1 Child or
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.30
note: Procedure must be carried out within 2 hours after suspect presents to investigating constable.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Oct 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
note: Commencement of Act
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-10
schema version: 2

1 Oct 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
note: Royal Assent and commencement of the Cybercrime Act 2001
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-11
schema version: 2

1 Oct 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-12
schema version: 2

1 Mar 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-13
schema version: 2

1 July 2004
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.246
note: Anti-terrorism Act (No. 2) 2004
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-14
schema version: 2

1 July 2008
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2008
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-15
schema version: 2

1 Mar 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-16
schema version: 2

1 Mar 2010 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Amendment (Working With Children—Criminal History) Act 2010
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-17-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-17-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-17
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-1-17-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition

1 Jan 2011
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
note: National Security Legislation Amendment Act 2010
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-18
schema version: 2

1 Jan 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
note: Extradition and Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation Amendment Act 2012
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-19
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.112
note: Crime scene must be present if suspects are within the purpose.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Crime scene must be present if suspects are within the purpose.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-act-1914-sec-1-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Section 1

1 Dec 2014 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
note: Revision of Statute Law
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-20
schema version: 2

1 July 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
note: Amendment of Territories Legislation by Territories Legislation Amendment Act 2016
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-21
schema version: 2

1 July 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
note: July 2015 (s 2(1))
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-22
schema version: 2

1 July 2017 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
note: July 2017 (s 2(1))
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-23
schema version: 2

1 Mar 2021
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.260
note: Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-24
schema version: 2

1 Apr 2022
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
note: Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (AFP Powers and Other Matters) Act 2022
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-25
schema version: 2

1 Jan 2023 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-26
schema version: 2

1 July 2023 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
note: July 2023 (s 2(1))
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-27
schema version: 2

1 Jan 1947
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
note: Statute Law Revision Act 1950
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-3
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-1-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Classification is Deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the type of obligation or prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Classification is Undertaking

1 Dec 1966
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
note: Commencement of Crimes Act 1973
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-4
schema version: 2

1 Feb 1987 (s 2 and
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-5
schema version: 2

1 July 1997
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
note: Audit (Transitional and Miscellaneous) Amendment Act 1997
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-6
schema version: 2

1 Jan 1998 (s 2(2) and
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
note: Legislation history
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-7
schema version: 2

1 July 1998 (s 2(2) and
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
note: July 1998 (s 2(2) and gaz 1998, No S316)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-8
schema version: 2

1 July 2000 (gaz 2000,
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
note: No S229
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-9
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to carry out procedure within 2 hours.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Child or

10 Apr 1984
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
note: Public Service Reform Act 1984
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Dec
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.264
note: Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Act 2025
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-10
schema version: 2

10 Dec 1999
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-2
schema version: 2

10 Dec 1999 (s 2(2))
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
note: Privacy Amendment (Office of the Privacy Commissioner) Act 2000
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-3
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-10-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: No temporal relation specified
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

10 Dec 2002
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (People Smuggling, Firearms Trafficking and Other Measures) Act 2002
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-4
schema version: 2

10 Dec 2008
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
note: Legislation history
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-5
schema version: 2

10 Sept 2015
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
note: Endnotes
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-6
schema version: 2

10 Dec
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.259
note: Requires amendment of legislation
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-7
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-10-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

10 Dec
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.263
note: Conditional commencement of the Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) Act 2024
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-8
schema version: 2

10 Dec
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.263
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-9
schema version: 2

11 Dec 1992
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
note: Conditional commencement
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11
schema version: 2

11 Nov 1999
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-2
schema version: 2

11 Oct 2002
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
note: Conditional commencement and effective date of the Crimes Amendment Act
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-3
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-11-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for commencement and effective date
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Remainder: 1 Jan 2003 (s 2(1) and gaz 2002, No GN44)

11 Feb
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.256
note: Amendment to Australian Crime Commission Act 2016
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-4
schema version: 2

11 Apr
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
note: Conditional commencement of Home Affairs and Integrity Agencies Legislation Amendment Act 2018
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-5
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-11-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional commencement of the Act
modality: Deontic
operator: Conditional Commencement

11 Dec
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.259
note: Amendment of Crimes Legislation
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-6
schema version: 2

11 Aug
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.262
note: Amendment to Aboriginal Land Grant (Jervis Bay Territory) Act 2023
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-7-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-7
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-11-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between amendment and previous provision
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal interval required for conditional commencement

11 Dec
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.263
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions No. 2 Act 2024
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-8
schema version: 2

11 Dec 2024 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.263
note: Legislation history for Crimes Act 1914
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-9
schema version: 2

12 June 1975
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
note: Conditional commencement of the Act
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12
schema version: 2

12 Dec
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
note: References schedules
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-10
schema version: 2

12 May 2003 (s 2 and
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
note: Establishment of Australian Crime Commission
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-2
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-12-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishs the Australian Crime Commission
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes

12 Nov 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.246
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-3
schema version: 2

12 Dec 2006
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-4
schema version: 2

12 Dec 2006
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-5
schema version: 2

12 Dec 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
note: Privacy Amendment (Enhancing Privacy Protection) Act 2012
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-6
schema version: 2

12 Dec 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People Trafficking) Act 2013
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-7-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-7
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-12-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified

12 Apr 2013 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
note: Legislation history for Crimes Legislation Amendment (Law Enforcement Integrity, Vulnerable Witness Protection and Other Measures) Act 2013
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-8
schema version: 2

12 Dec
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-9
schema version: 2

13 Dec 1960
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13
schema version: 2

13 Dec 1960
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
note: Statute Law Revision (Decimal Currency) Act
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-2
schema version: 2

13 Oct 1999
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-3
schema version: 2

13 Oct 1999
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
note: Legislation history for Crimes Act 1914
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-4
schema version: 2

13 June 2006
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
note: Transitionals and Consequentials Act 2006
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-5
schema version: 2

13 Dec 2006 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
note: Decriminalization of certain offenses
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-6
schema version: 2

13 Dec 2006
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
note: Prohibition on marking plastic explosives
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-7
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-13-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits marking of plastic explosives
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

13 July 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-8
schema version: 2

13 Sept
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.262
note: Conditional commencement of Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Modernisation) Act 2023
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-9-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-9-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-9-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-9-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-9
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-13-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: 14 Sept 2023 (s 2(1) items 4, 8)

crimes-act-1914-sec-13-9-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: No clear duty, ban conduct, grant permission, or create a right

crimes-act-1914-sec-13-9-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: 14 Sept 2023 (s 2(1) items 4, 8)

14 Dec 1946
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14
schema version: 2

14 Dec 1983
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
note: Conditional commencement of amendments
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-14-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-2
schema version: 2

14 Nov 2002
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-14-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-3
schema version: 2

14 Dec 2005
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2006
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-14-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-4
schema version: 2

14 Apr 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-14-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-5
schema version: 2

14 Mar 2013
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-14-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-6
schema version: 2

15 Mar 1995
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15
schema version: 2

15 Sept 1995
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
note: Legislation history
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-2
schema version: 2

15 Nov 2005
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-3
schema version: 2

15 Mar 2007
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Matters) Act 2008
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-4
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditionally commenced on 1 July 2007

15 Apr 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
note: Sch 1 (items 64,71), sch 2 (item 9)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-5
schema version: 2

15 Dec
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.260
note: Conditional commencement of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Act 2020
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15-6-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-6
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-15-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition

16 Mar 1926
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16
schema version: 2

16 July 1999
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-10
schema version: 2

16 July 1999
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
note: Fine Enforcement Act, 1999
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-11
schema version: 2

16 Jan 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
note: Conditional commencement on specific dates
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-12-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-12-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-12
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-12-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement on specific dates

16 Aug 2004
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.246
note: Conditional commencement of Anti-terrorism Act (No. 3) 2004
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-13-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-13-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-13
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-13-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

16 Aug 2004
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.246
note: Legislation history for Crimes Act 1914
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-14
schema version: 2

16 Nov 2005
type: Concept
references: Anti-Terrorism Act (No. 2) 2005
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
note: Reference to Anti-Terrorism Act (No. 2) 2005
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-15
schema version: 2

16 June 2020
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-16
schema version: 2

16 June 2021 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
note: Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-17
schema version: 2

16 Feb
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.260
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-18
schema version: 2

16 Dec 1950
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-2
schema version: 2

16 Dec 1985
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
note: Duty to report certain information
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-3
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the agent to report certain information
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

16 June 1982
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
note: Royal Assent
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-4
schema version: 2

16 Dec 1985
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
note: Royal Assent for Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act (No. 2) 1982
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-n3logic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-shacl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-5
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This is a classification of the key as a valid CogAI key
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies the key as a valid CogAI key
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
premise text: The key is 'sec-16-5'

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Royal Assent is an Undertaking for the Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act (No. 2) 1982
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies Royal Assent as an Undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The key is 'sec-16-5'

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This is a classification of the key as a specific legislative excerpt in a diffusion context
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Classifies the key as a specific legislative excerpt in a diffusion context
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
premise text: The key is 'sec-16-5'

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-n3logic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This is a classification of the key as a specific legislative excerpt
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: Classifies the key as a specific legislative excerpt
modality: N3Logic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The key is 'sec-16-5'

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-shacl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This is a classification of the key as a valid SHACL key
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Classifies the key as a valid SHACL key
modality: SHACL
operator: Applicable
premise text: The key is 'sec-16-5'

16 Dec 1985 (s 2(6))
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
note: Defence Force (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1982
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-6
schema version: 2

16 Dec 1985
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
note: Prohibition on Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 1)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-7
schema version: 2

16 Dec 1987
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
note: Conditional commencement of sections 10, 12, 13, and 15 on specific dates.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-8-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-8-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-8
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for commencement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

16 Jan 1995
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-9
schema version: 2

17 Sept 1981
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
note: Amendment by Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 2) 1985
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17
schema version: 2

17 Oct 1986
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-2
schema version: 2

17 Jan 1990
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
note: Amended by Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 41, 2003
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-3
schema version: 2

17 Jan 1990
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
note: Endnotes and legislation history
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-4
schema version: 2

17 Apr 1997
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
note: Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments Act 1997
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-5
schema version: 2

17 July 1990 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
note: Prohibition of certain items
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-6
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-17-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids certain items
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

17 Dec
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.260
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Economic Disruption) Act 2021
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-7
schema version: 2

17 Mar 2006
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.265
note: Amendment history for Crimes Act 1914
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-8
schema version: 2

18 Dec 1986
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18
schema version: 2

18 Dec 1987
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
note: Transition provisions and consequential amendments for Telecommunications and Postal Services Act 1989
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-2
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-18-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for transitional provisions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal intervals mentioned in s 5(1), (6), (7)

18 Feb 2005
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
note: Conditional commencement of s 4-11, sch 1 on 1 July 2005
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-3
schema version: 2

18 June 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
note: June 2015 (s 2(1))
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-4
schema version: 2

19 Dec 1973
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19
schema version: 2

19 Feb 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act 2010
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-10-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-10-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-10
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-19-10-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

19 Feb 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
note: References specific schedules and items
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-11
schema version: 2

19 May
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-12
schema version: 2

19 Oct 1979 (s 2 and
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
note: Consequential amendments to Australian Federal Police Act
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-2
schema version: 2

19 June 1989
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-3
schema version: 2

19 Dec 1994
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
note: References specific sections for Royal Assent
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-4
schema version: 2

19 Dec 1996
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment Act 1997
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-5-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-5
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-19-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified

19 Dec 2002
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
note: Classifies items in schedules 1, 2, and 3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-6
schema version: 2

19 June 2006
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-7
schema version: 2

19 Feb 2007
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-8
schema version: 2

19 Feb 2007
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
note: Transitionals and Consequentials Act 2007
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-9
schema version: 2

1989 Remainder:
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
note: Royal Assent for Crimes Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1989-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1989
schema version: 2

1991 Remainder: 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
note: Amendment by AUSSAT Repeal Act
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1991-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1991
schema version: 2

2 Aboriginal
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.30
note: Procedure must be carried out within 2 hours after suspect presents to investigating constable.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Dec 1920
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2 Dec 1920
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
note: Commencement of Crimes Act 1926
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-2-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-3
schema version: 2

2 July 2000 (gaz 2000,
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
note: No S328
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-2-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-4
schema version: 2

2 Mar 2011
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
note: Law and Justice Legislation Amendment (Identity Crimes and Other Measures) Act 3, 2011
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-2-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-5
schema version: 2

2 Mar 2011
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
note: Compilation date and related information
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-2-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-6
schema version: 2

2 Oct 2014
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
note: Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Foreign Fighters) Act 2014
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-2-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-7
schema version: 2

2 Sept
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.260
note: Legislation history for Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Act 2021
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-2-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-8
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to carry out procedure within 2 hours.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Aboriginal

20 June 2001 (s 2(4))
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
note: Amendment of Royal Assent by Statute Law Revision Act 2002
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20
schema version: 2

20 Feb
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.264
note: Conditional commencement of Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2025
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-10
schema version: 2

20 June 2006
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
note: Law Enforcement (AFP Professional Standards and Related Measures) Act 2006
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-2
schema version: 2

20 Feb 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
note: Conditional commencement of Statute Law Revision Act 2010
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-3
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified

20 Mar 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Powers and Offences) Act 2012
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-4
schema version: 2

20 May 2015
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
note: Amendment of schedule and item numbers
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-5
schema version: 2

20 Oct
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.256
note: Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2016
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-6
schema version: 2

20 Sept 2017 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
note: Establishment of the Australian Signals Directorate
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-7
schema version: 2

20 Sept
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.259
note: Amendment machinery for Crimes Legislation Amendment (Police Powers at Airports) Act 2019
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-8
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-20-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 Sept

20 Sept
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.262
note: Counter-Terrorism and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2023
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-9
schema version: 2

21 Oct 1991
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21
schema version: 2

21 Oct 1991
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-2
schema version: 2

21 Dec 2001 (gaz
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
note: Legislation history
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-3
schema version: 2

21 Aug
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.262
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus) Act 2023
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-4
schema version: 2

21 Jan
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.264
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-5
schema version: 2

21 Jan
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.265
note: Consequential and transitional provisions for the Commonwealth Parole Board Act 2026
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-6
schema version: 2

22 June 1928
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22
schema version: 2

22 May 2009
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-10
schema version: 2

22 Mar 2011
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
note: Acts Interpretation Amendment Act 2011
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-11
schema version: 2

22 Sept 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
note: Legislation history for Crimes Act 1914
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-12-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-12
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the legislation
modality: Deontic
operator: has

22 May 2018
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-13
schema version: 2

22 June
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-14
schema version: 2

22 May
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
note: May be cited as C2018A00034
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-15
schema version: 2

22 May
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
note: Conditional commencement of certain provisions
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-16
schema version: 2

22 June
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.259
note: Class specification for certain schedules
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-17
schema version: 2

22 Jan 2026 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.264
note: Conditional commencement of section 2(1) item 4 on 18 Feb 2026
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-18
schema version: 2

22 June 1928
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
note: Crimes Act 1932
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-2
schema version: 2

22 Sept 1982
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-3
schema version: 2

22 Nov 1983
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
note: Consequential Amendments Act 1983
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-4
schema version: 2

22 Dec 1983
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-5
schema version: 2

22 Oct 1990
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment Act 1991
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-6-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-6
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

22 Dec 1993
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-7
schema version: 2

22 June 2004
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.246
note: Conditional commencement of certain provisions
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-8
schema version: 2

22 Feb 2005
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Amendment Act
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-9-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-9-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-9
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Classification
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal interval specified

23 Apr 1959
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Act 1960
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23
schema version: 2

23 May 2009
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
note: Fair Work (State Referral and Consequential and Other Amendments) Act 2009
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-10
schema version: 2

23 May 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2013
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-11-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-11
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This classification applies to this excerpt
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classification of legislation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPartOf
premise text: Legislation is classified by part and section

23 Mar 2016
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
note: Conditional commencement of Tribunals Amalgamation Act 2015
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-12
schema version: 2

23 June 2017 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
note: Statute Update (Winter 2017) Act 2017
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-13
schema version: 2

23 Aug
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-14
schema version: 2

23 May 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
note: National Security Legislation Amendment (Espionage and Foreign Interference) Act 2018
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-15
schema version: 2

23 June 2020 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.259
note: List of items for June 2020 (s 2(1))
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-16-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-16
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: List of items
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion

23 July
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.260
note: Sunsetting Review and Other Measures Act 2021 (C2021A00088)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-17
schema version: 2

23 Aug 1991
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
note: Classifies sections of the law
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-2
schema version: 2

23 Feb 1995
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
note: Conditional commencement of section 14
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-3
schema version: 2

23 Mar 2006
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-4
schema version: 2

23 July 1998
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
note: Amendment of section 2(2) by Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 41, 2003
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-5
schema version: 2

23 July 1998 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
note: July 1998 (s 2(1))
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-6
schema version: 2

23 Oct 2002
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
note: Criminal Code Amendment (Espionage and Related Matters) Act, 2002
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-7
schema version: 2

23 Mar 2006
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-8
schema version: 2

23 Mar 2006
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
note: ASIO Legislation Amendment Act 2006
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-9
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between commencement and the Act
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

23WA Definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.17
note: Defines terms used in Part IC
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wa-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wa-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wa
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wa-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines key terms
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wa-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WA Definitions

23WB Interview friends
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.27
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23WB(1) Interview friends
has part: 23WB(2) Interview friends
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wb
schema version: 2

23WB(1) Interview friends
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.27
note: List of people who may act as an interview friend
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wb-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23WB Interview friends

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WB(1) Interview friends

23WB(2) Interview friends
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.27
note: Who can act as interview friends for a child or incapable person?
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wb-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23WB Interview friends

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WB(2) Interview friends

23WC How forensic procedures may be authorised in different
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.29
note: Authorises forensic procedures under certain circumstances.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wc-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wc-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wc
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and shows the provisions that authorise...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows the carrying out of a forensic procedure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: The following table shows...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wc-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WC How forensic procedures may be authorised in different

23WD Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23WD(1) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
has part: 23WD(2) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
has part: 23WD(3) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
has part: 23WD(4) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wd
schema version: 2

23WD(1) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.33
note: Authorisation to carry out forensic procedure with informed consent.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23WD Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorisation occurs during the procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between authorisation and procedure
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) A person is authorised to carry out a forensic procedure on a suspect with the informed consent of the suspect.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorisation implies that the consent is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of authorisation and consent
modality: Argumentation
operator: imply
premise text: (1) A person is authorised to carry out a forensic procedure on a suspect with the informed consent of the suspect.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person is authorised to carry out a forensic procedure on a suspect.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting authority
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
premise text: The person is authorised to carry out the procedure.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Informed consent of the suspect is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requiring informed consent
modality: Deontic
operator: require
premise text: The person is authorised to carry out the procedure in accordance with Division 6 and not otherwise.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authority and consent are spread to the suspect.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of authority and consent
modality: Diffusion
operator: spread
premise text: (1) A person is authorised to carry out a forensic procedure on a suspect with the informed consent of the suspect.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WD(1) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed

23WD(2) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.33
note: Forensic procedure not allowed for certain individuals
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23WD Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WD(2) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed

23WD(3) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.33
note: Keeping a suspect in custody after investigation period expiration requires magistrate order.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23WD Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an order of a magistrate under Division 5 will have to be obtained to authorise this.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires an investigation period expiration before keeping a suspect in custody.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Require
premise text: (3) This Division does not authorise...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an order of a magistrate under Division 5 will have to be obtained to authorise this.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies the provision as prohibiting keeping a suspect in custody after investigation period expiration using AI.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (3) This Division does not authorise...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an order of a magistrate under Division 5 will have to be obtained to authorise this.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits keeping a suspect in custody after investigation period expiration.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) This Division does not authorise...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an order of a magistrate under Division 5 will have to be obtained to authorise this.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Implies that keeping a suspect in custody after investigation period expiration is not allowed.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Imply
premise text: (3) This Division does not authorise...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an order of a magistrate under Division 5 will have to be obtained to authorise this.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies that keeping a suspect in custody after investigation period expiration is not allowed.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (3) This Division does not authorise...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WD(3) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed

23WD(4) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.33
note: Informed consent allows forensic procedure during investigation period.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wd-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23WD Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows action with consent.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

23WE People who cannot consent to forensic procedures
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.33
note: A child cannot consent to a forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23we-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23we
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23we-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WE People who cannot consent to forensic procedures

23WF Informed consent to forensic procedures—general
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23WF(1) Informed consent to forensic procedures—general
has part: 23WF(2) Informed consent to forensic procedures—general
has part: 23WF(3) Informed consent to forensic procedures—general
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wf
schema version: 2

23WF(1) Informed consent to forensic procedures—general
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
note: Suspect must provide informed consent for forensic procedures.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23WF Informed consent to forensic procedures—general

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide informed consent.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Constable must ask for consent if suspect is not believed to be Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) the constable does not believe on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Constable must ask for consent if suspect is not believed to be Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) a constable intends to ask a suspect to consent to a forensic procedure; and (b) the constable does not believe on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander.

23WF(2) Informed consent to forensic procedures—general
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
note: Informed consent to forensic procedures for suspects not covered by section 23WE.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23WF Informed consent to forensic procedures—general

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Informed consent is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WF(2) Informed consent to forensic procedures—general

23WF(3) Informed consent to forensic procedures—general
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
note: Restricts communication with legal practitioner for suspects in custody
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23WF Informed consent to forensic procedures—general

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Suspect cannot communicate with legal practitioner in private
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Constable has reasonable grounds to suspect evidence destruction

23WG Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23WG(1) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
has part: 23WG(2) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
has part: 23WG(3) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
has part: 23WG(4) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
has part: 23WG(5) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wg
schema version: 2

23WG(1) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
note: Informed consent required for forensic procedures on Aboriginal suspects.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23WG Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the constable believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires informed consent
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (a) a constable intends to ask a suspect to consent...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the constable intends to ask a suspect to consent to a forensic procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires informed consent for forensic procedures
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (1) This section applies where...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the constable believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires informed consent for suspects
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (a) a constable intends to ask a suspect to consent to a forensic procedure; and...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the constable intends to ask a suspect to consent to a forensic procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires informed consent for suspects
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (b) the constable believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the constable believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires informed consent for suspects
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (a) a constable intends to ask a suspect to consent to a forensic procedure; and (b) the constable believes on reasonable grounds that...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WG(1) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal

23WG(2) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
note: Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23WG Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval is between the request and the consent
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for informed consent
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) A suspect not covered by section 23WE gives informed consent to a forensic procedure...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The suspect must give informed consent
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide informed consent
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) A suspect not covered by section 23WE gives informed consent to a forensic procedure...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The constable must comply with the rest of this section
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with the rest of this section
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) A suspect not covered by section 23WE gives informed consent to a forensic procedure...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The constable must inform the suspect of the matters
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Constable must inform the suspect of matters
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) A suspect not covered by section 23WE gives informed consent to a forensic procedure...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval is between the request and the consent
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for informed consent
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) A suspect not covered by section 23WE gives informed consent to a forensic procedure...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WG(2) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal

23WG(3) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
type: Concept
references: sec-23YK
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
note: Constable must not ask suspect to consent to forensic procedure without interview friend present, waiver, or reasonable grounds.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wg-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23WG Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of asking suspect to consent without interview friend present.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) The constable must not ask the suspect...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WG(3) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal

23WG(4) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
note: Notify Aboriginal legal assistance organisation of consent request
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wg-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23WG Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the suspect is to be asked to consent to a forensic procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Notify representative before request
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
premise text: (b) notify such a representative that the suspect is to be asked to consent to a forensic procedure.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the suspect is to be asked to consent to a forensic procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify representative
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) inform the suspect that a representative of an Aboriginal legal assistance organisation will be notified...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the suspect is to be asked to consent to a forensic procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify representative
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) notify such a representative that the suspect is to be asked to consent to a forensic procedure.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WG(4) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal

23WG(5) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
note: Exemption from compliance with subsection (4) under certain circumstances.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-5-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wg-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23WG Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Under the specified circumstances, the exemption applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission from compliance with subsection (4)
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: The constable is not required to comply.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption is justified under this condition.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The exemption is justified by the presence of a legal practitioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: Justification
premise text: The constable is not required to comply with subsection (4) if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-5-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption applies during this time period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The exemption is applicable within the specified circumstances.
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalInclusion
premise text: The constable is not required to comply with subsection (4) if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WG(5) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal

23WH Constable may request suspect to consent to forensic
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.36
note: Constable may request suspect to consent to forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wh-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wh-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wh
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request is obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wh-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WH Constable may request suspect to consent to forensic

23WI Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.36
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23WI(1) Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
has part: 23WI(2) Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
has part: 23WI(3) Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wi
schema version: 2

23WI(1) Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.36
note: Constable must be satisfied on balance of probabilities before requesting forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wi-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23WI Matters to be considered by constable before requesting

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The constable must be satisfied on the balance of probabilities that...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Procedure must occur within specific temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: must
premise text: (1) The constable must be satisfied on the balance of probabilities...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person on whom the forensic procedure is proposed to be carried out is not a child or an incapable person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Constable's decision must be based on evidence and justification
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
premise text: (d) the person on whom the forensic procedure is proposed to be carried out is not a child or an incapable person

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The constable must be satisfied on the balance of probabilities that...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Constable must satisfy conditions before requesting procedure
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (1) The constable must be satisfied on the balance of probabilities...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There are reasonable grounds to believe that the forensic procedure is likely to produce evidence tending to confirm or disprove...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Constable must have reasonable grounds to believe in procedure's likelihood
modality: Epistemic
operator: must
premise text: (b) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the forensic procedure is likely to produce evidence tending to confirm or disprove...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person on whom the forensic procedure is proposed to be carried out is a suspect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Procedure must be carried out in sequence of events
modality: LTL
operator: must
premise text: (a) the person on whom the procedure is proposed to be carried out is a suspect

23WI(2) Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.36
note: Constable must balance public interests when requesting forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wi-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23WI Matters to be considered by constable before requesting

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The constable must balance the public interest...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Constable has an obligation to balance public interests.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) In determining whether a request is justified in all the circumstances...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The constable may balance the public interest...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Constable has permission to consider foreign law enforcement agency requests.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (2) In determining whether a request is justified in all the circumstances...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WI(2) Matters to be considered by constable before requesting

23WI(3) Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.36
note: Constable must consider certain factors when requesting a detention.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wi-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23WI Matters to be considered by constable before requesting

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Consideration of suspect's age is within a reasonable timeframe.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (3) In balancing those interests, the constable must have regard to...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider the seriousness of circumstances and suspect's alleged participation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) In balancing those interests, the constable must have regard to...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Consideration of suspect's age is within a reasonable timeframe.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (3) In balancing those interests, the constable must have regard to...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WI(3) Matters to be considered by constable before requesting

23WJ Matters that suspect must be informed of before giving
type: Concept
description: information about the purpose, offence, and consequences of not consenting
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.38
note: Suspect must be informed of certain matters before giving consent to forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-argumentation-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-alleninterval-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wj
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-alleninterval-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Forensic procedure must occur before certain actions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Informing suspect implies consent to forensic procedure.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform suspect of certain matters before giving consent.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Forensic procedure is a subclass of certain procedures.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS_OF

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Constable knows the suspect's rights and obligations.
modality: Epistemic
operator: KNOWS

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Next step in forensic procedure must be informed to suspect.
modality: LTL
operator: NEXT

23WK Withdrawal of consent
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.41
note: Forensic procedure cannot proceed without consent after withdrawal.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wk-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wk-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wk
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Forensic procedure halted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot proceed
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Consent withdrawn

23WL Recording of giving of information and suspect’s responses
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.42
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23WL(1) Recording of giving of information and suspect’s responses
has part: 23WL(2) Recording of giving of information and suspect’s responses
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wl
schema version: 2

23WL(1) Recording of giving of information and suspect’s responses
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.42
note: Suspect must undergo forensic procedure within a specified time frame after presenting themselves. Constable must ensure information and suspect's responses are tape recorded.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wl-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23WL Recording of giving of information and suspect’s responses

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in any case within the following period: 4 hours after the suspect so presents himself or herself.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Time frame for forensic procedure.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
premise text: (d) in any other case—4 hours after the suspect so presents himself or herself.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the procedure must be carried out as quickly as reasonably possible but in any case within the following period:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Processing of suspect's information.
modality: CogAI
operator: PROCESSING
premise text: (1) If a suspect who is not in custody:...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the procedure must be carried out as quickly as reasonably possible but in any case within the following period:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide forensic procedure within a time frame.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) If a suspect who is not in custody:...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to ensure recording
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the procedure must be carried out as quickly as reasonably possible but in any case within the following period:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about suspect's presentation.
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
premise text: (a) consents to a forensic procedure; and (b) presents himself or herself to the investigating constable to undergo the procedure;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the suspect so presents himself or herself.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of suspect's presentation.
modality: LTL
operator: RECURRING
premise text: (b) presents himself or herself to the investigating constable to undergo the procedure;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WL(1) Recording of giving of information and suspect’s responses

23WL(2) Recording of giving of information and suspect’s responses
type: Concept
description: written record of information and suspect's responses
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.42
note: Exemptions from time limits for forensic procedures Constable must ensure written record of information and suspect's responses is made available to the suspect.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wl-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23WL Recording of giving of information and suspect’s responses

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to disregard time limit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from time limits
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Reasonable time required

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Constable must ensure written record is made.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WL(2) Recording of giving of information and suspect’s responses

23WM Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23WM(1) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
has part: 23WM(2) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
has part: 23WM(2A) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
has part: 23WM(3) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
has part: 23WM(4) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wm
schema version: 2

23WM(1) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.44
note: Authorisation to carry out non-intimate forensic procedure
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23WM Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is authorized to carry out the procedure in accordance with Division 6 and not otherwise.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between authorization and procedure execution
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) A person is authorised to carry out a non-intimate forensic procedure on a suspect by order of a senior police officer under section 23WN.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is authorized to carry out the procedure in accordance with Division 6 and not otherwise.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization exists
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (1) A person is authorised to carry out a non-intimate forensic procedure on a suspect by order of a senior police officer under section 23WN.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is authorized to carry out the procedure in accordance with Division 6 and not otherwise.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between authorization and procedure execution
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (1) A person is authorised to carry out a non-intimate forensic procedure on a suspect by order of a senior police officer under section 23WN.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WM(1) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by

23WM(2) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.44
note: Forensic procedures on children and incapable persons are prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23WM Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Division 23WM(2) excludes forensic procedures on children and incapable persons.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Forensic procedures on children and incapable persons are excluded from Division 23WM(2).
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Excludes
premise text: (2) This Division does not authorise the carrying out of a forensic procedure...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Division 23WM(2) excludes forensic procedures on children and incapable persons.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Forensic procedures on children and incapable persons are excluded from Division 23WM(2).
modality: CogAI
operator: Excludes
premise text: (2) This Division does not authorise the carrying out of a forensic procedure...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Forensic procedures on children and incapable persons are prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits forensic procedures on children and incapable persons.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) This Division does not authorise the carrying out of a forensic procedure...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Division 23WM(2) excludes forensic procedures on children and incapable persons.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Forensic procedures on children and incapable persons are excluded from Division 23WM(2).
modality: Diffusion
operator: Excludes
premise text: (2) This Division does not authorise the carrying out of a forensic procedure...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Division 23WM(2) excludes forensic procedures on children and incapable persons.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Forensic procedures on children and incapable persons are excluded from Division 23WM(2).
modality: LTL
operator: Excludes
premise text: (2) This Division does not authorise the carrying out of a forensic procedure...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WM(2) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by

23WM(2A) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.44
note: Carrying out of forensic procedure on suspect from foreign country or international tribunal is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2a-logic-ltl-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wm-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 23WM Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of carrying out forensic procedure on suspect from foreign country or international tribunal.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2A) This Division does not authorise the carrying out of a forensic procedure on a suspect if the procedure has been requested by: (a) a foreign country or international tribunal; or (b) a foreign law enforcement agency.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2a-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Prohibition of carrying out forensic procedure on suspect from foreign country or international tribunal is absolute and unconditional.
modality: LTL
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2A) This Division does not authorise the carrying out of a forensic procedure on a suspect if the procedure has been requested by: (a) a foreign country or international tribunal; or (b) a foreign law enforcement agency.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WM(2A) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by

23WM(3) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.44
note: Keeping a suspect in custody after investigation period expiration requires magistrate order.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wm-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23WM Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If it is necessary to keep a suspect in custody after the expiration of the Part IC investigation period in order to carry out a forensic procedure, an order of a magistrate under Division 5 will have to be obtained to authorise this.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits keeping a suspect in custody after investigation period expiration.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) This Division does not authorise keeping a suspect in custody, in order to carry out a forensic procedure, after the expiration of the investigation period provided for by Part IC.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WM(3) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by

23WM(4) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.44
note: Permits carrying out of forensic procedure by constable during investigation period.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wm-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23WM Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WM(4) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by

23WN Circumstances in which senior police officer may order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
note: Senior police officer may order non-intimate forensic procedures on suspect in custody under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wn-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wn-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wn
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wn-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WN Circumstances in which senior police officer may order

23WO Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23WO(1) Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
has part: 23WO(2) Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
has part: 23WO(3) Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wo
schema version: 2

23WO(1) Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
note: Senior police officer must be satisfied about suspect's custody and offence relevance before proceeding with forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wo-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23WO Matters to be considered by senior police officer before

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the carrying out of the forensic procedure without consent is justified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Forensic procedure must be justified in all circumstances before proceeding.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (d) the carrying out of the forensic procedure without consent is justified in all the circumstances.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The senior police officer MUST be satisfied...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to satisfy conditions before proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) The senior police officer must be satisfied on the balance of probabilities...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the suspect is in the lawful custody of a constable.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Senior police officer must be satisfied about suspect's custody before proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) The suspect is in the lawful custody of a constable.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...there are reasonable grounds to believe that the suspect committed a relevant offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Senior police officer must be satisfied about offence relevance before proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the suspect committed a relevant offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the forensic procedure is likely to produce evidence tending to confirm or disprove that the suspect committed a relevant offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Senior police officer must be satisfied about evidence relevance before proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (c) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the forensic procedure is likely to produce evidence tending to confirm or disprove...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WO(1) Matters to be considered by senior police officer before

23WO(2) Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
note: Senior police officer must balance public interests when deciding to carry out forensic procedure without consent.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wo-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23WO Matters to be considered by senior police officer before

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The senior police officer must balance public interests within a specific time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Excerpt mentions a specific time frame for balancing public interests.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) In determining whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure without consent is justified in all the circumstances...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The senior police officer must balance the public interest in obtaining evidence against the public interest in upholding the suspect's physical integrity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Excerpt requires balancing competing public interests.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Balance
premise text: (2) In determining whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure without consent is justified in all the circumstances...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The senior police officer must reason about balancing competing public interests.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Excerpt requires reasoning about balancing public interests.
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
premise text: (2) In determining whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure without consent is justified in all the circumstances...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The senior police officer must balance the public interest...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Senior police officer has an obligation to balance public interests.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) In determining whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure without consent is justified in all the circumstances...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The senior police officer must diffuse competing public interests.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Excerpt requires consideration of multiple factors when deciding to carry out forensic procedure without consent.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) In determining whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure without consent is justified in all the circumstances...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WO(2) Matters to be considered by senior police officer before

23WO(3) Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
note: Senior police officer must consider certain matters when making decisions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wo-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23WO Matters to be considered by senior police officer before

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider matters
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WO(3) Matters to be considered by senior police officer before

23WP Record of senior police officer’s order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.46
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23WP(1) Record of senior police officer’s order
has part: 23WP(2) Record of senior police officer’s order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wp
schema version: 2

23WP(1) Record of senior police officer’s order
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.46
note: Senior police officer must make a record of order, including date and time.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wp-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23WP Record of senior police officer’s order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Senior police officer must make a record.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wp-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WP(1) Record of senior police officer’s order

23WP(2) Record of senior police officer’s order
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.46
note: Senior police officer must provide a copy of the record to the suspect.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wp-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23WP Record of senior police officer’s order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wp-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WP(2) Record of senior police officer’s order

23WQ Forensic procedure may be carried out by order of
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.47
note: A person is authorised to carry out a forensic procedure on a suspect by order of a magistrate.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wq
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Forensic procedure may be carried out by order of a magistrate under section 23WS or 23XA
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between magistrate's order and forensic procedure
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
premise text: Section 23WS or 23XA

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person is authorised to carry out a forensic procedure on a suspect by order of a magistrate under section 23WS or 23XA
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of magistrate's order on forensic procedure
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Section 23WS or 23XA

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Forensic procedure may be carried out by order of a magistrate
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization to carry out forensic procedure
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorization
premise text: Section 23WS or 23XA

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person is authorised to carry out a forensic procedure on a suspect by order of a magistrate
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate's obligation to authorise forensic procedure
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 23WS or 23XA

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Forensic procedure may be carried out by order of a magistrate under section 23WS or 23XA
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagated authorization from magistrate to forensic procedure
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: Section 23WS or 23XA

23WR Circumstances in which magistrate may order forensic
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.47
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23WR(1) Circumstances in which magistrate may order forensic
has part: 23WR(2) Circumstances in which magistrate may order forensic
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wr
schema version: 2

23WR(1) Circumstances in which magistrate may order forensic
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.47
note: A magistrate may order a forensic procedure on a suspect under certain circumstances.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23WR Circumstances in which magistrate may order forensic

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate has the power to order a forensic procedure.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

23WR(2) Circumstances in which magistrate may order forensic
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.47
note: Magistrate cannot order forensic procedure requested by foreign law enforcement agency.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23WR Circumstances in which magistrate may order forensic

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request from foreign agency overlaps with magistrate's authority.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Request from foreign agency overlaps with magistrate's authority.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Foreign law enforcement agency requested the procedure.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Magistrate's ordering is blocked by foreign agency request.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Magistrate's ordering is blocked by foreign agency request.
modality: CogAI
operator: IsBlockedBy
premise text: Foreign law enforcement agency requested the procedure.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ordering is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate cannot order forensic procedure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Foreign law enforcement agency requested the procedure.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request from foreign agency diffuses to other agencies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Request from foreign agency diffuses to other agencies.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Foreign law enforcement agency requested the procedure.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request from foreign agency is invalid for magistrate's ordering.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Request from foreign agency is invalid for magistrate's ordering.
modality: SHACL
operator: IsInvalid
premise text: Foreign law enforcement agency requested the procedure.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WR(2) Circumstances in which magistrate may order forensic

23WS Final order for carrying out of forensic procedure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.48
note: Magistrate must order carrying out of forensic procedure under specified conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ws
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: forensic procedure is carried out at some point after subsection 23WR(1) applies
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Forensic procedure must be carried out after subsection 23WR(1) applies.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: subsection 23WR(1) applies

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: magistrate is required to order carrying out of forensic procedure
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must order carrying out of forensic procedure.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: subsection 23WR(1) applies

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: magistrate has discretion to order carrying out of forensic procedure
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate may consider carrying out of forensic procedure.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: section 23WT applies

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: magistrate has discretion to order carrying out of forensic procedure and section 23WT applies
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Magistrate must consider carrying out of forensic procedure and section 23WT applies.
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
premise text: subsection 23WR(1) applies and section 23WT applies

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: forensic procedure is carried out at some point before subsection 23WR(1) applies
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Forensic procedure may be carried out before subsection 23WR(1) applies.
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: section 23WT applies

23WT Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.48
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23WT(1) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
has part: 23WT(2) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
has part: 23WT(3) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
has part: 23WT(4) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wt
schema version: 2

23WT(1) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.48
note: Magistrate must be satisfied on the balance of probabilities that certain conditions are met before ordering a forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wt-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23WT Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that the forensic procedure is likely to produce evidence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: There are reasonable grounds to believe that the forensic procedure is likely to produce evidence tending to confirm or disprove that the suspect committed a relevant offence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (c) There are reasonable...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must be satisfied on the balance of probabilities.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) The magistrate MUST be satisfied...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The carrying out of the forensic procedure is justified in all circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (d) The carrying out...is justified in all the circumstances.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...has been requested by a foreign country or an international tribunal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A constable has been authorized by the Attorney-General to apply for an order under this Part.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (ca) If the forensic procedure...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that there are reasonable grounds to believe...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: There are reasonable grounds to believe that the suspect committed a relevant offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) On the evidence before...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WT(1) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering

23WT(2) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.48
note: Balance public interests when ordering forensic procedures.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wt-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23WT Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the magistrate must:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Public interest balancing
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) In determining...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WT(2) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering

23WT(3) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.48
note: Consider matters before ordering a forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wt-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23WT Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The matter >= ordering a forensic procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Matters are considered before ordering a forensic procedure.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (3) In balancing those interests, the magistrate must have regard to...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the magistrate considers the matter, then it implies ordering a forensic procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Consideration by the magistrate implies ordering a forensic procedure.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (3) In balancing those interests, the magistrate must have regard to...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consideration IS-A cognitive process.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Consideration by the magistrate is a cognitive process.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
premise text: (3) In balancing those interests, the magistrate must have regard to...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The magistrate MUST consider the matters.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must consider the matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) In balancing those interests, the magistrate must have regard to...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consideration IS-A forensic procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Consideration by the magistrate is related to forensic procedures.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-A
premise text: (3) In balancing those interests, the magistrate must have regard to...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WT(3) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering

23WT(4) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.48
note: Magistrate must consider religious beliefs of suspect in forensic procedure
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wt-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23WT Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The magistrate must consider the religious beliefs of the suspect during the forensic procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between consideration and procedure
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (4) Without limiting the matters that the magistrate may take into account...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consideration of the religious beliefs of the suspect will be processed through artificial intelligence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: Through
premise text: (4) Without limiting the matters that the magistrate may take into account...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The magistrate must consider the religious beliefs of the suspect.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider religious beliefs
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (4) Without limiting the matters that the magistrate may take into account...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consideration of the religious beliefs of the suspect will be spread through the forensic procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of consideration to other procedures
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
premise text: (4) Without limiting the matters that the magistrate may take into account...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The magistrate must consider the religious beliefs of the suspect until the forensic procedure is completed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between consideration and procedure
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (4) Without limiting the matters that the magistrate may take into account...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WT(4) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering

23WU Application for order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23WU(1) Application for order
has part: 23WU(2) Application for order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wu
schema version: 2

23WU(1) Application for order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
note: Authorized applicant may apply for order to arrange forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wu-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23WU Application for order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WU(1) Application for order

23WU(2) Application for order
type: Concept
description: Evidence on oath or affidavit, suspect's presence (subject to magistrate's order)
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
note: Application for order must be made in writing, supported by evidence, and specify type of forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wu-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23WU Application for order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made in writing and supported by evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Suspect's presence is required (subject to magistrate's order).
modality: Deontic
operator: BE

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Type of forensic procedure must be specified.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SPECIFY

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WU(2) Application for order

23WV Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect in
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23WV(1) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect in
has part: 23WV(2) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect in
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wv
schema version: 2

23WV(1) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect in
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
note: Magistrate must issue warrant for suspect's temporary custody.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wv-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wv-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23WV Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect in

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate has an obligation to issue a warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WV(1) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect in

23WV(2) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect in
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
note: Return suspect to original custody without delay if application is refused or order is made at the end of detention period.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wv-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wv-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23WV Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect in

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Return suspect without delay
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to return suspect
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Application refused or order made at end of detention period

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WV(2) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect in

23WW Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23WW(1) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
has part: 23WW(2) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
has part: 23WW(3) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
has part: 23WW(4) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
has part: 23WW(5) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ww
schema version: 2

23WW(1) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
note: Magistrate may issue summons or warrant for suspect's appearance at hearing.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ww-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23WW Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate may issue summons or warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WW(1) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in

23WW(2) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
type: Concept
description: Information on oath, Affidavit
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
note: Application for summons must be made by information on oath and accompanied by affidavit.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ww-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23WW Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made by information on oath.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Affidavit must accompany application.
modality: Deontic
operator: ACCOMPANIED BY

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WW(2) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in

23WW(3) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
note: Magistrate must issue summons only if necessary to ensure suspect's appearance at hearing.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ww-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23WW Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must issue summons.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) The magistrate may issue a summons only if satisfied:

23WW(4) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
type: Concept
description: Information on oath, affidavit
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
note: Application for warrant must be made by information on oath and accompanied by affidavit.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ww-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23WW Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made by information on oath and accompanied by affidavit.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WW(4) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in

23WW(5) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
note: Magistrate may not issue warrant without justification.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ww-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23WW Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Justification condition for warrant issuance
modality: Deontic
operator: justifiedBy
premise text: (5) The magistrate may issue a warrant only if satisfied: (a) that the arrest is necessary to ensure the appearance of the suspect at the hearing of the application, and that the issue of a summons would not ensure that appearance; or (b) that the suspect might destroy evidence that might be obtained by carrying out the forensic procedure; or (c) that the issue of the warrant is otherwise justified.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Alternative justification condition for warrant issuance
modality: Deontic
operator: otherwiseJustifiedBy
premise text: (5) The magistrate may issue a warrant only if satisfied: (a) that the arrest is necessary to ensure the appearance of the suspect at the hearing of the application, and that the issue of a summons would not ensure that appearance; or (b) that the suspect might destroy evidence that might be obtained by carrying out the forensic procedure; or (c) that the issue of the warrant is otherwise justified.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WW(5) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in

23WX Procedure at hearing of application for order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
note: Order may only be made in presence of suspect concerned
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wx
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The order must be made in the presence of the suspect concerned
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Presence required for order
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
premise text: (1) An order may only be made in the presence of the suspect concerned

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A contrary order can be made by the magistrate
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Contrary orders allowed
modality: Deontic
operator: subjectTo
premise text: (1) An order may only be made in the presence of the suspect concerned, subject to any contrary order made by the magistrate.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The order must be made in the presence of the suspect concerned
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Order must be made in presence of suspect concerned
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
premise text: (1) An order may only be made in the presence of the suspect concerned, subject to any contrary order made by the magistrate.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The excerpt is a part of the procedure at hearing
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies as part of procedure at hearing
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
premise text: (1) An order may only be made in the presence of the suspect concerned, subject to any contrary order made by the magistrate.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The presence is required for the order
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Presence required for order
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
premise text: (1) An order may only be made in the presence of the suspect concerned, subject to any contrary order made by the magistrate.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WX Procedure at hearing of application for order

23WY Making of order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.52
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23WY(1) Making of order
has part: 23WY(2) Making of order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wy
schema version: 2

23WY(1) Making of order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.52
note: Magistrate must give reasons, keep written record, order suspect to attend, and inform of reasonable force use.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wy-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wy-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23WY Making of order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must perform actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

23WY(2) Making of order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.52
note: Directions for procedure timing, place, and manner
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wy-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wy-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wy-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23wy-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23WY Making of order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wy-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wy-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate's discretion
modality: Deontic
operator: may

23XA Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.53
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23XA(1) Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure
has part: 23XA(2) Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure
has part: 23XA(3) Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xa
schema version: 2

23XA(1) Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.53
note: Magistrate may make interim order for carrying out forensic procedure without delay under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xa-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23XA Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate may make interim order
modality: Deontic
operator: May

23XA(2) Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.53
note: Interim order operates until confirmed or disallowed by a magistrate.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xa-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23XA Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds true for interim orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds

23XA(3) Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.53
note: Subdivision B applies in relation to an order confirming the interim order
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xa-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23XA Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subdivision B applies
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

23XB Application for interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23XB(1) Application for interim order
has part: 23XB(2) Application for interim order
has part: 23XB(3) Application for interim order
has part: 23XB(4) Application for interim order
has part: 23XB(5) Application for interim order
has part: 23XB(6) Application for interim order
has part: 23XB(7) Application for interim order
has part: 23XB(8) Application for interim order
has part: 23XB(9) Application for interim order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xb
schema version: 2

23XB(1) Application for interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
note: Authorized applicant may apply for interim order without delay.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23XB Application for interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorized applicant has the right to apply for interim order.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XB(1) Application for interim order

23XB(2) Application for interim order
type: Concept
description: Evidence on oath or affidavit
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
note: Application for interim order must be supported by evidence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23XB Application for interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application for interim order is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Application for interim order is a requirement.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XB(2) Application for interim order

23XB(3) Application for interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
note: Methods for making an application for interim order
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23XB Application for interim order

23XB(4) Application for interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
note: Must be present when application is made.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xb-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23XB Application for interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be present
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) The suspect must be in the presence of the authorised applicant when the application is made.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XB(4) Application for interim order

23XB(5) Application for interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
note: Presence of interview friend or legal representative required for suspect
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xb-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23XB Application for interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Interview friend or legal representative must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During interview, friend or legal representative must be present
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (5) If the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Interview friend or legal representative must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: During interview, friend or legal representative must be present
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (5) If the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An interview friend or legal representative must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires presence of interview friend or legal representative
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (5) If the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Interview friend or legal representative must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: During interview, friend or legal representative must be present
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (5) If the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Interview friend or legal representative must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: During interview, friend or legal representative must be present
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (5) If the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XB(5) Application for interim order

23XB(6) Application for interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
note: Authorised applicant must have interview friend or legal representative present if suspect is Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander not covered by subsection (5).
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xb-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 23XB Application for interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an interview friend or legal representative of the suspect must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for the requirement to have an interview friend or legal representative present.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (6) If the applicant believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by subsection (5),

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an interview friend or legal representative of the suspect must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal interval for the requirement to have an interview friend or legal representative present.
modality: CogAI
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (6) If the applicant believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by subsection (5),

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an interview friend or legal representative of the suspect must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must have interview friend or legal representative present.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (6) If the applicant believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by subsection (5),

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an interview friend or legal representative of the suspect must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval for the requirement to have an interview friend or legal representative present.
modality: Diffusion
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (6) If the applicant believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by subsection (5),

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an interview friend or legal representative of the suspect must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for the requirement to have an interview friend or legal representative present.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (6) If the applicant believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by subsection (5),

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XB(6) Application for interim order

23XB(7) Application for interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
note: Exemption from subsection (6) for applicants with reasonable grounds
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xb-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 23XB Application for interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to the applicant
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: Subsection (6) does not apply if...

23XB(8) Application for interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
note: Must be in the presence of authorized applicant if legal representative is present.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xb-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 23XB Application for interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Suspect meets temporal relationship with authorized applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between legal representative and suspect.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
premise text: Legal representative is present.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Suspect must also be in the presence of authorized applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be in the presence of authorized applicant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Legal representative is present.

23XB(9) Application for interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
note: Excluding interview friend from applicant's presence under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-9-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xb-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 23XB Application for interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits exclusion of interview friend from applicant's presence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (9) In spite of subsection (5) or (6), the suspect’s interview friend may be excluded...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-9-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XB(9) Application for interim order

23XC Procedure at hearing of application for interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.55
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23XC(1) Procedure at hearing of application for interim order
has part: 23XC(2) Procedure at hearing of application for interim order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xc
schema version: 2

23XC(1) Procedure at hearing of application for interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.55
note: Ensure suspect, legal representative, and interview friend are given opportunity to speak.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23XC Procedure at hearing of application for interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure action is taken
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XC(1) Procedure at hearing of application for interim order

23XC(2) Procedure at hearing of application for interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.55
note: Ensure written submission or oral communication for suspect and legal representative.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23XC Procedure at hearing of application for interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...within a specific time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Ensure communication within a specific time frame.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) If the application is made by...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...written submission or oral communication.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure written submission or oral communication.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Magistrate must ensure...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XC(2) Procedure at hearing of application for interim order

23XD Making of interim order
type: Concept
description: Information about interim order
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.55
note: Magistrate must inform applicant personally or by telephone.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xd-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xd-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xd-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xd
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xd-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must inform applicant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xd-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Informing is a form of communication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xd-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XD Making of interim order

23XE Records of application and interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23XE(1) Records of application and interim order
has part: 23XE(2) Records of application and interim order
has part: 23XE(3) Records of application and interim order
has part: 23XE(4) Records of application and interim order
has part: 23XE(5) Records of application and interim order
has part: 23XE(6) Records of application and interim order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xe
schema version: 2

23XE(1) Records of application and interim order
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
note: Applicant must make a record of application and grounds for interim order.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xe-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23XE Records of application and interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicant must make a record.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XE(1) Records of application and interim order

23XE(2) Records of application and interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
note: Send a copy of the applicant's record to the magistrate as soon as practicable.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xe-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23XE Records of application and interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to send a copy of the record
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

23XE(3) Records of application and interim order
type: Concept
description: (a) the application; (b) the grounds for seeking the order; (c) the order made; (d) the date and time when the order was made; (e) the reasons for making it
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
note: Record of interim order made by magistrate
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xe-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23XE Records of application and interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Record is made at a specific date and time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (3) The magistrate must, at the time of, or as soon as practicable after, making an interim order...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Magistrate's record implies that the application and grounds for seeking the order are provided
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (3) The magistrate must, at the time of, or as soon as practicable after, making an interim order...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Record is a part of forensic procedures on suspect by order of a magistrate
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: (3) The magistrate must, at the time of, or as soon as practicable after, making an interim order...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must make record of interim order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) The magistrate must, at the time of, or as soon as practicable after, making an interim order...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Record is a part of forensic procedures on suspect by order of a magistrate
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: (3) The magistrate must, at the time of, or as soon as practicable after, making an interim order...

23XE(4) Records of application and interim order
type: Concept
description: Record
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
note: Must send a copy of the record to the applicant
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xe-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23XE Records of application and interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The magistrate must send a copy of the record to the applicant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

23XE(5) Records of application and interim order
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
note: Must provide suspect with copies of records
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xe-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23XE Records of application and interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During application period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: as soon as practicable after the applicant receives the magistrate’s record

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

23XE(6) Records of application and interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
note: Order has no effect if records do not match
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xe-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 23XE Records of application and interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order has no effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !
premise text: Applicant's record does not match Magistrate's record

23XF Suspect may be prevented from destroying or contaminating
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.57
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23XF(1) Suspect may be prevented from destroying or contaminating
has part: 23XF(2) Suspect may be prevented from destroying or contaminating
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xf
schema version: 2

23XF(1) Suspect may be prevented from destroying or contaminating
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.57
note: Prevent suspect from destroying or contaminating evidence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23XF Suspect may be prevented from destroying or contaminating

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xf-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XF(1) Suspect may be prevented from destroying or contaminating

23XF(2) Suspect may be prevented from destroying or contaminating
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.57
note: Prevents carrying out forensic procedures before interim order is made
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xf-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23XF Suspect may be prevented from destroying or contaminating

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No one may carry out a forensic procedure before an interim order is made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) Nothing in this section authorises any person to carry out a forensic procedure before an interim order is made.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xf-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If no interim order has been made, then no one may carry out a forensic procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Establishes the relationship between the prohibition and the condition
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: (2) Nothing in this section authorises any person to carry out a forensic procedure before an interim order is made.

23XG Results of forensic procedure carried out under interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.57
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23XG(1) Results of forensic procedure carried out under interim order
has part: 23XG(2) Results of forensic procedure carried out under interim order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xg
schema version: 2

23XG(1) Results of forensic procedure carried out under interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.57
note: Analysis of sample under interim order is prohibited unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23XG Results of forensic procedure carried out under interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for analysis
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (a) the sample is likely to perish before a final order is made

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of analysis
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A sample taken under an interim order must not be analysed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XG(1) Results of forensic procedure carried out under interim order

23XG(2) Results of forensic procedure carried out under interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.57
note: Disclosing analysis results before final order is made or if interim order is disallowed.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23XG Results of forensic procedure carried out under interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not intentionally disclose the results...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (2) A person who conducts an analysis...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XG(2) Results of forensic procedure carried out under interim order

23XH Restrictions on publication
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.61
note: Restrictions on publication of suspect information
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xh-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xh-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xh
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits intentional publication of suspect information
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: None

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xh-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XH Restrictions on publication

23XI General rules for carrying out forensic procedures
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.62
note: Forensic procedures must be carried out under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xi-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xi-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xi-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xi-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xi
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xi-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must not be carried out in the presence or view of a person who is of the opposite sex to the suspect.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits carrying out forensic procedures in certain circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Forensic procedure must be carried out in circumstances affording reasonable privacy to the suspect.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xi-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must not be carried out while the suspect is being questioned as defined in subsection 23B(6).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits carrying out forensic procedures in certain circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Forensic procedure must be carried out while the suspect is not being questioned as defined in subsection 23B(6).

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xi-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must not involve more visual inspection than is necessary for the carrying out of the procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits carrying out forensic procedures in certain circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Forensic procedure must be carried out in circumstances affording reasonable privacy to the suspect.

23XJ Use of force in carrying out forensic procedures
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.63
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23XJ(1) Use of force in carrying out forensic procedures
has part: 23XJ(2) Use of force in carrying out forensic procedures
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xj
schema version: 2

23XJ(1) Use of force in carrying out forensic procedures
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.63
note: Authorised person may use reasonable force to carry out forensic procedures.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xj-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23XJ Use of force in carrying out forensic procedures

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorised person may use reasonable force.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XJ(1) Use of force in carrying out forensic procedures

23XJ(2) Use of force in carrying out forensic procedures
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.63
note: All forensic procedures must be carried out in accordance with professional standards.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xj-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23XJ Use of force in carrying out forensic procedures

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XJ(2) Use of force in carrying out forensic procedures

23XK Forensic procedures not to be carried out in cruel, inhuman
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.63
note: Forensic procedures must not be carried out in cruel, inhuman or degrading manner.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xk-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xk-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xk
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits carrying out forensic procedures in cruel, inhuman or degrading manner.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xk-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XK Forensic procedures not to be carried out in cruel, inhuman

23XL Taking of hair samples
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.63
note: Authorisation for taking hair samples under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xl
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Permission granted to take a sample of hair.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission for a specific action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: The person takes only so much hair as the person believes is necessary

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must use the least painful technique.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposing an obligation on the person taking the sample.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The sample is taken using the least painful technique known and available to the person.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This action must not cause unnecessary pain or discomfort.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibiting certain actions for taking hair samples.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: The sample is not taken using a technique that causes unnecessary pain or discomfort.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Permission granted to take a sample of hair.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission for the person to take hair samples under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: The sample is taken using the least painful technique known and available to the person.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This action is not mandatory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting a right to the suspect to refuse taking a hair sample.
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
premise text: The person must inform the suspect that they have the right to refuse taking a sample of hair.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XL Taking of hair samples

23XM Persons who may carry out forensic procedures
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.63
note: Specifies persons who may carry out forensic procedures under this Part.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xm-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xm
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xm-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XM Persons who may carry out forensic procedures

23XN Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.68
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23XN(1) Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
has part: 23XN(2) Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
has part: 23XN(3) Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xn
schema version: 2

23XN(1) Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.68
note: Forensic procedures must be carried out by a person of the same sex as the suspect.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23XN Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) If practicable, an intimate forensic procedure (other than the taking of a sample of blood or a dental impression) is to be carried out: (a) if the suspect is an adult—by a person of the same sex as the suspect; or (b) if the suspect is a child—by a person of the sex chosen by the suspect or, if the suspect does not wish to make such a choice, by a person of the same sex as the suspect.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be carried out by a person of the same sex as the suspect.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) If practicable, an intimate forensic procedure (other than the taking of a sample of blood or a dental impression) is to be carried out: (a) if the suspect is an adult—by a person of the same sex as the suspect; or (b) if the suspect is a child—by a person of the sex chosen by the suspect or, if the suspect does not wish to make such a choice, by a person of the same sex as the suspect.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XN(1) Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by

23XN(2) Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.68
note: Forensic procedures must be carried out by a person of the same sex as the suspect.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23XN Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a specific time frame
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The procedure must be carried out within a specific time frame.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) If practicable, a non-intimate forensic procedure for which the suspect is required to remove clothing other than his or her...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a cognitive agent
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The procedure must be recognized by a cognitive agent.
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNIZES
premise text: (2) If practicable, a non-intimate forensic procedure for which the suspect is required to remove clothing other than his or her...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a person of the same sex as the suspect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be carried out by a person of the same sex as the suspect.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If practicable, a non-intimate forensic procedure for which the suspect is required to remove clothing other than his or her...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: all relevant parties
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The procedure must be carried out in a way that spreads to all relevant parties.
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
premise text: (2) If practicable, a non-intimate forensic procedure for which the suspect is required to remove clothing other than his or her...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a recursive manner
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The procedure must be carried out in a recursive manner.
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
premise text: (2) If practicable, a non-intimate forensic procedure for which the suspect is required to remove clothing other than his or her...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XN(2) Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by

23XN(3) Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.68
note: Person asked under section 23XO to help carry out forensic procedure must be of same sex as suspect or chosen by suspect if child.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xn-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23XN Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Forensic procedure must be carried out within same temporal interval as suspect's age.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (3) If practicable, a person asked under section 23XO to help carry out a forensic procedure...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be of same sex as suspect or chosen by suspect if child.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) If practicable, a person asked under section 23XO to help carry out a forensic procedure...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must not be inappropriate to help carry out forensic procedure.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
premise text: (3) If practicable, a person asked under section 23XO to help carry out a forensic procedure...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Forensic procedure must be carried out within same temporal interval as suspect's age.
modality: Diffusion
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (3) If practicable, a person asked under section 23XO to help carry out a forensic procedure...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Forensic procedure must be carried out within same temporal interval as suspect's age.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (3) If practicable, a person asked under section 23XO to help carry out a forensic procedure...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XN(3) Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by

23XO Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.69
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23XO(1) Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
has part: 23XO(2) Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
has part: 23XO(3) Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xo
schema version: 2

23XO(1) Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.69
note: A person authorized to carry out a forensic procedure can ask for help.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xo-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23XO Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XO(1) Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures

23XO(2) Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.69
note: A person is not required to be a specific type for help with forensic procedures.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xo-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23XO Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures

23XO(3) Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.69
note: Use reasonable force to enable a forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xo-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23XO Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Enabling occurs during the carrying out of the procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between enabling and carrying out.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) A person who is asked to help carry out a forensic procedure may...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If enabling occurs, then the procedure can be carried out.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication from enabling and carrying out.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (3) A person who is asked to help carry out a forensic procedure may...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Use reasonable force to enable the forensic procedure to be carried out.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to use reasonable force.
modality: Deontic
operator: use
premise text: (3) A person who is asked to help carry out a forensic procedure may...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Enable the forensic procedure to be carried out.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to enable the forensic procedure.
modality: Deontic
operator: enable
premise text: (3) A person who is asked to help carry out a forensic procedure may...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation to enable diffuses through the person's actions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation through enabling.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (3) A person who is asked to help carry out a forensic procedure may...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XO(3) Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures

23XP Medical practitioner or dentist of suspect’s choice may be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23XP(1) Medical practitioner or dentist of suspect’s choice may be
has part: 23XP(2) Medical practitioner or dentist of suspect’s choice may be
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xp
schema version: 2

23XP(1) Medical practitioner or dentist of suspect’s choice may be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
note: Suspect has right to request medical practitioner or dentist of choice during forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xp-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23XP Medical practitioner or dentist of suspect’s choice may be

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses right to request medical practitioner or dentist.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xp-ss-1-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 23XP(1) Medical practitioner or dentist of suspect’s choice may be

23XP(2) Medical practitioner or dentist of suspect’s choice may be
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
note: Expert chosen may not be required to attend forensic procedure under certain circumstances.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xp-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23XP Medical practitioner or dentist of suspect’s choice may be

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

23XQ Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23XQ(1) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
has part: 23XQ(2) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
has part: 23XQ(3) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xq
schema version: 2

23XQ(1) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
note: Presence of interview friend or legal representative required for children
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23XQ Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires presence during interview
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) This section applies if the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implies need for interview friend or legal representative
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (1) This section applies if the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Requires cognitive AI to facilitate interview friend or legal representative
modality: CogAI
operator: requires
premise text: (1) This section applies if the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires presence of interview friend or legal representative
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (1) This section applies if the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Requires diffusion of information to interview friend or legal representative
modality: Diffusion
operator: requires
premise text: (1) This section applies if the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XQ(1) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children

23XQ(2) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
note: Presence of interview friend or legal representative required during forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23XQ Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for presence is during the forensic procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for presence requirement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The presence of an individual is justified by their role in the forensic procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Rational justification for presence requirement.
modality: Argumentation
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Either an interview friend or a legal representative must be present.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Presence of interview friend or legal representative is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The spread of the presence requirement is to all individuals involved in the forensic procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of presence requirement.
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal trace for presence is during the forensic procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal trace for presence requirement.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XQ(2) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children

23XQ(3) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
note: Excluding interview friends from forensic procedures
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xq-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23XQ Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The interval of interference overlaps with the procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Identifies overlapping intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) An interview friend unreasonably interferes with or obstructs the carrying out of the procedure.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exclusion of an interview friend is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits excluding interview friends
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) An interview friend (other than a legal representative) of the suspect may be excluded from the place where the forensic procedure is being carried out...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The interference or obstruction is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits obstructing or interfering with procedures
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) An interview friend unreasonably interferes with or obstructs the carrying out of the procedure.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The unreasonable behavior is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits unreasonable behavior
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) An interview friend unreasonably interferes with or obstructs the carrying out of the procedure.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XQ(3) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children

23XR Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.71
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23XR(1) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
has part: 23XR(2) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
has part: 23XR(3) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
has part: 23XR(4) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xr
schema version: 2

23XR(1) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.71
note: Investigating constable must believe on reasonable grounds that suspect is Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander not covered by section 23XQ.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23XR Presence of interview friend or legal representative—

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Belief must be on reasonable grounds
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (1) This section applies if the investigating constable believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by section 23XQ.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must believe on reasonable grounds
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) This section applies if the investigating constable believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by section 23XQ.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Believe on reasonable grounds
modality: Deontic
operator: BELIEVE
premise text: (1) This section applies if the investigating constable believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by section 23XQ.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to investigating constable
modality: Deontic
operator: APPLIES_TO
premise text: (1) This section applies if the investigating constable believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by section 23XQ.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Belief must be on reasonable grounds
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: (1) This section applies if the investigating constable believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by section 23XQ.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XR(1) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—

23XR(2) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.71
note: Presence of interview friend or legal representative required during forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23XR Presence of interview friend or legal representative—

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for presence includes the time during which the forensic procedure is carried out.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for presence of interview friend or legal representative.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rationale is that either an interview friend or a legal representative must be present.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Rationale for requiring presence of interview friend or legal representative.
modality: Argumentation
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Either an interview friend or a legal representative must be present.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Presence of interview friend or legal representative is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The presence requirement spreads to related individuals.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of presence requirement to related individuals.
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal trace includes the time during which the forensic procedure is carried out.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal trace for presence of interview friend or legal representative.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XR(2) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—

23XR(3) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.71
note: Waiver of interview friend presence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xr-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23XR Presence of interview friend or legal representative—

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the suspect expressly and voluntarily waives his or her right...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to waive interview friend presence
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Subsection (2) does not apply if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...waiver under subsection (3).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Voluntary waiver of interview friend presence
modality: Deontic
operator: Waive
premise text: ...the suspect expressly and voluntarily waives his or her right...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the suspect expressly and voluntarily waives his or her right...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Waiver of interview friend presence obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
premise text: Subsection (2) does not apply if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that, having regard to the suspect’s level of education and understanding...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Investigating constable's belief about suspect's understanding
modality: Epistemic
operator: Believe
premise text: the investigating constable believes on reasonable grounds...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the suspect expressly and voluntarily waives his or her right...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for waiver consideration
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
premise text: Subsection (3) does not apply if...

23XR(4) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.71
note: Excluding an interview friend from a forensic procedure if they unreasonably interfere.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xr-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23XR Presence of interview friend or legal representative—

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An interview friend may not be excluded if they unreasonably interfere.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits excluding an interview friend from a forensic procedure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) An interview friend (other than a legal representative) of the suspect may be excluded...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to exclude the interview friend if they unreasonably interfere.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on excluding an interview friend if they unreasonably interfere.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (4) An interview friend (other than a legal representative)...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exclusion is prohibited if it involves unreasonably interfering with the procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reiterates the prohibition on excluding an interview friend.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) An interview friend (other than a legal representative)...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prohibition applies during the time the interview friend unreasonably interferes.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Traces the temporal interval of the prohibition.
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
premise text: (4) An interview friend (other than a legal representative)...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XR(4) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—

23XS Presence of constables
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.71
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23XS(1) Presence of constables
has part: 23XS(2) Presence of constables
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xs
schema version: 2

23XS(1) Presence of constables
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.71
note: Limitation on number of constables present during forensic procedure
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xs-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23XS Presence of constables

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not exceed that which is reasonably necessary
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Maximum number limit
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
premise text: (1) The number of constables that may be present...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XS(1) Presence of constables

23XS(2) Presence of constables
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.71
note: Constable's presence is necessary for effective forensic procedure
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xs-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23XS Presence of constables

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The constable's presence overlaps with forensic procedure
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Constable's presence overlaps with forensic procedure
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) Where the presence of a constable...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The constable's presence implies effective forensic procedure
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Constable's presence implies effective forensic procedure
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (2) Where the presence of a constable...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The constable's presence is recognized as necessary for effective forensic procedure
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Constable's presence is recognized as necessary for effective forensic procedure
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (2) Where the presence of a constable...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The constable's presence is necessary
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Presence of constable is necessary
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (2) Where the presence of a constable...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The constable's presence diffuses to all who can ensure effective procedure
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Constable's presence diffuses to all who can ensure effective procedure
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) Where the presence of a constable...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XS(2) Presence of constables

23XT Recording of forensic procedure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.72
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23XT(1) Recording of forensic procedure
has part: 23XT(2) Recording of forensic procedure
has part: 23XT(3) Recording of forensic procedure
has part: 23XT(4) Recording of forensic procedure
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xt
schema version: 2

23XT(1) Recording of forensic procedure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.72
note: Carrying out of a forensic procedure must be video recorded unless the suspect objects or the recording is not practicable.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xt-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23XT Recording of forensic procedure

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to record forensic procedure
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XT(1) Recording of forensic procedure

23XT(2) Recording of forensic procedure
type: Concept
description: Reasons for video recording and protection provided by the video recording.
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.72
note: Suspect must be informed of video recording before forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xt-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23XT Recording of forensic procedure

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform suspect.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XT(2) Recording of forensic procedure

23XT(3) Recording of forensic procedure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.72
note: No right to object to video recording of forensic procedure for Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander friends
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xt-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23XT Recording of forensic procedure

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Video recording is not subject to section 23XQ
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Video recording overlaps with interview friend's powers
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Section 23YE gives interview friends general powers

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No right to object
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits objecting to video recording
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 23YE gives interview friends general powers

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition is justified
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Justifies prohibition on objecting to video recording
modality: Deontic
operator: Justify
premise text: Section 23YE gives interview friends general powers

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XT(3) Recording of forensic procedure

23XT(4) Recording of forensic procedure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.72
note: Forensic procedure must be carried out in the presence of an independent person.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xt-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23XT Recording of forensic procedure

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval: presence of an independent person.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) If the carrying out of the forensic procedure is not to be video recorded, the forensic procedure must be carried out in the presence of an independent person (not a constable). Subdivision F—Procedure after forensic procedure is carried out

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence: presence of an independent person.
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) If the carrying out of the forensic procedure is not to be video recorded, the forensic procedure must be carried out in the presence of an independent person (not a constable). Subdivision F—Procedure after forensic procedure is carried out

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forensic procedure must be carried out in the presence of an independent person.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information: presence of an independent person.
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) If the carrying out of the forensic procedure is not to be video recorded, the forensic procedure must be carried out in the presence of an independent person (not a constable). Subdivision F—Procedure after forensic procedure is carried out

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval: carrying out of the forensic procedure.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) If the carrying out of the forensic procedure is not to be video recorded, the forensic procedure must be carried out in the presence of an independent person (not a constable). Subdivision F—Procedure after forensic procedure is carried out

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XT(4) Recording of forensic procedure

23XU Samples—sufficient material to share
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.73
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23XU(1) Samples—sufficient material to share
has part: 23XU(2) Samples—sufficient material to share
has part: 23XU(3) Samples—sufficient material to share
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xu
schema version: 2

23XU(1) Samples—sufficient material to share
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.73
note: Sharing of sample material with suspect
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xu-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23XU Samples—sufficient material to share

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The request to share the sample material overlaps with the analysis.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between request and analysis
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a sample is taken from a suspect under this Part; and (b) the suspect requests the investigating constable that the sample be shared;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the conditions are met, then there is sufficient material to share.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference of sufficiency from conditions
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a sample is taken from a suspect under this Part; and (b) the suspect requests the investigating constable that the sample be shared;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is sufficient material to be analysed both in the investigation of the offence and on behalf of the suspect.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to share sample material
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (a) a sample is taken from a suspect under this Part; and (b) the suspect requests the investigating constable that the sample be shared;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The request to share the sample material spreads through the investigation.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of request through investigation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a sample is taken from a suspect under this Part; and (b) the suspect requests the investigating constable that the sample be shared;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The request to share the sample material occurs before or at the same time as the analysis.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between request and analysis
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a sample is taken from a suspect under this Part; and (b) the suspect requests the investigating constable that the sample be shared;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XU(1) Samples—sufficient material to share

23XU(2) Samples—sufficient material to share
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.73
note: The investigating constable must invite the suspect to nominate an accredited laboratory.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xu-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23XU Samples—sufficient material to share

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The investigating constable must invite the suspect.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XU(2) Samples—sufficient material to share

23XU(3) Samples—sufficient material to share
type: Concept
description: True
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.73
note: Must provide material to accredited laboratory within 28 days
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xu-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23XU Samples—sufficient material to share

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide material to accredited laboratory within 28 days
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XU(3) Samples—sufficient material to share

23XV Photographs
type: Concept
description: True
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.75
note: Suspect must be provided with a copy of the photograph taken during forensic procedure.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xv-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xv-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xv
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xv-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide copy of photograph to suspect
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xv-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XV Photographs

23XW Results of analysis
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.75
note: Must provide analysis results to suspect upon request.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xw-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xw-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xw-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xw
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide analysis results to suspect upon request.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xw-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Investigating constable knows analysis results.
modality: Epistemic
operator: KNOWS

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xw-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XW Results of analysis

23XX Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.97
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23XX(1) Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
has part: 23XX(2) Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
has part: 23XX(3) Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xx
schema version: 2

23XX(1) Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.97
note: Prohibition on using evidence from improper forensic procedures
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xx-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23XX Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of evidence from improper forensic procedures
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) This section applies...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XX(1) Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic

23XX(2) Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.97
note: Exemptions from inadmissibility of improper forensic evidence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xx-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23XX Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XX(2) Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic

23XX(3) Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.97
note: Excludes evidence from improper forensic procedures.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xx-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23XX Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of evidence from improper forensic procedures.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) This section applies to: (a) evidence of forensic material, or evidence consisting of forensic material, taken from the person by the forensic procedure;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on those who would use such evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) This section applies to: (a) evidence of forensic material, or evidence consisting of forensic material, taken from the person by the forensic procedure;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XX(3) Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic

23XY Inadmissibility of evidence where forensic material required
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.99
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23XY(1) Inadmissibility of evidence where forensic material required
has part: 23XY(2) Inadmissibility of evidence where forensic material required
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xy
schema version: 2

23XY(1) Inadmissibility of evidence where forensic material required
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.99
note: Prohibition on using forensic material in evidence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xy-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23XY Inadmissibility of evidence where forensic material required

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires overlap between the destruction of forensic material and its use in evidence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (c) any results of the analysis of the forensic material; and (d) any other evidence made or obtained as a result of or in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Requires inference from the destruction of forensic material to its use in evidence
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (c) any results of the analysis of the forensic material; and (d) any other evidence made or obtained as a result of or in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of forensic material in evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) If a provision of this Part requires forensic material taken from a person by a forensic procedure to be destroyed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Requires containment of the use of forensic material in evidence until its destruction is complete
modality: Diffusion
operator: Containment
premise text: (a) evidence of the forensic material; and (b) if the material has not been destroyed—evidence consisting of the forensic material

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires destruction of forensic material until its use in evidence is complete
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (1) If a provision of this Part requires forensic material taken from a person by a forensic procedure to be destroyed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XY(1) Inadmissibility of evidence where forensic material required

23XY(2) Inadmissibility of evidence where forensic material required
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.99
note: Evidence from forensic material is not admissible in proceedings against the person, but may be admissible if adduced by the person.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xy-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23XY Inadmissibility of evidence where forensic material required

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for when evidence from forensic material is admissible or inadmissible.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) The results of the analysis, and the other evidence, are not admissible if adduced by the prosecution in any proceedings against the person.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of evidence from forensic material in proceedings against the person.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) The results of the analysis, and the other evidence, are not admissible if adduced by the prosecution in any proceedings against the person.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to use evidence from forensic material in proceedings by the person.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) The results of the analysis, and the other evidence, are not admissible if adduced by the prosecution in any proceedings against the person.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of information about when evidence from forensic material is admissible or inadmissible.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (2) The results of the analysis, and the other evidence, are not admissible if adduced by the prosecution in any proceedings against the person.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal trace for when evidence from forensic material is used in proceedings.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (2) The results of the analysis, and the other evidence, are not admissible if adduced by the prosecution in any proceedings against the person.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XY(2) Inadmissibility of evidence where forensic material required

23XZ Admissibility of evidence relating to consent to forensic
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.99
note: Evidence of refusal or withdrawal of consent is not admissible in proceedings.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xz-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23xz
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xz-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XZ Admissibility of evidence relating to consent to forensic

23YA Admissibility of evidence relating to carrying out of forensic
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.100
note: Evidence of forensic procedure admissibility in court proceedings
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ya-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ya-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ya
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ya-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidence is admissible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes admissibility of evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: admission
premise text: None

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ya-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YA Admissibility of evidence relating to carrying out of forensic

23YB Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.100
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23YB(1) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
has part: 23YB(2) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
has part: 23YB(3) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
has part: 23YB(4) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
has part: 23YB(5) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yb
schema version: 2

23YB(1) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.100
note: This section applies where a constable or magistrate has ordered the carrying out of a forensic procedure on a suspect under this Part.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23YB Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to carry out forensic procedures.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YB(1) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure

23YB(2) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.100
note: Refusal to comply with forensic procedure or obstructing its carrying out is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23YB Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: evidence that the suspect refused to comply with any reasonable direction in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure; or evidence that the suspect obstructed, resisted, hindered, used violence against, threatened or intimidated a person in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between refusal to comply and obstruction
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4)

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: evidence that the suspect refused to comply with any reasonable direction in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure; or evidence that the suspect obstructed, resisted, hindered, used violence against, threatened or intimidated a person in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of obstructive behavior by AI system
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4)

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is admissible in any proceedings against the suspect in respect of a relevant offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of obstructing forensic procedure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4)

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: evidence that the suspect refused to comply with any reasonable direction in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure; or evidence that the suspect obstructed, resisted, hindered, used violence against, threatened or intimidated a person in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about obstructive behavior
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4)

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: evidence that the suspect refused to comply with any reasonable direction in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure; or evidence that the suspect obstructed, resisted, hindered, used violence against, threatened or intimidated a person in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of obstructive behavior
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4)

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YB(2) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure

23YB(3) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.100
note: Forensic procedure must be carried out satisfactorily for evidence to be admissible.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23YB Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Forensic procedure must be carried out satisfactorily for evidence to be admissible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires forensic procedure to occur before evidence can be admitted.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Require
premise text: (3) Evidence described in subsection (2) is not admissible if the forensic procedure was in fact carried out satisfactorily.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Forensic procedure must be carried out satisfactorily for evidence to be admissible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies forensic procedure as a requirement for admissibility of evidence using artificial intelligence.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (3) Evidence described in subsection (2) is not admissible if the forensic procedure was in fact carried out satisfactorily.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Forensic procedure must be carried out satisfactorily for evidence to be admissible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits obstructing forensic procedure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) Evidence described in subsection (2) is not admissible if the forensic procedure was in fact carried out satisfactorily.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Forensic procedure must be carried out satisfactorily for evidence to be admissible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Implies that forensic procedure is a necessary condition for admissibility of evidence.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Imply
premise text: (3) Evidence described in subsection (2) is not admissible if the forensic procedure was in fact carried out satisfactorily.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Forensic procedure must be carried out satisfactorily for evidence to be admissible.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies that forensic procedure is a requirement for admissibility of evidence.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (3) Evidence described in subsection (2) is not admissible if the forensic procedure was in fact carried out satisfactorily.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YB(3) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure

23YB(4) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.100
note: Refusing to comply with direction or obstructing forensic procedure is not admissible as evidence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yb-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23YB Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refusal or obstruction is not admissible as evidence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of obstructing forensic procedure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: State direction to suspect

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YB(4) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure

23YB(5) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.100
note: Does not apply to proceedings in foreign countries or international tribunals.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yb-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23YB Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Does not apply to proceedings in foreign countries or international tribunals.
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

23YC Destruction of forensic material where interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23YC(1) Destruction of forensic material where interim order
has part: 23YC(2) Destruction of forensic material where interim order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yc
schema version: 2

23YC(1) Destruction of forensic material where interim order
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
note: Ensure destruction of forensic material and provide results to suspect.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23YC Destruction of forensic material where interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure action is taken.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YC(1) Destruction of forensic material where interim order

23YC(2) Destruction of forensic material where interim order
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
note: Destroy forensic material after specified period
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23YC Destruction of forensic material where interim order

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must destroy forensic material
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If an order...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YC(2) Destruction of forensic material where interim order

23YD Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23YD(1) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
has part: 23YD(2) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
has part: 23YD(3) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
has part: 23YD(4) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
has part: 23YD(5) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
has part: 23YD(6) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yd
schema version: 2

23YD(1) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
note: Destruction of forensic material after 12 months is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23YD Destruction of forensic material after 12 months

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits destruction of forensic material after 12 months.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YD(1) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months

23YD(2) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
note: Destroy forensic material after 12 months if no proceedings instituted.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23YD Destruction of forensic material after 12 months

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable unless a warrant for apprehension of the suspect has been issued
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits destruction of forensic material after 12 months
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: a period of 12 months has elapsed since the forensic material was taken

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YD(2) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months

23YD(3) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
note: Destroy forensic material after 12 months if conviction is recorded or acquittal is confirmed.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23YD Destruction of forensic material after 12 months

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between destruction and acquittal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (b) the suspect is acquitted of such an offence and...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must destroy forensic material.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) If...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YD(3) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months

23YD(4) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
note: Destroy forensic material after 12 months if warrant lapses or suspect apprehended within 12 months
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yd-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23YD Destruction of forensic material after 12 months

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after (a) the warrant lapses; or (b) a period of 12 months elapses after the suspect is apprehended.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for destruction of forensic material
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued during the period of 12 months after forensic material is taken...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after (a) the warrant lapses; or (b) a period of 12 months elapses after the suspect is apprehended.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference from warrant lapse or suspect apprehension
modality: Argumentation
operator: CONCLUSION
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued during the period of 12 months after forensic material is taken...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after (a) the warrant lapses; or (b) a period of 12 months elapses after the suspect is apprehended.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to destroy forensic material
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued during the period of 12 months after forensic material is taken...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after (a) the warrant lapses; or (b) a period of 12 months elapses after the suspect is apprehended.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional destruction of forensic material
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF-THEN
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued during the period of 12 months after forensic material is taken...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after (a) the warrant lapses; or (b) a period of 12 months elapses after the suspect is apprehended.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for destruction of forensic material
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued during the period of 12 months after forensic material is taken...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YD(4) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months

23YD(5) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
note: Magistrate may extend retention period for forensic material under special reasons.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yd-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23YD Destruction of forensic material after 12 months

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate may extend retention period.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YD(5) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months

23YD(6) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
note: Magistrate must notify person from whom forensic material was taken before extending period.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yd-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 23YD Destruction of forensic material after 12 months

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must notify person from whom forensic material was taken before extending period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YD(6) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months

23YE Powers etc. of legal representatives and interview friends
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23YE(1) Powers etc. of legal representatives and interview friends
has part: 23YE(2) Powers etc. of legal representatives and interview friends
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ye
schema version: 2

23YE(1) Powers etc. of legal representatives and interview friends
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116
note: A legal representative or interview friend can make a request or objection on behalf of a suspect or offender.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ye-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ye-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ye-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23YE Powers etc. of legal representatives and interview friends

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ye-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request or objection
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Can make a request or objection
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: Legal representative or interview friend

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ye-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YE(1) Powers etc. of legal representatives and interview friends

23YE(2) Powers etc. of legal representatives and interview friends
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116
note: Interview friend or legal representative must be informed of matter in language they can communicate with fluency.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ye-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ye-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ye-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23YE Powers etc. of legal representatives and interview friends

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ye-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform interview friend or legal representative in language they can communicate with fluency.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ye-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YE(2) Powers etc. of legal representatives and interview friends

23YF Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23YF(1) Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
has part: 23YF(2) Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
has part: 23YF(3) Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yf
schema version: 2

23YF(1) Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116
note: Investigating constable must provide certain recordings to suspect, offender or volunteer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23YF Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide certain recordings.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YF(1) Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape

23YF(2) Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
type: Concept
description: opportunity to view video recording
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116
note: Investigating constable must provide suspect, offender or volunteer with opportunity to view video recording.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23YF Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide opportunity to view video recording.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YF(2) Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape

23YF(3) Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116
note: Destroy video recording of forensic procedure if section 23YD requires destruction of material.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23YF Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: investigating constable must ensure...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Video recording contains destruction of material
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) If section 23YD requires forensic material...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: investigating constable must ensure...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must destroy video recording
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) If section 23YD requires forensic material...

23YG Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23YG(1) Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
has part: 23YG(2) Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
has part: 23YG(3) Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yg
schema version: 2

23YG(1) Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
note: Material must be made available to suspect, offender or volunteer.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23YG Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Material must be made available.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YG(1) Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or

23YG(2) Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
note: Material must be made available within 14 days after creation or request.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23YG Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Material must be provided within a specified timeframe.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YG(2) Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or

23YG(3) Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
note: Exemptions from subsection (2)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yg-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23YG Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions apply
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YG(3) Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or

23YH No charge to be made for giving material etc. to suspects,
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
note: No charge for providing material or video recording to suspects, offenders, or volunteers.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yh-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yh-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yh
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory provision without charge.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yh-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YH No charge to be made for giving material etc. to suspects,

23YI Proof of belief or suspicion
type: Concept
description: Evidence
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.119
note: Prosecution must prove belief or suspicion on reasonable grounds.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yi-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yi-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yi-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yi
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yi-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prosecution has an obligation to prove...
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yi-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Prosecution must believe on reasonable grounds...
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yi-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YI Proof of belief or suspicion

23YJ Proof of impracticability
type: Concept
description: Evidence of impracticability
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.119
note: Prosecution must prove impracticability on balance of probabilities.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yj-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yj-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yj
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prove impracticability
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yj-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YJ Proof of impracticability

23YK Proof of voluntary waiver of certain rights
type: Concept
description: Proof of voluntary waiver
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.119
note: Prosecution must prove Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander waived a right.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yk-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yk-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yk
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prove waiver
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yk-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YK Proof of voluntary waiver of certain rights

23YL Liability for forensic procedures
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
note: No liability for civil or criminal actions in good faith during forensic procedures.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yl-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yl
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yl-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YL Liability for forensic procedures

23YM Experts not obliged to carry out forensic procedures
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
note: No obligation on experts to carry out forensic procedures.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ym-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ym
schema version: 2

23YN Retention of electronic recordings
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23YN(1) Retention of electronic recordings
has part: 23YN(2) Retention of electronic recordings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yn
schema version: 2

23YN(1) Retention of electronic recordings
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
note: Commissioner directs retention period for electronic recordings.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23YN Retention of electronic recordings

23YN(2) Retention of electronic recordings
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
note: Protection against unauthorized access or use of electronic recordings
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23YN Retention of electronic recordings

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is to be stored so as to protect it against unauthorised access or use by any person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for protection
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) A recording that is retained under this section...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is to be stored so as to protect it against unauthorised access or use by any person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applies protection AI to electronic recordings
modality: CogAI
operator: Protect
premise text: (2) A recording that is retained under this section...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...stored so as to protect it against unauthorised access or use by any person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits unauthorized access or use
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A recording that is retained under this section...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is to be stored so as to protect it against unauthorised access or use by any person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses protection across electronic recordings
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) A recording that is retained under this section...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is to be stored so as to protect it against unauthorised access or use by any person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validates electronic recordings for protection
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
premise text: (2) A recording that is retained under this section...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YN(2) Retention of electronic recordings

23YO Disclosure of information
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23YO(1) Disclosure of information
has part: 23YO(1A) Disclosure of information
has part: 23YO(2) Disclosure of information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yo
schema version: 2

23YO(1) Disclosure of information
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
note: Disclose information stored on Commonwealth DNA database system or NCIDD without causing disclosure.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yo-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23YO Disclosure of information

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between disclosure and access to Commonwealth DNA database system or NCIDD
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (b) the person’s conduct causes the disclosure of information other than as provided by this section;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of reckless conduct on obligation to disclose information
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
premise text: (a) and (b)

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosing information without access to Commonwealth DNA database system or NCIDD
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
premise text: (c) the person is reckless as to any such disclosure.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YO(1) Disclosure of information

23YO(1A) Disclosure of information
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
note: Exemption from disclosure of information stored on NCIDD under certain circumstances.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yo-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 23YO Disclosure of information

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from disclosure of information stored on NCIDD under certain circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

23YO(2) Disclosure of information
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
note: Disclosure of information for specific purposes
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yo-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23YO Disclosure of information

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) A person may only...

23YP Taking, retention and use of forensic material
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.123
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23YP(1) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
has part: 23YP(2) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
has part: 23YP(3) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yp
schema version: 2

23YP(1) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.123
note: Taking, retention and use of forensic material is authorized by law.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yp-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23YP Taking, retention and use of forensic material

23YP(2) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.123
note: Retention and use of forensic material from a State or Territory for Commonwealth purposes.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yp-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23YP Taking, retention and use of forensic material

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows retention and use of forensic material.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yp-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YP(2) Taking, retention and use of forensic material

23YP(3) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.123
note: Retention and use of forensic material from a State or Territory law for Commonwealth purposes.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yp-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yp-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23YP Taking, retention and use of forensic material

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to retain and use forensic material.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yp-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YP(3) Taking, retention and use of forensic material

23YQ Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.124
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23YQ(1) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
has part: 23YQ(2) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yq
schema version: 2

23YQ(1) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.124
note: Commissioner may delegate functions and powers to a constable or AFP appointee.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yq-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23YQ Commissioner may delegate functions and powers

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1) The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police may delegate...

23YQ(2) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.124
note: Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23YQ Commissioner may delegate functions and powers

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Delegate functions and powers
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YQ(2) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers

23YR Relationship with Part IAA
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128
note: Exemptions from taking identification material from suspects under 18 or in lawful custody
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yr-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yr-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yr-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yr
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yr-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits taking identification material from specified suspects
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yr-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines the scope of Part IAA
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

23YS Relationship with Part IC
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23YS(1) Relationship with Part IC
has part: 23YS(2) Relationship with Part IC
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ys
schema version: 2

23YS(1) Relationship with Part IC
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128
note: Nothing in this Part limits rights and protections of Part IC.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ys-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ys-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ys-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23YS Relationship with Part IC

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ys-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part does not limit rights and protections of Part IC.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Part IC's provisions imply this obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (1) Nothing in this Part...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ys-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YS(1) Relationship with Part IC

23YS(2) Relationship with Part IC
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128
note: Rights and protections of Part IC are in addition to those of this Part.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ys-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ys-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23YS Relationship with Part IC

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ys-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YS(2) Relationship with Part IC

23YU Application of other laws
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.129
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23YU(1) Application of other laws
has part: 23YU(2) Application of other laws
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yu
schema version: 2

23YU(1) Application of other laws
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.129
note: Exemptions from this Part do not limit other laws.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yu-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23YU Application of other laws

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from this Part do not limit other laws.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YU(1) Application of other laws

23YU(2) Application of other laws
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.129
note: Avoids doubt about using powers from this Part despite other laws.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23yu-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23YU Application of other laws

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...despite the existence of the power under the other law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between laws
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) To avoid any doubt...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a similar power conferred by this Part may be used...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to use powers from this Part despite other laws.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) To avoid any doubt...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23YU(2) Application of other laws

23ZA Application
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.139
note: This Part applies to a thing that is child abuse material or contains child abuse material.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23za-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23za-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23za
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23za-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision applies to the specified thing.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

crimes-act-1914-sec-23za-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZA Application

23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.140
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23ZB(1) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(2) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(3) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(4) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(5) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(6) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zb
schema version: 2

23ZB(1) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.140
note: Constable may give forfeiture notice if reasonably believes forfeitable thing is derived from or used in connection with a Commonwealth child sex offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Power to give forfeiture notice during the period of reasonable belief.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for 'reasonable belief'
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Constable reasonably believes forfeitable thing is derived from or used in connection with a Commonwealth child sex offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Power to give forfeiture notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to give forfeiture notice
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Constable reasonably believes forfeitable thing is derived from or used in connection with a Commonwealth child sex offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Power to give forfeiture notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory power to give forfeiture notice
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Constable reasonably believes forfeitable thing is derived from or used in connection with a Commonwealth child sex offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Power to give forfeiture notice during the period of reasonable belief.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal logic for 'reasonable belief'
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Constable reasonably believes forfeitable thing is derived from or used in connection with a Commonwealth child sex offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZB(1) Forfeiture of material by operation of law

23ZB(2) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.140
note: Notice must be given to owner or possessor of forfeitable thing.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Owner or possessor must receive notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notice obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIG
premise text: Constable must give notice to owner or possessor.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZB(2) Forfeiture of material by operation of law

23ZB(3) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.140
note: Forfeiture of material by operation of law
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-n3logic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the thing will be forfeited to the Commonwealth 30 days after the notice is given, unless...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for forfeiture
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: 30 days after the notice is given, unless any of the following persons object...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the head of the police force of the claim.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Requests notification to relevant parties
modality: Argumentation
operator: Request
premise text: (g) requests a person claiming compensation for forfeiture of the thing to notify...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the thing will be forfeited to the Commonwealth 30 days after the notice is given, unless any of the following persons object...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the possession or use of forfeitable material
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) The forfeiture notice is a notice that...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the thing will be forfeited to the Commonwealth...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the forfeitable material as a thing
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) identifies the forfeitable thing;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the head of the police force that includes the constable:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads the forfeiture notice to relevant parties
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (i) a person who owns the thing (either alone or with other persons);

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-n3logic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in connection with forfeiture of the thing;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: Defines the circumstances under which compensation is payable
modality: N3Logic
operator: Define
premise text: (f) explains the circumstances in which compensation is payable...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZB(3) Forfeiture of material by operation of law

23ZB(4) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.140
note: Give notice to anyone directly or indirectly affected by the proposed forfeiture.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zb-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to give notice
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZB(4) Forfeiture of material by operation of law

23ZB(5) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.140
note: Forfeiture of material to Commonwealth at end of period if no objection
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zb-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on Commonwealth to forfeit material
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

23ZB(6) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.140
note: Head of police force must instruct Director to apply for forfeiture order.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zb-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Instruction must be before forfeiture application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Timeframe for instruction must be before forfeiture application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Application must be made within timeframe

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must instruct Director
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to instruct Director
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Head of police force has authority

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Forfeiture order is a legal action
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Forfeiture order is a legal action
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
premise text: Section 23ZD applies to forfeitable things

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZB(6) Forfeiture of material by operation of law

23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.142
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23ZC(1) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
has part: 23ZC(2) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
has part: 23ZC(3) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
has part: 23ZC(4) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zc
schema version: 2

23ZC(1) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.142
note: Request for copy of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Timeframe overlaps with request period
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap: Request made within 30 days
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Request is made less than 30 days after notice

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Need for copy implies request
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication: Request implies need for copy
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Request includes specified parts of the thing

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State must provide copy
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide copy of innocuous parts
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Request for copy is made within 30 days

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Data is included in class of requested parts
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class inclusion: Requested data is specified clearly enough to enable identification
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: Request includes specified parts of the thing

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State propagates claim of providing copy
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagated claim: State must provide copy
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: Request is made within 30 days

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZC(1) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited

23ZC(2) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.142
note: Police head must comply with request for innocuous parts of material to be forfeited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Police head must comply with request.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Request is reasonably practicable.
modality: Epistemic
operator: REASONABLY PRACTICABLE

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conditional compliance based on reasonableness.
modality: LTL
operator: IF AND ONLY IF

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZC(2) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited

23ZC(3) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
description: No
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.142
note: Exemption from providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits providing copies under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

23ZC(4) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.142
note: The court may order the person to pay costs incurred by the police force in complying with a request.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zc-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must pay costs.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: The court may order the person to pay costs.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZC(4) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited

23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.144
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23ZD(1) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
has part: 23ZD(2) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
has part: 23ZD(3) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
has part: 23ZD(4) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
has part: 23ZD(5) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zd
schema version: 2

23ZD(1) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.144
note: Forfeiture of material by court order on application for Commonwealth child sex offence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Criminal proceedings overlap with the application for forfeiture
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with criminal proceedings
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: The court is satisfied in the course of criminal proceedings

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No person can commit a Commonwealth child sex offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the commission of a Commonwealth child sex offence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The court must order forfeiture to the Commonwealth

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZD(1) Forfeiture of material by court order on application

23ZD(2) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
description: Written notice
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.144
note: Notice must be given to those who claim ownership or would be affected by the proposed forfeiture.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for notice to be given
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) The Director of Public Prosecutions must give written notice of the application to anyone:

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

23ZD(3) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.144
note: Court may make interim orders on application for forfeiture of material
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May make orders
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZD(3) Forfeiture of material by court order on application

23ZD(4) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.144
note: Court may order forfeiture of material without notice or finding of specific offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zd-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...may be made even if a person entitled to be given notice of the application fails to appear at the hearing of the application;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Court may order forfeiture at any time without notice or finding of specific offence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (4) An order under subsection (1):...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...need not be based on a finding that a particular person committed a Commonwealth child sex offence.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Court may classify material as forfeitable using artificial intelligence without notice or finding of specific offence.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (4) An order under subsection (1):...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...may be made even if a person entitled to be given notice of the application fails to appear at the hearing of the application;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may prohibit material forfeiture without notice or finding of specific offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) An order under subsection (1):...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...can be based on a finding that some such offence was committed;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Court may diffuse responsibility for material forfeiture without notice or finding of specific offence.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (4) An order under subsection (1):...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...need not be based on a finding as to the commission of a particular Commonwealth child sex offence;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Court may order forfeiture repeatedly without notice or finding of specific offence.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (4) An order under subsection (1):...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZD(4) Forfeiture of material by court order on application

23ZD(5) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.144
note: The court may order the Commonwealth to pay compensation to a person who owns or has property in electronic equipment under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zd-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person A is not guilty of the crime.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The person did not commit, is not and has not been convicted of, the Commonwealth child sex offence before the hearing.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
premise text: Person A did not commit, is not and has not been convicted of, the Commonwealth child sex offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The court may order the Commonwealth to pay compensation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person A is not under investigation for the crime.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The person is not the subject of proceedings in another court relating to the Commonwealth child sex offence and has not been the subject of such proceedings in connection with which an appeal may still be lodged as of right.
modality: LTL
operator: and
premise text: Person A is not the subject of proceedings in another court relating to the Commonwealth child sex offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZD(5) Forfeiture of material by court order on application

23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23ZE(1) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(2) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(3) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(4) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(5) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(6) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ze
schema version: 2

23ZE(1) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
note: This section applies if a thing is forfeited to the Commonwealth under this Part.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ze-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZE(1) Effect of forfeiture under this Part

23ZE(2) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
note: The thing becomes property of Commonwealth upon forfeiture.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ze-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it becomes the property of the Commonwealth.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to transfer ownership
modality: Deontic
operator: becomes
premise text: (2) When the thing is forfeited

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZE(2) Effect of forfeiture under this Part

23ZE(3) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
note: Seizure without warrant is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ze-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Seizure without warrant is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of seizure without warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A constable may, without warrant, seize the thing.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZE(3) Effect of forfeiture under this Part

23ZE(4) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
note: The Commissioner may deal with the thing in any way he or she considers appropriate.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ze-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner has the power to act.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

23ZE(5) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
note: Police head may deal with seized thing in any way they consider appropriate
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ze-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing in any way he or she considers appropriate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between police action and thing
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing in any way he or she considers appropriate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of police action by AI
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing in any way he or she considers appropriate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to deal with thing
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing in any way he or she considers appropriate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreading of police action to thing
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing in any way he or she considers appropriate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Holding of police action over time
modality: LTL
operator: Hold
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...

23ZE(6) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
note: Subsections (3), (4) and (5) have effect despite section 9.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23ze-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part

23ZF Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23ZF(1) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
has part: 23ZF(2) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
has part: 23ZF(3) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zf
schema version: 2

23ZF(1) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
note: Person entitled to compensation for forfeited electronic equipment
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZF Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is entitled to compensation for the forfeited electronic equipment during the period of ownership.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During the period of ownership
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) the person owned, had a right to possess or had other property in the thing immediately before the forfeiture.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person owned, had a right to possess or had other property in the thing immediately before the forfeiture.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has right to compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
premise text: (a) a thing that is a computer, data storage device or other electronic equipment is forfeited under this Part;

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state has a duty to provide compensation to the person for the forfeited electronic equipment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has duty to provide compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasDutyTo
premise text: (b) the person owned, had a right to possess or had other property in the thing immediately before the forfeiture.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state has permission to provide compensation to the person for the forfeited electronic equipment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has permission to provide compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermissionTo
premise text: (b) the person owned, had a right to possess or had other property in the thing immediately before the forfeiture.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is entitled to compensation for the forfeited electronic equipment everywhere they own or had a right to possess it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Everywhere the person owns or had a right to possess the thing
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: (a) a thing that is a computer, data storage device or other electronic equipment is forfeited under this Part;

23ZF(2) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
note: Commonwealth liable for compensation on forfeiture of electronic equipment.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZF Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay compensation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Liability

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZF(2) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.

23ZF(3) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
note: Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23ZF Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to compensate
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZF(3) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.

23ZG Delegation by head of police force
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
note: Head of police force may delegate powers to a constable.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zg-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zg-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23zg
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to delegate
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zg-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23ZG Delegation by head of police force

24 June 1986
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
note: Conditional commencement of section 3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24
schema version: 2

24 Oct
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.263
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-10
schema version: 2

24 Nov 2024 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.263
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-11
schema version: 2

24 Oct 1997
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
note: Schedule 2 (items 636-638)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-2
schema version: 2

24 Nov 2000
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
note: Royal Assent and commencement of Act 2001
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-3
schema version: 2

24 May 2001 (s
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
note: Obligation to comply with certain items
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-4
schema version: 2

24 Nov 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
note: List of items and sections
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-5
schema version: 2

24 June 2014
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
note: National Security Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2014
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-6
schema version: 2

24 Aug
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Powers, Offences and Other Measures) Act 2018
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-7
schema version: 2

24 Aug
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
note: Conditional commencement of amendments to Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Act 2018
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-8-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-8-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-8
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-24-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for commencement of amendments
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: 25 Aug 2018 (s 2(1) item 1)

24 Nov
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.262
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 2) Act 2023
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-9-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-9-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-9
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-24-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

25 June 1984
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
note: Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 2)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25
schema version: 2

25 Feb 2015
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
note: Sch 1 (item 10): 25
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25-10
schema version: 2

25 Oct 1984
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
note: Royal Assent required for Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 2)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25-2
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Royal Assent is required
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

25 Oct 1991
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
note: Repeal of AUSSAT Repeal Act
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25-3
schema version: 2

25 Oct 1996
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
note: Sch 3 (items 37, 38)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25-4
schema version: 2

25 Oct 1996
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
note: Prohibition on transitional provisions and consequential amendments
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25-5
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-25-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids transitional provisions and consequential amendments
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

25 Nov 1996
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
note: Amendment of s 2(2), (6) by 77, 1996, sch 3 [items 1, 2]
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25-6
schema version: 2

25 Aug 2007
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
note: Employer sanctions for non-compliance with migration laws.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25-7
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-25-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on employers to comply with migration laws.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

25 June 2009
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
note: Conditional commencement of Federal Court of Australia Amendment (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 2009
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25-8
schema version: 2

25 Mar 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25-9
schema version: 2

26 May 2004
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.246
note: Conditional commencement of Australian Federal Police and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2004
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26
schema version: 2

26 Mar 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-26-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-2
schema version: 2

26 May 2015
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
note: References schedules 1 and 2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-26-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-3
schema version: 2

26 May 2015
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
note: Reference to schedule
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-26-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-4
schema version: 2

26 June 2015
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
note: Passports Legislation Amendment (Integrity) Act 2015
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-26-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-5
schema version: 2

26 Nov 2015
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.256
note: List of schedules and commencement date
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-26-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-6
schema version: 2

27 May 1973
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27
schema version: 2

27 May 2014
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
note: References schedules 1 and 4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-10
schema version: 2

27 May 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
note: Conditional commencement of section 2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-11
schema version: 2

27 Nov
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.262
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-12
schema version: 2

27 May 1973
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
note: Statute Law Revision Act 1973
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-2
schema version: 2

27 Aug 1985 (s 2 and
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
note: End of section
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-3
schema version: 2

27 June 1991
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-4
schema version: 2

27 June 1991
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
note: Royal Assent required for commencement
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-5
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-27-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires royal assent
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

27 Sept 1991
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-6
schema version: 2

27 June 2011
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
note: References schedules
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-7
schema version: 2

27 Dec 2011
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
note: Amendment of Crimes Legislation
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-8
schema version: 2

27 June 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-9
schema version: 2

28 Mar 1979
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
note: Consequential amendments to Australian Federal Police Act 1979
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28
schema version: 2

28 Dec 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
note: Amendment of integrity legislation
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-10
schema version: 2

28 June 2013
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
note: Amendment of Crimes Legislation Amendment (International Crime Cooperation and Other Measures) Act 2018
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-11
schema version: 2

28 Oct
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.259
note: Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (2019 Measures No. 1) Act 2019
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-12
schema version: 2

28 Nov 1979
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-2
schema version: 2

28 May 1980
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-3
schema version: 2

28 May 1980
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
note: Crimes (Currency) Act
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-4
schema version: 2

28 July 1989
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-5
schema version: 2

28 Nov 1994
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
note: Amendment by Statute Law Revision Act 1996
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-6
schema version: 2

28 Nov 1994
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
note: Enhancement Act
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-7
schema version: 2

28 June 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
note: Conditional commencement of National Crime Authority Legislation Amendment Act 2001
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-8
schema version: 2

28 Nov 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
note: Schedule 2 (items 8, 10(1))
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-9
schema version: 2

29 Oct 1914
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29
schema version: 2

29 Feb 2000
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-10
schema version: 2

29 June 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2012
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-11
schema version: 2

29 Nov 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-12
schema version: 2

29 June 2013
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
note: References schedules
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-13
schema version: 2

29 June 2013
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
note: Statute Law Revision Act (No. 1) 2014
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-14
schema version: 2

29 Nov
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.256
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-15
schema version: 2

29 June
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-16
schema version: 2

29 Oct 1914
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
note: Crimes Act 1915
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-2
schema version: 2

29 Oct 1914 (s 3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
note: Repeal Act 1920
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-3
schema version: 2

29 Mar 1926 (gaz
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
note: No summary available
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-4
schema version: 2

29 Oct 1966
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-5
schema version: 2

29 June 1998
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-6
schema version: 2

29 June 1998
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
note: Amendment of Schedule 1 (items 2, 8)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-7
schema version: 2

29 June 1998 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
note: Financial Sector Reform (Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Act 1998
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-8
schema version: 2

29 June 1998
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-9
schema version: 2

3 Suspect
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.31
note: Procedure must be carried out within 4 hours after suspect presents to investigating constable.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

3 May 1997
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-10
schema version: 2

3 June 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-11
schema version: 2

3 July 2002
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
note: Legislation history for Crimes Act 1914
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-12
schema version: 2

3 June 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
note: List of items in Schedule 1 and Schedule 3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-13
schema version: 2

3 May 2006
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-14
schema version: 2

3 July 2008
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-15
schema version: 2

3 Nov 2014
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-16
schema version: 2

3 Sept
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
note: Reference to schedules
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-17
schema version: 2

3 July 1937
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-2
schema version: 2

3 July 1937
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
note: July 1937 section 5 of Crimes Act 1941
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-3
schema version: 2

3 Sept 1939
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
note: Defence (Transitional Provisions) Act 1946
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-4
schema version: 2

3 July 1985 (s 2 and
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-5
schema version: 2

3 June 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
note: Conditional commencement of Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act 1989
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-6
schema version: 2

3 June 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
note: Legislation history for Crimes (Child Sex Tourism) Amendment Act 1994
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-7
schema version: 2

3 June 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
note: Conditional commencement of Australian Postal Corporation Amendment Act 1994
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-8
schema version: 2

3 June 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
note: Conditional commencement of Workplace Relations and Other Legislation Amendment Act 1996
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-9-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-9-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-9
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-3-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement on 8 July 1996

crimes-act-1914-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to carry out procedure within 4 hours.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Suspect

30 May 1932
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30
schema version: 2

30 June 2006
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
note: Schedule 1 (items 11-31)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-10
schema version: 2

30 Dec 2006 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
note: Prohibition on forensic procedures
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-11-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-11
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-30-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits forensic procedures
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

30 Oct 2017
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
note: Conditional commencement of legislation amendment act
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-12
schema version: 2

30 Nov 2016
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.256
note: Reference to Crimes Act 1914
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-13
schema version: 2

30 Nov
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
note: Conditional commencement of Criminal Code Amendment (High Risk Terrorist Offenders) Act 2016
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-14
schema version: 2

30 June 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
note: Prohibition on certain activities
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-15-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-15
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-30-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain activities
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-30-15-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30 June 2018 (s 2(1)

30 May 1932
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
note: Judiciary Act 1937
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-2
schema version: 2

30 June 1989
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
note: Conditional commencement of Parts 5-7
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-3
schema version: 2

30 Mar 1994 (gaz
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
note: Amendment Act 1994
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-4
schema version: 2

30 May 1994
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-5
schema version: 2

30 Nov 1994
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
note: Amendment by Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 41, 2003
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-6
schema version: 2

30 June 2004
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.246
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-7
schema version: 2

30 June 2006
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-8
schema version: 2

30 Dec 2006 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
note: Consequential Amendments Act 2006
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-9
schema version: 2

30J Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.149
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30J(1) Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
has part: 30J(2) Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
has part: 30J(3) Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30j
schema version: 2

30J(1) Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.149
note: Governor-General may make a Proclamation in case of serious industrial disturbance.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30J Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she may make a Proclamation to that effect, which Proclamation shall be and remain in operation for the purposes of this section until it is revoked.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for proclamation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) If at any time the Governor-General is of opinion that there exists in Australia a serious industrial disturbance...

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she may make a Proclamation to that effect, which Proclamation shall be and remain in operation for the purposes of this section until it is revoked.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation through proclamation
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (1) If at any time the Governor-General is of opinion that there exists in Australia a serious industrial disturbance...

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she may make a Proclamation to that effect, which Proclamation shall be and remain in operation for the purposes of this section until it is revoked.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information spread through proclamation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Spread
premise text: (1) If at any time the Governor-General is of opinion that there exists in Australia a serious industrial disturbance...

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she may make a Proclamation to that effect, which Proclamation shall be and remain in operation for the purposes of this section until it is revoked.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal trace for proclamation
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (1) If at any time the Governor-General is of opinion that there exists in Australia a serious industrial disturbance...

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30J(1) Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes

30J(2) Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.149
note: Participation in or incitement to a lock-out or strike during the operation of a proclamation.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30J Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offence committed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Participation in or incitement to a lock-out or strike.

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30J(2) Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes

30J(3) Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.149
note: Definition of employee and employer for section 30J(3)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-ltl-6
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-diffusion-7
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30j-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 30J Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the refusal is unreasonable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for lock-out
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: the closing is unreasonable

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of employee and employer for section 30J(3)
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: employer includes any person whose usual occupation is as an employer
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: employee includes any person whose usual occupation is as an employee

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: lock-out includes the total or partial refusal of employers, acting in combination, to give work, if the refusal is unreasonable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: lock-out includes the closing of a place or part of a place of employment, if the closing is unreasonable

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: lock-out includes the total or partial suspension of work by an employer, if the suspension is unreasonable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: lock-out includes the suspension of work by an employer, if the suspension is unreasonable

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-diffusion-7
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the suspension is unreasonable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Recurring trace for lock-out
modality: Diffusion
operator: <=>
premise text: the refusal is unreasonable

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-ltl-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the total or partial suspension of work by an employer
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for lock-out
modality: LTL
operator: <=>
premise text: the total or partial refusal of employers, acting in combination, to give work

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30J(3) Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes

30K Obstructing or hindering the performance of services
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.150
note: Obstructing or hindering public service performance
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30k-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30k-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30k-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30k-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30k
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-30k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obstructing or hindering public service performance is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits obstructing or hindering public service performance
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The person commits an offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-30k-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compelling or inducing surrender or departure from employment is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits compelling or inducing surrender or departure from employment
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) compels or induces any person employed in or in connexion with the provision of any public service by the Commonwealth or by any Department or public authority under the Commonwealth to surrender or depart from his or her employment;

crimes-act-1914-sec-30k-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Preventing offering or accepting employment is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits preventing offering or accepting employment
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) prevents any person from offering or accepting employment in or in connexion with the provision of any public service by the Commonwealth or by any Department or public authority under the Commonwealth;

crimes-act-1914-sec-30k-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30K Obstructing or hindering the performance of services

31 Judicial proceeding and tribunal definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.152
note: Defines judicial proceeding and tribunal.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31
schema version: 2

31 Aug 2004
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
note: Amendment of section 1, items 3-5 and 30-31
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-10
schema version: 2

31 May 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
note: Repealed by Health Insurance Amendment (General Practitioners and Quality Assurance) Act 2020
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-11-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-11-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-11
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-31-11-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between 'commencing' and 'repealed'
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal intervals identified

31 May 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Amendment (Royal Flying Doctor Service) Act 2010
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-12-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-12-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-12
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-31-12-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

31 May
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.263
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Act 2024
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-13
schema version: 2

31 Dec 1950
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
note: Duty to report crimes
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-2
schema version: 2

31 May 1955
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-3
schema version: 2

31 May 1955
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
note: Crimes Act 1959
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-4
schema version: 2

31 Dec 1973
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
note: Legislation history
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-5
schema version: 2

31 Dec 1982
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-6
schema version: 2

31 Mar 2000
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
note: Royal Assent for Criminal Code Amendment (Theft, Fraud, Bribery and Related Offences) Act 2000
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-7
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-31-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide Royal Assent
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

31 Oct 2002
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
note: Conditional commencement of certain sections
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-8
schema version: 2

31 Oct 2002 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
note: Ends on October 2002 (s 2(1))
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-9
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines judicial proceeding and tribunal.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-act-1914-sec-31-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: judicial tribunal means a body or person (other than a court) before whom a judicial proceeding is conducted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies judicial proceeding and tribunal.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: judicial proceeding means (other than in section 3L): a proceeding in or before a court; or a proceeding: before a body, or a person, acting under a law of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory; and in which evidence may be taken on oath.

crimes-act-1914-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31 Judicial proceeding and tribunal definitions

34 Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153
curation status: Proposed
has part: 34(1) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
has part: 34(2) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
has part: 34(3) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
has part: 34(4) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34
schema version: 2

34(1) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153
note: Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(1) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested

34(2) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to reasonable excuse.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (2).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if the judge or magistrate has a reasonable excuse.

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The judge or magistrate must provide a reasonable excuse for not applying subsection (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Judge or magistrate must provide reason for not applying subsection (1).
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the judge or magistrate has a reasonable excuse.

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The judge or magistrate believes that they have a reasonable excuse for not applying subsection (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Judge or magistrate believes in reasonable excuse.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the judge or magistrate has a reasonable excuse.

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The reasonable excuse is an interval of time during which the judge or magistrate believes that they have a valid reason for not applying subsection (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Reasonable excuse is an interval of belief.
modality: LTL
operator: Interval
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the judge or magistrate has a reasonable excuse.

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(2) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested

34(3) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153
note: Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The judge or magistrate must not act oppressively or when interested.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(e) element of the offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(3) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested

34(4) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153
note: Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the judge or magistrate has a personal interest in the matter;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between oppressive behavior and personal interest.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (4) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the judge or magistrate perversely exercises jurisdiction in a matter;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analysis of cognitive biases in judges or magistrates.
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
premise text: (4) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the judge or magistrate has a personal interest in the matter;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of oppressive behavior by judges or magistrates.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the judge or magistrate has a personal interest in the matter;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of knowledge about oppressive behavior by judges or magistrates.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (4) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the judge or magistrate perversely exercises jurisdiction in a matter;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of oppressive behavior by judges or magistrates.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (4) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(4) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested

35 Giving false testimony
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.155
curation status: Proposed
has part: 35(1) Giving false testimony
has part: 35(2) Giving false testimony
has part: 35(3) Giving false testimony
has part: 35(4) Giving false testimony
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35
schema version: 2

35(1) Giving false testimony
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.155
note: Giving false testimony in a federal judicial proceeding is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Giving false testimony

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits giving false testimony in a federal judicial proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits giving false testimony with the intention of instituting a judicial proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the person does so:

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits giving false testimony in a judicial proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the person gives false testimony touching a matter;

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(1) Giving false testimony

35(2) Giving false testimony
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.155
note: Giving false testimony is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Giving false testimony

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits giving false testimony.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(2) Giving false testimony

35(3) Giving false testimony
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.155
note: Giving false testimony is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Giving false testimony

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits giving false testimony.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(3) Giving false testimony

35(4) Giving false testimony
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.155
note: Exemptions from admissibility of false testimony
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Giving false testimony

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from admissibility of false testimony
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(4) Giving false testimony

36 Fabricating evidence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156
curation status: Proposed
has part: 36(1) Fabricating evidence
has part: 36(2) Fabricating evidence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36
schema version: 2

36(1) Fabricating evidence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156
note: Fabricating evidence in federal judicial proceedings is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Fabricating evidence

crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits fabricating evidence in federal judicial proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(1) Fabricating evidence

36(2) Fabricating evidence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156
note: Prohibition on fabricating evidence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Fabricating evidence

crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 36(2) is during the application of absolute liability to paragraph (1)(c) of the offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of section 36(2)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 36(2) is during the application of absolute liability to paragraph (1)(c) of the offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of section 36(2)
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (2) Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Fabricating evidence is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits fabricating evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Section 36(2)

crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 36(2) is during the application of absolute liability to paragraph (1)(c) of the offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of section 36(2)
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (2) Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 36(2) is during the application of absolute liability to paragraph (1)(c) of the offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of section 36(2)
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(2) Fabricating evidence

36A Intimidation of witnesses etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156
curation status: Proposed
has part: 36A(1) Intimidation of witnesses etc.
has part: 36A(2) Intimidation of witnesses etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36a
schema version: 2

36A(1) Intimidation of witnesses etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156
note: Threatening or intimidating a witness in a federal judicial proceeding is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 36A Intimidation of witnesses etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of threatening or intimidating a witness in a federal judicial proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of using violence to or inflicting injury on a witness in a federal judicial proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (i) threatens, intimidates or restrains another person;

crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of causing or procuring violence, damage, loss, or disadvantage to a witness in a federal judicial proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (iii) causes or procures violence, damage, loss or disadvantage to another person;

crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36A(1) Intimidation of witnesses etc.

36A(2) Intimidation of witnesses etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156
note: Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 36A Intimidation of witnesses etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36A(2) Intimidation of witnesses etc.

37 Corruption of witnesses
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.157
curation status: Proposed
has part: 37(1) Corruption of witnesses
has part: 37(2) Corruption of witnesses
has part: 37(3) Corruption of witnesses
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37
schema version: 2

37(1) Corruption of witnesses
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.157
note: Giving or receiving property to influence a witness in a judicial proceeding is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Corruption of witnesses

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of influencing a witness in a judicial proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the first person does so upon an agreement or understanding that any person called, or to be called, as a witness in a judicial proceeding will: (i) give false testimony; or (ii) withhold true testimony;

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of receiving property to influence a witness in a judicial proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (iii) asks for, receives or obtains any property, or benefit, of any kind for himself or herself or another person;

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of promising to give or confer property to influence a witness in a judicial proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (ii) promises or offers to give, to confer, to procure or to attempt to procure any property, or benefit, of any kind to, upon or for another person;

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of agreeing to receive property to influence a witness in a judicial proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (iv) agrees to receive or to obtain any property, or benefit, of any kind for himself or herself or another person;

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of giving property to influence a witness in a judicial proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (i) gives, confers or procures any property, or benefit, of any kind to, upon or for another person;

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(1) Corruption of witnesses

37(2) Corruption of witnesses
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.157
note: Inducing false testimony is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Corruption of witnesses

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits inducing false testimony.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(2) Corruption of witnesses

37(3) Corruption of witnesses
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.157
note: Committing an offence if inducing false testimony in a judicial proceeding.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Corruption of witnesses

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The act overlaps with the judicial proceeding.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap: The act and the judicial proceeding overlap.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person does an act; and (b) the person does so with the intention of inducing a person called, or to be called, as a witness in a judicial proceeding:

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to not induce false testimony in a judicial proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person does an act; and (b) the person does so with the intention of inducing a person called, or to be called, as a witness in a judicial proceeding:

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must not induce false testimony.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on inducing false testimony in a judicial proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person does an act; and (b) the person does so with the intention of inducing a person called, or to be called, as a witness in a judicial proceeding:

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The act occurs before the judicial proceeding.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal until: The act occurs before the judicial proceeding.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person does an act; and (b) the person does so with the intention of inducing a person called, or to be called, as a witness in a judicial proceeding:

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(3) Corruption of witnesses

38 Deceiving witnesses
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.158
curation status: Proposed
has part: 38(1) Deceiving witnesses
has part: 38(2) Deceiving witnesses
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38
schema version: 2

38(1) Deceiving witnesses
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.158
note: Deceiving witnesses is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-38-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-38-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 38 Deceiving witnesses

crimes-act-1914-sec-38-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits deceiving witnesses.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-38-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38(1) Deceiving witnesses

38(2) Deceiving witnesses
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.158
note: Deceiving witnesses is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-38-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-38-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 38 Deceiving witnesses

crimes-act-1914-sec-38-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits deceiving witnesses.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-38-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38(2) Deceiving witnesses

39 Destroying evidence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.158
curation status: Proposed
has part: 39(1) Destroying evidence
has part: 39(2) Destroying evidence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39
schema version: 2

39(1) Destroying evidence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.158
note: Destroying evidence in a federal judicial proceeding is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 39 Destroying evidence

crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits destroying evidence in a federal judicial proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the person knows that a book, document or thing of any kind is, or may be, required in evidence in a judicial proceeding;

crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits destroying evidence in a federal judicial proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the person: (i) destroys the book, document or thing;

crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits rendering evidence illegible, undecipherable or incapable of identification.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the person: (ii) renders the book, document or thing illegible, undecipherable or incapable of identification;

crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits destroying evidence with the intention of preventing it from being used in evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) the person does so with the intention of preventing the book, document or thing from being used in evidence;

crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits destroying evidence in a federal judicial proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (d) the judicial proceeding is a federal judicial proceeding.

39(2) Destroying evidence
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.158
note: Absolute liability applies for destroying evidence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 39 Destroying evidence

crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State is obligated to destroy evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges

crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39(2) Destroying evidence

4 June 2026
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments, applications, and modifications.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

4 July 2008
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
note: Same-Sex Relationships
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-10
schema version: 2

4 Dec 2009
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act 2010
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-11-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-11-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-11
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-11-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition

4 Apr 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
note: Schedule of items for Telecommunications Interception and Other Legislation Amendment (State Bodies) Act 2012
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-12-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-12-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-12
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-12-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: April 2012
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Identifies the temporal intervals for the commencement of the Act
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: The heading indicates an April date

4 Sept 2021 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Amendment (Remissions of Sentences) Act 2021
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-13-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-13-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-13
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-13-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

4 Nov 2025
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.264
note: Conditional commencement of Criminal Code Amendment (State Sponsors of Terrorism) Act 2025
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-14-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-14-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-14
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-14-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

4 Dec 2025
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.264
note: Schedule of items for commencement on June 4, 2026
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-15
schema version: 2

4 Child or
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.31
note: Suspect detention beyond 2 hours after arrest or magistrate's order is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-2
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of detention beyond 2 hours.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

4 Apr 1941
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-3
schema version: 2

4 Mar 1991
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
note: List of sections affected by the amendment act
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-4
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Mar 1991

4 May 2001 (s 2(2))
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
note: Duty to report age at time of conviction
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-5
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the defendant to report their age at time of conviction
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

4 June 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
note: Repeals, Consequentials and Transitionals Act 2001
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-6
schema version: 2

4 Apr 2002
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
note: Conditional commencement of Security Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2002
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-7-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-7
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

4 Nov 2005
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
note: Legislation history for Crimes Act 1914
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-8
schema version: 2

4 Nov 2006
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-9
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is no clear start or end date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Identifies temporal intervals between sections.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Section numbers increase consecutively.

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The compilation is structured in a logical manner.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the text into a hierarchical structure.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text is organized into volumes and parts.

40 Preventing witnesses from attending Court
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40(1) Preventing witnesses from attending Court
has part: 40(2) Preventing witnesses from attending Court
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40
schema version: 2

40(1) Preventing witnesses from attending Court
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
note: Preventing witnesses from attending Court
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-40-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Preventing witnesses from attending Court

crimes-act-1914-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 1 year.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits preventing witnesses from attending Court
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person has been subpoenaed or summoned to attend as a witness in a judicial proceeding; and (b) the first person prevents the other person from attending as a witness, or from producing anything in evidence, pursuant to the subpoena or summons; and (c) the judicial proceeding is a federal judicial proceeding.

crimes-act-1914-sec-40-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40(1) Preventing witnesses from attending Court

40(2) Preventing witnesses from attending Court
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
note: Prevents witnesses from attending Court
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-40-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Preventing witnesses from attending Court

crimes-act-1914-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits witnesses from attending Court
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-40-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40(2) Preventing witnesses from attending Court

41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
curation status: Proposed
has part: 41(1) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
has part: 41(1A) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
has part: 41(2) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
has part: 41(3) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
has part: 41(4) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
has part: 41(5) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
has part: 41(6) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
has part: 41(7) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41
schema version: 2

41(1) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
note: Conspiracy to bring false accusation is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conspiracy to bring false accusation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41(1) Conspiracy to bring false accusation

41(1A) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
note: Conspiracy to bring false accusation is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conspiracy to bring false accusation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41(1A) Conspiracy to bring false accusation

41(2) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
note: Agreement required for conspiracy to bring false accusation
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the overt act must have occurred during the time the agreement was in effect;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overt act must occur during agreement period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) For a person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1):

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must have entered into an agreement with one or more other persons;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires agreement for conspiracy
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (2) For a person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1):

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person and at least one other party to the agreement must have intended that a person be charged falsely with an offence pursuant to the agreement;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires intention for conspiracy
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (2) For a person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1):

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person or at least one other party to the agreement must have committed an overt act pursuant to the agreement;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires overt act for conspiracy
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (2) For a person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1):

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: at least one other party to the agreement must have intended that a person be charged falsely with an offence pursuant to the agreement;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires at least one other party for conspiracy
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (2) For a person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1):

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41(2) Conspiracy to bring false accusation

41(3) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
note: A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41(3) Conspiracy to bring false accusation

41(4) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
note: No person can be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1) if all other parties to the agreement have been acquitted of such an offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No person can be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The condition overlaps with the description 'no person can be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)'.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: All other parties to the agreement have been acquitted of such an offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No person can be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The condition is recognized by the AI system as a necessary condition for 'no person can be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)'.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: All other parties to the agreement have been acquitted of such an offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No person can be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If all parties are acquitted, then no person can be found guilty.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: All other parties to the agreement have been acquitted of such an offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No person can be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The condition diffuses into the description 'no person can be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)'.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: All other parties to the agreement have been acquitted of such an offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No person can be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The condition is until the point where all other parties to the agreement have been acquitted of such an offence.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: All other parties to the agreement have been acquitted of such an offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41(4) Conspiracy to bring false accusation

41(5) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
note: Must take reasonable steps to prevent false charging before committing an overt act.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must take reasonable steps to prevent false charging.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41(5) Conspiracy to bring false accusation

41(6) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
note: Court may dismiss charge if interests of justice require it.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Dismissal is permissible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to dismiss charge
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Court thinks interests of justice require dismissal

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41(6) Conspiracy to bring false accusation

41(7) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
note: Exempts subsection (1) from section 11.1 of the Criminal Code.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation

42 Conspiracy to defeat justice
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.161
curation status: Proposed
has part: 42(1) Conspiracy to defeat justice
has part: 42(2) Conspiracy to defeat justice
has part: 42(3) Conspiracy to defeat justice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42
schema version: 2

42(1) Conspiracy to defeat justice
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.161
note: Conspiring to obstruct justice is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-42-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Conspiracy to defeat justice

crimes-act-1914-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conspiracy to obstruct justice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-42-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(1) Conspiracy to defeat justice

42(2) Conspiracy to defeat justice
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.161
note: Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(b) element of the offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-42-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Conspiracy to defeat justice

crimes-act-1914-sec-42-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(2) Conspiracy to defeat justice

42(3) Conspiracy to defeat justice
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.161
note: Guilty of an offence against subsection (1)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-42-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Conspiracy to defeat justice

crimes-act-1914-sec-42-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(3) Conspiracy to defeat justice

43 Attempting to pervert justice
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.163
curation status: Proposed
has part: 43(1) Attempting to pervert justice
has part: 43(2) Attempting to pervert justice
has part: 43(3) Attempting to pervert justice
has part: 43(4) Attempting to pervert justice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-43
schema version: 2

43(1) Attempting to pervert justice
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.163
note: Attempting to obstruct or pervert justice is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-43-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 43 Attempting to pervert justice

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person attempts to obstruct, to prevent, to pervert or to defeat the course of justice in relation to a judicial power; and (b) the judicial power is the judicial power of the Commonwealth. Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits attempting to obstruct or pervert justice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person attempts to obstruct, to prevent, to pervert or to defeat the course of justice in relation to a judicial power; and (b) the judicial power is the judicial power of the Commonwealth. Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43(1) Attempting to pervert justice

43(2) Attempting to pervert justice
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.163
note: Absolute liability applies for attempting to pervert justice.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-43-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 43 Attempting to pervert justice

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state is obliged to prevent perverting justice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43(2) Attempting to pervert justice

43(3) Attempting to pervert justice
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.163
note: Conduct must be more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-43-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 43 Attempting to pervert justice

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct must occur during a specific time period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conduct must occur during a specific time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) For the person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1), the person’s conduct must be more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct is performed with a specific cognitive function.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Conduct is performed with a specific cognitive function.
modality: CogAI
operator: with
premise text: (3) For the person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1), the person’s conduct must be more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct must be more than mere preparation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mere preparation is not enough to constitute an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (3) For the person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1), the person’s conduct must be more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct is diffused through a specific medium.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conduct is diffused through a specific medium.
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: (3) For the person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1), the person’s conduct must be more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct must continue until a certain point in time.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conduct must continue until a certain point in time.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (3) For the person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1), the person’s conduct must be more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43(3) Attempting to pervert justice

43(4) Attempting to pervert justice
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.163
note: Guilty if attempting to pervert justice is impossible
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-43-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 43 Attempting to pervert justice

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action of perverting justice overlaps with subsection (1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The action of perverting justice overlaps with subsection (1)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (4) A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The system recognizes the action of perverting justice as a class
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The system recognizes the action of perverting justice as a class
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (4) A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Guilty if attempting to pervert justice is impossible
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (4) A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action of perverting justice diffuses into subsection (1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The action of perverting justice diffuses into subsection (1)
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (4) A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action of perverting justice is until the impossibility of doing so
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The action of perverting justice is until the impossibility of doing so
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (4) A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43(4) Attempting to pervert justice

44 Compounding offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.163
note: Agreement to compound or conceal an offence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-44-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to compound or conceal an offence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-44-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44 Compounding offences

45 Inserting advertisements without authority of court
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.164
curation status: Proposed
has part: 45(1) Inserting advertisements without authority of court
has part: 45(2) Inserting advertisements without authority of court
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45
schema version: 2

45(1) Inserting advertisements without authority of court
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.164
note: Inserting advertisements without court authority is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-45-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Inserting advertisements without authority of court

crimes-act-1914-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits inserting advertisements without court authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-45-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45(1) Inserting advertisements without authority of court

45(2) Inserting advertisements without authority of court
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.164
note: Inserting advertisements without court authority is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-45-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Inserting advertisements without authority of court

crimes-act-1914-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits inserting advertisements without court authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-45-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45(2) Inserting advertisements without authority of court

45A Criminal detention definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.165
note: Defines criminal detention in respect of an offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-45a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-45a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-45a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45a
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-45a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States the definition of criminal detention.
modality: Deontic
operator: is

crimes-act-1914-sec-45a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a subclass of 'detention' as 'criminal detention'.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a

crimes-act-1914-sec-45a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45A Criminal detention definitions

46 Aiding prisoner to escape
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.165
note: Aiding prisoner to escape is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Aiding prisoner to escape is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits aiding prisoner to escape.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person aids the prisoner: (i) to escape from that detention; or (ii) to attempt to escape from that detention; and (c) the prisoner escapes, or attempts to escape, from that detention;

crimes-act-1914-sec-46-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46 Aiding prisoner to escape

46A Aiding prisoner to escape—conveying thing into prison etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.166
curation status: Proposed
has part: 46A(1) Aiding prisoner to escape—conveying thing into prison etc.
has part: 46A(2) Aiding prisoner to escape—conveying thing into prison etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46a
schema version: 2

46A(1) Aiding prisoner to escape—conveying thing into prison etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.166
note: Conveying a thing into prison to facilitate prisoner escape is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 46A Aiding prisoner to escape—conveying thing into prison etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conveying a thing into prison to facilitate prisoner escape is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conveying a thing into prison occurs between the first person and the prisoner.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conveying a thing into prison to facilitate prisoner escape is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of conveying a thing into prison as a prohibited act using cognitive AI.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conveying a thing into prison to facilitate prisoner escape is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of conveying a thing into prison to facilitate prisoner escape.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conveying a thing into prison to facilitate prisoner escape is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conveying a thing into prison does not diffuse the risk of prisoner escape.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Not
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conveying a thing into prison to facilitate prisoner escape is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conveying a thing into prison occurs until the prisoner escapes.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46A(1) Aiding prisoner to escape—conveying thing into prison etc.

46A(2) Aiding prisoner to escape—conveying thing into prison etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.166
note: Conveying thing into prison for aiding prisoner to escape
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 46A Aiding prisoner to escape—conveying thing into prison etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Relates to a specific time period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(d) element of the offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conveying thing into prison for aiding prisoner to escape
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(d) element of the offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46A(2) Aiding prisoner to escape—conveying thing into prison etc.

47 Escaping
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.167
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47(1) Escaping
has part: 47(2) Escaping
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47
schema version: 2

47(1) Escaping
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.167
note: Escaping from lawful federal criminal detention is an offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Escaping

crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between escaping and detention.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence recognizes escaping from detention as an offence.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits escaping from lawful federal criminal detention.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuse responsibility for escaping from detention.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between escaping and detention.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(1) Escaping

47(2) Escaping
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.167
note: Absolute liability applies for escaping.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Escaping

crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State obliges to provide absolute liability.
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges

crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(2) Escaping

47A Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.167
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47A(1) Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention
has part: 47A(2) Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47a
schema version: 2

47A(1) Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.167
note: Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47A Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention

crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between rescuing a prisoner and criminal detention.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.

crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention as an offence.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.

crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.

crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of knowledge about rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.

crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Eventual occurrence of rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention.
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.

crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47A(1) Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention

47A(2) Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.167
note: Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47A Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention

crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47A(2) Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention

47B Person unlawfully at large
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.167
note: Leaving prison without permission is an offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47b
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the detention was lawful federal criminal detention; and
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Detention overlaps with leaving prison.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person leaves the prison, lock-up or other place; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of leaving prison without permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in accordance with a permission given under a law of a State or Territory (other than the Australian Capital Territory), the person leaves the prison, lock-up or other place; and
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to leave prison is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the detention was lawful federal criminal detention; and
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State has an obligation to prevent leaving prison.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person leaves the prison, lock-up or other place; and
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Leaving prison repeats the action of detention.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47B Person unlawfully at large

47C Permitting escape
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.168
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47C(1) Permitting escape
has part: 47C(2) Permitting escape
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47c
schema version: 2

47C(1) Permitting escape
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.168
note: Permitting escape from lawful federal criminal detention is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47C Permitting escape

crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between permitting escape and lawful detention.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (c) the first person intentionally or negligently permits the prisoner to escape from the detention; and...

crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the first person intentionally or negligently permits the prisoner to escape...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of escape from lawful detention.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the first person intentionally or negligently permits the prisoner to escape...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of actions that facilitate escape from detention.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the first person is charged for the time being with the criminal detention of another person (the prisoner); and...

crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the first person intentionally or negligently permits the prisoner to escape...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of actions that facilitate escape from detention.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (d) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.

crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of permitting escape from lawful detention.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: (c) the first person intentionally or negligently permits the prisoner to escape from the detention; and...

crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47C(1) Permitting escape

47C(2) Permitting escape
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.168
note: Absolute liability applies for a specific element of the offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47C Permitting escape

crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits absolute liability for a specific element of the offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

48 Harbouring etc. an escapee
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.168
curation status: Proposed
has part: 48(1) Harbouring etc. an escapee
has part: 48(2) Harbouring etc. an escapee
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48
schema version: 2

48(1) Harbouring etc. an escapee
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.168
note: Harbouring an escapee is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 48 Harbouring etc. an escapee

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits harbouring an escapee.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the first person knows that another person (the escapee) has escaped from a place where the other person was held in criminal detention;

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits harbouring an escapee.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) the detention was lawful federal criminal detention;

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first person harbours, maintains or employs the escapee;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits harbouring an escapee.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if:

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits harbouring an escapee.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the first person harbours, maintains or employs the escapee;

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48(1) Harbouring etc. an escapee

48(2) Harbouring etc. an escapee
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.168
note: Absolute liability for harbouring an escapee
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 48 Harbouring etc. an escapee

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes temporal relation between harbouring and escapee
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Section 48(2)

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: See section 6.2 of the Criminal Code
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies the provision as a criminal law provision
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: Section 48(2)

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Absolute liability applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits harbouring an escapee
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 48(2)

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses responsibility for harbouring an escapee
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: Section 48(2)

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes recurring trace between harbouring and escapee
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: Section 48(2)

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48(2) Harbouring etc. an escapee

48A Sentence ceases to run while escaped prisoner at large
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.169
curation status: Proposed
has part: 48A(1) Sentence ceases to run while escaped prisoner at large
has part: 48A(2) Sentence ceases to run while escaped prisoner at large
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48a
schema version: 2

48A(1) Sentence ceases to run while escaped prisoner at large
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.169
note: Person must undergo additional punishment upon return to custody
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 48A Sentence ceases to run while escaped prisoner at large

crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the punishment that the person would have undergone if the person had not escaped.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between escape and return to custody
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) A person who commits an offence...

crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the punishment that the person would have undergone if the person had not escaped.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of escape on punishment
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) A person who commits an offence...

crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person would have undergone if the person had not escaped.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of obligation to undergo additional punishment by AI system
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (1) A person who commits an offence...

crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person would have undergone if the person had not escaped.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to undergo additional punishment
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) A person who commits an offence...

crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person would have undergone if the person had not escaped.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to undergo additional punishment
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (1) A person who commits an offence...

crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48A(1) Sentence ceases to run while escaped prisoner at large

48A(2) Sentence ceases to run while escaped prisoner at large
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.169
note: Punishment for escaped prisoner must be carried out upon return to custody.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 48A Sentence ceases to run while escaped prisoner at large

crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48A(2) Sentence ceases to run while escaped prisoner at large

49 Removing property under seizure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.170
curation status: Proposed
has part: 49(1) Removing property under seizure
has part: 49(2) Removing property under seizure
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49
schema version: 2

49(1) Removing property under seizure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.170
note: Receiving, removing, retaining, concealing or disposing of property attached under court process with intent to hinder or defeat attachment is an offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 49 Removing property under seizure

crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligates person to return property
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits court to attach property
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission

crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Property attachment is valid until returned
modality: LTL
operator: Until

crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49(1) Removing property under seizure

49(2) Removing property under seizure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.170
note: Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(b) element of the offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 49 Removing property under seizure

crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49(2) Removing property under seizure

5 Aboriginal
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.32
note: Suspect may be detained in accordance with
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5
schema version: 2

5 Nov 2006
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
note: Legislation history for Crimes Act 1914
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-10
schema version: 2

5 Dec 2011
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-11
schema version: 2

5 May
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.256
note: Conditional commencement of statute law revision act
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-12
schema version: 2

5 Section 5
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.112
note: Serious offenders are subject to this provision.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-2
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-5-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Indicates that serious offenders are subject to this provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: isSubjectTo

crimes-act-1914-sec-5-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Section 5

5 June 1987
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-3
schema version: 2

5 June 1987 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
note: Legislation history
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-4
schema version: 2

5 July 1994
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-5
schema version: 2

5 July 1994
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
note: Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2) 1994
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-6
schema version: 2

5 Dec 1994
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment Act 1994
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-7-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-7
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-5-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement on January 1, 1995

5 Dec 1999 (s 2(1) and
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
note: Dec 1999 (s 2(1) and gaz 1999, No S584)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-8
schema version: 2

5 July 2002
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
note: Schedule 1 (items 6, 8-13)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-9
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Detention obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Aboriginal

51 Interpretation
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.171
note: Defines terms used in this Part, including piracy and offence against the Part.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-51-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-51-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-51-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These definitions apply to this Part
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies terms used in this Part
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Definitions of piracy and offence against the Part are provided

crimes-act-1914-sec-51-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51 Interpretation

52 Piracy
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.172
note: No act of piracy is allowed.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-52-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-52
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits action
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

crimes-act-1914-sec-52-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52 Piracy

53 Operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.172
curation status: Proposed
has part: 53(1) Operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft
has part: 53(2) Operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53
schema version: 2

53(1) Operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.172
note: Voluntarily participate in pirate-controlled ship or aircraft operation
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 53 Operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft

crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person must not...

crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(1) Operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft

53(2) Operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.172
note: Prohibition on operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 53 Operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft

crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Acts must occur during piracy
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (2) This section applies to acts performed on the high seas, in places beyond the jurisdiction of any country or in Australia.

crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analyzes piracy classification
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
premise text: (2) This section applies to acts performed on the high seas, in places beyond the jurisdiction of any country or in Australia.

crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the act
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Acts must be recurring
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (2) This section applies to acts performed on the high seas, in places beyond the jurisdiction of any country or in Australia.

crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validates piracy classification
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
premise text: (2) This section applies to acts performed on the high seas, in places beyond the jurisdiction of any country or in Australia.

crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(2) Operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft

54 Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.173
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54(1) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
has part: 54(2) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
has part: 54(3) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
has part: 54(4) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54
schema version: 2

54(1) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.173
note: Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for seizure
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) A member of the Defence Force or a member of the Australian Federal Police may seize...

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits seizure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A member of the Defence Force or a member of the Australian Federal Police may seize...

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54(1) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.

54(2) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.173
note: Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft is prohibited in certain circumstances.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for seizure prohibition.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) A seizure may be effected: (a) in Australia; or (b) on the high seas; or (c) in a place beyond the jurisdiction of any country.

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies seizure as prohibited using AI reasoning.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (2) A seizure may be effected: (a) in Australia; or (b) on the high seas; or (c) in a place beyond the jurisdiction of any country.

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits seizure of pirate ships and aircraft.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A seizure may be effected:

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses seizure prohibition to related concepts.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) A seizure may be effected: (a) in Australia; or (b) on the high seas; or (c) in a place beyond the jurisdiction of any country.

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal trace for seizure prohibition.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (2) A seizure may be effected: (a) in Australia; or (b) on the high seas; or (c) in a place beyond the jurisdiction of any country.

54(3) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.173
note: Order to return seized property or forfeit it if used in commission of an offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between seizure and application for return.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (3) The Supreme Court of a State or Territory may:

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to return seized property or forfeit it.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54(3) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.

54(4) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.173
note: Conditions for return of seized property
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on Commonwealth
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

55 Written consent of Attorney-General required
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55(1) Written consent of Attorney-General required
has part: 55(2) Written consent of Attorney-General required
has part: 55(3) Written consent of Attorney-General required
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55
schema version: 2

55(1) Written consent of Attorney-General required
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
note: Prosecution requires Attorney-General's consent
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Written consent of Attorney-General required

crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires consent for prosecution
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(1) Written consent of Attorney-General required

55(2) Written consent of Attorney-General required
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
note: Attorney-General's consent required before proceeding with arrest, charge, and remand.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Written consent of Attorney-General required

crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proceedings cannot proceed without consent.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires Attorney-General's consent.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: No further step in the proceedings can be taken until consent is given.

crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(2) Written consent of Attorney-General required

55(3) Written consent of Attorney-General required
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
note: Attorney-General's consent required for discharge of accused
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Written consent of Attorney-General required

crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires Attorney-General's consent
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(3) Written consent of Attorney-General required

56 Evidence of certain matters
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56(1) Evidence of certain matters
has part: 56(2) Evidence of certain matters
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56
schema version: 2

56(1) Evidence of certain matters
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
note: Certificate as evidence of certain matters
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Evidence of certain matters

crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between certificate and proceedings
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: for the purposes of any proceedings for an offence against this Part, evidence of the facts stated in the certificate.

crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State obligation to provide certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between certificate and proceedings (recurring trace)
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: for the purposes of any proceedings for an offence against this Part, evidence of the facts stated in the certificate.

crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56(1) Evidence of certain matters

56(2) Evidence of certain matters
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
note: Definition of eligible person
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Evidence of certain matters

crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: eligible person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: SES employee in the Foreign Affairs Department

crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56(2) Evidence of certain matters

6 Suspect
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.32
note: Suspect may be detained in accordance with item 4 or 5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6
schema version: 2

6 July 2005
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
note: Conditional commencement of statute law revision act
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-10-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-10-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-10
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-10-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between statute law revision act and commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement specified

6 July 2005
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-11
schema version: 2

6 July 2005
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
note: Legislation Amendment Act 2005
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-12
schema version: 2

6 Nov 2009
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-13
schema version: 2

6 July 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-14
schema version: 2

6 July 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
note: Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2) 2010
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-15-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-15-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-15
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-15-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: No temporal interval specified

6 Nov 2025
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.264
note: Conditional commencement of strengthening oversight of the National Intelligence Community Act 2025
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-16-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-16-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-16
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-16-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval defined
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Commencement defined by section

6 Section 6
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.112
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6(2) Section 6
has part: 6(3) Section 6
has part: 6(1) Section 6
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2
schema version: 2

6(1) Section 6
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.112
note: Offence of recording or retaining identifying information from forensic material without destruction.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Section 6

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The destruction of forensic material overlaps with the recording or retention of identifying information.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person’s conduct causes any identifying information about a person obtained from forensic material taken from the person under this Part to be recorded or retained in the Commonwealth DNA database system at any time after this Part requires the forensic material to be destroyed;

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits recording or retaining identifying information from forensic material without destruction.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the person’s conduct causes any identifying information about a person obtained from forensic material taken from the person under this Part to be recorded or retained in the Commonwealth DNA database system at any time after this Part requires the forensic material to be destroyed;

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: There is an obligation to destroy forensic material before recording or retaining identifying information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person’s conduct causes any identifying information about a person obtained from forensic material taken from the person under this Part to be recorded or retained in the Commonwealth DNA database system at any time after this Part requires the forensic material to be destroyed;

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The destruction of forensic material is a prerequisite for recording or retention of identifying information.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person’s conduct causes any identifying information about a person obtained from forensic material taken from the person under this Part to be recorded or retained in the Commonwealth DNA database system at any time after this Part requires the forensic material to be destroyed;

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(1) Section 6

6(2) Section 6
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.112
note: Reckless matching of DNA profiles is prohibited. Ensure removal of identifying information from DNA database system after end of identifying period.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Section 6

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reckless matching of DNA profiles.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the person’s conduct causes the matching that is not permitted by this Part of a DNA profile...

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reckless conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the person is reckless as to any such matching of profiles.

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offence if not removed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must ensure removal
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: No identifying information should be retained

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies imprisonment if reckless conduct occurs.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (b) the person is reckless as to any such matching of profiles.

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(2) Section 6

6(3) Section 6
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.112
note: Exemption for administering Commonwealth DNA database system
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Section 6

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows conduct not permitted by the Part for a specific purpose
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

6 Apr 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-3
schema version: 2

6 Apr 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
note: Reference to section 4(1), (2) and schedule 10.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-4
schema version: 2

6 July 2002
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-5
schema version: 2

6 July 2005
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-6
schema version: 2

6 July 2005
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.246
note: Conditional commencement of Anti-terrorism Act 2004
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-7-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-7
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified

6 July 2005
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-8
schema version: 2

6 July 2005
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
note: Amendment to Criminal Code
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-9
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval during which suspects may be detained in accordance with item 4 or 5
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: in custody

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to detain suspects in accordance with item 4 or 5
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 Suspect

7 May 1915
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7
schema version: 2

7 Dec 2023
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.263
note: Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Prohibited Hate Symbols and Other Measures) Act 2023
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-10-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-10
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-7-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits hate symbols
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

7 Feb 2025
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.264
note: Conditional commencement of Administrative Review Tribunal (Miscellaneous Measures) Act 2025
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-11
schema version: 2

7 Apr 1997
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
note: Royal Assent for Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act 1997
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-2
schema version: 2

7 Mar 2000
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-3
schema version: 2

7 May 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-4
schema version: 2

7 Dec 2006
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-5
schema version: 2

7 Dec 2006
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
note: Transitional provisions and consequential amendments
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-6
schema version: 2

7 Mar 2013
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
note: Consequential amendments to the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 2013
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-7
schema version: 2

7 Dec 2016
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-8
schema version: 2

7 June 2017 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
note: Prohibition on certain crimes
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-9-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-9
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-7-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain crimes
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

8 July 1996
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8
schema version: 2

8 July 1996
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
note: Amendment by Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 41, 2003
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-8-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-2
schema version: 2

8 Nov 2005
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
note: Legislation Amendment (Video Link Evidence and Other Measures) Act 136, 2005
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-8-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-3
schema version: 2

8 Dec 2018
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
note: Legislation history for Crimes Act 1914
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-8-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-4
schema version: 2

8 Dec 2021
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-8-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-5
schema version: 2

8 Dec 2021
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
note: National Security Legislation Amendment (Comprehensive Review and Other Measures No. 1) Act 2022
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-8-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-6
schema version: 2

8 Apr 2026
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.265
note: Awaiting commencement
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-8-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-7
schema version: 2

85E Interpretation—definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.175
note: Definitions for postal terms
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-6
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-7
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85e
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definitions for postal terms
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Australia Post means the Australian Postal Corporation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: article in the course of post means an article that is being carried by post, and includes an article that has been collected or received by Australia Post for carriage by post

crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: employee means a person who performs services for or on behalf of Australia Post.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: employee, in relation to Australia Post, includes a person who performs services for or on behalf of Australia Post and an employee of such a person

crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: postal message means a material record of an unwritten communication.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: mail-bag includes a package, parcel, container or wrapper belonging to Australia Post in which articles in the course of post are customarily contained

crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: postal message is a material record of an unwritten communication.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: postal message means: (a) a material record of an unwritten communication: (i) carried by post; or (ii) collected or received by Australia Post for carriage by post;

crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: postal message is a material record issued by Australia Post.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: postal message means: (b) a material record issued by Australia Post as a record of an unwritten communication: (i) carried by post; or (ii) collected or received by Australia Post for carriage by post.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-7
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Australia Post means the Australian Postal Corporation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: carried by post means carried by or through Australia Post.

85F Interpretation—expressions used in Australian Postal
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
note: Definitions of expressions used in Australian Postal Corporation Act 1989
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85f-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85f
schema version: 2

85G Forgery of postage stamps etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
curation status: Proposed
has part: 85G(1) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
has part: 85G(2) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
has part: 85G(3) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
has part: 85G(4) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
has part: 85G(5) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
has part: 85G(5A) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
has part: 85G(6) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85g
schema version: 2

85G(1) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
note: A person shall not forge a postage stamp.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 85G Forgery of postage stamps etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No one can forge a postage stamp.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of forging postage stamps.
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
premise text: (1) A person shall not forge a postage stamp.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85G(1) Forgery of postage stamps etc.

85G(2) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
note: Uttering a forged postage stamp is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 85G Forgery of postage stamps etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Uttering a forged postage stamp is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person shall not utter a postage stamp knowing it to be forged.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 10 years is imposed for the prohibited action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a penalty for the prohibited action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person shall not utter a postage stamp knowing it to be forged. Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action is classified as a crime.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the action as a crime.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person shall not utter a postage stamp knowing it to be forged. Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The penalty implies a prohibition.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: The penalty implies a prohibition.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (2) A person shall not utter a postage stamp knowing it to be forged. Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85G(2) Forgery of postage stamps etc.

85G(3) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
note: Making, using, or selling forged postage stamps is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85g-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 85G Forgery of postage stamps etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85G(3) Forgery of postage stamps etc.

85G(4) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
note: Making, using, or selling forged postage stamps is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85g-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 85G Forgery of postage stamps etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85G(4) Forgery of postage stamps etc.

85G(5) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
note: Making, using, or selling a die capable of making a mark resembling a postage stamp is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85g-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 85G Forgery of postage stamps etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...knowing that it is such a die,...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making, using, or selling a die capable of making a mark resembling a postage stamp.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) A person shall not...

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85G(5) Forgery of postage stamps etc.

85G(5A) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to reasonable excuse.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5a-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85g-ss-5a
schema version: 2
part of: 85G Forgery of postage stamps etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5a-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Reasonable excuse is a belief.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85G(5A) Forgery of postage stamps etc.

85G(6) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
note: Uttering a forged postage stamp is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85g-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 85G Forgery of postage stamps etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Uttering a forged postage stamp is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (6) A person shall be taken to utter a forged postage stamp if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Using or dealing with a forged postage stamp is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the action of using or dealing with a forged postage stamp.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (6) A person shall be taken to utter a forged postage stamp if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Attempting to induce any person to use, deal with, act on or accept a forged postage stamp is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the action of attempting to induce any person to use, deal with, act on or accept a forged postage stamp.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (6) A person shall be taken to utter a forged postage stamp if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Putting off a forged postage stamp is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the action of putting off a forged postage stamp.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (6) A person shall be taken to utter a forged postage stamp if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Using a forged postage stamp is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the action of using a forged postage stamp.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (6) A person shall be taken to utter a forged postage stamp if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85G(6) Forgery of postage stamps etc.

85H Special paper for postage stamps
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.177
note: Prohibition on making, using, or selling paper resembling postage stamp paper.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85h-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85h-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85h
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

crimes-act-1914-sec-85h-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85H Special paper for postage stamps

85N Wrongful delivery of postal article etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.178
note: Prohibition on intentionally delivering postal articles to incorrect persons.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85n-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85n-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85n
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits intentional delivery of postal articles.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

crimes-act-1914-sec-85n-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85N Wrongful delivery of postal article etc.

85Q Forgery of postal messages etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.178
curation status: Proposed
has part: 85Q(1) Forgery of postal messages etc.
has part: 85Q(2) Forgery of postal messages etc.
has part: 85Q(3) Forgery of postal messages etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85q
schema version: 2

85Q(1) Forgery of postal messages etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.178
note: A person shall not forge a postal message.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85q-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 85Q Forgery of postal messages etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits forging postal messages.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85Q(1) Forgery of postal messages etc.

85Q(2) Forgery of postal messages etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.178
note: Uttering a forged postal message is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85q-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 85Q Forgery of postal messages etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Uttering a forged postal message is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person shall not utter a postal message knowing it to be forged.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition on the action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person shall not utter a postal message knowing it to be forged.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agent is subject to the prohibition.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes the prohibition on the agent.
modality: Deontic
operator: Impose
premise text: (2) A person shall not utter a postal message knowing it to be forged.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Prohibits the action using linear logic.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person shall not utter a postal message knowing it to be forged.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85Q(2) Forgery of postal messages etc.

85Q(3) Forgery of postal messages etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.178
note: Uttering a forged postal message is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85q-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 85Q Forgery of postal messages etc.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action occurs during the prohibition.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Occurs during the action.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (3) A person shall be taken to utter a forged postal message if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Uttering a forged postal message implies prohibition through argumentation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implies the prohibition through argumentation.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
premise text: (3) A person shall be taken to utter a forged postal message if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Uttering a forged postal message is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A person shall be taken to utter a forged postal message if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Uttering a forged postal message implies prohibition.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies the prohibition.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (3) A person shall be taken to utter a forged postal message if...

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85Q(3) Forgery of postal messages etc.

85R Wrongful delivery of postal messages
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.178
note: Prohibits intentionally delivering postal messages to unauthorized recipients.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85r-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85r-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85r
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85r-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of intentional delivery
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: None

crimes-act-1914-sec-85r-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85R Wrongful delivery of postal messages

85T Sending false postal messages
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.179
note: Sending false postal messages is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85t-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85t-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85t
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85t-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits sending false postal messages.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-85t-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85T Sending false postal messages

85U Obstructing carriage of articles by post
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.179
note: No person shall intentionally obstruct or hinder the carriage by post of any article.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85u-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85u-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85u
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85u-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits obstructing carriage by post
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-act-1914-sec-85u-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85U Obstructing carriage of articles by post

85V Interference with property of Australia Post
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.179
curation status: Proposed
has part: 85V(1) Interference with property of Australia Post
has part: 85V(1A) Interference with property of Australia Post
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85v
schema version: 2

85V(1) Interference with property of Australia Post
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.179
note: Prohibition on tampering with Australia Post property
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85v-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 85V Interference with property of Australia Post

crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids intentional tampering with Australia Post property
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

85V(1A) Interference with property of Australia Post
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.179
note: Prohibition on interference with property of Australia Post
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85v-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 85V Interference with property of Australia Post

crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: absolute liability applies to whichever one of the following physical elements of circumstance is relevant to the offence:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes temporal relation between offence and circumstance
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (1A) For the purposes of an offence against subsection (1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: absolute liability applies to whichever one of the following physical elements of circumstance is relevant to the offence:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies elements of circumstance relevant to the offence using AI
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (1A) For the purposes of an offence against subsection (1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: absolute liability applies to whichever one of the following physical elements of circumstance is relevant to the offence:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits interference with property
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1A) For the purposes of an offence against subsection (1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: absolute liability applies to whichever one of the following physical elements of circumstance is relevant to the offence:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about interference with property
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (1A) For the purposes of an offence against subsection (1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: absolute liability applies to whichever one of the following physical elements of circumstance is relevant to the offence:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes recurring trace between offence and circumstance
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (1A) For the purposes of an offence against subsection (1)

85W Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.180
curation status: Proposed
has part: 85W(1) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
has part: 85W(2) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
has part: 85W(3) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
has part: 85W(3A) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
has part: 85W(4) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85w
schema version: 2

85W(1) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.180
note: Prohibition on carrying controlled drugs or plants by post.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85w-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 85W Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids intentional action.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85W(1) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by

85W(2) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.180
note: Validity of law not affected by concurrent offence against subsection (1)
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85w-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 85W Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Validity of law not affected
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to uphold law validity
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Act constitutes offence against subsection (1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85W(2) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by

85W(3) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.180
note: No obligation to comply with subsection (1) if conduct is for the purposes of the Medical Chest Program or in the course of duties, powers or functions performed by Australia Post or RFDSA.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85w-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 85W Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply if conduct is engaged in after a certain date.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for subsection (1)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
premise text: Subsection (1) applies to conduct engaged in before a certain date.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) imposes an obligation on individuals to comply with its requirements.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the obligation to comply with subsection (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The obligation to comply with subsection (1) is defined in section Z.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not impose an obligation on individuals to comply with its requirements if conduct is for the purposes of the Medical Chest Program or in the course of duties, powers or functions performed by Australia Post or RFDSA.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the exemption from subsection (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The exemption from subsection (1) is defined in section AA.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply if conduct is engaged in after a certain date.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for subsection (1)
modality: LTL
operator: <
premise text: Subsection (1) applies to conduct engaged in before a certain date.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85W(3) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by

85W(3A) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.180
note: Permitted conduct under certain circumstances
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85w-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 85W Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap with regulatory programs
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3A) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to conduct engaged in by a person if the person engages in the conduct: for the purposes of, and in accordance with, a program, prescribed by the regulations, for the supply of packages of pharmaceutical products and medical supplies to remote locations;

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of regulatory programs
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (3A) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to conduct engaged in by a person if the person engages in the conduct: for the purposes of, and in accordance with, a program, prescribed by the regulations, for the supply of packages of pharmaceutical products and medical supplies to remote locations;

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to engage in conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring conduct under regulatory programs
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (3A) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to conduct engaged in by a person if the person engages in the conduct: for the purposes of, and in accordance with, a program, prescribed by the regulations, for the supply of packages of pharmaceutical products and medical supplies to remote locations;

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validation of regulatory programs
modality: SHACL
operator: Validates
premise text: (3A) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to conduct engaged in by a person if the person engages in the conduct: for the purposes of, and in accordance with, a program, prescribed by the regulations, for the supply of packages of pharmaceutical products and medical supplies to remote locations;

85W(4) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.180
note: Defines Medical Chest Program
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85w-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 85W Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Program is Medical Chest Program
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
premise text: Medical Chest Program is a program

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85W(4) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by

85Z Articles carried by post to be taken to be Australia Post’s
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.183
note: Article carried by post is taken to be Australia Post's property.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85z-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85z-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85z
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85z-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: takes

85ZA Postage stamps to be valuable securities etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.183
note: A postage stamp is taken to be a valuable security for larceny purposes.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85za-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85za-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85za
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85za-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: takes

crimes-act-1914-sec-85za-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZA Postage stamps to be valuable securities etc.

85ZL Interpretation of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.184
note: Definitions and interpretations for Part VIIC of the Crimes Act 1914
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zl-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zl-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zl
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zl-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definitions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

85ZM Meaning of conviction and spent conviction
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.189
curation status: Proposed
has part: 85ZM(1) Meaning of conviction and spent conviction
has part: 85ZM(2) Meaning of conviction and spent conviction
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zm
schema version: 2

85ZM(1) Meaning of conviction and spent conviction
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.189
note: A person shall be taken to have been convicted of an offence if certain conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zm-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZM Meaning of conviction and spent conviction

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZM(1) Meaning of conviction and spent conviction

85ZM(2) Meaning of conviction and spent conviction
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.189
note: A person's conviction of an offence is spent if certain conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zm-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZM Meaning of conviction and spent conviction

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part, a person’s conviction of an offence is spent if:

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZM(2) Meaning of conviction and spent conviction

85ZN Meaning of quash
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.189
note: A person's conviction of an offence shall be taken to have been quashed under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zn
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: court's decision to take the offence into account was made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The finding of guilt has been quashed or set aside during the period when the court's decision to take the offence into account was made.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: finding of guilt has been quashed or set aside

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: person's conviction of the offence shall be taken to have been quashed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the conviction has been quashed or set aside, then the person's conviction of the offence shall be taken to have been quashed.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: conviction has been quashed or set aside

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: person's conviction of the offence shall be taken to have been quashed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the court's decision to take the offence into account has been set aside, then the person's conviction of the offence shall be taken to have been quashed.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: court's decision to take the offence into account has been set aside

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: court's decision to take the offence into account was made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The person's conviction of the other offence has been quashed or set aside during the period when the court's decision to take the offence into account was made.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: person's conviction of the other offence

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZN Meaning of quash

85ZP Application of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
curation status: Proposed
has part: 85ZP(1) Application of Part
has part: 85ZP(2) Application of Part
has part: 85ZP(3) Application of Part
has part: 85ZP(4) Application of Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zp
schema version: 2

85ZP(1) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
note: This Part applies in relation to a person convicted of an offence
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZP Application of Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to a person convicted of an offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The Part applies in relation to a person convicted of an offence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: applies
premise text: (1) This Part applies...

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to a person convicted of an offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The Part applies in relation to a person convicted of an offence
modality: Argumentation
operator: applies
premise text: (1) This Part applies...

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to a person convicted of an offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The Part applies in relation to a person convicted of an offence
modality: CogAI
operator: applies
premise text: (1) This Part applies...

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to a person convicted of an offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Part applies in relation to a person convicted of an offence
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (1) This Part applies...

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to a person convicted of an offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The Part applies in relation to a person convicted of an offence
modality: Diffusion
operator: applies
premise text: (1) This Part applies...

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZP(1) Application of Part

85ZP(2) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
note: A reference to a person convicted of an offence does not include a reference to a body corporate.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZP Application of Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclude bodies corporate from references to persons convicted of offences.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: (2) A reference in this Part to a person convicted of an offence does not include a reference to a body corporate.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZP(2) Application of Part

85ZP(3) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
note: Disclosing or taking into account a conviction of an offence is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zp-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZP Application of Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosing or taking into account a conviction of an offence is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Nothing in this Part authorises a person or body to disclose or take into account a conviction of an offence.

85ZP(4) Application of Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
note: Nothing in this Part affects anything lawfully done before a pardon is granted or a conviction is quashed or spent.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zp-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZP Application of Part

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Nothing in this Part affects anything lawfully done before a pardon is granted or a conviction is quashed or spent.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZP(4) Application of Part

85ZQ Part binds the Crown
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
note: Part binds the Crown in right of the Commonwealth, of each of the States, of the Australian Capital Territory and of the Northern Territory.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zq-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zq-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zq-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zq
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The part binds the Crown.
modality: Deontic
operator: Binding

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zq-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The part imposes an obligation on the Crown.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zq-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZQ Part binds the Crown

85ZR Pardons for persons wrongly convicted
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.191
curation status: Proposed
has part: 85ZR(1) Pardons for persons wrongly convicted
has part: 85ZR(2) Pardons for persons wrongly convicted
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zr
schema version: 2

85ZR(1) Pardons for persons wrongly convicted
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.191
note: A person wrongly convicted of a Commonwealth offence is taken for all purposes as never having been convicted.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZR Pardons for persons wrongly convicted

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Despite any other Commonwealth law or State law, where a person has been granted a free and absolute pardon for a Commonwealth offence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval during which the person is treated as never having been convicted.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The pardon is granted despite any other Commonwealth law or State law.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the person shall be taken for all purposes as never having been convicted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Supports the argument that the person should be treated as never having been convicted.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: The pardon is granted despite any other Commonwealth law or State law.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person shall be taken for all purposes as never having been convicted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to treat the person as never having been convicted.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The State is required to grant pardons for wrongful convictions.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Despite any other Commonwealth law or State law, where a person has been granted a free and absolute pardon...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission to treat the person as never having been convicted.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: The State is required to grant pardons for wrongful convictions.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person shall be taken, in a foreign country, by any Commonwealth authority or State authority in that country, for all purposes, never to have been convicted of the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Indicates that the person is treated as never having been convicted repeatedly.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: The person shall be taken, in any State or Territory, for all purposes, never to have been convicted of the offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZR(1) Pardons for persons wrongly convicted

85ZR(2) Pardons for persons wrongly convicted
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.191
note: A person wrongly convicted under a State or foreign law is taken never to have been convicted of an offence in corresponding circumstances or for a corresponding purpose.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZR Pardons for persons wrongly convicted

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Corresponding circumstances or for a corresponding purpose.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which the person is treated as never having been convicted of an offence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: State law

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Never to have been convicted of that offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justifies the obligation on the State to treat a person as never having been convicted of an offence.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: State law

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Never to have been convicted of that offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analyzes the implications of the obligation on the State to treat a person as never having been convicted of an offence.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: State law

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Never to have been convicted of that offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State to treat a person as never having been convicted of an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: State law

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Never to have been convicted of that offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applies the obligation on the State to treat a person as never having been convicted of an offence.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: State law

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZR(2) Pardons for persons wrongly convicted

85ZS Effect of pardons for persons wrongly convicted
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.191
note: Obligation on States to consider pardons for persons wrongly convicted
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zs-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zs-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zs
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zs-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on States to consider pardons for persons wrongly convicted
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zs-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZS Effect of pardons for persons wrongly convicted

85ZT Quashed convictions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.192
curation status: Proposed
has part: 85ZT(1) Quashed convictions
has part: 85ZT(2) Quashed convictions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zt
schema version: 2

85ZT(1) Quashed convictions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.192
note: No disclosure required for quashed convictions in States or Territories.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zt-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zt-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZT Quashed convictions

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No obligation to disclose quashed convictions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZT(1) Quashed convictions

85ZT(2) Quashed convictions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.192
note: No disclosure required for quashed convictions
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zt-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zt-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZT Quashed convictions

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of quashed convictions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

85ZU Effect of quashed convictions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.193
note: No disclosure of conviction is allowed without consent.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zu-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zu-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zu-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zu
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zu-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zu-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Confidentiality of conviction information
modality: Epistemic
operator: Confidentiality

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zu-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZU Effect of quashed convictions

85ZV Spent convictions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.194
curation status: Proposed
has part: 85ZV(1) Spent convictions
has part: 85ZV(2) Spent convictions
has part: 85ZV(3) Spent convictions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zv
schema version: 2

85ZV(1) Spent convictions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.194
note: No disclosure of spent convictions is required.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zv-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZV Spent convictions

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of spent convictions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZV(1) Spent convictions

85ZV(2) Spent convictions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.194
note: Must not disclose spent convictions to authorities.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zv-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZV Spent convictions

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure of spent convictions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZV(2) Spent convictions

85ZV(3) Spent convictions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.194
note: Disclosure of spent convictions is not required in certain circumstances or for a particular purpose.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zv-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZV Spent convictions

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to withhold disclosure of spent convictions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

85ZW Effect of right of non-disclosure
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.195
note: No disclosure of conviction is allowed without consent.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zw-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zw-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zw-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zw
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of conviction.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zw-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Depends on consent for disclosure.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Conditional

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zw-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZW Effect of right of non-disclosure

85ZX Convictions of further Commonwealth or Territory offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.196
curation status: Proposed
has part: 85ZX(1) Convictions of further Commonwealth or Territory offences
has part: 85ZX(2) Convictions of further Commonwealth or Territory offences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zx
schema version: 2

85ZX(1) Convictions of further Commonwealth or Territory offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.196
note: Court may order cessation of Division 3 application in relation to earlier offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zx-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZX Convictions of further Commonwealth or Territory offences

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may order cessation of Division 3 application.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZX(1) Convictions of further Commonwealth or Territory offences

85ZX(2) Convictions of further Commonwealth or Territory offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.196
note: Division 3 ceases to apply or does not apply to the person in relation to the earlier offence until the waiting period for the later offence has ended.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zx-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZX Convictions of further Commonwealth or Territory offences

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: waiting period for the later offence has ended
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Waiting period for the later offence has ended
modality: AllenInterval
operator: has ended
premise text: later offence has occurred

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: does not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Division 3 ceases to apply
modality: Deontic
operator: ceases
premise text: Division 3 applies

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Division 3 ceases to apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Division 3 does not apply in relation to the earlier offence
modality: Deontic
operator: does not apply
premise text: waiting period for the later offence has ended

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Division 3 ceases to apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Division 3 ceases to apply until the waiting period for the later offence has ended
modality: LinearLogic
operator: until
premise text: waiting period for the later offence has not ended

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZX(2) Convictions of further Commonwealth or Territory offences

85ZY Convictions of further State or foreign offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.196
note: Division 3 applies to a person in relation to an offence of which the person was convicted, or would so apply to the person if the waiting period for the offence had ended.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zy
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Division 3 applies to a person in relation to an offence of which the person was convicted, or would so apply to the person if the waiting period for the offence had ended.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: interval relation

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Division 3 applies to a person in relation to an offence of which the person was convicted, or would so apply to the person if the waiting period for the offence had ended.
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive agent

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Division 3 applies to a person in relation to an offence of which the person was convicted, or would so apply to the person if the waiting period for the offence had ended.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Division 3 applies to a person in relation to an offence of which the person was convicted, or would so apply to the person if the waiting period for the offence had ended.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Division 3 applies to a person in relation to an offence of which the person was convicted, or would so apply to the person if the waiting period for the offence had ended.
modality: LTL
operator: recurring trace

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZY Convictions of further State or foreign offences

85ZZ Information Commissioner’s functions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.198
curation status: Proposed
has part: 85ZZ(1) Information Commissioner’s functions
has part: 85ZZ(1A) Information Commissioner’s functions
has part: 85ZZ(2) Information Commissioner’s functions
has part: 85ZZ(3) Information Commissioner’s functions
has part: 85ZZ(4) Information Commissioner’s functions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zz
schema version: 2

85ZZ(1) Information Commissioner’s functions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.198
note: Department head is respondent to complaint about act or practice of Department or officer. The Information Commissioner has functions to investigate and try to settle breaches of Division 2 or 3. Right to complain about a breach of Division 2 or 3.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zz-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZZ Information Commissioner’s functions

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Department head is respondent to complaint.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Department head is respondent to complaint.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Secretary or head of Department is respondent to complaint.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Secretary or head of Department is respondent to complaint.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Secretary or head of Department is respondent to complaint.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: If a complaint is about an act or practice of a Commonwealth Department or a State Department, the Secretary or head of the Department is the respondent to the complaint.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Secretary or head of Department has duty to respond to complaint.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Secretary or head of Department has duty to respond to complaint.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: If a complaint is about an act or practice of a Commonwealth Department or a State Department, the Secretary or head of the Department is the respondent to the complaint.

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to complain
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZZ(1) Information Commissioner’s functions

85ZZ(1A) Information Commissioner’s functions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.198
note: Privacy functions for the purposes of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zz-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZZ Information Commissioner’s functions

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: has

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZZ(1A) Information Commissioner’s functions

85ZZ(2) Information Commissioner’s functions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.198
note: Minister is respondent to complaint about act or practice of another authority Ensure protection of human rights and social interests while performing functions. Complaint must be in writing.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zz-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZZ Information Commissioner’s functions

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has obligation to respond to complaint
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written complaint
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZZ(2) Information Commissioner’s functions

85ZZ(3) Information Commissioner’s functions
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.198
note: Chief executive officer of authority is respondent to complaint. Duty to provide help to a person making a complaint.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zz-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZZ Information Commissioner’s functions

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: chief executive officer is respondent to complaint.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority has obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: is

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: duty

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZZ(3) Information Commissioner’s functions

85ZZ(4) Information Commissioner’s functions
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.198
note: Specify respondent to complaint
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85zz-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 85ZZ Information Commissioner’s functions

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must specify respondent
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85ZZ(4) Information Commissioner’s functions

86B Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.221
note: Authorization for collection, use and disclosure of personal information
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86b-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86b
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-86b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on Commonwealth bodies
modality: Deontic
operator: has

86C Target entity may collect sensitive information for integrity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.221
note: Target entity may collect sensitive information for integrity purposes.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86c
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-86c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86C Target entity may collect sensitive information for integrity

86D Target entity may use personal information for integrity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.222
note: Target entity may use personal information for integrity purpose relating to the entity.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86d-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86d
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-86d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86D Target entity may use personal information for integrity

86E Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.222
curation status: Proposed
has part: 86E(1) Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
has part: 86E(2) Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
has part: 86E(3) Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86e
schema version: 2

86E(1) Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.222
note: Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity is required if a law limits disclosure and exempts it from the limitation.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 86E Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity

crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the disclosure is authorised under an Australian law or certain other exceptions apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Disclosure must occur between the time the information is collected and when it is disclosed to the target entity.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (b) exempts from the limitation a disclosure authorised by a law of the Commonwealth.

crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the disclosure is authorised under an Australian law or certain other exceptions apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Must provide personal information to target entity for integrity.
modality: CogAI
operator: must provide
premise text: (1) This section applies if a law of the Commonwealth or of a State or Territory:...

crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the disclosure is authorised under an Australian law or certain other exceptions apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (1) This section applies if a law of the Commonwealth or of a State or Territory:...

crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and exempts from the limitation a disclosure authorised by a law of the Commonwealth.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Disclosure must occur everywhere in the jurisdiction where the information is collected and disclosed.
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: (a) limits disclosure of some or all personal information by a person, body or authority (however described);...

crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and exempts from the limitation a disclosure authorised by a law of the Commonwealth.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Must conform to the requirements for disclosure of personal information.
modality: SHACL
operator: must conform to
premise text: (a) limits disclosure of some or all personal information by a person, body or authority (however described);...

crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86E(1) Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity

86E(2) Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.222
note: Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity purpose
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 86E Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity

crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Disclosure for integrity purpose

86E(3) Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.222
note: Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity purposes is required.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 86E Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity

crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires disclosure of personal information.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86E(3) Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity

86F This Part does not limit other laws
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.223
note: This Part does not limit other laws
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86f-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86f
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-86f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part does not imply limitation of laws
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limitation of laws
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibits

86G Guidelines on the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.223
curation status: Proposed
has part: 86G(1) Guidelines on the operation of this Part
has part: 86G(2) Guidelines on the operation of this Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86g
schema version: 2

86G(1) Guidelines on the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.223
note: Publishing guidelines approved by the Information Commissioner.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86g-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 86G Guidelines on the operation of this Part

86G(2) Guidelines on the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.223
note: Guidelines under subsection (1) are not a legislative instrument.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86g-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 86G Guidelines on the operation of this Part

87 False certificates
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.224
note: Giving false certificates is an offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-87-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits giving false certificates.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-act-1914-sec-87-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87 False certificates

89 Trespassing on Commonwealth land
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.224
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89(1) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
has part: 89(2) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
has part: 89(3) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
has part: 89(4) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
has part: 89(5) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89
schema version: 2

89(1) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.224
note: Trespassing on Commonwealth land is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Trespassing on Commonwealth land

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Trespassing is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits trespassing
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person who, without lawful excuse (proof whereof shall lie upon him or her), trespasses or goes upon any prohibited Commonwealth land commits an offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to not trespass
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to not trespass
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) A person who, without lawful excuse (proof whereof shall lie upon him or her), trespasses or goes upon any prohibited Commonwealth land commits an offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The penalty is a consequence of trespassing
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Trespassing has a consequence of a penalty
modality: Deontic
operator: Consequence
premise text: (1) A person who, without lawful excuse (proof whereof shall lie upon him or her), trespasses or goes upon any prohibited Commonwealth land commits an offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If trespassing occurs, then a penalty applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Trespassing implies a penalty
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) A person who, without lawful excuse (proof whereof shall lie upon him or her), trespasses or goes upon any prohibited Commonwealth land commits an offence.

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(1) Trespassing on Commonwealth land

89(2) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.224
note: Request for personal information from individuals on prohibited Commonwealth land.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Trespassing on Commonwealth land

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of trespassing on Commonwealth land.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(2) Trespassing on Commonwealth land

89(3) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.224
note: Detention of person found on prohibited Commonwealth land
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Trespassing on Commonwealth land

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the constable or officer may apprehend that person...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for detention
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (3) Where a person is found upon prohibited Commonwealth land...

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the constable or officer may apprehend that person...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of detention
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (3) Where a person is found upon prohibited Commonwealth land...

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the constable or officer may apprehend that person...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of trespassing
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) Where a person is found upon prohibited Commonwealth land...

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the constable or officer may apprehend that person...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of detention
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (3) Where a person is found upon prohibited Commonwealth land...

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the constable or officer may apprehend that person...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of detention
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (3) Where a person is found upon prohibited Commonwealth land...

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(3) Trespassing on Commonwealth land

89(4) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.224
note: Authorized Commonwealth officer must produce identification before apprehending a person.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Trespassing on Commonwealth land

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(4) Trespassing on Commonwealth land

89(5) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.224
note: Trespassing on prohibited Commonwealth land is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Trespassing on Commonwealth land

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Trespassing is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits trespassing on Commonwealth land.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Land is posted with a notice prohibiting trespassing.

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Land is classified as prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies land as prohibited if it has a posted notice.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: Land has a posted notice.

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(5) Trespassing on Commonwealth land

89A Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.225
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89A(1) Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
has part: 89A(2) Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
has part: 89A(3) Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89a
schema version: 2

89A(1) Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.225
note: Discharging firearms on prohibited areas is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89A Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land

crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits discharging firearms on prohibited areas.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89A(1) Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land

89A(2) Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.225
note: Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89A Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land

crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89A(2) Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land

89A(3) Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
type: Concept
description: instrument
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.225
note: Authorized Commonwealth officer must produce instrument before apprehending person.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 89A Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land

crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89A(3) Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land

9 May 1991
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
note: Royal Assent and commencement date
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9
schema version: 2

9 Dec 2008
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-2
schema version: 2

9 May
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
note: Never commenced
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-3
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-9-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Never commenced
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

9 Dec 2021 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
note: Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (High Risk Terrorist Offenders) Act 2021
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-4
schema version: 2

9 Nov 2022
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Amendment (Penalty Unit) Act 2022
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-5-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-5-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-5-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-5
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-9-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval required
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified as November 10, 2022 (s 2(1) item 1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-9-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: No explicit duty, ban conduct, grant permission, or create a right

crimes-act-1914-sec-9-5-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ordered trace required
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified as November 10, 2022 (s 2(1) item 1)

crimes-act-1914-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Commencement date specified

90 Trespass by cattle or live stock
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.226
note: Trespass by cattle or live stock is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-90-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits trespass by cattle or live stock.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-90-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90 Trespass by cattle or live stock

90A Destroying etc. posters etc. relating to Commonwealth loans
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.226
note: Destroying or damaging Commonwealth loan posters is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-90a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-90a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90a
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-90a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits destroying or damaging Commonwealth loan posters.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-act-1914-sec-90a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90A Destroying etc. posters etc. relating to Commonwealth loans

90B False statements in documents filed etc. under laws of a
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.226
note: Intentionally making false statements in documents filed or lodged with a Commonwealth officer is an offence.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-90b-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-90b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90b
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-90b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making false statements in documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

91 Regulations
type: Concept
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.227
note: The Governor-General may make regulations.
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-91-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-91-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-91-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91
schema version: 2

crimes-act-1914-sec-91-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Governor-General has the power to make regulations.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

crimes-act-1914-sec-91-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Regulations are part of the Act.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: HasPart

Crimes Act 1914
type: Document
date: 4 June 2026
identifier: No. 12 of 1914
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU