State or Territory—a person for the time being holding office or acting as: (i) the Commissioner or the person holding equivalent rank; or (ii) an Assistant Commissioner or a person holding equivalent rank; or (iii) a superintendent or a person holding equivalent rank; of the police force of that State or Territory.)
conclusion text: (authorising officer, in relation to an investigating official, means: (a) if the investigating official is a member or special member of the Australian Federal Police—a person for the time being holding office or acting as: (i) the Commissioner; or (ii) a Deputy Commissioner; or (iii) a member or special member of the Australian Federal Police who is of the rank of superintendent or higher; or (b) if the investigating official is a member of the police force of a State or Territory—a person for the time being holding office or acting as: (i) the Commissioner or the person holding equivalent rank; or (ii) an Assistant Commissioner or a person holding equivalent rank; or (iii) a superintendent or a person holding equivalent rank; of the police force of that State or Territory.)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23b-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines term for Commonwealth offence
premise text: (Commonwealth offence means: ...)
conclusion text: (Commonwealth offence) = (...)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23c
has part: 23C(1) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
has part: 23C(2) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
has part: 23C(2A) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
has part: 23C(3) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
has part: 23C(4) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
has part: 23C(5) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
has part: 23C(6) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
has part: 23C(6A) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
has part: 23C(7) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346

23C(1) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23c-ss-1
part of: 23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
note: Provisions apply if arrested for a Commonwealth offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23C(1) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: arrested for a Commonwealth offence
conclusion text: provisions apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23C(2) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23c-ss-2
part of: 23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
note: Person may be detained for investigation of Commonwealth offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23C(2) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to detain
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23C(2A) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23c-ss-2a
part of: 23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
note: Cessation of subsection (2) at the end of investigation period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-2a-norm

23C(3) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23c-ss-3
part of: 23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
note: Must be brought before a bail authority within the investigation period or as soon as practicable after.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23C(3) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be brought before a bail authority
premise text: (3) If the person is not released within the investigation period...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: →
logic summary: If not released, must be brought before bail authority
premise text: (3) If the person is not released within the investigation period...
conclusion text: must be brought before a bail authority
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Must be brought before bail authority within the investigation period or as soon as practicable after
premise text: (3) If the person is not released within the investigation period...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Must be brought before bail authority within the investigation period or as soon as practicable after
premise text: (3) If the person is not released within the investigation period...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Must be brought before bail authority within the investigation period or as soon as practicable after
premise text: (3) If the person is not released within the investigation period...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23C(4) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23c-ss-4
part of: 23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
note: Investigation period begins when arrested and ends at a reasonable time, not exceeding 2 hours for minors or 4 hours in other cases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-4-norm

23C(5) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23c-ss-5
part of: 23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
note: Consider complexity of matters when ascertaining time for investigation purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23C(5) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: regard
logic summary: Consideration of complexity is obligation.
premise text: (5) In ascertaining any period of time for the purposes of this section,
conclusion text: regard shall be had to the number and complexity of matters being investigated.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Complexity is a temporal property.
premise text: (5) In ascertaining any period of time for the purposes of this section,
conclusion text: the number and complexity of matters being investigated during the investigation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Complexity is a temporal property.
premise text: (5) In ascertaining any period of time for the purposes of this section,
conclusion text: the number and complexity of matters being investigated during the investigation.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Complexity is a temporal property.
premise text: (5) In ascertaining any period of time for the purposes of this section,
conclusion text: the number and complexity of matters being investigated during the investigation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Complexity is a temporal property.
premise text: (5) In ascertaining any period of time for the purposes of this section,
conclusion text: the number and complexity of matters being investigated during the investigation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23C(6) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23c-ss-6
part of: 23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
note: Reduction of investigation period for repeated arrests within 48 hours
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23C(6) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits repeated arrests within 48 hours
premise text: (6) If the person has been arrested more than once...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23C(6A) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23c-ss-6a
part of: 23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
note: Disregard subsection (6) for any later arrest if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-logic-linearlogic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23C(6A) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disregard subsection (6)
premise text: The state is obligated to disregard subsection (6) for any later arrest if certain conditions are met.
conclusion text: Subsection (6) should be disregarded.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Conjunction
logic summary: Conjunction: Subsection (6) and Obligation to disregard subsection (6)
premise text: Subsection (6) is a subclass of Obligation to disregard subsection (6).
conclusion text: Subsection (6) and Obligation to disregard subsection (6) are true.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission to disregard subsection (6)
premise text: The state is permitted to disregard subsection (6) for any later arrest if certain conditions are met.
conclusion text: Subsection (6) may be disregarded.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-6a-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Disjunction
logic summary: Disjunction: Subsection (6) or Obligation to disregard subsection (6)
premise text: Subsection (6) is a subclass of Obligation to disregard subsection (6).
conclusion text: Subsection (6) or Obligation to disregard subsection (6) are true.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23C(7) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23c-ss-7
part of: 23C Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
note: Disregard reasonable time for questioning suspension or delay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.346
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23C(7) Period of investigation if arrested for a non-terrorism offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23c-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Ignore
logic summary: Obligation to disregard time
premise text: (7) In ascertaining any period of time...
conclusion text: ...disregard any reasonable time...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23D Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23d
has part: 23D(1) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
has part: 23D(2) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
has part: 23D(3) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
has part: 23D(4) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.349

23D(1) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23d-ss-1
part of: 23D Application may be made for extension of investigation period
note: Application for extension of investigation period may be made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.349
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23D(1) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Obligation to apply for extension
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23D(2) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23d-ss-2
part of: 23D Application may be made for extension of investigation period
note: Application must be made before the magistrate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.349
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23D(2) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be done
conclusion text: The application must be made before the magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23D(3) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23d-ss-3
part of: 23D Application may be made for extension of investigation period
note: Application for extension of investigation period must include certain statements.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.349
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23D(3) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23D(4) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23d-ss-4
part of: 23D Application may be made for extension of investigation period
note: No information is required if disclosure is likely
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.349
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23d-ss-4-norm

23DA Magistrate may extend investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23da
has part: 23DA(1) Magistrate may extend investigation period
has part: 23DA(2) Magistrate may extend investigation period
has part: 23DA(3) Magistrate may extend investigation period
has part: 23DA(4) Magistrate may extend investigation period
has part: 23DA(5) Magistrate may extend investigation period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.350

23DA(1) Magistrate may extend investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23da-ss-1
part of: 23DA Magistrate may extend investigation period
note: Magistrate may extend investigation period for a serious Commonwealth offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.350
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DA(1) Magistrate may extend investigation period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Magistrate may extend investigation period
premise text: (1) This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DA(2) Magistrate may extend investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23da-ss-2
part of: 23DA Magistrate may extend investigation period
note: Magistrate may extend investigation period under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.350
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Magistrate may extend investigation period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during investigation period
logic summary: Further detention necessary during investigation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DA(3) Magistrate may extend investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23da-ss-3
part of: 23DA Magistrate may extend investigation period
note: Magistrate may extend investigation period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.350
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Extension period is specified
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DA(4) Magistrate may extend investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23da-ss-4
part of: 23DA Magistrate may extend investigation period
note: Disclosure of certain information is not required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.350
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-4-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DA(4) Magistrate may extend investigation period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23DA(5) Magistrate may extend investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23da-ss-5
part of: 23DA Magistrate may extend investigation period
note: Must provide a copy of the instrument to the investigating official.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.350
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23da-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of the instrument.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23DB Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23db
has part: 23DB(1) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
has part: 23DB(2) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
has part: 23DB(3) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
has part: 23DB(4) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
has part: 23DB(5) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
has part: 23DB(6) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
has part: 23DB(7) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
has part: 23DB(8) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.352

23DB(1) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23db-ss-1
part of: 23DB Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
note: Provisions apply if arrested for a terrorism offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.352
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DB(1) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: arrested for a terrorism offence
conclusion text: provisions apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DB(2) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23db-ss-2
part of: 23DB Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
note: Person may be detained for investigation of terrorism offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.352
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DB(2) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23DB(3) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23db-ss-3
part of: 23DB Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
note: Cessation of subsection (2) at the end of investigation period does not affect other powers to detain.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.352
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-3-norm

23DB(4) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23db-ss-4
part of: 23DB Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
note: Must be brought before a bail authority within the investigation period or as soon as practicable after.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.352
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DB(4) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be brought before a bail authority
premise text: (4) If the person is not released within the investigation period...
conclusion text: The person must be brought before a bail authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be brought as soon as practicable after the end of the investigation period
premise text: (4) If it is not practicable to do so within the investigation period...
conclusion text: The person must be brought as soon as practicable after the end of the investigation period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between release and investigation end
premise text: (4) If it is not practicable to do so within the investigation period...
conclusion text: The temporal interval between release and investigation end is between 0 and the investigation period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between release and investigation end
premise text: (4) If it is not practicable to do so within the investigation period...
conclusion text: The temporal interval between release and investigation end is between 0 and the investigation period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be brought before a bail authority or as soon as practicable after
premise text: (4) If the person is not released within the investigation period...
conclusion text: The person must be brought before a bail authority or as soon as practicable after.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DB(5) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23db-ss-5
part of: 23DB Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
note: Investigation period duration after arrest for terrorism offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.352
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-5-norm

23DB(6) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23db-ss-6
part of: 23DB Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
note: Consider complexity of matters when ascertaining time periods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.352
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DB(6) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: regard
logic summary: Obligation to consider complexity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DB(7) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23db-ss-7
part of: 23DB Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
note: Reduction of investigation period for repeated arrests within 48 hours
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.352
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DB(7) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Reduces investigation period for repeated arrests
premise text: (7) If the person has been arrested more than once within any period of 48 hours...
conclusion text: ...the investigation period for each arrest other than the first is reduced...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Reduction applies to temporal intervals within 48 hours
premise text: (b) any earlier investigation period or periods under section 23C.
conclusion text: ...within that 48 hours:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Reduction applies until the end of the 48-hour period
premise text: (7) If the person has been arrested more than once within any period of 48 hours...
conclusion text: ...the investigation period for each arrest other than the first is reduced by so much of any of the following periods as occurred within that 48 hours:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Reduction applies to repeated arrests within a short time frame
premise text: (7) If the person has been arrested more than once within any period of 48 hours...
conclusion text: ...the investigation period for each arrest other than the first is reduced by so much of any of the following periods as occurred within that 48 hours:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Reduction applies to repeated arrests with similar characteristics
premise text: (7) If the person has been arrested more than once within any period of 48 hours...
conclusion text: ...the investigation period for each arrest other than the first is reduced by so much of any of the following periods as occurred within that 48 hours:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DB(8) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23db-ss-8
part of: 23DB Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
note: Disregard subsection (7) for any later arrest if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.352
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DB(8) Period of investigation if arrested for a terrorism offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23db-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disregard subsection (7)
premise text: (8) However, in relation to each first arrest...
conclusion text: ...for any later arrest if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DC Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23dc
has part: 23DC(1) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
has part: 23DC(2) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
has part: 23DC(3) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
has part: 23DC(4) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
has part: 23DC(5) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.356

23DC(1) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23dc-ss-1
part of: 23DC Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
note: Suspension or delay of questioning may be specified during an investigation into a terrorism offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.356
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DC(1) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to specify the period during which suspension or delay of questioning may be applied.
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an investigation is being conducted into whether the person committed that terrorism offence or another terrorism offence.
conclusion text: The state must specify the period during which suspension or delay of questioning may be applied.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval during which suspension or delay of questioning may be applied.
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an investigation is being conducted into whether the person committed that terrorism offence or another terrorism offence.
conclusion text: The period during which suspension or delay of questioning may be applied starts when the person is arrested and ends when the investigation is completed.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval until which suspension or delay of questioning may not be applied.
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an investigation is being conducted into whether the person committed that terrorism offence or another terrorism offence.
conclusion text: The period during which suspension or delay of questioning may not be applied starts when the investigation is completed and ends at the end of the relevant temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: If
logic summary: Specifies the conditions under which the obligation applies.
premise text: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an investigation is being conducted into whether the person committed that terrorism offence or another terrorism offence.
conclusion text: The obligation applies if both conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Therefore
logic summary: Draws a conclusion based on the premises.
premise text: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an investigation is being conducted into whether the person committed that terrorism offence or another terrorism offence.
conclusion text: The state must specify the period during which suspension or delay of questioning may be applied because both conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DC(2) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23dc-ss-2
part of: 23DC Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
note: Specifies period for requesting a magistrate's extension of the investigation period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.356
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-2-norm

23DC(3) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23dc-ss-3
part of: 23DC Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
note: Application must be authorized in writing by an authorizing officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.356
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DC(3) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Authorization is required.
premise text: Application must be authorized in writing by an authorizing officer.
conclusion text: Authorization is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Requires
logic summary: Authorization from an authorizing officer is required.
premise text: The application must not be made unless the application is authorized, in writing, by an authorizing officer.
conclusion text: Authorization from an authorizing officer is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Imposes
logic summary: Imposition of authorization requirement.
premise text: The application must not be made unless the application is authorized, in writing, by an authorizing officer.
conclusion text: Authorization requirement imposed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Enforces
logic summary: Enforcement of authorization requirement.
premise text: The application must not be made unless the application is authorized, in writing, by an authorizing officer.
conclusion text: Authorization requirement enforced.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Guarantees
logic summary: Guarantee of authorization.
premise text: The application must not be made unless the application is authorized, in writing, by an authorizing officer.
conclusion text: Authorization guarantee provided.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DC(4) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23dc-ss-4
part of: 23DC Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
note: Application must include certain statements
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.356
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DC(4) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DC(5) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23dc-ss-5
part of: 23DC Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
note: No information must be included in the application if disclosure is likely to cause harm.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.356
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DC(5) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dc-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: No information must be included in the application.
premise text: Disclosure of information is likely to cause harm.
conclusion text: No obligation to disclose information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DD Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23dd
has part: 23DD(1) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
has part: 23DD(2) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
has part: 23DD(3) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
has part: 23DD(4) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
has part: 23DD(5) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
has part: 23DD(6) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.358

23DD(1) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23dd-ss-1
part of: 23DD Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
note: Specifies period for suspension or delay of questioning in terrorism cases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.358
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DD(1) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true for the specified period.
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an application has been made under subsection 23DC(2) to a magistrate in respect of the person. Specification of period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies temporal interval for suspension or delay.
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an application has been made under subsection 23DC(2) to a magistrate in respect of the person. Specification of period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Specifies end of temporal interval.
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an application has been made under subsection 23DC(2) to a magistrate in respect of the person. Specification of period
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses information about the specified period.
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an application has been made under subsection 23DC(2) to a magistrate in respect of the person. Specification of period
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes the specified period.
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested for a terrorism offence; and (b) an application has been made under subsection 23DC(2) to a magistrate in respect of the person. Specification of period
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23DD(2) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23dd-ss-2
part of: 23DD Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
note: The magistrate may specify a period for suspension or delay of questioning.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.358
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-2-norm

23DD(3) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23dd-ss-3
part of: 23DD Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
note: Specify period, day and time of signing, and reasons for specifying the period.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.358
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DD(3) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DD(4) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23dd-ss-4
part of: 23DD Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
note: Disclosure of certain information is not required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.358
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-4-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DD(4) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23DD(5) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23dd-ss-5
part of: 23DD Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
note: Magistrate must provide information to investigating official
description: instrument, matters included in instrument
references: sec-23E
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.358
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Magistrate must provide information to investigating official
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of instrument and matters included in instrument
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DD(6) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23dd-ss-6
part of: 23DD Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
note: The investigating official must take a specific action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.358
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DD(6) Time during which suspension or delay of questioning may be
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23dd-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty or obligation.
conclusion text: The investigating official must take the specified action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DE Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23de
has part: 23DE(1) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
has part: 23DE(2) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
has part: 23DE(3) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
has part: 23DE(4) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
has part: 23DE(5) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
has part: 23DE(6) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
has part: 23DE(7) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.360

23DE(1) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23de-ss-1
part of: 23DE Application may be made for extension of investigation period
note: Application for extension of investigation period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.360
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-1-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DE(1) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23DE(2) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23de-ss-2
part of: 23DE Application may be made for extension of investigation period
note: Application must be authorized in writing by an authorizing officer before making a request for extension of investigation period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.360
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DE(2) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be authorized in writing by an authorizing officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DE(3) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23de-ss-3
part of: 23DE Application may be made for extension of investigation period
note: Application for extension of investigation period must include certain statements.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.360
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DE(3) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DE(4) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23de-ss-4
part of: 23DE Application may be made for extension of investigation period
note: Application for extension of investigation period may be made under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.360
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DE(4) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Application for extension of investigation period may be made under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DE(5) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23de-ss-5
part of: 23DE Application may be made for extension of investigation period
note: Investigating official must provide application copy and inform applicant of right to representation.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.360
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DE(5) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide application copy and inform applicant of right to representation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DE(6) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23de-ss-6
part of: 23DE Application may be made for extension of investigation period
note: Official may remove information from application copy if it contains certain kinds of data.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.360
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DE(6) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Official may remove information from application copy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DE(7) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23de-ss-7
part of: 23DE Application may be made for extension of investigation period
note: Allow person or legal representative to make representations to magistrate about application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.360
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-7-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DE(7) Application may be made for extension of investigation period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23de-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23DF Magistrate may extend investigation period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23df
note: Magistrate may extend investigation period for terrorism offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.361
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23DF Magistrate may extend investigation period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Magistrate obligation to extend investigation period
premise text: (1) This section applies...
conclusion text: ...extend investigation period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between arrest and application may be relevant
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested...
conclusion text: ...extend investigation period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between arrest and application may be relevant for LTL analysis
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested...
conclusion text: ...extend investigation period
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between arrest and application may be relevant for diffusion analysis
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested...
conclusion text: ...extend investigation period
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23df-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between arrest and application may be relevant for CogAI analysis
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person is arrested...
conclusion text: ...extend investigation period
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23E Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23e
has part: 23E(1) Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
has part: 23E(2) Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
has part: 23E(3) Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.363

23E(1) Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23e-ss-1
part of: 23E Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
note: Magistrate must inform investigating official of matters included in an instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.363
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23E(1) Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must inform investigating official.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23E(2) Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23e-ss-2
part of: 23E Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
note: Investigating official must complete a form and forward it to the magistrate.
description: a form of the instrument with the name of the magistrate and particulars given by him or her
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.363
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23E(2) Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to complete a form and forward it to the magistrate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23E(3) Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23e-ss-3
part of: 23E Evidentiary provisions if application made by electronic means
note: Instrument with incorrect terms has no effect if not signed by magistrate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.363
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits incorrect instrument from having effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23F Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23f
has part: 23F(1) Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
has part: 23F(2) Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
has part: 23F(3) Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.365

23F(1) Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23f-ss-1
part of: 23F Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
note: Cautioning persons under arrest or protected suspects before questioning.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.365
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23F(1) Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to caution
premise text: Investigating official must question the person.
conclusion text: Cautioning is obligatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: STARTS BEFORE
logic summary: Temporal relationship between questioning and cautioning
premise text: Questioning starts before the person is cautioned.
conclusion text: Cautioning occurs before questioning.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23F(2) Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23f-ss-2
part of: 23F Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
note: Investigating official must inform person of caution in writing if most appropriate.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.365
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23F(2) Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must inform person of caution.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
logic summary: Informing in writing is a subclass of informing.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23F(3) Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23f-ss-3
part of: 23F Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
note: Exempts persons from answering questions under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.365
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23F(3) Cautioning persons who are under arrest or protected suspects
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts persons from answering questions
premise text: Another law requires the person to answer questions
conclusion text: Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Exemptions overlap with other laws
premise text: Another law requires the person to answer questions
conclusion text: Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Exemptions repeat in other laws
premise text: Another law requires the person to answer questions
conclusion text: Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Exemptions diffuse in other laws
premise text: Another law requires the person to answer questions
conclusion text: Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23f-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Exemptions are recognized in other laws
premise text: Another law requires the person to answer questions
conclusion text: Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23G Right to communicate with friend, relative and legal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23g
note: Right to communicate with friend, relative and legal practitioner during questioning.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.365
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-6

crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23G Right to communicate with friend, relative and legal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must inform the person of their right to communicate with a friend or relative.
premise text: Section 23G(1)(a)
conclusion text: The investigating official must inform the person of their right to communicate with a friend or relative.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must allow the person to make communication arrangements.
premise text: Section 23G(1)(b)
conclusion text: The investigating official must defer questioning for a reasonable time to allow the person to make communication arrangements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must arrange for a legal practitioner to be present during questioning.
premise text: Section 23G(1)(b)
conclusion text: The investigating official must allow the person to arrange for a legal practitioner to be present during questioning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must respect the person's choice of legal practitioner.
premise text: Section 23G(1)(b)
conclusion text: The investigating official must allow the person to choose their own legal practitioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must provide a reasonable time for communication arrangements.
premise text: Section 23G(1)(b)
conclusion text: The investigating official must allow the person to make communication arrangements within a reasonable time frame.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23g-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must respect the person's right to communicate with their legal practitioner.
premise text: Section 23G(1)(b)
conclusion text: The investigating official must allow the person to communicate with their chosen legal practitioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23H Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23h
has part: 23H(1) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
has part: 23H(1A) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
has part: 23H(2) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
has part: 23H(2A) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.366

23H(1) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23h-ss-1
part of: 23H Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
note: Notify Aboriginal legal assistance organisation of person under arrest or protected suspect.
description: Notification to representative of Aboriginal legal assistance organisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.366
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23H(1) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23H(1A) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23h-ss-1a
part of: 23H Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
note: Official must not question Aboriginal person until notified representative has communicated or 2 hours have passed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.366
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23H(1A) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Official must not question Aboriginal person.
premise text: (1AB) If a representative of an Aboriginal legal assistance organisation is notified under subsection (1), the investigating official must not question the person until...
conclusion text: ...the earlier of the following times: ...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: 2 hours have passed since representative was notified.
premise text: (1AB) If a representative of an Aboriginal legal assistance organisation is notified under subsection (1), the investigating official must not question the person until...
conclusion text: ...the earlier of the following times: ...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: 2 hours have passed since representative was notified.
premise text: (1AB) If a representative of an Aboriginal legal assistance organisation is notified under subsection (1), the investigating official must not question the person until...
conclusion text: ...the earlier of the following times: ...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23H(2) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23h-ss-2
part of: 23H Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
note: Official must not question Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander without interview friend present.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.366
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23H(2) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Official must not question Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander.
premise text: (2) Subject to subsection (7) and section 23L, if an investigating official...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Interview friend must be present before questioning.
premise text: (c) an interview friend is present while the person is being questioned and, before the start of the questioning...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Official must allow person to communicate with interview friend.
premise text: (c) an interview friend is present while the person is being questioned and, before the start of the questioning...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Person can waive right to have interview friend present.
premise text: (d) the person has expressly and voluntarily waived his or her right to have such a person present.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23H(2A) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23h-ss-2a
part of: 23H Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
note: Right to choose an interview friend under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.366
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 23H(2A) Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
logic summary: Right to choose an interview friend
premise text: State grants this right
conclusion text: NaturalPerson can exercise this right
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Exercise of the right must occur within a reasonable period
premise text: The person has a reasonable period to exercise the right
conclusion text: Exercise of the right occurs within this interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Chosen interview friend must arrive within 2 hours
premise text: The person has a reasonable period to exercise the right
conclusion text: Arrival of the chosen interview friend occurs within this interval
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Waiver of the right is not allowed
premise text: The person must exercise the right if they choose to do so
conclusion text: Waiver of the right is not permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23h-ss-2a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State has an obligation to ensure the chosen interview friend arrives on time
premise text: The state is responsible for ensuring the person's rights are respected
conclusion text: State must ensure the chosen interview friend arrives within 2 hours
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23K Persons under 18
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23k
has part: 23K(1) Persons under 18
has part: 23K(2) Persons under 18
has part: 23K(3) Persons under 18
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.369

23K(1) Persons under 18
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23k-ss-1
part of: 23K Persons under 18
note: Official must have interview friend present when questioning a minor under 18.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.369
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23K(1) Persons under 18
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Official must have interview friend present.
premise text: Interviewing a minor under 18.
conclusion text: Official must have interview friend present.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Communication must occur during questioning.
premise text: Questioning begins after allowing communication.
conclusion text: Communication occurs during questioning.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23K(2) Persons under 18
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23k-ss-2
part of: 23K Persons under 18
note: Excluding an interview friend from questioning if they unreasonably interfere.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.369
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to exclude an interview friend.
premise text: (2) An interview friend may be excluded from the questioning if he or she unreasonably interferes with it.
conclusion text: An interview friend may be excluded from the questioning if they unreasonably interfere.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defining a temporal interval for exclusion based on unreasonable interference.
premise text: (2) An interview friend may be excluded from the questioning if he or she unreasonably interferes with it.
conclusion text: [Unreasonable Interference] is a temporal interval for exclusion.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Defining a temporal trace for exclusion based on unreasonable interference.
premise text: (2) An interview friend may be excluded from the questioning if he or she unreasonably interferes with it.
conclusion text: [Unreasonable Interference] is a temporal trace.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Describing how exclusion based on unreasonable interference spreads to others.
premise text: (2) An interview friend may be excluded from the questioning if he or she unreasonably interferes with it.
conclusion text: [Exclusion] spreads to others through [Unreasonable Interference].
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Representing knowledge about exclusion based on unreasonable interference.
premise text: (2) An interview friend may be excluded from the questioning if he or she unreasonably interferes with it.
conclusion text: [Exclusion] is represented by [Unreasonable Interference].
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23K(3) Persons under 18
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23k-ss-3
part of: 23K Persons under 18
note: Defines acceptable interviewers for a person under 18
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.369
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23K(3) Persons under 18
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
logic summary: Defines class hierarchy
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23k-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Establishes obligation for interviewers
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23L Exceptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23l
has part: 23L(1) Exceptions
has part: 23L(2) Exceptions
has part: 23L(3) Exceptions
has part: 23L(4) Exceptions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.370

23L(1) Exceptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23l-ss-1
part of: 23L Exceptions
note: Official exemption from requirement under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.370
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23L(1) Exceptions
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Official exemption from requirement.
premise text: Reasonable grounds for believing non-compliance will result in harm to others.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Official's belief on reasonable grounds.
premise text: The official believes on reasonable grounds that...
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23L(2) Exceptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23l-ss-2
part of: 23L Exceptions
note: Exceptions for application of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.370
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23L(2) Exceptions
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23L(3) Exceptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23l-ss-3
part of: 23L Exceptions
note: Record of investigating official's grounds for belief must be made and complied with.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.370
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23L(3) Exceptions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide record of grounds for belief
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23L(4) Exceptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23l-ss-4
part of: 23L Exceptions
note: Offer services of another legal practitioner if communication or attendance is delayed.
description: Services of another legal practitioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.370
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23L(4) Exceptions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State must offer services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23M Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23m
has part: 23M(1) Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest
has part: 23M(2) Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest
has part: 23M(3) Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.371

23M(1) Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23m-ss-1
part of: 23M Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest
note: Informing a person under arrest of their whereabouts by relatives, friends or legal representatives.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.371
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23M(1) Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23M(2) Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23m-ss-2
part of: 23M Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest
note: Must provide information to the other person unless certain conditions are met.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.371
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory provision of information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: believes
logic summary: Investigating official's belief about the other person's relationship
premise text: the investigating official believes on reasonable grounds that...
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23M(3) Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23m-ss-3
part of: 23M Providing information relating to persons who are under arrest
note: Section has effect subject to section 23L.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.371
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23m-ss-3-norm

23N Right to interpreter
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23n
note: Right to interpreter for persons under arrest or protected suspects
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.371
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23n-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23n-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23n-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 23N Right to interpreter
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has right
logic summary: Right exists
premise text: Person under arrest or protected suspect has right to interpreter
conclusion text: Right to interpreter exists
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23P Right of non-Australian nationals to communicate with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23p
has part: 23P(1) Right of non-Australian nationals to communicate with
has part: 23P(2) Right of non-Australian nationals to communicate with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.372

23P(1) Right of non-Australian nationals to communicate with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23p-ss-1
part of: 23P Right of non-Australian nationals to communicate with
note: Non-Australian nationals have right to communicate with consular office.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.372
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-6

crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23P(1) Right of non-Australian nationals to communicate with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must inform non-Australian nationals of their right to communicate with consular office.
premise text: (1) Subject to section 23L, if a person who is under arrest or a protected suspect is not an Australian citizen...
conclusion text: ...he or she may communicate with, or attempt to communicate with, that consular office; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must provide reasonable facilities for non-Australian nationals to communicate with consular office.
premise text: (1) Subject to section 23L, if a person who is under arrest or a protected suspect is not an Australian citizen...
conclusion text: ...give the person reasonable facilities to do so; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must forward written communication from non-Australian nationals to consular office.
premise text: (1) Subject to section 23L, if a person who is under arrest or a protected suspect is not an Australian citizen...
conclusion text: ...forward any written communication from the person to that consular office; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must allow non-Australian nationals a reasonable time to communicate with consular office.
premise text: (1) Subject to section 23L, if a person who is under arrest or a protected suspect is not an Australian citizen...
conclusion text: ...allow the person a reasonable time to, or to attempt to, communicate with that consular office.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must notify consular office of non-Australian nationals' arrest or detention.
premise text: (1) Subject to section 23L, if a person who is under arrest or a protected suspect is not an Australian citizen...
conclusion text: ...that consular office will be notified accordingly; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must inform non-Australian nationals of their right to request notification.
premise text: (1) Subject to section 23L, if a person who is under arrest or a protected suspect is not an Australian citizen...
conclusion text: ...if the person so requests—notify that consular office accordingly; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23P(2) Right of non-Australian nationals to communicate with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23p-ss-2
part of: 23P Right of non-Australian nationals to communicate with
note: Must comply with paragraphs (1)(c), (d) and (f) before questioning a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.372
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23p-ss-2-norm

23Q Treatment of persons under arrest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23q
note: Must treat persons under arrest with humanity and respect for human dignity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.373
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23q-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23q-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23q-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23Q Treatment of persons under arrest
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must treat persons under arrest with humanity and respect for human dignity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23S Right to remain silent etc. not affected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23s
note: Right to remain silent not affected by this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.373
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23s-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23s-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23s-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: No obligation to answer questions or participate in an investigation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23T Acts authorised under other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23t
note: An investigating official can ask or cause a person to do something under another law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.373
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23t-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23t-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23t-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23T Acts authorised under other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23t-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Ability to perform an action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23U Tape recording of information required to be given to person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23u
note: Must provide certain information to a person under arrest or protected suspect.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.373
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23u-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23u-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23u-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23U Tape recording of information required to be given to person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23u-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide certain information to a person under arrest or protected suspect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23V Tape recording of confessions and admissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23v
has part: 23V(1) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
has part: 23V(2) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
has part: 23V(4) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
has part: 23V(5) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.374

23V(1) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23v-ss-1
part of: 23V Tape recording of confessions and admissions
note: Tape recording of confessions and admissions is required for certain circumstances.
description: A record in writing, a copy of the record, and an explanation of the procedure to be followed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.374
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23V(1) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The state must provide a written record and an explanation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23V(2) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23v-ss-2
part of: 23V Tape recording of confessions and admissions
note: Must provide access to recording within 7 days
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.374
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23V(2) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide access
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23V(4) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23v-ss-4
part of: 23V Tape recording of confessions and admissions
note: This section applies to certain offences under a law applied by the Commonwealth Places (Application of Laws) Act 1970.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.374
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23V(4) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies to
logic summary: The section applies to certain offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23V(5) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23v-ss-5
part of: 23V Tape recording of confessions and admissions
note: Court may admit evidence despite non-compliance with section requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.374
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23V(5) Tape recording of confessions and admissions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23v-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to deviate from requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23W Proof of belief
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23w
note: Prosecution must prove investigating official had reasonable grounds for belief.
description: Evidence of investigation and belief
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.376
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23w-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23w-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23w-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23w-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23W Proof of belief
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23w-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Prosecution has an obligation to prove...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23w-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: epistemic-possibility
logic summary: Investigating official must have reasonable grounds for belief.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed