Telecommunications Act 1997
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 47 of 1997
date: 4 June 2026
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

4 June 2026
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments, applications, saving, transitional provisions, editorial changes, presentational changes, modifications, and self-repealing provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the compilation as a descriptive logic application.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for the compilation date and amendment history.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
has part: 2(1) Commencement
has part: 2(2) Commencement
has part: 2(3) Commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.17

2(1) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-1
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Commencement of certain provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking
premise text: No explicit duty, ban conduct, grant permission, or create a right
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(2) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-2
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Commences on June 5, 1997
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for commencement
premise text: Temporal interval definition
conclusion text: Definition of commencement interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(3) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-3
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Commences on July 1, 1997
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-2-ss-3-norm

3 Objects
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Promotes long-term interests of end-users and efficiency of the Australian telecommunications industry.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-cogai-6

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Objects
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: promises
logic summary: Promises to promote long-term interests of end-users and efficiency.
premise text: (1) The main object of this Act...
conclusion text: to provide a regulatory framework that promotes...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: Classifies the objects of carriage services.
premise text: (1) The main object of this Act...
conclusion text: when read together with Parts XIB and XIC of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During the commencement of this Act, the regulatory framework promotes long-term interests of end-users.
premise text: (1) The main object of this Act...
conclusion text: when read together with Parts XIB and XIC of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: The regulatory framework implies the promotion of long-term interests of end-users.
premise text: (1) The main object of this Act...
conclusion text: to provide a regulatory framework that promotes...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: The regulatory framework diffuses the promotion of long-term interests of end-users.
premise text: (1) The main object of this Act...
conclusion text: when read together with Parts XIB and XIC of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: The regulatory framework recognizes the promotion of long-term interests of end-users.
premise text: (1) The main object of this Act...
conclusion text: to provide a regulatory framework that promotes...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Regulatory policy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-2
note: Promotes industry self-regulation and avoids undue financial burdens.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.19
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Regulatory policy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Promises
logic summary: Parliament promises to regulate telecommunications in a certain manner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

5 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Defines carrier and service provider under the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.19
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-5-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Simplified outline
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6 Main index
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
note: Main index to this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.23
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-6-norm

7 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
note: Defines terms related to telecommunications and ACMA's functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Defines terms related to telecommunications and ACMA's functions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies entities into types
premise text: ACNC type of entity means an entity that meets the description of a type of entity in column 1 of the table in subsection 25-5(5) of the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission Act 2012.
conclusion text: ACNC type of entity
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines telecommunications
premise text: For this purpose, telecommunications means the carriage of communications by means of guided and/or unguided electromagnetic energy.
conclusion text: telecommunications
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Crown to be bound
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
has part: 8(1) Crown to be bound
has part: 8(2) Crown to be bound
has part: 8(3) Crown to be bound
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40

8(1) Crown to be bound
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-1
part of: 8 Crown to be bound
note: The Crown is bound by this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Crown is obligated to comply with the Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(2) Crown to be bound
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-2
part of: 8 Crown to be bound
note: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-dialectical-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: The Act does not make the Crown liable to a pecuniary penalty.
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: The Act does not make the Crown liable to a pecuniary penalty.
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope of prohibition
premise text: The Act does not make the Crown liable to a pecuniary penalty during its existence.
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-dialectical-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Dialectical
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: The Act does not make the Crown liable to a pecuniary penalty.
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence.
execution surface: modalities::dialectical
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: The Act does not make the Crown liable to a pecuniary penalty.
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(3) Crown to be bound
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-3
part of: 8 Crown to be bound
note: Protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an authority of the Crown.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes protection in subsection (2) from the Crown.
premise text: (3) The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an authority of the Crown.
conclusion text: The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an authority of the Crown.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Indicates that the protection in subsection (2) overlaps with the authority of the Crown.
premise text: (3) The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an authority of the Crown.
conclusion text: The protection in subsection (2) overlaps with the authority of the Crown.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Indicates that the protection in subsection (2) repeats for the authority of the Crown.
premise text: (3) The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an authority of the Crown.
conclusion text: The protection in subsection (2) repeats for the authority of the Crown.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Indicates that the protection in subsection (2) diffuses to the authority of the Crown.
premise text: (3) The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an authority of the Crown.
conclusion text: The protection in subsection (2) diffuses to the authority of the Crown.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-8-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Indicates that the CogAI recognizes the authority of the Crown as exempt from protection in subsection (2).
premise text: (3) The protection in subsection (2) does not apply to an authority of the Crown.
conclusion text: The CogAI recognizes the authority of the Crown as exempt from protection in subsection (2).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Extra-territorial application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9
note: Applicability of the Act outside Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9 Extra-territorial application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Obligation to apply within and outside Australia
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Extension to external Territories
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
has part: 10(1) Extension to external Territories
has part: 10(2) Extension to external Territories
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40

10(1) Extension to external Territories
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-ss-1
part of: 10 Extension to external Territories
note: Extends to external Territories
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-10-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10(1) Extension to external Territories
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extension of jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(2) Extension to external Territories
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-ss-2
part of: 10 Extension to external Territories
note: The operation of this Act in relation to Norfolk Island is not affected by the amendments made by Division 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 5 to the Territories Legislation Amendment Act 2016.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: The operation of this Act is not affected by the amendments.
premise text: This Act operates in relation to Norfolk Island.
conclusion text: The operation of this Act is unaffected.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

11 Extension to offshore areas
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11
has part: 11(1) Extension to offshore areas
has part: 11(2) Extension to offshore areas
has part: 11(3) Extension to offshore areas
has part: 11(4) Extension to offshore areas
has part: 11(5) Extension to offshore areas
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40

11(1) Extension to offshore areas
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-ss-1
part of: 11 Extension to offshore areas
note: This Act applies in relation to the offshore areas of each of the States and eligible Territories.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The Act applies to offshore areas
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(2) Extension to offshore areas
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-ss-2
part of: 11 Extension to offshore areas
note: Application of the Act in offshore areas is limited to specific activities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(2) Extension to offshore areas
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
logic summary: Limited application
premise text: (2) The application of this Act...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(3) Extension to offshore areas
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-ss-3
part of: 11 Extension to offshore areas
note: Application of Act in offshore areas extends to acts done by persons related to exploration or exploitation of continental shelf resources.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(3) Extension to offshore areas
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extension obligation
premise text: (3) The application of this Act...
conclusion text: ...in relation to all acts done by or in relation to...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to offshore activities
premise text: (3) The application of this Act in accordance with subsection (1)...
conclusion text: ...in relation to all acts done by or in relation to, and all matters...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to offshore activities
premise text: (3) The application of this Act in accordance with subsection (1)...
conclusion text: ...in relation to all acts done by or in relation to, and all matters...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: related to
logic summary: Diffusion logic for offshore activities
premise text: (3) The application of this Act in accordance with subsection (1)...
conclusion text: ...in relation to all acts done by or in relation to, and all matters...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: related to
logic summary: CogAI logic for offshore activities
premise text: (3) The application of this Act in accordance with subsection (1)...
conclusion text: ...in relation to all acts done by or in relation to, and all matters...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

11(4) Extension to offshore areas
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-ss-4
part of: 11 Extension to offshore areas
note: No implication that subsection (3) limits subsection (2).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-4-norm

11(5) Extension to offshore areas
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-ss-5
part of: 11 Extension to offshore areas
note: Definition of offshore area
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: in this section
conclusion text: relates to offshore area
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

11A Application of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11a
note: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.41
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11A Application of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-11a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Act subject to Radiocommunications Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
has part: 12(1) Act subject to Radiocommunications Act
has part: 12(2) Act subject to Radiocommunications Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.41

12(1) Act subject to Radiocommunications Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-1
part of: 12 Act subject to Radiocommunications Act
note: Act subject to Radiocommunications Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.41
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(1) Act subject to Radiocommunications Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

12(2) Act subject to Radiocommunications Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-2
part of: 12 Act subject to Radiocommunications Act
note: Prohibits doing something under a licence unless prohibited by this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.41
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(2) Act subject to Radiocommunications Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits an action.
premise text: (2) However, to avoid doubt...
conclusion text: the person is prohibited by or under this Act from doing it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval during which an action is permitted.
premise text: (2) However, to avoid doubt...
conclusion text: the person is authorised to do something under a licence under the Radiocommunications Act 1992 does not entitle the person to do that thing if the person is prohibited by or under this Act from doing it, unless a condition of the licence requires the person to do it.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval until which an action is permitted.
premise text: (2) However, to avoid doubt...
conclusion text: the fact that a person is authorised to do something under a licence under the Radiocommunications Act 1992 does not entitle the person to do that thing if the person is prohibited by or under this Act from doing it, unless a condition of the licence requires the person to do it.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Defines a conditional statement.
premise text: (2) However, to avoid doubt...
conclusion text: the fact that a person is authorised to do something under a licence under the Radiocommunications Act 1992 does not entitle the person to do that thing if the person is prohibited by or under this Act from doing it.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-12-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: then
logic summary: Defines a conditional statement.
premise text: (2) However, to avoid doubt...
conclusion text: the person is authorised to do something under a licence under the Radiocommunications Act 1992 does not entitle the person to do that thing if the person is prohibited by or under this Act from doing it, unless a condition of the licence requires the person to do it.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Continuity of partnerships
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
note: Continuity of partnerships is not affected by changes in composition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continuity
logic summary: Continuity obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
has part: 14(1) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
has part: 14(2) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
has part: 14(3) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
has part: 14(4) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
has part: 14(5) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.42

14(1) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-1
part of: 14 Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
note: Definition of controlled carriage service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(1) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

14(2) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-2
part of: 14 Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
note: Network is a controlled network if it satisfies the geographical test.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(2) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (a) Carrier or carriage service provider operates a telecommunications network; (b) Network satisfies the geographical test.
conclusion text: Network is a controlled network
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(3) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-3
part of: 14 Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
note: Facility is a controlled facility if it satisfies the geographical test.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(3) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Facility is a controlled facility if it satisfies the geographical test.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(4) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-4
part of: 14 Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
note: Telecommunications network or facility must be located in Australia or meet specific conditions to satisfy the geographical test.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(4) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Network or facility must satisfy the geographical test
premise text: a telecommunications network, or a facility, satisfies the geographical test if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Network or facility must be in use during a specific period
premise text: (ii) the person, or at least one of the members of the group, carries on, or will carry on, a telecommunications-related business wholly or partly in Australia; (iii) the network, or the facility, as the case requires, is used, or will be used, to supply a listed carriage service
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Network or facility must be in use during a specific period
premise text: (ii) the person, or at least one of the members of the group, carries on, or will carry on, a telecommunications-related business wholly or partly in Australia; (iii) the network, or the facility, as the case requires, is used, or will be used, to supply a listed carriage service
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Person or group must operate the network or facility
premise text: a person, or a group of persons, operates the network or facility, as the case requires;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Person or group must carry on telecommunications-related business in Australia
premise text: (ii) the person, or at least one of the members of the group, carries on, or will carry on, a telecommunications-related business wholly or partly in Australia;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(5) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-5
part of: 14 Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
note: Defines telecommunications-related business
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-5-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-14-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(5) Controlled carriage services, controlled networks and controlled
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15 Content service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15
note: Definition of content service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.43
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-15-norm

16 Listed carriage services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16
has part: 16(1) Listed carriage services
has part: 16(2) Listed carriage services
has part: 16(3) Listed carriage services
has part: 16(4) Listed carriage services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44

16(1) Listed carriage services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-ss-1
part of: 16 Listed carriage services
note: Listed carriage services definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(1) Listed carriage services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

16(2) Listed carriage services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-ss-2
part of: 16 Listed carriage services
note: Defines point for listed carriage services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-2-norm

16(3) Listed carriage services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-ss-3
part of: 16 Listed carriage services
note: A point in a specific altitude is considered within Australia's territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(3) Listed carriage services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: A point in a specific altitude is considered within Australia's territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: above
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: The stratosphere is above the atmosphere.
conclusion text: A point in the atmosphere is considered within Australia's territory.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(4) Listed carriage services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-ss-4
part of: 16 Listed carriage services
note: Points on satellites and above stratosphere are outside Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Points on satellites and above stratosphere are outside Australia
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-16-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: Above stratosphere
conclusion text: Outside Australia
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Access to an emergency call service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18
note: Access to an emergency call service is required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.45
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-18-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Access to an emergency call service
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires access to an emergency call service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19
has part: 19(1) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
has part: 19(2) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
has part: 19(3) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
has part: 19(4) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.45

19(1) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-1
part of: 19 Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
note: A reference to a recognised person who operates an emergency call service is a reference to a person who operates an emergency call service and meets certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.45
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(1) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
logic summary: The text refers to a person who operates an emergency call service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(2) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-2
part of: 19 Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
note: A determination under paragraph (1)(b) is a notifiable instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.45
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(2) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Determinations are obligations.
premise text: (1)(b)
conclusion text: notifiable instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

19(3) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-3
part of: 19 Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
note: A person may be specified in a determination even if they do not operate an emergency call service at the time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.45
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-3-norm

19(4) Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-4
part of: 19 Recognised person who operates an emergency call service
note: Clarifies subsection (3) for avoidance of doubt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.45
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-19-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: clarification
logic summary: Provides clarity on subsection (3)
premise text: (4) Subsection (3) is enacted for the avoidance of doubt.
conclusion text: Clarifies subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

20 Customer cabling
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20
has part: 20(1) Customer cabling
has part: 20(2) Customer cabling
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.45

20(1) Customer cabling
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-ss-1
part of: 20 Customer cabling
note: Defines customer cabling as a line treated under regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.45
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-20-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-20-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(1) Customer cabling
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

20(2) Customer cabling
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-ss-2
part of: 20 Customer cabling
note: Regulations may deal with a matter by reference to the boundary of a telecommunications network.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.45
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-20-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-20-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(2) Customer cabling
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

21 Customer equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21
has part: 21(1) Customer equipment
has part: 21(2) Customer equipment
has part: 21(3) Customer equipment
has part: 21(4) Customer equipment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.46

21(1) Customer equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-ss-1
part of: 21 Customer equipment
note: Defines customer equipment for the purposes of the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(1) Customer equipment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

21(2) Customer equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-ss-2
part of: 21 Customer equipment
note: Regulations may deal with a matter by reference to the boundary of a telecommunications network.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(2) Customer equipment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

21(3) Customer equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-ss-3
part of: 21 Customer equipment
note: No implication that subsection (2) limits subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: No obligation to limit subsection (2) by implication.
premise text: (2)
conclusion text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

21(4) Customer equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-ss-4
part of: 21 Customer equipment
note: Defines customer equipment in absence of regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(4) Customer equipment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies entities into categories.
premise text: Customer equipment is defined by this section.
conclusion text: The definition applies to customer equipment.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Lists excluded items from the definition.
premise text: This section lists excluded items from the definition of customer equipment.
conclusion text: Excluded items are not considered customer equipment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-21-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Defines temporal boundaries for regulations.
premise text: Regulations made under this section apply to the specified boundary.
conclusion text: The regulation applies within the defined boundary.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Customer cabling and customer equipment—boundary of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22
has part: 22(1) Customer cabling and customer equipment—boundary of a
has part: 22(2) Customer cabling and customer equipment—boundary of a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.47

22(1) Customer cabling and customer equipment—boundary of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-ss-1
part of: 22 Customer cabling and customer equipment—boundary of a
note: Regulations must be followed to determine the boundary of a telecommunications network.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-22-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-22-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(1) Customer cabling and customer equipment—boundary of a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulations must be followed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(2) Customer cabling and customer equipment—boundary of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-ss-2
part of: 22 Customer cabling and customer equipment—boundary of a
note: Regulations may reference agreements between carriers, carriage service providers, and customers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-22-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-22-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(2) Customer cabling and customer equipment—boundary of a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

23 Immediate circle
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23
note: Defines 'immediate circle' for purposes of the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.49
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-23-norm

24 Extended meaning of use
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24
note: Definition of use in isolation or conjunction with other things.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.54
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-24-norm

25 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25
note: Defines network unit types
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.55
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-25-norm

26 Single line links connecting distinct places in Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26
has part: 26(1) Single line links connecting distinct places in Australia
has part: 26(2) Single line links connecting distinct places in Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56

26(1) Single line links connecting distinct places in Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-ss-1
part of: 26 Single line links connecting distinct places in Australia
note: Line link connecting distinct places in Australia must be a network unit if they are at least the statutory distance apart.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-26-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-26-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(1) Single line links connecting distinct places in Australia
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to be a network unit
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: the line link is a network unit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(2) Single line links connecting distinct places in Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-ss-2
part of: 26 Single line links connecting distinct places in Australia
note: Statutory distance is 500 metres or a longer distance not exceeding 50 kilometres specified in regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-26-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-26-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(2) Single line links connecting distinct places in Australia
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Statutory distance is specified
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the statutory distance...
conclusion text: 500 metres or a longer distance not exceeding 50 kilometres.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27
has part: 27(1) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
has part: 27(2) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
has part: 27(3) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
has part: 27(4) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
has part: 27(5) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56

27(1) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-ss-1
part of: 27 Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
note: Owning multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia is an obligation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(1) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Ownership of line links
premise text: (same person owns, or same persons own)
conclusion text: is a network unit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(2) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-ss-2
part of: 27 Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
note: Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia must satisfy certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(2) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory condition
premise text: the owners of the line links are bodies corporate;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: each of those line links connects distinct places in Australia;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(3) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-ss-3
part of: 27 Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
note: Statutory distance is 5 kilometres or up to 500 kilometres as specified in regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(3) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Statutory distance is specified
premise text: (a) 5 kilometres; or (b) if a longer distance, not exceeding 500 kilometres, is specified in the regulations—that longer distance.
conclusion text: The statutory distance is 5 kilometres or up to 500 kilometres as specified in regulations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal interval for statutory distance
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, the statutory distance is:
conclusion text: The temporal interval for the statutory distance is up to 500 kilometres as specified in regulations.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal interval for regulatory distance
premise text: (b) if a longer distance, not exceeding 500 kilometres, is specified in the regulations—that longer distance.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for the regulatory distance is up to 500 kilometres as specified in regulations.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Regulatory distance is not necessarily fixed
premise text: (b) if a longer distance, not exceeding 500 kilometres, is specified in the regulations—that longer distance.
conclusion text: The regulatory distance is not necessarily fixed at up to 500 kilometres as specified in regulations.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Regulatory distance is defined by regulation
premise text: (b) if a longer distance, not exceeding 500 kilometres, is specified in the regulations—that longer distance.
conclusion text: The regulatory distance is defined by regulation as up to 500 kilometres.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(4) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-ss-4
part of: 27 Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
note: Definition of 'owner' and 'related company group'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-4-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(4) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

27(5) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-ss-5
part of: 27 Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
note: Determine relationship between corporate bodies in the same manner as under Corporations Act 2001.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(5) Multiple line links connecting distinct places in Australia
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-27-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: same manner
logic summary: Same manner as under Corporations Act 2001.
premise text: Corporations Act 2001
conclusion text: Determine relationship between corporate bodies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

28 Designated radiocommunications facility
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28
has part: 28(1) Designated radiocommunications facility
has part: 28(2) Designated radiocommunications facility
has part: 28(3) Designated radiocommunications facility
has part: 28(4) Designated radiocommunications facility
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.57

28(1) Designated radiocommunications facility
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-1
part of: 28 Designated radiocommunications facility
note: Facility is a network unit if used or for use to supply carriage service between points in Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.57
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(1) Designated radiocommunications facility
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (1) If a designated radiocommunications facility is used, or is for use...
conclusion text: ...the facility is a network unit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal relation between points in Australia
premise text: (1) If a designated radiocommunications facility is used, or is for use...
conclusion text: ...to supply carriage service between a point in Australia and one or more other points in Australia.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: if-then
logic summary: Inference from condition to conclusion
premise text: (1) If a designated radiocommunications facility is used, or is for use...
conclusion text: ...the facility is a network unit.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: for
logic summary: Temporal relation between points in Australia
premise text: (1) If a designated radiocommunications facility is used, or is for use...
conclusion text: ...to supply carriage service between one or more other points in Australia.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: is
logic summary: Classification of facility as network unit
premise text: (1) If a designated radiocommunications facility is used, or is for use...
conclusion text: ...the facility is a network unit.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

28(2) Designated radiocommunications facility
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-2
part of: 28 Designated radiocommunications facility
note: It does not matter whether the supply involves the use of a satellite or the use of a line or other facility outside Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.57
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: The provision implies an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(3) Designated radiocommunications facility
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-3
part of: 28 Designated radiocommunications facility
note: Defines point for purposes of section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.57
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-cogai-6

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes mobile or potentially mobile points
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, a point includes...
conclusion text: a point includes a mobile or potentially mobile point
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes land, underground, atmosphere, outer space, underwater, sea
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, a point includes...
conclusion text: a point includes land, underground, atmosphere, outer space, underwater, sea
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes temporal intervals
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, a point includes...
conclusion text: a point includes land, underground, atmosphere, outer space, underwater, sea
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes ordered or recurring trace
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, a point includes...
conclusion text: a point includes land, underground, atmosphere, outer space, underwater, sea
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes diffusion
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, a point includes...
conclusion text: a point includes land, underground, atmosphere, outer space, underwater, sea
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes CogAI
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, a point includes...
conclusion text: a point includes land, underground, atmosphere, outer space, underwater, sea
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

28(4) Designated radiocommunications facility
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-4
part of: 28 Designated radiocommunications facility
note: Designated radiocommunications facility definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.57
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(4) Designated radiocommunications facility
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-28-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Definition of designated radiocommunications facility
premise text: (4) For the purposes of this section, a point that is:
conclusion text: a designated radiocommunications facility
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

29 Facilities specified in Ministerial determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29
has part: 29(1) Facilities specified in Ministerial determination
has part: 29(2) Facilities specified in Ministerial determination
has part: 29(4) Facilities specified in Ministerial determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.58

29(1) Facilities specified in Ministerial determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-ss-1
part of: 29 Facilities specified in Ministerial determination
note: Minister may determine a facility as a network unit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.58
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-29-ss-1-norm

29(2) Facilities specified in Ministerial determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-ss-2
part of: 29 Facilities specified in Ministerial determination
note: The determination has effect accordingly.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.58
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-29-ss-2-norm

29(4) Facilities specified in Ministerial determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-ss-4
part of: 29 Facilities specified in Ministerial determination
note: Nothing in other provisions limits power conferred by subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.58
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-29-ss-4-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-29-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29(4) Facilities specified in Ministerial determination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

30 Line links
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30
has part: 30(1) Line links
has part: 30(2) Line links
has part: 30(3) Line links
has part: 30(4) Line links
has part: 30(4A) Line links
has part: 30(5) Line links
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59

30(1) Line links
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-1
part of: 30 Line links
note: A line constitutes a line link.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(1) Line links
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: constitutes
logic summary: Line link definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(2) Line links
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-2
part of: 30 Line links
note: A line link is constituted by two connected lines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(2) Line links
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: A line link is constituted by two connected lines.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Temporal relationship
premise text: Connected lines meet at a point
conclusion text: Line links are temporal relationships between two points
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(3) Line links
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-3
part of: 30 Line links
note: Subsection (2) is recursive.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: recursive
logic summary: Recursive application of subsection (2)
premise text: (2)(b) references a line link
conclusion text: Subsection (2) is recursive
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

30(4) Line links
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-4
part of: 30 Line links
note: Lines must be connected in a specific way for communication to work.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(4) Line links
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Lines must be connected in a specific way for communication to work.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Lines are connected to each other or the same facility
conclusion text: Lines must be connected in a specific way
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: connectedAt
logic summary: Temporal relation between lines
premise text: Lines are connected at the same facility
conclusion text: Communication can be carried through facilities including the lines
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(4A) Line links
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-4a
part of: 30 Line links
note: A line does not form part of any line link to the extent that it is on the customer side of the boundary of a telecommunications network.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4a-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(4A) Line links
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

30(5) Line links
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-5
part of: 30 Line links
note: A facility other than a line does not form part of any line link.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-30-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Facility other than a line does not form part of any line link.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Designated radiocommunications facility
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31
note: Definition of designated radiocommunications facility
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-31-norm

32 Public mobile telecommunications service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32
has part: 32(1) Public mobile telecommunications service
has part: 32(2) Public mobile telecommunications service
has part: 32(3) Public mobile telecommunications service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61

32(1) Public mobile telecommunications service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32-ss-1
part of: 32 Public mobile telecommunications service
note: Service is a public mobile telecommunications service if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(1) Public mobile telecommunications service
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Conditions must be met
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(2) Public mobile telecommunications service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32-ss-2
part of: 32 Public mobile telecommunications service
note: Carriage service is exempt if primary network supplies services between customer equipment and other such equipment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(2) Public mobile telecommunications service
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts carriage services under certain conditions.
premise text: (a) the service is supplied by means of a telecommunications network (a primary network) that is connected to one or more line links or other facilities...
conclusion text: The carriage service is exempt if the primary network supplies services between customer equipment and other such equipment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
logic summary: Defines a subclass of 'carriage service' for exemption purposes.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, a carriage service is an exempt service if...
conclusion text: The primary network must supply services between customer equipment and other such equipment for the carriage service to be exempt.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Primary network's principal function is during the carriage service period.
premise text: (b) the principal function of the primary network is to supply carriage services between customer equipment connected to the primary network and other such equipment;
conclusion text: The primary network's principal function must be during the carriage service period for it to be exempt.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Primary network cannot be used in carrying a communication between equipment connected to network units and other such equipment until the carriage service period ends.
premise text: (d) despite the connection or connections referred to in paragraph (a), the primary network cannot be used in carrying a communication, as a single transaction, between equipment connected to the network units and other such equipment;
conclusion text: The primary network must not be used in carrying a communication until the carriage service period ends.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Permits primary network to supply services between customer equipment and other such equipment for exemption purposes.
premise text: (c) the supply of carriage services between such equipment and equipment connected to the network units is, at most, an ancillary function of the primary network;
conclusion text: The primary network may supply services between customer equipment and other such equipment as an ancillary function for exemption purposes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
logic summary: Defines a subclass of 'primary network' for exemption purposes.
premise text: (a) the service is supplied by means of a telecommunications network (a primary network) that is connected to one or more line links or other facilities...
conclusion text: The primary network must be connected to one or more line links or other facilities for it to be exempt.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

32(3) Public mobile telecommunications service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32-ss-3
part of: 32 Public mobile telecommunications service
note: Exempt carriage service is a one-way only, store-and-forward communications service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-32-ss-3-norm

33 Intercell hand-over functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33
has part: 33(1) Intercell hand-over functions
has part: 33(2) Intercell hand-over functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62

33(1) Intercell hand-over functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-1
part of: 33 Intercell hand-over functions
note: Telecommunications network must have intercell hand-over functions if it meets certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(1) Intercell hand-over functions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Network must have intercell hand-over functions.
premise text: (a) the facilities of the network include at least 2 base stations...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Network is a telecommunications network if it has intercell hand-over functions.
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, a telecommunications network...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33(2) Intercell hand-over functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-2
part of: 33 Intercell hand-over functions
note: A carriage service is an eligible mobile telecommunications service if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the type of service
premise text: Service is a carriage service if...
conclusion text: Service is eligible
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditions for eligibility
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: Eligibility conditions met
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 When a base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34
has part: 34(1) When a base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications
has part: 34(2) When a base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.63

34(1) When a base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34-ss-1
part of: 34 When a base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications
note: A base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications customer access network if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.63
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-6

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(1) When a base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Base station must be part of a terrestrial radiocommunications customer access network.
premise text: (a) the base station is part of a telecommunications network;
conclusion text: The base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications customer access network.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Base station is part of a telecommunications network.
premise text: (a) the base station is part of a telecommunications network;
conclusion text: The base station is part of a telecommunications network.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Customer equipment not in physical contact with any part of the telecommunications network.
premise text: (d) customer equipment used for or in relation to the supply of the service is not in physical contact with any part of the telecommunications network by means of which the service is supplied;
conclusion text: The customer equipment is not in physical contact with any part of the telecommunications network.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Network does not have intercell hand-over functions.
premise text: (f) the network does not have intercell hand-over functions;
conclusion text: The network does not have intercell hand-over functions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Network is not an exempt network.
premise text: (h) the network is not an exempt network (as defined by subsection (3)).
conclusion text: The network is not an exempt network.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Service wholly or principally used, or wholly or principally for use, by each end-user.
premise text: (e) the service is wholly or principally used, or wholly or principally for use, by each end-user;
conclusion text: The service is wholly or principally used, or wholly or principally for use, by each end-user.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(2) When a base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34-ss-2
part of: 34 When a base station is part of a terrestrial radiocommunications
note: Exempt base station use for broadcasting services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.63
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-n3logic-6

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies base stations by use
premise text: Base station is an exempt base station if...
conclusion text: ...sole use of the base station is...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Defines conditions for exemption
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), a base station is an exempt base station if...
conclusion text: ...sole use of the base station is...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between conditions
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), a base station is an exempt base station if...
conclusion text: ...sole use of the base station is...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: has
logic summary: Identifies AI-related concepts
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), a base station is an exempt base station if...
conclusion text: ...sole use of the base station is...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: asserts
logic summary: Defines schema for data validation
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), a base station is an exempt base station if...
conclusion text: ...sole use of the base station is...
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-34-ss-2-logic-n3logic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: implies
logic summary: Describes logical implication between conditions
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), a base station is an exempt base station if...
conclusion text: ...sole use of the base station is...
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

35 Fixed radiocommunications link
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35
has part: 35(1) Fixed radiocommunications link
has part: 35(2) Fixed radiocommunications link
has part: 35(3) Fixed radiocommunications link
has part: 35(4) Fixed radiocommunications link
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64

35(1) Fixed radiocommunications link
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-1
part of: 35 Fixed radiocommunications link
note: Definition of fixed radiocommunications link
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-6

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(1) Fixed radiocommunications link
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Facility or combination is used in connection with supply of carriage service
conclusion text: Facility or combination is a fixed radiocommunications link
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Some or all communications carried by facility or combination have characteristic of double-ended interconnection
conclusion text: Facility or combination has double-ended interconnection
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: Facility or combination is used in connection with supply of carriage service between 2 or more fixed points
conclusion text: Facility or combination has been used in connection with supply of carriage service for some time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Recurring trace
premise text: Some or all communications carried by facility or combination have characteristic of double-ended interconnection
conclusion text: Facility or combination has recurring double-ended interconnection
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !=
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Facility or combination does not consist of one or more base stations that are part of a terrestrial radiocommunications customer access network
conclusion text: Facility or combination is not part of a terrestrial radiocommunications customer access network
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !=
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Facility or combination does not consist of one or more base stations that would be part of such a network if paragraph 34(1)(h) had not been enacted
conclusion text: Facility or combination is not affected by paragraph 34(1)(h)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35(2) Fixed radiocommunications link
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-2
part of: 35 Fixed radiocommunications link
note: Definition of fixed point on land or building
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(2) Fixed radiocommunications link
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Definition of obligation
premise text: Fixed point is defined as such
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35(3) Fixed radiocommunications link
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-3
part of: 35 Fixed radiocommunications link
note: Eligible network unit for double-ended interconnection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(3) Fixed radiocommunications link
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies eligible network units
premise text: Network unit is an eligible facility
conclusion text: Facility is an eligible network unit
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between communication and interconnection
premise text: Communication occurs before interconnection
conclusion text: Interconnection occurs during communication
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35(4) Fixed radiocommunications link
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-4
part of: 35 Fixed radiocommunications link
note: Definition of eligible network unit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-35-ss-4-norm

36 Distinct places—basic rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36
has part: 36(1) Distinct places—basic rules
has part: 36(2) Distinct places—basic rules
has part: 36(3) Distinct places—basic rules
has part: 36(4) Distinct places—basic rules
has part: 36(5) Distinct places—basic rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66

36(1) Distinct places—basic rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36-ss-1
part of: 36 Distinct places—basic rules
note: Places must be distinct unless they are all in the same area due to subsections (2), (3) or (4).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(1) Distinct places—basic rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Places must be distinct.
premise text: (1) Places are distinct unless they are all in the same area because of subsection (2), (3) or (4).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Places may be contiguous.
premise text: (1) Places are distinct unless they are all in the same area because of subsection (2), (3) or (4).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Places may be contiguous.
premise text: (1) Places are distinct unless they are all in the same area because of subsection (2), (3) or (4).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Places may be contiguous.
premise text: (1) Places are distinct unless they are all in the same area because of subsection (2), (3) or (4).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Places may be contiguous.
premise text: (1) Places are distinct unless they are all in the same area because of subsection (2), (3) or (4).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

36(2) Distinct places—basic rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36-ss-2
part of: 36 Distinct places—basic rules
note: Places in the same area if situated in the same property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: Property definition includes location
conclusion text: Places in the same area if within the same property
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(3) Distinct places—basic rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36-ss-3
part of: 36 Distinct places—basic rules
note: Places in the same area if they are situated in properties each of which forms part of a combined area as defined by section 38.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(3) Distinct places—basic rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Identifies overlapping properties
premise text: (3) Places are in the same area if they are situated in properties each of which forms part of a combined area as defined by section 38 and:
conclusion text: places are in the same area.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occurs-before
logic summary: Identifies temporal relationship between properties
premise text: (3) Places are in the same area if they are situated in properties each of which forms part of a combined area as defined by section 38 and:
conclusion text: places are in the same area.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has-principal-user
logic summary: Identifies principal user
premise text: (a) the same person or persons is or are the principal user (as defined by section 39) of all the properties that together constitute that combined area;
conclusion text: combined area is an eligible combined area for the purposes of this paragraph.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has-determination-under-section-40
logic summary: Identifies determination under section 40
premise text: (b) because of a determination in force under section 40, that combined area is an eligible combined area for the purposes of this paragraph.
conclusion text: combined area is an eligible combined area for the purposes of this paragraph.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

36(4) Distinct places—basic rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36-ss-4
part of: 36 Distinct places—basic rules
note: Places in the same area if situated in the same eligible Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(4) Distinct places—basic rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: Area
conclusion text: Place
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(5) Distinct places—basic rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36-ss-5
part of: 36 Distinct places—basic rules
note: Later provisions of this Division have effect only for the purposes of this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(5) Distinct places—basic rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-36-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: only if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (later provisions of this Division)
conclusion text: have effect only for the purposes of this Division
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Properties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37
has part: 37(1) Properties
has part: 37(2) Properties
has part: 37(3) Properties
has part: 37(4) Properties
has part: 37(5) Properties
has part: 37(6) Properties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66

37(1) Properties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-1
part of: 37 Properties
note: Definition of property requiring a single freehold or leasehold title, no part subject to a lease, and defined by geographical coordinates.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(1) Properties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires a single freehold or leasehold title, no part subject to a lease, and defined by geographical coordinates.
premise text: (a) there is a single freehold or leasehold title in relation to that area (whether or not that title is registered under a law of a State or Territory relating to the registration of interests in land);
conclusion text: (1) An area of land is a property if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(2) Properties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-2
part of: 37 Properties
note: A property is a single freehold or leasehold title in relation to an area of land, unless it is only part of another such area.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(2) Properties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

37(3) Properties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-3
part of: 37 Properties
note: An area of land is a property if provided in this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(3) Properties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: An area of land is not a property except as provided in this section.
conclusion text: There is no obligation to consider an area of land as a property unless provided in this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative linear logic
premise text: An area of land is not a property except as provided in this section.
conclusion text: There is no positive obligation to consider an area of land as a property unless provided in this section.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
premise text: An area of land is not a property except as provided in this section.
conclusion text: There is no temporal interval between an area of land being considered a property and it not being considered a property unless provided in this section.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Diffusion logic
premise text: An area of land is not a property except as provided in this section.
conclusion text: There is no diffusion from an area of land being considered a property to it not being considered a property unless provided in this section.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Cognitive agent logic
premise text: An area of land is not a property except as provided in this section.
conclusion text: There is no cognitive agent that considers an area of land to be a property unless provided in this section.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(4) Properties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-4
part of: 37 Properties
note: Circumstances for not constituting a property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-4-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(4) Properties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

37(5) Properties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-5
part of: 37 Properties
note: Regulations may prescribe circumstances for land to be considered property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(5) Properties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mayPrescribe
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe circumstances for land to be considered property.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe circumstances for land to be considered property during certain times.
premise text: (5) Despite paragraph (1)(c), the regulations may prescribe the circumstances in which an area of land, the title to which is defined otherwise than by reference to geographical coordinates, is a property.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe circumstances for land to be considered property during certain times.
premise text: (5) Despite paragraph (1)(c), the regulations may prescribe the circumstances in which an area of land, the title to which is defined otherwise than by reference to geographical coordinates, is a property.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: mayPrescribe
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe circumstances for land to be considered property.
premise text: (5) Despite paragraph (1)(c), the regulations may prescribe the circumstances in which an area of land, the title to which is defined otherwise than by reference to geographical coordinates, is a property.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: mayPrescribe
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe circumstances for land to be considered property.
premise text: (5) Despite paragraph (1)(c), the regulations may prescribe the circumstances in which an area of land, the title to which is defined otherwise than by reference to geographical coordinates, is a property.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

37(6) Properties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-6
part of: 37 Properties
note: Definition of land and lease
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: land includes premises and a part of premises
conclusion text: premises are land
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-37-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Corresponding meaning for leasehold title
premise text: lease includes sublease
conclusion text: sublease is lease
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Combined areas
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38
has part: 38(1) Combined areas
has part: 38(2) Combined areas
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.67

38(1) Combined areas
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38-ss-1
part of: 38 Combined areas
note: Combined areas must be defined by contiguous properties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.67
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38(1) Combined areas
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of combined area is obligatory.
premise text: (2) 2 contiguous properties form a combined area.
conclusion text: (1) 2 contiguous properties form a combined area.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal relation between properties is not specified.
premise text: (1) 2 contiguous properties form a combined area.
conclusion text: (1) 2 contiguous properties form a combined area.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38(2) Combined areas
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38-ss-2
part of: 38 Combined areas
note: Combined areas must be contiguous with another property that forms part of a combined area.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.67
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38(2) Combined areas
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Combined areas must be contiguous with another property that forms part of a combined area.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-38-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between properties
premise text: Property A is contiguous with Property B.
conclusion text: Property A and Property B are in the same combined area.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Principal user of a property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39
has part: 39(1) Principal user of a property
has part: 39(2) Principal user of a property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.68

39(1) Principal user of a property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39-ss-1
part of: 39 Principal user of a property
note: Defines principal user of a property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.68
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(1) Principal user of a property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the principal user
premise text: (a) occupies the property; or (b) uses the property for the purpose that is the sole or principal purpose for which the property is used.
conclusion text: The person who occupies the property or uses it for its sole or principal purpose is the principal user.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between occupation and use
premise text: (a) occupies the property; or (b) uses the property for the purpose that is the sole or principal purpose for which the property is used.
conclusion text: The person who occupies the property during a certain period of time also uses it for its sole or principal purpose.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between occupation and use
premise text: (a) occupies the property; or (b) uses the property for the purpose that is the sole or principal purpose for which the property is used.
conclusion text: The person who occupies the property until a certain point in time also uses it for its sole or principal purpose.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: and
logic summary: Describes the relationship between occupation and use
premise text: (a) occupies the property; or (b) uses the property for the purpose that is the sole or principal purpose for which the property is used.
conclusion text: The person who occupies the property and uses it for its sole or principal purpose also has a certain relationship with the property.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Describes the logical implication of occupation and use
premise text: (a) occupies the property; or (b) uses the property for the purpose that is the sole or principal purpose for which the property is used.
conclusion text: If a person occupies the property or uses it for its sole or principal purpose, then they are the principal user of the property.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(2) Principal user of a property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39-ss-2
part of: 39 Principal user of a property
note: Principal user of a property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.68
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(2) Principal user of a property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of principal user
premise text: (2) However, if 2 or more persons:
conclusion text: they are taken to together be the principal user of the property.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between users and properties
premise text: (a) together occupy a property; or (b) together use a property for the purpose that is the sole or principal purpose for which the property is used;
conclusion text: they are taken to together be the principal user of the property.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relation between users and properties
premise text: (a) together occupy a property; or (b) together use a property for the purpose that is the sole or principal purpose for which the property is used;
conclusion text: they are taken to together be the principal user of the property.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: and
logic summary: Combining multiple conditions
premise text: (a) together occupy a property; or (b) together use a property for the purpose that is the sole or principal purpose for which the property is used;
conclusion text: they are taken to together be the principal user of the property.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-39-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: is
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: (2) However, if 2 or more persons:
conclusion text: they are taken to together be the principal user of the property.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40 Eligible combined areas
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40
note: Determine eligibility of combined areas
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.68
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-40-norm

41 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41
note: Owner of network unit must hold carrier licence unless exemption applies or nominated carrier declaration is in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.69
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-41-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-41-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41 Simplified outline
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Owner must hold licence
premise text: Exemption applies or nominated carrier declaration is in force
conclusion text: Licence not required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42
has part: 42(1) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
has part: 42(2) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
has part: 42(3) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
has part: 42(4) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
has part: 42(5) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70

42(1) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-1
part of: 42 Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
note: Network unit cannot be used without carrier licence or nominated declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(1) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of network unit without carrier licence or nominated declaration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(2) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-2
part of: 42 Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
note: Owner must not allow or permit another person to use the unit without a carrier licence or nominated carrier declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of unauthorized use
premise text: (2) If there is only one owner...
conclusion text: ...must not allow or permit another person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(3) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-3
part of: 42 Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
note: Owner must not use network unit to supply carriage service without carrier licence or nominated carrier declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (3) If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit, an owner of the network unit must not use the unit...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition
premise text: (3) If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit, an owner of the network unit must not use the unit...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for prohibition
premise text: (3) If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit, an owner of the network unit must not use the unit...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(4) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-4
part of: 42 Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
note: Owner must not allow or permit another person to use the network unit without a carrier licence or nominated carrier declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of using the network unit without a carrier licence or nominated carrier declaration.
premise text: (4) If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit, an owner of the network unit must not...
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) the owner holds a carrier licence; or (b) a nominated carrier declaration is in force in relation to the unit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for network unit use without carrier licence or nominated carrier declaration.
premise text: (4) If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit, an owner of the network unit must not...
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) the owner holds a carrier licence; or (b) a nominated carrier declaration is in force in relation to the unit.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for network unit use without carrier licence or nominated carrier declaration.
premise text: (4) If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit, an owner of the network unit must not...
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) the owner holds a carrier licence; or (b) a nominated carrier declaration is in force in relation to the unit.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation of network unit owners to ensure compliance with carrier licence or nominated carrier declaration.
premise text: (4) If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit, an owner of the network unit must not...
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) the owner holds a carrier licence; or (b) a nominated carrier declaration is in force in relation to the unit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of network unit use without carrier licence or nominated carrier declaration on owner obligations.
premise text: (4) If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit, an owner of the network unit must not...
conclusion text: ...unless: (a) the owner holds a carrier licence; or (b) a nominated carrier declaration is in force in relation to the unit.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(5) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-5
part of: 42 Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
note: Using network unit without carrier licence or nomination is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(5) Network unit not to be used without carrier licence or nominated
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (5) A person who contravenes subsection (1), (2), (3) or (4)
conclusion text: commits an offence punishable on conviction by a fine not exceeding 20,000 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Restriction on network unit usage
premise text: (5) A person who contravenes subsection (1), (2), (3) or (4)
conclusion text: A person who contravenes subsection (1), (2), (3) or (4) commits an offence punishable on conviction by a fine not exceeding 20,000 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implication of contravening subsections
premise text: (5) A person who contravenes subsection (1), (2), (3) or (4)
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-42-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Restriction on network unit usage
premise text: (5) A person who contravenes subsection (1), (2), (3) or (4)
conclusion text: A person who contravenes subsection (1), (2), (3) or (4) commits an offence punishable by a fine not exceeding 20,000 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

43 Continuing offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43
note: Continuing contravention of section 42 is a separate offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.71
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-43-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-43-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 Continuing offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Supply to the public
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44
has part: 44(1) Supply to the public
has part: 44(2) Supply to the public
has part: 44(3) Supply to the public
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.71

44(1) Supply to the public
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44-ss-1
part of: 44 Supply to the public
note: Circumstances for network unit to be used to supply carriage service to the public
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.71
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(1) Supply to the public
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

44(2) Supply to the public
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44-ss-2
part of: 44 Supply to the public
note: Supply to the public
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.71
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(2) Supply to the public
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory supply
premise text: The unit must be used for the specified purposes.
conclusion text: There is an obligation to supply to the public.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval for supply
premise text: The unit must be used for the specified purposes within a certain time frame.
conclusion text: There is an obligation to supply to the public within a certain time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval for supply
premise text: The unit must be used for the specified purposes until a certain point in time.
conclusion text: There is an obligation to supply to the public until a certain point in time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
logic summary: Diffusion of information
premise text: The unit must be used for the specified purposes, and this information must be disseminated to the public.
conclusion text: There is an obligation to supply to the public and diffuse information.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: The unit must be used for the specified purposes, and this application must be applied by artificial intelligence.
conclusion text: There is an obligation to supply to the public and apply artificial intelligence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(3) Supply to the public
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44-ss-3
part of: 44 Supply to the public
note: If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit,
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.71
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(3) Supply to the public
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: There are 2 or more owners of a network unit.
conclusion text: An owner must provide supply to the public.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

45 Exemption—defence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45
has part: 45(1) Exemption—defence
has part: 45(2) Exemption—defence
has part: 45(3) Exemption—defence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73

45(1) Exemption—defence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45-ss-1
part of: 45 Exemption—defence
note: Exemption for defence organisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45(1) Exemption—defence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
logic summary: Implies exemption
premise text: (1) If the sole use of a network unit is use by, or on behalf of, a defence organisation...
conclusion text: Section 42 does not apply to the unit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation for exemption
premise text: (1) If the sole use of a network unit is use by, or on behalf of, a defence organisation...
conclusion text: Exemption applies during this period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Inference for exemption
premise text: (1) If the sole use of a network unit is use by, or on behalf of, a defence organisation...
conclusion text: Exemption implies this condition.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Spread for exemption
premise text: (1) If the sole use of a network unit is use by, or on behalf of, a defence organisation...
conclusion text: Exemption spreads to this network unit.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognises
logic summary: Recognition for exemption
premise text: (1) If the sole use of a network unit is use by, or on behalf of, a defence organisation...
conclusion text: Exemption is recognised for this network unit.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

45(2) Exemption—defence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45-ss-2
part of: 45 Exemption—defence
note: Exemption for defence organisation use of network unit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-2-norm

45(3) Exemption—defence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45-ss-3
part of: 45 Exemption—defence
note: Defines defence organisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45(3) Exemption—defence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines a term
premise text: (3) In this section:
conclusion text: defence organisation means...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Exemption—intelligence operations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46
note: Exempts certain intelligence operations from Section 42.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-46-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-46-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46 Exemption—intelligence operations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

47 Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47
has part: 47(1) Exemption—transport authorities
has part: 47(3) Exemption—transport authorities
has part: 47(4) Exemption—transport authorities
has part: 47(5) Exemption—transport authorities
has part: 47(7) Exemption—transport authorities
has part: 47(8) Exemption—transport authorities
has part: 47(9) Exemption—transport authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.74

47(1) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-1
part of: 47 Exemption—transport authorities
note: Exemption for Airservices Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(1) Exemption—transport authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
logic summary: Exempts network units from section 42
premise text: Section 42 applies to network units
conclusion text: Section 42 does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(3) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-3
part of: 47 Exemption—transport authorities
note: Exemption for network units used by State or Territory transport authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on State or Territory transport authorities
premise text: (3) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit...
conclusion text: ...if the sole use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the exemption
premise text: (3) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if the sole use of the...
conclusion text: ...if the sole use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for the exemption
premise text: (3) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if the sole use of the...
conclusion text: ...if the sole use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Defines a diffusion pattern for the exemption
premise text: (3) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if the sole use of the...
conclusion text: ...if the sole use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
logic summary: Defines a cognitive AI pattern for the exemption
premise text: (3) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if the sole use of the...
conclusion text: ...if the sole use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(4) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-4
part of: 47 Exemption—transport authorities
note: Exemption for rail corporations carrying communications necessary or desirable for train services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(4) Exemption—transport authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(5) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-5
part of: 47 Exemption—transport authorities
note: Exemption for network units used by Airservices Australia and carriers/ exempt users.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(5) Exemption—transport authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(7) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-7
part of: 47 Exemption—transport authorities
note: Exemption for network units used by State or Territory transport authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on State or Territory transport authorities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of exemption
premise text: (7) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if...the principal use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority...
conclusion text: ...to carry communications necessary or desirable for the workings of any or all of the following services...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Establishes the relationship between network unit use and exemption
premise text: (7) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if...the principal use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority...
conclusion text: ...to carry communications necessary or desirable for the workings of any or all of the following services...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Describes how exemption applies to network units
premise text: (7) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if...the principal use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority...
conclusion text: ...to carry communications necessary or desirable for the workings of any or all of the following services...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Analyzes the relationship between network unit use and exemption
premise text: (7) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if...the principal use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority...
conclusion text: ...to carry communications necessary or desirable for the workings of any or all of the following services...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(8) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-8
part of: 47 Exemption—transport authorities
note: Exemption for network units used by rail corporations and carriers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-8-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(8) Exemption—transport authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

47(9) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-9
part of: 47 Exemption—transport authorities
note: Definition of rail corporation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: rail corporation is a body corporate
conclusion text: that manages or operates rail transport services or infrastructure
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-47-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: rail corporation is a body corporate
conclusion text: that manages or operates both rail transport services and infrastructure
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Exemption—broadcasting services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48
note: Exemption for broadcasting services based on necessary or desirable purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.75
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-48-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48 Exemption—broadcasting services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

49 Exemption—electricity supply bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49
note: Exemption for electricity supply bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.77
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-49-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-49-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Legal exemption
premise text: Section 42 does not apply
conclusion text: Electricity supply body exempt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50
has part: 50(1) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
has part: 50(2) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
has part: 50(3) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
has part: 50(4) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
has part: 50(5) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78

50(1) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-1
part of: 50 Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
note: Exemption for line links with existing authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(1) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Conditional exemption
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(2) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-2
part of: 50 Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
note: Exemption for line links with existing authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(2) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Exemption for line links with existing authorisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: Date of repeal of the Telecommunications Act 1975
conclusion text: Repeal occurred before this date
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

50(3) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-3
part of: 50 Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
note: Exemption for line links installed before repeal of section 45 of the Telecommunications Act 1989.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(3) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts line links from section 42 of the Act.
premise text: Section 45 of the Telecommunications Act 1989 permits maintenance and operation of facilities.
conclusion text: Section 42 does not apply to these line links.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Exemption applies to facilities installed during specified period.
premise text: Section 45 of the Telecommunications Act 1989 was repealed before installation.
conclusion text: These line links were in operation during the relevant period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Exemption applies until facilities are modified or replaced.
premise text: Facilities installed before repeal of section 45 were permitted by that section.
conclusion text: These line links remain exempted until modification or replacement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Exemption applies if facilities meet specified conditions.
premise text: Section 45 of the Telecommunications Act 1989 permits maintenance and operation of facilities.
conclusion text: These line links meet the exemption criteria if they satisfy the specified conditions.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
logic summary: Exemption can be classified as a specific type of obligation.
premise text: Section 45 of the Telecommunications Act 1989 permits maintenance and operation of facilities.
conclusion text: This exemption is a specific instance of an obligation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(4) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-4
part of: 50 Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
note: Exemption for line links with existing authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(4) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to exempt line links with existing authorisation
premise text: (4) If...
conclusion text: section 42 of this Act does not apply to the line link.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the exemption
premise text: (4) If...
conclusion text: the sole use of the line link is use as provided in, and in accordance with any conditions specified in, the authorisation;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Justifies the exemption based on the conditions
premise text: (4) If...
conclusion text: section 42 of this Act does not apply to the line link.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(5) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-5
part of: 50 Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
note: Exemption for line links with existing authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(5) Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Line link must comply with conditions of previous authorisation
premise text: (5) If: a line link consists of facilities in relation to which an authorisation was in force...
conclusion text: ...and the principal use of the line link is use as provided in, and in accordance with any conditions specified in, the authorisation;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Line link must be used during period when previous authorisation was in force
premise text: (5) If: a line link consists of facilities in relation to which an authorisation was in force...
conclusion text: ...and the principal use of the line link is use as provided in, and in accordance with any conditions specified in, the authorisation;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Line link must cease use when previous authorisation expires
premise text: (5) If: a line link consists of facilities in relation to which an authorisation was in force...
conclusion text: ...and the principal use of the line link is use as provided in, and in accordance with any conditions specified in, the authorisation;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must-not
logic summary: Line link must not be used for purposes other than those specified in previous authorisation
premise text: (5) If: a line link consists of facilities in relation to which an authorisation was in force...
conclusion text: ...and the principal use of the line link is use as provided in, and in accordance with any conditions specified in, the authorisation;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-50-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must-comply
logic summary: Line link must comply with all conditions specified in previous authorisation
premise text: (5) If: a line link consists of facilities in relation to which an authorisation was in force...
conclusion text: ...and the principal use of the line link is use as provided in, and in accordance with any conditions specified in, the authorisation;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

51 Exemption—Ministerial determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51
has part: 51(1) Exemption—Ministerial determination
has part: 51(2) Exemption—Ministerial determination
has part: 51(3) Exemption—Ministerial determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.80

51(1) Exemption—Ministerial determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51-ss-1
part of: 51 Exemption—Ministerial determination
note: Minister may determine exemption from section 42
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.80
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51(1) Exemption—Ministerial determination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to make determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation to
logic summary: Temporal relation between section 42 and exemption determination
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine that section 42 does not apply in relation to:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: relation to
logic summary: Temporal relation between section 42 and exemption determination
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine that section 42 does not apply in relation to:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: relation to
logic summary: Temporal relation between section 42 and exemption determination
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine that section 42 does not apply in relation to:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: relation to
logic summary: Temporal relation between section 42 and exemption determination
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine that section 42 does not apply in relation to:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

51(2) Exemption—Ministerial determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51-ss-2
part of: 51 Exemption—Ministerial determination
note: Determination under this section may be unconditional or subject to conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.80
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-2-norm

51(3) Exemption—Ministerial determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51-ss-3
part of: 51 Exemption—Ministerial determination
note: Determination under this section has effect accordingly.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.80
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-51-ss-3-norm

52 Applications for carrier licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52
note: Eligible entities may apply for a carrier licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.82
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-52-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-52-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-52-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 52 Applications for carrier licence
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Eligible entities may apply for a carrier licence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53 Form of application etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53
note: Application must be in writing and in accordance with approved form.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.82
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53 Form of application etc.
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53A Copy of application to be given to Communications Access
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53a
has part: 53A(1) Copy of application to be given to Communications Access
has part: 53A(2) Copy of application to be given to Communications Access
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.82

53A(1) Copy of application to be given to Communications Access
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53a-ss-1
part of: 53A Copy of application to be given to Communications Access
note: ACMA must give a copy of the application to a Communications Access Coordinator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.82
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53A(2) Copy of application to be given to Communications Access
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53a-ss-2
part of: 53A Copy of application to be given to Communications Access
note: Application must be given to Communications Access Coordinator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.82
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53A(2) Copy of application to be given to Communications Access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide application copy
premise text: None
conclusion text: The application must be given to the Communications Access Coordinator.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Application to be accompanied by charge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54
note: An application must be accompanied by the charge imposed on it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.82
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-54-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-54-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54 Application to be accompanied by charge
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be accompanied by charge.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55
has part: 55(1) Further information
has part: 55(2) Further information
has part: 55(3) Further information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83

55(1) Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-1
part of: 55 Further information
note: Request for further information from applicant within a specified period.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(1) Further information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Request for further information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55(2) Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-2
part of: 55 Further information
note: ACMA may refuse to consider application until applicant provides information.
description: Information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(2) Further information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: ACMA has an obligation to refuse application until applicant provides information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55(3) Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-3
part of: 55 Further information
note: Definition of business day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(3) Further information
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: None
conclusion text: business day is a class of days
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-55-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: ACMA is open for business
conclusion text: business day is during ACMA's business hours
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Grant of licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56
has part: 56(1) Grant of licence
has part: 56(2) Grant of licence
has part: 56(3) Grant of licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83

56(1) Grant of licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56-ss-1
part of: 56 Grant of licence
note: Grant of carrier licence upon application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 56(1) Grant of licence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
logic summary: Permission to operate
premise text: Application submitted
conclusion text: Licence issued
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(2) Grant of licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56-ss-2
part of: 56 Grant of licence
note: ACMA must provide written notice upon granting carrier licence.
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(3) Grant of licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56-ss-3
part of: 56 Grant of licence
note: ACMA must publish notice stating licence has been granted
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56AA Deemed carrier licence—designated Telstra successor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56aa
note: Deemed carrier licence—designated Telstra successor
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56aa-norm

56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56a
has part: 56A(1) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 56A(2) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 56A(3) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 56A(4) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 56A(5) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 56A(6) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 56A(7) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 56A(8) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
has part: 56A(9) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86

56A(1) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56a-ss-1
part of: 56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
note: Must consult Communications Access Coordinator before granting a carrier licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56A(2) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56a-ss-2
part of: 56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
note: Notice of no further consultation required within 15 business days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56A(3) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56a-ss-3
part of: 56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
note: ACMA must not grant carrier licence while notice remains in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56A(4) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56a-ss-4
part of: 56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
note: ACMA must not grant carrier licence while notice remains in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: ACMA must not grant carrier licence.
conclusion text: while notice remains in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56A(5) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56a-ss-5
part of: 56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
note: ACMA may revoke notice under subsection (3) or (4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-5-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
logic summary: ACMA may revoke notice
premise text: ACMA has authority to revoke notices
conclusion text: Communications Access Coordinator must revoke notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
logic summary: Communications Access Coordinator must revoke notice
premise text: Communications Access Coordinator has authority to revoke notices
conclusion text: Notice under subsection (3) or (4) is revoked
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
logic summary: ACMA may revoke notice under subsection (3) or (4)
premise text: ACMA has authority to revoke notices
conclusion text: Notice under subsection (3) or (4) is revoked
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
logic summary: Communications Access Coordinator must revoke notice upon ACMA request
premise text: ACMA may revoke notices
conclusion text: Notice under subsection (3) or (4) is revoked
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56A(6) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56a-ss-6
part of: 56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
note: Cannot issue further notice after revocation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of issuing further notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56A(7) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56a-ss-7
part of: 56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
note: Must provide notice to applicant
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56A(8) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56a-ss-8
part of: 56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
note: ACMA cannot grant carrier licence while notice is in force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of granting licence
premise text: ACMA must not grant licence
conclusion text: Licence cannot be granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56A(9) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56a-ss-9
part of: 56A Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
note: Defines business day for ACMA purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-cogai-6

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56A(9) Consultation with Communications Access Coordinator
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of a business day
conclusion text: (9) In this section:business day means a day on which the ACMA is open for business in the Australian Capital Territory and in Victoria.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of business day
conclusion text: (9) In this section: business day means a day on which the ACMA is open for business in the Australian Capital Territory and in Victoria.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal definition of business day
conclusion text: (9) In this section: business day means a day on which the ACMA is open for business in the Australian Capital Territory and in Victoria.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of business day as a normative concept
conclusion text: (9) In this section: business day means a day on which the ACMA is open for business in the Australian Capital Territory and in Victoria.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of business day as a concept that can be applied to different contexts
conclusion text: (9) In this section: business day means a day on which the ACMA is open for business in the Australian Capital Territory and in Victoria.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-56a-ss-9-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of business day as a concept that can be understood by artificial intelligence systems
conclusion text: (9) In this section: business day means a day on which the ACMA is open for business in the Australian Capital Territory and in Victoria.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57 Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57
has part: 57(1) Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act
has part: 57(2) Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.87

57(1) Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57-ss-1
part of: 57 Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act
note: Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.87
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57(1) Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: Implies obligation
premise text: (1) A carrier licence has effect subject to this Act.
conclusion text: The carrier licence is subject to the Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

57(2) Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57-ss-2
part of: 57 Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act
note: This Act includes other laws and regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.87
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57(2) Carrier licence has effect subject to this Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Class hierarchy application
premise text: Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999
conclusion text: sec-57-ss-2
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Regulations under the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999
premise text: regulations under that Act
conclusion text: sec-57-ss-2
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusive provision
premise text: This Act includes...
conclusion text: sec-57-ss-2
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Refusal of carrier licence—disqualified applicant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58
note: Refusal of carrier licence for disqualified applicant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.87
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 58 Refusal of carrier licence—disqualified applicant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits granting a carrier licence to a disqualified applicant
premise text: The ACMA may refuse to grant a carrier licence...
conclusion text: ...the applicant is disqualified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the refusal of a carrier licence
premise text: (1) The ACMA may refuse to grant a carrier licence...
conclusion text: ...the applicant is disqualified.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implies that the refusal of a carrier licence is contingent on the applicant being disqualified
premise text: The ACMA may refuse to grant a carrier licence...
conclusion text: ...the applicant is disqualified.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads the information that an applicant is disqualified before granting a carrier licence
premise text: (1) The ACMA may refuse to grant a carrier licence...
conclusion text: ...the applicant is disqualified.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Infers that the refusal of a carrier licence is based on the disqualification of an applicant
premise text: (1) The ACMA may refuse to grant a carrier licence...
conclusion text: ...the applicant is disqualified.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58A Refusal of carrier licence—security
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58a
has part: 58A(1) Refusal of carrier licence—security
has part: 58A(2) Refusal of carrier licence—security
has part: 58A(3) Refusal of carrier licence—security
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.91

58A(1) Refusal of carrier licence—security
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58a-ss-1
part of: 58A Refusal of carrier licence—security
note: Grant of carrier licence to a particular person would be prejudicial to security.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.91
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits granting a carrier licence.
premise text: (1) If the Home Affairs Minister, after consulting the Prime Minister and the Minister administering this Act...
conclusion text: The grant of a carrier licence to the person would be prejudicial to security.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Identifies temporal intervals where the grant of a carrier licence would be prejudicial to security.
premise text: (1) If the Home Affairs Minister, after consulting the Prime Minister and the Minister administering this Act...
conclusion text: The grant of a carrier licence occurs during the period where national security is at risk.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Identifies recurring patterns in the grant of carrier licences that would be prejudicial to security.
premise text: (1) If the Home Affairs Minister, after consulting the Prime Minister and the Minister administering this Act...
conclusion text: The pattern of granting carrier licences to individuals with potential threats to national security recurs.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: Diffuses information about individuals who would be granted a carrier licence if it were not for the Home Affairs Minister's direction.
premise text: (1) If the Home Affairs Minister, after consulting the Prime Minister and the Minister administering this Act...
conclusion text: The information spreads that granting a carrier licence to the individual would be prejudicial to security.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognises
logic summary: Recognises the Home Affairs Minister's authority in determining who can be granted a carrier licence.
premise text: (1) If the Home Affairs Minister, after consulting the Prime Minister and the Minister administering this Act...
conclusion text: The CogAI system recognises the Home Affairs Minister's expertise in national security.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58A(2) Refusal of carrier licence—security
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58a-ss-2
part of: 58A Refusal of carrier licence—security
note: Comply with direction under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.91
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
premise text: (2) The ACMA must comply...
conclusion text: ...with a direction under subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58A(3) Refusal of carrier licence—security
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58a-ss-3
part of: 58A Refusal of carrier licence—security
note: ACMA cannot reconsider non-compulsory refusal to grant carrier licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.91
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-58a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on reconsideration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 Time limit on licence decision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59
has part: 59(1) Time limit on licence decision
has part: 59(2) Time limit on licence decision
has part: 59(3) Time limit on licence decision
has part: 59(4) Time limit on licence decision
has part: 59(5) Time limit on licence decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.92

59(1) Time limit on licence decision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59-ss-1
part of: 59 Time limit on licence decision
note: Refusal of licence decision within deadline
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.92
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) If the ACMA neither grants, nor refuses to grant...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59(2) Time limit on licence decision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59-ss-2
part of: 59 Time limit on licence decision
note: Time limit for ACMA decision on licence application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.92
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59(2) Time limit on licence decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory time limit
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: ...then the deadline day is...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59(3) Time limit on licence decision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59-ss-3
part of: 59 Time limit on licence decision
note: Determines deadline for licence decision based on section 56A notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.92
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-3-norm

59(4) Time limit on licence decision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59-ss-4
part of: 59 Time limit on licence decision
note: Deadline for licence decision after complying with section 55 request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.92
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory deadline
premise text: (4) If...
conclusion text: then the deadline day is...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59(5) Time limit on licence decision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59-ss-5
part of: 59 Time limit on licence decision
note: Deadline for licence decision if section 56A notice is in force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.92
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with section 56A notice
premise text: (5) If the ACMA gave a section 55 request; and (b) the request was complied with; and (c) there is a section 56A notice in force at the end of the tenth business day after the day on which the request was complied with;
conclusion text: then the deadline day is the fifth business day after the section 56A expiration day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: After
logic summary: Section 59(5) specifies a temporal interval for the deadline day
premise text: (5) If: (a) the ACMA gave a section 55 request; and (b) the request was complied with; and (c) there is a section 56A notice in force at the end of the tenth business day after the day on which the request was complied with;
conclusion text: then the deadline day is the fifth business day after the section 56A expiration day.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Section 59(5) specifies a temporal interval for the deadline day until the section 56A expiration day
premise text: (5) If: (a) the ACMA gave a section 55 request; and (b) the request was complied with; and (c) there is a section 56A notice in force at the end of the tenth business day after the day on which the request was complied with;
conclusion text: then the deadline day is the fifth business day after the section 56A expiration day.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: If-Then
logic summary: Section 59(5) specifies a condition for the deadline day if certain conditions are met
premise text: (5) If: (a) the ACMA gave a section 55 request; and (b) the request was complied with; and (c) there is a section 56A notice in force at the end of the tenth business day after the day on which the request was complied with;
conclusion text: then the deadline day is the fifth business day after the section 56A expiration day.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-59-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Section 59(5) classifies as a subclass of Section 55 requests
premise text: (5) If: (a) the ACMA gave a section 55 request; and (b) the request was complied with; and (c) there is a section 56A notice in force at the end of the tenth business day after the day on which the request was complied with;
conclusion text: then the deadline day is the fifth business day after the section 56A expiration day.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Notification of refusal of application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60
note: ACMA must give written notice of refusal to applicant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.95
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-60-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-60-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Conditions of carrier licence specified in Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61
note: Carrier licence is subject to conditions in Schedule 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.95
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-61-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-61-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-61-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61 Conditions of carrier licence specified in Schedule 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT
logic summary: Carrier licence is subject to conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152AZ of the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62
note: Carrier licence subject to condition set out in section 152AZ of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.95
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62 Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152AZ of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT
logic summary: Carrier licence is subject to a condition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62A Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BCO of the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62a
note: Carrier licence subject to condition set out in section 152BCO.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.95
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62A Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BCO of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT
logic summary: Carrier licence is subject to a condition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62B Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BDF of the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62b
note: Carrier licence subject to condition set out in section 152BDF.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.95
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62B Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BDF of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT
logic summary: Carrier licence is subject to condition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62C Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BEC of the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62c
note: Carrier licence subject to condition set out in section 152BEC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62C Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BEC of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT
logic summary: Carrier licence is subject to a condition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62D Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152CJC of the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62d
note: Carrier licence subject to condition set out in section 152CJC of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62d-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT
logic summary: Subject of obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62E Condition of carrier licence set out in section 37 of the National
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62e
note: Condition of carrier licence set out in section 37 of the National Broadband Network Companies Act 2011.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-62e-norm

63 Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63
has part: 63(1) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
has part: 63(2) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
has part: 63(3) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
has part: 63(4) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
has part: 63(5) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
has part: 63(6) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
has part: 63(7) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96

63(1) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-1
part of: 63 Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
note: Conditions applying to specified existing carrier licences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(1) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(2) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-2
part of: 63 Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
note: Conditions applying to specified future carrier licences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(2) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration of conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(3) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-3
part of: 63 Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
note: Conditions for carrier licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(3) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Imposes duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(4) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-4
part of: 63 Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
note: Declaration has effect accordingly.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-4-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(4) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

63(5) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-5
part of: 63 Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
note: Variation of instrument conditions by Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to vary instrument conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(6) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-6
part of: 63 Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
note: Minister may revoke instrument under subsections (1), (2) or (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(6) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to revoke instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(7) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-7
part of: 63 Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
note: Minister must provide copy of instrument to licence holder
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(7) Conditions of carrier licence declared by Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Minister must provide copy of instrument to licence holder
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTINGENT ON
logic summary: Instrument creation is contingent on certain conditions being met
premise text: (7) As soon as practicable after the Minister makes an instrument under subsection (1), (2), (5) or (6) that relates to a licence, the Minister must give the holder of the licence a copy of the instrument.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTINGENT ON
logic summary: Instrument creation is contingent on certain conditions being met
premise text: (7) As soon as practicable after the Minister makes an instrument under subsection (1), (2), (5) or (6) that relates to a licence, the Minister must give the holder of the licence a copy of the instrument.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS TO
logic summary: Copy of instrument is spread to licence holder upon creation of instrument
premise text: (7) As soon as practicable after the Minister makes an instrument under subsection (1), (2), (5) or (6) that relates to a licence, the Minister must give the holder of the licence a copy of the instrument.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES ACTION
logic summary: Minister requires action upon creation of instrument
premise text: (7) As soon as practicable after the Minister makes an instrument under subsection (1), (2), (5) or (6) that relates to a licence, the Minister must give the holder of the licence a copy of the instrument.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

63A Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63a
has part: 63A(1) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
has part: 63A(2) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
has part: 63A(3) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
has part: 63A(4) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
has part: 63A(5) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98

63A(1) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63a-ss-1
part of: 63A Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
note: Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited until declaration takes effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with conditions
premise text: Carrier licence is subject to conditions
conclusion text: Must comply with conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63A(2) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63a-ss-2
part of: 63A Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
note: Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited until declaration takes effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with conditions
premise text: (2) Until the first occasion after the commencement of this section on which a declaration under subsection 63(2) takes effect in relation to a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited:
conclusion text: the carrier licence is subject to the conditions set out in section 11 of the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Conditions - Telstra Infraco Limited) Declaration 2019
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Conditions overlap with declaration period
premise text: (2) Until the first occasion after the commencement of this section on which a declaration under subsection 63(2) takes effect in relation to a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited:
conclusion text: the conditions set out in section 11 of the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Conditions - Telstra Infraco Limited) Declaration 2019 overlap with the period during which the declaration takes effect
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Conditions repeat until declaration takes effect
premise text: (2) Until the first occasion after the commencement of this section on which a declaration under subsection 63(2) takes effect in relation to a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited:
conclusion text: the conditions set out in section 11 of the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Conditions - Telstra Infraco Limited) Declaration 2019 repeat until the declaration takes effect
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63A(3) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63a-ss-3
part of: 63A Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
note: If a carrier licence held by Telstra is subject to a condition, the first company is taken to have complied with that condition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If a licence is subject to a condition, then the first company complies with that condition.
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: (first Telstra company)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63A(4) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63a-ss-4
part of: 63A Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
note: Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited until declaration takes effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on Telstra Limited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63A(5) Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63a-ss-5
part of: 63A Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
note: Conditions of a carrier licence held by Telstra Limited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-5-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-5-logic-deontic-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasCondition
logic summary: Has condition
premise text: (5) If: a carrier licence held by a particular Telstra company...
conclusion text: ...is (whether in accordance with subsection (4) of this section or otherwise) subject to:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-5-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: hasTemporalRelation
logic summary: Has temporal relation with interim conditions
premise text: (5) If: a carrier licence held by a particular Telstra company...
conclusion text: ...is (whether in accordance with subsection (4) of this section or otherwise) subject to: i) a condition set out in an interim Telstra carrier licence condition declaration; or ii) an interim condition set out in the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Conditions - Telstra Infraco Limited) Declaration 2019;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-63a-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has obligation to comply with conditions
premise text: (5) If: a carrier licence held by a particular Telstra company...
conclusion text: ...is (whether in accordance with subsection (4) of this section or otherwise) subject to: i) a condition set out in an interim Telstra carrier licence condition declaration; or ii) an interim condition set out in the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Conditions - Telstra Infraco Limited) Declaration 2019;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

64 Consultation about declared licence conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64
has part: 64(1) Consultation about declared licence conditions
has part: 64(2) Consultation about declared licence conditions
has part: 64(3) Consultation about declared licence conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.101

64(1) Consultation about declared licence conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64-ss-1
part of: 64 Consultation about declared licence conditions
note: Minister must consult with licence holder before making an instrument under certain subsections.
description: Submissions from licence holder within a specified time limit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.101
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64(1) Consultation about declared licence conditions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to consult with the licence holder
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64(2) Consultation about declared licence conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64-ss-2
part of: 64 Consultation about declared licence conditions
note: Must provide at least 30 days' notice for declared licence conditions.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.101
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64(2) Consultation about declared licence conditions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide at least 30 days' notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64(3) Consultation about declared licence conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64-ss-3
part of: 64 Consultation about declared licence conditions
note: Minister must consult applicant before making instrument under subsection 63(3)
description: Submissions from applicant within specified time limit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.101
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64(3) Consultation about declared licence conditions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must take action before making instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65 Conditions about foreign ownership or control
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65
has part: 65(1) Conditions about foreign ownership or control
has part: 65(2) Conditions about foreign ownership or control
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.101

65(1) Conditions about foreign ownership or control
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-1
part of: 65 Conditions about foreign ownership or control
note: Foreign ownership or control condition for carrier licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.101
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(1) Conditions about foreign ownership or control
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: relates to
logic summary: Relates to foreign ownership or control
premise text: (1) A condition of a carrier licence may relate to the extent of foreign ownership or control (whether direct or indirect) of the holder.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to temporal intervals for foreign ownership or control conditions
premise text: (1) A condition of a carrier licence may relate to the extent of foreign ownership or control (whether direct or indirect) of the holder.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to ordered temporal intervals for foreign ownership or control conditions
premise text: (1) A condition of a carrier licence may relate to the extent of foreign ownership or control (whether direct or indirect) of the holder.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to diffusion of information for foreign ownership or control conditions
premise text: (1) A condition of a carrier licence may relate to the extent of foreign ownership or control (whether direct or indirect) of the holder.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to cognitive AI for foreign ownership or control conditions
premise text: (1) A condition of a carrier licence may relate to the extent of foreign ownership or control (whether direct or indirect) of the holder.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

65(2) Conditions about foreign ownership or control
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-2
part of: 65 Conditions about foreign ownership or control
note: Does not limit conditions declared under section 63 by implication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.101
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-65-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(2) Conditions about foreign ownership or control
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

67 Carrier licence conditions—special provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67
note: A condition of a carrier licence has effect subject to provisions under the Radiocommunications Act 1992.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.101
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-67-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-67-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-67-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67 Carrier licence conditions—special provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJUNCTIVE MODO
logic summary: Conditionality
premise text: (1) A condition of a carrier licence...
conclusion text: ...has effect subject to provisions...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

68 Compliance with conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68
has part: 68(1) Compliance with conditions
has part: 68(2) Compliance with conditions
has part: 68(3) Compliance with conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102

68(1) Compliance with conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68-ss-1
part of: 68 Compliance with conditions
note: Carrier must not contravene a condition of the carrier licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 68(1) Compliance with conditions
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Carrier must comply with conditions.
conclusion text: Carrier must not contravene a condition of the carrier licence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68(2) Compliance with conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68-ss-2
part of: 68 Compliance with conditions
note: Prohibition on aiding, abetting, or conspiring to contravene subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 68(2) Compliance with conditions
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on specific actions
premise text: (2) A person must not:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on inducing contraventions
premise text: (b) induce, whether by threats or promises or otherwise, a contravention of subsection (1);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on being knowingly concerned in contraventions
premise text: (c) be in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, nor party to, a contravention of subsection (1);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on conspiring to contravene subsection (1)
premise text: (d) conspire with others to effect a contravention of subsection (1);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between prohibited actions
premise text: (a), (b), and (c) are all related to contraventions of subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68(3) Compliance with conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68-ss-3
part of: 68 Compliance with conditions
note: Civil penalty provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-68-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits breaches of civil penalty provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69 Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69
has part: 69(1) Remedial directions—breach of condition
has part: 69(2) Remedial directions—breach of condition
has part: 69(3) Remedial directions—breach of condition
has part: 69(4) Remedial directions—breach of condition
has part: 69(4A) Remedial directions—breach of condition
has part: 69(5) Remedial directions—breach of condition
has part: 69(5A) Remedial directions—breach of condition
has part: 69(6) Remedial directions—breach of condition
has part: 69(6B) Remedial directions—breach of condition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102

