Telecommunications Act 1997
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 47 of 1997
date: 4 June 2026
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

4 June 2026
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments, applications, saving, transitional provisions, editorial changes, presentational changes, modifications, and self-repealing provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the compilation as a descriptive logic application.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for the compilation date and amendment history.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Compliance with this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
has part: 1(1) Compliance with this Act
has part: 1(2) Compliance with this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.13

1(1) Compliance with this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-ss-1
part of: 1 Compliance with this Act
note: Carrier must comply with the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.13
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1(1) Compliance with this Act
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1(2) Compliance with this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-ss-2
part of: 1 Compliance with this Act
note: Includes other Acts and regulations for compliance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.13
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1(2) Compliance with this Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

16 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
note: Carriers must provide access to facilities for competitive purposes.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-16-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Access to supplementary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
has part: 17(1) Access to supplementary facilities
has part: 17(2) Access to supplementary facilities
has part: 17(2A) Access to supplementary facilities
has part: 17(2B) Access to supplementary facilities
has part: 17(3) Access to supplementary facilities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.14

17(1) Access to supplementary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17-ss-1
part of: 17 Access to supplementary facilities
note: Carrier must provide access to facilities upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(1) Access to supplementary facilities
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide access
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(2) Access to supplementary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17-ss-2
part of: 17 Access to supplementary facilities
note: Second carrier may request access to facilities from first carrier under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(2) Access to supplementary facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for carriers
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <->
logic summary: Access to facilities is conditional on meeting certain requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(2A) Access to supplementary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17-ss-2a
part of: 17 Access to supplementary facilities
note: No obligation to comply with certain undertakings if it would have negative effects.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2a-norm

17(2B) Access to supplementary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17-ss-2b
part of: 17 Access to supplementary facilities
note: Right to access supplementary facilities under contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Contractual right
premise text: Contract in force
conclusion text: Right under contract
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(3) Access to supplementary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17-ss-3
part of: 17 Access to supplementary facilities
note: Regard must be had to the question whether compliance with the request will promote the long-term interests of the standard carrier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(3) Access to supplementary facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consider the request's impact on long-term interests.
premise text: The standard carrier licence conditions require consideration of long-term interests.
conclusion text: Compliance with the request promotes the long-term interests.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Compliance with the request must occur within a reasonable timeframe.
premise text: The standard carrier licence conditions require consideration of long-term interests.
conclusion text: Compliance with the request promotes the long-term interests.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Compliance with the request must occur within a reasonable timeframe.
premise text: The standard carrier licence conditions require consideration of long-term interests.
conclusion text: Compliance with the request promotes the long-term interests.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-A
logic summary: The request's impact on long-term interests is relevant to determining reasonableness.
premise text: The standard carrier licence conditions include consideration of long-term interests.
conclusion text: The request's impact on long-term interests is a factor in determining reasonableness.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-17-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
logic summary: The request's impact on long-term interests is relevant to determining reasonableness.
premise text: The standard carrier licence conditions include consideration of long-term interests.
conclusion text: The request's impact on long-term interests is a factor in determining reasonableness.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
has part: 18(1) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 18(2) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 18(3) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 18(4) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 18(5) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 18(6) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 18(7) Terms and conditions of access
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.16

18(1) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-1
part of: 18 Terms and conditions of access
note: Carrier must comply with terms and conditions agreed upon or determined by an arbitrator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(1) Terms and conditions of access
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(2) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-2
part of: 18 Terms and conditions of access
note: Regulations may make provision for arbitration conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(2) Terms and conditions of access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

18(3) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-3
part of: 18 Terms and conditions of access
note: The ACCC may be constituted by a single member or specified number of members for a particular arbitration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(3) Terms and conditions of access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May be constituted by a single member or specified number of members
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(4) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-4
part of: 18 Terms and conditions of access
note: Subclause (3) does not limit subclause (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-4-norm

18(5) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-5
part of: 18 Terms and conditions of access
note: No inconsistency with Ministerial pricing determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(5) Terms and conditions of access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !=
logic summary: Inconsistent determinations are prohibited
premise text: Ministerial pricing determination in force under clause 19
conclusion text: Determination made in arbitration under this clause
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(6) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-6
part of: 18 Terms and conditions of access
note: Arbitrator must not make a determination that would prevent compliance with an undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-6-logic-ltl-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Arbitrator must make a determination.
conclusion text: Arbitrator must not make a determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
logic summary: Temporal interval comparison
premise text: Determination would be made after a final migration plan is in force.
conclusion text: Determination would not be made before a final migration plan is in force.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <
logic summary: Temporal interval comparison
premise text: Final migration plan is in force.
conclusion text: Determination would not be made before the final migration plan is in force.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(7) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-ss-7
part of: 18 Terms and conditions of access
note: If an agreement is in force and in writing, the standard carrier licence conditions apply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(7) Terms and conditions of access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force
conclusion text: (b) the agreement is in writing; Schedule 1 Standard carrier licence conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal relationship between agreements and standard carrier licence conditions
premise text: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force
conclusion text: (b) the agreement is in writing; Schedule 1 Standard carrier licence conditions
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ⊇
logic summary: Inclusive relationship between agreements and standard carrier licence conditions
premise text: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force
conclusion text: (b) the agreement is in writing; Schedule 1 Standard carrier licence conditions
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Exhaustive relationship between agreements and standard carrier licence conditions
premise text: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force
conclusion text: (b) the agreement is in writing; Schedule 1 Standard carrier licence conditions
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-18-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: ⊥
logic summary: Negation of relationship between agreements and standard carrier licence conditions
premise text: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force
conclusion text: (b) the agreement is in writing; Schedule 1 Standard carrier licence conditions
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

19 Ministerial pricing determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
has part: 19(1) Ministerial pricing determinations
has part: 19(3) Ministerial pricing determinations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.18

19(1) Ministerial pricing determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19-ss-1
part of: 19 Ministerial pricing determinations
note: Minister may make a determination on price-related terms and conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-19-ss-1-norm

19(3) Ministerial pricing determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19-ss-3
part of: 19 Ministerial pricing determinations
note: Defines price-related terms and conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-19-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-19-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-19-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(3) Ministerial pricing determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-19-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes the defined terms in the schedule.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
note: Carriers must provide access to certain information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.19
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-20-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-20-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Access to network information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
has part: 21(1) Access to network information
has part: 21(2) Access to network information
has part: 21(3) Access to network information
has part: 21(4) Access to network information
has part: 21(5) Access to network information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.19

21(1) Access to network information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21-ss-1
part of: 21 Access to network information
note: Carrier must provide access to network information
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.19
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(1) Access to network information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(2) Access to network information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21-ss-2
part of: 21 Access to network information
note: Provide reasonable access to operations support systems and traffic flow information upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.19
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide access
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(3) Access to network information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21-ss-3
part of: 21 Access to network information
note: The first carrier must comply with subclause (2) unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.19
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(3) Access to network information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: unless
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: The first carrier must comply with subclause (2)
conclusion text: Unless certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between planning and compliance
premise text: a purpose of the access is to enable the second carrier to undertake planning, maintenance or reconfiguration of the second carrier’s telecommunications network
conclusion text: during the planning process
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between compliance and planning
premise text: the first carrier must comply with subclause (2)
conclusion text: until certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(4) Access to network information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21-ss-4
part of: 21 Access to network information
note: Must provide network information upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.19
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Obligation to provide network information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(5) Access to network information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21-ss-5
part of: 21 Access to network information
note: No implication that clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 limit access to network information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.19
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: No implication that clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 limit access to network information.
premise text: Clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 do not limit this clause.
conclusion text: This clause does not imply a limitation by clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 overlap with this clause.
premise text: Clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 do not limit this clause.
conclusion text: This clause overlaps with clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: and
logic summary: Clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 are part of this clause.
premise text: Clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 do not limit this clause.
conclusion text: This clause is the conjunction of clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 diffuse this clause.
premise text: Clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 do not limit this clause.
conclusion text: This clause is diffused by clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-21-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 recognize this clause.
premise text: Clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 do not limit this clause.
conclusion text: This clause is recognized by clauses 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Access to information in databases
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
has part: 22(1) Access to information in databases
has part: 22(2) Access to information in databases
has part: 22(3) Access to information in databases
has part: 22(4) Access to information in databases
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20

22(1) Access to information in databases
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-ss-1
part of: 22 Access to information in databases
note: Carrier must provide access to information in databases
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(1) Access to information in databases
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(2) Access to information in databases
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-ss-2
part of: 22 Access to information in databases
note: First carrier must provide second carrier with access to information about telecommunications network treatment.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(2) Access to information in databases
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Timely access to information
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(3) Access to information in databases
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-ss-3
part of: 22 Access to information in databases
note: Second carrier's request for access is reasonable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(3) Access to information in databases
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Allows second carrier to plan, maintain or reconfigure network.
premise text: Second carrier's request is reasonable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Requires
logic summary: Access must be for planning, maintenance or reconfiguration.
premise text: (3) The first carrier is not required to comply with subclause (2)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(4) Access to information in databases
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-ss-4
part of: 22 Access to information in databases
note: First carrier must provide information to second carrier upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-22-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Access to network planning information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
has part: 23(1) Access to network planning information
has part: 23(2) Access to network planning information
has part: 23(3) Access to network planning information
has part: 23(4) Access to network planning information
has part: 23(5) Access to network planning information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20

23(1) Access to network planning information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23-ss-1
part of: 23 Access to network planning information
note: Carrier must provide access to network planning information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(1) Access to network planning information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(2) Access to network planning information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23-ss-2
part of: 23 Access to network planning information
note: Provide telecommunications network planning information upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the first carrier.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(3) Access to network planning information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23-ss-3
part of: 23 Access to network planning information
note: Must provide network planning information
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(3) Access to network planning information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Relates to time period during which information must be provided
premise text: (3) The information is to include (but is not limited to) information relating to the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Relates to time period during which information must be provided
premise text: (3) The information is to include (but is not limited to) information relating to the following:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: mustBeProvidedBy
logic summary: Information must be provided by the carrier
premise text: (3) The information is to include (but is not limited to) information relating to the following:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: mustBeProvidedBy
logic summary: Information must be provided by the carrier
premise text: (3) The information is to include (but is not limited to) information relating to the following:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(4) Access to network planning information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23-ss-4
part of: 23 Access to network planning information
note: Second carrier may request access to network planning information if reasonable purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(4) Access to network planning information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(5) Access to network planning information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23-ss-5
part of: 23 Access to network planning information
note: Must provide network planning information to second carrier upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-23-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
has part: 24(1) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
has part: 24(2) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
has part: 24(3) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
has part: 24(4) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.21

24(1) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-ss-1
part of: 24 Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
note: Carrier must provide access to information about likely changes to network facilities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.21
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(1) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must provide access
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(2) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-ss-2
part of: 24 Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
note: Provide timely and detailed information about likely changes to facilities on a telecommunications network.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.21
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(3) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-ss-3
part of: 24 Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
note: Second carrier may request first carrier to comply with subclause (2) if planning for own network is involved.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.21
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(3) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to comply with subclause (2)
premise text: Second carrier's request is reasonable
conclusion text: First carrier may comply with subclause (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Compliance with subclause (2) may occur during planning for own network
premise text: The second carrier's request is reasonable
conclusion text: Compliance with subclause (2) may occur during planning for own network
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: If-then
logic summary: Request for compliance with subclause (2) implies that the second carrier is reasonable
premise text: The second carrier's request is reasonable
conclusion text: Compliance with subclause (2) may occur if the second carrier is reasonable
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: If-then
logic summary: Request for compliance with subclause (2) implies that the first carrier must provide information
premise text: The second carrier's request is reasonable
conclusion text: Compliance with subclause (2) may occur if the second carrier is reasonable
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: If-then
logic summary: Request for compliance with subclause (2) implies that the first carrier must provide information
premise text: The second carrier's request is reasonable
conclusion text: Compliance with subclause (2) may occur if the second carrier is reasonable
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(4) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-ss-4
part of: 24 Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
note: Must provide information to second carrier upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.21
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(4) Access to information about likely changes to network facilities—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-24-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide information to second carrier upon request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Access to quality of service information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
has part: 25(1) Access to quality of service information etc.
has part: 25(2) Access to quality of service information etc.
has part: 25(3) Access to quality of service information etc.
has part: 25(4) Access to quality of service information etc.
has part: 25(5) Access to quality of service information etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.22

25(1) Access to quality of service information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25-ss-1
part of: 25 Access to quality of service information etc.
note: Carrier must provide access to quality of service information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.22
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25(1) Access to quality of service information etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25(2) Access to quality of service information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25-ss-2
part of: 25 Access to quality of service information etc.
note: Provide detailed information about quality of service, network conditions, and call failures.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.22
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Timely provision of information
premise text: (2) The first carrier must, if requested to do so by the second carrier,
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25(3) Access to quality of service information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25-ss-3
part of: 25 Access to quality of service information etc.
note: Second carrier's request for compliance with subclause (2) is reasonable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.22
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 25(3) Access to quality of service information etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted to second carrier.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25(4) Access to quality of service information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25-ss-4
part of: 25 Access to quality of service information etc.
note: First carrier must provide information to second carrier upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.22
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25(5) Access to quality of service information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25-ss-5
part of: 25 Access to quality of service information etc.
note: Specify ITU recommendations for quality of service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.22
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25(5) Access to quality of service information etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify ITU recommendations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-25-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Classify ITU recommendations
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Security procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
has part: 26(1) Security procedures
has part: 26(2) Security procedures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.23

26(1) Security procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-ss-1
part of: 26 Security procedures
note: Carrier may withhold information from another carrier unless security procedures are in place.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.23
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-26-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to withhold information
premise text: Second carrier has security procedures in place
conclusion text: First carrier may withhold information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(2) Security procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-ss-2
part of: 26 Security procedures
note: Design procedures to protect information confidentiality
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.23
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-26-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-26-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(2) Security procedures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to protect information confidentiality
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Terms and conditions of compliance
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
note: First carrier must comply with requirements imposed by clause on agreed terms and conditions or determined by arbitrator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.23
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27 Terms and conditions of compliance
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27A Code relating to access to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27a
has part: 27A(1) Code relating to access to information
has part: 27A(2) Code relating to access to information
has part: 27A(3) Code relating to access to information
has part: 27A(4) Code relating to access to information
has part: 27A(5) Code relating to access to information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24

27A(1) Code relating to access to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27a-ss-1
part of: 27A Code relating to access to information
note: Code setting out conditions for provision of information under specified clauses.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May make a Code setting out conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27A(2) Code relating to access to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27a-ss-2
part of: 27A Code relating to access to information
note: Carrier must comply with the Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27A(2) Code relating to access to information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27A(3) Code relating to access to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27a-ss-3
part of: 27A Code relating to access to information
note: No implication on power to make an instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication of clause on power
premise text: (3) This clause does not...
conclusion text: No implication on power to make an instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27A(4) Code relating to access to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27a-ss-4
part of: 27A Code relating to access to information
note: Does not limit matters dealt with by codes or standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-4-norm

27A(5) Code relating to access to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27a-ss-5
part of: 27A Code relating to access to information
note: Does not limit subsection 33(3B) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-27a-ss-5-norm

28 Ministerial pricing determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
has part: 28(1) Ministerial pricing determinations
has part: 28(3) Ministerial pricing determinations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24

28(1) Ministerial pricing determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-ss-1
part of: 28 Ministerial pricing determinations
note: Minister may make a determination setting out principles dealing with price-related terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-28-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-28-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(1) Ministerial pricing determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(3) Ministerial pricing determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-ss-3
part of: 28 Ministerial pricing determinations
note: Defines price-related terms and conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-28-ss-3-norm

29 Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
has part: 29(1) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
has part: 29(2) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
has part: 29(3) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
has part: 29(4) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
has part: 29(5) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.25

29(1) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29-ss-1
part of: 29 Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
note: Carrier must consult about reconfiguration of carriage services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.25
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29(1) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29(2) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29-ss-2
part of: 29 Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
note: Must consult with second carrier before modifying or reconfiguring telecommunications network.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.25
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consult with second carrier
premise text: (2) The first carrier must, if requested to do so by the second carrier...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29(3) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29-ss-3
part of: 29 Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
note: First carrier must comply with subclause (2) unless modification affects second carrier's planning, maintenance, or reconfiguration activities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.25
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
premise text: (3) The first carrier is not required...
conclusion text: ...unless...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29(4) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29-ss-4
part of: 29 Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
note: Carrier must comply with requirement on terms and conditions agreed upon by parties or determined by arbitrator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.25
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29(4) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Carrier has an obligation to comply with the requirement.
premise text: (4) The first carrier must comply...
conclusion text: ...on such terms and conditions as are:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29(5) Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29-ss-5
part of: 29 Consultation about reconfiguration etc.
note: Regulations may make provision for arbitration conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.25
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29-ss-5-norm

29A Code relating to consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a
has part: 29A(1) Code relating to consultation
has part: 29A(2) Code relating to consultation
has part: 29A(3) Code relating to consultation
has part: 29A(4) Code relating to consultation
has part: 29A(5) Code relating to consultation
has part: 29A(6) Code relating to consultation
has part: 29A(7) Code relating to consultation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.26

29A(1) Code relating to consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a-ss-1
part of: 29A Code relating to consultation
note: The ACCC must make a Code setting out conditions for consultations under clause 29.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make a Code
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29A(2) Code relating to consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a-ss-2
part of: 29A Code relating to consultation
note: The Code may specify the manner and form in which a consultation is to occur.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29A(2) Code relating to consultation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

29A(3) Code relating to consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a-ss-3
part of: 29A Code relating to consultation
note: Does not limit subclause (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-3-norm

29A(4) Code relating to consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a-ss-4
part of: 29A Code relating to consultation
note: Carrier must comply with the Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29A(4) Code relating to consultation
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
premise text: (4) A carrier must comply with the Code.
conclusion text: The carrier MUST comply with the Code.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29A(5) Code relating to consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a-ss-5
part of: 29A Code relating to consultation
note: No implication that limits power to make an instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-5-norm

29A(6) Code relating to consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a-ss-6
part of: 29A Code relating to consultation
note: No implication on matters dealt with by codes or standards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-6-norm

29A(7) Code relating to consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29a-ss-7
part of: 29A Code relating to consultation
note: Does not limit subsection 33(3B) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 by implication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-29a-ss-7-norm

30 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
note: Carriers must provide access to telecommunications transmission towers, tower sites, and underground facilities.
description: Access to telecommunications transmission towers, tower sites, and underground facilities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.27
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-30-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide access
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
note: Definitions for eligible underground facility, site, and telecommunications transmission tower.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.27
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-31-norm

32 Extended meaning of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
has part: 32(1) Extended meaning of access
has part: 32(2) Extended meaning of access
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28

32(1) Extended meaning of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-1
part of: 32 Extended meaning of access
note: Giving access to a tower includes replacing the tower with another tower located on the same site and giving access to the replacement tower.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(1) Extended meaning of access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Describes a subclass relationship
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(2) Extended meaning of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-2
part of: 32 Extended meaning of access
note: Giving access to a site includes replacing the tower with another tower located on the site.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(2) Extended meaning of access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Implies obligation
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part, giving access to a site on which is situated a tower includes replacing the tower with another tower located on the site.
conclusion text: Replacing the tower with another tower located on the site is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Implies subclass relationship
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part, giving access to a site on which is situated a tower includes replacing the tower with another tower located on the site.
conclusion text: Replacing the tower with another tower located on the site is a subclass of 'giving access to a site'
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Implies temporal inclusion
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part, giving access to a site on which is situated a tower includes replacing the tower with another tower located on the site.
conclusion text: Replacing the tower with another tower located on the site is temporally included in 'giving access to a site'
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Implies temporal inclusion
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part, giving access to a site on which is situated a tower includes replacing the tower with another tower located on the site.
conclusion text: Replacing the tower with another tower located on the site is temporally included in 'giving access to a site'
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: Implies diffusion relationship
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part, giving access to a site on which is situated a tower includes replacing the tower with another tower located on the site.
conclusion text: Replacing the tower with another tower located on the site is diffusely related to 'giving access to a site'
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
logic summary: Implies cognitive relationship
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Part, giving access to a site on which is situated a tower includes replacing the tower with another tower located on the site.
conclusion text: Replacing the tower with another tower located on the site is cognitively related to 'giving access to a site'
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Access to telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
has part: 33(1) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 33(2) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 33(3) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 33(4) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 33(4A) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 33(5) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 33(6) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 33(7) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28

33(1) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-ss-1
part of: 33 Access to telecommunications transmission towers
note: Carrier must provide access to telecommunications transmission tower upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(1) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must provide access.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33(2) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-ss-2
part of: 33 Access to telecommunications transmission towers
note: Access to telecommunications transmission towers is permitted for the sole purpose of enabling a second carrier to install a facility used in connection with the supply of a carriage service by means of radiocommunications, subject to reasonable notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(2) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted by the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Access to telecommunications transmission towers is classified as a permitted activity.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

33(3) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-ss-3
part of: 33 Access to telecommunications transmission towers
note: Exemption from compliance with subclause (1) for a particular telecommunications transmission tower if a written certificate is issued by the ACCC stating it is not technically feasible.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(3) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Exemption from compliance with subclause (1) for a particular telecommunications transmission tower if a written certificate is issued by the ACCC stating it is not technically feasible.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which the exemption is in force
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

33(4) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-ss-4
part of: 33 Access to telecommunications transmission towers
note: The ACCC must consider certain factors when determining technical feasibility of compliance with subclause (1) in relation to a tower.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(4) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The ACCC must consider certain factors.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has regard to
logic summary: The ACCC must have regard to the specified factors.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33(4A) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-ss-4a
part of: 33 Access to telecommunications transmission towers
note: Consultation with ACMA before issuing a certificate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-4a-norm

33(5) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-ss-5
part of: 33 Access to telecommunications transmission towers
note: Must make decision within 10 business days after request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make decision within time frame.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33(6) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-ss-6
part of: 33 Access to telecommunications transmission towers
note: No obligation to comply with certain undertakings if it would have negative effects.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-6-norm

33(7) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33-ss-7
part of: 33 Access to telecommunications transmission towers
note: Requester must comply with contingent provisions of a contract if they have not come into force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(7) Access to telecommunications transmission towers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with contingent provisions.
premise text: Requester made the request.
conclusion text: Contingent provisions have not come into force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Requester must comply with contingent provisions if they have not come into force.
premise text: Contingent provisions have not come into force.
conclusion text: Requester made the request.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Requester must comply with contingent provisions if they have not come into force.
premise text: Contingent provisions have not come into force.
conclusion text: Requester made the request.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Requester must comply with contingent provisions if they have not come into force.
premise text: Contingent provisions have not come into force.
conclusion text: Requester made the request.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-33-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Requester must comply with contingent provisions if they have not come into force.
premise text: Contingent provisions have not come into force.
conclusion text: Requester made the request.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
has part: 34(1) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 34(2) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 34(3) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 34(4) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
has part: 34(4A) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.30

34(1) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-1
part of: 34 Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
note: Carrier must provide access to site upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(1) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide access
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(2) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-2
part of: 34 Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
note: Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers is permitted for the sole purpose of enabling a second carrier to install a facility used in connection with the supply of a carriage service by means of radiocommunications, subject to reasonable notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(2) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted for specific purpose
premise text: (2) The first carrier is not required to comply with subclause (1)
conclusion text: (a) the access is provided for the sole purpose of enabling the second carrier...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Access classification
premise text: (2) The first carrier is not required to comply with subclause (1)
conclusion text: the access is provided for the sole purpose of enabling the second carrier...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for notice requirement
premise text: (b) the second carrier gives the first carrier reasonable notice that...
conclusion text: the access is provided for the sole purpose of enabling the second carrier...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Reasonable notice justification
premise text: (b) the second carrier gives the first carrier reasonable notice that...
conclusion text: the access is provided for the sole purpose of enabling the second carrier...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Notice propagation
premise text: (b) the second carrier gives the first carrier reasonable notice that...
conclusion text: the access is provided for the sole purpose of enabling the second carrier...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation for access classification
premise text: (2) The first carrier is not required to comply with subclause (1)
conclusion text: the access is provided for the sole purpose of enabling the second carrier...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

34(3) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-3
part of: 34 Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
note: Exempts first carrier from complying with subclause (1) if ACCC certifies technical infeasibility.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(3) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: ACCC certifies technical infeasibility
conclusion text: First carrier exempted from compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

34(4) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-4
part of: 34 Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
note: The ACCC must consider certain factors when determining technical feasibility of compliance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(4) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The ACCC must consider certain factors.
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: technical feasibility of compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Factors considered include technical difficulties and health/safety risks.
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: considered factors
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(4A) Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-4a
part of: 34 Access to sites of telecommunications transmission towers
note: Consultation with ACMA before issuing a certificate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Permission to consult ACMA
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Access to eligible underground facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
has part: 35(1) Access to eligible underground facilities
has part: 35(2) Access to eligible underground facilities
has part: 35(3) Access to eligible underground facilities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.33

35(1) Access to eligible underground facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-35-ss-1
part of: 35 Access to eligible underground facilities
note: Carrier must provide access to eligible underground facility upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.33
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(1) Access to eligible underground facilities
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier has a duty to provide access.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35(2) Access to eligible underground facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-35-ss-2
part of: 35 Access to eligible underground facilities
note: First carrier not required to comply with subclause (1) unless access is for the second carrier's installation or reasonable notice is given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.33
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(2) Access to eligible underground facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted to the second carrier.
premise text: (a) and (b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Access is provided for the sole purpose of enabling the second carrier to install a line used, or for use, in connection with the supply of a carriage service.
premise text: (a)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Second carrier gives reasonable notice that the second carrier requires the access.
premise text: (b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

35(3) Access to eligible underground facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-35-ss-3
part of: 35 Access to eligible underground facilities
note: Exemption from compliance with subclause (1) for eligible underground facilities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.33
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(3) Access to eligible underground facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Exemption from compliance with subclause (1) for eligible underground facilities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation application
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

36 Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
has part: 36(1) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 36(2) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 36(3) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 36(4) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 36(5) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 36(6) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 36(7) Terms and conditions of access
has part: 36(8) Terms and conditions of access
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.36

36(1) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-1
part of: 36 Terms and conditions of access
note: Carrier must comply with terms and conditions agreed upon by parties or determined by arbitrator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(1) Terms and conditions of access
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must comply with terms and conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(2) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-2
part of: 36 Terms and conditions of access
note: Carrier must comply with terms and conditions agreed upon by parties or determined by arbitrator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(2) Terms and conditions of access
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Arbitrator appointment is within a specific time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: Carrier must comply with terms and conditions for all carriers.
premise text: (i) Carrier 1
conclusion text: (ii) Carrier 2
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Terms and conditions are disseminated to all parties.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNIZES
logic summary: System recognizes terms and conditions as binding.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

36(3) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-3
part of: 36 Terms and conditions of access
note: Carrier must comply with terms and conditions agreed upon by parties or determined by arbitrator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(3) Terms and conditions of access
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must comply with terms and conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(4) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-4
part of: 36 Terms and conditions of access
note: Regulations may make provision for the conduct of an arbitration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(4) Terms and conditions of access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

36(5) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-5
part of: 36 Terms and conditions of access
note: ACCC may be constituted by a single member or specified number of members for a particular arbitration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-5-norm

36(6) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-6
part of: 36 Terms and conditions of access
note: No implication that subclause (4) is limited by subclause (5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-norm

36(7) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-7
part of: 36 Terms and conditions of access
note: Prevent arbitrators from making determinations that would prevent Telstra successors from complying with undertakings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents actions
premise text: Arbitrator must not make a determination
conclusion text: Determination would prevent Telstra successor from complying with undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for final migration plan
premise text: Section 36(7) defines terms and conditions of access
conclusion text: Determination would prevent Telstra successor from complying with undertaking if final migration plan is in force
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for designated Telstra successors
premise text: Section 36(7) defines terms and conditions of access
conclusion text: Arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if final migration plan is in force
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses obligations to designated Telstra successors
premise text: Section 36(7) defines terms and conditions of access
conclusion text: Arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if final migration plan is in force
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Identifies cognitive biases in arbitrators' decisions
premise text: Section 36(7) defines terms and conditions of access
conclusion text: Arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if final migration plan is in force
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(8) Terms and conditions of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-8
part of: 36 Terms and conditions of access
note: Determination under this clause has no effect to the extent it is inconsistent with an agreement in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(8) Terms and conditions of access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to consider agreements in writing
premise text: (8) If an agreement is in force and in writing;
conclusion text: Determination under this clause has no effect...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between clause and agreements
premise text: (8) If: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a), (2)(a) or (3)(a) is in force;
conclusion text: ...and the agreement is in writing.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Recurring trace for clause and agreements
premise text: (8) If: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a), (2)(a) or (3)(a) is in force;
conclusion text: ...and the agreement is in writing.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Clause diffuses into agreements
premise text: (8) If: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a), (2)(a) or (3)(a) is in force;
conclusion text: ...and the agreement is in writing.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Incorporates
logic summary: Clause incorporates agreements into its scope
premise text: (8) If: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a), (2)(a) or (3)(a) is in force;
conclusion text: ...and the agreement is in writing.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

37 Code relating to access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
has part: 37(1) Code relating to access
has part: 37(2) Code relating to access
has part: 37(3) Code relating to access
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.37

37(1) Code relating to access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-ss-1
part of: 37 Code relating to access
note: The ACCC may make a Code setting out conditions for access provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.37
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(2) Code relating to access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-ss-2
part of: 37 Code relating to access
note: Carrier must comply with the Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.37
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(2) Code relating to access
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(3) Code relating to access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37-ss-3
part of: 37 Code relating to access
note: Does not limit a power to make an instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.37
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not imply
logic summary: Limits a power
premise text: (3) This clause does not, by implication
conclusion text: limit a power conferred by or under this Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

38 Industry co-operation about sharing of sites and eligible
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
note: Carrier must co-operate with other carriers to share sites and eligible underground facilities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-38-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-38-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38 Industry co-operation about sharing of sites and eligible
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 This Part does not limit Part 3 of this Schedule
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
note: Does not limit Part 3 of this Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-39-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-39-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Limits Part 3
premise text: Does not limit
conclusion text: Part 3
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
note: Carriers must keep records, inspect facilities regularly, investigate and take remedial action.
description: Records, inspection reports, investigation findings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.39
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-40-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-40-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40 Simplified outline
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to perform actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Records relating to underground facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
has part: 41(1) Records relating to underground facilities
has part: 41(2) Records relating to underground facilities
has part: 41(3) Records relating to underground facilities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.39

41(1) Records relating to underground facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-41-ss-1
part of: 41 Records relating to underground facilities
note: Carrier must keep records of designated overhead lines.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.39
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(1) Records relating to underground facilities
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to keep records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41(2) Records relating to underground facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-41-ss-2
part of: 41 Records relating to underground facilities
note: Carrier must keep and maintain records of telecommunications towers.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.39
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(2) Records relating to underground facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to keep and maintain records.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41(3) Records relating to underground facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-41-ss-3
part of: 41 Records relating to underground facilities
note: Carrier must keep records of underground facilities
description: (a) the kind and location of those facilities; (b) if any of those facilities is an eligible underground facility— the capacity of that facility to hold further lines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.39
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(3) Records relating to underground facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier has a duty to keep records
conclusion text: (a) the kind and location of those facilities; (b) if any of those facilities is an eligible underground facility— the capacity of that facility to hold further lines.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between records and facilities
conclusion text: (a) the kind and location of those facilities; (b) if any of those facilities is an eligible underground facility— the capacity of that facility to hold further lines.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between records and facilities
conclusion text: (a) the kind and location of those facilities; (b) if any of those facilities is an eligible underground facility— the capacity of that facility to hold further lines.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Spread of records across time
conclusion text: (a) the kind and location of those facilities; (b) if any of those facilities is an eligible underground facility— the capacity of that facility to hold further lines.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-41-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application to records
conclusion text: (a) the kind and location of those facilities; (b) if any of those facilities is an eligible underground facility— the capacity of that facility to hold further lines.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Regular inspection of facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
has part: 42(1) Regular inspection of facilities
has part: 42(2) Regular inspection of facilities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40

42(1) Regular inspection of facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-ss-1
part of: 42 Regular inspection of facilities
note: Carrier must inspect facility regularly.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-42-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-42-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(1) Regular inspection of facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inspect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(2) Regular inspection of facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-ss-2
part of: 42 Regular inspection of facilities
note: Must regard good engineering practice when determining regularity of inspections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-42-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-42-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(2) Regular inspection of facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to regard good engineering practice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Prompt investigation of dangerous facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
note: Carrier must investigate facility condition if reasonable grounds exist.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-43-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-43-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 Prompt investigation of dangerous facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to investigate
premise text: Carrier owns or operates facility
conclusion text: Investigate facility condition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-43-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Investigation must occur within a reasonable timeframe
premise text: Carrier has reasonable grounds to suspect facility condition endangers health or safety
conclusion text: Investigation must be prompt
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Remedial action
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
has part: 44(1) Remedial action
has part: 44(2) Remedial action
has part: 44(3) Remedial action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.41

44(1) Remedial action
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-1
part of: 44 Remedial action
note: Carrier must take remedial action following inspection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.41
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(1) Remedial action
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to perform action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(2) Remedial action
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-2
part of: 44 Remedial action
note: Carrier must take remedial action following investigation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.41
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(2) Remedial action
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(3) Remedial action
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-3
part of: 44 Remedial action
note: Carrier must comply with remedial action as soon as practicable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.41
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(3) Remedial action
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must comply with remedial action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44A Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44a
note: Carrier must obtain designated interconnection service from carriage service provider.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44A Simplified outline
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-44a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must obtain designated interconnection service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
note: Defines terms for active declared service, designated interconnection service, and eligible service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-45-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-45-logic-descriptionlogic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-45-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines terms for active declared service
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Carriers must obtain designated interconnection services from
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
note: Carrier must obtain designated interconnection services from carriage service providers.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.43
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-46-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-46-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-46-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46 Carriers must obtain designated interconnection services from
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must obtain designated interconnection services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-46-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPartOf
logic summary: Carriage service providers' telecommunications networks are interconnected with carriers' telecommunications networks.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
has part: 47(1) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(2) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(3) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(4) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(5) Designated interconnection services
has part: 47(6) Designated interconnection services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44

47(1) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47-ss-1
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services
note: The Minister may declare a specified service as a designated interconnection service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-1-norm

47(2) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47-ss-2
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services
note: Declaration has effect accordingly.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: Declaration's effect
premise text: (2) A declaration under subclause (1)
conclusion text: has effect accordingly.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(3) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47-ss-3
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services
note: Request for ACCC report on proposed declaration promoting objective of any-to-any connectivity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to request ACCC report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(4) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47-ss-4
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services
note: Must provide report to Minister within 30 days
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide report to Minister within 30 days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(5) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47-ss-5
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services
note: Minister must consider ACCC's report and other relevant matters when deciding to make a declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(5) Designated interconnection services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to consider ACCC's report and other relevant matters.
premise text: The Minister must decide whether to make the declaration.
conclusion text: The Minister must have regard to the ACCC’s report and such other matters as the Minister considers relevant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Minister's consideration of ACCC's report is a temporal interval.
premise text: The Minister must have regard to the ACCC’s report.
conclusion text: The Minister considers the ACCC’s report between other relevant matters.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Minister's consideration of ACCC's report is a temporal interval with no lower bound.
premise text: The Minister must have regard to the ACCC’s report.
conclusion text: The Minister considers the ACCC’s report without any lower temporal limit.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Minister's decision-making process is a diffusion of information.
premise text: The Minister must decide whether to make the declaration.
conclusion text: The Minister’s decision-making process involves diffusing information about the ACCC’s report and other relevant matters.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-5-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Minister's consideration of ACCC's report is an argumentative process.
premise text: The Minister must have regard to the ACCC’s report.
conclusion text: The Minister uses the ACCC’s report as a basis for their decision-making process.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(6) Designated interconnection services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47-ss-6
part of: 47 Designated interconnection services
note: Declaration under subclause (1) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-47-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Legislative instrument
premise text: Declaration under subclause (1)
conclusion text: a legislative instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
note: Telstra must prepare a draft functional separation undertaking.
description: draft functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-68-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-68-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to prepare a draft functional separation undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
note: Definitions for the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-69-norm

1 April, 1 July or 1 October.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-2
note: Definitions for regulated service, retail business unit, and wholesale/network business unit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has meaning
logic summary: Regulated service definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Declared network services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
note: Declared network service definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-70-norm

71 Regulated services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
note: A regulated service is a declared service within the meaning of Part XIC of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-71-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-71-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71 Regulated services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Service is declared
premise text: Part XIC of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
conclusion text: Regulated service
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Notional contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
note: Treats notional contracts as actual contracts for purposes of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-72-norm

73 Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
has part: 73(1) Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
has part: 73(2) Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
has part: 73(3) Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.49

73(1) Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-73-ss-1
part of: 73 Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
note: Functional separation undertaking requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.49
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-73-ss-1-norm

73(2) Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-73-ss-2
part of: 73 Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
note: Defines how a final functional separation undertaking affects quarters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.49
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-73-ss-2-norm

73(3) Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-73-ss-3
part of: 73 Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
note: ACCC may perform functions or exercise powers in relation to the undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.49
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-73-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-73-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-73-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: ACCC may perform functions or exercise powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74 Functional separation principles
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74
has part: 74(1) Functional separation principles
has part: 74(2) Functional separation principles
has part: 74(3) Functional separation principles
has part: 74(4) Functional separation principles
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.50

74(1) Functional separation principles
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-ss-1
part of: 74 Functional separation principles
note: Maintain functional separation principles
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must maintain functional separation principles
premise text: (1) The functional separation principles are as follows:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Maintain arm's length functional separation between wholesale and retail business units
premise text: (c) the principle that Telstra should maintain arm’s length functional separation between:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Develop performance measures relating to compliance with a final functional separation undertaking
premise text: (iii) the development of performance measures relating to compliance with a final functional separation undertaking;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Conduct independent audit and other checks on compliance with a final functional separation undertaking
premise text: (iv) independent audit, and other checks, of compliance with a final functional separation undertaking;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Consult wholesale customers at the same time and in the same manner when consulting retail business units
premise text: (ii) proposed developments in connection with services supplied by Telstra’s wholesale/network business unit;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(2) Functional separation principles
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-ss-2
part of: 74 Functional separation principles
note: Must consider favourable terms and conditions when determining equivalence principle.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(2) Functional separation principles
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider favourable terms and conditions.
premise text: (2) In determining the principle of equivalence...
conclusion text: ...regard must be had to whether...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of equivalence principle.
premise text: (2) In determining the principle of equivalence...
conclusion text: ...regard must be had to whether...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(3) Functional separation principles
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-ss-3
part of: 74 Functional separation principles
note: Regard may be had to matters not limited by subclause (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-3-norm

74(4) Functional separation principles
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-ss-4
part of: 74 Functional separation principles
note: Clarifies that this clause does not affect the meaning of anything in Part 33.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: clarification
logic summary: Clarifies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75 Functional separation requirements determination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-75
has part: 75(1) Functional separation requirements determination
has part: 75(2) Functional separation requirements determination
has part: 75(3) Functional separation requirements determination
has part: 75(4) Functional separation requirements determination
has part: 75(4A) Functional separation requirements determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.51

75(1) Functional separation requirements determination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-75-ss-1
part of: 75 Functional separation requirements determination
note: Minister may make written determination specifying functional separation requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.51
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-75-ss-1-norm

75(2) Functional separation requirements determination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-75-ss-2
part of: 75 Functional separation requirements determination
note: Functional separation requirements determination may deal with the manner in which functional separation principles are to be implemented.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.51
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-75-ss-2-norm

75(3) Functional separation requirements determination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-75-ss-3
part of: 75 Functional separation requirements determination
note: Determines manner of meeting requirement set out in paragraph 73(1)(b) or (c)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.51
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-75-ss-3-norm

75(4) Functional separation requirements determination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-75-ss-4
part of: 75 Functional separation requirements determination
note: Functional separation requirements determination does not limit subclause (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.51
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-75-ss-4-norm

75(4A) Functional separation requirements determination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-75-ss-4a
part of: 75 Functional separation requirements determination
note: Minister must publish notice on website before making or varying functional separation requirements determination.
description: Notice setting out determination or variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.51
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-75-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-75-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-75-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75(4A) Functional separation requirements determination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-75-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76
has part: 76(1) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
has part: 76(2) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
has part: 76(3) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
has part: 76(4) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56

76(1) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-ss-1
part of: 76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
note: Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister within 90 days or a longer period specified in an instrument.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Telstra has an obligation to provide a draft functional separation undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(2) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-ss-2
part of: 76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
note: Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(3) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-ss-3
part of: 76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
note: Minister may specify a period for purposes of paragraph (1)(b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to specify a period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(4) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-ss-4
part of: 76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
note: Minister must not specify period under subclause (3) unless Telstra satisfies certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to specify period under subclause (3)
premise text: Telstra has given the ACCC an undertaking under section 577A
conclusion text: Minister must not specify period under subclause (3) unless Telstra satisfies certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Periods overlap with specified events
premise text: that decision is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of one or more specified events within a specified period
conclusion text: Periods overlap with specified events
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Minister has permission to specify period under subclause (3)
premise text: Telstra satisfies the Minister that Telstra is preparing an undertaking under section 577A
conclusion text: Minister has permission to specify period under subclause (3) unless Telstra satisfies certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: ACCC has an obligation to decide on undertaking
premise text: the ACCC has not decided whether to accept the undertaking
conclusion text: ACCC has an obligation to decide on undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to specify period under subclause (3)
premise text: the ACCC has decided to accept the undertaking
conclusion text: Minister has an obligation to specify period under subclause (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77
has part: 77(1) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
has part: 77(2) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
has part: 77(3) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59

77(1) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-ss-1
part of: 77 Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
note: Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-77-ss-1-norm

77(2) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-ss-2
part of: 77 Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
note: The Minister must approve or vary the original undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-77-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve or vary the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(3) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-ss-3
part of: 77 Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
note: Minister must publish notice and consider submissions before making decision.
description: Notice and submissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.59
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-77-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-77-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(3) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must perform action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Time limit for making an approval decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78
has part: 78(1) Time limit for making an approval decision
has part: 78(2) Time limit for making an approval decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61

78(1) Time limit for making an approval decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-ss-1
part of: 78 Time limit for making an approval decision
note: Defines time limit for making an approval decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-78-ss-1-norm

78(2) Time limit for making an approval decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-ss-2
part of: 78 Time limit for making an approval decision
note: Must make a decision within 6 months
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make a decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79 Effect of approval
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-79
has part: 79(1) Effect of approval
has part: 79(2) Effect of approval
has part: 79(3) Effect of approval
has part: 79(4) Effect of approval
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61

79(1) Effect of approval
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-79-ss-1
part of: 79 Effect of approval
note: Minister must approve draft functional separation undertaking for it to become final.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-79-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-79-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79(1) Effect of approval
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister's approval is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79(2) Effect of approval
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-79-ss-2
part of: 79 Effect of approval
note: Final functional separation undertaking comes into force on a specific day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-79-ss-2-norm

79(3) Effect of approval
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-79-ss-3
part of: 79 Effect of approval
note: No withdrawal of final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-79-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Cannot withdraw
premise text: (3) A final functional separation undertaking may not be withdrawn.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79(4) Effect of approval
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-79-ss-4
part of: 79 Effect of approval
note: Final functional separation undertaking is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.61
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-79-ss-4-norm

80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80
has part: 80(1) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(2) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(3) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(4) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(5) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(6) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(7) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(8) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(9) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(10) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62

80(1) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-1
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking
note: Variation of final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-1-norm

80(2) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-2
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking
note: Variation of final functional separation undertaking may be requested or initiated by the Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(3) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-3
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking
note: Duty to consider variation of final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consider variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(4) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-4
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking
note: Publish notice and invite submissions before varying final functional separation undertaking.
description: Notice, submissions, advice from ACCC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice and invite submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: > 14 DAYS
logic summary: Submissions must be made within 14 days after notice publication
premise text: (a) cause to be published on the Department’s website a notice: (i) setting out the proposed variation; and (ii) inviting persons to make submissions to the Minister about the proposed variation within 14 days after the notice is published;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must consider submissions received within 14-day period
premise text: (d) consider any submissions received within the 14-day period mentioned in paragraph (a);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must ask ACCC for advice on proposed variation
premise text: (e) ask the ACCC to give advice to the Minister, within 44 days after the notice is published,
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must have regard to advice given by ACCC
premise text: (f) have regard to any advice given by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(5) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-5
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking
note: Minor variation of final functional separation undertaking is exempt from subclause (4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-5-norm

80(6) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-6
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking
note: Must provide notice and consider submissions from Telstra before making a proposed variation.
description: Notice and submissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(6) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice and consider submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(7) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-7
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking
note: Minister may ask ACCC for additional advice on a matter arising under this clause.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-7-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(7) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

80(8) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-8
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking
note: Notify Telstra of variation in final functional separation undertaking
description: Notification to Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
conclusion text: The Minister must notify Telstra
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: STARTS AT
logic summary: Temporal interval for notification
premise text: (8) As soon as practicable after varying a final functional separation undertaking, the Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the variation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Consequence of variation notification
premise text: (8) As soon as practicable after varying a final functional separation undertaking, the Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the variation.
conclusion text: When variation comes into force
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: DISTRIBUTES
logic summary: Notification dissemination
premise text: (8) As soon as practicable after varying a final functional separation undertaking, the Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the variation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
logic summary: Cognitive requirement for notification
premise text: (8) As soon as practicable after varying a final functional separation undertaking, the Minister must notify Telstra in writing of the variation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(9) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-9
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking
note: Variation of final functional separation undertaking comes into force on the day after notice is given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the effect of variation on final functional separation undertaking
premise text: (9) A variation of a final functional separation undertaking comes into force on the day after notice is given to Telstra in accordance with subclause (8)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between variation and final functional separation undertaking
premise text: (9) A variation of a final functional separation undertaking comes into force on the day after notice is given to Telstra in accordance with subclause (8)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between variation and final functional separation undertaking
premise text: (9) A variation of a final functional separation undertaking comes into force on the day after notice is given to Telstra in accordance with subclause (8)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes propagation of variation to final functional separation undertaking
premise text: (9) A variation of a final functional separation undertaking comes into force on the day after notice is given to Telstra in accordance with subclause (8)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes application of variation to final functional separation undertaking
premise text: (9) A variation of a final functional separation undertaking comes into force on the day after notice is given to Telstra in accordance with subclause (8)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(10) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-10
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking
note: A variation of a final functional separation undertaking is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.62
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-10-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-80-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits variation of final functional separation undertaking as a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81 Publication of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-81
has part: 81(1) Publication of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 81(2) Publication of final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64

81(1) Publication of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-81-ss-1
part of: 81 Publication of final functional separation undertaking
note: Make a copy of the final functional separation undertaking available on Telstra’s website.
description: Copy of the final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-81-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make a copy available
conclusion text: Telstra must make a copy of the undertaking available.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81(2) Publication of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-81-ss-2
part of: 81 Publication of final functional separation undertaking
note: Make a copy of the varied final functional separation undertaking available on Telstra’s website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-81-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-82
has part: 82(1) Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
has part: 82(2) Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64

82(1) Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-82-ss-1
part of: 82 Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
note: Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-82-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(2) Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-82-ss-2
part of: 82 Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
note: Exemption from compliance with final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-82-ss-2-norm

83 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-83
note: Telstra must provide undertakings about structural separation, hybrid fibre-coaxial networks, and subscription television broadcasting licences.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.65
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-83-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-83-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Imposes a duty on Telstra.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-84
has part: 84(1) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
has part: 84(2) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
has part: 84(3) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66

84(1) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-84-ss-1
part of: 84 Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
note: Telstra must not exercise control of the licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Prevents
logic summary: Prevents Telstra from exercising control over the licence
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Prevents
logic summary: Prevents Telstra from exercising control over the licence for all time
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Prevents
logic summary: Prevents Telstra from exercising control over the licence for all time
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Classification of spectrum licences
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

84(2) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-84-ss-2
part of: 84 Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
note: Exemption from control by Telstra for certain undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84(3) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-84-ss-3
part of: 84 Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
note: Telstra must give ACCC a draft migration plan under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Obligation to provide a draft migration plan.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Draft migration plan is given between Telstra and ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85 Use by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-85
has part: 85(1) Use by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
has part: 85(2) Use by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.67

85(1) Use by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-85-ss-1
part of: 85 Use by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
note: Telstra must not supply a carriage service using a radiocommunications device.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.67
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-85-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85(2) Use by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-85-ss-2
part of: 85 Use by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
note: Exemption from rule for Telstra undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.67
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-85-ss-2-norm

86 Associate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-86
has part: 86(1) Associate
has part: 86(2) Associate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.69

86(1) Associate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-86-ss-1
part of: 86 Associate
note: Definition of associate for control of spectrum licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.69
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of associate for control of spectrum licence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(2) Associate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-86-ss-2
part of: 86 Associate
note: Persons are not associates if they do not act together in relevant dealings and cannot exert influence over each other's business dealings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.69
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-ltl-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of association
premise text: (a) they do not act together in any relevant dealings relating to the spectrum licence
conclusion text: they are not associates
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of ability to exert influence
premise text: (b) neither of them is in a position to exert influence over the business dealings of the other in relation to the spectrum licence
conclusion text: neither can exert influence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of acting together
premise text: (a) they do not act together in any relevant dealings relating to the spectrum licence
conclusion text: they do not act together
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: disjointness
logic summary: Temporal intervals of acting together and influencing are disjoint
premise text: (a) they do not act together in any relevant dealings relating to the spectrum licence
conclusion text: their temporal intervals are disjoint
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: disjointness
logic summary: Temporal intervals of acting together and influencing are disjoint
premise text: (a) they do not act together in any relevant dealings relating to the spectrum licence
conclusion text: their temporal intervals are disjoint
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87 Control
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-87
note: Control includes control as a result of, or by means of, trusts, agreements, arrangements, understandings and practices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-87-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-87-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-87-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87 Control
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-87-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclass relation
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88 When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-88
has part: 88(1) When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
has part: 88(2) When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
has part: 88(3) When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70

88(1) When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-88-ss-1
part of: 88 When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
note: Telstra cannot exercise control of a spectrum licence without meeting the specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Telstra's control of a spectrum licence is prohibited without meeting the specified conditions.
premise text: Telstra must meet the specified conditions to exercise control of a spectrum licence.
conclusion text: If Telstra does not meet the specified conditions, it cannot exercise control of a spectrum licence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The key overlaps with other keys that describe the temporal intervals related to the exercise of control of a spectrum licence.
premise text: The key is related to the temporal intervals related to the exercise of control of a spectrum licence.
conclusion text: The key overlaps with other keys that describe the temporal intervals related to the exercise of control of a spectrum licence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Next
logic summary: The key is next in the sequence of keys that describe the conditions for exercising control of a spectrum licence.
premise text: The key is related to the sequence of keys that describe the conditions for exercising control of a spectrum licence.
conclusion text: The key is next in the sequence of keys that describe the conditions for exercising control of a spectrum licence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Contains
logic summary: The key contains other keys that describe the diffusion of information related to the exercise of control of a spectrum licence.
premise text: The key is related to the diffusion of information related to the exercise of control of a spectrum licence.
conclusion text: The key contains other keys that describe the diffusion of information related to the exercise of control of a spectrum licence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: The key implies other keys that describe the argumentation related to the exercise of control of a spectrum licence.
premise text: The key is related to the argumentation related to the exercise of control of a spectrum licence.
conclusion text: The key implies other keys that describe the argumentation related to the exercise of control of a spectrum licence.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(2) When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-88-ss-2
part of: 88 When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
note: An employee of a licensee cannot be regarded as in control of a spectrum licence solely because of being an employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(2) When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot be regarded as in control solely because of being an employee.
premise text: Being an employee
conclusion text: Not in a position to exercise control
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Control is not exercised during employment.
premise text: Employment
conclusion text: No control exercised
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(3) When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-88-ss-3
part of: 88 When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
note: Multiple persons can exercise control of a spectrum licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-1-sec-88-ss-3-norm

1 Compliance with this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
has part: 1(1) Compliance with this Act
has part: 1(2) Compliance with this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.72

1(1) Compliance with this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-ss-1
part of: 1 Compliance with this Act
note: Service provider must comply with the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1(1) Compliance with this Act
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1(2) Compliance with this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-ss-2
part of: 1 Compliance with this Act
note: Inclusion of related Acts and regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1(2) Compliance with this Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999
conclusion text: Schedule 2
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-1-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Chapter 5 of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979
conclusion text: Telecommunications Act 1997
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Operator services must be provided to end-users of standard telephone services.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Simplified outline
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide operator services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Scope of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: Scope of Part applies to specified operator services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Scope of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Scope applies to specified operator services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Operator services must be provided to end-users of a standard
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
has part: 4(1) Operator services must be provided to end-users of a standard
has part: 4(2) Operator services must be provided to end-users of a standard
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73

4(1) Operator services must be provided to end-users of a standard
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4-ss-1
part of: 4 Operator services must be provided to end-users of a standard
note: Carriage service provider must provide operator services to end-users of a standard telephone service.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4(1) Operator services must be provided to end-users of a standard
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(2) Operator services must be provided to end-users of a standard
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4-ss-2
part of: 4 Operator services must be provided to end-users of a standard
note: Provider may arrange for provision of operator services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-4-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-4-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 4(2) Operator services must be provided to end-users of a standard
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

5 Access to end-users of other carriage service providers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: Carriage service provider must provide operator services to end-users of its standard telephone service.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.73
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Access to end-users of other carriage service providers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide operator services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Operator services are a type of standard telephone service.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
note: Must provide directory assistance services to end-users of standard telephone services.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.75
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Simplified outline
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty to provide directory assistance services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Directory assistance services must be provided to end-users
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
has part: 7(1) Directory assistance services must be provided to end-users
has part: 7(2) Directory assistance services must be provided to end-users
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.75

7(1) Directory assistance services must be provided to end-users
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7-ss-1
part of: 7 Directory assistance services must be provided to end-users
note: Carriage service provider must provide directory assistance services to end-users.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.75
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(1) Directory assistance services must be provided to end-users
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(2) Directory assistance services must be provided to end-users
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7-ss-2
part of: 7 Directory assistance services must be provided to end-users
note: Provider must provide directory assistance services to end-users.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.75
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-7-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(2) Directory assistance services must be provided to end-users
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Access by end-users of other carriage service providers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
note: First provider must comply with request from second provider to provide directory assistance services.
description: directory assistance services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.75
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 Access by end-users of other carriage service providers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
note: Carriage service providers must provide information to a person or association under an obligation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.77
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
premise text: Carriage service providers have an obligation to provide information.
conclusion text: They must provide the required information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Information must be provided at any time after the obligation begins
premise text: The obligation to provide information begins at some point in the future.
conclusion text: Information must be provided at least as soon as the obligation begins.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Providing information implies fulfilling the obligation
premise text: Providing information is a necessary condition for fulfilling the obligation.
conclusion text: Fulfilling the obligation requires providing the required information.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-SPREAD-TO
logic summary: Information spreads to all relevant parties
premise text: The information is disseminated to all relevant individuals or organizations.
conclusion text: The information is spread to all relevant parties.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-9-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Carriage service providers are intelligent agents
premise text: Carriage service providers have the capacity for intelligent action.
conclusion text: They are intelligent agents capable of providing information.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
has part: 10(1) Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra
has part: 10(2) Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra
has part: 10(3) Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.77

10(1) Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-ss-1
part of: 10 Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra
note: Must provide information to Telstra if a carrier licence condition applies.
description: Information about integrated public number database
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.77
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(2) Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-ss-2
part of: 10 Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra
note: Must provide information to Telstra upon request.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.77
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the timing of the obligation
premise text: (2) If: ... (a) and (b)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

10(3) Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-ss-3
part of: 10 Carriage service providers must give information to Telstra
note: Must provide public number information to Telstra
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.77
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide public number information to Telstra
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-10-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has the same meaning as
logic summary: Number has the same meaning as in Division 2 of Part 22
premise text: Division 2 of Part 22
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Carriage service providers must give information to another
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
has part: 11(1) Carriage service providers must give information to another
has part: 11(2) Carriage service providers must give information to another
has part: 11(3) Carriage service providers must give information to another
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78

11(1) Carriage service providers must give information to another
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-ss-1
part of: 11 Carriage service providers must give information to another
note: Must provide information to another
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(2) Carriage service providers must give information to another
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-ss-2
part of: 11 Carriage service providers must give information to another
note: Must provide information to end-user with public number
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(3) Carriage service providers must give information to another
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-ss-3
part of: 11 Carriage service providers must give information to another
note: Carriage service providers must give information to another
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.78
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(3) Carriage service providers must give information to another
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has the same meaning as
logic summary: Define number and public number
premise text: Division 2 of Part 22
conclusion text: number
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
note: Carriage service provider must provide itemised billing.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.79
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-12-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Simplified outline
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide itemised billing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Itemised billing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
has part: 13(1) Itemised billing
has part: 13(2) Itemised billing
has part: 13(3) Itemised billing
has part: 13(4) Itemised billing
has part: 13(5) Itemised billing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.79

13(1) Itemised billing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-ss-1
part of: 13 Itemised billing
note: Must provide itemised billing for standard telephone services
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.79
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Obligation to provide itemised billing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13(2) Itemised billing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-ss-2
part of: 13 Itemised billing
note: Provider must provide itemised billing.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.79
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide itemised billing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13(3) Itemised billing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-ss-3
part of: 13 Itemised billing
note: Customer can opt out of itemised billing for calls made using a particular service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.79
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OptOut
logic summary: Customer's choice is binding.
premise text: Customer chooses not to have itemised billing.
conclusion text: Itemised billing for calls made using that service is not required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalRange
logic summary: Temporal range for itemised billing.
premise text: Calls made after opt-out.
conclusion text: Itemised billing is not required before opt-out.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13(4) Itemised billing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-ss-4
part of: 13 Itemised billing
note: Customer can request itemised billing for designated local calls.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.79
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13(5) Itemised billing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-ss-5
part of: 13 Itemised billing
note: Definition of designated local call for standard telephone service provider
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.79
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13(5) Itemised billing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of designated local call for standard telephone service provider
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-13-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
has part: 14(1) Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
has part: 14(2) Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
has part: 14(3) Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.81

14(1) Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-ss-1
part of: 14 Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
note: Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.81
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-14-ss-1-norm

14(2) Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-ss-2
part of: 14 Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
note: Consider technical feasibility and plans for itemised billing when deciding exemptions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.81
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-14-ss-2-norm

14(3) Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-ss-3
part of: 14 Exemptions from itemised billing requirements
note: ACMA may have regard for matters beyond the scope of itemised billing requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.81
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-14-ss-3-norm

15 Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
has part: 15(1) Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
has part: 15(2) Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
has part: 15(3) Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.81

15(1) Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15-ss-1
part of: 15 Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
note: Carriage service providers must not show specified details in an itemised bill.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.81
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(1) Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of showing specified details in an itemised bill.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(2) Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15-ss-2
part of: 15 Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
note: Must have regard to Australian Privacy Principles
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.81
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE REGARD TO
logic summary: Obligation to consider Australian Privacy Principles
premise text: (2) In making a determination under subclause (1), the ACMA must have regard to the Australian Privacy Principles.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of Australian Privacy Principles
premise text: (2) In making a determination under subclause (1), the ACMA must have regard to the Australian Privacy Principles.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of Australian Privacy Principles
premise text: (2) In making a determination under subclause (1), the ACMA must have regard to the Australian Privacy Principles.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: NOT BY IMPLICATION LIMITS
logic summary: Obligation not limited by implication
premise text: (2) In making a determination under subclause (1), the ACMA must have regard to the Australian Privacy Principles.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15(3) Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15-ss-3
part of: 15 Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
note: Carriage service provider must comply with a determination under subclause (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.81
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-3-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-15-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(3) Details that are not to be specified in an itemised bill
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

16 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
note: Must inform prospective residential customer about priority assistance
description: Informing prospective residential customer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.82
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-16-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must inform prospective residential customer about priority assistance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Priority assistance industry code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
note: Defines priority assistance industry code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.82
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-17-norm

18 Compliance with the priority assistance industry code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
note: Compliance with priority assistance industry code is mandatory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-18-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Compliance with the priority assistance industry code
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
has part: 19(1) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
has part: 19(2) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
has part: 19(3) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83

19(1) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-1
part of: 19 Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
note: Carriage service provider must offer priority assistance if requested by prospective residential customer.
description: Priority assistance in connection with the supply of a standard telephone service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(1) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST-OFFER
logic summary: Must offer priority assistance
premise text: (a) the provider receives an inquiry from a prospective residential customer about the supply of a standard telephone service; and (b) the provider does not offer priority assistance in connection with the service.
conclusion text: The carriage service provider MUST offer priority assistance in connection with the supply of a standard telephone service if the prospective residential customer requests it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(2) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-2
part of: 19 Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
note: Provider must inform prospective residential customer of priority assistance options.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(2) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Provider must inform prospective residential customer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(3) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-3
part of: 19 Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
note: Definition of priority assistance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines term
conclusion text: priority assistance has the same meaning as in the priority assistance industry code.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Requirements for Telstra Limited and Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
note: No requirement imposed on Telstra Limited if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.83
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-2-sec-20-norm

1 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
note: Carrier may enter land and exercise certain powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.85
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Simplified outline
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Carrier has permission to enter land.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
note: Defines terms used in the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.87
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-2-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Definitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for defined terms
premise text: Definitions are used throughout the Act
conclusion text: Terms must be defined in a hierarchical manner
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Obligation to define terms
premise text: The Act requires definitions for certain terms
conclusion text: Definitions are mandatory
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Designated overhead line
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
note: Definition of designated overhead line
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Designated overhead line
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of designated overhead line
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: Line is suspended above the surface of land or water
conclusion text: Line has temporal relation to land or water
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
has part: 4(1) Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
has part: 4(2) Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
has part: 4(3) Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.90

4(1) Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-ss-1
part of: 4 Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
note: Extension to a tower is treated as the installation of a facility.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4(1) Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If a tower is a facility, then its extension is treated as the installation of a facility.
premise text: (a) a tower is a facility; and (b) the tower is, or is to be, extended;
conclusion text: (c) the carrying out of the extension is to be treated as the carrying out of the installation of the facility;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: The extension includes the installation of a facility.
premise text: (a) a tower is a facility; and (b) the tower is, or is to be, extended;
conclusion text: (c) the carrying out of the extension is to be treated as the carrying out of the installation of the facility;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: The extension includes a trace that starts at the installation of a facility.
premise text: (a) a tower is a facility; and (b) the tower is, or is to be, extended;
conclusion text: (c) the carrying out of the extension is to be treated as the carrying out of the installation of the facility;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: The extension includes a diffusion that starts at the installation of a facility.
premise text: (a) a tower is a facility; and (b) the tower is, or is to be, extended;
conclusion text: (c) the carrying out of the extension is to be treated as the carrying out of the installation of the facility;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
logic summary: The extension includes a cognitive process that starts at the installation of a facility.
premise text: (a) a tower is a facility; and (b) the tower is, or is to be, extended;
conclusion text: (c) the carrying out of the extension is to be treated as the carrying out of the installation of the facility;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(2) Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-ss-2
part of: 4 Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
note: Avoids doubt about what a tower includes in the context of this clause.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-2-norm

4(3) Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-ss-3
part of: 4 Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
note: Tower must be treated as facility installation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4(3) Extension to a tower to be treated as the installation of a facility
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Must treat tower as facility installation
premise text: Tower is defined
conclusion text: Obligation to treat tower as facility installation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-4-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of tower
premise text: Tower is a tower, pole or mast
conclusion text: Definition of tower
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Inspection of land
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
has part: 5(1) Inspection of land
has part: 5(2) Inspection of land
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.91

5(1) Inspection of land
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5-ss-1
part of: 5 Inspection of land
note: Carrier may inspect and alter land for its purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.91
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 5(1) Inspection of land
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Carrier has permission to inspect and alter land.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5(2) Inspection of land
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5-ss-2
part of: 5 Inspection of land
note: Carrier may enter land and perform actions necessary for surveying or obtaining information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.91
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-5-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-5-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 5(2) Inspection of land
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Carrier is permitted to enter land and perform actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Installation of facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
has part: 6(1) Installation of facilities
has part: 6(2) Installation of facilities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.93

6(1) Installation of facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6-ss-1
part of: 6 Installation of facilities
note: Carrier may install facility under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.93
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to install facility
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(2) Installation of facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6-ss-2
part of: 6 Installation of facilities
note: Carrier's permission to enter and occupy land for carrying out activity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.93
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2) Installation of facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Carrier is permitted to enter and occupy land
premise text: (2) If subclause (1) authorises a carrier...
conclusion text: The carrier may, for purposes in connection with the carrying out of that activity:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Carrier's activities overlap with land occupation
premise text: (2) If subclause (1) authorises a carrier...
conclusion text: The carrier may, for purposes in connection with the carrying out of that activity:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Carrier's activities are recurring on land
premise text: (2) If subclause (1) authorises a carrier...
conclusion text: The carrier may, for purposes in connection with the carrying out of that activity:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: EntityRelationship
logic summary: Carrier and land are related entities
premise text: (2) If subclause (1) authorises a carrier...
conclusion text: The carrier may, for purposes in connection with the carrying out of that activity:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-6-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validates
logic summary: Carrier's activities are validated by land occupation
premise text: (2) If subclause (1) authorises a carrier...
conclusion text: The carrier may, for purposes in connection with the carrying out of that activity:
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

7 Maintenance of facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
has part: 7(1) Maintenance of facilities
has part: 7(2) Maintenance of facilities
has part: 7(3) Maintenance of facilities
has part: 7(3A) Maintenance of facilities
has part: 7(4) Maintenance of facilities
has part: 7(5) Maintenance of facilities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98

7(1) Maintenance of facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7-ss-1
part of: 7 Maintenance of facilities
note: Carrier must maintain facility at any time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(1) Maintenance of facilities
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to maintain facility
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(2) Maintenance of facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7-ss-2
part of: 7 Maintenance of facilities
note: Carrier may enter on and occupy land, remove or erect a gate in any fence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(2) Maintenance of facilities
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Carrier can enter on and occupy land.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Carrier can enter on land during exercise of powers.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(3) Maintenance of facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7-ss-3
part of: 7 Maintenance of facilities
note: Maintenance of facilities includes alteration, removal, repair, provisioning, ensuring proper functioning, replacement, and installation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(3) Maintenance of facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes a range of maintenance activities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclause
logic summary: Subclauses (5) and (6) specify conditions for replacement and installation.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(3A) Maintenance of facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7-ss-3a
part of: 7 Maintenance of facilities
note: Temporary facility installation conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3a-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies conditions for temporary facility installation
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-3a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Describes the purpose of temporary facility installation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(4) Maintenance of facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7-ss-4
part of: 7 Maintenance of facilities
note: Clarifies the meaning of 'tower' in clause 4.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-4-norm

7(5) Maintenance of facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7-ss-5
part of: 7 Maintenance of facilities
note: Conditions for replacement facility noise levels
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(5) Maintenance of facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Conditions for replacement facility noise levels
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-7-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval comparison
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Carrier to do as little damage as practicable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
note: Carrier must take reasonable steps to minimize damage and inconvenience.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 Carrier to do as little damage as practicable
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to take reasonable steps.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8A Carrier to remove temporary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8a
has part: 8A(1) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
has part: 8A(2) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
has part: 8A(3) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
has part: 8A(4) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
has part: 8A(5) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
has part: 8A(6) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
has part: 8A(7) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102

8A(1) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8a-ss-1
part of: 8A Carrier to remove temporary facilities
note: Carrier must remove temporary facilities within 28 days after completion of maintenance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8A(1) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to remove facilities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8A(2) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2
part of: 8A Carrier to remove temporary facilities
note: Carrier must remove temporary facilities within 28 days after completion of replacement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8A(2) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to remove facilities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Facility removal must occur within a specific time frame
premise text: (2) If: (a) a carrier installs a low-impact facility under Division 3; and (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(c);
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: within
logic summary: Facility removal must occur within a specific time frame
premise text: (2) If: (a) a carrier installs a low-impact facility under Division 3; and (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(c);
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: mustBeRemoved
logic summary: Facility removal must occur after a specific event (replacement completion)
premise text: (2) If: (a) a carrier installs a low-impact facility under Division 3; and (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(c);
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: mustBeRemoved
logic summary: Facility removal must occur after a specific event (replacement completion)
premise text: (2) If: (a) a carrier installs a low-impact facility under Division 3; and (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(c);
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8A(3) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8a-ss-3
part of: 8A Carrier to remove temporary facilities
note: Carrier must remove temporary facilities within 28 days after the end of an event.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8A(3) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to remove facilities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8A(4) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8a-ss-4
part of: 8A Carrier to remove temporary facilities
note: Carrier must remove temporary facilities within 28 days after the end of events mentioned in paragraph 6(5)(e).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8A(4) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must remove temporary facilities.
premise text: (4) If...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Removal must occur within 28 days after the end of events mentioned in paragraph 6(5)(e).
premise text: (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(e);
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: =>
logic summary: Removal of temporary facility is conditional on events mentioned in paragraph 6(5)(e).
premise text: (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(e);
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8A(5) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5
part of: 8A Carrier to remove temporary facilities
note: Carrier must remove temporary facilities within 28 days after ceasing to be needed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8A(5) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must remove temporary facilities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Facility ceases to be needed within 28 days.
premise text: (5) If: (a) a carrier installs a low-impact facility under Division 3; and (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(g);
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: =>
logic summary: Carrier must remove temporary facilities if conditions are met.
premise text: (5) If: (a) a carrier installs a low-impact facility under Division 3; and (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(g);
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF
logic summary: Facility removal depends on emergency services organisations' needs.
premise text: (5) If: (a) a carrier installs a low-impact facility under Division 3; and (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(g);
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-5-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Carrier's obligation to remove temporary facilities.
premise text: (5) If: (a) a carrier installs a low-impact facility under Division 3; and (b) the installation is covered by paragraph 6(5)(g);
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8A(6) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6
part of: 8A Carrier to remove temporary facilities
note: Carrier must remove temporary facilities within 28 days after completion of maintenance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8A(6) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to remove facilities
premise text: (6) If...
conclusion text: ...the carrier must remove the facility within 28 days...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Temporal interval for removal of facilities
premise text: (6) If...
conclusion text: ...within 28 days after the completion of the maintenance mentioned in paragraph 7(3A)(a).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLICATION
logic summary: Implication of installation on removal
premise text: (6) If a carrier installs a facility under Division 4;
conclusion text: ...the carrier must remove the facility within 28 days...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: INFLUENCE
logic summary: Influence of maintenance on removal
premise text: (6) If the installation is covered by subclause 7(3A);
conclusion text: ...the carrier must remove the facility within 28 days...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNITION
logic summary: Recognition of obligation
premise text: (6) If a carrier installs a facility under Division 4;
conclusion text: ...the carrier must remove the facility within 28 days...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8A(7) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8a-ss-7
part of: 8A Carrier to remove temporary facilities
note: Carrier must remove temporary facilities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8A(7) Carrier to remove temporary facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to remove temporary facilities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8B Low-impact facility installed at or near a venue—annual limit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8b
has part: 8B(1) Low-impact facility installed at or near a venue—annual limit
has part: 8B(2) Low-impact facility installed at or near a venue—annual limit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.103

8B(1) Low-impact facility installed at or near a venue—annual limit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8b-ss-1
part of: 8B Low-impact facility installed at or near a venue—annual limit
note: Annual limit for low-impact facilities installed at or near a venue
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.103
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8B(1) Low-impact facility installed at or near a venue—annual limit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure annual limit
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: Total days ≤ 183
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8B(2) Low-impact facility installed at or near a venue—annual limit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2
part of: 8B Low-impact facility installed at or near a venue—annual limit
note: Defines low-impact facility for purposes of the clause.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.103
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this clause, low-impact facilities has the same meaning as in clause 6.
conclusion text: Clause 6
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this clause, low-impact facilities has the same meaning as in clause 6.
conclusion text: Clause 6
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this clause, low-impact facilities has the same meaning as in clause 6.
conclusion text: Clause 6
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a concept with a specific meaning
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this clause, low-impact facilities has the same meaning as in clause 6.
conclusion text: Clause 6
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8b-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a concept with a specific meaning
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this clause, low-impact facilities has the same meaning as in clause 6.
conclusion text: Clause 6
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8C Low-impact facility installed to provide additional capacity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8c
note: Annual limit for installing low-impact facilities during high-demand holiday periods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.103
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8C Low-impact facility installed to provide additional capacity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-8c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Imposes a duty on carriers to install low-impact facilities during high-demand holiday periods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Carrier to restore land—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
has part: 9(1) Carrier to restore land—general
has part: 9(2) Carrier to restore land—general
has part: 9(3) Carrier to restore land—general
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104

9(1) Carrier to restore land—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9-ss-1
part of: 9 Carrier to restore land—general
note: Carrier must restore land to its original condition after engaging in an activity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(1) Carrier to restore land—general
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier has a moral obligation to restore land.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(2) Carrier to restore land—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9-ss-2
part of: 9 Carrier to restore land—general
note: Carrier must take reasonable steps to restore land within 10 business days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(2) Carrier to restore land—general
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to restore land within 10 business days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(3) Carrier to restore land—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9-ss-3
part of: 9 Carrier to restore land—general
note: Carrier may delay restoration of land by up to 10 business days with owner's or occupier's consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(3) Carrier to restore land—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: Carrier agrees with owner or occupier
conclusion text: Restoration may be delayed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9A Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9a
has part: 9A(1) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
has part: 9A(2) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
has part: 9A(3) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
has part: 9A(4) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
has part: 9A(5) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
has part: 9A(6) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104

9A(1) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9a-ss-1
part of: 9A Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
note: Carrier must restore land to its original condition after removing a low-impact facility.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9A(1) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier has an obligation to restore land.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9A(2) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2
part of: 9A Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
note: Carrier must restore land to its original condition after removing a facility.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9A(2) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier has an obligation to restore land.
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: ...the carrier must take all reasonable steps...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Condition after restoration must be greater than or equal to the condition before installation.
premise text: (a) a carrier installs a facility under Division 4 on particular land;
conclusion text: ...the land is restored to a condition that is similar to its condition before...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Condition after restoration must be greater than or equal to the condition before installation.
premise text: (a) a carrier installs a facility under Division 4 on particular land;
conclusion text: ...the land is restored to a condition that is similar to its condition before...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: RESTORE
logic summary: Carrier must restore land.
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: ...the carrier must take all reasonable steps...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9A(3) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3
part of: 9A Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
note: Carrier must restore land within 10 business days after removal of temporary facilities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9A(3) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to restore land
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal relationship between removal and restoration
premise text: (3) If the installation of the facility is covered by paragraph 6(5)(b), (c), (d), (e), (f) or (g),
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
logic summary: Restoration implies removal of temporary facilities
premise text: (3) If the installation of the facility is covered by paragraph 6(5)(b), (c), (d), (e), (f) or (g),
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must take all reasonable steps to ensure restoration begins within 10 business days
premise text: (3) If the installation of the facility is covered by paragraph 6(5)(b), (c), (d), (e), (f) or (g),
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9A(4) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9a-ss-4
part of: 9A Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
note: Restore land within 10 business days after removal of facility
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to restore land
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9A(5) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9a-ss-5
part of: 9A Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
note: Carrier may delay restoration of land after 10 business days with owner's consent or occupier's consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 9A(5) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: Carrier agrees with owner or occupier
conclusion text: Restoration may be delayed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9A(6) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9a-ss-6
part of: 9A Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
note: Carrier must restore land after removal of temporary facilities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.104
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9A(6) Carrier to restore land—removal of temporary facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-9a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to restore land
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Management of activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
note: A carrier must take all reasonable steps to protect the safety of persons and property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.105
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Management of activities
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must take all reasonable steps.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Agreements with public utilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
has part: 11(1) Agreements with public utilities
has part: 11(2) Agreements with public utilities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106

11(1) Agreements with public utilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11-ss-1
part of: 11 Agreements with public utilities
note: Carrier must make reasonable efforts to enter into an agreement with a public utility.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(1) Agreements with public utilities
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must make reasonable efforts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Carrier's reasonable efforts must meet the requirements of the agreement.
premise text: (1) A carrier must make reasonable efforts to enter into an agreement with a public utility that makes provision for the manner in which the carrier will engage in an activity that is:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Carrier's reasonable efforts must meet the requirements of the agreement.
premise text: (1) A carrier must make reasonable efforts to enter into an agreement with a public utility that makes provision for the manner in which the carrier will engage in an activity that is:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Carrier may not unreasonably refuse to enter into an agreement.
premise text: (1) A carrier must make reasonable efforts to enter into an agreement with a public utility that makes provision for the manner in which the carrier will engage in an activity that is:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must provide reasonable efforts to enter into an agreement.
premise text: (1) A carrier must make reasonable efforts to enter into an agreement with a public utility that makes provision for the manner in which the carrier will engage in an activity that is:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

11(2) Agreements with public utilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11-ss-2
part of: 11 Agreements with public utilities
note: Carrier must comply with an agreement in force under subclause (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(2) Agreements with public utilities
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must comply with an agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Compliance with industry standards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
note: Carrier must comply with industry standards to reduce public safety risk
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Compliance with industry standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
premise text: (a) relates to the activity; (b) is recognised by ACMA as a standard for use in that industry; (c) is likely to reduce a risk to the safety of the public if the carrier complies with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
premise text: (a) relates to the activity; (b) is recognised by ACMA as a standard for use in that industry; (c) is likely to reduce a risk to the safety of the public if the carrier complies with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Information diffusion
premise text: (a) relates to the activity; (b) is recognised by ACMA as a standard for use in that industry; (c) is likely to reduce a risk to the safety of the public if the carrier complies with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-12-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: (a) relates to the activity; (b) is recognised by ACMA as a standard for use in that industry; (c) is likely to reduce a risk to the safety of the public if the carrier complies with the standard.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Compliance with international agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-13
note: Carrier must comply with Australia's obligations under a listed international agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 Compliance with international agreements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must comply with Australia's obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Conditions specified in the regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-14
note: Carrier must comply with conditions specified in regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.107
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-14-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 Conditions specified in the regulations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Conditions specified in a Ministerial Code of Practice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15
note: Conditions for carriers in relation to activities covered by the Code of Practice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.107
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-15-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-15-logic-argumentation-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Conditions specified in a Ministerial Code of Practice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Imposes a duty on carriers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Conditions apply during activities covered by the Code of Practice
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument...
conclusion text: ...in relation to any or all of the activities covered by...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-15-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
logic summary: Requires carriers to comply with conditions
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Conditions to which a facility installation permit is subject
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-16
note: Conditions for a facility installation permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.107
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-16-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Conditions to which a facility installation permit is subject
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional clause
premise text: If a condition is met
conclusion text: The permit is subject to the conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-17
has part: 17(1) Notice to owner of land—general
has part: 17(2) Notice to owner of land—general
has part: 17(3) Notice to owner of land—general
has part: 17(4) Notice to owner of land—general
has part: 17(4A) Notice to owner of land—general
has part: 17(5) Notice to owner of land—general
has part: 17(6) Notice to owner of land—general
has part: 17(6A) Notice to owner of land—general
has part: 17(6B) Notice to owner of land—general
has part: 17(7) Notice to owner of land—general
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108

17(1) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-1
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general
note: Carrier must give written notice to land owner and occupier before engaging in activity.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(1) Notice to owner of land—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must give notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(2) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-2
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general
note: Carrier must specify purpose for activity
description: Notice to owner of land—general
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(2) Notice to owner of land—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must specify purpose
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(3) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-3
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general
note: Compensation may be payable under clause 42 if a person suffers financial loss or damage.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(3) Notice to owner of land—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(4) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-4
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general
note: Notice must be given at least 10 business days before carrier begins activity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(4) Notice to owner of land—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(4A) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-4a
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general
note: Notice need be given 2 business days before engaging in certain activities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(4A) Notice to owner of land—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
premise text: The notice need be given only 2 business days before...
conclusion text: A carrier must give notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(5) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-5
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general
note: Waiver of notice requirement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-5-norm

17(6) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-6
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general
note: Exemption from notice requirement for certain activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission to engage in specific activities
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not apply if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(6A) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general
note: Exemption from notice requirement for carrier engaging in Division 2 activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Carrier permitted to engage in Division 2 activities without notice requirement
premise text: (6A) Subclause (1) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...carrier considers that compliance with subclause (1) is impracticable in the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for exemption from notice requirement
premise text: (6A) Subclause (1) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...carrier considers that compliance with subclause (1) is impracticable in the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for carrier's activities under Division 2
premise text: (6A) Subclause (1) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...carrier considers that compliance with subclause (1) is impracticable in the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of exemption from notice requirement to related activities
premise text: (6A) Subclause (1) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...carrier considers that compliance with subclause (1) is impracticable in the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for exemption from notice requirement
premise text: (6A) Subclause (1) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...carrier considers that compliance with subclause (1) is impracticable in the circumstances.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

17(6B) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-6b
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general
note: Definition of temporary defence facility
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-6b-norm

17(7) Notice to owner of land—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-17-ss-7
part of: 17 Notice to owner of land—general
note: Activity not inconsistent with Australia's obligations under a listed international agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-17-ss-7-norm

18 Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-18
has part: 18(1) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
has part: 18(2) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
has part: 18(3) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
has part: 18(3A) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
has part: 18(3B) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
has part: 18(4) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110

18(1) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-18-ss-1
part of: 18 Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
note: Carrier must give written notice to owner and occupier before engaging in certain activities.
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(1) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must give written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(2) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-18-ss-2
part of: 18 Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
note: Carrier may not engage in activities if request is not complied with.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(2) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of carrier activities
premise text: Request not complied with
conclusion text: Carrier may not engage in activities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(3) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-18-ss-3
part of: 18 Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
note: Waiver of notice requirement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3-norm

18(3A) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-18-ss-3a
part of: 18 Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
note: Exemption from notice requirement for carriers engaging in Division 2 activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission to carriers
premise text: (a) the carrier intends to engage in an activity under Division 2
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(3B) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b
part of: 18 Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
note: Prohibition on lopping of trees without notice to land owner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(3B) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on lopping of trees without notice to land owner
premise text: (3B) For the purposes of this clause, a temporary defence facility is a facility of the kind mentioned in paragraph 6(1)(c) of this Schedule.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition on lopping of trees without notice to land owner
premise text: (3B) For the purposes of this clause, a temporary defence facility is a facility of the kind mentioned in paragraph 6(1)(c) of this Schedule.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition on lopping of trees without notice to land owner
premise text: (3B) For the purposes of this clause, a temporary defence facility is a facility of the kind mentioned in paragraph 6(1)(c) of this Schedule.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibition on lopping of trees without notice to land owner
premise text: (3B) For the purposes of this clause, a temporary defence facility is a facility of the kind mentioned in paragraph 6(1)(c) of this Schedule.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-3b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of lopping of trees as prohibited without notice to land owner using CogAI
premise text: (3B) For the purposes of this clause, a temporary defence facility is a facility of the kind mentioned in paragraph 6(1)(c) of this Schedule.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

18(4) Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-18-ss-4
part of: 18 Notice to owner of land—lopping of trees etc.
note: Exemption from subclauses (1) and (2) for certain activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.110
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-18-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission to engage in specific activities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Notice to roads authorities, utilities etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-19
note: Notice to road authorities, utilities etc. before engaging in certain activities
description: Written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.111
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-19-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-19-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must give written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Roads etc. to remain open for passage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-20
note: Ensure facility installation allows reasonable passage.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-20-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-20-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Roads etc. to remain open for passage
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to ensure passage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Application for facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-21
has part: 21(1) Application for facility installation permit
has part: 21(2) Application for facility installation permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113

21(1) Application for facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-21-ss-1
part of: 21 Application for facility installation permit
note: Carrier must apply for permit to install facilities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-21-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(1) Application for facility installation permit
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(2) Application for facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-21-ss-2
part of: 21 Application for facility installation permit
note: The permit is called a facility installation permit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-21-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-21-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(2) Application for facility installation permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Permit name
conclusion text: The permit is called a facility installation permit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Form of application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22
note: Application must be in writing and in accordance with the approved form.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-22-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Form of application
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Application to be accompanied by charge
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-23
note: Application must be accompanied by charge
description: charge (if any)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-23-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-23-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-23-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23 Application to be accompanied by charge
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide charge
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Withdrawal of application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24
note: No prohibition on withdrawing an application and submitting a fresh one.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-24-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-24-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 Withdrawal of application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: No obligation to maintain an application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Issue of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-25
note: Issue facility installation permit after considering application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.113
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-25-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Facility installation permit obligation
premise text: Application consideration
conclusion text: Permit issuance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-26
has part: 26(1) Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
has part: 26(2) Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
has part: 26(3) Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
has part: 26(4) Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114

26(1) Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-26-ss-1
part of: 26 Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
note: Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(2) Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-26-ss-2
part of: 26 Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
note: Deemed refusal of facility installation permit if no notification within 65 business days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Expresses prohibition
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: Prohibition on issuing permit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(3) Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-26-ss-3
part of: 26 Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
note: Determination of business days for facility installation permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-3-norm

26(4) Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-26-ss-4
part of: 26 Deemed refusal of facility installation permit
note: Must consider ACMA's need to act with sufficient speed when determining the validity of actions taken under Part 25.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.114
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory consideration of ACMA's need to act with sufficient speed.
premise text: ACMA needs to act with sufficient speed.
conclusion text: Consideration is mandatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within a time limit
logic summary: Must consider the time limit imposed by subclause (2).
premise text: There is a time limit imposed by subclause (2).
conclusion text: Consideration must be within the time limit.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Must consider the ACMA's need to act with sufficient speed in relation to the permit.
premise text: The ACMA needs to act with sufficient speed.
conclusion text: Consideration is required.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-26-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: ACMA has an obligation to consider its need to act with sufficient speed.
premise text: The ACMA needs to act with sufficient speed.
conclusion text: Consideration is mandatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Criteria for issue of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27
note: Criteria for issue of facility installation permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.115
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-27-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-27-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Criteria for issue of facility installation permit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Special provisions relating to environmental matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28
has part: 28(1) Special provisions relating to environmental matters
has part: 28(2) Special provisions relating to environmental matters
has part: 28(5) Special provisions relating to environmental matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.122

28(1) Special provisions relating to environmental matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-ss-1
part of: 28 Special provisions relating to environmental matters
note: Exemptions from environmental provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.122
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-28-ss-1-norm

28(2) Special provisions relating to environmental matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-ss-2
part of: 28 Special provisions relating to environmental matters
note: Consultation with Environment Secretary before issuing a facility installation permit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.122
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-28-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-28-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-28-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consult
premise text: ACMA must issue a permit
conclusion text: Environment Secretary consulted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(5) Special provisions relating to environmental matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28-ss-5
part of: 28 Special provisions relating to environmental matters
note: Includes certain parts of Divisions 25 and 29.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.122
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-28-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-28-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-28-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Classifies included provisions
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Consultation with the ACCC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-29
note: Consultation with ACCC before issuing a facility installation permit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-29-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult ACCC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-30
has part: 30(1) Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act
has part: 30(2) Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123

30(1) Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-30-ss-1
part of: 30 Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act
note: Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(1) Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: Implies obligation
premise text: (1) A facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act.
conclusion text: The facility installation permit is subject to the Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(2) Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-30-ss-2
part of: 30 Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act
note: Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(2) Facility installation permit has effect subject to this Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes specified Acts and regulations
premise text: this Act includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999
conclusion text: and regulations under that Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
logic summary: Defines subclass relationship between Acts
premise text: this clause defines a subclass of this Act
conclusion text: the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between Acts
premise text: this clause has effect during the period of this Act
conclusion text: the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between Acts
premise text: this clause has effect during the period of this Act
conclusion text: the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: Diffuses regulation to related Acts
premise text: this clause includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act
conclusion text: in the same way as this Act
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-30-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes regulation in AI framework
premise text: this clause includes the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and regulations under that Act
conclusion text: in the same way as this Act
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

31 Duration of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-31
has part: 31(1) Duration of facility installation permit
has part: 31(2) Duration of facility installation permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123

31(1) Duration of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-31-ss-1
part of: 31 Duration of facility installation permit
note: Facility installation permit duration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-31-ss-1-norm

31(2) Duration of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-31-ss-2
part of: 31 Duration of facility installation permit
note: ACMA may extend the period specified in a facility installation permit under special circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.123
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-31-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Conditions of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-32
has part: 32(1) Conditions of facility installation permit
has part: 32(2) Conditions of facility installation permit
has part: 32(3) Conditions of facility installation permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124

32(1) Conditions of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-32-ss-1
part of: 32 Conditions of facility installation permit
note: Facility installation permit is subject to specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(1) Conditions of facility installation permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Facility installation permit has obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(2) Conditions of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-32-ss-2
part of: 32 Conditions of facility installation permit
note: Restricts or limits the carrying out of an activity under Division 3.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(2) Conditions of facility installation permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Restricts or limits the carrying out of an activity.
premise text: (2) A condition of a facility installation permit may restrict, limit or prevent the carrying out of, an activity under Division 3.
conclusion text: This subclause does not, by implication, limit subclause (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Restricts or limits the carrying out of an activity over a specific temporal interval.
premise text: (2) A condition of a facility installation permit may restrict, limit or prevent the carrying out of, an activity under Division 3.
conclusion text: This subclause does not, by implication, limit subclause (1).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restricts or limits the carrying out of an activity over a specific temporal interval.
premise text: (2) A condition of a facility installation permit may restrict, limit or prevent the carrying out of, an activity under Division 3.
conclusion text: This subclause does not, by implication, limit subclause (1).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restricts or limits the carrying out of an activity over a specific temporal interval.
premise text: (2) A condition of a facility installation permit may restrict, limit or prevent the carrying out of, an activity under Division 3.
conclusion text: This subclause does not, by implication, limit subclause (1).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restricts or limits the carrying out of an activity over a specific temporal interval.
premise text: (2) A condition of a facility installation permit may restrict, limit or prevent the carrying out of, an activity under Division 3.
conclusion text: This subclause does not, by implication, limit subclause (1).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

32(3) Conditions of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-32-ss-3
part of: 32 Conditions of facility installation permit
note: Conditions for a facility installation permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-32-ss-3-norm

33 Surrender of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-33
note: Holder may surrender permit by written notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-33-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to surrender permit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Cancellation of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-34
has part: 34(1) Cancellation of facility installation permit
has part: 34(2) Cancellation of facility installation permit
has part: 34(3) Cancellation of facility installation permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124

34(1) Cancellation of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-ss-1
part of: 34 Cancellation of facility installation permit
note: ACMA may cancel facility installation permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-34-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-34-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(1) Cancellation of facility installation permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits cancellation of permit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(2) Cancellation of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-ss-2
part of: 34 Cancellation of facility installation permit
note: Consider contraventions of Division 5 and matters relevant to permit issuance when cancelling a facility installation permit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Consider contraventions and relevant matters when cancelling a permit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(3) Cancellation of facility installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-34-ss-3
part of: 34 Cancellation of facility installation permit
note: ACMA may have regard for matters beyond those explicitly limited by subclause (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-34-ss-3-norm

35 Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-35
has part: 35(1) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
has part: 35(2) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
has part: 35(3) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
has part: 35(4) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.125

35(1) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-35-ss-1
part of: 35 Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
note: Application for review of ACMA decision to refuse facility installation permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.125
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty on ACMA to hold public inquiry
premise text: ACMA has not held a public inquiry
conclusion text: Refuse permit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35(2) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-35-ss-2
part of: 35 Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
note: Notice must be given to affected persons for review of decision.
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.125
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory obligation to provide written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35(3) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-35-ss-3
part of: 35 Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
note: Failure to comply does not affect decision validity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.125
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(3) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Obligation implies obligation
premise text: A decision is made.
conclusion text: The decision is valid if it complies with subclause (2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Obligation implies obligation in linear logic
premise text: A decision is made.
conclusion text: The decision is valid if it complies with subclause (2).
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal interval of compliance overlaps with decision validity
premise text: Compliance occurs at a specific time.
conclusion text: The decision is valid if it complies with subclause (2).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Obligation diffuses to all parties affected by the decision
premise text: A decision affects multiple parties.
conclusion text: The decision is valid if it complies with subclause (2).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: Obligation in AI implies obligation to comply
premise text: A decision is made by an AI system.
conclusion text: The decision is valid if it complies with subclause (2).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35(4) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-35-ss-4
part of: 35 Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
note: Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.125
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(4) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasSameMeaningAs
logic summary: Definition of decision
premise text: (decision has the same meaning as in the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)
conclusion text: (decision has the same meaning as in the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation of decision
premise text: (decision has the same meaning as in the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)
conclusion text: (decision occurs during the period covered by the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation of decision
premise text: (decision has the same meaning as in the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)
conclusion text: (decision occurs during the period covered by the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation of decision
premise text: (decision has the same meaning as in the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)
conclusion text: (decision spreads during the period covered by the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-35-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation of decision
premise text: (decision has the same meaning as in the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)
conclusion text: (decision occurs during the period covered by the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-36
has part: 36(1) Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws
has part: 36(2) Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126

36(1) Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-36-ss-1
part of: 36 Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws
note: Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(1) Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits activities inconsistent with State/Territory laws
premise text: (1) Divisions 2, 3 and 4 do not operate so as to authorise an activity
conclusion text: to the extent that the carrying out of the activity would be inconsistent with the provisions of a law of a State or Territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws during certain periods
premise text: (1) Divisions 2, 3 and 4 do not operate so as to authorise an activity
conclusion text: to the extent that the carrying out of the activity would be inconsistent with the provisions of a law of a State or Territory.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws during certain periods
premise text: (1) Divisions 2, 3 and 4 do not operate so as to authorise an activity
conclusion text: to the extent that the carrying out of the activity would be inconsistent with the provisions of a law of a State or Territory.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws during certain periods
premise text: (1) Divisions 2, 3 and 4 do not operate so as to authorise an activity
conclusion text: to the extent that the carrying out of the activity would be inconsistent with the provisions of a law of a State or Territory.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws during certain periods
premise text: (1) Divisions 2, 3 and 4 do not operate so as to authorise an activity
conclusion text: to the extent that the carrying out of the activity would be inconsistent with the provisions of a law of a State or Territory.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

36(2) Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-36-ss-2
part of: 36 Activities not generally exempt from State and Territory laws
note: Exemptions under clause 37 apply to the rule set out in subclause (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions apply to the rule set out in subclause (1)
premise text: Clause 37 exemptions apply
conclusion text: Subclause (1) is exempted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
logic summary: The exemptions under clause 37 apply before subclause (1)
premise text: Clause 37 exemptions apply before subclause (1)
conclusion text: Exemptions apply before subclause (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: before
logic summary: The rule set out in subclause (1) is before the exemptions under clause 37
premise text: Subclause (1) is part of the rule set
conclusion text: Exemptions apply after subclause (1)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: apply
logic summary: The exemptions under clause 37 diffuse to the rule set out in subclause (1)
premise text: Clause 37 exemptions apply
conclusion text: Exemptions diffuse to subclause (1)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-36-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: apply
logic summary: The exemptions under clause 37 are applied by the State and Territory
premise text: Clause 37 exemptions apply
conclusion text: Exemptions are applied by the State and Territory
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

37 Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-37
has part: 37(1) Exemption from State and Territory laws
has part: 37(2) Exemption from State and Territory laws
has part: 37(3) Exemption from State and Territory laws
has part: 37(4) Exemption from State and Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126

37(1) Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-37-ss-1
part of: 37 Exemption from State and Territory laws
note: Activity must be authorised by Division 2, 3 or 4.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(1) Exemption from State and Territory laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be authorised
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(2) Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-37-ss-2
part of: 37 Exemption from State and Territory laws
note: Exemption from State and Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Allows carrier to engage in activity despite State or Territory law
premise text: (2) The carrier may engage in the activity
conclusion text: despite a law of a State or Territory
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Relates to
logic summary: Describes temporal relation between exemptions and laws
premise text: (2) The carrier may engage in the activity despite a law of a State or Territory about...
conclusion text: ...or (f) the use of land; or...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Traces
logic summary: Describes sequence of exemptions and laws
premise text: (2) The carrier may engage in the activity despite a law of a State or Territory about...
conclusion text: ...or (f) the use of land; or...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applies to
logic summary: Describes scope of exemptions
premise text: (2) The carrier may engage in the activity despite a law of a State or Territory about...
conclusion text: ...or (f) the use of land; or...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Describes AI application to exemptions
premise text: (2) The carrier may engage in the activity despite a law of a State or Territory about...
conclusion text: ...or (f) the use of land; or...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(3) Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-37-ss-3
part of: 37 Exemption from State and Territory laws
note: Exemption from State and Territory laws for protection of cultural heritage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(3) Exemption from State and Territory laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(4) Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-37-ss-4
part of: 37 Exemption from State and Territory laws
note: Exemption from State and Territory laws for high-voltage electricity supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.126
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Exemption from State and Territory laws for high-voltage electricity supply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-37-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval comparison
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-38
note: Nothing in this Division affects the operation of other State or Territory laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.127
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-38-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-38-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to respect concurrent State and Territory laws.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Liability to taxation not affected
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-39
note: Liability to taxation not affected by this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.127
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-39-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-39-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to taxation under a law of a State or Territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-41
has part: 41(1) Guidelines
has part: 41(2) Guidelines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128

41(1) Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-41-ss-1
part of: 41 Guidelines
note: Must consider guidelines and other relevant matters when performing a function or exercising power.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consider guidelines and other relevant matters.
premise text: (a) any guidelines in force under subclause (2); and (b) such other matters as the ACMA considers relevant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Consideration of guidelines is within the scope of performance of function or exercise of power.
premise text: (a) any guidelines in force under subclause (2); and (b) such other matters as the ACMA considers relevant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Consideration of guidelines is within the scope of performance of function or exercise of power.
premise text: (a) any guidelines in force under subclause (2); and (b) such other matters as the ACMA considers relevant.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS RELEVANT TO
logic summary: Consideration of guidelines is relevant to performance of function or exercise of power.
premise text: (a) any guidelines in force under subclause (2); and (b) such other matters as the ACMA considers relevant.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS RELEVANT TO
logic summary: Consideration of guidelines is relevant to performance of function or exercise of power.
premise text: (a) any guidelines in force under subclause (2); and (b) such other matters as the ACMA considers relevant.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41(2) Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-41-ss-2
part of: 41 Guidelines
note: ACMA may formulate guidelines by written instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-41-ss-2-norm

42 Compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-42
has part: 42(1) Compensation
has part: 42(2) Compensation
has part: 42(3) Compensation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128

42(1) Compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-42-ss-1
part of: 42 Compensation
note: Compensation for financial loss or damage caused by a carrier's actions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Carrier has an obligation to provide compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(2) Compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-42-ss-2
part of: 42 Compensation
note: Compensation for damage to property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(2) Compensation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Compensation includes damage of a temporary character
premise text: (a) Damage of a temporary character as well as of a permanent character
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Compensation for damage to property over time
premise text: (2) Compensation payable under subclause (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(3) Compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-42-ss-3
part of: 42 Compensation
note: Defines court of competent jurisdiction for property claims.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(3) Compensation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Court defined
premise text: court of competent jurisdiction
conclusion text: means the Federal Court or Supreme Court of State/Territory
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-42-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Class hierarchy for courts
premise text: inferior court
conclusion text: County Court, District Court, local Court of State/Territory
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Power extends to carrier’s employees etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-43
note: Carrier's employees empowered to perform actions on land
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.129
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-43-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-43-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 Power extends to carrier’s employees etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: empowers
logic summary: Carrier empowers employees to perform actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 State and Territory laws that discriminate against carriers and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-44
note: Discrimination against carriers and users of carriage services is prohibited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.129
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-44-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-44-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits discrimination against carriers and users of carriage services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 State and Territory laws may confer powers and immunities on
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-45
note: No obligation on Parliament to prevent State/Territory laws from conferring powers/immunities on carriers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.131
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-45-norm

46 ACMA may limit tort liability in relation to the supply of certain
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-46
has part: 46(1) ACMA may limit tort liability in relation to the supply of certain
has part: 46(2) ACMA may limit tort liability in relation to the supply of certain
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.131

46(1) ACMA may limit tort liability in relation to the supply of certain
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-46-ss-1
part of: 46 ACMA may limit tort liability in relation to the supply of certain
note: ACMA may limit tort liability in relation to the supply of certain carriage services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.131
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-46-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Imposes obligation on ACMA
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46(2) ACMA may limit tort liability in relation to the supply of certain
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-46-ss-2
part of: 46 ACMA may limit tort liability in relation to the supply of certain
note: Limit tort liability in relation to the supply of certain instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.131
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-46-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Limit tort liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Ownership of facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-47
note: Carrier's property remains with owner, regardless of fixture status.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-47-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-47-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-47-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47 Ownership of facilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Carrier's property remains with owner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-48
has part: 48(1) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
has part: 48(2) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
has part: 48(3) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
has part: 48(4) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
has part: 48(5) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132

48(1) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-48-ss-1
part of: 48 ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
note: ACMA must inform the public about designated overhead lines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform the public
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(2) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-48-ss-2
part of: 48 ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
note: ACMA must consider certain matters when performing its function.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider certain matters.
premise text: ACMA has a function to perform.
conclusion text: ACMA must consider these matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Function is a subclass of consideration.
premise text: Consideration is a type of function.
conclusion text: ACMA's function is a consideration.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(3) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-48-ss-3
part of: 48 ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
note: ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(4) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-48-ss-4
part of: 48 ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
note: ACMA must inform the public about designated overhead lines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform the public
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(5) ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-48-ss-5
part of: 48 ACMA may inform the public about designated overhead lines,
note: Inform public about designated overhead lines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.132
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of telecommunications transmission towers
premise text: (a) a tower; or (b) a pole; or (c) a mast; or (d) a similar structure;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-48-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for informing public
premise text: (5) In this clause:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Monitoring of progress in relation to placing facilities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-50
note: ACMA must monitor progress in relation to placing facilities underground.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.134
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-50-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-50-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to monitor progress
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Removal of certain overhead lines
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-51
has part: 51(1) Removal of certain overhead lines
has part: 51(2) Removal of certain overhead lines
has part: 51(3) Removal of certain overhead lines
has part: 51(4) Removal of certain overhead lines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.134

51(1) Removal of certain overhead lines
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-51-ss-1
part of: 51 Removal of certain overhead lines
note: Owner must remove suspended part of eligible overhead line within 6 months after completion of removals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.134
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51(1) Removal of certain overhead lines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide obligation
conclusion text: Owner must remove suspended part of eligible overhead line.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51(2) Removal of certain overhead lines
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-51-ss-2
part of: 51 Removal of certain overhead lines
note: Exempt owner of eligible overhead line from compliance with subclause (1) in relation to the first pole.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.134
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (a) there is a local government body for the area in which the first pole is situated;
conclusion text: the local government body may, by writing:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Granting exemption from compliance with subclause (1)
premise text: (b) there is no prescribed administrative authority for the State or Territory in which the first pole is situated;
conclusion text: the local government body may, by writing:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defining a temporal interval for exemption
premise text: (d) extend the period of 6 months mentioned in subclause (1) for the purposes of the application of subclause (1) to the owner of the eligible overhead line and to the first pole.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Extension
logic summary: Extending a period for compliance with subclause (1)
premise text: (d) extend the period of 6 months mentioned in subclause (1) for the purposes of the application of subclause (1) to the owner of the eligible overhead line and to the first pole.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

51(3) Removal of certain overhead lines
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-51-ss-3
part of: 51 Removal of certain overhead lines
note: Exempt owner of eligible overhead line from compliance with subclause (1) in relation to the first pole.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.134
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 51(3) Removal of certain overhead lines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (3) If there is a prescribed administrative authority...
conclusion text: The prescribed administrative authority may exempt the owner...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

51(4) Removal of certain overhead lines
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-51-ss-4
part of: 51 Removal of certain overhead lines
note: Exemption from compliance with subclause (1) for the owner of eligible overhead line and first pole.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.134
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-51-ss-4-norm

52 Commonwealth laws not displaced
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-52
note: No carrier can engage in an activity contrary to another Commonwealth law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.137
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-52-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-52-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-52-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 52 Commonwealth laws not displaced
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits carrier from engaging in activity contrary to another law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53 Subdivider to pay for necessary alterations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-53
note: Subdivider liable for costs incurred by carrier due to subdivision of land.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.137
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-53-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-53-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-53-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53 Subdivider to pay for necessary alterations
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs incurred by carrier.
premise text: Subdivider subdivided land.
conclusion text: Carrier is entitled to payment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Service of notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-54
has part: 54(1) Service of notices
has part: 54(2) Service of notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.137

54(1) Service of notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-54-ss-1
part of: 54 Service of notices
note: Carrier must serve notice on land owner if unable to find or serve personally/posteriously.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.137
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of serving notice on land owner if unable to find or serve personally/posteriously.
premise text: (a) a carrier is unable, after diligent inquiry, to find out who owns particular land; or (b) a carrier is unable to serve a notice under this Part on the owner of land either personally or by post;
conclusion text: the carrier may not serve a notice under this Part on the owner of the land.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlap between notice serving and land occupation.
premise text: (c) if the land is occupied—serving a copy of the notice on the occupier;
conclusion text: the notice serving and land occupation overlap when the land is occupied.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of notice serving on unoccupied land.
premise text: (d) if the land is not occupied—attaching, if practicable, a copy of the notice to a conspicuous part of the land;
conclusion text: the notice serving on unoccupied land recurs when attached to a conspicuous part of the land.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of notice serving from carrier to land owner.
premise text: (a) a carrier is unable, after diligent inquiry, to find out who owns particular land; or (b) a carrier is unable to serve a notice under this Part on the owner of land either personally or by post;
conclusion text: the notice serving diffuses from the carrier to the land owner.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implication of notice serving on land ownership.
premise text: (a) a carrier is unable, after diligent inquiry, to find out who owns particular land; or (b) a carrier is unable to serve a notice under this Part on the owner of land either personally or by post;
conclusion text: the land owner is implied if the carrier is unable to find out who owns it.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(2) Service of notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-54-ss-2
part of: 54 Service of notices
note: Diligent inquiry required to find out land occupation information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.137
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Carrier has an obligation to make diligent inquiry
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Existing buildings, structures and facilities—application of State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-60
note: Application of State laws to certain building and facility standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-60-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-60-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: State laws apply to specified standards
premise text: State law
conclusion text: Standard applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Existing buildings, structures and facilities—application of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-61
note: No common law rule applies to a carrier's building if authorized by specific laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.139
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-61-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-61-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-61-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61 Existing buildings, structures and facilities—application of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: No common law rule applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-62
has part: 62(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 62(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 62(3) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 62(4) Compensation for acquisition of property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.140

62(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-62-ss-1
part of: 62 Compensation for acquisition of property
note: Carrier must pay reasonable compensation to a person if acquisition of property would not be valid without it.
description: Compensation for acquisition of property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.140
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must pay compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-62-ss-2
part of: 62 Compensation for acquisition of property
note: Compensation for acquisition of property must consider prior agreements and damages recovered from the carrier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.140
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider prior agreements and damages recovered from the carrier.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62(3) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-62-ss-3
part of: 62 Compensation for acquisition of property
note: Does not limit operation of clause 42
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.140
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-3-norm

62(4) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-62-ss-4
part of: 62 Compensation for acquisition of property
note: Compensation for acquisition of property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.140
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-62-ss-4-norm

63 Application of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-63
note: This Part applies in relation to certain actions and rights.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.141
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-63-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3-sec-63-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63 Application of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

1 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-1
note: Activities in protection zones are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.142
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Simplified outline
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits activities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-2
note: Definitions for Schedule 3A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.142
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes geographical sense of Australia
premise text: Australia, when used in a geographical sense...
conclusion text: has a different meaning from the meaning it has elsewhere in this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes external Territories
premise text: Note: Australia has a different meaning in this Schedule...
conclusion text: from the meaning it has elsewhere in this Act.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

2A Extension to offshore areas
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-2a
note: Reference to eligible Territories extended to external Territories
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2a-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2A Extension to offshore areas
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

2AA Operation in Greater Sunrise special regime area
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-2aa
note: No effect on Commonwealth law application in Greater Sunrise special regime area
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes Commonwealth law application
premise text: Subsection 13AB(1) of the Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973
conclusion text: No effect on Commonwealth law application in Greater Sunrise special regime area
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Overlap between exploration/extraction activities and Commonwealth law application
premise text: Subsection 13AB(1) of the Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973
conclusion text: Exploration/extraction activities in Greater Sunrise special regime area may overlap with Commonwealth law application
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Repetition of exploration/extraction activities in Greater Sunrise special regime area
premise text: Subsection 13AB(1) of the Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973
conclusion text: Exploration/extraction activities in Greater Sunrise special regime area may be repeated without affecting Commonwealth law application
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of exploration/extraction activities to other areas
premise text: Subsection 13AB(1) of the Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973
conclusion text: Exploration/extraction activities in Greater Sunrise special regime area may diffuse to other areas without affecting Commonwealth law application
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2aa-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of exploration/extraction activities in Greater Sunrise special regime area
premise text: Subsection 13AB(1) of the Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973
conclusion text: Exploration/extraction activities in Greater Sunrise special regime area are recognized as exempt from Commonwealth law application
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

2B Submarine cable installed in a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-2b
note: Submarine cable installed in a protection zone is not material for determining its relation to the protection zone.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Submarine cable installed in a protection zone is not material for determining its relation to the protection zone.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-3
note: Activities in a protection zone are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.149
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits activities in a protection zone.
premise text: ACMA declares a protection zone.
conclusion text: Activities in the zone are prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 ACMA may declare a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-4
has part: 4(1) ACMA may declare a protection zone
has part: 4(1A) ACMA may declare a protection zone
has part: 4(2) ACMA may declare a protection zone
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150

4(1) ACMA may declare a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-4-ss-1
part of: 4 ACMA may declare a protection zone
note: ACMA may declare a protection zone in relation to one or more submarine cables.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-4-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration of protection zone is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(1A) ACMA may declare a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-4-ss-1a
part of: 4 ACMA may declare a protection zone
note: ACMA may not declare a protection zone for specified domestic submarine cables or proposed cables without regulation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-4-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-4-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-4-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of declaring protection zones for specified cables.
premise text: ACMA must not declare a protection zone.
conclusion text: Unless specified in regulations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(2) ACMA may declare a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-4-ss-2
part of: 4 ACMA may declare a protection zone
note: ACMA must comply with Subdivision B before declaring a protection zone.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-4-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with Subdivision B
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Declaration on ACMA’s initiative or in response to request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-5
note: Declaration of protection zone may be made by ACMA or at request of person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to make declaration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Response to a request to declare a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-6
has part: 6(1) Response to a request to declare a protection zone
has part: 6(2) Response to a request to declare a protection zone
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150

6(1) Response to a request to declare a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1
part of: 6 Response to a request to declare a protection zone
note: ACMA must give person a copy of proposal if it decides to develop one
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACMA must give proposal
premise text: ACMA decides to develop a proposal
conclusion text: ACMA must give person a copy of proposal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: ACMA must give proposal before person receives request
premise text: If ACMA decides to develop a proposal in response to the request; the ACMA must give the person a copy of its proposal
conclusion text: Proposal is given before request is received
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: ACMA may not give proposal if it decides not to develop one
premise text: If ACMA decides not to develop a proposal; the ACMA must give the person a copy of its proposal
conclusion text: Proposal is given only if development decision is made
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: ACMA may decide not to develop proposal
premise text: If ACMA decides not to develop a proposal; the ACMA must give the person a copy of its proposal
conclusion text: Proposal development is optional for ACMA
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACMA must give proposal if it decides to develop one
premise text: If ACMA decides to develop a proposal; the ACMA must give the person a copy of its proposal
conclusion text: Proposal is given when development decision is made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(2) Response to a request to declare a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-6-ss-2
part of: 6 Response to a request to declare a protection zone
note: ACMA must notify person of decision not to declare protection zone
description: reasons for decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.150
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACMA has a duty to notify person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Decision not to declare a requested protection zone or to declare a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-7
has part: 7(1) Decision not to declare a requested protection zone or to declare a
has part: 7(2) Decision not to declare a requested protection zone or to declare a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.151

7(1) Decision not to declare a requested protection zone or to declare a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-7-ss-1
part of: 7 Decision not to declare a requested protection zone or to declare a
note: ACMA must notify person of decision not to declare protection zone
description: reasons for decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.151
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACMA has a duty to notify person
conclusion text: ACMA must notify person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(2) Decision not to declare a requested protection zone or to declare a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2
part of: 7 Decision not to declare a requested protection zone or to declare a
note: ACMA must declare a protection zone if requested and develops a proposal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.151
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-ltl-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACMA must declare a protection zone.
premise text: (2) If:...
conclusion text: ...; ACMA declares a protection zone.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACMA must develop a proposal for the requested protection zone.
premise text: (b) The ACMA develops a proposal for the protection zone in response to the request.
conclusion text: ...; and if:...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACMA must respond to a person's request for a protection zone.
premise text: (a) A person requests the ACMA to declare a protection zone;
conclusion text: ...; and if:...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: The proposal development must occur before the declaration.
premise text: (b) The ACMA develops a proposal for the protection zone in response to the request;
conclusion text: ...; and if:...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-7-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: The declaration must occur before the development of the proposal.
premise text: (c) The ACMA declares a protection zone that is different from...
conclusion text: ...; and if:...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Location of submarine cable to be specified in declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-8
has part: 8(1) Location of submarine cable to be specified in declaration
has part: 8(2) Location of submarine cable to be specified in declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152

8(1) Location of submarine cable to be specified in declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-8-ss-1
part of: 8 Location of submarine cable to be specified in declaration
note: Specify a nominal location for the cable or cables in all Australian waters.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-8-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(1) Location of submarine cable to be specified in declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify a location
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(2) Location of submarine cable to be specified in declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-8-ss-2
part of: 8 Location of submarine cable to be specified in declaration
note: Must specify location in geographic coordinates with geodetic datum
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-8-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(2) Location of submarine cable to be specified in declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Express location in geographic coordinates with geodetic datum
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Area of a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-9
has part: 9(1) Area of a protection zone
has part: 9(2) Area of a protection zone
has part: 9(3) Area of a protection zone
has part: 9(4) Area of a protection zone
has part: 9(5) Area of a protection zone
has part: 9(6) Area of a protection zone
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152

9(1) Area of a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-9-ss-1
part of: 9 Area of a protection zone
note: Defines protection zone area for one submarine cable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a specific area
premise text: (1)
conclusion text: protection zone in relation to one submarine cable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(2) Area of a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-9-ss-2
part of: 9 Area of a protection zone
note: Defines the area of a protection zone for one submarine cable in relation to Australian waters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the protection zone
premise text: (2) The protection zone in relation to one submarine cable:
conclusion text: the area within 1,852 metres either side of the points on the surface of the sea above the nominal location of the cable
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: or
logic summary: Defines alternative areas for the protection zone
premise text: (2) The protection zone in relation to one submarine cable:
conclusion text: the area within 1,852 metres either side of the points on the surface of the sea above the nominal location of the cable or the waters beneath that area
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

9(3) Area of a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-9-ss-3
part of: 9 Area of a protection zone
note: No effect outside the described area
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: No effect outside the described area
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(4) Area of a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-9-ss-4
part of: 9 Area of a protection zone
note: Defines the area of a protection zone for multiple submarine cables in Australian waters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the protection zone
premise text: (i) the area between the nominal location of the cables; and (ii) the area within 1,852 metres from the outside edge of the points on the surface of the sea above the nominal location of each of the two outermost cables
conclusion text: the waters beneath those areas
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(5) Area of a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-9-ss-5
part of: 9 Area of a protection zone
note: No effect outside the described area
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: No effect outside the described area
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(6) Area of a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-9-ss-6
part of: 9 Area of a protection zone
note: Defines nominal location for submarine cables within a protection zone.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.152
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies specific term
premise text: Nominal location is specified in the declaration of the protection zone
conclusion text: Nominal location for submarine cables within a protection zone
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-9-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship
premise text: Temporal interval defined by declaration of protection zone
conclusion text: Temporal interval for submarine cable nominal location
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

10 Prohibited activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-10
note: Activities prohibited in a protection zone
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.153
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-10-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Prohibited activities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on activities
premise text: (1) A declaration of a protection zone may specify activities that are prohibited in the protection zone.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Restricted activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-11
has part: 11(1) Restricted activities
has part: 11(2) Restricted activities
has part: 11(3) Restricted activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.155

11(1) Restricted activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-11-ss-1
part of: 11 Restricted activities
note: Restrictions on activities in the protection zone
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.155
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(2) Restricted activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-11-ss-2
part of: 11 Restricted activities
note: Activity must be covered by subclause (3) to impose restrictions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.155
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(2) Restricted activities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Implies that the activity must be covered by subclause (3)
premise text: (2) An activity on which restrictions are imposed
conclusion text: must be covered by subclause (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(3) Restricted activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-11-ss-3
part of: 11 Restricted activities
note: Restricted activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.155
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits specific activities
premise text: (3) This subclause covers the following activities:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-11-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Restricts activities during specific periods
premise text: (3) This subclause covers the following activities:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-12
has part: 12(1) Conditions
has part: 12(2) Conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156

12(1) Conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-12-ss-1
part of: 12 Conditions
note: Conditions for a protection zone declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-12-ss-1-norm

12(2) Conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-12-ss-2
part of: 12 Conditions
note: Conditions must be specified in the declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-12-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-12-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(2) Conditions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must specify conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 When a declaration takes effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-13
has part: 13(1) When a declaration takes effect
has part: 13(2) When a declaration takes effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156

13(1) When a declaration takes effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-13-ss-1
part of: 13 When a declaration takes effect
note: Declaration takes effect at specified time
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-13-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13(1) When a declaration takes effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes effect
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: (1) A declaration of a protection zone takes effect at the time specified by the ACMA.
conclusion text: The declaration takes effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

13(2) When a declaration takes effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-13-ss-2
part of: 13 When a declaration takes effect
note: ACMA must not specify a time before installation begins.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Duration of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-14
has part: 14(1) Duration of declaration
has part: 14(2) Duration of declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156

14(1) Duration of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1
part of: 14 Duration of declaration
note: Declaration of protection zone continues in effect until revoked.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Obligation to maintain declaration
premise text: (1) A declaration of a protection zone continues in effect until the ACMA revokes it.
conclusion text: The declaration must continue in effect until revoked.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval until revocation
premise text: (1) A declaration of a protection zone continues in effect until the ACMA revokes it.
conclusion text: The declaration ends at the time of revocation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval until revocation
premise text: (1) A declaration of a protection zone continues in effect until the ACMA revokes it.
conclusion text: The declaration ends at the time of revocation.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: continues
logic summary: Declaration spreads through time
premise text: (1) A declaration of a protection zone continues in effect until the ACMA revokes it.
conclusion text: The declaration is still in effect throughout its duration.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: continues
logic summary: Declaration maintains status over time
premise text: (1) A declaration of a protection zone continues in effect until the ACMA revokes it.
conclusion text: The declaration remains valid throughout its duration.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(2) Duration of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-14-ss-2
part of: 14 Duration of declaration
note: Declaration continues in effect even if submarine cables cease to operate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.156
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Declaration continues in effect
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, a declaration continues in effect even if the submarine cable or cables in the protection zone have ceased to operate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-15
has part: 15(1) ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone
has part: 15(2) ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone
has part: 15(3) ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.157

15(1) ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-15-ss-1
part of: 15 ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone
note: ACMA must develop a proposal for the protection zone before declaring it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.157
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to develop a proposal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(2) ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-15-ss-2
part of: 15 ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone
note: Activities to be prohibited in the proposed protection zone.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.157
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(2) ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of activities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(3) ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-15-ss-3
part of: 15 ACMA to develop a proposal for a protection zone
note: Develop a proposal for a protection zone
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.157
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must develop a proposal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-17
has part: 17(1) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
has part: 17(2) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.157

17(1) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-17-ss-1
part of: 17 ACMA to publish proposal etc.
note: Publish a proposal developed under clause 15.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.157
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish a proposal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(2) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-17-ss-2
part of: 17 ACMA to publish proposal etc.
note: Publish proposal and invite public submissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.157
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish proposal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17A ACMA to publish summary of proposal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-17a
has part: 17A(1) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
has part: 17A(2) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
has part: 17A(3) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.158

17A(1) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-1
part of: 17A ACMA to publish summary of proposal
note: Publish a summary of proposal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.158
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish a summary
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17A(2) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-2
part of: 17A ACMA to publish summary of proposal
note: Publish a summary of the proposal in specified locations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.158
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish a summary.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17A(3) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-3
part of: 17A ACMA to publish summary of proposal
note: Must provide information about accessing the proposal and requesting a copy.
description: (a) access the proposal on the ACMA’s website; (b) request a copy of the proposal under subclause 17(3).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.158
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-17a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
conclusion text: (a) access the proposal on the ACMA’s website; (b) request a copy of the proposal under subclause 17(3).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Cable must be a submarine cable of national significance
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-18
has part: 18(1) Cable must be a submarine cable of national significance
has part: 18(2) Cable must be a submarine cable of national significance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.159

18(1) Cable must be a submarine cable of national significance
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-18-ss-1
part of: 18 Cable must be a submarine cable of national significance
note: ACMA must declare protection zones only for submarine cables of national significance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.159
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: ACMA must declare protection zones.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(2) Cable must be a submarine cable of national significance
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-18-ss-2
part of: 18 Cable must be a submarine cable of national significance
note: Cable must be of national significance if specified in regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.159
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-18-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-18-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(2) Cable must be a submarine cable of national significance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (a) a cable is specified in regulations made for the purposes of subclause 4(1A); or (b) a route of a cable is specified in regulations made for the purposes of subclause 4(1A);
conclusion text: the cable is taken to be of national significance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-18-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal relation between regulation and specification
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subclause (1)
conclusion text: the cable is taken to be of national significance.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Consultation with Environment Secretary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-19
has part: 19(1) Consultation with Environment Secretary
has part: 19(2) Consultation with Environment Secretary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.159

19(1) Consultation with Environment Secretary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-19-ss-1
part of: 19 Consultation with Environment Secretary
note: Consultation with Environment Secretary required before declaring a protection zone.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.159
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult with Environment Secretary
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(2) Consultation with Environment Secretary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2
part of: 19 Consultation with Environment Secretary
note: Must consider Environment Secretary's advice on proposal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.159
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider advice
premise text: ACMA must have regard to...
conclusion text: ...Environment Secretary's advice on proposal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Temporal relationship between consideration and proposal
premise text: (2) The ACMA must have regard to...
conclusion text: ...any advice or recommendations provided by the Environment Secretary in relation to the proposal
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: MUST
logic summary: Rational basis for obligation
premise text: The ACMA must have regard to...
conclusion text: ...any advice or recommendations provided by the Environment Secretary in relation to the proposal
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IN
logic summary: Scope of consideration
premise text: (2) The ACMA must have regard to...
conclusion text: ...any advice or recommendations provided by the Environment Secretary in relation to the proposal
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-19-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Temporal relationship between consideration and proposal
premise text: (2) The ACMA must have regard to...
conclusion text: ...any advice or recommendations provided by the Environment Secretary in relation to the proposal
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Matters the ACMA must have regard to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-20
note: Consider public submissions and objective of facilitating efficient carriage services when deciding to declare a protection zone.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.159
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: ACMA must have regard to...
conclusion text: consider public submissions and objective of facilitating efficient carriage services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal consideration
premise text: In deciding whether to declare a protection zone in relation to one or more submarine cables, the ACMA must have regard to...
conclusion text: consider public submissions and objective of facilitating efficient carriage services at any time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal consideration
premise text: In deciding whether to declare a protection zone in relation to one or more submarine cables, the ACMA must have regard to...
conclusion text: consider public submissions and objective of facilitating efficient carriage services at any time
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: must consider
logic summary: Public submission consideration
premise text: In deciding whether to declare a protection zone in relation to one or more submarine cables, the ACMA must have regard to...
conclusion text: consider public submissions and objective of facilitating efficient carriage services
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-20-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must consider
logic summary: Public submission consideration
premise text: In deciding whether to declare a protection zone in relation to one or more submarine cables, the ACMA must have regard to...
conclusion text: consider public submissions and objective of facilitating efficient carriage services
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Environment and heritage considerations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-21
note: ACMA must consider environmental and heritage impacts when installing, maintaining or operating a submarine cable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.160
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-21-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consider environmental and heritage impacts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Deadline for final decision about protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-22
note: Make decision on protection zone within 12 months
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.161
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-22-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-22-logic-linearlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-22-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Proposal published
conclusion text: Decision made within 12 months
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 ACMA may vary or revoke a declaration of a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-23
has part: 23(1) ACMA may vary or revoke a declaration of a protection zone
has part: 23(2) ACMA may vary or revoke a declaration of a protection zone
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.162

23(1) ACMA may vary or revoke a declaration of a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-23-ss-1
part of: 23 ACMA may vary or revoke a declaration of a protection zone
note: ACMA may vary or revoke a declaration of a protection zone.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.162
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-23-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: ACMA may vary or revoke a declaration of a protection zone.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(2) ACMA may vary or revoke a declaration of a protection zone
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-23-ss-2
part of: 23 ACMA may vary or revoke a declaration of a protection zone
note: ACMA must comply with Subdivision B before varying or revoking a declaration of a protection zone.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.162
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-23-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to comply with Subdivision B
premise text: ACMA varies or revokes a declaration of a protection zone
conclusion text: ACMA must comply with Subdivision B
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consult about the proposal
premise text: ACMA develops a variation or revocation proposal
conclusion text: ACMA must consult about the proposal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Variation or revocation on ACMA’s initiative or in response to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-24
note: Variation or revocation of a declaration of a protection zone may be made on ACMA's own initiative or at the request of a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.162
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-24-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-24-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 ACMA to notify affected carrier of request to vary or revoke a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-25
note: Notify affected carrier of request to vary or revoke a declaration
description: details of the request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.162
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-25-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Response to a request to vary or revoke a declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-26
has part: 26(1) Response to a request to vary or revoke a declaration
has part: 26(2) Response to a request to vary or revoke a declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.163

26(1) Response to a request to vary or revoke a declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-26-ss-1
part of: 26 Response to a request to vary or revoke a declaration
note: ACMA must provide a copy of proposal and notify person of reasons for difference if proposal differs from requested.
description: copy of proposal, notification of reasons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.163
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-26-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide copy of proposal and notify person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(2) Response to a request to vary or revoke a declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-26-ss-2
part of: 26 Response to a request to vary or revoke a declaration
note: ACMA must notify person of decision and reasons if request is denied
description: notification in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.163
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-26-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
conclusion text: ACMA must notify person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Decision not to vary or revoke a declaration after a request to do
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-27
note: ACMA cannot vary or revoke a declaration after a request to do so.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.163
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-27-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-27-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: ACMA cannot vary or revoke the declaration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 When a variation or revocation takes effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-28
note: Variation or revocation of a protection zone takes effect at the specified time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-28-norm

29 Protection zone as varied must not exceed permitted area
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-29
note: Protection zone area must not exceed permitted area after variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-29-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29 Protection zone as varied must not exceed permitted area
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not Exceed
logic summary: Protection zone area restriction
premise text: Subclauses 9(3) and (5)
conclusion text: Obligation to not exceed permitted area
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 ACMA to develop a variation or revocation proposal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-30
has part: 30(1) ACMA to develop a variation or revocation proposal
has part: 30(2) ACMA to develop a variation or revocation proposal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164

30(1) ACMA to develop a variation or revocation proposal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-30-ss-1
part of: 30 ACMA to develop a variation or revocation proposal
note: ACMA must develop a proposal before varying or revoking a declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-30-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(2) ACMA to develop a variation or revocation proposal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-30-ss-2
part of: 30 ACMA to develop a variation or revocation proposal
note: Proposal must not be a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-30-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits proposals from being legislative instruments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32
has part: 32(1) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
has part: 32(2) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
has part: 32(3) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
has part: 32(4) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
has part: 32(5) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
has part: 32(6) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164

32(1) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32-ss-1
part of: 32 ACMA to publish proposal etc.
note: Publish a proposal developed under clause 30.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish a proposal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(2) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32-ss-2
part of: 32 ACMA to publish proposal etc.
note: Publish proposal and invite public submissions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish proposal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(3) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32-ss-3
part of: 32 ACMA to publish proposal etc.
note: ACMA must provide a copy of the proposal within 2 business days after receiving a request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide a copy of the proposal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(4) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4
part of: 32 ACMA to publish proposal etc.
note: Exemption from subclause (3) for ACMA actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4-logic-ltl-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: ACMA is permitted to make variation or revocation
premise text: ACMA has made the variation or revocation
conclusion text: Subclause (3) does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: ACMA is permitted to decide not to make variation or revocation
premise text: ACMA has decided not to make the variation or revocation
conclusion text: Subclause (3) does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: ACMA's action overlaps with subclause (3)
premise text: ACMA has made the variation or revocation
conclusion text: Subclause (3) does not apply
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: ACMA's action overlaps with subclause (3)
premise text: ACMA has decided not to make the variation or revocation
conclusion text: Subclause (3) does not apply
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(5) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32-ss-5
part of: 32 ACMA to publish proposal etc.
note: ACMA may provide a copy of the proposal in electronic form upon request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to provide a copy in electronic form.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(6) ACMA to publish proposal etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32-ss-6
part of: 32 ACMA to publish proposal etc.
note: No charge for copy of proposal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Imposes
logic summary: ACMA imposes no charge
premise text: None
conclusion text: No charge for copy of proposal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32A ACMA to publish summary of proposal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32a
has part: 32A(1) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
has part: 32A(2) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.165

32A(1) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32a-ss-1
part of: 32A ACMA to publish summary of proposal
note: Publish summary of proposal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.165
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish summary
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32A(2) ACMA to publish summary of proposal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-32a-ss-2
part of: 32A ACMA to publish summary of proposal
note: Publish a summary of the proposal in specified locations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.165
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish a summary.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Consultation with Environment Secretary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-33
has part: 33(1) Consultation with Environment Secretary
has part: 33(2) Consultation with Environment Secretary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.166

33(1) Consultation with Environment Secretary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-33-ss-1
part of: 33 Consultation with Environment Secretary
note: Consultation with Environment Secretary required before varying or revoking a protection zone declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.166
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult with Environment Secretary
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33(2) Consultation with Environment Secretary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2
part of: 33 Consultation with Environment Secretary
note: Must consider Environment Secretary's advice on proposal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.166
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider advice
premise text: ACMA must have regard to Environment Secretary's advice
conclusion text: Environment Secretary's advice is relevant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Proposal is within the scope of Environment Secretary's advice
premise text: ACMA must have regard to Environment Secretary's advice in relation to proposal
conclusion text: Proposal is within the scope of Environment Secretary's advice
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Proposal is within the scope of Environment Secretary's advice
premise text: ACMA must have regard to Environment Secretary's advice in relation to proposal
conclusion text: Proposal is within the scope of Environment Secretary's advice
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_RELEVANT_TO
logic summary: Advice is relevant to ACMA's consideration
premise text: ACMA must have regard to Environment Secretary's advice
conclusion text: Environment Secretary's advice is relevant
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-33-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_RELEVANT_TO
logic summary: Advice is relevant to ACMA's consideration
premise text: ACMA must have regard to Environment Secretary's advice
conclusion text: Environment Secretary's advice is relevant
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Matters the ACMA must have regard to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-34
note: ACMA must consider certain matters when varying or revoking a declaration of a protection zone.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.166
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-34-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-34-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACMA must consider certain matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Deadline for final decision about varying or revoking a protection
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-35
note: Deadline for final decision about varying or revoking a protection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.167
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-35-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-35-logic-linearlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must decide within 180 days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-35-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
logic summary: Decision is conditional on proposal publication
premise text: Proposal published
conclusion text: Decision made
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Damaging a submarine cable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-36
has part: 36(1) Damaging a submarine cable
has part: 36(2) Damaging a submarine cable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.168

36(1) Damaging a submarine cable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-36-ss-1
part of: 36 Damaging a submarine cable
note: Damaging a submarine cable is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.168
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-36-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(1) Damaging a submarine cable
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits damaging a submarine cable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(2) Damaging a submarine cable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-36-ss-2
part of: 36 Damaging a submarine cable
note: Damaging a submarine cable is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.168
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits damaging a submarine cable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Negligently damaging a submarine cable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-37
has part: 37(1) Negligently damaging a submarine cable
has part: 37(2) Negligently damaging a submarine cable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.168

37(1) Negligently damaging a submarine cable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1
part of: 37 Negligently damaging a submarine cable
note: Negligently damaging a submarine cable is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.168
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(1) Negligently damaging a submarine cable
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Direct prohibition
conclusion text: (a) the person engages in conduct; (b) the conduct results in damage to a submarine cable; (c) the person is negligent as to the fact that the conduct results in that damage; (d) the cable is in a protection zone.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal relation between conduct and damage
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; (b) the conduct results in damage to a submarine cable; (c) the person is negligent as to the fact that the conduct results in that damage; (d) the cable is in a protection zone.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Recurring trace of conduct and damage
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; (b) the conduct results in damage to a submarine cable; (c) the person is negligent as to the fact that the conduct results in that damage; (d) the cable is in a protection zone.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Spread of damage from conduct
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; (b) the conduct results in damage to a submarine cable; (c) the person is negligent as to the fact that the conduct results in that damage; (d) the cable is in a protection zone.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Rationality of conduct and damage assessment
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; (b) the conduct results in damage to a submarine cable; (c) the person is negligent as to the fact that the conduct results in that damage; (d) the cable is in a protection zone.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(2) Negligently damaging a submarine cable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-37-ss-2
part of: 37 Negligently damaging a submarine cable
note: Negligently damaging a submarine cable is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.168
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(2) Negligently damaging a submarine cable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits an action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Defence to offences of damaging a submarine cable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-38
note: Defence to offences of damaging a submarine cable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.168
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-38-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38 Defence to offences of damaging a submarine cable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

39 Master or owner of ship used in offence of damaging a submarine
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-39
has part: 39(1) Master or owner of ship used in offence of damaging a submarine
has part: 39(2) Master or owner of ship used in offence of damaging a submarine
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.169

39(1) Master or owner of ship used in offence of damaging a submarine
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-39-ss-1
part of: 39 Master or owner of ship used in offence of damaging a submarine
note: Permitting another person to use a ship used in the commission of an offence is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.169
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-39-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-39-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(1) Master or owner of ship used in offence of damaging a submarine
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(2) Master or owner of ship used in offence of damaging a submarine
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-39-ss-2
part of: 39 Master or owner of ship used in offence of damaging a submarine
note: Strict liability applies to damaging a submarine
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.169
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-39-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-39-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(2) Master or owner of ship used in offence of damaging a submarine
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits damaging a submarine
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Engaging in prohibited or restricted activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-40
note: Engaging in prohibited conduct within a protection zone is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.169
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-40-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-40-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-40-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40 Engaging in prohibited or restricted activities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct within a protection zone.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Aggravated offence of engaging in prohibited or restricted
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-41
note: Engaging in prohibited conduct with intention of making commercial gain is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.170
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-41-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-41-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-41-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 41 Aggravated offence of engaging in prohibited or restricted
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct with intention of making commercial gain.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Defences to offences of engaging in prohibited or restricted
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-42
note: Defences to offences of engaging in prohibited or restricted activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.171
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-42-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-42-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42 Defences to offences of engaging in prohibited or restricted
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

43 Alternative verdict if aggravated offence not proven
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-43
note: Defendant must be accorded procedural fairness in relation to finding of guilt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.171
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-43-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-43-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 Alternative verdict if aggravated offence not proven
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant must be accorded procedural fairness.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Master or owner of ship used in offence of engaging in prohibited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-44
note: Permitting another person to use a ship used in the commission of an offence is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.171
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 44 Master or owner of ship used in offence of engaging in prohibited
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44A Foreign nationals and foreign ships
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-44a
has part: 44A(1) Foreign nationals and foreign ships
has part: 44A(2) Foreign nationals and foreign ships
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.172

44A(1) Foreign nationals and foreign ships
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1
part of: 44A Foreign nationals and foreign ships
note: Exemptions for foreign nationals and ships
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.172
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44A(1) Foreign nationals and foreign ships
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from the Division's application
premise text: (1) This Division does not apply to...
conclusion text: ...if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between exemptions and the Division's application
premise text: (c) the thing done, or omitted to be done, does not involve a ship;
conclusion text: ...unless...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of exemptions and the Division's application
premise text: (f) the operations of artificial islands, installations or structures that are under Australia’s jurisdiction.
conclusion text: ...or is connected with...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Permission to engage in certain activities without the Division's application
premise text: (b) the thing is done, or omitted to be done in, on, or beneath the seabed that lies beneath...
conclusion text: ...if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44A(2) Foreign nationals and foreign ships
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2
part of: 44A Foreign nationals and foreign ships
note: Exemptions from Division 3A for foreign nationals and ships
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.172
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44A(2) Foreign nationals and foreign ships
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from Division 3A
premise text: (2) This Division does not apply to anything done, or omitted to be done...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Exemptions during exploration and exploitation of continental shelf
premise text: (c) the thing done, or omitted to be done, involves a foreign ship; unless...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Exemptions during exploration and exploitation of continental shelf
premise text: (c) the thing done, or omitted to be done, involves a foreign ship; unless...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Exemptions during exploration and exploitation of continental shelf
premise text: (c) the thing done, or omitted to be done, involves a foreign ship; unless...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Exemptions during exploration and exploitation of continental shelf
premise text: (c) the thing done, or omitted to be done, involves a foreign ship; unless...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Person may claim damages
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-45
has part: 45(1) Person may claim damages
has part: 45(2) Person may claim damages
has part: 45(3) Person may claim damages
has part: 45(4) Person may claim damages
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.174

45(1) Person may claim damages
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-45-ss-1
part of: 45 Person may claim damages
note: Person may recover damages for loss or damage caused by prohibited conduct in a protection zone.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.174
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45(1) Person may claim damages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45(2) Person may claim damages
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2
part of: 45 Person may claim damages
note: Action can be commenced within 6 years after the cause of action accrued.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.174
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45(2) Person may claim damages
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Ability to commence action within time limit
premise text: (2) An action under subclause (1) may be commenced at any time within 6 years after the day on which the cause of action that relates to the conduct accrued.
conclusion text: The person can commence the action within 6 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which the action can be commenced
premise text: (2) An action under subclause (1) may be commenced at any time within 6 years after the day on which the cause of action that relates to the conduct accrued.
conclusion text: The temporal interval is during 6 years from the cause of action.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval until which the action can be commenced
premise text: (2) An action under subclause (1) may be commenced at any time within 6 years after the day on which the cause of action that relates to the conduct accrued.
conclusion text: The temporal interval is until 6 years from the cause of action.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: within
logic summary: Action can be commenced within a specific time limit
premise text: (2) An action under subclause (1) may be commenced at any time within 6 years after the day on which the cause of action that relates to the conduct accrued.
conclusion text: The action is within the specified time limit.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: can
logic summary: Ability to commence action within time limit
premise text: (2) An action under subclause (1) may be commenced at any time within 6 years after the day on which the cause of action that relates to the conduct accrued.
conclusion text: The person can perform the specified action.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45(3) Person may claim damages
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-45-ss-3
part of: 45 Person may claim damages
note: A person who is involved in a contravention can claim damages.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.174
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45(3) Person may claim damages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45(4) Person may claim damages
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-45-ss-4
part of: 45 Person may claim damages
note: Jurisdiction is conferred on the Federal Court in any matter arising under this clause in respect of which a civil proceeding is instituted under this clause.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.174
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45(4) Person may claim damages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-45-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: The Federal Court has jurisdiction over matters arising under the clause.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Indemnity for loss of anchor etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-46
has part: 46(1) Indemnity for loss of anchor etc.
has part: 46(2) Indemnity for loss of anchor etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175

46(1) Indemnity for loss of anchor etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1
part of: 46 Indemnity for loss of anchor etc.
note: Owner of ship entitled to indemnification from carrier if loss occurs while avoiding damage to submarine cable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46(1) Indemnity for loss of anchor etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Owner has obligation to be indemnified.
premise text: Ship owner is entitled to indemnification.
conclusion text: Carrier must provide indemnification.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Sacrifice occurs during time when no prohibited conduct is engaged in.
premise text: No prohibited conduct is being engaged in at the time of sacrifice.
conclusion text: Sacrifice occurs within allowed timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occursBefore
logic summary: Loss occurs after sacrifice is made.
premise text: Sacrifice is made before loss occurs.
conclusion text: Loss occurs after sacrifice.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
logic summary: Carrier has permission to make sacrifice if it avoids damage to submarine cable.
premise text: Carrier is responsible for submarine cable.
conclusion text: Carrier may make sacrifice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46(2) Indemnity for loss of anchor etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-46-ss-2
part of: 46 Indemnity for loss of anchor etc.
note: Jurisdiction is conferred on the Federal Court in any matter arising under this clause.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46(2) Indemnity for loss of anchor etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Jurisdiction is conferred on the Federal Court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 ACMA to notify relevant authorities of declaration, variation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-47
has part: 47(1) ACMA to notify relevant authorities of declaration, variation etc.
has part: 47(2) ACMA to notify relevant authorities of declaration, variation etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175

47(1) ACMA to notify relevant authorities of declaration, variation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-47-ss-1
part of: 47 ACMA to notify relevant authorities of declaration, variation etc.
note: ACMA must notify authorities of declaration decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(2) ACMA to notify relevant authorities of declaration, variation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-47-ss-2
part of: 47 ACMA to notify relevant authorities of declaration, variation etc.
note: ACMA must notify relevant authorities of declaration, variation etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.175
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-47-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(2) ACMA to notify relevant authorities of declaration, variation etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Notice if carrier decommissions a submarine cable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-48
note: Carrier must notify ACMA of cessation of submarine cable use.
description: Notification in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.176
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-48-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-48-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier has a duty to notify ACMA
conclusion text: The carrier must provide notification.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-48-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Cessation must occur after declaration of protection zone
premise text: If the cable ceases to be in use (other than temporarily), then...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-50
note: Installing an international submarine cable without a permit in a protection zone or Australian waters is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.177
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-50-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-50-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-50-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 50 Simplified outline
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Application for a protection zone installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-51
has part: 51(1) Application for a protection zone installation permit
has part: 51(2) Application for a protection zone installation permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.179

51(1) Application for a protection zone installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-51-ss-1
part of: 51 Application for a protection zone installation permit
note: Carrier may apply for a permit to install submarine cables in protection zones or Australian waters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.179
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-51-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 51(1) Application for a protection zone installation permit
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission for installation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51(2) Application for a protection zone installation permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-51-ss-2
part of: 51 Application for a protection zone installation permit
note: It is immaterial whether the cable or cables specified in the application are the cable or cables in relation to which the protection zone was declared.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.179
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-51-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: The provision imposes an obligation on the applicant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

52 Form of application etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-52
has part: 52(1) Form of application etc.
has part: 52(2) Form of application etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.179

52(1) Form of application etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-52-ss-1
part of: 52 Form of application etc.
note: Application must be in writing and in the approved form.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.179
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52(1) Form of application etc.
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be in writing.
premise text: (1) An application must be: (a) in writing;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: IN THE FORM OF
logic summary: Application must be in the approved form.
premise text: (1) An application must be: (b) in the form approved in writing by the ACMA;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(2) Form of application etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-52-ss-2
part of: 52 Form of application etc.
note: Application must provide specific information about submarine cables
description: (a) the proposed route or routes, in Australian waters, of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; and (b) information about the ownership and control of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application;
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.179
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52(2) Form of application etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must provide specific information
conclusion text: (a) the proposed route or routes, in Australian waters, of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; and (b) information about the ownership and control of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53 Application to be accompanied by charge
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-53
note: An application must be accompanied by the charge (if any)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-53-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-53-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-53-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53 Application to be accompanied by charge
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be accompanied by charge
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Withdrawal of application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-54
note: Does not prevent withdrawal of application and submission of fresh application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54 Withdrawal of application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

54A Notification of change of circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-54a
has part: 54A(1) Notification of change of circumstances
has part: 54A(2) Notification of change of circumstances
has part: 54A(3) Notification of change of circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180

54A(1) Notification of change of circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-1
part of: 54A Notification of change of circumstances
note: Notify change of circumstances to ACMA upon becoming aware.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54A(1) Notification of change of circumstances
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify change of circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54A(2) Notification of change of circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-2
part of: 54A Notification of change of circumstances
note: ACMA must decide on change of circumstances after notification.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to decide
premise text: Change of circumstances notification
conclusion text: Decision required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54A(3) Notification of change of circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-3
part of: 54A Notification of change of circumstances
note: Notify applicant of decision within 2 business days
description: Notification in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-54a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory notification
conclusion text: ACMA must notify applicant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-55
has part: 55(1) Further information
has part: 55(2) Further information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181

55(1) Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-55-ss-1
part of: 55 Further information
note: Request for further information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(1) Further information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: request
logic summary: Request for information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: request
logic summary: Request for further information
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55(2) Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-55-ss-2
part of: 55 Further information
note: ACMA may refuse to consider application until applicant provides information.
description: Information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(2) Further information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: ACMA has an obligation to refuse application until applicant provides information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55A Consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-55a
has part: 55A(1) Consultation
has part: 55A(2) Consultation
has part: 55A(3) Consultation
has part: 55A(4) Consultation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181

55A(1) Consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-1
part of: 55A Consultation
note: Consultation before making a decision on an application for a protection zone installation permit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult
premise text: ACMA must make a decision on the application
conclusion text: Consultation is required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55A(2) Consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-2
part of: 55A Consultation
note: ACMA must provide consultation to Secretaries within 2 business days.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide consultation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55A(3) Consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-3
part of: 55A Consultation
note: Secretary must notify ACMA within 15 business days of receiving an application.
description: Notice to the ACMA under paragraph (3)(a)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55A(3) Consultation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
conclusion text: The Secretary must give a written notice to the ACMA.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55A(4) Consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-4
part of: 55A Consultation
note: Cannot grant permit while notice is in force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.181
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-55a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (3)(a) notice is in force
conclusion text: cannot grant permit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Grant or refusal of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-56
has part: 56(1) Grant or refusal of permit
has part: 56(3) Grant or refusal of permit
has part: 56(4) Grant or refusal of permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.183

56(1) Grant or refusal of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-56-ss-1
part of: 56 Grant or refusal of permit
note: Grant or refusal of permit for protection zone installation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.183
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
logic summary: Permission to install submarine cable
premise text: Application is covered by paragraph 51(1)(a) of this Schedule
conclusion text: Install submarine cable in protection zone
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
logic summary: Permission to install submarine cable in Australian waters
premise text: Application is covered by paragraph 51(1)(b) of this Schedule
conclusion text: Install submarine cable in Australian waters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
logic summary: Permission to install each international submarine cable
premise text: Application is covered by paragraph 51(1)(c) of this Schedule
conclusion text: Install each international submarine cable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(3) Grant or refusal of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-56-ss-3
part of: 56 Grant or refusal of permit
note: Refusal to grant permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.183
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse
logic summary: Grant refusal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation of refusal
conclusion text: (3) After considering the application, the ACMA may refuse to grant a protection zone installation permit.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(4) Grant or refusal of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-56-ss-4
part of: 56 Grant or refusal of permit
note: Notification of refusal decision and reasons
description: Reasons for decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.183
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
conclusion text: The ACMA must notify the applicant in writing of its decision and reasons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57 Matters to which the ACMA must have regard in making a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-57
note: ACMA must consider certain matters when deciding on a permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider matters
premise text: ACMA must have regard to certain matters
conclusion text: Decision about permit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57A Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-57a
has part: 57A(1) Refusal of permit—security
has part: 57A(2) Refusal of permit—security
has part: 57A(3) Refusal of permit—security
has part: 57A(4) Refusal of permit—security
has part: 57A(5) Refusal of permit—security
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184

57A(1) Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1
part of: 57A Refusal of permit—security
note: Grant of protection zone installation permit to a carrier may be refused due to security concerns.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of granting a protection zone installation permit.
premise text: The Home Affairs Minister considers that the grant would be prejudicial to security.
conclusion text: A written direction may be given not to grant the permit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Timeframe for granting or refusing a permit.
premise text: The Home Affairs Minister considers the grant of the permit would be prejudicial to security.
conclusion text: A written direction may be given within a certain timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring refusal of permits based on security concerns.
premise text: The Home Affairs Minister considers that the grant of the permit would be prejudicial to security.
conclusion text: A particular carrier may have its permit repeatedly refused.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Impact of refusal on carriers.
premise text: The Home Affairs Minister considers that the grant would be prejudicial to security.
conclusion text: Carriers may be affected by the refusal of their permit.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Use of AI in decision-making.
premise text: The Home Affairs Minister consults with the Prime Minister and the Minister administering the Act.
conclusion text: AI may be used to support the decision-making process.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57A(2) Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-2
part of: 57A Refusal of permit—security
note: Comply with a direction under subclause (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57A(3) Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-3
part of: 57A Refusal of permit—security
note: Cannot reconsider non-compulsory refusal to grant permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reconsideration of non-compulsory refusal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57A(4) Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4
part of: 57A Refusal of permit—security
note: Application lapses if permit application is pending when direction given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 57A(4) Refusal of permit—security
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits lapse of application if permit pending.
premise text: (4) If an application for a protection zone installation permit is pending at the time when the Home Affairs Minister gives a direction to the ACMA under this clause, then the application lapses.
conclusion text: The application lapses.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Application overlaps with time of direction given.
premise text: (4) If an application for a protection zone installation permit is pending at the time when the Home Affairs Minister gives a direction to the ACMA under this clause, then the application lapses.
conclusion text: The application overlaps with the time of the direction.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Application overlaps with time of direction given.
premise text: (4) If an application for a protection zone installation permit is pending at the time when the Home Affairs Minister gives a direction to the ACMA under this clause, then the application lapses.
conclusion text: The application overlaps with the time of the direction.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implication
logic summary: Direction implies lapse of application.
premise text: (4) If an application for a protection zone installation permit is pending at the time when the Home Affairs Minister gives a direction to the ACMA under this clause, then the application lapses.
conclusion text: If the direction is given, then the application lapses.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Implication
logic summary: Direction implies lapse of application.
premise text: (4) If an application for a protection zone installation permit is pending at the time when the Home Affairs Minister gives a direction to the ACMA under this clause, then the application lapses.
conclusion text: If the direction is given, then the application lapses.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57A(5) Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5
part of: 57A Refusal of permit—security
note: Refusal of permit—security
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-cogai-6

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 57A(5) Refusal of permit—security
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits non-compulsory refusal of permit
premise text: (5) In this clause:...
conclusion text: ...a refusal that is required by this clause.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies refusal as non-compulsory
premise text: non-compulsory refusal means a refusal to grant...
conclusion text: ...a protection zone installation permit, other than a refusal that is required by this clause.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for non-compulsory refusal
premise text: (5) In this clause:
conclusion text: ...a refusal to grant a protection zone installation permit, other than a refusal that is required by this clause.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for non-compulsory refusal
premise text: (5) In this clause:
conclusion text: ...a protection zone installation permit, other than a refusal that is required by this clause.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses definition of non-compulsory refusal
premise text: (5) In this clause:
conclusion text: ...a protection zone installation permit, other than a refusal that is required by this clause.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-57a-ss-5-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies refusal as non-compulsory using AI
premise text: (5) In this clause:
conclusion text: ...a protection zone installation permit, other than a refusal that is required by this clause.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Timing of decision on application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-58
has part: 58(1) Timing of decision on application
has part: 58(2) Timing of decision on application
has part: 58(3) Timing of decision on application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.185

58(1) Timing of decision on application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1
part of: 58 Timing of decision on application
note: Decision must be made within a specified timeframe after receiving further information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.185
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make a decision within a specified timeframe.
premise text: The ACMA must take all reasonable steps to ensure that a decision is made on the application.
conclusion text: A decision must be made within 25 business days or as specified by written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for decision-making.
premise text: A decision must be made within 25 business days or as specified by written notice.
conclusion text: The timeframe is between 25 business days and 35 business days.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: Recurring trace for decision-making.
premise text: A decision must be made within a specified timeframe after receiving further information.
conclusion text: The decision-making process is recursive and depends on the receipt of further information.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: INFLUENCE
logic summary: Influence of further information on decision-making.
premise text: The ACMA must take all reasonable steps to ensure that a decision is made on the application.
conclusion text: Further information influences the decision-making process.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: PROCESS
logic summary: Processing of further information by the ACMA.
premise text: The applicant gave the ACMA further information under subclause 55(1) in relation to the application.
conclusion text: The ACMA processes the further information.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(2) Timing of decision on application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-58-ss-2
part of: 58 Timing of decision on application
note: Decision must be made within a specified timeframe
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.185
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(3) Timing of decision on application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-58-ss-3
part of: 58 Timing of decision on application
note: Prohibition on protection zone installation permit applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.185
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits carrier application for protection zone installation permit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58A Conditions of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-58a
has part: 58A(1) Conditions of permit
has part: 58A(2) Conditions of permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.187

58A(1) Conditions of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-58a-ss-1
part of: 58A Conditions of permit
note: Conditions for a protection zone installation permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.187
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58A(1) Conditions of permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory condition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58A(2) Conditions of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-58a-ss-2
part of: 58A Conditions of permit
note: ACMA may vary conditions covered by paragraph (1)(a) or (b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.187
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-58a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to vary conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 Duration of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-59
note: Duration of permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-59-norm

60 Surrender of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-60
note: Holder may surrender permit by written notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-60-norm

61 Extension of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-61
has part: 61(1) Extension of permit
has part: 61(2) Extension of permit
has part: 61(3) Extension of permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188

61(1) Extension of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-61-ss-1
part of: 61 Extension of permit
note: Holder of permit may apply to extend permit duration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 61(1) Extension of permit
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(2) Extension of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-61-ss-2
part of: 61 Extension of permit
note: Holder must provide reasons for requesting permit extension.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide reasons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(3) Extension of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-61-ss-3
part of: 61 Extension of permit
note: ACMA must give written notice of decision and reasons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
conclusion text: ACMA must give written notice of decision and reasons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Suspension or cancellation of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-62
has part: 62(1) Suspension or cancellation of permit
has part: 62(2) Suspension or cancellation of permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188

62(1) Suspension or cancellation of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1
part of: 62 Suspension or cancellation of permit
note: Suspension or cancellation of permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 62(1) Suspension or cancellation of permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) The ACMA may suspend or cancel a protection zone installation permit by written notice to the holder of the permit...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for suspension or cancellation
premise text: (1) The ACMA may suspend or cancel a protection zone installation permit by written notice to the holder of the permit...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for suspension or cancellation
premise text: (1) The ACMA may suspend or cancel a protection zone installation permit by written notice to the holder of the permit...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of suspension or cancellation
premise text: (1) The ACMA may suspend or cancel a protection zone installation permit by written notice to the holder of the permit...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication for suspension or cancellation
premise text: (1) The ACMA may suspend or cancel a protection zone installation permit by written notice to the holder of the permit...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62(2) Suspension or cancellation of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-62-ss-2
part of: 62 Suspension or cancellation of permit
note: ACMA must provide written notice and opportunity to submit matters before suspending or cancelling a permit.
description: written notice, opportunity to submit matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.188
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACMA must provide written notice and opportunity to submit matters before suspending or cancelling a permit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-62-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The ACMA must give the holder 30 days' written notice before suspending or cancelling a permit.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63 Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-63
has part: 63(1) Exemption from State and Territory laws
has part: 63(2) Exemption from State and Territory laws
has part: 63(3) Exemption from State and Territory laws
has part: 63(4) Exemption from State and Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.189

63(1) Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-63-ss-1
part of: 63 Exemption from State and Territory laws
note: Exemption from State and Territory laws for submarine cable installation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.189
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-1-norm

63(2) Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2
part of: 63 Exemption from State and Territory laws
note: Exemption from State and Territory laws for cable installation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.189
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to install cable despite State/Territory laws
premise text: (2) A carrier may...
conclusion text: ...install a cable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Exemption for environmental protection
premise text: (b) the protection of places or items of significance...
conclusion text: ...to Australia’s natural or cultural heritage
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to install cable despite local government powers
premise text: (c) the powers and functions of a local government body...
conclusion text: ...of engaging in the activity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to install cable despite fuel/power supply restrictions
premise text: (d) the supply of fuel or power, including...
conclusion text: ...the supply and distribution of extra-low voltage power systems
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to install cable despite regulation-specific matters
premise text: (e) a matter specified in the regulations.
conclusion text: ...of engaging in the activity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(3) Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-63-ss-3
part of: 63 Exemption from State and Territory laws
note: Exemption from State and Territory laws for protection of cultural heritage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.189
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
logic summary: Exempts from State and Territory laws
premise text: (3) Paragraph (2)(b)
conclusion text: does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(4) Exemption from State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-63-ss-4
part of: 63 Exemption from State and Territory laws
note: Exemption from State and Territory laws for high-voltage electricity supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.189
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-63-ss-4-norm

64 Application for a permit to install an international submarine
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-64
note: Carrier may apply for permit to install international submarine cables in non-protection zones and coastal waters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.191
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-64-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-64-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-64-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 64 Application for a permit to install an international submarine
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Carrier may apply for permit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65 Form of application etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-65
has part: 65(1) Form of application etc.
has part: 65(2) Form of application etc.
has part: 65(3) Form of application etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.191

65(1) Form of application etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-65-ss-1
part of: 65 Form of application etc.
note: Application must be in writing and in approved form.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.191
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(1) Form of application etc.
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65(2) Form of application etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-65-ss-2
part of: 65 Form of application etc.
note: Application must provide specific information
description: (a) proposed route or routes, in Australian waters, of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; (b) information about the ownership and control of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; (c) any other relevant information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.191
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(2) Form of application etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Must provide specific information
premise text: (a) proposed route or routes, in Australian waters, of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; (b) information about the ownership and control of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; (c) any other relevant information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires specific information to be provided
premise text: (a) proposed route or routes, in Australian waters, of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; (b) information about the ownership and control of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; (c) any other relevant information.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Requires specific information to be provided during a certain time period
premise text: (a) proposed route or routes, in Australian waters, of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; (b) information about the ownership and control of the submarine cable or cables specified in the application; (c) any other relevant information.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65(3) Form of application etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-65-ss-3
part of: 65 Form of application etc.
note: Control includes control as a result of, or by means of, trusts, agreements, arrangements, understandings and practices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.191
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(3) Form of application etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Control includes control as a result of, or by means of, trusts, agreements, arrangements, understandings and practices.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-65-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: result of
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 Application to be accompanied by charge
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-66
note: An application must be accompanied by the charge (if any)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-66-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-66-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66 Application to be accompanied by charge
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be accompanied by charge
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67 Withdrawal of application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-67
note: No prohibition on withdrawing an application and submitting a fresh one.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 67 Withdrawal of application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows withdrawal of an application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67A Notification of change of circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-67a
has part: 67A(1) Notification of change of circumstances
has part: 67A(2) Notification of change of circumstances
has part: 67A(3) Notification of change of circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192

67A(1) Notification of change of circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-1
part of: 67A Notification of change of circumstances
note: Notify change of circumstances to ACMA upon becoming aware.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67A(1) Notification of change of circumstances
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify change of circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67A(2) Notification of change of circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-2
part of: 67A Notification of change of circumstances
note: ACMA must decide on change of circumstances after notification.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to decide
premise text: Change of circumstances notification
conclusion text: Decision required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between notification and decision
premise text: After considering the notification, the ACMA must decide
conclusion text: Notification precedes decision
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67A(3) Notification of change of circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-3
part of: 67A Notification of change of circumstances
note: Notify applicant of decision within 2 business days
description: Notification in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-67a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify applicant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-68
has part: 68(1) Further information
has part: 68(2) Further information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192

68(1) Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-68-ss-1
part of: 68 Further information
note: Request for further information from applicant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68(1) Further information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: OBLIGATION
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68(2) Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-68-ss-2
part of: 68 Further information
note: ACMA may refuse to consider application until applicant provides information.
description: Information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68(2) Further information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-68-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: ACMA has an obligation to refuse application until applicant provides information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69 Grant or refusal of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-69
has part: 69(1) Grant or refusal of permit
has part: 69(3) Grant or refusal of permit
has part: 69(4) Grant or refusal of permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.193

69(1) Grant or refusal of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-69-ss-1
part of: 69 Grant or refusal of permit
note: Granting a non-protection zone installation permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.193
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-69-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
logic summary: Granting a permit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69(3) Grant or refusal of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-69-ss-3
part of: 69 Grant or refusal of permit
note: Refusal to grant permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.193
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-69-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-69-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-69-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse
logic summary: Grant refusal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69(4) Grant or refusal of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-69-ss-4
part of: 69 Grant or refusal of permit
note: ACMA must notify applicant of decision and reasons.
description: Decision and reasons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.193
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-69-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-69-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-69-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
conclusion text: ACMA must notify applicant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-70
has part: 70(1) Consultation
has part: 70(2) Consultation
has part: 70(3) Consultation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.193

70(1) Consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-70-ss-1
part of: 70 Consultation
note: Consultation before making a decision on an application for a non-protection zone installation permit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.193
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-70-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consult
premise text: ACMA must make a decision on the application.
conclusion text: ACMA must consult certain persons before making a decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(2) Consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-70-ss-2
part of: 70 Consultation
note: ACMA must provide consultation to Secretaries within 2 business days.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.193
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-70-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide consultation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(3) Consultation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-70-ss-3
part of: 70 Consultation
note: ACMA must not grant permit while notice is in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.193
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-70-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of granting permit
premise text: ACMA must not grant permit
conclusion text: while notice is in force
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71 Matters to which the ACMA must have regard in making a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-71
note: ACMA must consider specific factors when deciding on a permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.195
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-71-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-71-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACMA must consider specific factors
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72A Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-72a
has part: 72A(1) Refusal of permit—security
has part: 72A(2) Refusal of permit—security
has part: 72A(3) Refusal of permit—security
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.195

72A(1) Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-1
part of: 72A Refusal of permit—security
note: Grant of permit to carrier may be refused due to security concerns.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.195
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits granting permit
premise text: Grant of permit to carrier may be refused due to security concerns.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72A(2) Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-2
part of: 72A Refusal of permit—security
note: Comply with a direction under subclause (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.195
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72A(3) Refusal of permit—security
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-3
part of: 72A Refusal of permit—security
note: Cannot reconsider non-compulsory refusal to grant permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.195
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-72a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reconsideration of non-compulsory refusal to grant permit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 Timing of decision on application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-73
has part: 73(1) Timing of decision on application
has part: 73(2) Timing of decision on application
has part: 73(3) Timing of decision on application
has part: 73(4) Timing of decision on application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.196

73(1) Timing of decision on application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1
part of: 73 Timing of decision on application
note: Decision must be made within a specified timeframe after receiving further information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.196
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make a decision within a specified timeframe.
premise text: The ACMA must take all reasonable steps to ensure that a decision is made on the application.
conclusion text: A decision must be made within 60 business days or as specified by written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for decision-making.
premise text: A decision must be made within 60 business days or as specified by written notice.
conclusion text: The timeframe for making a decision is between 60 and 90 business days.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: Recurring trace of decision-making.
premise text: A decision must be made within 60 business days or as specified by written notice.
conclusion text: The process of making a decision is recursive and depends on the receipt of further information.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: INFLUENCE
logic summary: Influence of further information on decision-making.
premise text: The ACMA requests the applicant to give the ACMA further information under subclause 68(1) in relation to the application.
conclusion text: Further information influences the timeframe for making a decision.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: PROCESS
logic summary: Process of decision-making influenced by further information.
premise text: The ACMA must take all reasonable steps to ensure that a decision is made on the application.
conclusion text: The process of making a decision is influenced by the receipt of further information.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73(2) Timing of decision on application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-73-ss-2
part of: 73 Timing of decision on application
note: Decision on non-protection zone installation permit application must be made within a specified timeframe.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.196
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make decision within timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73(3) Timing of decision on application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-73-ss-3
part of: 73 Timing of decision on application
note: Extension of time for decision on application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.196
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73(3) Timing of decision on application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory extension of time
premise text: (3) If...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73(4) Timing of decision on application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-73-ss-4
part of: 73 Timing of decision on application
note: Extension of time for decision on application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.196
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73-ss-4-norm

73A Conditions of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-73a
has part: 73A(1) Conditions of permit
has part: 73A(2) Conditions of permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.198

73A(1) Conditions of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1
part of: 73A Conditions of permit
note: Conditions for non-protection zone installation permits
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.198
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73A(1) Conditions of permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory condition
premise text: The relevant cable or cables must be installed within 926 metres of the route or routes specified by the ACMA in the permit.
conclusion text: It is obligatory to install the cable or cables within that distance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal interval restriction
premise text: The relevant cable or cables must be installed within 926 metres of the route or routes specified by the ACMA in the permit.
conclusion text: The installation is restricted to a specific temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory condition for regulatory approvals
premise text: A person acting on behalf of the carrier must not install the relevant cable or cables unless all Commonwealth regulatory approvals have been obtained for the installation.
conclusion text: It is obligatory to obtain regulatory approvals before installing the cable or cables.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory condition for security
premise text: Such conditions (if any) in relation to security as the ACMA specifies in the permit.
conclusion text: It is obligatory to comply with security conditions specified by the ACMA.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory condition for installation
premise text: Such conditions (if any) in relation to the installation of the relevant cable or cables as the ACMA specifies in the permit.
conclusion text: It is obligatory to comply with installation conditions specified by the ACMA.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73A(2) Conditions of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-2
part of: 73A Conditions of permit
note: ACMA may vary conditions of permit by written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.198
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-73a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to vary conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74 Duration of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-74
note: Permit duration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-74-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-74-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74 Duration of permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true
conclusion text: Permit is in force for a period of 18 months
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75 Surrender of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-75
note: Holder may surrender permit by written notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-75-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-75-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to surrender permit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 Extension of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-76
has part: 76(1) Extension of permit
has part: 76(2) Extension of permit
has part: 76(3) Extension of permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199

76(1) Extension of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-76-ss-1
part of: 76 Extension of permit
note: Holder may apply to extend permit duration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(1) Extension of permit
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to extend permit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(2) Extension of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-76-ss-2
part of: 76 Extension of permit
note: Holder must provide reasons for requesting permit extension.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide reasons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(3) Extension of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-76-ss-3
part of: 76 Extension of permit
note: ACMA must give written notice of decision and reasons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
conclusion text: ACMA must give written notice of decision and reasons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Suspension or cancellation of permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-77
note: Suspension or cancellation of a non-protection zone installation permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits suspension or cancellation of a non-protection zone installation permit
premise text: ACMA may suspend or cancel...
conclusion text: ...by written notice to the holder of the permit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with Schedule 3A Protection of submarine cables
premise text: Schedule 3A Protection of submarine cables
conclusion text: ...by written notice to the holder of the permit
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with Schedule 3A Protection of submarine cables
premise text: Schedule 3A Protection of submarine cables
conclusion text: ...by written notice to the holder of the permit
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies that suspension or cancellation is subject to ACMA's discretion
premise text: ACMA may suspend or cancel...
conclusion text: ...by written notice to the holder of the permit
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-77-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Analyzes the relationship between ACMA and permit holders
premise text: ACMA may suspend or cancel...
conclusion text: ...by written notice to the holder of the permit
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Application of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-78
has part: 78(1) Application of this Division
has part: 78(2) Application of this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.201

78(1) Application of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1
part of: 78 Application of this Division
note: Installation of international submarine cable must comply with conditions in this Division and any additional conditions imposed by a Code of Practice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.201
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with conditions in this Division and any additional conditions imposed by a Code of Practice.
premise text: (1) This Division applies...
conclusion text: ...must comply with the conditions in this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Installation of international submarine cable must be done after commencement of this Division.
premise text: (1) This Division applies to the installation...
conclusion text: ...must be installed after commencement of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Installation of international submarine cable must be done before a specified date.
premise text: (b) in Australian waters, other than coastal waters...
conclusion text: ...must be installed before the specified date.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
logic summary: Installation of international submarine cable must comply with conditions in this Division and any additional conditions imposed by a Code of Practice, and must also meet other requirements.
premise text: (1) This Division applies to the installation...
conclusion text: ...must comply with the conditions in this Division and any additional conditions imposed by a Code of Practice.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Installation of international submarine cable is an activity that requires human judgment.
premise text: (a) in a protection zone;
conclusion text: ...is an installation of an international submarine cable.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

78(2) Application of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2
part of: 78 Application of this Division
note: Conditions for installation of domestic submarine cable in a protection zone
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.201
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(2) Application of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Mandatory condition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope
premise text: (2) This Division applies to the installation of a domestic submarine cable in a protection zone by, or on behalf of, a carrier.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope
premise text: (2) This Division applies to the installation of a domestic submarine cable in a protection zone by, or on behalf of, a carrier.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: by
logic summary: Scope of application
premise text: (2) This Division applies to the installation of a domestic submarine cable in a protection zone by, or on behalf of, a carrier.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-78-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: by
logic summary: Scope of application
premise text: (2) This Division applies to the installation of a domestic submarine cable in a protection zone by, or on behalf of, a carrier.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79 Installation to do as little damage as practicable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-79
note: Ensure minimal damage and inconvenience during installation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.201
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-79-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-79-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-79-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79 Installation to do as little damage as practicable
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ensure
logic summary: Guarantee actions
premise text: Actions must be taken
conclusion text: Ensure minimal damage and inconvenience
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Management of installation activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-80
note: Ensure good engineering practice, safety of persons and property, and environmental protection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.201
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-80-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-80-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-80-logic-deontic-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-80-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80 Management of installation activities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure good engineering practice
premise text: Good engineering practice
conclusion text: Must be followed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-80-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SHALL
logic summary: Protect the safety of persons and property
premise text: Safety of persons and property
conclusion text: Must be protected
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-80-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Protect the environment
premise text: Environmental protection
conclusion text: Must be followed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81 Compliance with industry standards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-81
note: Ensure compliance with industry standards for public safety.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.202
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-81-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-81-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-81-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81 Compliance with industry standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with industry standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Compliance with international agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-82
note: Ensure compliance with international agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.202
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-82-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-82-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-82-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82 Compliance with international agreements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
premise text: Australia's obligations under international agreements
conclusion text: Ensure compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83 Conditions specified in the regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-83
note: Carrier must comply with conditions specified in regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.202
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 83 Conditions specified in the regulations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83A Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-83a
has part: 83A(1) Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
has part: 83A(2) Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
has part: 83A(3) Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.202

83A(1) Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-1
part of: 83A Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
note: No application for injunction can be made without Attorney-General's consent under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.202
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 83A(1) Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No application can be made
premise text: Application for injunction must have Attorney-General's consent.
conclusion text: No application can be made without consent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

83A(2) Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-2
part of: 83A Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
note: No proceeding can be instituted without the written consent of the Attorney-General for certain enforcement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.202
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 83A(2) Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No proceeding can be instituted without the written consent of the Attorney-General.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83A(3) Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-3
part of: 83A Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
note: Attorney-General must consider Australia's international law obligations when deciding to consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.202
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 83A(3) Attorney-General’s consent required for certain enforcement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-83a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: Attorney-General must consider Australia's international law obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-84
has part: 84(1) Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
has part: 84(2) Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
has part: 84(3) Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.204

84(1) Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1
part of: 84 Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
note: Installing an international submarine cable without a permit is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.204
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 84(1) Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the installation of an international submarine cable without a permit.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: Penalty: 200 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the installation of an international submarine cable without a permit in Australian waters that are not in a protection zone and that are not coastal waters of a State or the Northern Territory.
premise text: (b) the cable is installed: (i) in Australian waters...
conclusion text: Penalty: 200 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the installation of an international submarine cable without a permit in a protection zone.
premise text: (b) the cable is installed: (ii) in a protection zone.
conclusion text: Penalty: 200 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the installation of an international submarine cable without a permit if the person does not have a permit under this Part authorising the installation of the cable in the place in which it is installed.
premise text: (c) the person does not have a permit...
conclusion text: Penalty: 200 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: The installation of an international submarine cable without a permit occurs during the period in which the person installs or causes to be installed the cable.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: Penalty: 200 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

84(2) Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-84-ss-2
part of: 84 Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
note: Installing an international submarine cable without a permit is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.204
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 84(2) Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84(3) Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-84-ss-3
part of: 84 Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
note: Installation of international submarine cable without permit is permitted for carriers with a permit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.204
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 84(3) Installing an international submarine cable without a permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to install cable without permit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84A Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-84a
has part: 84A(1) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
has part: 84A(2) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
has part: 84A(3) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
has part: 84A(4) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.204

84A(1) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-1
part of: 84A Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
note: Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.204
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 84A(1) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits the installation of a domestic submarine cable without a permit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84A(2) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-2
part of: 84A Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
note: Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.204
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 84A(2) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84A(3) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-3
part of: 84A Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
note: Installation of domestic submarine cable without permit is permitted if carrier has a permit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.204
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 84A(3) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to install cable without permit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84A(4) Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-4
part of: 84A Installing a domestic submarine cable without a permit
note: Exemption for domestic submarine cables installed before commencement of the clause.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.204
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-84a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission for domestic submarine cables installed before commencement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85 Breaching conditions of a permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-85
has part: 85(1) Breaching conditions of a permit
has part: 85(2) Breaching conditions of a permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.205

85(1) Breaching conditions of a permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1
part of: 85 Breaching conditions of a permit
note: Breach of permit conditions results in an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.205
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(1) Breaching conditions of a permit
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of breach of permit conditions.
premise text: (1) A carrier commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Penalty: 100 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with permit conditions.
premise text: (1) A carrier commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Penalty: 100 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of breach on offence.
premise text: (1) A carrier commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Penalty: 100 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct that breaches permit conditions.
premise text: (a) the carrier holds a permit under this Part authorising...
conclusion text: ...Penalty: 100 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85(2) Breaching conditions of a permit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-85-ss-2
part of: 85 Breaching conditions of a permit
note: No proceeding can be commenced without written consent of the Attorney-General for certain cases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.205
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(2) Breaching conditions of a permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No proceeding can be commenced without written consent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-86
has part: 86(1) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
has part: 86(2) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
has part: 86(3) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206

86(1) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-86-ss-1
part of: 86 Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
note: Installing a submarine cable in a protection zone or Australian waters without permission is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(1) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Installing a submarine cable in a protection zone or Australian waters without permission is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(2) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2
part of: 86 Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
note: Failure to comply with ACMA direction results in an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(2) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits non-compliance with ACMA direction.
premise text: (2) A carrier who does not comply with a direction under subclause (1)
conclusion text: commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to comply with ACMA direction.
premise text: (2) A carrier who does not comply with a direction under subclause (1)
conclusion text: commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Establishes the causal relationship between non-compliance and committing an offence.
premise text: (2) A carrier who does not comply with a direction under subclause (1)
conclusion text: commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Allows ACMA to direct carriers to remove unlawfully placed items.
premise text: (2) A carrier who does not comply with a direction under subclause (1)
conclusion text: commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(3) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-86-ss-3
part of: 86 Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
note: ACMA cannot give a direction to a carrier under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(3) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an unlawfully
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents ACMA from giving a direction to a carrier.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86A Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-86a
has part: 86A(1) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
has part: 86A(2) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
has part: 86A(3) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206

86A(1) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-1
part of: 86A Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
note: Installing a submarine cable in a protection zone without a permit is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 86A(1) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Installing a submarine cable in a protection zone without a permit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86A(2) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-2
part of: 86A Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
note: Failure to comply with ACMA direction results in an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 86A(2) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits non-compliance with ACMA direction.
premise text: ACMA direction to remove an item
conclusion text: Offence committed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86A(3) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-3
part of: 86A Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
note: ACMA cannot give a direction to a carrier under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.206
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 86A(3) Failing to comply with ACMA direction to remove an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-86a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: ACMA cannot give a direction.
premise text: ACMA direction to remove an...
conclusion text: ...must not give a direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87 Compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-87
has part: 87(1) Compensation
has part: 87(2) Compensation
has part: 87(3) Compensation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.208

87(1) Compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-87-ss-1
part of: 87 Compensation
note: Compensation for financial loss or damage caused by a carrier's actions.
description: reasonable amount of compensation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.208
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Carrier has an obligation to provide compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87(2) Compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-87-ss-2
part of: 87 Compensation
note: Compensation for damage to land and resources
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.208
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87(2) Compensation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to provide compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Defines a class of compensation that includes damage and resource-related claims
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87(3) Compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-87-ss-3
part of: 87 Compensation
note: Court of competent jurisdiction includes the Federal Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.208
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87(3) Compensation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
premise text: Court of competent jurisdiction includes the Federal Court.
conclusion text: The Federal Court is included in the court of competent jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-87-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Class hierarchy inclusion
premise text: Court of competent jurisdiction includes the Federal Court.
conclusion text: The Federal Court is part of the class hierarchy of courts of competent jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88 Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-88
has part: 88(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 88(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 88(3) Compensation for acquisition of property
has part: 88(4) Compensation for acquisition of property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.208

88(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-88-ss-1
part of: 88 Compensation for acquisition of property
note: Carrier must pay reasonable compensation to a person if acquisition of property is not valid without compensation.
description: Compensation for acquisition of property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.208
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(1) Compensation for acquisition of property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must pay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-88-ss-2
part of: 88 Compensation for acquisition of property
note: Compensation for acquisition of property must consider prior agreements and damages recovered from the carrier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.208
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(2) Compensation for acquisition of property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider prior agreements and damages recovered from the carrier.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(3) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-88-ss-3
part of: 88 Compensation for acquisition of property
note: This clause does not limit the operation of clause 87.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.208
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Clause 88(3) implies that clause 87 operates regardless of this clause.
premise text: Clause 87
conclusion text: Clause 87 operates regardless of this clause.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

88(4) Compensation for acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-88-ss-4
part of: 88 Compensation for acquisition of property
note: Definition of acquisition of property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.208
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-88-ss-4-norm

89 Delegation by the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-89
has part: 89(1) Delegation by the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s
has part: 89(2) Delegation by the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210

89(1) Delegation by the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-89-ss-1
part of: 89 Delegation by the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s
note: Delegation of powers to SES employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-89-ss-1-norm

89(2) Delegation by the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-89-ss-2
part of: 89 Delegation by the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s
note: Delegate must comply with directions of the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s Department.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-89-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-89-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(2) Delegation by the Secretary of the Attorney-General’s
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
premise text: Delegate
conclusion text: Comply with directions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90 Delegation by the Home Affairs Secretary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-90
has part: 90(1) Delegation by the Home Affairs Secretary
has part: 90(2) Delegation by the Home Affairs Secretary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210

90(1) Delegation by the Home Affairs Secretary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-90-ss-1
part of: 90 Delegation by the Home Affairs Secretary
note: Delegation of powers to SES employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-90-ss-1-norm

90(2) Delegation by the Home Affairs Secretary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3a-sec-90-ss-2
part of: 90 Delegation by the Home Affairs Secretary
note: Delegate must comply with directions of the Home Affairs Secretary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-90-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-90-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-90-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 90(2) Delegation by the Home Affairs Secretary
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
premise text: Directions of the Home Affairs Secretary
conclusion text: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-3a-sec-90-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for delegation
premise text: Delegation by the Home Affairs Secretary
conclusion text: Starts after commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Reviewable decisions of the ACMA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
note: Reviewable decisions of the ACMA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.211
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to review decisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Decisions to which section 556 does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
note: Decisions to which section 556 does not apply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.215
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-2-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Decisions to which section 556 does not apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

22 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22
note: Commencement of transitional provisions and consequential amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-norm

3 May 1997
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
note: Sale Act 1997
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-3-norm

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30
note: Conditional commencement of Telecommunications Legislation Amendment Act 1997
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16
note: Amendment of Sch 1 and Sch 2 by Statute Law Revision Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-16-norm

3 July 2002
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-2
note: Telecommunications Amendment Act 1998
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-3-2-norm

26 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-26
note: Remainder: Royal Assent s. 4 and 5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.219
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-26-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-26-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Royal Assent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17
note: Conditional commencement on July 1, 1998
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-17-norm

29 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-29
note: Commences on July 1, 1998
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-29-norm

11 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-norm

11 Dec 1998
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-2
note: Universal Service Cap Act 1999
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-2-norm

11 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-3
note: Commencement of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-3-norm

5 July 1999
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-5
note: Commencement of Environmental Reform (Consequential Provisions) Act 1999
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-shacl-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: 2 Aug 1999 (s 2(3), (4))
conclusion text: 5 July 1999 (s 2(1))
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: Sch 4 (items 21–29)
conclusion text: Sch 3 (items 77–82) and Sch 4 (items 21–29)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal trace
premise text: 2 Aug 1999 (s 2(3), (4))
conclusion text: 5 July 1999 (s 2(1))
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Artificial agent
premise text: Sch 4 (items 21–29)
conclusion text: Sch 3 (items 77–82) and Sch 4 (items 21–29)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Schema
premise text: Sch 4 (items 1–16, 21–29)
conclusion text: Sch 2 and Sch 3
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 July
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-2
note: List of schedules and items
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-16-2-norm

16 July 2000 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-3
note: Reference to amendment act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-16-3-norm

11 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-4
note: Commencement of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.220
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Starts on December 1999
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10
note: Conditional commencement of Broadcasting Services Amendment Act (No. 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-norm

23 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23
note: Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Amendment Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23 Dec
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPartOf
logic summary: Part of a legislative provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which the provision applies
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication of the provision on other laws
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusesTo
logic summary: Diffusion of the provision to related laws
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: isRelatedTo
logic summary: Relationship between the provision and AI systems
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-29-2
note: Commencement of Sch 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-29-2-norm

21 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21
note: Privacy Amendment (Private Sector) Act 155, 2000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-2
note: Dec 2001 (s 2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-2-norm

20 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20
note: Reference to section 4 and Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-norm

24 May 2001 (s 2(1)(a))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24
note: Duty to communicate and report
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-24-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-24-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 May 2001 (s 2(1)(a))
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 June 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-5-2
note: Repeals, Consequentials and Transitionals Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-2-norm

28 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-28
note: Conditional commencement of Statute Law Revision Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-28-norm

3 July 2002
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-3
note: Commencement of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.221
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-3-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Starts on July 1999
conclusion text: July 1999
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-2
note: Conditional commencement of the Telecommunications Competition Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-2-norm

19 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-19-norm

23 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-2
note: Schedules 1 and 2: 1 Jan 2004 (see s. 2(1) and Gazette 2003, No. GN47)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-2-norm

24 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-2
note: Schedule 1 (items 25–48)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-24-2-norm

27 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-norm

12 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12
note: Schedule 1 (items 42–87) commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-norm

17 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-2
note: Commencement of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-17-2-norm

20 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-2-norm

21 Apr 2004
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-3
note: US Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must implement the US Free Trade Agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-4
note: Schedule 9 (item 192) of the Telecommunications Act 1997
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.222
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-16-4-norm

22 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-2
note: Consequential and transitional provisions for the Australian Communications and Media Authority Act 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.223
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Feb
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to implement consequential and transitional provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Apr 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-2
note: Amendment of Sch 4 by Omnibus Repeal Day (Autumn 2014) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.223
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval application
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.223
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-16-5-norm

17 Oct 2014 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-3
note: Prohibition on damaging submarine cables
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.223
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-17-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-17-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-17-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits damage to submarine cables
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-3
note: Schedule 1 (items 2–105)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.223
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-3-norm

23 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-4
note: Schedule 3: Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Issues) Act 119, 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.223
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-4-norm

23 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-5
note: Schedule references
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.223
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-5-norm

1 Jan 2006 (see
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-3
note: References other schedules and items
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.223
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-3-norm

29 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-29-3
note: Commences on 1 July 2008
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-29-3-norm

3 May 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-4
note: Consequential Amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-3-4-norm

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-2
note: Do Not Call Register (Consequential Amendments) Act 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-2-norm

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-3
note: Schedule 1 (items 42–73)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-3-norm

8 Dec 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8
note: Commencement of Sch 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-8-norm

20 July
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-3-norm

20 Jan 2008 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-4
note: Conditional commencement of Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-4-norm

28 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-28-2
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 1 (items 57–68)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-28-2-norm

26 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-26-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-26-2-norm

27 May 2008 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-2
note: Legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.224
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-2-norm

21 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-4
note: Conditional commencement of the Telecommunications Amendment (Integrated Public Number Database) Act 2009
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-21-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: :
logic summary: Conditional commencement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-26-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-26-3-norm

27 Mar 2009 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-3
note: Statute Stocktake (Regulatory and Other Laws) Act 2009
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-3-norm

16 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-16-6-norm

17 Nov 2009 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-4
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-17-4-norm

1 Mar 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-4
note: Legislation Amendment Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits Do Not Call Register legislation amendment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-18-norm

30 May 2010 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-4
note: Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPartOf
logic summary: Classification of legislative provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-31-norm

13 July
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13
note: Commencement of Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.225
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Commencement of the Act
premise text: The commencement date is specified in s 2(1)
conclusion text: The Act commences on 1 January 2011
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15
note: Commencement of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.226
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-15-norm

1 Jan 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-5
note: Awaiting commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.226
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-5-norm

22 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-3
note: References specific sections of the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (National Broadband Network Measures—Access Arrangements) Act 2011
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.226
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-3-norm

12 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.226
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-2-norm

13 Apr 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-2
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.226
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-2-norm

12 Apr 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-3
note: Conditional commencement of Acts Interpretation Amendment Act 2011
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.226
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-3-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement specified
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.226
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-4-norm

27 Dec 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-5
note: Items 11 and 12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.226
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Item inclusion
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-26-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-26-4-norm

27 Sept 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-6
note: Remains in effect until September 26, 2011
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-6-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Defines the duration of the provision
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-16-7-norm

1 July 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-6
note: Cybercrime Legislation Amendment Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-6-norm

12 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-4
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-4-norm

22 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-4
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Sept
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Dec 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-3-5-norm

3 Dec 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-6
note: Privacy Amendment (Enhancing Privacy Protection) Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-3-6-norm

12 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-5
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2013
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-5-norm

29 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-29-4
note: June 2013 (s 2(1) item 16 Sch 3 (item 343))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.227
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-29-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-29-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-29-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Happens
logic summary: June 2013
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-28-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-28-3-norm

1 Mar 2014 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-7
note: Statute Law Revision Act (No. 1) 2014
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-7-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Mar 2014 (s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

27 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-7
note: Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Submarine Cable Protection) Act 2014
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-7-norm

27 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-8-norm

28 May 2014 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-28-4
note: May 2014 (s 2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.228
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-28-4-norm

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-5
note: Amendment of Sch 14 by Public Governance and Resources Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.229
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-5-norm

13 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.229
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-3-norm

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-3
note: Consequential Provisions Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.229
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Sept
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-4
note: Omnibus Repeal Day (Autumn 2014) Act 2014
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.229
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-4-norm

16 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-8
note: Statute Law Revision Act (No. 1) 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.229
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-16-8-norm

25 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-25
note: Commencement provision for Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.229
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-25-norm

5 Mar 2015
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-5-3
note: Amendment of certain items in Sch 1 and Sch 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.230
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-3-norm

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-5
note: Statute Law Amendment (Prescribed Forms and Other Updates) Act 74, 2023
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.230
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the type of obligation or prohibition
premise text: None
conclusion text: Obligation/Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-5
note: Consequential Amendments for Enhancing Online Safety for Children Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.230
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-5-norm

24 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-3
note: Prohibition on certain telecommunications activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.230
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-24-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-24-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-24-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain telecommunications activities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.230
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-4-norm

1 July 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-8
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 6 items 10–12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.230
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-8-norm

13 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.230
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-5-norm

13 Oct 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.230
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-6-norm

13 Apr 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-7
note: Items 1 and 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.230
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-7-norm

20 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-6
note: Mandatory amendment of Sch 5 and Sch 9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory amendment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-6
note: Conditional commencement of legislation amendment act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-6-norm

26 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-26-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-26-5-norm

1 July 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-9
note: Sch 2 (items 356–396)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-9-norm

18 June 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18-2
note: Amendment by Territories Legislation Amendment Act 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-18-2-norm

23 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-6
note: Consequential Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-6-norm

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-6
note: Statute Law Revision Act (No. 2) 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-6-norm

12 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-6
note: Statute Law Revision Act (No. 1) 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-6-norm

11 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-5-norm

10 Mar 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-10-7-norm

23 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-7-norm

1 July 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-10
note: Enhancing Online Safety for Children Amendment Act 2017
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-10-norm

22 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-5-norm

23 June 2017 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-8
note: Legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.231
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-8-norm

18 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.232
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-18-3-norm

18 Sept 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18-4
note: Amendment of Home Affairs and Integrity Agencies Legislation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.232
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-18-4-norm

9 May 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-9
note: Conditional commencement of Defence Legislation Amendment (2017 Measures No. 1) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.232
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-9-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-9-logic-deontic-3

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditionally commenced on 18 Sept 2018 (s 2(1) item 6)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-9-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditionally commenced on 11 May 2018 (s 2(1) item 7)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-9-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking
premise text: No clear duty, ban conduct, grant permission, or create a right
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-7
note: Establishment of the Australian Signals Directorate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.232
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-7-norm

11 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-6
note: Conditional commencement of Home Affairs and Integrity Agencies Legislation Amendment Act 2018
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.232
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-6-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 May 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-9-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.232
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-9-2-norm

18 Sept 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18-5
note: Item 6 of Crimes Legislation Amendment (International Crime Cooperation and Other Measures) Act 2018
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.232
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-18-5-norm

22 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.232
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-6-norm

22 Nov 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-7
note: Item 2 of Schedule 1, item 215
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.232
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-22-7-norm

8 Dec 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-2
note: Amendment notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.233
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-8-2-norm

1 Mar 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-11
note: Legislation Amendment Act 2019
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.233
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-11-norm

1 Mar 2019
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-12
note: Consequential Amendments Act 2019
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.233
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-12-norm

7 Aug 2019
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-7
note: Commencement of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.233
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Indicates commencement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-7
note: Regulation of telecommunications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.233
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Dec
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-2
note: Mandatory commencement of certain provisions on specific dates.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.234
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-25-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-25-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 May
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-2
note: Dec 2020 (s 2(1) item 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.234
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-15-2-norm

17 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-5
note: Conditional commencement of the Telecommunications Amendment (Infrastructure in New Developments) Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.234
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-17-5-norm

16 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.234
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-16-9-norm

17 Feb 2021 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-6
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.234
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-17-6-norm

1 Mar 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-13
note: Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.234
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-1-13-norm

23 July
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-9
note: Legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.234
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-23-9-norm

2 Dec 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-2-2
note: Conditional commencement on 2 June 2022
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.235
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-2-2-norm

13 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-8
note: Amendment of legislative provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.235
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-13-8-norm

11 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-7
note: Commencement and application details for Act 2022
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.235
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-7-norm

12 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-8
note: Commencement of amendments to the Telecommunications Act 1997
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.235
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-12-8-norm

11 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-8
note: Conditional commencement of certain sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-8-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-11-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Temporal intervals specified
conclusion text: Relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-7
note: Legislation Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards and Other Measures) Act 2024
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-7-norm

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-20-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Sept
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

31 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-2
note: Conditional commencement of certain provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-31-2-norm

31 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-3
note: Conditional commencement of the Telecommunications Amendment (SMS Sender ID Register) Act 2024
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-31-3-norm

5 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-5-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-4-norm

5 Mar 2025 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-5-5
note: Item 1 of Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Act 2024
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-5-5-norm

24 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-4
note: Telecommunications Act 1997
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.236
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-24-4-norm

29 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-29-5
note: National Broadband Network Companies Amendment (Commitment to Public Ownership) Act 2025
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-29-5-norm

27 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-9
note: Conditional commencement of the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Triple Zero Custodian and Emergency Calling Powers) Act 2025
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-9-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-27-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-30-8-norm

31 Oct 2025 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-4
note: Strengthening Oversight of the National Intelligence Community Act 2025
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-31-4-norm

4 Dec 2025
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
note: Amendment history for Telecommunications Act 1997
references: Endnote 4—Amendment history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-act-1997.pdf, p.237
asserts: telecommunications-act-1997-sch-4-sec-4-norm