1 Compliance with this Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.13
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1(1) Compliance with this Act
has part: 1(2) Compliance with this Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

1 April, 1 July or 1 October.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.47
note: Definitions for regulated service, retail business unit, and wholesale/network business unit.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated service definition
modality: Deontic
operator: has meaning

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

1(1) Compliance with this Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.13
note: Carrier must comply with the Act.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1 Compliance with this Act

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1(1) Compliance with this Act

1(2) Compliance with this Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.13
note: Includes other Acts and regulations for compliance
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1 Compliance with this Act

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1(2) Compliance with this Act

16 Simplified outline
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.14
note: Carriers must provide access to facilities for competitive purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-16-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

17 Access to supplementary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.14
curation status: Proposed
has part: 17(1) Access to supplementary facilities
has part: 17(2) Access to supplementary facilities
has part: 17(2A) Access to supplementary facilities
has part: 17(2B) Access to supplementary facilities
has part: 17(3) Access to supplementary facilities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
schema version: 2

17(1) Access to supplementary facilities
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.14
note: Carrier must provide access to facilities upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-17-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Access to supplementary facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide access
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(1) Access to supplementary facilities

17(2) Access to supplementary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.14
note: Second carrier may request access to facilities from first carrier under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-17-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Access to supplementary facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Access to facilities is conditional on meeting certain requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: <->

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for carriers
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(2) Access to supplementary facilities

17(2A) Access to supplementary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.14
note: No obligation to comply with certain undertakings if it would have negative effects.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-17-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Access to supplementary facilities

17(2B) Access to supplementary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.14
note: Right to access supplementary facilities under contract
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-17-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Access to supplementary facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Right under contract
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Contractual right
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
premise text: Contract in force

17(3) Access to supplementary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.14
note: Regard must be had to the question whether compliance with the request will promote the long-term interests of the standard carrier.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-17-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Access to supplementary facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with the request promotes the long-term interests.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Compliance with the request must occur within a reasonable timeframe.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The standard carrier licence conditions require consideration of long-term interests.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The request's impact on long-term interests is a factor in determining reasonableness.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The request's impact on long-term interests is relevant to determining reasonableness.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
premise text: The standard carrier licence conditions include consideration of long-term interests.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with the request promotes the long-term interests.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consider the request's impact on long-term interests.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The standard carrier licence conditions require consideration of long-term interests.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The request's impact on long-term interests is a factor in determining reasonableness.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The request's impact on long-term interests is relevant to determining reasonableness.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-A
premise text: The standard carrier licence conditions include consideration of long-term interests.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with the request promotes the long-term interests.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Compliance with the request must occur within a reasonable timeframe.
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: The standard carrier licence conditions require consideration of long-term interests.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(3) Access to supplementary facilities

18 Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.16
curation status: Proposed
has part: 18(1) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 18(2) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 18(3) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 18(4) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 18(5) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 18(6) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 18(7) Terms and conditions of access
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
schema version: 2

18(1) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.16
note: Carrier must comply with terms and conditions agreed upon or determined by an arbitrator.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Terms and conditions of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must comply.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(1) Terms and conditions of access

18(2) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.16
note: Regulations may make provision for arbitration conduct.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Terms and conditions of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(2) Terms and conditions of access

18(3) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.16
note: The ACCC may be constituted by a single member or specified number of members for a particular arbitration.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Terms and conditions of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May be constituted by a single member or specified number of members
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(3) Terms and conditions of access

18(4) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.16
note: Subclause (3) does not limit subclause (2)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Terms and conditions of access

18(5) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.16
note: No inconsistency with Ministerial pricing determination
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Terms and conditions of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Determination made in arbitration under this clause
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inconsistent determinations are prohibited
modality: Deontic
operator: !=
premise text: Ministerial pricing determination in force under clause 19

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(5) Terms and conditions of access

18(6) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.16
note: Arbitrator must not make a determination that would prevent compliance with an undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Terms and conditions of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Determination would not be made before a final migration plan is in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval comparison
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
premise text: Determination would be made after a final migration plan is in force.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Arbitrator must not make a determination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: Arbitrator must make a determination.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Determination would not be made before the final migration plan is in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval comparison
modality: LTL
operator: <
premise text: Final migration plan is in force.

18(7) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.16
note: If an agreement is in force and in writing, the standard carrier licence conditions apply.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Terms and conditions of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) the agreement is in writing; Schedule 1 Standard carrier licence conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between agreements and standard carrier licence conditions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) the agreement is in writing; Schedule 1 Standard carrier licence conditions
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Negation of relationship between agreements and standard carrier licence conditions
modality: CogAI
operator: ⊥
premise text: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) the agreement is in writing; Schedule 1 Standard carrier licence conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) the agreement is in writing; Schedule 1 Standard carrier licence conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Exhaustive relationship between agreements and standard carrier licence conditions
modality: Diffusion
operator: ⊆
premise text: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) the agreement is in writing; Schedule 1 Standard carrier licence conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Inclusive relationship between agreements and standard carrier licence conditions
modality: LTL
operator: ⊇
premise text: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(7) Terms and conditions of access

19 Ministerial pricing determinations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.18
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19(1) Ministerial pricing determinations
has part: 19(3) Ministerial pricing determinations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
schema version: 2

19(1) Ministerial pricing determinations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.18
note: Minister may make a determination on price-related terms and conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-19-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-19-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Ministerial pricing determinations

19(3) Ministerial pricing determinations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.18
note: Defines price-related terms and conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-19-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-19-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-19-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Ministerial pricing determinations

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-19-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes the defined terms in the schedule.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-19-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(3) Ministerial pricing determinations

20 Simplified outline
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.19
note: Carriers must provide access to certain information.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-20-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

21 Access to network information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.19
curation status: Proposed
has part: 21(1) Access to network information
has part: 21(2) Access to network information
has part: 21(3) Access to network information
has part: 21(4) Access to network information
has part: 21(5) Access to network information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
schema version: 2

21(1) Access to network information
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.19
note: Carrier must provide access to network information
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-21-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Access to network information

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(1) Access to network information

21(2) Access to network information
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.19
note: Provide reasonable access to operations support systems and traffic flow information upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-21-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Access to network information

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide access
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

21(3) Access to network information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.19
note: The first carrier must comply with subclause (2) unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-21-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Access to network information

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: during the planning process
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between planning and compliance
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: a purpose of the access is to enable the second carrier to undertake planning, maintenance or reconfiguration of the second carrier’s telecommunications network

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Unless certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: unless
premise text: The first carrier must comply with subclause (2)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: until certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between compliance and planning
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: the first carrier must comply with subclause (2)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(3) Access to network information

21(4) Access to network information
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.19
note: Must provide network information upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-21-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Access to network information

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide network information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

21(5) Access to network information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.19
note: No implication that clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 limit access to network information.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-21-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Access to network information

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This clause overlaps with clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 overlap with this clause.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: Clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 do not limit this clause.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This clause is recognized by clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 recognize this clause.
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: Clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 do not limit this clause.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This clause does not imply a limitation by clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No implication that clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 limit access to network information.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: Clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 do not limit this clause.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This clause is diffused by clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 diffuse this clause.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: Clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 do not limit this clause.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This clause is the conjunction of clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 are part of this clause.
modality: LTL
operator: and
premise text: Clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 do not limit this clause.

22 Access to information in databases
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 22(1) Access to information in databases
has part: 22(2) Access to information in databases
has part: 22(3) Access to information in databases
has part: 22(4) Access to information in databases
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
schema version: 2

22(1) Access to information in databases
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
note: Carrier must provide access to information in databases
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Access to information in databases

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(1) Access to information in databases

22(2) Access to information in databases
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
note: First carrier must provide second carrier with access to information about telecommunications network treatment.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Access to information in databases

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Timely access to information
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(2) Access to information in databases

22(3) Access to information in databases
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
note: Second carrier's request for access is reasonable.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Access to information in databases

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Access must be for planning, maintenance or reconfiguration.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Requires
premise text: (3) The first carrier is not required to comply with subclause (2)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows second carrier to plan, maintain or reconfigure network.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: Second carrier's request is reasonable.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(3) Access to information in databases

22(4) Access to information in databases
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
note: First carrier must provide information to second carrier upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Access to information in databases

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

23 Access to network planning information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23(1) Access to network planning information
has part: 23(2) Access to network planning information
has part: 23(3) Access to network planning information
has part: 23(4) Access to network planning information
has part: 23(5) Access to network planning information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
schema version: 2

23(1) Access to network planning information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
note: Carrier must provide access to network planning information
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Access to network planning information

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23(1) Access to network planning information

23(2) Access to network planning information
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
note: Provide telecommunications network planning information upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Access to network planning information

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the first carrier.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

23(3) Access to network planning information
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
note: Must provide network planning information
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Access to network planning information

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Relates to time period during which information must be provided
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) The information is to include (but is not limited to) information relating to the following:

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Information must be provided by the carrier
modality: CogAI
operator: mustBeProvidedBy
premise text: (3) The information is to include (but is not limited to) information relating to the following:

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information must be provided by the carrier
modality: Diffusion
operator: mustBeProvidedBy
premise text: (3) The information is to include (but is not limited to) information relating to the following:

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Relates to time period during which information must be provided
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (3) The information is to include (but is not limited to) information relating to the following:

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23(3) Access to network planning information

23(4) Access to network planning information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
note: Second carrier may request access to network planning information if reasonable purpose.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Access to network planning information

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23(4) Access to network planning information

23(5) Access to network planning information
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
note: Must provide network planning information to second carrier upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Access to network planning information

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

24 Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.21
curation status: Proposed
has part: 24(1) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
has part: 24(2) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
has part: 24(3) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
has part: 24(4) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
schema version: 2

24(1) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.21
note: Carrier must provide access to information about likely changes to network facilities.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must provide access
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(1) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—

24(2) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.21
note: Provide timely and detailed information about likely changes to facilities on a telecommunications network.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

24(3) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.21
note: Second carrier may request first carrier to comply with subclause (2) if planning for own network is involved.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with subclause (2) may occur during planning for own network
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Compliance with subclause (2) may occur during planning for own network
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: The second carrier's request is reasonable

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with subclause (2) may occur if the second carrier is reasonable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Request for compliance with subclause (2) implies that the second carrier is reasonable
modality: Argumentation
operator: If-then
premise text: The second carrier's request is reasonable

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with subclause (2) may occur if the second carrier is reasonable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Request for compliance with subclause (2) implies that the first carrier must provide information
modality: CogAI
operator: If-then
premise text: The second carrier's request is reasonable

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: First carrier may comply with subclause (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to comply with subclause (2)
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: Second carrier's request is reasonable

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with subclause (2) may occur if the second carrier is reasonable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Request for compliance with subclause (2) implies that the first carrier must provide information
modality: Diffusion
operator: If-then
premise text: The second carrier's request is reasonable

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(3) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—

24(4) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.21
note: Must provide information to second carrier upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information to second carrier upon request.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(4) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—

25 Access to quality of service information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.22
curation status: Proposed
has part: 25(1) Access to quality of service information etc.
has part: 25(2) Access to quality of service information etc.
has part: 25(3) Access to quality of service information etc.
has part: 25(4) Access to quality of service information etc.
has part: 25(5) Access to quality of service information etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
schema version: 2

25(1) Access to quality of service information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.22
note: Carrier must provide access to quality of service information
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 25 Access to quality of service information etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25(1) Access to quality of service information etc.

25(2) Access to quality of service information etc.
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.22
note: Provide detailed information about quality of service, network conditions, and call failures.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 25 Access to quality of service information etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Timely provision of information
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The first carrier must, if requested to do so by the second carrier,

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

25(3) Access to quality of service information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.22
note: Second carrier's request for compliance with subclause (2) is reasonable.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 25 Access to quality of service information etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted to second carrier.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25(3) Access to quality of service information etc.

25(4) Access to quality of service information etc.
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.22
note: First carrier must provide information to second carrier upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 25 Access to quality of service information etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

25(5) Access to quality of service information etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.22
note: Specify ITU recommendations for quality of service
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 25 Access to quality of service information etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify ITU recommendations
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classify ITU recommendations
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25(5) Access to quality of service information etc.

26 Security procedures
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.23
curation status: Proposed
has part: 26(1) Security procedures
has part: 26(2) Security procedures
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
schema version: 2

26(1) Security procedures
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.23
note: Carrier may withhold information from another carrier unless security procedures are in place.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-26-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Security procedures

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: First carrier may withhold information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to withhold information
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Second carrier has security procedures in place

26(2) Security procedures
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.23
note: Design procedures to protect information confidentiality
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-26-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Security procedures

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to protect information confidentiality
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-26-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26(2) Security procedures

27 Terms and conditions of compliance
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.23
note: First carrier must comply with requirements imposed by clause on agreed terms and conditions or determined by arbitrator.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27 Terms and conditions of compliance

27A Code relating to access to information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 27A(1) Code relating to access to information
has part: 27A(2) Code relating to access to information
has part: 27A(3) Code relating to access to information
has part: 27A(4) Code relating to access to information
has part: 27A(5) Code relating to access to information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27a
schema version: 2

27A(1) Code relating to access to information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24
note: Code setting out conditions for provision of information under specified clauses.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 27A Code relating to access to information

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May make a Code setting out conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

27A(2) Code relating to access to information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24
note: Carrier must comply with the Code.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 27A Code relating to access to information

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27A(2) Code relating to access to information

27A(3) Code relating to access to information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24
note: No implication on power to make an instrument
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 27A Code relating to access to information

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No implication on power to make an instrument
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implication of clause on power
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (3) This clause does not...

27A(4) Code relating to access to information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24
note: Does not limit matters dealt with by codes or standards
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 27A Code relating to access to information

27A(5) Code relating to access to information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24
note: Does not limit subsection 33(3B) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 27A Code relating to access to information

28 Ministerial pricing determinations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 28(1) Ministerial pricing determinations
has part: 28(3) Ministerial pricing determinations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
schema version: 2

28(1) Ministerial pricing determinations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24
note: Minister may make a determination setting out principles dealing with price-related terms.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-28-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Ministerial pricing determinations

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-28-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28(1) Ministerial pricing determinations

28(3) Ministerial pricing determinations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24
note: Defines price-related terms and conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-28-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Ministerial pricing determinations

29 Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.25
curation status: Proposed
has part: 29(1) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
has part: 29(2) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
has part: 29(3) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
has part: 29(4) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
has part: 29(5) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
schema version: 2

29(1) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.25
note: Carrier must consult about reconfiguration of carriage services.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 29 Consultation about reconfiguration etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29(1) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.

29(2) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.25
note: Must consult with second carrier before modifying or reconfiguring telecommunications network.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 29 Consultation about reconfiguration etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consult with second carrier
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The first carrier must, if requested to do so by the second carrier...

29(3) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.25
note: First carrier must comply with subclause (2) unless modification affects second carrier's planning, maintenance, or reconfiguration activities.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 29 Consultation about reconfiguration etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) The first carrier is not required...

29(4) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.25
note: Carrier must comply with requirement on terms and conditions agreed upon by parties or determined by arbitrator.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 29 Consultation about reconfiguration etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...on such terms and conditions as are:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has an obligation to comply with the requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (4) The first carrier must comply...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29(4) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.

29(5) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.25
note: Regulations may make provision for arbitration conduct
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 29 Consultation about reconfiguration etc.

29A Code relating to consultation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.26
curation status: Proposed
has part: 29A(1) Code relating to consultation
has part: 29A(2) Code relating to consultation
has part: 29A(3) Code relating to consultation
has part: 29A(4) Code relating to consultation
has part: 29A(5) Code relating to consultation
has part: 29A(6) Code relating to consultation
has part: 29A(7) Code relating to consultation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a
schema version: 2

29A(1) Code relating to consultation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.26
note: The ACCC must make a Code setting out conditions for consultations under clause 29.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 29A Code relating to consultation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a Code
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

29A(2) Code relating to consultation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.26
note: The Code may specify the manner and form in which a consultation is to occur.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 29A Code relating to consultation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29A(2) Code relating to consultation

29A(3) Code relating to consultation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.26
note: Does not limit subclause (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 29A Code relating to consultation

29A(4) Code relating to consultation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.26
note: Carrier must comply with the Code.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 29A Code relating to consultation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The carrier MUST comply with the Code.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) A carrier must comply with the Code.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29A(4) Code relating to consultation

29A(5) Code relating to consultation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.26
note: No implication that limits power to make an instrument
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 29A Code relating to consultation

29A(6) Code relating to consultation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.26
note: No implication on matters dealt with by codes or standards.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 29A Code relating to consultation

29A(7) Code relating to consultation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.26
note: Does not limit subsection 33(3B) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 by implication.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 29A Code relating to consultation

30 Simplified outline
type: Concept
description: Access to telecommunications transmission towers, tower sites, and underground facilities
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.27
note: Carriers must provide access to telecommunications transmission towers, tower sites, and underground facilities.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-30-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide access
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

31 Definitions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.27
note: Definitions for eligible underground facility, site, and telecommunications transmission tower.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-31-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
schema version: 2

32 Extended meaning of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 32(1) Extended meaning of access
has part: 32(2) Extended meaning of access
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
schema version: 2

32(1) Extended meaning of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
note: Giving access to a tower includes replacing the tower with another tower located on the same site and giving access to the replacement tower.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Extended meaning of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Describes a subclass relationship
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(1) Extended meaning of access

32(2) Extended meaning of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
note: Giving access to a site includes replacing the tower with another tower located on the site.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Extended meaning of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Replacing the tower with another tower located on the site is temporally included in 'giving access to a site'
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Implies temporal inclusion
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part, giving access to a site on which is situated a tower includes replacing the tower with another tower located on the site.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Replacing the tower with another tower located on the site is cognitively related to 'giving access to a site'
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Implies cognitive relationship
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part, giving access to a site on which is situated a tower includes replacing the tower with another tower located on the site.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Replacing the tower with another tower located on the site is an obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part, giving access to a site on which is situated a tower includes replacing the tower with another tower located on the site.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Replacing the tower with another tower located on the site is a subclass of 'giving access to a site'
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Implies subclass relationship
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part, giving access to a site on which is situated a tower includes replacing the tower with another tower located on the site.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Replacing the tower with another tower located on the site is diffusely related to 'giving access to a site'
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Implies diffusion relationship
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part, giving access to a site on which is situated a tower includes replacing the tower with another tower located on the site.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Replacing the tower with another tower located on the site is temporally included in 'giving access to a site'
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Implies temporal inclusion
modality: LTL
operator: includes
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part, giving access to a site on which is situated a tower includes replacing the tower with another tower located on the site.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(2) Extended meaning of access

33 Access to telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 33(1) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 33(2) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 33(3) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 33(4) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 33(4A) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 33(5) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 33(6) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 33(7) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
schema version: 2

33(1) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
note: Carrier must provide access to telecommunications transmission tower upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Access to telecommunications transmission towers

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must provide access.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33(1) Access to telecommunications transmission towers

33(2) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
note: Access to telecommunications transmission towers is permitted for the sole purpose of enabling a second carrier to install a facility used in connection with the supply of a carriage service by means of radiocommunications, subject to reasonable notice.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Access to telecommunications transmission towers

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Access to telecommunications transmission towers is classified as a permitted activity.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33(2) Access to telecommunications transmission towers

33(3) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
note: Exemption from compliance with subclause (1) for a particular telecommunications transmission tower if a written certificate is issued by the ACCC stating it is not technically feasible.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Access to telecommunications transmission towers

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval during which the exemption is in force
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from compliance with subclause (1) for a particular telecommunications transmission tower if a written certificate is issued by the ACCC stating it is not technically feasible.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33(3) Access to telecommunications transmission towers

33(4) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
note: The ACCC must consider certain factors when determining technical feasibility of compliance with subclause (1) in relation to a tower.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Access to telecommunications transmission towers

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The ACCC must consider certain factors.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The ACCC must have regard to the specified factors.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has regard to

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33(4) Access to telecommunications transmission towers

33(4A) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
note: Consultation with ACMA before issuing a certificate
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-4a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Access to telecommunications transmission towers

33(5) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
note: Must make decision within 10 business days after request.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Access to telecommunications transmission towers

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make decision within time frame.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

33(6) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
note: No obligation to comply with certain undertakings if it would have negative effects.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Access to telecommunications transmission towers

33(7) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
note: Requester must comply with contingent provisions of a contract if they have not come into force.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Access to telecommunications transmission towers

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Requester made the request.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requester must comply with contingent provisions if they have not come into force.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Contingent provisions have not come into force.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Requester made the request.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Requester must comply with contingent provisions if they have not come into force.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: Contingent provisions have not come into force.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Requester made the request.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Requester must comply with contingent provisions if they have not come into force.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: Contingent provisions have not come into force.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Contingent provisions have not come into force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with contingent provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Requester made the request.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Requester made the request.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Requester must comply with contingent provisions if they have not come into force.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: Contingent provisions have not come into force.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33(7) Access to telecommunications transmission towers

34 Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 34(1) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 34(2) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 34(3) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 34(4) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 34(4A) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
schema version: 2

34(1) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.30
note: Carrier must provide access to site upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide access
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(1) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers

34(2) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.30
note: Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers is permitted for the sole purpose of enabling a second carrier to install a facility used in connection with the supply of a carriage service by means of radiocommunications, subject to reasonable notice.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the access is provided for the sole purpose of enabling the second carrier...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for notice requirement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (b) the second carrier gives the first carrier reasonable notice that...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the access is provided for the sole purpose of enabling the second carrier...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Reasonable notice justification
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
premise text: (b) the second carrier gives the first carrier reasonable notice that...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the access is provided for the sole purpose of enabling the second carrier...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation for access classification
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (2) The first carrier is not required to comply with subclause (1)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the access is provided for the sole purpose of enabling the second carrier...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted for specific purpose
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) The first carrier is not required to comply with subclause (1)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the access is provided for the sole purpose of enabling the second carrier...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Access classification
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (2) The first carrier is not required to comply with subclause (1)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the access is provided for the sole purpose of enabling the second carrier...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Notice propagation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (b) the second carrier gives the first carrier reasonable notice that...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(2) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers

34(3) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.30
note: Exempts first carrier from complying with subclause (1) if ACCC certifies technical infeasibility.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: First carrier exempted from compliance
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: ACCC certifies technical infeasibility

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(3) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers

34(4) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.30
note: The ACCC must consider certain factors when determining technical feasibility of compliance.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: technical feasibility of compliance
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The ACCC must consider certain factors.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) and (b)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: considered factors
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Factors considered include technical difficulties and health/safety risks.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
premise text: (a) and (b)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(4) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers

34(4A) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.30
note: Consultation with ACMA before issuing a certificate
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to consult ACMA
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

35 Access to eligible underground facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 35(1) Access to eligible underground facilities
has part: 35(2) Access to eligible underground facilities
has part: 35(3) Access to eligible underground facilities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
schema version: 2

35(1) Access to eligible underground facilities
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.33
note: Carrier must provide access to eligible underground facility upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-35-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Access to eligible underground facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has a duty to provide access.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(1) Access to eligible underground facilities

35(2) Access to eligible underground facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.33
note: First carrier not required to comply with subclause (1) unless access is for the second carrier's installation or reasonable notice is given.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-35-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Access to eligible underground facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Access is provided for the sole purpose of enabling the second carrier to install a line used, or for use, in connection with the supply of a carriage service.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (a)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted to the second carrier.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (a) and (b)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Second carrier gives reasonable notice that the second carrier requires the access.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (b)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(2) Access to eligible underground facilities

35(3) Access to eligible underground facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.33
note: Exemption from compliance with subclause (1) for eligible underground facilities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-35-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Access to eligible underground facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from compliance with subclause (1) for eligible underground facilities
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(3) Access to eligible underground facilities

36 Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.36
curation status: Proposed
has part: 36(1) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 36(2) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 36(3) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 36(4) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 36(5) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 36(6) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 36(7) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 36(8) Terms and conditions of access
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
schema version: 2

36(1) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.36
note: Carrier must comply with terms and conditions agreed upon by parties or determined by arbitrator.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Terms and conditions of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must comply with terms and conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(1) Terms and conditions of access

36(2) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.36
note: Carrier must comply with terms and conditions agreed upon by parties or determined by arbitrator.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Terms and conditions of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Arbitrator appointment is within a specific time frame.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: System recognizes terms and conditions as binding.
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNIZES

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must comply.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Terms and conditions are disseminated to all parties.
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (ii) Carrier 2
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Carrier must comply with terms and conditions for all carriers.
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
premise text: (i) Carrier 1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(2) Terms and conditions of access

36(3) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.36
note: Carrier must comply with terms and conditions agreed upon by parties or determined by arbitrator.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Terms and conditions of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must comply with terms and conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(3) Terms and conditions of access

36(4) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.36
note: Regulations may make provision for the conduct of an arbitration.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Terms and conditions of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(4) Terms and conditions of access

36(5) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.36
note: ACCC may be constituted by a single member or specified number of members for a particular arbitration.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Terms and conditions of access

36(6) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.36
note: No implication that subclause (4) is limited by subclause (5)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Terms and conditions of access

36(7) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.36
note: Prevent arbitrators from making determinations that would prevent Telstra successors from complying with undertakings.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Terms and conditions of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Determination would prevent Telstra successor from complying with undertaking if final migration plan is in force
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for final migration plan
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: Section 36(7) defines terms and conditions of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if final migration plan is in force
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Identifies cognitive biases in arbitrators' decisions
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: Section 36(7) defines terms and conditions of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Determination would prevent Telstra successor from complying with undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Arbitrator must not make a determination

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if final migration plan is in force
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses obligations to designated Telstra successors
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: Section 36(7) defines terms and conditions of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if final migration plan is in force
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for designated Telstra successors
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: Section 36(7) defines terms and conditions of access

36(8) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.36
note: Determination under this clause has no effect to the extent it is inconsistent with an agreement in writing.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Terms and conditions of access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the agreement is in writing.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between clause and agreements
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (8) If: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a), (2)(a) or (3)(a) is in force;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the agreement is in writing.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Clause incorporates agreements into its scope
modality: CogAI
operator: Incorporates
premise text: (8) If: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a), (2)(a) or (3)(a) is in force;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Determination under this clause has no effect...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider agreements in writing
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (8) If an agreement is in force and in writing;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the agreement is in writing.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Clause diffuses into agreements
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (8) If: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a), (2)(a) or (3)(a) is in force;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the agreement is in writing.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for clause and agreements
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (8) If: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a), (2)(a) or (3)(a) is in force;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(8) Terms and conditions of access

37 Code relating to access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.37
curation status: Proposed
has part: 37(1) Code relating to access
has part: 37(2) Code relating to access
has part: 37(3) Code relating to access
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
schema version: 2

37(1) Code relating to access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.37
note: The ACCC may make a Code setting out conditions for access provision.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Code relating to access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

37(2) Code relating to access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.37
note: Carrier must comply with the Code.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Code relating to access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(2) Code relating to access

37(3) Code relating to access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.37
note: Does not limit a power to make an instrument
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Code relating to access

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: limit a power conferred by or under this Act
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits a power
modality: Deontic
operator: does not imply
premise text: (3) This clause does not, by implication

38 Industry co-operation about sharing of sites and eligible
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.38
note: Carrier must co-operate with other carriers to share sites and eligible underground facilities.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-38-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38 Industry co-operation about sharing of sites and eligible

39 This Part does not limit Part 3 of this Schedule
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.38
note: Does not limit Part 3 of this Schedule
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-39-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part 3
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits Part 3
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Does not limit

40 Simplified outline
type: Concept
description: Records, inspection reports, investigation findings
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.39
note: Carriers must keep records, inspect facilities regularly, investigate and take remedial action.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-40-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to perform actions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-40-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40 Simplified outline

41 Records relating to underground facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.39
curation status: Proposed
has part: 41(1) Records relating to underground facilities
has part: 41(2) Records relating to underground facilities
has part: 41(3) Records relating to underground facilities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
schema version: 2

41(1) Records relating to underground facilities
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.39
note: Carrier must keep records of designated overhead lines.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-41-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 41 Records relating to underground facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to keep records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41(1) Records relating to underground facilities

41(2) Records relating to underground facilities
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.39
note: Carrier must keep and maintain records of telecommunications towers.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-41-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 41 Records relating to underground facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to keep and maintain records.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41(2) Records relating to underground facilities

41(3) Records relating to underground facilities
type: Concept
description: (a) the kind and location of those facilities; (b) if any of those facilities is an eligible underground facility— the capacity of that facility to hold further lines.
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.39
note: Carrier must keep records of underground facilities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-41-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 41 Records relating to underground facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the kind and location of those facilities; (b) if any of those facilities is an eligible underground facility— the capacity of that facility to hold further lines.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between records and facilities
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the kind and location of those facilities; (b) if any of those facilities is an eligible underground facility— the capacity of that facility to hold further lines.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application to records
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the kind and location of those facilities; (b) if any of those facilities is an eligible underground facility— the capacity of that facility to hold further lines.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has a duty to keep records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the kind and location of those facilities; (b) if any of those facilities is an eligible underground facility— the capacity of that facility to hold further lines.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of records across time
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the kind and location of those facilities; (b) if any of those facilities is an eligible underground facility— the capacity of that facility to hold further lines.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between records and facilities
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41(3) Records relating to underground facilities

42 Regular inspection of facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 42(1) Regular inspection of facilities
has part: 42(2) Regular inspection of facilities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
schema version: 2

42(1) Regular inspection of facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
note: Carrier must inspect facility regularly.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-42-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Regular inspection of facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inspect
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-42-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(1) Regular inspection of facilities

42(2) Regular inspection of facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
note: Must regard good engineering practice when determining regularity of inspections.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-42-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Regular inspection of facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to regard good engineering practice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-42-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(2) Regular inspection of facilities

43 Prompt investigation of dangerous facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
note: Carrier must investigate facility condition if reasonable grounds exist.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-43-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-43-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-43-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigation must be prompt
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Investigation must occur within a reasonable timeframe
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Carrier has reasonable grounds to suspect facility condition endangers health or safety

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigate facility condition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to investigate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Carrier owns or operates facility

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43 Prompt investigation of dangerous facilities

44 Remedial action
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.41
curation status: Proposed
has part: 44(1) Remedial action
has part: 44(2) Remedial action
has part: 44(3) Remedial action
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
schema version: 2

44(1) Remedial action
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.41
note: Carrier must take remedial action following inspection.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Remedial action

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to perform action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(1) Remedial action

44(2) Remedial action
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.41
note: Carrier must take remedial action following investigation.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Remedial action

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to act
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(2) Remedial action

44(3) Remedial action
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.41
note: Carrier must comply with remedial action as soon as practicable.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Remedial action

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must comply with remedial action.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(3) Remedial action

44A Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.42
note: Carrier must obtain designated interconnection service from carriage service provider.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must obtain designated interconnection service.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44A Simplified outline

45 Definitions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.42
note: Defines terms for active declared service, designated interconnection service, and eligible service.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-45-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-45-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-45-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines terms for active declared service
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

46 Carriers must obtain designated interconnection services from
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.43
note: Carrier must obtain designated interconnection services from carriage service providers.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-46-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-46-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must obtain designated interconnection services.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-46-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Carriage service providers' telecommunications networks are interconnected with carriers' telecommunications networks.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPartOf

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-46-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46 Carriers must obtain designated interconnection services from

47 Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47(1) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(2) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(3) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(4) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(5) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(6) Designated interconnection services
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
schema version: 2

47(1) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
note: The Minister may declare a specified service as a designated interconnection service.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-47-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services

47(2) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
note: Declaration has effect accordingly.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-47-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has effect accordingly.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration's effect
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
premise text: (2) A declaration under subclause (1)

47(3) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
note: Request for ACCC report on proposed declaration promoting objective of any-to-any connectivity
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-47-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to request ACCC report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

47(4) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
note: Must provide report to Minister within 30 days
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-47-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report to Minister within 30 days
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

47(5) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
note: Minister must consider ACCC's report and other relevant matters when deciding to make a declaration.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-47-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister considers the ACCC’s report between other relevant matters.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Minister's consideration of ACCC's report is a temporal interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The Minister must have regard to the ACCC’s report.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister uses the ACCC’s report as a basis for their decision-making process.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Minister's consideration of ACCC's report is an argumentative process.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IS_A
premise text: The Minister must have regard to the ACCC’s report.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must have regard to the ACCC’s report and such other matters as the Minister considers relevant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to consider ACCC's report and other relevant matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister must decide whether to make the declaration.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister’s decision-making process involves diffusing information about the ACCC’s report and other relevant matters.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Minister's decision-making process is a diffusion of information.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: The Minister must decide whether to make the declaration.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister considers the ACCC’s report without any lower temporal limit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Minister's consideration of ACCC's report is a temporal interval with no lower bound.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The Minister must have regard to the ACCC’s report.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(5) Designated interconnection services

47(6) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
note: Declaration under subclause (1) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-47-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a legislative instrument
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legislative instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Declaration under subclause (1)

68 Simplified outline
type: Concept
description: draft functional separation undertaking
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.46
note: Telstra must prepare a draft functional separation undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-68-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prepare a draft functional separation undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

69 Definitions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.46
note: Definitions for the Act
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-69-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
schema version: 2

70 Declared network services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.47
note: Declared network service definition
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-70-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
schema version: 2

71 Regulated services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.47
note: A regulated service is a declared service within the meaning of Part XIC of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-71-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Regulated service
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Service is declared
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Part XIC of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-71-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 71 Regulated services

72 Notional contracts
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.48
note: Treats notional contracts as actual contracts for purposes of this Part.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-72-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
schema version: 2

73 Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.49
curation status: Proposed
has part: 73(1) Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
has part: 73(2) Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
has part: 73(3) Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
schema version: 2

73(1) Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.49
note: Functional separation undertaking requirements
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-73-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-73-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking

73(2) Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.49
note: Defines how a final functional separation undertaking affects quarters.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-73-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-73-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking

73(3) Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.49
note: ACCC may perform functions or exercise powers in relation to the undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-73-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-73-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-73-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-73-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACCC may perform functions or exercise powers.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

74 Functional separation principles
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.50
curation status: Proposed
has part: 74(1) Functional separation principles
has part: 74(2) Functional separation principles
has part: 74(3) Functional separation principles
has part: 74(4) Functional separation principles
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74
schema version: 2

74(1) Functional separation principles
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.50
note: Maintain functional separation principles
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Functional separation principles

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must maintain functional separation principles
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) The functional separation principles are as follows:

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Maintain arm's length functional separation between wholesale and retail business units
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (c) the principle that Telstra should maintain arm’s length functional separation between:

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Develop performance measures relating to compliance with a final functional separation undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (iii) the development of performance measures relating to compliance with a final functional separation undertaking;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conduct independent audit and other checks on compliance with a final functional separation undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (iv) independent audit, and other checks, of compliance with a final functional separation undertaking;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consult wholesale customers at the same time and in the same manner when consulting retail business units
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (ii) proposed developments in connection with services supplied by Telstra’s wholesale/network business unit;

74(2) Functional separation principles
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.50
note: Must consider favourable terms and conditions when determining equivalence principle.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Functional separation principles

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...regard must be had to whether...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of equivalence principle.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) In determining the principle of equivalence...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...regard must be had to whether...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider favourable terms and conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) In determining the principle of equivalence...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74(2) Functional separation principles

74(3) Functional separation principles
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.50
note: Regard may be had to matters not limited by subclause (2)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Functional separation principles

74(4) Functional separation principles
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.50
note: Clarifies that this clause does not affect the meaning of anything in Part 33.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Functional separation principles

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Clarifies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: clarification

75 Functional separation requirements determination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.51
curation status: Proposed
has part: 75(1) Functional separation requirements determination
has part: 75(2) Functional separation requirements determination
has part: 75(3) Functional separation requirements determination
has part: 75(4) Functional separation requirements determination
has part: 75(4A) Functional separation requirements determination
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-75
schema version: 2

75(1) Functional separation requirements determination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.51
note: Minister may make written determination specifying functional separation requirements.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-75-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-75-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Functional separation requirements determination

75(2) Functional separation requirements determination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.51
note: Functional separation requirements determination may deal with the manner in which functional separation principles are to be implemented.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-75-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-75-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Functional separation requirements determination

75(3) Functional separation requirements determination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.51
note: Determines manner of meeting requirement set out in paragraph 73(1)(b) or (c)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-75-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-75-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Functional separation requirements determination

75(4) Functional separation requirements determination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.51
note: Functional separation requirements determination does not limit subclause (1).
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-75-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-75-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Functional separation requirements determination

75(4A) Functional separation requirements determination
type: Concept
description: Notice setting out determination or variation
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.51
note: Minister must publish notice on website before making or varying functional separation requirements determination.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-75-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-75-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-75-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Functional separation requirements determination

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-75-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-75-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75(4A) Functional separation requirements determination

76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
curation status: Proposed
has part: 76(1) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
has part: 76(2) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
has part: 76(3) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
has part: 76(4) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-76
schema version: 2

76(1) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
description: True
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
note: Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister within 90 days or a longer period specified in an instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Telstra has an obligation to provide a draft functional separation undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

76(2) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
note: Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

76(3) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
note: Minister may specify a period for purposes of paragraph (1)(b)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to specify a period
modality: Deontic
operator: May

76(4) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
note: Minister must not specify period under subclause (3) unless Telstra satisfies certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Periods overlap with specified events
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Periods overlap with specified events
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: that decision is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of one or more specified events within a specified period

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister must not specify period under subclause (3) unless Telstra satisfies certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to specify period under subclause (3)
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Telstra has given the ACCC an undertaking under section 577A

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister has permission to specify period under subclause (3) unless Telstra satisfies certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has permission to specify period under subclause (3)
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: Telstra satisfies the Minister that Telstra is preparing an undertaking under section 577A

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACCC has an obligation to decide on undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACCC has an obligation to decide on undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: the ACCC has not decided whether to accept the undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister has an obligation to specify period under subclause (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to specify period under subclause (3)
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: the ACCC has decided to accept the undertaking

77 Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
curation status: Proposed
has part: 77(1) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
has part: 77(2) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
has part: 77(3) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77
schema version: 2

77(1) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
note: Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-77-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister

77(2) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
note: The Minister must approve or vary the original undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-77-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve or vary the undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

77(3) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
type: Concept
description: Notice and submissions
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
note: Minister must publish notice and consider submissions before making decision.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-77-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must perform action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-77-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(3) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister

78 Time limit for making an approval decision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
curation status: Proposed
has part: 78(1) Time limit for making an approval decision
has part: 78(2) Time limit for making an approval decision
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78
schema version: 2

78(1) Time limit for making an approval decision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
note: Defines time limit for making an approval decision
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-78-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Time limit for making an approval decision

78(2) Time limit for making an approval decision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
note: Must make a decision within 6 months
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Time limit for making an approval decision

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a decision
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

79 Effect of approval
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
curation status: Proposed
has part: 79(1) Effect of approval
has part: 79(2) Effect of approval
has part: 79(3) Effect of approval
has part: 79(4) Effect of approval
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-79
schema version: 2

79(1) Effect of approval
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
note: Minister must approve draft functional separation undertaking for it to become final.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-79-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-79-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Effect of approval

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister's approval is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-79-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79(1) Effect of approval

79(2) Effect of approval
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
note: Final functional separation undertaking comes into force on a specific day.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-79-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-79-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Effect of approval

79(3) Effect of approval
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
note: No withdrawal of final functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-79-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-79-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Effect of approval

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot withdraw
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) A final functional separation undertaking may not be withdrawn.

79(4) Effect of approval
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
note: Final functional separation undertaking is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-79-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-79-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Effect of approval

80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
curation status: Proposed
has part: 80(1) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(2) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(3) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(4) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(5) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(6) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(7) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(8) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(9) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(10) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80
schema version: 2

80(1) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
note: Variation of final functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking

80(10) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
note: A variation of a final functional separation undertaking is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits variation of final functional separation undertaking as a legislative instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

80(2) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
note: Variation of final functional separation undertaking may be requested or initiated by the Minister.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

80(3) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
note: Duty to consider variation of final functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

80(4) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
description: Notice, submissions, advice from ACCC
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
note: Publish notice and invite submissions before varying final functional separation undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Submissions must be made within 14 days after notice publication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: > 14 DAYS
premise text: (a) cause to be published on the Department’s website a notice: (i) setting out the proposed variation; and (ii) inviting persons to make submissions to the Minister about the proposed variation within 14 days after the notice is published;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice and invite submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must consider submissions received within 14-day period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (d) consider any submissions received within the 14-day period mentioned in paragraph (a);

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must ask ACCC for advice on proposed variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (e) ask the ACCC to give advice to the Minister, within 44 days after the notice is published,

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must have regard to advice given by ACCC
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (f) have regard to any advice given by the ACCC.

80(5) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
note: Minor variation of final functional separation undertaking is exempt from subclause (4)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking

80(6) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
description: Notice and submissions
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
note: Must provide notice and consider submissions from Telstra before making a proposed variation.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice and consider submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80(6) Variation of final functional separation undertaking

80(7) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
note: Minister may ask ACCC for additional advice on a matter arising under this clause.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80(7) Variation of final functional separation undertaking

80(8) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
description: Notification to Telstra
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
note: Notify Telstra of variation in final functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for notification
modality: AllenInterval
operator: STARTS AT
premise text: (8) As soon as practicable after varying a final functional separation undertaking, the Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the variation.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: When variation comes into force
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Consequence of variation notification
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (8) As soon as practicable after varying a final functional separation undertaking, the Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the variation.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive requirement for notification
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
premise text: (8) As soon as practicable after varying a final functional separation undertaking, the Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the variation.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must notify Telstra
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Notification dissemination
modality: Diffusion
operator: DISTRIBUTES
premise text: (8) As soon as practicable after varying a final functional separation undertaking, the Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the variation.

80(9) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
note: Variation of final functional separation undertaking comes into force on the day after notice is given.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between variation and final functional separation undertaking
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (9) A variation of a final functional separation undertaking comes into force on the day after notice is given to Telstra in accordance with subclause (8)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes application of variation to final functional separation undertaking
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
premise text: (9) A variation of a final functional separation undertaking comes into force on the day after notice is given to Telstra in accordance with subclause (8)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the effect of variation on final functional separation undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: (9) A variation of a final functional separation undertaking comes into force on the day after notice is given to Telstra in accordance with subclause (8)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes propagation of variation to final functional separation undertaking
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
premise text: (9) A variation of a final functional separation undertaking comes into force on the day after notice is given to Telstra in accordance with subclause (8)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between variation and final functional separation undertaking
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: (9) A variation of a final functional separation undertaking comes into force on the day after notice is given to Telstra in accordance with subclause (8)

81 Publication of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
curation status: Proposed
has part: 81(1) Publication of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 81(2) Publication of final functional separation undertaking
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-81
schema version: 2

81(1) Publication of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
description: Copy of the final functional separation undertaking
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
note: Make a copy of the final functional separation undertaking available on Telstra’s website.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-81-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-81-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Publication of final functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must make a copy of the undertaking available.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a copy available
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

81(2) Publication of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
note: Make a copy of the varied final functional separation undertaking available on Telstra’s website.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-81-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-81-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Publication of final functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

82 Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
curation status: Proposed
has part: 82(1) Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
has part: 82(2) Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-82
schema version: 2

82(1) Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
note: Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-82-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-82-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Compliance with final functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

82(2) Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
note: Exemption from compliance with final functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-82-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-82-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Compliance with final functional separation undertaking

83 Simplified outline
type: Concept
description: True
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.65
note: Telstra must provide undertakings about structural separation, hybrid fibre-coaxial networks, and subscription television broadcasting licences.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-83-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-83
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on Telstra.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

84 Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
curation status: Proposed
has part: 84(1) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
has part: 84(2) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
has part: 84(3) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-84
schema version: 2

84(1) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
note: Telstra must not exercise control of the licence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-84-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Prevents Telstra from exercising control over the licence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Prevents
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of spectrum licences
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Prevents Telstra from exercising control over the licence for all time
modality: Diffusion
operator: Prevents
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Prevents Telstra from exercising control over the licence for all time
modality: LTL
operator: Prevents
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;

84(2) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
note: Exemption from control by Telstra for certain undertakings
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-84-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

84(3) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
note: Telstra must give ACCC a draft migration plan under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-84-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Draft migration plan is given between Telstra and ACCC.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a draft migration plan.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

85 Use by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.67
curation status: Proposed
has part: 85(1) Use by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
has part: 85(2) Use by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-85
schema version: 2

85(1) Use by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.67
note: Telstra must not supply a carriage service using a radiocommunications device.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-85-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-85-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 85 Use by Telstra of certain spectrum licences

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

85(2) Use by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.67
note: Exemption from rule for Telstra undertakings
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-85-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-85-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 85 Use by Telstra of certain spectrum licences

86 Associate
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.69
curation status: Proposed
has part: 86(1) Associate
has part: 86(2) Associate
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-86
schema version: 2

86(1) Associate
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.69
note: Definition of associate for control of spectrum licence
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-86-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Associate

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of associate for control of spectrum licence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

86(2) Associate
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.69
note: Persons are not associates if they do not act together in relevant dealings and cannot exert influence over each other's business dealings.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-86-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Associate

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: their temporal intervals are disjoint
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals of acting together and influencing are disjoint
modality: AllenInterval
operator: disjointness
premise text: (a) they do not act together in any relevant dealings relating to the spectrum licence

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: they are not associates
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of association
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (a) they do not act together in any relevant dealings relating to the spectrum licence

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: neither can exert influence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of ability to exert influence
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (b) neither of them is in a position to exert influence over the business dealings of the other in relation to the spectrum licence

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: they do not act together
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of acting together
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (a) they do not act together in any relevant dealings relating to the spectrum licence

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: their temporal intervals are disjoint
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal intervals of acting together and influencing are disjoint
modality: LTL
operator: disjointness
premise text: (a) they do not act together in any relevant dealings relating to the spectrum licence

87 Control
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
note: Control includes control as a result of, or by means of, trusts, agreements, arrangements, understandings and practices.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-87-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-87-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-87
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion relation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-87-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass relation
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-87-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87 Control

88 When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
curation status: Proposed
has part: 88(1) When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
has part: 88(2) When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
has part: 88(3) When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-88
schema version: 2

88(1) When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
note: Telstra cannot exercise control of a spectrum licence without meeting the specified conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-88-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 88 When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The key overlaps with other keys that describe the temporal intervals related to the exercise of control of a spectrum licence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The key overlaps with other keys that describe the temporal intervals related to the exercise of control of a spectrum licence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The key is related to the temporal intervals related to the exercise of control of a spectrum licence.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The key implies other keys that describe the argumentation related to the exercise of control of a spectrum licence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The key implies other keys that describe the argumentation related to the exercise of control of a spectrum licence.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: The key is related to the argumentation related to the exercise of control of a spectrum licence.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If Telstra does not meet the specified conditions, it cannot exercise control of a spectrum licence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Telstra's control of a spectrum licence is prohibited without meeting the specified conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Telstra must meet the specified conditions to exercise control of a spectrum licence.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The key contains other keys that describe the diffusion of information related to the exercise of control of a spectrum licence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The key contains other keys that describe the diffusion of information related to the exercise of control of a spectrum licence.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Contains
premise text: The key is related to the diffusion of information related to the exercise of control of a spectrum licence.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The key is next in the sequence of keys that describe the conditions for exercising control of a spectrum licence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The key is next in the sequence of keys that describe the conditions for exercising control of a spectrum licence.
modality: LTL
operator: Next
premise text: The key is related to the sequence of keys that describe the conditions for exercising control of a spectrum licence.

88(2) When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
note: An employee of a licensee cannot be regarded as in control of a spectrum licence solely because of being an employee.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-88-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 88 When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No control exercised
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Control is not exercised during employment.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Employment

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not in a position to exercise control
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot be regarded as in control solely because of being an employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: Being an employee

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(2) When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum

88(3) When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
note: Multiple persons can exercise control of a spectrum licence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-88-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 88 When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum

1 Compliance with this Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.72
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1(1) Compliance with this Act
has part: 1(2) Compliance with this Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
schema version: 2

1(1) Compliance with this Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.72
note: Service provider must comply with the Act.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1 Compliance with this Act

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1(1) Compliance with this Act

1(2) Compliance with this Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.72
note: Inclusion of related Acts and regulations
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1 Compliance with this Act

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Schedule 2
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telecommunications Act 1997
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Chapter 5 of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1(2) Compliance with this Act

10 Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.77
curation status: Proposed
has part: 10(1) Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra
has part: 10(2) Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra
has part: 10(3) Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
schema version: 2

10(1) Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra
type: Concept
description: Information about integrated public number database
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.77
note: Must provide information to Telstra if a carrier licence condition applies.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

10(2) Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.77
note: Must provide information to Telstra upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the timing of the obligation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) If: ... (a) and (b)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

10(3) Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.77
note: Must provide public number information to Telstra
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide public number information to Telstra
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Number has the same meaning as in Division 2 of Part 22
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has the same meaning as
premise text: Division 2 of Part 22

11 Carriage service providers must give information to another
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11(1) Carriage service providers must give information to another
has part: 11(2) Carriage service providers must give information to another
has part: 11(3) Carriage service providers must give information to another
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
schema version: 2

11(1) Carriage service providers must give information to another
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78
note: Must provide information to another
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Carriage service providers must give information to another

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

11(2) Carriage service providers must give information to another
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78
note: Must provide information to end-user with public number
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Carriage service providers must give information to another

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

11(3) Carriage service providers must give information to another
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78
note: Carriage service providers must give information to another
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Carriage service providers must give information to another

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: number
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Define number and public number
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has the same meaning as
premise text: Division 2 of Part 22

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(3) Carriage service providers must give information to another

12 Simplified outline
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.79
note: Carriage service provider must provide itemised billing.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-12-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide itemised billing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 Simplified outline

13 Itemised billing
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.79
curation status: Proposed
has part: 13(1) Itemised billing
has part: 13(2) Itemised billing
has part: 13(3) Itemised billing
has part: 13(4) Itemised billing
has part: 13(5) Itemised billing
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
schema version: 2

13(1) Itemised billing
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.79
note: Must provide itemised billing for standard telephone services
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 13 Itemised billing

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide itemised billing
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

13(2) Itemised billing
type: Concept
description: yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.79
note: Provider must provide itemised billing.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 13 Itemised billing

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide itemised billing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

13(3) Itemised billing
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.79
note: Customer can opt out of itemised billing for calls made using a particular service.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 13 Itemised billing

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Itemised billing is not required before opt-out.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal range for itemised billing.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalRange
premise text: Calls made after opt-out.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Itemised billing for calls made using that service is not required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Customer's choice is binding.
modality: Deontic
operator: OptOut
premise text: Customer chooses not to have itemised billing.

13(4) Itemised billing
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.79
note: Customer can request itemised billing for designated local calls.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 13 Itemised billing

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

13(5) Itemised billing
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.79
note: Definition of designated local call for standard telephone service provider
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 13 Itemised billing

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of designated local call for standard telephone service provider
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13(5) Itemised billing

14 Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.81
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14(1) Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
has part: 14(2) Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
has part: 14(3) Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
schema version: 2

14(1) Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.81
note: Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-14-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Exemptions from itemised billing requirements

14(2) Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.81
note: Consider technical feasibility and plans for itemised billing when deciding exemptions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-14-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Exemptions from itemised billing requirements

14(3) Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.81
note: ACMA may have regard for matters beyond the scope of itemised billing requirements
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-14-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Exemptions from itemised billing requirements

15 Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.81
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15(1) Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
has part: 15(2) Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
has part: 15(3) Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
schema version: 2

15(1) Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.81
note: Carriage service providers must not show specified details in an itemised bill.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of showing specified details in an itemised bill.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(1) Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill

15(2) Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.81
note: Must have regard to Australian Privacy Principles
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of Australian Privacy Principles
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) In making a determination under subclause (1), the ACMA must have regard to the Australian Privacy Principles.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider Australian Privacy Principles
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE REGARD TO
premise text: (2) In making a determination under subclause (1), the ACMA must have regard to the Australian Privacy Principles.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation not limited by implication
modality: Deontic
operator: NOT BY IMPLICATION LIMITS
premise text: (2) In making a determination under subclause (1), the ACMA must have regard to the Australian Privacy Principles.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of Australian Privacy Principles
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) In making a determination under subclause (1), the ACMA must have regard to the Australian Privacy Principles.

15(3) Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.81
note: Carriage service provider must comply with a determination under subclause (1).
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(3) Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill

16 Simplified outline
type: Concept
description: Informing prospective residential customer
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.82
note: Must inform prospective residential customer about priority assistance
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-16-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform prospective residential customer about priority assistance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

17 Priority assistance industry code
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.82
note: Defines priority assistance industry code
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Compliance with the priority assistance industry code
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
note: Compliance with priority assistance industry code is mandatory.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-18-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18 Compliance with the priority assistance industry code

19 Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19(1) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
has part: 19(2) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
has part: 19(3) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
schema version: 2

19(1) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
type: Concept
description: Priority assistance in connection with the supply of a standard telephone service
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
note: Carriage service provider must offer priority assistance if requested by prospective residential customer.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The carriage service provider MUST offer priority assistance in connection with the supply of a standard telephone service if the prospective residential customer requests it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must offer priority assistance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST-OFFER
premise text: (a) the provider receives an inquiry from a prospective residential customer about the supply of a standard telephone service; and (b) the provider does not offer priority assistance in connection with the service.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(1) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage

19(2) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
note: Provider must inform prospective residential customer of priority assistance options.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Provider must inform prospective residential customer.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(2) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage

19(3) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
note: Definition of priority assistance
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: priority assistance has the same meaning as in the priority assistance industry code.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: =

2 Simplified outline
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73
note: Operator services must be provided to end-users of standard telephone services.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide operator services
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Simplified outline

20 Requirements for Telstra Limited and Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
note: No requirement imposed on Telstra Limited if certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
schema version: 2

3 Scope of Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73
note: Scope of Part applies to specified operator services
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Scope applies to specified operator services
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Scope of Part

4 Operator services must be provided to end-users of a standard
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73
curation status: Proposed
has part: 4(1) Operator services must be provided to end-users of a standard
has part: 4(2) Operator services must be provided to end-users of a standard
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
schema version: 2

4(1) Operator services must be provided to end-users of a standard
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73
note: Carriage service provider must provide operator services to end-users of a standard telephone service.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Operator services must be provided to end-users of a standard

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory provision
modality: Deontic
operator: must

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4(1) Operator services must be provided to end-users of a standard

4(2) Operator services must be provided to end-users of a standard
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73
note: Provider may arrange for provision of operator services.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-4-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Operator services must be provided to end-users of a standard

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-4-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4(2) Operator services must be provided to end-users of a standard

5 Access to end-users of other carriage service providers
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73
note: Carriage service provider must provide operator services to end-users of its standard telephone service.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide operator services.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Operator services are a type of standard telephone service.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Access to end-users of other carriage service providers

6 Simplified outline
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.75
note: Must provide directory assistance services to end-users of standard telephone services.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty to provide directory assistance services.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 Simplified outline

7 Directory assistance services must be provided to end-users
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.75
curation status: Proposed
has part: 7(1) Directory assistance services must be provided to end-users
has part: 7(2) Directory assistance services must be provided to end-users
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
schema version: 2

7(1) Directory assistance services must be provided to end-users
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.75
note: Carriage service provider must provide directory assistance services to end-users.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-7-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Directory assistance services must be provided to end-users

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(1) Directory assistance services must be provided to end-users

7(2) Directory assistance services must be provided to end-users
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.75
note: Provider must provide directory assistance services to end-users.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-7-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Directory assistance services must be provided to end-users

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-7-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(2) Directory assistance services must be provided to end-users

8 Access by end-users of other carriage service providers
type: Concept
description: directory assistance services
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.75
note: First provider must comply with request from second provider to provide directory assistance services.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with request.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8 Access by end-users of other carriage service providers

9 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.77
note: Carriage service providers must provide information to a person or association under an obligation.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information must be provided at least as soon as the obligation begins.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Information must be provided at any time after the obligation begins
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The obligation to provide information begins at some point in the future.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Fulfilling the obligation requires providing the required information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Providing information implies fulfilling the obligation
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: Providing information is a necessary condition for fulfilling the obligation.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: They are intelligent agents capable of providing information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Carriage service providers are intelligent agents
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
premise text: Carriage service providers have the capacity for intelligent action.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: They must provide the required information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Carriage service providers have an obligation to provide information.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information is spread to all relevant parties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information spreads to all relevant parties
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-SPREAD-TO
premise text: The information is disseminated to all relevant individuals or organizations.

1 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.85
note: Carrier may enter land and exercise certain powers.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has permission to enter land.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Simplified outline

10 Management of activities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.105
note: A carrier must take all reasonable steps to protect the safety of persons and property.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must take all reasonable steps.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Management of activities

11 Agreements with public utilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11(1) Agreements with public utilities
has part: 11(2) Agreements with public utilities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
schema version: 2

11(1) Agreements with public utilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
note: Carrier must make reasonable efforts to enter into an agreement with a public utility.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Agreements with public utilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Carrier's reasonable efforts must meet the requirements of the agreement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
premise text: (1) A carrier must make reasonable efforts to enter into an agreement with a public utility that makes provision for the manner in which the carrier will engage in an activity that is:

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must make reasonable efforts.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier may not unreasonably refuse to enter into an agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: (1) A carrier must make reasonable efforts to enter into an agreement with a public utility that makes provision for the manner in which the carrier will engage in an activity that is:

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must provide reasonable efforts to enter into an agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) A carrier must make reasonable efforts to enter into an agreement with a public utility that makes provision for the manner in which the carrier will engage in an activity that is:

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Carrier's reasonable efforts must meet the requirements of the agreement.
modality: LTL
operator: MEETS
premise text: (1) A carrier must make reasonable efforts to enter into an agreement with a public utility that makes provision for the manner in which the carrier will engage in an activity that is:

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(1) Agreements with public utilities

11(2) Agreements with public utilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
note: Carrier must comply with an agreement in force under subclause (1).
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Agreements with public utilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must comply with an agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(2) Agreements with public utilities

12 Compliance with industry standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
note: Carrier must comply with industry standards to reduce public safety risk
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (a) relates to the activity; (b) is recognised by ACMA as a standard for use in that industry; (c) is likely to reduce a risk to the safety of the public if the carrier complies with the standard.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
premise text: (a) relates to the activity; (b) is recognised by ACMA as a standard for use in that industry; (c) is likely to reduce a risk to the safety of the public if the carrier complies with the standard.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
premise text: (a) relates to the activity; (b) is recognised by ACMA as a standard for use in that industry; (c) is likely to reduce a risk to the safety of the public if the carrier complies with the standard.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: (a) relates to the activity; (b) is recognised by ACMA as a standard for use in that industry; (c) is likely to reduce a risk to the safety of the public if the carrier complies with the standard.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 Compliance with industry standards

13 Compliance with international agreements
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
note: Carrier must comply with Australia's obligations under a listed international agreement.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-13
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must comply with Australia's obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13 Compliance with international agreements

14 Conditions specified in the regulations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.107
note: Carrier must comply with conditions specified in regulations.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-14-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-14
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14 Conditions specified in the regulations

15 Conditions specified in a Ministerial Code of Practice
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.107
note: Conditions for carriers in relation to activities covered by the Code of Practice
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-15-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-15-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to any or all of the activities covered by...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conditions apply during activities covered by the Code of Practice
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-15-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Requires carriers to comply with conditions
modality: Argumentation
operator: must

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on carriers
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15 Conditions specified in a Ministerial Code of Practice

16 Conditions to which a facility installation permit is subject
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.107
note: Conditions for a facility installation permit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-16-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-16
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The permit is subject to the conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional clause
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: If a condition is met

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Conditions to which a facility installation permit is subject

17 Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
curation status: Proposed
has part: 17(1) Notice to owner of land—general
has part: 17(2) Notice to owner of land—general
has part: 17(3) Notice to owner of land—general
has part: 17(4) Notice to owner of land—general
has part: 17(4A) Notice to owner of land—general
has part: 17(5) Notice to owner of land—general
has part: 17(6) Notice to owner of land—general
has part: 17(6A) Notice to owner of land—general
has part: 17(6B) Notice to owner of land—general
has part: 17(7) Notice to owner of land—general
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-17
schema version: 2

17(1) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
note: Carrier must give written notice to land owner and occupier before engaging in activity.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must give notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(1) Notice to owner of land—general

17(2) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
description: Notice to owner of land—general
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
note: Carrier must specify purpose for activity
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must specify purpose
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(2) Notice to owner of land—general

17(3) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
note: Compensation may be payable under clause 42 if a person suffers financial loss or damage.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(3) Notice to owner of land—general

17(4) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
note: Notice must be given at least 10 business days before carrier begins activity.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(4) Notice to owner of land—general

17(4A) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
note: Notice need be given 2 business days before engaging in certain activities.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A carrier must give notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The notice need be given only 2 business days before...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(4A) Notice to owner of land—general

17(5) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
note: Waiver of notice requirement
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general

17(6) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
note: Exemption from notice requirement for certain activities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to engage in specific activities
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not apply if...

17(6A) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
note: Exemption from notice requirement for carrier engaging in Division 2 activities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...carrier considers that compliance with subclause (1) is impracticable in the circumstances.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for exemption from notice requirement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (6A) Subclause (1) does not apply if...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...carrier considers that compliance with subclause (1) is impracticable in the circumstances.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for exemption from notice requirement
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
premise text: (6A) Subclause (1) does not apply if...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...carrier considers that compliance with subclause (1) is impracticable in the circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier permitted to engage in Division 2 activities without notice requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (6A) Subclause (1) does not apply if...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...carrier considers that compliance with subclause (1) is impracticable in the circumstances.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of exemption from notice requirement to related activities
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (6A) Subclause (1) does not apply if...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...carrier considers that compliance with subclause (1) is impracticable in the circumstances.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for carrier's activities under Division 2
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (6A) Subclause (1) does not apply if...

17(6B) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
note: Definition of temporary defence facility
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-6b
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general

17(7) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
note: Activity not inconsistent with Australia's obligations under a listed international agreement
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general

18 Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
curation status: Proposed
has part: 18(1) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
has part: 18(2) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
has part: 18(3) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
has part: 18(3A) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
has part: 18(3B) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
has part: 18(4) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-18
schema version: 2

18(1) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
type: Concept
description: written notice
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
note: Carrier must give written notice to owner and occupier before engaging in certain activities.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-18-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must give written notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(1) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.

18(2) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
note: Carrier may not engage in activities if request is not complied with.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-18-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Carrier may not engage in activities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of carrier activities
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Request not complied with

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(2) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.

18(3) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
note: Waiver of notice requirement
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-18-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.

18(3A) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
note: Exemption from notice requirement for carriers engaging in Division 2 activities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-18-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to carriers
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (a) the carrier intends to engage in an activity under Division 2

18(3B) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
note: Prohibition on lopping of trees without notice to land owner
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition on lopping of trees without notice to land owner
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (3B) For the purposes of this clause, a temporary defence facility is a facility of the kind mentioned in paragraph 6(1)(c) of this Schedule.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of lopping of trees as prohibited without notice to land owner using CogAI
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (3B) For the purposes of this clause, a temporary defence facility is a facility of the kind mentioned in paragraph 6(1)(c) of this Schedule.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on lopping of trees without notice to land owner
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3B) For the purposes of this clause, a temporary defence facility is a facility of the kind mentioned in paragraph 6(1)(c) of this Schedule.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibition on lopping of trees without notice to land owner
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (3B) For the purposes of this clause, a temporary defence facility is a facility of the kind mentioned in paragraph 6(1)(c) of this Schedule.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition on lopping of trees without notice to land owner
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (3B) For the purposes of this clause, a temporary defence facility is a facility of the kind mentioned in paragraph 6(1)(c) of this Schedule.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(3B) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.

18(4) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
note: Exemption from subclauses (1) and (2) for certain activities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-18-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to engage in specific activities
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission

19 Notice to roads authorities, utilities etc.
type: Concept
description: Written notice
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.111
note: Notice to road authorities, utilities etc. before engaging in certain activities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-19-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-19
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must give written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

2 Definitions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.87
note: Defines terms used in the Act
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Definitions are mandatory
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to define terms
modality: Deontic
operator: !
premise text: The Act requires definitions for certain terms

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Terms must be defined in a hierarchical manner
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for defined terms
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Definitions are used throughout the Act

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Definitions

20 Roads etc. to remain open for passage
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.112
note: Ensure facility installation allows reasonable passage.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-20-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-20
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to ensure passage.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 Roads etc. to remain open for passage

21 Application for facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
curation status: Proposed
has part: 21(1) Application for facility installation permit
has part: 21(2) Application for facility installation permit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-21
schema version: 2

21(1) Application for facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
note: Carrier must apply for permit to install facilities.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-21-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Application for facility installation permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-21-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(1) Application for facility installation permit

21(2) Application for facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
note: The permit is called a facility installation permit.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-21-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-21-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Application for facility installation permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The permit is called a facility installation permit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit name
modality: Deontic
operator: is

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-21-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(2) Application for facility installation permit

22 Form of application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
note: Application must be in writing and in accordance with the approved form.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-22-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be in writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22 Form of application

23 Application to be accompanied by charge
type: Concept
description: charge (if any)
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
note: Application must be accompanied by charge
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-23-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-23
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide charge
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-23-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23 Application to be accompanied by charge

24 Withdrawal of application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
note: No prohibition on withdrawing an application and submitting a fresh one.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-24-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No obligation to maintain an application.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24 Withdrawal of application

25 Issue of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
note: Issue facility installation permit after considering application.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-25-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-25
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Permit issuance
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Facility installation permit obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Application consideration

26 Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
curation status: Proposed
has part: 26(1) Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
has part: 26(2) Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
has part: 26(3) Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
has part: 26(4) Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-26
schema version: 2

26(1) Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
note: Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-26-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Deemed refusal of facility installation permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

26(2) Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
note: Deemed refusal of facility installation permit if no notification within 65 business days
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-26-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Deemed refusal of facility installation permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition on issuing permit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: !
premise text: (2) If...

26(3) Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
note: Determination of business days for facility installation permit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-26-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Deemed refusal of facility installation permit

26(4) Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
note: Must consider ACMA's need to act with sufficient speed when determining the validity of actions taken under Part 25.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-26-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Deemed refusal of facility installation permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consideration must be within the time limit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Must consider the time limit imposed by subclause (2).
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within a time limit
premise text: There is a time limit imposed by subclause (2).

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consideration is mandatory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory consideration of ACMA's need to act with sufficient speed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: ACMA needs to act with sufficient speed.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consideration is mandatory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA has an obligation to consider its need to act with sufficient speed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The ACMA needs to act with sufficient speed.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consideration is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Must consider the ACMA's need to act with sufficient speed in relation to the permit.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: The ACMA needs to act with sufficient speed.

27 Criteria for issue of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115
note: Criteria for issue of facility installation permit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-27-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Criteria for issue of facility installation permit
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

28 Special provisions relating to environmental matters
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.122
curation status: Proposed
has part: 28(1) Special provisions relating to environmental matters
has part: 28(2) Special provisions relating to environmental matters
has part: 28(5) Special provisions relating to environmental matters
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28
schema version: 2

28(1) Special provisions relating to environmental matters
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.122
note: Exemptions from environmental provisions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-28-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Special provisions relating to environmental matters

28(2) Special provisions relating to environmental matters
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.122
note: Consultation with Environment Secretary before issuing a facility installation permit.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-28-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-28-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Special provisions relating to environmental matters

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-28-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Environment Secretary consulted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA must issue a permit

28(5) Special provisions relating to environmental matters
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.122
note: Includes certain parts of Divisions 25 and 29.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-28-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-28-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Special provisions relating to environmental matters

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-28-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies included provisions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes

29 Consultation with the ACCC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
note: Consultation with ACCC before issuing a facility installation permit.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-29-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-29
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult ACCC
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

3 Designated overhead line
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.90
note: Definition of designated overhead line
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Line has temporal relation to land or water
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Line is suspended above the surface of land or water

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of designated overhead line
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Designated overhead line

30 Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30(1) Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act
has part: 30(2) Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-30
schema version: 2

30(1) Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
note: Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-30-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The facility installation permit is subject to the Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
premise text: (1) A facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(1) Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act

30(2) Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
note: Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-30-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between Acts
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: this clause has effect during the period of this Act

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in the same way as this Act
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Includes regulation in AI framework
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
premise text: this clause includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and regulations under that Act
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes specified Acts and regulations
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: this Act includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines subclass relationship between Acts
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
premise text: this clause defines a subclass of this Act

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in the same way as this Act
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses regulation to related Acts
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
premise text: this clause includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between Acts
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: this clause has effect during the period of this Act

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(2) Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act

31 Duration of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
curation status: Proposed
has part: 31(1) Duration of facility installation permit
has part: 31(2) Duration of facility installation permit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-31
schema version: 2

31(1) Duration of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
note: Facility installation permit duration
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-31-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-31-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 31 Duration of facility installation permit

31(2) Duration of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
note: ACMA may extend the period specified in a facility installation permit under special circumstances.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-31-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-31-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 31 Duration of facility installation permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

32 Conditions of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
curation status: Proposed
has part: 32(1) Conditions of facility installation permit
has part: 32(2) Conditions of facility installation permit
has part: 32(3) Conditions of facility installation permit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-32
schema version: 2

32(1) Conditions of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
note: Facility installation permit is subject to specified conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-32-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Conditions of facility installation permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Facility installation permit has obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(1) Conditions of facility installation permit

32(2) Conditions of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
note: Restricts or limits the carrying out of an activity under Division 3.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-32-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Conditions of facility installation permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This subclause does not, by implication, limit subclause (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Restricts or limits the carrying out of an activity over a specific temporal interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (2) A condition of a facility installation permit may restrict, limit or prevent the carrying out of, an activity under Division 3.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This subclause does not, by implication, limit subclause (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Restricts or limits the carrying out of an activity over a specific temporal interval.
modality: CogAI
operator: Restrict
premise text: (2) A condition of a facility installation permit may restrict, limit or prevent the carrying out of, an activity under Division 3.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This subclause does not, by implication, limit subclause (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts or limits the carrying out of an activity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A condition of a facility installation permit may restrict, limit or prevent the carrying out of, an activity under Division 3.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This subclause does not, by implication, limit subclause (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Restricts or limits the carrying out of an activity over a specific temporal interval.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Restrict
premise text: (2) A condition of a facility installation permit may restrict, limit or prevent the carrying out of, an activity under Division 3.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This subclause does not, by implication, limit subclause (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Restricts or limits the carrying out of an activity over a specific temporal interval.
modality: LTL
operator: Restrict
premise text: (2) A condition of a facility installation permit may restrict, limit or prevent the carrying out of, an activity under Division 3.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(2) Conditions of facility installation permit

32(3) Conditions of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
note: Conditions for a facility installation permit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-32-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Conditions of facility installation permit

33 Surrender of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
note: Holder may surrender permit by written notice.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-33-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-33
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to surrender permit
modality: Deontic
operator: may

34 Cancellation of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
curation status: Proposed
has part: 34(1) Cancellation of facility installation permit
has part: 34(2) Cancellation of facility installation permit
has part: 34(3) Cancellation of facility installation permit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-34
schema version: 2

34(1) Cancellation of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
note: ACMA may cancel facility installation permit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-34-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Cancellation of facility installation permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits cancellation of permit
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-34-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(1) Cancellation of facility installation permit

34(2) Cancellation of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
note: Consider contraventions of Division 5 and matters relevant to permit issuance when cancelling a facility installation permit.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Cancellation of facility installation permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consider contraventions and relevant matters when cancelling a permit.
modality: Deontic
operator: consider

34(3) Cancellation of facility installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
note: ACMA may have regard for matters beyond those explicitly limited by subclause (2)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-34-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Cancellation of facility installation permit

35 Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.125
curation status: Proposed
has part: 35(1) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
has part: 35(2) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
has part: 35(3) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
has part: 35(4) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-35
schema version: 2

35(1) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.125
note: Application for review of ACMA decision to refuse facility installation permit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-35-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refuse permit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty on ACMA to hold public inquiry
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: ACMA has not held a public inquiry

35(2) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
type: Concept
description: written notice
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.125
note: Notice must be given to affected persons for review of decision.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-35-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation to provide written notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

35(3) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.125
note: Failure to comply does not affect decision validity
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-35-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The decision is valid if it complies with subclause (2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of compliance overlaps with decision validity
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Compliance occurs at a specific time.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The decision is valid if it complies with subclause (2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Obligation in AI implies obligation to comply
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
premise text: A decision is made by an AI system.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The decision is valid if it complies with subclause (2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: A decision is made.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The decision is valid if it complies with subclause (2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Obligation diffuses to all parties affected by the decision
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: A decision affects multiple parties.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The decision is valid if it complies with subclause (2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Obligation implies obligation in linear logic
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: A decision is made.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(3) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal

35(4) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.125
note: Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-35-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (decision occurs during the period covered by the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation of decision
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (decision has the same meaning as in the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (decision occurs during the period covered by the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal relation of decision
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (decision has the same meaning as in the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (decision has the same meaning as in the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of decision
modality: Deontic
operator: hasSameMeaningAs
premise text: (decision has the same meaning as in the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (decision spreads during the period covered by the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal relation of decision
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (decision has the same meaning as in the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (decision occurs during the period covered by the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation of decision
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (decision has the same meaning as in the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(4) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal

36 Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
curation status: Proposed
has part: 36(1) Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws
has part: 36(2) Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-36
schema version: 2

36(1) Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
note: Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-36-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to the extent that the carrying out of the activity would be inconsistent with the provisions of a law of a State or Territory.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws during certain periods
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) Divisions 2, 3 and 4 do not operate so as to authorise an activity

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to the extent that the carrying out of the activity would be inconsistent with the provisions of a law of a State or Territory.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws during certain periods
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (1) Divisions 2, 3 and 4 do not operate so as to authorise an activity

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to the extent that the carrying out of the activity would be inconsistent with the provisions of a law of a State or Territory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits activities inconsistent with State/Territory laws
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (1) Divisions 2, 3 and 4 do not operate so as to authorise an activity

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to the extent that the carrying out of the activity would be inconsistent with the provisions of a law of a State or Territory.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws during certain periods
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (1) Divisions 2, 3 and 4 do not operate so as to authorise an activity

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to the extent that the carrying out of the activity would be inconsistent with the provisions of a law of a State or Territory.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws during certain periods
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) Divisions 2, 3 and 4 do not operate so as to authorise an activity

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(1) Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws

36(2) Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
note: Exemptions under clause 37 apply to the rule set out in subclause (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-36-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exemptions apply before subclause (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The exemptions under clause 37 apply before subclause (1)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
premise text: Clause 37 exemptions apply before subclause (1)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exemptions are applied by the State and Territory
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The exemptions under clause 37 are applied by the State and Territory
modality: CogAI
operator: apply
premise text: Clause 37 exemptions apply

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subclause (1) is exempted
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions apply to the rule set out in subclause (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Clause 37 exemptions apply

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exemptions diffuse to subclause (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The exemptions under clause 37 diffuse to the rule set out in subclause (1)
modality: Diffusion
operator: apply
premise text: Clause 37 exemptions apply

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exemptions apply after subclause (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The rule set out in subclause (1) is before the exemptions under clause 37
modality: LTL
operator: before
premise text: Subclause (1) is part of the rule set

37 Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
curation status: Proposed
has part: 37(1) Exemption from State and Territory laws
has part: 37(2) Exemption from State and Territory laws
has part: 37(3) Exemption from State and Territory laws
has part: 37(4) Exemption from State and Territory laws
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-37
schema version: 2

37(1) Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
note: Activity must be authorised by Division 2, 3 or 4.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-37-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Exemption from State and Territory laws

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be authorised
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(1) Exemption from State and Territory laws

37(2) Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
note: Exemption from State and Territory laws
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-37-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Exemption from State and Territory laws

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (f) the use of land; or...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relation between exemptions and laws
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Relates to
premise text: (2) The carrier may engage in the activity despite a law of a State or Territory about...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (f) the use of land; or...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes AI application to exemptions
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (2) The carrier may engage in the activity despite a law of a State or Territory about...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: despite a law of a State or Territory
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows carrier to engage in activity despite State or Territory law
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: (2) The carrier may engage in the activity

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (f) the use of land; or...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes scope of exemptions
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applies to
premise text: (2) The carrier may engage in the activity despite a law of a State or Territory about...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (f) the use of land; or...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes sequence of exemptions and laws
modality: LTL
operator: Traces
premise text: (2) The carrier may engage in the activity despite a law of a State or Territory about...

37(3) Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
note: Exemption from State and Territory laws for protection of cultural heritage
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-37-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Exemption from State and Territory laws

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(3) Exemption from State and Territory laws

37(4) Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
note: Exemption from State and Territory laws for high-voltage electricity supply
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-37-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Exemption from State and Territory laws

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval comparison
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from State and Territory laws for high-voltage electricity supply
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

38 Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.127
note: Nothing in this Division affects the operation of other State or Territory laws.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-38-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-38
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to respect concurrent State and Territory laws.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

39 Liability to taxation not affected
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.127
note: Liability to taxation not affected by this Division.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-39-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-39
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to taxation under a law of a State or Territory.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

4 Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.90
curation status: Proposed
has part: 4(1) Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
has part: 4(2) Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
has part: 4(3) Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
schema version: 2

4(1) Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.90
note: Extension to a tower is treated as the installation of a facility.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (c) the carrying out of the extension is to be treated as the carrying out of the installation of the facility;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The extension includes the installation of a facility.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: (a) a tower is a facility; and (b) the tower is, or is to be, extended;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (c) the carrying out of the extension is to be treated as the carrying out of the installation of the facility;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The extension includes a cognitive process that starts at the installation of a facility.
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
premise text: (a) a tower is a facility; and (b) the tower is, or is to be, extended;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (c) the carrying out of the extension is to be treated as the carrying out of the installation of the facility;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If a tower is a facility, then its extension is treated as the installation of a facility.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (a) a tower is a facility; and (b) the tower is, or is to be, extended;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (c) the carrying out of the extension is to be treated as the carrying out of the installation of the facility;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The extension includes a diffusion that starts at the installation of a facility.
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
premise text: (a) a tower is a facility; and (b) the tower is, or is to be, extended;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (c) the carrying out of the extension is to be treated as the carrying out of the installation of the facility;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The extension includes a trace that starts at the installation of a facility.
modality: LTL
operator: includes
premise text: (a) a tower is a facility; and (b) the tower is, or is to be, extended;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4(1) Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility

4(2) Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.90
note: Avoids doubt about what a tower includes in the context of this clause.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility

4(3) Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.90
note: Tower must be treated as facility installation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to treat tower as facility installation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must treat tower as facility installation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Tower is defined

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Definition of tower
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition of tower
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Tower is a tower, pole or mast

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4(3) Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility

41 Guidelines
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
curation status: Proposed
has part: 41(1) Guidelines
has part: 41(2) Guidelines
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-41
schema version: 2

41(1) Guidelines
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
note: Must consider guidelines and other relevant matters when performing a function or exercising power.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-41-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 41 Guidelines

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Consideration of guidelines is within the scope of performance of function or exercise of power.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
premise text: (a) any guidelines in force under subclause (2); and (b) such other matters as the ACMA considers relevant.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Consideration of guidelines is relevant to performance of function or exercise of power.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS RELEVANT TO
premise text: (a) any guidelines in force under subclause (2); and (b) such other matters as the ACMA considers relevant.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider guidelines and other relevant matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) any guidelines in force under subclause (2); and (b) such other matters as the ACMA considers relevant.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Consideration of guidelines is relevant to performance of function or exercise of power.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS RELEVANT TO
premise text: (a) any guidelines in force under subclause (2); and (b) such other matters as the ACMA considers relevant.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Consideration of guidelines is within the scope of performance of function or exercise of power.
modality: LTL
operator: WITHIN
premise text: (a) any guidelines in force under subclause (2); and (b) such other matters as the ACMA considers relevant.

41(2) Guidelines
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
note: ACMA may formulate guidelines by written instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-41-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 41 Guidelines

42 Compensation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
curation status: Proposed
has part: 42(1) Compensation
has part: 42(2) Compensation
has part: 42(3) Compensation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-42
schema version: 2

42(1) Compensation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
note: Compensation for financial loss or damage caused by a carrier's actions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-42-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Compensation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has an obligation to provide compensation.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

42(2) Compensation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
note: Compensation for damage to property
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-42-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Compensation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Compensation for damage to property over time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) Compensation payable under subclause (1)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Compensation includes damage of a temporary character
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: (a) Damage of a temporary character as well as of a permanent character

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(2) Compensation

42(3) Compensation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
note: Defines court of competent jurisdiction for property claims.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-42-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Compensation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: means the Federal Court or Supreme Court of State/Territory
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court defined
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: court of competent jurisdiction

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: County Court, District Court, local Court of State/Territory
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for courts
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
premise text: inferior court

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(3) Compensation

43 Power extends to carrier’s employees etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.129
note: Carrier's employees empowered to perform actions on land
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-43-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-43
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier empowers employees to perform actions
modality: Deontic
operator: empowers

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43 Power extends to carrier’s employees etc.

44 State and Territory laws that discriminate against carriers and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.129
note: Discrimination against carriers and users of carriage services is prohibited
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-44-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-44
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits discrimination against carriers and users of carriage services
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

45 State and Territory laws may confer powers and immunities on
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.131
note: No obligation on Parliament to prevent State/Territory laws from conferring powers/immunities on carriers.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-45-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-45
schema version: 2

46 ACMA may limit tort liability in relation to the supply of certain
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.131
curation status: Proposed
has part: 46(1) ACMA may limit tort liability in relation to the supply of certain
has part: 46(2) ACMA may limit tort liability in relation to the supply of certain
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-46
schema version: 2

46(1) ACMA may limit tort liability in relation to the supply of certain
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.131
note: ACMA may limit tort liability in relation to the supply of certain carriage services.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-46-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-46-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 46 ACMA may limit tort liability in relation to the supply of certain

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on ACMA
modality: Deontic
operator: may

46(2) ACMA may limit tort liability in relation to the supply of certain
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.131
note: Limit tort liability in relation to the supply of certain instruments
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-46-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-46-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 46 ACMA may limit tort liability in relation to the supply of certain

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limit tort liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

47 Ownership of facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
note: Carrier's property remains with owner, regardless of fixture status.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-47-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-47
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier's property remains with owner.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-47-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47 Ownership of facilities

48 ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
curation status: Proposed
has part: 48(1) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
has part: 48(2) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
has part: 48(3) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
has part: 48(4) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
has part: 48(5) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-48
schema version: 2

48(1) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
note: ACMA must inform the public about designated overhead lines.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-48-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 48 ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform the public
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

48(2) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
note: ACMA must consider certain matters when performing its function.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-48-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 48 ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must consider these matters.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider certain matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA has a function to perform.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA's function is a consideration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Function is a subclass of consideration.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
premise text: Consideration is a type of function.

48(3) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
note: ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-48-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 48 ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: may

48(4) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
note: ACMA must inform the public about designated overhead lines.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-48-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 48 ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform the public
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

48(5) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
note: Inform public about designated overhead lines
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-48-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 48 ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for informing public
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (5) In this clause:

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of telecommunications transmission towers
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
premise text: (a) a tower; or (b) a pole; or (c) a mast; or (d) a similar structure;

5 Inspection of land
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.91
curation status: Proposed
has part: 5(1) Inspection of land
has part: 5(2) Inspection of land
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
schema version: 2

5(1) Inspection of land
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.91
note: Carrier may inspect and alter land for its purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 5 Inspection of land

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has permission to inspect and alter land.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5(1) Inspection of land

5(2) Inspection of land
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.91
note: Carrier may enter land and perform actions necessary for surveying or obtaining information.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-5-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 5 Inspection of land

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier is permitted to enter land and perform actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-5-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5(2) Inspection of land

50 Monitoring of progress in relation to placing facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.134
note: ACMA must monitor progress in relation to placing facilities underground.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-50-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-50
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to monitor progress
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

51 Removal of certain overhead lines
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.134
curation status: Proposed
has part: 51(1) Removal of certain overhead lines
has part: 51(2) Removal of certain overhead lines
has part: 51(3) Removal of certain overhead lines
has part: 51(4) Removal of certain overhead lines
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-51
schema version: 2

51(1) Removal of certain overhead lines
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.134
note: Owner must remove suspended part of eligible overhead line within 6 months after completion of removals.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-51-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Removal of certain overhead lines

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Owner must remove suspended part of eligible overhead line.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51(1) Removal of certain overhead lines

51(2) Removal of certain overhead lines
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.134
note: Exempt owner of eligible overhead line from compliance with subclause (1) in relation to the first pole.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-51-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Removal of certain overhead lines

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defining a temporal interval for exemption
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (d) extend the period of 6 months mentioned in subclause (1) for the purposes of the application of subclause (1) to the owner of the eligible overhead line and to the first pole.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the local government body may, by writing:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (a) there is a local government body for the area in which the first pole is situated;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the local government body may, by writing:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting exemption from compliance with subclause (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: (b) there is no prescribed administrative authority for the State or Territory in which the first pole is situated;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extending a period for compliance with subclause (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Extension
premise text: (d) extend the period of 6 months mentioned in subclause (1) for the purposes of the application of subclause (1) to the owner of the eligible overhead line and to the first pole.

51(3) Removal of certain overhead lines
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.134
note: Exempt owner of eligible overhead line from compliance with subclause (1) in relation to the first pole.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-51-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Removal of certain overhead lines

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prescribed administrative authority may exempt the owner...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (3) If there is a prescribed administrative authority...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51(3) Removal of certain overhead lines

51(4) Removal of certain overhead lines
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.134
note: Exemption from compliance with subclause (1) for the owner of eligible overhead line and first pole.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-51-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Removal of certain overhead lines

52 Commonwealth laws not displaced
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.137
note: No carrier can engage in an activity contrary to another Commonwealth law.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-52-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-52
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits carrier from engaging in activity contrary to another law.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-52-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52 Commonwealth laws not displaced

53 Subdivider to pay for necessary alterations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.137
note: Subdivider liable for costs incurred by carrier due to subdivision of land.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-53-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-53
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Carrier is entitled to payment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs incurred by carrier.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Subdivider subdivided land.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-53-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53 Subdivider to pay for necessary alterations

54 Service of notices
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.137
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54(1) Service of notices
has part: 54(2) Service of notices
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-54
schema version: 2

54(1) Service of notices
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.137
note: Carrier must serve notice on land owner if unable to find or serve personally/posteriously.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-54-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Service of notices

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the notice serving and land occupation overlap when the land is occupied.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlap between notice serving and land occupation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (c) if the land is occupied—serving a copy of the notice on the occupier;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the land owner is implied if the carrier is unable to find out who owns it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of notice serving on land ownership.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
premise text: (a) a carrier is unable, after diligent inquiry, to find out who owns particular land; or (b) a carrier is unable to serve a notice under this Part on the owner of land either personally or by post;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the carrier may not serve a notice under this Part on the owner of the land.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of serving notice on land owner if unable to find or serve personally/posteriously.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) a carrier is unable, after diligent inquiry, to find out who owns particular land; or (b) a carrier is unable to serve a notice under this Part on the owner of land either personally or by post;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the notice serving diffuses from the carrier to the land owner.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of notice serving from carrier to land owner.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (a) a carrier is unable, after diligent inquiry, to find out who owns particular land; or (b) a carrier is unable to serve a notice under this Part on the owner of land either personally or by post;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the notice serving on unoccupied land recurs when attached to a conspicuous part of the land.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of notice serving on unoccupied land.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (d) if the land is not occupied—attaching, if practicable, a copy of the notice to a conspicuous part of the land;

54(2) Service of notices
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.137
note: Diligent inquiry required to find out land occupation information
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-54-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Service of notices

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has an obligation to make diligent inquiry
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

6 Installation of facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.93
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6(1) Installation of facilities
has part: 6(2) Installation of facilities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
schema version: 2

6(1) Installation of facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.93
note: Carrier may install facility under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Installation of facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to install facility
modality: Deontic
operator: May

6(2) Installation of facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.93
note: Carrier's permission to enter and occupy land for carrying out activity
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Installation of facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The carrier may, for purposes in connection with the carrying out of that activity:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Carrier's activities overlap with land occupation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) If subclause (1) authorises a carrier...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The carrier may, for purposes in connection with the carrying out of that activity:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Carrier and land are related entities
modality: CogAI
operator: EntityRelationship
premise text: (2) If subclause (1) authorises a carrier...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The carrier may, for purposes in connection with the carrying out of that activity:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier is permitted to enter and occupy land
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) If subclause (1) authorises a carrier...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The carrier may, for purposes in connection with the carrying out of that activity:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Carrier's activities are recurring on land
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (2) If subclause (1) authorises a carrier...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The carrier may, for purposes in connection with the carrying out of that activity:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Carrier's activities are validated by land occupation
modality: SHACL
operator: Validates
premise text: (2) If subclause (1) authorises a carrier...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(2) Installation of facilities

60 Existing buildings, structures and facilities—application of State
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
note: Application of State laws to certain building and facility standards
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-60-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-60
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Standard applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State laws apply to specified standards
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: State law

61 Existing buildings, structures and facilities—application of the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
note: No common law rule applies to a carrier's building if authorized by specific laws.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-61-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-61
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No common law rule applies.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-61-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61 Existing buildings, structures and facilities—application of the

62 Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.140
curation status: Proposed
has part: 62(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 62(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 62(3) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 62(4) Compensation for acquisition of property
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-62
schema version: 2

62(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
description: Compensation for acquisition of property
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.140
note: Carrier must pay reasonable compensation to a person if acquisition of property would not be valid without it.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-62-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Compensation for acquisition of property

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must pay compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62(1) Compensation for acquisition of property

62(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.140
note: Compensation for acquisition of property must consider prior agreements and damages recovered from the carrier.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-62-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Compensation for acquisition of property

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider prior agreements and damages recovered from the carrier.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62(2) Compensation for acquisition of property

62(3) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.140
note: Does not limit operation of clause 42
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-62-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Compensation for acquisition of property

62(4) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.140
note: Compensation for acquisition of property
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-62-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Compensation for acquisition of property

63 Application of this Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.141
note: This Part applies in relation to certain actions and rights.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-63-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-63
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-63-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63 Application of this Part

7 Maintenance of facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
curation status: Proposed
has part: 7(1) Maintenance of facilities
has part: 7(2) Maintenance of facilities
has part: 7(3) Maintenance of facilities
has part: 7(3A) Maintenance of facilities
has part: 7(4) Maintenance of facilities
has part: 7(5) Maintenance of facilities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
schema version: 2

7(1) Maintenance of facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
note: Carrier must maintain facility at any time.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Maintenance of facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to maintain facility
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(1) Maintenance of facilities

7(2) Maintenance of facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
note: Carrier may enter on and occupy land, remove or erect a gate in any fence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Maintenance of facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Carrier can enter on land during exercise of powers.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier can enter on and occupy land.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(2) Maintenance of facilities

7(3) Maintenance of facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
note: Maintenance of facilities includes alteration, removal, repair, provisioning, ensuring proper functioning, replacement, and installation.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Maintenance of facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes a range of maintenance activities.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclauses (5) and (6) specify conditions for replacement and installation.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclause

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(3) Maintenance of facilities

7(3A) Maintenance of facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
note: Temporary facility installation conditions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3a-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Maintenance of facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the purpose of temporary facility installation
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies conditions for temporary facility installation
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

7(4) Maintenance of facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
note: Clarifies the meaning of 'tower' in clause 4.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Maintenance of facilities

7(5) Maintenance of facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
note: Conditions for replacement facility noise levels
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Maintenance of facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval comparison
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditions for replacement facility noise levels
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(5) Maintenance of facilities

8 Carrier to do as little damage as practicable
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Carrier must take reasonable steps to minimize damage and inconvenience.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take reasonable steps.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8 Carrier to do as little damage as practicable

8A Carrier to remove temporary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8A(1) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
has part: 8A(2) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
has part: 8A(3) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
has part: 8A(4) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
has part: 8A(5) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
has part: 8A(6) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
has part: 8A(7) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8a
schema version: 2

8A(1) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Carrier must remove temporary facilities within 28 days after completion of maintenance.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8A Carrier to remove temporary facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to remove facilities
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8A(1) Carrier to remove temporary facilities

8A(2) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Carrier must remove temporary facilities within 28 days after completion of replacement.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8A Carrier to remove temporary facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Facility removal must occur within a specific time frame
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: (2) If: (a) a carrier installs a low-impact facility under Division 3; and (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(c);

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Facility removal must occur after a specific event (replacement completion)
modality: CogAI
operator: mustBeRemoved
premise text: (2) If: (a) a carrier installs a low-impact facility under Division 3; and (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(c);

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to remove facilities
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Facility removal must occur after a specific event (replacement completion)
modality: Diffusion
operator: mustBeRemoved
premise text: (2) If: (a) a carrier installs a low-impact facility under Division 3; and (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(c);

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Facility removal must occur within a specific time frame
modality: LTL
operator: within
premise text: (2) If: (a) a carrier installs a low-impact facility under Division 3; and (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(c);

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8A(2) Carrier to remove temporary facilities

8A(3) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Carrier must remove temporary facilities within 28 days after the end of an event.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 8A Carrier to remove temporary facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to remove facilities
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8A(3) Carrier to remove temporary facilities

8A(4) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Carrier must remove temporary facilities within 28 days after the end of events mentioned in paragraph 6(5)(e).
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 8A Carrier to remove temporary facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Removal must occur within 28 days after the end of events mentioned in paragraph 6(5)(e).
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(e);

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must remove temporary facilities.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Removal of temporary facility is conditional on events mentioned in paragraph 6(5)(e).
modality: LinearLogic
operator: =>
premise text: (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(e);

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8A(4) Carrier to remove temporary facilities

8A(5) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Carrier must remove temporary facilities within 28 days after ceasing to be needed.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 8A Carrier to remove temporary facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Facility ceases to be needed within 28 days.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (5) If: (a) a carrier installs a low-impact facility under Division 3; and (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(g);

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Carrier's obligation to remove temporary facilities.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (5) If: (a) a carrier installs a low-impact facility under Division 3; and (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(g);

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must remove temporary facilities.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Facility removal depends on emergency services organisations' needs.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF
premise text: (5) If: (a) a carrier installs a low-impact facility under Division 3; and (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(g);

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Carrier must remove temporary facilities if conditions are met.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: =>
premise text: (5) If: (a) a carrier installs a low-impact facility under Division 3; and (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(g);

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8A(5) Carrier to remove temporary facilities

8A(6) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Carrier must remove temporary facilities within 28 days after completion of maintenance.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 8A Carrier to remove temporary facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...within 28 days after the completion of the maintenance mentioned in paragraph 7(3A)(a).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for removal of facilities
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
premise text: (6) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the carrier must remove the facility within 28 days...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of installation on removal
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLICATION
premise text: (6) If a carrier installs a facility under Division 4;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the carrier must remove the facility within 28 days...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of obligation
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNITION
premise text: (6) If a carrier installs a facility under Division 4;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the carrier must remove the facility within 28 days...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to remove facilities
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (6) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the carrier must remove the facility within 28 days...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Influence of maintenance on removal
modality: Diffusion
operator: INFLUENCE
premise text: (6) If the installation is covered by subclause 7(3A);

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8A(6) Carrier to remove temporary facilities

8A(7) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
note: Carrier must remove temporary facilities.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8a-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 8A Carrier to remove temporary facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to remove temporary facilities.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8A(7) Carrier to remove temporary facilities

8B Low-impact facility installed at or near a venue—annual limit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.103
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8B(1) Low-impact facility installed at or near a venue—annual limit
has part: 8B(2) Low-impact facility installed at or near a venue—annual limit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8b
schema version: 2

8B(1) Low-impact facility installed at or near a venue—annual limit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.103
note: Annual limit for low-impact facilities installed at or near a venue
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8B Low-impact facility installed at or near a venue—annual limit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Total days ≤ 183
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure annual limit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) and (b)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8B(1) Low-impact facility installed at or near a venue—annual limit

8B(2) Low-impact facility installed at or near a venue—annual limit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.103
note: Defines low-impact facility for purposes of the clause.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8B Low-impact facility installed at or near a venue—annual limit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Clause 6
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this clause, low-impact facilities has the same meaning as in clause 6.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Clause 6
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines a concept with a specific meaning
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this clause, low-impact facilities has the same meaning as in clause 6.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Clause 6
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this clause, low-impact facilities has the same meaning as in clause 6.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Clause 6
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines a concept with a specific meaning
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this clause, low-impact facilities has the same meaning as in clause 6.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Clause 6
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this clause, low-impact facilities has the same meaning as in clause 6.

8C Low-impact facility installed to provide additional capacity
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.103
note: Annual limit for installing low-impact facilities during high-demand holiday periods.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8c
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on carriers to install low-impact facilities during high-demand holiday periods.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8C Low-impact facility installed to provide additional capacity

9 Carrier to restore land—general
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
curation status: Proposed
has part: 9(1) Carrier to restore land—general
has part: 9(2) Carrier to restore land—general
has part: 9(3) Carrier to restore land—general
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
schema version: 2

9(1) Carrier to restore land—general
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
note: Carrier must restore land to its original condition after engaging in an activity.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Carrier to restore land—general

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has a moral obligation to restore land.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(1) Carrier to restore land—general

9(2) Carrier to restore land—general
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
note: Carrier must take reasonable steps to restore land within 10 business days.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Carrier to restore land—general

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to restore land within 10 business days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(2) Carrier to restore land—general

9(3) Carrier to restore land—general
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
note: Carrier may delay restoration of land by up to 10 business days with owner's or occupier's consent.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Carrier to restore land—general

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Restoration may be delayed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Carrier agrees with owner or occupier

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(3) Carrier to restore land—general

9A Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
curation status: Proposed
has part: 9A(1) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
has part: 9A(2) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
has part: 9A(3) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
has part: 9A(4) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
has part: 9A(5) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
has part: 9A(6) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9a
schema version: 2

9A(1) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
note: Carrier must restore land to its original condition after removing a low-impact facility.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 9A Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has an obligation to restore land.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9A(1) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities

9A(2) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
note: Carrier must restore land to its original condition after removing a facility.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 9A Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the land is restored to a condition that is similar to its condition before...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Condition after restoration must be greater than or equal to the condition before installation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (a) a carrier installs a facility under Division 4 on particular land;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the carrier must take all reasonable steps...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has an obligation to restore land.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the carrier must take all reasonable steps...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Carrier must restore land.
modality: Diffusion
operator: RESTORE
premise text: (2) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the land is restored to a condition that is similar to its condition before...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Condition after restoration must be greater than or equal to the condition before installation.
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: (a) a carrier installs a facility under Division 4 on particular land;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9A(2) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities

9A(3) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
note: Carrier must restore land within 10 business days after removal of temporary facilities.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 9A Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between removal and restoration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: (3) If the installation of the facility is covered by paragraph 6(5)(b), (c), (d), (e), (f) or (g),

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to restore land
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must take all reasonable steps to ensure restoration begins within 10 business days
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) If the installation of the facility is covered by paragraph 6(5)(b), (c), (d), (e), (f) or (g),

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Restoration implies removal of temporary facilities
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
premise text: (3) If the installation of the facility is covered by paragraph 6(5)(b), (c), (d), (e), (f) or (g),

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9A(3) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities

9A(4) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
note: Restore land within 10 business days after removal of facility
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 9A Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to restore land
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

9A(5) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
note: Carrier may delay restoration of land after 10 business days with owner's consent or occupier's consent.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 9A Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Restoration may be delayed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Carrier agrees with owner or occupier

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9A(5) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities

9A(6) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
note: Carrier must restore land after removal of temporary facilities.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 9A Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to restore land
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9A(6) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities

1 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.142
note: Activities in protection zones are prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-1
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits activities
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Simplified outline

10 Prohibited activities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.153
note: Activities prohibited in a protection zone
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-10
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on activities
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A declaration of a protection zone may specify activities that are prohibited in the protection zone.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-10-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Prohibited activities

11 Restricted activities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.155
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11(1) Restricted activities
has part: 11(2) Restricted activities
has part: 11(3) Restricted activities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-11
schema version: 2

11(1) Restricted activities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.155
note: Restrictions on activities in the protection zone
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-11-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Restricted activities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

11(2) Restricted activities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.155
note: Activity must be covered by subclause (3) to impose restrictions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-11-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Restricted activities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must be covered by subclause (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies that the activity must be covered by subclause (3)
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (2) An activity on which restrictions are imposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(2) Restricted activities

11(3) Restricted activities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.155
note: Restricted activities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-11-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Restricted activities

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Restricts activities during specific periods
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) This subclause covers the following activities:

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits specific activities
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (3) This subclause covers the following activities:

12 Conditions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12(1) Conditions
has part: 12(2) Conditions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-12
schema version: 2

12(1) Conditions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
note: Conditions for a protection zone declaration
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-12-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-12-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Conditions

12(2) Conditions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
note: Conditions must be specified in the declaration.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-12-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-12-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Conditions

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must specify conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-12-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(2) Conditions

13 When a declaration takes effect
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
curation status: Proposed
has part: 13(1) When a declaration takes effect
has part: 13(2) When a declaration takes effect
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-13
schema version: 2

13(1) When a declaration takes effect
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
note: Declaration takes effect at specified time
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-13-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 13 When a declaration takes effect

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The declaration takes effect
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: takes effect
premise text: (1) A declaration of a protection zone takes effect at the time specified by the ACMA.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-13-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13(1) When a declaration takes effect

13(2) When a declaration takes effect
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
note: ACMA must not specify a time before installation begins.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-13-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 13 When a declaration takes effect

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

14 Duration of declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14(1) Duration of declaration
has part: 14(2) Duration of declaration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-14
schema version: 2

14(1) Duration of declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
note: Declaration of protection zone continues in effect until revoked.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Duration of declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The declaration ends at the time of revocation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval until revocation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: until
premise text: (1) A declaration of a protection zone continues in effect until the ACMA revokes it.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The declaration remains valid throughout its duration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Declaration maintains status over time
modality: CogAI
operator: continues
premise text: (1) A declaration of a protection zone continues in effect until the ACMA revokes it.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The declaration must continue in effect until revoked.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to maintain declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
premise text: (1) A declaration of a protection zone continues in effect until the ACMA revokes it.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The declaration is still in effect throughout its duration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Declaration spreads through time
modality: Diffusion
operator: continues
premise text: (1) A declaration of a protection zone continues in effect until the ACMA revokes it.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The declaration ends at the time of revocation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval until revocation
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (1) A declaration of a protection zone continues in effect until the ACMA revokes it.

14(2) Duration of declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
note: Declaration continues in effect even if submarine cables cease to operate.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-14-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Duration of declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration continues in effect
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, a declaration continues in effect even if the submarine cable or cables in the protection zone have ceased to operate.

15 ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.157
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15(1) ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone
has part: 15(2) ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone
has part: 15(3) ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-15
schema version: 2

15(1) ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.157
note: ACMA must develop a proposal for the protection zone before declaring it.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-15-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15 ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to develop a proposal
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15(2) ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.157
note: Activities to be prohibited in the proposed protection zone.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-15-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15 ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of activities
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(2) ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone

15(3) ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.157
note: Develop a proposal for a protection zone
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-15-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15 ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must develop a proposal
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

17 ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.157
curation status: Proposed
has part: 17(1) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
has part: 17(2) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-17
schema version: 2

17(1) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.157
note: Publish a proposal developed under clause 15.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-17-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 17 ACMA to publish proposal etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish a proposal
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

17(2) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.157
note: Publish proposal and invite public submissions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-17-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 17 ACMA to publish proposal etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish proposal
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

17A ACMA to publish summary of proposal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.158
curation status: Proposed
has part: 17A(1) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
has part: 17A(2) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
has part: 17A(3) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-17a
schema version: 2

17A(1) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.158
note: Publish a summary of proposal
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 17A ACMA to publish summary of proposal

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish a summary
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

17A(2) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.158
note: Publish a summary of the proposal in specified locations.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 17A ACMA to publish summary of proposal

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish a summary.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

17A(3) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
type: Concept
description: (a) access the proposal on the ACMA’s website; (b) request a copy of the proposal under subclause 17(3).
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.158
note: Must provide information about accessing the proposal and requesting a copy.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 17A ACMA to publish summary of proposal

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) access the proposal on the ACMA’s website; (b) request a copy of the proposal under subclause 17(3).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

18 Cable must be a submarine cable of national significance
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.159
curation status: Proposed
has part: 18(1) Cable must be a submarine cable of national significance
has part: 18(2) Cable must be a submarine cable of national significance
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-18
schema version: 2

18(1) Cable must be a submarine cable of national significance
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.159
note: ACMA must declare protection zones only for submarine cables of national significance.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-18-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Cable must be a submarine cable of national significance

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must declare protection zones.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

18(2) Cable must be a submarine cable of national significance
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.159
note: Cable must be of national significance if specified in regulations.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-18-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-18-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Cable must be a submarine cable of national significance

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-18-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the cable is taken to be of national significance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between regulation and specification
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subclause (1)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the cable is taken to be of national significance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: (a) a cable is specified in regulations made for the purposes of subclause 4(1A); or (b) a route of a cable is specified in regulations made for the purposes of subclause 4(1A);

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-18-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(2) Cable must be a submarine cable of national significance

19 Consultation with Environment Secretary
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.159
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19(1) Consultation with Environment Secretary
has part: 19(2) Consultation with Environment Secretary
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-19
schema version: 2

19(1) Consultation with Environment Secretary
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.159
note: Consultation with Environment Secretary required before declaring a protection zone.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-19-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Consultation with Environment Secretary

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult with Environment Secretary
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

19(2) Consultation with Environment Secretary
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.159
note: Must consider Environment Secretary's advice on proposal
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Consultation with Environment Secretary

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...any advice or recommendations provided by the Environment Secretary in relation to the proposal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between consideration and proposal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
premise text: (2) The ACMA must have regard to...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...any advice or recommendations provided by the Environment Secretary in relation to the proposal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Rational basis for obligation
modality: Argumentation
operator: MUST
premise text: The ACMA must have regard to...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...any advice or recommendations provided by the Environment Secretary in relation to the proposal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal relationship between consideration and proposal
modality: CogAI
operator: WITHIN
premise text: (2) The ACMA must have regard to...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Environment Secretary's advice on proposal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider advice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA must have regard to...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...any advice or recommendations provided by the Environment Secretary in relation to the proposal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Scope of consideration
modality: Diffusion
operator: IN
premise text: (2) The ACMA must have regard to...

2 Definitions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.142
note: Definitions for Schedule 3A
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has a different meaning from the meaning it has elsewhere in this Act.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes geographical sense of Australia
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: Australia, when used in a geographical sense...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: from the meaning it has elsewhere in this Act.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes external Territories
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: Note: Australia has a different meaning in this Schedule...

20 Matters the ACMA must have regard to
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.159
note: Consider public submissions and objective of facilitating efficient carriage services when deciding to declare a protection zone.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-20
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: consider public submissions and objective of facilitating efficient carriage services at any time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal consideration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: In deciding whether to declare a protection zone in relation to one or more submarine cables, the ACMA must have regard to...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: consider public submissions and objective of facilitating efficient carriage services
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Public submission consideration
modality: CogAI
operator: must consider
premise text: In deciding whether to declare a protection zone in relation to one or more submarine cables, the ACMA must have regard to...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: consider public submissions and objective of facilitating efficient carriage services
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA must have regard to...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: consider public submissions and objective of facilitating efficient carriage services
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Public submission consideration
modality: Diffusion
operator: must consider
premise text: In deciding whether to declare a protection zone in relation to one or more submarine cables, the ACMA must have regard to...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: consider public submissions and objective of facilitating efficient carriage services at any time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal consideration
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: In deciding whether to declare a protection zone in relation to one or more submarine cables, the ACMA must have regard to...

21 Environment and heritage considerations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.160
note: ACMA must consider environmental and heritage impacts when installing, maintaining or operating a submarine cable.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-21-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-21
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consider environmental and heritage impacts.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

22 Deadline for final decision about protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.161
note: Make decision on protection zone within 12 months
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-22-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-22-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-22
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make decision
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-22-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision made within 12 months
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
premise text: Proposal published

23 ACMA may vary or revoke a declaration of a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.162
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23(1) ACMA may vary or revoke a declaration of a protection zone
has part: 23(2) ACMA may vary or revoke a declaration of a protection zone
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-23
schema version: 2

23(1) ACMA may vary or revoke a declaration of a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.162
note: ACMA may vary or revoke a declaration of a protection zone.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-23-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-23-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23 ACMA may vary or revoke a declaration of a protection zone

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA may vary or revoke a declaration of a protection zone.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

23(2) ACMA may vary or revoke a declaration of a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.162
note: ACMA must comply with Subdivision B before varying or revoking a declaration of a protection zone.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-23-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-23-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23 ACMA may vary or revoke a declaration of a protection zone

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must comply with Subdivision B
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to comply with Subdivision B
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA varies or revokes a declaration of a protection zone

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must consult about the proposal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consult about the proposal
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA develops a variation or revocation proposal

24 Variation or revocation on ACMA’s initiative or in response to
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.162
note: Variation or revocation of a declaration of a protection zone may be made on ACMA's own initiative or at the request of a person.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-24-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-24
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

25 ACMA to notify affected carrier of request to vary or revoke a
type: Concept
description: details of the request
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.162
note: Notify affected carrier of request to vary or revoke a declaration
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-25-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-25
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

26 Response to a request to vary or revoke a declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.163
curation status: Proposed
has part: 26(1) Response to a request to vary or revoke a declaration
has part: 26(2) Response to a request to vary or revoke a declaration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-26
schema version: 2

26(1) Response to a request to vary or revoke a declaration
type: Concept
description: copy of proposal, notification of reasons
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.163
note: ACMA must provide a copy of proposal and notify person of reasons for difference if proposal differs from requested.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-26-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-26-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Response to a request to vary or revoke a declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide copy of proposal and notify person.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

26(2) Response to a request to vary or revoke a declaration
type: Concept
description: notification in writing
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.163
note: ACMA must notify person of decision and reasons if request is denied
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-26-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-26-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Response to a request to vary or revoke a declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must notify person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

27 Decision not to vary or revoke a declaration after a request to do
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.163
note: ACMA cannot vary or revoke a declaration after a request to do so.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-27-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-27
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA cannot vary or revoke the declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

28 When a variation or revocation takes effect
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
note: Variation or revocation of a protection zone takes effect at the specified time.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-28
schema version: 2

29 Protection zone as varied must not exceed permitted area
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
note: Protection zone area must not exceed permitted area after variation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-29-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-29
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to not exceed permitted area
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protection zone area restriction
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not Exceed
premise text: Subclauses 9(3) and (5)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29 Protection zone as varied must not exceed permitted area

2A Extension to offshore areas
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
note: Reference to eligible Territories extended to external Territories
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-2a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2A Extension to offshore areas

2AA Operation in Greater Sunrise special regime area
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
note: No effect on Commonwealth law application in Greater Sunrise special regime area
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-2aa
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exploration/extraction activities in Greater Sunrise special regime area may overlap with Commonwealth law application
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlap between exploration/extraction activities and Commonwealth law application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Subsection 13AB(1) of the Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exploration/extraction activities in Greater Sunrise special regime area are recognized as exempt from Commonwealth law application
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of exploration/extraction activities in Greater Sunrise special regime area
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: Subsection 13AB(1) of the Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No effect on Commonwealth law application in Greater Sunrise special regime area
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes Commonwealth law application
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: Subsection 13AB(1) of the Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exploration/extraction activities in Greater Sunrise special regime area may diffuse to other areas without affecting Commonwealth law application
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of exploration/extraction activities to other areas
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Subsection 13AB(1) of the Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exploration/extraction activities in Greater Sunrise special regime area may be repeated without affecting Commonwealth law application
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Repetition of exploration/extraction activities in Greater Sunrise special regime area
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: Subsection 13AB(1) of the Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973

2B Submarine cable installed in a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
note: Submarine cable installed in a protection zone is not material for determining its relation to the protection zone.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-2b
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Submarine cable installed in a protection zone is not material for determining its relation to the protection zone.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

3 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.149
note: Activities in a protection zone are prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Activities in the zone are prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits activities in a protection zone.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: ACMA declares a protection zone.

30 ACMA to develop a variation or revocation proposal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30(1) ACMA to develop a variation or revocation proposal
has part: 30(2) ACMA to develop a variation or revocation proposal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-30
schema version: 2

30(1) ACMA to develop a variation or revocation proposal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
note: ACMA must develop a proposal before varying or revoking a declaration.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-30-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-30-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30 ACMA to develop a variation or revocation proposal

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

30(2) ACMA to develop a variation or revocation proposal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
note: Proposal must not be a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-30-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-30-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30 ACMA to develop a variation or revocation proposal

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits proposals from being legislative instruments.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

32 ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
curation status: Proposed
has part: 32(1) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
has part: 32(2) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
has part: 32(3) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
has part: 32(4) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
has part: 32(5) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
has part: 32(6) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32
schema version: 2

32(1) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
note: Publish a proposal developed under clause 30.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 32 ACMA to publish proposal etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish a proposal
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

32(2) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
note: Publish proposal and invite public submissions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 32 ACMA to publish proposal etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish proposal
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

32(3) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
note: ACMA must provide a copy of the proposal within 2 business days after receiving a request.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 32 ACMA to publish proposal etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a copy of the proposal
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

32(4) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
note: Exemption from subclause (3) for ACMA actions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 32 ACMA to publish proposal etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subclause (3) does not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: ACMA's action overlaps with subclause (3)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: ACMA has made the variation or revocation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subclause (3) does not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA is permitted to make variation or revocation
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: ACMA has made the variation or revocation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subclause (3) does not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA is permitted to decide not to make variation or revocation
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: ACMA has decided not to make the variation or revocation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subclause (3) does not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: ACMA's action overlaps with subclause (3)
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: ACMA has decided not to make the variation or revocation

32(5) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
note: ACMA may provide a copy of the proposal in electronic form upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 32 ACMA to publish proposal etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to provide a copy in electronic form.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

32(6) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
note: No charge for copy of proposal
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 32 ACMA to publish proposal etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No charge for copy of proposal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA imposes no charge
modality: Deontic
operator: Imposes
premise text: None

32A ACMA to publish summary of proposal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.165
curation status: Proposed
has part: 32A(1) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
has part: 32A(2) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32a
schema version: 2

32A(1) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.165
note: Publish summary of proposal
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 32A ACMA to publish summary of proposal

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish summary
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

32A(2) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.165
note: Publish a summary of the proposal in specified locations.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 32A ACMA to publish summary of proposal

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish a summary.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

33 Consultation with Environment Secretary
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.166
curation status: Proposed
has part: 33(1) Consultation with Environment Secretary
has part: 33(2) Consultation with Environment Secretary
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-33
schema version: 2

33(1) Consultation with Environment Secretary
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.166
note: Consultation with Environment Secretary required before varying or revoking a protection zone declaration.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-33-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Consultation with Environment Secretary

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult with Environment Secretary
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

33(2) Consultation with Environment Secretary
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.166
note: Must consider Environment Secretary's advice on proposal
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Consultation with Environment Secretary

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proposal is within the scope of Environment Secretary's advice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Proposal is within the scope of Environment Secretary's advice
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: ACMA must have regard to Environment Secretary's advice in relation to proposal

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Environment Secretary's advice is relevant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Advice is relevant to ACMA's consideration
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_RELEVANT_TO
premise text: ACMA must have regard to Environment Secretary's advice

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Environment Secretary's advice is relevant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider advice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA must have regard to Environment Secretary's advice

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Environment Secretary's advice is relevant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Advice is relevant to ACMA's consideration
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_RELEVANT_TO
premise text: ACMA must have regard to Environment Secretary's advice

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proposal is within the scope of Environment Secretary's advice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Proposal is within the scope of Environment Secretary's advice
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: ACMA must have regard to Environment Secretary's advice in relation to proposal

34 Matters the ACMA must have regard to
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.166
note: ACMA must consider certain matters when varying or revoking a declaration of a protection zone.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-34-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-34
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must consider certain matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

35 Deadline for final decision about varying or revoking a protection
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.167
note: Deadline for final decision about varying or revoking a protection
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-35-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-35-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-35
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must decide within 180 days
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-35-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Decision is conditional on proposal publication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
premise text: Proposal published

36 Damaging a submarine cable
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.168
curation status: Proposed
has part: 36(1) Damaging a submarine cable
has part: 36(2) Damaging a submarine cable
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-36
schema version: 2

36(1) Damaging a submarine cable
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.168
note: Damaging a submarine cable is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-36-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Damaging a submarine cable

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits damaging a submarine cable.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-36-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(1) Damaging a submarine cable

36(2) Damaging a submarine cable
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.168
note: Damaging a submarine cable is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-36-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Damaging a submarine cable

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits damaging a submarine cable.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

37 Negligently damaging a submarine cable
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.168
curation status: Proposed
has part: 37(1) Negligently damaging a submarine cable
has part: 37(2) Negligently damaging a submarine cable
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-37
schema version: 2

37(1) Negligently damaging a submarine cable
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.168
note: Negligently damaging a submarine cable is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Negligently damaging a submarine cable

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between conduct and damage
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; (b) the conduct results in damage to a submarine cable; (c) the person is negligent as to the fact that the conduct results in that damage; (d) the cable is in a protection zone.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Rationality of conduct and damage assessment
modality: Argumentation
operator: Applicable
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; (b) the conduct results in damage to a submarine cable; (c) the person is negligent as to the fact that the conduct results in that damage; (d) the cable is in a protection zone.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the person engages in conduct; (b) the conduct results in damage to a submarine cable; (c) the person is negligent as to the fact that the conduct results in that damage; (d) the cable is in a protection zone.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Direct prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of damage from conduct
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; (b) the conduct results in damage to a submarine cable; (c) the person is negligent as to the fact that the conduct results in that damage; (d) the cable is in a protection zone.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of conduct and damage
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; (b) the conduct results in damage to a submarine cable; (c) the person is negligent as to the fact that the conduct results in that damage; (d) the cable is in a protection zone.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(1) Negligently damaging a submarine cable

37(2) Negligently damaging a submarine cable
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.168
note: Negligently damaging a submarine cable is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-37-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Negligently damaging a submarine cable

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits an action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(2) Negligently damaging a submarine cable

38 Defence to offences of damaging a submarine cable
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.168
note: Defence to offences of damaging a submarine cable
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-38-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-38
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38 Defence to offences of damaging a submarine cable

39 Master or owner of ship used in offence of damaging a submarine
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.169
curation status: Proposed
has part: 39(1) Master or owner of ship used in offence of damaging a submarine
has part: 39(2) Master or owner of ship used in offence of damaging a submarine
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-39
schema version: 2

39(1) Master or owner of ship used in offence of damaging a submarine
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.169
note: Permitting another person to use a ship used in the commission of an offence is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-39-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-39-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 39 Master or owner of ship used in offence of damaging a submarine

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-39-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39(1) Master or owner of ship used in offence of damaging a submarine

39(2) Master or owner of ship used in offence of damaging a submarine
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.169
note: Strict liability applies to damaging a submarine
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-39-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-39-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 39 Master or owner of ship used in offence of damaging a submarine

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits damaging a submarine
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-39-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39(2) Master or owner of ship used in offence of damaging a submarine

4 ACMA may declare a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
curation status: Proposed
has part: 4(1) ACMA may declare a protection zone
has part: 4(1A) ACMA may declare a protection zone
has part: 4(2) ACMA may declare a protection zone
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-4
schema version: 2

4(1) ACMA may declare a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
note: ACMA may declare a protection zone in relation to one or more submarine cables.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-4-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-4-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 4 ACMA may declare a protection zone

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration of protection zone is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

4(1A) ACMA may declare a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
note: ACMA may not declare a protection zone for specified domestic submarine cables or proposed cables without regulation.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-4-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-4-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-4-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 4 ACMA may declare a protection zone

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-4-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Unless specified in regulations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of declaring protection zones for specified cables.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: ACMA must not declare a protection zone.

4(2) ACMA may declare a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
note: ACMA must comply with Subdivision B before declaring a protection zone.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-4-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-4-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 4 ACMA may declare a protection zone

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with Subdivision B
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

40 Engaging in prohibited or restricted activities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.169
note: Engaging in prohibited conduct within a protection zone is an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-40-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-40
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct within a protection zone.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-40-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40 Engaging in prohibited or restricted activities

41 Aggravated offence of engaging in prohibited or restricted
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
note: Engaging in prohibited conduct with intention of making commercial gain is an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-41-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-41
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct with intention of making commercial gain.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-41-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41 Aggravated offence of engaging in prohibited or restricted

42 Defences to offences of engaging in prohibited or restricted
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.171
note: Defences to offences of engaging in prohibited or restricted activities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-42-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-42
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-42-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42 Defences to offences of engaging in prohibited or restricted

43 Alternative verdict if aggravated offence not proven
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.171
note: Defendant must be accorded procedural fairness in relation to finding of guilt.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-43-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-43
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant must be accorded procedural fairness.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43 Alternative verdict if aggravated offence not proven

44 Master or owner of ship used in offence of engaging in prohibited
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.171
note: Permitting another person to use a ship used in the commission of an offence is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-44
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44 Master or owner of ship used in offence of engaging in prohibited

44A Foreign nationals and foreign ships
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.172
curation status: Proposed
has part: 44A(1) Foreign nationals and foreign ships
has part: 44A(2) Foreign nationals and foreign ships
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-44a
schema version: 2

44A(1) Foreign nationals and foreign ships
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.172
note: Exemptions for foreign nationals and ships
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 44A Foreign nationals and foreign ships

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between exemptions and the Division's application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (c) the thing done, or omitted to be done, does not involve a ship;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from the Division's application
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (1) This Division does not apply to...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to engage in certain activities without the Division's application
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: (b) the thing is done, or omitted to be done in, on, or beneath the seabed that lies beneath...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or is connected with...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of exemptions and the Division's application
modality: LTL
operator: recurring
premise text: (f) the operations of artificial islands, installations or structures that are under Australia’s jurisdiction.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44A(1) Foreign nationals and foreign ships

44A(2) Foreign nationals and foreign ships
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.172
note: Exemptions from Division 3A for foreign nationals and ships
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 44A Foreign nationals and foreign ships

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Exemptions during exploration and exploitation of continental shelf
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (c) the thing done, or omitted to be done, involves a foreign ship; unless...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Exemptions during exploration and exploitation of continental shelf
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (c) the thing done, or omitted to be done, involves a foreign ship; unless...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from Division 3A
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (2) This Division does not apply to anything done, or omitted to be done...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Exemptions during exploration and exploitation of continental shelf
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (c) the thing done, or omitted to be done, involves a foreign ship; unless...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Exemptions during exploration and exploitation of continental shelf
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (c) the thing done, or omitted to be done, involves a foreign ship; unless...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44A(2) Foreign nationals and foreign ships

45 Person may claim damages
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.174
curation status: Proposed
has part: 45(1) Person may claim damages
has part: 45(2) Person may claim damages
has part: 45(3) Person may claim damages
has part: 45(4) Person may claim damages
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-45
schema version: 2

45(1) Person may claim damages
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.174
note: Person may recover damages for loss or damage caused by prohibited conduct in a protection zone.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-45-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Person may claim damages

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45(1) Person may claim damages

45(2) Person may claim damages
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.174
note: Action can be commenced within 6 years after the cause of action accrued.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Person may claim damages

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval is during 6 years from the cause of action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval during which the action can be commenced
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) An action under subclause (1) may be commenced at any time within 6 years after the day on which the cause of action that relates to the conduct accrued.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person can perform the specified action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Ability to commence action within time limit
modality: CogAI
operator: can
premise text: (2) An action under subclause (1) may be commenced at any time within 6 years after the day on which the cause of action that relates to the conduct accrued.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person can commence the action within 6 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ability to commence action within time limit
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: (2) An action under subclause (1) may be commenced at any time within 6 years after the day on which the cause of action that relates to the conduct accrued.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action is within the specified time limit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Action can be commenced within a specific time limit
modality: Diffusion
operator: within
premise text: (2) An action under subclause (1) may be commenced at any time within 6 years after the day on which the cause of action that relates to the conduct accrued.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval is until 6 years from the cause of action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval until which the action can be commenced
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (2) An action under subclause (1) may be commenced at any time within 6 years after the day on which the cause of action that relates to the conduct accrued.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45(2) Person may claim damages

45(3) Person may claim damages
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.174
note: A person who is involved in a contravention can claim damages.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-45-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Person may claim damages

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45(3) Person may claim damages

45(4) Person may claim damages
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.174
note: Jurisdiction is conferred on the Federal Court in any matter arising under this clause in respect of which a civil proceeding is instituted under this clause.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-45-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Person may claim damages

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Federal Court has jurisdiction over matters arising under the clause.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45(4) Person may claim damages

46 Indemnity for loss of anchor etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
curation status: Proposed
has part: 46(1) Indemnity for loss of anchor etc.
has part: 46(2) Indemnity for loss of anchor etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-46
schema version: 2

46(1) Indemnity for loss of anchor etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
note: Owner of ship entitled to indemnification from carrier if loss occurs while avoiding damage to submarine cable.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 46 Indemnity for loss of anchor etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sacrifice occurs within allowed timeframe.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Sacrifice occurs during time when no prohibited conduct is engaged in.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: No prohibited conduct is being engaged in at the time of sacrifice.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Carrier must provide indemnification.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Owner has obligation to be indemnified.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: Ship owner is entitled to indemnification.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Carrier may make sacrifice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has permission to make sacrifice if it avoids damage to submarine cable.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
premise text: Carrier is responsible for submarine cable.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Loss occurs after sacrifice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Loss occurs after sacrifice is made.
modality: LTL
operator: occursBefore
premise text: Sacrifice is made before loss occurs.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46(1) Indemnity for loss of anchor etc.

46(2) Indemnity for loss of anchor etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
note: Jurisdiction is conferred on the Federal Court in any matter arising under this clause.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-46-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 46 Indemnity for loss of anchor etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Jurisdiction is conferred on the Federal Court.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46(2) Indemnity for loss of anchor etc.

47 ACMA to notify relevant authorities of declaration, variation etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47(1) ACMA to notify relevant authorities of declaration, variation etc.
has part: 47(2) ACMA to notify relevant authorities of declaration, variation etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-47
schema version: 2

47(1) ACMA to notify relevant authorities of declaration, variation etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
note: ACMA must notify authorities of declaration decision
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-47-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47 ACMA to notify relevant authorities of declaration, variation etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

47(2) ACMA to notify relevant authorities of declaration, variation etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
note: ACMA must notify relevant authorities of declaration, variation etc.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-47-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47 ACMA to notify relevant authorities of declaration, variation etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-47-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(2) ACMA to notify relevant authorities of declaration, variation etc.

48 Notice if carrier decommissions a submarine cable
type: Concept
description: Notification in writing
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.176
note: Carrier must notify ACMA of cessation of submarine cable use.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-48-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-48-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-48
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-48-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Cessation must occur after declaration of protection zone
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: If the cable ceases to be in use (other than temporarily), then...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The carrier must provide notification.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has a duty to notify ACMA
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

5 Declaration on ACMA’s initiative or in response to request
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
note: Declaration of protection zone may be made by ACMA or at request of person.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-5
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

50 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.177
note: Installing an international submarine cable without a permit in a protection zone or Australian waters is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-50-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-50
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-50-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50 Simplified outline

51 Application for a protection zone installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.179
curation status: Proposed
has part: 51(1) Application for a protection zone installation permit
has part: 51(2) Application for a protection zone installation permit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-51
schema version: 2

51(1) Application for a protection zone installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.179
note: Carrier may apply for a permit to install submarine cables in protection zones or Australian waters.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-51-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Application for a protection zone installation permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission for installation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-51-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51(1) Application for a protection zone installation permit

51(2) Application for a protection zone installation permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.179
note: It is immaterial whether the cable or cables specified in the application are the cable or cables in relation to which the protection zone was declared.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-51-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-51-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Application for a protection zone installation permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision imposes an obligation on the applicant.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

52 Form of application etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.179
curation status: Proposed
has part: 52(1) Form of application etc.
has part: 52(2) Form of application etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-52
schema version: 2

52(1) Form of application etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.179
note: Application must be in writing and in the approved form.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-52-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Form of application etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be in writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) An application must be: (a) in writing;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be in the approved form.
modality: Deontic
operator: IN THE FORM OF
premise text: (1) An application must be: (b) in the form approved in writing by the ACMA;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52(1) Form of application etc.

52(2) Form of application etc.
type: Concept
description: (a) the proposed route or routes, in Australian waters, of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; and (b) information about the ownership and control of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application;
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.179
note: Application must provide specific information about submarine cables
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-52-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Form of application etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the proposed route or routes, in Australian waters, of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; and (b) information about the ownership and control of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must provide specific information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52(2) Form of application etc.

53 Application to be accompanied by charge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180
note: An application must be accompanied by the charge (if any)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-53-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-53
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be accompanied by charge
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-53-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53 Application to be accompanied by charge

54 Withdrawal of application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180
note: Does not prevent withdrawal of application and submission of fresh application.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-54
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54 Withdrawal of application

54A Notification of change of circumstances
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54A(1) Notification of change of circumstances
has part: 54A(2) Notification of change of circumstances
has part: 54A(3) Notification of change of circumstances
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-54a
schema version: 2

54A(1) Notification of change of circumstances
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180
note: Notify change of circumstances to ACMA upon becoming aware.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54A Notification of change of circumstances

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify change of circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54A(1) Notification of change of circumstances

54A(2) Notification of change of circumstances
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180
note: ACMA must decide on change of circumstances after notification.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54A Notification of change of circumstances

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to decide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Change of circumstances notification

54A(3) Notification of change of circumstances
type: Concept
description: Notification in writing
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180
note: Notify applicant of decision within 2 business days
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54A Notification of change of circumstances

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must notify applicant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory notification
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

55 Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55(1) Further information
has part: 55(2) Further information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-55
schema version: 2

55(1) Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
note: Request for further information
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-55-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Further information

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request for information
modality: Deontic
operator: request

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Request for further information
modality: Epistemic
operator: request

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(1) Further information

55(2) Further information
type: Concept
description: Information
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
note: ACMA may refuse to consider application until applicant provides information.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-55-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Further information

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA has an obligation to refuse application until applicant provides information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(2) Further information

55A Consultation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55A(1) Consultation
has part: 55A(2) Consultation
has part: 55A(3) Consultation
has part: 55A(4) Consultation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-55a
schema version: 2

55A(1) Consultation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
note: Consultation before making a decision on an application for a protection zone installation permit.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55A Consultation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consultation is required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA must make a decision on the application

55A(2) Consultation
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
note: ACMA must provide consultation to Secretaries within 2 business days.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55A Consultation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide consultation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55A(3) Consultation
type: Concept
description: Notice to the ACMA under paragraph (3)(a)
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
note: Secretary must notify ACMA within 15 business days of receiving an application.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55A Consultation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Secretary must give a written notice to the ACMA.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55A(3) Consultation

55A(4) Consultation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
note: Cannot grant permit while notice is in force
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55A Consultation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: cannot grant permit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (3)(a) notice is in force

56 Grant or refusal of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.183
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56(1) Grant or refusal of permit
has part: 56(3) Grant or refusal of permit
has part: 56(4) Grant or refusal of permit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-56
schema version: 2

56(1) Grant or refusal of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.183
note: Grant or refusal of permit for protection zone installation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-56-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Grant or refusal of permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Install submarine cable in protection zone
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to install submarine cable
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
premise text: Application is covered by paragraph 51(1)(a) of this Schedule

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Install submarine cable in Australian waters
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to install submarine cable in Australian waters
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
premise text: Application is covered by paragraph 51(1)(b) of this Schedule

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Install each international submarine cable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to install each international submarine cable
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
premise text: Application is covered by paragraph 51(1)(c) of this Schedule

56(3) Grant or refusal of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.183
note: Refusal to grant permit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-56-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Grant or refusal of permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) After considering the application, the ACMA may refuse to grant a protection zone installation permit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation of refusal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant refusal
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse

56(4) Grant or refusal of permit
type: Concept
description: Reasons for decision
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.183
note: Notification of refusal decision and reasons
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-56-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Grant or refusal of permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The ACMA must notify the applicant in writing of its decision and reasons.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

57 Matters to which the ACMA must have regard in making a
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
note: ACMA must consider certain matters when deciding on a permit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-57
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision about permit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider matters
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA must have regard to certain matters

57A Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57A(1) Refusal of permit—security
has part: 57A(2) Refusal of permit—security
has part: 57A(3) Refusal of permit—security
has part: 57A(4) Refusal of permit—security
has part: 57A(5) Refusal of permit—security
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-57a
schema version: 2

57A(1) Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
note: Grant of protection zone installation permit to a carrier may be refused due to security concerns.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57A Refusal of permit—security

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A written direction may be given within a certain timeframe.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Timeframe for granting or refusing a permit.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: The Home Affairs Minister considers the grant of the permit would be prejudicial to security.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AI may be used to support the decision-making process.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Use of AI in decision-making.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: The Home Affairs Minister consults with the Prime Minister and the Minister administering the Act.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A written direction may be given not to grant the permit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of granting a protection zone installation permit.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The Home Affairs Minister considers that the grant would be prejudicial to security.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Carriers may be affected by the refusal of their permit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Impact of refusal on carriers.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: The Home Affairs Minister considers that the grant would be prejudicial to security.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A particular carrier may have its permit repeatedly refused.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring refusal of permits based on security concerns.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: The Home Affairs Minister considers that the grant of the permit would be prejudicial to security.

57A(2) Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
note: Comply with a direction under subclause (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57A Refusal of permit—security

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

57A(3) Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
note: Cannot reconsider non-compulsory refusal to grant permit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 57A Refusal of permit—security

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reconsideration of non-compulsory refusal
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

57A(4) Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
note: Application lapses if permit application is pending when direction given.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 57A Refusal of permit—security

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The application overlaps with the time of the direction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Application overlaps with time of direction given.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (4) If an application for a protection zone installation permit is pending at the time when the Home Affairs Minister gives a direction to the ACMA under this clause, then the application lapses.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the direction is given, then the application lapses.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Direction implies lapse of application.
modality: CogAI
operator: Implication
premise text: (4) If an application for a protection zone installation permit is pending at the time when the Home Affairs Minister gives a direction to the ACMA under this clause, then the application lapses.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The application lapses.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits lapse of application if permit pending.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (4) If an application for a protection zone installation permit is pending at the time when the Home Affairs Minister gives a direction to the ACMA under this clause, then the application lapses.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the direction is given, then the application lapses.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Direction implies lapse of application.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implication
premise text: (4) If an application for a protection zone installation permit is pending at the time when the Home Affairs Minister gives a direction to the ACMA under this clause, then the application lapses.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The application overlaps with the time of the direction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Application overlaps with time of direction given.
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (4) If an application for a protection zone installation permit is pending at the time when the Home Affairs Minister gives a direction to the ACMA under this clause, then the application lapses.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57A(4) Refusal of permit—security

57A(5) Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
note: Refusal of permit—security
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 57A Refusal of permit—security

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a refusal to grant a protection zone installation permit, other than a refusal that is required by this clause.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for non-compulsory refusal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (5) In this clause:

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a protection zone installation permit, other than a refusal that is required by this clause.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies refusal as non-compulsory using AI
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (5) In this clause:

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a refusal that is required by this clause.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits non-compulsory refusal of permit
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) In this clause:...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a protection zone installation permit, other than a refusal that is required by this clause.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies refusal as non-compulsory
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: non-compulsory refusal means a refusal to grant...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a protection zone installation permit, other than a refusal that is required by this clause.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses definition of non-compulsory refusal
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (5) In this clause:

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a protection zone installation permit, other than a refusal that is required by this clause.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for non-compulsory refusal
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (5) In this clause:

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57A(5) Refusal of permit—security

58 Timing of decision on application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.185
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58(1) Timing of decision on application
has part: 58(2) Timing of decision on application
has part: 58(3) Timing of decision on application
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-58
schema version: 2

58(1) Timing of decision on application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.185
note: Decision must be made within a specified timeframe after receiving further information.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Timing of decision on application

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The timeframe is between 25 business days and 35 business days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for decision-making.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: A decision must be made within 25 business days or as specified by written notice.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The ACMA processes the further information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Processing of further information by the ACMA.
modality: CogAI
operator: PROCESS
premise text: The applicant gave the ACMA further information under subclause 55(1) in relation to the application.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A decision must be made within 25 business days or as specified by written notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a decision within a specified timeframe.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The ACMA must take all reasonable steps to ensure that a decision is made on the application.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Further information influences the decision-making process.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Influence of further information on decision-making.
modality: Diffusion
operator: INFLUENCE
premise text: The ACMA must take all reasonable steps to ensure that a decision is made on the application.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The decision-making process is recursive and depends on the receipt of further information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for decision-making.
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
premise text: A decision must be made within a specified timeframe after receiving further information.

58(2) Timing of decision on application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.185
note: Decision must be made within a specified timeframe
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-58-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Timing of decision on application

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make decision
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

58(3) Timing of decision on application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.185
note: Prohibition on protection zone installation permit applications
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-58-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Timing of decision on application

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits carrier application for protection zone installation permit
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

58A Conditions of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.187
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58A(1) Conditions of permit
has part: 58A(2) Conditions of permit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-58a
schema version: 2

58A(1) Conditions of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.187
note: Conditions for a protection zone installation permit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-58a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58A Conditions of permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory condition
modality: Deontic
operator: must

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58A(1) Conditions of permit

58A(2) Conditions of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.187
note: ACMA may vary conditions covered by paragraph (1)(a) or (b)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-58a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58A Conditions of permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to vary conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: may

59 Duration of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188
note: Duration of permit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-59-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-59
schema version: 2

6 Response to a request to declare a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6(1) Response to a request to declare a protection zone
has part: 6(2) Response to a request to declare a protection zone
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-6
schema version: 2

6(1) Response to a request to declare a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
note: ACMA must give person a copy of proposal if it decides to develop one
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Response to a request to declare a protection zone

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proposal is given before request is received
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: ACMA must give proposal before person receives request
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: If ACMA decides to develop a proposal in response to the request; the ACMA must give the person a copy of its proposal

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must give person a copy of proposal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must give proposal
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA decides to develop a proposal

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proposal development is optional for ACMA
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA may decide not to develop proposal
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: If ACMA decides not to develop a proposal; the ACMA must give the person a copy of its proposal

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proposal is given when development decision is made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must give proposal if it decides to develop one
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: If ACMA decides to develop a proposal; the ACMA must give the person a copy of its proposal

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proposal is given only if development decision is made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: ACMA may not give proposal if it decides not to develop one
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: If ACMA decides not to develop a proposal; the ACMA must give the person a copy of its proposal

6(2) Response to a request to declare a protection zone
type: Concept
description: reasons for decision
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
note: ACMA must notify person of decision not to declare protection zone
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-6-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Response to a request to declare a protection zone

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA has a duty to notify person
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

60 Surrender of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188
note: Holder may surrender permit by written notice.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-60-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-60
schema version: 2

61 Extension of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188
curation status: Proposed
has part: 61(1) Extension of permit
has part: 61(2) Extension of permit
has part: 61(3) Extension of permit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-61
schema version: 2

61(1) Extension of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188
note: Holder of permit may apply to extend permit duration.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-61-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Extension of permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61(1) Extension of permit

61(2) Extension of permit
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188
note: Holder must provide reasons for requesting permit extension.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-61-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Extension of permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide reasons
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

61(3) Extension of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188
note: ACMA must give written notice of decision and reasons.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-61-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Extension of permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must give written notice of decision and reasons.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

62 Suspension or cancellation of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188
curation status: Proposed
has part: 62(1) Suspension or cancellation of permit
has part: 62(2) Suspension or cancellation of permit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-62
schema version: 2

62(1) Suspension or cancellation of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188
note: Suspension or cancellation of permit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Suspension or cancellation of permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for suspension or cancellation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) The ACMA may suspend or cancel a protection zone installation permit by written notice to the holder of the permit...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication for suspension or cancellation
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) The ACMA may suspend or cancel a protection zone installation permit by written notice to the holder of the permit...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) The ACMA may suspend or cancel a protection zone installation permit by written notice to the holder of the permit...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of suspension or cancellation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (1) The ACMA may suspend or cancel a protection zone installation permit by written notice to the holder of the permit...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for suspension or cancellation
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (1) The ACMA may suspend or cancel a protection zone installation permit by written notice to the holder of the permit...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62(1) Suspension or cancellation of permit

62(2) Suspension or cancellation of permit
type: Concept
description: written notice, opportunity to submit matters
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188
note: ACMA must provide written notice and opportunity to submit matters before suspending or cancelling a permit.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-62-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Suspension or cancellation of permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The ACMA must give the holder 30 days' written notice before suspending or cancelling a permit.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must provide written notice and opportunity to submit matters before suspending or cancelling a permit.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

63 Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.189
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63(1) Exemption from State and Territory laws
has part: 63(2) Exemption from State and Territory laws
has part: 63(3) Exemption from State and Territory laws
has part: 63(4) Exemption from State and Territory laws
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-63
schema version: 2

63(1) Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.189
note: Exemption from State and Territory laws for submarine cable installation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-63-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Exemption from State and Territory laws

63(2) Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.189
note: Exemption from State and Territory laws for cable installation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Exemption from State and Territory laws

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to Australia’s natural or cultural heritage
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Exemption for environmental protection
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) the protection of places or items of significance...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...install a cable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to install cable despite State/Territory laws
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) A carrier may...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...of engaging in the activity
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to install cable despite local government powers
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (c) the powers and functions of a local government body...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the supply and distribution of extra-low voltage power systems
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to install cable despite fuel/power supply restrictions
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (d) the supply of fuel or power, including...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...of engaging in the activity
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to install cable despite regulation-specific matters
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (e) a matter specified in the regulations.

63(3) Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.189
note: Exemption from State and Territory laws for protection of cultural heritage
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-63-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Exemption from State and Territory laws

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: does not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts from State and Territory laws
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
premise text: (3) Paragraph (2)(b)

63(4) Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.189
note: Exemption from State and Territory laws for high-voltage electricity supply
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-63-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Exemption from State and Territory laws

64 Application for a permit to install an international submarine
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.191
note: Carrier may apply for permit to install international submarine cables in non-protection zones and coastal waters.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-64-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-64
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier may apply for permit.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-64-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64 Application for a permit to install an international submarine

65 Form of application etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.191
curation status: Proposed
has part: 65(1) Form of application etc.
has part: 65(2) Form of application etc.
has part: 65(3) Form of application etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-65
schema version: 2

65(1) Form of application etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.191
note: Application must be in writing and in approved form.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-65-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Form of application etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be in writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65(1) Form of application etc.

65(2) Form of application etc.
type: Concept
description: (a) proposed route or routes, in Australian waters, of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; (b) information about the ownership and control of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; (c) any other relevant information.
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.191
note: Application must provide specific information
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-65-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Form of application etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires specific information to be provided during a certain time period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) proposed route or routes, in Australian waters, of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; (b) information about the ownership and control of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; (c) any other relevant information.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide specific information
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (a) proposed route or routes, in Australian waters, of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; (b) information about the ownership and control of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; (c) any other relevant information.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires specific information to be provided
modality: LTL
operator: requires
premise text: (a) proposed route or routes, in Australian waters, of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; (b) information about the ownership and control of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; (c) any other relevant information.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65(2) Form of application etc.

65(3) Form of application etc.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.191
note: Control includes control as a result of, or by means of, trusts, agreements, arrangements, understandings and practices.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-65-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Form of application etc.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: result of

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Control includes control as a result of, or by means of, trusts, agreements, arrangements, understandings and practices.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65(3) Form of application etc.

66 Application to be accompanied by charge
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
note: An application must be accompanied by the charge (if any)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-66-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-66
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be accompanied by charge
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66 Application to be accompanied by charge

67 Withdrawal of application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
note: No prohibition on withdrawing an application and submitting a fresh one.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-67
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows withdrawal of an application
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 67 Withdrawal of application

67A Notification of change of circumstances
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
curation status: Proposed
has part: 67A(1) Notification of change of circumstances
has part: 67A(2) Notification of change of circumstances
has part: 67A(3) Notification of change of circumstances
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-67a
schema version: 2

67A(1) Notification of change of circumstances
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
note: Notify change of circumstances to ACMA upon becoming aware.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 67A Notification of change of circumstances

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify change of circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 67A(1) Notification of change of circumstances

67A(2) Notification of change of circumstances
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
note: ACMA must decide on change of circumstances after notification.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 67A Notification of change of circumstances

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notification precedes decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between notification and decision
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: After considering the notification, the ACMA must decide

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to decide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Change of circumstances notification

67A(3) Notification of change of circumstances
type: Concept
description: Notification in writing
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
note: Notify applicant of decision within 2 business days
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 67A Notification of change of circumstances

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify applicant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

68 Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
curation status: Proposed
has part: 68(1) Further information
has part: 68(2) Further information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-68
schema version: 2

68(1) Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
note: Request for further information from applicant.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-68-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Further information

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Epistemic
operator: OBLIGATION

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68(1) Further information

68(2) Further information
type: Concept
description: Information
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
note: ACMA may refuse to consider application until applicant provides information.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-68-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Further information

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA has an obligation to refuse application until applicant provides information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68(2) Further information

69 Grant or refusal of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.193
curation status: Proposed
has part: 69(1) Grant or refusal of permit
has part: 69(3) Grant or refusal of permit
has part: 69(4) Grant or refusal of permit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-69
schema version: 2

69(1) Grant or refusal of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.193
note: Granting a non-protection zone installation permit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-69-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-69-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Grant or refusal of permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting a permit
modality: Deontic
operator: grant

69(3) Grant or refusal of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.193
note: Refusal to grant permit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-69-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-69-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-69-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Grant or refusal of permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-69-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant refusal
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse

69(4) Grant or refusal of permit
type: Concept
description: Decision and reasons
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.193
note: ACMA must notify applicant of decision and reasons.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-69-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-69-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-69-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Grant or refusal of permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-69-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must notify applicant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

7 Decision not to declare a requested protection zone or to declare a
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.151
curation status: Proposed
has part: 7(1) Decision not to declare a requested protection zone or to declare a
has part: 7(2) Decision not to declare a requested protection zone or to declare a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-7
schema version: 2

7(1) Decision not to declare a requested protection zone or to declare a
type: Concept
description: reasons for decision
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.151
note: ACMA must notify person of decision not to declare protection zone
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-7-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Decision not to declare a requested protection zone or to declare a

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must notify person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA has a duty to notify person
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

7(2) Decision not to declare a requested protection zone or to declare a
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.151
note: ACMA must declare a protection zone if requested and develops a proposal.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Decision not to declare a requested protection zone or to declare a

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...; and if:...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The proposal development must occur before the declaration.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
premise text: (b) The ACMA develops a proposal for the protection zone in response to the request;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...; ACMA declares a protection zone.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must declare a protection zone.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If:...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...; and if:...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must develop a proposal for the requested protection zone.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) The ACMA develops a proposal for the protection zone in response to the request.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...; and if:...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must respond to a person's request for a protection zone.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) A person requests the ACMA to declare a protection zone;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...; and if:...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The declaration must occur before the development of the proposal.
modality: LTL
operator: BEFORE
premise text: (c) The ACMA declares a protection zone that is different from...

70 Consultation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.193
curation status: Proposed
has part: 70(1) Consultation
has part: 70(2) Consultation
has part: 70(3) Consultation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-70
schema version: 2

70(1) Consultation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.193
note: Consultation before making a decision on an application for a non-protection zone installation permit.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-70-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-70-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Consultation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must consult certain persons before making a decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACMA must make a decision on the application.

70(2) Consultation
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.193
note: ACMA must provide consultation to Secretaries within 2 business days.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-70-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-70-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Consultation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide consultation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

70(3) Consultation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.193
note: ACMA must not grant permit while notice is in force.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-70-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-70-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Consultation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: while notice is in force
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of granting permit
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: ACMA must not grant permit

71 Matters to which the ACMA must have regard in making a
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.195
note: ACMA must consider specific factors when deciding on a permit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-71-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-71
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must consider specific factors
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

72A Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.195
curation status: Proposed
has part: 72A(1) Refusal of permit—security
has part: 72A(2) Refusal of permit—security
has part: 72A(3) Refusal of permit—security
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-72a
schema version: 2

72A(1) Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.195
note: Grant of permit to carrier may be refused due to security concerns.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 72A Refusal of permit—security

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits granting permit
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Grant of permit to carrier may be refused due to security concerns.

72A(2) Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.195
note: Comply with a direction under subclause (1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 72A Refusal of permit—security

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

72A(3) Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.195
note: Cannot reconsider non-compulsory refusal to grant permit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 72A Refusal of permit—security

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reconsideration of non-compulsory refusal to grant permit
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

73 Timing of decision on application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.196
curation status: Proposed
has part: 73(1) Timing of decision on application
has part: 73(2) Timing of decision on application
has part: 73(3) Timing of decision on application
has part: 73(4) Timing of decision on application
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-73
schema version: 2

73(1) Timing of decision on application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.196
note: Decision must be made within a specified timeframe after receiving further information.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Timing of decision on application

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The timeframe for making a decision is between 60 and 90 business days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for decision-making.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: A decision must be made within 60 business days or as specified by written notice.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The process of making a decision is influenced by the receipt of further information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Process of decision-making influenced by further information.
modality: CogAI
operator: PROCESS
premise text: The ACMA must take all reasonable steps to ensure that a decision is made on the application.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A decision must be made within 60 business days or as specified by written notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a decision within a specified timeframe.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The ACMA must take all reasonable steps to ensure that a decision is made on the application.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Further information influences the timeframe for making a decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Influence of further information on decision-making.
modality: Diffusion
operator: INFLUENCE
premise text: The ACMA requests the applicant to give the ACMA further information under subclause 68(1) in relation to the application.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The process of making a decision is recursive and depends on the receipt of further information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of decision-making.
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
premise text: A decision must be made within 60 business days or as specified by written notice.

73(2) Timing of decision on application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.196
note: Decision on non-protection zone installation permit application must be made within a specified timeframe.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-73-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Timing of decision on application

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make decision within timeframe.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

73(3) Timing of decision on application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.196
note: Extension of time for decision on application
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-73-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Timing of decision on application

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory extension of time
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) If...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73(3) Timing of decision on application

73(4) Timing of decision on application
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.196
note: Extension of time for decision on application
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-73-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Timing of decision on application

73A Conditions of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.198
curation status: Proposed
has part: 73A(1) Conditions of permit
has part: 73A(2) Conditions of permit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-73a
schema version: 2

73A(1) Conditions of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.198
note: Conditions for non-protection zone installation permits
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 73A Conditions of permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The installation is restricted to a specific temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval restriction
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: The relevant cable or cables must be installed within 926 metres of the route or routes specified by the ACMA in the permit.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It is obligatory to install the cable or cables within that distance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory condition
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: The relevant cable or cables must be installed within 926 metres of the route or routes specified by the ACMA in the permit.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It is obligatory to obtain regulatory approvals before installing the cable or cables.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory condition for regulatory approvals
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: A person acting on behalf of the carrier must not install the relevant cable or cables unless all Commonwealth regulatory approvals have been obtained for the installation.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It is obligatory to comply with security conditions specified by the ACMA.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory condition for security
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Such conditions (if any) in relation to security as the ACMA specifies in the permit.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It is obligatory to comply with installation conditions specified by the ACMA.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory condition for installation
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Such conditions (if any) in relation to the installation of the relevant cable or cables as the ACMA specifies in the permit.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73A(1) Conditions of permit

73A(2) Conditions of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.198
note: ACMA may vary conditions of permit by written notice
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 73A Conditions of permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to vary conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: May

74 Duration of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
note: Permit duration
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-74-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-74
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Permit is in force for a period of 18 months
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds true
modality: Deontic
operator: holds

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74 Duration of permit

75 Surrender of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
note: Holder may surrender permit by written notice.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-75-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-75
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to surrender permit
modality: Deontic
operator: May

76 Extension of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
curation status: Proposed
has part: 76(1) Extension of permit
has part: 76(2) Extension of permit
has part: 76(3) Extension of permit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-76
schema version: 2

76(1) Extension of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
note: Holder may apply to extend permit duration.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-76-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Extension of permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to extend permit
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(1) Extension of permit

76(2) Extension of permit
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
note: Holder must provide reasons for requesting permit extension.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-76-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Extension of permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide reasons
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

76(3) Extension of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
note: ACMA must give written notice of decision and reasons.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-76-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Extension of permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must give written notice of decision and reasons.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

77 Suspension or cancellation of permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
note: Suspension or cancellation of a non-protection zone installation permit
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-77
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by written notice to the holder of the permit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with Schedule 3A Protection of submarine cables
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: Schedule 3A Protection of submarine cables

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by written notice to the holder of the permit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analyzes the relationship between ACMA and permit holders
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
premise text: ACMA may suspend or cancel...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by written notice to the holder of the permit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits suspension or cancellation of a non-protection zone installation permit
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: ACMA may suspend or cancel...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by written notice to the holder of the permit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Implies that suspension or cancellation is subject to ACMA's discretion
modality: Diffusion
operator: Imply
premise text: ACMA may suspend or cancel...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by written notice to the holder of the permit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Overlaps with Schedule 3A Protection of submarine cables
modality: LTL
operator: Overlap
premise text: Schedule 3A Protection of submarine cables

78 Application of this Division
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.201
curation status: Proposed
has part: 78(1) Application of this Division
has part: 78(2) Application of this Division
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-78
schema version: 2

78(1) Application of this Division
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.201
note: Installation of international submarine cable must comply with conditions in this Division and any additional conditions imposed by a Code of Practice.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Application of this Division

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must be installed after commencement of this Division.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Installation of international submarine cable must be done after commencement of this Division.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (1) This Division applies to the installation...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is an installation of an international submarine cable.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Installation of international submarine cable is an activity that requires human judgment.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: (a) in a protection zone;

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must comply with the conditions in this Division.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with conditions in this Division and any additional conditions imposed by a Code of Practice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) This Division applies...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must comply with the conditions in this Division and any additional conditions imposed by a Code of Practice.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Installation of international submarine cable must comply with conditions in this Division and any additional conditions imposed by a Code of Practice, and must also meet other requirements.
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
premise text: (1) This Division applies to the installation...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must be installed before the specified date.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Installation of international submarine cable must be done before a specified date.
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: (b) in Australian waters, other than coastal waters...

78(2) Application of this Division
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.201
note: Conditions for installation of domestic submarine cable in a protection zone
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Application of this Division

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal scope
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) This Division applies to the installation of a domestic submarine cable in a protection zone by, or on behalf of, a carrier.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Scope of application
modality: CogAI
operator: by
premise text: (2) This Division applies to the installation of a domestic submarine cable in a protection zone by, or on behalf of, a carrier.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory condition
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Scope of application
modality: Diffusion
operator: by
premise text: (2) This Division applies to the installation of a domestic submarine cable in a protection zone by, or on behalf of, a carrier.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal scope
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) This Division applies to the installation of a domestic submarine cable in a protection zone by, or on behalf of, a carrier.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(2) Application of this Division

79 Installation to do as little damage as practicable
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.201
note: Ensure minimal damage and inconvenience during installation.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-79-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-79
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ensure minimal damage and inconvenience
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Guarantee actions
modality: Deontic
operator: ensure
premise text: Actions must be taken

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-79-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79 Installation to do as little damage as practicable

8 Location of submarine cable to be specified in declaration
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8(1) Location of submarine cable to be specified in declaration
has part: 8(2) Location of submarine cable to be specified in declaration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-8
schema version: 2

8(1) Location of submarine cable to be specified in declaration
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152
note: Specify a nominal location for the cable or cables in all Australian waters.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-8-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Location of submarine cable to be specified in declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify a location
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-8-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(1) Location of submarine cable to be specified in declaration

8(2) Location of submarine cable to be specified in declaration
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152
note: Must specify location in geographic coordinates with geodetic datum
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-8-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Location of submarine cable to be specified in declaration

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Express location in geographic coordinates with geodetic datum
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-8-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(2) Location of submarine cable to be specified in declaration

80 Management of installation activities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.201
note: Ensure good engineering practice, safety of persons and property, and environmental protection.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-80-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-80-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-80-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-80
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must be followed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure good engineering practice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Good engineering practice

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-80-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must be protected
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protect the safety of persons and property
modality: Deontic
operator: SHALL
premise text: Safety of persons and property

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-80-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must be followed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protect the environment
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Environmental protection

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-80-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80 Management of installation activities

81 Compliance with industry standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.202
note: Ensure compliance with industry standards for public safety.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-81-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-81
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with industry standards.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-81-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81 Compliance with industry standards

82 Compliance with international agreements
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.202
note: Ensure compliance with international agreements
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-82-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-82
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ensure compliance
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Australia's obligations under international agreements

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-82-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82 Compliance with international agreements

83 Conditions specified in the regulations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.202
note: Carrier must comply with conditions specified in regulations.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-83
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83 Conditions specified in the regulations

83A Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.202
curation status: Proposed
has part: 83A(1) Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
has part: 83A(2) Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
has part: 83A(3) Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-83a
schema version: 2

83A(1) Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.202
note: No application for injunction can be made without Attorney-General's consent under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 83A Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No application can be made without consent.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No application can be made
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Application for injunction must have Attorney-General's consent.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83A(1) Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement

83A(2) Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.202
note: No proceeding can be instituted without the written consent of the Attorney-General for certain enforcement.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 83A Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No proceeding can be instituted without the written consent of the Attorney-General.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83A(2) Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement

83A(3) Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.202
note: Attorney-General must consider Australia's international law obligations when deciding to consent.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 83A Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Attorney-General must consider Australia's international law obligations.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83A(3) Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement

84 Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.204
curation status: Proposed
has part: 84(1) Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
has part: 84(2) Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
has part: 84(3) Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-84
schema version: 2

84(1) Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.204
note: Installing an international submarine cable without a permit is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Installing an international submarine cable without a permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: 200 penalty units.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The installation of an international submarine cable without a permit occurs during the period in which the person installs or causes to be installed the cable.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: 200 penalty units.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the installation of an international submarine cable without a permit.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: 200 penalty units.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the installation of an international submarine cable without a permit in Australian waters that are not in a protection zone and that are not coastal waters of a State or the Northern Territory.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the cable is installed: (i) in Australian waters...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: 200 penalty units.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the installation of an international submarine cable without a permit in a protection zone.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the cable is installed: (ii) in a protection zone.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty: 200 penalty units.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the installation of an international submarine cable without a permit if the person does not have a permit under this Part authorising the installation of the cable in the place in which it is installed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) the person does not have a permit...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 84(1) Installing an international submarine cable without a permit

84(2) Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.204
note: Installing an international submarine cable without a permit is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-84-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Installing an international submarine cable without a permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 84(2) Installing an international submarine cable without a permit

84(3) Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.204
note: Installation of international submarine cable without permit is permitted for carriers with a permit.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-84-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Installing an international submarine cable without a permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to install cable without permit.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 84(3) Installing an international submarine cable without a permit

84A Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.204
curation status: Proposed
has part: 84A(1) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
has part: 84A(2) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
has part: 84A(3) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
has part: 84A(4) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-84a
schema version: 2

84A(1) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.204
note: Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit is an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 84A Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the installation of a domestic submarine cable without a permit.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 84A(1) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit

84A(2) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.204
note: Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 84A Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 84A(2) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit

84A(3) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.204
note: Installation of domestic submarine cable without permit is permitted if carrier has a permit.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 84A Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to install cable without permit.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 84A(3) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit

84A(4) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.204
note: Exemption for domestic submarine cables installed before commencement of the clause.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 84A Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission for domestic submarine cables installed before commencement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission

85 Breaching conditions of a permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.205
curation status: Proposed
has part: 85(1) Breaching conditions of a permit
has part: 85(2) Breaching conditions of a permit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-85
schema version: 2

85(1) Breaching conditions of a permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.205
note: Breach of permit conditions results in an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 85 Breaching conditions of a permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Penalty: 100 penalty units.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of breach of permit conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A carrier commits an offence if...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Penalty: 100 penalty units.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with permit conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) A carrier commits an offence if...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Penalty: 100 penalty units.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct that breaches permit conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the carrier holds a permit under this Part authorising...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Penalty: 100 penalty units.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of breach on offence.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) A carrier commits an offence if...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85(1) Breaching conditions of a permit

85(2) Breaching conditions of a permit
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.205
note: No proceeding can be commenced without written consent of the Attorney-General for certain cases.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-85-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 85 Breaching conditions of a permit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No proceeding can be commenced without written consent.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85(2) Breaching conditions of a permit

86 Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
curation status: Proposed
has part: 86(1) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
has part: 86(2) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
has part: 86(3) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-86
schema version: 2

86(1) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
note: Installing a submarine cable in a protection zone or Australian waters without permission is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-86-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Installing a submarine cable in a protection zone or Australian waters without permission is prohibited.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86(1) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully

86(2) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
note: Failure to comply with ACMA direction results in an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: commits an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits non-compliance with ACMA direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A carrier who does not comply with a direction under subclause (1)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: commits an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to comply with ACMA direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) A carrier who does not comply with a direction under subclause (1)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: commits an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows ACMA to direct carriers to remove unlawfully placed items.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (2) A carrier who does not comply with a direction under subclause (1)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: commits an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Establishes the causal relationship between non-compliance and committing an offence.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: (2) A carrier who does not comply with a direction under subclause (1)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86(2) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully

86(3) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
note: ACMA cannot give a direction to a carrier under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-86-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents ACMA from giving a direction to a carrier.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86(3) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully

86A Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
curation status: Proposed
has part: 86A(1) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
has part: 86A(2) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
has part: 86A(3) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-86a
schema version: 2

86A(1) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
note: Installing a submarine cable in a protection zone without a permit is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 86A Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Installing a submarine cable in a protection zone without a permit.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86A(1) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an

86A(2) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
note: Failure to comply with ACMA direction results in an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 86A Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offence committed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits non-compliance with ACMA direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: ACMA direction to remove an item

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86A(2) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an

86A(3) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
note: ACMA cannot give a direction to a carrier under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 86A Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not give a direction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA cannot give a direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: ACMA direction to remove an...

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86A(3) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an

87 Compensation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.208
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87(1) Compensation
has part: 87(2) Compensation
has part: 87(3) Compensation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-87
schema version: 2

87(1) Compensation
type: Concept
description: reasonable amount of compensation
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.208
note: Compensation for financial loss or damage caused by a carrier's actions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-87-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Compensation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has an obligation to provide compensation.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

87(2) Compensation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.208
note: Compensation for damage to land and resources
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-87-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Compensation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to provide compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a class of compensation that includes damage and resource-related claims
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87(2) Compensation

87(3) Compensation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.208
note: Court of competent jurisdiction includes the Federal Court.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-87-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Compensation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court is included in the court of competent jurisdiction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion relation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: Court of competent jurisdiction includes the Federal Court.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court is part of the class hierarchy of courts of competent jurisdiction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy inclusion
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: Court of competent jurisdiction includes the Federal Court.

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87(3) Compensation

88 Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.208
curation status: Proposed
has part: 88(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 88(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 88(3) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 88(4) Compensation for acquisition of property
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-88
schema version: 2

88(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
description: Compensation for acquisition of property
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.208
note: Carrier must pay reasonable compensation to a person if acquisition of property is not valid without compensation.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-88-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Compensation for acquisition of property

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must pay
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(1) Compensation for acquisition of property

88(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.208
note: Compensation for acquisition of property must consider prior agreements and damages recovered from the carrier.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-88-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Compensation for acquisition of property

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider prior agreements and damages recovered from the carrier.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(2) Compensation for acquisition of property

88(3) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.208
note: This clause does not limit the operation of clause 87.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-88-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Compensation for acquisition of property

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Clause 87 operates regardless of this clause.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Clause 88(3) implies that clause 87 operates regardless of this clause.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: Clause 87

88(4) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.208
note: Definition of acquisition of property
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-88-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Compensation for acquisition of property

89 Delegation by the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89(1) Delegation by the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s
has part: 89(2) Delegation by the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-89
schema version: 2

89(1) Delegation by the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
note: Delegation of powers to SES employees
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-89-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-89-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Delegation by the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s

89(2) Delegation by the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
note: Delegate must comply with directions of the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s Department.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-89-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-89-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Delegation by the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Comply with directions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Delegate

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-89-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(2) Delegation by the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s

9 Area of a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152
curation status: Proposed
has part: 9(1) Area of a protection zone
has part: 9(2) Area of a protection zone
has part: 9(3) Area of a protection zone
has part: 9(4) Area of a protection zone
has part: 9(5) Area of a protection zone
has part: 9(6) Area of a protection zone
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-9
schema version: 2

9(1) Area of a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152
note: Defines protection zone area for one submarine cable
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-9-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Area of a protection zone

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: protection zone in relation to one submarine cable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a specific area
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (1)

9(2) Area of a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152
note: Defines the area of a protection zone for one submarine cable in relation to Australian waters.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-9-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Area of a protection zone

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the area within 1,852 metres either side of the points on the surface of the sea above the nominal location of the cable
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the protection zone
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (2) The protection zone in relation to one submarine cable:

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the area within 1,852 metres either side of the points on the surface of the sea above the nominal location of the cable or the waters beneath that area
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Defines alternative areas for the protection zone
modality: LinearLogic
operator: or
premise text: (2) The protection zone in relation to one submarine cable:

9(3) Area of a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152
note: No effect outside the described area
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-9-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Area of a protection zone

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No effect outside the described area
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

9(4) Area of a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152
note: Defines the area of a protection zone for multiple submarine cables in Australian waters.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-9-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Area of a protection zone

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the waters beneath those areas
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the protection zone
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (i) the area between the nominal location of the cables; and (ii) the area within 1,852 metres from the outside edge of the points on the surface of the sea above the nominal location of each of the two outermost cables

9(5) Area of a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152
note: No effect outside the described area
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-9-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Area of a protection zone

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No effect outside the described area
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

9(6) Area of a protection zone
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152
note: Defines nominal location for submarine cables within a protection zone.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-9-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Area of a protection zone

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval for submarine cable nominal location
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: Temporal interval defined by declaration of protection zone

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Nominal location for submarine cables within a protection zone
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies specific term
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Nominal location is specified in the declaration of the protection zone

90 Delegation by the Home Affairs Secretary
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
curation status: Proposed
has part: 90(1) Delegation by the Home Affairs Secretary
has part: 90(2) Delegation by the Home Affairs Secretary
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-90
schema version: 2

90(1) Delegation by the Home Affairs Secretary
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
note: Delegation of powers to SES employees
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-90-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-90-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 90 Delegation by the Home Affairs Secretary

90(2) Delegation by the Home Affairs Secretary
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
note: Delegate must comply with directions of the Home Affairs Secretary.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-90-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-90-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3a-sec-90-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 90 Delegation by the Home Affairs Secretary

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-90-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Starts after commencement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for delegation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Delegation by the Home Affairs Secretary

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to comply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Directions of the Home Affairs Secretary

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-90-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90(2) Delegation by the Home Affairs Secretary

1 Reviewable decisions of the ACMA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.211
note: Reviewable decisions of the ACMA
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
schema version: 2

1 July 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
note: Enhancing Online Safety for Children Amendment Act 2017
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-10
schema version: 2

1 Mar 2021
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.233
note: Legislation Amendment Act 2019
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-11
schema version: 2

1 Mar 2019
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.233
note: Consequential Amendments Act 2019
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-12
schema version: 2

1 Mar 2021
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.234
note: Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-13
schema version: 2

1 Apr 2005
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.223
note: Amendment of Sch 4 by Omnibus Repeal Day (Autumn 2014) Act
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

1 Jan 2006 (see
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.223
note: References other schedules and items
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-3
schema version: 2

1 Mar 2010
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
note: Legislation Amendment Act 2010
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-4
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits Do Not Call Register legislation amendment
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

1 Jan 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.226
note: Awaiting commencement
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-5
schema version: 2

1 July 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
note: Cybercrime Legislation Amendment Act 2012
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-6
schema version: 2

1 Mar 2014 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
note: Statute Law Revision Act (No. 1) 2014
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-7
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Mar 2014 (s 2(1)

1 July 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.230
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 6 items 10–12
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-8
schema version: 2

1 July 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
note: Sch 2 (items 356–396)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-9
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to review decisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

10 Dec
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
note: Conditional commencement of Broadcasting Services Amendment Act (No. 1)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Dec
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
note: Conditional commencement of the Telecommunications Competition Act 2002
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-2
schema version: 2

10 Sept
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.229
note: Consequential Provisions Act 2015
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Sept

10 Sept
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.229
note: Omnibus Repeal Day (Autumn 2014) Act 2014
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-4
schema version: 2

10 Sept
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.230
note: Statute Law Amendment (Prescribed Forms and Other Updates) Act 74, 2023
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-5
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation/Prohibition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the type of obligation or prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: None

10 Sept
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
note: Statute Law Revision Act (No. 2) 2015
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-6
schema version: 2

10 Mar 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-7
schema version: 2

11 Dec
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11
schema version: 2

11 Dec 1998
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
note: Universal Service Cap Act 1999
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-2
schema version: 2

11 June
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
note: Commencement of Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-3
schema version: 2

11 Nov
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
note: Commencement of Act
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-4
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Starts on December 1999
modality: Deontic
operator: begins

11 Feb
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-5
schema version: 2

11 Apr
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.232
note: Conditional commencement of Home Affairs and Integrity Agencies Legislation Amendment Act 2018
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-6-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-6
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified

11 Apr
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.235
note: Commencement and application details for Act 2022
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-7
schema version: 2

11 Apr
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
note: Conditional commencement of certain sections
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-8-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-8
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal intervals specified

12 Dec
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
note: Schedule 1 (items 42–87) commencement
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12
schema version: 2

12 Apr
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.226
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-2
schema version: 2

12 Apr 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.226
note: Conditional commencement of Acts Interpretation Amendment Act 2011
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement specified

12 Sept
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2012
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-4
schema version: 2

12 Dec
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2013
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-5
schema version: 2

12 Nov
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
note: Statute Law Revision Act (No. 1) 2016
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-6
schema version: 2

12 Dec
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.233
note: Regulation of telecommunications
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-7
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 Dec

12 Dec
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.235
note: Commencement of amendments to the Telecommunications Act 1997
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-8
schema version: 2

13 July
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
note: Commencement of Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Act 2010
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13
schema version: 2

13 Apr 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.226
note: Conditional commencement
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-2
schema version: 2

13 Apr
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.229
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-3
schema version: 2

13 Apr
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.230
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-4
schema version: 2

13 Apr
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.230
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-5
schema version: 2

13 Oct 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.230
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-6
schema version: 2

13 Apr 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.230
note: Items 1 and 3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-7
schema version: 2

13 Dec
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.235
note: Amendment of legislative provisions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-8
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Act commences on 1 January 2011
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commencement of the Act
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
premise text: The commencement date is specified in s 2(1)

15 Dec
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.226
note: Commencement of Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15
schema version: 2

15 Dec
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.234
note: Dec 2020 (s 2(1) item 2)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-15-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-2
schema version: 2

16 Dec
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
note: Amendment of Sch 1 and Sch 2 by Statute Law Revision Act 2002
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16
schema version: 2

16 July
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
note: List of schedules and items
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-16-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-2
schema version: 2

16 July 2000 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
note: Reference to amendment act
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-16-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-3
schema version: 2

16 Aug
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
note: Schedule 9 (item 192) of the Telecommunications Act 1997
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-16-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-4
schema version: 2

16 Oct
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.223
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-16-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-5
schema version: 2

16 Nov
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-16-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-6
schema version: 2

16 Apr
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-16-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-7
schema version: 2

16 Oct
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.229
note: Statute Law Revision Act (No. 1) 2015
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-16-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-8
schema version: 2

16 Feb
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.234
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-16-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-9
schema version: 2

17 June
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
note: Conditional commencement on July 1, 1998
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17
schema version: 2

17 Dec
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
note: Commencement of Act
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-17-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-2
schema version: 2

17 Oct 2014 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.223
note: Prohibition on damaging submarine cables
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-17-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-17-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-17-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits damage to submarine cables
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

17 Nov 2009 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2010
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-17-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-4
schema version: 2

17 Dec
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.234
note: Conditional commencement of the Telecommunications Amendment (Infrastructure in New Developments) Act 2021
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-17-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-5
schema version: 2

17 Feb 2021 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.234
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-17-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-6
schema version: 2

18 May
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18
schema version: 2

18 June 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
note: Amendment by Territories Legislation Amendment Act 2016
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-18-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18-2
schema version: 2

18 Sept
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.232
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-18-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18-3
schema version: 2

18 Sept 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.232
note: Amendment of Home Affairs and Integrity Agencies Legislation
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-18-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18-4
schema version: 2

18 Sept 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.232
note: Item 6 of Crimes Legislation Amendment (International Crime Cooperation and Other Measures) Act 2018
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-18-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18-5
schema version: 2

19 Dec
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19
schema version: 2

2 Decisions to which section 556 does not apply
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.215
note: Decisions to which section 556 does not apply
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Dec 2021
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.235
note: Conditional commencement on 2 June 2022
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-2-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Decisions to which section 556 does not apply

20 Mar
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
note: Reference to section 4 and Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20
schema version: 2

20 Apr
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-2
schema version: 2

20 July
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-3
schema version: 2

20 Jan 2008 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
note: Conditional commencement of Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Act
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-4
schema version: 2

20 Sept
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.230
note: Consequential Amendments for Enhancing Online Safety for Children Act 2015
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-5
schema version: 2

20 May
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
note: Mandatory amendment of Sch 5 and Sch 9
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-6
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory amendment
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

20 Sept
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
note: Legislation Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards and Other Measures) Act 2024
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-7
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 Sept

21 Dec
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
note: Privacy Amendment (Private Sector) Act 155, 2000
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-21
schema version: 2

21 Dec
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
note: Dec 2001 (s 2(1))
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-2
schema version: 2

21 Apr 2004
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
note: US Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must implement the US Free Trade Agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

21 Nov
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
note: Conditional commencement of the Telecommunications Amendment (Integrated Public Number Database) Act 2009
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-4
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional commencement
modality: Deontic
operator: :

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

22 Apr
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
note: Commencement of transitional provisions and consequential amendments
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22
schema version: 2

22 Feb
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.223
note: Consequential and transitional provisions for the Australian Communications and Media Authority Act 2005
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to implement consequential and transitional provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22 Feb

22 Mar
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.226
note: References specific sections of the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (National Broadband Network Measures—Access Arrangements) Act 2011
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-3
schema version: 2

22 Sept
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-4
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22 Sept

22 June
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-5
schema version: 2

22 May
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.232
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-6
schema version: 2

22 Nov 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.232
note: Item 2 of Schedule 1, item 215
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-7
schema version: 2

23 Dec
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
note: Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Amendment Act (No. 2)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23
schema version: 2

23 Sept
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
note: Schedules 1 and 2: 1 Jan 2004 (see s. 2(1) and Gazette 2003, No. GN47)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-2
schema version: 2

23 Aug
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.223
note: Schedule 1 (items 2–105)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-3
schema version: 2

23 Sept
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.223
note: Schedule 3: Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act 119, 2005
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-4
schema version: 2

23 Sept
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.223
note: Schedule references
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-5
schema version: 2

23 Mar
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
note: Consequential Provisions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-6
schema version: 2

23 Mar
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-7
schema version: 2

23 June 2017 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
note: Legislation history
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-8
schema version: 2

23 July
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.234
note: Legislation history
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-9
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval during which the provision applies
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of the provision on other laws
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Relationship between the provision and AI systems
modality: CogAI
operator: isRelatedTo

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Part of a legislative provision
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPartOf

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of the provision to related laws
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusesTo

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23 Dec

24 May 2001 (s 2(1)(a))
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
note: Duty to communicate and report
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-24-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24
schema version: 2

24 Oct
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
note: Schedule 1 (items 25–48)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-24-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-2
schema version: 2

24 Mar
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.230
note: Prohibition on certain telecommunications activities
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-24-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-24-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-24-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain telecommunications activities
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

24 Oct
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
note: Telecommunications Act 1997
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-24-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-4
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24 May 2001 (s 2(1)(a))

25 Feb
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.229
note: Commencement provision for Act 2015
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-25
schema version: 2

25 May
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.234
note: Mandatory commencement of certain provisions on specific dates.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-25-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-25-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25 May

26 Mar
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
note: Remainder: Royal Assent s. 4 and 5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-26-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-26
schema version: 2

26 May
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-26-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-26-2
schema version: 2

26 Mar
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-26-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-26-3
schema version: 2

26 Sept
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-26-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-26-4
schema version: 2

26 May
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-26-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-26-5
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Royal Assent
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

27 Nov
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
note: Conditional commencement
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27
schema version: 2

27 May 2008 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
note: Legislation history
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-2
schema version: 2

27 Mar 2009 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
note: Statute Stocktake (Regulatory and Other Laws) Act 2009
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-3
schema version: 2

27 June
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.226
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-4
schema version: 2

27 Dec 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.226
note: Items 11 and 12
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-5
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Item inclusion
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

27 Sept 2011
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
note: Remains in effect until September 26, 2011
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-6-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-6
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the duration of the provision
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

27 May
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
note: Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Submarine Cable Protection) Act 2014
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-7
schema version: 2

27 May
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-8
schema version: 2

27 Mar
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
note: Conditional commencement of the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Triple Zero Custodian and Emergency Calling Powers) Act 2025
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-9-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-9
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: None

28 June
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
note: Conditional commencement of Statute Law Revision Act 2002
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-28
schema version: 2

28 Sept
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 1 (items 57–68)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-28-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-28-2
schema version: 2

28 Feb
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-28-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-28-3
schema version: 2

28 May 2014 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
note: May 2014 (s 2(1))
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-28-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-28-4
schema version: 2

29 June
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
note: Commences on July 1, 1998
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-29
schema version: 2

29 Nov
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
note: Commencement of Sch 4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-29-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-29-2
schema version: 2

29 Mar
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
note: Commences on 1 July 2008
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-29-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-29-3
schema version: 2

29 June
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
note: June 2013 (s 2(1) item 16 Sch 3 (item 343))
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-29-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-29-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-29-4
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-29-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: June 2013
modality: Deontic
operator: Happens

29 Nov
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
note: National Broadband Network Companies Amendment (Commitment to Public Ownership) Act 2025
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-29-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-29-5
schema version: 2

3 May 1997
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
note: Sale Act 1997
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
schema version: 2

3 July 2002
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
note: Telecommunications Amendment Act 1998
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-3-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-2
schema version: 2

3 July 2002
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
note: Commencement of Act
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-3-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: July 1999
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Starts on July 1999
modality: Deontic
operator: begins

3 May 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
note: Consequential Amendments
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-3-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-4
schema version: 2

3 Dec 2012
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-3-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-5
schema version: 2

3 Dec 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
note: Privacy Amendment (Enhancing Privacy Protection) Act 2012
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-3-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-6
schema version: 2

30 June
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
note: Conditional commencement of Telecommunications Legislation Amendment Act 1997
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30
schema version: 2

30 June
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
note: Do Not Call Register (Consequential Amendments) Act 2006
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-2
schema version: 2

30 June
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
note: Schedule 1 (items 42–73)
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-3
schema version: 2

30 May 2010 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
note: Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-4
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classification of legislative provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPartOf

30 June
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.229
note: Amendment of Sch 14 by Public Governance and Resources Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2015
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-5
schema version: 2

30 Oct
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
note: Conditional commencement of legislation amendment act
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-6
schema version: 2

30 Oct
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.232
note: Establishment of the Australian Signals Directorate
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-7
schema version: 2

30 Oct
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-8
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

31 May
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 7
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-31-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31
schema version: 2

31 May
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
note: Conditional commencement of certain provisions
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-31-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-2
schema version: 2

31 May
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
note: Conditional commencement of the Telecommunications Amendment (SMS Sender ID Register) Act 2024
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-31-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-3
schema version: 2

31 Oct 2025 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
note: Strengthening Oversight of the National Intelligence Community Act 2025
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-31-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-4
schema version: 2

4 Dec 2025
type: Concept
references: Endnote 4—Amendment history
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
note: Amendment history for Telecommunications Act 1997
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
schema version: 2

5 July 1999
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
note: Commencement of Environmental Reform (Consequential Provisions) Act 1999
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-5
schema version: 2

5 June 2001
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
note: Repeals, Consequentials and Transitionals Act 2001
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-5-2
schema version: 2

5 Mar 2015
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.230
note: Amendment of certain items in Sch 1 and Sch 3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-5-3
schema version: 2

5 Sept
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-5-4
schema version: 2

5 Mar 2025 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
note: Item 1 of Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Act 2024
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-5-5
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 5 July 1999 (s 2(1))
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: 2 Aug 1999 (s 2(3), (4))

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sch 3 (items 77–82) and Sch 4 (items 21–29)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial agent
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
premise text: Sch 4 (items 21–29)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sch 3 (items 77–82) and Sch 4 (items 21–29)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Sch 4 (items 21–29)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 5 July 1999 (s 2(1))
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal trace
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: 2 Aug 1999 (s 2(3), (4))

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sch 2 and Sch 3
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Schema
modality: SHACL
operator: Applicable
premise text: Sch 4 (items 1–16, 21–29)

7 Aug 2019
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.233
note: Commencement of Act
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-7
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Indicates commencement
modality: Deontic
operator: begins

8 Dec 2006
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
note: Commencement of Sch 1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8
schema version: 2

8 Dec 2018
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.233
note: Amendment notice
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-8-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-2
schema version: 2

9 May 2018
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.232
note: Conditional commencement of Defence Legislation Amendment (2017 Measures No. 1) Act
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-9-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-9-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-9
schema version: 2

9 May 2018
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.232
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-9-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-9-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditionally commenced on 18 Sept 2018 (s 2(1) item 6)

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-9-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: No clear duty, ban conduct, grant permission, or create a right

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-9-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditionally commenced on 11 May 2018 (s 2(1) item 7)

4 June 2026
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments, applications, saving, transitional provisions, editorial changes, presentational changes, modifications, and self-repealing provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for the compilation date and amendment history.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the compilation as a descriptive logic application.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable

Telecommunications Act 1997
type: Document
date: 4 June 2026
identifier: No. 47 of 1997
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU