1 Short title
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.7
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.7
note: Defines sections and table of contents for the Act.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Definition of commencement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for section commencement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Commencement definition

1 July 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
note: July 2015 (s 2(1))
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-3
schema version: 2

1 July 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.119
note: July 2016 (s 2(1))
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-1-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-4
schema version: 2

1 July 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.119
note: Commencement of legislation
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-1-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-5
schema version: 2

1 Mar 2021
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.119
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-1-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-6
schema version: 2

1 Sept 2021 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.119
note: Conditional commencement of the Act
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-1-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-7
schema version: 2

10 Protection of disclosers
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 10(1) Protection of disclosers
has part: 10(2) Protection of disclosers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Sept
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.117
note: Legislation history for Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-2
schema version: 2

10 Sept
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
note: Conditional commencement of National Security Legislation Amendment Act 2014
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-3
schema version: 2

10 Sept
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
note: Conditional commencement of Civil Law and Justice (Omnibus Amendments) Act 2015
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-4
schema version: 2

10 Dec
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.119
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-5
schema version: 2

10(1) Protection of disclosers
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.24
note: Protection of disclosers from civil, criminal or administrative liability
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Protection of disclosers

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (making a public interest disclosure)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protection from liability implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (making a public interest disclosure) -> (not subject to civil, criminal or administrative liability)

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (making a public interest disclosure)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protection from liability implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (making a public interest disclosure) -> (no contractual or other remedy may be enforced)

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (making a public interest disclosure)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protection from liability implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (making a public interest disclosure) -> (no contractual or other right may be exercised)

10(2) Protection of disclosers
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.24
note: Protection of disclosers from contract termination
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Protection of disclosers

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute privilege in defamation proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2)

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10(2) Protection of disclosers

11 Liability for false or misleading statements etc. unaffected
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11(1) Liability for false or misleading statements etc. unaffected
has part: 11(2) Liability for false or misleading statements etc. unaffected
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11
schema version: 2

11 Aug
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.120
note: Members of Parliament (Staff) Amendment Act 2023
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-2
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Aug

11(1) Liability for false or misleading statements etc. unaffected
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.24
note: No liability for knowingly making false or misleading statements
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Liability for false or misleading statements etc. unaffected

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No liability for knowingly making false or misleading statements
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to not make false or misleading statements
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 10 does not apply

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No liability for knowingly making false or misleading statements
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on making false or misleading statements
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Section 10 does not apply

11(2) Liability for false or misleading statements etc. unaffected
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.24
note: Section 10 does not apply to liability for an offence against certain sections of the Criminal Code.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Liability for false or misleading statements etc. unaffected

11A Designated publication restrictions
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.24
note: Disclosure contravening designated publication restriction is prohibited if person making disclosure knows of the contravention and lacks reasonable excuse.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11a
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure occurs within the same temporal interval as the designated publication restriction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Disclosure must occur within the same temporal interval as the designated publication restriction
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Person making disclosure knows that the disclosure contravenes the designated publication restriction and does not have a reasonable excuse for that contravention.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure is inferentially linked to the designated publication restriction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Disclosure must be inferentially linked to the designated publication restriction if person making disclosure knows of the contravention and lacks reasonable excuse
modality: CogAI
operator: Inferential
premise text: Person making disclosure knows that the disclosure contravenes the designated publication restriction and does not have a reasonable excuse for that contravention.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure contravening designated publication restriction
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Person making disclosure knows of the contravention and lacks reasonable excuse.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure diffuses to all relevant parties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Disclosure must diffuse to all relevant parties if person making disclosure knows of the contravention and lacks reasonable excuse
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Person making disclosure knows that the disclosure contravenes the designated publication restriction and does not have a reasonable excuse for that contravention.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure is recurrent.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Disclosure must be recurrent if person making disclosure knows of the contravention and lacks reasonable excuse
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: Person making disclosure knows that the disclosure contravenes the designated publication restriction and does not have a reasonable excuse for that contravention.

12 Discloser’s liability for own conduct not affected
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.25
note: Discloser's liability for own conduct not affected
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12
schema version: 2

12 Dec
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.120
note: Repeal of certain items in Schedule 1 before commencement.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-2
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation persists regardless of disclosure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continuity of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: continuum
premise text: Disclosure does not affect liability for conduct.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation persists regardless of disclosure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continuity of obligation in context of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: continuum
premise text: Disclosure does not affect individual's liability for conduct.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 Discloser’s liability for own conduct not affected

12A Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.25
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12A(1) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
has part: 12A(2) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
has part: 12A(3) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
has part: 12A(4) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12a
schema version: 2

12A(1) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
type: Concept
description: true
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.25
note: Witnesses must provide assistance in relation to a public interest disclosure.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 12A Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide assistance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12A(1) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.

12A(2) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.25
note: Immunity from civil, criminal or administrative action for providing assistance in relation to a public interest disclosure.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12A Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to provide immunity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12A(2) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.

12A(3) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.25
note: Witnesses are not subject to civil, criminal or administrative liability for assistance provided.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 12A Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Immunity from liability is granted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Assistance provides immunity from liability.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Assistance is provided.

12A(4) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.25
note: No contractual remedy may be enforced against the witness.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 12A Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits enforcement of contractual remedy
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

12B Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.26
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12B(1) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
has part: 12B(2) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
has part: 12B(3) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
has part: 12B(4) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
has part: 12B(5) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12b
schema version: 2

12B(1) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
type: Concept
description: False or misleading statements
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.26
note: Individuals providing assistance in public interest disclosures must not make false or misleading statements.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 12B Witnesses—exceptions to immunities

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on making false or misleading statements
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12B(1) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities

12B(2) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.26
note: Prohibition on knowingly making false or misleading statements
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12B Witnesses—exceptions to immunities

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits knowingly making false or misleading statements
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

12B(3) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.26
note: Section 12A does not apply to the liability of a witness for an offence against certain sections of the Criminal Code.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 12B Witnesses—exceptions to immunities

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: overlaps with the Criminal Code
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The section number overlaps with the Criminal Code.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: section 137.1, 137.2, 144.1 or 145.1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: imply that section 12A is excluded
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The designated publication restrictions imply that section 12A is excluded from applying to the liability of a witness for an offence against certain sections of the Criminal Code.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: Designated publication restrictions

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: does not apply
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 12A is excluded from applying to the liability of a witness for an offence against certain sections of the Criminal Code.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: Section 12A

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: implies that section 12A does not apply
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The liability of a witness for an offence against certain sections of the Criminal Code implies that section 12A does not apply.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implication
premise text: the liability of the witness

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: repeats in the Criminal Code
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The section number repeats in the Criminal Code.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: section 137.1, 137.2, 144.1 or 145.1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12B(3) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities

12B(4) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.26
note: Prohibition on contravening a designated publication restriction
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 12B Witnesses—exceptions to immunities

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids contravening a designated publication restriction
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

12B(5) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.26
note: Witnesses' liability for conduct not affected by section 12A
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 12B Witnesses—exceptions to immunities

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 12A and witnesses' liability for conduct overlap in time
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Section 12A and witnesses' liability for conduct overlap in time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Assistance provided relates to witness's conduct

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Witnesses' conduct is a separate issue from section 12A using AI
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Witnesses' conduct classified as a separate issue from section 12A using AI
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
premise text: Assistance provided relates to witness's conduct

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 12A does not affect witness's liability for conduct
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If assistance relates to witness's conduct, then section 12A does not affect liability.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Assistance provided relates to witness's conduct

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 12A spreads to witnesses' liability for conduct
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Section 12A spreads to witnesses' liability for conduct
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
premise text: Assistance provided relates to witness's conduct

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 12A repeats witnesses' liability for conduct
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Witnesses' liability for conduct repeated by section 12A
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: Assistance provided relates to witness's conduct

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12B(5) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities

13 What constitutes taking a reprisal
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.27
curation status: Proposed
has part: 13(1) What constitutes taking a reprisal
has part: 13(2) What constitutes taking a reprisal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13
schema version: 2

13 Apr
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.117
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 2 (items 7-9), Schedule 7
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-2
schema version: 2

13 Oct
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
note: Public Interest Disclosure Act 2015 commencement
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-3
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory provision
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

13(1) What constitutes taking a reprisal
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.27
note: Taking a reprisal against another person is prohibited.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 13 What constitutes taking a reprisal

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The engagement occurs before the belief or suspicion of the second person making a public interest disclosure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between engagement and reprisal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: When the conduct is engaged in, the first person believes or suspects that the second person has made a public interest disclosure

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the first person engages in conduct resulting in detriment to another person, then taking a reprisal is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of conduct on reprisal
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: The first person engages in conduct that results in detriment to the second person

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first person is a person who has engaged in conduct resulting in detriment to another person and believes or suspects that the other person has made a public interest disclosure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of persons against whom reprisal may be taken based on conduct and belief
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: The first person engages in conduct that results in detriment to the second person and believes or suspects that the second person has made a public interest disclosure

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Taking a reprisal is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of taking a reprisal
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Engaging in conduct that results in detriment to another person

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the first person believes or suspects that the second person has made a public interest disclosure, then taking a reprisal is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of prohibition through engagement and belief
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: The first person believes or suspects that the second person has made a public interest disclosure

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13(1) What constitutes taking a reprisal

13(2) What constitutes taking a reprisal
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.27
note: List of detrimental actions against an employee
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 13 What constitutes taking a reprisal

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Listing of prohibited actions
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (2) Detriment includes...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...(h) damage to a person’s reputation;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of detrimental actions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
premise text: (a) dismissal of an employee;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13(2) What constitutes taking a reprisal

14 Compensation
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14(1) Compensation
has part: 14(2) Compensation
has part: 14(3) Compensation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14
schema version: 2

14 Apr 2015 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.117
note: Amendment by Acts and Instruments (Framework Reform) (Consequential Provisions) Act
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-2
schema version: 2

14 Oct 2024 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.121
note: Conditional commencement of the National Intelligence Community Act 2025
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-3
schema version: 2

14(1) Compensation
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.28
note: Compensation for reprisal against an applicant
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Compensation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to compensate
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(1) Compensation

14(2) Compensation
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.28
note: Federal Court must not make an order under paragraph (1)(b) if the respondent's employer establishes that it took reasonable precautions and exercised due diligence to avoid reprisal.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Compensation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: within the timeframe of the reprisal
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The respondent's employer establishes that it took reasonable precautions within the timeframe of the reprisal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (2) The Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) must not make an order under paragraph (1)(b)

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The respondent's employer establishes that it took reasonable precautions and exercised due diligence to avoid reprisal.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on making an order under paragraph (1)(b)
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (2) The Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) must not make an order under paragraph (1)(b)

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in a recurring manner
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The respondent's employer establishes that it took reasonable precautions and exercised due diligence to avoid reprisal in a recurring manner
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (2) The Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) must not make an order under paragraph (1)(b)

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(2) Compensation

14(3) Compensation
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.28
note: Joint liability for compensation
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Compensation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the respondent and the respondent’s employer are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation concerned.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between orders
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (3) If the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) makes an order...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the respondent and the respondent’s employer are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation concerned.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge graph representation of liability
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph
premise text: (3) If the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) makes an order...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the respondent and the respondent’s employer are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation concerned.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Joint liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) If the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) makes an order...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the respondent and the respondent’s employer are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation concerned.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of liability
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (3) If the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) makes an order...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the respondent and the respondent’s employer are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation concerned.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring liability for compensation
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (3) If the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) makes an order...

15 July 2013
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.7
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15
schema version: 2

15 January 2014
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.7
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-2
schema version: 2

15 Injunctions, apologies and other orders
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.29
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15(1) Injunctions, apologies and other orders
has part: 15(2) Injunctions, apologies and other orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-3
schema version: 2

15(1) Injunctions, apologies and other orders
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.29
note: Restraining respondent from taking reprisal or requiring them to do something.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-3-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Injunctions, apologies and other orders

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits respondent from taking reprisal.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

15(2) Injunctions, apologies and other orders
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.29
note: Prohibits aiding, abetting, counselling, or procuring conduct against an applicant.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-3-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Injunctions, apologies and other orders

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Court may make any other orders (including granting an injunction)...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Orders apply during conduct
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) If the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Court may make any other orders (including granting an injunction)...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2) If the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) has power...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Court may make any other orders (including granting an injunction)...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits aiding, abetting, counselling, or procuring conduct against an applicant.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (a) aided, abetted, counselled or procured the conduct against the applicant;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Court may make any other orders (including granting an injunction)...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits inducing conduct against an applicant.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (b) induced the conduct against the applicant, whether through threats or promises or otherwise;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Court may make any other orders (including granting an injunction)...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Orders apply during conduct
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) If the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia...

15 July
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.117
note: Remainder of s 3-83
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-4
schema version: 2

16 Reinstatement
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.30
note: Reinstatement obligation for applicant if respondent takes reprisal against them.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The applicant must be reinstated if the reprisal occurred during employment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Reinstatement is contingent on reprisal during employment.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The applicant was employed by the respondent.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The respondent has the property of reinstating the applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Reinstatement is a property of the respondent's actions.
modality: CogAI
operator: hasProperty
premise text: The respondent has taken reprisal against the applicant.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The applicant must be reinstated.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to reinstate applicant if conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: The respondent has taken reprisal against the applicant.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The applicant must be reinstated if the conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Reinstatement is contingent on specific conditions being met.
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: The respondent has taken reprisal against the applicant.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The applicant must be reinstated if the reprisal terminates.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Reinstatement is contingent on termination of reprisal.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: The respondent has terminated the applicant's employment.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Reinstatement

17 Multiple orders
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.30
note: May make orders under sections 14, 15 and 16 in respect of the same conduct.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 18(1) Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
has part: 18(2) Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18
schema version: 2

18 June 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
note: June 2015 (s 2(1))
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-18-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-2
schema version: 2

18 Mar
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.119
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-18-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-3
schema version: 2

18(1) Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.30
note: No costs for vexatious proceedings
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on ordering costs in vexatious proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-18-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(1) Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.

18(2) Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.30
note: Pay costs only if instituted vexatiously or without reasonable cause.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Pay costs
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Instituting proceedings vexatiously or without reasonable cause

19 Reprisals in relation to disclosures—offences
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.31
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19(1) Reprisals in relation to disclosures—offences
has part: 19(2) Reprisals in relation to disclosures—offences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19
schema version: 2

19 June
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.120
note: Conditional commencement of Public Interest Disclosure Amendment (Review) Act 2023
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-2
schema version: 2

19 June
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.120
note: Never commenced
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-3
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Never commenced
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: contains
premise text: The commencement of this Act is 1 July 2023

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Never commenced
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

19 Sept
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.120
note: Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Modernisation) Act 2023
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-4
schema version: 2

19(1) Reprisals in relation to disclosures—offences
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.31
note: Taking a reprisal—by a threat to cause detriment is prohibited.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Reprisals in relation to disclosures—offences

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Taking a reprisal—by a threat to cause detriment is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of taking a reprisal—by a threat to cause detriment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence in relation to another person (the second person)...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(1) Reprisals in relation to disclosures—offences

19(2) Reprisals in relation to disclosures—offences
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.31
note: Reckless conduct towards a person who has made or may have made a public interest disclosure.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Reprisals in relation to disclosures—offences

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal relation between conduct and threat is necessary for liability.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between conduct and threat is necessary for liability.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (b) engaging in the conduct consists of, or results in, a threat to cause detriment to the second person;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if they engage in reckless conduct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reckless conduct is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) the first person engages in conduct; and (b) engaging in the conduct consists of, or results in, a threat to cause detriment to the second person;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first person's belief or suspicion of a public interest disclosure is an obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Engaging in conduct with reckless disregard is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (d) when the conduct is engaged in, the first person believes or suspects that the second person, or any other person: (i) has made a public interest disclosure; or (ii) may have made a public interest disclosure;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The recurring trace of conduct towards persons who have made or may make public interest disclosures is necessary for liability.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of conduct towards persons who have made or may make public interest disclosures is necessary for liability.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (a) the first person engages in conduct; and (b) engaging in the conduct consists of, or results in, a threat to cause detriment to the second person;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(2) Reprisals in relation to disclosures—offences

19A Interaction between civil remedies and offences
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.33
note: A person may bring proceedings under sections 14, 15 or 16 in relation to a reprisal even if prosecution for an offence against section 19 has not been brought.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19a-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19a-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19a
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19A Interaction between civil remedies and offences

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.7
note: Commencement rules
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.7
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-2-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-2-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-2
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-2-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

2 Oct 2014
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-2-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-3
schema version: 2

2 Dec 2015
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.119
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-2-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-4
schema version: 2

20 Disclosure or use of identifying information
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20(1) Disclosure or use of identifying information
has part: 20(2) Disclosure or use of identifying information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20
schema version: 2

20 Sept
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.120
note: Sch 1 (items 196-198), Sch 3 (item 2): 21 Sept 2023
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-2
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

20(1) Disclosure or use of identifying information
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.33
note: Disclosing identifying information after a public interest disclosure is prohibited.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Disclosure or use of identifying information

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosing information that enables the identification of the second person is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing identifying information after a public interest disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) another person (the second person) has made a public interest disclosure;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Using disclosing identifying information after a public interest disclosure is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of using disclosing identifying information after a public interest disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) the disclosure is to a person other than the second person.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for using disclosing identifying information after a public interest disclosure is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of imprisonment for using disclosing identifying information after a public interest disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 6 months or 30 penalty units, or both.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Using identifying information after a public interest disclosure is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of using identifying information after a public interest disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Use of identifying information

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(1) Disclosure or use of identifying information

20(2) Disclosure or use of identifying information
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.33
note: Using identifying information is prohibited.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Disclosure or use of identifying information

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of using identifying information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(2) Disclosure or use of identifying information

21 Identifying information not to be disclosed etc. to courts or
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.35
note: Public officials cannot disclose identifying information to courts or tribunals.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-21-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of identifying information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-21-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21 Identifying information not to be disclosed etc. to courts or

22 Interaction with protections under Part 3-1 of the Fair Work Act
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.35
note: Part 3-1 of the Fair Work Act applies to public interest disclosure by a public official.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22 Interaction with protections under Part 3-1 of the Fair Work Act

22A Interaction with remedies under the Fair Work Act 2009
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.35
note: Prohibition on making applications for certain orders in Federal Court or Family Court of Australia.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-22a-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-22a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22a
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-22a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to particular conduct if another application has been made...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on making applications for certain orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (1) A person is not entitled to make an application...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-22a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22A Interaction with remedies under the Fair Work Act 2009

23 Claims for protection
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.36
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23(1) Claims for protection
has part: 23(2) Claims for protection
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23
schema version: 2

23(1) Claims for protection
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.36
note: Individual bears onus of adducing evidence, party instituting proceedings bears onus of proving claim is not made out.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-23-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Claims for protection

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Individual bears obligation to adduce evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-23-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23(1) Claims for protection

23(2) Claims for protection
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.36
note: Right not to be compelled to give evidence under section 126K of the Evidence Act 1995.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-23-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Claims for protection

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right exists
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-23-ss-2-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 23(2) Claims for protection

24 Protections have effect despite other Commonwealth laws
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.37
note: Protections have effect despite other Commonwealth laws
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-24-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24 Protections have effect despite other Commonwealth laws

25 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.38
note: A public interest disclosure is a disclosure of information that meets certain criteria.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-25-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision imposes an obligation on public officials.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

26 Meaning of public interest disclosure
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.39
note: Disclosure of information is a public interest disclosure if certain conditions are met.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26
schema version: 2

26 May
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
note: May
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-2
schema version: 2

26 May
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
note: Permits item 38 of Schedule 8 and item 9 of Schedule 9.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-3
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosures
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (b) On a previous occasion, the discloser made an internal disclosure of information that consisted of, or included...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference from conditions to obligation
modality: Argumentation
operator: Inference
premise text: (a) The information tends to show, or the discloser believes on reasonable grounds that the information tends to...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of disclosures and recipients
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
premise text: (b) The recipient of the information is a person of the kind referred to in column 2...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) A disclosure of information is a public interest disclosure...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of disclosures into internal and external
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: Item Column 1 Type of disclosure Column 2 Recipient Column 3 Further requirements...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of obligations through disclosures
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (b) On a previous occasion, the discloser made an internal disclosure of information that consisted of, or included...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26 Meaning of public interest disclosure

27 Associated allegations
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.44
note: Allegations of disclosable conduct must be made in conjunction with a public interest disclosure.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-27-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27
schema version: 2

27 May 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
description: Information about the amalgamation of tribunals
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
note: Duty to provide information
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-27-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-27-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-2
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-27-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide allegations of disclosable conduct with a public interest disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-27-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27 Associated allegations

28 How a public interest disclosure may be made
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 28(1) How a public interest disclosure may be made
has part: 28(2) How a public interest disclosure may be made
has part: 28(3) How a public interest disclosure may be made
has part: 28(4) How a public interest disclosure may be made
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28
schema version: 2

28 July 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
note: Prohibition on Acts and Instruments
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-2
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits Acts and Instruments
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

28(1) How a public interest disclosure may be made
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.44
note: A public interest disclosure may be made orally or in writing.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 28 How a public interest disclosure may be made

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28(1) How a public interest disclosure may be made

28(2) How a public interest disclosure may be made
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.44
note: Anonymous public interest disclosure allowed
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 28 How a public interest disclosure may be made

28(3) How a public interest disclosure may be made
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.44
note: A public interest disclosure may be made without asserting that the disclosure is made for the purposes of this Act.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 28 How a public interest disclosure may be made

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make a public interest disclosure without asserting purpose.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

28(4) How a public interest disclosure may be made
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.44
note: Exemption from section 28(4) for NACC disclosures
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 28 How a public interest disclosure may be made

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from section 28(4) for NACC disclosures
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28(4) How a public interest disclosure may be made

29 Meaning of disclosable conduct
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.44
note: Disclosable conduct includes various types of misconduct and abuse of public trust.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-deontic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-deontic-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29
schema version: 2

29 Nov
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.119
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-2
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conduct that results in...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Includes conduct resulting in wastage of resources.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (a) Relevant money (within the meaning...)

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosable conduct includes...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes various types of misconduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) Conduct that contravenes a law...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosable conduct includes...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes abuse of public trust.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (d) Conduct that is an abuse of public trust.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosable conduct includes...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, or deception.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (i) Fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, or deception...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosable conduct includes...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes misconduct relating to scientific analysis.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (b) Misconduct relating to scientific analysis...

29A Meaning of personal work-related conduct
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.47
note: Public officials must not engage in personal work-related conduct that has implications for another official.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-deontic-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29a
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Personal work-related conduct overlaps with the second official's employment or functions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Personal work-related conduct overlaps with the second official's employment or functions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The second official's employment or functions are relevant to personal work-related conduct.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Personal work-related conduct is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits personal work-related conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Public officials must not engage in conduct that has implications for another official.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Public officials have an obligation to avoid personal work-related conduct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on public officials to avoid personal work-related conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Public officials must not engage in conduct that has implications for another official.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Bullying or harassment is prohibited as personal work-related conduct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits bullying or harassment as personal work-related conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Bullying or harassment is an example of personal work-related conduct.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The transfer or promotion of another official is prohibited as personal work-related conduct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the transfer or promotion of another official as personal work-related conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: The transfer or promotion of another official is an example of personal work-related conduct.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29A Meaning of personal work-related conduct

3 Crown to be bound
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.8
curation status: Proposed
has part: 3(1) Crown to be bound
has part: 3(2) Crown to be bound
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Sept
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.119
note: Sch 2 (items 96-111): 4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-2
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies legislative provisions into a deontic model
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart

3(1) Crown to be bound
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.8
note: The Crown is bound by this Act.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 3 Crown to be bound

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Crown has an obligation to comply.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) This Act binds the Crown in each of its capacities.

3(2) Crown to be bound
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.8
note: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 3 Crown to be bound

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence during this period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The Crown's liability ends when the Act comes into force.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: ¬
premise text: The Crown's liability can be determined using AI algorithms.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown cannot be prosecuted for an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: The Crown cannot be prosecuted for an offence.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown cannot be prosecuted for an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Negation of obligation
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ¬
premise text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3(2) Crown to be bound

30 Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.48
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30(1) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
has part: 30(2) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
has part: 30(3) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
has part: 30(4) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30
schema version: 2

30 June
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.117
note: Sch 11 (items 84-91), Sch 14: 1 July 2014 (s 2(1) items 6, 14)
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-2
schema version: 2

30 Oct 2014 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
note: Duty to report certain information
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-3
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

30 June
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-4
schema version: 2

30(1) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.48
note: Public official not engaging in conduct unrelated to contract
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Officers or employees of a contracted service provider

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the individual does not engage in conduct in connection with his or her position as such a public official unless the conduct is in connection with entering into, or giving effect to, the contract.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Contract duration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) provides services for the purposes (whether direct or indirect) of the Commonwealth contract;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the individual does not engage in conduct in connection with his or her position as such a public official unless the conduct is in connection with entering into, or giving effect to, the contract.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Public official obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) is an officer or employee of a contracted service provider for a Commonwealth contract;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the individual does not engage in conduct in connection with his or her position as such a public official unless the conduct is in connection with entering into, or giving effect to, the contract.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Contractor service provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (b) provides services for the purposes (whether direct or indirect) of the Commonwealth contract;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the individual does not engage in conduct in connection with his or her position as such a public official unless the conduct is in connection with entering into, or giving effect to, the contract.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Contract services
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (b) provides services for the purposes (whether direct or indirect) of the Commonwealth contract;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(1) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider

30(2) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.48
note: A contracted service provider for a Commonwealth contract is responsible for the provision of goods or services.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Officers or employees of a contracted service provider

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal scope of a contracted service provider's responsibility is during the duration of the contract.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal scope of a contracted service provider's responsibility
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: A person who is responsible for the provision of goods or services under the Commonwealth contract is also responsible during the duration of the contract.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consequence of a contracted service provider's responsibility is that they must provide goods or services.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Consequence of a contracted service provider's responsibility
modality: Argumentation
operator: if-then
premise text: If a person is responsible for the provision of goods or services under the Commonwealth contract, then they must provide those goods or services.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A contracted service provider is defined as someone who is responsible for the provision of goods or services.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of a contracted service provider
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: A person is a contracted service provider if they are responsible for the provision of goods or services.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The mandatory nature of a contracted service provider's responsibility is to provide goods or services.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory nature of a contracted service provider's responsibility
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: A person who is responsible for the provision of goods or services under the Commonwealth contract must provide those goods or services.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The global applicability of a contracted service provider's responsibility is everywhere during the duration of the contract.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Global applicability of a contracted service provider's responsibility
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: A person who is responsible for the provision of goods or services under the Commonwealth contract is also responsible everywhere during the duration of the contract.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(2) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider

30(3) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.48
note: A Commonwealth contract is a contract to which the Commonwealth or an agency is a party.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Officers or employees of a contracted service provider

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a Commonwealth contract.
modality: Deontic
operator: is

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(3) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider

30(4) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.48
note: Exempts Commonwealth contracts from grants covered by instruments under section 105C of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Officers or employees of a contracted service provider

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A grant covered by an instrument made under section 105C does not apply to a Commonwealth contract at any time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Grants under section 105C are excluded from the temporal scope of Commonwealth contracts.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalExclusion
premise text: Section 105C of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A grant covered by an instrument made under section 105C does not apply to a Commonwealth contract at any time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Grants under section 105C are excluded from the temporal scope of Commonwealth contracts.
modality: CogAI
operator: TemporalExclusion
premise text: Section 105C of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No grant covered by an instrument made under section 105C applies to a Commonwealth contract.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants under section 105C are excluded from Commonwealth contracts.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Section 105C of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A grant covered by an instrument made under section 105C does not apply to a Commonwealth contract at any time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Grants under section 105C are excluded from the temporal scope of Commonwealth contracts.
modality: Diffusion
operator: TemporalExclusion
premise text: Section 105C of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A grant covered by an instrument made under section 105C does not apply to a Commonwealth contract at any time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Grants under section 105C are excluded from the temporal scope of Commonwealth contracts.
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalExclusion
premise text: Section 105C of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(4) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider

31 Disagreements with government policies etc.
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.49
note: Disagreements with government policies etc.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-31-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31
schema version: 2

31 May
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.121
note: May
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-31-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-2
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts conduct from disclosure if related to government policy or action
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31 Disagreements with government policies etc.

32 Conduct connected with courts or Commonwealth tribunals
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.49
note: Conduct of judicial officers and certain court staff is not disclosable conduct.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-32-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-32-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32 Conduct connected with courts or Commonwealth tribunals

33 Conduct connected with intelligence agencies
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.51
note: Conduct connected with intelligence agencies is not disclosable if it is part of proper performance or exercise of powers.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-33-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: None

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-33-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33 Conduct connected with intelligence agencies

34 Meaning of authorised internal recipient
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.51
note: Defines who is an authorized internal recipient of a disclosure.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-34-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34 Meaning of authorised internal recipient

35 When conduct relates to an agency
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.53
curation status: Proposed
has part: 35(1) When conduct relates to an agency
has part: 35(2) When conduct relates to an agency
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35
schema version: 2

35(1) When conduct relates to an agency
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.53
note: Agency conduct is considered conduct if an agency or public official engages in it.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 35 When conduct relates to an agency

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conduct by unincorporated subsidiary agencies is also considered conduct.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Conduct by unincorporated subsidiary agencies

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency conduct is considered conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1) Conduct relates to an agency if the agency, or a public official belonging to the agency at the time of the conduct, engages in the conduct.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(1) When conduct relates to an agency

35(2) When conduct relates to an agency
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.53
note: Agency conduct is attributed to parent agency when subsidiary agency is established.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 35 When conduct relates to an agency

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...conduct that would, apart from this subsection, relate to the subsidiary agency...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Agency conduct is attributed to parent agency when subsidiary agency is established.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalRelation
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1), if:...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...conduct that would, apart from this subsection, relate to the subsidiary agency...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Agency conduct is attributed to parent agency when subsidiary agency is established.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1), if:...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...conduct that would, apart from this subsection, relate to the subsidiary agency...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Agency conduct is attributed to parent agency when subsidiary agency is established.
modality: CogAI
operator: Attribution
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1), if:...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...conduct that would, apart from this subsection, relate to the subsidiary agency...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency conduct is attributed to parent agency.
modality: Deontic
operator: Attribution
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1), if:...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...conduct that would, apart from this subsection, relate to the subsidiary agency...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Agency conduct is attributed to parent agency when subsidiary agency is established.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1), if:...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(2) When conduct relates to an agency

36 Meaning of authorised officer
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.54
note: Defines an authorised officer for an agency.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-36-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the principal officer of the agency; or a public official...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the principal officer or appointed public official.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: An authorised officer is...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36 Meaning of authorised officer

4 June 2026
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

4 Extension to external Territories
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.8
note: The Act extends to every external Territory.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-4-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-2
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extension obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
premise text: The Act extends to every external Territory.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-4-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Extension to external Territories

4 Dec 2025
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.121
note: References schedules
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-4-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-3
schema version: 2

4 June 2026 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.121
note: June 2026 (s 2(1))
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-4-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-4
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the text as a compilation of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text is classified as a compilation.

41 Meaning of intelligence information
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.54
curation status: Proposed
has part: 41(1) Meaning of intelligence information
has part: 41(2) Meaning of intelligence information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41
schema version: 2

41(1) Meaning of intelligence information
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.54
note: Defines intelligence information
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 41 Meaning of intelligence information

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41(1) Meaning of intelligence information

41(2) Meaning of intelligence information
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.54
note: Sensitive law enforcement information means information that disclosure is reasonably likely to prejudice Australia's law enforcement interests.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 41 Meaning of intelligence information

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between sensitive law enforcement information and Australia's law enforcement interests.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) Sensitive law enforcement information means information the disclosure of which is reasonably likely to prejudice Australia’s law enforcement interests, including Australia’s interests in the following:

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes how sensitive law enforcement information can be recognized by artificial agents.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (2) Sensitive law enforcement information means information the disclosure of which is reasonably likely to prejudice Australia’s law enforcement interests, including Australia’s interests in the following:

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to protect Australia's law enforcement interests.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) Sensitive law enforcement information means information the disclosure of which is reasonably likely to prejudice Australia’s law enforcement interests, including Australia’s interests in the following:

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a class of sensitive law enforcement information.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: (2) Sensitive law enforcement information means information the disclosure of which is reasonably likely to prejudice Australia’s law enforcement interests, including Australia’s interests in the following:

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes how sensitive law enforcement information affects Australia's law enforcement interests.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) Sensitive law enforcement information means information the disclosure of which is reasonably likely to prejudice Australia’s law enforcement interests, including Australia’s interests in the following:

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between sensitive law enforcement information and Australia's law enforcement interests.
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
premise text: (2) Sensitive law enforcement information means information the disclosure of which is reasonably likely to prejudice Australia’s law enforcement interests, including Australia’s interests in the following:

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41(2) Meaning of intelligence information

42 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.57
note: Disclosure must be made to an authorised officer or a supervisor for it to be considered internal.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-42-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide disclosure to an authorised officer or supervisor.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-42-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42 Simplified outline

43 Allocation of disclosure—decision by authorised officer
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.57
note: Discloser must disclose information to an authorised officer of an agency.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-43-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-43
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide disclosure information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43 Allocation of disclosure—decision by authorised officer

44 Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.62
curation status: Proposed
has part: 44(1) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
has part: 44(2) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
has part: 44(3) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
has part: 44(4) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44
schema version: 2

44(1) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.62
note: Notice of decision to allocate a disclosure to an agency.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(1) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate

44(2) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
type: Concept
description: yes
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.62
note: Authorised officer must provide written notice to persons and agencies covered by subsection (3) of this section.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During: reasonably practicable.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(2) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate

44(3) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.62
note: Notice of decision to allocate disclosure must be given to certain persons and agencies.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Notice of decision to allocate disclosure is contained in this subsection.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) This subsection covers the following persons and agencies:

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice of decision to allocate disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(3) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate

44(4) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
type: Concept
description: true
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.62
note: Must provide notice to discloser upon allocation decision.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(4) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate

44A Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.63
curation status: Proposed
has part: 44A(1) Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
has part: 44A(2) Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
has part: 44A(3) Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44a
schema version: 2

44A(1) Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.63
note: Decision not to allocate disclosure under paragraph 43(3)(b)
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 44A Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate

44A(2) Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.63
note: Authorised officer must refer conduct for investigation under another law or power.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44a-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 44A Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must refer conduct
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must refer conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If the authorised officer is satisfied...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44A(2) Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate

44A(3) Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
type: Concept
description: written notice with reasons and details of action taken or proposed
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.63
note: Authorised officer must give written notice to discloser after decision not to allocate disclosure.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44a-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 44A Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44A(3) Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate

44B Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.65
curation status: Proposed
has part: 44B(1) Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
has part: 44B(2) Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
has part: 44B(3) Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44b
schema version: 2

44B(1) Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.65
note: Agency must allocate disclosure if stop action direction is lifted
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 44B Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must perform action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44B(1) Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction

44B(2) Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.65
note: Authorised officer must give written notice to Ombudsman or IGIS under certain conditions.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 44B Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ombudsman or IGIS must receive notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice to Ombudsman or IGIS
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Authorised officer has a duty to give written notice

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44B(2) Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction

44B(3) Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.65
note: List of matters for disclosure purposes
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 44B Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44B(3) Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction

45 Reallocation of disclosures
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.65
note: Authorised officer may reallocate disclosure
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to reallocate disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: May

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45 Reallocation of disclosures

45A Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.66
curation status: Proposed
has part: 45A(1) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
has part: 45A(2) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
has part: 45A(3) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
has part: 45A(4) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45a
schema version: 2

45A(1) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.66
note: Disclose certain information to an authorized officer within 1 business day.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires disclosure within a specific time frame.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: Urgent notice within 1 business day

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) an authorised officer receives a disclosure that is: (i) made to the authorised officer; or (ii) made to a supervisor of a public official and given to the authorised officer;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45A(1) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with

45A(2) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
type: Concept
description: yes
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.66
note: Authorised officer must provide notice to IGIS within 1 business day after disclosure is received.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice within 1 business day.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45A(2) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with

45A(3) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
type: Concept
description: Notice to IGIS
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.66
note: Authorised officer must give written notice to IGIS within 14 days after disclosure.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorised officer must give written notice to IGIS.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45A(3) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with

45A(4) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.66
note: Principal officer must provide regular written notice to IGIS about investigation progress and expected completion time.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between notice and investigation completion
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (c) the likelihood of any extension, or further extension, of the time for completion of the investigation being required under subsection 52(4).

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The principal officer must provide regular written notice to IGIS about the investigation progress.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Describes implication between notice and investigation progress
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (a) the progress of the investigation;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes information dissemination
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (b) the anticipated time remaining before the investigation is completed;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45A(4) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with

46 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.68
note: Agency must investigate disclosure within set time and in accordance with Division requirements.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-46-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must investigate disclosure within set time.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

47 Principal officer must investigate disclosures
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.68
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47(1) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
has part: 47(2) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
has part: 47(3) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
has part: 47(4) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47
schema version: 2

47(1) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.68
note: Agency principal officer must investigate disclosures allocated to the agency under Division 1.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Principal officer must investigate disclosures

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(1) Principal officer must investigate disclosures

47(2) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.68
note: Principal officer must investigate disclosures
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Principal officer must investigate disclosures

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide investigation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Investigation is a part of disclosure investigation
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(2) Principal officer must investigate disclosures

47(3) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.68
note: Agency must investigate disclosures
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Principal officer must investigate disclosures

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must investigate disclosures
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(3) Principal officer must investigate disclosures

47(4) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.68
note: Principal officer must investigate disclosures
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Principal officer must investigate disclosures

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must investigate disclosures
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must investigate disclosures
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) This section has effect subject to any stop action direction under the NACC Act.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(4) Principal officer must investigate disclosures

48 Discretion not to investigate
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.69
note: Principal officer may decide not to investigate disclosure under certain conditions.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-48-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to investigate
modality: Deontic
operator: may

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48 Discretion not to investigate

49 Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.71
curation status: Proposed
has part: 49(1) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
has part: 49(2) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
has part: 49(3) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
has part: 49(4) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49
schema version: 2

49(1) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.71
note: Agency may decide not to investigate disclosure under separate investigative power.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 49 Investigative agency using separate investigative powers

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has discretion to decide on investigation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49(1) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers

49(2) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.71
note: Separate investigative power for disclosure investigation
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 49 Investigative agency using separate investigative powers

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...investigate the disclosure.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Investigative agency has separate power
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (2) A separate investigative power...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49(2) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers

49(3) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
type: Concept
description: Investigation completion information
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.71
note: Inform principal officers and discloser of investigation completion
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 49 Investigative agency using separate investigative powers

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

49(4) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.71
note: Exemption from disclosure due to impracticality
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 49 Investigative agency using separate investigative powers

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Contacting the discloser is not reasonably practicable.

5 Extension to things outside Australia
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.8
note: Act extends to acts, omissions, matters and things outside Australia.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-5-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extension to things outside Australia
modality: Deontic
operator: extends

50 Notification to discloser
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.72
curation status: Proposed
has part: 50(1) Notification to discloser
has part: 50(1A) Notification to discloser
has part: 50(2) Notification to discloser
has part: 50(3) Notification to discloser
has part: 50(4) Notification to discloser
has part: 50(4A) Notification to discloser
has part: 50(5) Notification to discloser
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50
schema version: 2

50(1) Notification to discloser
type: Concept
description: yes
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.72
note: Principal officer must notify discloser of investigation decision
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Notification to discloser

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50(1) Notification to discloser

50(1A) Notification to discloser
type: Concept
description: yes
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.72
note: Principal officer must give written notice to discloser of estimated investigation length.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-1a-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Notification to discloser

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50(1A) Notification to discloser

50(2) Notification to discloser
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.72
note: Principal officer must give written notice to discloser under certain conditions.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Notification to discloser

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During certain conditions: referral of conduct under another law or power
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) If paragraph (1)(b) applies, the principal officer must give written notice...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implies: referral of conduct under another law or power
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (2) If paragraph (1)(b) applies, the principal officer must give written notice...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes: referral of conduct under another law or power
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (2) If paragraph (1)(b) applies, the principal officer must give written notice...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information: referral of conduct under another law or power
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (2) If paragraph (1)(b) applies, the principal officer must give written notice...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50(2) Notification to discloser

50(3) Notification to discloser
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.72
note: Delete certain reasons from notification to discloser.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Notification to discloser

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between deletion and notification.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) Despite paragraph (2)(a), the principal officer may delete from the reasons given to the discloser any reasons that would, if contained in a document, cause the document:

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes the application of deletion rules.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (3) Despite paragraph (2)(a), the principal officer may delete from the reasons given to the discloser any reasons that would, if contained in a document, cause the document:

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the principal officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the effect of deletion on notification.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) Despite paragraph (2)(a), the principal officer may delete from the reasons given to the discloser any reasons that would, if contained in a document, cause the document:

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between deletion and notification.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (3) Despite paragraph (2)(a), the principal officer may delete from the reasons given to the discloser any reasons that would, if contained in a document, cause the document:

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50(3) Notification to discloser

50(4) Notification to discloser
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.72
note: Discloser may be notified of a matter under this section (other than subsection (4A)) in the copy of the notice given to the discloser under subsection 44(4).
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Notification to discloser

50(4A) Notification to discloser
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.72
note: Principal officer must notify discloser upon investigation of disclosure no longer subject to stop action direction.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-4a-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Notification to discloser

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification upon investigation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50(4A) Notification to discloser

50(5) Notification to discloser
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.72
note: Exemption from notification if not reasonably practicable
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Notification to discloser

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50(5) Notification to discloser

50A Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.74
curation status: Proposed
has part: 50A(1) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
has part: 50A(2) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
has part: 50A(3) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
has part: 50A(4) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50a
schema version: 2

50A(1) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.74
note: Principal officer must give written notice to Ombudsman about decision not to investigate disclosure.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 50A Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50A(1) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation

50A(2) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
type: Concept
description: Written notice
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.74
note: Notification to IGIS about investigation decision
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 50A Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Principal officer must give written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50A(2) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation

50A(3) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.74
note: Must provide details about action taken or proposed under section 50AA.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 50A Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide details.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50A(3) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation

50A(4) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
type: Concept
description: written notice
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.74
note: Principal officer must give written notice of stop action direction to Ombudsman or IGIS.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 50A Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50A(4) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation

50AA Decision not to investigate—referral for investigation under
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.73
curation status: Proposed
has part: 50AA(1) Decision not to investigate—referral for investigation under
has part: 50AA(2) Decision not to investigate—referral for investigation under
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50aa
schema version: 2

50AA(1) Decision not to investigate—referral for investigation under
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.73
note: Agency cannot investigate disclosure under certain circumstances.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 50AA Decision not to investigate—referral for investigation under

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Agency's decision not to investigate disclosure must be within a certain time frame.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (a) decides under section 48 not to investigate the disclosure, or (b) does not decide to investigate the disclosure further; and (c) is satisfied, on reasonable grounds, that the conduct disclosed would be more appropriately investigated under another law or power.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Agency's decision not to investigate disclosure must be based on sound reasoning.
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
premise text: (a) decides under section 48 not to investigate the disclosure, or (b) does not decide to investigate the disclosure further; and (c) is satisfied, on reasonable grounds, that the conduct disclosed would be more appropriately investigated under another law or power.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency is prohibited from investigating disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) decides under section 48 not to investigate the disclosure, or (b) does not decide to investigate the disclosure further; and (c) is satisfied, on reasonable grounds, that the conduct disclosed would be more appropriately investigated under another law or power.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Agency's decision not to investigate disclosure must diffuse through the organization.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (a) decides under section 48 not to investigate the disclosure, or (b) does not decide to investigate the disclosure further; and (c) is satisfied, on reasonable grounds, that the conduct disclosed would be more appropriately investigated under another law or power.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Agency's decision not to investigate disclosure must be part of a recurring pattern.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (a) decides under section 48 not to investigate the disclosure, or (b) does not decide to investigate the disclosure further; and (c) is satisfied, on reasonable grounds, that the conduct disclosed would be more appropriately investigated under another law or power.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50AA(1) Decision not to investigate—referral for investigation under

50AA(2) Decision not to investigate—referral for investigation under
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.73
note: Principal officer must refer conduct for investigation under other law or power.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 50AA Decision not to investigate—referral for investigation under

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide referral
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50AA(2) Decision not to investigate—referral for investigation under

51 Report of investigation
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.75
curation status: Proposed
has part: 51(1) Report of investigation
has part: 51(2) Report of investigation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51
schema version: 2

51(1) Report of investigation
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.75
note: Principal officer must prepare report after investigation.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Report of investigation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-51-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51(1) Report of investigation

51(2) Report of investigation
type: Concept
description: yes
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.75
note: Report must provide specific information about investigation
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-51-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Report of investigation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-51-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51(2) Report of investigation

52 Time limit for investigations under this Division
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.77
curation status: Proposed
has part: 52(1) Time limit for investigations under this Division
has part: 52(2) Time limit for investigations under this Division
has part: 52(3) Time limit for investigations under this Division
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-52
schema version: 2

52(1) Time limit for investigations under this Division
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.77
note: Investigations must be completed within 90 days after specific events.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-52-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Time limit for investigations under this Division

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigation completion ends 90 days after specified event
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for investigation completion
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
premise text: Investigation completion starts at specified event

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Within 90 days after specified events
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must complete investigation within time limit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Investigation must be completed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52(1) Time limit for investigations under this Division

52(2) Time limit for investigations under this Division
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.77
note: Time limit for investigations under this Division
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-52-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Time limit for investigations under this Division

52(3) Time limit for investigations under this Division
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.77
note: Extension of time limit for investigations under this Division
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-52-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Time limit for investigations under this Division

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to extend time limit
modality: Deontic
operator: may

53 Conduct of investigations under this Division
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.78
curation status: Proposed
has part: 53(1) Conduct of investigations under this Division
has part: 53(2) Conduct of investigations under this Division
has part: 53(3) Conduct of investigations under this Division
has part: 53(4) Conduct of investigations under this Division
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53
schema version: 2

53(1) Conduct of investigations under this Division
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.78
note: Agency officer must conduct investigation as they think fit.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 53 Conduct of investigations under this Division

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must conduct investigation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(1) Conduct of investigations under this Division

53(2) Conduct of investigations under this Division
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.78
note: Principal officer may obtain information from persons and make inquiries as they think fit.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 53 Conduct of investigations under this Division

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Principal officer has the power to obtain information.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(2) Conduct of investigations under this Division

53(3) Conduct of investigations under this Division
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.78
note: Comply with standards under section 74 during investigations.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 53 Conduct of investigations under this Division

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Comply with standards.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Section 74 standards apply.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(3) Conduct of investigations under this Division

53(4) Conduct of investigations under this Division
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.78
note: Must act in accordance with rules relating to fraud made for the purposes of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 53 Conduct of investigations under this Division

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The principal officer must act accordingly during the investigation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During investigation relating to fraud
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The investigation relates to one or more instances of fraud.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The principal officer must act accordingly.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must act in accordance with rules
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Rules relating to fraud are made for the purposes of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(4) Conduct of investigations under this Division

54 Adoption of findings of another investigation
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.79
note: May adopt findings from another investigation under this Division.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-54-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54 Adoption of findings of another investigation

55 The Ombudsman and the IGIS—recommendations
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.80
note: Notification of allocation or non-allocation of disclosure to an agency
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-55-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: IGIS must investigate disclosure
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: IGIS is notified of allocation or non-allocation

56 Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.82
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56(1) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
has part: 56(2) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
has part: 56(3) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
has part: 56(4) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
has part: 56(4A) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56
schema version: 2

56(1) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.82
note: Disclose information suspected to be evidence of an offence
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must disclose information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56(1) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force

56(2) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.82
note: Duty to give information to police
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Member of police force must receive information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Investigator has a duty to give relevant information

56(3) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
type: Concept
description: True
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.82
note: Investigator must disclose information to a member of an Australian police force under certain circumstances.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Reasonable grounds

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56(3) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force

56(4) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.82
note: Exemption from subsection (3) for certain investigations and corruption issues.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between subsection (3) and exemption.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (i) to investigate the commission of the offence; and (ii) to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions in gathering evidence and preparing briefs of evidence in relation to the commission of the offence;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to investigate without subsection (3) applying.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (4) However, subsection (3) does not apply:

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission for corruption issue referral.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (b) if the investigator suspects on reasonable grounds that the relevant information raises a corruption issue (within the meaning of the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2022) and:

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Repeating pattern of exemption for certain investigations.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (a) if the investigator believes on reasonable grounds that the agency to which the investigator belongs has the capacity and the appropriate skills and resources needed:

56(4A) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.82
note: Disclosure of corruption issue to a member of an Australian police force
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4a-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State has obligation to disclose corruption issue
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56(4A) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force

58 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.85
note: Additional obligations on principal officers, authorised officers, supervisors and public officials.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-58-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-58-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58 Simplified outline

59 Additional obligations of principal officers
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.85
curation status: Proposed
has part: 59(1) Additional obligations of principal officers
has part: 59(2) Additional obligations of principal officers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59
schema version: 2

59(1) Additional obligations of principal officers
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.85
note: Principal officer must ensure authorised officers are accessible and aware of each other's identity.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 59 Additional obligations of principal officers

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The principal officer must ensure authorised officers are accessible by public officials who belong to the agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Principal officer must ensure authorised officers are accessible for at least some time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (a) The principal officer of an agency must take reasonable steps to...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The principal officer must ensure authorised officers are accessible by public officials who belong to the agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Principal officer must ensure authorised officers are accessible for at least some time.
modality: CogAI
operator: >=
premise text: (a) The principal officer of an agency must take reasonable steps to...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) public officials who belong to the agency are aware of the identity of each authorised officer of the agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must ensure authorised officers are accessible and aware of each other's identity.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) The principal officer of an agency must take reasonable steps to...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The principal officer must ensure authorised officers are accessible by public officials who belong to the agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Principal officer must ensure authorised officers are accessible for at least some time.
modality: Diffusion
operator: >=
premise text: (a) The principal officer of an agency must take reasonable steps to...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The principal officer must ensure authorised officers are accessible by public officials who belong to the agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Principal officer must ensure authorised officers are accessible for at least some time.
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: (a) The principal officer of an agency must take reasonable steps to...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59(1) Additional obligations of principal officers

59(2) Additional obligations of principal officers
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.85
note: Principal officer must encourage and support public interest disclosures.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 59 Additional obligations of principal officers

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide encouragement and support.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59(2) Additional obligations of principal officers

6 Objects
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.9
note: Promote integrity and accountability of Commonwealth public sector.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-6-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...integrity and accountability of Commonwealth public sector.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to promote integrity and accountability.
modality: Deontic
operator: promote
premise text: State has a duty to promote...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 Objects

60 Additional obligations of authorised officers
type: Concept
description: Information to be disclosed
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.87
note: Authorised officer must inform individual about potential internal disclosure.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure must be made within a reasonable timeframe
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Authorised officer has reasonable grounds to believe disclosure is disclosable conduct
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Disclosure concerns or could concern disclosable conduct

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure must be made if individual proposes to disclose information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Authorised officer has reasonable grounds to believe disclosure is disclosable conduct
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: Individual proposes to disclose information

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inform individual about potential internal disclosure
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform individual
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Authorised officer has reasonable grounds to believe disclosure is disclosable conduct

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure must be made within a reasonable timeframe
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Disclosable conduct
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: Information concerns or could concern disclosable conduct

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60 Additional obligations of authorised officers

60A Additional obligations of supervisors
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.88
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60A(1) Additional obligations of supervisors
has part: 60A(2) Additional obligations of supervisors
has part: 60A(3) Additional obligations of supervisors
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60a
schema version: 2

60A(1) Additional obligations of supervisors
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.88
note: Supervisor must explain matters to discloser if they have reasonable grounds to believe information concerns disclosable conduct.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60A Additional obligations of supervisors

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to disclose.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Supervisor must explain matters to discloser.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Reasonable grounds exist.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60A(1) Additional obligations of supervisors

60A(2) Additional obligations of supervisors
type: Concept
description: information to an authorised officer
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.88
note: Supervisor must inform and advise discloser about disclosure procedures.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60A Additional obligations of supervisors

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure procedures
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The supervisor must: (a) inform the discloser that the disclosure could be treated as an internal disclosure for the purposes of this Act;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Supervisor's obligation to inform and advise
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
premise text: (2) The supervisor must: (a) inform the discloser that the disclosure could be treated as an internal disclosure for the purposes of this Act;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Supervisor's obligation to provide civil and criminal protections
modality: CogAI
operator: must
premise text: (d) explain to the discloser the civil and criminal protections this Act provides to protect disclosers, and those providing assistance in relation to such disclosures, from reprisals.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Supervisor must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Supervisor's obligation to explain procedures
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
premise text: (2) The supervisor must: (b) explain to the discloser the procedures under this Act for such a disclosure to be:

60A(3) Additional obligations of supervisors
type: Concept
description: yes
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.88
note: Supervisor must provide information to authorized officer after disclosure.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 60A Additional obligations of supervisors

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

61 Additional obligations of public officials
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.89
curation status: Proposed
has part: 61(1) Additional obligations of public officials
has part: 61(2) Additional obligations of public officials
has part: 61(3) Additional obligations of public officials
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61
schema version: 2

61(1) Additional obligations of public officials
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.89
note: Public officials must use best endeavours to assist principal officers in investigations.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-61-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Additional obligations of public officials

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Assist principal officer
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must use best endeavours
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Public official

61(2) Additional obligations of public officials
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.89
note: Public officials must assist Ombudsman in performance of functions
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-61-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Additional obligations of public officials

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide assistance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

61(3) Additional obligations of public officials
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.89
note: Public officials must use their best endeavours to assist the IGIS.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-61-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Additional obligations of public officials

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must use best endeavours
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

62 Additional functions of the Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.90
note: The Ombudsman must assist principal officers, authorised officers, public officials, and former public officials in relation to the operation of this Act.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-62-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-62
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Ombudsman has a duty to assist certain individuals.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62 Additional functions of the Ombudsman

63 Additional functions of the IGIS
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.91
note: The IGIS must assist principal officers of intelligence agencies and public officials who belong to intelligence agencies in relation to the operation of this Act.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-63-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The IGIS must assist principal officers of intelligence agencies and public officials who belong to intelligence agencies.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-63-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63 Additional functions of the IGIS

64 Simplified outline of this Division
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.93
note: Sharing of information about disclosure between agencies is authorized, but further disclosure or use of such information is prohibited except for providing legal advice and professional assistance.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-64-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No further disclosure or use allowed
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of further disclosure or use of information
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Legal practitioner's duty to maintain confidentiality

65 Sharing information and documents between agencies
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.93
curation status: Proposed
has part: 65(1) Sharing information and documents between agencies
has part: 65(2) Sharing information and documents between agencies
has part: 65(3) Sharing information and documents between agencies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65
schema version: 2

65(1) Sharing information and documents between agencies
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.93
note: Sharing information and documents between agencies is required.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-65-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Sharing information and documents between agencies

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires sharing of information and documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-65-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65(1) Sharing information and documents between agencies

65(2) Sharing information and documents between agencies
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.93
note: Permits sharing of information or documents
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-65-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Sharing information and documents between agencies

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows action
modality: Deontic
operator: PERMITS

65(3) Sharing information and documents between agencies
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.93
note: Sharing information and documents between agencies.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-65-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Sharing information and documents between agencies

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-65-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65(3) Sharing information and documents between agencies

67 Secrecy—legal practitioners
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.94
curation status: Proposed
has part: 67(1) Secrecy—legal practitioners
has part: 67(2) Secrecy—legal practitioners
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-67
schema version: 2

67(1) Secrecy—legal practitioners
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.94
note: Disclosing legal information without permission is an offence.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-67-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-67-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-67-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-67-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 67 Secrecy—legal practitioners

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-67-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years or 120 penalty units, or both.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing legal information
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the person has obtained information in the person’s capacity as the recipient of a legal practitioner disclosure;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-67-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years or 120 penalty units, or both.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of using disclosed information
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the person: (i) discloses the information to another person; or (ii) uses the information;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-67-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 67(1) Secrecy—legal practitioners

67(2) Secrecy—legal practitioners
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.94
note: Disclosure for legal advice or professional assistance is permitted.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-67-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-67-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-67-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 67 Secrecy—legal practitioners

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-67-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits disclosure for legal advice or professional assistance.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

68 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.96
note: Simplified outline of Division definitions
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-68-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68
schema version: 2

69 Public officials
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.96
note: Defines public official for the purposes of the Act.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-69-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-69-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-69-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-69-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Act applies to public officials and agencies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines scope of Act
modality: Deontic
operator: in
premise text: Section 69

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-69-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Public official belongs to agency
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies public officials into categories
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Item in table

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-69-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69 Public officials

7 Simplified outline of this Act
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.10
note: Agencies are required to investigate disclosures of potential disclosable conduct.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must investigate disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Investigation is a part of agency's duties
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A

70 Individuals taken to be public officials
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.101
curation status: Proposed
has part: 70(1) Individuals taken to be public officials
has part: 70(2) Individuals taken to be public officials
has part: 70(3) Individuals taken to be public officials
has part: 70(3A) Individuals taken to be public officials
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70
schema version: 2

70(1) Individuals taken to be public officials
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.101
note: Authorised officer may determine that an individual has been a public official for disclosure purposes.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Individuals taken to be public officials

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: In relation to the disclosure of the information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Time of obtaining information is relevant for public official status
modality: AllenInterval
operator: when the individual obtained the information
premise text: Individual has disclosed or proposes to disclose information

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Act has effect in relation to the disclosure of the information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorised officer may determine
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Individual has information that concerns disclosable conduct

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: In relation to the disclosure of the information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Individual must be a public official for disclosure purposes
modality: Deontic
operator: must be a public official
premise text: This Act has effect in relation to the disclosure of the information

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: In relation to the disclosure of the information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorised officer may determine that this Act has effect
modality: Deontic
operator: may determine that this Act has effect
premise text: Individual has disclosed or proposes to disclose information

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: In relation to the disclosure of the information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: This Act is taken always to have had effect in relation to the disclosure of the information
modality: Deontic
operator: is taken always to have had effect
premise text: Individual has disclosed or proposes to disclose information

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(1) Individuals taken to be public officials

70(2) Individuals taken to be public officials
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.101
note: Authorized officer may make determination on request or initiative.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Individuals taken to be public officials

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization to make determination
modality: Deontic
operator: may

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(2) Individuals taken to be public officials

70(3) Individuals taken to be public officials
type: Concept
description: Reasons for refusal (if applicable)
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.101
note: Authorised officer must make determination after considering individual's request.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Individuals taken to be public officials

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must make determination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(3) Individuals taken to be public officials

70(3A) Individuals taken to be public officials
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.101
note: Exemption from section 70(3A) for judicial officers
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Individuals taken to be public officials

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Judicial officers' terms do not overlap with section 70(3A)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Section 70(3A) does not apply during judicial officer's term
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Individuals taken to be public officials

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AI system recognizes judicial officers as exempt from section 70(3A)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Section 70(3A) exemption for judicial officers recognized by AI system
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: Individuals taken to be public officials

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Judicial officers are exempt
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 70(3A) does not apply to judicial officers
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
premise text: Individuals taken to be public officials

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Other public officials are exempt from section 70(3A)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Section 70(3A) exemption for judicial officers spreads to other public officials
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
premise text: Individuals taken to be public officials

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Judicial officers' terms do not overlap with section 70(3A)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Section 70(3A) does not apply during judicial officer's term
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Individuals taken to be public officials

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(3A) Individuals taken to be public officials

71 Meaning of agency
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.102
curation status: Proposed
has part: 71(1) Meaning of agency
has part: 71(2) Meaning of agency
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71
schema version: 2

71(1) Meaning of agency
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.102
note: Definition of agency
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-71-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 71 Meaning of agency

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-71-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 71(1) Meaning of agency

71(2) Meaning of agency
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.102
note: A Royal Commission is not an agency.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-71-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-71-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 71 Meaning of agency

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-71-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A Royal Commission is not an agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of agency
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (2) However, a Royal Commission is not an agency.

72 Meaning of prescribed authority
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.102
curation status: Proposed
has part: 72(1) Meaning of prescribed authority
has part: 72(2) Meaning of prescribed authority
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72
schema version: 2

72(1) Meaning of prescribed authority
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.102
note: Defines prescribed authority
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 72 Meaning of prescribed authority

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: prescribed authority means one of following entities:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
premise text: (a) a Commonwealth company

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: prescribed authority means one of following entities:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
premise text: (b) the part of the Defence Department known as the Australian Geospatial-Intelligence Organisation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: prescribed authority means one of following entities:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
premise text: (c) the part of the Defence Department known as the Defence Intelligence Organisation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: prescribed authority means one of following entities:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
premise text: (d) the High Court or any court created by the Parliament

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: prescribed authority means one of following entities:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
premise text: (e) a body that is established by a law of the Commonwealth and prescribed by the PID rules

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: prescribed authority means one of following entities:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
premise text: (f) the person holding, or performing the duties of, an office that is established by a law of the Commonwealth and prescribed by the PID rules

72(2) Meaning of prescribed authority
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.102
note: Entities are prescribed authorities in their own right.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 72 Meaning of prescribed authority

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Entities are prescribed authorities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prescribed authority definition
modality: Deontic
operator: has-prescribed-authority
premise text: Definition of prescribed authority in subsection (1)

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72(2) Meaning of prescribed authority

73 Meaning of principal officer
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.103
curation status: Proposed
has part: 73(1) Meaning of principal officer
has part: 73(2) Meaning of principal officer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73
schema version: 2

73(1) Meaning of principal officer
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.103
note: Defines principal officer for an agency
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Meaning of principal officer

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines principal officer for an agency
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73(1) Meaning of principal officer

73(2) Meaning of principal officer
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.103
note: Definition of principal officer for purposes of the Act.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Meaning of principal officer

73A Scope of Subdivision
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.104
note: Scope of Subdivision
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73a
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73A Scope of Subdivision

73B Machinery of government changes—conduct relating to
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.105
note: Conduct before change time relates to new agency under certain conditions.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73b
schema version: 2

73C Machinery of government changes—disclosures made before
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.105
curation status: Proposed
has part: 73C(1) Machinery of government changes—disclosures made before
has part: 73C(2) Machinery of government changes—disclosures made before
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73c
schema version: 2

73C(1) Machinery of government changes—disclosures made before
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.105
note: Disclosure of information before government change
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73c-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 73C Machinery of government changes—disclosures made before

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State must provide disclosure
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Disclosure made before change time

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73C(1) Machinery of government changes—disclosures made before

73C(2) Machinery of government changes—disclosures made before
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.105
note: Machinery of government changes—disclosures made before
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73c-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 73C Machinery of government changes—disclosures made before

73D Machinery of government changes—information transfer
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.106
curation status: Proposed
has part: 73D(1) Machinery of government changes—information transfer
has part: 73D(2) Machinery of government changes—information transfer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73d
schema version: 2

73D(1) Machinery of government changes—information transfer
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.106
note: Disclosure of information before change time is obligation to report investigation completion.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73d-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 73D Machinery of government changes—information transfer

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigation completion must be reported.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report investigation completion.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Disclosure of information before change time.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73D(1) Machinery of government changes—information transfer

73D(2) Machinery of government changes—information transfer
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.106
note: Authorises principal officer to provide information in relation to disclosure.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73d-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 73D Machinery of government changes—information transfer

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermissionTo

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73d-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73D(2) Machinery of government changes—information transfer

74 Ombudsman may determine standards
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.107
curation status: Proposed
has part: 74(1) Ombudsman may determine standards
has part: 74(2) Ombudsman may determine standards
has part: 74(3) Ombudsman may determine standards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74
schema version: 2

74(1) Ombudsman may determine standards
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.107
note: The Ombudsman may determine standards relating to procedures, investigations, reports, and information giving.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Ombudsman may determine standards

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to determine standards
modality: Deontic
operator: may

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74(1) Ombudsman may determine standards

74(2) Ombudsman may determine standards
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.107
note: Consultation requirement before determining standards.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Ombudsman may determine standards

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A standard may not be determined without consultation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Ombudsman must consult the IGIS.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74(2) Ombudsman may determine standards

74(3) Ombudsman may determine standards
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.107
note: Ensure standards are in force at all times after commencement.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Ombudsman may determine standards

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...standards are in force at all times after the commencement of this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Standards must be in force during the commencement period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) The Ombudsman must ensure that standards are in force under each of paragraphs (1)(a), (b) and (c)...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...standards are in force at all times after the commencement of this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Standards being in force implies their maintenance.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (3) The Ombudsman must ensure that standards are in force under each of paragraphs (1)(a), (b) and (c)...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...standards are in force at all times after the commencement of this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Standards must be maintained through artificial intelligence.
modality: CogAI
operator: mustBe
premise text: (3) The Ombudsman must ensure that standards are in force under each of paragraphs (1)(a), (b) and (c)...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...standards are in force at all times...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to ensure standards are in force.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) The Ombudsman must...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...standards are in force at all times after the commencement of this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Standards must be maintained through diffusion.
modality: Diffusion
operator: mustBe
premise text: (3) The Ombudsman must ensure that standards are in force under each of paragraphs (1)(a), (b) and (c)...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74(3) Ombudsman may determine standards

75 Restriction on the application of secrecy provisions
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.107
note: Exemptions from secrecy provisions for disclosure investigations and performance of functions/exercise of powers.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-75-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-75-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-75-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-75-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-75
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-75-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (d) the disclosure, recording or use is for the purposes of the performance of the functions, or the exercise of the powers,
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between disclosure investigations and performance of functions/exercise of powers.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (c) the disclosure, recording or use is in connection with giving a person access to information for...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...does not apply to the disclosure, recording or use of information if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information for specific purposes.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (1) A provision of a law of the Commonwealth that prohibits...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-75-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (b) the disclosure, recording or use is for the purposes of...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information for specific purposes.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) the disclosure, recording or use is in connection with the conduct of a disclosure investigation;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-75-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (c) the disclosure, recording or use is in connection with giving a person access to information for...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace between disclosure investigations and performance of functions/exercise of powers.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (b) the disclosure, recording or use is for the purposes of the performance of the functions, or the exercise of the powers,

76 Annual reports by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.108
curation status: Proposed
has part: 76(1) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
has part: 76(2) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
has part: 76(3) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
has part: 76(4) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76
schema version: 2

76(1) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.108
note: Annual report by Ombudsman to Minister and Parliament
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Annual reports by the Ombudsman

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(1) Annual reports by the Ombudsman

76(2) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.108
note: Annual reports by the Ombudsman must include specific information.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Annual reports by the Ombudsman

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual reports
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(2) Annual reports by the Ombudsman

76(3) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.108
note: Principal officer must provide information and assistance to the Ombudsman.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Annual reports by the Ombudsman

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision starts at a specific point in time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Starts at a specific point in time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: STARTS AT
premise text: The principal officer must give the Ombudsman such information and assistance as required by a specific point in time.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The principal officer must give the Ombudsman such information and assistance as required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information and assistance.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
premise text: The Ombudsman reasonably requires such information and assistance.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The principal officer is obligated to provide the required information and assistance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Principal officer has an obligation to provide information and assistance.
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE
premise text: The principal officer must give the Ombudsman such information and assistance as required.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision starts at a specific point in time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Starts at a specific point in time.
modality: LTL
operator: STARTS AT
premise text: The principal officer must give the Ombudsman such information and assistance as required by a specific point in time.

76(4) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.108
note: Delete material from a document given to the Ombudsman that could identify an individual or result in exemption under Part IV of the Freedom of Information Act 1982.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Annual reports by the Ombudsman

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for deletion
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal interval
premise text: (b) the inclusion of which would...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) Despite subsection (3), the principal officer may delete...

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(4) Annual reports by the Ombudsman

76A Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.110
curation status: Proposed
has part: 76A(1) Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
has part: 76A(2) Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
has part: 76A(3) Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76a
schema version: 2

76A(1) Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.110
note: The Ombudsman must prepare and give a report to the Minister.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 76A Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76A(1) Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman

76A(2) Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.110
note: Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman must include specific information.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 76A Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide reports
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76A(2) Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman

76A(3) Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
description: Annual reports
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.110
note: Reports must be submitted in accordance with subsections 76(3) and (4)
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 76A Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Annual report submission
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Reports must be submitted within a six-month period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: Six-monthly reports

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Annual report
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide annual reports
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Subsections 76(3) and (4)

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76A(3) Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman

77 Delegations
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.110
curation status: Proposed
has part: 77(1) Delegations
has part: 77(2) Delegations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77
schema version: 2

77(1) Delegations
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.110
note: Delegation of functions or powers to a public official
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-77-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-77-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Delegations

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-77-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The delegation occurs during the principal officer's term.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The delegation is by writing.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The public official may receive delegated functions or powers.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to delegate
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: The principal officer may, by writing, delegate any or all of their functions or powers.

77(2) Delegations
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.110
note: Comply with principal officer's directions when exercising delegated functions.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-77-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Delegations

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with directions
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-77-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(2) Delegations

78 Liability for acts and omissions
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.111
curation status: Proposed
has part: 78(1) Liability for acts and omissions
has part: 78(2) Liability for acts and omissions
has part: 78(3) Liability for acts and omissions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78
schema version: 2

78(1) Liability for acts and omissions
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.111
note: No liability for acts and omissions in good faith
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Liability for acts and omissions

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals for good faith
modality: AllenInterval
operator: interval relation
premise text: (d) in the performance, or purported performance, of any function conferred on the person by this Act; (e) in the exercise, or purported exercise, of any power conferred on the person by this Act;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference to exemption
modality: Argumentation
operator: inference rule
premise text: (a) the principal officer of an agency or a delegate of the principal officer; (b) an authorised officer of an agency; (c) a supervisor of a person who makes a disclosure;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive agent exemption
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive agent
premise text: (a) the principal officer of an agency or a delegate of the principal officer; (b) an authorised officer of an agency; (c) a supervisor of a person who makes a disclosure;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from liability
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion through good faith
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion operator
premise text: (d) in the performance, or purported performance, of any function conferred on the person by this Act; (e) in the exercise, or purported exercise, of any power conferred on the person by this Act;

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(1) Liability for acts and omissions

78(2) Liability for acts and omissions
type: Concept
references: sec-8
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.111
note: Section does not apply to a breach of designated publication restriction.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Liability for acts and omissions

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(2) Liability for acts and omissions

78(3) Liability for acts and omissions
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.111
note: No effect on rights to seek judicial review
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Liability for acts and omissions

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes rights from this section
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(3) Liability for acts and omissions

79 Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112
note: This Act does not exclude or limit State and Territory laws.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-79-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79
schema version: 2

7A Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.13
curation status: Proposed
has part: 7A(1) Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
has part: 7A(2) Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
has part: 7A(3) Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7a
schema version: 2

7A(1) Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.13
note: A complaint may be made to the Ombudsman about handling of a disclosure under the Act.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 7A Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A complaint may be made about the allocation of a disclosure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Complaints can be made about the allocation of a disclosure
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976 requires agencies to allocate disclosures promptly.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A complaint may be made about non-compliance with the Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Complaints can be made about compliance with the Act
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976 requires agencies to comply with its provisions.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A complaint may be made about the principal officer's compliance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Complaints can be made about principal officers
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976 requires agencies to have principal officers who comply with its provisions.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A complaint may be made about the handling of a disclosure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976 requires agencies to handle disclosures reasonably.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A complaint may be made about the investigation of a disclosure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Complaints can be made about investigation of a disclosure
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-A
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976 requires agencies to investigate disclosures promptly.

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7A(1) Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976

7A(2) Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.13
note: Exemptions from the Ombudsman's jurisdiction
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 7A Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from the Ombudsman's jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to:

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7A(2) Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976

7A(3) Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.13
note: Does not limit section 5 or 5A of the Ombudsman Act 1976.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 7A Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976

7B Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.14
curation status: Proposed
has part: 7B(1) Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
has part: 7B(2) Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
has part: 7B(3) Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7b
schema version: 2

7B(1) Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.14
note: Complaints about handling of disclosure under the Act can be made to the IGIS.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7b-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 7B Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses ability to make a complaint.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7B(1) Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and

7B(2) Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.14
note: List of matters that can be included in a complaint under the IGIS.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7b-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 7B Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State's obligation to handle complaints reasonably.
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7B(2) Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and

7B(3) Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.14
note: Does not limit section 8 or 8A of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7b-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 7B Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and

8 Definitions
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.15
note: Definitions section
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8
schema version: 2

80 Law relating to legal professional privilege not affected
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112
note: No effect on legal professional privilege law
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-80-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80
schema version: 2

82 Other investigative powers etc. not affected
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112
curation status: Proposed
has part: 82(1) Other investigative powers etc. not affected
has part: 82(2) Other investigative powers etc. not affected
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82
schema version: 2

82(1) Other investigative powers etc. not affected
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112
note: No implication on Commonwealth laws' investigative powers
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Other investigative powers etc. not affected

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82(1) Other investigative powers etc. not affected

82(2) Other investigative powers etc. not affected
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112
note: No obligation imposed by this Act on an agency or public official supersedes obligations under other Commonwealth laws.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Other investigative powers etc. not affected

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: under other Commonwealth laws
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Supersedes obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: supersedes
premise text: No obligation imposed by this Act

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82(2) Other investigative powers etc. not affected

82A Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112
curation status: Proposed
has part: 82A(1) Review of operation of Act
has part: 82A(2) Review of operation of Act
has part: 82A(3) Review of operation of Act
has part: 82A(4) Review of operation of Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82a
schema version: 2

82A(1) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112
note: The Minister must cause a review to be undertaken of the operation of this Act.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 82A Review of operation of Act

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to undertake a review
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

82A(2) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112
note: Review of operation of Act must be conducted after 5 years.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 82A Review of operation of Act

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to review operation of Act
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82A(2) Review of operation of Act

82A(3) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112
note: The Minister must cause a written report about the review to be prepared.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 82A Review of operation of Act

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must cause a written report about the review to be prepared.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

82A(4) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112
note: The Minister must cause a copy of the report to be laid before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 82A Review of operation of Act

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must cause a copy of the report to be laid before each House of Parliament.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

83 The PID rules
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.113
note: The Minister may make rules by legislative instrument.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-83-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-83-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-83
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-83-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the PID rules as a descriptive clause.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text describes the rules as 'prescribing matters'

9 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.23
note: Taking reprisal against a person for making a public interest disclosure is an offence.
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-9-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9
schema version: 2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of reprisal against a person for making a public interest disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013
type: Document
date: 4 June 2026
identifier: No. 133 of 2013
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU