Crimes Act 1914
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 12 of 1914
date: 4 June 2026
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

4 June 2026
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments, applications, and modifications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the text into a hierarchical structure.
premise text: The text is organized into volumes and parts.
conclusion text: The compilation is structured in a logical manner.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Identifies temporal intervals between sections.
premise text: Section numbers increase consecutively.
conclusion text: There is no clear start or end date.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WA Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wa
note: Defines terms used in Part IC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wa-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wa-logic-descriptionlogic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wa-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WA Definitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wa-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition
logic summary: Defines key terms
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WB Interview friends
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wb
has part: 23WB(1) Interview friends
has part: 23WB(2) Interview friends
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.27

23WB(1) Interview friends
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wb-ss-1
part of: 23WB Interview friends
note: List of people who may act as an interview friend
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wb-ss-1-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WB(1) Interview friends
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23WB(2) Interview friends
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wb-ss-2
part of: 23WB Interview friends
note: Who can act as interview friends for a child or incapable person?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wb-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WB(2) Interview friends
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23WC How forensic procedures may be authorised in different
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wc
note: Authorises forensic procedures under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wc-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wc-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wc-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WC How forensic procedures may be authorised in different
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows the carrying out of a forensic procedure.
premise text: The following table shows...
conclusion text: ...and shows the provisions that authorise...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Child or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Procedure must be carried out within 2 hours after suspect presents to investigating constable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Child or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to carry out procedure within 2 hours.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Aboriginal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Procedure must be carried out within 2 hours after suspect presents to investigating constable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Aboriginal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to carry out procedure within 2 hours.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Suspect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Procedure must be carried out within 4 hours after suspect presents to investigating constable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Suspect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to carry out procedure within 4 hours.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Child or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-2
note: Suspect detention beyond 2 hours after arrest or magistrate's order is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of detention beyond 2 hours.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Aboriginal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Suspect may be detained in accordance with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Aboriginal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Detention obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Suspect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
note: Suspect may be detained in accordance with item 4 or 5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Suspect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to detain suspects in accordance with item 4 or 5
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval during which suspects may be detained in accordance with item 4 or 5
premise text: in custody
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WD Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wd
has part: 23WD(1) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
has part: 23WD(2) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
has part: 23WD(3) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
has part: 23WD(4) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.33

23WD(1) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wd-ss-1
part of: 23WD Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
note: Authorisation to carry out forensic procedure with informed consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.33
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WD(1) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Granting authority
premise text: The person is authorised to carry out the procedure.
conclusion text: A person is authorised to carry out a forensic procedure on a suspect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Requiring informed consent
premise text: The person is authorised to carry out the procedure in accordance with Division 6 and not otherwise.
conclusion text: Informed consent of the suspect is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between authorisation and procedure
premise text: (1) A person is authorised to carry out a forensic procedure on a suspect with the informed consent of the suspect.
conclusion text: The authorisation occurs during the procedure.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: imply
logic summary: Implication of authorisation and consent
premise text: (1) A person is authorised to carry out a forensic procedure on a suspect with the informed consent of the suspect.
conclusion text: The authorisation implies that the consent is required.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: spread
logic summary: Spread of authority and consent
premise text: (1) A person is authorised to carry out a forensic procedure on a suspect with the informed consent of the suspect.
conclusion text: The authority and consent are spread to the suspect.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WD(2) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wd-ss-2
part of: 23WD Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
note: Forensic procedure not allowed for certain individuals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.33
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WD(2) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23WD(3) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wd-ss-3
part of: 23WD Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
note: Keeping a suspect in custody after investigation period expiration requires magistrate order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.33
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WD(3) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits keeping a suspect in custody after investigation period expiration.
premise text: (3) This Division does not authorise...
conclusion text: ...an order of a magistrate under Division 5 will have to be obtained to authorise this.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies that keeping a suspect in custody after investigation period expiration is not allowed.
premise text: (3) This Division does not authorise...
conclusion text: ...an order of a magistrate under Division 5 will have to be obtained to authorise this.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Require
logic summary: Requires an investigation period expiration before keeping a suspect in custody.
premise text: (3) This Division does not authorise...
conclusion text: ...an order of a magistrate under Division 5 will have to be obtained to authorise this.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies that keeping a suspect in custody after investigation period expiration is not allowed.
premise text: (3) This Division does not authorise...
conclusion text: ...an order of a magistrate under Division 5 will have to be obtained to authorise this.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies the provision as prohibiting keeping a suspect in custody after investigation period expiration using AI.
premise text: (3) This Division does not authorise...
conclusion text: ...an order of a magistrate under Division 5 will have to be obtained to authorise this.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WD(4) Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wd-ss-4
part of: 23WD Forensic procedure may be carried out with informed
note: Informed consent allows forensic procedure during investigation period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.33
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows action with consent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WE People who cannot consent to forensic procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23we
note: A child cannot consent to a forensic procedure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.33
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23we-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-23we-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WE People who cannot consent to forensic procedures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23WF Informed consent to forensic procedures—general
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wf
has part: 23WF(1) Informed consent to forensic procedures—general
has part: 23WF(2) Informed consent to forensic procedures—general
has part: 23WF(3) Informed consent to forensic procedures—general
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34

23WF(1) Informed consent to forensic procedures—general
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wf-ss-1
part of: 23WF Informed consent to forensic procedures—general
note: Suspect must provide informed consent for forensic procedures.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide informed consent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Constable must ask for consent if suspect is not believed to be Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander.
premise text: (b) the constable does not believe on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Constable must ask for consent if suspect is not believed to be Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander.
premise text: (a) a constable intends to ask a suspect to consent to a forensic procedure; and (b) the constable does not believe on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WF(2) Informed consent to forensic procedures—general
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wf-ss-2
part of: 23WF Informed consent to forensic procedures—general
note: Informed consent to forensic procedures for suspects not covered by section 23WE.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WF(2) Informed consent to forensic procedures—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Informed consent is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WF(3) Informed consent to forensic procedures—general
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wf-ss-3
part of: 23WF Informed consent to forensic procedures—general
note: Restricts communication with legal practitioner for suspects in custody
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Restricts action
premise text: Constable has reasonable grounds to suspect evidence destruction
conclusion text: Suspect cannot communicate with legal practitioner in private
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WG Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wg
has part: 23WG(1) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
has part: 23WG(2) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
has part: 23WG(3) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
has part: 23WG(4) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
has part: 23WG(5) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34

23WG(1) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wg-ss-1
part of: 23WG Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
note: Informed consent required for forensic procedures on Aboriginal suspects.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WG(1) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires informed consent
premise text: (a) a constable intends to ask a suspect to consent...
conclusion text: ...the constable believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires informed consent for forensic procedures
premise text: (1) This section applies where...
conclusion text: ...the constable intends to ask a suspect to consent to a forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires informed consent for suspects
premise text: (a) a constable intends to ask a suspect to consent to a forensic procedure; and...
conclusion text: ...the constable believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires informed consent for suspects
premise text: (b) the constable believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander.
conclusion text: ...the constable intends to ask a suspect to consent to a forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires informed consent for suspects
premise text: (a) a constable intends to ask a suspect to consent to a forensic procedure; and (b) the constable believes on reasonable grounds that...
conclusion text: ...the constable believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WG(2) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wg-ss-2
part of: 23WG Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
note: Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WG(2) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide informed consent
premise text: (2) A suspect not covered by section 23WE gives informed consent to a forensic procedure...
conclusion text: The suspect must give informed consent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with the rest of this section
premise text: (2) A suspect not covered by section 23WE gives informed consent to a forensic procedure...
conclusion text: The constable must comply with the rest of this section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for informed consent
premise text: (2) A suspect not covered by section 23WE gives informed consent to a forensic procedure...
conclusion text: The temporal interval is between the request and the consent
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for informed consent
premise text: (2) A suspect not covered by section 23WE gives informed consent to a forensic procedure...
conclusion text: The temporal interval is between the request and the consent
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Constable must inform the suspect of matters
premise text: (2) A suspect not covered by section 23WE gives informed consent to a forensic procedure...
conclusion text: The constable must inform the suspect of the matters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WG(3) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wg-ss-3
part of: 23WG Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
note: Constable must not ask suspect to consent to forensic procedure without interview friend present, waiver, or reasonable grounds.
references: sec-23YK
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WG(3) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of asking suspect to consent without interview friend present.
premise text: (3) The constable must not ask the suspect...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WG(4) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wg-ss-4
part of: 23WG Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
note: Notify Aboriginal legal assistance organisation of consent request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WG(4) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify representative
premise text: (a) inform the suspect that a representative of an Aboriginal legal assistance organisation will be notified...
conclusion text: ...the suspect is to be asked to consent to a forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify representative
premise text: (b) notify such a representative that the suspect is to be asked to consent to a forensic procedure.
conclusion text: ...the suspect is to be asked to consent to a forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
logic summary: Notify representative before request
premise text: (b) notify such a representative that the suspect is to be asked to consent to a forensic procedure.
conclusion text: ...the suspect is to be asked to consent to a forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WG(5) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wg-ss-5
part of: 23WG Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
note: Exemption from compliance with subsection (4) under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-5-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-5-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WG(5) Informed consent to forensic procedures—Aboriginal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Permission from compliance with subsection (4)
premise text: The constable is not required to comply.
conclusion text: Under the specified circumstances, the exemption applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-5-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalInclusion
logic summary: The exemption is applicable within the specified circumstances.
premise text: The constable is not required to comply with subsection (4) if...
conclusion text: The exemption applies during this time period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wg-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Justification
logic summary: The exemption is justified by the presence of a legal practitioner.
premise text: The constable is not required to comply with subsection (4) if...
conclusion text: The exemption is justified under this condition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WH Constable may request suspect to consent to forensic
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wh
note: Constable may request suspect to consent to forensic procedure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wh-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wh-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wh-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WH Constable may request suspect to consent to forensic
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Request is obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WI Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wi
has part: 23WI(1) Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
has part: 23WI(2) Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
has part: 23WI(3) Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.36

23WI(1) Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wi-ss-1
part of: 23WI Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
note: Constable must be satisfied on balance of probabilities before requesting forensic procedure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Constable must satisfy conditions before requesting procedure
premise text: (1) The constable must be satisfied on the balance of probabilities...
conclusion text: The constable must be satisfied on the balance of probabilities that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: must
logic summary: Constable must have reasonable grounds to believe in procedure's likelihood
premise text: (b) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the forensic procedure is likely to produce evidence tending to confirm or disprove...
conclusion text: There are reasonable grounds to believe that the forensic procedure is likely to produce evidence tending to confirm or disprove...
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: must
logic summary: Procedure must be carried out in sequence of events
premise text: (a) the person on whom the procedure is proposed to be carried out is a suspect
conclusion text: The person on whom the forensic procedure is proposed to be carried out is a suspect
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
logic summary: Constable's decision must be based on evidence and justification
premise text: (d) the person on whom the forensic procedure is proposed to be carried out is not a child or an incapable person
conclusion text: The person on whom the forensic procedure is proposed to be carried out is not a child or an incapable person
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: must
logic summary: Procedure must occur within specific temporal interval
premise text: (1) The constable must be satisfied on the balance of probabilities...
conclusion text: The constable must be satisfied on the balance of probabilities that...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WI(2) Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wi-ss-2
part of: 23WI Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
note: Constable must balance public interests when requesting forensic procedure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WI(2) Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Constable has an obligation to balance public interests.
premise text: (2) In determining whether a request is justified in all the circumstances...
conclusion text: The constable must balance the public interest...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Constable has permission to consider foreign law enforcement agency requests.
premise text: (2) In determining whether a request is justified in all the circumstances...
conclusion text: The constable may balance the public interest...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WI(3) Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wi-ss-3
part of: 23WI Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
note: Constable must consider certain factors when requesting a detention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WI(3) Matters to be considered by constable before requesting
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consider the seriousness of circumstances and suspect's alleged participation.
premise text: (3) In balancing those interests, the constable must have regard to...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Consideration of suspect's age is within a reasonable timeframe.
premise text: (3) In balancing those interests, the constable must have regard to...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wi-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Consideration of suspect's age is within a reasonable timeframe.
premise text: (3) In balancing those interests, the constable must have regard to...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WJ Matters that suspect must be informed of before giving
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wj
note: Suspect must be informed of certain matters before giving consent to forensic procedure.
description: information about the purpose, offence, and consequences of not consenting
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-argumentation-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-alleninterval-6

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must inform suspect of certain matters before giving consent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: KNOWS
logic summary: Constable knows the suspect's rights and obligations.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: NEXT
logic summary: Next step in forensic procedure must be informed to suspect.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS_OF
logic summary: Forensic procedure is a subclass of certain procedures.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Informing suspect implies consent to forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wj-logic-alleninterval-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: Forensic procedure must occur before certain actions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WK Withdrawal of consent
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wk
note: Forensic procedure cannot proceed without consent after withdrawal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wk-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wk-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Cannot proceed
premise text: Consent withdrawn
conclusion text: Forensic procedure halted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WL Recording of giving of information and suspect’s responses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wl
has part: 23WL(1) Recording of giving of information and suspect’s responses
has part: 23WL(2) Recording of giving of information and suspect’s responses
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.42

23WL(1) Recording of giving of information and suspect’s responses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wl-ss-1
part of: 23WL Recording of giving of information and suspect’s responses
note: Suspect must undergo forensic procedure within a specified time frame after presenting themselves. Constable must ensure information and suspect's responses are tape recorded.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-deontic-6

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WL(1) Recording of giving of information and suspect’s responses
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide forensic procedure within a time frame.
premise text: (1) If a suspect who is not in custody:...
conclusion text: ...the procedure must be carried out as quickly as reasonably possible but in any case within the following period:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Time frame for forensic procedure.
premise text: (d) in any other case—4 hours after the suspect so presents himself or herself.
conclusion text: ...in any case within the following period: 4 hours after the suspect so presents himself or herself.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURRING
logic summary: Recurring trace of suspect's presentation.
premise text: (b) presents himself or herself to the investigating constable to undergo the procedure;
conclusion text: ...the suspect so presents himself or herself.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Diffusion of information about suspect's presentation.
premise text: (a) consents to a forensic procedure; and (b) presents himself or herself to the investigating constable to undergo the procedure;
conclusion text: ...the procedure must be carried out as quickly as reasonably possible but in any case within the following period:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: PROCESSING
logic summary: Processing of suspect's information.
premise text: (1) If a suspect who is not in custody:...
conclusion text: ...the procedure must be carried out as quickly as reasonably possible but in any case within the following period:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to ensure recording
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WL(2) Recording of giving of information and suspect’s responses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wl-ss-2
part of: 23WL Recording of giving of information and suspect’s responses
note: Exemptions from time limits for forensic procedures Constable must ensure written record of information and suspect's responses is made available to the suspect.
description: written record of information and suspect's responses
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WL(2) Recording of giving of information and suspect’s responses
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from time limits
premise text: Reasonable time required
conclusion text: Obligation to disregard time limit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wl-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Constable must ensure written record is made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WM Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wm
has part: 23WM(1) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
has part: 23WM(2) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
has part: 23WM(2A) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
has part: 23WM(3) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
has part: 23WM(4) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.44

23WM(1) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wm-ss-1
part of: 23WM Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
note: Authorisation to carry out non-intimate forensic procedure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WM(1) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Authorization exists
premise text: (1) A person is authorised to carry out a non-intimate forensic procedure on a suspect by order of a senior police officer under section 23WN.
conclusion text: The person is authorized to carry out the procedure in accordance with Division 6 and not otherwise.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between authorization and procedure execution
premise text: (1) A person is authorised to carry out a non-intimate forensic procedure on a suspect by order of a senior police officer under section 23WN.
conclusion text: The person is authorized to carry out the procedure in accordance with Division 6 and not otherwise.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between authorization and procedure execution
premise text: (1) A person is authorised to carry out a non-intimate forensic procedure on a suspect by order of a senior police officer under section 23WN.
conclusion text: The person is authorized to carry out the procedure in accordance with Division 6 and not otherwise.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23WM(2) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wm-ss-2
part of: 23WM Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
note: Forensic procedures on children and incapable persons are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WM(2) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits forensic procedures on children and incapable persons.
premise text: (2) This Division does not authorise the carrying out of a forensic procedure...
conclusion text: Forensic procedures on children and incapable persons are prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Excludes
logic summary: Forensic procedures on children and incapable persons are excluded from Division 23WM(2).
premise text: (2) This Division does not authorise the carrying out of a forensic procedure...
conclusion text: Division 23WM(2) excludes forensic procedures on children and incapable persons.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Excludes
logic summary: Forensic procedures on children and incapable persons are excluded from Division 23WM(2).
premise text: (2) This Division does not authorise the carrying out of a forensic procedure...
conclusion text: Division 23WM(2) excludes forensic procedures on children and incapable persons.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Excludes
logic summary: Forensic procedures on children and incapable persons are excluded from Division 23WM(2).
premise text: (2) This Division does not authorise the carrying out of a forensic procedure...
conclusion text: Division 23WM(2) excludes forensic procedures on children and incapable persons.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Excludes
logic summary: Forensic procedures on children and incapable persons are excluded from Division 23WM(2).
premise text: (2) This Division does not authorise the carrying out of a forensic procedure...
conclusion text: Division 23WM(2) excludes forensic procedures on children and incapable persons.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WM(2A) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wm-ss-2a
part of: 23WM Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
note: Carrying out of forensic procedure on suspect from foreign country or international tribunal is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2a-logic-ltl-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WM(2A) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of carrying out forensic procedure on suspect from foreign country or international tribunal.
premise text: (2A) This Division does not authorise the carrying out of a forensic procedure on a suspect if the procedure has been requested by: (a) a foreign country or international tribunal; or (b) a foreign law enforcement agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-2a-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of carrying out forensic procedure on suspect from foreign country or international tribunal is absolute and unconditional.
premise text: (2A) This Division does not authorise the carrying out of a forensic procedure on a suspect if the procedure has been requested by: (a) a foreign country or international tribunal; or (b) a foreign law enforcement agency.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WM(3) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wm-ss-3
part of: 23WM Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
note: Keeping a suspect in custody after investigation period expiration requires magistrate order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WM(3) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits keeping a suspect in custody after investigation period expiration.
premise text: (3) This Division does not authorise keeping a suspect in custody, in order to carry out a forensic procedure, after the expiration of the investigation period provided for by Part IC.
conclusion text: If it is necessary to keep a suspect in custody after the expiration of the Part IC investigation period in order to carry out a forensic procedure, an order of a magistrate under Division 5 will have to be obtained to authorise this.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WM(4) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wm-ss-4
part of: 23WM Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
note: Permits carrying out of forensic procedure by constable during investigation period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WM(4) Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WN Circumstances in which senior police officer may order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wn
note: Senior police officer may order non-intimate forensic procedures on suspect in custody under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wn-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wn-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wn-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WN Circumstances in which senior police officer may order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WO Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wo
has part: 23WO(1) Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
has part: 23WO(2) Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
has part: 23WO(3) Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45

23WO(1) Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wo-ss-1
part of: 23WO Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
note: Senior police officer must be satisfied about suspect's custody and offence relevance before proceeding with forensic procedure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WO(1) Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to satisfy conditions before proceeding.
premise text: (1) The senior police officer must be satisfied on the balance of probabilities...
conclusion text: The senior police officer MUST be satisfied...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Forensic procedure must be justified in all circumstances before proceeding.
premise text: (d) the carrying out of the forensic procedure without consent is justified in all the circumstances.
conclusion text: ...the carrying out of the forensic procedure without consent is justified.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Senior police officer must be satisfied about suspect's custody before proceeding.
premise text: (a) The suspect is in the lawful custody of a constable.
conclusion text: ...the suspect is in the lawful custody of a constable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Senior police officer must be satisfied about offence relevance before proceeding.
premise text: (b) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the suspect committed a relevant offence.
conclusion text: ...there are reasonable grounds to believe that the suspect committed a relevant offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Senior police officer must be satisfied about evidence relevance before proceeding.
premise text: (c) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the forensic procedure is likely to produce evidence tending to confirm or disprove...
conclusion text: ...the forensic procedure is likely to produce evidence tending to confirm or disprove that the suspect committed a relevant offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WO(2) Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wo-ss-2
part of: 23WO Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
note: Senior police officer must balance public interests when deciding to carry out forensic procedure without consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WO(2) Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Senior police officer has an obligation to balance public interests.
premise text: (2) In determining whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure without consent is justified in all the circumstances...
conclusion text: The senior police officer must balance the public interest...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Excerpt mentions a specific time frame for balancing public interests.
premise text: (2) In determining whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure without consent is justified in all the circumstances...
conclusion text: The senior police officer must balance public interests within a specific time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Balance
logic summary: Excerpt requires balancing competing public interests.
premise text: (2) In determining whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure without consent is justified in all the circumstances...
conclusion text: The senior police officer must balance the public interest in obtaining evidence against the public interest in upholding the suspect's physical integrity.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Excerpt requires consideration of multiple factors when deciding to carry out forensic procedure without consent.
premise text: (2) In determining whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure without consent is justified in all the circumstances...
conclusion text: The senior police officer must diffuse competing public interests.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
logic summary: Excerpt requires reasoning about balancing public interests.
premise text: (2) In determining whether the carrying out of the forensic procedure without consent is justified in all the circumstances...
conclusion text: The senior police officer must reason about balancing competing public interests.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WO(3) Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wo-ss-3
part of: 23WO Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
note: Senior police officer must consider certain matters when making decisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WO(3) Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider matters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WP Record of senior police officer’s order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wp
has part: 23WP(1) Record of senior police officer’s order
has part: 23WP(2) Record of senior police officer’s order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.46

23WP(1) Record of senior police officer’s order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wp-ss-1
part of: 23WP Record of senior police officer’s order
note: Senior police officer must make a record of order, including date and time.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wp-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wp-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WP(1) Record of senior police officer’s order
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Senior police officer must make a record.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WP(2) Record of senior police officer’s order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wp-ss-2
part of: 23WP Record of senior police officer’s order
note: Senior police officer must provide a copy of the record to the suspect.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wp-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wp-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WP(2) Record of senior police officer’s order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WQ Forensic procedure may be carried out by order of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wq
note: A person is authorised to carry out a forensic procedure on a suspect by order of a magistrate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorization
logic summary: Authorization to carry out forensic procedure
premise text: Section 23WS or 23XA
conclusion text: Forensic procedure may be carried out by order of a magistrate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Magistrate's obligation to authorise forensic procedure
premise text: Section 23WS or 23XA
conclusion text: A person is authorised to carry out a forensic procedure on a suspect by order of a magistrate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between magistrate's order and forensic procedure
premise text: Section 23WS or 23XA
conclusion text: Forensic procedure may be carried out by order of a magistrate under section 23WS or 23XA
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of magistrate's order on forensic procedure
premise text: Section 23WS or 23XA
conclusion text: A person is authorised to carry out a forensic procedure on a suspect by order of a magistrate under section 23WS or 23XA
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wq-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagated authorization from magistrate to forensic procedure
premise text: Section 23WS or 23XA
conclusion text: Forensic procedure may be carried out by order of a magistrate under section 23WS or 23XA
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23WR Circumstances in which magistrate may order forensic
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wr
has part: 23WR(1) Circumstances in which magistrate may order forensic
has part: 23WR(2) Circumstances in which magistrate may order forensic
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.47

23WR(1) Circumstances in which magistrate may order forensic
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wr-ss-1
part of: 23WR Circumstances in which magistrate may order forensic
note: A magistrate may order a forensic procedure on a suspect under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Magistrate has the power to order a forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WR(2) Circumstances in which magistrate may order forensic
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wr-ss-2
part of: 23WR Circumstances in which magistrate may order forensic
note: Magistrate cannot order forensic procedure requested by foreign law enforcement agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WR(2) Circumstances in which magistrate may order forensic
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Magistrate cannot order forensic procedure.
premise text: Foreign law enforcement agency requested the procedure.
conclusion text: Ordering is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Request from foreign agency overlaps with magistrate's authority.
premise text: Foreign law enforcement agency requested the procedure.
conclusion text: Request from foreign agency overlaps with magistrate's authority.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Request from foreign agency diffuses to other agencies.
premise text: Foreign law enforcement agency requested the procedure.
conclusion text: Request from foreign agency diffuses to other agencies.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IsBlockedBy
logic summary: Magistrate's ordering is blocked by foreign agency request.
premise text: Foreign law enforcement agency requested the procedure.
conclusion text: Magistrate's ordering is blocked by foreign agency request.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wr-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: IsInvalid
logic summary: Request from foreign agency is invalid for magistrate's ordering.
premise text: Foreign law enforcement agency requested the procedure.
conclusion text: Request from foreign agency is invalid for magistrate's ordering.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WS Final order for carrying out of forensic procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ws
note: Magistrate must order carrying out of forensic procedure under specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must order carrying out of forensic procedure.
premise text: subsection 23WR(1) applies
conclusion text: magistrate is required to order carrying out of forensic procedure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Magistrate may consider carrying out of forensic procedure.
premise text: section 23WT applies
conclusion text: magistrate has discretion to order carrying out of forensic procedure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Forensic procedure must be carried out after subsection 23WR(1) applies.
premise text: subsection 23WR(1) applies
conclusion text: forensic procedure is carried out at some point after subsection 23WR(1) applies
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Forensic procedure may be carried out before subsection 23WR(1) applies.
premise text: section 23WT applies
conclusion text: forensic procedure is carried out at some point before subsection 23WR(1) applies
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ws-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
logic summary: Magistrate must consider carrying out of forensic procedure and section 23WT applies.
premise text: subsection 23WR(1) applies and section 23WT applies
conclusion text: magistrate has discretion to order carrying out of forensic procedure and section 23WT applies
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23WT Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wt
has part: 23WT(1) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
has part: 23WT(2) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
has part: 23WT(3) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
has part: 23WT(4) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.48

23WT(1) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wt-ss-1
part of: 23WT Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
note: Magistrate must be satisfied on the balance of probabilities that certain conditions are met before ordering a forensic procedure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WT(1) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must be satisfied on the balance of probabilities.
premise text: (1) The magistrate MUST be satisfied...
conclusion text: ...that certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: There are reasonable grounds to believe that the forensic procedure is likely to produce evidence tending to confirm or disprove that the suspect committed a relevant offence.
premise text: (c) There are reasonable...
conclusion text: ...that the forensic procedure is likely to produce evidence...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The carrying out of the forensic procedure is justified in all circumstances.
premise text: (d) The carrying out...is justified in all the circumstances.
conclusion text: ...that certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: A constable has been authorized by the Attorney-General to apply for an order under this Part.
premise text: (ca) If the forensic procedure...
conclusion text: ...has been requested by a foreign country or an international tribunal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: There are reasonable grounds to believe that the suspect committed a relevant offence.
premise text: (b) On the evidence before...
conclusion text: ...that there are reasonable grounds to believe...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WT(2) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wt-ss-2
part of: 23WT Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
note: Balance public interests when ordering forensic procedures.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WT(2) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Public interest balancing
premise text: (2) In determining...
conclusion text: ...the magistrate must:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WT(3) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wt-ss-3
part of: 23WT Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
note: Consider matters before ordering a forensic procedure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WT(3) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must consider the matters.
premise text: (3) In balancing those interests, the magistrate must have regard to...
conclusion text: The magistrate MUST consider the matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Matters are considered before ordering a forensic procedure.
premise text: (3) In balancing those interests, the magistrate must have regard to...
conclusion text: The matter >= ordering a forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Consideration by the magistrate implies ordering a forensic procedure.
premise text: (3) In balancing those interests, the magistrate must have regard to...
conclusion text: If the magistrate considers the matter, then it implies ordering a forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Consideration by the magistrate is related to forensic procedures.
premise text: (3) In balancing those interests, the magistrate must have regard to...
conclusion text: The consideration IS-A forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Consideration by the magistrate is a cognitive process.
premise text: (3) In balancing those interests, the magistrate must have regard to...
conclusion text: The consideration IS-A cognitive process.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WT(4) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wt-ss-4
part of: 23WT Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
note: Magistrate must consider religious beliefs of suspect in forensic procedure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WT(4) Matters to be considered by magistrate before ordering
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Obligation to consider religious beliefs
premise text: (4) Without limiting the matters that the magistrate may take into account...
conclusion text: The magistrate must consider the religious beliefs of the suspect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Temporal relationship between consideration and procedure
premise text: (4) Without limiting the matters that the magistrate may take into account...
conclusion text: The magistrate must consider the religious beliefs of the suspect during the forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between consideration and procedure
premise text: (4) Without limiting the matters that the magistrate may take into account...
conclusion text: The magistrate must consider the religious beliefs of the suspect until the forensic procedure is completed.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
logic summary: Spread of consideration to other procedures
premise text: (4) Without limiting the matters that the magistrate may take into account...
conclusion text: The consideration of the religious beliefs of the suspect will be spread through the forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wt-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Through
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: (4) Without limiting the matters that the magistrate may take into account...
conclusion text: The consideration of the religious beliefs of the suspect will be processed through artificial intelligence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WU Application for order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wu
has part: 23WU(1) Application for order
has part: 23WU(2) Application for order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50

23WU(1) Application for order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wu-ss-1
part of: 23WU Application for order
note: Authorized applicant may apply for order to arrange forensic procedure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WU(1) Application for order
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WU(2) Application for order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wu-ss-2
part of: 23WU Application for order
note: Application for order must be made in writing, supported by evidence, and specify type of forensic procedure.
description: Evidence on oath or affidavit, suspect's presence (subject to magistrate's order)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WU(2) Application for order
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made in writing and supported by evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SPECIFY
logic summary: Type of forensic procedure must be specified.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wu-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: BE
logic summary: Suspect's presence is required (subject to magistrate's order).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WV Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wv
has part: 23WV(1) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect in
has part: 23WV(2) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect in
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50

23WV(1) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wv-ss-1
part of: 23WV Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect in
note: Magistrate must issue warrant for suspect's temporary custody.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wv-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WV(1) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Magistrate has an obligation to issue a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WV(2) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wv-ss-2
part of: 23WV Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect in
note: Return suspect to original custody without delay if application is refused or order is made at the end of detention period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wv-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WV(2) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to return suspect
premise text: Application refused or order made at end of detention period
conclusion text: Return suspect without delay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WW Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ww
has part: 23WW(1) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
has part: 23WW(2) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
has part: 23WW(3) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
has part: 23WW(4) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
has part: 23WW(5) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51

23WW(1) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ww-ss-1
part of: 23WW Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
note: Magistrate may issue summons or warrant for suspect's appearance at hearing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WW(1) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Magistrate may issue summons or warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WW(2) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ww-ss-2
part of: 23WW Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
note: Application for summons must be made by information on oath and accompanied by affidavit.
description: Information on oath, Affidavit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WW(2) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made by information on oath.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ACCOMPANIED BY
logic summary: Affidavit must accompany application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WW(3) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ww-ss-3
part of: 23WW Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
note: Magistrate must issue summons only if necessary to ensure suspect's appearance at hearing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must issue summons.
premise text: (3) The magistrate may issue a summons only if satisfied:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WW(4) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ww-ss-4
part of: 23WW Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
note: Application for warrant must be made by information on oath and accompanied by affidavit.
description: Information on oath, affidavit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WW(4) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made by information on oath and accompanied by affidavit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WW(5) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ww-ss-5
part of: 23WW Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
note: Magistrate may not issue warrant without justification.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-5-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WW(5) Securing the presence of suspect at hearing—suspect not in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: justifiedBy
logic summary: Justification condition for warrant issuance
premise text: (5) The magistrate may issue a warrant only if satisfied: (a) that the arrest is necessary to ensure the appearance of the suspect at the hearing of the application, and that the issue of a summons would not ensure that appearance; or (b) that the suspect might destroy evidence that might be obtained by carrying out the forensic procedure; or (c) that the issue of the warrant is otherwise justified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ww-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: otherwiseJustifiedBy
logic summary: Alternative justification condition for warrant issuance
premise text: (5) The magistrate may issue a warrant only if satisfied: (a) that the arrest is necessary to ensure the appearance of the suspect at the hearing of the application, and that the issue of a summons would not ensure that appearance; or (b) that the suspect might destroy evidence that might be obtained by carrying out the forensic procedure; or (c) that the issue of the warrant is otherwise justified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WX Procedure at hearing of application for order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wx
note: Order may only be made in presence of suspect concerned
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WX Procedure at hearing of application for order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
logic summary: Presence required for order
premise text: (1) An order may only be made in the presence of the suspect concerned
conclusion text: The order must be made in the presence of the suspect concerned
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: subjectTo
logic summary: Contrary orders allowed
premise text: (1) An order may only be made in the presence of the suspect concerned, subject to any contrary order made by the magistrate.
conclusion text: A contrary order can be made by the magistrate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
logic summary: Order must be made in presence of suspect concerned
premise text: (1) An order may only be made in the presence of the suspect concerned, subject to any contrary order made by the magistrate.
conclusion text: The order must be made in the presence of the suspect concerned
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Classifies as part of procedure at hearing
premise text: (1) An order may only be made in the presence of the suspect concerned, subject to any contrary order made by the magistrate.
conclusion text: The excerpt is a part of the procedure at hearing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wx-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
logic summary: Presence required for order
premise text: (1) An order may only be made in the presence of the suspect concerned, subject to any contrary order made by the magistrate.
conclusion text: The presence is required for the order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23WY Making of order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wy
has part: 23WY(1) Making of order
has part: 23WY(2) Making of order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.52

23WY(1) Making of order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wy-ss-1
part of: 23WY Making of order
note: Magistrate must give reasons, keep written record, order suspect to attend, and inform of reasonable force use.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wy-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must perform actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23WY(2) Making of order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23wy-ss-2
part of: 23WY Making of order
note: Directions for procedure timing, place, and manner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wy-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wy-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23wy-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wy-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Magistrate's discretion
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23wy-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23XA Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xa
has part: 23XA(1) Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure
has part: 23XA(2) Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure
has part: 23XA(3) Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.53

23XA(1) Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xa-ss-1
part of: 23XA Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure
note: Magistrate may make interim order for carrying out forensic procedure without delay under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xa-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Magistrate may make interim order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XA(2) Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xa-ss-2
part of: 23XA Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure
note: Interim order operates until confirmed or disallowed by a magistrate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xa-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true for interim orders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XA(3) Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xa-ss-3
part of: 23XA Interim order for carrying out of a forensic procedure
note: Subdivision B applies in relation to an order confirming the interim order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xa-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Subdivision B applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XB Application for interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xb
has part: 23XB(1) Application for interim order
has part: 23XB(2) Application for interim order
has part: 23XB(3) Application for interim order
has part: 23XB(4) Application for interim order
has part: 23XB(5) Application for interim order
has part: 23XB(6) Application for interim order
has part: 23XB(7) Application for interim order
has part: 23XB(8) Application for interim order
has part: 23XB(9) Application for interim order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54

23XB(1) Application for interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xb-ss-1
part of: 23XB Application for interim order
note: Authorized applicant may apply for interim order without delay.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XB(1) Application for interim order
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Authorized applicant has the right to apply for interim order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XB(2) Application for interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xb-ss-2
part of: 23XB Application for interim order
note: Application for interim order must be supported by evidence.
description: Evidence on oath or affidavit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XB(2) Application for interim order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application for interim order is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Application for interim order is a requirement.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XB(3) Application for interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xb-ss-3
part of: 23XB Application for interim order
note: Methods for making an application for interim order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-3-norm

23XB(4) Application for interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xb-ss-4
part of: 23XB Application for interim order
note: Must be present when application is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XB(4) Application for interim order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be present
premise text: (4) The suspect must be in the presence of the authorised applicant when the application is made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XB(5) Application for interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xb-ss-5
part of: 23XB Application for interim order
note: Presence of interview friend or legal representative required for suspect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XB(5) Application for interim order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires presence of interview friend or legal representative
premise text: (5) If the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person;
conclusion text: An interview friend or legal representative must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During interview, friend or legal representative must be present
premise text: (5) If the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person;
conclusion text: Interview friend or legal representative must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: During interview, friend or legal representative must be present
premise text: (5) If the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person;
conclusion text: Interview friend or legal representative must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: During interview, friend or legal representative must be present
premise text: (5) If the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person;
conclusion text: Interview friend or legal representative must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: During interview, friend or legal representative must be present
premise text: (5) If the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person;
conclusion text: Interview friend or legal representative must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XB(6) Application for interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xb-ss-6
part of: 23XB Application for interim order
note: Authorised applicant must have interview friend or legal representative present if suspect is Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander not covered by subsection (5).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XB(6) Application for interim order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must have interview friend or legal representative present.
premise text: (6) If the applicant believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by subsection (5),
conclusion text: an interview friend or legal representative of the suspect must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for the requirement to have an interview friend or legal representative present.
premise text: (6) If the applicant believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by subsection (5),
conclusion text: an interview friend or legal representative of the suspect must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for the requirement to have an interview friend or legal representative present.
premise text: (6) If the applicant believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by subsection (5),
conclusion text: an interview friend or legal representative of the suspect must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for the requirement to have an interview friend or legal representative present.
premise text: (6) If the applicant believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by subsection (5),
conclusion text: an interview friend or legal representative of the suspect must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for the requirement to have an interview friend or legal representative present.
premise text: (6) If the applicant believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by subsection (5),
conclusion text: an interview friend or legal representative of the suspect must also be in the presence of the authorised applicant.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XB(7) Application for interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xb-ss-7
part of: 23XB Application for interim order
note: Exemption from subsection (6) for applicants with reasonable grounds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission to the applicant
premise text: Subsection (6) does not apply if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XB(8) Application for interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xb-ss-8
part of: 23XB Application for interim order
note: Must be in the presence of authorized applicant if legal representative is present.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be in the presence of authorized applicant.
premise text: Legal representative is present.
conclusion text: Suspect must also be in the presence of authorized applicant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between legal representative and suspect.
premise text: Legal representative is present.
conclusion text: Suspect meets temporal relationship with authorized applicant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XB(9) Application for interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xb-ss-9
part of: 23XB Application for interim order
note: Excluding interview friend from applicant's presence under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-9-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-9-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XB(9) Application for interim order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xb-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits exclusion of interview friend from applicant's presence.
premise text: (9) In spite of subsection (5) or (6), the suspect’s interview friend may be excluded...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XC Procedure at hearing of application for interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xc
has part: 23XC(1) Procedure at hearing of application for interim order
has part: 23XC(2) Procedure at hearing of application for interim order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.55

23XC(1) Procedure at hearing of application for interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xc-ss-1
part of: 23XC Procedure at hearing of application for interim order
note: Ensure suspect, legal representative, and interview friend are given opportunity to speak.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.55
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XC(1) Procedure at hearing of application for interim order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure action is taken
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XC(2) Procedure at hearing of application for interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xc-ss-2
part of: 23XC Procedure at hearing of application for interim order
note: Ensure written submission or oral communication for suspect and legal representative.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.55
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XC(2) Procedure at hearing of application for interim order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure written submission or oral communication.
premise text: Magistrate must ensure...
conclusion text: ...written submission or oral communication.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Ensure communication within a specific time frame.
premise text: (2) If the application is made by...
conclusion text: ...within a specific time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XD Making of interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xd
note: Magistrate must inform applicant personally or by telephone.
description: Information about interim order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.55
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xd-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xd-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xd-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xd-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XD Making of interim order
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xd-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must inform applicant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xd-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Informing is a form of communication
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XE Records of application and interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xe
has part: 23XE(1) Records of application and interim order
has part: 23XE(2) Records of application and interim order
has part: 23XE(3) Records of application and interim order
has part: 23XE(4) Records of application and interim order
has part: 23XE(5) Records of application and interim order
has part: 23XE(6) Records of application and interim order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56

23XE(1) Records of application and interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xe-ss-1
part of: 23XE Records of application and interim order
note: Applicant must make a record of application and grounds for interim order.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XE(1) Records of application and interim order
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Applicant must make a record.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XE(2) Records of application and interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xe-ss-2
part of: 23XE Records of application and interim order
note: Send a copy of the applicant's record to the magistrate as soon as practicable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to send a copy of the record
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XE(3) Records of application and interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xe-ss-3
part of: 23XE Records of application and interim order
note: Record of interim order made by magistrate
description: (a) the application; (b) the grounds for seeking the order; (c) the order made; (d) the date and time when the order was made; (e) the reasons for making it
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must make record of interim order
premise text: (3) The magistrate must, at the time of, or as soon as practicable after, making an interim order...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Record is made at a specific date and time
premise text: (3) The magistrate must, at the time of, or as soon as practicable after, making an interim order...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Magistrate's record implies that the application and grounds for seeking the order are provided
premise text: (3) The magistrate must, at the time of, or as soon as practicable after, making an interim order...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Record is a part of forensic procedures on suspect by order of a magistrate
premise text: (3) The magistrate must, at the time of, or as soon as practicable after, making an interim order...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Record is a part of forensic procedures on suspect by order of a magistrate
premise text: (3) The magistrate must, at the time of, or as soon as practicable after, making an interim order...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XE(4) Records of application and interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xe-ss-4
part of: 23XE Records of application and interim order
note: Must send a copy of the record to the applicant
description: Record
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: The magistrate must send a copy of the record to the applicant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XE(5) Records of application and interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xe-ss-5
part of: 23XE Records of application and interim order
note: Must provide suspect with copies of records
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During application period
premise text: as soon as practicable after the applicant receives the magistrate’s record
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XE(6) Records of application and interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xe-ss-6
part of: 23XE Records of application and interim order
note: Order has no effect if records do not match
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xe-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Applicant's record does not match Magistrate's record
conclusion text: Order has no effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XF Suspect may be prevented from destroying or contaminating
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xf
has part: 23XF(1) Suspect may be prevented from destroying or contaminating
has part: 23XF(2) Suspect may be prevented from destroying or contaminating
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.57

23XF(1) Suspect may be prevented from destroying or contaminating
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xf-ss-1
part of: 23XF Suspect may be prevented from destroying or contaminating
note: Prevent suspect from destroying or contaminating evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xf-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XF(1) Suspect may be prevented from destroying or contaminating
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XF(2) Suspect may be prevented from destroying or contaminating
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xf-ss-2
part of: 23XF Suspect may be prevented from destroying or contaminating
note: Prevents carrying out forensic procedures before interim order is made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xf-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents action
premise text: (2) Nothing in this section authorises any person to carry out a forensic procedure before an interim order is made.
conclusion text: No one may carry out a forensic procedure before an interim order is made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xf-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Establishes the relationship between the prohibition and the condition
premise text: (2) Nothing in this section authorises any person to carry out a forensic procedure before an interim order is made.
conclusion text: If no interim order has been made, then no one may carry out a forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XG Results of forensic procedure carried out under interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xg
has part: 23XG(1) Results of forensic procedure carried out under interim order
has part: 23XG(2) Results of forensic procedure carried out under interim order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.57

23XG(1) Results of forensic procedure carried out under interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xg-ss-1
part of: 23XG Results of forensic procedure carried out under interim order
note: Analysis of sample under interim order is prohibited unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XG(1) Results of forensic procedure carried out under interim order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of analysis
premise text: (1) A sample taken under an interim order must not be analysed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for analysis
premise text: (a) the sample is likely to perish before a final order is made
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XG(2) Results of forensic procedure carried out under interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xg-ss-2
part of: 23XG Results of forensic procedure carried out under interim order
note: Disclosing analysis results before final order is made or if interim order is disallowed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XG(2) Results of forensic procedure carried out under interim order
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: (2) A person who conducts an analysis...
conclusion text: ...must not intentionally disclose the results...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XH Restrictions on publication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xh
note: Restrictions on publication of suspect information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xh-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xh-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xh-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XH Restrictions on publication
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits intentional publication of suspect information
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XI General rules for carrying out forensic procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xi
note: Forensic procedures must be carried out under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xi-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xi-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xi-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xi-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xi-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits carrying out forensic procedures in certain circumstances.
premise text: Forensic procedure must be carried out in circumstances affording reasonable privacy to the suspect.
conclusion text: Must not be carried out in the presence or view of a person who is of the opposite sex to the suspect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xi-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits carrying out forensic procedures in certain circumstances.
premise text: Forensic procedure must be carried out while the suspect is not being questioned as defined in subsection 23B(6).
conclusion text: Must not be carried out while the suspect is being questioned as defined in subsection 23B(6).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xi-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits carrying out forensic procedures in certain circumstances.
premise text: Forensic procedure must be carried out in circumstances affording reasonable privacy to the suspect.
conclusion text: Must not involve more visual inspection than is necessary for the carrying out of the procedure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XJ Use of force in carrying out forensic procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xj
has part: 23XJ(1) Use of force in carrying out forensic procedures
has part: 23XJ(2) Use of force in carrying out forensic procedures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.63

23XJ(1) Use of force in carrying out forensic procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xj-ss-1
part of: 23XJ Use of force in carrying out forensic procedures
note: Authorised person may use reasonable force to carry out forensic procedures.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xj-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XJ(1) Use of force in carrying out forensic procedures
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Authorised person may use reasonable force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XJ(2) Use of force in carrying out forensic procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xj-ss-2
part of: 23XJ Use of force in carrying out forensic procedures
note: All forensic procedures must be carried out in accordance with professional standards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xj-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XJ(2) Use of force in carrying out forensic procedures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XK Forensic procedures not to be carried out in cruel, inhuman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xk
note: Forensic procedures must not be carried out in cruel, inhuman or degrading manner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xk-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xk-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xk-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XK Forensic procedures not to be carried out in cruel, inhuman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits carrying out forensic procedures in cruel, inhuman or degrading manner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XL Taking of hair samples
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xl
note: Authorisation for taking hair samples under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XL Taking of hair samples
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission for a specific action.
premise text: The person takes only so much hair as the person believes is necessary
conclusion text: Permission granted to take a sample of hair.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposing an obligation on the person taking the sample.
premise text: The sample is taken using the least painful technique known and available to the person.
conclusion text: The person must use the least painful technique.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibiting certain actions for taking hair samples.
premise text: The sample is not taken using a technique that causes unnecessary pain or discomfort.
conclusion text: This action must not cause unnecessary pain or discomfort.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission for the person to take hair samples under certain conditions.
premise text: The sample is taken using the least painful technique known and available to the person.
conclusion text: Permission granted to take a sample of hair.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xl-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
logic summary: Granting a right to the suspect to refuse taking a hair sample.
premise text: The person must inform the suspect that they have the right to refuse taking a sample of hair.
conclusion text: This action is not mandatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XM Persons who may carry out forensic procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xm
note: Specifies persons who may carry out forensic procedures under this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xm-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xm-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XM Persons who may carry out forensic procedures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23XN Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xn
has part: 23XN(1) Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
has part: 23XN(2) Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
has part: 23XN(3) Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.68

23XN(1) Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xn-ss-1
part of: 23XN Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
note: Forensic procedures must be carried out by a person of the same sex as the suspect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XN(1) Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be carried out by a person of the same sex as the suspect.
premise text: (1) If practicable, an intimate forensic procedure (other than the taking of a sample of blood or a dental impression) is to be carried out: (a) if the suspect is an adult—by a person of the same sex as the suspect; or (b) if the suspect is a child—by a person of the sex chosen by the suspect or, if the suspect does not wish to make such a choice, by a person of the same sex as the suspect.
conclusion text: (1) If practicable, an intimate forensic procedure (other than the taking of a sample of blood or a dental impression) is to be carried out: (a) if the suspect is an adult—by a person of the same sex as the suspect; or (b) if the suspect is a child—by a person of the sex chosen by the suspect or, if the suspect does not wish to make such a choice, by a person of the same sex as the suspect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XN(2) Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xn-ss-2
part of: 23XN Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
note: Forensic procedures must be carried out by a person of the same sex as the suspect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XN(2) Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be carried out by a person of the same sex as the suspect.
premise text: (2) If practicable, a non-intimate forensic procedure for which the suspect is required to remove clothing other than his or her...
conclusion text: a person of the same sex as the suspect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: The procedure must be carried out within a specific time frame.
premise text: (2) If practicable, a non-intimate forensic procedure for which the suspect is required to remove clothing other than his or her...
conclusion text: a specific time frame
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: The procedure must be carried out in a recursive manner.
premise text: (2) If practicable, a non-intimate forensic procedure for which the suspect is required to remove clothing other than his or her...
conclusion text: a recursive manner
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: The procedure must be carried out in a way that spreads to all relevant parties.
premise text: (2) If practicable, a non-intimate forensic procedure for which the suspect is required to remove clothing other than his or her...
conclusion text: all relevant parties
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNIZES
logic summary: The procedure must be recognized by a cognitive agent.
premise text: (2) If practicable, a non-intimate forensic procedure for which the suspect is required to remove clothing other than his or her...
conclusion text: a cognitive agent
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XN(3) Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xn-ss-3
part of: 23XN Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
note: Person asked under section 23XO to help carry out forensic procedure must be of same sex as suspect or chosen by suspect if child.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XN(3) Certain forensic procedures generally to be carried out by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be of same sex as suspect or chosen by suspect if child.
premise text: (3) If practicable, a person asked under section 23XO to help carry out a forensic procedure...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
logic summary: Must not be inappropriate to help carry out forensic procedure.
premise text: (3) If practicable, a person asked under section 23XO to help carry out a forensic procedure...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Forensic procedure must be carried out within same temporal interval as suspect's age.
premise text: (3) If practicable, a person asked under section 23XO to help carry out a forensic procedure...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Forensic procedure must be carried out within same temporal interval as suspect's age.
premise text: (3) If practicable, a person asked under section 23XO to help carry out a forensic procedure...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xn-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Forensic procedure must be carried out within same temporal interval as suspect's age.
premise text: (3) If practicable, a person asked under section 23XO to help carry out a forensic procedure...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XO Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xo
has part: 23XO(1) Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
has part: 23XO(2) Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
has part: 23XO(3) Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.69

23XO(1) Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xo-ss-1
part of: 23XO Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
note: A person authorized to carry out a forensic procedure can ask for help.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-1-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XO(1) Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23XO(2) Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xo-ss-2
part of: 23XO Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
note: A person is not required to be a specific type for help with forensic procedures.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-2-norm

23XO(3) Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xo-ss-3
part of: 23XO Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
note: Use reasonable force to enable a forensic procedure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XO(3) Person may get help to carry out forensic procedures
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: use
logic summary: Obligation to use reasonable force.
premise text: (3) A person who is asked to help carry out a forensic procedure may...
conclusion text: Use reasonable force to enable the forensic procedure to be carried out.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: enable
logic summary: Obligation to enable the forensic procedure.
premise text: (3) A person who is asked to help carry out a forensic procedure may...
conclusion text: Enable the forensic procedure to be carried out.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between enabling and carrying out.
premise text: (3) A person who is asked to help carry out a forensic procedure may...
conclusion text: Enabling occurs during the carrying out of the procedure.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication from enabling and carrying out.
premise text: (3) A person who is asked to help carry out a forensic procedure may...
conclusion text: If enabling occurs, then the procedure can be carried out.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xo-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation through enabling.
premise text: (3) A person who is asked to help carry out a forensic procedure may...
conclusion text: The obligation to enable diffuses through the person's actions.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XP Medical practitioner or dentist of suspect’s choice may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xp
has part: 23XP(1) Medical practitioner or dentist of suspect’s choice may be
has part: 23XP(2) Medical practitioner or dentist of suspect’s choice may be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70

23XP(1) Medical practitioner or dentist of suspect’s choice may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xp-ss-1
part of: 23XP Medical practitioner or dentist of suspect’s choice may be
note: Suspect has right to request medical practitioner or dentist of choice during forensic procedure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xp-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xp-ss-1-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XP(1) Medical practitioner or dentist of suspect’s choice may be
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Expresses right to request medical practitioner or dentist.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XP(2) Medical practitioner or dentist of suspect’s choice may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xp-ss-2
part of: 23XP Medical practitioner or dentist of suspect’s choice may be
note: Expert chosen may not be required to attend forensic procedure under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xp-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XQ Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xq
has part: 23XQ(1) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
has part: 23XQ(2) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
has part: 23XQ(3) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70

23XQ(1) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xq-ss-1
part of: 23XQ Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
note: Presence of interview friend or legal representative required for children
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XQ(1) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires presence of interview friend or legal representative
premise text: (1) This section applies if the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Requires presence during interview
premise text: (1) This section applies if the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implies need for interview friend or legal representative
premise text: (1) This section applies if the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires diffusion of information to interview friend or legal representative
premise text: (1) This section applies if the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires cognitive AI to facilitate interview friend or legal representative
premise text: (1) This section applies if the suspect is: (a) a child; or (b) an incapable person.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23XQ(2) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xq-ss-2
part of: 23XQ Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
note: Presence of interview friend or legal representative required during forensic procedure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XQ(2) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Presence of interview friend or legal representative is required.
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.
conclusion text: Either an interview friend or a legal representative must be present.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for presence requirement.
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for presence is during the forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal trace for presence requirement.
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.
conclusion text: The temporal trace for presence is during the forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Spread of presence requirement.
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.
conclusion text: The spread of the presence requirement is to all individuals involved in the forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: MUST
logic summary: Rational justification for presence requirement.
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.
conclusion text: The presence of an individual is justified by their role in the forensic procedure.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XQ(3) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xq-ss-3
part of: 23XQ Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
note: Excluding interview friends from forensic procedures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XQ(3) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—children
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits excluding interview friends
premise text: (3) An interview friend (other than a legal representative) of the suspect may be excluded from the place where the forensic procedure is being carried out...
conclusion text: The exclusion of an interview friend is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits obstructing or interfering with procedures
premise text: (3) An interview friend unreasonably interferes with or obstructs the carrying out of the procedure.
conclusion text: The interference or obstruction is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Identifies overlapping intervals
premise text: (3) An interview friend unreasonably interferes with or obstructs the carrying out of the procedure.
conclusion text: The interval of interference overlaps with the procedure.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xq-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits unreasonable behavior
premise text: (3) An interview friend unreasonably interferes with or obstructs the carrying out of the procedure.
conclusion text: The unreasonable behavior is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XR Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xr
has part: 23XR(1) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
has part: 23XR(2) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
has part: 23XR(3) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
has part: 23XR(4) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.71

23XR(1) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xr-ss-1
part of: 23XR Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
note: Investigating constable must believe on reasonable grounds that suspect is Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander not covered by section 23XQ.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XR(1) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must believe on reasonable grounds
premise text: (1) This section applies if the investigating constable believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by section 23XQ.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: BELIEVE
logic summary: Believe on reasonable grounds
premise text: (1) This section applies if the investigating constable believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by section 23XQ.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Belief must be on reasonable grounds
premise text: (1) This section applies if the investigating constable believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by section 23XQ.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Belief must be on reasonable grounds
premise text: (1) This section applies if the investigating constable believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by section 23XQ.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: APPLIES_TO
logic summary: Section applies to investigating constable
premise text: (1) This section applies if the investigating constable believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by section 23XQ.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XR(2) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xr-ss-2
part of: 23XR Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
note: Presence of interview friend or legal representative required during forensic procedure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XR(2) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Presence of interview friend or legal representative is required.
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.
conclusion text: Either an interview friend or a legal representative must be present.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for presence of interview friend or legal representative.
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for presence includes the time during which the forensic procedure is carried out.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal trace for presence of interview friend or legal representative.
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.
conclusion text: The temporal trace includes the time during which the forensic procedure is carried out.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Spread of presence requirement to related individuals.
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.
conclusion text: The presence requirement spreads to related individuals.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: MUST
logic summary: Rationale for requiring presence of interview friend or legal representative.
premise text: (2) Either an interview friend or a legal representative (if he or she is not the interview friend) of the suspect must be present while the forensic procedure is carried out.
conclusion text: The rationale is that either an interview friend or a legal representative must be present.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XR(3) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xr-ss-3
part of: 23XR Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
note: Waiver of interview friend presence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to waive interview friend presence
premise text: Subsection (2) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...the suspect expressly and voluntarily waives his or her right...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Waive
logic summary: Voluntary waiver of interview friend presence
premise text: ...the suspect expressly and voluntarily waives his or her right...
conclusion text: ...waiver under subsection (3).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Believe
logic summary: Investigating constable's belief about suspect's understanding
premise text: the investigating constable believes on reasonable grounds...
conclusion text: ...that, having regard to the suspect’s level of education and understanding...
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
logic summary: Temporal interval for waiver consideration
premise text: Subsection (3) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...the suspect expressly and voluntarily waives his or her right...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Waiver of interview friend presence obligation
premise text: Subsection (2) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...the suspect expressly and voluntarily waives his or her right...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23XR(4) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xr-ss-4
part of: 23XR Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
note: Excluding an interview friend from a forensic procedure if they unreasonably interfere.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XR(4) Presence of interview friend or legal representative—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits excluding an interview friend from a forensic procedure.
premise text: (4) An interview friend (other than a legal representative) of the suspect may be excluded...
conclusion text: An interview friend may not be excluded if they unreasonably interfere.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
logic summary: Traces the temporal interval of the prohibition.
premise text: (4) An interview friend (other than a legal representative)...
conclusion text: The prohibition applies during the time the interview friend unreasonably interferes.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on excluding an interview friend if they unreasonably interfere.
premise text: (4) An interview friend (other than a legal representative)...
conclusion text: There is an obligation to exclude the interview friend if they unreasonably interfere.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xr-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Reiterates the prohibition on excluding an interview friend.
premise text: (4) An interview friend (other than a legal representative)...
conclusion text: The exclusion is prohibited if it involves unreasonably interfering with the procedure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XS Presence of constables
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xs
has part: 23XS(1) Presence of constables
has part: 23XS(2) Presence of constables
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.71

23XS(1) Presence of constables
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xs-ss-1
part of: 23XS Presence of constables
note: Limitation on number of constables present during forensic procedure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XS(1) Presence of constables
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Maximum number limit
premise text: (1) The number of constables that may be present...
conclusion text: must not exceed that which is reasonably necessary
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XS(2) Presence of constables
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xs-ss-2
part of: 23XS Presence of constables
note: Constable's presence is necessary for effective forensic procedure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XS(2) Presence of constables
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Presence of constable is necessary
premise text: (2) Where the presence of a constable...
conclusion text: The constable's presence is necessary
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Constable's presence overlaps with forensic procedure
premise text: (2) Where the presence of a constable...
conclusion text: The constable's presence overlaps with forensic procedure
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Constable's presence implies effective forensic procedure
premise text: (2) Where the presence of a constable...
conclusion text: The constable's presence implies effective forensic procedure
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Constable's presence diffuses to all who can ensure effective procedure
premise text: (2) Where the presence of a constable...
conclusion text: The constable's presence diffuses to all who can ensure effective procedure
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xs-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Constable's presence is recognized as necessary for effective forensic procedure
premise text: (2) Where the presence of a constable...
conclusion text: The constable's presence is recognized as necessary for effective forensic procedure
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XT Recording of forensic procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xt
has part: 23XT(1) Recording of forensic procedure
has part: 23XT(2) Recording of forensic procedure
has part: 23XT(3) Recording of forensic procedure
has part: 23XT(4) Recording of forensic procedure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.72

23XT(1) Recording of forensic procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xt-ss-1
part of: 23XT Recording of forensic procedure
note: Carrying out of a forensic procedure must be video recorded unless the suspect objects or the recording is not practicable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XT(1) Recording of forensic procedure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to record forensic procedure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XT(2) Recording of forensic procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xt-ss-2
part of: 23XT Recording of forensic procedure
note: Suspect must be informed of video recording before forensic procedure.
description: Reasons for video recording and protection provided by the video recording.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XT(2) Recording of forensic procedure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform suspect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XT(3) Recording of forensic procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xt-ss-3
part of: 23XT Recording of forensic procedure
note: No right to object to video recording of forensic procedure for Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander friends
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-3-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XT(3) Recording of forensic procedure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits objecting to video recording
premise text: Section 23YE gives interview friends general powers
conclusion text: No right to object
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Video recording overlaps with interview friend's powers
premise text: Section 23YE gives interview friends general powers
conclusion text: Video recording is not subject to section 23XQ
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Justify
logic summary: Justifies prohibition on objecting to video recording
premise text: Section 23YE gives interview friends general powers
conclusion text: Prohibition is justified
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XT(4) Recording of forensic procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xt-ss-4
part of: 23XT Recording of forensic procedure
note: Forensic procedure must be carried out in the presence of an independent person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XT(4) Recording of forensic procedure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Forensic procedure must be carried out in the presence of an independent person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval: presence of an independent person.
premise text: (4) If the carrying out of the forensic procedure is not to be video recorded, the forensic procedure must be carried out in the presence of an independent person (not a constable). Subdivision F—Procedure after forensic procedure is carried out
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval: carrying out of the forensic procedure.
premise text: (4) If the carrying out of the forensic procedure is not to be video recorded, the forensic procedure must be carried out in the presence of an independent person (not a constable). Subdivision F—Procedure after forensic procedure is carried out
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Diffusion of information: presence of an independent person.
premise text: (4) If the carrying out of the forensic procedure is not to be video recorded, the forensic procedure must be carried out in the presence of an independent person (not a constable). Subdivision F—Procedure after forensic procedure is carried out
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xt-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Artificial intelligence: presence of an independent person.
premise text: (4) If the carrying out of the forensic procedure is not to be video recorded, the forensic procedure must be carried out in the presence of an independent person (not a constable). Subdivision F—Procedure after forensic procedure is carried out
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XU Samples—sufficient material to share
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xu
has part: 23XU(1) Samples—sufficient material to share
has part: 23XU(2) Samples—sufficient material to share
has part: 23XU(3) Samples—sufficient material to share
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.73

23XU(1) Samples—sufficient material to share
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xu-ss-1
part of: 23XU Samples—sufficient material to share
note: Sharing of sample material with suspect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.73
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XU(1) Samples—sufficient material to share
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to share sample material
premise text: (a) a sample is taken from a suspect under this Part; and (b) the suspect requests the investigating constable that the sample be shared;
conclusion text: There is sufficient material to be analysed both in the investigation of the offence and on behalf of the suspect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between request and analysis
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a sample is taken from a suspect under this Part; and (b) the suspect requests the investigating constable that the sample be shared;
conclusion text: The request to share the sample material overlaps with the analysis.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between request and analysis
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a sample is taken from a suspect under this Part; and (b) the suspect requests the investigating constable that the sample be shared;
conclusion text: The request to share the sample material occurs before or at the same time as the analysis.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Propagation of request through investigation
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a sample is taken from a suspect under this Part; and (b) the suspect requests the investigating constable that the sample be shared;
conclusion text: The request to share the sample material spreads through the investigation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Inference of sufficiency from conditions
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a sample is taken from a suspect under this Part; and (b) the suspect requests the investigating constable that the sample be shared;
conclusion text: If the conditions are met, then there is sufficient material to share.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23XU(2) Samples—sufficient material to share
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xu-ss-2
part of: 23XU Samples—sufficient material to share
note: The investigating constable must invite the suspect to nominate an accredited laboratory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.73
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XU(2) Samples—sufficient material to share
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The investigating constable must invite the suspect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XU(3) Samples—sufficient material to share
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xu-ss-3
part of: 23XU Samples—sufficient material to share
note: Must provide material to accredited laboratory within 28 days
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.73
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XU(3) Samples—sufficient material to share
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide material to accredited laboratory within 28 days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XV Photographs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xv
note: Suspect must be provided with a copy of the photograph taken during forensic procedure.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xv-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xv-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xv-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XV Photographs
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xv-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide copy of photograph to suspect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XW Results of analysis
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xw
note: Must provide analysis results to suspect upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xw-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xw-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xw-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xw-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XW Results of analysis
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide analysis results to suspect upon request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xw-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: KNOWS
logic summary: Investigating constable knows analysis results.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XX Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xx
has part: 23XX(1) Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
has part: 23XX(2) Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
has part: 23XX(3) Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.97

23XX(1) Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xx-ss-1
part of: 23XX Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
note: Prohibition on using evidence from improper forensic procedures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.97
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XX(1) Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of evidence from improper forensic procedures
premise text: (1) This section applies...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XX(2) Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xx-ss-2
part of: 23XX Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
note: Exemptions from inadmissibility of improper forensic evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.97
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XX(2) Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23XX(3) Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xx-ss-3
part of: 23XX Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
note: Excludes evidence from improper forensic procedures.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.97
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XX(3) Inadmissibility of evidence from improper forensic
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits the use of evidence from improper forensic procedures.
premise text: (3) This section applies to: (a) evidence of forensic material, or evidence consisting of forensic material, taken from the person by the forensic procedure;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xx-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on those who would use such evidence.
premise text: (3) This section applies to: (a) evidence of forensic material, or evidence consisting of forensic material, taken from the person by the forensic procedure;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XY Inadmissibility of evidence where forensic material required
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xy
has part: 23XY(1) Inadmissibility of evidence where forensic material required
has part: 23XY(2) Inadmissibility of evidence where forensic material required
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.99

23XY(1) Inadmissibility of evidence where forensic material required
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xy-ss-1
part of: 23XY Inadmissibility of evidence where forensic material required
note: Prohibition on using forensic material in evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.99
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XY(1) Inadmissibility of evidence where forensic material required
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of forensic material in evidence
premise text: (1) If a provision of this Part requires forensic material taken from a person by a forensic procedure to be destroyed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Requires overlap between the destruction of forensic material and its use in evidence
premise text: (c) any results of the analysis of the forensic material; and (d) any other evidence made or obtained as a result of or in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Requires destruction of forensic material until its use in evidence is complete
premise text: (1) If a provision of this Part requires forensic material taken from a person by a forensic procedure to be destroyed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Containment
logic summary: Requires containment of the use of forensic material in evidence until its destruction is complete
premise text: (a) evidence of the forensic material; and (b) if the material has not been destroyed—evidence consisting of the forensic material
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Requires inference from the destruction of forensic material to its use in evidence
premise text: (c) any results of the analysis of the forensic material; and (d) any other evidence made or obtained as a result of or in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23XY(2) Inadmissibility of evidence where forensic material required
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xy-ss-2
part of: 23XY Inadmissibility of evidence where forensic material required
note: Evidence from forensic material is not admissible in proceedings against the person, but may be admissible if adduced by the person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.99
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XY(2) Inadmissibility of evidence where forensic material required
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of evidence from forensic material in proceedings against the person.
premise text: (2) The results of the analysis, and the other evidence, are not admissible if adduced by the prosecution in any proceedings against the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to use evidence from forensic material in proceedings by the person.
premise text: (2) The results of the analysis, and the other evidence, are not admissible if adduced by the prosecution in any proceedings against the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for when evidence from forensic material is admissible or inadmissible.
premise text: (2) The results of the analysis, and the other evidence, are not admissible if adduced by the prosecution in any proceedings against the person.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Temporal trace for when evidence from forensic material is used in proceedings.
premise text: (2) The results of the analysis, and the other evidence, are not admissible if adduced by the prosecution in any proceedings against the person.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xy-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spread of information about when evidence from forensic material is admissible or inadmissible.
premise text: (2) The results of the analysis, and the other evidence, are not admissible if adduced by the prosecution in any proceedings against the person.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23XZ Admissibility of evidence relating to consent to forensic
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23xz
note: Evidence of refusal or withdrawal of consent is not admissible in proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.99
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23xz-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-23xz-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XZ Admissibility of evidence relating to consent to forensic
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23YA Admissibility of evidence relating to carrying out of forensic
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ya
note: Evidence of forensic procedure admissibility in court proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.100
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ya-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ya-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ya-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YA Admissibility of evidence relating to carrying out of forensic
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ya-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: admission
logic summary: Establishes admissibility of evidence
premise text: None
conclusion text: Evidence is admissible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YB Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yb
has part: 23YB(1) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
has part: 23YB(2) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
has part: 23YB(3) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
has part: 23YB(4) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
has part: 23YB(5) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.100

23YB(1) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yb-ss-1
part of: 23YB Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
note: This section applies where a constable or magistrate has ordered the carrying out of a forensic procedure on a suspect under this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.100
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YB(1) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to carry out forensic procedures.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YB(2) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yb-ss-2
part of: 23YB Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
note: Refusal to comply with forensic procedure or obstructing its carrying out is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.100
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YB(2) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of obstructing forensic procedure
premise text: (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4)
conclusion text: is admissible in any proceedings against the suspect in respect of a relevant offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between refusal to comply and obstruction
premise text: (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4)
conclusion text: evidence that the suspect refused to comply with any reasonable direction in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure; or evidence that the suspect obstructed, resisted, hindered, used violence against, threatened or intimidated a person in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of obstructive behavior
premise text: (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4)
conclusion text: evidence that the suspect refused to comply with any reasonable direction in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure; or evidence that the suspect obstructed, resisted, hindered, used violence against, threatened or intimidated a person in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of information about obstructive behavior
premise text: (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4)
conclusion text: evidence that the suspect refused to comply with any reasonable direction in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure; or evidence that the suspect obstructed, resisted, hindered, used violence against, threatened or intimidated a person in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognition of obstructive behavior by AI system
premise text: (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4)
conclusion text: evidence that the suspect refused to comply with any reasonable direction in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure; or evidence that the suspect obstructed, resisted, hindered, used violence against, threatened or intimidated a person in connection with the carrying out of the forensic procedure;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YB(3) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yb-ss-3
part of: 23YB Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
note: Forensic procedure must be carried out satisfactorily for evidence to be admissible.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.100
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YB(3) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits obstructing forensic procedure.
premise text: (3) Evidence described in subsection (2) is not admissible if the forensic procedure was in fact carried out satisfactorily.
conclusion text: Forensic procedure must be carried out satisfactorily for evidence to be admissible.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies that forensic procedure is a requirement for admissibility of evidence.
premise text: (3) Evidence described in subsection (2) is not admissible if the forensic procedure was in fact carried out satisfactorily.
conclusion text: Forensic procedure must be carried out satisfactorily for evidence to be admissible.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Require
logic summary: Requires forensic procedure to occur before evidence can be admitted.
premise text: (3) Evidence described in subsection (2) is not admissible if the forensic procedure was in fact carried out satisfactorily.
conclusion text: Forensic procedure must be carried out satisfactorily for evidence to be admissible.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies that forensic procedure is a necessary condition for admissibility of evidence.
premise text: (3) Evidence described in subsection (2) is not admissible if the forensic procedure was in fact carried out satisfactorily.
conclusion text: Forensic procedure must be carried out satisfactorily for evidence to be admissible.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies forensic procedure as a requirement for admissibility of evidence using artificial intelligence.
premise text: (3) Evidence described in subsection (2) is not admissible if the forensic procedure was in fact carried out satisfactorily.
conclusion text: Forensic procedure must be carried out satisfactorily for evidence to be admissible.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YB(4) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yb-ss-4
part of: 23YB Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
note: Refusing to comply with direction or obstructing forensic procedure is not admissible as evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.100
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YB(4) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of obstructing forensic procedure
premise text: State direction to suspect
conclusion text: Refusal or obstruction is not admissible as evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YB(5) Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yb-ss-5
part of: 23YB Obstructing the carrying out of forensic procedure
note: Does not apply to proceedings in foreign countries or international tribunals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.100
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Does not apply to proceedings in foreign countries or international tribunals.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YC Destruction of forensic material where interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yc
has part: 23YC(1) Destruction of forensic material where interim order
has part: 23YC(2) Destruction of forensic material where interim order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102

23YC(1) Destruction of forensic material where interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yc-ss-1
part of: 23YC Destruction of forensic material where interim order
note: Ensure destruction of forensic material and provide results to suspect.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YC(1) Destruction of forensic material where interim order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Ensure action is taken.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YC(2) Destruction of forensic material where interim order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yc-ss-2
part of: 23YC Destruction of forensic material where interim order
note: Destroy forensic material after specified period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YC(2) Destruction of forensic material where interim order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must destroy forensic material
premise text: (2) If an order...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YD Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yd
has part: 23YD(1) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
has part: 23YD(2) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
has part: 23YD(3) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
has part: 23YD(4) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
has part: 23YD(5) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
has part: 23YD(6) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102

23YD(1) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yd-ss-1
part of: 23YD Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
note: Destruction of forensic material after 12 months is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YD(1) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits destruction of forensic material after 12 months.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YD(2) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yd-ss-2
part of: 23YD Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
note: Destroy forensic material after 12 months if no proceedings instituted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YD(2) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits destruction of forensic material after 12 months
premise text: a period of 12 months has elapsed since the forensic material was taken
conclusion text: the forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable unless a warrant for apprehension of the suspect has been issued
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YD(3) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yd-ss-3
part of: 23YD Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
note: Destroy forensic material after 12 months if conviction is recorded or acquittal is confirmed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YD(3) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must destroy forensic material.
premise text: (3) If...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between destruction and acquittal
premise text: (b) the suspect is acquitted of such an offence and...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YD(4) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yd-ss-4
part of: 23YD Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
note: Destroy forensic material after 12 months if warrant lapses or suspect apprehended within 12 months
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YD(4) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to destroy forensic material
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued during the period of 12 months after forensic material is taken...
conclusion text: The forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after (a) the warrant lapses; or (b) a period of 12 months elapses after the suspect is apprehended.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for destruction of forensic material
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued during the period of 12 months after forensic material is taken...
conclusion text: The forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after (a) the warrant lapses; or (b) a period of 12 months elapses after the suspect is apprehended.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for destruction of forensic material
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued during the period of 12 months after forensic material is taken...
conclusion text: The forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after (a) the warrant lapses; or (b) a period of 12 months elapses after the suspect is apprehended.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF-THEN
logic summary: Conditional destruction of forensic material
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued during the period of 12 months after forensic material is taken...
conclusion text: The forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after (a) the warrant lapses; or (b) a period of 12 months elapses after the suspect is apprehended.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: CONCLUSION
logic summary: Inference from warrant lapse or suspect apprehension
premise text: (4) If a warrant for the apprehension of the suspect is issued during the period of 12 months after forensic material is taken...
conclusion text: The forensic material must be destroyed as soon as practicable after (a) the warrant lapses; or (b) a period of 12 months elapses after the suspect is apprehended.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YD(5) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yd-ss-5
part of: 23YD Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
note: Magistrate may extend retention period for forensic material under special reasons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YD(5) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Magistrate may extend retention period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YD(6) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yd-ss-6
part of: 23YD Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
note: Magistrate must notify person from whom forensic material was taken before extending period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.102
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YD(6) Destruction of forensic material after 12 months
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yd-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must notify person from whom forensic material was taken before extending period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Crime scene must be present if suspects are within the purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.112
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-1-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Section 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Crime scene must be present if suspects are within the purpose.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-2
note: Serious offenders are subject to this provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.112
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-5-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Section 5
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-5-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: isSubjectTo
logic summary: Indicates that serious offenders are subject to this provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2
has part: 6(2) Section 6
has part: 6(3) Section 6
has part: 6(1) Section 6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.112

6(2) Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-2
part of: 6 Section 6
note: Reckless matching of DNA profiles is prohibited. Ensure removal of identifying information from DNA database system after end of identifying period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.112
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2) Section 6
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reckless matching of DNA profiles.
premise text: (a) the person’s conduct causes the matching that is not permitted by this Part of a DNA profile...
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reckless conduct.
premise text: (b) the person is reckless as to any such matching of profiles.
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies imprisonment if reckless conduct occurs.
premise text: (b) the person is reckless as to any such matching of profiles.
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must ensure removal
premise text: No identifying information should be retained
conclusion text: Offence if not removed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(3) Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-3
part of: 6 Section 6
note: Exemption for administering Commonwealth DNA database system
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.112
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows conduct not permitted by the Part for a specific purpose
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(1) Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-1
part of: 6 Section 6
note: Offence of recording or retaining identifying information from forensic material without destruction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.112
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(1) Section 6
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits recording or retaining identifying information from forensic material without destruction.
premise text: (a) the person’s conduct causes any identifying information about a person obtained from forensic material taken from the person under this Part to be recorded or retained in the Commonwealth DNA database system at any time after this Part requires the forensic material to be destroyed;
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The destruction of forensic material overlaps with the recording or retention of identifying information.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person’s conduct causes any identifying information about a person obtained from forensic material taken from the person under this Part to be recorded or retained in the Commonwealth DNA database system at any time after this Part requires the forensic material to be destroyed;
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The destruction of forensic material is a prerequisite for recording or retention of identifying information.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person’s conduct causes any identifying information about a person obtained from forensic material taken from the person under this Part to be recorded or retained in the Commonwealth DNA database system at any time after this Part requires the forensic material to be destroyed;
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: There is an obligation to destroy forensic material before recording or retaining identifying information.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person’s conduct causes any identifying information about a person obtained from forensic material taken from the person under this Part to be recorded or retained in the Commonwealth DNA database system at any time after this Part requires the forensic material to be destroyed;
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YE Powers etc. of legal representatives and interview friends
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ye
has part: 23YE(1) Powers etc. of legal representatives and interview friends
has part: 23YE(2) Powers etc. of legal representatives and interview friends
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116

23YE(1) Powers etc. of legal representatives and interview friends
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ye-ss-1
part of: 23YE Powers etc. of legal representatives and interview friends
note: A legal representative or interview friend can make a request or objection on behalf of a suspect or offender.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ye-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ye-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ye-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YE(1) Powers etc. of legal representatives and interview friends
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ye-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Can make a request or objection
premise text: Legal representative or interview friend
conclusion text: Request or objection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YE(2) Powers etc. of legal representatives and interview friends
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ye-ss-2
part of: 23YE Powers etc. of legal representatives and interview friends
note: Interview friend or legal representative must be informed of matter in language they can communicate with fluency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ye-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ye-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ye-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YE(2) Powers etc. of legal representatives and interview friends
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ye-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must inform interview friend or legal representative in language they can communicate with fluency.
premise text: (2) If...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YF Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yf
has part: 23YF(1) Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
has part: 23YF(2) Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
has part: 23YF(3) Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116

23YF(1) Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yf-ss-1
part of: 23YF Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
note: Investigating constable must provide certain recordings to suspect, offender or volunteer.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YF(1) Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide certain recordings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YF(2) Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yf-ss-2
part of: 23YF Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
note: Investigating constable must provide suspect, offender or volunteer with opportunity to view video recording.
description: opportunity to view video recording
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YF(2) Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide opportunity to view video recording.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YF(3) Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yf-ss-3
part of: 23YF Obligation of investigating constables relating to tape
note: Destroy video recording of forensic procedure if section 23YD requires destruction of material.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.116
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must destroy video recording
premise text: (3) If section 23YD requires forensic material...
conclusion text: investigating constable must ensure...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yf-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Video recording contains destruction of material
premise text: (3) If section 23YD requires forensic material...
conclusion text: investigating constable must ensure...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YG Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yg
has part: 23YG(1) Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
has part: 23YG(2) Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
has part: 23YG(3) Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118

23YG(1) Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yg-ss-1
part of: 23YG Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
note: Material must be made available to suspect, offender or volunteer.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YG(1) Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Material must be made available.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YG(2) Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yg-ss-2
part of: 23YG Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
note: Material must be made available within 14 days after creation or request.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YG(2) Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Material must be provided within a specified timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YG(3) Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yg-ss-3
part of: 23YG Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
note: Exemptions from subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YG(3) Material required to be made available to suspect, offender or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YH No charge to be made for giving material etc. to suspects,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yh
note: No charge for providing material or video recording to suspects, offenders, or volunteers.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.118
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yh-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yh-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yh-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YH No charge to be made for giving material etc. to suspects,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory provision without charge.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YI Proof of belief or suspicion
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yi
note: Prosecution must prove belief or suspicion on reasonable grounds.
description: Evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.119
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yi-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yi-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yi-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yi-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YI Proof of belief or suspicion
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yi-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Prosecution has an obligation to prove...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yi-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Prosecution must believe on reasonable grounds...
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YJ Proof of impracticability
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yj
note: Prosecution must prove impracticability on balance of probabilities.
description: Evidence of impracticability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.119
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yj-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yj-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yj-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YJ Proof of impracticability
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to prove impracticability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YK Proof of voluntary waiver of certain rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yk
note: Prosecution must prove Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander waived a right.
description: Proof of voluntary waiver
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.119
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yk-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yk-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yk-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YK Proof of voluntary waiver of certain rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to prove waiver
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YL Liability for forensic procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yl
note: No liability for civil or criminal actions in good faith during forensic procedures.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yl-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yl-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YL Liability for forensic procedures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23YM Experts not obliged to carry out forensic procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ym
note: No obligation on experts to carry out forensic procedures.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ym-norm

23YN Retention of electronic recordings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yn
has part: 23YN(1) Retention of electronic recordings
has part: 23YN(2) Retention of electronic recordings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120

23YN(1) Retention of electronic recordings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yn-ss-1
part of: 23YN Retention of electronic recordings
note: Commissioner directs retention period for electronic recordings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-1-norm

23YN(2) Retention of electronic recordings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yn-ss-2
part of: 23YN Retention of electronic recordings
note: Protection against unauthorized access or use of electronic recordings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YN(2) Retention of electronic recordings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits unauthorized access or use
premise text: (2) A recording that is retained under this section...
conclusion text: ...stored so as to protect it against unauthorised access or use by any person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for protection
premise text: (2) A recording that is retained under this section...
conclusion text: ...is to be stored so as to protect it against unauthorised access or use by any person.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses protection across electronic recordings
premise text: (2) A recording that is retained under this section...
conclusion text: ...is to be stored so as to protect it against unauthorised access or use by any person.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Protect
logic summary: Applies protection AI to electronic recordings
premise text: (2) A recording that is retained under this section...
conclusion text: ...is to be stored so as to protect it against unauthorised access or use by any person.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yn-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
logic summary: Validates electronic recordings for protection
premise text: (2) A recording that is retained under this section...
conclusion text: ...is to be stored so as to protect it against unauthorised access or use by any person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YO Disclosure of information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yo
has part: 23YO(1) Disclosure of information
has part: 23YO(1A) Disclosure of information
has part: 23YO(2) Disclosure of information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120

23YO(1) Disclosure of information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yo-ss-1
part of: 23YO Disclosure of information
note: Disclose information stored on Commonwealth DNA database system or NCIDD without causing disclosure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YO(1) Disclosure of information
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between disclosure and access to Commonwealth DNA database system or NCIDD
premise text: (b) the person’s conduct causes the disclosure of information other than as provided by this section;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosing information without access to Commonwealth DNA database system or NCIDD
premise text: (c) the person is reckless as to any such disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: Implication of reckless conduct on obligation to disclose information
premise text: (a) and (b)
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YO(1A) Disclosure of information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yo-ss-1a
part of: 23YO Disclosure of information
note: Exemption from disclosure of information stored on NCIDD under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Exemption from disclosure of information stored on NCIDD under certain circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YO(2) Disclosure of information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yo-ss-2
part of: 23YO Disclosure of information
note: Disclosure of information for specific purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.120
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yo-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information
premise text: (2) A person may only...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YP Taking, retention and use of forensic material
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yp
has part: 23YP(1) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
has part: 23YP(2) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
has part: 23YP(3) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.123

23YP(1) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yp-ss-1
part of: 23YP Taking, retention and use of forensic material
note: Taking, retention and use of forensic material is authorized by law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.123
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yp-ss-1-norm

23YP(2) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yp-ss-2
part of: 23YP Taking, retention and use of forensic material
note: Retention and use of forensic material from a State or Territory for Commonwealth purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.123
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yp-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yp-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YP(2) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows retention and use of forensic material.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YP(3) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yp-ss-3
part of: 23YP Taking, retention and use of forensic material
note: Retention and use of forensic material from a State or Territory law for Commonwealth purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.123
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yp-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yp-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YP(3) Taking, retention and use of forensic material
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to retain and use forensic material.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YQ Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yq
has part: 23YQ(1) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
has part: 23YQ(2) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.124

23YQ(1) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yq-ss-1
part of: 23YQ Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
note: Commissioner may delegate functions and powers to a constable or AFP appointee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.124
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yq-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (1) The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police may delegate...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YQ(2) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yq-ss-2
part of: 23YQ Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
note: Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.124
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yq-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YQ(2) Commissioner may delegate functions and powers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Delegate functions and powers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YR Relationship with Part IAA
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yr
note: Exemptions from taking identification material from suspects under 18 or in lawful custody
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yr-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yr-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yr-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yr-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits taking identification material from specified suspects
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yr-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Defines the scope of Part IAA
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YS Relationship with Part IC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ys
has part: 23YS(1) Relationship with Part IC
has part: 23YS(2) Relationship with Part IC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128

23YS(1) Relationship with Part IC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ys-ss-1
part of: 23YS Relationship with Part IC
note: Nothing in this Part limits rights and protections of Part IC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ys-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ys-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ys-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YS(1) Relationship with Part IC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ys-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Part IC's provisions imply this obligation.
premise text: (1) Nothing in this Part...
conclusion text: This Part does not limit rights and protections of Part IC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23YS(2) Relationship with Part IC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ys-ss-2
part of: 23YS Relationship with Part IC
note: Rights and protections of Part IC are in addition to those of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.128
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ys-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ys-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YS(2) Relationship with Part IC
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23YU Application of other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yu
has part: 23YU(1) Application of other laws
has part: 23YU(2) Application of other laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.129

23YU(1) Application of other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yu-ss-1
part of: 23YU Application of other laws
note: Exemptions from this Part do not limit other laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.129
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YU(1) Application of other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Exemptions from this Part do not limit other laws.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23YU(2) Application of other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23yu-ss-2
part of: 23YU Application of other laws
note: Avoids doubt about using powers from this Part despite other laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.129
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23YU(2) Application of other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to use powers from this Part despite other laws.
premise text: (2) To avoid any doubt...
conclusion text: a similar power conferred by this Part may be used...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23yu-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between laws
premise text: (2) To avoid any doubt...
conclusion text: ...despite the existence of the power under the other law.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZA Application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23za
note: This Part applies to a thing that is child abuse material or contains child abuse material.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.139
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23za-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23za-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23za-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZA Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23za-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies to the specified thing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zb
has part: 23ZB(1) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(2) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(3) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(4) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(5) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
has part: 23ZB(6) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.140

23ZB(1) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zb-ss-1
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law
note: Constable may give forfeiture notice if reasonably believes forfeitable thing is derived from or used in connection with a Commonwealth child sex offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.140
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZB(1) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to give forfeiture notice
premise text: Constable reasonably believes forfeitable thing is derived from or used in connection with a Commonwealth child sex offence.
conclusion text: Power to give forfeiture notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for 'reasonable belief'
premise text: Constable reasonably believes forfeitable thing is derived from or used in connection with a Commonwealth child sex offence.
conclusion text: Power to give forfeiture notice during the period of reasonable belief.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal logic for 'reasonable belief'
premise text: Constable reasonably believes forfeitable thing is derived from or used in connection with a Commonwealth child sex offence.
conclusion text: Power to give forfeiture notice during the period of reasonable belief.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory power to give forfeiture notice
premise text: Constable reasonably believes forfeitable thing is derived from or used in connection with a Commonwealth child sex offence.
conclusion text: Power to give forfeiture notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZB(2) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zb-ss-2
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law
note: Notice must be given to owner or possessor of forfeitable thing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.140
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZB(2) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIG
logic summary: Notice obligation
premise text: Constable must give notice to owner or possessor.
conclusion text: Owner or possessor must receive notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZB(3) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zb-ss-3
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law
note: Forfeiture of material by operation of law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.140
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-n3logic-6

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZB(3) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the possession or use of forfeitable material
premise text: (3) The forfeiture notice is a notice that...
conclusion text: ...the thing will be forfeited to the Commonwealth 30 days after the notice is given, unless any of the following persons object...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies the forfeitable material as a thing
premise text: (a) identifies the forfeitable thing;
conclusion text: ...the thing will be forfeited to the Commonwealth...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for forfeiture
premise text: 30 days after the notice is given, unless any of the following persons object...
conclusion text: ...the thing will be forfeited to the Commonwealth 30 days after the notice is given, unless...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads the forfeiture notice to relevant parties
premise text: (i) a person who owns the thing (either alone or with other persons);
conclusion text: ...the head of the police force that includes the constable:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Request
logic summary: Requests notification to relevant parties
premise text: (g) requests a person claiming compensation for forfeiture of the thing to notify...
conclusion text: ...the head of the police force of the claim.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-3-logic-n3logic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: Define
logic summary: Defines the circumstances under which compensation is payable
premise text: (f) explains the circumstances in which compensation is payable...
conclusion text: ...in connection with forfeiture of the thing;
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZB(4) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zb-ss-4
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law
note: Give notice to anyone directly or indirectly affected by the proposed forfeiture.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.140
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZB(4) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to give notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23ZB(5) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zb-ss-5
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law
note: Forfeiture of material to Commonwealth at end of period if no objection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.140
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on Commonwealth to forfeit material
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZB(6) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zb-ss-6
part of: 23ZB Forfeiture of material by operation of law
note: Head of police force must instruct Director to apply for forfeiture order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.140
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZB(6) Forfeiture of material by operation of law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to instruct Director
premise text: Head of police force has authority
conclusion text: Must instruct Director
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Forfeiture order is a legal action
premise text: Section 23ZD applies to forfeitable things
conclusion text: Forfeiture order is a legal action
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zb-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Timeframe for instruction must be before forfeiture application
premise text: Application must be made within timeframe
conclusion text: Instruction must be before forfeiture application
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zc
has part: 23ZC(1) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
has part: 23ZC(2) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
has part: 23ZC(3) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
has part: 23ZC(4) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.142

23ZC(1) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zc-ss-1
part of: 23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
note: Request for copy of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.142
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZC(1) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide copy of innocuous parts
premise text: Request for copy is made within 30 days
conclusion text: State must provide copy
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Class inclusion: Requested data is specified clearly enough to enable identification
premise text: Request includes specified parts of the thing
conclusion text: Data is included in class of requested parts
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap: Request made within 30 days
premise text: Request is made less than 30 days after notice
conclusion text: Timeframe overlaps with request period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication: Request implies need for copy
premise text: Request includes specified parts of the thing
conclusion text: Need for copy implies request
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagated claim: State must provide copy
premise text: Request is made within 30 days
conclusion text: State propagates claim of providing copy
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23ZC(2) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zc-ss-2
part of: 23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
note: Police head must comply with request for innocuous parts of material to be forfeited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.142
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZC(2) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Police head must comply with request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: REASONABLY PRACTICABLE
logic summary: Request is reasonably practicable.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: IF AND ONLY IF
logic summary: Conditional compliance based on reasonableness.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZC(3) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zc-ss-3
part of: 23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
note: Exemption from providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited under certain conditions.
description: No
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.142
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits providing copies under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZC(4) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zc-ss-4
part of: 23ZC Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
note: The court may order the person to pay costs incurred by the police force in complying with a request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.142
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZC(4) Providing copies of innocuous parts of material to be forfeited
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
premise text: The court may order the person to pay costs.
conclusion text: The person must pay costs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zd
has part: 23ZD(1) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
has part: 23ZD(2) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
has part: 23ZD(3) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
has part: 23ZD(4) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
has part: 23ZD(5) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.144

23ZD(1) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zd-ss-1
part of: 23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application
note: Forfeiture of material by court order on application for Commonwealth child sex offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.144
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZD(1) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the commission of a Commonwealth child sex offence
premise text: The court must order forfeiture to the Commonwealth
conclusion text: No person can commit a Commonwealth child sex offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with criminal proceedings
premise text: The court is satisfied in the course of criminal proceedings
conclusion text: Criminal proceedings overlap with the application for forfeiture
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZD(2) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zd-ss-2
part of: 23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application
note: Notice must be given to those who claim ownership or would be affected by the proposed forfeiture.
description: Written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.144
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for notice to be given
premise text: (2) The Director of Public Prosecutions must give written notice of the application to anyone:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZD(3) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zd-ss-3
part of: 23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application
note: Court may make interim orders on application for forfeiture of material
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.144
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZD(3) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May make orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23ZD(4) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zd-ss-4
part of: 23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application
note: Court may order forfeiture of material without notice or finding of specific offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.144
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZD(4) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court may prohibit material forfeiture without notice or finding of specific offence.
premise text: (4) An order under subsection (1):...
conclusion text: ...may be made even if a person entitled to be given notice of the application fails to appear at the hearing of the application;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Court may order forfeiture at any time without notice or finding of specific offence.
premise text: (4) An order under subsection (1):...
conclusion text: ...may be made even if a person entitled to be given notice of the application fails to appear at the hearing of the application;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Court may order forfeiture repeatedly without notice or finding of specific offence.
premise text: (4) An order under subsection (1):...
conclusion text: ...need not be based on a finding as to the commission of a particular Commonwealth child sex offence;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Court may diffuse responsibility for material forfeiture without notice or finding of specific offence.
premise text: (4) An order under subsection (1):...
conclusion text: ...can be based on a finding that some such offence was committed;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Court may classify material as forfeitable using artificial intelligence without notice or finding of specific offence.
premise text: (4) An order under subsection (1):...
conclusion text: ...need not be based on a finding that a particular person committed a Commonwealth child sex offence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23ZD(5) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zd-ss-5
part of: 23ZD Forfeiture of material by court order on application
note: The court may order the Commonwealth to pay compensation to a person who owns or has property in electronic equipment under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.144
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-5-logic-ltl-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZD(5) Forfeiture of material by court order on application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The court may order the Commonwealth to pay compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
logic summary: The person did not commit, is not and has not been convicted of, the Commonwealth child sex offence before the hearing.
premise text: Person A did not commit, is not and has not been convicted of, the Commonwealth child sex offence.
conclusion text: Person A is not guilty of the crime.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zd-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: and
logic summary: The person is not the subject of proceedings in another court relating to the Commonwealth child sex offence and has not been the subject of such proceedings in connection with which an appeal may still be lodged as of right.
premise text: Person A is not the subject of proceedings in another court relating to the Commonwealth child sex offence.
conclusion text: Person A is not under investigation for the crime.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ze
has part: 23ZE(1) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(2) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(3) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(4) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(5) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
has part: 23ZE(6) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147

23ZE(1) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ze-ss-1
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part
note: This section applies if a thing is forfeited to the Commonwealth under this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-1-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZE(1) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23ZE(2) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ze-ss-2
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part
note: The thing becomes property of Commonwealth upon forfeiture.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZE(2) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: becomes
logic summary: Obligation to transfer ownership
premise text: (2) When the thing is forfeited
conclusion text: it becomes the property of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZE(3) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ze-ss-3
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part
note: Seizure without warrant is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZE(3) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of seizure without warrant.
premise text: (3) A constable may, without warrant, seize the thing.
conclusion text: Seizure without warrant is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZE(4) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ze-ss-4
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part
note: The Commissioner may deal with the thing in any way he or she considers appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Commissioner has the power to act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZE(5) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ze-ss-5
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part
note: Police head may deal with seized thing in any way they consider appropriate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to deal with thing
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing in any way he or she considers appropriate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between police action and thing
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing in any way he or she considers appropriate
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Hold
logic summary: Holding of police action over time
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing in any way he or she considers appropriate
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreading of police action to thing
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing in any way he or she considers appropriate
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognition of police action by AI
premise text: (5) However, if the thing is in the custody of a constable...
conclusion text: The head of the police force may deal with the thing in any way he or she considers appropriate
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZE(6) Effect of forfeiture under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23ze-ss-6
part of: 23ZE Effect of forfeiture under this Part
note: Subsections (3), (4) and (5) have effect despite section 9.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23ze-ss-6-norm

23ZF Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zf
has part: 23ZF(1) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
has part: 23ZF(2) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
has part: 23ZF(3) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147

23ZF(1) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zf-ss-1
part of: 23ZF Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
note: Person entitled to compensation for forfeited electronic equipment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Has right to compensation
premise text: (a) a thing that is a computer, data storage device or other electronic equipment is forfeited under this Part;
conclusion text: The person owned, had a right to possess or had other property in the thing immediately before the forfeiture.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During the period of ownership
premise text: (b) the person owned, had a right to possess or had other property in the thing immediately before the forfeiture.
conclusion text: The person is entitled to compensation for the forfeited electronic equipment during the period of ownership.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Everywhere the person owns or had a right to possess the thing
premise text: (a) a thing that is a computer, data storage device or other electronic equipment is forfeited under this Part;
conclusion text: The person is entitled to compensation for the forfeited electronic equipment everywhere they own or had a right to possess it.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasDutyTo
logic summary: Has duty to provide compensation
premise text: (b) the person owned, had a right to possess or had other property in the thing immediately before the forfeiture.
conclusion text: The state has a duty to provide compensation to the person for the forfeited electronic equipment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermissionTo
logic summary: Has permission to provide compensation
premise text: (b) the person owned, had a right to possess or had other property in the thing immediately before the forfeiture.
conclusion text: The state has permission to provide compensation to the person for the forfeited electronic equipment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZF(2) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zf-ss-2
part of: 23ZF Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
note: Commonwealth liable for compensation on forfeiture of electronic equipment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZF(2) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Liability
logic summary: Obligation to pay compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZF(3) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zf-ss-3
part of: 23ZF Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
note: Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.147
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZF(3) Compensation for forfeiture of electronic equipment etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to compensate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23ZG Delegation by head of police force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23zg
note: Head of police force may delegate powers to a constable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.148
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zg-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23zg-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zg-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23ZG Delegation by head of police force
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-23zg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to delegate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30J Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30j
has part: 30J(1) Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
has part: 30J(2) Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
has part: 30J(3) Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.149

30J(1) Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30j-ss-1
part of: 30J Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
note: Governor-General may make a Proclamation in case of serious industrial disturbance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.149
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 30J(1) Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for proclamation
premise text: (1) If at any time the Governor-General is of opinion that there exists in Australia a serious industrial disturbance...
conclusion text: ...he or she may make a Proclamation to that effect, which Proclamation shall be and remain in operation for the purposes of this section until it is revoked.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Temporal trace for proclamation
premise text: (1) If at any time the Governor-General is of opinion that there exists in Australia a serious industrial disturbance...
conclusion text: ...he or she may make a Proclamation to that effect, which Proclamation shall be and remain in operation for the purposes of this section until it is revoked.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Spread
logic summary: Information spread through proclamation
premise text: (1) If at any time the Governor-General is of opinion that there exists in Australia a serious industrial disturbance...
conclusion text: ...he or she may make a Proclamation to that effect, which Proclamation shall be and remain in operation for the purposes of this section until it is revoked.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation through proclamation
premise text: (1) If at any time the Governor-General is of opinion that there exists in Australia a serious industrial disturbance...
conclusion text: ...he or she may make a Proclamation to that effect, which Proclamation shall be and remain in operation for the purposes of this section until it is revoked.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30J(2) Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30j-ss-2
part of: 30J Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
note: Participation in or incitement to a lock-out or strike during the operation of a proclamation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.149
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 30J(2) Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Participation in or incitement to a lock-out or strike.
conclusion text: Offence committed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30J(3) Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30j-ss-3
part of: 30J Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
note: Definition of employee and employer for section 30J(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.149
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-ltl-6
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-diffusion-7

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30J(3) Industrial disturbances, lock-outs and strikes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of employee and employer for section 30J(3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: employee includes any person whose usual occupation is as an employee
conclusion text: employer includes any person whose usual occupation is as an employer
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: lock-out includes the closing of a place or part of a place of employment, if the closing is unreasonable
conclusion text: lock-out includes the total or partial refusal of employers, acting in combination, to give work, if the refusal is unreasonable
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: lock-out includes the suspension of work by an employer, if the suspension is unreasonable
conclusion text: lock-out includes the total or partial suspension of work by an employer, if the suspension is unreasonable
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for lock-out
premise text: the closing is unreasonable
conclusion text: the refusal is unreasonable
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-ltl-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=>
logic summary: Recurring trace for lock-out
premise text: the total or partial refusal of employers, acting in combination, to give work
conclusion text: the total or partial suspension of work by an employer
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-30j-ss-3-logic-diffusion-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: <=>
logic summary: Recurring trace for lock-out
premise text: the refusal is unreasonable
conclusion text: the suspension is unreasonable
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30K Obstructing or hindering the performance of services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30k
note: Obstructing or hindering public service performance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.150
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30k-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30k-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30k-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30k-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-30k-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 30K Obstructing or hindering the performance of services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-30k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits obstructing or hindering public service performance
premise text: The person commits an offence.
conclusion text: Obstructing or hindering public service performance is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-30k-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits compelling or inducing surrender or departure from employment
premise text: (b) compels or induces any person employed in or in connexion with the provision of any public service by the Commonwealth or by any Department or public authority under the Commonwealth to surrender or depart from his or her employment;
conclusion text: Compelling or inducing surrender or departure from employment is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-30k-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits preventing offering or accepting employment
premise text: (c) prevents any person from offering or accepting employment in or in connexion with the provision of any public service by the Commonwealth or by any Department or public authority under the Commonwealth;
conclusion text: Preventing offering or accepting employment is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Judicial proceeding and tribunal definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31
note: Defines judicial proceeding and tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.152
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 Judicial proceeding and tribunal definitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Defines judicial proceeding and tribunal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-31-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies judicial proceeding and tribunal.
premise text: judicial proceeding means (other than in section 3L): a proceeding in or before a court; or a proceeding: before a body, or a person, acting under a law of the Commonwealth, of a State or of a Territory; and in which evidence may be taken on oath.
conclusion text: judicial tribunal means a body or person (other than a court) before whom a judicial proceeding is conducted.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34
has part: 34(1) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
has part: 34(2) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
has part: 34(3) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
has part: 34(4) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153

34(1) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34-ss-1
part of: 34 Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
note: Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(1) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(2) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34-ss-2
part of: 34 Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to reasonable excuse.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(2) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden.
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if the judge or magistrate has a reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Judge or magistrate must provide reason for not applying subsection (1).
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the judge or magistrate has a reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: The judge or magistrate must provide a reasonable excuse for not applying subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Judge or magistrate believes in reasonable excuse.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the judge or magistrate has a reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: The judge or magistrate believes that they have a reasonable excuse for not applying subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Interval
logic summary: Reasonable excuse is an interval of belief.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the judge or magistrate has a reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: The reasonable excuse is an interval of time during which the judge or magistrate believes that they have a valid reason for not applying subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

34(3) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34-ss-3
part of: 34 Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
note: Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(3) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
premise text: (3) Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(e) element of the offence.
conclusion text: The judge or magistrate must not act oppressively or when interested.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(4) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34-ss-4
part of: 34 Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
note: Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.153
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(4) Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of oppressive behavior by judges or magistrates.
premise text: (4) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the judge or magistrate has a personal interest in the matter;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between oppressive behavior and personal interest.
premise text: (4) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the judge or magistrate has a personal interest in the matter;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of oppressive behavior by judges or magistrates.
premise text: (4) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the judge or magistrate perversely exercises jurisdiction in a matter;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of knowledge about oppressive behavior by judges or magistrates.
premise text: (4) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the judge or magistrate has a personal interest in the matter;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-34-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Analysis of cognitive biases in judges or magistrates.
premise text: (4) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the judge or magistrate perversely exercises jurisdiction in a matter;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Giving false testimony
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35
has part: 35(1) Giving false testimony
has part: 35(2) Giving false testimony
has part: 35(3) Giving false testimony
has part: 35(4) Giving false testimony
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.155

35(1) Giving false testimony
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-1
part of: 35 Giving false testimony
note: Giving false testimony in a federal judicial proceeding is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.155
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(1) Giving false testimony
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits giving false testimony in a federal judicial proceeding.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits giving false testimony with the intention of instituting a judicial proceeding.
premise text: (b) the person does so:
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits giving false testimony in a judicial proceeding.
premise text: (a) the person gives false testimony touching a matter;
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35(2) Giving false testimony
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-2
part of: 35 Giving false testimony
note: Giving false testimony is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.155
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(2) Giving false testimony
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits giving false testimony.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35(3) Giving false testimony
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-3
part of: 35 Giving false testimony
note: Giving false testimony is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.155
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(3) Giving false testimony
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits giving false testimony.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35(4) Giving false testimony
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-4
part of: 35 Giving false testimony
note: Exemptions from admissibility of false testimony
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.155
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(4) Giving false testimony
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-35-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from admissibility of false testimony
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Fabricating evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36
has part: 36(1) Fabricating evidence
has part: 36(2) Fabricating evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156

36(1) Fabricating evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36-ss-1
part of: 36 Fabricating evidence
note: Fabricating evidence in federal judicial proceedings is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(1) Fabricating evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits fabricating evidence in federal judicial proceedings.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(2) Fabricating evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36-ss-2
part of: 36 Fabricating evidence
note: Prohibition on fabricating evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(2) Fabricating evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits fabricating evidence
premise text: Section 36(2)
conclusion text: Fabricating evidence is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of section 36(2)
premise text: (2) Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.
conclusion text: Section 36(2) is during the application of absolute liability to paragraph (1)(c) of the offence
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of section 36(2)
premise text: (2) Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.
conclusion text: Section 36(2) is during the application of absolute liability to paragraph (1)(c) of the offence
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of section 36(2)
premise text: (2) Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.
conclusion text: Section 36(2) is during the application of absolute liability to paragraph (1)(c) of the offence
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-36-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of section 36(2)
premise text: (2) Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.
conclusion text: Section 36(2) is during the application of absolute liability to paragraph (1)(c) of the offence
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36A Intimidation of witnesses etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36a
has part: 36A(1) Intimidation of witnesses etc.
has part: 36A(2) Intimidation of witnesses etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156

36A(1) Intimidation of witnesses etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36a-ss-1
part of: 36A Intimidation of witnesses etc.
note: Threatening or intimidating a witness in a federal judicial proceeding is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 36A(1) Intimidation of witnesses etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of threatening or intimidating a witness in a federal judicial proceeding.
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of using violence to or inflicting injury on a witness in a federal judicial proceeding.
premise text: (i) threatens, intimidates or restrains another person;
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of causing or procuring violence, damage, loss, or disadvantage to a witness in a federal judicial proceeding.
premise text: (iii) causes or procures violence, damage, loss or disadvantage to another person;
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36A(2) Intimidation of witnesses etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36a-ss-2
part of: 36A Intimidation of witnesses etc.
note: Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.156
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-36a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 36A(2) Intimidation of witnesses etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

37 Corruption of witnesses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37
has part: 37(1) Corruption of witnesses
has part: 37(2) Corruption of witnesses
has part: 37(3) Corruption of witnesses
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.157

37(1) Corruption of witnesses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-1
part of: 37 Corruption of witnesses
note: Giving or receiving property to influence a witness in a judicial proceeding is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.157
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(1) Corruption of witnesses
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of influencing a witness in a judicial proceeding.
premise text: (a) the first person does so upon an agreement or understanding that any person called, or to be called, as a witness in a judicial proceeding will: (i) give false testimony; or (ii) withhold true testimony;
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of receiving property to influence a witness in a judicial proceeding.
premise text: (iii) asks for, receives or obtains any property, or benefit, of any kind for himself or herself or another person;
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of promising to give or confer property to influence a witness in a judicial proceeding.
premise text: (ii) promises or offers to give, to confer, to procure or to attempt to procure any property, or benefit, of any kind to, upon or for another person;
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of agreeing to receive property to influence a witness in a judicial proceeding.
premise text: (iv) agrees to receive or to obtain any property, or benefit, of any kind for himself or herself or another person;
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of giving property to influence a witness in a judicial proceeding.
premise text: (i) gives, confers or procures any property, or benefit, of any kind to, upon or for another person;
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(2) Corruption of witnesses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-2
part of: 37 Corruption of witnesses
note: Inducing false testimony is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.157
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(2) Corruption of witnesses
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits inducing false testimony.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(3) Corruption of witnesses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-3
part of: 37 Corruption of witnesses
note: Committing an offence if inducing false testimony in a judicial proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.157
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-logic-ltl-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(3) Corruption of witnesses
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to not induce false testimony in a judicial proceeding.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person does an act; and (b) the person does so with the intention of inducing a person called, or to be called, as a witness in a judicial proceeding:
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on inducing false testimony in a judicial proceeding.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person does an act; and (b) the person does so with the intention of inducing a person called, or to be called, as a witness in a judicial proceeding:
conclusion text: The person must not induce false testimony.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap: The act and the judicial proceeding overlap.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person does an act; and (b) the person does so with the intention of inducing a person called, or to be called, as a witness in a judicial proceeding:
conclusion text: The act overlaps with the judicial proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-37-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal until: The act occurs before the judicial proceeding.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person does an act; and (b) the person does so with the intention of inducing a person called, or to be called, as a witness in a judicial proceeding:
conclusion text: The act occurs before the judicial proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Deceiving witnesses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38
has part: 38(1) Deceiving witnesses
has part: 38(2) Deceiving witnesses
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.158

38(1) Deceiving witnesses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38-ss-1
part of: 38 Deceiving witnesses
note: Deceiving witnesses is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.158
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-38-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-38-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-38-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 38(1) Deceiving witnesses
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-38-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits deceiving witnesses.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38(2) Deceiving witnesses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38-ss-2
part of: 38 Deceiving witnesses
note: Deceiving witnesses is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.158
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-38-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-38-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-38-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 38(2) Deceiving witnesses
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-38-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits deceiving witnesses.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Destroying evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39
has part: 39(1) Destroying evidence
has part: 39(2) Destroying evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.158

39(1) Destroying evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39-ss-1
part of: 39 Destroying evidence
note: Destroying evidence in a federal judicial proceeding is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.158
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits destroying evidence in a federal judicial proceeding.
premise text: (a) the person knows that a book, document or thing of any kind is, or may be, required in evidence in a judicial proceeding;
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits destroying evidence in a federal judicial proceeding.
premise text: (b) the person: (i) destroys the book, document or thing;
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits rendering evidence illegible, undecipherable or incapable of identification.
premise text: (b) the person: (ii) renders the book, document or thing illegible, undecipherable or incapable of identification;
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits destroying evidence with the intention of preventing it from being used in evidence.
premise text: (c) the person does so with the intention of preventing the book, document or thing from being used in evidence;
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits destroying evidence in a federal judicial proceeding.
premise text: (d) the judicial proceeding is a federal judicial proceeding.
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(2) Destroying evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39-ss-2
part of: 39 Destroying evidence
note: Absolute liability applies for destroying evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.158
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(2) Destroying evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: State is obligated to destroy evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Preventing witnesses from attending Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40
has part: 40(1) Preventing witnesses from attending Court
has part: 40(2) Preventing witnesses from attending Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159

40(1) Preventing witnesses from attending Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40-ss-1
part of: 40 Preventing witnesses from attending Court
note: Preventing witnesses from attending Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-40-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-40-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(1) Preventing witnesses from attending Court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits preventing witnesses from attending Court
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person has been subpoenaed or summoned to attend as a witness in a judicial proceeding; and (b) the first person prevents the other person from attending as a witness, or from producing anything in evidence, pursuant to the subpoena or summons; and (c) the judicial proceeding is a federal judicial proceeding.
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 1 year.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(2) Preventing witnesses from attending Court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40-ss-2
part of: 40 Preventing witnesses from attending Court
note: Prevents witnesses from attending Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.159
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-40-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-40-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(2) Preventing witnesses from attending Court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits witnesses from attending Court
premise text: (2) Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41
has part: 41(1) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
has part: 41(1A) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
has part: 41(2) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
has part: 41(3) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
has part: 41(4) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
has part: 41(5) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
has part: 41(6) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
has part: 41(7) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160

41(1) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41-ss-1
part of: 41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation
note: Conspiracy to bring false accusation is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(1) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conspiracy to bring false accusation.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41(1A) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41-ss-1a
part of: 41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation
note: Conspiracy to bring false accusation is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(1A) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conspiracy to bring false accusation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41(2) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41-ss-2
part of: 41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation
note: Agreement required for conspiracy to bring false accusation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(2) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires agreement for conspiracy
premise text: (2) For a person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1):
conclusion text: the person must have entered into an agreement with one or more other persons;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires intention for conspiracy
premise text: (2) For a person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1):
conclusion text: the person and at least one other party to the agreement must have intended that a person be charged falsely with an offence pursuant to the agreement;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires overt act for conspiracy
premise text: (2) For a person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1):
conclusion text: the person or at least one other party to the agreement must have committed an overt act pursuant to the agreement;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Overt act must occur during agreement period
premise text: (2) For a person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1):
conclusion text: the overt act must have occurred during the time the agreement was in effect;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires at least one other party for conspiracy
premise text: (2) For a person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1):
conclusion text: at least one other party to the agreement must have intended that a person be charged falsely with an offence pursuant to the agreement;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41(3) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41-ss-3
part of: 41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation
note: A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(3) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41(4) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41-ss-4
part of: 41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation
note: No person can be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1) if all other parties to the agreement have been acquitted of such an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(4) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If all parties are acquitted, then no person can be found guilty.
premise text: All other parties to the agreement have been acquitted of such an offence.
conclusion text: No person can be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The condition overlaps with the description 'no person can be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)'.
premise text: All other parties to the agreement have been acquitted of such an offence.
conclusion text: No person can be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The condition is until the point where all other parties to the agreement have been acquitted of such an offence.
premise text: All other parties to the agreement have been acquitted of such an offence.
conclusion text: No person can be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The condition diffuses into the description 'no person can be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)'.
premise text: All other parties to the agreement have been acquitted of such an offence.
conclusion text: No person can be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The condition is recognized by the AI system as a necessary condition for 'no person can be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)'.
premise text: All other parties to the agreement have been acquitted of such an offence.
conclusion text: No person can be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

41(5) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41-ss-5
part of: 41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation
note: Must take reasonable steps to prevent false charging before committing an overt act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(5) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must take reasonable steps to prevent false charging.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41(6) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41-ss-6
part of: 41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation
note: Court may dismiss charge if interests of justice require it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(6) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to dismiss charge
premise text: Court thinks interests of justice require dismissal
conclusion text: Dismissal is permissible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41(7) Conspiracy to bring false accusation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41-ss-7
part of: 41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation
note: Exempts subsection (1) from section 11.1 of the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.160
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-41-ss-7-norm

42 Conspiracy to defeat justice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42
has part: 42(1) Conspiracy to defeat justice
has part: 42(2) Conspiracy to defeat justice
has part: 42(3) Conspiracy to defeat justice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.161

42(1) Conspiracy to defeat justice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-1
part of: 42 Conspiracy to defeat justice
note: Conspiring to obstruct justice is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.161
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-42-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-42-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(1) Conspiracy to defeat justice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conspiracy to obstruct justice.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(2) Conspiracy to defeat justice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-2
part of: 42 Conspiracy to defeat justice
note: Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(b) element of the offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.161
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-42-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-42-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(2) Conspiracy to defeat justice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

42(3) Conspiracy to defeat justice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-3
part of: 42 Conspiracy to defeat justice
note: Guilty of an offence against subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.161
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-42-ss-3-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-42-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(3) Conspiracy to defeat justice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

43 Attempting to pervert justice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43
has part: 43(1) Attempting to pervert justice
has part: 43(2) Attempting to pervert justice
has part: 43(3) Attempting to pervert justice
has part: 43(4) Attempting to pervert justice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.163

43(1) Attempting to pervert justice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43-ss-1
part of: 43 Attempting to pervert justice
note: Attempting to obstruct or pervert justice is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.163
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 43(1) Attempting to pervert justice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits attempting to obstruct or pervert justice.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person attempts to obstruct, to prevent, to pervert or to defeat the course of justice in relation to a judicial power; and (b) the judicial power is the judicial power of the Commonwealth. Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person attempts to obstruct, to prevent, to pervert or to defeat the course of justice in relation to a judicial power; and (b) the judicial power is the judicial power of the Commonwealth. Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43(2) Attempting to pervert justice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43-ss-2
part of: 43 Attempting to pervert justice
note: Absolute liability applies for attempting to pervert justice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.163
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43(2) Attempting to pervert justice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: Imposes duty on the state.
conclusion text: The state is obliged to prevent perverting justice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43(3) Attempting to pervert justice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43-ss-3
part of: 43 Attempting to pervert justice
note: Conduct must be more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.163
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43(3) Attempting to pervert justice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mere preparation is not enough to constitute an obligation.
premise text: (3) For the person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1), the person’s conduct must be more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence.
conclusion text: The conduct must be more than mere preparation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Conduct must occur during a specific time period.
premise text: (3) For the person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1), the person’s conduct must be more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence.
conclusion text: The conduct must occur during a specific time period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Conduct must continue until a certain point in time.
premise text: (3) For the person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1), the person’s conduct must be more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence.
conclusion text: The conduct must continue until a certain point in time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Conduct is diffused through a specific medium.
premise text: (3) For the person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1), the person’s conduct must be more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence.
conclusion text: The conduct is diffused through a specific medium.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: with
logic summary: Conduct is performed with a specific cognitive function.
premise text: (3) For the person to be guilty of an offence against subsection (1), the person’s conduct must be more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence.
conclusion text: The conduct is performed with a specific cognitive function.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

43(4) Attempting to pervert justice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43-ss-4
part of: 43 Attempting to pervert justice
note: Guilty if attempting to pervert justice is impossible
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.163
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43(4) Attempting to pervert justice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guilty if attempting to pervert justice is impossible
premise text: (4) A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The action of perverting justice overlaps with subsection (1)
premise text: (4) A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: The action of perverting justice overlaps with subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The action of perverting justice is until the impossibility of doing so
premise text: (4) A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: The action of perverting justice is until the impossibility of doing so
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The action of perverting justice diffuses into subsection (1)
premise text: (4) A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: The action of perverting justice diffuses into subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-43-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The system recognizes the action of perverting justice as a class
premise text: (4) A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: The system recognizes the action of perverting justice as a class
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Compounding offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44
note: Agreement to compound or conceal an offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.163
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-44-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-44-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-44-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44 Compounding offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to compound or conceal an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Inserting advertisements without authority of court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45
has part: 45(1) Inserting advertisements without authority of court
has part: 45(2) Inserting advertisements without authority of court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.164

45(1) Inserting advertisements without authority of court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45-ss-1
part of: 45 Inserting advertisements without authority of court
note: Inserting advertisements without court authority is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.164
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-45-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-45-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45(1) Inserting advertisements without authority of court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits inserting advertisements without court authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45(2) Inserting advertisements without authority of court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45-ss-2
part of: 45 Inserting advertisements without authority of court
note: Inserting advertisements without court authority is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.164
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-45-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-45-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45(2) Inserting advertisements without authority of court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits inserting advertisements without court authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45A Criminal detention definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45a
note: Defines criminal detention in respect of an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.165
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-45a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-45a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-45a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-45a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45A Criminal detention definitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-45a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: States the definition of criminal detention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-45a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Defines a subclass of 'detention' as 'criminal detention'.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Aiding prisoner to escape
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46
note: Aiding prisoner to escape is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.165
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-46-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 46 Aiding prisoner to escape
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits aiding prisoner to escape.
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person aids the prisoner: (i) to escape from that detention; or (ii) to attempt to escape from that detention; and (c) the prisoner escapes, or attempts to escape, from that detention;
conclusion text: Aiding prisoner to escape is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46A Aiding prisoner to escape—conveying thing into prison etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46a
has part: 46A(1) Aiding prisoner to escape—conveying thing into prison etc.
has part: 46A(2) Aiding prisoner to escape—conveying thing into prison etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.166

46A(1) Aiding prisoner to escape—conveying thing into prison etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46a-ss-1
part of: 46A Aiding prisoner to escape—conveying thing into prison etc.
note: Conveying a thing into prison to facilitate prisoner escape is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.166
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 46A(1) Aiding prisoner to escape—conveying thing into prison etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of conveying a thing into prison to facilitate prisoner escape.
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...
conclusion text: Conveying a thing into prison to facilitate prisoner escape is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Conveying a thing into prison occurs between the first person and the prisoner.
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...
conclusion text: Conveying a thing into prison to facilitate prisoner escape is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Conveying a thing into prison occurs until the prisoner escapes.
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...
conclusion text: Conveying a thing into prison to facilitate prisoner escape is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Not
logic summary: Conveying a thing into prison does not diffuse the risk of prisoner escape.
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...
conclusion text: Conveying a thing into prison to facilitate prisoner escape is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of conveying a thing into prison as a prohibited act using cognitive AI.
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...
conclusion text: Conveying a thing into prison to facilitate prisoner escape is prohibited.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46A(2) Aiding prisoner to escape—conveying thing into prison etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46a-ss-2
part of: 46A Aiding prisoner to escape—conveying thing into prison etc.
note: Conveying thing into prison for aiding prisoner to escape
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.166
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 46A(2) Aiding prisoner to escape—conveying thing into prison etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conveying thing into prison for aiding prisoner to escape
premise text: (2) Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(d) element of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-46a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Relates to a specific time period
premise text: (2) Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(d) element of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Escaping
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47
has part: 47(1) Escaping
has part: 47(2) Escaping
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.167

47(1) Escaping
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-1
part of: 47 Escaping
note: Escaping from lawful federal criminal detention is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.167
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(1) Escaping
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits escaping from lawful federal criminal detention.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between escaping and detention.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between escaping and detention.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuse responsibility for escaping from detention.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Artificial intelligence recognizes escaping from detention as an offence.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(2) Escaping
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-2
part of: 47 Escaping
note: Absolute liability applies for escaping.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.167
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(2) Escaping
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: State obliges to provide absolute liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47A Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47a
has part: 47A(1) Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention
has part: 47A(2) Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.167

47A(1) Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47a-ss-1
part of: 47A Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention
note: Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.167
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 47A(1) Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention.
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
conclusion text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between rescuing a prisoner and criminal detention.
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
conclusion text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
logic summary: Eventual occurrence of rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention.
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
conclusion text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of knowledge about rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention.
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
conclusion text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention as an offence.
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
conclusion text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) another person (the prisoner) is in criminal detention; and (b) the first person rescues the prisoner from that detention by force; and (c) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47A(2) Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47a-ss-2
part of: 47A Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention
note: Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.167
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-2-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-47a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47A(2) Rescuing a prisoner from criminal detention
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

47B Person unlawfully at large
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47b
note: Leaving prison without permission is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.167
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 47B Person unlawfully at large
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of leaving prison without permission.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person leaves the prison, lock-up or other place; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission to leave prison is required.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...in accordance with a permission given under a law of a State or Territory (other than the Australian Capital Territory), the person leaves the prison, lock-up or other place; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Detention overlaps with leaving prison.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the detention was lawful federal criminal detention; and
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Leaving prison repeats the action of detention.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person leaves the prison, lock-up or other place; and
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47b-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State has an obligation to prevent leaving prison.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the detention was lawful federal criminal detention; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

47C Permitting escape
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47c
has part: 47C(1) Permitting escape
has part: 47C(2) Permitting escape
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.168

47C(1) Permitting escape
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47c-ss-1
part of: 47C Permitting escape
note: Permitting escape from lawful federal criminal detention is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.168
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 47C(1) Permitting escape
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of escape from lawful detention.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the first person intentionally or negligently permits the prisoner to escape...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of actions that facilitate escape from detention.
premise text: (b) the first person is charged for the time being with the criminal detention of another person (the prisoner); and...
conclusion text: ...and the first person intentionally or negligently permits the prisoner to escape...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of permitting escape from lawful detention.
premise text: (c) the first person intentionally or negligently permits the prisoner to escape from the detention; and...
conclusion text: ...the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between permitting escape and lawful detention.
premise text: (c) the first person intentionally or negligently permits the prisoner to escape from the detention; and...
conclusion text: ...the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of actions that facilitate escape from detention.
premise text: (d) the detention is lawful federal criminal detention.
conclusion text: ...the first person intentionally or negligently permits the prisoner to escape...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47C(2) Permitting escape
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47c-ss-2
part of: 47C Permitting escape
note: Absolute liability applies for a specific element of the offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.168
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-47c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits absolute liability for a specific element of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Harbouring etc. an escapee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48
has part: 48(1) Harbouring etc. an escapee
has part: 48(2) Harbouring etc. an escapee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.168

48(1) Harbouring etc. an escapee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48-ss-1
part of: 48 Harbouring etc. an escapee
note: Harbouring an escapee is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.168
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(1) Harbouring etc. an escapee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits harbouring an escapee.
premise text: (a) the first person knows that another person (the escapee) has escaped from a place where the other person was held in criminal detention;
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits harbouring an escapee.
premise text: (c) the detention was lawful federal criminal detention;
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits harbouring an escapee.
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if:
conclusion text: The first person harbours, maintains or employs the escapee;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits harbouring an escapee.
premise text: (b) the first person harbours, maintains or employs the escapee;
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(2) Harbouring etc. an escapee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48-ss-2
part of: 48 Harbouring etc. an escapee
note: Absolute liability for harbouring an escapee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.168
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(2) Harbouring etc. an escapee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits harbouring an escapee
premise text: Section 48(2)
conclusion text: Absolute liability applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes temporal relation between harbouring and escapee
premise text: Section 48(2)
conclusion text: Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establishes recurring trace between harbouring and escapee
premise text: Section 48(2)
conclusion text: Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses responsibility for harbouring an escapee
premise text: Section 48(2)
conclusion text: Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(c) element of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-48-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies the provision as a criminal law provision
premise text: Section 48(2)
conclusion text: See section 6.2 of the Criminal Code
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48A Sentence ceases to run while escaped prisoner at large
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48a
has part: 48A(1) Sentence ceases to run while escaped prisoner at large
has part: 48A(2) Sentence ceases to run while escaped prisoner at large
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.169

48A(1) Sentence ceases to run while escaped prisoner at large
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48a-ss-1
part of: 48A Sentence ceases to run while escaped prisoner at large
note: Person must undergo additional punishment upon return to custody
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.169
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48A(1) Sentence ceases to run while escaped prisoner at large
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to undergo additional punishment
premise text: (1) A person who commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the person would have undergone if the person had not escaped.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between escape and return to custody
premise text: (1) A person who commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the punishment that the person would have undergone if the person had not escaped.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of escape on punishment
premise text: (1) A person who commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the punishment that the person would have undergone if the person had not escaped.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to undergo additional punishment
premise text: (1) A person who commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the person would have undergone if the person had not escaped.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of obligation to undergo additional punishment by AI system
premise text: (1) A person who commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the person would have undergone if the person had not escaped.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48A(2) Sentence ceases to run while escaped prisoner at large
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48a-ss-2
part of: 48A Sentence ceases to run while escaped prisoner at large
note: Punishment for escaped prisoner must be carried out upon return to custody.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.169
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48A(2) Sentence ceases to run while escaped prisoner at large
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-48a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Removing property under seizure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49
has part: 49(1) Removing property under seizure
has part: 49(2) Removing property under seizure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.170

49(1) Removing property under seizure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-1
part of: 49 Removing property under seizure
note: Receiving, removing, retaining, concealing or disposing of property attached under court process with intent to hinder or defeat attachment is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.170
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 49(1) Removing property under seizure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligates person to return property
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Property attachment is valid until returned
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permits court to attach property
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49(2) Removing property under seizure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-2
part of: 49 Removing property under seizure
note: Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(b) element of the offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.170
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49(2) Removing property under seizure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-49-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Absolute liability obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51
note: Defines terms used in this Part, including piracy and offence against the Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.171
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-51-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-51-logic-descriptionlogic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-51-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51 Interpretation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-51-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies terms used in this Part
premise text: Definitions of piracy and offence against the Part are provided
conclusion text: These definitions apply to this Part
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Piracy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52
note: No act of piracy is allowed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.172
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-52-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-52-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-52-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 52 Piracy
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53 Operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53
has part: 53(1) Operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft
has part: 53(2) Operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.172

53(1) Operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-1
part of: 53 Operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft
note: Voluntarily participate in pirate-controlled ship or aircraft operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.172
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(1) Operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person must not...
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 15 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(2) Operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-2
part of: 53 Operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft
note: Prohibition on operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.172
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(2) Operating a pirate-controlled ship or aircraft
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Acts must occur during piracy
premise text: (2) This section applies to acts performed on the high seas, in places beyond the jurisdiction of any country or in Australia.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Acts must be recurring
premise text: (2) This section applies to acts performed on the high seas, in places beyond the jurisdiction of any country or in Australia.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Analyzes piracy classification
premise text: (2) This section applies to acts performed on the high seas, in places beyond the jurisdiction of any country or in Australia.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-53-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
logic summary: Validates piracy classification
premise text: (2) This section applies to acts performed on the high seas, in places beyond the jurisdiction of any country or in Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54
has part: 54(1) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
has part: 54(2) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
has part: 54(3) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
has part: 54(4) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.173

54(1) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54-ss-1
part of: 54 Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
note: Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.173
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(1) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits seizure
premise text: (1) A member of the Defence Force or a member of the Australian Federal Police may seize...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for seizure
premise text: (1) A member of the Defence Force or a member of the Australian Federal Police may seize...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(2) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54-ss-2
part of: 54 Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
note: Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft is prohibited in certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.173
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits seizure of pirate ships and aircraft.
premise text: (2) A seizure may be effected:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for seizure prohibition.
premise text: (2) A seizure may be effected: (a) in Australia; or (b) on the high seas; or (c) in a place beyond the jurisdiction of any country.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Defines temporal trace for seizure prohibition.
premise text: (2) A seizure may be effected: (a) in Australia; or (b) on the high seas; or (c) in a place beyond the jurisdiction of any country.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses seizure prohibition to related concepts.
premise text: (2) A seizure may be effected: (a) in Australia; or (b) on the high seas; or (c) in a place beyond the jurisdiction of any country.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies seizure as prohibited using AI reasoning.
premise text: (2) A seizure may be effected: (a) in Australia; or (b) on the high seas; or (c) in a place beyond the jurisdiction of any country.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(3) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54-ss-3
part of: 54 Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
note: Order to return seized property or forfeit it if used in commission of an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.173
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(3) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to return seized property or forfeit it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between seizure and application for return.
premise text: (3) The Supreme Court of a State or Territory may:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(4) Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54-ss-4
part of: 54 Seizure of pirate ships and aircraft etc.
note: Conditions for return of seized property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.173
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-54-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on Commonwealth
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Written consent of Attorney-General required
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55
has part: 55(1) Written consent of Attorney-General required
has part: 55(2) Written consent of Attorney-General required
has part: 55(3) Written consent of Attorney-General required
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174

55(1) Written consent of Attorney-General required
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-1
part of: 55 Written consent of Attorney-General required
note: Prosecution requires Attorney-General's consent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(1) Written consent of Attorney-General required
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires consent for prosecution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55(2) Written consent of Attorney-General required
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-2
part of: 55 Written consent of Attorney-General required
note: Attorney-General's consent required before proceeding with arrest, charge, and remand.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(2) Written consent of Attorney-General required
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires Attorney-General's consent.
premise text: No further step in the proceedings can be taken until consent is given.
conclusion text: Proceedings cannot proceed without consent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55(3) Written consent of Attorney-General required
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-3
part of: 55 Written consent of Attorney-General required
note: Attorney-General's consent required for discharge of accused
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(3) Written consent of Attorney-General required
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires Attorney-General's consent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Evidence of certain matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56
has part: 56(1) Evidence of certain matters
has part: 56(2) Evidence of certain matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174

56(1) Evidence of certain matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56-ss-1
part of: 56 Evidence of certain matters
note: Certificate as evidence of certain matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56(1) Evidence of certain matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: State obligation to provide certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between certificate and proceedings
premise text: for the purposes of any proceedings for an offence against this Part, evidence of the facts stated in the certificate.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between certificate and proceedings (recurring trace)
premise text: for the purposes of any proceedings for an offence against this Part, evidence of the facts stated in the certificate.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

56(2) Evidence of certain matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56-ss-2
part of: 56 Evidence of certain matters
note: Definition of eligible person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.174
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56(2) Evidence of certain matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-56-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: SES employee in the Foreign Affairs Department
conclusion text: eligible person
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85E Interpretation—definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85e
note: Definitions for postal terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.175
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-6
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-7

crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definitions for postal terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
premise text: article in the course of post means an article that is being carried by post, and includes an article that has been collected or received by Australia Post for carriage by post
conclusion text: Australia Post means the Australian Postal Corporation.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
premise text: employee, in relation to Australia Post, includes a person who performs services for or on behalf of Australia Post and an employee of such a person
conclusion text: employee means a person who performs services for or on behalf of Australia Post.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
premise text: mail-bag includes a package, parcel, container or wrapper belonging to Australia Post in which articles in the course of post are customarily contained
conclusion text: postal message means a material record of an unwritten communication.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
premise text: postal message means: (a) a material record of an unwritten communication: (i) carried by post; or (ii) collected or received by Australia Post for carriage by post;
conclusion text: postal message is a material record of an unwritten communication.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
premise text: postal message means: (b) a material record issued by Australia Post as a record of an unwritten communication: (i) carried by post; or (ii) collected or received by Australia Post for carriage by post.
conclusion text: postal message is a material record issued by Australia Post.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85e-logic-descriptionlogic-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
premise text: carried by post means carried by or through Australia Post.
conclusion text: Australia Post means the Australian Postal Corporation.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85F Interpretation—expressions used in Australian Postal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85f
note: Definitions of expressions used in Australian Postal Corporation Act 1989
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85f-norm

85G Forgery of postage stamps etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85g
has part: 85G(1) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
has part: 85G(2) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
has part: 85G(3) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
has part: 85G(4) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
has part: 85G(5) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
has part: 85G(5A) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
has part: 85G(6) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176

85G(1) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85g-ss-1
part of: 85G Forgery of postage stamps etc.
note: A person shall not forge a postage stamp.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85G(1) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of forging postage stamps.
premise text: (1) A person shall not forge a postage stamp.
conclusion text: No one can forge a postage stamp.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85G(2) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85g-ss-2
part of: 85G Forgery of postage stamps etc.
note: Uttering a forged postage stamp is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85G(2) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
premise text: (2) A person shall not utter a postage stamp knowing it to be forged.
conclusion text: Uttering a forged postage stamp is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a penalty for the prohibited action.
premise text: (2) A person shall not utter a postage stamp knowing it to be forged. Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 10 years is imposed for the prohibited action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: The penalty implies a prohibition.
premise text: (2) A person shall not utter a postage stamp knowing it to be forged. Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
conclusion text: The penalty implies a prohibition.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Classifies the action as a crime.
premise text: (2) A person shall not utter a postage stamp knowing it to be forged. Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
conclusion text: The action is classified as a crime.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85G(3) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85g-ss-3
part of: 85G Forgery of postage stamps etc.
note: Making, using, or selling forged postage stamps is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85G(3) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85G(4) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85g-ss-4
part of: 85G Forgery of postage stamps etc.
note: Making, using, or selling forged postage stamps is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85G(4) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85G(5) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85g-ss-5
part of: 85G Forgery of postage stamps etc.
note: Making, using, or selling a die capable of making a mark resembling a postage stamp is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85G(5) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of making, using, or selling a die capable of making a mark resembling a postage stamp.
premise text: (5) A person shall not...
conclusion text: ...knowing that it is such a die,...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85G(5A) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85g-ss-5a
part of: 85G Forgery of postage stamps etc.
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to reasonable excuse.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5a-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85G(5A) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-5a-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Reasonable excuse is a belief.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85G(6) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85g-ss-6
part of: 85G Forgery of postage stamps etc.
note: Uttering a forged postage stamp is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.176
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85G(6) Forgery of postage stamps etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
premise text: (6) A person shall be taken to utter a forged postage stamp if...
conclusion text: Uttering a forged postage stamp is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action of using or dealing with a forged postage stamp.
premise text: (6) A person shall be taken to utter a forged postage stamp if...
conclusion text: Using or dealing with a forged postage stamp is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action of attempting to induce any person to use, deal with, act on or accept a forged postage stamp.
premise text: (6) A person shall be taken to utter a forged postage stamp if...
conclusion text: Attempting to induce any person to use, deal with, act on or accept a forged postage stamp is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action of putting off a forged postage stamp.
premise text: (6) A person shall be taken to utter a forged postage stamp if...
conclusion text: Putting off a forged postage stamp is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85g-ss-6-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action of using a forged postage stamp.
premise text: (6) A person shall be taken to utter a forged postage stamp if...
conclusion text: Using a forged postage stamp is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85H Special paper for postage stamps
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85h
note: Prohibition on making, using, or selling paper resembling postage stamp paper.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.177
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85h-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85h-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85h-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85H Special paper for postage stamps
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85N Wrongful delivery of postal article etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85n
note: Prohibition on intentionally delivering postal articles to incorrect persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.178
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85n-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85n-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85n-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85N Wrongful delivery of postal article etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits intentional delivery of postal articles.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85Q Forgery of postal messages etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85q
has part: 85Q(1) Forgery of postal messages etc.
has part: 85Q(2) Forgery of postal messages etc.
has part: 85Q(3) Forgery of postal messages etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.178

85Q(1) Forgery of postal messages etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85q-ss-1
part of: 85Q Forgery of postal messages etc.
note: A person shall not forge a postal message.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.178
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85Q(1) Forgery of postal messages etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits forging postal messages.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85Q(2) Forgery of postal messages etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85q-ss-2
part of: 85Q Forgery of postal messages etc.
note: Uttering a forged postal message is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.178
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85Q(2) Forgery of postal messages etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
premise text: (2) A person shall not utter a postal message knowing it to be forged.
conclusion text: Uttering a forged postal message is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition on the action.
premise text: (2) A person shall not utter a postal message knowing it to be forged.
conclusion text: The action is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action using linear logic.
premise text: (2) A person shall not utter a postal message knowing it to be forged.
conclusion text: The action is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Impose
logic summary: Imposes the prohibition on the agent.
premise text: (2) A person shall not utter a postal message knowing it to be forged.
conclusion text: The agent is subject to the prohibition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85Q(3) Forgery of postal messages etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85q-ss-3
part of: 85Q Forgery of postal messages etc.
note: Uttering a forged postal message is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.178
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85Q(3) Forgery of postal messages etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
premise text: (3) A person shall be taken to utter a forged postal message if...
conclusion text: Uttering a forged postal message is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies the prohibition.
premise text: (3) A person shall be taken to utter a forged postal message if...
conclusion text: Uttering a forged postal message implies prohibition.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies the prohibition through argumentation.
premise text: (3) A person shall be taken to utter a forged postal message if...
conclusion text: Uttering a forged postal message implies prohibition through argumentation.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85q-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Occurs during the action.
premise text: (3) A person shall be taken to utter a forged postal message if...
conclusion text: The action occurs during the prohibition.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85R Wrongful delivery of postal messages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85r
note: Prohibits intentionally delivering postal messages to unauthorized recipients.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.178
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85r-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85r-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85r-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85R Wrongful delivery of postal messages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85r-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of intentional delivery
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85T Sending false postal messages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85t
note: Sending false postal messages is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.179
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85t-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85t-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85t-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85T Sending false postal messages
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85t-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits sending false postal messages.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85U Obstructing carriage of articles by post
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85u
note: No person shall intentionally obstruct or hinder the carriage by post of any article.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.179
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85u-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85u-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85u-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85U Obstructing carriage of articles by post
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85u-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits obstructing carriage by post
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85V Interference with property of Australia Post
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85v
has part: 85V(1) Interference with property of Australia Post
has part: 85V(1A) Interference with property of Australia Post
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.179

85V(1) Interference with property of Australia Post
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85v-ss-1
part of: 85V Interference with property of Australia Post
note: Prohibition on tampering with Australia Post property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.179
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids intentional tampering with Australia Post property
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85V(1A) Interference with property of Australia Post
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85v-ss-1a
part of: 85V Interference with property of Australia Post
note: Prohibition on interference with property of Australia Post
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.179
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits interference with property
premise text: (1A) For the purposes of an offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: absolute liability applies to whichever one of the following physical elements of circumstance is relevant to the offence:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes temporal relation between offence and circumstance
premise text: (1A) For the purposes of an offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: absolute liability applies to whichever one of the following physical elements of circumstance is relevant to the offence:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establishes recurring trace between offence and circumstance
premise text: (1A) For the purposes of an offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: absolute liability applies to whichever one of the following physical elements of circumstance is relevant to the offence:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses information about interference with property
premise text: (1A) For the purposes of an offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: absolute liability applies to whichever one of the following physical elements of circumstance is relevant to the offence:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85v-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies elements of circumstance relevant to the offence using AI
premise text: (1A) For the purposes of an offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: absolute liability applies to whichever one of the following physical elements of circumstance is relevant to the offence:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

85W Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85w
has part: 85W(1) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
has part: 85W(2) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
has part: 85W(3) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
has part: 85W(3A) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
has part: 85W(4) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.180

85W(1) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85w-ss-1
part of: 85W Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
note: Prohibition on carrying controlled drugs or plants by post.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.180
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85W(1) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids intentional action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85W(2) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85w-ss-2
part of: 85W Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
note: Validity of law not affected by concurrent offence against subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.180
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85W(2) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to uphold law validity
premise text: Act constitutes offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: Validity of law not affected
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

85W(3) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85w-ss-3
part of: 85W Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
note: No obligation to comply with subsection (1) if conduct is for the purposes of the Medical Chest Program or in the course of duties, powers or functions performed by Australia Post or RFDSA.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.180
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85W(3) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for subsection (1)
premise text: Subsection (1) applies to conduct engaged in before a certain date.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply if conduct is engaged in after a certain date.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for subsection (1)
premise text: Subsection (1) applies to conduct engaged in before a certain date.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply if conduct is engaged in after a certain date.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the obligation to comply with subsection (1)
premise text: The obligation to comply with subsection (1) is defined in section Z.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) imposes an obligation on individuals to comply with its requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the exemption from subsection (1)
premise text: The exemption from subsection (1) is defined in section AA.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not impose an obligation on individuals to comply with its requirements if conduct is for the purposes of the Medical Chest Program or in the course of duties, powers or functions performed by Australia Post or RFDSA.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

85W(3A) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85w-ss-3a
part of: 85W Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
note: Permitted conduct under certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.180
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-shacl-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to engage in conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap with regulatory programs
premise text: (3A) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to conduct engaged in by a person if the person engages in the conduct: for the purposes of, and in accordance with, a program, prescribed by the regulations, for the supply of packages of pharmaceutical products and medical supplies to remote locations;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Recurring conduct under regulatory programs
premise text: (3A) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to conduct engaged in by a person if the person engages in the conduct: for the purposes of, and in accordance with, a program, prescribed by the regulations, for the supply of packages of pharmaceutical products and medical supplies to remote locations;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of regulatory programs
premise text: (3A) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to conduct engaged in by a person if the person engages in the conduct: for the purposes of, and in accordance with, a program, prescribed by the regulations, for the supply of packages of pharmaceutical products and medical supplies to remote locations;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-3a-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validates
logic summary: Validation of regulatory programs
premise text: (3A) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to conduct engaged in by a person if the person engages in the conduct: for the purposes of, and in accordance with, a program, prescribed by the regulations, for the supply of packages of pharmaceutical products and medical supplies to remote locations;
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85W(4) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85w-ss-4
part of: 85W Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
note: Defines Medical Chest Program
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.180
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85W(4) Causing controlled drugs or controlled plants to be carried by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85w-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Medical Chest Program is a program
conclusion text: Program is Medical Chest Program
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85Z Articles carried by post to be taken to be Australia Post’s
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85z
note: Article carried by post is taken to be Australia Post's property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.183
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85z-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85z-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85z-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZA Postage stamps to be valuable securities etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85za
note: A postage stamp is taken to be a valuable security for larceny purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.183
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85za-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85za-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85za-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZA Postage stamps to be valuable securities etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85za-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZL Interpretation of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zl
note: Definitions and interpretations for Part VIIC of the Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.184
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zl-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zl-logic-descriptionlogic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zl-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definitions
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZM Meaning of conviction and spent conviction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zm
has part: 85ZM(1) Meaning of conviction and spent conviction
has part: 85ZM(2) Meaning of conviction and spent conviction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.189

85ZM(1) Meaning of conviction and spent conviction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zm-ss-1
part of: 85ZM Meaning of conviction and spent conviction
note: A person shall be taken to have been convicted of an offence if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.189
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zm-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZM(1) Meaning of conviction and spent conviction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZM(2) Meaning of conviction and spent conviction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zm-ss-2
part of: 85ZM Meaning of conviction and spent conviction
note: A person's conviction of an offence is spent if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.189
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zm-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZM(2) Meaning of conviction and spent conviction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part, a person’s conviction of an offence is spent if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZN Meaning of quash
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zn
note: A person's conviction of an offence shall be taken to have been quashed under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.189
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZN Meaning of quash
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If the conviction has been quashed or set aside, then the person's conviction of the offence shall be taken to have been quashed.
premise text: conviction has been quashed or set aside
conclusion text: person's conviction of the offence shall be taken to have been quashed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The finding of guilt has been quashed or set aside during the period when the court's decision to take the offence into account was made.
premise text: finding of guilt has been quashed or set aside
conclusion text: court's decision to take the offence into account was made
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: The person's conviction of the other offence has been quashed or set aside during the period when the court's decision to take the offence into account was made.
premise text: person's conviction of the other offence
conclusion text: court's decision to take the offence into account was made
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zn-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If the court's decision to take the offence into account has been set aside, then the person's conviction of the offence shall be taken to have been quashed.
premise text: court's decision to take the offence into account has been set aside
conclusion text: person's conviction of the offence shall be taken to have been quashed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZP Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zp
has part: 85ZP(1) Application of Part
has part: 85ZP(2) Application of Part
has part: 85ZP(3) Application of Part
has part: 85ZP(4) Application of Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190

85ZP(1) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zp-ss-1
part of: 85ZP Application of Part
note: This Part applies in relation to a person convicted of an offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZP(1) Application of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The Part applies in relation to a person convicted of an offence
premise text: (1) This Part applies...
conclusion text: ...in relation to a person convicted of an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: applies
logic summary: The Part applies in relation to a person convicted of an offence
premise text: (1) This Part applies...
conclusion text: ...in relation to a person convicted of an offence
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: applies
logic summary: The Part applies in relation to a person convicted of an offence
premise text: (1) This Part applies...
conclusion text: ...in relation to a person convicted of an offence
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: applies
logic summary: The Part applies in relation to a person convicted of an offence
premise text: (1) This Part applies...
conclusion text: ...in relation to a person convicted of an offence
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: applies
logic summary: The Part applies in relation to a person convicted of an offence
premise text: (1) This Part applies...
conclusion text: ...in relation to a person convicted of an offence
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZP(2) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zp-ss-2
part of: 85ZP Application of Part
note: A reference to a person convicted of an offence does not include a reference to a body corporate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZP(2) Application of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Exclude bodies corporate from references to persons convicted of offences.
premise text: (2) A reference in this Part to a person convicted of an offence does not include a reference to a body corporate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZP(3) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zp-ss-3
part of: 85ZP Application of Part
note: Disclosing or taking into account a conviction of an offence is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Nothing in this Part authorises a person or body to disclose or take into account a conviction of an offence.
conclusion text: Disclosing or taking into account a conviction of an offence is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZP(4) Application of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zp-ss-4
part of: 85ZP Application of Part
note: Nothing in this Part affects anything lawfully done before a pardon is granted or a conviction is quashed or spent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZP(4) Application of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zp-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Nothing in this Part affects anything lawfully done before a pardon is granted or a conviction is quashed or spent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZQ Part binds the Crown
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zq
note: Part binds the Crown in right of the Commonwealth, of each of the States, of the Australian Capital Territory and of the Northern Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.190
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zq-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zq-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zq-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zq-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZQ Part binds the Crown
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Binding
logic summary: The part binds the Crown.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zq-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The part imposes an obligation on the Crown.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZR Pardons for persons wrongly convicted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zr
has part: 85ZR(1) Pardons for persons wrongly convicted
has part: 85ZR(2) Pardons for persons wrongly convicted
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.191

85ZR(1) Pardons for persons wrongly convicted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zr-ss-1
part of: 85ZR Pardons for persons wrongly convicted
note: A person wrongly convicted of a Commonwealth offence is taken for all purposes as never having been convicted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.191
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZR(1) Pardons for persons wrongly convicted
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to treat the person as never having been convicted.
premise text: The State is required to grant pardons for wrongful convictions.
conclusion text: The person shall be taken for all purposes as never having been convicted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval during which the person is treated as never having been convicted.
premise text: The pardon is granted despite any other Commonwealth law or State law.
conclusion text: Despite any other Commonwealth law or State law, where a person has been granted a free and absolute pardon for a Commonwealth offence...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Indicates that the person is treated as never having been convicted repeatedly.
premise text: The person shall be taken, in any State or Territory, for all purposes, never to have been convicted of the offence.
conclusion text: The person shall be taken, in a foreign country, by any Commonwealth authority or State authority in that country, for all purposes, never to have been convicted of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Grants permission to treat the person as never having been convicted.
premise text: The State is required to grant pardons for wrongful convictions.
conclusion text: Despite any other Commonwealth law or State law, where a person has been granted a free and absolute pardon...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Supports the argument that the person should be treated as never having been convicted.
premise text: The pardon is granted despite any other Commonwealth law or State law.
conclusion text: Therefore, the person shall be taken for all purposes as never having been convicted.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZR(2) Pardons for persons wrongly convicted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zr-ss-2
part of: 85ZR Pardons for persons wrongly convicted
note: A person wrongly convicted under a State or foreign law is taken never to have been convicted of an offence in corresponding circumstances or for a corresponding purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.191
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZR(2) Pardons for persons wrongly convicted
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State to treat a person as never having been convicted of an offence.
premise text: State law
conclusion text: Never to have been convicted of that offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which the person is treated as never having been convicted of an offence.
premise text: State law
conclusion text: Corresponding circumstances or for a corresponding purpose.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Justifies the obligation on the State to treat a person as never having been convicted of an offence.
premise text: State law
conclusion text: Never to have been convicted of that offence.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Applies the obligation on the State to treat a person as never having been convicted of an offence.
premise text: State law
conclusion text: Never to have been convicted of that offence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zr-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Analyzes the implications of the obligation on the State to treat a person as never having been convicted of an offence.
premise text: State law
conclusion text: Never to have been convicted of that offence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZS Effect of pardons for persons wrongly convicted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zs
note: Obligation on States to consider pardons for persons wrongly convicted
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.191
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zs-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zs-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zs-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZS Effect of pardons for persons wrongly convicted
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zs-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation on States to consider pardons for persons wrongly convicted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZT Quashed convictions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zt
has part: 85ZT(1) Quashed convictions
has part: 85ZT(2) Quashed convictions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.192

85ZT(1) Quashed convictions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zt-ss-1
part of: 85ZT Quashed convictions
note: No disclosure required for quashed convictions in States or Territories.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.192
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zt-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZT(1) Quashed convictions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: No obligation to disclose quashed convictions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZT(2) Quashed convictions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zt-ss-2
part of: 85ZT Quashed convictions
note: No disclosure required for quashed convictions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.192
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zt-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of quashed convictions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZU Effect of quashed convictions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zu
note: No disclosure of conviction is allowed without consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.193
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zu-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zu-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zu-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zu-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZU Effect of quashed convictions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zu-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zu-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Confidentiality
logic summary: Confidentiality of conviction information
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZV Spent convictions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zv
has part: 85ZV(1) Spent convictions
has part: 85ZV(2) Spent convictions
has part: 85ZV(3) Spent convictions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.194

85ZV(1) Spent convictions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zv-ss-1
part of: 85ZV Spent convictions
note: No disclosure of spent convictions is required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.194
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZV(1) Spent convictions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of spent convictions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZV(2) Spent convictions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zv-ss-2
part of: 85ZV Spent convictions
note: Must not disclose spent convictions to authorities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.194
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZV(2) Spent convictions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure of spent convictions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZV(3) Spent convictions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zv-ss-3
part of: 85ZV Spent convictions
note: Disclosure of spent convictions is not required in certain circumstances or for a particular purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.194
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to withhold disclosure of spent convictions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZW Effect of right of non-disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zw
note: No disclosure of conviction is allowed without consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.195
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zw-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zw-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zw-logic-epistemic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zw-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZW Effect of right of non-disclosure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of conviction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zw-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Conditional
logic summary: Depends on consent for disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZX Convictions of further Commonwealth or Territory offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zx
has part: 85ZX(1) Convictions of further Commonwealth or Territory offences
has part: 85ZX(2) Convictions of further Commonwealth or Territory offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.196

85ZX(1) Convictions of further Commonwealth or Territory offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zx-ss-1
part of: 85ZX Convictions of further Commonwealth or Territory offences
note: Court may order cessation of Division 3 application in relation to earlier offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.196
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZX(1) Convictions of further Commonwealth or Territory offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Court may order cessation of Division 3 application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

85ZX(2) Convictions of further Commonwealth or Territory offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zx-ss-2
part of: 85ZX Convictions of further Commonwealth or Territory offences
note: Division 3 ceases to apply or does not apply to the person in relation to the earlier offence until the waiting period for the later offence has ended.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.196
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZX(2) Convictions of further Commonwealth or Territory offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ceases
logic summary: Division 3 ceases to apply
premise text: Division 3 applies
conclusion text: does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not apply
logic summary: Division 3 does not apply in relation to the earlier offence
premise text: waiting period for the later offence has ended
conclusion text: Division 3 ceases to apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: until
logic summary: Division 3 ceases to apply until the waiting period for the later offence has ended
premise text: waiting period for the later offence has not ended
conclusion text: Division 3 ceases to apply
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zx-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: has ended
logic summary: Waiting period for the later offence has ended
premise text: later offence has occurred
conclusion text: waiting period for the later offence has ended
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZY Convictions of further State or foreign offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zy
note: Division 3 applies to a person in relation to an offence of which the person was convicted, or would so apply to the person if the waiting period for the offence had ended.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.196
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZY Convictions of further State or foreign offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Division 3 applies to a person in relation to an offence of which the person was convicted, or would so apply to the person if the waiting period for the offence had ended.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: interval relation
logic summary: Division 3 applies to a person in relation to an offence of which the person was convicted, or would so apply to the person if the waiting period for the offence had ended.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: recurring trace
logic summary: Division 3 applies to a person in relation to an offence of which the person was convicted, or would so apply to the person if the waiting period for the offence had ended.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Division 3 applies to a person in relation to an offence of which the person was convicted, or would so apply to the person if the waiting period for the offence had ended.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zy-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive agent
logic summary: Division 3 applies to a person in relation to an offence of which the person was convicted, or would so apply to the person if the waiting period for the offence had ended.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZZ Information Commissioner’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zz
has part: 85ZZ(1) Information Commissioner’s functions
has part: 85ZZ(1A) Information Commissioner’s functions
has part: 85ZZ(2) Information Commissioner’s functions
has part: 85ZZ(3) Information Commissioner’s functions
has part: 85ZZ(4) Information Commissioner’s functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.198

85ZZ(1) Information Commissioner’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zz-ss-1
part of: 85ZZ Information Commissioner’s functions
note: Department head is respondent to complaint about act or practice of Department or officer. The Information Commissioner has functions to investigate and try to settle breaches of Division 2 or 3. Right to complain about a breach of Division 2 or 3.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.198
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZZ(1) Information Commissioner’s functions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Department head is respondent to complaint.
premise text: Secretary or head of Department is respondent to complaint.
conclusion text: Department head is respondent to complaint.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Secretary or head of Department is respondent to complaint.
premise text: If a complaint is about an act or practice of a Commonwealth Department or a State Department, the Secretary or head of the Department is the respondent to the complaint.
conclusion text: Secretary or head of Department is respondent to complaint.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Secretary or head of Department has duty to respond to complaint.
premise text: If a complaint is about an act or practice of a Commonwealth Department or a State Department, the Secretary or head of the Department is the respondent to the complaint.
conclusion text: Secretary or head of Department has duty to respond to complaint.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has functions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Right to complain
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZZ(1A) Information Commissioner’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zz-ss-1a
part of: 85ZZ Information Commissioner’s functions
note: Privacy functions for the purposes of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.198
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZZ(1A) Information Commissioner’s functions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZZ(2) Information Commissioner’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zz-ss-2
part of: 85ZZ Information Commissioner’s functions
note: Minister is respondent to complaint about act or practice of another authority Ensure protection of human rights and social interests while performing functions. Complaint must be in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.198
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZZ(2) Information Commissioner’s functions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister has obligation to respond to complaint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written complaint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZZ(3) Information Commissioner’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zz-ss-3
part of: 85ZZ Information Commissioner’s functions
note: Chief executive officer of authority is respondent to complaint. Duty to provide help to a person making a complaint.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.198
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZZ(3) Information Commissioner’s functions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Authority has obligation
conclusion text: chief executive officer is respondent to complaint.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: duty
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85ZZ(4) Information Commissioner’s functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85zz-ss-4
part of: 85ZZ Information Commissioner’s functions
note: Specify respondent to complaint
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.198
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85ZZ(4) Information Commissioner’s functions
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-85zz-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must specify respondent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86B Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86b
note: Authorization for collection, use and disclosure of personal information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.221
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86b-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86b-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-86b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Obligation on Commonwealth bodies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86C Target entity may collect sensitive information for integrity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86c
note: Target entity may collect sensitive information for integrity purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.221
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86c-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-86c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86C Target entity may collect sensitive information for integrity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

86D Target entity may use personal information for integrity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86d
note: Target entity may use personal information for integrity purpose relating to the entity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.222
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86d-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-86d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86D Target entity may use personal information for integrity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

86E Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86e
has part: 86E(1) Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
has part: 86E(2) Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
has part: 86E(3) Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.222

86E(1) Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86e-ss-1
part of: 86E Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
note: Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity is required if a law limits disclosure and exempts it from the limitation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.222
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86E(1) Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity.
premise text: (1) This section applies if a law of the Commonwealth or of a State or Territory:...
conclusion text: ...unless the disclosure is authorised under an Australian law or certain other exceptions apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Disclosure must occur between the time the information is collected and when it is disclosed to the target entity.
premise text: (b) exempts from the limitation a disclosure authorised by a law of the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: ...unless the disclosure is authorised under an Australian law or certain other exceptions apply.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Disclosure must occur everywhere in the jurisdiction where the information is collected and disclosed.
premise text: (a) limits disclosure of some or all personal information by a person, body or authority (however described);...
conclusion text: ...and exempts from the limitation a disclosure authorised by a law of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must provide
logic summary: Must provide personal information to target entity for integrity.
premise text: (1) This section applies if a law of the Commonwealth or of a State or Territory:...
conclusion text: ...unless the disclosure is authorised under an Australian law or certain other exceptions apply.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: must conform to
logic summary: Must conform to the requirements for disclosure of personal information.
premise text: (a) limits disclosure of some or all personal information by a person, body or authority (however described);...
conclusion text: ...and exempts from the limitation a disclosure authorised by a law of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86E(2) Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86e-ss-2
part of: 86E Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
note: Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity purpose
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.222
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted
premise text: Disclosure for integrity purpose
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86E(3) Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86e-ss-3
part of: 86E Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
note: Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity purposes is required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.222
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86E(3) Disclosure of personal information to target entity for integrity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-86e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires disclosure of personal information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86F This Part does not limit other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86f
note: This Part does not limit other laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.223
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86f-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86f-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-86f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibits
logic summary: Limitation of laws
conclusion text: This Part does not imply limitation of laws
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86G Guidelines on the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86g
has part: 86G(1) Guidelines on the operation of this Part
has part: 86G(2) Guidelines on the operation of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.223

86G(1) Guidelines on the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86g-ss-1
part of: 86G Guidelines on the operation of this Part
note: Publishing guidelines approved by the Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.223
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86g-ss-1-norm

86G(2) Guidelines on the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86g-ss-2
part of: 86G Guidelines on the operation of this Part
note: Guidelines under subsection (1) are not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.223
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-86g-ss-2-norm

87 False certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87
note: Giving false certificates is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.224
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-87-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-87-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-87-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 87 False certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits giving false certificates.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89 Trespassing on Commonwealth land
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89
has part: 89(1) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
has part: 89(2) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
has part: 89(3) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
has part: 89(4) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
has part: 89(5) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.224

89(1) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-1
part of: 89 Trespassing on Commonwealth land
note: Trespassing on Commonwealth land is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.224
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(1) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits trespassing
premise text: (1) A person who, without lawful excuse (proof whereof shall lie upon him or her), trespasses or goes upon any prohibited Commonwealth land commits an offence.
conclusion text: Trespassing is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to not trespass
premise text: (1) A person who, without lawful excuse (proof whereof shall lie upon him or her), trespasses or goes upon any prohibited Commonwealth land commits an offence.
conclusion text: There is an obligation to not trespass
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Trespassing implies a penalty
premise text: (1) A person who, without lawful excuse (proof whereof shall lie upon him or her), trespasses or goes upon any prohibited Commonwealth land commits an offence.
conclusion text: If trespassing occurs, then a penalty applies
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Consequence
logic summary: Trespassing has a consequence of a penalty
premise text: (1) A person who, without lawful excuse (proof whereof shall lie upon him or her), trespasses or goes upon any prohibited Commonwealth land commits an offence.
conclusion text: The penalty is a consequence of trespassing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(2) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-2
part of: 89 Trespassing on Commonwealth land
note: Request for personal information from individuals on prohibited Commonwealth land.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.224
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(2) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of trespassing on Commonwealth land.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(3) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-3
part of: 89 Trespassing on Commonwealth land
note: Detention of person found on prohibited Commonwealth land
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.224
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(3) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of trespassing
premise text: (3) Where a person is found upon prohibited Commonwealth land...
conclusion text: ...the constable or officer may apprehend that person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for detention
premise text: (3) Where a person is found upon prohibited Commonwealth land...
conclusion text: ...the constable or officer may apprehend that person...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of detention
premise text: (3) Where a person is found upon prohibited Commonwealth land...
conclusion text: ...the constable or officer may apprehend that person...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of detention
premise text: (3) Where a person is found upon prohibited Commonwealth land...
conclusion text: ...the constable or officer may apprehend that person...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognition of detention
premise text: (3) Where a person is found upon prohibited Commonwealth land...
conclusion text: ...the constable or officer may apprehend that person...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(4) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-4
part of: 89 Trespassing on Commonwealth land
note: Authorized Commonwealth officer must produce identification before apprehending a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.224
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(4) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(5) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-5
part of: 89 Trespassing on Commonwealth land
note: Trespassing on prohibited Commonwealth land is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.224
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(5) Trespassing on Commonwealth land
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits trespassing on Commonwealth land.
premise text: Land is posted with a notice prohibiting trespassing.
conclusion text: Trespassing is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-89-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies land as prohibited if it has a posted notice.
premise text: Land has a posted notice.
conclusion text: Land is classified as prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89A Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89a
has part: 89A(1) Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
has part: 89A(2) Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
has part: 89A(3) Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.225

89A(1) Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89a-ss-1
part of: 89A Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
note: Discharging firearms on prohibited areas is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.225
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 89A(1) Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits discharging firearms on prohibited areas.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89A(2) Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89a-ss-2
part of: 89A Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
note: Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.225
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 89A(2) Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89A(3) Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89a-ss-3
part of: 89A Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
note: Authorized Commonwealth officer must produce instrument before apprehending person.
description: instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.225
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89A(3) Discharging firearms on or over Commonwealth land
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-89a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90 Trespass by cattle or live stock
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90
note: Trespass by cattle or live stock is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.226
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-90-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-90-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-90-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 90 Trespass by cattle or live stock
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits trespass by cattle or live stock.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90A Destroying etc. posters etc. relating to Commonwealth loans
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90a
note: Destroying or damaging Commonwealth loan posters is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.226
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-90a-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-90a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-90a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 90A Destroying etc. posters etc. relating to Commonwealth loans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-90a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits destroying or damaging Commonwealth loan posters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90B False statements in documents filed etc. under laws of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90b
note: Intentionally making false statements in documents filed or lodged with a Commonwealth officer is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.226
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-90b-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-90b-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-90b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making false statements in documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91 Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91
note: The Governor-General may make regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.227
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-91-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-91-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-91-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-act-1914-sec-91-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Governor-General has the power to make regulations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-91-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: HasPart
logic summary: Regulations are part of the Act.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Oct 1914
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-norm

29 Oct 1914
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-2
note: Crimes Act 1915
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-2-norm

7 May 1915
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-norm

29 Oct 1914 (s 3)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-3
note: Repeal Act 1920
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-3-norm

2 Dec 1920
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-2-2-norm

2 Dec 1920
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-3
note: Commencement of Crimes Act 1926
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-2-3-norm

16 Mar 1926
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-norm

29 Mar 1926 (gaz
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-4
note: No summary available
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-4-norm

22 June 1928
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-norm

22 June 1928
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-2
note: Crimes Act 1932
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-2-norm

30 May 1932
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-norm

30 May 1932
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-2
note: Judiciary Act 1937
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-2-norm

3 July 1937
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-2-norm

3 July 1937
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-3
note: July 1937 section 5 of Crimes Act 1941
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-3-norm

4 Apr 1941
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-3-norm

3 Sept 1939
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-4
note: Defence (Transitional Provisions) Act 1946
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-4-norm

14 Dec 1946
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-14-norm

1 Jan 1947
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-3
note: Statute Law Revision Act 1950
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-1-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the type of obligation or prohibition
premise text: Classification is Undertaking
conclusion text: Classification is Deontic
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Dec 1950
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-2-norm

31 Dec 1950
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-2
note: Duty to report crimes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-2-norm

31 May 1955
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-3-norm

31 May 1955
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-4
note: Crimes Act 1959
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-4-norm

23 Apr 1959
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Act 1960
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between commencement and the Act
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Dec 1960
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-norm

13 Dec 1960
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-2
note: Statute Law Revision (Decimal Currency) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-2-norm

29 Oct 1966
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-5-norm

1 Dec 1966
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-4
note: Commencement of Crimes Act 1973
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-4-norm

27 May 1973
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-norm

27 May 1973
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-2
note: Statute Law Revision Act 1973
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-2-norm

19 Dec 1973
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-norm

31 Dec 1973
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-5
note: Legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.232
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-5-norm

12 June 1975
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
note: Conditional commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-norm

28 Mar 1979
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28
note: Consequential amendments to Australian Federal Police Act 1979
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-norm

28 Nov 1979
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-2-norm

19 Oct 1979 (s 2 and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-2
note: Consequential amendments to Australian Federal Police Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-2-norm

28 May 1980
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-3-norm

28 May 1980
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-4
note: Crimes (Currency) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-4-norm

17 Sept 1981
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17
note: Amendment by Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 2) 1985
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17-norm

16 Dec 1985
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-3
note: Duty to report certain information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.233
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the agent to report certain information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 June 1982
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-4
note: Royal Assent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-4-norm

16 Dec 1985
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-5
note: Royal Assent for Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act (No. 2) 1982
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-n3logic-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-shacl-3
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies Royal Assent as an Undertaking
premise text: The key is 'sec-16-5'
conclusion text: Royal Assent is an Undertaking for the Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act (No. 2) 1982
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-n3logic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the key as a specific legislative excerpt
premise text: The key is 'sec-16-5'
conclusion text: This is a classification of the key as a specific legislative excerpt
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-shacl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the key as a valid SHACL key
premise text: The key is 'sec-16-5'
conclusion text: This is a classification of the key as a valid SHACL key
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the key as a valid CogAI key
premise text: The key is 'sec-16-5'
conclusion text: This is a classification of the key as a valid CogAI key
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-5-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the key as a specific legislative excerpt in a diffusion context
premise text: The key is 'sec-16-5'
conclusion text: This is a classification of the key as a specific legislative excerpt in a diffusion context
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Sept 1982
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-3-norm

16 Dec 1985 (s 2(6))
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-6
note: Defence Force (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1982
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-6-norm

31 Dec 1982
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-6-norm

3 July 1985 (s 2 and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-5-norm

22 Nov 1983
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-4
note: Consequential Amendments Act 1983
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-4-norm

14 Dec 1983
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-2
note: Conditional commencement of amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-14-2-norm

22 Dec 1983
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-5-norm

27 Aug 1985 (s 2 and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-3
note: End of section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.234
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-3-norm

10 Apr 1984
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
note: Public Service Reform Act 1984
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-norm

25 June 1984
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25
note: Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-norm

25 Oct 1984
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-2
note: Royal Assent required for Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Royal Assent is required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Dec 1985
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-7
note: Prohibition on Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-7-norm

24 June 1986
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24
note: Conditional commencement of section 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-norm

17 Oct 1986
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17-2-norm

1 Feb 1987 (s 2 and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-5-norm

18 Dec 1986
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-norm

5 June 1987
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-3-norm

5 June 1987 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-4
note: Legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.235
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-4-norm

16 Dec 1987
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-8
note: Conditional commencement of sections 10, 12, 13, and 15 on specific dates.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-8-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-8-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for commencement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Dec 1987
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-2
note: Transition provisions and consequential amendments for Telecommunications and Postal Services Act 1989
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-2-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-18-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for transitional provisions
premise text: Temporal intervals mentioned in s 5(1), (6), (7)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 June 1989
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-3-norm

30 June 1989
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-3
note: Conditional commencement of Parts 5-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-3-norm

28 July 1989
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-5-norm

1989 Remainder:
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1989
note: Royal Assent for Crimes Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1989-norm

17 Jan 1990
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-3
note: Amended by Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 41, 2003
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17-3-norm

3 June 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-6
note: Conditional commencement of Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act 1989
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-6-norm

17 Jan 1990
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-4
note: Endnotes and legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.236
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17-4-norm

22 Oct 1990
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-6
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment Act 1991
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-6-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Mar 1991
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-4
note: List of sections affected by the amendment act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-4-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Mar 1991
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

9 May 1991
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9
note: Royal Assent and commencement date
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for commencement
premise text: Commencement date specified
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 June 1991
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-4-norm

1991 Remainder: 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1991
note: Amendment by AUSSAT Repeal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1991-norm

21 Oct 1991
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21-norm

27 June 1991
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-5
note: Royal Assent required for commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.237
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-27-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires royal assent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Aug 1991
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-2
note: Classifies sections of the law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-2-norm

27 Sept 1991
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-6-norm

25 Oct 1991
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-3
note: Repeal of AUSSAT Repeal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-3-norm

21 Oct 1991
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21-2-norm

11 Dec 1992
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-norm

22 Dec 1993
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-7-norm

30 Mar 1994 (gaz
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-4
note: Amendment Act 1994
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-4-norm

30 May 1994
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-5-norm

30 Nov 1994
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-6
note: Amendment by Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 41, 2003
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-6-norm

3 June 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-7
note: Legislation history for Crimes (Child Sex Tourism) Amendment Act 1994
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.238
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-7-norm

5 July 1994
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-5-norm

5 July 1994
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-6
note: Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2) 1994
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-6-norm

28 Nov 1994
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-6
note: Amendment by Statute Law Revision Act 1996
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-6-norm

25 Oct 1996
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-4
note: Sch 3 (items 37, 38)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-4-norm

28 Nov 1994
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-7
note: Enhancement Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-7-norm

3 June 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-8
note: Conditional commencement of Australian Postal Corporation Amendment Act 1994
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-8-norm

5 Dec 1994
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-7
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment Act 1994
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-7-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-5-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement on January 1, 1995
conclusion text: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Dec 1994
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-4
note: References specific sections for Royal Assent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-4-norm

16 Jan 1995
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-9-norm

25 Oct 1996
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-5
note: Prohibition on transitional provisions and consequential amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-25-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids transitional provisions and consequential amendments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Feb 1995
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-3
note: Conditional commencement of section 14
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-3-norm

15 Mar 1995
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15-norm

15 Sept 1995
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-2
note: Legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.239
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15-2-norm

8 July 1996
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-8-norm

8 July 1996
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-2
note: Amendment by Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 41, 2003
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-8-2-norm

3 June 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-9
note: Conditional commencement of Workplace Relations and Other Legislation Amendment Act 1996
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-9-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-9-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-3-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement on 8 July 1996
conclusion text: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Nov 1996
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-6
note: Amendment of s 2(2), (6) by 77, 1996, sch 3 [items 1, 2]
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-6-norm

19 Dec 1996
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-5
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment Act 1997
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-5-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Apr 1997
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-2
note: Royal Assent for Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act 1997
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-2-norm

17 Apr 1997
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-5
note: Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments Act 1997
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17-5-norm

3 May 1997
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-10-norm

1 July 1997
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-6
note: Audit (Transitional and Miscellaneous) Amendment Act 1997
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-6-norm

24 Oct 1997
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-2
note: Schedule 2 (items 636-638)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-2-norm

1 Jan 1998 (s 2(2) and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-7
note: Legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.240
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-7-norm

29 June 1998
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-6-norm

29 June 1998
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-7
note: Amendment of Schedule 1 (items 2, 8)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-7-norm

23 Mar 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-4-norm

29 June 1998 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-8
note: Financial Sector Reform (Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Act 1998
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-8-norm

29 June 1998
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-9-norm

1 July 1998 (s 2(2) and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-8
note: July 1998 (s 2(2) and gaz 1998, No S316)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-8-norm

23 July 1998
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-5
note: Amendment of section 2(2) by Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 41, 2003
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-5-norm

3 June 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-11-norm

23 July 1998 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-6
note: July 1998 (s 2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-6-norm

16 July 1999
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-10-norm

16 July 1999
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-11
note: Fine Enforcement Act, 1999
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-11-norm

13 Oct 1999
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-3-norm

13 Oct 1999
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-4
note: Legislation history for Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.241
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-4-norm

11 Nov 1999
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-2-norm

5 Dec 1999 (s 2(1) and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-8
note: Dec 1999 (s 2(1) and gaz 1999, No S584)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-8-norm

10 Dec 1999
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-2-norm

10 Dec 1999 (s 2(2))
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-3
note: Privacy Amendment (Office of the Privacy Commissioner) Act 2000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-3-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-10-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: No temporal relation specified
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Feb 2000
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-10-norm

1 July 2000 (gaz 2000,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-9
note: No S229
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-9-norm

7 Mar 2000
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-3-norm

2 July 2000 (gaz 2000,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-4
note: No S328
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-2-4-norm

31 Mar 2000
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-7
note: Royal Assent for Criminal Code Amendment (Theft, Fraud, Bribery and Related Offences) Act 2000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-31-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide Royal Assent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Nov 2000
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-3
note: Royal Assent and commencement of Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-3-norm

6 Apr 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-3-norm

20 June 2001 (s 2(4))
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20
note: Amendment of Royal Assent by Statute Law Revision Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-norm

3 July 2002
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-12
note: Legislation history for Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.242
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-12-norm

6 Apr 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-4
note: Reference to section 4(1), (2) and schedule 10.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-4-norm

24 May 2001 (s
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-4
note: Obligation to comply with certain items
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-4-norm

4 May 2001 (s 2(2))
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-5
note: Duty to report age at time of conviction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the defendant to report their age at time of conviction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 May 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-4-norm

4 June 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-6
note: Repeals, Consequentials and Transitionals Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-6-norm

28 June 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-8
note: Conditional commencement of National Crime Authority Legislation Amendment Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-8-norm

1 Oct 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-10
note: Commencement of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-10-norm

1 Oct 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-11
note: Royal Assent and commencement of the Cybercrime Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-11-norm

1 Oct 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-12-norm

21 Dec 2001 (gaz
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-3
note: Legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.243
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21-3-norm

4 Apr 2002
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-7
note: Conditional commencement of Security Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-7-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 July 2002
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-9
note: Schedule 1 (items 6, 8-13)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-9-norm

6 July 2002
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-5
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-5-norm

11 Oct 2002
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-3
note: Conditional commencement and effective date of the Crimes Amendment Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-3-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-11-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for commencement and effective date
premise text: Remainder: 1 Jan 2003 (s 2(1) and gaz 2002, No GN44)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Oct 2002
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-7
note: Criminal Code Amendment (Espionage and Related Matters) Act, 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-7-norm

31 Oct 2002
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-8
note: Conditional commencement of certain sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-8-norm

6 July 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-6-norm

31 Oct 2002 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-9
note: Ends on October 2002 (s 2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.244
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-9-norm

14 Nov 2002
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-14-3-norm

12 May 2003 (s 2 and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-2
note: Establishment of Australian Crime Commission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-2-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-12-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
logic summary: Establishs the Australian Crime Commission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Dec 2002
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-4
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (People Smuggling, Firearms Trafficking and Other Measures) Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-4-norm

19 Dec 2002
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-6
note: Classifies items in schedules 1, 2, and 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-6-norm

16 Jan 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-12
note: Conditional commencement on specific dates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-12-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-12-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-12-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Conditional commencement on specific dates
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

3 June 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-13
note: List of items in Schedule 1 and Schedule 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-13-norm

1 Mar 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-13
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-13-norm

17 July 1990 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-6
note: Prohibition of certain items
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.245
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-17-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids certain items
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Nov 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.246
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-3-norm

26 May 2004
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26
note: Conditional commencement of Australian Federal Police and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2004
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.246
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-26-norm

22 June 2004
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-8
note: Conditional commencement of certain provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.246
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-8-norm

6 July 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-7
note: Conditional commencement of Anti-terrorism Act 2004
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.246
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-7-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 June 2004
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.246
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-7-norm

1 July 2004
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-14
note: Anti-terrorism Act (No. 2) 2004
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.246
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-14-norm

16 Aug 2004
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-13
note: Conditional commencement of Anti-terrorism Act (No. 3) 2004
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.246
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-13-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-13-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-16-13-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Aug 2004
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-14
note: Legislation history for Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.246
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-14-norm

31 Aug 2004
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-10
note: Amendment of section 1, items 3-5 and 30-31
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-10-norm

3 May 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-14
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-14-norm

13 June 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-5
note: Transitionals and Consequentials Act 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-5-norm

18 Feb 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-3
note: Conditional commencement of s 4-11, sch 1 on 1 July 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-3-norm

22 Feb 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-9
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Amendment Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-9-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-9-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Temporal interval specified
conclusion text: Classification
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 July 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-8-norm

6 July 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-9
note: Amendment to Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-9-norm

6 July 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-10
note: Conditional commencement of statute law revision act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-10-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-10-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-10-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between statute law revision act and commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement specified
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 July 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-11-norm

6 July 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-12
note: Legislation Amendment Act 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-12-norm

4 Nov 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-8
note: Legislation history for Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.247
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-8-norm

8 Nov 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-3
note: Legislation Amendment (Video Link Evidence and Other Measures) Act 136, 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-8-3-norm

15 Nov 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15-3-norm

16 Nov 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-15
note: Reference to Anti-Terrorism Act (No. 2) 2005
references: Anti-Terrorism Act (No. 2) 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-15-norm

14 Dec 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-4
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-14-4-norm

23 Mar 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-8-norm

23 Mar 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-9
note: ASIO Legislation Amendment Act 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-9-norm

19 June 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-7-norm

20 June 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-2
note: Law Enforcement (AFP Professional Standards and Related Measures) Act 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-2-norm

30 June 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-8-norm

30 Dec 2006 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-9
note: Consequential Amendments Act 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-9-norm

30 June 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-10
note: Schedule 1 (items 11-31)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-10-norm

30 Dec 2006 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-11
note: Prohibition on forensic procedures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-11-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-30-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits forensic procedures
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Nov 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-9-norm

5 Nov 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-10
note: Legislation history for Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.248
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-10-norm

7 Dec 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-5-norm

7 Dec 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-6
note: Transitional provisions and consequential amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-6-norm

12 Dec 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-4-norm

13 Dec 2006 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-6
note: Decriminalization of certain offenses
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-6-norm

12 Dec 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-5-norm

13 Dec 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-7
note: Prohibition on marking plastic explosives
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-13-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits marking of plastic explosives
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Feb 2007
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-8-norm

25 Aug 2007
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-7
note: Employer sanctions for non-compliance with migration laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-25-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on employers to comply with migration laws.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Feb 2007
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-9
note: Transitionals and Consequentials Act 2007
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-9-norm

15 Mar 2007
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-4
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Matters) Act 2008
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15-4-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15-4-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditionally commenced on 1 July 2007
conclusion text: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 July 2008
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-15
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2008
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-15-norm

3 July 2008
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-15
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-15-norm

4 July 2008
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-10
note: Same-Sex Relationships
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-10-norm

9 Dec 2008
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-2-norm

10 Dec 2008
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-5
note: Legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.249
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-5-norm

22 May 2009
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-10-norm

23 May 2009
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-10
note: Fair Work (State Referral and Consequential and Other Amendments) Act 2009
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-10-norm

25 June 2009
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-8
note: Conditional commencement of Federal Court of Australia Amendment (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 2009
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-8-norm

6 Nov 2009
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-13
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-13-norm

4 Dec 2009
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-11
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-11-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-11-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-11-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Feb 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-10
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-10-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-10-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-19-10-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Feb 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-11
note: References specific schedules and items
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-11-norm

20 Feb 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-3
note: Conditional commencement of Statute Law Revision Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-3-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-20-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Mar 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-16
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-16-norm

1 Mar 2010 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-17
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Amendment (Working With Children—Criminal History) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-17-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-17-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-1-17-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Mar 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-9-norm

26 Mar 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-2
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Offences Against Children) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-26-2-norm

14 Apr 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-14-5-norm

15 Apr 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-5
note: Sch 1 (items 64,71), sch 2 (item 9)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.250
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15-5-norm

31 May 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-11
note: Repealed by Health Insurance Amendment (General Practitioners and Quality Assurance) Act 2020
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-11-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-11-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-31-11-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between 'commencing' and 'repealed'
premise text: Temporal intervals identified
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 June 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-16
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-16-norm

16 June 2021 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-17
note: Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-17-norm

31 May 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-12
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Amendment (Royal Flying Doctor Service) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-12-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-12-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-31-12-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 July 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-14
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-14-norm

6 July 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-15
note: Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2) 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-15-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-15-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-15-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: No temporal interval specified
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 July 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-8-norm

1 Jan 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-18
note: National Security Legislation Amendment Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-18-norm

24 Nov 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-5
note: List of items and sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-5-norm

2 Mar 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-5
note: Law and Justice Legislation Amendment (Identity Crimes and Other Measures) Act 3, 2011
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-2-5-norm

2 Mar 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-6
note: Compilation date and related information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.251
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-2-6-norm

22 Mar 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-11
note: Acts Interpretation Amendment Act 2011
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-11-norm

27 June 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-7
note: References schedules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-7-norm

27 Dec 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-8
note: Amendment of Crimes Legislation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-8-norm

5 Dec 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-11-norm

1 Jan 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-19
note: Extradition and Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation Amendment Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-19-norm

20 Mar 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-4
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Powers and Offences) Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-4-norm

4 Apr 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-12
note: Schedule of items for Telecommunications Interception and Other Legislation Amendment (State Bodies) Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-12-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-12-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-12-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Identifies the temporal intervals for the commencement of the Act
premise text: The heading indicates an April date
conclusion text: April 2012
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 June 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-9
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-9-norm

29 June 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-11
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-11-norm

22 Sept 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-12
note: Legislation history for Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.252
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-12-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-12-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-22-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Identifies the legislation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Nov 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-9
note: Schedule 2 (items 8, 10(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-9-norm

29 Nov 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-12-norm

28 Dec 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-10
note: Amendment of integrity legislation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-10-norm

12 Dec 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-6
note: Privacy Amendment (Enhancing Privacy Protection) Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-6-norm

12 Dec 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-7
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People Trafficking) Act 2013
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-7-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-12-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified
conclusion text: Temporal interval required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Mar 2013
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-7
note: Consequential amendments to the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 2013
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-7-norm

14 Mar 2013
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-14-6-norm

12 Apr 2013 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-8
note: Legislation history for Crimes Legislation Amendment (Law Enforcement Integrity, Vulnerable Witness Protection and Other Measures) Act 2013
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.253
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-8-norm

28 June 2013
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-11
note: Amendment of Crimes Legislation Amendment (International Crime Cooperation and Other Measures) Act 2018
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-11-norm

22 May 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-13
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-13-norm

23 May 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-11
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2013
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-11-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPartOf
logic summary: Classification of legislation
premise text: Legislation is classified by part and section
conclusion text: This classification applies to this excerpt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 June 2013
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-13
note: References schedules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-13-norm

29 June 2013
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-14
note: Statute Law Revision Act (No. 1) 2014
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-14-norm

27 May 2014
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-10
note: References schedules 1 and 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-10-norm

24 June 2014
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-6
note: National Security Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2014
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-6-norm

2 Oct 2014
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-7
note: Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Foreign Fighters) Act 2014
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-2-7-norm

3 Nov 2014
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-16
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-16-norm

1 Dec 2014 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-20
note: Revision of Statute Law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-20-norm

25 Feb 2015
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-10
note: Sch 1 (item 10): 25
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.254
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-25-10-norm

20 May 2015
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-5
note: Amendment of schedule and item numbers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-5-norm

30 Oct 2017
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-12
note: Conditional commencement of legislation amendment act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-12-norm

26 May 2015
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-3
note: References schedules 1 and 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-26-3-norm

18 June 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-4
note: June 2015 (s 2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-18-4-norm

27 May 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-11
note: Conditional commencement of section 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-11-norm

1 July 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-21
note: Amendment of Territories Legislation by Territories Legislation Amendment Act 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-21-norm

23 Mar 2016
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-12
note: Conditional commencement of Tribunals Amalgamation Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-12-norm

26 May 2015
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-4
note: Reference to schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-26-4-norm

1 July 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-22
note: July 2015 (s 2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-22-norm

26 June 2015
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-5
note: Passports Legislation Amendment (Integrity) Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-26-5-norm

10 Sept 2015
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-6
note: Endnotes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.255
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-6-norm

26 Nov 2015
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-6
note: List of schedules and commencement date
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.256
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-26-6-norm

11 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-4
note: Amendment to Australian Crime Commission Act 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.256
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-4-norm

5 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-12
note: Conditional commencement of statute law revision act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.256
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-5-12-norm

20 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-6
note: Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.256
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-6-norm

29 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-15
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.256
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-15-norm

30 Nov 2016
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-13
note: Reference to Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.256
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-13-norm

30 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-14
note: Conditional commencement of Criminal Code Amendment (High Risk Terrorist Offenders) Act 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-14-norm

7 Dec 2016
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-8-norm

7 June 2017 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-9
note: Prohibition on certain crimes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-9-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-7-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain crimes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-19-12-norm

1 July 2017 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-23
note: July 2017 (s 2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-23-norm

22 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-14
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-14-norm

23 June 2017 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-13
note: Statute Update (Winter 2017) Act 2017
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-13-norm

23 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-14
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-14-norm

20 Sept 2017 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-7
note: Establishment of the Australian Signals Directorate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-7-norm

11 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-5
note: Conditional commencement of Home Affairs and Integrity Agencies Legislation Amendment Act 2018
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-11-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Conditional Commencement
logic summary: Conditional commencement of the Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-3
note: Never commenced
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.257
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-3-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-9-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Never commenced
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-15
note: May be cited as C2018A00034
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-15-norm

22 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-16
note: Conditional commencement of certain provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-16-norm

23 May 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-15
note: National Security Legislation Amendment (Espionage and Foreign Interference) Act 2018
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-15-norm

29 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-16
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-29-16-norm

30 June 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-15
note: Prohibition on certain activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-15-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-30-15-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-30-15-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 30 June 2018 (s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-30-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain activities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-7
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Powers, Offences and Other Measures) Act 2018
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-7-norm

24 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-8
note: Conditional commencement of amendments to Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Act 2018
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-8-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-8-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-24-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for commencement of amendments
premise text: 25 Aug 2018 (s 2(1) item 1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Dec 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-4
note: Legislation history for Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.258
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-8-4-norm

10 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-7
note: Requires amendment of legislation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.259
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-10-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Expresses a requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-8
note: Amendment machinery for Crimes Legislation Amendment (Police Powers at Airports) Act 2019
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.259
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-8-norm

crimes-act-1914-sec-20-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Sept
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

28 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-12
note: Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (2019 Measures No. 1) Act 2019
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.259
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-28-12-norm

11 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-6
note: Amendment of Crimes Legislation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.259
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-6-norm

22 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-17
note: Class specification for certain schedules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.259
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-17-norm

23 June 2020 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-16
note: List of items for June 2020 (s 2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.259
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-16-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-16-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-23-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
logic summary: List of items
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-6
note: Conditional commencement of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Act 2020
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.260
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15-6-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-15-6-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-15-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-7
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment (Economic Disruption) Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.260
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17-7-norm

16 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-18
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.260
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-16-18-norm

1 Mar 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-24
note: Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.260
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-24-norm

23 July
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-17
note: Sunsetting Review and Other Measures Act 2021 (C2021A00088)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.260
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-23-17-norm

2 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-8
note: Legislation history for Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.260
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-2-8-norm

3 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-17
note: Reference to schedules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-3-17-norm

4 Sept 2021 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-13
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Amendment (Remissions of Sentences) Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-13-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-13-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-13-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Dec 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-8-5-norm

9 Dec 2021 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-4
note: Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (High Risk Terrorist Offenders) Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-4-norm

8 Dec 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-6
note: National Security Legislation Amendment (Comprehensive Review and Other Measures No. 1) Act 2022
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-8-6-norm

1 Apr 2022
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-25
note: Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (AFP Powers and Other Matters) Act 2022
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-25-norm

9 Nov 2022
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-5
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Amendment (Penalty Unit) Act 2022
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-5-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-5-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-5-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-9-5-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-9-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified as November 10, 2022 (s 2(1) item 1)
conclusion text: Temporal interval required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-9-5-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified as November 10, 2022 (s 2(1) item 1)
conclusion text: Ordered trace required
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-9-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking
premise text: No explicit duty, ban conduct, grant permission, or create a right
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-9-norm

1 Jan 2023 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-26
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-26-norm

12 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-10
note: References schedules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-12-10-norm

1 July 2023 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-27
note: July 2023 (s 2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.261
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-1-27-norm

11 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-7
note: Amendment to Aboriginal Land Grant (Jervis Bay Territory) Act 2023
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.262
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-7-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-7-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-11-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between amendment and previous provision
premise text: Temporal interval required for conditional commencement
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-4
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus) Act 2023
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.262
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21-4-norm

13 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-9
note: Conditional commencement of Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Modernisation) Act 2023
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.262
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-9-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-9-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-9-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-13-9-logic-deontic-3

crimes-act-1914-sec-13-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: 14 Sept 2023 (s 2(1) items 4, 8)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-13-9-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
premise text: 14 Sept 2023 (s 2(1) items 4, 8)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-act-1914-sec-13-9-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking
premise text: No clear duty, ban conduct, grant permission, or create a right
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-9
note: Counter-Terrorism and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2023
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.262
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-9-norm

24 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-9
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 2) Act 2023
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.262
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-9-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-9-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-24-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.262
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-27-12-norm

7 Dec 2023
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-10
note: Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Prohibited Hate Symbols and Other Measures) Act 2023
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.263
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-10-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-10-logic-deontic-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-7-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits hate symbols
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-8
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions No. 2 Act 2024
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.263
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-8-norm

31 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-13
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Act 2024
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.263
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-31-13-norm

24 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.263
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-10-norm

24 Nov 2024 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-11
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.263
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-24-11-norm

10 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-8
note: Conditional commencement of the Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) Act 2024
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.263
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-8-norm

10 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.263
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-9-norm

11 Dec 2024 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-9
note: Legislation history for Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.263
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-11-9-norm

10 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-10
note: Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Act 2025
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.264
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-10-10-norm

7 Feb 2025
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-11
note: Conditional commencement of Administrative Review Tribunal (Miscellaneous Measures) Act 2025
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.264
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-7-11-norm

20 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-10
note: Conditional commencement of Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2025
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.264
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-20-10-norm

4 Nov 2025
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-14
note: Conditional commencement of Criminal Code Amendment (State Sponsors of Terrorism) Act 2025
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.264
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-14-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-14-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-4-14-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Nov 2025
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-16
note: Conditional commencement of strengthening oversight of the National Intelligence Community Act 2025
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.264
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-16-norm
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-6-16-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-act-1914-sec-6-16-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for commencement
premise text: Commencement defined by section
conclusion text: Temporal interval defined
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Dec 2025
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-15
note: Schedule of items for commencement on June 4, 2026
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.264
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-4-15-norm

21 Jan
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.264
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21-5-norm

22 Jan 2026 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-18
note: Conditional commencement of section 2(1) item 4 on 18 Feb 2026
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.264
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-22-18-norm

21 Jan
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-6
note: Consequential and transitional provisions for the Commonwealth Parole Board Act 2026
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.265
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-21-6-norm

8 Apr 2026
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-7
note: Awaiting commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.265
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-8-7-norm

17 Mar 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-8
note: Amendment history for Crimes Act 1914
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-act-1914.pdf, p.265
asserts: crimes-act-1914-sec-17-8-norm