69(1) Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69-ss-1
part of: 69 Remedial directions—breach of condition
note: Carrier must comply with licence conditions if contravening them.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69(1) Remedial directions—breach of condition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Carrier has an obligation to comply with licence conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69(2) Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69-ss-2
part of: 69 Remedial directions—breach of condition
note: Written direction requiring carrier to take specified action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
premise text: ACMA directs carrier
conclusion text: Carrier must take action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69(3) Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69-ss-3
part of: 69 Remedial directions—breach of condition
note: Direction to implement administrative systems for monitoring compliance with a condition of the licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69(3) Remedial directions—breach of condition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to implement administrative systems.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69(4) Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69-ss-4
part of: 69 Remedial directions—breach of condition
note: Carrier must not contravene a direction under subsection (2).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 69(4) Remedial directions—breach of condition
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of action
premise text: (4) A carrier must not contravene a direction under subsection (2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69(4A) Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69-ss-4a
part of: 69 Remedial directions—breach of condition
note: Exempts certain conditions from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-4a-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69(4A) Remedial directions—breach of condition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

69(5) Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69-ss-5
part of: 69 Remedial directions—breach of condition
note: Exempts a condition from subsection (1) of section 369.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69(5) Remedial directions—breach of condition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts a condition from subsection (1) of section 369.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

69(5A) Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69-ss-5a
part of: 69 Remedial directions—breach of condition
note: Exempts certain conditions from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-5a-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-5a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69(5A) Remedial directions—breach of condition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

69(6) Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69-ss-6
part of: 69 Remedial directions—breach of condition
note: Exempts certain conditions from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-6-norm

69(6B) Remedial directions—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69-ss-6b
part of: 69 Remedial directions—breach of condition
note: Exempts a specific condition from the breach of condition provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-6b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-6b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69-ss-6b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Exempts a specific condition from the breach of condition provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69aa
has part: 69AA(1) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
has part: 69AA(2) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
has part: 69AA(3) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
has part: 69AA(4) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.105

69AA(1) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69aa-ss-1
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
note: Carrier must comply with conditions of licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.105
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69AA(1) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Carrier has a duty to comply
premise text: (a) a carrier has contravened, or is contravening, a condition of the carrier licence held by the carrier;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Carrier has a duty to comply with conditions
premise text: (1) This section applies if:...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69AA(2) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69aa-ss-2
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
note: The ACCC may give the carrier a written direction requiring the carrier to take specified action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.105
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69AA(2) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: The ACCC may give a direction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69AA(3) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69aa-ss-3
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
note: Carrier must implement administrative systems for monitoring compliance with the condition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.105
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69AA(3) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must implement administrative systems.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69AA(4) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69aa-ss-4
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
note: Preventing ACCC from giving a direction that would prevent Telstra from complying with an undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.105
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents ACCC from giving a direction.
premise text: ACCC must not give a direction.
conclusion text: Direction would prevent Telstra from complying with an undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents ACCC from giving a direction that would prevent Telstra from complying with an undertaking.
premise text: ACCC must not give a direction under subsection (2).
conclusion text: Direction would have the effect of preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-69aa-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: If ACCC gives a direction, then it would prevent Telstra from complying with an undertaking.
premise text: ACCC must not give a direction under subsection (2).
conclusion text: Direction would have the effect of preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70
has part: 70(1) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(1A) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(2) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(2A) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(3) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(3B) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(4) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(4A) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(4B) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(4C) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(4D) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(4E) Formal warnings—breach of condition
has part: 70(4F) Formal warnings—breach of condition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106

70(1) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-1
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition
note: Carrier must issue formal warning for breach of condition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(1) Formal warnings—breach of condition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Carrier has an obligation to issue formal warning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(1A) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-1a
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition
note: Exempts certain conditions from subsection (1) of section 70(1A)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-1a-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(1A) Formal warnings—breach of condition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

70(2) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-2
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition
note: Exempts a condition from subsection (1) of section 369.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(2) Formal warnings—breach of condition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts a condition from subsection (1)
premise text: Section 369 deals with Rules of Conduct under section 367.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

70(2A) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-2a
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition
note: Exempts certain conditions from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(2A) Formal warnings—breach of condition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relates to
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between conditions
premise text: Subsection (1)
conclusion text: Part 1 of Schedule 1
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

70(3) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-3
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition
note: Exempts certain conditions from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Applies to exemptions from obligations
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to certain conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(3B) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-3b
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition
note: Exempts a specific condition from the general breach of condition rule.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3b-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3b-logic-deontic-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(3B) Formal warnings—breach of condition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between two events
premise text: The exemption is effective from the date of commencement
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply to this condition after the specified date
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3b-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <>
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between two events
premise text: The exemption is effective from the date of commencement
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply to this condition after the specified date
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-3b-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies a specific obligation or prohibition
premise text: The exemption is a specific case of the general breach rule
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply to this condition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(4) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-4
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition
note: Exemption from breach of condition for standard access obligations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(4) Formal warnings—breach of condition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Exemption implies obligation to comply with standard access obligations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(4A) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-4a
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for access determinations under section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(4A) Formal warnings—breach of condition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts access determinations from subsection (1)
premise text: Section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with access determinations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(4B) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-4b
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for certain rules of conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4b-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4b-logic-deontic-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(4B) Formal warnings—breach of condition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
logic summary: Exempts subsection (1) for certain rules of conduct
premise text: Section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with binding rules of conduct.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply to this condition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Imposes duty on State to comply
logic summary: State is under obligation to comply with section 152BDF
premise text: Section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with binding rules of conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4b-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts State from duty to comply
logic summary: State is exempted from duty to comply with section 152BDF
premise text: Section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with binding rules of conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

70(4C) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-4c
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition
note: Exempts access agreements from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4c-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(4C) Formal warnings—breach of condition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Exempts access agreements from subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for this section
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to this condition
conclusion text: The condition starts at this point in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

70(4D) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-4d
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for a specific condition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4d-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4d-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4d-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4d-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4d-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal relationship between subsection (1) and the exemption
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152CJC
conclusion text: The exemption is applicable after subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4d-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Equality of the exemption and the condition
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152CJC
conclusion text: The exemption is equal to the condition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4d-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Temporal relationship between subsection (1) and the exemption
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152CJC
conclusion text: The exemption is applicable before subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4d-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <=
logic summary: Inequality of the exemption and the condition
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152CJC
conclusion text: The exemption is less than or equal to the condition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

70(4E) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-4e
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for certain conditions set out in section 37 of the National Broadband Network Companies Act 2011.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4e-norm

70(4F) Formal warnings—breach of condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-4f
part of: 70 Formal warnings—breach of condition
note: Exempts certain conditions from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-70-ss-4f-norm

71 Surrender of carrier licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71
note: Carrier may surrender carrier licence by written notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-71-norm

72 Cancellation of carrier licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72
has part: 72(1) Cancellation of carrier licence
has part: 72(2A) Cancellation of carrier licence
has part: 72(2B) Cancellation of carrier licence
has part: 72(3) Cancellation of carrier licence
has part: 72(4) Cancellation of carrier licence
has part: 72(5) Cancellation of carrier licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108

72(1) Cancellation of carrier licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72-ss-1
part of: 72 Cancellation of carrier licence
note: Failure to pay annual charge on or before due date results in cancellation of carrier licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-cogai-6

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 72(1) Cancellation of carrier licence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits failure to pay annual charge.
premise text: Annual charge becomes due and payable on a specific date.
conclusion text: Carrier licence cancellation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Equality
logic summary: Defines annual charge as charge imposed by Part 3 of the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Charges) Act 1997.
premise text: Annual charge is a specific type of charge.
conclusion text: Annual charge is equal to the specified charge.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Charge becomes due and payable on or after a specific date.
premise text: Date of charge becoming due and payable is specified.
conclusion text: Charge becomes due and payable on or after the specified date.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ∀
logic summary: All carriers must pay annual charge on or before due date to avoid licence cancellation.
premise text: Carrier is subject to annual charge.
conclusion text: Carrier pays annual charge on or before due date.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: ¬∃
logic summary: No carrier can pay late and avoid licence cancellation.
premise text: Carrier cannot pay late.
conclusion text: Carrier must pay on or before due date to avoid cancellation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: ¬∃
logic summary: No carrier can avoid licence cancellation by paying late.
premise text: Carrier pays late.
conclusion text: Carrier must pay on or before due date to avoid cancellation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(2A) Cancellation of carrier licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72-ss-2a
part of: 72 Cancellation of carrier licence
note: Failure to pay industry levy results in cancellation of carrier licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 72(2A) Cancellation of carrier licence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits failure to pay industry levy.
premise text: Industry levy is due and payable.
conclusion text: Carrier licence cancellation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(2B) Cancellation of carrier licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72-ss-2b
part of: 72 Cancellation of carrier licence
note: Cancellation of carrier licence if funding charge is not paid on time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-6

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 72(2B) Cancellation of carrier licence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits cancellation of carrier licence if funding charge is not paid on time.
premise text: (2B) The ACMA may cancel a carrier licence held by a carrier...
conclusion text: if the carrier fails to pay in full any funding charge...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies funding charge as a charge imposed by the Telecommunications (Regional Broadband Scheme) Charge Act 2020.
premise text: For this purpose, funding charge means charge...
conclusion text: ...the Telecommunications (Regional Broadband Scheme) Charge Act 2020.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Funding charge becomes due and payable on a specific date.
premise text: The ACMA may cancel a carrier licence held by a carrier...
conclusion text: ...on or before the date on which the funding charge becomes due and payable.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Funding charge is recurring and must be paid on time.
premise text: The ACMA may cancel a carrier licence held by a carrier...
conclusion text: ...if the carrier fails to pay in full any funding charge...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Carrier has an obligation to pay funding charge on time.
premise text: (2B) The ACMA may cancel a carrier licence held by a carrier...
conclusion text: ...if the carrier fails to pay in full any funding charge...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Cancellation of carrier licence is diffuse over time.
premise text: (2B) The ACMA may cancel a carrier licence held by a carrier...
conclusion text: ...if the carrier fails to pay in full any funding charge...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(3) Cancellation of carrier licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72-ss-3
part of: 72 Cancellation of carrier licence
note: ACMA may cancel carrier licence if holder becomes disqualified body corporate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 72(3) Cancellation of carrier licence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits cancellation of carrier licence
premise text: (3) If the holder of a carrier licence becomes a disqualified body corporate...
conclusion text: ACMA may cancel carrier licence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for cancellation
premise text: (3) If the holder of a carrier licence becomes a disqualified body corporate...
conclusion text: Cancellation occurs at this point in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implicates cancellation if holder is disqualified body corporate
premise text: (3) If the holder of a carrier licence becomes a disqualified body corporate...
conclusion text: Cancellation occurs
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses cancellation to all relevant parties
premise text: (3) If the holder of a carrier licence becomes a disqualified body corporate...
conclusion text: Cancellation is diffused to all relevant parties
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognise
logic summary: Recognises holder as disqualified body corporate
premise text: (3) If the holder of a carrier licence becomes a disqualified body corporate...
conclusion text: Holder is recognised as disqualified body corporate
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(4) Cancellation of carrier licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72-ss-4
part of: 72 Cancellation of carrier licence
note: ACMA may cancel carrier licence if holder becomes disqualified partnership
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 72(4) Cancellation of carrier licence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits cancellation of carrier licence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(5) Cancellation of carrier licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72-ss-5
part of: 72 Cancellation of carrier licence
note: Must be a constitutional corporation to hold carrier licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72(5) Cancellation of carrier licence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Not none of the following
premise text: (5) If, at a particular time, the holder of a carrier licence is none of the following:
conclusion text: a constitutional corporation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During a particular time
premise text: (5) If, at a particular time, the holder of a carrier licence is none of the following:
conclusion text: a constitutional corporation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: During a particular time
premise text: (5) If, at a particular time, the holder of a carrier licence is none of the following:
conclusion text: a constitutional corporation
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: During a particular time
premise text: (5) If, at a particular time, the holder of a carrier licence is none of the following:
conclusion text: a constitutional corporation
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-72-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: During a particular time
premise text: (5) If, at a particular time, the holder of a carrier licence is none of the following:
conclusion text: a constitutional corporation
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73
has part: 73(1) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
has part: 73(2) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
has part: 73(3) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
has part: 73(4) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
has part: 73(5) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
has part: 73(6) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
has part: 73(7) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110

73(1) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73-ss-1
part of: 73 Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
note: Annual charge due and payable when application charge is due.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-6

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73(1) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: due
logic summary: Obligation to pay annual charge when application charge is due.
premise text: Application charge is due and payable.
conclusion text: Annual charge must be paid.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is
logic summary: Annual charge is a type of charge imposed by Part 3 of the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Charges) Act 1997.
premise text: Annual charge means charge imposed by Part 3 of the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Charges) Act 1997.
conclusion text: Annual charge is a specific type of charge.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Annual charge must be paid during the period when application charge is due and payable.
premise text: Late payment penalty means an amount that is payable by way of penalty in accordance with a determination under subsection (4).
conclusion text: Annual charge must be paid within a specific time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Annual charge must be paid during the period when application charge is due and payable.
premise text: Late payment penalty means an amount that is payable by way of penalty in accordance with a determination under subsection (4).
conclusion text: Annual charge must be paid within a specific time frame.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: There is an obligation to pay annual charge when application charge is due and payable.
premise text: When application charge is due and payable, annual charge must be paid.
conclusion text: Annual charge must be paid.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: There is an obligation to pay late payment penalty when late payment penalty is payable.
premise text: Late payment penalty means an amount that is payable by way of penalty in accordance with a determination under subsection (4).
conclusion text: Late payment penalty must be paid.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73(2) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73-ss-2
part of: 73 Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
note: Application charge due and payable when application is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73(2) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: due
logic summary: Duty to pay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73(3) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73-ss-3
part of: 73 Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
note: Annual charge is due and payable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-shacl-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73(3) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: due
logic summary: Obligation to pay annual charge
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation of annual charge payment
premise text: (3) Annual charge is due and payable at the time ascertained in accordance with a written determination made by the ACMA.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Spread of late payment penalty
premise text: (3) Annual charge is due and payable at the time ascertained in accordance with a written determination made by the ACMA.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Artificial agent recognizes annual charge payment
premise text: (3) Annual charge is due and payable at the time ascertained in accordance with a written determination made by the ACMA.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: validates
logic summary: Schema validation of annual charge payment
premise text: (3) Annual charge is due and payable at the time ascertained in accordance with a written determination made by the ACMA.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73(4) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73-ss-4
part of: 73 Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
note: Penalty for unpaid annual charge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73(4) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay penalty
premise text: (4) The ACMA may, by written instrument...
conclusion text: The person is liable to pay to the Commonwealth...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Penalty applies during the period after which the charge became due
premise text: (4) The ACMA may, by written instrument...
conclusion text: The amount unpaid is computed from that time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Penalty applies during the period after which the charge became due
premise text: (4) The ACMA may, by written instrument...
conclusion text: The amount unpaid is computed from that time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Penalty applies if annual charge remains unpaid after it became due
premise text: (4) The ACMA may, by written instrument...
conclusion text: The person is liable to pay to the Commonwealth...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if
logic summary: Penalty applies if annual charge remains unpaid after it became due
premise text: (4) The ACMA may, by written instrument...
conclusion text: The person is liable to pay to the Commonwealth...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73(5) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73-ss-5
part of: 73 Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
note: Remission of penalty after determination under subsection (4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-5-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73(5) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

73(6) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73-ss-6
part of: 73 Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
note: ACMA may remit late payment penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73(6) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Authorization to remit penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73(7) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73-ss-7
part of: 73 Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
note: Annual charge, application charge and late payment penalty are payable to the ACMA on behalf of the Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73(7) Collection of charges relating to carrier licences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the obligation
premise text: (7) Annual charge, application charge and late payment penalty are payable to the ACMA on behalf of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Justifies the obligation through logical reasoning
premise text: (7) Annual charge, application charge and late payment penalty are payable to the ACMA on behalf of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Spreads the obligation through related concepts
premise text: (7) Annual charge, application charge and late payment penalty are payable to the ACMA on behalf of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Draws conclusions based on AI reasoning
premise text: (7) Annual charge, application charge and late payment penalty are payable to the ACMA on behalf of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73A Refund of application charge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73a
has part: 73A(1) Refund of application charge
has part: 73A(2) Refund of application charge
has part: 73A(3) Refund of application charge
has part: 73A(4) Refund of application charge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.112

73A(1) Refund of application charge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73a-ss-1
part of: 73A Refund of application charge
note: Refund of application charge if application lapses or is refused
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73A(1) Refund of application charge
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to refund application charge
premise text: (1) This section applies...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73A(2) Refund of application charge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73a-ss-2
part of: 73A Refund of application charge
note: Must refund application charge to applicant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: Must refund application charge to applicant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for refund
premise text: (2) The ACMA, on behalf of the Commonwealth, must refund the application charge to the applicant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Refund implies obligation
premise text: (2) The ACMA, on behalf of the Commonwealth, must refund the application charge to the applicant.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Diffusion of refundable amount
premise text: (2) The ACMA, on behalf of the Commonwealth, must refund the application charge to the applicant.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: CogAI application for refundable amount
premise text: (2) The ACMA, on behalf of the Commonwealth, must refund the application charge to the applicant.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73A(3) Refund of application charge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73a-ss-3
part of: 73A Refund of application charge
note: The Consolidated Revenue Fund is appropriated for payments under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73A(3) Refund of application charge
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Consolidated Revenue Fund is appropriated.
conclusion text: for payments under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73A(4) Refund of application charge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73a-ss-4
part of: 73A Refund of application charge
note: Definition of application charge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73A(4) Refund of application charge
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-73a-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key term
conclusion text: application charge
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74 Collection of charges on behalf of the Commonwealth
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74
note: ACMA may collect payments on behalf of the Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-74-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-74-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to collect payments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75 Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-75
has part: 75(1) Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge
has part: 75(2) Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113

75(1) Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-75-ss-1
part of: 75 Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge
note: Cancels exemptions from charge liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-75-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-75-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75(1) Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cancel
logic summary: Repeals exemption provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75(2) Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-75-ss-2
part of: 75 Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge
note: Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge does not apply if another Act refers to the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Charges) Act 1997.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-75-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-75-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75(2) Cancellation of certain exemptions from charge
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

76 Commonwealth not liable to charge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76
has part: 76(1) Commonwealth not liable to charge
has part: 76(2) Commonwealth not liable to charge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113

76(1) Commonwealth not liable to charge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76-ss-1
part of: 76 Commonwealth not liable to charge
note: The Commonwealth is not liable to pay charge imposed by the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Charges) Act 1997.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(2) Commonwealth not liable to charge
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76-ss-2
part of: 76 Commonwealth not liable to charge
note: The Commonwealth is not liable to charge for certain authorities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If the Commonwealth is not liable to charge, then it cannot be taxed.
premise text: (2) A reference in this section to the Commonwealth includes a reference to an authority of the Commonwealth that cannot, by law of the Commonwealth, be made liable to taxation by the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: The Commonwealth is not liable to charge for certain authorities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SubClassOf
logic summary: This section defines a subclass of 'authority' that cannot be taxed.
premise text: (2) A reference in this section to the Commonwealth includes a reference to an authority of the Commonwealth that cannot, by law of the Commonwealth, be made liable to taxation by the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: This is an authority that cannot be taxed.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The section defines a temporal interval during which the Commonwealth is not liable to charge.
premise text: (2) A reference in this section to the Commonwealth includes a reference to an authority of the Commonwealth that cannot, by law of the Commonwealth, be made liable to taxation by the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: This is a temporal interval during which the Commonwealth is not liable to charge.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The section defines a recurring pattern of non-liability for taxation.
premise text: (2) A reference in this section to the Commonwealth includes a reference to an authority of the Commonwealth that cannot, by law of the Commonwealth, be made liable to taxation by the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: This is a recurring pattern of non-liability for taxation.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The section spreads knowledge about the Commonwealth's non-liability to charge.
premise text: (2) A reference in this section to the Commonwealth includes a reference to an authority of the Commonwealth that cannot, by law of the Commonwealth, be made liable to taxation by the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: This spreads knowledge about the Commonwealth's non-liability to charge.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-76-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The section recognizes a pattern of non-liability for taxation in the Commonwealth.
premise text: (2) A reference in this section to the Commonwealth includes a reference to an authority of the Commonwealth that cannot, by law of the Commonwealth, be made liable to taxation by the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: This recognizes a pattern of non-liability for taxation in the Commonwealth.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Applications for nominated carrier declarations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77
note: Carrier may apply for nominated carrier declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-77-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-77-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 77 Applications for nominated carrier declarations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

78 Application to be accompanied by charge etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78
has part: 78(1) Application to be accompanied by charge etc.
has part: 78(2) Application to be accompanied by charge etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114

78(1) Application to be accompanied by charge etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78-ss-1
part of: 78 Application to be accompanied by charge etc.
note: Application must be accompanied by charge, consent of network owners, and acceptance responsibility.
description: charge, consent of network owners, election of applicant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(1) Application to be accompanied by charge etc.
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be accompanied by charge, consent of network owners, and acceptance responsibility.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78(2) Application to be accompanied by charge etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78-ss-2
part of: 78 Application to be accompanied by charge etc.
note: Application must be accompanied by charge etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(2) Application to be accompanied by charge etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide application with charge etc.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-78-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79 Form of application etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79
note: Application, consent and election must be in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-79-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-79-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-79-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79 Form of application etc.
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be in writing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80
has part: 80(1) Further information
has part: 80(2) Further information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114

80(1) Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80-ss-1
part of: 80 Further information
note: Request for further information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-80-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-80-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-80-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(1) Further information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-80-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Request for information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(2) Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80-ss-2
part of: 80 Further information
note: ACMA may refuse to consider application until applicant provides information.
description: Information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-80-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-80-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(2) Further information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81 Making a nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81
has part: 81(1) Making a nominated carrier declaration
has part: 81(2) Making a nominated carrier declaration
has part: 81(3) Making a nominated carrier declaration
has part: 81(4) Making a nominated carrier declaration
has part: 81(5) Making a nominated carrier declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115

81(1) Making a nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81-ss-1
part of: 81 Making a nominated carrier declaration
note: The ACMA may declare the applicant as the nominated carrier if they can comply with obligations and will not impede administration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81(1) Making a nominated carrier declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Ability to comply with obligations
premise text: (a) if the declaration were made, the applicant would be in a position to comply with all of the obligations imposed on the applicant...
conclusion text: The applicant can comply with obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must not impede
logic summary: No impediment to administration
premise text: (b) the making of the declaration will not impede the efficient administration of this Act.
conclusion text: The declaration must not impede administration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: in relation to
logic summary: Temporal relationship with units
premise text: ...the network units if the ACMA is satisfied that:
conclusion text: The declaration relates to the units.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81(2) Making a nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81-ss-2
part of: 81 Making a nominated carrier declaration
note: Only one carrier can be declared as the nominated carrier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: only
logic summary: Single nomination obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81(3) Making a nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81-ss-3
part of: 81 Making a nominated carrier declaration
note: Must give a copy of declaration to applicant and owners of network units.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must give a copy
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81(4) Making a nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81-ss-4
part of: 81 Making a nominated carrier declaration
note: Publish declaration in Gazette
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81(4) Making a nominated carrier declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish declaration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81(5) Making a nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81-ss-5
part of: 81 Making a nominated carrier declaration
note: Includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81A Obligations of nominated carrier
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81a
has part: 81A(1) Obligations of nominated carrier
has part: 81A(2) Obligations of nominated carrier
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115

81A(1) Obligations of nominated carrier
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81a-ss-1
part of: 81A Obligations of nominated carrier
note: The Act applies to the nominated carrier in relation to network units as if they were owned or operated by the nominated carrier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81A(1) Obligations of nominated carrier
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to ensure the nominated carrier operates or owns network units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81A(2) Obligations of nominated carrier
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81a-ss-2
part of: 81A Obligations of nominated carrier
note: No effect on other persons owning or operating network units.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81A(2) Obligations of nominated carrier
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-81a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Exclude from this Act's application
premise text: (1) does not affect
conclusion text: other persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

82 Notification of refusal of application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82
note: ACMA must give written notice of refusal to applicant and owners of network units.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-82-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-82-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: ACMA prohibits refusing to make a nominated carrier declaration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83 Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83
has part: 83(1) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
has part: 83(2) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
has part: 83(3) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
has part: 83(4) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
has part: 83(5) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
has part: 83(6) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
has part: 83(7) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
has part: 83(8) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116

83(1) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83-ss-1
part of: 83 Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
note: Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits revoking a nominated carrier declaration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83(2) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83-ss-2
part of: 83 Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
note: Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(2) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits revocation without consent
premise text: (2) The ACMA must, by writing, revoke the nominated carrier declaration relating to a nominated carrier and relating to one or more network units if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for revocation
premise text: (2) The ACMA must, by writing, revoke the nominated carrier declaration relating to a nominated carrier and relating to one or more network units if:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for revocation
premise text: (2) The ACMA must, by writing, revoke the nominated carrier declaration relating to a nominated carrier and relating to one or more network units if:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses revocation based on consent
premise text: (2) The ACMA must, by writing, revoke the nominated carrier declaration relating to a nominated carrier and relating to one or more network units if:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
logic summary: Applies reasoning to revocation based on consent
premise text: (2) The ACMA must, by writing, revoke the nominated carrier declaration relating to a nominated carrier and relating to one or more network units if:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83(3) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83-ss-3
part of: 83 Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
note: Must provide revocation to former nominated carrier and owners of network units.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide revocation to former nominated carrier and owners of network units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83(4) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83-ss-4
part of: 83 Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
note: Publishing a copy of revocation in the Gazette.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(4) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Publishing obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83(5) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83-ss-5
part of: 83 Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
note: Revocation of nominated carrier declaration takes effect on the specified date.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-5-norm

83(6) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83-ss-6
part of: 83 Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
note: Notice and submission requirement before revoking a nominated carrier declaration
description: written notice and submission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify and consider submissions
premise text: ACMA must not revoke a nominated carrier declaration
conclusion text: unless ACMA has given the nominated carrier a written notice...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Time limit for submission consideration
premise text: ACMA must consider any submission that was received within the time limit specified in the notice
conclusion text: within the time limit specified in the notice
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Submission consideration implies revocation proposal acceptance
premise text: ACMA must consider any submission that was received within the time limit specified in the notice
conclusion text: the ACMA has accepted the nominated carrier's submission
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Submission consideration as a diffusion process
premise text: ACMA must consider any submission that was received within the time limit specified in the notice
conclusion text: the ACMA has diffused the nominated carrier's submission into its decision-making process
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Submission consideration as a cognitive process
premise text: ACMA must consider any submission that was received within the time limit specified in the notice
conclusion text: the ACMA has considered the nominated carrier's submission using its cognitive abilities
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83(7) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83-ss-7
part of: 83 Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
note: A time limit must run for at least 7 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(7) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a time limit of at least 7 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83(8) Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83-ss-8
part of: 83 Revocation of nominated carrier declaration
note: Includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.116
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-83-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-84
has part: 84(1) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
has part: 84(2) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
has part: 84(3) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
has part: 84(4) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
has part: 84(5) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.118

84(1) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-84-ss-1
part of: 84 Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
note: Maintain a Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.118
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to maintain a Register
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of carrier declarations and licences
premise text: (a) all nominated carrier declarations currently in force; (b) all carrier licences currently in force; (c) all conditions of such licences.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between Register entries and carrier declarations/ licences
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84(2) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-84-ss-2
part of: 84 Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
note: Allow electronic means for maintaining Register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.118
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allow electronic means for maintaining Register
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Classifies part of a long provision
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between intervals
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84(3) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-84-ss-3
part of: 84 Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
note: Inspect and copy extracts from the Register on payment of a charge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.118
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Allow inspection and copying
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84(4) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-84-ss-4
part of: 84 Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
note: A person must make a copy of or take an extract from the Register if ACMA provides them with a printout.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.118
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must make a copy or take an extract from the Register.
premise text: ACMA provides a printout of the Register.
conclusion text: A person must make a copy or take an extract from the Register.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: The provision is part of a section about the Register.
premise text: sec-84-ss-4 is a subsection of sec-84.
conclusion text: sec-84-ss-4 is part of a section about the Register.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84(5) Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-84-ss-5
part of: 84 Register of nominated carrier declarations and carrier licences
note: Request for electronic form of information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.118
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-84-ss-5-norm

85 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85
note: Service providers must comply with service provider rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.119
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-85-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-85-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-85-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85 Simplified outline
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 Service providers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86
note: Definition of service provider
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.120
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Definition of terms
premise text: The definitions of carriage service provider and content service provider are provided in sections 87 and 97 respectively.
conclusion text: These definitions must be understood to apply the Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Temporal intervals
premise text: The definitions of carriage service provider and content service provider are applicable from the commencement of the Act.
conclusion text: This temporal interval is relevant to the application of the Act.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >
logic summary: Recurring trace
premise text: The definitions of carriage service provider and content service provider are applicable in a recurring manner.
conclusion text: This recurring trace is relevant to the application of the Act.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: >
logic summary: Spread of information
premise text: The definitions of carriage service provider and content service provider are applicable in a way that spreads information.
conclusion text: This diffusion is relevant to the application of the Act.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-86-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: >
logic summary: Artificial intelligence
premise text: The definitions of carriage service provider and content service provider are applicable in a way that involves artificial intelligence.
conclusion text: This CogAI application is relevant to the Act.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87 Carriage service providers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87
has part: 87(1) Carriage service providers
has part: 87(2) Carriage service providers
has part: 87(3) Carriage service providers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.121

87(1) Carriage service providers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-1
part of: 87 Carriage service providers
note: Must be a carriage service provider if supplying or proposing to supply a listed carriage service using a network unit owned by one or more carriers or in relation to which a nominated carrier declaration is in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.121
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to be a carriage service provider
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87(2) Carriage service providers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-2
part of: 87 Carriage service providers
note: Person supplying or proposing to supply a listed carriage service must be a carriage service provider.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.121
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Obligation on carriage service providers
premise text: Carriage service providers are required to meet the definition of a carriage service provider.
conclusion text: Carriage service providers must be able to supply or propose to supply a listed carriage service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87(3) Carriage service providers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-3
part of: 87 Carriage service providers
note: List of carriage service provisions that must be supplied by carriers or exempt network-users.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.121
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87(3) Carriage service providers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-87-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must supply carriage service
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88 Supply to the public
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88
has part: 88(1) Supply to the public
has part: 88(2) Supply to the public
has part: 88(3) Supply to the public
has part: 88(4) Supply to the public
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123

88(1) Supply to the public
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88-ss-1
part of: 88 Supply to the public
note: Circumstances for carriage service supply to the public
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(1) Supply to the public
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

88(2) Supply to the public
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88-ss-2
part of: 88 Supply to the public
note: Service supplied to public if conditions met
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(2) Supply to the public
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If conditions met, obligation to supply service
premise text: a carriage service is used for the carriage of communications between 2 end-users
conclusion text: the service is supplied to the public
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(3) Supply to the public
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88-ss-3
part of: 88 Supply to the public
note: Service supplied to public if end-user is outside supplier's circle.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(3) Supply to the public
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to supply service to public.
premise text: (a) a carriage service is used to supply point-to-multipoint services to end-users; and (b) at least one end-user is outside the immediate circle of the supplier of the service;
conclusion text: the service is supplied to the public.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Service point-to-multipoint services overlap with public services.
premise text: (3) If: (a) a carriage service is used to supply point-to-multipoint services to end-users; and (b) at least one end-user is outside the immediate circle of the supplier of the service;
conclusion text: the service is supplied to the public.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Service point-to-multipoint services are recurrently supplied to public.
premise text: (3) If: (a) a carriage service is used to supply point-to-multipoint services to end-users; and (b) at least one end-user is outside the immediate circle of the supplier of the service;
conclusion text: the service is supplied to the public.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Service point-to-multipoint services diffuse into public services.
premise text: (3) If: (a) a carriage service is used to supply point-to-multipoint services to end-users; and (b) at least one end-user is outside the immediate circle of the supplier of the service;
conclusion text: the service is supplied to the public.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Service point-to-multipoint services are classified as public by AI.
premise text: (3) If: (a) a carriage service is used to supply point-to-multipoint services to end-users; and (b) at least one end-user is outside the immediate circle of the supplier of the service;
conclusion text: the service is supplied to the public.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(4) Supply to the public
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88-ss-4
part of: 88 Supply to the public
note: Supply designated content services to end-users
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(4) Supply to the public
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-88-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must supply
premise text: (4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89 Exemption from definition—customers located on the same
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89
has part: 89(1) Exemption from definition—customers located on the same
has part: 89(2) Exemption from definition—customers located on the same
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124

89(1) Exemption from definition—customers located on the same
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-1
part of: 89 Exemption from definition—customers located on the same
note: Exemption from definition for customers located on the same premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(1) Exemption from definition—customers located on the same
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: the carriage service is exempt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for exemption
premise text: (c) all of the customers of the service are physically present on the premises
conclusion text: exemption applies during business hours
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Grants permission to exempt
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: the carriage service may be exempt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the supplier
premise text: (a) the supplier of a carriage service manages a business or other activity carried on at particular premises
conclusion text: the supplier must ensure exemption for these customers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

89(2) Exemption from definition—customers located on the same
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-2
part of: 89 Exemption from definition—customers located on the same
note: Defines premises for exemption from definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-89-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Identifies specific elements of the premise
premise text: (a) land; and (b) a group of buildings that is located in the same vicinity.
conclusion text: premises includes: land; and a group of buildings that is located in the same vicinity.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

90 Exemption from definition—defence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90
has part: 90(1) Exemption from definition—defence
has part: 90(2) Exemption from definition—defence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124

90(1) Exemption from definition—defence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90-ss-1
part of: 90 Exemption from definition—defence
note: Exemption from definition—defence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 90(1) Exemption from definition—defence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts defence organisations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90(2) Exemption from definition—defence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90-ss-2
part of: 90 Exemption from definition—defence
note: Definition of defence organisation Exemption from definition—defence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-7

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 90(2) Exemption from definition—defence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of defence organisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies the Defence Department and Australian Defence Force
premise text: (a) the Defence Department; or (b) the Australian Defence Force;
conclusion text: defence organisation means: ... (a) the Defence Department; or (b) the Australian Defence Force; ...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies an organisation of a foreign country
premise text: (c) an organisation of a foreign country, so far as the organisation: ...
conclusion text: defence organisation means: ... (c) an organisation of a foreign country, so far as the organisation: ...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies functions corresponding to functions of the Defence Department or Australian Defence Force
premise text: (i) has functions corresponding to functions of, or of a part of, the Defence Department or the Australian Defence Force;
conclusion text: defence organisation means: ... (i) has functions corresponding to functions of, or of a part of, the Defence Department or the Australian Defence Force; ...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies authorisation by the Commonwealth to operate or train in Australia or an external Territory
premise text: (ii) is authorised by the Commonwealth to operate or train in Australia or an external Territory;
conclusion text: defence organisation means: ... (ii) is authorised by the Commonwealth to operate or train in Australia or an external Territory; ...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies a part of such an organisation or body
premise text: (d) a part of such an organisation or body.
conclusion text: defence organisation means: ... (d) a part of such an organisation or body.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
logic summary: Exempts the service from the definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91 Exemption from definition—intelligence operations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91
note: Exempts certain intelligence services from definition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.125
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-91-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-91-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-91-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91 Exemption from definition—intelligence operations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-91-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Defines an exemption
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92 Exemption from definition—transport authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92
has part: 92(1) Exemption from definition—transport authorities
has part: 92(3) Exemption from definition—transport authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.125

92(1) Exemption from definition—transport authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92-ss-1
part of: 92 Exemption from definition—transport authorities
note: Exemption from definition—transport authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.125
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-92-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-92-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92(1) Exemption from definition—transport authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
logic summary: Exempts transport authorities from the definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92(3) Exemption from definition—transport authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92-ss-3
part of: 92 Exemption from definition—transport authorities
note: Exemption from definition for transport authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.125
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-92-ss-3-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-92-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 92(3) Exemption from definition—transport authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

93 Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93
has part: 93(1) Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
has part: 93(2) Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
has part: 93(2A) Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
has part: 93(3) Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126

93(1) Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93-ss-1
part of: 93 Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
note: Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-cogai-6

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
logic summary: Exempts certain communications from definition
premise text: (1) If:...
conclusion text: ...subsections 87(1) and (2) do not apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Applies to communications necessary or desirable for broadcasting services
premise text: (a) the sole or principal use of a carriage service is...
conclusion text: ...the supply of broadcasting services to the public;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Communications during broadcasting services are exempted
premise text: (i) the supply of broadcasting services to the public;
conclusion text: ...subsections 87(1) and (2) do not apply.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Exemption implies certain conditions are met
premise text: (a) the sole or principal use of a carriage service is...
conclusion text: ...subsections 87(1) and (2) do not apply.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses exemptions to related communications
premise text: (b) those communications are neither...
conclusion text: ...subsections 87(1) and (2) do not apply.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes exemptions in broadcasting services
premise text: (i) the supply of broadcasting services to the public;
conclusion text: ...subsections 87(1) and (2) do not apply.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

93(2) Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93-ss-2
part of: 93 Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
note: Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-2-norm

93(2A) Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93-ss-2a
part of: 93 Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
note: Disregard subsection 212(3) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-2a-norm

93(3) Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93-ss-3
part of: 93 Exemption from definition—broadcasting services
note: Definition of broadcasting transmitter and head end of a cable transmission system
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-93-ss-3-norm

94 Exemption from definition—electricity supply bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94
has part: 94(1) Exemption from definition—electricity supply bodies
has part: 94(2) Exemption from definition—electricity supply bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.127

94(1) Exemption from definition—electricity supply bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94-ss-1
part of: 94 Exemption from definition—electricity supply bodies
note: Exemption from definition—electricity supply bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.127
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-94-ss-1-norm

94(2) Exemption from definition—electricity supply bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94-ss-2
part of: 94 Exemption from definition—electricity supply bodies
note: Definition of electricity supply body
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.127
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-94-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-94-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-94-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-94-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Electricity supply body is an authority or a body corporate
conclusion text: Electricity supply body is a class of entities
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-94-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Subclass relationship
premise text: Electricity supply body is a business or function
conclusion text: Electricity supply body is a subclass of authority or body corporate
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95 Exemption from definition—Ministerial determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95
note: Minister may determine exemption from definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.127
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-95-norm

96 Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96
has part: 96(1) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
has part: 96(2) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
has part: 96(3) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
has part: 96(5) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128

96(1) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96-ss-1
part of: 96 Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
note: Minister may exempt a person from certain regulatory provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-96-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-96-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96(1) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

96(2) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96-ss-2
part of: 96 Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
note: Determination under this section may be unconditional or subject to conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-96-ss-2-norm

96(3) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96-ss-3
part of: 96 Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
note: Effect of determination under this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-96-ss-3-norm

96(5) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96-ss-5
part of: 96 Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
note: Exempts certain regulatory provisions from the Ministerial
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-96-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-96-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-96-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96(5) Exemption from certain regulatory provisions—Ministerial
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-96-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Defines exemption for regulatory provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

97 Content service providers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-97
has part: 97(1) Content service providers
has part: 97(2) Content service providers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.129

97(1) Content service providers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-97-ss-1
part of: 97 Content service providers
note: Defines content service provider
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.129
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 97(1) Content service providers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies a content service provider
premise text: The person uses, or proposes to use, a listed carriage service
conclusion text: The person is a content service provider
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship of using a carriage service
premise text: A person uses, or proposes to use, a listed carriage service
conclusion text: The person is a content service provider during this time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Establishes the implication between using a carriage service and being a content service provider
premise text: A person uses, or proposes to use, a listed carriage service
conclusion text: The person is a content service provider
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
logic summary: Describes the diffusion of information about being a content service provider
premise text: A person uses, or proposes to use, a listed carriage service
conclusion text: The person is a content service provider
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
logic summary: Describes the cognitive implications of being a content service provider
premise text: A person uses, or proposes to use, a listed carriage service
conclusion text: The person is a content service provider
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

97(2) Content service providers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-97-ss-2
part of: 97 Content service providers
note: Content service providers must supply content to end-users outside their immediate circle.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.129
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 97(2) Content service providers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-97-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98 Service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-98
has part: 98(1) Service provider rules
has part: 98(2) Service provider rules
has part: 98(3) Service provider rules
has part: 98(4) Service provider rules
has part: 98(5) Service provider rules
has part: 98(6) Service provider rules
has part: 98(7) Service provider rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.130

98(1) Service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-98-ss-1
part of: 98 Service provider rules
note: Service provider rules are defined in Schedule 2 and service provider determinations under section 99.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.130
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98(1) Service provider rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defined
logic summary: Service provider rules are defined
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98(2) Service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-98-ss-2
part of: 98 Service provider rules
note: Service provider must comply with standard access obligations.
description: Compliance with standard access obligations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.130
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98(2) Service provider rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98(3) Service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-98-ss-3
part of: 98 Service provider rules
note: Service provider must comply with access determinations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.130
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98(3) Service provider rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98(4) Service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-98-ss-4
part of: 98 Service provider rules
note: Service provider must comply with binding rules of conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.130
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98(4) Service provider rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98(5) Service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-98-ss-5
part of: 98 Service provider rules
note: Reference to another rule as a service provider rule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.130
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-5-norm

98(6) Service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-98-ss-6
part of: 98 Service provider rules
note: References an external rule as a service provider rule.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.130
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
logic summary: References an external rule.
premise text: External rule mentioned in subsection 152CJD(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
conclusion text: Service provider rule for the purposes of this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98(7) Service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-98-ss-7
part of: 98 Service provider rules
note: Service provider rule for NBN corporations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.130
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98(7) Service provider rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes service provider rules from the National Broadband Network Companies Act 2011
premise text: Subsection 38(2) of the National Broadband Network Companies Act 2011 deals with rules about...
conclusion text: This rule is a service provider rule for the purposes of this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Applies to rules about supply, investment, and divestment during NBN corporation operations
premise text: The rule set out in subsection 38(2) of the National Broadband Network Companies Act 2011 deals with rules about...
conclusion text: This rule applies to rules about supply, investment, and divestment during NBN corporation operations.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Applies to all NBN corporations
premise text: The rule set out in subsection 38(2) of the National Broadband Network Companies Act 2011 deals with rules about...
conclusion text: This rule applies to all NBN corporations.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: throughout
logic summary: Applies to all NBN corporation assets and operations
premise text: The rule set out in subsection 38(2) of the National Broadband Network Companies Act 2011 deals with rules about...
conclusion text: This rule applies to all NBN corporation assets and operations.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-98-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: for
logic summary: Describes a specific type of service provider rule
premise text: The rule set out in subsection 38(2) of the National Broadband Network Companies Act 2011 deals with rules about...
conclusion text: This rule is a specific type of service provider rule.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

99 Service provider determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-99
has part: 99(1) Service provider determinations
has part: 99(1A) Service provider determinations
has part: 99(2) Service provider determinations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.131

99(1) Service provider determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-99-ss-1
part of: 99 Service provider determinations
note: Service provider determination obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.131
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide service provider determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99(1A) Service provider determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-99-ss-1a
part of: 99 Service provider determinations
note: Minister may make service provider determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.131
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to make a determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99(2) Service provider determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-99-ss-2
part of: 99 Service provider determinations
note: Service provider determination has effect only to the extent that it is authorised by specified provisions of the Constitution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.131
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 99(2) Service provider determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: only if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Authorisation by specified provisions of the Constitution
conclusion text: Service provider determination has effect only to that extent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-99-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval for service provider determinations
premise text: Authorisation by specified provisions of the Constitution
conclusion text: Service provider determination has effect only between those times
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100 Exemptions from service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100
has part: 100(1) Exemptions from service provider rules
has part: 100(2) Exemptions from service provider rules
has part: 100(3) Exemptions from service provider rules
has part: 100(4) Exemptions from service provider rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132

100(1) Exemptions from service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100-ss-1
part of: 100 Exemptions from service provider rules
note: The Minister may determine exemptions from service provider rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-100-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-100-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(1) Exemptions from service provider rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

100(2) Exemptions from service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100-ss-2
part of: 100 Exemptions from service provider rules
note: Exemptions from service provider rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-100-ss-2-norm

100(3) Exemptions from service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100-ss-3
part of: 100 Exemptions from service provider rules
note: Determination may be unconditional or subject to conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-100-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(4) Exemptions from service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100-ss-4
part of: 100 Exemptions from service provider rules
note: Determination under this section has effect accordingly.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-100-ss-4-norm

101 Service providers must comply with service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-101
has part: 101(1) Service providers must comply with service provider rules
has part: 101(2) Service providers must comply with service provider rules
has part: 101(3) Service providers must comply with service provider rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132

101(1) Service providers must comply with service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-101-ss-1
part of: 101 Service providers must comply with service provider rules
note: Service providers must comply with service provider rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 101(1) Service providers must comply with service provider rules
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101(2) Service providers must comply with service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-101-ss-2
part of: 101 Service providers must comply with service provider rules
note: Prohibits aiding, abetting, counseling, or procuring a contravention of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 101(2) Service providers must comply with service provider rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits an action
premise text: (2) A person must not:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101(3) Service providers must comply with service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-101-ss-3
part of: 101 Service providers must comply with service provider rules
note: Service providers must comply with service provider rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 101(3) Service providers must comply with service provider rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-101-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102 Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-102
has part: 102(1) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
has part: 102(2) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
has part: 102(3) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
has part: 102(4) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.133

102(1) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-102-ss-1
part of: 102 Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
note: Service provider must comply with rules if contravening them.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.133
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(1) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Service provider has a duty to comply with rules.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(2) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-102-ss-2
part of: 102 Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
note: Written direction requiring provider to take specified action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.133
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Mandatory obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(3) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-102-ss-3
part of: 102 Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
note: Service provider must implement administrative systems and employee training.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.133
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(3) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to implement systems
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(4) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-102-ss-4
part of: 102 Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
note: Service provider must not contravene a direction under subsection (2).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.133
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(4) Remedial directions—breach of service provider rules
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-102-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening a direction.
premise text: (4) A service provider must not contravene a direction under subsection (2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103 Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103
has part: 103(1) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
has part: 103(1A) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
has part: 103(2) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
has part: 103(3) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
has part: 103(3A) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.135

103(1) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103-ss-1
part of: 103 Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
note: ACMA may issue a formal warning for breaching service provider rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.135
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 103(1) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: ACMA has an obligation to issue formal warnings for breaching service provider rules.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103(1A) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103-ss-1a
part of: 103 Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
note: Exempts certain sections from breach of service provider rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.135
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-1a-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 103(1A) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

103(2) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103-ss-2
part of: 103 Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
note: Exempts a rule from subsection (1) in relation to section 369.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.135
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 103(2) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

103(3) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103-ss-3
part of: 103 Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
note: Exempts a carriage service provider from certain obligations under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.135
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 103(3) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Provides an exemption from certain obligations.
premise text: Subsection 152BA(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
conclusion text: The rule set out in subsection 152BA(2) does not apply to this provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: The exemption applies to a specific temporal interval (the effective date of the rule set out in subsection 152BA(2)).
premise text: Subsection 152BA(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 provides that a carriage service provider must comply with any standard access obligations that are applicable to the provider.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalRecurringTrace
logic summary: The exemption is recurring and applies to all carriage service providers within the specified temporal interval.
premise text: Subsection 152BA(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 provides that a carriage service provider must comply with any standard access obligations that are applicable to the provider.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: InformationSpread
logic summary: The exemption is intended to diffuse knowledge of the specific rule set out in subsection 152BA(2) among carriage service providers.
premise text: Subsection 152BA(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 provides that a carriage service provider must comply with any standard access obligations that are applicable to the provider.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: KnowledgeRepresentation
logic summary: The exemption is represented as a knowledge representation within the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
premise text: Subsection 152BA(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 provides that a carriage service provider must comply with any standard access obligations that are applicable to the provider.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103(3A) Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103-ss-3a
part of: 103 Formal warnings—breach of service provider rules
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for certain rule set
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.135
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-103-ss-3a-norm

104 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-104
note: Monitor and report on matters relating to carrier performance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.138
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-104-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-104-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-104-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to monitor and report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105 Monitoring of performance—annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105
has part: 105(5A) Monitoring of performance—annual report
has part: 105(5B) Monitoring of performance—annual report
has part: 105(6) Monitoring of performance—annual report
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.138

105(5A) Monitoring of performance—annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105-ss-5a
part of: 105 Monitoring of performance—annual report
note: Annual report on monitoring of performance and compliance costs
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.138
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-5a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105(5B) Monitoring of performance—annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105-ss-5b
part of: 105 Monitoring of performance—annual report
note: Exempts Part 14 from certain amendments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.138
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-5b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-5b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-5b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 105(5B) Monitoring of performance—annual report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-5b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
logic summary: Specifies the type of obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105(6) Monitoring of performance—annual report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105-ss-6
part of: 105 Monitoring of performance—annual report
note: Publish annual report on website within 6 months after financial year end.
description: Annual report
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.138
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish annual report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105A Monitoring of performance—additional report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105a
has part: 105A(1) Monitoring of performance—additional report
has part: 105A(2) Monitoring of performance—additional report
has part: 105A(3) Monitoring of performance—additional report
has part: 105A(4) Monitoring of performance—additional report
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139

105A(1) Monitoring of performance—additional report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105a-ss-1
part of: 105A Monitoring of performance—additional report
note: The ACMA must monitor and report on specified matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 105A(1) Monitoring of performance—additional report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to monitor and report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105A(2) Monitoring of performance—additional report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105a-ss-2
part of: 105A Monitoring of performance—additional report
note: Report must be given to Minister within specified time or period
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105A(3) Monitoring of performance—additional report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105a-ss-3
part of: 105A Monitoring of performance—additional report
note: Report must be in a specified form.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 105A(3) Monitoring of performance—additional report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report in specified form.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105A(4) Monitoring of performance—additional report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105a-ss-4
part of: 105A Monitoring of performance—additional report
note: Comply with any requirement regarding report publication
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105C Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105c
has part: 105C(1) Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
has part: 105C(2) Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
has part: 105C(3) Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139

105C(1) Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105c-ss-1
part of: 105C Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
note: The ACCC must monitor and report breaches by a designated Telstra successor company.
description: Reports to the Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 105C(1) Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to monitor and report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105C(2) Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105c-ss-2
part of: 105C Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
note: Must provide report to Minister after end of financial year
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: AT THE END OF
logic summary: Temporal relation to end of financial year
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

105C(3) Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105c-ss-3
part of: 105C Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
note: Minister must table a report in each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 105C(3) Monitoring of breaches by a designated Telstra successor
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-105c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must perform the action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106
note: Industry codes may be registered by ACMA.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.140
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-106-norm

107 Industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107
note: Definition of industry code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.141
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-107-norm

108 Industry standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-108
note: Definition of industry standard
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.141
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108-norm

108A Electronic messaging service provider
type: Concept
realized by: sec-108a
has part: 108A(1) Electronic messaging service provider
has part: 108A(2) Electronic messaging service provider
has part: 108A(3) Electronic messaging service provider
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.141

108A(1) Electronic messaging service provider
type: Concept
realized by: sec-108a-ss-1
part of: 108A Electronic messaging service provider
note: Definition of electronic messaging service provider
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.141
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 108A(1) Electronic messaging service provider
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of a term
conclusion text: The person is an electronic messaging service provider.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108A(2) Electronic messaging service provider
type: Concept
realized by: sec-108a-ss-2
part of: 108A Electronic messaging service provider
note: Service must be supplied to public if at least one end-user is outside the supplier's circle.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.141
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 108A(2) Electronic messaging service provider
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Service is supplied to public if at least one end-user is outside the supplier's circle.
conclusion text: Supplier has an obligation to supply service to public.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: outside
logic summary: Temporal interval for service provision
premise text: Service is supplied to public if at least one end-user is outside the supplier's circle.
conclusion text: Supplier must supply service within a certain temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: and
logic summary: Temporal logic for service provision
premise text: Service is supplied to public if at least one end-user is outside the supplier's circle.
conclusion text: Supplier must supply service within a certain temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Diffusion of service provision
premise text: Service is supplied to public if at least one end-user is outside the supplier's circle.
conclusion text: Supplier must supply service to all end-users within a certain temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if
logic summary: Artificial intelligence for service provision
premise text: Service is supplied to public if at least one end-user is outside the supplier's circle.
conclusion text: Supplier must use artificial intelligence to supply service to public.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108A(3) Electronic messaging service provider
type: Concept
realized by: sec-108a-ss-3
part of: 108A Electronic messaging service provider
note: Definition of electronic messaging service provider
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.141
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-3-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 108A(3) Electronic messaging service provider
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

108B Telecommunications industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-108b
note: Defines telecommunications industry for purposes of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.142
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108b-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108b-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 108B Telecommunications industry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108b-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Class hierarchy application
premise text: Industry
conclusion text: Telecommunications industry
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-108b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Obligation to define industry
premise text: This Part
conclusion text: Telecommunications industry definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

109 Telecommunications activity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-109
note: Defines telecommunications activity for regulatory purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.142
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 109 Telecommunications activity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

109B Telemarketing activity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-109b
has part: 109B(1) Telemarketing activity
has part: 109B(2) Telemarketing activity
has part: 109B(3) Telemarketing activity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.142

109B(1) Telemarketing activity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-109b-ss-1
part of: 109B Telemarketing activity
note: Definition of telemarketing activity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.142
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 109B(1) Telemarketing activity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: Telemarketing activity is defined as an activity to which subsection (2), (3) or (4) applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

109B(2) Telemarketing activity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-109b-ss-2
part of: 109B Telemarketing activity
note: Telemarketing activities that do not meet the specified criteria are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.142
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of telemarketing activities
premise text: (2) This subsection applies to an activity that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

109B(3) Telemarketing activity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-109b-ss-3
part of: 109B Telemarketing activity
note: Telemarketing activity is prohibited if it involves marketing, advertising, or promoting goods or services without the supplier's consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.142
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of telemarketing activity
premise text: Telemarketing calls are used to market, advertise, or promote goods or services.
conclusion text: The activity is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of telemarketing activity with temporal interval
premise text: Telemarketing calls are used to market, advertise, or promote goods or services.
conclusion text: The activity is prohibited within the specified time frame.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of telemarketing activity with descriptive clause
premise text: Telemarketing calls are used to market, advertise, or promote goods or services.
conclusion text: The activity is prohibited if it involves marketing, advertising, or promoting goods or services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of telemarketing activity with relation to land or interests in land
premise text: Telemarketing calls are used to market, advertise, or promote land or interests in land.
conclusion text: The activity is prohibited if it involves marketing, advertising, or promoting land or interests in land.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109b-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of telemarketing activity with relation to supplier or prospective supplier
premise text: Telemarketing calls are used to advertise or promote a supplier or prospective supplier of goods or services.
conclusion text: The activity is prohibited if it involves advertising or promoting a supplier or prospective supplier of goods or services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

109C Fax marketing activity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-109c
has part: 109C(1) Fax marketing activity
has part: 109C(2) Fax marketing activity
has part: 109C(3) Fax marketing activity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.144

109C(1) Fax marketing activity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-109c-ss-1
part of: 109C Fax marketing activity
note: Definition of fax marketing activity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.144
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109c-ss-1-norm

109C(2) Fax marketing activity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-109c-ss-2
part of: 109C Fax marketing activity
note: Prohibits certain marketing activities using fax marketing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.144
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits the specified activities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

109C(3) Fax marketing activity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-109c-ss-3
part of: 109C Fax marketing activity
note: Prohibition on fax marketing activity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.144
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109c-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-109c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits fax marketing activity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110 Sections of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110
has part: 110(1) Sections of the telecommunications industry
has part: 110(2) Sections of the telecommunications industry
has part: 110(3) Sections of the telecommunications industry
has part: 110(4) Sections of the telecommunications industry
has part: 110(5) Sections of the telecommunications industry
has part: 110(6) Sections of the telecommunications industry
has part: 110(7) Sections of the telecommunications industry
has part: 110(8) Sections of the telecommunications industry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.146

110(1) Sections of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-1
part of: 110 Sections of the telecommunications industry
note: Definition of telecommunications industry sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-1-norm

110(2) Sections of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-2
part of: 110 Sections of the telecommunications industry
note: Defines sections of the telecommunications industry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-2-norm

110(3) Sections of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-3
part of: 110 Sections of the telecommunications industry
note: ACMA may determine telecommunications activity sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-3-norm

110(4) Sections of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-4
part of: 110 Sections of the telecommunications industry
note: Unique name and/or number must be assigned to a section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(4) Sections of the telecommunications industry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide unique name and/or number
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110(5) Sections of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-5
part of: 110 Sections of the telecommunications industry
note: A determination under subsection (3) has effect accordingly.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(5) Sections of the telecommunications industry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
premise text: (5) A determination under subsection (3) has effect accordingly.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110(6) Sections of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-6
part of: 110 Sections of the telecommunications industry
note: Telecommunications industry sections can be aggregated or subsetted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-6-norm

110(7) Sections of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-7
part of: 110 Sections of the telecommunications industry
note: Does not limit subsection (3) by implication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (7)
conclusion text: (6)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

110(8) Sections of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-8
part of: 110 Sections of the telecommunications industry
note: Publish determination in Gazette
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(8) Sections of the telecommunications industry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish
premise text: State obligation to publish
conclusion text: Determination must be published in Gazette
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110B Sections of the telemarketing industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110b
has part: 110B(1) Sections of the telemarketing industry
has part: 110B(2) Sections of the telemarketing industry
has part: 110B(3) Sections of the telemarketing industry
has part: 110B(4) Sections of the telemarketing industry
has part: 110B(5) Sections of the telemarketing industry
has part: 110B(6) Sections of the telemarketing industry
has part: 110B(7) Sections of the telemarketing industry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148

110B(1) Sections of the telemarketing industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110b-ss-1
part of: 110B Sections of the telemarketing industry
note: Definition of sections in the telemarketing industry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-1-norm

110B(2) Sections of the telemarketing industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110b-ss-2
part of: 110B Sections of the telemarketing industry
note: All persons carrying on telemarketing activities constitute a single section of the telemarketing industry.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110B(2) Sections of the telemarketing industry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of a single section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110B(3) Sections of the telemarketing industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110b-ss-3
part of: 110B Sections of the telemarketing industry
note: Determine specified telemarketing activities as a section of the industry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Determine specified telemarketing activities as a section of the industry
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110B(4) Sections of the telemarketing industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110b-ss-4
part of: 110B Sections of the telemarketing industry
note: Unique name and/or number must be identified in the determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110B(4) Sections of the telemarketing industry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must identify unique name and/or number.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110B(5) Sections of the telemarketing industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110b-ss-5
part of: 110B Sections of the telemarketing industry
note: A determination under subsection (3) has effect accordingly.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110B(5) Sections of the telemarketing industry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: Implication of a determination
premise text: (5) A determination under subsection (3)
conclusion text: has effect accordingly.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between a determination and its effect
premise text: (5) A determination under subsection (3)
conclusion text: has effect accordingly.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110B(6) Sections of the telemarketing industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110b-ss-6
part of: 110B Sections of the telemarketing industry
note: Sections of the telemarketing industry need not be mutually exclusive.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-6-norm

110B(7) Sections of the telemarketing industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110b-ss-7
part of: 110B Sections of the telemarketing industry
note: No implication that subsection (3) is limited by subsection (6).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110b-ss-7-norm

110C Sections of the fax marketing industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110c
has part: 110C(1) Sections of the fax marketing industry
has part: 110C(2) Sections of the fax marketing industry
has part: 110C(3) Sections of the fax marketing industry
has part: 110C(4) Sections of the fax marketing industry
has part: 110C(5) Sections of the fax marketing industry
has part: 110C(6) Sections of the fax marketing industry
has part: 110C(7) Sections of the fax marketing industry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148

110C(1) Sections of the fax marketing industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110c-ss-1
part of: 110C Sections of the fax marketing industry
note: Definition of sections in the fax marketing industry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-1-norm

110C(2) Sections of the fax marketing industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110c-ss-2
part of: 110C Sections of the fax marketing industry
note: All persons carrying on fax marketing activities must be considered part of the single section for the purposes of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110C(2) Sections of the fax marketing industry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classification obligation
premise text: The text classifies fax marketing activities as part of the single section.
conclusion text: There is an obligation to classify fax marketing activities correctly.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal relation between sections
premise text: The text does not specify a temporal relation between the classification of fax marketing activities and other sections.
conclusion text: There is no specified temporal relation between the classification of fax marketing activities and other sections.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Recurring trace for classification
premise text: The text does not specify a recurring trace for the classification of fax marketing activities.
conclusion text: There is no specified recurring trace for the classification of fax marketing activities.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: No diffusion of responsibility
premise text: The text does not specify a diffusion of responsibility for the classification of fax marketing activities.
conclusion text: There is no specified diffusion of responsibility for the classification of fax marketing activities.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: No cognitive AI application
premise text: The text does not specify a cognitive AI application for the classification of fax marketing activities.
conclusion text: There is no specified cognitive AI application for the classification of fax marketing activities.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

110C(3) Sections of the fax marketing industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110c-ss-3
part of: 110C Sections of the fax marketing industry
note: Determine specified fax marketing activities as a section of the industry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Duty to determine
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110C(4) Sections of the fax marketing industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110c-ss-4
part of: 110C Sections of the fax marketing industry
note: Unique name and/or number must be assigned to a section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110C(4) Sections of the fax marketing industry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide unique name and/or number
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110C(5) Sections of the fax marketing industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110c-ss-5
part of: 110C Sections of the fax marketing industry
note: A determination under subsection (3) has effect accordingly.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110C(5) Sections of the fax marketing industry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Holds
logic summary: The obligation holds.
premise text: (5) A determination under subsection (3) has effect accordingly.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110C(6) Sections of the fax marketing industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110c-ss-6
part of: 110C Sections of the fax marketing industry
note: Definitions of fax marketing industry sections are not mutually exclusive.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-6-norm

110C(7) Sections of the fax marketing industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110c-ss-7
part of: 110C Sections of the fax marketing industry
note: Does not limit subsection (3) by implication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-110c-ss-7-norm

111 Participants in a section of the telecommunications industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111
note: A person is a participant in a section of the telecommunications industry if they are a member of that group.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.149
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 111 Participants in a section of the telecommunications industry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Membership is a necessary condition for participation.
premise text: Person A is a member of group X.
conclusion text: Person A is a participant in section Y.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

111AA Participants in a section of the telemarketing industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111aa
note: A person is a participant in a section of the telemarketing industry if they are a member of that group.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.149
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111aa-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111aa-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111aa-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111aa-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 111AA Participants in a section of the telemarketing industry
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of participant
premise text: Person is a member of the group
conclusion text: Person is a participant in the section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111aa-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between membership and participation
premise text: Person is a member of the group at some point
conclusion text: Person participates in the section during that time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111AB Participants in a section of the fax marketing industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111ab
note: A person is a participant in a section of the fax marketing industry if they are a member of that group.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111ab-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111ab-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111ab-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 111AB Participants in a section of the fax marketing industry
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111ab-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of participant
premise text: Person is a member of the group
conclusion text: Person is a participant in the section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111B Unsolicited commercial electronic messages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111b
has part: 111B(1) Unsolicited commercial electronic messages
has part: 111B(2) Unsolicited commercial electronic messages
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150

111B(1) Unsolicited commercial electronic messages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111b-ss-1
part of: 111B Unsolicited commercial electronic messages
note: Sending unsolicited commercial electronic messages without consent is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 111B(1) Unsolicited commercial electronic messages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits sending unsolicited commercial electronic messages.
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, an unsolicited commercial electronic message is a commercial electronic message that is sent:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for sending messages.
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, an unsolicited commercial electronic message is a commercial electronic message that is sent:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Defines temporal trace for sending messages.
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, an unsolicited commercial electronic message is a commercial electronic message that is sent:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Describes spread of messages.
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, an unsolicited commercial electronic message is a commercial electronic message that is sent:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Describes recognition of messages.
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, an unsolicited commercial electronic message is a commercial electronic message that is sent:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

111B(2) Unsolicited commercial electronic messages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111b-ss-2
part of: 111B Unsolicited commercial electronic messages
note: Definition of expression used in this section and the Spam Act 2003
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-111b-ss-2-norm

112 Statement of regulatory policy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-112
has part: 112(1) Statement of regulatory policy
has part: 112(1B) Statement of regulatory policy
has part: 112(1C) Statement of regulatory policy
has part: 112(2) Statement of regulatory policy
has part: 112(3) Statement of regulatory policy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.151

112(1) Statement of regulatory policy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-112-ss-1
part of: 112 Statement of regulatory policy
note: Parliament intends that industry bodies develop codes for the telecommunications industry.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.151
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 112(1) Statement of regulatory policy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: intend
logic summary: Expresses intention to act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112(1B) Statement of regulatory policy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-112-ss-1b
part of: 112 Statement of regulatory policy
note: Bodies or associations must develop industry codes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.151
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 112(1B) Statement of regulatory policy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide industry codes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112(1C) Statement of regulatory policy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-112-ss-1c
part of: 112 Statement of regulatory policy
note: Bodies or associations must develop industry codes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.151
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 112(1C) Statement of regulatory policy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide industry codes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112(2) Statement of regulatory policy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-112-ss-2
part of: 112 Statement of regulatory policy
note: ACMA must act in a manner that addresses public interest considerations without imposing undue burdens on industry participants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.151
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to act in a manner that addresses public interest considerations.
premise text: ACMA has powers under sections 117-125B.
conclusion text: ACMA must act in a way that enables public interest considerations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112(3) Statement of regulatory policy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-112-ss-3
part of: 112 Statement of regulatory policy
note: ACMA must consider public interest when determining burdens on telecommunications industry participants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.151
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 112(3) Statement of regulatory policy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: ACMA has an obligation to consider public interest.
premise text: (3) In determining whether public interest considerations are being addressed...
conclusion text: ...the ACMA must have regard to...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: ACMA's consideration of public interest overlaps with the code or standard concerned.
premise text: (3) In determining whether public interest considerations are being addressed...
conclusion text: ...the ACMA must have regard to...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: ACMA's consideration of public interest implies a duty to consider the benefits of the code or standard.
premise text: (3) In determining whether public interest considerations are being addressed...
conclusion text: ...the ACMA must have regard to...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: ACMA's consideration of public interest diffuses the burden on telecommunications industry participants.
premise text: (3) In determining whether public interest considerations are being addressed...
conclusion text: ...the ACMA must have regard to...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-112-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: ACMA's consideration of public interest is an inference from the code or standard concerned.
premise text: (3) In determining whether public interest considerations are being addressed...
conclusion text: ...the ACMA must have regard to...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

113 Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-113
has part: 113(1) Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
has part: 113(2) Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
has part: 113(3) Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.153

113(1) Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-113-ss-1
part of: 113 Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
note: Industry codes and standards may deal with certain matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.153
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-113-ss-1-norm

113(2) Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-113-ss-2
part of: 113 Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
note: Dependence on industry section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.153
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-113-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-113-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 113(2) Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

113(3) Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-113-ss-3
part of: 113 Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
note: Industry codes must provide customers with certain information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.153
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-113-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-113-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-113-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 113(3) Examples of matters that may be dealt with by industry codes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-113-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

114 Industry codes and industry standards may confer powers on
type: Concept
realized by: sec-114
has part: 114(1) Industry codes and industry standards may confer powers on
has part: 114(2) Industry codes and industry standards may confer powers on
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156

114(1) Industry codes and industry standards may confer powers on
type: Concept
realized by: sec-114-ss-1
part of: 114 Industry codes and industry standards may confer powers on
note: Granting functions and powers to the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman with consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Grants permission to the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.
premise text: (1) If the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman consents, an industry code or industry standard may confer functions and powers on the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: The consent of the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman is a necessary condition for the industry code or standard to confer powers.
premise text: (1) If the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman consents, an industry code or industry standard may confer functions and powers on the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The consent of the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman is a necessary condition for the industry code or standard to confer powers until it is revoked.
premise text: (1) If the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman consents, an industry code or industry standard may confer functions and powers on the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorizes
logic summary: Authorizes the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman to act with the consent of an industry code or standard.
premise text: (1) If the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman consents, an industry code or industry standard may confer functions and powers on the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
logic summary: The consent of the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman is a necessary condition for the industry code or standard to confer powers through it.
premise text: (1) If the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman consents, an industry code or industry standard may confer functions and powers on the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

114(2) Industry codes and industry standards may confer powers on
type: Concept
realized by: sec-114-ss-2
part of: 114 Industry codes and industry standards may confer powers on
note: Continuity of consent not affected by changes in Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman position.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 114(2) Industry codes and industry standards may confer powers on
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-114-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continuity
logic summary: Continuity of consent
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

115 Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-115
has part: 115(1) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
has part: 115(2) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
has part: 115(3) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
has part: 115(4) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
has part: 115(5) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156

115(1) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-115-ss-1
part of: 115 Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
note: Industry codes and industry standards do not require particular design features or performance requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Exempts from requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

115(2) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-115-ss-2
part of: 115 Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
note: Exemptions from industry code or standard compliance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Indicates exemptions from compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

115(3) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-115-ss-3
part of: 115 Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
note: Exemption from industry code/standard application for certain matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Exemption from industry code/standard application for certain matters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

115(4) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-115-ss-4
part of: 115 Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
note: Exemption from industry code restrictions for certain Division 2AA of Part V of the Copyright Act 1968 codes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Industry code restrictions do not apply to certain exemptions
premise text: The rule in subsection (1) does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

115(5) Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-115-ss-5
part of: 115 Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with certain
note: Exemptions for optical fibre lines and facilities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-115-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Prohibits requiring optical fibre lines or facilities
premise text: Compliance with industry code or standard
conclusion text: Permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116 Industry codes and industry standards not to deal with matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-116
note: Industry codes and industry standards do not deal with matters related to content services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.158
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-116-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-116-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-116-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with matters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116A Industry codes and standards do not affect Privacy Act 1988
type: Concept
realized by: sec-116a
note: Industry codes and standards do not affect Privacy Act 1988
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.158
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-116a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-116a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-116a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 116A Industry codes and standards do not affect Privacy Act 1988
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-116a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Industry codes and standards do not affect Privacy Act 1988
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117 Registration of industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-117
note: Body or association must develop and submit industry code to ACMA for review.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.159
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-117-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-117-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-117-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 117 Registration of industry codes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-117-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must develop and submit industry code.
premise text: The body or association represents a particular section of the industry.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118 ACMA may request codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-118
note: Request for codes from industry bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.161
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-118-norm

119 Publication of notice where no body or association represents a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119
has part: 119(1) Publication of notice where no body or association represents a
has part: 119(2) Publication of notice where no body or association represents a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164

119(1) Publication of notice where no body or association represents a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119-ss-1
part of: 119 Publication of notice where no body or association represents a
note: Publish notice if industry not represented by a body or association
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119(2) Publication of notice where no body or association represents a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119-ss-2
part of: 119 Publication of notice where no body or association represents a
note: The period specified in a notice must run for at least 60 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 119(2) Publication of notice where no body or association represents a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a specified period
premise text: (2) The period specified in a notice under subsection (1) must run for at least 60 days.
conclusion text: The period specified in a notice must run for at least 60 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the period and 60 days
premise text: (2) The period specified in a notice under subsection (1) must run for at least 60 days.
conclusion text: The period specified in a notice meets the temporal interval of 60 days.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the period and 60 days
premise text: (2) The period specified in a notice under subsection (1) must run for at least 60 days.
conclusion text: The period specified in a notice meets the temporal interval of 60 days.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: APPLIES_TO
logic summary: Applicability to notices under subsection (1)
premise text: (2) The period specified in a notice under subsection (1) must run for at least 60 days.
conclusion text: The diffusion of the obligation applies to notices under subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: APPLIES_TO
logic summary: Applicability to notices under subsection (1)
premise text: (2) The period specified in a notice under subsection (1) must run for at least 60 days.
conclusion text: The CogAI applies to notices under subsection (1).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119A Variation of industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119a
note: ACMA must be satisfied that certain conditions are met before giving draft variation to ACMA.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-alleninterval-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 119A Variation of industry codes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACMA must satisfy conditions before giving draft variation.
premise text: The body or association gave consideration to any submissions that were received from participants in that section of the industry within that period.
conclusion text: ACMA MUST be satisfied that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACMA must comply with publication requirements for submissions.
premise text: The body or association gave consideration to any submissions that were received from participants in that section of the industry within that period.
conclusion text: ACMA MUST comply with...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACMA must be satisfied that draft variation provides appropriate community safeguards.
premise text: The code (as proposed to be varied) deals with the matters covered by the code (as proposed to be varied) in an appropriate manner.
conclusion text: ACMA MUST be satisfied that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACMA must be satisfied that draft variation deals with matters of substantial relevance to the community.
premise text: The code (as proposed to be varied) provides appropriate community safeguards for the matters covered by the code (as proposed to be varied).
conclusion text: ACMA MUST be satisfied that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119a-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Draft variation must be published on website and invited public to make submissions within a specified period.
premise text: The body or association gave consideration to any submissions that were received from participants in that section of the industry within that period.
conclusion text: Draft variation >= Published on website and invited public to make submissions within a specified period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.7000
curation status: Proposed

119B Publication requirements for submissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119b
has part: 119B(1) Publication requirements for submissions
has part: 119B(2) Publication requirements for submissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.167

119B(1) Publication requirements for submissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119b-ss-1
part of: 119B Publication requirements for submissions
note: Publication requirements for submissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.167
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119b-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 119B(1) Publication requirements for submissions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

119B(2) Publication requirements for submissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119b-ss-2
part of: 119B Publication requirements for submissions
note: Must publish submissions on its website.
description: Submissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.167
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 119B(2) Publication requirements for submissions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-119b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120 Replacement of industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-120
note: Changes to an industry code may be achieved by replacing the code instead of varying it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-120-norm

121 Directions about compliance with industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-121
has part: 121(1) Directions about compliance with industry codes
has part: 121(1A) Directions about compliance with industry codes
has part: 121(1B) Directions about compliance with industry codes
has part: 121(2) Directions about compliance with industry codes
has part: 121(3) Directions about compliance with industry codes
has part: 121(4) Directions about compliance with industry codes
has part: 121(5) Directions about compliance with industry codes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170

121(1) Directions about compliance with industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-121-ss-1
part of: 121 Directions about compliance with industry codes
note: Directs a person to comply with an industry code if they have contravened or are contravening it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Directs a person to comply with an industry code.
premise text: The ACMA is satisfied that the person has contravened or is contravening an industry code.
conclusion text: The person must comply with the industry code.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Directs compliance with an industry code during the period when the person has contravened or is contravening it.
premise text: (a) a person is a participant in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, the telemarketing industry or the fax marketing industry; and (b) the ACMA is satisfied that the person has contravened or is contravening an industry code;
conclusion text: The person must comply with the industry code during the period when they have contravened or are contravening it.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Directs compliance with an industry code during the period when the person has contravened or is contravening it.
premise text: (a) a person is a participant in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, the telemarketing industry or the fax marketing industry; and (b) the ACMA is satisfied that the person has contravened or is contravening an industry code;
conclusion text: The person must comply with the industry code during the period when they have contravened or are contravening it.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Gives permission to the ACMA to direct a person to comply with an industry code if they have contravened or are contravening it.
premise text: The ACMA is satisfied that the person has contravened or is contravening an industry code;
conclusion text: The ACMA may, by written notice given to the person, direct the person to comply with the industry code.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: Directs a person to comply with an industry code if they have contravened or are contravening it.
premise text: (a) a person is a participant in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, the telemarketing industry or the fax marketing industry; and (b) the ACMA is satisfied that the person has contravened or is contravening an industry code;
conclusion text: The person must comply with the industry code.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

121(1A) Directions about compliance with industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-121-ss-1a
part of: 121 Directions about compliance with industry codes
note: ACMA must consult Information Commissioner before giving direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

121(1B) Directions about compliance with industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-121-ss-1b
part of: 121 Directions about compliance with industry codes
note: Person may be given a direction under subsection (1) in respect of the replacement code during the period when the replacement code is registered.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1b-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 121(1B) Directions about compliance with industry codes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to give direction under subsection (1)
premise text: (a) at a time when an industry code...
conclusion text: then, during the period...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

121(2) Directions about compliance with industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-121-ss-2
part of: 121 Directions about compliance with industry codes
note: Compliance with industry codes is mandatory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 121(2) Directions about compliance with industry codes
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

121(3) Directions about compliance with industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-121-ss-3
part of: 121 Directions about compliance with industry codes
note: Prohibition on aiding, abetting, or conspiring to contravene subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 121(3) Directions about compliance with industry codes
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Direct prohibition on actions
premise text: (3) A person must not:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Indirect prohibition on actions
premise text: (b) induce, whether by threats or promises or otherwise, a contravention of subsection (2);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Participation in prohibited actions
premise text: (c) be in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, nor party to, a contravention of subsection (2);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Conspiracy to commit prohibited actions
premise text: (d) conspire with others to effect a contravention of subsection (2);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

121(4) Directions about compliance with industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-121-ss-4
part of: 121 Directions about compliance with industry codes
note: Directions about compliance with industry codes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 121(4) Directions about compliance with industry codes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

121(5) Directions about compliance with industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-121-ss-5
part of: 121 Directions about compliance with industry codes
note: A direction under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-5-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-121-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 121(5) Directions about compliance with industry codes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

122 Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-122
has part: 122(1) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
has part: 122(2) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
has part: 122(3) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
has part: 122(4) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.171

122(1) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-122-ss-1
part of: 122 Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
note: Applicable to participants in specific industries
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.171
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122(1) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Participant status is a condition for applicability
premise text: Person is a participant in the industry.
conclusion text: Therefore, person is subject to this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal applicability starts at section commencement
premise text: Section commences on January 1st, 2024.
conclusion text: Therefore, this section applies from January 1st, 2024.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Temporal applicability ends at section repeal
premise text: Section is repealed on December 31st, 2026.
conclusion text: Therefore, this section applies until December 31st, 2026.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: is-a
logic summary: Warning is a type of formal warning
premise text: Formal warning is a type of notice.
conclusion text: Therefore, warning is a type of formal warning.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: is-a
logic summary: Warning is an AI-generated entity
premise text: Formal warning is generated by the system.
conclusion text: Therefore, warning is an AI-generated entity.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

122(2) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-122-ss-2
part of: 122 Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
note: ACMA may issue a formal warning for breaching industry codes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.171
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122(2) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Issuance of a formal warning is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122(3) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-122-ss-3
part of: 122 Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
note: Consult Information Commissioner before issuing warning for breach of industry code related to Australian Privacy Principles or APP code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.171
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult Information Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation
premise text: (3) If the ACMA is satisfied that the contravention of the industry code relates directly or indirectly to a matter dealt with by the Australian Privacy Principles or by a registered APP code (within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988), the ACMA must consult the Information Commissioner before issuing the warning.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Recurring trace for consultation
premise text: (3) If the ACMA is satisfied that the contravention of the industry code relates directly or indirectly to a matter dealt with by the Australian Privacy Principles or by a registered APP code (within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988), the ACMA must consult the Information Commissioner before issuing the warning.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Diffusion for consultation
premise text: (3) If the ACMA is satisfied that the contravention of the industry code relates directly or indirectly to a matter dealt with by the Australian Privacy Principles or by a registered APP code (within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988), the ACMA must consult the Information Commissioner before issuing the warning.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Artificial intelligence for consultation
premise text: (3) If the ACMA is satisfied that the contravention of the industry code relates directly or indirectly to a matter dealt with by the Australian Privacy Principles or by a registered APP code (within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988), the ACMA must consult the Information Commissioner before issuing the warning.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122(4) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-122-ss-4
part of: 122 Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
note: Formal warnings for breach of industry codes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.171
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-4-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122(4) Formal warnings—breach of industry codes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

122A De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-122a
has part: 122A(1) De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
has part: 122A(2) De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
has part: 122A(3) De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.172

122A(1) De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-122a-ss-1
part of: 122A De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
note: ACMA may remove industry codes from the Register.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.172
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122a-ss-1-norm

122A(2) De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-122a-ss-2
part of: 122A De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
note: Industry code ceases to be registered when removed from the Register.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.172
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122A(2) De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Ceasing obligation
premise text: (2) An industry code ceases to be registered...
conclusion text: An industry code ceases to be registered.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122A(3) De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-122a-ss-3
part of: 122A De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
note: If ACMA removes a provision from the Register, this Part has effect in relation to things occurring after the removal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.172
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122A(3) De-registering industry codes and provisions of industry codes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-122a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: ACMA removes a provision from the Register
conclusion text: This Part has effect in relation to things occurring after the removal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

123 ACMA may determine an industry standard if a request for an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-123
has part: 123(1) ACMA may determine an industry standard if a request for an
has part: 123(2) ACMA may determine an industry standard if a request for an
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.173

123(1) ACMA may determine an industry standard if a request for an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-123-ss-1
part of: 123 ACMA may determine an industry standard if a request for an
note: ACMA must determine an industry standard if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.173
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-123-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-123-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-123-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

123(2) ACMA may determine an industry standard if a request for an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-123-ss-2
part of: 123 ACMA may determine an industry standard if a request for an
note: ACMA may determine an industry standard if a request for an industry standard is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.173
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-123-ss-2-norm

124 ACMA may determine industry standard where no industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-124
has part: 124(1) ACMA may determine industry standard where no industry
has part: 124(2) ACMA may determine industry standard where no industry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.174

124(1) ACMA may determine industry standard where no industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-124-ss-1
part of: 124 ACMA may determine industry standard where no industry
note: ACMA may determine industry standard where no industry body or association exists.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.174
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-124-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-124-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-124-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Determine
logic summary: ACMA has the obligation to determine an industry standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(2) ACMA may determine industry standard where no industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-124-ss-2
part of: 124 ACMA may determine industry standard where no industry
note: ACMA may determine industry standard where no industry standard exists.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.174
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-124-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-124-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-124-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May determine industry standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125 ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125
has part: 125(1) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
has part: 125(2) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
has part: 125(3) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
has part: 125(4) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
has part: 125(6) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175

125(1) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125-ss-1
part of: 125 ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
note: ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes are deficient.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May determine industry standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125(2) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125-ss-2
part of: 125 ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
note: The period specified in a notice must run for at least 30 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a specified period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125(3) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125-ss-3
part of: 125 ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
note: ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determine
logic summary: Establishes authority to set standards
premise text: ACMA may
conclusion text: May determine industry standard
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125(4) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125-ss-4
part of: 125 ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
note: ACMA must consult a body or association before determining an industry standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125(6) ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125-ss-6
part of: 125 ACMA may determine industry standards where industry codes
note: Industry code ceases registration on industry standard commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125-ss-6-norm

125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125aa
has part: 125AA(1) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
has part: 125AA(2) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
has part: 125AA(3) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
has part: 125AA(4) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
has part: 125AA(5) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.176

125AA(1) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125aa-ss-1
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
note: ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.176
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125AA(2) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125aa-ss-2
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
note: Industry standard must be known by a specific name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.176
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide industry standard with a specific name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125AA(3) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125aa-ss-3
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
note: ACMA must consult a body or association before determining a standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.176
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consult
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125AA(4) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125aa-ss-4
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
note: The Minister may direct ACMA to determine a standard within a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.176
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 125AA(4) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: The Minister may direct ACMA to determine a standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125AA(5) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125aa-ss-5
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
note: ACMA must not determine a standard unless directed by subsection (4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.176
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of determining a standard without direction
premise text: ACMA must determine a standard
conclusion text: unless directed by subsection (4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for ACMA's determination process
premise text: The ACMA must not determine a standard...
conclusion text: ...unless it does so in accordance with a direction under subsection (4)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of ACMA's determination process on standards
premise text: ACMA must not determine a standard unless...
conclusion text: ...it does so in accordance with a direction under subsection (4)
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagation of ACMA's determination process through standards
premise text: The ACMA must not determine a standard...
conclusion text: ...unless it does so in accordance with a direction under subsection (4)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125aa-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of ACMA's determination process
premise text: ACMA must not determine a standard unless...
conclusion text: ...it does so in accordance with a direction under subsection (4)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125A ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125a
note: ACMA must determine industry standards for telemarketing before a certain date.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.177
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to determine standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125B ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125b
has part: 125B(1) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
has part: 125B(2) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
has part: 125B(3) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
has part: 125B(4) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
has part: 125B(5) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.178

125B(1) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125b-ss-1
part of: 125B ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
note: ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to fax marketing activities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.178
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACMA must determine industry standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125B(2) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125b-ss-2
part of: 125B ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
note: Industry standard must be known by a specific name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.178
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide industry standard with a specific name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125B(3) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125b-ss-3
part of: 125B ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
note: ACMA must consult a body or association before determining a standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.178
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125B(4) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125b-ss-4
part of: 125B ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
note: Ensure standard is in force after commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.178
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to ensure standard
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125B(5) ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125b-ss-5
part of: 125B ACMA must determine certain industry standards relating to
note: Must determine industry standards relating to marketing fax
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.178
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-125b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: ACMA must determine industry standards relating to marketing fax
conclusion text: must determine industry standards relating to marketing fax
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126 Industry standards not to be determined for certain privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-126
note: ACMA cannot determine industry standards for certain privacy matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.179
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-126-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-126-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-126-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of determining industry standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128 Compliance with industry standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-128
note: Industry standard registration obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.179
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-128-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-128-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-128-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128 Compliance with industry standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-128-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with industry standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

129 Formal warnings—breach of industry standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-129
has part: 129(1) Formal warnings—breach of industry standards
has part: 129(2) Formal warnings—breach of industry standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180

129(1) Formal warnings—breach of industry standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-129-ss-1
part of: 129 Formal warnings—breach of industry standards
note: Participant in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, telemarketing industry or fax marketing industry must comply with formal warnings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 129(1) Formal warnings—breach of industry standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
premise text: Participant in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, telemarketing industry or fax marketing industry.
conclusion text: Must comply with formal warnings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship
premise text: This section applies to a person who is a participant in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, the telemarketing industry or the fax marketing industry.
conclusion text: Applicable during formal warnings.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship
premise text: This section applies to a person who is a participant in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, the telemarketing industry or the fax marketing industry.
conclusion text: During formal warnings, must comply with formal warnings.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation
premise text: Participant in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, telemarketing industry or fax marketing industry.
conclusion text: Must comply with formal warnings.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: Participant in a particular section of the telecommunications industry, telemarketing industry or fax marketing industry.
conclusion text: Must comply with formal warnings.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

129(2) Formal warnings—breach of industry standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-129-ss-2
part of: 129 Formal warnings—breach of industry standards
note: ACMA may issue a formal warning for breaching industry standards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 129(2) Formal warnings—breach of industry standards
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-129-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: ACMA may issue a formal warning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

130 Variation of industry standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-130
note: Variation of industry standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-130-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-130-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-130-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to vary industry standards
premise text: ACMA may vary an industry standard
conclusion text: if it is necessary or convenient to do so
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131 Revocation of industry standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-131
has part: 131(1) Revocation of industry standards
has part: 131(2) Revocation of industry standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181

131(1) Revocation of industry standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-131-ss-1
part of: 131 Revocation of industry standards
note: ACMA may revoke industry standard
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-131-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-131-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-131-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to revoke
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131(2) Revocation of industry standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-131-ss-2
part of: 131 Revocation of industry standards
note: Revocation of industry standards when a code replaces an industry standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-131-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-131-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-131-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of industry standards when a code replaces an industry standard.
premise text: (2) If: (a) an industry code is registered under this Part; and (b) the code is expressed to replace an industry standard;
conclusion text: the industry standard is revoked when the code is registered.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132 Public consultation on industry standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-132
note: Public consultation on industry standards before determining or varying an industry standard.
description: Notice and draft of the industry standard or variation, written comments to ACMA.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-132-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-132-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consult the public.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133 Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-133
has part: 133(1) Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
has part: 133(1A) Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
has part: 133(2) Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.182

133(1) Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-133-ss-1
part of: 133 Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
note: Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry before determining or varying an industry standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.182
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consult ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133(1A) Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-133-ss-1a
part of: 133 Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
note: Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry before determining or varying an industry standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.182
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consult
premise text: ACMA must consult the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.
conclusion text: The ACMA must consult the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133(2) Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-133-ss-2
part of: 133 Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry
note: Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman before revoking an industry standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.182
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consult
premise text: ACMA must consult the ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.
conclusion text: Obligation to consult
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation
premise text: Before revoking an industry standard under subsection 131(1)
conclusion text: Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman must occur before revocation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Consultation implies revocation
premise text: ACMA must consult the ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.
conclusion text: Revoking an industry standard under subsection 131(1) is implied by consultation
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Consultation process
premise text: ACMA must consult the ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.
conclusion text: Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman is a diffusion of information
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-133-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: ACMA must consult the ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.
conclusion text: Consultation with ACCC and the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman is an artificial intelligence application
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134 Consultation with Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-134
has part: 134(1) Consultation with Information Commissioner
has part: 134(2) Consultation with Information Commissioner
has part: 134(3) Consultation with Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.182

134(1) Consultation with Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-134-ss-1
part of: 134 Consultation with Information Commissioner
note: Consultation with Information Commissioner required for industry standards dealing with privacy matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.182
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134(1) Consultation with Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires consultation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134(2) Consultation with Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-134-ss-2
part of: 134 Consultation with Information Commissioner
note: Consultation with Information Commissioner before determining or varying industry standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.182
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consult Information Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134(3) Consultation with Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-134-ss-3
part of: 134 Consultation with Information Commissioner
note: Consultation with Information Commissioner before revoking industry standard
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.182
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-134-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult
premise text: ACMA must revoke industry standard
conclusion text: ACMA must consult Information Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135 Consultation with consumer body
type: Concept
realized by: sec-135
has part: 135(1) Consultation with consumer body
has part: 135(2) Consultation with consumer body
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.183

135(1) Consultation with consumer body
type: Concept
realized by: sec-135-ss-1
part of: 135 Consultation with consumer body
note: Consultation with consumer body before determining or varying an industry standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.183
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consult consumer body
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135(2) Consultation with consumer body
type: Concept
realized by: sec-135-ss-2
part of: 135 Consultation with consumer body
note: Consultation with consumer body before revoking industry standard
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.183
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consult
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135A Consultation with the States and Territories
type: Concept
realized by: sec-135a
note: Consultation with States and Territories before determining or varying an industry standard
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.183
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consult
premise text: ACMA must consult States and Territories
conclusion text: Industry standard determination or variation is prohibited without consultation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval of consultation
premise text: ACMA must consult States and Territories within a certain time frame
conclusion text: Consultation period is a necessary condition for industry standard determination or variation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Consequence of consultation
premise text: ACMA's decision is influenced by consultation with States and Territories
conclusion text: Industry standard determination or variation without consultation may lead to unintended consequences
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
logic summary: Propagation of consultation requirements
premise text: Consultation with States and Territories is necessary for industry standard determination or variation in a particular sector
conclusion text: Industry standard determination or variation without consultation may spread to other sectors
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-135a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application of consultation requirements
premise text: ACMA's AI system must consult States and Territories before determining or varying an industry standard
conclusion text: AI system's decision is influenced by consultation with States and Territories
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136 ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136
has part: 136(1) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
has part: 136(1A) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
has part: 136(2) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
has part: 136(3) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
has part: 136(4) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
has part: 136(5) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184

136(1) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136-ss-1
part of: 136 ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
note: ACMA must maintain a Register of industry codes and standards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(1) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACMA must maintain a Register.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Register of industry codes and standards.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(1A) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136-ss-1a
part of: 136 ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
note: ACMA must not include removed industry codes in the Register.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: ACMA must not include removed industry codes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(2) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136-ss-2
part of: 136 ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
note: Register must be maintained by electronic means.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must maintain Register electronically.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of industry codes and industries.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(3) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136-ss-3
part of: 136 ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
note: Allow inspection and copying of Register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(3) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission to inspect and copy Register
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(4) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136-ss-4
part of: 136 ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
note: A person must make a copy of or take an extract from the Register if ACMA provides a printout.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must make a copy or take an extract from the Register.
premise text: ACMA provides a printout.
conclusion text: A person must make a copy of or take an extract from the Register.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: The Register is maintained by electronic means.
premise text: The Register is maintained by electronic means.
conclusion text: A person is taken to have made a copy of or taken an extract from the Register if ACMA gives the person a printout.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(5) ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136-ss-5
part of: 136 ACMA to maintain Register of industry codes and industry
note: Provide copy in electronic form on request
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Grant permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136A Application for eligibility for reimbursement of costs of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136a
has part: 136A(1) Application for eligibility for reimbursement of costs of
has part: 136A(2) Application for eligibility for reimbursement of costs of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.185

136A(1) Application for eligibility for reimbursement of costs of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136a-ss-1
part of: 136A Application for eligibility for reimbursement of costs of
note: Body or association may apply for reimbursement of costs incurred in developing industry code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.185
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136a-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136A(1) Application for eligibility for reimbursement of costs of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

136A(2) Application for eligibility for reimbursement of costs of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136a-ss-2
part of: 136A Application for eligibility for reimbursement of costs of
note: Application must be in writing and accompanied by estimate of refundable costs.
description: estimate of total refundable costs, statement breaking down estimate into categories
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.185
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136A(2) Application for eligibility for reimbursement of costs of
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be in writing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136B Declaration of eligibility for reimbursement of costs of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136b
note: ACMA must make declaration if certain conditions met
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.186
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: ACMA must make declaration if certain conditions met
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136C Reimbursement of costs of developing or varying
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136c
note: Reimbursement of costs for developing or varying consumer-related industry codes
description: written statement, written claim, written declaration, and process description
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136C Reimbursement of costs of developing or varying
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Reimbursement obligation for developing or varying consumer-related industry codes
premise text: section 136B declaration was made in relation to the development of an industry code
conclusion text: ACMA must reimburse costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval for reimbursement of costs
premise text: section 136B declaration was in force when costs were incurred
conclusion text: costs incurred within the temporal interval are refundable
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.7000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Reimbursement obligation for body or association to provide written statement and claim
premise text: copy of code was accompanied by a written statement itemising costs incurred
conclusion text: body or association must provide written statement and claim
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Reimbursement obligation for ACMA to verify process description
premise text: copy of code was accompanied by a written declaration describing the process for development of the code
conclusion text: ACMA must verify process description
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.7000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136c-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Reimbursement obligation for ACMA to reimburse costs
premise text: section 136B declaration was in force when costs were incurred and each cost is refundable
conclusion text: ACMA must reimburse costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed

136D Costs—transactions between persons not at arm’s length
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136d
note: Body or association must pay reasonable costs in transactions not at arm's length.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.191
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136d-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136D Costs—transactions between persons not at arm’s length
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay reasonable costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136E Refundable cost
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136e
has part: 136E(1) Refundable cost
has part: 136E(2) Refundable cost
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.191

136E(1) Refundable cost
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136e-ss-1
part of: 136E Refundable cost
note: A refundable cost incurred by a body or association in developing or varying a code is a cost incurred by the body or association in developing the code or varying the code, as the case may be.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.191
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136e-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136E(1) Refundable cost
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

136E(2) Refundable cost
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136e-ss-2
part of: 136E Refundable cost
note: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.191
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136e-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-136e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136E(2) Refundable cost
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

137 Protection from civil proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-137
note: Protection from civil proceedings against internet service providers and electronic messaging service providers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-137-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-137-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-137-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 137 Protection from civil proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-137-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits civil proceedings against internet service providers and electronic messaging service providers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138 Implied freedom of political communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-138
note: Exemption from Part 1 for constitutional doctrine of implied freedom of political communication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-138-norm

139 Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139
has part: 139(1) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
has part: 139(2) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
has part: 139(3) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
has part: 139(4) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192

139(1) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139-ss-1
part of: 139 Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
note: Prohibition on entering into contracts or arrangements that require another person to carry out telemarketing activities without compliance with Part 139.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 139(1) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of entering into contracts or arrangements that require another person to carry out telemarketing activities without compliance with Part 139.
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) must not enter into a contract or arrangement...
conclusion text: ...if: (a) under the contract, arrangement or understanding, the other person undertakes to carry on one or more telemarketing activities or fax marketing activities;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The provision has a temporal interval that defines when the prohibition applies.
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) must not enter into a contract or arrangement...
conclusion text: ...if: (a) under the contract, arrangement or understanding, the other person undertakes to carry on one or more telemarketing activities or fax marketing activities;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: The provision has a recurring trace that applies everywhere.
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) must not enter into a contract or arrangement...
conclusion text: ...if: (a) under the contract, arrangement or understanding, the other person undertakes to carry on one or more telemarketing activities or fax marketing activities;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: The provision has an argumentative structure that implies prohibition.
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) must not enter into a contract or arrangement...
conclusion text: ...if: (a) under the contract, arrangement or understanding, the other person undertakes to carry on one or more telemarketing activities or fax marketing activities;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

139(2) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139-ss-2
part of: 139 Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
note: A person must not aid, abet, counsel or procure a contravention of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 139(2) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

139(3) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139-ss-3
part of: 139 Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
note: Civil penalty provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 139(3) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a civil penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

139(4) Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139-ss-4
part of: 139 Agreements for the carrying on of telemarketing activities or fax
note: No effect on contract validity if subsection (1) not complied with.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If failure to comply affects contract validity, then subsection (1) must be complied with.
premise text: Failure to comply with subsection (1) does not affect the validity of any contract, arrangement or understanding.
conclusion text: If failure to comply with subsection (1) does not affect contract validity, then subsection (1) must be complied with.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-139-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: None
logic summary: No temporal interval specified.
premise text: A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not affect the validity of any contract, arrangement or understanding.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

142 Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142
note: Controller of local access line must not supply eligible service to person other than carrier or service provider.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.194
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 142 Simplified outline of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of supplying eligible service to person other than carrier or service provider.
premise text: line came into existence, or was upgraded, on or after designated commencement date
conclusion text: must not supply eligible service
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Line came into existence on or after designated commencement date.
premise text: line came into existence, or was upgraded, on or after designated commencement date
conclusion text: came into existence on or after designated commencement date
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Line is used to supply superfast carriage service wholly or principally to residential customers, or prospective residential customers, in Australia.
premise text: line is used, or is proposed to be used, to supply superfast carriage service wholly or principally to residential customers, or prospective residential customers, in Australia
conclusion text: is used to supply superfast carriage service
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Controller of local access line has permission to use line for other purposes.
premise text: no functional separation undertaking is in force
conclusion text: has permission to use line for other purposes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142A Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142a
note: Definitions for telecommunications network and line terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.195
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: In this Part:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Term definitions
premise text: alter, associate, business unit, close proximity, corporation, customer interface, declared service, designated carriage service, designated commencement date, electricity supply body, eligible service, fixed-line carriage service
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142B Functional separation undertaking given by a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142b
note: Defines functional separation undertaking given by a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.198
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142b-norm

142BA Promotion of the long-term interests of end-users of carriage
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142ba
note: Promotes long-term interests of end-users of carriage services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.198
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142ba-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142ba-logic-descriptionlogic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142ba-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies things promoting long-term interests
premise text: Part XIC of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
conclusion text: same manner as it is determined for the purposes of Part XIC
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

142BB Terms and conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142bb
note: Treats notional contracts as actual contracts for terms and conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bb-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bb-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 142BB Terms and conditions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

142BC Unsatisfactory compliance record
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142bc
note: Determine unsatisfactory compliance record based on breaches of functional separation undertakings and contraventions of specified sections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bc-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bc-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bc-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 142BC Unsatisfactory compliance record
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Determines existence of obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142BD Designated carriage service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142bd
has part: 142BD(1) Designated carriage service
has part: 142BD(2) Designated carriage service
has part: 142BD(3) Designated carriage service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199

142BD(1) Designated carriage service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142bd-ss-1
part of: 142BD Designated carriage service
note: Definition of designated carriage service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-1-norm

142BD(2) Designated carriage service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142bd-ss-2
part of: 142BD Designated carriage service
note: Specify carriage service for purposes of paragraph (1)(a)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-2-norm

142BD(3) Designated carriage service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142bd-ss-3
part of: 142BD Designated carriage service
note: The ACCC must not specify a carriage service unless it enables end-users to download communications and has a normal transmission speed of 25 megabits per second or more.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of specifying a carriage service without enabling end-users to download communications.
premise text: (3) The ACCC must not specify a carriage service under subsection (2)
conclusion text: unless: (a) the carriage service enables end-users to download communications; and (b) the download transmission speed of the carriage service is normally 25 megabits per second or more;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for specifying a carriage service.
premise text: (3) The ACCC must not specify a carriage service under subsection (2)
conclusion text: unless: (a) the carriage service enables end-users to download communications; and (b) the download transmission speed of the carriage service is normally 25 megabits per second or more;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for specifying a carriage service.
premise text: (3) The ACCC must not specify a carriage service under subsection (2)
conclusion text: unless: (a) the carriage service enables end-users to download communications; and (b) the download transmission speed of the carriage service is normally 25 megabits per second or more;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142bd-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation on the ACCC to specify a carriage service.
premise text: (3) The ACCC must not specify a carriage service under subsection (2)
conclusion text: unless: (a) the carriage service enables end-users to download communications; and (b) the download transmission speed of the carriage service is normally 25 megabits per second or more;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142C Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—lines that
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142c
has part: 142C(1) Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—lines that
has part: 142C(2) Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—lines that
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.201

142C(1) Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—lines that
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142c-ss-1
part of: 142C Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—lines that
note: Local access lines must be part of a telecommunications network in Australia and used to supply a superfast carriage service to residential customers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.201
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 142C(1) Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—lines that
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be part of a telecommunications network in Australia
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142C(2) Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—lines that
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142c-ss-2
part of: 142C Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—lines that
note: If a person (the first person) must provide certain information.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.201
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 142C(2) Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—lines that
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-142c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143 Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—networks in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143
note: Local access lines must be part of a telecommunications network supplying superfast carriage services to residential customers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.203
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143 Supply of eligible services to be on wholesale basis—networks in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Network must exist before designated commencement date
premise text: (network came into existence on or after 1 January 2011, but before the designated commencement date)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Network must not be the national broadband network
premise text: (network is not the national broadband network)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 January 2011, but before the designated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Person in control of network must exercise control.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.203
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-1-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-1-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 January 2011, but before the designated
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

143AA Judicial enforcement of prohibitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143aa
has part: 143AA(1) Judicial enforcement of prohibitions
has part: 143AA(2) Judicial enforcement of prohibitions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.205

143AA(1) Judicial enforcement of prohibitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143aa-ss-1
part of: 143AA Judicial enforcement of prohibitions
note: Federal Court may make orders against a person who contravenes certain subsections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.205
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143aa-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 143AA(1) Judicial enforcement of prohibitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits a person from contravening certain subsections.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143AA(2) Judicial enforcement of prohibitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143aa-ss-2
part of: 143AA Judicial enforcement of prohibitions
note: Federal Court may discharge or vary an order granted under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.205
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits discharge or variation of orders granted under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143A Class exemptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143a
has part: 143A(1) Class exemptions
has part: 143A(2) Class exemptions
has part: 143A(3) Class exemptions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206

143A(1) Class exemptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143a-ss-1
part of: 143A Class exemptions
note: Exempts a person from section 142C if they meet certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143A(1) Class exemptions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts from section 142C.
premise text: The ACCC may determine that a person is exempt.
conclusion text: The person is exempt from section 142C.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclass
logic summary: Subclass of persons exempt from section 142C.
premise text: The ACCC may determine that a person is exempt.
conclusion text: The person is a subclass of those exempt from section 142C.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143A(2) Class exemptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143a-ss-2
part of: 143A Class exemptions
note: Exemptions for certain persons from section 143
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143A(2) Class exemptions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Exemptions for certain persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class
logic summary: Class exemptions
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143A(3) Class exemptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143a-ss-3
part of: 143A Class exemptions
note: Ensure availability of designated carriage service and non-discrimination in wholesale supply
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143A(3) Class exemptions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure availability of designated carriage service
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Class exemptions
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143B Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143b
has part: 143B(1) Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
has part: 143B(2) Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
has part: 143B(3) Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210

143B(1) Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143b-ss-1
part of: 143B Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
note: Comply with conditions or limitations of exemption after designated commencement date.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143B(1) Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143B(2) Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143b-ss-2
part of: 143B Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
note: Prohibition on aiding, abetting, or conspiring to contravene subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 143B(2) Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

143B(3) Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143b-ss-3
part of: 143B Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
note: Civil penalty provisions
references: Part 31
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 143B(3) Compliance with conditions and limitations of exemption
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits breaches of civil penalty provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143C Judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143c
has part: 143C(1) Judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations of
has part: 143C(2) Judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210

143C(1) Judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143c-ss-1
part of: 143C Judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations of
note: Federal Court may direct person to comply with condition or limitation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143C(1) Judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Federal Court has obligation to direct person to comply with condition or limitation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143C(2) Judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143c-ss-2
part of: 143C Judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations of
note: The Federal Court may discharge or vary an order granted under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or allowance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143D Publication of list of persons who have elected to be bound by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143d
note: Publish list of persons bound by exemption determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.211
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143d-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish list
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143E Exemptions—certain real estate development projects etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143e
note: Exemptions for certain real estate development projects
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.211
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143e-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143E Exemptions—certain real estate development projects etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

143F Exemptions—lines installed in close proximity to other lines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143f
has part: 143F(1) Exemptions—lines installed in close proximity to other lines
has part: 143F(2) Exemptions—lines installed in close proximity to other lines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.214

143F(1) Exemptions—lines installed in close proximity to other lines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143f-ss-1
part of: 143F Exemptions—lines installed in close proximity to other lines
note: Exemptions for certain lines installed in close proximity to other lines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.214
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143F(1) Exemptions—lines installed in close proximity to other lines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to exempt certain lines
premise text: (a) a telecommunications network came into existence on or after 1 January 2011; and (b) a line came into existence on or after the designated commencement date for the purposes of connecting particular premises to the network;
conclusion text: the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is exempt from section 142C
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for exemption
premise text: (c) the coming into existence of the line enables or enabled the occupier of the premises to become a customer in relation to carriage services supplied using the line;
conclusion text: the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is used to supply a superfast carriage service; and the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is exempt from section 142C
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Defines the recurring nature of exemption
premise text: (d) the premises are in close proximity to a line that forms part of the infrastructure of the network as the network stood immediately before the designated commencement date;
conclusion text: the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is used to supply a superfast carriage service; and the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is exempt from section 142C
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to provide exemptions for certain lines
premise text: (a) a telecommunications network came into existence on or after 1 January 2011; and (b) a line came into existence on or after the designated commencement date for the purposes of connecting particular premises to the network;
conclusion text: the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is used to supply a superfast carriage service; and the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is exempt from section 142C
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143F(2) Exemptions—lines installed in close proximity to other lines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143f-ss-2
part of: 143F Exemptions—lines installed in close proximity to other lines
note: Exemptions for lines installed in close proximity to other lines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.214
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <=
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between events
premise text: The line mentioned in paragraph (b) is used to supply a superfast carriage service; The line mentioned in paragraph (b) is exempt from section 142C.
conclusion text: The line must have come into existence on or after the designated commencement date for the purposes of connecting particular premises to the network.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines conditions under which a line is exempt from section 142C
premise text: (2) If: (a) a designated telecommunications network was in existence immediately before the designated commencement date; and (b) a line came into existence on or after the designated commencement date for the purposes of connecting particular premises to the network; and (c) the coming into existence of the line enables or enabled the occupier of the premises to become a customer in relation to carriage services supplied using the line; and (d) the premises are in close proximity to a line that forms part of the infrastructure of the network as the network stood immediately before the designated commencement date; and (e) the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is used to supply a superfast carriage service;
conclusion text: The line is exempt from section 142C if the conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Describes recurring trace of events
premise text: (2) If: (a) a designated telecommunications network was in existence immediately before the designated commencement date; and (b) a line came into existence on or after the designated commencement date for the purposes of connecting particular premises to the network; and (c) the coming into existence of the line enables or enabled the occupier of the premises to become a customer in relation to carriage services supplied using the line; and (d) the premises are in close proximity to a line that forms part of the infrastructure of the network as the network stood immediately before the designated commencement date; and (e) the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is used to supply a superfast carriage service;
conclusion text: The conditions must be met for the line to be exempt from section 142C.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143f-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines scope of exemption
premise text: (2) If: (a) a designated telecommunications network was in existence immediately before the designated commencement date; and (b) a line came into existence on or after the designated commencement date for the purposes of connecting particular premises to the network; and (c) the coming into existence of the line enables or enabled the occupier of the premises to become a customer in relation to carriage services supplied using the line; and (d) the premises are in close proximity to a line that forms part of the infrastructure of the network as the network stood immediately before the designated commencement date; and (e) the line mentioned in paragraph (b) is used to supply a superfast carriage service;
conclusion text: The exemption applies only if the conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143G Exemptions—networks covered by exemption instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143g
note: Exemptions for networks covered by exemption instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.215
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143g-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143g-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143g-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between temporal intervals for commencement
premise text: Commencement date is designated
conclusion text: If the Telecommunications (Network Exemption—TransACT Very Small Scale Networks) Instrument 2012 was in force...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

143H Exemption—networks marketed as business networks
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143h
has part: 143H(1) Exemption—networks marketed as business networks
has part: 143H(2) Exemption—networks marketed as business networks
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218

143H(1) Exemption—networks marketed as business networks
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143h-ss-1
part of: 143H Exemption—networks marketed as business networks
note: Exemption for certain telecommunications networks marketed as business networks.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143H(1) Exemption—networks marketed as business networks
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempt
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to exempt certain telecommunications networks.
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: the line is exempt from section 142C.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the timing of exemptions for telecommunications networks.
premise text: (c) the line is used, or proposed to be used...
conclusion text: the use or proposed use, when considered in relation to...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Describes the duration of exemptions for telecommunications networks.
premise text: (d) that use or proposed use, when considered in relation to...
conclusion text: the line is exempt from section 142C.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempt
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to exempt certain telecommunications networks.
premise text: (b) the network is marketed by the carrier exclusively...
conclusion text: the line is exempt from section 142C.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempt
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to exempt certain telecommunications networks.
premise text: (e) the other conditions (if any) determined under subsection...
conclusion text: the line is exempt from section 142C.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143H(2) Exemption—networks marketed as business networks
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143h-ss-2
part of: 143H Exemption—networks marketed as business networks
note: Determine conditions for exemptions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-143h-ss-2-norm

144 Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
type: Concept
realized by: sec-144
has part: 144(1) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
has part: 144(2) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
has part: 144(3) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
has part: 144(4) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
has part: 144(5) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
has part: 144(6) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
has part: 144(7) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
has part: 144(8) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218

144(1) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
type: Concept
realized by: sec-144-ss-1
part of: 144 Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
note: Exempts a specified network from section 143.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grants permission to exempt a network.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

144(2) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
type: Concept
realized by: sec-144-ss-2
part of: 144 Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
note: Conditional commencement Exempts a specified local access line from section 143.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grants permission to exempt a local access line.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

144(3) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
type: Concept
realized by: sec-144-ss-3
part of: 144 Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
note: The Minister may exempt a specified person from subsection 143(2).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-3-norm

144(4) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
type: Concept
realized by: sec-144-ss-4
part of: 144 Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
note: Exemptions for ministerial instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-4-norm

144(5) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
type: Concept
realized by: sec-144-ss-5
part of: 144 Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
note: Consultation with ACCC and ACMA before making an instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult
premise text: Minister must consult ACCC and ACMA
conclusion text: Instrument cannot be made without consultation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval of consultation required
premise text: Consultation with ACCC and ACMA must occur before making an instrument
conclusion text: Instrument cannot be made outside this temporal window
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Consultation implies instrument creation
premise text: Minister must consult ACCC and ACMA before making an instrument
conclusion text: Instrument creation follows from consultation
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

144(6) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
type: Concept
realized by: sec-144-ss-6
part of: 144 Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
note: An instrument under subsection (1), (2) or (3) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-6-norm

144(7) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
type: Concept
realized by: sec-144-ss-7
part of: 144 Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
note: Minister cannot make an instrument under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-7-norm

144(8) Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
type: Concept
realized by: sec-144-ss-8
part of: 144 Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
note: Exemptions—Ministerial instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.218
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-144-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between instrument and commencement date
premise text: Temporal interval mentioned in subsection (7)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

145 Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-145
has part: 145(1) Exemption—transport authorities
has part: 145(2) Exemption—transport authorities
has part: 145(3) Exemption—transport authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219

145(1) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-145-ss-1
part of: 145 Exemption—transport authorities
note: Exemption for transport authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 145(1) Exemption—transport authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
logic summary: Exempts certain services from subsections 142C(2) and 143(2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

145(2) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-145-ss-2
part of: 145 Exemption—transport authorities
note: Exemption for Airservices Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Airservices Australia exemption
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not apply to a carriage service supplied to Airservices Australia unless the carriage service is supplied on the basis that Airservices Australia must not re-supply the carriage service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not apply to a carriage service supplied to Airservices Australia unless the carriage service is supplied on the basis that Airservices Australia must not re-supply the carriage service.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Recurring trace
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not apply to a carriage service supplied to Airservices Australia unless the carriage service is supplied on the basis that Airservices Australia must not re-supply the carriage service.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

145(3) Exemption—transport authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-145-ss-3
part of: 145 Exemption—transport authorities
note: Exemption for State or Territory transport authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-145-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Grants permission to State or Territory transport authorities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

146 Exemption—electricity supply bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-146
has part: 146(1) Exemption—electricity supply bodies
has part: 146(2) Exemption—electricity supply bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220

146(1) Exemption—electricity supply bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-146-ss-1
part of: 146 Exemption—electricity supply bodies
note: Exemption for electricity supply bodies from certain subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-146-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-146-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-146-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 146(1) Exemption—electricity supply bodies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-146-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Exemption condition
premise text: (a) or (b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

146(2) Exemption—electricity supply bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-146-ss-2
part of: 146 Exemption—electricity supply bodies
note: Exemption for electricity supply bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-146-ss-2-norm

147 Exemption—gas supply bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-147
has part: 147(1) Exemption—gas supply bodies
has part: 147(2) Exemption—gas supply bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221

147(1) Exemption—gas supply bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-147-ss-1
part of: 147 Exemption—gas supply bodies
note: Exemption for gas supply bodies from certain subsections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-147-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-147-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 147(1) Exemption—gas supply bodies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

147(2) Exemption—gas supply bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-147-ss-2
part of: 147 Exemption—gas supply bodies
note: Exemption for gas supply bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-147-ss-2-norm

148 Exemption—water supply bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-148
has part: 148(1) Exemption—water supply bodies
has part: 148(2) Exemption—water supply bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221

148(1) Exemption—water supply bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-148-ss-1
part of: 148 Exemption—water supply bodies
note: Exemption for water supply bodies from certain subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
logic summary: Permitted exemption
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

148(2) Exemption—water supply bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-148-ss-2
part of: 148 Exemption—water supply bodies
note: Exemption for water supply bodies under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the exemption and the carriage service
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: ...unless the carriage service is supplied on the basis that...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the exemption and the carriage service
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: ...unless the carriage service is supplied on the basis that...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the exemption as a permission
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: does not apply to a carriage service supplied to a water supply body unless...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-148-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Describes the scope of the exemption
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: ...unless the carriage service is supplied on the basis that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

149 Exemption—sewerage services bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149
has part: 149(1) Exemption—sewerage services bodies
has part: 149(2) Exemption—sewerage services bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222

149(1) Exemption—sewerage services bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149-ss-1
part of: 149 Exemption—sewerage services bodies
note: Exemption for sewerage services bodies from certain subsections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149(1) Exemption—sewerage services bodies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

149(2) Exemption—sewerage services bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149-ss-2
part of: 149 Exemption—sewerage services bodies
note: Exemption for sewerage services bodies under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149(2) Exemption—sewerage services bodies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts carriage service supplied to sewerage services bodies under specific conditions
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not apply...
conclusion text: ...unless the carriage service is supplied on the basis that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal relation
logic summary: Defines temporal relation for exemption
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not apply to a carriage service supplied to a sewerage services body unless the carriage service is supplied on...
conclusion text: ...the carriage service is supplied on the basis that...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: recurring trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for exemption
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not apply to a carriage service supplied to a sewerage services body unless the carriage service is supplied on...
conclusion text: ...the carriage service is supplied on the basis that...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: information flow
logic summary: Defines information flow for exemption
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not apply to a carriage service supplied to a sewerage services body unless the carriage service is supplied on...
conclusion text: ...the carriage service is supplied on the basis that...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-149-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: artificial intelligence application
logic summary: Defines artificial intelligence application for exemption
premise text: (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not apply to a carriage service supplied to a sewerage services body unless the carriage service is supplied on...
conclusion text: ...the carriage service is supplied on the basis that...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

150 Exemption—storm water drainage services bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-150
has part: 150(1) Exemption—storm water drainage services bodies
has part: 150(2) Exemption—storm water drainage services bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222

150(1) Exemption—storm water drainage services bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-150-ss-1
part of: 150 Exemption—storm water drainage services bodies
note: Exemption for storm water drainage services bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-150-ss-1-norm

150(2) Exemption—storm water drainage services bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-150-ss-2
part of: 150 Exemption—storm water drainage services bodies
note: Exemption for storm water drainage services bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-150-ss-2-norm

151 Exemption—State or Territory road authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151
has part: 151(1) Exemption—State or Territory road authorities
has part: 151(2) Exemption—State or Territory road authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222

151(1) Exemption—State or Territory road authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151-ss-1
part of: 151 Exemption—State or Territory road authorities
note: Exemption for State or Territory road authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151-ss-1-norm

151(2) Exemption—State or Territory road authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151-ss-2
part of: 151 Exemption—State or Territory road authorities
note: Exemption for State or Territory road authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151-ss-2-norm

151A Standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151a
has part: 151A(1) Standard functional separation undertaking
has part: 151A(2) Standard functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224

151A(1) Standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151a-ss-1
part of: 151A Standard functional separation undertaking
note: A corporation may give a written undertaking to the ACCC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to give an undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151A(2) Standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151a-ss-2
part of: 151A Standard functional separation undertaking
note: Functional separation requirements for wholesale and retail business units
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide functional separation requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151B Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151b
has part: 151B(1) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
has part: 151B(1A) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
has part: 151B(1B) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
has part: 151B(2) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
has part: 151B(3) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
has part: 151B(4) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228

151B(1) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151b-ss-1
part of: 151B Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
note: The ACCC may determine that a corporation is bound by the Act if it elects to be so.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The ACCC may determine
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Corporation is bound by the Act
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151B(1A) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151b-ss-1a
part of: 151B Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
note: Functional separation undertaking must comply with specific provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1a-norm

151B(1B) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151b-ss-1b
part of: 151B Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
note: No provision of a kind specified in a determination under subsection 151A(15) may be included.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1b-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 151B(1B) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of a specific provision
premise text: (1B) A functional separation undertaking...
conclusion text: ...must not contain...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151B(2) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151b-ss-2
part of: 151B Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
note: Exemptions from certain provisions for functional separation undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-2-norm

151B(3) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151b-ss-3
part of: 151B Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
note: A corporation can give another standard functional separation undertaking without cancelling the previous one.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-3-norm

151B(4) Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151b-ss-4
part of: 151B Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
note: Deemed standard functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151b-ss-4-norm

151C Joint functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151c
has part: 151C(1) Joint functional separation undertaking
has part: 151C(2) Joint functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231

151C(1) Joint functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151c-ss-1
part of: 151C Joint functional separation undertaking
note: Joint written undertaking for joint functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151c-ss-1-norm

151C(2) Joint functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151c-ss-2
part of: 151C Joint functional separation undertaking
note: Joint functional separation undertaking requirements
description: The wholesaler and retailer must provide specific conditions for their workers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151c-ss-2-norm

151D Further information about undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151d
has part: 151D(1) Further information about undertaking
has part: 151D(2) Further information about undertaking
has part: 151D(3) Further information about undertaking
has part: 151D(4) Further information about undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236

151D(1) Further information about undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151d-ss-1
part of: 151D Further information about undertaking
note: Request for further information if a joint functional separation undertaking is given
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional provision
premise text: (a) a person gives the ACCC a standard functional separation undertaking; or (b) 2 or more persons give the ACCC a joint functional separation undertaking.
conclusion text: Request for further information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

151D(2) Further information about undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151d-ss-2
part of: 151D Further information about undertaking
note: Request for further information
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: request
logic summary: Requesting information as an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

151D(3) Further information about undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151d-ss-3
part of: 151D Further information about undertaking
note: The ACCC may refuse to consider the undertaking until the person or persons give the ACCC the information.
description: Information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151D(3) Further information about undertaking
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The ACCC may refuse to consider the undertaking until the person or persons give the ACCC the information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151D(4) Further information about undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151d-ss-4
part of: 151D Further information about undertaking
note: Request for further information may be withdrawn in whole or in part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Withdrawal
logic summary: Request for further information may be withdrawn.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151E Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151e
has part: 151E(1) Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
has part: 151E(2) Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
has part: 151E(3) Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
has part: 151E(4) Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237

151E(1) Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151e-ss-1
part of: 151E Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
note: Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151E(1) Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

151E(2) Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151e-ss-2
part of: 151E Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
note: Withdrawal of undertaking at any time before ACCC decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to withdraw undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal relation between withdrawal and ACCC decision
premise text: (2) The person or persons may withdraw the undertaking at any time before the ACCC makes a decision to accept or reject the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: May
logic summary: Justification for withdrawal of undertaking
premise text: (2) The person or persons may withdraw the undertaking at any time before the ACCC makes a decision to accept or reject the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Effect of withdrawal on ACCC decision-making
premise text: (2) The person or persons may withdraw the undertaking at any time before the ACCC makes a decision to accept or reject the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: influences
logic summary: Impact of withdrawal on ACCC decision-making process
premise text: (2) The person or persons may withdraw the undertaking at any time before the ACCC makes a decision to accept or reject the undertaking.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151E(3) Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151e-ss-3
part of: 151E Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
note: Allows person or persons to give a fresh undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Permits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151E(4) Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151e-ss-4
part of: 151E Withdrawal of undertaking that is under consideration
note: Refund of fee upon withdrawal of undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to refund fee
premise text: (4) If...
conclusion text: ...the ACCC may, on behalf of the Commonwealth, refund the whole or a part of the fee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between withdrawal and payment
premise text: (4) If...
conclusion text: ...the ACCC may, on behalf of the Commonwealth, refund the whole or a part of the fee.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of withdrawal and payment on refund
premise text: (4) If...
conclusion text: ...the ACCC may, on behalf of the Commonwealth, refund the whole or a part of the fee.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagated obligation to refund fee
premise text: (4) If...
conclusion text: ...the ACCC may, on behalf of the Commonwealth, refund the whole or a part of the fee.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151e-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inferred obligation to refund fee
premise text: (4) If...
conclusion text: ...the ACCC may, on behalf of the Commonwealth, refund the whole or a part of the fee.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151F ACCC to accept or reject functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151f
note: Scope for accepting or rejecting functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151f-norm

151G Consultation—acceptance or rejection of undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151g
note: Scope of section 151G regarding consultation and acceptance or rejection of undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.239
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151g-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151g-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the provision as an undertaking
premise text: Provision is an undertaking
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151H Serial undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151h
has part: 151H(1) Serial undertakings
has part: 151H(2) Serial undertakings
has part: 151H(3) Serial undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.240

151H(1) Serial undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151h-ss-1
part of: 151H Serial undertakings
note: ACCC may refuse to consider another functional separation undertaking if it is materially similar to a previous one.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.240
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 151H(1) Serial undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of considering another undertaking
premise text: ACCC rejects the first undertaking
conclusion text: Refusal to consider other undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151H(2) Serial undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151h-ss-2
part of: 151H Serial undertakings
note: ACCC may refuse to consider another joint functional separation undertaking if it is materially similar to the first one.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.240
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of considering another undertaking
premise text: ACCC rejects the first functional separation undertaking.
conclusion text: ACCC may refuse to consider the other functional separation undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Conditional refusal of consideration
premise text: (b) the ACCC rejects the first functional separation undertaking; and (c) those persons subsequently give the ACCC another joint functional separation undertaking.
conclusion text: The ACCC may refuse to consider the other functional separation undertaking until it is satisfied that the undertakings are not materially similar.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: ACCC's discretion in refusing consideration
premise text: The ACCC may refuse to consider the other functional separation undertaking.
conclusion text: The ACCC has the power to refuse consideration of another undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: ACCC's obligation to consider undertakings
premise text: (a) 2 or more persons give the ACCC a joint functional separation undertaking; and (b) the ACCC rejects the first functional separation undertaking.
conclusion text: The ACCC is obligated to consider the first functional separation undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151H(3) Serial undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151h-ss-3
part of: 151H Serial undertakings
note: ACCC must refund fee if undertaking is refused and fee was paid.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.240
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-logic-ltl-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151H(3) Serial undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: ACCC must refund fee.
premise text: (3) If the ACCC refuses to consider a functional separation undertaking under this section; and (b) a person or persons have paid a fee in relation to the undertaking;
conclusion text: the ACCC must, on behalf of the Commonwealth, refund the fee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: ACCC must refund fee if undertaking is refused and fee was paid.
premise text: (3) If: (a) the ACCC refuses to consider a functional separation undertaking under this section; and (b) a person or persons have paid a fee in relation to the undertaking;
conclusion text: the ACCC must, on behalf of the Commonwealth, refund the fee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: May
logic summary: ACCC may refuse to consider undertaking if it is not in its power to do so.
premise text: (3) If: (a) the ACCC refuses to consider a functional separation undertaking under this section; and (b) a person or persons have paid a fee in relation to the undertaking;
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151h-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: May
logic summary: Undertaking may be conditional on ACCC's power to consider it.
premise text: (3) If: (a) the ACCC refuses to consider a functional separation undertaking under this section; and (b) a person or persons have paid a fee in relation to the undertaking;
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

151J Criteria for accepting functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151j
has part: 151J(1) Criteria for accepting functional separation undertaking
has part: 151J(2) Criteria for accepting functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.241

151J(1) Criteria for accepting functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151j-ss-1
part of: 151J Criteria for accepting functional separation undertaking
note: Criteria for accepting functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.241
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151j-ss-1-norm

151J(2) Criteria for accepting functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151j-ss-2
part of: 151J Criteria for accepting functional separation undertaking
note: Regard must be had when deciding to accept an undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.241
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151j-ss-2-norm

151K Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151k
has part: 151K(1) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
has part: 151K(2) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
has part: 151K(3) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
has part: 151K(4) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.242

151K(1) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151k-ss-1
part of: 151K Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
note: Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.242
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-1-norm

151K(2) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151k-ss-2
part of: 151K Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
note: The ACCC must consider a varied undertaking under section 151F if the person gives it within the specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.242
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151K(2) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The ACCC must consider a varied undertaking.
premise text: The person gives the varied undertaking to the ACCC within the period specified in the notice.
conclusion text: The ACCC will consider the varied undertaking under section 151F as if the varied undertaking had been given to the ACCC instead of the original undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151K(3) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151k-ss-3
part of: 151K Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
note: ACCC must consider a varied undertaking given in response to notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.242
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151K(3) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACCC must consider a varied undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151K(4) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151k-ss-4
part of: 151K Variation of functional separation undertaking that is under
note: Duty to consider notice under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.242
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to consider notice
premise text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151L Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151l
has part: 151L(1) Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is
has part: 151L(2) Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is
has part: 151L(3) Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.243

151L(1) Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151l-ss-1
part of: 151L Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is
note: Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is given to the ACCC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.243
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151l-ss-1-norm

151L(2) Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151l-ss-2
part of: 151L Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is
note: The ACCC may give a written notice stating that it would be inclined to accept a joint functional separation undertaking if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.243
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151l-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses a possibility or inclination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151L(3) Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151l-ss-3
part of: 151L Replacement of functional separation undertaking that is
note: Duty to consider notice under subsection (2) is not required
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.243
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151l-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬O
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151M Renewal of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151m
note: Renewal of functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.243
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151m-norm

151N Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151n
has part: 151N(1) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
has part: 151N(2) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
has part: 151N(3) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
has part: 151N(4) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
has part: 151N(5) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
has part: 151N(6) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
has part: 151N(7) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.244

151N(1) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151n-ss-1
part of: 151N Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
note: ACCC may vary existing functional separation undertaking by omitting or substituting expiry time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.244
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: ACCC may perform action
conclusion text: ACCC may vary existing undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Expiry time is a temporal interval during which the undertaking is in force
premise text: (1) If: ... and (a) a standard functional separation undertaking is in force;
conclusion text: the expiry time specified in the notice.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Expiry time is a temporal interval during which the undertaking is in force
premise text: (1) If: ... and (a) a standard functional separation undertaking is in force;
conclusion text: the expiry time specified in the notice.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

151N(2) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151n-ss-2
part of: 151N Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
note: Expiry time of certain functional separation must be later than rejection of other undertaking and not later than 12 months after.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.244
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151N(2) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be later than rejection of other undertaking
premise text: (2) The expiry time specified in the notice:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
logic summary: Not later than 12 months after rejection of other undertaking
premise text: (2) The expiry time specified in the notice:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151N(3) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151n-ss-3
part of: 151N Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
note: Exempts notice under subsection (1) from Subsection 151A(8)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.244
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-3-norm

151N(4) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151n-ss-4
part of: 151N Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
note: ACCC may vary existing functional separation undertaking by omitting or substituting expiry time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.244
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151N(4) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: ACCC may vary existing undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151N(5) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151n-ss-5
part of: 151N Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
note: Expiry time of certain functional separation must be later than rejection of other undertaking and not later than 12 months after.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.244
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-5-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151N(5) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be later than rejection of other undertaking
premise text: (5) The expiry time specified in the notice:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
logic summary: Not later than 12 months after rejection of other undertaking
premise text: (5) The expiry time specified in the notice:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151N(6) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151n-ss-6
part of: 151N Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
note: Exempts notice under subsection (4) from Subsection 151C(8)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.244
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151N(7) Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151n-ss-7
part of: 151N Variation of expiry time of certain functional separation
note: Publish notice on website before varying functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.244
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151n-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151P Duration of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151p
has part: 151P(1) Duration of functional separation undertaking
has part: 151P(2) Duration of functional separation undertaking
has part: 151P(3) Duration of functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.246

151P(1) Duration of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151p-ss-1
part of: 151P Duration of functional separation undertaking
note: Condition for application of section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.246
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151p-ss-1-norm

151P(2) Duration of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151p-ss-2
part of: 151P Duration of functional separation undertaking
note: Duration of functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.246
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151p-ss-2-norm

151P(3) Duration of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151p-ss-3
part of: 151P Duration of functional separation undertaking
note: New undertaking comes into force immediately after expiry of other undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.246
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151p-ss-3-norm

151Q Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151q
has part: 151Q(1) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
has part: 151Q(2) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
has part: 151Q(3) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
has part: 151Q(4) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
has part: 151Q(5) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.247

151Q(1) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151q-ss-1
part of: 151Q Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
note: Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.247
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Temporal interval not specified
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151Q(2) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151q-ss-2
part of: 151Q Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
note: Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force may be given to ACCC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.247
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-2-norm

151Q(3) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151q-ss-3
part of: 151Q Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
note: Compliance with specific subsections required for variation of standard functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.247
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151Q(3) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory compliance with subsections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151Q(4) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151q-ss-4
part of: 151Q Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
note: Variation of joint functional separation undertaking must comply with specific subsections and paragraph.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.247
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Compliance
logic summary: Must comply with specified subsections and paragraph.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151Q(5) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151q-ss-5
part of: 151Q Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
note: The variation must be done
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.247
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151Q(5) Variation of functional separation undertaking that is in force
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151q-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must do the variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151R Further information about variation of functional separation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151r
has part: 151R(1) Further information about variation of functional separation
has part: 151R(2) Further information about variation of functional separation
has part: 151R(3) Further information about variation of functional separation
has part: 151R(4) Further information about variation of functional separation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.248

151R(1) Further information about variation of functional separation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151r-ss-1
part of: 151R Further information about variation of functional separation
note: Request for further information if a variation of functional separation is given to the ACCC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.248
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151R(1) Further information about variation of functional separation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

151R(2) Further information about variation of functional separation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151r-ss-2
part of: 151R Further information about variation of functional separation
note: Request for further information about variation of functional separation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.248
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151R(2) Further information about variation of functional separation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide further information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151R(3) Further information about variation of functional separation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151r-ss-3
part of: 151R Further information about variation of functional separation
note: The ACCC may refuse to consider the variation until the person or persons give the ACCC the information.
description: Information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.248
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151R(3) Further information about variation of functional separation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The ACCC must refuse to consider the variation until the person or persons give the ACCC the information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151R(4) Further information about variation of functional separation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151r-ss-4
part of: 151R Further information about variation of functional separation
note: The ACCC may withdraw its request for further information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.248
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151r-ss-4-norm

151S Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151s
has part: 151S(1) Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
has part: 151S(2) Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
has part: 151S(3) Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
has part: 151S(4) Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.249

151S(1) Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151s-ss-1
part of: 151S Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
note: Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.249
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-1-norm

151S(2) Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151s-ss-2
part of: 151S Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
note: Person or persons may withdraw variation at any time before ACCC makes a decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.249
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to withdraw variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for withdrawal
premise text: (2) The person or persons may withdraw the variation at any time before the ACCC makes a decision to accept or reject the variation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: can
logic summary: Ability to withdraw variation
premise text: (2) The person or persons may withdraw the variation at any time before the ACCC makes a decision to accept or reject the variation.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: can
logic summary: Ability to diffuse information about withdrawal
premise text: (2) The person or persons may withdraw the variation at any time before the ACCC makes a decision to accept or reject the variation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: can
logic summary: Ability of AI system to process withdrawal information
premise text: (2) The person or persons may withdraw the variation at any time before the ACCC makes a decision to accept or reject the variation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151S(3) Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151s-ss-3
part of: 151S Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
note: Allowance for giving a fresh variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.249
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows the person to give a fresh variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151S(4) Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151s-ss-4
part of: 151S Withdrawal of variation that is under consideration
note: Refund of fee upon withdrawal of variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.249
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151s-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to refund fee
premise text: (4) If...
conclusion text: ...the ACCC may, on behalf of the Commonwealth, refund the whole or a part of the fee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151T ACCC to accept or reject variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151t
note: ACCC must accept or reject variation of standard functional separation undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.249
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151t-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151t-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151t-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151T ACCC to accept or reject variation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151t-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to accept or reject variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151U Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151u
has part: 151U(1) Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation
has part: 151U(2) Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation
has part: 151U(3) Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.251

151U(1) Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151u-ss-1
part of: 151U Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation
note: Consultation required for variation of standard functional separation undertaking or joint functional separation undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.251
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151U(2) Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151u-ss-2
part of: 151U Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation
note: Publish notice and invite submissions before making a decision on variation.
description: Submissions within the specified time limit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.251
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice and invite submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151U(3) Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151u-ss-3
part of: 151U Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation
note: Time limit for acceptance or rejection of variation must not be shorter than 15 business days after notice is published.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.251
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151U(3) Consultation—acceptance or rejection of variation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must not be shorter than 15 business days
premise text: (3) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is published.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval contains a minimum duration of 15 business days
premise text: (3) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is published.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval has a minimum duration of 15 business days
premise text: (3) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is published.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: APPLIES TO
logic summary: Applies to provisions with temporal intervals
premise text: (3) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is published.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151u-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: APPLIES TO
logic summary: Applies to provisions with temporal intervals and duration constraints
premise text: (3) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is published.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151V Criteria for accepting variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151v
has part: 151V(1) Criteria for accepting variation
has part: 151V(2) Criteria for accepting variation
has part: 151V(3) Criteria for accepting variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252

151V(1) Criteria for accepting variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151v-ss-1
part of: 151V Criteria for accepting variation
note: Criteria for accepting variation of standard functional separation undertaking or joint functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151V(1) Criteria for accepting variation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (a) a person gives the ACCC a variation of a standard functional separation undertaking; or (b) 2 or more persons give the ACCC a variation of a joint functional separation undertaking.
conclusion text: This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval for variation acceptance
premise text: (a) a person gives the ACCC a variation of a standard functional separation undertaking; or (b) 2 or more persons give the ACCC a variation of a joint functional separation undertaking.
conclusion text: This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal scope for variation acceptance
premise text: (a) a person gives the ACCC a variation of a standard functional separation undertaking; or (b) 2 or more persons give the ACCC a variation of a joint functional separation undertaking.
conclusion text: This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Variation acceptance mechanism
premise text: (a) a person gives the ACCC a variation of a standard functional separation undertaking; or (b) 2 or more persons give the ACCC a variation of a joint functional separation undertaking.
conclusion text: Criteria for accepting variation
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: for
logic summary: Rationale for variation acceptance
premise text: (a) a person gives the ACCC a variation of a standard functional separation undertaking; or (b) 2 or more persons give the ACCC a variation of a joint functional separation undertaking.
conclusion text: This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151V(2) Criteria for accepting variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151v-ss-2
part of: 151V Criteria for accepting variation
note: Consideration of factors when accepting variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-2-norm

151V(3) Criteria for accepting variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151v-ss-3
part of: 151V Criteria for accepting variation
note: Authority to determine matters for variation purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151v-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (3) The Minister may...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151W Revocation of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151w
has part: 151W(1) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
has part: 151W(2) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
has part: 151W(3) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
has part: 151W(4) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
has part: 151W(5) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
has part: 151W(6) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252

151W(1) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151w-ss-1
part of: 151W Revocation of functional separation undertaking
note: Revocation of functional separation undertaking if breach or contravention occurs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 151W(1) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of undertaking if breach or contravention occurs.
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force; and (b) the person has breached a fundamental provision of the undertaking or contravened section 151ZF or 151ZG;
conclusion text: The ACCC may not revoke the undertaking if breach or contravention occurs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for which the undertaking is in force.
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force;
conclusion text: The undertaking is in force from the time it was given to the present.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for which the undertaking applies.
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force; and (b) the person has breached a fundamental provision of the undertaking or contravened section 151ZF or 151ZG;
conclusion text: The undertaking applies until the breach or contravention occurs.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permits revocation of undertaking if breach or contravention occurs.
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force; and (b) the person has breached a fundamental provision of the undertaking or contravened section 151ZF or 151ZG;
conclusion text: The ACCC may revoke the undertaking if breach or contravention occurs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Establishes a relationship between the revocation of an undertaking and its conditions.
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force; and (b) the person has breached a fundamental provision of the undertaking or contravened section 151ZF or 151ZG;
conclusion text: Revocation occurs if breach or contravention occurs.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151W(2) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151w-ss-2
part of: 151W Revocation of functional separation undertaking
note: Revocation of functional separation undertaking if unsatisfactory compliance record
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of functional separation undertaking
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force; and (b) the ACCC is satisfied that the person has an unsatisfactory compliance record in relation to functional separation;
conclusion text: the ACCC may, by written notice given to the person, revoke the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for revocation of functional separation undertaking
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force; and (b) the ACCC is satisfied that the person has an unsatisfactory compliance record in relation to functional separation;
conclusion text: the ACCC may, by written notice given to the person, revoke the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for revocation of functional separation undertaking based on compliance record
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force; and (b) the ACCC is satisfied that the person has an unsatisfactory compliance record in relation to functional separation;
conclusion text: the ACCC may, by written notice given to the person, revoke the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of revocation decision for functional separation undertaking
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force; and (b) the ACCC is satisfied that the person has an unsatisfactory compliance record in relation to functional separation;
conclusion text: the ACCC may, by written notice given to the person, revoke the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Rebuttal
logic summary: Rebuttal of unsatisfactory compliance record for functional separation undertaking
premise text: (a) a standard functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force; and (b) the ACCC is satisfied that the person has an unsatisfactory compliance record in relation to functional separation;
conclusion text: the ACCC may, by written notice given to the person, revoke the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151W(3) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151w-ss-3
part of: 151W Revocation of functional separation undertaking
note: ACCC must revoke standard functional separation undertaking upon request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151W(3) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice to revoke undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151W(4) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151w-ss-4
part of: 151W Revocation of functional separation undertaking
note: Revocation takes effect within a specified time frame after notice is given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-4-norm

151W(5) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151w-ss-5
part of: 151W Revocation of functional separation undertaking
note: Revocation of functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-5-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 151W(5) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

151W(6) Revocation of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151w-ss-6
part of: 151W Revocation of functional separation undertaking
note: Revocation of functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.252
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151w-ss-6-norm

151X Consultation—revocation of functional separation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151x
has part: 151X(1) Consultation—revocation of functional separation
has part: 151X(2) Consultation—revocation of functional separation
has part: 151X(3) Consultation—revocation of functional separation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.255

151X(1) Consultation—revocation of functional separation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151x-ss-1
part of: 151X Consultation—revocation of functional separation
note: ACCC must give written notice to person before revoking standard functional separation undertaking.
description: Submission within time limit specified in notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.255
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151X(1) Consultation—revocation of functional separation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACCC must give written notice to person before revoking standard functional separation undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151X(2) Consultation—revocation of functional separation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151x-ss-2
part of: 151X Consultation—revocation of functional separation
note: Time limit for revocation of joint functional separation must be at least 15 business days after notice is given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.255
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151X(2) Consultation—revocation of functional separation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days
premise text: (2) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is given.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Time limit must be at least 15 business days after notice is given
premise text: (2) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is given.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Time limit for revocation of joint functional separation must be at least 15 business days after notice is given
premise text: (2) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is given.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Revocation of joint functional separation undertaking
premise text: (2) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is given.
conclusion text: Revocation of joint functional separation undertaking
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Revocation of joint functional separation undertaking
premise text: (2) The time limit must not be shorter than 15 business days after the notice is given.
conclusion text: Revocation of joint functional separation undertaking
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151X(3) Consultation—revocation of functional separation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151x-ss-3
part of: 151X Consultation—revocation of functional separation
note: Must consult before revoking joint functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.255
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151Y Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151y
has part: 151Y(1) Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
has part: 151Y(2) Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
has part: 151Y(3) Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.256

151Y(1) Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151y-ss-1
part of: 151Y Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
note: Notification of breach or contravention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.256
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151Y(1) Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151Y(2) Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151y-ss-2
part of: 151Y Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
note: ACCC must give a person a written notice stating that the ACCC considers the person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory compliance record in relation to functional separation.
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.256
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The ACCC must give a written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
logic summary: The provision is part of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151Y(3) Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151y-ss-3
part of: 151Y Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
note: Failure to comply with subsection (2) does not affect the validity of a revocation of a functional separation undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.256
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151Y(3) Notification that a person is at risk of having an unsatisfactory
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151y-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes the effect of non-compliance on revocation validity
premise text: (2)
conclusion text: (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151Z Variation of functional separation undertaking following
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151z
has part: 151Z(1) Variation of functional separation undertaking following
has part: 151Z(2) Variation of functional separation undertaking following
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.257

151Z(1) Variation of functional separation undertaking following
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151z-ss-1
part of: 151Z Variation of functional separation undertaking following
note: ACCC may vary a revoked standard functional separation undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.257
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151Z(1) Variation of functional separation undertaking following
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to vary the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151Z(2) Variation of functional separation undertaking following
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151z-ss-2
part of: 151Z Variation of functional separation undertaking following
note: Must not vary standard functional separation undertaking under subsection (1) unless variation addresses grounds for revocation of undertaking under section 151W and does not address other matter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.257
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on varying standard functional separation undertaking
premise text: (2) The ACCC must not vary a standard functional separation undertaking under subsection (1)
conclusion text: unless the variation addresses the matter or matters that constituted the grounds for the revocation of the undertaking under section 151W; and does not address any other matter.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Variation must not address other matter
premise text: (2) The ACCC must not vary a standard functional separation undertaking under subsection (1) unless the variation: does not address any other matter.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalRelevance
logic summary: Variation must be relevant to revocation of undertaking under section 151W
premise text: (2) The ACCC must not vary a standard functional separation undertaking under subsection (1) unless the variation: addresses the matter or matters that constituted the grounds for the revocation of the undertaking under section 151W; and does not address any other matter.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: ACCC has obligation to vary standard functional separation undertaking under subsection (1)
premise text: (2) The ACCC must not vary a standard functional separation undertaking under subsection (1) unless the variation: addresses the matter or matters that constituted the grounds for the revocation of the undertaking under section 151W; and does not address any other matter.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151z-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Variation must be relevant to revocation of undertaking under section 151W
premise text: (2) The ACCC must not vary a standard functional separation undertaking under subsection (1) unless the variation: addresses the matter or matters that constituted the grounds for the revocation of the undertaking under section 151W; and does not address any other matter.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

151ZA Reporting obligations following giving of revocation notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151za
has part: 151ZA(1) Reporting obligations following giving of revocation notice
has part: 151ZA(2) Reporting obligations following giving of revocation notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.258

151ZA(1) Reporting obligations following giving of revocation notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151za-ss-1
part of: 151ZA Reporting obligations following giving of revocation notice
note: The ACCC may direct the person to provide reports about compliance with the undertaking.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.258
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151za-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151za-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZA(1) Reporting obligations following giving of revocation notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The ACCC must direct the person to provide reports.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZA(2) Reporting obligations following giving of revocation notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151za-ss-2
part of: 151ZA Reporting obligations following giving of revocation notice
note: Direct person to provide report on compliance with undertaking after revocation notice.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.258
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151za-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151za-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZA(2) Reporting obligations following giving of revocation notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Directs a person to take action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZB Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zb
has part: 151ZB(1) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
has part: 151ZB(2) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
has part: 151ZB(3) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
has part: 151ZB(4) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
has part: 151ZB(5) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
has part: 151ZB(6) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.260

151ZB(1) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zb-ss-1
part of: 151ZB Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
note: Notify ACCC of changes in control within 10 business days.
description: Notification to ACCC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.260
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZB(1) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZB(2) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zb-ss-2
part of: 151ZB Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
note: Notification by controller of person who gave undertaking must be in a form approved by ACCC.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.260
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify changes in control of person who gave undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZB(3) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zb-ss-3
part of: 151ZB Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
note: Notify ACCC of control position within 10 business days
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.260
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZB(3) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZB(4) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zb-ss-4
part of: 151ZB Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
note: Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.260
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZB(4) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZB(5) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zb-ss-5
part of: 151ZB Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
note: A person must not aid, abet, counsel or procure a contravention of subsection (1) or (3);
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.260
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-5-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZB(5) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

151ZB(6) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zb-ss-6
part of: 151ZB Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
note: Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.260
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZB(6) Requirement to notify changes in control of person who gave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to notify changes in control of person who gave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZC Register of functional separation undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zc
has part: 151ZC(1) Register of functional separation undertakings
has part: 151ZC(2) Register of functional separation undertakings
has part: 151ZC(3) Register of functional separation undertakings
has part: 151ZC(4) Register of functional separation undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.262

151ZC(1) Register of functional separation undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zc-ss-1
part of: 151ZC Register of functional separation undertakings
note: Maintain a Register of functional separation undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.262
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
logic summary: Classify undertakings
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasMember
logic summary: List variations of undertakings
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZC(2) Register of functional separation undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zc-ss-2
part of: 151ZC Register of functional separation undertakings
note: The Register is to be maintained by electronic means.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.262
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-2-norm

151ZC(3) Register of functional separation undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zc-ss-3
part of: 151ZC Register of functional separation undertakings
note: Make Register available for inspection on ACCC's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.262
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZC(3) Register of functional separation undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide access to Register
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZC(4) Register of functional separation undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zc-ss-4
part of: 151ZC Register of functional separation undertakings
note: The Register is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.262
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zc-ss-4-norm

151ZD Compliance with functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zd
has part: 151ZD(1) Compliance with functional separation undertaking
has part: 151ZD(2) Compliance with functional separation undertaking
has part: 151ZD(3) Compliance with functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.262

151ZD(1) Compliance with functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zd-ss-1
part of: 151ZD Compliance with functional separation undertaking
note: Compliance with functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.262
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zd-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZD(2) Compliance with functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zd-ss-2
part of: 151ZD Compliance with functional separation undertaking
note: Prohibition on aiding, abetting, or conspiring to contravene subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.262
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zd-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zd-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZD(2) Compliance with functional separation undertaking
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

151ZD(3) Compliance with functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zd-ss-3
part of: 151ZD Compliance with functional separation undertaking
note: Civil penalty provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.262
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zd-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits breaches of civil penalty provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZE Enforcement of functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151ze
note: Order directing disposal of network units, lines, shares or other assets if breach found.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.263
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZE Enforcement of functional separation undertaking
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Directs disposal of assets.
premise text: (a) a functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force;
conclusion text: the Court may make any or all of the following orders...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for asset disposal.
premise text: (d) an order directing the disposal of network units, lines, shares or other assets;
conclusion text: ...the Court may make any or all of the following orders...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of breach on asset disposal.
premise text: (a) a functional separation undertaking given by a person is in force;
conclusion text: ...the Court may make any or all of the following orders...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagating breach to asset disposal.
premise text: (b) the Federal Court is satisfied, on the application of...
conclusion text: ...the Court may make any or all of the following orders...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151ze-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classification of breach to asset disposal.
premise text: (b) the Federal Court is satisfied, on the application of...
conclusion text: ...the Court may make any or all of the following orders...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZF Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zf
has part: 151ZF(1) Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
has part: 151ZF(2) Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
has part: 151ZF(3) Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.265

151ZF(1) Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zf-ss-1
part of: 151ZF Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
note: Discrimination in wholesale services supply is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.265
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZF(1) Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of discrimination
premise text: Section 142C and section 143 apply to the line.
conclusion text: Discrimination is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between designated commencement date and prohibition period
premise text: The person must not discriminate on or after the designated commencement date.
conclusion text: Prohibition period starts at the designated commencement date.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of prohibition on wholesale services supply
premise text: If section 142C or section 143 applies to the line, then discrimination is prohibited.
conclusion text: Discrimination implies a violation of the law.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagation of prohibition through wholesale customers
premise text: The person's wholesale customers or prospective wholesale customers are affected by the prohibition.
conclusion text: Prohibition spreads to all eligible customers.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classification of wholesale customers using AI
premise text: The person's wholesale customers or prospective wholesale customers can be classified using artificial intelligence.
conclusion text: Eligible customers can be classified using AI.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZF(2) Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zf-ss-2
part of: 151ZF Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
note: Wholesale customer discrimination allowed under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.265
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZF(2) Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows wholesale customer discrimination
premise text: (2) The rule in subsection (1) does not prevent discrimination...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

151ZF(3) Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zf-ss-3
part of: 151ZF Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
note: Grounds for believing a wholesale customer is not creditworthy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.265
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZF(3) Eligible services to be supplied on a non-discriminatory basis
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: List of examples
premise text: (2)
conclusion text: (a) and (b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZG Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zg
has part: 151ZG(1) Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a
has part: 151ZG(2) Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.267

151ZG(1) Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zg-ss-1
part of: 151ZG Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a
note: Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a designated commencement date if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.267
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZG(1) Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If section 142C or section 143 applies, then no discrimination between wholesale customers is allowed.
premise text: section 142C applies to the line
conclusion text: no discrimination between wholesale customers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If neither section 142C nor section 143 applies, then a functional separation undertaking is required.
premise text: neither section 142C nor section 143 applies to the line
conclusion text: a functional separation undertaking is required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The provision applies during the designated commencement date.
premise text: on and after the designated commencement date
conclusion text: if an eligible service is supplied or proposed to be supplied by a person using a local access line
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: A functional separation undertaking is required if neither section 142C nor section 143 applies.
premise text: neither section 142C nor section 143 applies to the line
conclusion text: a functional separation undertaking is required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
logic summary: No discrimination between wholesale customers is allowed if section 142C or section 143 applies.
premise text: section 142C applies to the line
conclusion text: no discrimination between wholesale customers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

151ZG(2) Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zg-ss-2
part of: 151ZG Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a
note: Discrimination between wholesale customers is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.267
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZG(2) Eligible services—related activities to be carried on on a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of discrimination
premise text: State must not discriminate
conclusion text: Wholesale customers must be treated equally
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of activities as eligible or non-eligible
premise text: Activities are classified as eligible or non-eligible
conclusion text: Discrimination is prohibited for eligible activities
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between activities and discrimination prohibition
premise text: Activities must be carried out before discrimination is prohibited
conclusion text: Discrimination is prohibited for preparatory activities
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zg-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of discriminatory behavior
premise text: State must not discriminate between wholesale customers
conclusion text: Wholesale customers must be treated equally
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZH Statement about the differences between an access
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zh
note: Publish statement on website within 5 business days after access agreement entry.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.269
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zh-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zh-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zh-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZH Statement about the differences between an access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zh-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide statement on website
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZI Anti-avoidance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zi
has part: 151ZI(1) Anti-avoidance
has part: 151ZI(2) Anti-avoidance
has part: 151ZI(3) Anti-avoidance
has part: 151ZI(4) Anti-avoidance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.273

151ZI(1) Anti-avoidance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zi-ss-1
part of: 151ZI Anti-avoidance
note: Corporation cannot enter into a scheme to avoid application of Part provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.273
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZI(1) Anti-avoidance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A corporation must not...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZI(2) Anti-avoidance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zi-ss-2
part of: 151ZI Anti-avoidance
note: A person must not aid, abet, counsel or procure a contravention of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.273
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZI(2) Anti-avoidance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

151ZI(3) Anti-avoidance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zi-ss-3
part of: 151ZI Anti-avoidance
note: Civil penalty provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.273
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits civil penalty provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZI(4) Anti-avoidance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zi-ss-4
part of: 151ZI Anti-avoidance
note: Definition of scheme for purposes of this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.273
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zi-ss-4-norm

151ZJ Self-incrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zj
has part: 151ZJ(1) Self-incrimination
has part: 151ZJ(2) Self-incrimination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.274

151ZJ(1) Self-incrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zj-ss-1
part of: 151ZJ Self-incrimination
note: No excuse from giving a report under certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.274
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zj-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZJ(1) Self-incrimination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZJ(2) Self-incrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zj-ss-2
part of: 151ZJ Self-incrimination
note: No admissible evidence against an individual in certain cases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.274
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zj-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZJ(2) Self-incrimination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to protect an individual's self-incrimination
premise text: (2) However, in the case of an individual:
conclusion text: is not admissible in evidence against the individual.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

151ZK Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zk
note: Delegation of ACCC powers to staff and SES employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.274
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zk-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zk-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zk-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permittedBy
logic summary: Permission granted
premise text: The ACCC may, by writing, delegate to a person...
conclusion text: ...the ACCC's powers under any of the following provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zk-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: The ACCC may delegate to a person who is...
conclusion text: ...the ACCC's powers under any of the following provisions
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZL Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zl
has part: 151ZL(1) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
has part: 151ZL(2) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
has part: 151ZL(3) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
has part: 151ZL(4) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
has part: 151ZL(5) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
has part: 151ZL(6) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.275

151ZL(1) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zl-ss-1
part of: 151ZL Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
note: Right to review ACCC decision on functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.275
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Right to review
conclusion text: The person or persons may apply to the Australian Competition Tribunal for a review of the decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZL(2) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zl-ss-2
part of: 151ZL Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
note: Right to review ACCC decision on functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.275
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Right to review
premise text: The person or persons may apply...
conclusion text: to the Australian Competition Tribunal for a review of the decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

151ZL(3) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zl-ss-3
part of: 151ZL Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
note: Right to review decision by Australian Competition Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.275
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Has the right to review a decision
premise text: The ACCC has made a decision under section 151T.
conclusion text: The person or persons may apply to the Australian Competition Tribunal for a review of the decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During the period of the decision
premise text: The decision is made under section 151T.
conclusion text: The person or persons may apply to the Australian Competition Tribunal for a review of the decision during this period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implies that the decision is reviewable if the ACCC rejects a variation
premise text: The ACCC makes a decision under section 151T to reject a variation.
conclusion text: The person or persons may apply to the Australian Competition Tribunal for a review of the decision.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: ifAndOnlyIf
logic summary: If the ACCC rejects a variation, then the person or persons may apply to the Australian Competition Tribunal for a review of the decision
premise text: The ACCC makes a decision under section 151T to reject a variation.
conclusion text: The person or persons may apply to the Australian Competition Tribunal for a review of the decision if and only if the ACCC rejects a variation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Has the right to review a decision by the Australian Competition Tribunal
premise text: The person or persons may apply to the Australian Competition Tribunal for a review of the decision.
conclusion text: The person or persons has the right to review a decision by the Australian Competition Tribunal.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZL(4) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zl-ss-4
part of: 151ZL Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
note: Right to review decision by Australian Competition Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.275
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZL(4) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to review decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZL(5) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zl-ss-5
part of: 151ZL Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
note: Right to review decision by Australian Competition Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.275
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Right to review decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZL(6) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zl-ss-6
part of: 151ZL Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
note: Application for review of ACCC decision must be made within specified time frames.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.275
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZL(6) Review by the Australian Competition Tribunal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zl-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made within specified time frames.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZM Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zm
has part: 151ZM(1) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
has part: 151ZM(2) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
has part: 151ZM(3) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
has part: 151ZM(4) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
has part: 151ZM(5) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
has part: 151ZM(6) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
has part: 151ZM(7) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.276

151ZM(1) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zm-ss-1
part of: 151ZM Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
note: The Australian Competition Tribunal may make a decision affirming or setting aside the ACCC's decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.276
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May make a decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZM(2) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zm-ss-2
part of: 151ZM Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
note: Decision of ACCC is binding on Australian Competition Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.276
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: binding
logic summary: Binding decision
premise text: Decision of ACCC is binding on Australian Competition Tribunal
conclusion text: Decision of ACCC is binding
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: binding
logic summary: Binding on Australian Competition Tribunal
premise text: A decision by the Australian Competition Tribunal: affirming a decision of the ACCC; or setting aside a decision of the ACCC;
conclusion text: Decision of ACCC is binding on Australian Competition Tribunal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: binding
logic summary: Binding on ACCC decisions
premise text: A decision by the Australian Competition Tribunal: affirming a decision of the ACCC; or setting aside a decision of the ACCC;
conclusion text: Decision of ACCC is binding on ACCC decisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: binding
logic summary: Binding on Australian Competition Tribunal decisions
premise text: A decision by the Australian Competition Tribunal: affirming a decision of the ACCC; or setting aside a decision of the ACCC;
conclusion text: Decision of ACCC is binding on Australian Competition Tribunal decisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZM(3) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zm-ss-3
part of: 151ZM Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
note: Reset start of decision-making period after ACCC sets aside a decision to reject a functional separation undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.276
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: reset
logic summary: Reset start of decision-making period
premise text: Subsection 151F(5) has effect as if the undertaking had been received by the ACCC immediately after the decision was set aside.
conclusion text: The start of the 3-month decision-making period is reset.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Reset start of decision-making period during which the undertaking must be considered
premise text: Subsection 151F(5) has effect as if the undertaking had been received by the ACCC immediately after the decision was set aside.
conclusion text: The start of the 3-month decision-making period is reset during which the undertaking must be considered.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Reset start of decision-making period during which the undertaking must be considered
premise text: Subsection 151F(5) has effect as if the undertaking had been received by the ACCC immediately after the decision was set aside.
conclusion text: The start of the 3-month decision-making period is reset during which the undertaking must be considered.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustConsider
logic summary: Must consider the undertaking during the reset period
premise text: Subsection 151F(5) has effect as if the undertaking had been received by the ACCC immediately after the decision was set aside.
conclusion text: The ACCC must consider the undertaking during the reset period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustProvide
logic summary: Must provide information about the undertaking during the reset period
premise text: Subsection 151F(5) has effect as if the undertaking had been received by the ACCC immediately after the decision was set aside.
conclusion text: The ACCC must provide information about the undertaking during the reset period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZM(4) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zm-ss-4
part of: 151ZM Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
note: Reset start of decision-making period after setting aside ACCC decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.276
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Australian Competition Tribunal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZM(5) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zm-ss-5
part of: 151ZM Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
note: Requires ACCC to provide information, reports, and assistance to the Australian Competition Tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.276
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Expresses a requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZM(6) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zm-ss-6
part of: 151ZM Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
note: May consider information given to the ACCC in connection with a decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.276
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May consider information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

151ZM(7) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zm-ss-7
part of: 151ZM Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
note: References to other Acts have effect in relation to a review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.276
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151ZM(7) Functions and powers of the Australian Competition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zm-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes references to other Acts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151ZN Provisions that do not apply in relation to an Australian
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151zn
note: Exemption from Competition Tribunal review for ACCC decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.277
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zn-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zn-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-151zn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
logic summary: Exempts ACCC decisions from Competition Tribunal review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152 Associate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-152
note: Definition of associate for control purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.277
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-152-norm

153 Control
type: Concept
realized by: sec-153
note: Control includes control as a result of, or by means of, trusts, agreements, arrangements, understandings and practices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.278
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-153-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-153-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 153 Control
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

154 Control of a company
type: Concept
realized by: sec-154
has part: 154(1) Control of a company
has part: 154(2) Control of a company
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.279

154(1) Control of a company
type: Concept
realized by: sec-154-ss-1
part of: 154 Control of a company
note: Determines control of a company under Schedule 1 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.279
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-154-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-154-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-154-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 154(1) Control of a company
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-154-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
logic summary: Determines control of a company
premise text: Schedule 1 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992
conclusion text: control of a company
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

154(2) Control of a company
type: Concept
realized by: sec-154-ss-2
part of: 154 Control of a company
note: Definition of associate in section 152 applies instead.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.279
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-154-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-154-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-154-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 154(2) Control of a company
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-154-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Definition of associate applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

155 When a person is in a position to exercise control of a network
type: Concept
realized by: sec-155
note: A person is in a position to exercise control of a telecommunications network if they meet certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.279
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 155 When a person is in a position to exercise control of a network
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasControl
logic summary: Has control over a telecommunications network.
premise text: (a) the controller legally or beneficially owns the network...
conclusion text: The controller has control over the network.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During what time period does the controller have control?
premise text: (i) to exercise control of the operation of all or part of the network...
conclusion text: The controller has control during this time period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: If the controller meets these conditions, then they have control.
premise text: (a) the controller legally or beneficially owns the network...
conclusion text: The controller has control if they own the network.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: The controller's control spreads to other parts of the network.
premise text: (ii) to exercise control of the selection of the kinds of services that are supplied using the network...
conclusion text: The controller's control diffuses to other parts of the network.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: The controller is recognized as having control by others.
premise text: (ii) the controller, either alone or together with an associate of the controller, is in a position to veto any action taken by the board of directors of the company...
conclusion text: Others recognize the controller's control.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

155A When a person is in a position to exercise control of a line
type: Concept
realized by: sec-155a
note: A person is in a position to exercise control of a line if they own it or have significant influence over its management.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.281
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 155A When a person is in a position to exercise control of a line
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasControl
logic summary: Has control
premise text: The controller is in a position to exercise control of the operation of all or part of the line.
conclusion text: The person has control over the line.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasVetoPower
logic summary: Has veto power over company actions
premise text: (ii) The controller, either alone or together with an associate of the controller, is in a position to veto any action taken by the board of directors of the company.
conclusion text: The person has veto power over company actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasAppointmentPower
logic summary: Has appointment power over company directors
premise text: (iii) The controller, either alone or together with an associate of the controller, is in a position to appoint or secure the appointment of, or veto the appointment of, at least half of the board of directors of the company.
conclusion text: The person has appointment power over company directors.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-155a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasDirectionPower
logic summary: Has direction power over company management
premise text: (iv) The controller, either alone or together with an associate of the controller, is in a position to exercise, in any other manner, whether directly or indirectly, direction or restraint over any substantial issue affecting the management or affairs of the company.
conclusion text: The person has direction power over company management.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156 Deemed networks etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156
has part: 156(1) Deemed networks etc.
has part: 156(2) Deemed networks etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.283

156(1) Deemed networks etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156-ss-1
part of: 156 Deemed networks etc.
note: Network alteration or upgrade obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.283
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156(1) Deemed networks etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to treat the altered network as a separate entity.
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part...
conclusion text: ...that part is taken to be a network in its own right;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the alteration/upgrade and the designated commencement date.
premise text: (a) a telecommunications network is altered or upgraded on or after 1 January 2011...
conclusion text: ...but before the designated commencement date;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Specifies the temporal scope of the obligation.
premise text: (a) a telecommunications network is altered or upgraded on or after 1 January 2011...
conclusion text: ...but before the designated commencement date;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Allows for the possibility of treating the altered network as a separate entity.
premise text: (b) as a result of the alteration or upgrade...
conclusion text: ...a part of the network became capable of being used to supply a superfast carriage service;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

156(2) Deemed networks etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156-ss-2
part of: 156 Deemed networks etc.
note: Telecommunications network extension obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.283
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156(2) Deemed networks etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

1 January 2011, but before the designated commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-3
note: Network taken to have come into existence on or after 1 January 2011, but before the designated commencement date.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.283
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-1-3-norm

156A Certain lines deemed to have come into existence on or after
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156a
note: Defines conditions for local access lines coming into existence before designated commencement date
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.285
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-156a-norm

157 Certain installations and connections are not taken to be an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-157
has part: 157(1) Certain installations and connections are not taken to be an
has part: 157(2) Certain installations and connections are not taken to be an
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.286

157(1) Certain installations and connections are not taken to be an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-157-ss-1
part of: 157 Certain installations and connections are not taken to be an
note: Neither installation nor connection is taken to be an extension, alteration or upgrade of the network.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.286
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-157-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-157-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 157(1) Certain installations and connections are not taken to be an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

157(2) Certain installations and connections are not taken to be an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-157-ss-2
part of: 157 Certain installations and connections are not taken to be an
note: Exemptions from subsection (1) for certain expressions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.286
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-157-ss-2-norm

158 Local access line
type: Concept
realized by: sec-158
has part: 158(1) Local access line
has part: 158(2) Local access line
has part: 158(2A) Local access line
has part: 158(2B) Local access line
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.287

158(1) Local access line
type: Concept
realized by: sec-158-ss-1
part of: 158 Local access line
note: Definition of local access line
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.287
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 158(1) Local access line
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is part of
logic summary: Part of the infrastructure
premise text: Local access network
conclusion text: Local access line
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158(2) Local access line
type: Concept
realized by: sec-158-ss-2
part of: 158 Local access line
note: Line does not form part of a local access line to the extent that it is on the customer side of the boundary of a telecommunications network.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.287
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-2-norm

158(2A) Local access line
type: Concept
realized by: sec-158-ss-2a
part of: 158 Local access line
note: Conditional effect of subsection (2) on subsection (2B)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.287
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-2a-norm

158(2B) Local access line
type: Concept
realized by: sec-158-ss-2b
part of: 158 Local access line
note: Relates to other provisions for lines to which section 142C applies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.287
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 158(2B) Local access line
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: to the extent that
logic summary: Temporal relation to section 142C
premise text: Section 151ZF, 151ZG or 151ZH relates to a line to which section 142C applies
conclusion text: Section 142C applies
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158A Deemed local access lines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-158a
has part: 158A(1) Deemed local access lines
has part: 158A(2) Deemed local access lines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.288

158A(1) Deemed local access lines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-158a-ss-1
part of: 158A Deemed local access lines
note: Local access line deemed to have come into existence on or after the designated commencement date if it was in existence immediately before and is extended on or after that date.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.288
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 158A(1) Deemed local access lines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to treat the local access line as having come into existence on or after the designated commencement date.
premise text: (a) a local access line was in existence immediately before the designated commencement date;
conclusion text: the extension is taken to be a local access line in its own right;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between the designated commencement date and the date when the local access line was in existence immediately before.
premise text: (a) a local access line was in existence immediately before the designated commencement date;
conclusion text: the extension is taken to be a local access line in its own right;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between the designated commencement date and the date when the local access line was extended.
premise text: (b) the line is extended on or after the designated commencement date;
conclusion text: the extension is taken to be a local access line in its own right;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to treat the local access line as having come into existence on or after the designated commencement date.
premise text: (d) the local access line referred to in paragraph (c) is taken to have come into existence on or after the designated commencement date.
conclusion text: the extension is taken to be a local access line in its own right;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158A(2) Deemed local access lines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-158a-ss-2
part of: 158A Deemed local access lines
note: Exemptions from subsection (1) of section 158A(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.288
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-158a-ss-2-norm

159 Alteration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-159
has part: 159(1) Alteration
has part: 159(2) Alteration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.289

159(1) Alteration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-159-ss-1
part of: 159 Alteration
note: An alteration of a telecommunications network does not include an extension of the network.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.289
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-159-ss-1-norm

159(2) Alteration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-159-ss-2
part of: 159 Alteration
note: An alteration of a line does not include an extension of the line.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.289
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-159-ss-2-norm

160 Upgrade of telecommunications network
type: Concept
realized by: sec-160
has part: 160(1) Upgrade of telecommunications network
has part: 160(2) Upgrade of telecommunications network
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.289

160(1) Upgrade of telecommunications network
type: Concept
realized by: sec-160-ss-1
part of: 160 Upgrade of telecommunications network
note: Upgrade of telecommunications network does not include an extension of the network.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.289
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-160-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-160-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 160(1) Upgrade of telecommunications network
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

160(2) Upgrade of telecommunications network
type: Concept
realized by: sec-160-ss-2
part of: 160 Upgrade of telecommunications network
note: Upgrade of telecommunications network does not include extension of the line.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.289
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-160-ss-2-norm

161 Extended meaning of residential customer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-161
has part: 161(1) Extended meaning of residential customer
has part: 161(2) Extended meaning of residential customer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.289

161(1) Extended meaning of residential customer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-161-ss-1
part of: 161 Extended meaning of residential customer
note: Individual carrying on business at residence is taken as residential customer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.289
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 161(1) Extended meaning of residential customer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Obligation to treat individual as residential customer.
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part...
conclusion text: ...the individual, in the individual’s capacity as a customer, is taken to be a residential customer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: carried out at
logic summary: Temporal relation between business and residence
premise text: (a) most or all of the work of the business is carried out at the residence of the individual;
conclusion text: ...the individual, in the individual’s capacity as a customer, is taken to be a residential customer.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: carried out at
logic summary: Temporal relation between business and residence (recurring trace)
premise text: (a) most or all of the work of the business is carried out at the residence of the individual;
conclusion text: ...the individual, in the individual’s capacity as a customer, is taken to be a residential customer.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: carried on by
logic summary: Diffusion logic for 'business carried on'
premise text: (b) the business does not occupy any premises other than the residence of the individual;
conclusion text: ...the individual, in the individual’s capacity as a customer, is taken to be a residential customer.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: carried on by
logic summary: CogAI logic for 'business carried on'
premise text: (b) the business does not occupy any premises other than the residence of the individual;
conclusion text: ...the individual, in the individual’s capacity as a customer, is taken to be a residential customer.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161(2) Extended meaning of residential customer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-161-ss-2
part of: 161 Extended meaning of residential customer
note: Extended meaning of residential customer for partnership businesses
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.289
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-161-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 161(2) Extended meaning of residential customer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

162 Close proximity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-162
has part: 162(1) Close proximity
has part: 162(2) Close proximity
has part: 162(3) Close proximity
has part: 162(4) Close proximity
has part: 162(5) Close proximity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.291

162(1) Close proximity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-162-ss-1
part of: 162 Close proximity
note: Minister may determine proximity for specified circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.291
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to determine proximity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162(2) Close proximity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-162-ss-2
part of: 162 Close proximity
note: Minister may determine proximity exception
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.291
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to deviate from proximity rule
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162(3) Close proximity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-162-ss-3
part of: 162 Close proximity
note: Delegation to the ACCC must be of a legislative character.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.291
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 162(3) Close proximity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Obligation on delegation
premise text: Delegation to the ACCC must be of a legislative character.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162(4) Close proximity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-162-ss-4
part of: 162 Close proximity
note: Delegation of powers to ACCC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.291
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: delegation
logic summary: Power delegation
premise text: Minister delegates power to ACCC
conclusion text: ACCC holds the delegated power
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162(5) Close proximity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-162-ss-5
part of: 162 Close proximity
note: Comply with written directions of the Minister when performing a delegated function or exercising a delegated power.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.291
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-162-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with written directions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-270
note: Protect the confidentiality of certain information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.292
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-270-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-270-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-270-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-270-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-270-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-270-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory duty to protect confidentiality
premise text: None
conclusion text: Protect the confidentiality of information that relates to...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-270-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Relates to
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure and use of protected information
premise text: Disclosure or use of protected information is authorised in limited circumstances (for example, disclosure or use for purposes relating to the enforcement of the criminal law).
conclusion text: Certain record-keeping requirements are imposed in relation to authorised disclosures or uses of information.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-270-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory duty to disclose only for authorized purposes
premise text: An authorised recipient of protected information may only disclose or use the information for an authorised purpose.
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-270-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory duty to keep records
premise text: Certain record-keeping requirements are imposed in relation to authorised disclosures or uses of information.
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271 Eligible person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-271
note: Definition of an eligible person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.292
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-271-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-271-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 271 Eligible person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

272 Number-database operator and eligible number-database
type: Concept
realized by: sec-272
has part: 272(1) Number-database operator and eligible number-database
has part: 272(2) Number-database operator and eligible number-database
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.293

272(1) Number-database operator and eligible number-database
type: Concept
realized by: sec-272-ss-1
part of: 272 Number-database operator and eligible number-database
note: Definition of number-database operator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.293
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-272-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-272-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-272-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(1) Number-database operator and eligible number-database
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-272-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies a person with a determination in force
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, a number-database operator is a person...
conclusion text: a number-database operator is a person in respect of which a determination is in force under subsection 472(1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(2) Number-database operator and eligible number-database
type: Concept
realized by: sec-272-ss-2
part of: 272 Number-database operator and eligible number-database
note: Definition of eligible number-database person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.293
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-272-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-272-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(2) Number-database operator and eligible number-database
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

273 Information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-273
note: A reference in this Part to information includes a reference to opinion.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.293
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-273-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-273-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-273-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-273-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273 Information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-273-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes
premise text: A reference in this Part to information
conclusion text: a reference to opinion
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-273-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclass of
premise text: Information
conclusion text: Opinion
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

274 Telecommunications contractor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-274
note: Definition of telecommunications contractor
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.293
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-274-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-274-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-274-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 274 Telecommunications contractor
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-274-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

275 Number-database contractor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-275
note: Definition of number-database contractor
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.293
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275-norm

275A Location information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-275a
has part: 275A(1) Location information
has part: 275A(2) Location information
has part: 275A(3) Location information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294

275A(1) Location information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-275a-ss-1
part of: 275A Location information
note: Information about location of mobile telephone handset or device must be provided by the customer responsible for it.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 275A(1) Location information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide location information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

275A(2) Location information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-275a-ss-2
part of: 275A Location information
note: Document about location of mobile communications device must relate to customer's affairs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 275A(2) Location information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide location information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

275A(3) Location information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-275a-ss-3
part of: 275A Location information
note: Clarifies section enactment for doubt avoidance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275a-ss-3-norm

275B Emergency management person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-275b
has part: 275B(1) Emergency management person
has part: 275B(2) Emergency management person
has part: 275B(3) Emergency management person
has part: 275B(4) Emergency management person
has part: 275B(5) Emergency management person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294

275B(1) Emergency management person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-275b-ss-1
part of: 275B Emergency management person
note: Defines emergency management person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 275B(1) Emergency management person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines term
conclusion text: emergency management person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Classifies emergency management person
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

275B(2) Emergency management person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-275b-ss-2
part of: 275B Emergency management person
note: Specify offices and/or positions for emergency management person definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-2-norm

275B(3) Emergency management person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-275b-ss-3
part of: 275B Emergency management person
note: Specify offices or positions under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 275B(3) Emergency management person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must specify offices or positions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

275B(4) Emergency management person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-275b-ss-4
part of: 275B Emergency management person
note: Protection of communications does not limit subsection (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 275B(4) Emergency management person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not
logic summary: Obligation negation
premise text: (3)
conclusion text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

275B(5) Emergency management person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-275b-ss-5
part of: 275B Emergency management person
note: Consultation requirement before making an instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.294
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 275B(5) Emergency management person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consult
premise text: (5) Before making an instrument under subsection (2), the AFP Minister must consult the Minister administering this Act.
conclusion text: The AFP Minister MUST consult the Minister administering this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation
premise text: (5) Before making an instrument under subsection (2), the AFP Minister must consult the Minister administering this Act.
conclusion text: The consultation MUST occur BEFORE making an instrument under subsection (2).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation
premise text: (5) Before making an instrument under subsection (2), the AFP Minister must consult the Minister administering this Act.
conclusion text: The consultation MUST occur WITHIN a specific temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Consultation as a diffusion of responsibility
premise text: (5) Before making an instrument under subsection (2), the AFP Minister must consult the Minister administering this Act.
conclusion text: The consultation IS_A a diffusion of responsibility from the AFP Minister to the Minister administering this Act.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275b-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Consultation as a cognitive process
premise text: (5) Before making an instrument under subsection (2), the AFP Minister must consult the Minister administering this Act.
conclusion text: The consultation IS_A a cognitive process involving the AFP Minister and the Minister administering this Act.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

275C Emergency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-275c
note: Defines 'emergency' for this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.295
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275c-norm

275D Emergency law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-275d
has part: 275D(1) Emergency law
has part: 275D(2) Emergency law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.295

275D(1) Emergency law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-275d-ss-1
part of: 275D Emergency law
note: Definition of emergency law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.295
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275d-ss-1-norm

275D(2) Emergency law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-275d-ss-2
part of: 275D Emergency law
note: Specify a law for emergency law definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.295
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275d-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to specify a law
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

275E Relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-275e
note: Defines relevant information for this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.295
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-275e-norm

276 Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-276
has part: 276(1) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
has part: 276(2) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
has part: 276(3) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.296

276(1) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-276-ss-1
part of: 276 Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
note: Disclose or use information about certain communications without consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.296
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 276(1) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure or use of certain information.
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

276(2) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-276-ss-2
part of: 276 Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
note: Disclosing or using certain information is prohibited for eligible persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.296
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 276(2) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
premise text: (2) A person who has been an eligible person must not disclose or use...
conclusion text: ...Offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between knowledge and disclosure.
premise text: (2) A person who has been an eligible person must not disclose or use...
conclusion text: ...because the person was employed by the contractor in connection with its business as such a contractor.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure and knowledge.
premise text: (2) A person who has been an eligible person must not disclose or use...
conclusion text: ...because the person was employed by the contractor in connection with its business as such a contractor.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread of knowledge
logic summary: Spread of knowledge and disclosure.
premise text: (2) A person who has been an eligible person must not disclose or use...
conclusion text: ...because the person was employed by the contractor in connection with its business as such a contractor.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph
logic summary: Knowledge graph of persons and their knowledge.
premise text: (2) A person who has been an eligible person must not disclose or use...
conclusion text: ...because the person was employed by the contractor in connection with its business as such a contractor.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

276(3) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-276-ss-3
part of: 276 Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
note: Offence for contravening section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.296
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 276(3) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-276-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

277 Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
type: Concept
realized by: sec-277
has part: 277(1) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
has part: 277(2) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
has part: 277(3) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.298

277(1) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
type: Concept
realized by: sec-277-ss-1
part of: 277 Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
note: Disclose or use information or documents that relate to carriage services or personal particulars without permission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.298
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
premise text: (1) An eligible number-database person must not disclose or use any information or document...
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure/use and business activities.
premise text: (1) An eligible number-database person must not disclose or use any information or document...
conclusion text: in connection with the person’s business as such an operator; or because the person is employed by the operator in connection with its business as such an operator
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure/use and carriage services.
premise text: (1) An eligible number-database person must not disclose or use any information or document...
conclusion text: if the person is a number-database operator—in connection with the person’s business as such an operator; or if the person is an employee of a number-database operator—because the person is employed by the operator in connection with its business as such an operator
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spread of disclosure/use to personal particulars.
premise text: (1) An eligible number-database person must not disclose or use any information or document...
conclusion text: because the person is employed by the operator in connection with its business as such an operator; or because the person is employed by the operator in connection with its business as such a contractor
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of disclosure/use on carriage services.
premise text: (1) An eligible number-database person must not disclose or use any information or document...
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

277(2) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
type: Concept
realized by: sec-277-ss-2
part of: 277 Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
note: Prohibition on disclosing or using information related to a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) without proper authorization.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.298
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 277(2) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on certain actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

277(3) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
type: Concept
realized by: sec-277-ss-3
part of: 277 Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
note: Offence for contravening section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.298
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 277(3) Primary disclosure/use offence—eligible number-database
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-277-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

278 Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-278
has part: 278(1) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
has part: 278(2) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
has part: 278(3) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
has part: 278(4) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.300

278(1) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-278-ss-1
part of: 278 Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
note: Disclose or use information about emergency calls without authorization.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.300
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 278(1) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
premise text: (1) An emergency call person must not disclose or use any information...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

278(2) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-278-ss-2
part of: 278 Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
note: Disclose or use information related to emergency call service operations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.300
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 278(2) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
premise text: (2) A person who has been an emergency call person must not disclose...
conclusion text: ...Offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure or use prohibition.
premise text: (2) A person who has been an emergency call person must not disclose...
conclusion text: ...Offence
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

278(3) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-278-ss-3
part of: 278 Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
note: Offence for contravening section 278(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.300
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits contravention of section 278(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies contravention as an offence
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

278(4) Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-278-ss-4
part of: 278 Primary disclosure/use offence—emergency call persons
note: Exempts emergency call communications from primary disclosure/use offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.300
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-cogai-6

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits certain types of communications.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Defines the scope of exempted emergency call communications.
premise text: (4) Subparagraphs (1)(a)(i) and (ii)
conclusion text: carried by a carrier or carriage service provider
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Specifies the temporal relationship between exempted emergency call communications.
premise text: (4) Subparagraphs (1)(a)(i) and (ii)
conclusion text: carried by a carrier or carriage service provider
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between exempted emergency call communications.
premise text: (4) Subparagraphs (1)(a)(i) and (ii)
conclusion text: carried by a carrier or carriage service provider
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Contains
logic summary: Describes the propagation of exempted emergency call communications.
premise text: (4) Subparagraphs (1)(a)(i) and (ii)
conclusion text: carried by a carrier or carriage service provider
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-278-ss-4-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Contains
logic summary: Describes the processing of exempted emergency call communications.
premise text: (4) Subparagraphs (1)(a)(i) and (ii)
conclusion text: carried by a carrier or carriage service provider
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

279 Performance of person’s duties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-279
has part: 279(1) Performance of person’s duties
has part: 279(2) Performance of person’s duties
has part: 279(3) Performance of person’s duties
has part: 279(4) Performance of person’s duties
has part: 279(5) Performance of person’s duties
has part: 279(6) Performance of person’s duties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.302

279(1) Performance of person’s duties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-279-ss-1
part of: 279 Performance of person’s duties
note: Disclosure or use of information is allowed in performance of duties as an employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.302
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 279(1) Performance of person’s duties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permits disclosure or use in performance of duties.
premise text: (1) Section 276 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for disclosure or use.
premise text: (b) the disclosure or use is made in the performance of the person’s duties as such an employee.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implicates that disclosure or use is allowed if it's part of job duties.
premise text: (a) the person is an employee...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

279(2) Performance of person’s duties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-279-ss-2
part of: 279 Performance of person’s duties
note: Disclosure or use of information is allowed in performance of duties as a telecommunications contractor.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.302
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 279(2) Performance of person’s duties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows disclosure or use
premise text: (a) the person is a telecommunications contractor; and (b) the disclosure or use is made in the performance of the person’s duties as such a contractor.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows disclosure or use in performance of duties
premise text: (2) Section 276 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person of information or a document if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

279(3) Performance of person’s duties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-279-ss-3
part of: 279 Performance of person’s duties
note: Disclosure or use of information is allowed in performance of duties as an employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.302
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 279(3) Performance of person’s duties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose or use information in performance of duties.
premise text: (3) Section 277 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

279(4) Performance of person’s duties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-279-ss-4
part of: 279 Performance of person’s duties
note: Disclosure or use of information or document by a number-database contractor in performance of duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.302
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-4-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 279(4) Performance of person’s duties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

279(5) Performance of person’s duties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-279-ss-5
part of: 279 Performance of person’s duties
note: Disclosure or use of information by an employee in performance of duties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.302
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 279(5) Performance of person’s duties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Permits disclosure or use by an employee in performance of duties
premise text: (5) Section 278 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person of information or a document if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation: disclosure or use is made in the performance of the person's duties as such an employee
premise text: the disclosure or use is made in the performance of the person’s duties as such an employee.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace: disclosure or use by a person of information or a document
premise text: the person is an employee of: (i) a recognised person who operates an emergency call service; or (ii) an emergency call contractor;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information flow
logic summary: Information flow: disclosure or use by an employee in performance of duties
premise text: (5) Section 278 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person of information or a document if:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation: employee, recognised person who operates an emergency call service, emergency call contractor
premise text: a recognised person who operates an emergency call service; or an emergency call contractor;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

279(6) Performance of person’s duties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-279-ss-6
part of: 279 Performance of person’s duties
note: Disclosure or use of information is permitted for emergency call contractors performing their duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.302
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 279(6) Performance of person’s duties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose or use information.
premise text: (6) Section 278 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person of information or a document if: (a) the person is an emergency call contractor; and (b) the disclosure or use is made in the performance of the person’s duties as such a contractor.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for emergency call contractors.
premise text: (6) Section 278 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person of information or a document if: (a) the person is an emergency call contractor; and (b) the disclosure or use is made in the performance of the person’s duties as such a contractor.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for emergency call contractors.
premise text: (6) Section 278 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person of information or a document if: (a) the person is an emergency call contractor; and (b) the disclosure or use is made in the performance of the person’s duties as such a contractor.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion for emergency call contractors.
premise text: (6) Section 278 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person of information or a document if: (a) the person is an emergency call contractor; and (b) the disclosure or use is made in the performance of the person’s duties as such a contractor.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-279-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognition for emergency call contractors.
premise text: (6) Section 278 does not prohibit a disclosure or use by a person of information or a document if: (a) the person is an emergency call contractor; and (b) the disclosure or use is made in the performance of the person’s duties as such a contractor.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

280 Authorisation by or under law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-280
has part: 280(1) Authorisation by or under law
has part: 280(1A) Authorisation by or under law
has part: 280(1B) Authorisation by or under law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.303

280(1) Authorisation by or under law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-280-ss-1
part of: 280 Authorisation by or under law
note: Disclosure or use of information is permitted under law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.303
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 280(1) Authorisation by or under law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose or use information.
premise text: (1) Division 2 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for permitted disclosures or uses.
premise text: (b) in any other case—the disclosure or use is required or authorised by or under law.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

280(1A) Authorisation by or under law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-280-ss-1a
part of: 280 Authorisation by or under law
note: Reference to enforcement agency's functions is taken to be a reference to the performance of the National Anti-Corruption Commissioner's functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.303
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1a-logic-linearlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 280(1A) Authorisation by or under law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
logic summary: Reference to enforcement agency's functions is taken to be a reference to the performance of the National Anti-Corruption Commissioner's functions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1a-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: refers to
logic summary: Reference to enforcement agency's functions is taken to be a reference to the performance of the National Anti-Corruption Commissioner's functions.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

280(1B) Authorisation by or under law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-280-ss-1b
part of: 280 Authorisation by or under law
note: Disclosure of information or document permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.303
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-280-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

281 Witnesses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-281
has part: 281(1) Witnesses
has part: 281(2) Witnesses
has part: 281(3) Witnesses
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.305

281(1) Witnesses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-281-ss-1
part of: 281 Witnesses
note: Disclosure of information or documents by a witness summoned to give evidence or produce documents is permitted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.305
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 281(1) Witnesses
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted by the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

281(2) Witnesses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-281-ss-2
part of: 281 Witnesses
note: Disclosure of information or document by a person as a witness in a civil proceeding is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.305
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information or document by a person as a witness in a civil proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure purposes.
premise text: (b) is not used or disclosed by the service provider for any purpose other than one or more of the following purposes:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for disclosure purposes.
premise text: (ii) complying with the requirements of warrants under Chapters 2 and 3 of that Act or authorisations under Chapter 4 of that Act;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information or document by a person as a witness in a civil proceeding.
premise text: (iii) complying with requests or requirements to make disclosures provided for by sections 284 to 288 of this Act;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information or document by a person as a witness in a civil proceeding.
premise text: (iv) providing persons with access to their personal information in accordance with the Privacy Act 1988;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

281(3) Witnesses
type: Concept
realized by: sec-281-ss-3
part of: 281 Witnesses
note: Exemptions from subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.305
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-281-ss-3-norm

284 Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-284
has part: 284(1) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
has part: 284(1A) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
has part: 284(2) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
has part: 284(3) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.306

284(1) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-284-ss-1
part of: 284 Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
note: Disclosure of information or document to assist ACMA in carrying out its functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.306
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 284(1) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted to disclose information or document.
premise text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.
conclusion text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Disclosure made during ACMA's function execution.
premise text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.
conclusion text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Disclosure allowed until ACMA's function execution ends.
premise text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.
conclusion text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Disclosure allowed under certain conditions.
premise text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.
conclusion text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Disclosure justified by assistance to ACMA.
premise text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.
conclusion text: (1) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit a disclosure by a person of information or a document if: (a) the disclosure is made to, or to a member of the staff of, the ACMA; and (b) the information or document may assist the ACMA to carry out its functions or powers.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

284(1A) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-284-ss-1a
part of: 284 Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
note: Disclosure of information or document is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.306
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-logic-epistemic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 284(1A) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between disclosure and assistance
premise text: The disclosure must be made during the eSafety Commissioner's functions.
conclusion text: The disclosure is permitted if it occurs during the eSafety Commissioner's functions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between disclosure and assistance
premise text: The information or document may assist the eSafety Commissioner until a certain point.
conclusion text: The disclosure is permitted if it occurs before that point.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permissive language
premise text: The disclosure is not required but permitted.
conclusion text: The disclosure is permitted under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-1a-logic-epistemic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional relationship between disclosure and assistance
premise text: If the information or document assists the eSafety Commissioner, then it can be disclosed.
conclusion text: The disclosure is permitted if it assists the eSafety Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

284(2) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-284-ss-2
part of: 284 Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
note: Disclosure of information or document to ACCC staff for assistance with telecommunications functions and powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.306
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information or document
premise text: Disclosure is made to ACCC staff
conclusion text: Assistance with telecommunications functions and powers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

284(3) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-284-ss-3
part of: 284 Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
note: Disclosure of information or document to Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.306
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-284-ss-3-norm

285 Integrated public number database
type: Concept
realized by: sec-285
has part: 285(1) Integrated public number database
has part: 285(1A) Integrated public number database
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.307

285(1) Integrated public number database
type: Concept
realized by: sec-285-ss-1
part of: 285 Integrated public number database
note: Permitted disclosures—general
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.307
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-285-ss-1-norm

285(1A) Integrated public number database
type: Concept
realized by: sec-285-ss-1a
part of: 285 Integrated public number database
note: Disclosure of information from integrated public number database is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.307
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-285-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-285-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-285-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-285-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Disclosure of information from integrated public number database is permitted under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-285-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between disclosure and conditions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

285A Data for emergency warnings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-285a
note: Disclosure of information from integrated public number database for emergency purposes is permitted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.311
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-285a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-285a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-285a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Disclosure is allowed for emergency purposes.
premise text: the information or document consists of information contained in an integrated public number database;
conclusion text: the disclosure is permitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

286 Calls to emergency service number
type: Concept
realized by: sec-286
note: Disclosure of certain information is permitted under specific conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.312
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-286-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-286-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-286-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Indicates that disclosure is permitted under specific conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

287 Threat to person’s life or health
type: Concept
realized by: sec-287
note: Disclosure or use of information is allowed under certain conditions to prevent a serious threat to life or health.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.313
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-287-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-287-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-287-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-287-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 287 Threat to person’s life or health
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-287-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permits disclosure or use under certain conditions.
premise text: Reasonable grounds exist to prevent a serious threat.
conclusion text: Disclosure or use is allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-287-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Disclosure or use occurs during a serious threat period.
premise text: Serious threat exists.
conclusion text: Disclosure or use overlaps with the threat period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

288 Communications for maritime purposes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-288
note: Disclosure or use of information is permitted if reasonably necessary for preservation of human life at sea or maritime communications purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.313
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-288-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-288-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-288-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose or use information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

289 Knowledge or consent of person concerned
type: Concept
realized by: sec-289
note: Disclosure or use of information or document is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.313
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-289-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-289-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-289-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose or use information or document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

290 Implicit consent of sender and recipient of communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-290
note: Disclosure or use of communication is allowed if sender and recipient would have consented.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.314
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-290-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-290-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-290-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 290 Implicit consent of sender and recipient of communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-290-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Permits disclosure or use of communication.
premise text: Sender and recipient would have consented.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

291 Business needs of other carriers or service providers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-291
has part: 291(1) Business needs of other carriers or service providers
has part: 291(2) Business needs of other carriers or service providers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.314

291(1) Business needs of other carriers or service providers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-291-ss-1
part of: 291 Business needs of other carriers or service providers
note: Disclosure or use of information or document for specific purposes is permitted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.314
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Indicates that disclosure or use is permitted under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

291(2) Business needs of other carriers or service providers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-291-ss-2
part of: 291 Business needs of other carriers or service providers
note: Disclosure or use of information or document for specific purposes related to carriage service provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.314
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Disclosure or use of information or document for specific purposes related to carriage service provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

291A Location dependent carriage services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-291a
has part: 291A(1) Location dependent carriage services
has part: 291A(2) Location dependent carriage services
has part: 291A(3) Location dependent carriage services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.316

291A(1) Location dependent carriage services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-291a-ss-1
part of: 291A Location dependent carriage services
note: Disclosure of information or document for location-dependent carriage services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.316
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

291A(2) Location dependent carriage services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-291a-ss-2
part of: 291A Location dependent carriage services
note: Disclosure or use of information is permitted for a specific purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.316
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 291A(2) Location dependent carriage services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between events
premise text: Disclosure or use is made for a purpose of, or is connected with, the supply, or proposed supply, by a person of a location dependent carriage service.
conclusion text: Temporal interval defined
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies action as permitted
premise text: (2) Sections 276 and 277 do not prohibit disclosure or use of information or a document.
conclusion text: Disclosure or use is permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <>
logic summary: Describes trace of events
premise text: The disclosure or use is made for a purpose of, or is connected with, the supply, or proposed supply, by a person of a location dependent carriage service.
conclusion text: Trace defined
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies knowledge as applicable
premise text: The disclosure or use is made for a purpose of, or is connected with, the supply, or proposed supply, by a person of a location dependent carriage service.
conclusion text: Knowledge is applicable
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies data as valid
premise text: The disclosure or use is made for a purpose of, or is connected with, the supply, or proposed supply, by a person of a location dependent carriage service.
conclusion text: Data is valid
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

291A(3) Location dependent carriage services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-291a-ss-3
part of: 291A Location dependent carriage services
note: Definition of integrated public number database and location dependent carriage service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.316
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 291A(3) Location dependent carriage services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-291a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Definition of integrated public number database implies existence of Telstra Limited's database or another person's database
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

292 Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-292
has part: 292(1) Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
has part: 292(2) Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.317

292(1) Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-292-ss-1
part of: 292 Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
note: Disclosure or use of information or document is allowed under specified circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.317
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 292(1) Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows disclosure or use of information or document under specified circumstances.
premise text: (1) Section 276 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for permitted disclosure or use.
premise text: (1) Section 276 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implicates permitted disclosure or use under specified circumstances.
premise text: (1) Section 276 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagates permitted disclosure or use under specified circumstances.
premise text: (1) Section 276 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Infers permitted disclosure or use under specified circumstances.
premise text: (1) Section 276 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

292(2) Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-292-ss-2
part of: 292 Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
note: Permits disclosure or use of information in specified circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.317
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows action
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.
conclusion text: Section 277 permits disclosure or use in specified circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal scope
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.
conclusion text: Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Identifies recurring pattern
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.
conclusion text: Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Spread
logic summary: Describes information flow
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.
conclusion text: Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-292-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Represents knowledge concept
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a disclosure or use of information or a document in circumstances specified in the regulations.
conclusion text: Circumstances prescribed in the regulations
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

293 Uses connected with exempt disclosures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-293
has part: 293(1) Uses connected with exempt disclosures
has part: 293(2) Uses connected with exempt disclosures
has part: 293(3) Uses connected with exempt disclosures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.318

293(1) Uses connected with exempt disclosures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-293-ss-1
part of: 293 Uses connected with exempt disclosures
note: Permits use of information or document for disclosure purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.318
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 293(1) Uses connected with exempt disclosures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows use under specified conditions
premise text: (a) the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person;
conclusion text: Section 276 does not prohibit this use.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal scope
premise text: (1) Section 276 does not prohibit a use of information or a document
conclusion text: if the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship
premise text: (1) Section 276 does not prohibit a use of information or a document
conclusion text: if the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Spread
logic summary: Defines information flow
premise text: (a) the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person;
conclusion text: if the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Defines knowledge structure
premise text: (b) because of this Division, the disclosure is not prohibited by section 276.
conclusion text: if because of this Division, the disclosure is not prohibited by section 276.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

293(2) Uses connected with exempt disclosures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-293-ss-2
part of: 293 Uses connected with exempt disclosures
note: Permits use of information or document for disclosure purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.318
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows use
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a use of information or a document
conclusion text: if: (a) the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person; and (b) because of this Division, the disclosure is not prohibited by section 277.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for use
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a use of information or a document
conclusion text: if: (a) the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person; and (b) because of this Division, the disclosure is not prohibited by section 277.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for use
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a use of information or a document
conclusion text: if: (a) the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person; and (b) because of this Division, the disclosure is not prohibited by section 277.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Describes diffusion for use
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a use of information or a document
conclusion text: if: (a) the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person; and (b) because of this Division, the disclosure is not prohibited by section 277.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Describes exempt disclosures using CogAI
premise text: (2) Section 277 does not prohibit a use of information or a document
conclusion text: if: (a) the use is made for the purposes of, or in connection with, a disclosure of the information or document by the person; and (b) because of this Division, the disclosure is not prohibited by section 277.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

293(3) Uses connected with exempt disclosures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-293-ss-3
part of: 293 Uses connected with exempt disclosures
note: Permits use of information or document for disclosure purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.318
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-293-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Exempts disclosure of information or document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

294 Effect of this Subdivision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-294
note: Nothing in this Subdivision limits the generality of anything else.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.318
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-294-norm

295 Burden of proof
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295
has part: 295(1) Burden of proof
has part: 295(2) Burden of proof
has part: 295(3) Burden of proof
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.318

295(1) Burden of proof
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295-ss-1
part of: 295 Burden of proof
note: Burden of proof for offences against Division 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.318
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 295(1) Burden of proof
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide burden of proof
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295(2) Burden of proof
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295-ss-2
part of: 295 Burden of proof
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to an exception
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.318
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Evidential Burden
logic summary: Defendant must provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295(3) Burden of proof
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295-ss-3
part of: 295 Burden of proof
note: Burden of proof definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.318
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 295(3) Burden of proof
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines evidential burden
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295A ACMA to make integrated public number database scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295a
note: ACMA must make integrated public number database scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.320
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295a-norm

295B Scheme must deal with certain matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295b
has part: 295B(1) Scheme must deal with certain matters
has part: 295B(2) Scheme must deal with certain matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.320

295B(1) Scheme must deal with certain matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295b-ss-1
part of: 295B Scheme must deal with certain matters
note: Scheme must deal with certain matters
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.320
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 295B(1) Scheme must deal with certain matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295B(2) Scheme must deal with certain matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295b-ss-2
part of: 295B Scheme must deal with certain matters
note: Applicant must specify purpose for authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.320
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 295B(2) Scheme must deal with certain matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide purpose
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295C Applications may be treated differently
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295c
note: Different provision for different kinds of authorization applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.321
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295c-norm

295D Scope of authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295d
note: Scope of authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.321
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295d-norm

295E Provisional and final authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295e
note: Provision for provisional and final authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.321
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295e-norm

295F Conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295f
note: Conditions for authorisation grant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.321
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295f-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295f-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 295F Conditions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Imposes conditions on authorisation grant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295G Varying or revoking authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295g
note: Provision for varying or revoking authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.321
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295g-norm

295H Scheme may confer administrative powers on the ACMA
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295h
note: ACMA may make decisions of an administrative character.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.322
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295h-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295h-logic-ltl-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295h-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295h-logic-deontic-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295h-logic-ltl-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the administrative powers
premise text: The scheme may make provision for or in relation to a particular matter by empowering the ACMA to make decisions of an administrative character
conclusion text: The administrative powers are defined within the scheme's temporal scope
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295h-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines the nature of the administrative powers
premise text: The scheme may make provision for or in relation to a particular matter by empowering the ACMA to make decisions of an administrative character
conclusion text: The administrative powers are defined as discretionary
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295h-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines the scope of the administrative powers
premise text: The scheme may make provision for or in relation to a particular matter by empowering the ACMA to make decisions of an administrative character
conclusion text: The administrative powers are defined within the scheme's scope
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

295J Ancillary or incidental provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295j
note: ACMA considers provisions appropriate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.322
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295j-norm

295K Scheme-making power not limited
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295k
note: No implication that section 295A is limited by sections 295B to 295J.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.322
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295k-norm

295L Variation of scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295l
has part: 295L(1) Variation of scheme
has part: 295L(2) Variation of scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.322

295L(1) Variation of scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295l-ss-1
part of: 295L Variation of scheme
note: Scheme variation allowed under specific conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.322
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295l-ss-1-norm

295L(2) Variation of scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295l-ss-2
part of: 295L Variation of scheme
note: Does not limit application of subsection 33(3) to other instruments under this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.322
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295l-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 295L(2) Variation of scheme
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

295M Consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295m
has part: 295M(1) Consultation
has part: 295M(2) Consultation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.322

295M(1) Consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295m-ss-1
part of: 295M Consultation
note: Consultation with relevant authorities before making the scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.322
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295m-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consult
premise text: ACMA must consult the Information Commissioner and Secretary of the Department.
conclusion text: The scheme must be made after consultation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295M(2) Consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295m-ss-2
part of: 295M Consultation
note: Consultation before making a decision under the scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.322
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295m-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult
premise text: ACMA must consult persons before making a decision
conclusion text: Decision under the scheme cannot be made without consultation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295N Criteria for deciding authorisation applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295n
has part: 295N(1) Criteria for deciding authorisation applications
has part: 295N(2) Criteria for deciding authorisation applications
has part: 295N(3) Criteria for deciding authorisation applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.323

295N(1) Criteria for deciding authorisation applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295n-ss-1
part of: 295N Criteria for deciding authorisation applications
note: Minister must specify criteria for deciding authorisation applications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.323
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 295N(1) Criteria for deciding authorisation applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide criteria
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295N(2) Criteria for deciding authorisation applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295n-ss-2
part of: 295N Criteria for deciding authorisation applications
note: Minister may specify different criteria for different kinds of authorisation applications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.323
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to specify criteria
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295N(3) Criteria for deciding authorisation applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295n-ss-3
part of: 295N Criteria for deciding authorisation applications
note: Must apply criteria and may consider other relevant matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.323
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to apply criteria
premise text: (3) In deciding an authorisation application, the ACMA:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295P Conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295p
note: Minister may determine conditions for authorisation under integrated public number database scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.323
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295p-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295p-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295p-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to determine conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295p-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: determine
logic summary: Classify and describe conditions
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295Q Other reviewable decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295q
note: Specify decisions under integrated public number database scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.324
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295q-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295q-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to specify decisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295R Offence of breaching a condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295r
note: Breach of authorisation condition results in an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.324
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-diffusion-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 295R Offence of breaching a condition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: breach
logic summary: Condition breach is a necessary condition for the offence.
premise text: The person does an act or omits to do an act.
conclusion text: The act or omission breaches a condition of the authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorisation
logic summary: Authorisation is a necessary condition for the offence.
premise text: The person is the holder of an authorisation under the integrated public number database scheme.
conclusion text: The person does not commit an offence unless they hold an authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Condition breach occurs during the act or omission.
premise text: The person does an act or omits to do an act.
conclusion text: The act or omission breaches a condition of the authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Condition breach is a necessary condition for the offence until the act or omission ends.
premise text: The person does an act or omits to do an act.
conclusion text: The act or omission breaches a condition of the authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295r-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Condition breach is necessary for the offence if the person holds an authorisation.
premise text: The person is the holder of an authorisation under the integrated public number database scheme.
conclusion text: The person does not commit an offence unless they hold an authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295S Remedial directions for breaching a condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295s
has part: 295S(1) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
has part: 295S(2) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
has part: 295S(3) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
has part: 295S(4) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
has part: 295S(5) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.324

295S(1) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295s-ss-1
part of: 295S Remedial directions for breaching a condition
note: Remedial directions for breaching a condition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.324
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295S(2) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295s-ss-2
part of: 295S Remedial directions for breaching a condition
note: The ACMA may give a person a written direction requiring them to take specified action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.324
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295S(3) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295s-ss-3
part of: 295S Remedial directions for breaching a condition
note: Must not contravene a direction under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.324
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 295S(3) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of contravention
premise text: (3) A person must not contravene a direction under subsection (2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295S(4) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295s-ss-4
part of: 295S Remedial directions for breaching a condition
note: Civil penalty provision for breaching a condition
references: sec-295s-ss-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.324
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 295S(4) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295S(5) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295s-ss-5
part of: 295S Remedial directions for breaching a condition
note: A direction given under subsection (2) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.324
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 295S(5) Remedial directions for breaching a condition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295s-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (5) A direction given under subsection (2)
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295T Formal warnings for breaching a condition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295t
note: Issue formal warning for breaching a condition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.325
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295t-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295t-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295t-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may issue
logic summary: Obligation to issue warning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295U Report to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295u
has part: 295U(1) Report to Minister
has part: 295U(2) Report to Minister
has part: 295U(3) Report to Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.325

295U(1) Report to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295u-ss-1
part of: 295U Report to Minister
note: ACMA must provide a report on compliance with the integrated public number database scheme.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.325
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295u-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide a report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295U(2) Report to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295u-ss-2
part of: 295U Report to Minister
note: Report confidential information to Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.325
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295u-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory reporting
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295U(3) Report to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295u-ss-3
part of: 295U Report to Minister
note: Minister must report to Parliament within 15 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.325
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295u-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: Minister must report to Parliament within 15 days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295V Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295v
has part: 295V(1) Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
has part: 295V(2) Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
has part: 295V(3) Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
has part: 295V(4) Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.326

295V(1) Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295v-ss-1
part of: 295V Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
note: Use or disclosure of information by emergency management for a purpose connected with persons being alerted to a likely emergency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.326
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295v-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295v-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 295V(1) Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to use or disclose information for a specific purpose.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295V(2) Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295v-ss-2
part of: 295V Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
note: Use or disclose relevant information for a purpose connected with persons being alerted to an emergency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.326
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295v-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295v-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295v-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: use
logic summary: Use relevant information for a purpose connected with persons being alerted to an emergency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295V(3) Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295v-ss-3
part of: 295V Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
note: Use or disclosure of information for reasonable testing of emergency alertness
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.326
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295v-ss-3-norm

295V(4) Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295v-ss-4
part of: 295V Use or disclosure of information by emergency management
note: Disclosure of relevant information to another person for a specific purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.326
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295v-ss-4-norm

295W Use or disclosure of information by other persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295w
has part: 295W(1) Use or disclosure of information by other persons
has part: 295W(2) Use or disclosure of information by other persons
has part: 295W(3) Use or disclosure of information by other persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.327

295W(1) Use or disclosure of information by other persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295w-ss-1
part of: 295W Use or disclosure of information by other persons
note: Permitted use or disclosure of information for emergency purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.327
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 295W(1) Use or disclosure of information by other persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERMIT
logic summary: Permission to use or disclose information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295W(2) Use or disclosure of information by other persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295w-ss-2
part of: 295W Use or disclosure of information by other persons
note: Permitted use or disclosure of information for testing purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.327
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission to use or disclose information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295W(3) Use or disclosure of information by other persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295w-ss-3
part of: 295W Use or disclosure of information by other persons
note: Permitted use or disclosure of information for emergency purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.327
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission to use or disclose information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295X Effect on telecommunications network
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295x
note: Must take reasonable steps to ensure no adverse effect on telecommunications network.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.327
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295x-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295x-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295x-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to take reasonable steps
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295Y Coronial and other inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295y
note: Disclosure of relevant information in relation to an emergency or likely emergency is taken as a disclosure for a purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.327
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295y-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295y-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 295Y Coronial and other inquiries
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

295Z Offence—use or disclosure of information by emergency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295z
note: Use or disclosure of information by emergency management person is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.328
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295z-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295z-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295z-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of use or disclosure of information by emergency management person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295ZA Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295za
has part: 295ZA(1) Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
has part: 295ZA(2) Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
has part: 295ZA(3) Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.328

295ZA(1) Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295za-ss-1
part of: 295ZA Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
note: Disclosing or using information without permission is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.328
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 295ZA(1) Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing or using information without permission.
premise text: (a) information is disclosed to the person as permitted by subsection 295V(1) or (2) or 295W(1); and (b) the person uses or discloses the information;
conclusion text: The use or disclosure referred to in paragraph (b) of this subsection is not for a purpose connected with persons being alerted to the emergency or likely emergency concerned.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval of when the person uses or discloses the information.
premise text: (b) the person uses or discloses the information;
conclusion text: The temporal interval is from the time the person receives the information to the time they use or disclose it.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of when the person uses or discloses the information.
premise text: (b) the person uses or discloses the information;
conclusion text: The recurring trace is from the time the person receives the information to the present.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spread of information through use or disclosure.
premise text: (b) the person uses or discloses the information;
conclusion text: The information spreads from the person to others through their actions.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Graph
logic summary: Knowledge graph of permitted and prohibited information.
premise text: (a) information is disclosed to the person as permitted by subsection 295V(1) or (2) or 295W(1); and
conclusion text: The knowledge graph contains entries for permitted and prohibited information.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295ZA(2) Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295za-ss-2
part of: 295ZA Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
note: Disclosing or using information without permission is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.328
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 295ZA(2) Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing or using information without permission.
premise text: Information is disclosed to the person as permitted by subsection 295V(3) or 295W(2);
conclusion text: The use or disclosure referred to in paragraph (b) of this subsection is not for the purpose of reasonable testing of whether, in the event of an emergency occurring, persons would be able to be alerted to that emergency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of using or disclosing information for testing purposes.
premise text: (b) the person uses or discloses the information;
conclusion text: The use or disclosure referred to in paragraph (b) of this subsection is not for the purpose of reasonable testing of whether, in the event of an emergency occurring, persons would be able to be alerted to that emergency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between information disclosure and use.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) information is disclosed to the person as permitted by subsection 295V(3) or 295W(2); and (b) the person uses or discloses the information;
conclusion text: The temporal relation between information disclosure and use is that the use occurs after the disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of information disclosure and use.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) information is disclosed to the person as permitted by subsection 295V(3) or 295W(2); and (b) the person uses or discloses the information;
conclusion text: The recurring trace of information disclosure and use indicates that the person has committed an offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of using or disclosing information for emergency purposes.
premise text: (c) the use or disclosure referred to in paragraph (b) of this subsection is not for the purpose of reasonable testing of whether, in the event of an emergency occurring, persons would be able to be alerted to that emergency.
conclusion text: The use or disclosure referred to in paragraph (b) of this subsection is not for the purpose of reasonable testing of whether, in the event of an emergency occurring, persons would be able to be alerted to that emergency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295ZA(3) Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295za-ss-3
part of: 295ZA Offence—use or disclosure of information by other persons
note: Disclosing information without permission is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.328
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295za-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing information without permission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295ZB Reports of access
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295zb
has part: 295ZB(1) Reports of access
has part: 295ZB(2) Reports of access
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.329

295ZB(1) Reports of access
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295zb-ss-1
part of: 295ZB Reports of access
note: Emergency management person must provide written report to AFP Minister and ACMA with specific information.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.329
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zb-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 295ZB(1) Reports of access
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295ZB(2) Reports of access
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295zb-ss-2
part of: 295ZB Reports of access
note: Must report to AFP Minister and ACMA after last disclosure
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.329
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zb-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295ZC Annual reports to the ACMA and Information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295zc
note: Annual report must be provided within 2 months after the end of a financial year.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.329
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zc-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zc-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zc-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 295ZC Annual reports to the ACMA and Information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295ZD Arrangements with States and Territories
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295zd
has part: 295ZD(1) Arrangements with States and Territories
has part: 295ZD(2) Arrangements with States and Territories
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.330

295ZD(1) Arrangements with States and Territories
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295zd-ss-1
part of: 295ZD Arrangements with States and Territories
note: Makes arrangements with State or Territory Ministers regarding emergency management functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.330
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zd-ss-1-norm

295ZD(2) Arrangements with States and Territories
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295zd-ss-2
part of: 295ZD Arrangements with States and Territories
note: An instrument for an arrangement under this section is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.330
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zd-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: An instrument for an arrangement under this section is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295ZE Commonwealth immunity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295ze
note: No action lies against the Commonwealth in relation to loss, damage or injury resulting from use or disclosure of relevant information for emergency purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.330
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295ze-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295ze-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295ze-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 295ZE Commonwealth immunity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-295ze-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No action lies against the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

296 Performance of person’s duties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-296
note: Must not disclose or use information except for permitted purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.331
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-296-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-296-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-296-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

297 Authorisation by or under law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-297
note: Must not disclose or use information unless required or authorised by law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.331
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-297-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-297-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-297-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 297 Authorisation by or under law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-297-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure
premise text: Disclosure permitted by section 280 or this section
conclusion text: Disclosure not permitted unless required or authorised
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

299 Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-299
has part: 299(1) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
has part: 299(1A) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
has part: 299(2) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.331

299(1) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-299-ss-1
part of: 299 Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
note: Must not disclose or use information except for the purpose of carrying out ACMA's functions and powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.331
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 299(1) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure or use of information
premise text: Disclosed information or document
conclusion text: Carrying out ACMA's functions and powers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

299(1A) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-299-ss-1a
part of: 299 Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
note: Must not disclose or use information except for specified purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.331
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 299(1A) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure or use of information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

299(2) Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-299-ss-2
part of: 299 Assisting the ACMA, the eSafety Commissioner, the ACCC or
note: Disclosing information or a document without permission is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.331
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: Disclosure without permission
conclusion text: Prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

299A Integrated public number database
type: Concept
realized by: sec-299a
has part: 299A(1) Integrated public number database
has part: 299A(2) Integrated public number database
has part: 299A(3) Integrated public number database
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.332

299A(1) Integrated public number database
type: Concept
realized by: sec-299a-ss-1
part of: 299A Integrated public number database
note: Disclosing or using information without authorization is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.332
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 299A(1) Integrated public number database
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure or use of information without authorization.
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: (c) and (d)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

299A(2) Integrated public number database
type: Concept
realized by: sec-299a-ss-2
part of: 299A Integrated public number database
note: Disclosing or using information without authorization is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.332
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 299A(2) Integrated public number database
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: then (c) during the period...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal restriction
logic summary: Restriction on time period of disclosure or use.
premise text: (c) during the period the person holds an authorisation in force under the integrated public number database scheme in relation to the information or document—
conclusion text: ...the person must not disclose or use the information or document except for that purpose;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring restriction on disclosure or use.
premise text: (d) if the person does not hold such an authorisation—the person must not disclose or use the information or document.
conclusion text: ...the person must not disclose or use the information or document;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to hold authorization for disclosure or use.
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: ...the person must not disclose or use the information or document;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of unauthorized disclosure or use.
premise text: (d) if the person does not hold such an authorisation—the person must not disclose or use the information or document.
conclusion text: ...the person must not disclose or use the information or document;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

299A(3) Integrated public number database
type: Concept
realized by: sec-299a-ss-3
part of: 299A Integrated public number database
note: Disclosing information for a permitted purpose is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.332
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-299a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of information for a permitted purpose.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

300 Threat to person’s life or health
type: Concept
realized by: sec-300
has part: 300(1) Threat to person’s life or health
has part: 300(2) Threat to person’s life or health
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.333

300(1) Threat to person’s life or health
type: Concept
realized by: sec-300-ss-1
part of: 300 Threat to person’s life or health
note: Disclosing personal info without consent is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.333
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 300(1) Threat to person’s life or health
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of personal info without consent.
premise text: (a) information or a document is disclosed to a person (the first person) as permitted by section 287 or this section;
conclusion text: The disclosure is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to protect personal info.
premise text: (a) information or a document is disclosed to a person (the first person) as permitted by section 287 or this section;
conclusion text: The state must protect personal info.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The disclosure overlaps with a temporal interval of personal info protection.
premise text: (a) information or a document is disclosed to a person (the first person) as permitted by section 287 or this section;
conclusion text: The disclosure overlaps with the temporal interval of personal info protection.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: The disclosure is recurrently prohibited.
premise text: (a) information or a document is disclosed to a person (the first person) as permitted by section 287 or this section;
conclusion text: The disclosure is recurrently prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to protect personal info.
premise text: (b) the information or the contents of the document relate to the affairs or personal particulars (including any unlisted telephone number or any address) of another person.
conclusion text: The state must protect personal info.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

300(2) Threat to person’s life or health
type: Concept
realized by: sec-300-ss-2
part of: 300 Threat to person’s life or health
note: Must not disclose or use information unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.333
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
premise text: The first person must not disclose or use the information.
conclusion text: unless certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: believes
logic summary: Belief of reasonable grounds for necessity
premise text: the first person believes on reasonable grounds that the disclosure or use is reasonably necessary to prevent or lessen a serious threat to the life or health of a person.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: lessening
logic summary: Lessening a serious threat
premise text: (ii) the first person believes on reasonable grounds that the disclosure or use is reasonably necessary to prevent or lessen a serious threat to the life or health of a person.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: in
logic summary: Connection with time intervals
premise text: (ii) the first person believes on reasonable grounds that the disclosure or use is reasonably necessary to prevent or lessen a serious threat to the life or health of a person.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-300-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: to
logic summary: Transmission of information
premise text: (ii) the first person believes on reasonable grounds that the disclosure or use is reasonably necessary to prevent or lessen a serious threat to the life or health of a person.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

301 Communications for maritime purposes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-301
note: Disclosure of information or document is permitted for certain maritime purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.334
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-301-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-301-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-301-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 301 Communications for maritime purposes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-301-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permits disclosure for certain maritime purposes.
premise text: Section 288 deals with the disclosure or use of information or documents where the disclosure or use is made for certain maritime purposes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

302 Business needs of other carriers or service providers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-302
note: Disclosing or using information without permission is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.334
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 302 Business needs of other carriers or service providers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
premise text: Section 291 permits disclosure or use under certain conditions.
conclusion text: Disclosure or use is prohibited unless permitted by section 291.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for permissible use.
premise text: Section 291 permits disclosure or use under certain conditions.
conclusion text: Permissible use is within a specific temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

302A Location dependent carriage services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-302a
has part: 302A(1) Location dependent carriage services
has part: 302A(2) Location dependent carriage services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.335

302A(1) Location dependent carriage services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-302a-ss-1
part of: 302A Location dependent carriage services
note: Disclosing or using information or documents without permission is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.335
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure or use.
premise text: Section 291A deals with the disclosure or use of information or documents for the purposes of the supply, or proposed supply, by a person of a location dependent carriage service.
conclusion text: The provision prohibits disclosure or use without permission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

302A(2) Location dependent carriage services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-302a-ss-2
part of: 302A Location dependent carriage services
note: Definition of location dependent carriage service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.335
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302a-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-302a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 302A(2) Location dependent carriage services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

303 Secondary offence—contravening this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-303
note: Committing an offence punishable by imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.335
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 303 Secondary offence—contravening this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits committing an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

303A Generality of Division not limited
type: Concept
realized by: sec-303a
note: Nothing in this Division limits the generality of anything else in it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.335
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303a-norm

303B Acts taken to be authorised by this Act for purposes of Privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-303b
has part: 303B(1) Acts taken to be authorised by this Act for purposes of Privacy
has part: 303B(2) Acts taken to be authorised by this Act for purposes of Privacy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.336

303B(1) Acts taken to be authorised by this Act for purposes of Privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-303b-ss-1
part of: 303B Acts taken to be authorised by this Act for purposes of Privacy
note: Disclosure or use of information is authorized for Privacy Act purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.336
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorizes disclosure or use of information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

303B(2) Acts taken to be authorised by this Act for purposes of Privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-303b-ss-2
part of: 303B Acts taken to be authorised by this Act for purposes of Privacy
note: Disclosure or use of information is authorized for Privacy Act purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.336
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorizes disclosure or use of information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

303C Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-303c
has part: 303C(1) Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
has part: 303C(2) Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
has part: 303C(3) Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.336

303C(1) Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-303c-ss-1
part of: 303C Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
note: No effect on civil proceedings or administrative action under Privacy Act 1988
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.336
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 303C(1) Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: No effect on civil proceedings or administrative action
premise text: (1) The prosecution of an offence against Division 2 or 4 of this Part for disclosure or use of information or a document does not prevent civil proceedings or administrative action from being taken under the Privacy Act 1988 or a registered APP code (as defined in that Act) in relation to the disclosure or use.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: No effect on civil proceedings or administrative action
premise text: (1) The prosecution of an offence against Division 2 or 4 of this Part for disclosure or use of information or a document does not prevent civil proceedings or administrative action from being taken under the Privacy Act 1988 or a registered APP code (as defined in that Act) in relation to the disclosure or use.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

303C(2) Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-303c-ss-2
part of: 303C Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
note: Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect the applicability of this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.336
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 303C(2) Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If prosecution affects applicability, then applicability is unaffected.
premise text: Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect the applicability of this section.
conclusion text: Applicability is unaffected regardless of outcome of prosecution.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Prosecution does not affect applicability, but may overlap with it.
premise text: Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect the applicability of this section.
conclusion text: Applicability is unaffected regardless of outcome of prosecution.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
logic summary: Applicability will be affected by future prosecutions.
premise text: Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect the applicability of this section.
conclusion text: Applicability is unaffected regardless of outcome of prosecution.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Applicability spreads to all offences under this Part.
premise text: This section applies regardless of the outcome of the prosecution.
conclusion text: Applicability is unaffected by outcome of prosecution.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: Applicability can be inferred from prosecution.
premise text: Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect the applicability of this section.
conclusion text: Applicability is unaffected regardless of outcome of prosecution.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

303C(3) Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-303c-ss-3
part of: 303C Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
note: Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect the operation of section 49 of the Privacy Act 1988.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.336
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 303C(3) Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-303c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Implies that prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect the operation of section 49 of the Privacy Act 1988.
premise text: (3) This section does not affect the operation of section 49 of the Privacy Act 1988.
conclusion text: Prosecution of an offence against this Part does not affect the operation of section 49 of the Privacy Act 1988.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

304 Associate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-304
note: Defines associate for carrier, carriage service provider, and number-database operator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.337
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-304-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-304-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 304 Associate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

305 Authorisations under the Telecommunications (Interception and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-305
note: Authorisation notification for carriers and associates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.337
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-305-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-305-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-305-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-305-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 305 Authorisations under the Telecommunications (Interception and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-305-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Notification of authorisation
premise text: Carrier or associate notified
conclusion text: Authorisation made under Division 4 or 4A
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-305-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relationship between authorisation and notification
premise text: Authorisation made under Division 4 or 4A
conclusion text: Notification of authorisation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

306 Record of disclosures—general
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306
note: Authorisation required for disclosure of information or document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.337
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306 Record of disclosures—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires authorisation
premise text: (a) an eligible person or an eligible number-database person discloses information or a document
conclusion text: (i) a provision of Division 3 (other than section 279, 285, 285A, 290, 291 or 291A)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Disclosures must be during Division 3 provisions
premise text: (i) a provision of Division 3 (other than section 279, 285, 285A, 290, 291 or 291A)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Disclosures must be during Division 3 provisions
premise text: (i) a provision of Division 3 (other than section 279, 285, 285A, 290, 291 or 291A)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Disclosures must be during Division 3 provisions
premise text: (i) a provision of Division 3 (other than section 279, 285, 285A, 290, 291 or 291A)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Disclosures must be during Division 3 provisions
premise text: (i) a provision of Division 3 (other than section 279, 285, 285A, 290, 291 or 291A)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306A Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306a
has part: 306A(1) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
has part: 306A(2) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
has part: 306A(3) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
has part: 306A(4) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
has part: 306A(5) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
has part: 306A(6) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
has part: 306A(7) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.340

306A(1) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306a-ss-1
part of: 306A Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
note: Authorisation required for disclosure of information or documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.340
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306A(1) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires authorisation for disclosure.
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) an eligible person or an eligible number-database person discloses information or a document; and (b) the disclosure or disclosures are authorised by an authorisation under section 180 or 180B of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (in so far as the authorisation is of a kind referred to in subsection 180(2) or 180B(2) of that Act).
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: (a) an eligible person or an eligible number-database person discloses information or a document; and (b) the disclosure or disclosures are authorised by an authorisation under section 180 or 180B of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (in so far as the authorisation is of a kind referred to in subsection 180(2) or 180B(2) of that Act).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306A(2) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306a-ss-2
part of: 306A Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
note: Record of disclosures must be made by carriers, providers, and operators.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.340
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306A(2) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make a record
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306A(3) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306a-ss-3
part of: 306A Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
note: Make a record of disclosure and provide copy to carrier within 5 days.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.340
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306A(3) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make record and provide copy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306A(4) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306a-ss-4
part of: 306A Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
note: Carrier must retain copy of record for 3 years.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.340
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306A(4) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Carrier has a duty to retain copy of record.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306A(5) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306a-ss-5
part of: 306A Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
note: Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the Telecommunications Act 1997
description: name of person or persons who made disclosure, date of disclosure, grounds for disclosure, name of person who made authorisation and date of making
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.340
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306A(5) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide record of disclosures
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306A(6) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306a-ss-6
part of: 306A Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
note: Record may be made, given or retained in written or electronic form.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.340
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-6-norm

306A(7) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306a-ss-7
part of: 306A Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
note: Offence for contravening section
references: sec-4AA
references: sec-4B
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.340
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 306A(7) Record of disclosures—prospective authorisation under the
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-306a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits contravention of section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

307 Incorrect records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-307
has part: 307(1) Incorrect records
has part: 307(2) Incorrect records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.341

307(1) Incorrect records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-307-ss-1
part of: 307 Incorrect records
note: Do not make a record in an incorrect way.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.341
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-307-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-307-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-307-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 307(1) Incorrect records
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-307-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person must not...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

307(2) Incorrect records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-307-ss-2
part of: 307 Incorrect records
note: Offence for contravening subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.341
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-307-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-307-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-307-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 307(2) Incorrect records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-307-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

308 Annual reports to the ACMA by carriers, carriage service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-308
note: Annual reports by carriers, carriage service providers or number-database operators
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.341
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-308-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-308-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-308-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 308 Annual reports to the ACMA by carriers, carriage service
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-308-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

309 Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-309
has part: 309(1) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
has part: 309(1A) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
has part: 309(2) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
has part: 309(3) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
has part: 309(4) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.342

309(1) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-309-ss-1
part of: 309 Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
note: The Information Commissioner must monitor compliance with this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.342
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 309(1) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to monitor
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

309(1A) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-309-ss-1a
part of: 309 Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
note: The Information Commissioner has a privacy function.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.342
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 309(1A) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has a privacy function.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

309(2) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-309-ss-2
part of: 309 Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
note: The Information Commissioner must monitor certain records.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.342
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 309(2) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide monitoring
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Has part in Part 1, Section 309(2)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

309(3) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-309-ss-3
part of: 309 Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
note: Carrier must provide access to records upon request of Information Commissioner.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.342
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 309(3) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must provide access.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

309(4) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-309-ss-4
part of: 309 Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
note: The Information Commissioner must provide a written report to the Minister.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.342
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 309(4) Monitoring by the Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must provide a written report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for reporting.
premise text: (4) The Information Commissioner may give the Minister a written report about any matters arising out of the performance of the function conferred by subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for reporting.
premise text: (4) The Information Commissioner may give the Minister a written report about any matters arising out of the performance of the function conferred by subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Reporting on matters.
premise text: (4) The Information Commissioner may give the Minister a written report about any matters arising out of the performance of the function conferred by subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-309-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Reporting on matters.
premise text: (4) The Information Commissioner may give the Minister a written report about any matters arising out of the performance of the function conferred by subsection (1).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

310 Instrument-making powers not limited
type: Concept
realized by: sec-310
has part: 310(1) Instrument-making powers not limited
has part: 310(2) Instrument-making powers not limited
has part: 310(3) Instrument-making powers not limited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.344

310(1) Instrument-making powers not limited
type: Concept
realized by: sec-310-ss-1
part of: 310 Instrument-making powers not limited
note: No implication that limits instrument-making power
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.344
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Limits instrument-making power
premise text: (1) This Part does not, by implication, limit a power conferred by or under this Act to make an instrument.
conclusion text: This Part does not limit a power conferred by or under this Act to make an instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

310(2) Instrument-making powers not limited
type: Concept
realized by: sec-310-ss-2
part of: 310 Instrument-making powers not limited
note: No implication on matters dealt with by codes or standards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.344
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: no implication
logic summary: No limitation
premise text: (2) This Part does not, by implication...
conclusion text: ...limit the matters that may be dealt with...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between parts
premise text: Part 6
conclusion text: ...the matters that may be dealt with by codes or standards in Part 6.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

310(3) Instrument-making powers not limited
type: Concept
realized by: sec-310-ss-3
part of: 310 Instrument-making powers not limited
note: Does not limit subsection 33(3B) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.344
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-310-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Does not imply
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Section 310(3)
conclusion text: Subsection 33(3B) is unaffected
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed