1 Short title
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.17
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

1 January 2011, but before the designated
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.203
note: Person in control of network must exercise control.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-1-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-1-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 January 2011, but before the designated

1 January 2011, but before the designated commencement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.283
note: Network taken to have come into existence on or after 1 January 2011, but before the designated commencement date.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-3
schema version: 2

10 Extension to external Territories
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 10(1) Extension to external Territories
has part: 10(2) Extension to external Territories
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10
schema version: 2

10(1) Extension to external Territories
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
note: Extends to external Territories
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Extension to external Territories

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extension of jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: extends

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-10-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10(1) Extension to external Territories

10(2) Extension to external Territories
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
note: The operation of this Act in relation to Norfolk Island is not affected by the amendments made by Division 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 5 to the Territories Legislation Amendment Act 2016.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Extension to external Territories

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The operation of this Act is unaffected.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The operation of this Act is not affected by the amendments.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: This Act operates in relation to Norfolk Island.

100 Exemptions from service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
curation status: Proposed
has part: 100(1) Exemptions from service provider rules
has part: 100(2) Exemptions from service provider rules
has part: 100(3) Exemptions from service provider rules
has part: 100(4) Exemptions from service provider rules
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100
schema version: 2

100(1) Exemptions from service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
note: The Minister may determine exemptions from service provider rules.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-100-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 100 Exemptions from service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-100-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100(1) Exemptions from service provider rules

100(2) Exemptions from service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
note: Exemptions from service provider rules
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-100-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 100 Exemptions from service provider rules

100(3) Exemptions from service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
note: Determination may be unconditional or subject to conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-100-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 100 Exemptions from service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: May

100(4) Exemptions from service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
note: Determination under this section has effect accordingly.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-100-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 100 Exemptions from service provider rules

101 Service providers must comply with service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
curation status: Proposed
has part: 101(1) Service providers must comply with service provider rules
has part: 101(2) Service providers must comply with service provider rules
has part: 101(3) Service providers must comply with service provider rules
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-101
schema version: 2

101(1) Service providers must comply with service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
note: Service providers must comply with service provider rules.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-101-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 101 Service providers must comply with service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 101(1) Service providers must comply with service provider rules

101(2) Service providers must comply with service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
note: Prohibits aiding, abetting, counseling, or procuring a contravention of subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-101-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 101 Service providers must comply with service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits an action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person must not:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 101(2) Service providers must comply with service provider rules

101(3) Service providers must comply with service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
note: Service providers must comply with service provider rules
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-101-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 101 Service providers must comply with service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 101(3) Service providers must comply with service provider rules

102 Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.133
curation status: Proposed
has part: 102(1) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
has part: 102(2) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
has part: 102(3) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
has part: 102(4) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-102
schema version: 2

102(1) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.133
note: Service provider must comply with rules if contravening them.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-102-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 102 Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Service provider has a duty to comply with rules.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 102(1) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules

102(2) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.133
note: Written direction requiring provider to take specified action.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-102-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 102 Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: require

102(3) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.133
note: Service provider must implement administrative systems and employee training.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-102-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 102 Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to implement systems
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 102(3) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules

102(4) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.133
note: Service provider must not contravene a direction under subsection (2).
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-102-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 102 Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening a direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (4) A service provider must not contravene a direction under subsection (2).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 102(4) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules

103 Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.135
curation status: Proposed
has part: 103(1) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
has part: 103(1A) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
has part: 103(2) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
has part: 103(3) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
has part: 103(3A) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-103
schema version: 2

103(1) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.135
note: ACMA may issue a formal warning for breaching service provider rules.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-103-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 103 Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA has an obligation to issue formal warnings for breaching service provider rules.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 103(1) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules

103(1A) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.135
note: Exempts certain sections from breach of service provider rules
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-103-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 103 Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 103(1A) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules

103(2) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.135
note: Exempts a rule from subsection (1) in relation to section 369.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-103-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 103 Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 103(2) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules

103(3) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.135
note: Exempts a carriage service provider from certain obligations under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-103-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 103 Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The exemption applies to a specific temporal interval (the effective date of the rule set out in subsection 152BA(2)).
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
premise text: Subsection 152BA(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 provides that a carriage service provider must comply with any standard access obligations that are applicable to the provider.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The exemption is represented as a knowledge representation within the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
modality: CogAI
operator: KnowledgeRepresentation
premise text: Subsection 152BA(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 provides that a carriage service provider must comply with any standard access obligations that are applicable to the provider.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rule set out in subsection 152BA(2) does not apply to this provision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Provides an exemption from certain obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Subsection 152BA(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The exemption is intended to diffuse knowledge of the specific rule set out in subsection 152BA(2) among carriage service providers.
modality: Diffusion
operator: InformationSpread
premise text: Subsection 152BA(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 provides that a carriage service provider must comply with any standard access obligations that are applicable to the provider.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The exemption is recurring and applies to all carriage service providers within the specified temporal interval.
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalRecurringTrace
premise text: Subsection 152BA(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 provides that a carriage service provider must comply with any standard access obligations that are applicable to the provider.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 103(3) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules

103(3A) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.135
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for certain rule set
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-103-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 103 Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules

104 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.138
note: Monitor and report on matters relating to carrier performance.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-104-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-104-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-104
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-104-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to monitor and report.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

105 Monitoring of performance—annual report
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.138
curation status: Proposed
has part: 105(5A) Monitoring of performance—annual report
has part: 105(5B) Monitoring of performance—annual report
has part: 105(6) Monitoring of performance—annual report
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105
schema version: 2

105(5A) Monitoring of performance—annual report
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.138
note: Annual report on monitoring of performance and compliance costs
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-5a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105-ss-5a
schema version: 2
part of: 105 Monitoring of performance—annual report

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

105(5B) Monitoring of performance—annual report
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.138
note: Exempts Part 14 from certain amendments.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-5b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-5b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105-ss-5b
schema version: 2
part of: 105 Monitoring of performance—annual report

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-5b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specifies the type of obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-5b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 105(5B) Monitoring of performance—annual report

105(6) Monitoring of performance—annual report
type: Concept
description: Annual report
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.138
note: Publish annual report on website within 6 months after financial year end.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 105 Monitoring of performance—annual report

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish annual report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

105A Monitoring of performance—additional report
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
curation status: Proposed
has part: 105A(1) Monitoring of performance—additional report
has part: 105A(2) Monitoring of performance—additional report
has part: 105A(3) Monitoring of performance—additional report
has part: 105A(4) Monitoring of performance—additional report
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105a
schema version: 2

105A(1) Monitoring of performance—additional report
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
note: The ACMA must monitor and report on specified matters.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 105A Monitoring of performance—additional report

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to monitor and report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 105A(1) Monitoring of performance—additional report

105A(2) Monitoring of performance—additional report
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
note: Report must be given to Minister within specified time or period
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 105A Monitoring of performance—additional report

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

105A(3) Monitoring of performance—additional report
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
note: Report must be in a specified form.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 105A Monitoring of performance—additional report

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report in specified form.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 105A(3) Monitoring of performance—additional report

105A(4) Monitoring of performance—additional report
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
note: Comply with any requirement regarding report publication
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 105A Monitoring of performance—additional report

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

105C Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
curation status: Proposed
has part: 105C(1) Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
has part: 105C(2) Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
has part: 105C(3) Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105c
schema version: 2

105C(1) Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
type: Concept
description: Reports to the Minister
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
note: The ACCC must monitor and report breaches by a designated Telstra successor company.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 105C Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to monitor and report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 105C(1) Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor

105C(2) Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
note: Must provide report to Minister after end of financial year
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 105C Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation to end of financial year
modality: AllenInterval
operator: AT THE END OF

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

105C(3) Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
note: Minister must table a report in each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 105C Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must perform the action.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 105C(3) Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor

106 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.140
note: Industry codes may be registered by ACMA.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-106-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106
schema version: 2

107 Industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.141
note: Definition of industry code
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-107-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107
schema version: 2

108 Industry standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.141
note: Definition of industry standard
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-108
schema version: 2

108A Electronic messaging service provider
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.141
curation status: Proposed
has part: 108A(1) Electronic messaging service provider
has part: 108A(2) Electronic messaging service provider
has part: 108A(3) Electronic messaging service provider
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-108a
schema version: 2

108A(1) Electronic messaging service provider
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.141
note: Definition of electronic messaging service provider
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-108a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 108A Electronic messaging service provider

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is an electronic messaging service provider.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of a term
modality: Deontic
operator: is

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 108A(1) Electronic messaging service provider

108A(2) Electronic messaging service provider
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.141
note: Service must be supplied to public if at least one end-user is outside the supplier's circle.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-108a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 108A Electronic messaging service provider

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Supplier must supply service within a certain temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for service provision
modality: AllenInterval
operator: outside
premise text: Service is supplied to public if at least one end-user is outside the supplier's circle.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Supplier must use artificial intelligence to supply service to public.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence for service provision
modality: CogAI
operator: if
premise text: Service is supplied to public if at least one end-user is outside the supplier's circle.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Supplier has an obligation to supply service to public.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: Service is supplied to public if at least one end-user is outside the supplier's circle.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Supplier must supply service to all end-users within a certain temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of service provision
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: Service is supplied to public if at least one end-user is outside the supplier's circle.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Supplier must supply service within a certain temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal logic for service provision
modality: LTL
operator: and
premise text: Service is supplied to public if at least one end-user is outside the supplier's circle.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 108A(2) Electronic messaging service provider

108A(3) Electronic messaging service provider
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.141
note: Definition of electronic messaging service provider
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-108a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 108A Electronic messaging service provider

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 108A(3) Electronic messaging service provider

108B Telecommunications industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.142
note: Defines telecommunications industry for purposes of this Part.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108b-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108b-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-108b
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telecommunications industry definition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to define industry
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: This Part

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108b-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telecommunications industry
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy application
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: Industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 108B Telecommunications industry

109 Telecommunications activity
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.142
note: Defines telecommunications activity for regulatory purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-109
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 109 Telecommunications activity

109B Telemarketing activity
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.142
curation status: Proposed
has part: 109B(1) Telemarketing activity
has part: 109B(2) Telemarketing activity
has part: 109B(3) Telemarketing activity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-109b
schema version: 2

109B(1) Telemarketing activity
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.142
note: Definition of telemarketing activity
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-109b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 109B Telemarketing activity

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telemarketing activity is defined as an activity to which subsection (2), (3) or (4) applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: =

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 109B(1) Telemarketing activity

109B(2) Telemarketing activity
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.142
note: Telemarketing activities that do not meet the specified criteria are prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-109b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 109B Telemarketing activity

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of telemarketing activities
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) This subsection applies to an activity that...

109B(3) Telemarketing activity
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.142
note: Telemarketing activity is prohibited if it involves marketing, advertising, or promoting goods or services without the supplier's consent.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-109b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 109B Telemarketing activity

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The activity is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of telemarketing activity
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Telemarketing calls are used to market, advertise, or promote goods or services.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The activity is prohibited if it involves marketing, advertising, or promoting goods or services.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of telemarketing activity with descriptive clause
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Telemarketing calls are used to market, advertise, or promote goods or services.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The activity is prohibited if it involves marketing, advertising, or promoting land or interests in land.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of telemarketing activity with relation to land or interests in land
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Telemarketing calls are used to market, advertise, or promote land or interests in land.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The activity is prohibited if it involves advertising or promoting a supplier or prospective supplier of goods or services.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of telemarketing activity with relation to supplier or prospective supplier
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Telemarketing calls are used to advertise or promote a supplier or prospective supplier of goods or services.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The activity is prohibited within the specified time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Prohibition of telemarketing activity with temporal interval
modality: LTL
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Telemarketing calls are used to market, advertise, or promote goods or services.

109C Fax marketing activity
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.144
curation status: Proposed
has part: 109C(1) Fax marketing activity
has part: 109C(2) Fax marketing activity
has part: 109C(3) Fax marketing activity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-109c
schema version: 2

109C(1) Fax marketing activity
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.144
note: Definition of fax marketing activity
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109c-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-109c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 109C Fax marketing activity

109C(2) Fax marketing activity
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.144
note: Prohibits certain marketing activities using fax marketing.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-109c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 109C Fax marketing activity

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the specified activities.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

109C(3) Fax marketing activity
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.144
note: Prohibition on fax marketing activity
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109c-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-109c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 109C Fax marketing activity

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits fax marketing activity
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

11 Extension to offshore areas
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11(1) Extension to offshore areas
has part: 11(2) Extension to offshore areas
has part: 11(3) Extension to offshore areas
has part: 11(4) Extension to offshore areas
has part: 11(5) Extension to offshore areas
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11
schema version: 2

11(1) Extension to offshore areas
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
note: This Act applies in relation to the offshore areas of each of the States and eligible Territories.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Extension to offshore areas

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Act applies to offshore areas
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

11(2) Extension to offshore areas
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
note: Application of the Act in offshore areas is limited to specific activities.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Extension to offshore areas

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limited application
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
premise text: (2) The application of this Act...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(2) Extension to offshore areas

11(3) Extension to offshore areas
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
note: Application of Act in offshore areas extends to acts done by persons related to exploration or exploitation of continental shelf resources.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Extension to offshore areas

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to all acts done by or in relation to, and all matters...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation to offshore activities
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) The application of this Act in accordance with subsection (1)...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to all acts done by or in relation to, and all matters...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI logic for offshore activities
modality: CogAI
operator: related to
premise text: (3) The application of this Act in accordance with subsection (1)...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to all acts done by or in relation to...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extension obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
premise text: (3) The application of this Act...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to all acts done by or in relation to, and all matters...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion logic for offshore activities
modality: Diffusion
operator: related to
premise text: (3) The application of this Act in accordance with subsection (1)...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to all acts done by or in relation to, and all matters...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation to offshore activities
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (3) The application of this Act in accordance with subsection (1)...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(3) Extension to offshore areas

11(4) Extension to offshore areas
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
note: No implication that subsection (3) limits subsection (2).
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Extension to offshore areas

11(5) Extension to offshore areas
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
note: Definition of offshore area
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Extension to offshore areas

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: relates to offshore area
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: in this section

110 Sections of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.146
curation status: Proposed
has part: 110(1) Sections of the telecommunications industry
has part: 110(2) Sections of the telecommunications industry
has part: 110(3) Sections of the telecommunications industry
has part: 110(4) Sections of the telecommunications industry
has part: 110(5) Sections of the telecommunications industry
has part: 110(6) Sections of the telecommunications industry
has part: 110(7) Sections of the telecommunications industry
has part: 110(8) Sections of the telecommunications industry
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110
schema version: 2

110(1) Sections of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.146
note: Definition of telecommunications industry sections
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Sections of the telecommunications industry

110(2) Sections of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.146
note: Defines sections of the telecommunications industry
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Sections of the telecommunications industry

110(3) Sections of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.146
note: ACMA may determine telecommunications activity sections
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Sections of the telecommunications industry

110(4) Sections of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.146
note: Unique name and/or number must be assigned to a section
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Sections of the telecommunications industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide unique name and/or number
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110(4) Sections of the telecommunications industry

110(5) Sections of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.146
note: A determination under subsection (3) has effect accordingly.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Sections of the telecommunications industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
premise text: (5) A determination under subsection (3) has effect accordingly.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110(5) Sections of the telecommunications industry

110(6) Sections of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.146
note: Telecommunications industry sections can be aggregated or subsetted.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Sections of the telecommunications industry

110(7) Sections of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.146
note: Does not limit subsection (3) by implication.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Sections of the telecommunications industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (6)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !
premise text: (7)

110(8) Sections of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.146
note: Publish determination in Gazette
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Sections of the telecommunications industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Determination must be published in Gazette
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: State obligation to publish

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110(8) Sections of the telecommunications industry

110B Sections of the telemarketing industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
curation status: Proposed
has part: 110B(1) Sections of the telemarketing industry
has part: 110B(2) Sections of the telemarketing industry
has part: 110B(3) Sections of the telemarketing industry
has part: 110B(4) Sections of the telemarketing industry
has part: 110B(5) Sections of the telemarketing industry
has part: 110B(6) Sections of the telemarketing industry
has part: 110B(7) Sections of the telemarketing industry
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110b
schema version: 2

110B(1) Sections of the telemarketing industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
note: Definition of sections in the telemarketing industry
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 110B Sections of the telemarketing industry

110B(2) Sections of the telemarketing industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
note: All persons carrying on telemarketing activities constitute a single section of the telemarketing industry.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 110B Sections of the telemarketing industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of a single section
modality: Deontic
operator: =

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110B(2) Sections of the telemarketing industry

110B(3) Sections of the telemarketing industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
note: Determine specified telemarketing activities as a section of the industry
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 110B Sections of the telemarketing industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determine specified telemarketing activities as a section of the industry
modality: Deontic
operator: may

110B(4) Sections of the telemarketing industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
note: Unique name and/or number must be identified in the determination.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 110B Sections of the telemarketing industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must identify unique name and/or number.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110B(4) Sections of the telemarketing industry

110B(5) Sections of the telemarketing industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
note: A determination under subsection (3) has effect accordingly.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 110B Sections of the telemarketing industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has effect accordingly.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between a determination and its effect
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (5) A determination under subsection (3)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has effect accordingly.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implication of a determination
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
premise text: (5) A determination under subsection (3)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110B(5) Sections of the telemarketing industry

110B(6) Sections of the telemarketing industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
note: Sections of the telemarketing industry need not be mutually exclusive.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110b-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 110B Sections of the telemarketing industry

110B(7) Sections of the telemarketing industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
note: No implication that subsection (3) is limited by subsection (6).
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110b-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 110B Sections of the telemarketing industry

110C Sections of the fax marketing industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
curation status: Proposed
has part: 110C(1) Sections of the fax marketing industry
has part: 110C(2) Sections of the fax marketing industry
has part: 110C(3) Sections of the fax marketing industry
has part: 110C(4) Sections of the fax marketing industry
has part: 110C(5) Sections of the fax marketing industry
has part: 110C(6) Sections of the fax marketing industry
has part: 110C(7) Sections of the fax marketing industry
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110c
schema version: 2

110C(1) Sections of the fax marketing industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
note: Definition of sections in the fax marketing industry
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 110C Sections of the fax marketing industry

110C(2) Sections of the fax marketing industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
note: All persons carrying on fax marketing activities must be considered part of the single section for the purposes of this Part.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 110C Sections of the fax marketing industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is no specified temporal relation between the classification of fax marketing activities and other sections.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between sections
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: The text does not specify a temporal relation between the classification of fax marketing activities and other sections.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is no specified cognitive AI application for the classification of fax marketing activities.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: No cognitive AI application
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: The text does not specify a cognitive AI application for the classification of fax marketing activities.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to classify fax marketing activities correctly.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The text classifies fax marketing activities as part of the single section.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is no specified diffusion of responsibility for the classification of fax marketing activities.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: No diffusion of responsibility
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: The text does not specify a diffusion of responsibility for the classification of fax marketing activities.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is no specified recurring trace for the classification of fax marketing activities.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for classification
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: The text does not specify a recurring trace for the classification of fax marketing activities.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110C(2) Sections of the fax marketing industry

110C(3) Sections of the fax marketing industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
note: Determine specified fax marketing activities as a section of the industry
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 110C Sections of the fax marketing industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to determine
modality: Deontic
operator: may

110C(4) Sections of the fax marketing industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
note: Unique name and/or number must be assigned to a section
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 110C Sections of the fax marketing industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide unique name and/or number
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110C(4) Sections of the fax marketing industry

110C(5) Sections of the fax marketing industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
note: A determination under subsection (3) has effect accordingly.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110c-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 110C Sections of the fax marketing industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The obligation holds.
modality: Deontic
operator: Holds
premise text: (5) A determination under subsection (3) has effect accordingly.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110C(5) Sections of the fax marketing industry

110C(6) Sections of the fax marketing industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
note: Definitions of fax marketing industry sections are not mutually exclusive.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110c-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 110C Sections of the fax marketing industry

110C(7) Sections of the fax marketing industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
note: Does not limit subsection (3) by implication.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110c-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 110C Sections of the fax marketing industry

111 Participants in a section of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.149
note: A person is a participant in a section of the telecommunications industry if they are a member of that group.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-111
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person A is a participant in section Y.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Membership is a necessary condition for participation.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Person A is a member of group X.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 111 Participants in a section of the telecommunications industry

111AA Participants in a section of the telemarketing industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.149
note: A person is a participant in a section of the telemarketing industry if they are a member of that group.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111aa-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111aa-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111aa-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-111aa
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111aa-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person participates in the section during that time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between membership and participation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Person is a member of the group at some point

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person is a participant in the section
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of participant
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Person is a member of the group

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111aa-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 111AA Participants in a section of the telemarketing industry

111AB Participants in a section of the fax marketing industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
note: A person is a participant in a section of the fax marketing industry if they are a member of that group.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111ab-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111ab-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-111ab
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111ab-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person is a participant in the section
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of participant
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Person is a member of the group

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111ab-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 111AB Participants in a section of the fax marketing industry

111B Unsolicited commercial electronic messages
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
curation status: Proposed
has part: 111B(1) Unsolicited commercial electronic messages
has part: 111B(2) Unsolicited commercial electronic messages
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-111b
schema version: 2

111B(1) Unsolicited commercial electronic messages
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
note: Sending unsolicited commercial electronic messages without consent is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-111b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 111B Unsolicited commercial electronic messages

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for sending messages.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, an unsolicited commercial electronic message is a commercial electronic message that is sent:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes recognition of messages.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, an unsolicited commercial electronic message is a commercial electronic message that is sent:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits sending unsolicited commercial electronic messages.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, an unsolicited commercial electronic message is a commercial electronic message that is sent:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes spread of messages.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, an unsolicited commercial electronic message is a commercial electronic message that is sent:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal trace for sending messages.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, an unsolicited commercial electronic message is a commercial electronic message that is sent:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 111B(1) Unsolicited commercial electronic messages

111B(2) Unsolicited commercial electronic messages
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
note: Definition of expression used in this section and the Spam Act 2003
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-111b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 111B Unsolicited commercial electronic messages

112 Statement of regulatory policy
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.151
curation status: Proposed
has part: 112(1) Statement of regulatory policy
has part: 112(1B) Statement of regulatory policy
has part: 112(1C) Statement of regulatory policy
has part: 112(2) Statement of regulatory policy
has part: 112(3) Statement of regulatory policy
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-112
schema version: 2

112(1) Statement of regulatory policy
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.151
note: Parliament intends that industry bodies develop codes for the telecommunications industry.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-112-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 112 Statement of regulatory policy

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses intention to act
modality: Deontic
operator: intend

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 112(1) Statement of regulatory policy

112(1B) Statement of regulatory policy
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.151
note: Bodies or associations must develop industry codes.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-112-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 112 Statement of regulatory policy

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide industry codes.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 112(1B) Statement of regulatory policy

112(1C) Statement of regulatory policy
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.151
note: Bodies or associations must develop industry codes.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-112-ss-1c
schema version: 2
part of: 112 Statement of regulatory policy

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide industry codes.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 112(1C) Statement of regulatory policy

112(2) Statement of regulatory policy
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.151
note: ACMA must act in a manner that addresses public interest considerations without imposing undue burdens on industry participants.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-112-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 112 Statement of regulatory policy

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must act in a way that enables public interest considerations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to act in a manner that addresses public interest considerations.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA has powers under sections 117-125B.

112(3) Statement of regulatory policy
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.151
note: ACMA must consider public interest when determining burdens on telecommunications industry participants.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-112-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 112 Statement of regulatory policy

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the ACMA must have regard to...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: ACMA's consideration of public interest overlaps with the code or standard concerned.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) In determining whether public interest considerations are being addressed...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the ACMA must have regard to...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: ACMA's consideration of public interest implies a duty to consider the benefits of the code or standard.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (3) In determining whether public interest considerations are being addressed...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the ACMA must have regard to...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: ACMA's consideration of public interest is an inference from the code or standard concerned.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (3) In determining whether public interest considerations are being addressed...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the ACMA must have regard to...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA has an obligation to consider public interest.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) In determining whether public interest considerations are being addressed...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the ACMA must have regard to...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: ACMA's consideration of public interest diffuses the burden on telecommunications industry participants.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) In determining whether public interest considerations are being addressed...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 112(3) Statement of regulatory policy

113 Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.153
curation status: Proposed
has part: 113(1) Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
has part: 113(2) Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
has part: 113(3) Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-113
schema version: 2

113(1) Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.153
note: Industry codes and standards may deal with certain matters.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-113-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-113-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 113 Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes

113(2) Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.153
note: Dependence on industry section
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-113-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-113-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 113 Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-113-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 113(2) Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes

113(3) Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.153
note: Industry codes must provide customers with certain information.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-113-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-113-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-113-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 113 Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-113-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-113-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 113(3) Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes

114 Industry codes and industry standards may confer powers on
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
curation status: Proposed
has part: 114(1) Industry codes and industry standards may confer powers on
has part: 114(2) Industry codes and industry standards may confer powers on
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-114
schema version: 2

114(1) Industry codes and industry standards may confer powers on
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
note: Granting functions and powers to the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman with consent.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-114-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 114 Industry codes and industry standards may confer powers on

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The consent of the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman is a necessary condition for the industry code or standard to confer powers.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (1) If the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman consents, an industry code or industry standard may confer functions and powers on the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission to the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: (1) If the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman consents, an industry code or industry standard may confer functions and powers on the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorizes the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman to act with the consent of an industry code or standard.
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorizes
premise text: (1) If the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman consents, an industry code or industry standard may confer functions and powers on the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The consent of the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman is a necessary condition for the industry code or standard to confer powers through it.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
premise text: (1) If the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman consents, an industry code or industry standard may confer functions and powers on the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The consent of the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman is a necessary condition for the industry code or standard to confer powers until it is revoked.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (1) If the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman consents, an industry code or industry standard may confer functions and powers on the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.

114(2) Industry codes and industry standards may confer powers on
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
note: Continuity of consent not affected by changes in Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman position.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-114-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 114 Industry codes and industry standards may confer powers on

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continuity of consent
modality: Deontic
operator: continuity
premise text: None

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 114(2) Industry codes and industry standards may confer powers on

115 Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
curation status: Proposed
has part: 115(1) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
has part: 115(2) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
has part: 115(3) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
has part: 115(4) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
has part: 115(5) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-115
schema version: 2

115(1) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
note: Industry codes and industry standards do not require particular design features or performance requirements.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-115-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 115 Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts from requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: !

115(2) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
note: Exemptions from industry code or standard compliance
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-115-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 115 Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Indicates exemptions from compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: !

115(3) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
note: Exemption from industry code/standard application for certain matters
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-115-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 115 Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from industry code/standard application for certain matters
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

115(4) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
note: Exemption from industry code restrictions for certain Division 2AA of Part V of the Copyright Act 1968 codes
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-115-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 115 Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Industry code restrictions do not apply to certain exemptions
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: The rule in subsection (1) does not apply

115(5) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
note: Exemptions for optical fibre lines and facilities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-115-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 115 Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Permitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits requiring optical fibre lines or facilities
modality: Deontic
operator: !
premise text: Compliance with industry code or standard

116 Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with matters
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.158
note: Industry codes and industry standards do not deal with matters related to content services.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-116-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-116-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-116
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-116-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with matters
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

116A Industry codes and standards do not affect Privacy Act 1988
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.158
note: Industry codes and standards do not affect Privacy Act 1988
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-116a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-116a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-116a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-116a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Industry codes and standards do not affect Privacy Act 1988
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-116a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 116A Industry codes and standards do not affect Privacy Act 1988

117 Registration of industry codes
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.159
note: Body or association must develop and submit industry code to ACMA for review.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-117-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-117-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-117
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-117-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must develop and submit industry code.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The body or association represents a particular section of the industry.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-117-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 117 Registration of industry codes

118 ACMA may request codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.161
note: Request for codes from industry bodies
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-118-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-118
schema version: 2

119 Publication of notice where no body or association represents a
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
curation status: Proposed
has part: 119(1) Publication of notice where no body or association represents a
has part: 119(2) Publication of notice where no body or association represents a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-119
schema version: 2

119(1) Publication of notice where no body or association represents a
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
note: Publish notice if industry not represented by a body or association
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-119-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 119 Publication of notice where no body or association represents a

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

119(2) Publication of notice where no body or association represents a
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
note: The period specified in a notice must run for at least 60 days.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-119-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 119 Publication of notice where no body or association represents a

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The period specified in a notice meets the temporal interval of 60 days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the period and 60 days
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
premise text: (2) The period specified in a notice under subsection (1) must run for at least 60 days.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The CogAI applies to notices under subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applicability to notices under subsection (1)
modality: CogAI
operator: APPLIES_TO
premise text: (2) The period specified in a notice under subsection (1) must run for at least 60 days.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The period specified in a notice must run for at least 60 days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a specified period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The period specified in a notice under subsection (1) must run for at least 60 days.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The diffusion of the obligation applies to notices under subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applicability to notices under subsection (1)
modality: Diffusion
operator: APPLIES_TO
premise text: (2) The period specified in a notice under subsection (1) must run for at least 60 days.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The period specified in a notice meets the temporal interval of 60 days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the period and 60 days
modality: LTL
operator: MEETS
premise text: (2) The period specified in a notice under subsection (1) must run for at least 60 days.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 119(2) Publication of notice where no body or association represents a

119A Variation of industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
note: ACMA must be satisfied that certain conditions are met before giving draft variation to ACMA.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-119a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Draft variation >= Published on website and invited public to make submissions within a specified period.
confidence: 0.7000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Draft variation must be published on website and invited public to make submissions within a specified period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The body or association gave consideration to any submissions that were received from participants in that section of the industry within that period.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA MUST be satisfied that...
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must satisfy conditions before giving draft variation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The body or association gave consideration to any submissions that were received from participants in that section of the industry within that period.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA MUST comply with...
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must comply with publication requirements for submissions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The body or association gave consideration to any submissions that were received from participants in that section of the industry within that period.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA MUST be satisfied that...
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must be satisfied that draft variation provides appropriate community safeguards.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The code (as proposed to be varied) deals with the matters covered by the code (as proposed to be varied) in an appropriate manner.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA MUST be satisfied that...
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must be satisfied that draft variation deals with matters of substantial relevance to the community.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The code (as proposed to be varied) provides appropriate community safeguards for the matters covered by the code (as proposed to be varied).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 119A Variation of industry codes

119B Publication requirements for submissions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.167
curation status: Proposed
has part: 119B(1) Publication requirements for submissions
has part: 119B(2) Publication requirements for submissions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-119b
schema version: 2

119B(1) Publication requirements for submissions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.167
note: Publication requirements for submissions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119b-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-119b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 119B Publication requirements for submissions

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 119B(1) Publication requirements for submissions

119B(2) Publication requirements for submissions
type: Concept
description: Submissions
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.167
note: Must publish submissions on its website.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-119b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 119B Publication requirements for submissions

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 119B(2) Publication requirements for submissions

11A Application of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.41
note: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11A Application of the Criminal Code

12 Act subject to Radiocommunications Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.41
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12(1) Act subject to Radiocommunications Act
has part: 12(2) Act subject to Radiocommunications Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12
schema version: 2

12(1) Act subject to Radiocommunications Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.41
note: Act subject to Radiocommunications Act
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Act subject to Radiocommunications Act

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(1) Act subject to Radiocommunications Act

12(2) Act subject to Radiocommunications Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.41
note: Prohibits doing something under a licence unless prohibited by this Act.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Act subject to Radiocommunications Act

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is authorised to do something under a licence under the Radiocommunications Act 1992 does not entitle the person to do that thing if the person is prohibited by or under this Act from doing it, unless a condition of the licence requires the person to do it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval during which an action is permitted.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) However, to avoid doubt...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is authorised to do something under a licence under the Radiocommunications Act 1992 does not entitle the person to do that thing if the person is prohibited by or under this Act from doing it, unless a condition of the licence requires the person to do it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines a conditional statement.
modality: CogAI
operator: then
premise text: (2) However, to avoid doubt...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is prohibited by or under this Act from doing it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits an action.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2) However, to avoid doubt...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the fact that a person is authorised to do something under a licence under the Radiocommunications Act 1992 does not entitle the person to do that thing if the person is prohibited by or under this Act from doing it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines a conditional statement.
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: (2) However, to avoid doubt...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the fact that a person is authorised to do something under a licence under the Radiocommunications Act 1992 does not entitle the person to do that thing if the person is prohibited by or under this Act from doing it, unless a condition of the licence requires the person to do it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval until which an action is permitted.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (2) However, to avoid doubt...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(2) Act subject to Radiocommunications Act

120 Replacement of industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
note: Changes to an industry code may be achieved by replacing the code instead of varying it.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-120-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-120
schema version: 2

121 Directions about compliance with industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
curation status: Proposed
has part: 121(1) Directions about compliance with industry codes
has part: 121(1A) Directions about compliance with industry codes
has part: 121(1B) Directions about compliance with industry codes
has part: 121(2) Directions about compliance with industry codes
has part: 121(3) Directions about compliance with industry codes
has part: 121(4) Directions about compliance with industry codes
has part: 121(5) Directions about compliance with industry codes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-121
schema version: 2

121(1) Directions about compliance with industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
note: Directs a person to comply with an industry code if they have contravened or are contravening it.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-121-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 121 Directions about compliance with industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must comply with the industry code during the period when they have contravened or are contravening it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Directs compliance with an industry code during the period when the person has contravened or is contravening it.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) a person is a participant in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, the telemarketing industry or the fax marketing industry; and (b) the ACMA is satisfied that the person has contravened or is contravening an industry code;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must comply with the industry code.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Directs a person to comply with an industry code if they have contravened or are contravening it.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
premise text: (a) a person is a participant in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, the telemarketing industry or the fax marketing industry; and (b) the ACMA is satisfied that the person has contravened or is contravening an industry code;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must comply with the industry code.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directs a person to comply with an industry code.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: The ACMA is satisfied that the person has contravened or is contravening an industry code.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The ACMA may, by written notice given to the person, direct the person to comply with the industry code.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Gives permission to the ACMA to direct a person to comply with an industry code if they have contravened or are contravening it.
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: The ACMA is satisfied that the person has contravened or is contravening an industry code;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must comply with the industry code during the period when they have contravened or are contravening it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Directs compliance with an industry code during the period when the person has contravened or is contravening it.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (a) a person is a participant in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, the telemarketing industry or the fax marketing industry; and (b) the ACMA is satisfied that the person has contravened or is contravening an industry code;

121(1A) Directions about compliance with industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
note: ACMA must consult Information Commissioner before giving direction.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-121-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 121 Directions about compliance with industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

121(1B) Directions about compliance with industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
note: Person may be given a direction under subsection (1) in respect of the replacement code during the period when the replacement code is registered.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-121-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 121 Directions about compliance with industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then, during the period...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to give direction under subsection (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (a) at a time when an industry code...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1b-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 121(1B) Directions about compliance with industry codes

121(2) Directions about compliance with industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
note: Compliance with industry codes is mandatory.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-121-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 121 Directions about compliance with industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 121(2) Directions about compliance with industry codes

121(3) Directions about compliance with industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
note: Prohibition on aiding, abetting, or conspiring to contravene subsection (2)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-121-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 121 Directions about compliance with industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Direct prohibition on actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A person must not:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Indirect prohibition on actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) induce, whether by threats or promises or otherwise, a contravention of subsection (2);

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participation in prohibited actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) be in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, nor party to, a contravention of subsection (2);

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conspiracy to commit prohibited actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (d) conspire with others to effect a contravention of subsection (2);

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 121(3) Directions about compliance with industry codes

121(4) Directions about compliance with industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
note: Directions about compliance with industry codes
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-121-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 121 Directions about compliance with industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 121(4) Directions about compliance with industry codes

121(5) Directions about compliance with industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
note: A direction under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-121-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 121 Directions about compliance with industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 121(5) Directions about compliance with industry codes

122 Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.171
curation status: Proposed
has part: 122(1) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
has part: 122(2) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
has part: 122(3) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
has part: 122(4) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-122
schema version: 2

122(1) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.171
note: Applicable to participants in specific industries
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-122-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Formal warnings—breach of industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, this section applies from January 1st, 2024.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal applicability starts at section commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Section commences on January 1st, 2024.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, warning is an AI-generated entity.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Warning is an AI-generated entity
modality: CogAI
operator: is-a
premise text: Formal warning is generated by the system.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, person is subject to this section.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Participant status is a condition for applicability
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Person is a participant in the industry.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, warning is a type of formal warning.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Warning is a type of formal warning
modality: Diffusion
operator: is-a
premise text: Formal warning is a type of notice.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, this section applies until December 31st, 2026.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal applicability ends at section repeal
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: Section is repealed on December 31st, 2026.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 122(1) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes

122(2) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.171
note: ACMA may issue a formal warning for breaching industry codes.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-122-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Formal warnings—breach of industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Issuance of a formal warning is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 122(2) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes

122(3) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.171
note: Consult Information Commissioner before issuing warning for breach of industry code related to Australian Privacy Principles or APP code.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-122-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Formal warnings—breach of industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) If the ACMA is satisfied that the contravention of the industry code relates directly or indirectly to a matter dealt with by the Australian Privacy Principles or by a registered APP code (within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988), the ACMA must consult the Information Commissioner before issuing the warning.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence for consultation
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) If the ACMA is satisfied that the contravention of the industry code relates directly or indirectly to a matter dealt with by the Australian Privacy Principles or by a registered APP code (within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988), the ACMA must consult the Information Commissioner before issuing the warning.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult Information Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion for consultation
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) If the ACMA is satisfied that the contravention of the industry code relates directly or indirectly to a matter dealt with by the Australian Privacy Principles or by a registered APP code (within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988), the ACMA must consult the Information Commissioner before issuing the warning.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for consultation
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) If the ACMA is satisfied that the contravention of the industry code relates directly or indirectly to a matter dealt with by the Australian Privacy Principles or by a registered APP code (within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988), the ACMA must consult the Information Commissioner before issuing the warning.

122(4) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.171
note: Formal warnings for breach of industry codes
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-122-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Formal warnings—breach of industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 122(4) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes

122A De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.172
curation status: Proposed
has part: 122A(1) De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
has part: 122A(2) De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
has part: 122A(3) De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-122a
schema version: 2

122A(1) De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.172
note: ACMA may remove industry codes from the Register.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-122a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 122A De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes

122A(2) De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.172
note: Industry code ceases to be registered when removed from the Register.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-122a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 122A De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An industry code ceases to be registered.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ceasing obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
premise text: (2) An industry code ceases to be registered...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 122A(2) De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes

122A(3) De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.172
note: If ACMA removes a provision from the Register, this Part has effect in relation to things occurring after the removal.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-122a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 122A De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part has effect in relation to things occurring after the removal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: ACMA removes a provision from the Register

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 122A(3) De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes

123 ACMA may determine an industry standard if a request for an
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.173
curation status: Proposed
has part: 123(1) ACMA may determine an industry standard if a request for an
has part: 123(2) ACMA may determine an industry standard if a request for an
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-123
schema version: 2

123(1) ACMA may determine an industry standard if a request for an
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.173
note: ACMA must determine an industry standard if certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-123-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-123-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-123-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 123 ACMA may determine an industry standard if a request for an

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-123-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

123(2) ACMA may determine an industry standard if a request for an
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.173
note: ACMA may determine an industry standard if a request for an industry standard is made.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-123-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-123-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 123 ACMA may determine an industry standard if a request for an

124 ACMA may determine industry standard where no industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.174
curation status: Proposed
has part: 124(1) ACMA may determine industry standard where no industry
has part: 124(2) ACMA may determine industry standard where no industry
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-124
schema version: 2

124(1) ACMA may determine industry standard where no industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.174
note: ACMA may determine industry standard where no industry body or association exists.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-124-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-124-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-124-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 124 ACMA may determine industry standard where no industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-124-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA has the obligation to determine an industry standard.
modality: Deontic
operator: Determine

124(2) ACMA may determine industry standard where no industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.174
note: ACMA may determine industry standard where no industry standard exists.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-124-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-124-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-124-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 124 ACMA may determine industry standard where no industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-124-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May determine industry standard.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

125 ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
curation status: Proposed
has part: 125(1) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
has part: 125(2) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
has part: 125(3) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
has part: 125(4) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
has part: 125(6) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125
schema version: 2

125(1) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
note: ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes are deficient.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 125 ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May determine industry standards.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

125(2) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
note: The period specified in a notice must run for at least 30 days.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 125 ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a specified period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

125(3) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
note: ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 125 ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: May determine industry standard
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes authority to set standards
modality: Deontic
operator: determine
premise text: ACMA may

125(4) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
note: ACMA must consult a body or association before determining an industry standard.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 125 ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

125(6) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
note: Industry code ceases registration on industry standard commencement
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 125 ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes

125A ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.177
note: ACMA must determine industry standards for telemarketing before a certain date.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to determine standards
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.176
curation status: Proposed
has part: 125AA(1) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
has part: 125AA(2) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
has part: 125AA(3) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
has part: 125AA(4) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
has part: 125AA(5) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125aa
schema version: 2

125AA(1) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.176
note: ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

125AA(2) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.176
note: Industry standard must be known by a specific name
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide industry standard with a specific name
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

125AA(3) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.176
note: ACMA must consult a body or association before determining a standard.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125aa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

125AA(4) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.176
note: The Minister may direct ACMA to determine a standard within a specified period.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125aa-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister may direct ACMA to determine a standard.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 125AA(4) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by

125AA(5) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.176
note: ACMA must not determine a standard unless directed by subsection (4)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125aa-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless it does so in accordance with a direction under subsection (4)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for ACMA's determination process
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: The ACMA must not determine a standard...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...it does so in accordance with a direction under subsection (4)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of ACMA's determination process on standards
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: ACMA must not determine a standard unless...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...it does so in accordance with a direction under subsection (4)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of ACMA's determination process
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: ACMA must not determine a standard unless...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless directed by subsection (4)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of determining a standard without direction
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: ACMA must determine a standard

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless it does so in accordance with a direction under subsection (4)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of ACMA's determination process through standards
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: The ACMA must not determine a standard...

125B ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.178
curation status: Proposed
has part: 125B(1) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
has part: 125B(2) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
has part: 125B(3) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
has part: 125B(4) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
has part: 125B(5) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125b
schema version: 2

125B(1) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.178
note: ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to fax marketing activities.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 125B ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must determine industry standards
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

125B(2) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.178
note: Industry standard must be known by a specific name
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 125B ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide industry standard with a specific name
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

125B(3) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.178
note: ACMA must consult a body or association before determining a standard.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 125B ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

125B(4) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.178
note: Ensure standard is in force after commencement
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 125B ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to ensure standard
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

125B(5) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.178
note: Must determine industry standards relating to marketing fax
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 125B ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must determine industry standards relating to marketing fax
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: ACMA must determine industry standards relating to marketing fax

126 Industry standards not to be determined for certain privacy
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.179
note: ACMA cannot determine industry standards for certain privacy matters.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-126-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-126-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-126
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-126-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of determining industry standards
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

128 Compliance with industry standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.179
note: Industry standard registration obligation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-128-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-128-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-128
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-128-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with industry standards
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-128-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 128 Compliance with industry standards

129 Formal warnings—breach of industry standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180
curation status: Proposed
has part: 129(1) Formal warnings—breach of industry standards
has part: 129(2) Formal warnings—breach of industry standards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-129
schema version: 2

129(1) Formal warnings—breach of industry standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180
note: Participant in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, telemarketing industry or fax marketing industry must comply with formal warnings.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-129-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 129 Formal warnings—breach of industry standards

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Applicable during formal warnings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: This section applies to a person who is a participant in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, the telemarketing industry or the fax marketing industry.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must comply with formal warnings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: must
premise text: Participant in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, telemarketing industry or fax marketing industry.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must comply with formal warnings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Participant in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, telemarketing industry or fax marketing industry.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must comply with formal warnings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
premise text: Participant in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, telemarketing industry or fax marketing industry.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: During formal warnings, must comply with formal warnings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: This section applies to a person who is a participant in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, the telemarketing industry or the fax marketing industry.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 129(1) Formal warnings—breach of industry standards

129(2) Formal warnings—breach of industry standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180
note: ACMA may issue a formal warning for breaching industry standards.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-129-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 129 Formal warnings—breach of industry standards

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA may issue a formal warning.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 129(2) Formal warnings—breach of industry standards

13 Continuity of partnerships
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.42
note: Continuity of partnerships is not affected by changes in composition.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continuity obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: continuity

130 Variation of industry standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180
note: Variation of industry standards
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-130-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-130-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-130
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-130-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if it is necessary or convenient to do so
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to vary industry standards
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: ACMA may vary an industry standard

131 Revocation of industry standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
curation status: Proposed
has part: 131(1) Revocation of industry standards
has part: 131(2) Revocation of industry standards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-131
schema version: 2

131(1) Revocation of industry standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
note: ACMA may revoke industry standard
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-131-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-131-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-131-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 131 Revocation of industry standards

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-131-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to revoke
modality: Deontic
operator: may

131(2) Revocation of industry standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
note: Revocation of industry standards when a code replaces an industry standard.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-131-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-131-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-131-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 131 Revocation of industry standards

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-131-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the industry standard is revoked when the code is registered.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of industry standards when a code replaces an industry standard.
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
premise text: (2) If: (a) an industry code is registered under this Part; and (b) the code is expressed to replace an industry standard;

132 Public consultation on industry standards
type: Concept
description: Notice and draft of the industry standard or variation, written comments to ACMA.
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
note: Public consultation on industry standards before determining or varying an industry standard.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-132-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-132
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consult the public.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

133 Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.182
curation status: Proposed
has part: 133(1) Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
has part: 133(1A) Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
has part: 133(2) Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-133
schema version: 2

133(1) Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.182
note: Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry before determining or varying an industry standard.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-133-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 133 Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consult ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

133(1A) Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.182
note: Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry before determining or varying an industry standard.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-133-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 133 Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The ACMA must consult the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA must consult the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.

133(2) Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.182
note: Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman before revoking an industry standard.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-133-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 133 Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman must occur before revocation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Before revoking an industry standard under subsection 131(1)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revoking an industry standard under subsection 131(1) is implied by consultation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Consultation implies revocation
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: ACMA must consult the ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman is an artificial intelligence application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
premise text: ACMA must consult the ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to consult
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA must consult the ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman is a diffusion of information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Consultation process
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-A
premise text: ACMA must consult the ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.

134 Consultation with Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.182
curation status: Proposed
has part: 134(1) Consultation with Information Commissioner
has part: 134(2) Consultation with Information Commissioner
has part: 134(3) Consultation with Information Commissioner
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-134
schema version: 2

134(1) Consultation with Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.182
note: Consultation with Information Commissioner required for industry standards dealing with privacy matters.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-134-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 134 Consultation with Information Commissioner

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires consultation
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 134(1) Consultation with Information Commissioner

134(2) Consultation with Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.182
note: Consultation with Information Commissioner before determining or varying industry standard.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-134-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 134 Consultation with Information Commissioner

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consult Information Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

134(3) Consultation with Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.182
note: Consultation with Information Commissioner before revoking industry standard
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-134-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 134 Consultation with Information Commissioner

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must consult Information Commissioner
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA must revoke industry standard

135 Consultation with consumer body
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.183
curation status: Proposed
has part: 135(1) Consultation with consumer body
has part: 135(2) Consultation with consumer body
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-135
schema version: 2

135(1) Consultation with consumer body
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.183
note: Consultation with consumer body before determining or varying an industry standard.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-135-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 135 Consultation with consumer body

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consult consumer body
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

135(2) Consultation with consumer body
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.183
note: Consultation with consumer body before revoking industry standard
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-135-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 135 Consultation with consumer body

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

135A Consultation with the States and Territories
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.183
note: Consultation with States and Territories before determining or varying an industry standard
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-135a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consultation period is a necessary condition for industry standard determination or variation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of consultation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: ACMA must consult States and Territories within a certain time frame

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Industry standard determination or variation without consultation may lead to unintended consequences
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Consequence of consultation
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: ACMA's decision is influenced by consultation with States and Territories

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AI system's decision is influenced by consultation with States and Territories
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application of consultation requirements
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: ACMA's AI system must consult States and Territories before determining or varying an industry standard

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Industry standard determination or variation is prohibited without consultation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA must consult States and Territories

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Industry standard determination or variation without consultation may spread to other sectors
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of consultation requirements
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
premise text: Consultation with States and Territories is necessary for industry standard determination or variation in a particular sector

136 ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
curation status: Proposed
has part: 136(1) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
has part: 136(1A) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
has part: 136(2) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
has part: 136(3) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
has part: 136(4) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
has part: 136(5) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-136
schema version: 2

136(1) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
note: ACMA must maintain a Register of industry codes and standards.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-136-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 136 ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must maintain a Register.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Register of industry codes and standards.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 136(1) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry

136(1A) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
note: ACMA must not include removed industry codes in the Register.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-136-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 136 ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must not include removed industry codes.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

136(2) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
note: Register must be maintained by electronic means.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-136-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 136 ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must maintain Register electronically.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of industry codes and industries.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

136(3) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
note: Allow inspection and copying of Register
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-136-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 136 ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission to inspect and copy Register
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 136(3) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry

136(4) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
note: A person must make a copy of or take an extract from the Register if ACMA provides a printout.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-136-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 136 ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person must make a copy of or take an extract from the Register.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must make a copy or take an extract from the Register.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA provides a printout.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person is taken to have made a copy of or taken an extract from the Register if ACMA gives the person a printout.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The Register is maintained by electronic means.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
premise text: The Register is maintained by electronic means.

136(5) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
note: Provide copy in electronic form on request
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-136-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 136 ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: may

136A Application for eligibility for reimbursement of costs of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.185
curation status: Proposed
has part: 136A(1) Application for eligibility for reimbursement of costs of
has part: 136A(2) Application for eligibility for reimbursement of costs of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-136a
schema version: 2

136A(1) Application for eligibility for reimbursement of costs of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.185
note: Body or association may apply for reimbursement of costs incurred in developing industry code.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-136a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 136A Application for eligibility for reimbursement of costs of

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 136A(1) Application for eligibility for reimbursement of costs of

136A(2) Application for eligibility for reimbursement of costs of
type: Concept
description: estimate of total refundable costs, statement breaking down estimate into categories
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.185
note: Application must be in writing and accompanied by estimate of refundable costs.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-136a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 136A Application for eligibility for reimbursement of costs of

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be in writing
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 136A(2) Application for eligibility for reimbursement of costs of

136B Declaration of eligibility for reimbursement of costs of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.186
note: ACMA must make declaration if certain conditions met
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-136b
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must make declaration if certain conditions met
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

136C Reimbursement of costs of developing or varying
type: Concept
description: written statement, written claim, written declaration, and process description
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188
note: Reimbursement of costs for developing or varying consumer-related industry codes
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-136c
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: costs incurred within the temporal interval are refundable
confidence: 0.7000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for reimbursement of costs
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: section 136B declaration was in force when costs were incurred

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must reimburse costs
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reimbursement obligation for developing or varying consumer-related industry codes
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: section 136B declaration was made in relation to the development of an industry code

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: body or association must provide written statement and claim
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reimbursement obligation for body or association to provide written statement and claim
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: copy of code was accompanied by a written statement itemising costs incurred

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must verify process description
confidence: 0.7000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reimbursement obligation for ACMA to verify process description
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: copy of code was accompanied by a written declaration describing the process for development of the code

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must reimburse costs
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reimbursement obligation for ACMA to reimburse costs
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: section 136B declaration was in force when costs were incurred and each cost is refundable

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 136C Reimbursement of costs of developing or varying

136D Costs—transactions between persons not at arm’s length
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.191
note: Body or association must pay reasonable costs in transactions not at arm's length.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-136d
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay reasonable costs
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 136D Costs—transactions between persons not at arm’s length

136E Refundable cost
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.191
curation status: Proposed
has part: 136E(1) Refundable cost
has part: 136E(2) Refundable cost
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-136e
schema version: 2

136E(1) Refundable cost
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.191
note: A refundable cost incurred by a body or association in developing or varying a code is a cost incurred by the body or association in developing the code or varying the code, as the case may be.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136e-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-136e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 136E Refundable cost

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 136E(1) Refundable cost

136E(2) Refundable cost
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.191
note: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136e-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-136e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 136E Refundable cost

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 136E(2) Refundable cost

137 Protection from civil proceedings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
note: Protection from civil proceedings against internet service providers and electronic messaging service providers.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-137-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-137-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-137
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-137-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits civil proceedings against internet service providers and electronic messaging service providers.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-137-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 137 Protection from civil proceedings

138 Implied freedom of political communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
note: Exemption from Part 1 for constitutional doctrine of implied freedom of political communication.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-138-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-138
schema version: 2

139 Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
curation status: Proposed
has part: 139(1) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
has part: 139(2) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
has part: 139(3) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
has part: 139(4) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139
schema version: 2

139(1) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
note: Prohibition on entering into contracts or arrangements that require another person to carry out telemarketing activities without compliance with Part 139.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 139 Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if: (a) under the contract, arrangement or understanding, the other person undertakes to carry on one or more telemarketing activities or fax marketing activities;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision has a temporal interval that defines when the prohibition applies.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) must not enter into a contract or arrangement...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if: (a) under the contract, arrangement or understanding, the other person undertakes to carry on one or more telemarketing activities or fax marketing activities;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The provision has an argumentative structure that implies prohibition.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) must not enter into a contract or arrangement...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if: (a) under the contract, arrangement or understanding, the other person undertakes to carry on one or more telemarketing activities or fax marketing activities;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of entering into contracts or arrangements that require another person to carry out telemarketing activities without compliance with Part 139.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) must not enter into a contract or arrangement...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if: (a) under the contract, arrangement or understanding, the other person undertakes to carry on one or more telemarketing activities or fax marketing activities;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The provision has a recurring trace that applies everywhere.
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) must not enter into a contract or arrangement...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 139(1) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax

139(2) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
note: A person must not aid, abet, counsel or procure a contravention of subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 139 Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 139(2) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax

139(3) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
note: Civil penalty provision
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 139 Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a civil penalty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 139(3) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax

139(4) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
note: No effect on contract validity if subsection (1) not complied with.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 139 Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: No temporal interval specified.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: None
premise text: A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not affect the validity of any contract, arrangement or understanding.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If failure to comply with subsection (1) does not affect contract validity, then subsection (1) must be complied with.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If failure to comply affects contract validity, then subsection (1) must be complied with.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Failure to comply with subsection (1) does not affect the validity of any contract, arrangement or understanding.

14 Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.42
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14(1) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
has part: 14(2) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
has part: 14(3) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
has part: 14(4) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
has part: 14(5) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14
schema version: 2

14(1) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.42
note: Definition of controlled carriage service
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(1) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled

14(2) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.42
note: Network is a controlled network if it satisfies the geographical test.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Network is a controlled network
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: (a) Carrier or carriage service provider operates a telecommunications network; (b) Network satisfies the geographical test.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(2) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled

14(3) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.42
note: Facility is a controlled facility if it satisfies the geographical test.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Facility is a controlled facility if it satisfies the geographical test.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(3) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled

14(4) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.42
note: Telecommunications network or facility must be located in Australia or meet specific conditions to satisfy the geographical test.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Network or facility must be in use during a specific period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (ii) the person, or at least one of the members of the group, carries on, or will carry on, a telecommunications-related business wholly or partly in Australia; (iii) the network, or the facility, as the case requires, is used, or will be used, to supply a listed carriage service

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Network or facility must satisfy the geographical test
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: a telecommunications network, or a facility, satisfies the geographical test if...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Person or group must operate the network or facility
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: a person, or a group of persons, operates the network or facility, as the case requires;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Person or group must carry on telecommunications-related business in Australia
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (ii) the person, or at least one of the members of the group, carries on, or will carry on, a telecommunications-related business wholly or partly in Australia;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Network or facility must be in use during a specific period
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (ii) the person, or at least one of the members of the group, carries on, or will carry on, a telecommunications-related business wholly or partly in Australia; (iii) the network, or the facility, as the case requires, is used, or will be used, to supply a listed carriage service

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(4) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled

14(5) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.42
note: Defines telecommunications-related business
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(5) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled

142 Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.194
note: Controller of local access line must not supply eligible service to person other than carrier or service provider.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: came into existence on or after designated commencement date
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Line came into existence on or after designated commencement date.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: line came into existence, or was upgraded, on or after designated commencement date

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not supply eligible service
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of supplying eligible service to person other than carrier or service provider.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: line came into existence, or was upgraded, on or after designated commencement date

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has permission to use line for other purposes
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Controller of local access line has permission to use line for other purposes.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: no functional separation undertaking is in force

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is used to supply superfast carriage service
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Line is used to supply superfast carriage service wholly or principally to residential customers, or prospective residential customers, in Australia.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: line is used, or is proposed to be used, to supply superfast carriage service wholly or principally to residential customers, or prospective residential customers, in Australia

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 142 Simplified outline of this Part

142A Definitions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.195
note: Definitions for telecommunications network and line terms
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: In this Part:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Term definitions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: alter, associate, business unit, close proximity, corporation, customer interface, declared service, designated carriage service, designated commencement date, electricity supply body, eligible service, fixed-line carriage service

142B Functional separation undertaking given by a person
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.198
note: Defines functional separation undertaking given by a person.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142b
schema version: 2

142BA Promotion of the long-term interests of end-users of carriage
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.198
note: Promotes long-term interests of end-users of carriage services
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142ba-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142ba-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142ba
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142ba-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: same manner as it is determined for the purposes of Part XIC
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies things promoting long-term interests
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Part XIC of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010

142BB Terms and conditions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
note: Treats notional contracts as actual contracts for terms and conditions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bb-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142bb
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bb-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 142BB Terms and conditions

142BC Unsatisfactory compliance record
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
note: Determine unsatisfactory compliance record based on breaches of functional separation undertakings and contraventions of specified sections.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bc-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bc-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142bc
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determines existence of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: has

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bc-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 142BC Unsatisfactory compliance record

142BD Designated carriage service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
curation status: Proposed
has part: 142BD(1) Designated carriage service
has part: 142BD(2) Designated carriage service
has part: 142BD(3) Designated carriage service
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142bd
schema version: 2

142BD(1) Designated carriage service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
note: Definition of designated carriage service
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142bd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 142BD Designated carriage service

142BD(2) Designated carriage service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
note: Specify carriage service for purposes of paragraph (1)(a)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142bd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 142BD Designated carriage service

142BD(3) Designated carriage service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
note: The ACCC must not specify a carriage service unless it enables end-users to download communications and has a normal transmission speed of 25 megabits per second or more.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142bd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 142BD Designated carriage service

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless: (a) the carriage service enables end-users to download communications; and (b) the download transmission speed of the carriage service is normally 25 megabits per second or more;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for specifying a carriage service.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (3) The ACCC must not specify a carriage service under subsection (2)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless: (a) the carriage service enables end-users to download communications; and (b) the download transmission speed of the carriage service is normally 25 megabits per second or more;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of specifying a carriage service without enabling end-users to download communications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) The ACCC must not specify a carriage service under subsection (2)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless: (a) the carriage service enables end-users to download communications; and (b) the download transmission speed of the carriage service is normally 25 megabits per second or more;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on the ACCC to specify a carriage service.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) The ACCC must not specify a carriage service under subsection (2)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless: (a) the carriage service enables end-users to download communications; and (b) the download transmission speed of the carriage service is normally 25 megabits per second or more;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for specifying a carriage service.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (3) The ACCC must not specify a carriage service under subsection (2)

142C Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—lines that
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.201
curation status: Proposed
has part: 142C(1) Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—lines that
has part: 142C(2) Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—lines that
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142c
schema version: 2

142C(1) Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—lines that
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.201
note: Local access lines must be part of a telecommunications network in Australia and used to supply a superfast carriage service to residential customers.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 142C Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—lines that

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be part of a telecommunications network in Australia
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 142C(1) Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—lines that

142C(2) Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—lines that
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.201
note: If a person (the first person) must provide certain information.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 142C Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—lines that

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 142C(2) Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—lines that

143 Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—networks in
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.203
note: Local access lines must be part of a telecommunications network supplying superfast carriage services to residential customers.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Network must exist before designated commencement date
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: (network came into existence on or after 1 January 2011, but before the designated commencement date)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Network must not be the national broadband network
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: (network is not the national broadband network)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143 Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—networks in

143A Class exemptions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
curation status: Proposed
has part: 143A(1) Class exemptions
has part: 143A(2) Class exemptions
has part: 143A(3) Class exemptions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143a
schema version: 2

143A(1) Class exemptions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
note: Exempts a person from section 142C if they meet certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 143A Class exemptions

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is exempt from section 142C.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts from section 142C.
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: The ACCC may determine that a person is exempt.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is a subclass of those exempt from section 142C.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass of persons exempt from section 142C.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclass
premise text: The ACCC may determine that a person is exempt.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143A(1) Class exemptions

143A(2) Class exemptions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
note: Exemptions for certain persons from section 143
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 143A Class exemptions

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions for certain persons
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class exemptions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143A(2) Class exemptions

143A(3) Class exemptions
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
note: Ensure availability of designated carriage service and non-discrimination in wholesale supply
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 143A Class exemptions

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure availability of designated carriage service
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class exemptions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143A(3) Class exemptions

143AA Judicial enforcement of prohibitions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.205
curation status: Proposed
has part: 143AA(1) Judicial enforcement of prohibitions
has part: 143AA(2) Judicial enforcement of prohibitions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143aa
schema version: 2

143AA(1) Judicial enforcement of prohibitions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.205
note: Federal Court may make orders against a person who contravenes certain subsections.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 143AA Judicial enforcement of prohibitions

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits a person from contravening certain subsections.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143aa-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143AA(1) Judicial enforcement of prohibitions

143AA(2) Judicial enforcement of prohibitions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.205
note: Federal Court may discharge or vary an order granted under this section.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 143AA Judicial enforcement of prohibitions

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits discharge or variation of orders granted under this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

143B Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
curation status: Proposed
has part: 143B(1) Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
has part: 143B(2) Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
has part: 143B(3) Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143b
schema version: 2

143B(1) Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
note: Comply with conditions or limitations of exemption after designated commencement date.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 143B Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143B(1) Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption

143B(2) Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
note: Prohibition on aiding, abetting, or conspiring to contravene subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 143B Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143B(2) Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption

143B(3) Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
type: Concept
references: Part 31
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
note: Civil penalty provisions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 143B Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits breaches of civil penalty provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143B(3) Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption

143C Judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
curation status: Proposed
has part: 143C(1) Judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations of
has part: 143C(2) Judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143c
schema version: 2

143C(1) Judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
note: Federal Court may direct person to comply with condition or limitation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 143C Judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations of

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Federal Court has obligation to direct person to comply with condition or limitation
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143C(1) Judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations of

143C(2) Judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
note: The Federal Court may discharge or vary an order granted under this section.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 143C Judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations of

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or allowance
modality: Deontic
operator: may

143D Publication of list of persons who have elected to be bound by
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.211
note: Publish list of persons bound by exemption determination
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143d
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish list
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

143E Exemptions—certain real estate development projects etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.211
note: Exemptions for certain real estate development projects
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143e-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143e
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143E Exemptions—certain real estate development projects etc.

143F Exemptions—lines installed in close proximity to other lines
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.214
curation status: Proposed
has part: 143F(1) Exemptions—lines installed in close proximity to other lines
has part: 143F(2) Exemptions—lines installed in close proximity to other lines
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143f
schema version: 2

143F(1) Exemptions—lines installed in close proximity to other lines
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.214
note: Exemptions for certain lines installed in close proximity to other lines
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 143F Exemptions—lines installed in close proximity to other lines

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is used to supply a superfast carriage service; and the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is exempt from section 142C
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for exemption
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (c) the coming into existence of the line enables or enabled the occupier of the premises to become a customer in relation to carriage services supplied using the line;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is exempt from section 142C
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to exempt certain lines
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) a telecommunications network came into existence on or after 1 January 2011; and (b) a line came into existence on or after the designated commencement date for the purposes of connecting particular premises to the network;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is used to supply a superfast carriage service; and the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is exempt from section 142C
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to provide exemptions for certain lines
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) a telecommunications network came into existence on or after 1 January 2011; and (b) a line came into existence on or after the designated commencement date for the purposes of connecting particular premises to the network;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is used to supply a superfast carriage service; and the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is exempt from section 142C
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the recurring nature of exemption
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (d) the premises are in close proximity to a line that forms part of the infrastructure of the network as the network stood immediately before the designated commencement date;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143F(1) Exemptions—lines installed in close proximity to other lines

143F(2) Exemptions—lines installed in close proximity to other lines
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.214
note: Exemptions for lines installed in close proximity to other lines
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 143F Exemptions—lines installed in close proximity to other lines

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The line must have come into existence on or after the designated commencement date for the purposes of connecting particular premises to the network.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between events
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <=
premise text: The line mentioned in paragraph (b) is used to supply a superfast carriage service; The line mentioned in paragraph (b) is exempt from section 142C.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The line is exempt from section 142C if the conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines conditions under which a line is exempt from section 142C
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (2) If: (a) a designated telecommunications network was in existence immediately before the designated commencement date; and (b) a line came into existence on or after the designated commencement date for the purposes of connecting particular premises to the network; and (c) the coming into existence of the line enables or enabled the occupier of the premises to become a customer in relation to carriage services supplied using the line; and (d) the premises are in close proximity to a line that forms part of the infrastructure of the network as the network stood immediately before the designated commencement date; and (e) the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is used to supply a superfast carriage service;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption applies only if the conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines scope of exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (2) If: (a) a designated telecommunications network was in existence immediately before the designated commencement date; and (b) a line came into existence on or after the designated commencement date for the purposes of connecting particular premises to the network; and (c) the coming into existence of the line enables or enabled the occupier of the premises to become a customer in relation to carriage services supplied using the line; and (d) the premises are in close proximity to a line that forms part of the infrastructure of the network as the network stood immediately before the designated commencement date; and (e) the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is used to supply a superfast carriage service;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conditions must be met for the line to be exempt from section 142C.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes recurring trace of events
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: (2) If: (a) a designated telecommunications network was in existence immediately before the designated commencement date; and (b) a line came into existence on or after the designated commencement date for the purposes of connecting particular premises to the network; and (c) the coming into existence of the line enables or enabled the occupier of the premises to become a customer in relation to carriage services supplied using the line; and (d) the premises are in close proximity to a line that forms part of the infrastructure of the network as the network stood immediately before the designated commencement date; and (e) the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is used to supply a superfast carriage service;

143G Exemptions—networks covered by exemption instruments
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.215
note: Exemptions for networks covered by exemption instruments
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143g-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143g-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143g
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143g-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the Telecommunications (Network Exemption—TransACT Very Small Scale Networks) Instrument 2012 was in force...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between temporal intervals for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Commencement date is designated

143H Exemption—networks marketed as business networks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
curation status: Proposed
has part: 143H(1) Exemption—networks marketed as business networks
has part: 143H(2) Exemption—networks marketed as business networks
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143h
schema version: 2

143H(1) Exemption—networks marketed as business networks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
note: Exemption for certain telecommunications networks marketed as business networks.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 143H Exemption—networks marketed as business networks

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the use or proposed use, when considered in relation to...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the timing of exemptions for telecommunications networks.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (c) the line is used, or proposed to be used...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the line is exempt from section 142C.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to exempt certain telecommunications networks.
modality: Deontic
operator: exempt
premise text: (1) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the line is exempt from section 142C.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to exempt certain telecommunications networks.
modality: Deontic
operator: exempt
premise text: (b) the network is marketed by the carrier exclusively...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the line is exempt from section 142C.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to exempt certain telecommunications networks.
modality: Deontic
operator: exempt
premise text: (e) the other conditions (if any) determined under subsection...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the line is exempt from section 142C.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the duration of exemptions for telecommunications networks.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (d) that use or proposed use, when considered in relation to...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143H(1) Exemption—networks marketed as business networks

143H(2) Exemption—networks marketed as business networks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
note: Determine conditions for exemptions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 143H Exemption—networks marketed as business networks

144 Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
curation status: Proposed
has part: 144(1) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
has part: 144(2) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
has part: 144(3) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
has part: 144(4) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
has part: 144(5) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
has part: 144(6) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
has part: 144(7) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
has part: 144(8) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-144
schema version: 2

144(1) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
note: Exempts a specified network from section 143.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-144-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Exemptions—Ministerial instrument

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission to exempt a network.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

144(2) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
note: Conditional commencement Exempts a specified local access line from section 143.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-144-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Exemptions—Ministerial instrument

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission to exempt a local access line.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

144(3) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
note: The Minister may exempt a specified person from subsection 143(2).
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-144-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Exemptions—Ministerial instrument

144(4) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
note: Exemptions for ministerial instruments
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-144-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Exemptions—Ministerial instrument

144(5) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
note: Consultation with ACCC and ACMA before making an instrument
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-144-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Exemptions—Ministerial instrument

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Instrument cannot be made outside this temporal window
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of consultation required
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: Consultation with ACCC and ACMA must occur before making an instrument

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Instrument creation follows from consultation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Consultation implies instrument creation
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: Minister must consult ACCC and ACMA before making an instrument

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Instrument cannot be made without consultation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Minister must consult ACCC and ACMA

144(6) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
note: An instrument under subsection (1), (2) or (3) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-144-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Exemptions—Ministerial instrument

144(7) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
note: Minister cannot make an instrument under subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-144-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Exemptions—Ministerial instrument

144(8) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
note: Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-144-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Exemptions—Ministerial instrument

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between instrument and commencement date
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal interval mentioned in subsection (7)

145 Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
curation status: Proposed
has part: 145(1) Exemption—transport authorities
has part: 145(2) Exemption—transport authorities
has part: 145(3) Exemption—transport authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-145
schema version: 2

145(1) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
note: Exemption for transport authorities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-145-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 145 Exemption—transport authorities

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts certain services from subsections 142C(2) and 143(2)
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 145(1) Exemption—transport authorities

145(2) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
note: Exemption for Airservices Australia
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-145-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 145 Exemption—transport authorities

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not apply to a carriage service supplied to Airservices Australia unless the carriage service is supplied on the basis that Airservices Australia must not re-supply the carriage service.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Airservices Australia exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not apply to a carriage service supplied to Airservices Australia unless the carriage service is supplied on the basis that Airservices Australia must not re-supply the carriage service.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not apply to a carriage service supplied to Airservices Australia unless the carriage service is supplied on the basis that Airservices Australia must not re-supply the carriage service.

145(3) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
note: Exemption for State or Territory transport authorities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-145-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 145 Exemption—transport authorities

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission to State or Territory transport authorities
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits

146 Exemption—electricity supply bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
curation status: Proposed
has part: 146(1) Exemption—electricity supply bodies
has part: 146(2) Exemption—electricity supply bodies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-146
schema version: 2

146(1) Exemption—electricity supply bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
note: Exemption for electricity supply bodies from certain subsections
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-146-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-146-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-146-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 146 Exemption—electricity supply bodies

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-146-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption condition
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (a) or (b)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-146-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 146(1) Exemption—electricity supply bodies

146(2) Exemption—electricity supply bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
note: Exemption for electricity supply bodies
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-146-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-146-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 146 Exemption—electricity supply bodies

147 Exemption—gas supply bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
curation status: Proposed
has part: 147(1) Exemption—gas supply bodies
has part: 147(2) Exemption—gas supply bodies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-147
schema version: 2

147(1) Exemption—gas supply bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
note: Exemption for gas supply bodies from certain subsections.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-147-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-147-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 147 Exemption—gas supply bodies

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-147-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 147(1) Exemption—gas supply bodies

147(2) Exemption—gas supply bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
note: Exemption for gas supply bodies
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-147-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-147-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 147 Exemption—gas supply bodies

148 Exemption—water supply bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
curation status: Proposed
has part: 148(1) Exemption—water supply bodies
has part: 148(2) Exemption—water supply bodies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-148
schema version: 2

148(1) Exemption—water supply bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
note: Exemption for water supply bodies from certain subsections
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-148-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Exemption—water supply bodies

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permitted exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: allows

148(2) Exemption—water supply bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
note: Exemption for water supply bodies under certain conditions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-148-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Exemption—water supply bodies

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the carriage service is supplied on the basis that...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the exemption and the carriage service
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: does not apply to a carriage service supplied to a water supply body unless...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the exemption as a permission
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the carriage service is supplied on the basis that...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the scope of the exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the carriage service is supplied on the basis that...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the exemption and the carriage service
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a)

149 Exemption—sewerage services bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
curation status: Proposed
has part: 149(1) Exemption—sewerage services bodies
has part: 149(2) Exemption—sewerage services bodies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149
schema version: 2

149(1) Exemption—sewerage services bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
note: Exemption for sewerage services bodies from certain subsections.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 149 Exemption—sewerage services bodies

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 149(1) Exemption—sewerage services bodies

149(2) Exemption—sewerage services bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
note: Exemption for sewerage services bodies under certain conditions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 149 Exemption—sewerage services bodies

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the carriage service is supplied on the basis that...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal relation for exemption
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal relation
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not apply to a carriage service supplied to a sewerage services body unless the carriage service is supplied on...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the carriage service is supplied on the basis that...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines artificial intelligence application for exemption
modality: CogAI
operator: artificial intelligence application
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not apply to a carriage service supplied to a sewerage services body unless the carriage service is supplied on...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the carriage service is supplied on the basis that...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts carriage service supplied to sewerage services bodies under specific conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not apply...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the carriage service is supplied on the basis that...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines information flow for exemption
modality: Diffusion
operator: information flow
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not apply to a carriage service supplied to a sewerage services body unless the carriage service is supplied on...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the carriage service is supplied on the basis that...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for exemption
modality: LTL
operator: recurring trace
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not apply to a carriage service supplied to a sewerage services body unless the carriage service is supplied on...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 149(2) Exemption—sewerage services bodies

15 Content service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.43
note: Definition of content service
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15
schema version: 2

150 Exemption—storm water drainage services bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
curation status: Proposed
has part: 150(1) Exemption—storm water drainage services bodies
has part: 150(2) Exemption—storm water drainage services bodies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-150
schema version: 2

150(1) Exemption—storm water drainage services bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
note: Exemption for storm water drainage services bodies
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-150-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-150-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 150 Exemption—storm water drainage services bodies

150(2) Exemption—storm water drainage services bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
note: Exemption for storm water drainage services bodies
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-150-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-150-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 150 Exemption—storm water drainage services bodies

151 Exemption—State or Territory road authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151(1) Exemption—State or Territory road authorities
has part: 151(2) Exemption—State or Territory road authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151
schema version: 2

151(1) Exemption—State or Territory road authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
note: Exemption for State or Territory road authorities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151 Exemption—State or Territory road authorities

151(2) Exemption—State or Territory road authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
note: Exemption for State or Territory road authorities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151 Exemption—State or Territory road authorities

151A Standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151A(1) Standard functional separation undertaking
has part: 151A(2) Standard functional separation undertaking
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151a
schema version: 2

151A(1) Standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
note: A corporation may give a written undertaking to the ACCC.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151A Standard functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to give an undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: May

151A(2) Standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
note: Functional separation requirements for wholesale and retail business units
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151A Standard functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide functional separation requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

151B Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151B(1) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
has part: 151B(1A) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
has part: 151B(1B) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
has part: 151B(2) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
has part: 151B(3) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
has part: 151B(4) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151b
schema version: 2

151B(1) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
note: The ACCC may determine that a corporation is bound by the Act if it elects to be so.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151B Deemed standard functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The ACCC may determine
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Corporation is bound by the Act
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies

151B(1A) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
note: Functional separation undertaking must comply with specific provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151b-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 151B Deemed standard functional separation undertaking

151B(1B) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
note: No provision of a kind specified in a determination under subsection 151A(15) may be included.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151b-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 151B Deemed standard functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not contain...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of a specific provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1B) A functional separation undertaking...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1b-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151B(1B) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking

151B(2) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
note: Exemptions from certain provisions for functional separation undertakings
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151B Deemed standard functional separation undertaking

151B(3) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
note: A corporation can give another standard functional separation undertaking without cancelling the previous one.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151B Deemed standard functional separation undertaking

151B(4) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
note: Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 151B Deemed standard functional separation undertaking

151C Joint functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151C(1) Joint functional separation undertaking
has part: 151C(2) Joint functional separation undertaking
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151c
schema version: 2

151C(1) Joint functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
note: Joint written undertaking for joint functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151c-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151C Joint functional separation undertaking

151C(2) Joint functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
description: The wholesaler and retailer must provide specific conditions for their workers
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
note: Joint functional separation undertaking requirements
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151c-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151C Joint functional separation undertaking

151D Further information about undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151D(1) Further information about undertaking
has part: 151D(2) Further information about undertaking
has part: 151D(3) Further information about undertaking
has part: 151D(4) Further information about undertaking
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151d
schema version: 2

151D(1) Further information about undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
note: Request for further information if a joint functional separation undertaking is given
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151D Further information about undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request for further information
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional provision
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (a) a person gives the ACCC a standard functional separation undertaking; or (b) 2 or more persons give the ACCC a joint functional separation undertaking.

151D(2) Further information about undertaking
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
note: Request for further information
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151D Further information about undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requesting information as an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: request

151D(3) Further information about undertaking
type: Concept
description: Information
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
note: The ACCC may refuse to consider the undertaking until the person or persons give the ACCC the information.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151D Further information about undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The ACCC may refuse to consider the undertaking until the person or persons give the ACCC the information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151D(3) Further information about undertaking

151D(4) Further information about undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
note: Request for further information may be withdrawn in whole or in part.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 151D Further information about undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request for further information may be withdrawn.
modality: Deontic
operator: Withdrawal

151E Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151E(1) Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
has part: 151E(2) Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
has part: 151E(3) Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
has part: 151E(4) Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151e
schema version: 2

151E(1) Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
note: Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151E Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151E(1) Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration

151E(2) Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
note: Withdrawal of undertaking at any time before ACCC decision
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151E Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between withdrawal and ACCC decision
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (2) The person or persons may withdraw the undertaking at any time before the ACCC makes a decision to accept or reject the undertaking.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justification for withdrawal of undertaking
modality: Argumentation
operator: May
premise text: (2) The person or persons may withdraw the undertaking at any time before the ACCC makes a decision to accept or reject the undertaking.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Impact of withdrawal on ACCC decision-making process
modality: CogAI
operator: influences
premise text: (2) The person or persons may withdraw the undertaking at any time before the ACCC makes a decision to accept or reject the undertaking.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to withdraw undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Effect of withdrawal on ACCC decision-making
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (2) The person or persons may withdraw the undertaking at any time before the ACCC makes a decision to accept or reject the undertaking.

151E(3) Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
note: Allows person or persons to give a fresh undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151E Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits action
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow

151E(4) Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
note: Refund of fee upon withdrawal of undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151e-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 151E Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the ACCC may, on behalf of the Commonwealth, refund the whole or a part of the fee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between withdrawal and payment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
premise text: (4) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the ACCC may, on behalf of the Commonwealth, refund the whole or a part of the fee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of withdrawal and payment on refund
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (4) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the ACCC may, on behalf of the Commonwealth, refund the whole or a part of the fee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inferred obligation to refund fee
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (4) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the ACCC may, on behalf of the Commonwealth, refund the whole or a part of the fee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to refund fee
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (4) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the ACCC may, on behalf of the Commonwealth, refund the whole or a part of the fee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagated obligation to refund fee
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (4) If...

151F ACCC to accept or reject functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
note: Scope for accepting or rejecting functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151f-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151f
schema version: 2

151G Consultation—acceptance or rejection of undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.239
note: Scope of section 151G regarding consultation and acceptance or rejection of undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151g-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151g-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151g
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the provision as an undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Provision is an undertaking

151H Serial undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.240
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151H(1) Serial undertakings
has part: 151H(2) Serial undertakings
has part: 151H(3) Serial undertakings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151h
schema version: 2

151H(1) Serial undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.240
note: ACCC may refuse to consider another functional separation undertaking if it is materially similar to a previous one.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151H Serial undertakings

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refusal to consider other undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of considering another undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: ACCC rejects the first undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151H(1) Serial undertakings

151H(2) Serial undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.240
note: ACCC may refuse to consider another joint functional separation undertaking if it is materially similar to the first one.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151H Serial undertakings

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACCC may refuse to consider the other functional separation undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of considering another undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: ACCC rejects the first functional separation undertaking.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The ACCC has the power to refuse consideration of another undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACCC's discretion in refusing consideration
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: The ACCC may refuse to consider the other functional separation undertaking.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The ACCC is obligated to consider the first functional separation undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACCC's obligation to consider undertakings
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) 2 or more persons give the ACCC a joint functional separation undertaking; and (b) the ACCC rejects the first functional separation undertaking.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The ACCC may refuse to consider the other functional separation undertaking until it is satisfied that the undertakings are not materially similar.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conditional refusal of consideration
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (b) the ACCC rejects the first functional separation undertaking; and (c) those persons subsequently give the ACCC another joint functional separation undertaking.

151H(3) Serial undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.240
note: ACCC must refund fee if undertaking is refused and fee was paid.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151h-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151H Serial undertakings

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the ACCC must, on behalf of the Commonwealth, refund the fee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACCC must refund fee.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (3) If the ACCC refuses to consider a functional separation undertaking under this section; and (b) a person or persons have paid a fee in relation to the undertaking;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the ACCC must, on behalf of the Commonwealth, refund the fee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACCC must refund fee if undertaking is refused and fee was paid.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (3) If: (a) the ACCC refuses to consider a functional separation undertaking under this section; and (b) a person or persons have paid a fee in relation to the undertaking;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: ACCC may refuse to consider undertaking if it is not in its power to do so.
modality: Epistemic
operator: May
premise text: (3) If: (a) the ACCC refuses to consider a functional separation undertaking under this section; and (b) a person or persons have paid a fee in relation to the undertaking;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Undertaking may be conditional on ACCC's power to consider it.
modality: LTL
operator: May
premise text: (3) If: (a) the ACCC refuses to consider a functional separation undertaking under this section; and (b) a person or persons have paid a fee in relation to the undertaking;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151H(3) Serial undertakings

151J Criteria for accepting functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.241
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151J(1) Criteria for accepting functional separation undertaking
has part: 151J(2) Criteria for accepting functional separation undertaking
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151j
schema version: 2

151J(1) Criteria for accepting functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.241
note: Criteria for accepting functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151j-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151J Criteria for accepting functional separation undertaking

151J(2) Criteria for accepting functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.241
note: Regard must be had when deciding to accept an undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151j-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151J Criteria for accepting functional separation undertaking

151K Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.242
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151K(1) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
has part: 151K(2) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
has part: 151K(3) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
has part: 151K(4) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151k
schema version: 2

151K(1) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.242
note: Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151K Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under

151K(2) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.242
note: The ACCC must consider a varied undertaking under section 151F if the person gives it within the specified period.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151K Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The ACCC will consider the varied undertaking under section 151F as if the varied undertaking had been given to the ACCC instead of the original undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The ACCC must consider a varied undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The person gives the varied undertaking to the ACCC within the period specified in the notice.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151K(2) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under

151K(3) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.242
note: ACCC must consider a varied undertaking given in response to notice.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151k-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151K Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACCC must consider a varied undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151K(3) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under

151K(4) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.242
note: Duty to consider notice under subsection (2)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151k-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 151K Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consider notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2)

151L Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.243
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151L(1) Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is
has part: 151L(2) Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is
has part: 151L(3) Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151l
schema version: 2

151L(1) Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.243
note: Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is given to the ACCC.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151l-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151L Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is

151L(2) Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.243
note: The ACCC may give a written notice stating that it would be inclined to accept a joint functional separation undertaking if certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151l-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151L Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a possibility or inclination.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

151L(3) Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.243
note: Duty to consider notice under subsection (2) is not required
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151l-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151l-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151L Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬O

151M Renewal of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.243
note: Renewal of functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151m-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151m
schema version: 2

151N Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.244
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151N(1) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
has part: 151N(2) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
has part: 151N(3) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
has part: 151N(4) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
has part: 151N(5) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
has part: 151N(6) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
has part: 151N(7) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151n
schema version: 2

151N(1) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.244
note: ACCC may vary existing functional separation undertaking by omitting or substituting expiry time.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151N Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the expiry time specified in the notice.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Expiry time is a temporal interval during which the undertaking is in force
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) If: ... and (a) a standard functional separation undertaking is in force;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACCC may vary existing undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACCC may perform action
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the expiry time specified in the notice.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Expiry time is a temporal interval during which the undertaking is in force
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) If: ... and (a) a standard functional separation undertaking is in force;

151N(2) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.244
note: Expiry time of certain functional separation must be later than rejection of other undertaking and not later than 12 months after.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151N Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be later than rejection of other undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The expiry time specified in the notice:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Not later than 12 months after rejection of other undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
premise text: (2) The expiry time specified in the notice:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151N(2) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation

151N(3) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.244
note: Exempts notice under subsection (1) from Subsection 151A(8)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151n-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151N Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation

151N(4) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.244
note: ACCC may vary existing functional separation undertaking by omitting or substituting expiry time.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151n-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 151N Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACCC may vary existing undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151N(4) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation

151N(5) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.244
note: Expiry time of certain functional separation must be later than rejection of other undertaking and not later than 12 months after.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151n-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 151N Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be later than rejection of other undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (5) The expiry time specified in the notice:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Not later than 12 months after rejection of other undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
premise text: (5) The expiry time specified in the notice:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151N(5) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation

151N(6) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.244
note: Exempts notice under subsection (4) from Subsection 151C(8)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151n-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 151N Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission

151N(7) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.244
note: Publish notice on website before varying functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151n-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 151N Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

151P Duration of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.246
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151P(1) Duration of functional separation undertaking
has part: 151P(2) Duration of functional separation undertaking
has part: 151P(3) Duration of functional separation undertaking
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151p
schema version: 2

151P(1) Duration of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.246
note: Condition for application of section
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151p-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151P Duration of functional separation undertaking

151P(2) Duration of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.246
note: Duration of functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151p-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151P Duration of functional separation undertaking

151P(3) Duration of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.246
note: New undertaking comes into force immediately after expiry of other undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151p-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151p-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151P Duration of functional separation undertaking

151Q Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.247
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151Q(1) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
has part: 151Q(2) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
has part: 151Q(3) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
has part: 151Q(4) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
has part: 151Q(5) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151q
schema version: 2

151Q(1) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.247
note: Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151q-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151Q Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal interval not specified

151Q(2) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.247
note: Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force may be given to ACCC.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151q-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151Q Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force

151Q(3) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.247
note: Compliance with specific subsections required for variation of standard functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151q-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151Q Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance with subsections
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151Q(3) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force

151Q(4) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.247
note: Variation of joint functional separation undertaking must comply with specific subsections and paragraph.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151q-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 151Q Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with specified subsections and paragraph.
modality: Deontic
operator: Compliance

151Q(5) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.247
note: The variation must be done
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151q-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 151Q Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must do the variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151Q(5) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force

151R Further information about variation of functional separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.248
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151R(1) Further information about variation of functional separation
has part: 151R(2) Further information about variation of functional separation
has part: 151R(3) Further information about variation of functional separation
has part: 151R(4) Further information about variation of functional separation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151r
schema version: 2

151R(1) Further information about variation of functional separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.248
note: Request for further information if a variation of functional separation is given to the ACCC.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151R Further information about variation of functional separation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151R(1) Further information about variation of functional separation

151R(2) Further information about variation of functional separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.248
note: Request for further information about variation of functional separation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151R Further information about variation of functional separation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide further information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151R(2) Further information about variation of functional separation

151R(3) Further information about variation of functional separation
type: Concept
description: Information
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.248
note: The ACCC may refuse to consider the variation until the person or persons give the ACCC the information.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151r-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151R Further information about variation of functional separation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The ACCC must refuse to consider the variation until the person or persons give the ACCC the information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151R(3) Further information about variation of functional separation

151R(4) Further information about variation of functional separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.248
note: The ACCC may withdraw its request for further information.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151r-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 151R Further information about variation of functional separation

151S Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.249
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151S(1) Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
has part: 151S(2) Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
has part: 151S(3) Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
has part: 151S(4) Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151s
schema version: 2

151S(1) Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.249
note: Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151s-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151S Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration

151S(2) Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.249
note: Person or persons may withdraw variation at any time before ACCC makes a decision.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151s-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151S Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for withdrawal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The person or persons may withdraw the variation at any time before the ACCC makes a decision to accept or reject the variation.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Ability to withdraw variation
modality: Argumentation
operator: can
premise text: (2) The person or persons may withdraw the variation at any time before the ACCC makes a decision to accept or reject the variation.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Ability of AI system to process withdrawal information
modality: CogAI
operator: can
premise text: (2) The person or persons may withdraw the variation at any time before the ACCC makes a decision to accept or reject the variation.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to withdraw variation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Ability to diffuse information about withdrawal
modality: Diffusion
operator: can
premise text: (2) The person or persons may withdraw the variation at any time before the ACCC makes a decision to accept or reject the variation.

151S(3) Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.249
note: Allowance for giving a fresh variation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151s-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151S Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows the person to give a fresh variation
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

151S(4) Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.249
note: Refund of fee upon withdrawal of variation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151s-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 151S Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the ACCC may, on behalf of the Commonwealth, refund the whole or a part of the fee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to refund fee
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (4) If...

151T ACCC to accept or reject variation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.249
note: ACCC must accept or reject variation of standard functional separation undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151t-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151t-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151t
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151t-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to accept or reject variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151t-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151T ACCC to accept or reject variation

151U Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.251
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151U(1) Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation
has part: 151U(2) Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation
has part: 151U(3) Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151u
schema version: 2

151U(1) Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.251
note: Consultation required for variation of standard functional separation undertaking or joint functional separation undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151u-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151U Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

151U(2) Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation
type: Concept
description: Submissions within the specified time limit
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.251
note: Publish notice and invite submissions before making a decision on variation.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151u-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151U Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice and invite submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

151U(3) Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.251
note: Time limit for acceptance or rejection of variation must not be shorter than 15 business days after notice is published.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151u-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151U Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval contains a minimum duration of 15 business days
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is published.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applies to provisions with temporal intervals and duration constraints
modality: CogAI
operator: APPLIES TO
premise text: (3) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is published.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must not be shorter than 15 business days
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is published.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applies to provisions with temporal intervals
modality: Diffusion
operator: APPLIES TO
premise text: (3) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is published.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval has a minimum duration of 15 business days
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is published.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151U(3) Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation

151V Criteria for accepting variation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151V(1) Criteria for accepting variation
has part: 151V(2) Criteria for accepting variation
has part: 151V(3) Criteria for accepting variation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151v
schema version: 2

151V(1) Criteria for accepting variation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
note: Criteria for accepting variation of standard functional separation undertaking or joint functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151v-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151V Criteria for accepting variation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for variation acceptance
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (a) a person gives the ACCC a variation of a standard functional separation undertaking; or (b) 2 or more persons give the ACCC a variation of a joint functional separation undertaking.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Rationale for variation acceptance
modality: Argumentation
operator: for
premise text: (a) a person gives the ACCC a variation of a standard functional separation undertaking; or (b) 2 or more persons give the ACCC a variation of a joint functional separation undertaking.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (a) a person gives the ACCC a variation of a standard functional separation undertaking; or (b) 2 or more persons give the ACCC a variation of a joint functional separation undertaking.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Criteria for accepting variation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Variation acceptance mechanism
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: (a) a person gives the ACCC a variation of a standard functional separation undertaking; or (b) 2 or more persons give the ACCC a variation of a joint functional separation undertaking.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal scope for variation acceptance
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (a) a person gives the ACCC a variation of a standard functional separation undertaking; or (b) 2 or more persons give the ACCC a variation of a joint functional separation undertaking.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151V(1) Criteria for accepting variation

151V(2) Criteria for accepting variation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
note: Consideration of factors when accepting variation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151v-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151V Criteria for accepting variation

151V(3) Criteria for accepting variation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
note: Authority to determine matters for variation purposes
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151v-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151V Criteria for accepting variation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: (3) The Minister may...

151W Revocation of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151W(1) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
has part: 151W(2) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
has part: 151W(3) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
has part: 151W(4) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
has part: 151W(5) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
has part: 151W(6) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151w
schema version: 2

151W(1) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
note: Revocation of functional separation undertaking if breach or contravention occurs.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151w-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151W Revocation of functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking is in force from the time it was given to the present.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for which the undertaking is in force.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation occurs if breach or contravention occurs.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishes a relationship between the revocation of an undertaking and its conditions.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force; and (b) the person has breached a fundamental provision of the undertaking or contravened section 151ZF or 151ZG;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The ACCC may not revoke the undertaking if breach or contravention occurs.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of undertaking if breach or contravention occurs.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force; and (b) the person has breached a fundamental provision of the undertaking or contravened section 151ZF or 151ZG;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The ACCC may revoke the undertaking if breach or contravention occurs.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits revocation of undertaking if breach or contravention occurs.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force; and (b) the person has breached a fundamental provision of the undertaking or contravened section 151ZF or 151ZG;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking applies until the breach or contravention occurs.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for which the undertaking applies.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force; and (b) the person has breached a fundamental provision of the undertaking or contravened section 151ZF or 151ZG;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151W(1) Revocation of functional separation undertaking

151W(2) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
note: Revocation of functional separation undertaking if unsatisfactory compliance record
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151w-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151W Revocation of functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the ACCC may, by written notice given to the person, revoke the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for revocation of functional separation undertaking
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force; and (b) the ACCC is satisfied that the person has an unsatisfactory compliance record in relation to functional separation;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the ACCC may, by written notice given to the person, revoke the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Rebuttal of unsatisfactory compliance record for functional separation undertaking
modality: Argumentation
operator: Rebuttal
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force; and (b) the ACCC is satisfied that the person has an unsatisfactory compliance record in relation to functional separation;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the ACCC may, by written notice given to the person, revoke the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of functional separation undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force; and (b) the ACCC is satisfied that the person has an unsatisfactory compliance record in relation to functional separation;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the ACCC may, by written notice given to the person, revoke the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of revocation decision for functional separation undertaking
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force; and (b) the ACCC is satisfied that the person has an unsatisfactory compliance record in relation to functional separation;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the ACCC may, by written notice given to the person, revoke the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for revocation of functional separation undertaking based on compliance record
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force; and (b) the ACCC is satisfied that the person has an unsatisfactory compliance record in relation to functional separation;

151W(3) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
note: ACCC must revoke standard functional separation undertaking upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151w-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151W Revocation of functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice to revoke undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151W(3) Revocation of functional separation undertaking

151W(4) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
note: Revocation takes effect within a specified time frame after notice is given.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151w-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 151W Revocation of functional separation undertaking

151W(5) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
note: Revocation of functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151w-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 151W Revocation of functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151W(5) Revocation of functional separation undertaking

151W(6) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
note: Revocation of functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151w-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 151W Revocation of functional separation undertaking

151X Consultation—revocation of functional separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.255
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151X(1) Consultation—revocation of functional separation
has part: 151X(2) Consultation—revocation of functional separation
has part: 151X(3) Consultation—revocation of functional separation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151x
schema version: 2

151X(1) Consultation—revocation of functional separation
type: Concept
description: Submission within time limit specified in notice
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.255
note: ACCC must give written notice to person before revoking standard functional separation undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151x-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151X Consultation—revocation of functional separation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACCC must give written notice to person before revoking standard functional separation undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151X(1) Consultation—revocation of functional separation

151X(2) Consultation—revocation of functional separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.255
note: Time limit for revocation of joint functional separation must be at least 15 business days after notice is given.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151x-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151X Consultation—revocation of functional separation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Time limit must be at least 15 business days after notice is given
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (2) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is given.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation of joint functional separation undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Revocation of joint functional separation undertaking
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: (2) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is given.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
premise text: (2) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is given.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation of joint functional separation undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Revocation of joint functional separation undertaking
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: (2) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is given.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Time limit for revocation of joint functional separation must be at least 15 business days after notice is given
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: (2) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is given.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151X(2) Consultation—revocation of functional separation

151X(3) Consultation—revocation of functional separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.255
note: Must consult before revoking joint functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151x-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151X Consultation—revocation of functional separation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

151Y Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.256
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151Y(1) Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
has part: 151Y(2) Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
has part: 151Y(3) Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151y
schema version: 2

151Y(1) Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.256
note: Notification of breach or contravention
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151y-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151Y Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151Y(1) Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory

151Y(2) Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
type: Concept
description: written notice
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.256
note: ACCC must give a person a written notice stating that the ACCC considers the person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory compliance record in relation to functional separation.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151y-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151Y Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The ACCC must give a written notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The provision is part of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF

151Y(3) Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.256
note: Failure to comply with subsection (2) does not affect the validity of a revocation of a functional separation undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151y-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151Y Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes the effect of non-compliance on revocation validity
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: (2)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151Y(3) Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory

151Z Variation of functional separation undertaking following
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.257
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151Z(1) Variation of functional separation undertaking following
has part: 151Z(2) Variation of functional separation undertaking following
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151z
schema version: 2

151Z(1) Variation of functional separation undertaking following
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.257
note: ACCC may vary a revoked standard functional separation undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151z-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151Z Variation of functional separation undertaking following

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to vary the undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151Z(1) Variation of functional separation undertaking following

151Z(2) Variation of functional separation undertaking following
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.257
note: Must not vary standard functional separation undertaking under subsection (1) unless variation addresses grounds for revocation of undertaking under section 151W and does not address other matter.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151z-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151Z Variation of functional separation undertaking following

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Variation must not address other matter
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
premise text: (2) The ACCC must not vary a standard functional separation undertaking under subsection (1) unless the variation: does not address any other matter.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Variation must be relevant to revocation of undertaking under section 151W
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (2) The ACCC must not vary a standard functional separation undertaking under subsection (1) unless the variation: addresses the matter or matters that constituted the grounds for the revocation of the undertaking under section 151W; and does not address any other matter.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless the variation addresses the matter or matters that constituted the grounds for the revocation of the undertaking under section 151W; and does not address any other matter.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on varying standard functional separation undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) The ACCC must not vary a standard functional separation undertaking under subsection (1)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACCC has obligation to vary standard functional separation undertaking under subsection (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) The ACCC must not vary a standard functional separation undertaking under subsection (1) unless the variation: addresses the matter or matters that constituted the grounds for the revocation of the undertaking under section 151W; and does not address any other matter.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Variation must be relevant to revocation of undertaking under section 151W
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalRelevance
premise text: (2) The ACCC must not vary a standard functional separation undertaking under subsection (1) unless the variation: addresses the matter or matters that constituted the grounds for the revocation of the undertaking under section 151W; and does not address any other matter.

151ZA Reporting obligations following giving of revocation notice
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.258
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151ZA(1) Reporting obligations following giving of revocation notice
has part: 151ZA(2) Reporting obligations following giving of revocation notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151za
schema version: 2

151ZA(1) Reporting obligations following giving of revocation notice
type: Concept
description: True
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.258
note: The ACCC may direct the person to provide reports about compliance with the undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151za-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151za-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZA Reporting obligations following giving of revocation notice

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The ACCC must direct the person to provide reports.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151za-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZA(1) Reporting obligations following giving of revocation notice

151ZA(2) Reporting obligations following giving of revocation notice
type: Concept
description: True
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.258
note: Direct person to provide report on compliance with undertaking after revocation notice.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151za-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151za-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZA Reporting obligations following giving of revocation notice

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directs a person to take action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151za-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZA(2) Reporting obligations following giving of revocation notice

151ZB Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.260
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151ZB(1) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
has part: 151ZB(2) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
has part: 151ZB(3) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
has part: 151ZB(4) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
has part: 151ZB(5) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
has part: 151ZB(6) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zb
schema version: 2

151ZB(1) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
type: Concept
description: Notification to ACCC
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.260
note: Notify ACCC of changes in control within 10 business days.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZB Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZB(1) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave

151ZB(2) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.260
note: Notification by controller of person who gave undertaking must be in a form approved by ACCC.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZB Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify changes in control of person who gave undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

151ZB(3) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.260
note: Notify ACCC of control position within 10 business days
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZB Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZB(3) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave

151ZB(4) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.260
note: Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zb-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZB Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZB(4) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave

151ZB(5) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.260
note: A person must not aid, abet, counsel or procure a contravention of subsection (1) or (3);
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zb-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZB Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZB(5) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave

151ZB(6) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.260
note: Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zb-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZB Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify changes in control of person who gave
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZB(6) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave

151ZC Register of functional separation undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.262
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151ZC(1) Register of functional separation undertakings
has part: 151ZC(2) Register of functional separation undertakings
has part: 151ZC(3) Register of functional separation undertakings
has part: 151ZC(4) Register of functional separation undertakings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zc
schema version: 2

151ZC(1) Register of functional separation undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.262
note: Maintain a Register of functional separation undertakings
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZC Register of functional separation undertakings

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classify undertakings
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: List variations of undertakings
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasMember

151ZC(2) Register of functional separation undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.262
note: The Register is to be maintained by electronic means.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZC Register of functional separation undertakings

151ZC(3) Register of functional separation undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.262
note: Make Register available for inspection on ACCC's website.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZC Register of functional separation undertakings

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide access to Register
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZC(3) Register of functional separation undertakings

151ZC(4) Register of functional separation undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.262
note: The Register is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zc-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZC Register of functional separation undertakings

151ZD Compliance with functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.262
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151ZD(1) Compliance with functional separation undertaking
has part: 151ZD(2) Compliance with functional separation undertaking
has part: 151ZD(3) Compliance with functional separation undertaking
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zd
schema version: 2

151ZD(1) Compliance with functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.262
note: Compliance with functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zd-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZD Compliance with functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

151ZD(2) Compliance with functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.262
note: Prohibition on aiding, abetting, or conspiring to contravene subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zd-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZD Compliance with functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zd-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZD(2) Compliance with functional separation undertaking

151ZD(3) Compliance with functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.262
note: Civil penalty provisions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zd-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZD Compliance with functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits breaches of civil penalty provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

151ZE Enforcement of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.263
note: Order directing disposal of network units, lines, shares or other assets if breach found.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151ze
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Court may make any or all of the following orders...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for asset disposal.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (d) an order directing the disposal of network units, lines, shares or other assets;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Court may make any or all of the following orders...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of breach on asset disposal.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (a) a functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Court may make any or all of the following orders...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of breach to asset disposal.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: (b) the Federal Court is satisfied, on the application of...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Court may make any or all of the following orders...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directs disposal of assets.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) a functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Court may make any or all of the following orders...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagating breach to asset disposal.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (b) the Federal Court is satisfied, on the application of...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZE Enforcement of functional separation undertaking

151ZF Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.265
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151ZF(1) Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
has part: 151ZF(2) Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
has part: 151ZF(3) Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zf
schema version: 2

151ZF(1) Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.265
note: Discrimination in wholesale services supply is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZF Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition period starts at the designated commencement date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between designated commencement date and prohibition period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: The person must not discriminate on or after the designated commencement date.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Discrimination implies a violation of the law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of prohibition on wholesale services supply
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: If section 142C or section 143 applies to the line, then discrimination is prohibited.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Eligible customers can be classified using AI.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of wholesale customers using AI
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: The person's wholesale customers or prospective wholesale customers can be classified using artificial intelligence.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Discrimination is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of discrimination
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 142C and section 143 apply to the line.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition spreads to all eligible customers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of prohibition through wholesale customers
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: The person's wholesale customers or prospective wholesale customers are affected by the prohibition.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZF(1) Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis

151ZF(2) Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.265
note: Wholesale customer discrimination allowed under certain conditions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZF Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows wholesale customer discrimination
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) The rule in subsection (1) does not prevent discrimination...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZF(2) Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis

151ZF(3) Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.265
note: Grounds for believing a wholesale customer is not creditworthy
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZF Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) and (b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: List of examples
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (2)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZF(3) Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis

151ZG Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.267
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151ZG(1) Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a
has part: 151ZG(2) Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zg
schema version: 2

151ZG(1) Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.267
note: Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a designated commencement date if certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZG Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if an eligible service is supplied or proposed to be supplied by a person using a local access line
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision applies during the designated commencement date.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: on and after the designated commencement date

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: no discrimination between wholesale customers
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If section 142C or section 143 applies, then no discrimination between wholesale customers is allowed.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: section 142C applies to the line

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a functional separation undertaking is required
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If neither section 142C nor section 143 applies, then a functional separation undertaking is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: neither section 142C nor section 143 applies to the line

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a functional separation undertaking is required
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A functional separation undertaking is required if neither section 142C nor section 143 applies.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: neither section 142C nor section 143 applies to the line

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: no discrimination between wholesale customers
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No discrimination between wholesale customers is allowed if section 142C or section 143 applies.
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
premise text: section 142C applies to the line

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZG(1) Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a

151ZG(2) Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.267
note: Discrimination between wholesale customers is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZG Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Discrimination is prohibited for preparatory activities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between activities and discrimination prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Activities must be carried out before discrimination is prohibited

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Wholesale customers must be treated equally
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of discrimination
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: State must not discriminate

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Discrimination is prohibited for eligible activities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of activities as eligible or non-eligible
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: Activities are classified as eligible or non-eligible

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Wholesale customers must be treated equally
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of discriminatory behavior
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: State must not discriminate between wholesale customers

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZG(2) Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a

151ZH Statement about the differences between an access
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.269
note: Publish statement on website within 5 business days after access agreement entry.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zh-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zh-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zh
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide statement on website
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zh-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZH Statement about the differences between an access

151ZI Anti-avoidance
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.273
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151ZI(1) Anti-avoidance
has part: 151ZI(2) Anti-avoidance
has part: 151ZI(3) Anti-avoidance
has part: 151ZI(4) Anti-avoidance
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zi
schema version: 2

151ZI(1) Anti-avoidance
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.273
note: Corporation cannot enter into a scheme to avoid application of Part provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zi-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZI Anti-avoidance

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A corporation must not...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZI(1) Anti-avoidance

151ZI(2) Anti-avoidance
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.273
note: A person must not aid, abet, counsel or procure a contravention of subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zi-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZI Anti-avoidance

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZI(2) Anti-avoidance

151ZI(3) Anti-avoidance
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.273
note: Civil penalty provisions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zi-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZI Anti-avoidance

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits civil penalty provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

151ZI(4) Anti-avoidance
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.273
note: Definition of scheme for purposes of this section
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zi-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZI Anti-avoidance

151ZJ Self-incrimination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.274
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151ZJ(1) Self-incrimination
has part: 151ZJ(2) Self-incrimination
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zj
schema version: 2

151ZJ(1) Self-incrimination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.274
note: No excuse from giving a report under certain provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zj-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZJ Self-incrimination

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZJ(1) Self-incrimination

151ZJ(2) Self-incrimination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.274
note: No admissible evidence against an individual in certain cases.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zj-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZJ Self-incrimination

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is not admissible in evidence against the individual.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to protect an individual's self-incrimination
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) However, in the case of an individual:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZJ(2) Self-incrimination

151ZK Delegation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.274
note: Delegation of ACCC powers to staff and SES employees
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zk-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zk-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zk-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zk
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zk-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the ACCC's powers under any of the following provisions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The ACCC may delegate to a person who is...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the ACCC's powers under any of the following provisions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: permittedBy
premise text: The ACCC may, by writing, delegate to a person...

151ZL Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.275
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151ZL(1) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
has part: 151ZL(2) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
has part: 151ZL(3) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
has part: 151ZL(4) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
has part: 151ZL(5) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
has part: 151ZL(6) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zl
schema version: 2

151ZL(1) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.275
note: Right to review ACCC decision on functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zl-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZL Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person or persons may apply to the Australian Competition Tribunal for a review of the decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to review
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

151ZL(2) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.275
note: Right to review ACCC decision on functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zl-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZL Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to the Australian Competition Tribunal for a review of the decision.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to review
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
premise text: The person or persons may apply...

151ZL(3) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.275
note: Right to review decision by Australian Competition Tribunal
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zl-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZL Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person or persons may apply to the Australian Competition Tribunal for a review of the decision during this period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During the period of the decision
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The decision is made under section 151T.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person or persons may apply to the Australian Competition Tribunal for a review of the decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implies that the decision is reviewable if the ACCC rejects a variation
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: The ACCC makes a decision under section 151T to reject a variation.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person or persons has the right to review a decision by the Australian Competition Tribunal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Has the right to review a decision by the Australian Competition Tribunal
modality: CogAI
operator: hasRightTo
premise text: The person or persons may apply to the Australian Competition Tribunal for a review of the decision.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person or persons may apply to the Australian Competition Tribunal for a review of the decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has the right to review a decision
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
premise text: The ACCC has made a decision under section 151T.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person or persons may apply to the Australian Competition Tribunal for a review of the decision if and only if the ACCC rejects a variation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: If the ACCC rejects a variation, then the person or persons may apply to the Australian Competition Tribunal for a review of the decision
modality: Diffusion
operator: ifAndOnlyIf
premise text: The ACCC makes a decision under section 151T to reject a variation.

151ZL(4) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.275
note: Right to review decision by Australian Competition Tribunal
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zl-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZL Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to review decision
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZL(4) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal

151ZL(5) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.275
note: Right to review decision by Australian Competition Tribunal
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zl-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZL Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to review decision
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

151ZL(6) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.275
note: Application for review of ACCC decision must be made within specified time frames.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zl-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZL Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within specified time frames.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZL(6) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal

151ZM Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.276
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151ZM(1) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
has part: 151ZM(2) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
has part: 151ZM(3) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
has part: 151ZM(4) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
has part: 151ZM(5) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
has part: 151ZM(6) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
has part: 151ZM(7) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zm
schema version: 2

151ZM(1) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.276
note: The Australian Competition Tribunal may make a decision affirming or setting aside the ACCC's decision.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZM Functions and powers of the Australian Competition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May make a decision
modality: Deontic
operator: may

151ZM(2) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.276
note: Decision of ACCC is binding on Australian Competition Tribunal
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZM Functions and powers of the Australian Competition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision of ACCC is binding
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Binding decision
modality: Deontic
operator: binding
premise text: Decision of ACCC is binding on Australian Competition Tribunal

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision of ACCC is binding on Australian Competition Tribunal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Binding on Australian Competition Tribunal
modality: Deontic
operator: binding
premise text: A decision by the Australian Competition Tribunal: affirming a decision of the ACCC; or setting aside a decision of the ACCC;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision of ACCC is binding on ACCC decisions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Binding on ACCC decisions
modality: Deontic
operator: binding
premise text: A decision by the Australian Competition Tribunal: affirming a decision of the ACCC; or setting aside a decision of the ACCC;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision of ACCC is binding on Australian Competition Tribunal decisions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Binding on Australian Competition Tribunal decisions
modality: Deontic
operator: binding
premise text: A decision by the Australian Competition Tribunal: affirming a decision of the ACCC; or setting aside a decision of the ACCC;

151ZM(3) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.276
note: Reset start of decision-making period after ACCC sets aside a decision to reject a functional separation undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zm-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZM Functions and powers of the Australian Competition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The start of the 3-month decision-making period is reset during which the undertaking must be considered.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Reset start of decision-making period during which the undertaking must be considered
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Subsection 151F(5) has effect as if the undertaking had been received by the ACCC immediately after the decision was set aside.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The start of the 3-month decision-making period is reset.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reset start of decision-making period
modality: Deontic
operator: reset
premise text: Subsection 151F(5) has effect as if the undertaking had been received by the ACCC immediately after the decision was set aside.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The ACCC must consider the undertaking during the reset period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider the undertaking during the reset period
modality: Deontic
operator: mustConsider
premise text: Subsection 151F(5) has effect as if the undertaking had been received by the ACCC immediately after the decision was set aside.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The ACCC must provide information about the undertaking during the reset period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information about the undertaking during the reset period
modality: Deontic
operator: mustProvide
premise text: Subsection 151F(5) has effect as if the undertaking had been received by the ACCC immediately after the decision was set aside.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The start of the 3-month decision-making period is reset during which the undertaking must be considered.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Reset start of decision-making period during which the undertaking must be considered
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Subsection 151F(5) has effect as if the undertaking had been received by the ACCC immediately after the decision was set aside.

151ZM(4) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.276
note: Reset start of decision-making period after setting aside ACCC decision
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zm-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZM Functions and powers of the Australian Competition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Australian Competition Tribunal
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

151ZM(5) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.276
note: Requires ACCC to provide information, reports, and assistance to the Australian Competition Tribunal.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zm-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZM Functions and powers of the Australian Competition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

151ZM(6) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.276
note: May consider information given to the ACCC in connection with a decision
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zm-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZM Functions and powers of the Australian Competition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May consider information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

151ZM(7) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.276
note: References to other Acts have effect in relation to a review.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zm-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 151ZM Functions and powers of the Australian Competition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes references to other Acts.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151ZM(7) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition

151ZN Provisions that do not apply in relation to an Australian
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.277
note: Exemption from Competition Tribunal review for ACCC decisions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zn-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zn-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151zn
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts ACCC decisions from Competition Tribunal review
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts

152 Associate
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.277
note: Definition of associate for control purposes
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-152-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-152
schema version: 2

153 Control
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.278
note: Control includes control as a result of, or by means of, trusts, agreements, arrangements, understandings and practices.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-153-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-153
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-153-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 153 Control

154 Control of a company
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.279
curation status: Proposed
has part: 154(1) Control of a company
has part: 154(2) Control of a company
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-154
schema version: 2

154(1) Control of a company
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.279
note: Determines control of a company under Schedule 1 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-154-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-154-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-154-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 154 Control of a company

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-154-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: control of a company
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determines control of a company
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
premise text: Schedule 1 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-154-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 154(1) Control of a company

154(2) Control of a company
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.279
note: Definition of associate in section 152 applies instead.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-154-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-154-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-154-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 154 Control of a company

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-154-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of associate applies.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-154-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 154(2) Control of a company

155 When a person is in a position to exercise control of a network
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.279
note: A person is in a position to exercise control of a telecommunications network if they meet certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-155
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The controller has control during this time period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During what time period does the controller have control?
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (i) to exercise control of the operation of all or part of the network...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The controller has control if they own the network.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: If the controller meets these conditions, then they have control.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (a) the controller legally or beneficially owns the network...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Others recognize the controller's control.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The controller is recognized as having control by others.
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (ii) the controller, either alone or together with an associate of the controller, is in a position to veto any action taken by the board of directors of the company...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The controller has control over the network.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has control over a telecommunications network.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasControl
premise text: (a) the controller legally or beneficially owns the network...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The controller's control diffuses to other parts of the network.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The controller's control spreads to other parts of the network.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (ii) to exercise control of the selection of the kinds of services that are supplied using the network...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 155 When a person is in a position to exercise control of a network

155A When a person is in a position to exercise control of a line
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.281
note: A person is in a position to exercise control of a line if they own it or have significant influence over its management.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-155a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person has control over the line.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has control
modality: Deontic
operator: hasControl
premise text: The controller is in a position to exercise control of the operation of all or part of the line.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person has veto power over company actions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has veto power over company actions
modality: Deontic
operator: hasVetoPower
premise text: (ii) The controller, either alone or together with an associate of the controller, is in a position to veto any action taken by the board of directors of the company.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person has appointment power over company directors.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has appointment power over company directors
modality: Deontic
operator: hasAppointmentPower
premise text: (iii) The controller, either alone or together with an associate of the controller, is in a position to appoint or secure the appointment of, or veto the appointment of, at least half of the board of directors of the company.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person has direction power over company management.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has direction power over company management
modality: Deontic
operator: hasDirectionPower
premise text: (iv) The controller, either alone or together with an associate of the controller, is in a position to exercise, in any other manner, whether directly or indirectly, direction or restraint over any substantial issue affecting the management or affairs of the company.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 155A When a person is in a position to exercise control of a line

156 Deemed networks etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.283
curation status: Proposed
has part: 156(1) Deemed networks etc.
has part: 156(2) Deemed networks etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156
schema version: 2

156(1) Deemed networks etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.283
note: Network alteration or upgrade obligation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 156 Deemed networks etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...but before the designated commencement date;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the alteration/upgrade and the designated commencement date.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) a telecommunications network is altered or upgraded on or after 1 January 2011...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that part is taken to be a network in its own right;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to treat the altered network as a separate entity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a part of the network became capable of being used to supply a superfast carriage service;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows for the possibility of treating the altered network as a separate entity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (b) as a result of the alteration or upgrade...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...but before the designated commencement date;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies the temporal scope of the obligation.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (a) a telecommunications network is altered or upgraded on or after 1 January 2011...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156(1) Deemed networks etc.

156(2) Deemed networks etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.283
note: Telecommunications network extension obligation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 156 Deemed networks etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156(2) Deemed networks etc.

156A Certain lines deemed to have come into existence on or after
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.285
note: Defines conditions for local access lines coming into existence before designated commencement date
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156a
schema version: 2

157 Certain installations and connections are not taken to be an
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.286
curation status: Proposed
has part: 157(1) Certain installations and connections are not taken to be an
has part: 157(2) Certain installations and connections are not taken to be an
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-157
schema version: 2

157(1) Certain installations and connections are not taken to be an
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.286
note: Neither installation nor connection is taken to be an extension, alteration or upgrade of the network.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-157-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-157-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 157 Certain installations and connections are not taken to be an

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-157-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 157(1) Certain installations and connections are not taken to be an

157(2) Certain installations and connections are not taken to be an
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.286
note: Exemptions from subsection (1) for certain expressions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-157-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-157-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 157 Certain installations and connections are not taken to be an

158 Local access line
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.287
curation status: Proposed
has part: 158(1) Local access line
has part: 158(2) Local access line
has part: 158(2A) Local access line
has part: 158(2B) Local access line
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-158
schema version: 2

158(1) Local access line
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.287
note: Definition of local access line
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-158-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 158 Local access line

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Local access line
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Part of the infrastructure
modality: Deontic
operator: is part of
premise text: Local access network

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 158(1) Local access line

158(2) Local access line
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.287
note: Line does not form part of a local access line to the extent that it is on the customer side of the boundary of a telecommunications network.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-158-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 158 Local access line

158(2A) Local access line
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.287
note: Conditional effect of subsection (2) on subsection (2B)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-2a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-158-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 158 Local access line

158(2B) Local access line
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.287
note: Relates to other provisions for lines to which section 142C applies
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-158-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 158 Local access line

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 142C applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation to section 142C
modality: AllenInterval
operator: to the extent that
premise text: Section 151ZF, 151ZG or 151ZH relates to a line to which section 142C applies

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 158(2B) Local access line

158A Deemed local access lines
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.288
curation status: Proposed
has part: 158A(1) Deemed local access lines
has part: 158A(2) Deemed local access lines
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-158a
schema version: 2

158A(1) Deemed local access lines
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.288
note: Local access line deemed to have come into existence on or after the designated commencement date if it was in existence immediately before and is extended on or after that date.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-158a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 158A Deemed local access lines

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the extension is taken to be a local access line in its own right;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between the designated commencement date and the date when the local access line was in existence immediately before.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) a local access line was in existence immediately before the designated commencement date;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the extension is taken to be a local access line in its own right;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to treat the local access line as having come into existence on or after the designated commencement date.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) a local access line was in existence immediately before the designated commencement date;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the extension is taken to be a local access line in its own right;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to treat the local access line as having come into existence on or after the designated commencement date.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (d) the local access line referred to in paragraph (c) is taken to have come into existence on or after the designated commencement date.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the extension is taken to be a local access line in its own right;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between the designated commencement date and the date when the local access line was extended.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (b) the line is extended on or after the designated commencement date;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 158A(1) Deemed local access lines

158A(2) Deemed local access lines
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.288
note: Exemptions from subsection (1) of section 158A(2)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-158a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 158A Deemed local access lines

159 Alteration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.289
curation status: Proposed
has part: 159(1) Alteration
has part: 159(2) Alteration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-159
schema version: 2

159(1) Alteration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.289
note: An alteration of a telecommunications network does not include an extension of the network.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-159-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-159-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 159 Alteration

159(2) Alteration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.289
note: An alteration of a line does not include an extension of the line.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-159-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-159-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 159 Alteration

16 Listed carriage services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16(1) Listed carriage services
has part: 16(2) Listed carriage services
has part: 16(3) Listed carriage services
has part: 16(4) Listed carriage services
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16
schema version: 2

16(1) Listed carriage services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
note: Listed carriage services definition
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Listed carriage services

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(1) Listed carriage services

16(2) Listed carriage services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
note: Defines point for listed carriage services
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Listed carriage services

16(3) Listed carriage services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
note: A point in a specific altitude is considered within Australia's territory.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Listed carriage services

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A point in the atmosphere is considered within Australia's territory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: above
premise text: The stratosphere is above the atmosphere.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A point in a specific altitude is considered within Australia's territory.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(3) Listed carriage services

16(4) Listed carriage services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
note: Points on satellites and above stratosphere are outside Australia
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Listed carriage services

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Outside Australia
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Above stratosphere

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Points on satellites and above stratosphere are outside Australia
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

160 Upgrade of telecommunications network
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.289
curation status: Proposed
has part: 160(1) Upgrade of telecommunications network
has part: 160(2) Upgrade of telecommunications network
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-160
schema version: 2

160(1) Upgrade of telecommunications network
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.289
note: Upgrade of telecommunications network does not include an extension of the network.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-160-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-160-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 160 Upgrade of telecommunications network

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-160-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 160(1) Upgrade of telecommunications network

160(2) Upgrade of telecommunications network
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.289
note: Upgrade of telecommunications network does not include extension of the line.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-160-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-160-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 160 Upgrade of telecommunications network

161 Extended meaning of residential customer
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.289
curation status: Proposed
has part: 161(1) Extended meaning of residential customer
has part: 161(2) Extended meaning of residential customer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-161
schema version: 2

161(1) Extended meaning of residential customer
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.289
note: Individual carrying on business at residence is taken as residential customer.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-161-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 161 Extended meaning of residential customer

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the individual, in the individual’s capacity as a customer, is taken to be a residential customer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between business and residence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: carried out at
premise text: (a) most or all of the work of the business is carried out at the residence of the individual;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the individual, in the individual’s capacity as a customer, is taken to be a residential customer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI logic for 'business carried on'
modality: CogAI
operator: carried on by
premise text: (b) the business does not occupy any premises other than the residence of the individual;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the individual, in the individual’s capacity as a customer, is taken to be a residential customer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to treat individual as residential customer.
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the individual, in the individual’s capacity as a customer, is taken to be a residential customer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion logic for 'business carried on'
modality: Diffusion
operator: carried on by
premise text: (b) the business does not occupy any premises other than the residence of the individual;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the individual, in the individual’s capacity as a customer, is taken to be a residential customer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between business and residence (recurring trace)
modality: LTL
operator: carried out at
premise text: (a) most or all of the work of the business is carried out at the residence of the individual;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 161(1) Extended meaning of residential customer

161(2) Extended meaning of residential customer
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.289
note: Extended meaning of residential customer for partnership businesses
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-161-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 161 Extended meaning of residential customer

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 161(2) Extended meaning of residential customer

162 Close proximity
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.291
curation status: Proposed
has part: 162(1) Close proximity
has part: 162(2) Close proximity
has part: 162(3) Close proximity
has part: 162(4) Close proximity
has part: 162(5) Close proximity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-162
schema version: 2

162(1) Close proximity
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.291
note: Minister may determine proximity for specified circumstances
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-162-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 162 Close proximity

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to determine proximity
modality: Deontic
operator: may

162(2) Close proximity
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.291
note: Minister may determine proximity exception
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-162-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 162 Close proximity

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to deviate from proximity rule
modality: Deontic
operator: may

162(3) Close proximity
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.291
note: Delegation to the ACCC must be of a legislative character.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-162-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 162 Close proximity

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on delegation
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Delegation to the ACCC must be of a legislative character.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 162(3) Close proximity

162(4) Close proximity
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.291
note: Delegation of powers to ACCC
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-162-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 162 Close proximity

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACCC holds the delegated power
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Power delegation
modality: Deontic
operator: delegation
premise text: Minister delegates power to ACCC

162(5) Close proximity
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.291
note: Comply with written directions of the Minister when performing a delegated function or exercising a delegated power.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-162-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 162 Close proximity

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with written directions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

18 Access to an emergency call service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.45
note: Access to an emergency call service is required.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-18-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires access to an emergency call service.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18 Access to an emergency call service

19 Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19(1) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
has part: 19(2) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
has part: 19(3) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
has part: 19(4) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19
schema version: 2

19(1) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.45
note: A reference to a recognised person who operates an emergency call service is a reference to a person who operates an emergency call service and meets certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Recognised person who operates an emergency call service

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The text refers to a person who operates an emergency call service.
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(1) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service

19(2) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.45
note: A determination under paragraph (1)(b) is a notifiable instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Recognised person who operates an emergency call service

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: notifiable instrument
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determinations are obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1)(b)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(2) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service

19(3) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.45
note: A person may be specified in a determination even if they do not operate an emergency call service at the time.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Recognised person who operates an emergency call service

19(4) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.45
note: Clarifies subsection (3) for avoidance of doubt
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Recognised person who operates an emergency call service

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Clarifies subsection (3)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Provides clarity on subsection (3)
modality: Deontic
operator: clarification
premise text: (4) Subsection (3) is enacted for the avoidance of doubt.

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.17
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2(1) Commencement
has part: 2(2) Commencement
has part: 2(3) Commencement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

2(1) Commencement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.17
note: Commencement of certain provisions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: No explicit duty, ban conduct, grant permission, or create a right

2(2) Commencement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.17
note: Commences on June 5, 1997
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Definition of commencement interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal interval definition

2(3) Commencement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.17
note: Commences on July 1, 1997
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-2-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

20 Customer cabling
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20(1) Customer cabling
has part: 20(2) Customer cabling
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20
schema version: 2

20(1) Customer cabling
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.45
note: Defines customer cabling as a line treated under regulations.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-20-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Customer cabling

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-20-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(1) Customer cabling

20(2) Customer cabling
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.45
note: Regulations may deal with a matter by reference to the boundary of a telecommunications network.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-20-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Customer cabling

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-20-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(2) Customer cabling

21 Customer equipment
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.46
curation status: Proposed
has part: 21(1) Customer equipment
has part: 21(2) Customer equipment
has part: 21(3) Customer equipment
has part: 21(4) Customer equipment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21
schema version: 2

21(1) Customer equipment
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.46
note: Defines customer equipment for the purposes of the Act.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Customer equipment

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(1) Customer equipment

21(2) Customer equipment
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.46
note: Regulations may deal with a matter by reference to the boundary of a telecommunications network.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Customer equipment

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(2) Customer equipment

21(3) Customer equipment
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.46
note: No implication that subsection (2) limits subsection (1).
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Customer equipment

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No obligation to limit subsection (2) by implication.
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
premise text: (2)

21(4) Customer equipment
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.46
note: Defines customer equipment in absence of regulations.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Customer equipment

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The regulation applies within the defined boundary.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal boundaries for regulations.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Regulations made under this section apply to the specified boundary.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Excluded items are not considered customer equipment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Lists excluded items from the definition.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: This section lists excluded items from the definition of customer equipment.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition applies to customer equipment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies entities into categories.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Customer equipment is defined by this section.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(4) Customer equipment

22 Customer cabling and customer equipment—boundary of a
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.47
curation status: Proposed
has part: 22(1) Customer cabling and customer equipment—boundary of a
has part: 22(2) Customer cabling and customer equipment—boundary of a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22
schema version: 2

22(1) Customer cabling and customer equipment—boundary of a
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.47
note: Regulations must be followed to determine the boundary of a telecommunications network.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-22-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Customer cabling and customer equipment—boundary of a

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations must be followed.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-22-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(1) Customer cabling and customer equipment—boundary of a

22(2) Customer cabling and customer equipment—boundary of a
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.47
note: Regulations may reference agreements between carriers, carriage service providers, and customers.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-22-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Customer cabling and customer equipment—boundary of a

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-22-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(2) Customer cabling and customer equipment—boundary of a

23 Immediate circle
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.49
note: Defines 'immediate circle' for purposes of the Act.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23
schema version: 2

24 Extended meaning of use
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.54
note: Definition of use in isolation or conjunction with other things.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24
schema version: 2

25 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.55
note: Defines network unit types
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25
schema version: 2

26 Single line links connecting distinct places in Australia
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
curation status: Proposed
has part: 26(1) Single line links connecting distinct places in Australia
has part: 26(2) Single line links connecting distinct places in Australia
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26
schema version: 2

26(1) Single line links connecting distinct places in Australia
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
note: Line link connecting distinct places in Australia must be a network unit if they are at least the statutory distance apart.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-26-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Single line links connecting distinct places in Australia

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the line link is a network unit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to be a network unit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) and (b)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-26-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26(1) Single line links connecting distinct places in Australia

26(2) Single line links connecting distinct places in Australia
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
note: Statutory distance is 500 metres or a longer distance not exceeding 50 kilometres specified in regulations.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-26-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Single line links connecting distinct places in Australia

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 500 metres or a longer distance not exceeding 50 kilometres.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Statutory distance is specified
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the statutory distance...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-26-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26(2) Single line links connecting distinct places in Australia

27 Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
curation status: Proposed
has part: 27(1) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
has part: 27(2) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
has part: 27(3) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
has part: 27(4) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
has part: 27(5) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27
schema version: 2

27(1) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
note: Owning multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia is an obligation.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is a network unit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ownership of line links
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (same person owns, or same persons own)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27(1) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia

27(2) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
note: Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia must satisfy certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: each of those line links connects distinct places in Australia;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory condition
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: the owners of the line links are bodies corporate;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27(2) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia

27(3) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
note: Statutory distance is 5 kilometres or up to 500 kilometres as specified in regulations.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for the statutory distance is up to 500 kilometres as specified in regulations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for statutory distance
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, the statutory distance is:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The regulatory distance is defined by regulation as up to 500 kilometres.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Regulatory distance is defined by regulation
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: (b) if a longer distance, not exceeding 500 kilometres, is specified in the regulations—that longer distance.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The statutory distance is 5 kilometres or up to 500 kilometres as specified in regulations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Statutory distance is specified
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (a) 5 kilometres; or (b) if a longer distance, not exceeding 500 kilometres, is specified in the regulations—that longer distance.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The regulatory distance is not necessarily fixed at up to 500 kilometres as specified in regulations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Regulatory distance is not necessarily fixed
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: (b) if a longer distance, not exceeding 500 kilometres, is specified in the regulations—that longer distance.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for the regulatory distance is up to 500 kilometres as specified in regulations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for regulatory distance
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: (b) if a longer distance, not exceeding 500 kilometres, is specified in the regulations—that longer distance.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27(3) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia

27(4) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
note: Definition of 'owner' and 'related company group'
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27(4) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia

27(5) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
note: Determine relationship between corporate bodies in the same manner as under Corporations Act 2001.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Determine relationship between corporate bodies
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Same manner as under Corporations Act 2001.
modality: Deontic
operator: same manner
premise text: Corporations Act 2001

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27(5) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia

270 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.292
note: Protect the confidentiality of certain information
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-270-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-270-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-270-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-270-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-270-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-270
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-270-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Certain record-keeping requirements are imposed in relation to authorised disclosures or uses of information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure and use of protected information
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Relates to
premise text: Disclosure or use of protected information is authorised in limited circumstances (for example, disclosure or use for purposes relating to the enforcement of the criminal law).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-270-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Protect the confidentiality of information that relates to...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty to protect confidentiality
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: None

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-270-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty to disclose only for authorized purposes
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: An authorised recipient of protected information may only disclose or use the information for an authorised purpose.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-270-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty to keep records
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Certain record-keeping requirements are imposed in relation to authorised disclosures or uses of information.

271 Eligible person
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.292
note: Definition of an eligible person
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-271-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-271
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-271-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 271 Eligible person

272 Number-database operator and eligible number-database
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.293
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(1) Number-database operator and eligible number-database
has part: 272(2) Number-database operator and eligible number-database
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-272
schema version: 2

272(1) Number-database operator and eligible number-database
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.293
note: Definition of number-database operator
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-272-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-272-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-272-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Number-database operator and eligible number-database

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-272-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a number-database operator is a person in respect of which a determination is in force under subsection 472(1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies a person with a determination in force
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, a number-database operator is a person...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-272-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(1) Number-database operator and eligible number-database

272(2) Number-database operator and eligible number-database
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.293
note: Definition of eligible number-database person
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-272-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-272-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Number-database operator and eligible number-database

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-272-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(2) Number-database operator and eligible number-database

273 Information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.293
note: A reference in this Part to information includes a reference to opinion.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-273-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-273-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-273-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-273
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-273-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a reference to opinion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: A reference in this Part to information

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-273-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Opinion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass of
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
premise text: Information

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-273-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273 Information

274 Telecommunications contractor
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.293
note: Definition of telecommunications contractor
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-274-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-274-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-274
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-274-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-274-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 274 Telecommunications contractor

275 Number-database contractor
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.293
note: Definition of number-database contractor
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-275
schema version: 2

275A Location information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294
curation status: Proposed
has part: 275A(1) Location information
has part: 275A(2) Location information
has part: 275A(3) Location information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-275a
schema version: 2

275A(1) Location information
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294
note: Information about location of mobile telephone handset or device must be provided by the customer responsible for it.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-275a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 275A Location information

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide location information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 275A(1) Location information

275A(2) Location information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294
note: Document about location of mobile communications device must relate to customer's affairs.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-275a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 275A Location information

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide location information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 275A(2) Location information

275A(3) Location information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294
note: Clarifies section enactment for doubt avoidance
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275a-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-275a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 275A Location information

275B Emergency management person
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294
curation status: Proposed
has part: 275B(1) Emergency management person
has part: 275B(2) Emergency management person
has part: 275B(3) Emergency management person
has part: 275B(4) Emergency management person
has part: 275B(5) Emergency management person
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-275b
schema version: 2

275B(1) Emergency management person
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294
note: Defines emergency management person
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-275b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 275B Emergency management person

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: emergency management person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies emergency management person
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 275B(1) Emergency management person

275B(2) Emergency management person
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294
note: Specify offices and/or positions for emergency management person definition
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-275b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 275B Emergency management person

275B(3) Emergency management person
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294
note: Specify offices or positions under subsection (2)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-275b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 275B Emergency management person

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must specify offices or positions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 275B(3) Emergency management person

275B(4) Emergency management person
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294
note: Protection of communications does not limit subsection (3)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-275b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 275B Emergency management person

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation negation
modality: Deontic
operator: does not
premise text: (3)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 275B(4) Emergency management person

275B(5) Emergency management person
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294
note: Consultation requirement before making an instrument
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-275b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 275B Emergency management person

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consultation MUST occur BEFORE making an instrument under subsection (2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (5) Before making an instrument under subsection (2), the AFP Minister must consult the Minister administering this Act.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consultation IS_A a cognitive process involving the AFP Minister and the Minister administering this Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Consultation as a cognitive process
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: (5) Before making an instrument under subsection (2), the AFP Minister must consult the Minister administering this Act.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The AFP Minister MUST consult the Minister administering this Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (5) Before making an instrument under subsection (2), the AFP Minister must consult the Minister administering this Act.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consultation IS_A a diffusion of responsibility from the AFP Minister to the Minister administering this Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Consultation as a diffusion of responsibility
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: (5) Before making an instrument under subsection (2), the AFP Minister must consult the Minister administering this Act.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consultation MUST occur WITHIN a specific temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (5) Before making an instrument under subsection (2), the AFP Minister must consult the Minister administering this Act.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 275B(5) Emergency management person

275C Emergency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.295
note: Defines 'emergency' for this Part.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-275c
schema version: 2

275D Emergency law
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.295
curation status: Proposed
has part: 275D(1) Emergency law
has part: 275D(2) Emergency law
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-275d
schema version: 2

275D(1) Emergency law
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.295
note: Definition of emergency law
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275d-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-275d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 275D Emergency law

275D(2) Emergency law
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.295
note: Specify a law for emergency law definition
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275d-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-275d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 275D Emergency law

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to specify a law
modality: Deontic
operator: may

275E Relevant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.295
note: Defines relevant information for this Part.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275e-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-275e
schema version: 2

276 Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.296
curation status: Proposed
has part: 276(1) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
has part: 276(2) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
has part: 276(3) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-276
schema version: 2

276(1) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.296
note: Disclose or use information about certain communications without consent.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-276-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 276 Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure or use of certain information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: None

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 276(1) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons

276(2) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.296
note: Disclosing or using certain information is prohibited for eligible persons.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-276-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 276 Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...because the person was employed by the contractor in connection with its business as such a contractor.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between knowledge and disclosure.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) A person who has been an eligible person must not disclose or use...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...because the person was employed by the contractor in connection with its business as such a contractor.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge graph of persons and their knowledge.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph
premise text: (2) A person who has been an eligible person must not disclose or use...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person who has been an eligible person must not disclose or use...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...because the person was employed by the contractor in connection with its business as such a contractor.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of knowledge and disclosure.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread of knowledge
premise text: (2) A person who has been an eligible person must not disclose or use...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...because the person was employed by the contractor in connection with its business as such a contractor.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure and knowledge.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (2) A person who has been an eligible person must not disclose or use...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 276(2) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons

276(3) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.296
note: Offence for contravening section
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-276-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 276 Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 276(3) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons

277 Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.298
curation status: Proposed
has part: 277(1) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
has part: 277(2) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
has part: 277(3) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-277
schema version: 2

277(1) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.298
note: Disclose or use information or documents that relate to carriage services or personal particulars without permission.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-277-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 277 Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in connection with the person’s business as such an operator; or because the person is employed by the operator in connection with its business as such an operator
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure/use and business activities.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (1) An eligible number-database person must not disclose or use any information or document...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of disclosure/use on carriage services.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) An eligible number-database person must not disclose or use any information or document...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) An eligible number-database person must not disclose or use any information or document...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: because the person is employed by the operator in connection with its business as such an operator; or because the person is employed by the operator in connection with its business as such a contractor
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of disclosure/use to personal particulars.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (1) An eligible number-database person must not disclose or use any information or document...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the person is a number-database operator—in connection with the person’s business as such an operator; or if the person is an employee of a number-database operator—because the person is employed by the operator in connection with its business as such an operator
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure/use and carriage services.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (1) An eligible number-database person must not disclose or use any information or document...

277(2) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.298
note: Prohibition on disclosing or using information related to a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) without proper authorization.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-277-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 277 Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on certain actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 277(2) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database

277(3) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.298
note: Offence for contravening section
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-277-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 277 Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 277(3) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database

278 Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.300
curation status: Proposed
has part: 278(1) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
has part: 278(2) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
has part: 278(3) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
has part: 278(4) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-278
schema version: 2

278(1) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.300
note: Disclose or use information about emergency calls without authorization.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-278-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 278 Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) An emergency call person must not disclose or use any information...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 278(1) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons

278(2) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.300
note: Disclose or use information related to emergency call service operations.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-278-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 278 Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure or use prohibition.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) A person who has been an emergency call person must not disclose...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person who has been an emergency call person must not disclose...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 278(2) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons

278(3) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.300
note: Offence for contravening section 278(1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-278-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 278 Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits contravention of section 278(1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies contravention as an offence
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

278(4) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.300
note: Exempts emergency call communications from primary disclosure/use offence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-278-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 278 Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: carried by a carrier or carriage service provider
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the temporal relationship between exempted emergency call communications.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (4) Subparagraphs (1)(a)(i) and (ii)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: carried by a carrier or carriage service provider
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes the processing of exempted emergency call communications.
modality: CogAI
operator: Contains
premise text: (4) Subparagraphs (1)(a)(i) and (ii)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain types of communications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: carried by a carrier or carriage service provider
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines the scope of exempted emergency call communications.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: (4) Subparagraphs (1)(a)(i) and (ii)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: carried by a carrier or carriage service provider
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the propagation of exempted emergency call communications.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Contains
premise text: (4) Subparagraphs (1)(a)(i) and (ii)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: carried by a carrier or carriage service provider
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between exempted emergency call communications.
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
premise text: (4) Subparagraphs (1)(a)(i) and (ii)

279 Performance of person’s duties
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.302
curation status: Proposed
has part: 279(1) Performance of person’s duties
has part: 279(2) Performance of person’s duties
has part: 279(3) Performance of person’s duties
has part: 279(4) Performance of person’s duties
has part: 279(5) Performance of person’s duties
has part: 279(6) Performance of person’s duties
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-279
schema version: 2

279(1) Performance of person’s duties
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.302
note: Disclosure or use of information is allowed in performance of duties as an employee.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-279-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 279 Performance of person’s duties

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for disclosure or use.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (b) the disclosure or use is made in the performance of the person’s duties as such an employee.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implicates that disclosure or use is allowed if it's part of job duties.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (a) the person is an employee...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits disclosure or use in performance of duties.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1) Section 276 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 279(1) Performance of person’s duties

279(2) Performance of person’s duties
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.302
note: Disclosure or use of information is allowed in performance of duties as a telecommunications contractor.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-279-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 279 Performance of person’s duties

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows disclosure or use
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (a) the person is a telecommunications contractor; and (b) the disclosure or use is made in the performance of the person’s duties as such a contractor.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows disclosure or use in performance of duties
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) Section 276 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person of information or a document if:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 279(2) Performance of person’s duties

279(3) Performance of person’s duties
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.302
note: Disclosure or use of information is allowed in performance of duties as an employee.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-279-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 279 Performance of person’s duties

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose or use information in performance of duties.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (3) Section 277 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 279(3) Performance of person’s duties

279(4) Performance of person’s duties
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.302
note: Disclosure or use of information or document by a number-database contractor in performance of duties.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-279-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 279 Performance of person’s duties

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 279(4) Performance of person’s duties

279(5) Performance of person’s duties
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.302
note: Disclosure or use of information by an employee in performance of duties
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-279-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 279 Performance of person’s duties

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation: disclosure or use is made in the performance of the person's duties as such an employee
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: the disclosure or use is made in the performance of the person’s duties as such an employee.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation: employee, recognised person who operates an emergency call service, emergency call contractor
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
premise text: a recognised person who operates an emergency call service; or an emergency call contractor;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits disclosure or use by an employee in performance of duties
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: (5) Section 278 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person of information or a document if:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information flow: disclosure or use by an employee in performance of duties
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information flow
premise text: (5) Section 278 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person of information or a document if:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace: disclosure or use by a person of information or a document
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: the person is an employee of: (i) a recognised person who operates an emergency call service; or (ii) an emergency call contractor;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 279(5) Performance of person’s duties

279(6) Performance of person’s duties
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.302
note: Disclosure or use of information is permitted for emergency call contractors performing their duties.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-279-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 279 Performance of person’s duties

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for emergency call contractors.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (6) Section 278 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person of information or a document if: (a) the person is an emergency call contractor; and (b) the disclosure or use is made in the performance of the person’s duties as such a contractor.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition for emergency call contractors.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (6) Section 278 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person of information or a document if: (a) the person is an emergency call contractor; and (b) the disclosure or use is made in the performance of the person’s duties as such a contractor.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose or use information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (6) Section 278 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person of information or a document if: (a) the person is an emergency call contractor; and (b) the disclosure or use is made in the performance of the person’s duties as such a contractor.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion for emergency call contractors.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (6) Section 278 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person of information or a document if: (a) the person is an emergency call contractor; and (b) the disclosure or use is made in the performance of the person’s duties as such a contractor.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for emergency call contractors.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (6) Section 278 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person of information or a document if: (a) the person is an emergency call contractor; and (b) the disclosure or use is made in the performance of the person’s duties as such a contractor.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 279(6) Performance of person’s duties

28 Designated radiocommunications facility
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.57
curation status: Proposed
has part: 28(1) Designated radiocommunications facility
has part: 28(2) Designated radiocommunications facility
has part: 28(3) Designated radiocommunications facility
has part: 28(4) Designated radiocommunications facility
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28
schema version: 2

28(1) Designated radiocommunications facility
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.57
note: Facility is a network unit if used or for use to supply carriage service between points in Australia.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Designated radiocommunications facility

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to supply carriage service between a point in Australia and one or more other points in Australia.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between points in Australia
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (1) If a designated radiocommunications facility is used, or is for use...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the facility is a network unit.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference from condition to conclusion
modality: Argumentation
operator: if-then
premise text: (1) If a designated radiocommunications facility is used, or is for use...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the facility is a network unit.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of facility as network unit
modality: CogAI
operator: is
premise text: (1) If a designated radiocommunications facility is used, or is for use...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the facility is a network unit.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (1) If a designated radiocommunications facility is used, or is for use...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to supply carriage service between one or more other points in Australia.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal relation between points in Australia
modality: Diffusion
operator: for
premise text: (1) If a designated radiocommunications facility is used, or is for use...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28(1) Designated radiocommunications facility

28(2) Designated radiocommunications facility
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.57
note: It does not matter whether the supply involves the use of a satellite or the use of a line or other facility outside Australia.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Designated radiocommunications facility

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision implies an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies

28(3) Designated radiocommunications facility
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.57
note: Defines point for purposes of section
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Designated radiocommunications facility

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a point includes land, underground, atmosphere, outer space, underwater, sea
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Includes temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, a point includes...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a point includes land, underground, atmosphere, outer space, underwater, sea
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Includes CogAI
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, a point includes...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a point includes a mobile or potentially mobile point
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes mobile or potentially mobile points
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, a point includes...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a point includes land, underground, atmosphere, outer space, underwater, sea
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes land, underground, atmosphere, outer space, underwater, sea
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, a point includes...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a point includes land, underground, atmosphere, outer space, underwater, sea
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Includes diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, a point includes...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a point includes land, underground, atmosphere, outer space, underwater, sea
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Includes ordered or recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: includes
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, a point includes...

28(4) Designated radiocommunications facility
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.57
note: Designated radiocommunications facility definition
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Designated radiocommunications facility

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a designated radiocommunications facility
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of designated radiocommunications facility
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
premise text: (4) For the purposes of this section, a point that is:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28(4) Designated radiocommunications facility

280 Authorisation by or under law
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.303
curation status: Proposed
has part: 280(1) Authorisation by or under law
has part: 280(1A) Authorisation by or under law
has part: 280(1B) Authorisation by or under law
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-280
schema version: 2

280(1) Authorisation by or under law
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.303
note: Disclosure or use of information is permitted under law.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-280-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 280 Authorisation by or under law

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for permitted disclosures or uses.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (b) in any other case—the disclosure or use is required or authorised by or under law.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose or use information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1) Division 2 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document if...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 280(1) Authorisation by or under law

280(1A) Authorisation by or under law
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.303
note: Reference to enforcement agency's functions is taken to be a reference to the performance of the National Anti-Corruption Commissioner's functions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1a-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-280-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 280 Authorisation by or under law

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reference to enforcement agency's functions is taken to be a reference to the performance of the National Anti-Corruption Commissioner's functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1a-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Reference to enforcement agency's functions is taken to be a reference to the performance of the National Anti-Corruption Commissioner's functions.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: refers to

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 280(1A) Authorisation by or under law

280(1B) Authorisation by or under law
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.303
note: Disclosure of information or document permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-280-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 280 Authorisation by or under law

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

281 Witnesses
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.305
curation status: Proposed
has part: 281(1) Witnesses
has part: 281(2) Witnesses
has part: 281(3) Witnesses
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-281
schema version: 2

281(1) Witnesses
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.305
note: Disclosure of information or documents by a witness summoned to give evidence or produce documents is permitted.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-281-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 281 Witnesses

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 281(1) Witnesses

281(2) Witnesses
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.305
note: Disclosure of information or document by a person as a witness in a civil proceeding is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-281-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 281 Witnesses

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure purposes.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (b) is not used or disclosed by the service provider for any purpose other than one or more of the following purposes:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information or document by a person as a witness in a civil proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information or document by a person as a witness in a civil proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (iii) complying with requests or requirements to make disclosures provided for by sections 284 to 288 of this Act;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information or document by a person as a witness in a civil proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (iv) providing persons with access to their personal information in accordance with the Privacy Act 1988;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for disclosure purposes.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (ii) complying with the requirements of warrants under Chapters 2 and 3 of that Act or authorisations under Chapter 4 of that Act;

281(3) Witnesses
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.305
note: Exemptions from subsection (2)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-281-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 281 Witnesses

284 Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.306
curation status: Proposed
has part: 284(1) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
has part: 284(1A) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
has part: 284(2) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
has part: 284(3) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-284
schema version: 2

284(1) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.306
note: Disclosure of information or document to assist ACMA in carrying out its functions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-284-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 284 Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Disclosure made during ACMA's function execution.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Disclosure justified by assistance to ACMA.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
premise text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted to disclose information or document.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Disclosure allowed under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
premise text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Disclosure allowed until ACMA's function execution ends.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 284(1) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or

284(1A) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.306
note: Disclosure of information or document is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-logic-epistemic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-284-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 284 Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The disclosure is permitted if it occurs during the eSafety Commissioner's functions.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between disclosure and assistance
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The disclosure must be made during the eSafety Commissioner's functions.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The disclosure is permitted under certain conditions.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permissive language
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: The disclosure is not required but permitted.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-logic-epistemic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The disclosure is permitted if it assists the eSafety Commissioner.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Conditional relationship between disclosure and assistance
modality: Epistemic
operator: if-then
premise text: If the information or document assists the eSafety Commissioner, then it can be disclosed.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The disclosure is permitted if it occurs before that point.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between disclosure and assistance
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: The information or document may assist the eSafety Commissioner until a certain point.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 284(1A) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or

284(2) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.306
note: Disclosure of information or document to ACCC staff for assistance with telecommunications functions and powers.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-284-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 284 Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Assistance with telecommunications functions and powers
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information or document
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Disclosure is made to ACCC staff

284(3) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.306
note: Disclosure of information or document to Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-284-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 284 Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or

285 Integrated public number database
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.307
curation status: Proposed
has part: 285(1) Integrated public number database
has part: 285(1A) Integrated public number database
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-285
schema version: 2

285(1) Integrated public number database
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.307
note: Permitted disclosures—general
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-285-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-285-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 285 Integrated public number database

285(1A) Integrated public number database
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.307
note: Disclosure of information from integrated public number database is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-285-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-285-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-285-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-285-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 285 Integrated public number database

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-285-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between disclosure and conditions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-285-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Disclosure of information from integrated public number database is permitted under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

285A Data for emergency warnings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.311
note: Disclosure of information from integrated public number database for emergency purposes is permitted.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-285a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-285a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-285a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-285a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the disclosure is permitted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Disclosure is allowed for emergency purposes.
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: the information or document consists of information contained in an integrated public number database;

286 Calls to emergency service number
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.312
note: Disclosure of certain information is permitted under specific conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-286-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-286-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-286
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-286-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Indicates that disclosure is permitted under specific conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: !

287 Threat to person’s life or health
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.313
note: Disclosure or use of information is allowed under certain conditions to prevent a serious threat to life or health.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-287-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-287-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-287-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-287
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-287-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure or use overlaps with the threat period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Disclosure or use occurs during a serious threat period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Serious threat exists.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-287-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure or use is allowed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits disclosure or use under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Reasonable grounds exist to prevent a serious threat.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-287-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 287 Threat to person’s life or health

288 Communications for maritime purposes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.313
note: Disclosure or use of information is permitted if reasonably necessary for preservation of human life at sea or maritime communications purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-288-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-288-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-288
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-288-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose or use information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

289 Knowledge or consent of person concerned
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.313
note: Disclosure or use of information or document is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-289-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-289-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-289
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-289-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose or use information or document
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

29 Facilities specified in Ministerial determination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.58
curation status: Proposed
has part: 29(1) Facilities specified in Ministerial determination
has part: 29(2) Facilities specified in Ministerial determination
has part: 29(4) Facilities specified in Ministerial determination
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29
schema version: 2

29(1) Facilities specified in Ministerial determination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.58
note: Minister may determine a facility as a network unit.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-29-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 29 Facilities specified in Ministerial determination

29(2) Facilities specified in Ministerial determination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.58
note: The determination has effect accordingly.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-29-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 29 Facilities specified in Ministerial determination

29(4) Facilities specified in Ministerial determination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.58
note: Nothing in other provisions limits power conferred by subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-29-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 29 Facilities specified in Ministerial determination

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-29-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29(4) Facilities specified in Ministerial determination

290 Implicit consent of sender and recipient of communication
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.314
note: Disclosure or use of communication is allowed if sender and recipient would have consented.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-290-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-290-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-290
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-290-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits disclosure or use of communication.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: Sender and recipient would have consented.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-290-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 290 Implicit consent of sender and recipient of communication

291 Business needs of other carriers or service providers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.314
curation status: Proposed
has part: 291(1) Business needs of other carriers or service providers
has part: 291(2) Business needs of other carriers or service providers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-291
schema version: 2

291(1) Business needs of other carriers or service providers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.314
note: Disclosure or use of information or document for specific purposes is permitted.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-291-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 291 Business needs of other carriers or service providers

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Indicates that disclosure or use is permitted under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: !

291(2) Business needs of other carriers or service providers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.314
note: Disclosure or use of information or document for specific purposes related to carriage service provision.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-291-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 291 Business needs of other carriers or service providers

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Disclosure or use of information or document for specific purposes related to carriage service provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

291A Location dependent carriage services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.316
curation status: Proposed
has part: 291A(1) Location dependent carriage services
has part: 291A(2) Location dependent carriage services
has part: 291A(3) Location dependent carriage services
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-291a
schema version: 2

291A(1) Location dependent carriage services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.316
note: Disclosure of information or document for location-dependent carriage services
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-291a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 291A Location dependent carriage services

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >

291A(2) Location dependent carriage services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.316
note: Disclosure or use of information is permitted for a specific purpose.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-291a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 291A Location dependent carriage services

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval defined
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between events
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
premise text: Disclosure or use is made for a purpose of, or is connected with, the supply, or proposed supply, by a person of a location dependent carriage service.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Knowledge is applicable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies knowledge as applicable
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: The disclosure or use is made for a purpose of, or is connected with, the supply, or proposed supply, by a person of a location dependent carriage service.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure or use is permitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies action as permitted
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (2) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit disclosure or use of information or a document.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Trace defined
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes trace of events
modality: LTL
operator: <>
premise text: The disclosure or use is made for a purpose of, or is connected with, the supply, or proposed supply, by a person of a location dependent carriage service.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Data is valid
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Classifies data as valid
modality: SHACL
operator: =
premise text: The disclosure or use is made for a purpose of, or is connected with, the supply, or proposed supply, by a person of a location dependent carriage service.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 291A(2) Location dependent carriage services

291A(3) Location dependent carriage services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.316
note: Definition of integrated public number database and location dependent carriage service.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-291a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 291A Location dependent carriage services

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of integrated public number database implies existence of Telstra Limited's database or another person's database
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 291A(3) Location dependent carriage services

292 Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.317
curation status: Proposed
has part: 292(1) Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
has part: 292(2) Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-292
schema version: 2

292(1) Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.317
note: Disclosure or use of information or document is allowed under specified circumstances.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-292-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 292 Circumstances prescribed in the regulations

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for permitted disclosure or use.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) Section 276 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implicates permitted disclosure or use under specified circumstances.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) Section 276 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Infers permitted disclosure or use under specified circumstances.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (1) Section 276 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows disclosure or use of information or document under specified circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1) Section 276 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagates permitted disclosure or use under specified circumstances.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (1) Section 276 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 292(1) Circumstances prescribed in the regulations

292(2) Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.317
note: Permits disclosure or use of information in specified circumstances.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-292-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 292 Circumstances prescribed in the regulations

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal scope
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Represents knowledge concept
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 277 permits disclosure or use in specified circumstances.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows action
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes information flow
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Spread
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Identifies recurring pattern
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.

293 Uses connected with exempt disclosures
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.318
curation status: Proposed
has part: 293(1) Uses connected with exempt disclosures
has part: 293(2) Uses connected with exempt disclosures
has part: 293(3) Uses connected with exempt disclosures
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-293
schema version: 2

293(1) Uses connected with exempt disclosures
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.318
note: Permits use of information or document for disclosure purposes
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-293-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 293 Uses connected with exempt disclosures

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal scope
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) Section 276 does not prohibit a use of information or a document

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if because of this Division, the disclosure is not prohibited by section 276.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines knowledge structure
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (b) because of this Division, the disclosure is not prohibited by section 276.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 276 does not prohibit this use.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows use under specified conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (a) the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines information flow
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Spread
premise text: (a) the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (1) Section 276 does not prohibit a use of information or a document

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 293(1) Uses connected with exempt disclosures

293(2) Uses connected with exempt disclosures
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.318
note: Permits use of information or document for disclosure purposes
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-293-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 293 Uses connected with exempt disclosures

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if: (a) the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person; and (b) because of this Division, the disclosure is not prohibited by section 277.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for use
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a use of information or a document

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if: (a) the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person; and (b) because of this Division, the disclosure is not prohibited by section 277.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes exempt disclosures using CogAI
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a use of information or a document

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if: (a) the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person; and (b) because of this Division, the disclosure is not prohibited by section 277.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows use
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a use of information or a document

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if: (a) the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person; and (b) because of this Division, the disclosure is not prohibited by section 277.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes diffusion for use
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a use of information or a document

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if: (a) the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person; and (b) because of this Division, the disclosure is not prohibited by section 277.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for use
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a use of information or a document

293(3) Uses connected with exempt disclosures
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.318
note: Permits use of information or document for disclosure purposes
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-293-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 293 Uses connected with exempt disclosures

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts disclosure of information or document
modality: Deontic
operator: !

294 Effect of this Subdivision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.318
note: Nothing in this Subdivision limits the generality of anything else.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-294-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-294
schema version: 2

295 Burden of proof
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.318
curation status: Proposed
has part: 295(1) Burden of proof
has part: 295(2) Burden of proof
has part: 295(3) Burden of proof
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295
schema version: 2

295(1) Burden of proof
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.318
note: Burden of proof for offences against Division 2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 295 Burden of proof

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide burden of proof
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295(1) Burden of proof

295(2) Burden of proof
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.318
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to an exception
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 295 Burden of proof

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Defendant must provide evidence
modality: Epistemic
operator: Evidential Burden

295(3) Burden of proof
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.318
note: Burden of proof definition
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 295 Burden of proof

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines evidential burden
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295(3) Burden of proof

295A ACMA to make integrated public number database scheme
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.320
note: ACMA must make integrated public number database scheme
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295a
schema version: 2

295B Scheme must deal with certain matters
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.320
curation status: Proposed
has part: 295B(1) Scheme must deal with certain matters
has part: 295B(2) Scheme must deal with certain matters
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295b
schema version: 2

295B(1) Scheme must deal with certain matters
type: Concept
description: yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.320
note: Scheme must deal with certain matters
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 295B Scheme must deal with certain matters

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295B(1) Scheme must deal with certain matters

295B(2) Scheme must deal with certain matters
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.320
note: Applicant must specify purpose for authorisation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 295B Scheme must deal with certain matters

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide purpose
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295B(2) Scheme must deal with certain matters

295C Applications may be treated differently
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.321
note: Different provision for different kinds of authorization applications
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295c
schema version: 2

295D Scope of authorisations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.321
note: Scope of authorisations
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295d-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295d
schema version: 2

295E Provisional and final authorisations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.321
note: Provision for provisional and final authorisations
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295e-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295e
schema version: 2

295F Conditions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.321
note: Conditions for authorisation grant
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295f-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295f
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes conditions on authorisation grant
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295F Conditions

295G Varying or revoking authorisations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.321
note: Provision for varying or revoking authorisations
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295g-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295g
schema version: 2

295H Scheme may confer administrative powers on the ACMA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.322
note: ACMA may make decisions of an administrative character.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295h-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295h-logic-ltl-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295h-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295h-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295h
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295h-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The administrative powers are defined as discretionary
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the nature of the administrative powers
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The scheme may make provision for or in relation to a particular matter by empowering the ACMA to make decisions of an administrative character

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295h-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The administrative powers are defined within the scheme's scope
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the scope of the administrative powers
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The scheme may make provision for or in relation to a particular matter by empowering the ACMA to make decisions of an administrative character

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295h-logic-ltl-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The administrative powers are defined within the scheme's temporal scope
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the administrative powers
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: The scheme may make provision for or in relation to a particular matter by empowering the ACMA to make decisions of an administrative character

295J Ancillary or incidental provisions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.322
note: ACMA considers provisions appropriate
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295j-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295j
schema version: 2

295K Scheme-making power not limited
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.322
note: No implication that section 295A is limited by sections 295B to 295J.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295k-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295k
schema version: 2

295L Variation of scheme
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.322
curation status: Proposed
has part: 295L(1) Variation of scheme
has part: 295L(2) Variation of scheme
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295l
schema version: 2

295L(1) Variation of scheme
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.322
note: Scheme variation allowed under specific conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295l-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 295L Variation of scheme

295L(2) Variation of scheme
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.322
note: Does not limit application of subsection 33(3) to other instruments under this Act.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295l-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 295L Variation of scheme

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295L(2) Variation of scheme

295M Consultation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.322
curation status: Proposed
has part: 295M(1) Consultation
has part: 295M(2) Consultation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295m
schema version: 2

295M(1) Consultation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.322
note: Consultation with relevant authorities before making the scheme.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295m-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 295M Consultation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The scheme must be made after consultation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA must consult the Information Commissioner and Secretary of the Department.

295M(2) Consultation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.322
note: Consultation before making a decision under the scheme.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295m-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 295M Consultation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision under the scheme cannot be made without consultation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA must consult persons before making a decision

295N Criteria for deciding authorisation applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.323
curation status: Proposed
has part: 295N(1) Criteria for deciding authorisation applications
has part: 295N(2) Criteria for deciding authorisation applications
has part: 295N(3) Criteria for deciding authorisation applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295n
schema version: 2

295N(1) Criteria for deciding authorisation applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.323
note: Minister must specify criteria for deciding authorisation applications.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 295N Criteria for deciding authorisation applications

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide criteria
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295N(1) Criteria for deciding authorisation applications

295N(2) Criteria for deciding authorisation applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.323
note: Minister may specify different criteria for different kinds of authorisation applications.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 295N Criteria for deciding authorisation applications

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to specify criteria
modality: Deontic
operator: May

295N(3) Criteria for deciding authorisation applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.323
note: Must apply criteria and may consider other relevant matters
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295n-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 295N Criteria for deciding authorisation applications

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply criteria
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) In deciding an authorisation application, the ACMA:

295P Conditions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.323
note: Minister may determine conditions for authorisation under integrated public number database scheme.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295p-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295p-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295p-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295p
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to determine conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295p-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classify and describe conditions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: determine
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument...

295Q Other reviewable decisions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.324
note: Specify decisions under integrated public number database scheme
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295q-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295q-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295q
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to specify decisions
modality: Deontic
operator: May

295R Offence of breaching a condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.324
note: Breach of authorisation condition results in an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295r
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The act or omission breaches a condition of the authorisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Condition breach occurs during the act or omission.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The person does an act or omits to do an act.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The act or omission breaches a condition of the authorisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Condition breach is a necessary condition for the offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: breach
premise text: The person does an act or omits to do an act.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person does not commit an offence unless they hold an authorisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation is a necessary condition for the offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: authorisation
premise text: The person is the holder of an authorisation under the integrated public number database scheme.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person does not commit an offence unless they hold an authorisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Condition breach is necessary for the offence if the person holds an authorisation.
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: The person is the holder of an authorisation under the integrated public number database scheme.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The act or omission breaches a condition of the authorisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Condition breach is a necessary condition for the offence until the act or omission ends.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: The person does an act or omits to do an act.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295R Offence of breaching a condition

295S Remedial directions for breaching a condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.324
curation status: Proposed
has part: 295S(1) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
has part: 295S(2) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
has part: 295S(3) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
has part: 295S(4) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
has part: 295S(5) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295s
schema version: 2

295S(1) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.324
note: Remedial directions for breaching a condition
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295s-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 295S Remedial directions for breaching a condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

295S(2) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.324
note: The ACMA may give a person a written direction requiring them to take specified action.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295s-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 295S Remedial directions for breaching a condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

295S(3) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.324
note: Must not contravene a direction under subsection (2)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295s-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 295S Remedial directions for breaching a condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) A person must not contravene a direction under subsection (2).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295S(3) Remedial directions for breaching a condition

295S(4) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
type: Concept
references: sec-295s-ss-3
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.324
note: Civil penalty provision for breaching a condition
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295s-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 295S Remedial directions for breaching a condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295S(4) Remedial directions for breaching a condition

295S(5) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.324
note: A direction given under subsection (2) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295s-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 295S Remedial directions for breaching a condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (5) A direction given under subsection (2)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295S(5) Remedial directions for breaching a condition

295T Formal warnings for breaching a condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.325
note: Issue formal warning for breaching a condition
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295t-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295t-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295t
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295t-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to issue warning
modality: Deontic
operator: may issue

295U Report to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.325
curation status: Proposed
has part: 295U(1) Report to Minister
has part: 295U(2) Report to Minister
has part: 295U(3) Report to Minister
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295u
schema version: 2

295U(1) Report to Minister
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.325
note: ACMA must provide a report on compliance with the integrated public number database scheme.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295u-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295u-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 295U Report to Minister

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

295U(2) Report to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.325
note: Report confidential information to Minister
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295u-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295u-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 295U Report to Minister

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory reporting
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

295U(3) Report to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.325
note: Minister must report to Parliament within 15 days
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295u-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295u-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 295U Report to Minister

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister must report to Parliament within 15 days
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

295V Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.326
curation status: Proposed
has part: 295V(1) Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
has part: 295V(2) Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
has part: 295V(3) Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
has part: 295V(4) Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295v
schema version: 2

295V(1) Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.326
note: Use or disclosure of information by emergency management for a purpose connected with persons being alerted to a likely emergency.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295v-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295v-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 295V Use or disclosure of information by emergency management

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to use or disclose information for a specific purpose.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295v-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295V(1) Use or disclosure of information by emergency management

295V(2) Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.326
note: Use or disclose relevant information for a purpose connected with persons being alerted to an emergency.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295v-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295v-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295v-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 295V Use or disclosure of information by emergency management

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295v-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Use relevant information for a purpose connected with persons being alerted to an emergency.
modality: Deontic
operator: use

295V(3) Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.326
note: Use or disclosure of information for reasonable testing of emergency alertness
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295v-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295v-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 295V Use or disclosure of information by emergency management

295V(4) Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.326
note: Disclosure of relevant information to another person for a specific purpose.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295v-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295v-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 295V Use or disclosure of information by emergency management

295W Use or disclosure of information by other persons
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.327
curation status: Proposed
has part: 295W(1) Use or disclosure of information by other persons
has part: 295W(2) Use or disclosure of information by other persons
has part: 295W(3) Use or disclosure of information by other persons
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295w
schema version: 2

295W(1) Use or disclosure of information by other persons
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.327
note: Permitted use or disclosure of information for emergency purposes
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295w-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 295W Use or disclosure of information by other persons

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to use or disclose information
modality: Deontic
operator: PERMIT

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295W(1) Use or disclosure of information by other persons

295W(2) Use or disclosure of information by other persons
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.327
note: Permitted use or disclosure of information for testing purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295w-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 295W Use or disclosure of information by other persons

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to use or disclose information.
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

295W(3) Use or disclosure of information by other persons
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.327
note: Permitted use or disclosure of information for emergency purposes
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295w-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 295W Use or disclosure of information by other persons

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to use or disclose information
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

295X Effect on telecommunications network
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.327
note: Must take reasonable steps to ensure no adverse effect on telecommunications network.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295x-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295x-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295x
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295x-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take reasonable steps
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

295Y Coronial and other inquiries
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.327
note: Disclosure of relevant information in relation to an emergency or likely emergency is taken as a disclosure for a purpose.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295y-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295y
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295y-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295Y Coronial and other inquiries

295Z Offence—use or disclosure of information by emergency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.328
note: Use or disclosure of information by emergency management person is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295z-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295z-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295z
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295z-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of use or disclosure of information by emergency management person.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

295ZA Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.328
curation status: Proposed
has part: 295ZA(1) Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
has part: 295ZA(2) Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
has part: 295ZA(3) Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295za
schema version: 2

295ZA(1) Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.328
note: Disclosing or using information without permission is an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295za-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 295ZA Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval is from the time the person receives the information to the time they use or disclose it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of when the person uses or discloses the information.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (b) the person uses or discloses the information;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The knowledge graph contains entries for permitted and prohibited information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge graph of permitted and prohibited information.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Graph
premise text: (a) information is disclosed to the person as permitted by subsection 295V(1) or (2) or 295W(1); and

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The use or disclosure referred to in paragraph (b) of this subsection is not for a purpose connected with persons being alerted to the emergency or likely emergency concerned.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing or using information without permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) information is disclosed to the person as permitted by subsection 295V(1) or (2) or 295W(1); and (b) the person uses or discloses the information;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information spreads from the person to others through their actions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of information through use or disclosure.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (b) the person uses or discloses the information;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The recurring trace is from the time the person receives the information to the present.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of when the person uses or discloses the information.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (b) the person uses or discloses the information;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295ZA(1) Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons

295ZA(2) Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.328
note: Disclosing or using information without permission is an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295za-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 295ZA Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal relation between information disclosure and use is that the use occurs after the disclosure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between information disclosure and use.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) information is disclosed to the person as permitted by subsection 295V(3) or 295W(2); and (b) the person uses or discloses the information;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The use or disclosure referred to in paragraph (b) of this subsection is not for the purpose of reasonable testing of whether, in the event of an emergency occurring, persons would be able to be alerted to that emergency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing or using information without permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Information is disclosed to the person as permitted by subsection 295V(3) or 295W(2);

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The use or disclosure referred to in paragraph (b) of this subsection is not for the purpose of reasonable testing of whether, in the event of an emergency occurring, persons would be able to be alerted to that emergency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of using or disclosing information for testing purposes.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the person uses or discloses the information;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The use or disclosure referred to in paragraph (b) of this subsection is not for the purpose of reasonable testing of whether, in the event of an emergency occurring, persons would be able to be alerted to that emergency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of using or disclosing information for emergency purposes.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) the use or disclosure referred to in paragraph (b) of this subsection is not for the purpose of reasonable testing of whether, in the event of an emergency occurring, persons would be able to be alerted to that emergency.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The recurring trace of information disclosure and use indicates that the person has committed an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of information disclosure and use.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) information is disclosed to the person as permitted by subsection 295V(3) or 295W(2); and (b) the person uses or discloses the information;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295ZA(2) Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons

295ZA(3) Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.328
note: Disclosing information without permission is an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295za-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 295ZA Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing information without permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

295ZB Reports of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.329
curation status: Proposed
has part: 295ZB(1) Reports of access
has part: 295ZB(2) Reports of access
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295zb
schema version: 2

295ZB(1) Reports of access
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.329
note: Emergency management person must provide written report to AFP Minister and ACMA with specific information.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zb-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295zb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 295ZB Reports of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295ZB(1) Reports of access

295ZB(2) Reports of access
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.329
note: Must report to AFP Minister and ACMA after last disclosure
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zb-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295zb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 295ZB Reports of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

295ZC Annual reports to the ACMA and Information
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.329
note: Annual report must be provided within 2 months after the end of a financial year.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zc-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zc-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295zc
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zc-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295ZC Annual reports to the ACMA and Information

295ZD Arrangements with States and Territories
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.330
curation status: Proposed
has part: 295ZD(1) Arrangements with States and Territories
has part: 295ZD(2) Arrangements with States and Territories
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295zd
schema version: 2

295ZD(1) Arrangements with States and Territories
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.330
note: Makes arrangements with State or Territory Ministers regarding emergency management functions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zd-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295zd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 295ZD Arrangements with States and Territories

295ZD(2) Arrangements with States and Territories
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.330
note: An instrument for an arrangement under this section is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zd-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295zd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 295ZD Arrangements with States and Territories

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An instrument for an arrangement under this section is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

295ZE Commonwealth immunity
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.330
note: No action lies against the Commonwealth in relation to loss, damage or injury resulting from use or disclosure of relevant information for emergency purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295ze-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295ze-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295ze
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295ze-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No action lies against the Commonwealth.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295ze-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295ZE Commonwealth immunity

296 Performance of person’s duties
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.331
note: Must not disclose or use information except for permitted purpose.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-296-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-296-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-296
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-296-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot

297 Authorisation by or under law
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.331
note: Must not disclose or use information unless required or authorised by law.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-297-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-297-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-297
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-297-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure not permitted unless required or authorised
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: Disclosure permitted by section 280 or this section

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-297-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 297 Authorisation by or under law

299 Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.331
curation status: Proposed
has part: 299(1) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
has part: 299(1A) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
has part: 299(2) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-299
schema version: 2

299(1) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.331
note: Must not disclose or use information except for the purpose of carrying out ACMA's functions and powers.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-299-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 299 Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Carrying out ACMA's functions and powers
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure or use of information
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: Disclosed information or document

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 299(1) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or

299(1A) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.331
note: Must not disclose or use information except for specified purpose.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-299-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 299 Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure or use of information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 299(1A) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or

299(2) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.331
note: Disclosing information or a document without permission is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-299-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 299 Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Disclosure without permission

299A Integrated public number database
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.332
curation status: Proposed
has part: 299A(1) Integrated public number database
has part: 299A(2) Integrated public number database
has part: 299A(3) Integrated public number database
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-299a
schema version: 2

299A(1) Integrated public number database
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.332
note: Disclosing or using information without authorization is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-299a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 299A Integrated public number database

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (c) and (d)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure or use of information without authorization.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) and (b)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 299A(1) Integrated public number database

299A(2) Integrated public number database
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.332
note: Disclosing or using information without authorization is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-299a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 299A Integrated public number database

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person must not disclose or use the information or document except for that purpose;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Restriction on time period of disclosure or use.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal restriction
premise text: (c) during the period the person holds an authorisation in force under the integrated public number database scheme in relation to the information or document—

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then (c) during the period...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person must not disclose or use the information or document;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to hold authorization for disclosure or use.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person must not disclose or use the information or document;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of unauthorized disclosure or use.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (d) if the person does not hold such an authorisation—the person must not disclose or use the information or document.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person must not disclose or use the information or document;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring restriction on disclosure or use.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (d) if the person does not hold such an authorisation—the person must not disclose or use the information or document.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 299A(2) Integrated public number database

299A(3) Integrated public number database
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.332
note: Disclosing information for a permitted purpose is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-299a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 299A Integrated public number database

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information for a permitted purpose.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

3 Objects
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.17
note: Promotes long-term interests of end-users and efficiency of the Australian telecommunications industry.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: when read together with Parts XIB and XIC of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During the commencement of this Act, the regulatory framework promotes long-term interests of end-users.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) The main object of this Act...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to provide a regulatory framework that promotes...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The regulatory framework implies the promotion of long-term interests of end-users.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (1) The main object of this Act...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to provide a regulatory framework that promotes...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The regulatory framework recognizes the promotion of long-term interests of end-users.
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (1) The main object of this Act...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to provide a regulatory framework that promotes...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Promises to promote long-term interests of end-users and efficiency.
modality: Deontic
operator: promises
premise text: (1) The main object of this Act...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: when read together with Parts XIB and XIC of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the objects of carriage services.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
premise text: (1) The main object of this Act...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: when read together with Parts XIB and XIC of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The regulatory framework diffuses the promotion of long-term interests of end-users.
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: (1) The main object of this Act...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Objects

30 Line links
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30(1) Line links
has part: 30(2) Line links
has part: 30(3) Line links
has part: 30(4) Line links
has part: 30(4A) Line links
has part: 30(5) Line links
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30
schema version: 2

30(1) Line links
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
note: A line constitutes a line link.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Line links

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Line link definition
modality: Deontic
operator: constitutes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(1) Line links

30(2) Line links
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
note: A line link is constituted by two connected lines.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Line links

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Line links are temporal relationships between two points
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
premise text: Connected lines meet at a point

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A line link is constituted by two connected lines.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(2) Line links

30(3) Line links
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
note: Subsection (2) is recursive.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Line links

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (2) is recursive
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Recursive application of subsection (2)
modality: Deontic
operator: recursive
premise text: (2)(b) references a line link

30(4) Line links
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
note: Lines must be connected in a specific way for communication to work.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Line links

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Communication can be carried through facilities including the lines
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between lines
modality: AllenInterval
operator: connectedAt
premise text: Lines are connected at the same facility

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Lines must be connected in a specific way for communication to work.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Lines must be connected in a specific way
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Lines are connected to each other or the same facility

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(4) Line links

30(4A) Line links
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
note: A line does not form part of any line link to the extent that it is on the customer side of the boundary of a telecommunications network.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Line links

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(4A) Line links

30(5) Line links
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
note: A facility other than a line does not form part of any line link.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Line links

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Facility other than a line does not form part of any line link.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

300 Threat to person’s life or health
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.333
curation status: Proposed
has part: 300(1) Threat to person’s life or health
has part: 300(2) Threat to person’s life or health
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-300
schema version: 2

300(1) Threat to person’s life or health
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.333
note: Disclosing personal info without consent is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-300-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 300 Threat to person’s life or health

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The disclosure overlaps with the temporal interval of personal info protection.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The disclosure overlaps with a temporal interval of personal info protection.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) information or a document is disclosed to a person (the first person) as permitted by section 287 or this section;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The disclosure is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of personal info without consent.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) information or a document is disclosed to a person (the first person) as permitted by section 287 or this section;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state must protect personal info.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to protect personal info.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) information or a document is disclosed to a person (the first person) as permitted by section 287 or this section;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state must protect personal info.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to protect personal info.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (b) the information or the contents of the document relate to the affairs or personal particulars (including any unlisted telephone number or any address) of another person.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The disclosure is recurrently prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The disclosure is recurrently prohibited.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (a) information or a document is disclosed to a person (the first person) as permitted by section 287 or this section;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 300(1) Threat to person’s life or health

300(2) Threat to person’s life or health
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.333
note: Must not disclose or use information unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-300-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 300 Threat to person’s life or health

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Connection with time intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: in
premise text: (ii) the first person believes on reasonable grounds that the disclosure or use is reasonably necessary to prevent or lessen a serious threat to the life or health of a person.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless certain conditions are met.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: The first person must not disclose or use the information.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Transmission of information
modality: Diffusion
operator: to
premise text: (ii) the first person believes on reasonable grounds that the disclosure or use is reasonably necessary to prevent or lessen a serious threat to the life or health of a person.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Belief of reasonable grounds for necessity
modality: Epistemic
operator: believes
premise text: the first person believes on reasonable grounds that the disclosure or use is reasonably necessary to prevent or lessen a serious threat to the life or health of a person.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Lessening a serious threat
modality: LTL
operator: lessening
premise text: (ii) the first person believes on reasonable grounds that the disclosure or use is reasonably necessary to prevent or lessen a serious threat to the life or health of a person.

301 Communications for maritime purposes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.334
note: Disclosure of information or document is permitted for certain maritime purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-301-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-301-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-301
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-301-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits disclosure for certain maritime purposes.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Section 288 deals with the disclosure or use of information or documents where the disclosure or use is made for certain maritime purposes.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-301-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 301 Communications for maritime purposes

302 Business needs of other carriers or service providers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.334
note: Disclosing or using information without permission is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-302
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Permissible use is within a specific temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for permissible use.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: Section 291 permits disclosure or use under certain conditions.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure or use is prohibited unless permitted by section 291.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 291 permits disclosure or use under certain conditions.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 302 Business needs of other carriers or service providers

302A Location dependent carriage services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.335
curation status: Proposed
has part: 302A(1) Location dependent carriage services
has part: 302A(2) Location dependent carriage services
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-302a
schema version: 2

302A(1) Location dependent carriage services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.335
note: Disclosing or using information or documents without permission is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-302a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 302A Location dependent carriage services

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision prohibits disclosure or use without permission.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 291A deals with the disclosure or use of information or documents for the purposes of the supply, or proposed supply, by a person of a location dependent carriage service.

302A(2) Location dependent carriage services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.335
note: Definition of location dependent carriage service
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-302a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 302A Location dependent carriage services

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 302A(2) Location dependent carriage services

303 Secondary offence—contravening this Division
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.335
note: Committing an offence punishable by imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-303
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits committing an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 303 Secondary offence—contravening this Division

303A Generality of Division not limited
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.335
note: Nothing in this Division limits the generality of anything else in it.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-303a
schema version: 2

303B Acts taken to be authorised by this Act for purposes of Privacy
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.336
curation status: Proposed
has part: 303B(1) Acts taken to be authorised by this Act for purposes of Privacy
has part: 303B(2) Acts taken to be authorised by this Act for purposes of Privacy
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-303b
schema version: 2

303B(1) Acts taken to be authorised by this Act for purposes of Privacy
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.336
note: Disclosure or use of information is authorized for Privacy Act purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-303b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 303B Acts taken to be authorised by this Act for purposes of Privacy

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorizes disclosure or use of information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

303B(2) Acts taken to be authorised by this Act for purposes of Privacy
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.336
note: Disclosure or use of information is authorized for Privacy Act purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-303b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 303B Acts taken to be authorised by this Act for purposes of Privacy

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorizes disclosure or use of information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

303C Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.336
curation status: Proposed
has part: 303C(1) Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
has part: 303C(2) Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
has part: 303C(3) Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-303c
schema version: 2

303C(1) Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.336
note: No effect on civil proceedings or administrative action under Privacy Act 1988
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-303c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 303C Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No effect on civil proceedings or administrative action
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) The prosecution of an offence against Division 2 or 4 of this Part for disclosure or use of information or a document does not prevent civil proceedings or administrative action from being taken under the Privacy Act 1988 or a registered APP code (as defined in that Act) in relation to the disclosure or use.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: No effect on civil proceedings or administrative action
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) The prosecution of an offence against Division 2 or 4 of this Part for disclosure or use of information or a document does not prevent civil proceedings or administrative action from being taken under the Privacy Act 1988 or a registered APP code (as defined in that Act) in relation to the disclosure or use.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 303C(1) Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect

303C(2) Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.336
note: Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect the applicability of this section.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-303c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 303C Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Applicability is unaffected regardless of outcome of prosecution.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Prosecution does not affect applicability, but may overlap with it.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect the applicability of this section.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Applicability is unaffected regardless of outcome of prosecution.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applicability can be inferred from prosecution.
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
premise text: Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect the applicability of this section.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Applicability is unaffected regardless of outcome of prosecution.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If prosecution affects applicability, then applicability is unaffected.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect the applicability of this section.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Applicability is unaffected by outcome of prosecution.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applicability spreads to all offences under this Part.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: This section applies regardless of the outcome of the prosecution.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Applicability is unaffected regardless of outcome of prosecution.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Applicability will be affected by future prosecutions.
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
premise text: Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect the applicability of this section.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 303C(2) Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect

303C(3) Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.336
note: Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect the operation of section 49 of the Privacy Act 1988.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-303c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 303C Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect the operation of section 49 of the Privacy Act 1988.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies that prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect the operation of section 49 of the Privacy Act 1988.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (3) This section does not affect the operation of section 49 of the Privacy Act 1988.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 303C(3) Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect

304 Associate
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.337
note: Defines associate for carrier, carriage service provider, and number-database operator.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-304-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-304
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-304-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 304 Associate

305 Authorisations under the Telecommunications (Interception and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.337
note: Authorisation notification for carriers and associates
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-305-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-305-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-305-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-305
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-305-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notification of authorisation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between authorisation and notification
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Authorisation made under Division 4 or 4A

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-305-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorisation made under Division 4 or 4A
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification of authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Carrier or associate notified

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-305-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 305 Authorisations under the Telecommunications (Interception and

306 Record of disclosures—general
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.337
note: Authorisation required for disclosure of information or document
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Disclosures must be during Division 3 provisions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (i) a provision of Division 3 (other than section 279, 285, 285A, 290, 291 or 291A)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Disclosures must be during Division 3 provisions
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (i) a provision of Division 3 (other than section 279, 285, 285A, 290, 291 or 291A)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (i) a provision of Division 3 (other than section 279, 285, 285A, 290, 291 or 291A)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (a) an eligible person or an eligible number-database person discloses information or a document

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Disclosures must be during Division 3 provisions
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (i) a provision of Division 3 (other than section 279, 285, 285A, 290, 291 or 291A)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Disclosures must be during Division 3 provisions
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (i) a provision of Division 3 (other than section 279, 285, 285A, 290, 291 or 291A)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306 Record of disclosures—general

306A Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.340
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306A(1) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
has part: 306A(2) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
has part: 306A(3) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
has part: 306A(4) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
has part: 306A(5) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
has part: 306A(6) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
has part: 306A(7) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306a
schema version: 2

306A(1) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.340
note: Authorisation required for disclosure of information or documents.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306A Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: (a) an eligible person or an eligible number-database person discloses information or a document; and (b) the disclosure or disclosures are authorised by an authorisation under section 180 or 180B of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (in so far as the authorisation is of a kind referred to in subsection 180(2) or 180B(2) of that Act).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires authorisation for disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) an eligible person or an eligible number-database person discloses information or a document; and (b) the disclosure or disclosures are authorised by an authorisation under section 180 or 180B of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (in so far as the authorisation is of a kind referred to in subsection 180(2) or 180B(2) of that Act).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306A(1) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the

306A(2) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.340
note: Record of disclosures must be made by carriers, providers, and operators.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306A Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a record
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306A(2) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the

306A(3) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.340
note: Make a record of disclosure and provide copy to carrier within 5 days.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 306A Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make record and provide copy.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306A(3) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the

306A(4) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.340
note: Carrier must retain copy of record for 3 years.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 306A Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has a duty to retain copy of record.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306A(4) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the

306A(5) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
type: Concept
description: name of person or persons who made disclosure, date of disclosure, grounds for disclosure, name of person who made authorisation and date of making
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.340
note: Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the Telecommunications Act 1997
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 306A Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide record of disclosures
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306A(5) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the

306A(6) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.340
note: Record may be made, given or retained in written or electronic form.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 306A Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the

306A(7) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
type: Concept
references: sec-4AA
references: sec-4B
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.340
note: Offence for contravening section
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306a-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 306A Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits contravention of section
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306A(7) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the

307 Incorrect records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.341
curation status: Proposed
has part: 307(1) Incorrect records
has part: 307(2) Incorrect records
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-307
schema version: 2

307(1) Incorrect records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.341
note: Do not make a record in an incorrect way.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-307-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-307-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-307-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 307 Incorrect records

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-307-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person must not...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-307-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 307(1) Incorrect records

307(2) Incorrect records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.341
note: Offence for contravening subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-307-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-307-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-307-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 307 Incorrect records

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-307-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-307-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 307(2) Incorrect records

308 Annual reports to the ACMA by carriers, carriage service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.341
note: Annual reports by carriers, carriage service providers or number-database operators
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-308-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-308-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-308
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-308-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-308-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 308 Annual reports to the ACMA by carriers, carriage service

309 Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.342
curation status: Proposed
has part: 309(1) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
has part: 309(1A) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
has part: 309(2) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
has part: 309(3) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
has part: 309(4) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-309
schema version: 2

309(1) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.342
note: The Information Commissioner must monitor compliance with this Division.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-309-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 309 Monitoring by the Information Commissioner

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to monitor
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 309(1) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner

309(1A) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.342
note: The Information Commissioner has a privacy function.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-309-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 309 Monitoring by the Information Commissioner

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has a privacy function.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 309(1A) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner

309(2) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.342
note: The Information Commissioner must monitor certain records.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-309-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 309 Monitoring by the Information Commissioner

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide monitoring
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Has part in Part 1, Section 309(2)
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 309(2) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner

309(3) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.342
note: Carrier must provide access to records upon request of Information Commissioner.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-309-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 309 Monitoring by the Information Commissioner

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must provide access.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 309(3) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner

309(4) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.342
note: The Information Commissioner must provide a written report to the Minister.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-309-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 309 Monitoring by the Information Commissioner

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for reporting.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) The Information Commissioner may give the Minister a written report about any matters arising out of the performance of the function conferred by subsection (1).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Reporting on matters.
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) The Information Commissioner may give the Minister a written report about any matters arising out of the performance of the function conferred by subsection (1).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must provide a written report.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Reporting on matters.
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) The Information Commissioner may give the Minister a written report about any matters arising out of the performance of the function conferred by subsection (1).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for reporting.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) The Information Commissioner may give the Minister a written report about any matters arising out of the performance of the function conferred by subsection (1).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 309(4) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner

31 Designated radiocommunications facility
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
note: Definition of designated radiocommunications facility
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-31-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31
schema version: 2

310 Instrument-making powers not limited
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.344
curation status: Proposed
has part: 310(1) Instrument-making powers not limited
has part: 310(2) Instrument-making powers not limited
has part: 310(3) Instrument-making powers not limited
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-310
schema version: 2

310(1) Instrument-making powers not limited
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.344
note: No implication that limits instrument-making power
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-310-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 310 Instrument-making powers not limited

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part does not limit a power conferred by or under this Act to make an instrument.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits instrument-making power
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (1) This Part does not, by implication, limit a power conferred by or under this Act to make an instrument.

310(2) Instrument-making powers not limited
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.344
note: No implication on matters dealt with by codes or standards.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-310-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 310 Instrument-making powers not limited

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the matters that may be dealt with by codes or standards in Part 6.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between parts
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal relation
premise text: Part 6

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...limit the matters that may be dealt with...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No limitation
modality: Deontic
operator: no implication
premise text: (2) This Part does not, by implication...

310(3) Instrument-making powers not limited
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.344
note: Does not limit subsection 33(3B) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-310-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 310 Instrument-making powers not limited

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection 33(3B) is unaffected
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Does not imply
premise text: Section 310(3)

32 Public mobile telecommunications service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
curation status: Proposed
has part: 32(1) Public mobile telecommunications service
has part: 32(2) Public mobile telecommunications service
has part: 32(3) Public mobile telecommunications service
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32
schema version: 2

32(1) Public mobile telecommunications service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
note: Service is a public mobile telecommunications service if certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Public mobile telecommunications service

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditions must be met
modality: Deontic
operator: >

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(1) Public mobile telecommunications service

32(2) Public mobile telecommunications service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
note: Carriage service is exempt if primary network supplies services between customer equipment and other such equipment.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Public mobile telecommunications service

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The primary network's principal function must be during the carriage service period for it to be exempt.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Primary network's principal function is during the carriage service period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) the principal function of the primary network is to supply carriage services between customer equipment connected to the primary network and other such equipment;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The carriage service is exempt if the primary network supplies services between customer equipment and other such equipment.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts carriage services under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (a) the service is supplied by means of a telecommunications network (a primary network) that is connected to one or more line links or other facilities...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The primary network may supply services between customer equipment and other such equipment as an ancillary function for exemption purposes.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits primary network to supply services between customer equipment and other such equipment for exemption purposes.
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: (c) the supply of carriage services between such equipment and equipment connected to the network units is, at most, an ancillary function of the primary network;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The primary network must supply services between customer equipment and other such equipment for the carriage service to be exempt.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a subclass of 'carriage service' for exemption purposes.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, a carriage service is an exempt service if...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The primary network must be connected to one or more line links or other facilities for it to be exempt.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a subclass of 'primary network' for exemption purposes.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
premise text: (a) the service is supplied by means of a telecommunications network (a primary network) that is connected to one or more line links or other facilities...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The primary network must not be used in carrying a communication until the carriage service period ends.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Primary network cannot be used in carrying a communication between equipment connected to network units and other such equipment until the carriage service period ends.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (d) despite the connection or connections referred to in paragraph (a), the primary network cannot be used in carrying a communication, as a single transaction, between equipment connected to the network units and other such equipment;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(2) Public mobile telecommunications service

32(3) Public mobile telecommunications service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
note: Exempt carriage service is a one-way only, store-and-forward communications service.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Public mobile telecommunications service

33 Intercell hand-over functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
curation status: Proposed
has part: 33(1) Intercell hand-over functions
has part: 33(2) Intercell hand-over functions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33
schema version: 2

33(1) Intercell hand-over functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
note: Telecommunications network must have intercell hand-over functions if it meets certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Intercell hand-over functions

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Network must have intercell hand-over functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) the facilities of the network include at least 2 base stations...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Network is a telecommunications network if it has intercell hand-over functions.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, a telecommunications network...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33(1) Intercell hand-over functions

33(2) Intercell hand-over functions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
note: A carriage service is an eligible mobile telecommunications service if certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Intercell hand-over functions

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Eligibility conditions met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditions for eligibility
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (a) and (b)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Service is eligible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the type of service
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Service is a carriage service if...

34 When a base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.63
curation status: Proposed
has part: 34(1) When a base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications
has part: 34(2) When a base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34
schema version: 2

34(1) When a base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.63
note: A base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications customer access network if certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 34 When a base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications customer access network.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Base station must be part of a terrestrial radiocommunications customer access network.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (a) the base station is part of a telecommunications network;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The network does not have intercell hand-over functions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Network does not have intercell hand-over functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (f) the network does not have intercell hand-over functions;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The service is wholly or principally used, or wholly or principally for use, by each end-user.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Service wholly or principally used, or wholly or principally for use, by each end-user.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (e) the service is wholly or principally used, or wholly or principally for use, by each end-user;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The base station is part of a telecommunications network.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Base station is part of a telecommunications network.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: (a) the base station is part of a telecommunications network;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The customer equipment is not in physical contact with any part of the telecommunications network.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Customer equipment not in physical contact with any part of the telecommunications network.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: (d) customer equipment used for or in relation to the supply of the service is not in physical contact with any part of the telecommunications network by means of which the service is supplied;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The network is not an exempt network.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Network is not an exempt network.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: (h) the network is not an exempt network (as defined by subsection (3)).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(1) When a base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications

34(2) When a base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.63
note: Exempt base station use for broadcasting services
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-n3logic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 34 When a base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...sole use of the base station is...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between conditions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), a base station is an exempt base station if...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...sole use of the base station is...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Identifies AI-related concepts
modality: CogAI
operator: has
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), a base station is an exempt base station if...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...sole use of the base station is...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines conditions for exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), a base station is an exempt base station if...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...sole use of the base station is...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies base stations by use
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Base station is an exempt base station if...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-n3logic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...sole use of the base station is...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: Describes logical implication between conditions
modality: N3Logic
operator: implies
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), a base station is an exempt base station if...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...sole use of the base station is...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Defines schema for data validation
modality: SHACL
operator: asserts
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), a base station is an exempt base station if...

35 Fixed radiocommunications link
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
curation status: Proposed
has part: 35(1) Fixed radiocommunications link
has part: 35(2) Fixed radiocommunications link
has part: 35(3) Fixed radiocommunications link
has part: 35(4) Fixed radiocommunications link
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35
schema version: 2

35(1) Fixed radiocommunications link
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
note: Definition of fixed radiocommunications link
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Fixed radiocommunications link

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Facility or combination has been used in connection with supply of carriage service for some time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Facility or combination is used in connection with supply of carriage service between 2 or more fixed points

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Facility or combination is not part of a terrestrial radiocommunications customer access network
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: !=
premise text: Facility or combination does not consist of one or more base stations that are part of a terrestrial radiocommunications customer access network

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Facility or combination is not affected by paragraph 34(1)(h)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: !=
premise text: Facility or combination does not consist of one or more base stations that would be part of such a network if paragraph 34(1)(h) had not been enacted

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Facility or combination is a fixed radiocommunications link
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Facility or combination is used in connection with supply of carriage service

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Facility or combination has double-ended interconnection
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Some or all communications carried by facility or combination have characteristic of double-ended interconnection

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Facility or combination has recurring double-ended interconnection
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: Some or all communications carried by facility or combination have characteristic of double-ended interconnection

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(1) Fixed radiocommunications link

35(2) Fixed radiocommunications link
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
note: Definition of fixed point on land or building
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Fixed radiocommunications link

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: Fixed point is defined as such

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(2) Fixed radiocommunications link

35(3) Fixed radiocommunications link
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
note: Eligible network unit for double-ended interconnection
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Fixed radiocommunications link

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Interconnection occurs during communication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between communication and interconnection
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Communication occurs before interconnection

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Facility is an eligible network unit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies eligible network units
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Network unit is an eligible facility

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(3) Fixed radiocommunications link

35(4) Fixed radiocommunications link
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
note: Definition of eligible network unit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Fixed radiocommunications link

36 Distinct places—basic rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
curation status: Proposed
has part: 36(1) Distinct places—basic rules
has part: 36(2) Distinct places—basic rules
has part: 36(3) Distinct places—basic rules
has part: 36(4) Distinct places—basic rules
has part: 36(5) Distinct places—basic rules
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36
schema version: 2

36(1) Distinct places—basic rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
note: Places must be distinct unless they are all in the same area due to subsections (2), (3) or (4).
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Distinct places—basic rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Places may be contiguous.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
premise text: (1) Places are distinct unless they are all in the same area because of subsection (2), (3) or (4).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Places may be contiguous.
modality: CogAI
operator: MEETS
premise text: (1) Places are distinct unless they are all in the same area because of subsection (2), (3) or (4).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Places must be distinct.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) Places are distinct unless they are all in the same area because of subsection (2), (3) or (4).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Places may be contiguous.
modality: Diffusion
operator: MEETS
premise text: (1) Places are distinct unless they are all in the same area because of subsection (2), (3) or (4).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Places may be contiguous.
modality: LTL
operator: MEETS
premise text: (1) Places are distinct unless they are all in the same area because of subsection (2), (3) or (4).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(1) Distinct places—basic rules

36(2) Distinct places—basic rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
note: Places in the same area if situated in the same property
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Distinct places—basic rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Places in the same area if within the same property
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: Property definition includes location

36(3) Distinct places—basic rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
note: Places in the same area if they are situated in properties each of which forms part of a combined area as defined by section 38.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Distinct places—basic rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: places are in the same area.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Identifies overlapping properties
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (3) Places are in the same area if they are situated in properties each of which forms part of a combined area as defined by section 38 and:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: combined area is an eligible combined area for the purposes of this paragraph.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies principal user
modality: Deontic
operator: has-principal-user
premise text: (a) the same person or persons is or are the principal user (as defined by section 39) of all the properties that together constitute that combined area;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: combined area is an eligible combined area for the purposes of this paragraph.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies determination under section 40
modality: Deontic
operator: has-determination-under-section-40
premise text: (b) because of a determination in force under section 40, that combined area is an eligible combined area for the purposes of this paragraph.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: places are in the same area.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Identifies temporal relationship between properties
modality: LTL
operator: occurs-before
premise text: (3) Places are in the same area if they are situated in properties each of which forms part of a combined area as defined by section 38 and:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(3) Distinct places—basic rules

36(4) Distinct places—basic rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
note: Places in the same area if situated in the same eligible Territory.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Distinct places—basic rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Place
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: Area

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(4) Distinct places—basic rules

36(5) Distinct places—basic rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
note: Later provisions of this Division have effect only for the purposes of this Division.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Distinct places—basic rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: have effect only for the purposes of this Division
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: only if
premise text: (later provisions of this Division)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(5) Distinct places—basic rules

37 Properties
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
curation status: Proposed
has part: 37(1) Properties
has part: 37(2) Properties
has part: 37(3) Properties
has part: 37(4) Properties
has part: 37(5) Properties
has part: 37(6) Properties
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37
schema version: 2

37(1) Properties
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
note: Definition of property requiring a single freehold or leasehold title, no part subject to a lease, and defined by geographical coordinates.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Properties

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) An area of land is a property if:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires a single freehold or leasehold title, no part subject to a lease, and defined by geographical coordinates.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (a) there is a single freehold or leasehold title in relation to that area (whether or not that title is registered under a law of a State or Territory relating to the registration of interests in land);

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(1) Properties

37(2) Properties
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
note: A property is a single freehold or leasehold title in relation to an area of land, unless it is only part of another such area.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Properties

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(2) Properties

37(3) Properties
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
note: An area of land is a property if provided in this section.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Properties

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is no temporal interval between an area of land being considered a property and it not being considered a property unless provided in this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: An area of land is not a property except as provided in this section.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is no cognitive agent that considers an area of land to be a property unless provided in this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive agent logic
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: An area of land is not a property except as provided in this section.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is no obligation to consider an area of land as a property unless provided in this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !
premise text: An area of land is not a property except as provided in this section.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is no diffusion from an area of land being considered a property to it not being considered a property unless provided in this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion logic
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: An area of land is not a property except as provided in this section.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is no positive obligation to consider an area of land as a property unless provided in this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Negative linear logic
modality: LinearLogic
operator: !
premise text: An area of land is not a property except as provided in this section.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(3) Properties

37(4) Properties
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
note: Circumstances for not constituting a property
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Properties

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(4) Properties

37(5) Properties
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
note: Regulations may prescribe circumstances for land to be considered property.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Properties

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe circumstances for land to be considered property during certain times.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (5) Despite paragraph (1)(c), the regulations may prescribe the circumstances in which an area of land, the title to which is defined otherwise than by reference to geographical coordinates, is a property.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe circumstances for land to be considered property.
modality: CogAI
operator: mayPrescribe
premise text: (5) Despite paragraph (1)(c), the regulations may prescribe the circumstances in which an area of land, the title to which is defined otherwise than by reference to geographical coordinates, is a property.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe circumstances for land to be considered property.
modality: Deontic
operator: mayPrescribe

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe circumstances for land to be considered property.
modality: Diffusion
operator: mayPrescribe
premise text: (5) Despite paragraph (1)(c), the regulations may prescribe the circumstances in which an area of land, the title to which is defined otherwise than by reference to geographical coordinates, is a property.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe circumstances for land to be considered property during certain times.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (5) Despite paragraph (1)(c), the regulations may prescribe the circumstances in which an area of land, the title to which is defined otherwise than by reference to geographical coordinates, is a property.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(5) Properties

37(6) Properties
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
note: Definition of land and lease
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Properties

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: premises are land
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: land includes premises and a part of premises

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: sublease is lease
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Corresponding meaning for leasehold title
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: lease includes sublease

38 Combined areas
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.67
curation status: Proposed
has part: 38(1) Combined areas
has part: 38(2) Combined areas
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38
schema version: 2

38(1) Combined areas
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.67
note: Combined areas must be defined by contiguous properties.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 38 Combined areas

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) 2 contiguous properties form a combined area.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between properties is not specified.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (1) 2 contiguous properties form a combined area.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) 2 contiguous properties form a combined area.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of combined area is obligatory.
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (2) 2 contiguous properties form a combined area.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38(1) Combined areas

38(2) Combined areas
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.67
note: Combined areas must be contiguous with another property that forms part of a combined area.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 38 Combined areas

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Property A and Property B are in the same combined area.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between properties
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
premise text: Property A is contiguous with Property B.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Combined areas must be contiguous with another property that forms part of a combined area.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38(2) Combined areas

39 Principal user of a property
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.68
curation status: Proposed
has part: 39(1) Principal user of a property
has part: 39(2) Principal user of a property
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39
schema version: 2

39(1) Principal user of a property
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.68
note: Defines principal user of a property
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 39 Principal user of a property

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person who occupies the property during a certain period of time also uses it for its sole or principal purpose.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between occupation and use
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) occupies the property; or (b) uses the property for the purpose that is the sole or principal purpose for which the property is used.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a person occupies the property or uses it for its sole or principal purpose, then they are the principal user of the property.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Describes the logical implication of occupation and use
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (a) occupies the property; or (b) uses the property for the purpose that is the sole or principal purpose for which the property is used.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person who occupies the property or uses it for its sole or principal purpose is the principal user.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the principal user
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (a) occupies the property; or (b) uses the property for the purpose that is the sole or principal purpose for which the property is used.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person who occupies the property and uses it for its sole or principal purpose also has a certain relationship with the property.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the relationship between occupation and use
modality: Diffusion
operator: and
premise text: (a) occupies the property; or (b) uses the property for the purpose that is the sole or principal purpose for which the property is used.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person who occupies the property until a certain point in time also uses it for its sole or principal purpose.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between occupation and use
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (a) occupies the property; or (b) uses the property for the purpose that is the sole or principal purpose for which the property is used.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39(1) Principal user of a property

39(2) Principal user of a property
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.68
note: Principal user of a property
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 39 Principal user of a property

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: they are taken to together be the principal user of the property.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between users and properties
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) together occupy a property; or (b) together use a property for the purpose that is the sole or principal purpose for which the property is used;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: they are taken to together be the principal user of the property.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: is
premise text: (2) However, if 2 or more persons:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: they are taken to together be the principal user of the property.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of principal user
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) However, if 2 or more persons:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: they are taken to together be the principal user of the property.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Combining multiple conditions
modality: Diffusion
operator: and
premise text: (a) together occupy a property; or (b) together use a property for the purpose that is the sole or principal purpose for which the property is used;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: they are taken to together be the principal user of the property.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between users and properties
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (a) together occupy a property; or (b) together use a property for the purpose that is the sole or principal purpose for which the property is used;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39(2) Principal user of a property

4 June 2026
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments, applications, saving, transitional provisions, editorial changes, presentational changes, modifications, and self-repealing provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

4 Regulatory policy
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.19
note: Promotes industry self-regulation and avoids undue financial burdens.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Parliament promises to regulate telecommunications in a certain manner.
modality: Deontic
operator: Promises

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Regulatory policy

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for the compilation date and amendment history.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the compilation as a descriptive logic application.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable

40 Eligible combined areas
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.68
note: Determine eligibility of combined areas
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-40-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40
schema version: 2

41 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.69
note: Owner of network unit must hold carrier licence unless exemption applies or nominated carrier declaration is in force.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-41-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Licence not required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Owner must hold licence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Exemption applies or nominated carrier declaration is in force

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41 Simplified outline

42 Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
curation status: Proposed
has part: 42(1) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
has part: 42(2) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
has part: 42(3) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
has part: 42(4) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
has part: 42(5) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42
schema version: 2

42(1) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
note: Network unit cannot be used without carrier licence or nominated declaration.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of network unit without carrier licence or nominated declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(1) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated

42(2) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
note: Owner must not allow or permit another person to use the unit without a carrier licence or nominated carrier declaration.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not allow or permit another person...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of unauthorized use
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (2) If there is only one owner...

42(3) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
note: Owner must not use network unit to supply carriage service without carrier licence or nominated carrier declaration.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (3) If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit, an owner of the network unit must not use the unit...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (3) If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit, an owner of the network unit must not use the unit...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for prohibition
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (3) If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit, an owner of the network unit must not use the unit...

42(4) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
note: Owner must not allow or permit another person to use the network unit without a carrier licence or nominated carrier declaration.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) the owner holds a carrier licence; or (b) a nominated carrier declaration is in force in relation to the unit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for network unit use without carrier licence or nominated carrier declaration.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (4) If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit, an owner of the network unit must not...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) the owner holds a carrier licence; or (b) a nominated carrier declaration is in force in relation to the unit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of network unit use without carrier licence or nominated carrier declaration on owner obligations.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (4) If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit, an owner of the network unit must not...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) the owner holds a carrier licence; or (b) a nominated carrier declaration is in force in relation to the unit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of using the network unit without a carrier licence or nominated carrier declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit, an owner of the network unit must not...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) the owner holds a carrier licence; or (b) a nominated carrier declaration is in force in relation to the unit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation of network unit owners to ensure compliance with carrier licence or nominated carrier declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (4) If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit, an owner of the network unit must not...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) the owner holds a carrier licence; or (b) a nominated carrier declaration is in force in relation to the unit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for network unit use without carrier licence or nominated carrier declaration.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (4) If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit, an owner of the network unit must not...

42(5) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
note: Using network unit without carrier licence or nomination is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: commits an offence punishable on conviction by a fine not exceeding 20,000 penalty units.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) A person who contravenes subsection (1), (2), (3) or (4)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person who contravenes subsection (1), (2), (3) or (4) commits an offence punishable on conviction by a fine not exceeding 20,000 penalty units.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restriction on network unit usage
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) A person who contravenes subsection (1), (2), (3) or (4)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person who contravenes subsection (1), (2), (3) or (4) commits an offence punishable by a fine not exceeding 20,000 penalty units.
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restriction on network unit usage
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) A person who contravenes subsection (1), (2), (3) or (4)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of contravening subsections
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (5) A person who contravenes subsection (1), (2), (3) or (4)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(5) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated

43 Continuing offences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.71
note: Continuing contravention of section 42 is a separate offence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-43-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-43
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43 Continuing offences

44 Supply to the public
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.71
curation status: Proposed
has part: 44(1) Supply to the public
has part: 44(2) Supply to the public
has part: 44(3) Supply to the public
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44
schema version: 2

44(1) Supply to the public
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.71
note: Circumstances for network unit to be used to supply carriage service to the public
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Supply to the public

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(1) Supply to the public

44(2) Supply to the public
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.71
note: Supply to the public
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Supply to the public

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to supply to the public within a certain time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for supply
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: The unit must be used for the specified purposes within a certain time frame.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to supply to the public and apply artificial intelligence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: must
premise text: The unit must be used for the specified purposes, and this application must be applied by artificial intelligence.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to supply to the public.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory supply
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: The unit must be used for the specified purposes.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to supply to the public and diffuse information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
premise text: The unit must be used for the specified purposes, and this information must be disseminated to the public.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to supply to the public until a certain point in time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for supply
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: The unit must be used for the specified purposes until a certain point in time.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(2) Supply to the public

44(3) Supply to the public
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.71
note: If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit,
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Supply to the public

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An owner must provide supply to the public.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: There are 2 or more owners of a network unit.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(3) Supply to the public

45 Exemption—defence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73
curation status: Proposed
has part: 45(1) Exemption—defence
has part: 45(2) Exemption—defence
has part: 45(3) Exemption—defence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45
schema version: 2

45(1) Exemption—defence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73
note: Exemption for defence organisations
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Exemption—defence

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exemption applies during this period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation for exemption
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) If the sole use of a network unit is use by, or on behalf of, a defence organisation...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exemption implies this condition.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference for exemption
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (1) If the sole use of a network unit is use by, or on behalf of, a defence organisation...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exemption is recognised for this network unit.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition for exemption
modality: CogAI
operator: recognises
premise text: (1) If the sole use of a network unit is use by, or on behalf of, a defence organisation...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 42 does not apply to the unit.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
premise text: (1) If the sole use of a network unit is use by, or on behalf of, a defence organisation...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exemption spreads to this network unit.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread for exemption
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (1) If the sole use of a network unit is use by, or on behalf of, a defence organisation...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45(1) Exemption—defence

45(2) Exemption—defence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73
note: Exemption for defence organisation use of network unit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Exemption—defence

45(3) Exemption—defence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73
note: Defines defence organisation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Exemption—defence

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: defence organisation means...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
premise text: (3) In this section:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45(3) Exemption—defence

46 Exemption—intelligence operations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.74
note: Exempts certain intelligence operations from Section 42.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-46-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-46-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46 Exemption—intelligence operations

47 Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.74
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47(1) Exemption—transport authorities
has part: 47(3) Exemption—transport authorities
has part: 47(4) Exemption—transport authorities
has part: 47(5) Exemption—transport authorities
has part: 47(7) Exemption—transport authorities
has part: 47(8) Exemption—transport authorities
has part: 47(9) Exemption—transport authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47
schema version: 2

47(1) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.74
note: Exemption for Airservices Australia
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Exemption—transport authorities

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 42 does not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts network units from section 42
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
premise text: Section 42 applies to network units

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(1) Exemption—transport authorities

47(3) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.74
note: Exemption for network units used by State or Territory transport authorities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Exemption—transport authorities

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the sole use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the exemption
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (3) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if the sole use of the...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the sole use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines a cognitive AI pattern for the exemption
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
premise text: (3) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if the sole use of the...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the sole use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on State or Territory transport authorities
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the sole use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines a diffusion pattern for the exemption
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (3) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if the sole use of the...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the sole use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for the exemption
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (3) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if the sole use of the...

47(4) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.74
note: Exemption for rail corporations carrying communications necessary or desirable for train services.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Exemption—transport authorities

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(4) Exemption—transport authorities

47(5) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.74
note: Exemption for network units used by Airservices Australia and carriers/ exempt users.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Exemption—transport authorities

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(5) Exemption—transport authorities

47(7) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.74
note: Exemption for network units used by State or Territory transport authorities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Exemption—transport authorities

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to carry communications necessary or desirable for the workings of any or all of the following services...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of exemption
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (7) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if...the principal use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to carry communications necessary or desirable for the workings of any or all of the following services...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishes the relationship between network unit use and exemption
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (7) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if...the principal use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to carry communications necessary or desirable for the workings of any or all of the following services...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analyzes the relationship between network unit use and exemption
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (7) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if...the principal use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on State or Territory transport authorities
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to carry communications necessary or desirable for the workings of any or all of the following services...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes how exemption applies to network units
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (7) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if...the principal use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority...

47(8) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.74
note: Exemption for network units used by rail corporations and carriers.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Exemption—transport authorities

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(8) Exemption—transport authorities

47(9) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.74
note: Definition of rail corporation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Exemption—transport authorities

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: that manages or operates rail transport services or infrastructure
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
premise text: rail corporation is a body corporate

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: that manages or operates both rail transport services and infrastructure
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
premise text: rail corporation is a body corporate

48 Exemption—broadcasting services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.75
note: Exemption for broadcasting services based on necessary or desirable purposes
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-48-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48 Exemption—broadcasting services

49 Exemption—electricity supply bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.77
note: Exemption for electricity supply bodies
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-49-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Electricity supply body exempt
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Section 42 does not apply

5 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.19
note: Defines carrier and service provider under the Act.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Simplified outline

50 Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78
curation status: Proposed
has part: 50(1) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
has part: 50(2) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
has part: 50(3) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
has part: 50(4) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
has part: 50(5) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50
schema version: 2

50(1) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78
note: Exemption for line links with existing authorisation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50(1) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws

50(2) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78
note: Exemption for line links with existing authorisation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Repeal occurred before this date
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
premise text: Date of repeal of the Telecommunications Act 1975

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption for line links with existing authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50(2) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws

50(3) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78
note: Exemption for line links installed before repeal of section 45 of the Telecommunications Act 1989.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These line links were in operation during the relevant period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Exemption applies to facilities installed during specified period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Section 45 of the Telecommunications Act 1989 was repealed before installation.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This exemption is a specific instance of an obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Exemption can be classified as a specific type of obligation.
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
premise text: Section 45 of the Telecommunications Act 1989 permits maintenance and operation of facilities.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 42 does not apply to these line links.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts line links from section 42 of the Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Section 45 of the Telecommunications Act 1989 permits maintenance and operation of facilities.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These line links meet the exemption criteria if they satisfy the specified conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Exemption applies if facilities meet specified conditions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: Section 45 of the Telecommunications Act 1989 permits maintenance and operation of facilities.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These line links remain exempted until modification or replacement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Exemption applies until facilities are modified or replaced.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: Facilities installed before repeal of section 45 were permitted by that section.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50(3) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws

50(4) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78
note: Exemption for line links with existing authorisation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the sole use of the line link is use as provided in, and in accordance with any conditions specified in, the authorisation;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the exemption
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (4) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: section 42 of this Act does not apply to the line link.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justifies the exemption based on the conditions
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (4) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: section 42 of this Act does not apply to the line link.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to exempt line links with existing authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (4) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50(4) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws

50(5) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78
note: Exemption for line links with existing authorisation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the principal use of the line link is use as provided in, and in accordance with any conditions specified in, the authorisation;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Line link must be used during period when previous authorisation was in force
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (5) If: a line link consists of facilities in relation to which an authorisation was in force...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the principal use of the line link is use as provided in, and in accordance with any conditions specified in, the authorisation;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Line link must comply with conditions of previous authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (5) If: a line link consists of facilities in relation to which an authorisation was in force...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the principal use of the line link is use as provided in, and in accordance with any conditions specified in, the authorisation;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Line link must not be used for purposes other than those specified in previous authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: must-not
premise text: (5) If: a line link consists of facilities in relation to which an authorisation was in force...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the principal use of the line link is use as provided in, and in accordance with any conditions specified in, the authorisation;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Line link must comply with all conditions specified in previous authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: must-comply
premise text: (5) If: a line link consists of facilities in relation to which an authorisation was in force...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the principal use of the line link is use as provided in, and in accordance with any conditions specified in, the authorisation;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Line link must cease use when previous authorisation expires
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (5) If: a line link consists of facilities in relation to which an authorisation was in force...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50(5) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws

51 Exemption—Ministerial determination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.80
curation status: Proposed
has part: 51(1) Exemption—Ministerial determination
has part: 51(2) Exemption—Ministerial determination
has part: 51(3) Exemption—Ministerial determination
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51
schema version: 2

51(1) Exemption—Ministerial determination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.80
note: Minister may determine exemption from section 42
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Exemption—Ministerial determination

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between section 42 and exemption determination
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation to
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine that section 42 does not apply in relation to:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal relation between section 42 and exemption determination
modality: CogAI
operator: relation to
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine that section 42 does not apply in relation to:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make determination
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal relation between section 42 and exemption determination
modality: Diffusion
operator: relation to
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine that section 42 does not apply in relation to:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between section 42 and exemption determination
modality: LTL
operator: relation to
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine that section 42 does not apply in relation to:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51(1) Exemption—Ministerial determination

51(2) Exemption—Ministerial determination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.80
note: Determination under this section may be unconditional or subject to conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Exemption—Ministerial determination

51(3) Exemption—Ministerial determination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.80
note: Determination under this section has effect accordingly.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Exemption—Ministerial determination

52 Applications for carrier licence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.82
note: Eligible entities may apply for a carrier licence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-52-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-52
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Eligible entities may apply for a carrier licence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-52-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52 Applications for carrier licence

53 Form of application etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.82
note: Application must be in writing and in accordance with approved form.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be in writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53 Form of application etc.

53A Copy of application to be given to Communications Access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.82
curation status: Proposed
has part: 53A(1) Copy of application to be given to Communications Access
has part: 53A(2) Copy of application to be given to Communications Access
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53a
schema version: 2

53A(1) Copy of application to be given to Communications Access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.82
note: ACMA must give a copy of the application to a Communications Access Coordinator.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 53A Copy of application to be given to Communications Access

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

53A(2) Copy of application to be given to Communications Access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.82
note: Application must be given to Communications Access Coordinator
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 53A Copy of application to be given to Communications Access

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The application must be given to the Communications Access Coordinator.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide application copy
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: None

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53A(2) Copy of application to be given to Communications Access

54 Application to be accompanied by charge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.82
note: An application must be accompanied by the charge imposed on it.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-54-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be accompanied by charge.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54 Application to be accompanied by charge

55 Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55(1) Further information
has part: 55(2) Further information
has part: 55(3) Further information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55
schema version: 2

55(1) Further information
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
note: Request for further information from applicant within a specified period.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Further information

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request for further information
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(1) Further information

55(2) Further information
type: Concept
description: Information
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
note: ACMA may refuse to consider application until applicant provides information.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Further information

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA has an obligation to refuse application until applicant provides information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(2) Further information

55(3) Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
note: Definition of business day
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Further information

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: business day is during ACMA's business hours
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: ACMA is open for business

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: business day is a class of days
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: None

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(3) Further information

56 Grant of licence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56(1) Grant of licence
has part: 56(2) Grant of licence
has part: 56(3) Grant of licence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56
schema version: 2

56(1) Grant of licence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
note: Grant of carrier licence upon application.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Grant of licence

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Licence issued
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to operate
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
premise text: Application submitted

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56(1) Grant of licence

56(2) Grant of licence
type: Concept
description: written notice
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
note: ACMA must provide written notice upon granting carrier licence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Grant of licence

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56(3) Grant of licence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
note: ACMA must publish notice stating licence has been granted
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Grant of licence

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56A(1) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 56A(2) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 56A(3) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 56A(4) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 56A(5) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 56A(6) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 56A(7) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 56A(8) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 56A(9) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56a
schema version: 2

56A(1) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
note: Must consult Communications Access Coordinator before granting a carrier licence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56A(2) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
note: Notice of no further consultation required within 15 business days
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56A(3) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
note: ACMA must not grant carrier licence while notice remains in force.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

56A(4) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
note: ACMA must not grant carrier licence while notice remains in force.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: while notice remains in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: ACMA must not grant carrier licence.

56A(5) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
note: ACMA may revoke notice under subsection (3) or (4)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Communications Access Coordinator must revoke notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA may revoke notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
premise text: ACMA has authority to revoke notices

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notice under subsection (3) or (4) is revoked
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Communications Access Coordinator must revoke notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
premise text: Communications Access Coordinator has authority to revoke notices

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notice under subsection (3) or (4) is revoked
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA may revoke notice under subsection (3) or (4)
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
premise text: ACMA has authority to revoke notices

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notice under subsection (3) or (4) is revoked
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Communications Access Coordinator must revoke notice upon ACMA request
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
premise text: ACMA may revoke notices

56A(6) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
note: Cannot issue further notice after revocation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of issuing further notice
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

56A(7) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
note: Must provide notice to applicant
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56a-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

56A(8) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
note: ACMA cannot grant carrier licence while notice is in force
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56a-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Licence cannot be granted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of granting licence
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: ACMA must not grant licence

56A(9) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
note: Defines business day for ACMA purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56a-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (9) In this section: business day means a day on which the ACMA is open for business in the Australian Capital Territory and in Victoria.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal definition of business day
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (9) In this section: business day means a day on which the ACMA is open for business in the Australian Capital Territory and in Victoria.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Definition of business day as a normative concept
modality: Argumentation
operator: =

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (9) In this section: business day means a day on which the ACMA is open for business in the Australian Capital Territory and in Victoria.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Definition of business day as a concept that can be understood by artificial intelligence systems
modality: CogAI
operator: =

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (9) In this section:business day means a day on which the ACMA is open for business in the Australian Capital Territory and in Victoria.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of a business day
modality: Deontic
operator: =

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (9) In this section: business day means a day on which the ACMA is open for business in the Australian Capital Territory and in Victoria.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition of business day
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (9) In this section: business day means a day on which the ACMA is open for business in the Australian Capital Territory and in Victoria.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Definition of business day as a concept that can be applied to different contexts
modality: Diffusion
operator: =

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56A(9) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator

56AA Deemed carrier licence—designated Telstra successor
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
note: Deemed carrier licence—designated Telstra successor
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56aa-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56aa
schema version: 2

57 Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.87
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57(1) Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act
has part: 57(2) Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57
schema version: 2

57(1) Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.87
note: Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57 Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The carrier licence is subject to the Act.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
premise text: (1) A carrier licence has effect subject to this Act.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57(1) Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act

57(2) Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.87
note: This Act includes other laws and regulations.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57 Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: sec-57-ss-2
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusive provision
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: This Act includes...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: sec-57-ss-2
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy application
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: sec-57-ss-2
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Regulations under the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: regulations under that Act

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57(2) Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act

58 Refusal of carrier licence—disqualified applicant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.87
note: Refusal of carrier licence for disqualified applicant
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the applicant is disqualified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the refusal of a carrier licence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) The ACMA may refuse to grant a carrier licence...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the applicant is disqualified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implies that the refusal of a carrier licence is contingent on the applicant being disqualified
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: The ACMA may refuse to grant a carrier licence...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the applicant is disqualified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Infers that the refusal of a carrier licence is based on the disqualification of an applicant
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (1) The ACMA may refuse to grant a carrier licence...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the applicant is disqualified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits granting a carrier licence to a disqualified applicant
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The ACMA may refuse to grant a carrier licence...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the applicant is disqualified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads the information that an applicant is disqualified before granting a carrier licence
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (1) The ACMA may refuse to grant a carrier licence...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58 Refusal of carrier licence—disqualified applicant

58A Refusal of carrier licence—security
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.91
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58A(1) Refusal of carrier licence—security
has part: 58A(2) Refusal of carrier licence—security
has part: 58A(3) Refusal of carrier licence—security
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58a
schema version: 2

58A(1) Refusal of carrier licence—security
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.91
note: Grant of carrier licence to a particular person would be prejudicial to security.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58A Refusal of carrier licence—security

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The grant of a carrier licence occurs during the period where national security is at risk.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Identifies temporal intervals where the grant of a carrier licence would be prejudicial to security.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) If the Home Affairs Minister, after consulting the Prime Minister and the Minister administering this Act...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The CogAI system recognises the Home Affairs Minister's expertise in national security.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognises the Home Affairs Minister's authority in determining who can be granted a carrier licence.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognises
premise text: (1) If the Home Affairs Minister, after consulting the Prime Minister and the Minister administering this Act...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The grant of a carrier licence to the person would be prejudicial to security.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits granting a carrier licence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) If the Home Affairs Minister, after consulting the Prime Minister and the Minister administering this Act...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information spreads that granting a carrier licence to the individual would be prejudicial to security.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about individuals who would be granted a carrier licence if it were not for the Home Affairs Minister's direction.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
premise text: (1) If the Home Affairs Minister, after consulting the Prime Minister and the Minister administering this Act...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The pattern of granting carrier licences to individuals with potential threats to national security recurs.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Identifies recurring patterns in the grant of carrier licences that would be prejudicial to security.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (1) If the Home Affairs Minister, after consulting the Prime Minister and the Minister administering this Act...

58A(2) Refusal of carrier licence—security
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.91
note: Comply with direction under subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58A Refusal of carrier licence—security

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...with a direction under subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (2) The ACMA must comply...

58A(3) Refusal of carrier licence—security
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.91
note: ACMA cannot reconsider non-compulsory refusal to grant carrier licence
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58A Refusal of carrier licence—security

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on reconsideration
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

59 Time limit on licence decision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.92
curation status: Proposed
has part: 59(1) Time limit on licence decision
has part: 59(2) Time limit on licence decision
has part: 59(3) Time limit on licence decision
has part: 59(4) Time limit on licence decision
has part: 59(5) Time limit on licence decision
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59
schema version: 2

59(1) Time limit on licence decision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.92
note: Refusal of licence decision within deadline
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 59 Time limit on licence decision

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) If the ACMA neither grants, nor refuses to grant...

59(2) Time limit on licence decision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.92
note: Time limit for ACMA decision on licence application
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 59 Time limit on licence decision

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...then the deadline day is...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory time limit
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (2) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59(2) Time limit on licence decision

59(3) Time limit on licence decision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.92
note: Determines deadline for licence decision based on section 56A notice
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 59 Time limit on licence decision

59(4) Time limit on licence decision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.92
note: Deadline for licence decision after complying with section 55 request
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 59 Time limit on licence decision

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the deadline day is...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory deadline
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (4) If...

59(5) Time limit on licence decision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.92
note: Deadline for licence decision if section 56A notice is in force
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 59 Time limit on licence decision

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the deadline day is the fifth business day after the section 56A expiration day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Section 59(5) specifies a temporal interval for the deadline day
modality: AllenInterval
operator: After
premise text: (5) If: (a) the ACMA gave a section 55 request; and (b) the request was complied with; and (c) there is a section 56A notice in force at the end of the tenth business day after the day on which the request was complied with;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the deadline day is the fifth business day after the section 56A expiration day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Section 59(5) classifies as a subclass of Section 55 requests
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: (5) If: (a) the ACMA gave a section 55 request; and (b) the request was complied with; and (c) there is a section 56A notice in force at the end of the tenth business day after the day on which the request was complied with;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the deadline day is the fifth business day after the section 56A expiration day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with section 56A notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (5) If the ACMA gave a section 55 request; and (b) the request was complied with; and (c) there is a section 56A notice in force at the end of the tenth business day after the day on which the request was complied with;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the deadline day is the fifth business day after the section 56A expiration day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Section 59(5) specifies a condition for the deadline day if certain conditions are met
modality: Diffusion
operator: If-Then
premise text: (5) If: (a) the ACMA gave a section 55 request; and (b) the request was complied with; and (c) there is a section 56A notice in force at the end of the tenth business day after the day on which the request was complied with;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the deadline day is the fifth business day after the section 56A expiration day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Section 59(5) specifies a temporal interval for the deadline day until the section 56A expiration day
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (5) If: (a) the ACMA gave a section 55 request; and (b) the request was complied with; and (c) there is a section 56A notice in force at the end of the tenth business day after the day on which the request was complied with;

6 Main index
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.23
note: Main index to this Act
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6
schema version: 2

60 Notification of refusal of application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.95
note: ACMA must give written notice of refusal to applicant.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-60-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

61 Conditions of carrier licence specified in Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.95
note: Carrier licence is subject to conditions in Schedule 1.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-61-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier licence is subject to conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-61-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61 Conditions of carrier licence specified in Schedule 1

62 Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152AZ of the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.95
note: Carrier licence subject to condition set out in section 152AZ of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-62
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier licence is subject to a condition.
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62 Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152AZ of the

62A Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BCO of the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.95
note: Carrier licence subject to condition set out in section 152BCO.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-62a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier licence is subject to a condition.
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62A Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BCO of the

62B Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BDF of the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.95
note: Carrier licence subject to condition set out in section 152BDF.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-62b
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier licence is subject to condition.
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62B Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BDF of the

62C Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BEC of the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
note: Carrier licence subject to condition set out in section 152BEC.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-62c
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier licence is subject to a condition.
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62C Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BEC of the

62D Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152CJC of the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
note: Carrier licence subject to condition set out in section 152CJC of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-62d
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subject of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT

62E Condition of carrier licence set out in section 37 of the National
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
note: Condition of carrier licence set out in section 37 of the National Broadband Network Companies Act 2011.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62e-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-62e
schema version: 2

63 Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63(1) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
has part: 63(2) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
has part: 63(3) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
has part: 63(4) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
has part: 63(5) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
has part: 63(6) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
has part: 63(7) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63
schema version: 2

63(1) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
note: Conditions applying to specified existing carrier licences
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(1) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister

63(2) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
note: Conditions applying to specified future carrier licences
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration of conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(2) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister

63(3) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
note: Conditions for carrier licence
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(3) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister

63(4) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
note: Declaration has effect accordingly.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(4) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister

63(5) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
note: Variation of instrument conditions by Minister
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to vary instrument conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: may

63(6) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
note: Minister may revoke instrument under subsections (1), (2) or (3)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to revoke instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(6) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister

63(7) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
note: Minister must provide copy of instrument to licence holder
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Instrument creation is contingent on certain conditions being met
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTINGENT ON
premise text: (7) As soon as practicable after the Minister makes an instrument under subsection (1), (2), (5) or (6) that relates to a licence, the Minister must give the holder of the licence a copy of the instrument.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Minister requires action upon creation of instrument
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES ACTION
premise text: (7) As soon as practicable after the Minister makes an instrument under subsection (1), (2), (5) or (6) that relates to a licence, the Minister must give the holder of the licence a copy of the instrument.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must provide copy of instrument to licence holder
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Copy of instrument is spread to licence holder upon creation of instrument
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS TO
premise text: (7) As soon as practicable after the Minister makes an instrument under subsection (1), (2), (5) or (6) that relates to a licence, the Minister must give the holder of the licence a copy of the instrument.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Instrument creation is contingent on certain conditions being met
modality: LTL
operator: CONTINGENT ON
premise text: (7) As soon as practicable after the Minister makes an instrument under subsection (1), (2), (5) or (6) that relates to a licence, the Minister must give the holder of the licence a copy of the instrument.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(7) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister

63A Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63A(1) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
has part: 63A(2) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
has part: 63A(3) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
has part: 63A(4) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
has part: 63A(5) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63a
schema version: 2

63A(1) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
note: Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited until declaration takes effect
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 63A Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must comply with conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Carrier licence is subject to conditions

63A(2) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
note: Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited until declaration takes effect
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 63A Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the conditions set out in section 11 of the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Conditions - Telstra Infraco Limited) Declaration 2019 overlap with the period during which the declaration takes effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conditions overlap with declaration period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) Until the first occasion after the commencement of this section on which a declaration under subsection 63(2) takes effect in relation to a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the carrier licence is subject to the conditions set out in section 11 of the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Conditions - Telstra Infraco Limited) Declaration 2019
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) Until the first occasion after the commencement of this section on which a declaration under subsection 63(2) takes effect in relation to a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the conditions set out in section 11 of the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Conditions - Telstra Infraco Limited) Declaration 2019 repeat until the declaration takes effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conditions repeat until declaration takes effect
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (2) Until the first occasion after the commencement of this section on which a declaration under subsection 63(2) takes effect in relation to a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited:

63A(3) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
note: If a carrier licence held by Telstra is subject to a condition, the first company is taken to have complied with that condition.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 63A Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (first Telstra company)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If a licence is subject to a condition, then the first company complies with that condition.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (a) and (b)

63A(4) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
note: Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited until declaration takes effect
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 63A Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on Telstra Limited
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

63A(5) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
note: Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-5-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 63A Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is (whether in accordance with subsection (4) of this section or otherwise) subject to:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has condition
modality: Deontic
operator: hasCondition
premise text: (5) If: a carrier licence held by a particular Telstra company...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is (whether in accordance with subsection (4) of this section or otherwise) subject to: i) a condition set out in an interim Telstra carrier licence condition declaration; or ii) an interim condition set out in the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Conditions - Telstra Infraco Limited) Declaration 2019;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has obligation to comply with conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: (5) If: a carrier licence held by a particular Telstra company...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-5-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is (whether in accordance with subsection (4) of this section or otherwise) subject to: i) a condition set out in an interim Telstra carrier licence condition declaration; or ii) an interim condition set out in the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Conditions - Telstra Infraco Limited) Declaration 2019;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Has temporal relation with interim conditions
modality: LTL
operator: hasTemporalRelation
premise text: (5) If: a carrier licence held by a particular Telstra company...

64 Consultation about declared licence conditions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.101
curation status: Proposed
has part: 64(1) Consultation about declared licence conditions
has part: 64(2) Consultation about declared licence conditions
has part: 64(3) Consultation about declared licence conditions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64
schema version: 2

64(1) Consultation about declared licence conditions
type: Concept
description: Submissions from licence holder within a specified time limit
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.101
note: Minister must consult with licence holder before making an instrument under certain subsections.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Consultation about declared licence conditions

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to consult with the licence holder
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64(1) Consultation about declared licence conditions

64(2) Consultation about declared licence conditions
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.101
note: Must provide at least 30 days' notice for declared licence conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Consultation about declared licence conditions

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide at least 30 days' notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64(2) Consultation about declared licence conditions

64(3) Consultation about declared licence conditions
type: Concept
description: Submissions from applicant within specified time limit
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.101
note: Minister must consult applicant before making instrument under subsection 63(3)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Consultation about declared licence conditions

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must take action before making instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64(3) Consultation about declared licence conditions

65 Conditions about foreign ownership or control
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.101
curation status: Proposed
has part: 65(1) Conditions about foreign ownership or control
has part: 65(2) Conditions about foreign ownership or control
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65
schema version: 2

65(1) Conditions about foreign ownership or control
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.101
note: Foreign ownership or control condition for carrier licence
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Conditions about foreign ownership or control

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Applies to temporal intervals for foreign ownership or control conditions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: applies to
premise text: (1) A condition of a carrier licence may relate to the extent of foreign ownership or control (whether direct or indirect) of the holder.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applies to cognitive AI for foreign ownership or control conditions
modality: CogAI
operator: applies to
premise text: (1) A condition of a carrier licence may relate to the extent of foreign ownership or control (whether direct or indirect) of the holder.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Relates to foreign ownership or control
modality: Deontic
operator: relates to
premise text: (1) A condition of a carrier licence may relate to the extent of foreign ownership or control (whether direct or indirect) of the holder.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applies to diffusion of information for foreign ownership or control conditions
modality: Diffusion
operator: applies to
premise text: (1) A condition of a carrier licence may relate to the extent of foreign ownership or control (whether direct or indirect) of the holder.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Applies to ordered temporal intervals for foreign ownership or control conditions
modality: LTL
operator: applies to
premise text: (1) A condition of a carrier licence may relate to the extent of foreign ownership or control (whether direct or indirect) of the holder.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65(1) Conditions about foreign ownership or control

65(2) Conditions about foreign ownership or control
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.101
note: Does not limit conditions declared under section 63 by implication.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Conditions about foreign ownership or control

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65(2) Conditions about foreign ownership or control

67 Carrier licence conditions—special provisions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.101
note: A condition of a carrier licence has effect subject to provisions under the Radiocommunications Act 1992.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-67-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-67
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...has effect subject to provisions...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditionality
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJUNCTIVE MODO
premise text: (1) A condition of a carrier licence...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-67-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 67 Carrier licence conditions—special provisions

68 Compliance with conditions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
curation status: Proposed
has part: 68(1) Compliance with conditions
has part: 68(2) Compliance with conditions
has part: 68(3) Compliance with conditions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68
schema version: 2

68(1) Compliance with conditions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Carrier must not contravene a condition of the carrier licence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Compliance with conditions

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Carrier must not contravene a condition of the carrier licence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: Carrier must comply with conditions.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68(1) Compliance with conditions

68(2) Compliance with conditions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Prohibition on aiding, abetting, or conspiring to contravene subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Compliance with conditions

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between prohibited actions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (a), (b), and (c) are all related to contraventions of subsection (1)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on specific actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person must not:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on inducing contraventions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) induce, whether by threats or promises or otherwise, a contravention of subsection (1);

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on being knowingly concerned in contraventions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) be in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, nor party to, a contravention of subsection (1);

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on conspiring to contravene subsection (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (d) conspire with others to effect a contravention of subsection (1);

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68(2) Compliance with conditions

68(3) Compliance with conditions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Civil penalty provisions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Compliance with conditions

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits breaches of civil penalty provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

69 Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
curation status: Proposed
has part: 69(1) Remedial directions—breach of condition
has part: 69(2) Remedial directions—breach of condition
has part: 69(3) Remedial directions—breach of condition
has part: 69(4) Remedial directions—breach of condition
has part: 69(4A) Remedial directions—breach of condition
has part: 69(5) Remedial directions—breach of condition
has part: 69(5A) Remedial directions—breach of condition
has part: 69(6) Remedial directions—breach of condition
has part: 69(6B) Remedial directions—breach of condition
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69
schema version: 2

69(1) Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Carrier must comply with licence conditions if contravening them.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Remedial directions—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has an obligation to comply with licence conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69(1) Remedial directions—breach of condition

69(2) Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Written direction requiring carrier to take specified action
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Remedial directions—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Carrier must take action
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: require
premise text: ACMA directs carrier

69(3) Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Direction to implement administrative systems for monitoring compliance with a condition of the licence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Remedial directions—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to implement administrative systems.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69(3) Remedial directions—breach of condition

69(4) Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Carrier must not contravene a direction under subsection (2).
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Remedial directions—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of action
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (4) A carrier must not contravene a direction under subsection (2).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69(4) Remedial directions—breach of condition

69(4A) Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Exempts certain conditions from subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-4a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Remedial directions—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69(4A) Remedial directions—breach of condition

69(5) Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Exempts a condition from subsection (1) of section 369.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Remedial directions—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts a condition from subsection (1) of section 369.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69(5) Remedial directions—breach of condition

69(5A) Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Exempts certain conditions from subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-5a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69-ss-5a
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Remedial directions—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-5a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69(5A) Remedial directions—breach of condition

69(6) Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Exempts certain conditions from subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Remedial directions—breach of condition

69(6B) Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Exempts a specific condition from the breach of condition provision.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-6b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-6b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69-ss-6b
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Remedial directions—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-6b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts a specific condition from the breach of condition provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.105
curation status: Proposed
has part: 69AA(1) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
has part: 69AA(2) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
has part: 69AA(3) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
has part: 69AA(4) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69aa
schema version: 2

69AA(1) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.105
note: Carrier must comply with conditions of licence
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has a duty to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (a) a carrier has contravened, or is contravening, a condition of the carrier licence held by the carrier;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has a duty to comply with conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (1) This section applies if:...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69AA(1) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access

69AA(2) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.105
note: The ACCC may give the carrier a written direction requiring the carrier to take specified action.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The ACCC may give a direction
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69AA(2) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access

69AA(3) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.105
note: Carrier must implement administrative systems for monitoring compliance with the condition.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69aa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must implement administrative systems.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69AA(3) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access

69AA(4) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.105
note: Preventing ACCC from giving a direction that would prevent Telstra from complying with an undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69aa-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Direction would prevent Telstra from complying with an undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents ACCC from giving a direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: ACCC must not give a direction.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Direction would have the effect of preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents ACCC from giving a direction that would prevent Telstra from complying with an undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: ACCC must not give a direction under subsection (2).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Direction would have the effect of preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: If ACCC gives a direction, then it would prevent Telstra from complying with an undertaking.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: ACCC must not give a direction under subsection (2).

7 Definitions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24
note: Defines terms related to telecommunications and ACMA's functions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines terms related to telecommunications and ACMA's functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACNC type of entity
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies entities into types
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: ACNC type of entity means an entity that meets the description of a type of entity in column 1 of the table in subsection 25-5(5) of the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission Act 2012.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: telecommunications
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines telecommunications
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: For this purpose, telecommunications means the carriage of communications by means of guided and/or unguided electromagnetic energy.

70 Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
curation status: Proposed
has part: 70(1) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(1A) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(2) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(2A) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(3) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(3B) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(4) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(4A) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(4B) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(4C) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(4D) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(4E) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(4F) Formal warnings—breach of condition
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70
schema version: 2

70(1) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
note: Carrier must issue formal warning for breach of condition
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has an obligation to issue formal warning
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(1) Formal warnings—breach of condition

70(1A) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
note: Exempts certain conditions from subsection (1) of section 70(1A)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(1A) Formal warnings—breach of condition

70(2) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
note: Exempts a condition from subsection (1) of section 369.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts a condition from subsection (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Section 369 deals with Rules of Conduct under section 367.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(2) Formal warnings—breach of condition

70(2A) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
note: Exempts certain conditions from subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part 1 of Schedule 1
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between conditions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relates to
premise text: Subsection (1)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(2A) Formal warnings—breach of condition

70(3) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
note: Exempts certain conditions from subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applies to exemptions from obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to certain conditions

70(3B) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
note: Exempts a specific condition from the general breach of condition rule.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3b-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3b-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70-ss-3b
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply to this condition after the specified date
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between two events
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
premise text: The exemption is effective from the date of commencement

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3b-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply to this condition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies a specific obligation or prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The exemption is a specific case of the general breach rule

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3b-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply to this condition after the specified date
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between two events
modality: LTL
operator: <>
premise text: The exemption is effective from the date of commencement

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(3B) Formal warnings—breach of condition

70(4) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
note: Exemption from breach of condition for standard access obligations
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption implies obligation to comply with standard access obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(4) Formal warnings—breach of condition

70(4A) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for access determinations under section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts access determinations from subsection (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with access determinations.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(4A) Formal warnings—breach of condition

70(4B) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for certain rules of conduct
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4b-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4b-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70-ss-4b
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply to this condition.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts subsection (1) for certain rules of conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
premise text: Section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with binding rules of conduct.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State is under obligation to comply with section 152BDF
modality: Deontic
operator: Imposes duty on State to comply
premise text: Section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with binding rules of conduct.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4b-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State is exempted from duty to comply with section 152BDF
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts State from duty to comply
premise text: Section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with binding rules of conduct.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(4B) Formal warnings—breach of condition

70(4C) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
note: Exempts access agreements from subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4c-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70-ss-4c
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The condition starts at this point in time
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for this section
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to this condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts access agreements from subsection (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(4C) Formal warnings—breach of condition

70(4D) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for a specific condition
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4d-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4d-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4d-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4d-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70-ss-4d
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4d-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption is applicable after subsection (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between subsection (1) and the exemption
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152CJC

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4d-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption is equal to the condition
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Equality of the exemption and the condition
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152CJC

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4d-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption is less than or equal to the condition
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inequality of the exemption and the condition
modality: Deontic
operator: <=
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152CJC

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4d-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption is applicable before subsection (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between subsection (1) and the exemption
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152CJC

70(4E) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for certain conditions set out in section 37 of the National Broadband Network Companies Act 2011.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4e-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70-ss-4e
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition

70(4F) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
note: Exempts certain conditions from subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4f-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70-ss-4f
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition

71 Surrender of carrier licence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
note: Carrier may surrender carrier licence by written notice.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-71-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71
schema version: 2

72 Cancellation of carrier licence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
curation status: Proposed
has part: 72(1) Cancellation of carrier licence
has part: 72(2A) Cancellation of carrier licence
has part: 72(2B) Cancellation of carrier licence
has part: 72(3) Cancellation of carrier licence
has part: 72(4) Cancellation of carrier licence
has part: 72(5) Cancellation of carrier licence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72
schema version: 2

72(1) Cancellation of carrier licence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
note: Failure to pay annual charge on or before due date results in cancellation of carrier licence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 72 Cancellation of carrier licence

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Charge becomes due and payable on or after the specified date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Charge becomes due and payable on or after a specific date.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Date of charge becoming due and payable is specified.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Carrier must pay on or before due date to avoid cancellation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: No carrier can avoid licence cancellation by paying late.
modality: CogAI
operator: ¬∃
premise text: Carrier pays late.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Carrier licence cancellation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits failure to pay annual charge.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Annual charge becomes due and payable on a specific date.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Annual charge is equal to the specified charge.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines annual charge as charge imposed by Part 3 of the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Charges) Act 1997.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Equality
premise text: Annual charge is a specific type of charge.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Carrier must pay on or before due date to avoid cancellation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: No carrier can pay late and avoid licence cancellation.
modality: Diffusion
operator: ¬∃
premise text: Carrier cannot pay late.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Carrier pays annual charge on or before due date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: All carriers must pay annual charge on or before due date to avoid licence cancellation.
modality: LTL
operator: ∀
premise text: Carrier is subject to annual charge.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72(1) Cancellation of carrier licence

72(2A) Cancellation of carrier licence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
note: Failure to pay industry levy results in cancellation of carrier licence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 72 Cancellation of carrier licence

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Carrier licence cancellation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits failure to pay industry levy.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Industry levy is due and payable.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72(2A) Cancellation of carrier licence

72(2B) Cancellation of carrier licence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
note: Cancellation of carrier licence if funding charge is not paid on time.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 72 Cancellation of carrier licence

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...on or before the date on which the funding charge becomes due and payable.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Funding charge becomes due and payable on a specific date.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: The ACMA may cancel a carrier licence held by a carrier...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the carrier fails to pay in full any funding charge...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits cancellation of carrier licence if funding charge is not paid on time.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2B) The ACMA may cancel a carrier licence held by a carrier...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the carrier fails to pay in full any funding charge...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has an obligation to pay funding charge on time.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2B) The ACMA may cancel a carrier licence held by a carrier...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Telecommunications (Regional Broadband Scheme) Charge Act 2020.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies funding charge as a charge imposed by the Telecommunications (Regional Broadband Scheme) Charge Act 2020.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: For this purpose, funding charge means charge...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the carrier fails to pay in full any funding charge...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Cancellation of carrier licence is diffuse over time.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2B) The ACMA may cancel a carrier licence held by a carrier...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the carrier fails to pay in full any funding charge...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Funding charge is recurring and must be paid on time.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: The ACMA may cancel a carrier licence held by a carrier...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72(2B) Cancellation of carrier licence

72(3) Cancellation of carrier licence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
note: ACMA may cancel carrier licence if holder becomes disqualified body corporate
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 72 Cancellation of carrier licence

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cancellation occurs at this point in time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for cancellation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (3) If the holder of a carrier licence becomes a disqualified body corporate...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cancellation occurs
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implicates cancellation if holder is disqualified body corporate
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (3) If the holder of a carrier licence becomes a disqualified body corporate...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Holder is recognised as disqualified body corporate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognises holder as disqualified body corporate
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognise
premise text: (3) If the holder of a carrier licence becomes a disqualified body corporate...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA may cancel carrier licence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits cancellation of carrier licence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) If the holder of a carrier licence becomes a disqualified body corporate...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cancellation is diffused to all relevant parties
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses cancellation to all relevant parties
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (3) If the holder of a carrier licence becomes a disqualified body corporate...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72(3) Cancellation of carrier licence

72(4) Cancellation of carrier licence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
note: ACMA may cancel carrier licence if holder becomes disqualified partnership
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 72 Cancellation of carrier licence

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits cancellation of carrier licence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72(4) Cancellation of carrier licence

72(5) Cancellation of carrier licence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
note: Must be a constitutional corporation to hold carrier licence
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 72 Cancellation of carrier licence

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a constitutional corporation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During a particular time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (5) If, at a particular time, the holder of a carrier licence is none of the following:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a constitutional corporation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: During a particular time
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (5) If, at a particular time, the holder of a carrier licence is none of the following:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a constitutional corporation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Not none of the following
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (5) If, at a particular time, the holder of a carrier licence is none of the following:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a constitutional corporation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: During a particular time
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (5) If, at a particular time, the holder of a carrier licence is none of the following:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a constitutional corporation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: During a particular time
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (5) If, at a particular time, the holder of a carrier licence is none of the following:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72(5) Cancellation of carrier licence

73 Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
curation status: Proposed
has part: 73(1) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
has part: 73(2) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
has part: 73(3) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
has part: 73(4) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
has part: 73(5) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
has part: 73(6) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
has part: 73(7) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73
schema version: 2

73(1) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
note: Annual charge due and payable when application charge is due.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Collection of charges relating to carrier licences

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Annual charge must be paid within a specific time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Annual charge must be paid during the period when application charge is due and payable.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Late payment penalty means an amount that is payable by way of penalty in accordance with a determination under subsection (4).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Annual charge must be paid.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay annual charge when application charge is due.
modality: Deontic
operator: due
premise text: Application charge is due and payable.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Annual charge must be paid.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: There is an obligation to pay annual charge when application charge is due and payable.
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: When application charge is due and payable, annual charge must be paid.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Late payment penalty must be paid.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: There is an obligation to pay late payment penalty when late payment penalty is payable.
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Late payment penalty means an amount that is payable by way of penalty in accordance with a determination under subsection (4).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Annual charge is a specific type of charge.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Annual charge is a type of charge imposed by Part 3 of the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Charges) Act 1997.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is
premise text: Annual charge means charge imposed by Part 3 of the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Charges) Act 1997.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Annual charge must be paid within a specific time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Annual charge must be paid during the period when application charge is due and payable.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Late payment penalty means an amount that is payable by way of penalty in accordance with a determination under subsection (4).

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73(1) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences

73(2) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
note: Application charge due and payable when application is made.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Collection of charges relating to carrier licences

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to pay
modality: Deontic
operator: due

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73(2) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences

73(3) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
note: Annual charge is due and payable
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Collection of charges relating to carrier licences

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation of annual charge payment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) Annual charge is due and payable at the time ascertained in accordance with a written determination made by the ACMA.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial agent recognizes annual charge payment
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (3) Annual charge is due and payable at the time ascertained in accordance with a written determination made by the ACMA.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay annual charge
modality: Deontic
operator: due

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of late payment penalty
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (3) Annual charge is due and payable at the time ascertained in accordance with a written determination made by the ACMA.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Schema validation of annual charge payment
modality: SHACL
operator: validates
premise text: (3) Annual charge is due and payable at the time ascertained in accordance with a written determination made by the ACMA.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73(3) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences

73(4) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
note: Penalty for unpaid annual charge
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Collection of charges relating to carrier licences

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amount unpaid is computed from that time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Penalty applies during the period after which the charge became due
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (4) The ACMA may, by written instrument...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is liable to pay to the Commonwealth...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Penalty applies if annual charge remains unpaid after it became due
modality: CogAI
operator: if
premise text: (4) The ACMA may, by written instrument...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is liable to pay to the Commonwealth...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay penalty
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (4) The ACMA may, by written instrument...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is liable to pay to the Commonwealth...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Penalty applies if annual charge remains unpaid after it became due
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: (4) The ACMA may, by written instrument...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amount unpaid is computed from that time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Penalty applies during the period after which the charge became due
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (4) The ACMA may, by written instrument...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73(4) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences

73(5) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
note: Remission of penalty after determination under subsection (4)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Collection of charges relating to carrier licences

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73(5) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences

73(6) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
note: ACMA may remit late payment penalty
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Collection of charges relating to carrier licences

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization to remit penalty
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73(6) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences

73(7) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
note: Annual charge, application charge and late payment penalty are payable to the ACMA on behalf of the Commonwealth.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Collection of charges relating to carrier licences

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the obligation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (7) Annual charge, application charge and late payment penalty are payable to the ACMA on behalf of the Commonwealth.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justifies the obligation through logical reasoning
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (7) Annual charge, application charge and late payment penalty are payable to the ACMA on behalf of the Commonwealth.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Draws conclusions based on AI reasoning
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (7) Annual charge, application charge and late payment penalty are payable to the ACMA on behalf of the Commonwealth.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads the obligation through related concepts
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (7) Annual charge, application charge and late payment penalty are payable to the ACMA on behalf of the Commonwealth.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73(7) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences

73A Refund of application charge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.112
curation status: Proposed
has part: 73A(1) Refund of application charge
has part: 73A(2) Refund of application charge
has part: 73A(3) Refund of application charge
has part: 73A(4) Refund of application charge
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73a
schema version: 2

73A(1) Refund of application charge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.112
note: Refund of application charge if application lapses or is refused
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 73A Refund of application charge

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to refund application charge
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) This section applies...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73A(1) Refund of application charge

73A(2) Refund of application charge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.112
note: Must refund application charge to applicant
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 73A Refund of application charge

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for refund
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) The ACMA, on behalf of the Commonwealth, must refund the application charge to the applicant.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Refund implies obligation
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (2) The ACMA, on behalf of the Commonwealth, must refund the application charge to the applicant.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI application for refundable amount
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: (2) The ACMA, on behalf of the Commonwealth, must refund the application charge to the applicant.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must refund application charge to applicant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of refundable amount
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: (2) The ACMA, on behalf of the Commonwealth, must refund the application charge to the applicant.

73A(3) Refund of application charge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.112
note: The Consolidated Revenue Fund is appropriated for payments under this section.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 73A Refund of application charge

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: for payments under this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Consolidated Revenue Fund is appropriated.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73A(3) Refund of application charge

73A(4) Refund of application charge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.112
note: Definition of application charge
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 73A Refund of application charge

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: application charge
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines key term
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73A(4) Refund of application charge

74 Collection of charges on behalf of the Commonwealth
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.112
note: ACMA may collect payments on behalf of the Commonwealth.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-74-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to collect payments
modality: Deontic
operator: May

75 Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
curation status: Proposed
has part: 75(1) Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge
has part: 75(2) Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-75
schema version: 2

75(1) Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
note: Cancels exemptions from charge liability
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-75-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-75-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals exemption provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Cancel

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-75-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75(1) Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge

75(2) Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
note: Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge does not apply if another Act refers to the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Charges) Act 1997.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-75-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-75-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-75-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75(2) Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge

76 Commonwealth not liable to charge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
curation status: Proposed
has part: 76(1) Commonwealth not liable to charge
has part: 76(2) Commonwealth not liable to charge
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76
schema version: 2

76(1) Commonwealth not liable to charge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
note: The Commonwealth is not liable to pay charge imposed by the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Charges) Act 1997.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Commonwealth not liable to charge

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

76(2) Commonwealth not liable to charge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
note: The Commonwealth is not liable to charge for certain authorities.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Commonwealth not liable to charge

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This is a temporal interval during which the Commonwealth is not liable to charge.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The section defines a temporal interval during which the Commonwealth is not liable to charge.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) A reference in this section to the Commonwealth includes a reference to an authority of the Commonwealth that cannot, by law of the Commonwealth, be made liable to taxation by the Commonwealth.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This recognizes a pattern of non-liability for taxation in the Commonwealth.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The section recognizes a pattern of non-liability for taxation in the Commonwealth.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (2) A reference in this section to the Commonwealth includes a reference to an authority of the Commonwealth that cannot, by law of the Commonwealth, be made liable to taxation by the Commonwealth.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commonwealth is not liable to charge for certain authorities.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the Commonwealth is not liable to charge, then it cannot be taxed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (2) A reference in this section to the Commonwealth includes a reference to an authority of the Commonwealth that cannot, by law of the Commonwealth, be made liable to taxation by the Commonwealth.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This is an authority that cannot be taxed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: This section defines a subclass of 'authority' that cannot be taxed.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SubClassOf
premise text: (2) A reference in this section to the Commonwealth includes a reference to an authority of the Commonwealth that cannot, by law of the Commonwealth, be made liable to taxation by the Commonwealth.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This spreads knowledge about the Commonwealth's non-liability to charge.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The section spreads knowledge about the Commonwealth's non-liability to charge.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) A reference in this section to the Commonwealth includes a reference to an authority of the Commonwealth that cannot, by law of the Commonwealth, be made liable to taxation by the Commonwealth.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This is a recurring pattern of non-liability for taxation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The section defines a recurring pattern of non-liability for taxation.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (2) A reference in this section to the Commonwealth includes a reference to an authority of the Commonwealth that cannot, by law of the Commonwealth, be made liable to taxation by the Commonwealth.

77 Applications for nominated carrier declarations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
note: Carrier may apply for nominated carrier declaration.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-77-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-77-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77 Applications for nominated carrier declarations

78 Application to be accompanied by charge etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
curation status: Proposed
has part: 78(1) Application to be accompanied by charge etc.
has part: 78(2) Application to be accompanied by charge etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78
schema version: 2

78(1) Application to be accompanied by charge etc.
type: Concept
description: charge, consent of network owners, election of applicant
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
note: Application must be accompanied by charge, consent of network owners, and acceptance responsibility.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Application to be accompanied by charge etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be accompanied by charge, consent of network owners, and acceptance responsibility.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(1) Application to be accompanied by charge etc.

78(2) Application to be accompanied by charge etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
note: Application must be accompanied by charge etc.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Application to be accompanied by charge etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide application with charge etc.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(2) Application to be accompanied by charge etc.

79 Form of application etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
note: Application, consent and election must be in writing.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-79-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be in writing
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-79-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79 Form of application etc.

8 Crown to be bound
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8(1) Crown to be bound
has part: 8(2) Crown to be bound
has part: 8(3) Crown to be bound
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8
schema version: 2

8(1) Crown to be bound
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
note: The Crown is bound by this Act.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Crown to be bound

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Crown is obligated to comply with the Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

8(2) Crown to be bound
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
note: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-dialectical-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Crown to be bound

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal scope of prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The Act does not make the Crown liable to a pecuniary penalty during its existence.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: The Act does not make the Crown liable to a pecuniary penalty.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-dialectical-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dialectical
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Dialectical
operator: not
premise text: The Act does not make the Crown liable to a pecuniary penalty.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Diffusion
operator: not
premise text: The Act does not make the Crown liable to a pecuniary penalty.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: LinearLogic
operator: not
premise text: The Act does not make the Crown liable to a pecuniary penalty.

8(3) Crown to be bound
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
note: Protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an authority of the Crown.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Crown to be bound

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The protection in subsection (2) overlaps with the authority of the Crown.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Indicates that the protection in subsection (2) overlaps with the authority of the Crown.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an authority of the Crown.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The CogAI recognizes the authority of the Crown as exempt from protection in subsection (2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Indicates that the CogAI recognizes the authority of the Crown as exempt from protection in subsection (2).
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (3) The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an authority of the Crown.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an authority of the Crown.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes protection in subsection (2) from the Crown.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: (3) The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an authority of the Crown.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The protection in subsection (2) diffuses to the authority of the Crown.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Indicates that the protection in subsection (2) diffuses to the authority of the Crown.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an authority of the Crown.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The protection in subsection (2) repeats for the authority of the Crown.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Indicates that the protection in subsection (2) repeats for the authority of the Crown.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (3) The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an authority of the Crown.

80 Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
curation status: Proposed
has part: 80(1) Further information
has part: 80(2) Further information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80
schema version: 2

80(1) Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
note: Request for further information
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-80-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-80-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Further information

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-80-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request for information
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-80-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80(1) Further information

80(2) Further information
type: Concept
description: Information
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
note: ACMA may refuse to consider application until applicant provides information.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-80-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Further information

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-80-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80(2) Further information

81 Making a nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115
curation status: Proposed
has part: 81(1) Making a nominated carrier declaration
has part: 81(2) Making a nominated carrier declaration
has part: 81(3) Making a nominated carrier declaration
has part: 81(4) Making a nominated carrier declaration
has part: 81(5) Making a nominated carrier declaration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81
schema version: 2

81(1) Making a nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115
note: The ACMA may declare the applicant as the nominated carrier if they can comply with obligations and will not impede administration.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Making a nominated carrier declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The declaration relates to the units.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship with units
modality: AllenInterval
operator: in relation to
premise text: ...the network units if the ACMA is satisfied that:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The applicant can comply with obligations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ability to comply with obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: (a) if the declaration were made, the applicant would be in a position to comply with all of the obligations imposed on the applicant...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The declaration must not impede administration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No impediment to administration
modality: Deontic
operator: must not impede
premise text: (b) the making of the declaration will not impede the efficient administration of this Act.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81(1) Making a nominated carrier declaration

81(2) Making a nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115
note: Only one carrier can be declared as the nominated carrier.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Making a nominated carrier declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Single nomination obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: only

81(3) Making a nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115
note: Must give a copy of declaration to applicant and owners of network units.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Making a nominated carrier declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must give a copy
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

81(4) Making a nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115
note: Publish declaration in Gazette
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Making a nominated carrier declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81(4) Making a nominated carrier declaration

81(5) Making a nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115
note: Includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Making a nominated carrier declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes

81A Obligations of nominated carrier
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115
curation status: Proposed
has part: 81A(1) Obligations of nominated carrier
has part: 81A(2) Obligations of nominated carrier
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81a
schema version: 2

81A(1) Obligations of nominated carrier
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115
note: The Act applies to the nominated carrier in relation to network units as if they were owned or operated by the nominated carrier.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 81A Obligations of nominated carrier

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to ensure the nominated carrier operates or owns network units.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81A(1) Obligations of nominated carrier

81A(2) Obligations of nominated carrier
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115
note: No effect on other persons owning or operating network units.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 81A Obligations of nominated carrier

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: other persons
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclude from this Act's application
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: (1) does not affect

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81A(2) Obligations of nominated carrier

82 Notification of refusal of application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
note: ACMA must give written notice of refusal to applicant and owners of network units.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-82-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA prohibits refusing to make a nominated carrier declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

83 Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
curation status: Proposed
has part: 83(1) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
has part: 83(2) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
has part: 83(3) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
has part: 83(4) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
has part: 83(5) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
has part: 83(6) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
has part: 83(7) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
has part: 83(8) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-83
schema version: 2

83(1) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
note: Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-83-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 83 Revocation of nominated carrier declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revoking a nominated carrier declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

83(2) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
note: Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-83-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 83 Revocation of nominated carrier declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for revocation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) The ACMA must, by writing, revoke the nominated carrier declaration relating to a nominated carrier and relating to one or more network units if:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applies reasoning to revocation based on consent
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
premise text: (2) The ACMA must, by writing, revoke the nominated carrier declaration relating to a nominated carrier and relating to one or more network units if:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revocation without consent
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) The ACMA must, by writing, revoke the nominated carrier declaration relating to a nominated carrier and relating to one or more network units if:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses revocation based on consent
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) The ACMA must, by writing, revoke the nominated carrier declaration relating to a nominated carrier and relating to one or more network units if:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for revocation
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) The ACMA must, by writing, revoke the nominated carrier declaration relating to a nominated carrier and relating to one or more network units if:

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83(2) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration

83(3) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
note: Must provide revocation to former nominated carrier and owners of network units.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-83-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 83 Revocation of nominated carrier declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide revocation to former nominated carrier and owners of network units.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

83(4) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
note: Publishing a copy of revocation in the Gazette.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-83-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 83 Revocation of nominated carrier declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publishing obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83(4) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration

83(5) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
note: Revocation of nominated carrier declaration takes effect on the specified date.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-83-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 83 Revocation of nominated carrier declaration

83(6) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
description: written notice and submission
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
note: Notice and submission requirement before revoking a nominated carrier declaration
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-83-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 83 Revocation of nominated carrier declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: within the time limit specified in the notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Time limit for submission consideration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: ACMA must consider any submission that was received within the time limit specified in the notice

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the ACMA has accepted the nominated carrier's submission
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Submission consideration implies revocation proposal acceptance
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: ACMA must consider any submission that was received within the time limit specified in the notice

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the ACMA has considered the nominated carrier's submission using its cognitive abilities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Submission consideration as a cognitive process
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: ACMA must consider any submission that was received within the time limit specified in the notice

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless ACMA has given the nominated carrier a written notice...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify and consider submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA must not revoke a nominated carrier declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the ACMA has diffused the nominated carrier's submission into its decision-making process
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Submission consideration as a diffusion process
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: ACMA must consider any submission that was received within the time limit specified in the notice

83(7) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
note: A time limit must run for at least 7 days.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-83-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 83 Revocation of nominated carrier declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a time limit of at least 7 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83(7) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration

83(8) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
note: Includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-83-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 83 Revocation of nominated carrier declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes

84 Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.118
curation status: Proposed
has part: 84(1) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
has part: 84(2) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
has part: 84(3) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
has part: 84(4) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
has part: 84(5) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-84
schema version: 2

84(1) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.118
note: Maintain a Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-84-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between Register entries and carrier declarations/ licences
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to maintain a Register
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of carrier declarations and licences
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
premise text: (a) all nominated carrier declarations currently in force; (b) all carrier licences currently in force; (c) all conditions of such licences.

84(2) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.118
note: Allow electronic means for maintaining Register
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-84-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allow electronic means for maintaining Register
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies part of a long provision
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

84(3) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.118
note: Inspect and copy extracts from the Register on payment of a charge.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-84-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allow inspection and copying
modality: Deontic
operator: can

84(4) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.118
note: A person must make a copy of or take an extract from the Register if ACMA provides them with a printout.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-84-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person must make a copy or take an extract from the Register.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must make a copy or take an extract from the Register.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA provides a printout of the Register.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: sec-84-ss-4 is part of a section about the Register.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The provision is part of a section about the Register.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
premise text: sec-84-ss-4 is a subsection of sec-84.

84(5) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.118
note: Request for electronic form of information
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-84-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences

85 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.119
note: Service providers must comply with service provider rules.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-85-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-85-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85 Simplified outline

86 Service providers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.120
note: Definition of service provider
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This temporal interval is relevant to the application of the Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
premise text: The definitions of carriage service provider and content service provider are applicable from the commencement of the Act.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This CogAI application is relevant to the Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence
modality: CogAI
operator: >
premise text: The definitions of carriage service provider and content service provider are applicable in a way that involves artificial intelligence.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These definitions must be understood to apply the Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of terms
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: The definitions of carriage service provider and content service provider are provided in sections 87 and 97 respectively.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This diffusion is relevant to the application of the Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of information
modality: Diffusion
operator: >
premise text: The definitions of carriage service provider and content service provider are applicable in a way that spreads information.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This recurring trace is relevant to the application of the Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: >
premise text: The definitions of carriage service provider and content service provider are applicable in a recurring manner.

87 Carriage service providers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.121
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87(1) Carriage service providers
has part: 87(2) Carriage service providers
has part: 87(3) Carriage service providers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87
schema version: 2

87(1) Carriage service providers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.121
note: Must be a carriage service provider if supplying or proposing to supply a listed carriage service using a network unit owned by one or more carriers or in relation to which a nominated carrier declaration is in force.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Carriage service providers

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to be a carriage service provider
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

87(2) Carriage service providers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.121
note: Person supplying or proposing to supply a listed carriage service must be a carriage service provider.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Carriage service providers

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Carriage service providers must be able to supply or propose to supply a listed carriage service.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on carriage service providers
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: Carriage service providers are required to meet the definition of a carriage service provider.

87(3) Carriage service providers
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.121
note: List of carriage service provisions that must be supplied by carriers or exempt network-users.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Carriage service providers

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must supply carriage service
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87(3) Carriage service providers

88 Supply to the public
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
curation status: Proposed
has part: 88(1) Supply to the public
has part: 88(2) Supply to the public
has part: 88(3) Supply to the public
has part: 88(4) Supply to the public
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88
schema version: 2

88(1) Supply to the public
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
note: Circumstances for carriage service supply to the public
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Supply to the public

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(1) Supply to the public

88(2) Supply to the public
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
note: Service supplied to public if conditions met
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Supply to the public

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the service is supplied to the public
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If conditions met, obligation to supply service
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: a carriage service is used for the carriage of communications between 2 end-users

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(2) Supply to the public

88(3) Supply to the public
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
note: Service supplied to public if end-user is outside supplier's circle.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Supply to the public

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the service is supplied to the public.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Service point-to-multipoint services overlap with public services.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) If: (a) a carriage service is used to supply point-to-multipoint services to end-users; and (b) at least one end-user is outside the immediate circle of the supplier of the service;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the service is supplied to the public.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Service point-to-multipoint services are classified as public by AI.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
premise text: (3) If: (a) a carriage service is used to supply point-to-multipoint services to end-users; and (b) at least one end-user is outside the immediate circle of the supplier of the service;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the service is supplied to the public.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to supply service to public.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) a carriage service is used to supply point-to-multipoint services to end-users; and (b) at least one end-user is outside the immediate circle of the supplier of the service;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the service is supplied to the public.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Service point-to-multipoint services diffuse into public services.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) If: (a) a carriage service is used to supply point-to-multipoint services to end-users; and (b) at least one end-user is outside the immediate circle of the supplier of the service;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the service is supplied to the public.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Service point-to-multipoint services are recurrently supplied to public.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (3) If: (a) a carriage service is used to supply point-to-multipoint services to end-users; and (b) at least one end-user is outside the immediate circle of the supplier of the service;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(3) Supply to the public

88(4) Supply to the public
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
note: Supply designated content services to end-users
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Supply to the public

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must supply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4)

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(4) Supply to the public

89 Exemption from definition—customers located on the same
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89(1) Exemption from definition—customers located on the same
has part: 89(2) Exemption from definition—customers located on the same
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89
schema version: 2

89(1) Exemption from definition—customers located on the same
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
note: Exemption from definition for customers located on the same premises
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Exemption from definition—customers located on the same

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: exemption applies during business hours
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for exemption
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (c) all of the customers of the service are physically present on the premises

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the carriage service is exempt
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the carriage service may be exempt
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission to exempt
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (1) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the supplier must ensure exemption for these customers
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the supplier
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) the supplier of a carriage service manages a business or other activity carried on at particular premises

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(1) Exemption from definition—customers located on the same

89(2) Exemption from definition—customers located on the same
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
note: Defines premises for exemption from definition
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Exemption from definition—customers located on the same

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: premises includes: land; and a group of buildings that is located in the same vicinity.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies specific elements of the premise
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) land; and (b) a group of buildings that is located in the same vicinity.

9 Extra-territorial application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
note: Applicability of the Act outside Australia
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply within and outside Australia
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9 Extra-territorial application

90 Exemption from definition—defence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
curation status: Proposed
has part: 90(1) Exemption from definition—defence
has part: 90(2) Exemption from definition—defence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90
schema version: 2

90(1) Exemption from definition—defence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
note: Exemption from definition—defence
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 90 Exemption from definition—defence

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts defence organisations
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90(1) Exemption from definition—defence

90(2) Exemption from definition—defence
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
note: Definition of defence organisation Exemption from definition—defence
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-7
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 90 Exemption from definition—defence

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of defence organisation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts the service from the definition
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: defence organisation means: ... (a) the Defence Department; or (b) the Australian Defence Force; ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies the Defence Department and Australian Defence Force
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: (a) the Defence Department; or (b) the Australian Defence Force;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: defence organisation means: ... (c) an organisation of a foreign country, so far as the organisation: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies an organisation of a foreign country
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: (c) an organisation of a foreign country, so far as the organisation: ...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: defence organisation means: ... (i) has functions corresponding to functions of, or of a part of, the Defence Department or the Australian Defence Force; ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies functions corresponding to functions of the Defence Department or Australian Defence Force
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: (i) has functions corresponding to functions of, or of a part of, the Defence Department or the Australian Defence Force;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: defence organisation means: ... (ii) is authorised by the Commonwealth to operate or train in Australia or an external Territory; ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies authorisation by the Commonwealth to operate or train in Australia or an external Territory
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: (ii) is authorised by the Commonwealth to operate or train in Australia or an external Territory;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: defence organisation means: ... (d) a part of such an organisation or body.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies a part of such an organisation or body
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: (d) a part of such an organisation or body.

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90(2) Exemption from definition—defence

91 Exemption from definition—intelligence operations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.125
note: Exempts certain intelligence services from definition.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-91-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-91-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-91-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines an exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-91-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 91 Exemption from definition—intelligence operations

92 Exemption from definition—transport authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.125
curation status: Proposed
has part: 92(1) Exemption from definition—transport authorities
has part: 92(3) Exemption from definition—transport authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92
schema version: 2

92(1) Exemption from definition—transport authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.125
note: Exemption from definition—transport authorities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-92-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 92 Exemption from definition—transport authorities

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts transport authorities from the definition
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-92-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92(1) Exemption from definition—transport authorities

92(3) Exemption from definition—transport authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.125
note: Exemption from definition for transport authorities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-92-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 92 Exemption from definition—transport authorities

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-92-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92(3) Exemption from definition—transport authorities

93 Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
curation status: Proposed
has part: 93(1) Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
has part: 93(2) Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
has part: 93(2A) Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
has part: 93(3) Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93
schema version: 2

93(1) Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
note: Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 93 Exemption from definition—broadcasting services

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...subsections 87(1) and (2) do not apply.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Communications during broadcasting services are exempted
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (i) the supply of broadcasting services to the public;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...subsections 87(1) and (2) do not apply.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Exemption implies certain conditions are met
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (a) the sole or principal use of a carriage service is...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...subsections 87(1) and (2) do not apply.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes exemptions in broadcasting services
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (i) the supply of broadcasting services to the public;

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...subsections 87(1) and (2) do not apply.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts certain communications from definition
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
premise text: (1) If:...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the supply of broadcasting services to the public;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to communications necessary or desirable for broadcasting services
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: appliesTo
premise text: (a) the sole or principal use of a carriage service is...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...subsections 87(1) and (2) do not apply.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses exemptions to related communications
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (b) those communications are neither...

93(2) Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
note: Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 93 Exemption from definition—broadcasting services

93(2A) Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
note: Disregard subsection 212(3) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-2a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 93 Exemption from definition—broadcasting services

93(3) Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
note: Definition of broadcasting transmitter and head end of a cable transmission system
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 93 Exemption from definition—broadcasting services

94 Exemption from definition—electricity supply bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.127
curation status: Proposed
has part: 94(1) Exemption from definition—electricity supply bodies
has part: 94(2) Exemption from definition—electricity supply bodies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94
schema version: 2

94(1) Exemption from definition—electricity supply bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.127
note: Exemption from definition—electricity supply bodies
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-94-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 94 Exemption from definition—electricity supply bodies

94(2) Exemption from definition—electricity supply bodies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.127
note: Definition of electricity supply body
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-94-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-94-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-94-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 94 Exemption from definition—electricity supply bodies

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-94-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Electricity supply body is a class of entities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Electricity supply body is an authority or a body corporate

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-94-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Electricity supply body is a subclass of authority or body corporate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass relationship
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Electricity supply body is a business or function

95 Exemption from definition—Ministerial determination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.127
note: Minister may determine exemption from definition
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-95-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95
schema version: 2

96 Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
curation status: Proposed
has part: 96(1) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
has part: 96(2) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
has part: 96(3) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
has part: 96(5) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96
schema version: 2

96(1) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
note: Minister may exempt a person from certain regulatory provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-96-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-96-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96(1) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial

96(2) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
note: Determination under this section may be unconditional or subject to conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-96-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial

96(3) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
note: Effect of determination under this section
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-96-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial

96(5) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
note: Exempts certain regulatory provisions from the Ministerial
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-96-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-96-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-96-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines exemption for regulatory provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-96-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96(5) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial

97 Content service providers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.129
curation status: Proposed
has part: 97(1) Content service providers
has part: 97(2) Content service providers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-97
schema version: 2

97(1) Content service providers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.129
note: Defines content service provider
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-97-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 97 Content service providers

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is a content service provider during this time
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship of using a carriage service
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: A person uses, or proposes to use, a listed carriage service

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is a content service provider
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishes the implication between using a carriage service and being a content service provider
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: A person uses, or proposes to use, a listed carriage service

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is a content service provider
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes the cognitive implications of being a content service provider
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
premise text: A person uses, or proposes to use, a listed carriage service

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is a content service provider
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies a content service provider
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: The person uses, or proposes to use, a listed carriage service

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is a content service provider
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the diffusion of information about being a content service provider
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
premise text: A person uses, or proposes to use, a listed carriage service

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 97(1) Content service providers

97(2) Content service providers
type: Concept
description: True
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.129
note: Content service providers must supply content to end-users outside their immediate circle.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-97-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 97 Content service providers

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 97(2) Content service providers

98 Service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.130
curation status: Proposed
has part: 98(1) Service provider rules
has part: 98(2) Service provider rules
has part: 98(3) Service provider rules
has part: 98(4) Service provider rules
has part: 98(5) Service provider rules
has part: 98(6) Service provider rules
has part: 98(7) Service provider rules
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-98
schema version: 2

98(1) Service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.130
note: Service provider rules are defined in Schedule 2 and service provider determinations under section 99.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-98-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 98 Service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Service provider rules are defined
modality: Deontic
operator: defined

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 98(1) Service provider rules

98(2) Service provider rules
type: Concept
description: Compliance with standard access obligations
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.130
note: Service provider must comply with standard access obligations.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-98-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 98 Service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 98(2) Service provider rules

98(3) Service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.130
note: Service provider must comply with access determinations.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-98-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 98 Service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 98(3) Service provider rules

98(4) Service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.130
note: Service provider must comply with binding rules of conduct.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-98-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 98 Service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 98(4) Service provider rules

98(5) Service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.130
note: Reference to another rule as a service provider rule
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-98-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 98 Service provider rules

98(6) Service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.130
note: References an external rule as a service provider rule.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-98-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 98 Service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Service provider rule for the purposes of this Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: References an external rule.
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
premise text: External rule mentioned in subsection 152CJD(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.

98(7) Service provider rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.130
note: Service provider rule for NBN corporations
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-98-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 98 Service provider rules

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This rule applies to rules about supply, investment, and divestment during NBN corporation operations.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Applies to rules about supply, investment, and divestment during NBN corporation operations
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The rule set out in subsection 38(2) of the National Broadband Network Companies Act 2011 deals with rules about...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This rule is a specific type of service provider rule.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes a specific type of service provider rule
modality: CogAI
operator: for
premise text: The rule set out in subsection 38(2) of the National Broadband Network Companies Act 2011 deals with rules about...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This rule is a service provider rule for the purposes of this Act.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes service provider rules from the National Broadband Network Companies Act 2011
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: Subsection 38(2) of the National Broadband Network Companies Act 2011 deals with rules about...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This rule applies to all NBN corporation assets and operations.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applies to all NBN corporation assets and operations
modality: Diffusion
operator: throughout
premise text: The rule set out in subsection 38(2) of the National Broadband Network Companies Act 2011 deals with rules about...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This rule applies to all NBN corporations.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Applies to all NBN corporations
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: The rule set out in subsection 38(2) of the National Broadband Network Companies Act 2011 deals with rules about...

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 98(7) Service provider rules

99 Service provider determinations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.131
curation status: Proposed
has part: 99(1) Service provider determinations
has part: 99(1A) Service provider determinations
has part: 99(2) Service provider determinations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-99
schema version: 2

99(1) Service provider determinations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.131
note: Service provider determination obligation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-99-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 99 Service provider determinations

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide service provider determination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

99(1A) Service provider determinations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.131
note: Minister may make service provider determination
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-99-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 99 Service provider determinations

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make a determination
modality: Deontic
operator: may

99(2) Service provider determinations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.131
note: Service provider determination has effect only to the extent that it is authorised by specified provisions of the Constitution.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-99-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 99 Service provider determinations

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Service provider determination has effect only between those times
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for service provider determinations
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: Authorisation by specified provisions of the Constitution

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Service provider determination has effect only to that extent
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: only if
premise text: Authorisation by specified provisions of the Constitution

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 99(2) Service provider determinations

Telecommunications Act 1997
type: Document
date: 4 June 2026
identifier: No. 47 of 1997
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU