Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 133 of 2013
date: 4 June 2026
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

4 June 2026
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the text as a compilation of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013.
premise text: The text is classified as a compilation.
conclusion text: Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.7
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Commencement rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.7
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Defines sections and table of contents for the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.7
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for section commencement.
premise text: Commencement definition
conclusion text: Definition of commencement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 July 2013
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.7
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.7
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-2-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-2-2-logic-alleninterval-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-2-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 January 2014
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.7
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-2-norm

3 Crown to be bound
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
has part: 3(1) Crown to be bound
has part: 3(2) Crown to be bound
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.8

3(1) Crown to be bound
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-ss-1
part of: 3 Crown to be bound
note: The Crown is bound by this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.8
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Crown has an obligation to comply.
premise text: (1) This Act binds the Crown in each of its capacities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(2) Crown to be bound
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-ss-2
part of: 3 Crown to be bound
note: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.8
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(2) Crown to be bound
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty.
conclusion text: The Crown cannot be prosecuted for an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative prohibition
premise text: The Crown cannot be prosecuted for an offence.
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negation of obligation
premise text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty.
conclusion text: The Crown cannot be prosecuted for an offence.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: The Crown's liability ends when the Act comes into force.
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence during this period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: ¬
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: The Crown's liability can be determined using AI algorithms.
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to a pecuniary penalty or prosecution for an offence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Extension to external Territories
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-2
note: The Act extends to every external Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.8
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-4-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-4-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Extension to external Territories
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extension obligation
premise text: The Act extends to every external Territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Extension to things outside Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Act extends to acts, omissions, matters and things outside Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.8
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-5-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extension to things outside Australia
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Objects
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
note: Promote integrity and accountability of Commonwealth public sector.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.9
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-6-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Objects
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: promote
logic summary: Obligation to promote integrity and accountability.
premise text: State has a duty to promote...
conclusion text: ...integrity and accountability of Commonwealth public sector.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Simplified outline of this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
note: Agencies are required to investigate disclosures of potential disclosable conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.10
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must investigate disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Investigation is a part of agency's duties
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7A Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7a
has part: 7A(1) Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
has part: 7A(2) Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
has part: 7A(3) Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.13

7A(1) Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7a-ss-1
part of: 7A Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
note: A complaint may be made to the Ombudsman about handling of a disclosure under the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.13
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7A(1) Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976 requires agencies to handle disclosures reasonably.
conclusion text: A complaint may be made about the handling of a disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Complaints can be made about the allocation of a disclosure
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976 requires agencies to allocate disclosures promptly.
conclusion text: A complaint may be made about the allocation of a disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Complaints can be made about compliance with the Act
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976 requires agencies to comply with its provisions.
conclusion text: A complaint may be made about non-compliance with the Act.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Complaints can be made about investigation of a disclosure
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976 requires agencies to investigate disclosures promptly.
conclusion text: A complaint may be made about the investigation of a disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Complaints can be made about principal officers
premise text: The Ombudsman Act 1976 requires agencies to have principal officers who comply with its provisions.
conclusion text: A complaint may be made about the principal officer's compliance.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7A(2) Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7a-ss-2
part of: 7A Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
note: Exemptions from the Ombudsman's jurisdiction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.13
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7A(2) Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from the Ombudsman's jurisdiction
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7A(3) Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7a-ss-3
part of: 7A Role of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1976
note: Does not limit section 5 or 5A of the Ombudsman Act 1976.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.13
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7a-ss-3-norm

7B Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7b
has part: 7B(1) Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
has part: 7B(2) Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
has part: 7B(3) Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.14

7B(1) Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7b-ss-1
part of: 7B Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
note: Complaints about handling of disclosure under the Act can be made to the IGIS.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.14
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7b-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7B(1) Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Expresses ability to make a complaint.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7B(2) Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7b-ss-2
part of: 7B Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
note: List of matters that can be included in a complaint under the IGIS.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.14
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7b-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7B(2) Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: State's obligation to handle complaints reasonably.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7B(3) Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7b-ss-3
part of: 7B Role of the IGIS under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
note: Does not limit section 8 or 8A of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.14
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-7b-ss-3-norm

8 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
note: Definitions section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.15
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-8-norm

9 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9
note: Taking reprisal against a person for making a public interest disclosure is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.23
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-9-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of reprisal against a person for making a public interest disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Protection of disclosers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
has part: 10(1) Protection of disclosers
has part: 10(2) Protection of disclosers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.24

10(1) Protection of disclosers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-ss-1
part of: 10 Protection of disclosers
note: Protection of disclosers from civil, criminal or administrative liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.24
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Protection from liability implies obligation
premise text: (making a public interest disclosure) -> (not subject to civil, criminal or administrative liability)
conclusion text: (making a public interest disclosure)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Protection from liability implies obligation
premise text: (making a public interest disclosure) -> (no contractual or other remedy may be enforced)
conclusion text: (making a public interest disclosure)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Protection from liability implies obligation
premise text: (making a public interest disclosure) -> (no contractual or other right may be exercised)
conclusion text: (making a public interest disclosure)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(2) Protection of disclosers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-ss-2
part of: 10 Protection of disclosers
note: Protection of disclosers from contract termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.24
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10(2) Protection of disclosers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Absolute privilege in defamation proceedings
premise text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Liability for false or misleading statements etc. unaffected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11
has part: 11(1) Liability for false or misleading statements etc. unaffected
has part: 11(2) Liability for false or misleading statements etc. unaffected
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.24

11(1) Liability for false or misleading statements etc. unaffected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-ss-1
part of: 11 Liability for false or misleading statements etc. unaffected
note: No liability for knowingly making false or misleading statements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.24
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to not make false or misleading statements
premise text: Section 10 does not apply
conclusion text: No liability for knowingly making false or misleading statements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on making false or misleading statements
premise text: Section 10 does not apply
conclusion text: No liability for knowingly making false or misleading statements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(2) Liability for false or misleading statements etc. unaffected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-ss-2
part of: 11 Liability for false or misleading statements etc. unaffected
note: Section 10 does not apply to liability for an offence against certain sections of the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.24
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11-ss-2-norm

11A Designated publication restrictions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11a
note: Disclosure contravening designated publication restriction is prohibited if person making disclosure knows of the contravention and lacks reasonable excuse.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.24
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-cogai-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure contravening designated publication restriction
premise text: Person making disclosure knows of the contravention and lacks reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: Disclosure is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Disclosure must occur within the same temporal interval as the designated publication restriction
premise text: Person making disclosure knows that the disclosure contravenes the designated publication restriction and does not have a reasonable excuse for that contravention.
conclusion text: Disclosure occurs within the same temporal interval as the designated publication restriction.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Disclosure must be recurrent if person making disclosure knows of the contravention and lacks reasonable excuse
premise text: Person making disclosure knows that the disclosure contravenes the designated publication restriction and does not have a reasonable excuse for that contravention.
conclusion text: Disclosure is recurrent.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Disclosure must diffuse to all relevant parties if person making disclosure knows of the contravention and lacks reasonable excuse
premise text: Person making disclosure knows that the disclosure contravenes the designated publication restriction and does not have a reasonable excuse for that contravention.
conclusion text: Disclosure diffuses to all relevant parties.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inferential
logic summary: Disclosure must be inferentially linked to the designated publication restriction if person making disclosure knows of the contravention and lacks reasonable excuse
premise text: Person making disclosure knows that the disclosure contravenes the designated publication restriction and does not have a reasonable excuse for that contravention.
conclusion text: Disclosure is inferentially linked to the designated publication restriction.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Discloser’s liability for own conduct not affected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
note: Discloser's liability for own conduct not affected
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.25
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12-logic-deontic-2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Discloser’s liability for own conduct not affected
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continuum
logic summary: Continuity of obligation
premise text: Disclosure does not affect liability for conduct.
conclusion text: Obligation persists regardless of disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continuum
logic summary: Continuity of obligation in context of disclosure
premise text: Disclosure does not affect individual's liability for conduct.
conclusion text: Obligation persists regardless of disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12A Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12a
has part: 12A(1) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
has part: 12A(2) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
has part: 12A(3) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
has part: 12A(4) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.25

12A(1) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12a-ss-1
part of: 12A Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
note: Witnesses must provide assistance in relation to a public interest disclosure.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.25
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12A(1) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide assistance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12A(2) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12a-ss-2
part of: 12A Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
note: Immunity from civil, criminal or administrative action for providing assistance in relation to a public interest disclosure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.25
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12A(2) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to provide immunity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12A(3) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12a-ss-3
part of: 12A Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
note: Witnesses are not subject to civil, criminal or administrative liability for assistance provided.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.25
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Assistance provides immunity from liability.
premise text: Assistance is provided.
conclusion text: Immunity from liability is granted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12A(4) Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12a-ss-4
part of: 12A Witnesses—immunity from liability etc.
note: No contractual remedy may be enforced against the witness.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.25
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits enforcement of contractual remedy
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12B Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12b
has part: 12B(1) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
has part: 12B(2) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
has part: 12B(3) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
has part: 12B(4) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
has part: 12B(5) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.26

12B(1) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12b-ss-1
part of: 12B Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
note: Individuals providing assistance in public interest disclosures must not make false or misleading statements.
description: False or misleading statements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.26
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12B(1) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on making false or misleading statements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12B(2) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12b-ss-2
part of: 12B Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
note: Prohibition on knowingly making false or misleading statements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.26
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits knowingly making false or misleading statements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12B(3) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12b-ss-3
part of: 12B Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
note: Section 12A does not apply to the liability of a witness for an offence against certain sections of the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.26
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12B(3) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Section 12A is excluded from applying to the liability of a witness for an offence against certain sections of the Criminal Code.
premise text: Section 12A
conclusion text: does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The section number overlaps with the Criminal Code.
premise text: section 137.1, 137.2, 144.1 or 145.1
conclusion text: overlaps with the Criminal Code
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The section number repeats in the Criminal Code.
premise text: section 137.1, 137.2, 144.1 or 145.1
conclusion text: repeats in the Criminal Code
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implication
logic summary: The liability of a witness for an offence against certain sections of the Criminal Code implies that section 12A does not apply.
premise text: the liability of the witness
conclusion text: implies that section 12A does not apply
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: The designated publication restrictions imply that section 12A is excluded from applying to the liability of a witness for an offence against certain sections of the Criminal Code.
premise text: Designated publication restrictions
conclusion text: imply that section 12A is excluded
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

12B(4) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12b-ss-4
part of: 12B Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
note: Prohibition on contravening a designated publication restriction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.26
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids contravening a designated publication restriction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12B(5) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12b-ss-5
part of: 12B Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
note: Witnesses' liability for conduct not affected by section 12A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.26
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12B(5) Witnesses—exceptions to immunities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If assistance relates to witness's conduct, then section 12A does not affect liability.
premise text: Assistance provided relates to witness's conduct
conclusion text: Section 12A does not affect witness's liability for conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Section 12A and witnesses' liability for conduct overlap in time
premise text: Assistance provided relates to witness's conduct
conclusion text: Section 12A and witnesses' liability for conduct overlap in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Witnesses' liability for conduct repeated by section 12A
premise text: Assistance provided relates to witness's conduct
conclusion text: Section 12A repeats witnesses' liability for conduct
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: Section 12A spreads to witnesses' liability for conduct
premise text: Assistance provided relates to witness's conduct
conclusion text: Section 12A spreads to witnesses' liability for conduct
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12b-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Witnesses' conduct classified as a separate issue from section 12A using AI
premise text: Assistance provided relates to witness's conduct
conclusion text: Witnesses' conduct is a separate issue from section 12A using AI
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

13 What constitutes taking a reprisal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
has part: 13(1) What constitutes taking a reprisal
has part: 13(2) What constitutes taking a reprisal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.27

13(1) What constitutes taking a reprisal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-ss-1
part of: 13 What constitutes taking a reprisal
note: Taking a reprisal against another person is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.27
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 13(1) What constitutes taking a reprisal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of taking a reprisal
premise text: Engaging in conduct that results in detriment to another person
conclusion text: Taking a reprisal is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between engagement and reprisal
premise text: When the conduct is engaged in, the first person believes or suspects that the second person has made a public interest disclosure
conclusion text: The engagement occurs before the belief or suspicion of the second person making a public interest disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of conduct on reprisal
premise text: The first person engages in conduct that results in detriment to the second person
conclusion text: If the first person engages in conduct resulting in detriment to another person, then taking a reprisal is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagation of prohibition through engagement and belief
premise text: The first person believes or suspects that the second person has made a public interest disclosure
conclusion text: If the first person believes or suspects that the second person has made a public interest disclosure, then taking a reprisal is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classification of persons against whom reprisal may be taken based on conduct and belief
premise text: The first person engages in conduct that results in detriment to the second person and believes or suspects that the second person has made a public interest disclosure
conclusion text: The first person is a person who has engaged in conduct resulting in detriment to another person and believes or suspects that the other person has made a public interest disclosure.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13(2) What constitutes taking a reprisal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-ss-2
part of: 13 What constitutes taking a reprisal
note: List of detrimental actions against an employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.27
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13(2) What constitutes taking a reprisal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Listing of prohibited actions
premise text: (2) Detriment includes...
conclusion text: ...the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Classification of detrimental actions
premise text: (a) dismissal of an employee;
conclusion text: ...(h) damage to a person’s reputation;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
has part: 14(1) Compensation
has part: 14(2) Compensation
has part: 14(3) Compensation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.28

14(1) Compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-1
part of: 14 Compensation
note: Compensation for reprisal against an applicant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.28
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(1) Compensation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to compensate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(2) Compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-2
part of: 14 Compensation
note: Federal Court must not make an order under paragraph (1)(b) if the respondent's employer establishes that it took reasonable precautions and exercised due diligence to avoid reprisal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.28
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(2) Compensation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition on making an order under paragraph (1)(b)
premise text: (2) The Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) must not make an order under paragraph (1)(b)
conclusion text: The respondent's employer establishes that it took reasonable precautions and exercised due diligence to avoid reprisal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: The respondent's employer establishes that it took reasonable precautions within the timeframe of the reprisal
premise text: (2) The Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) must not make an order under paragraph (1)(b)
conclusion text: within the timeframe of the reprisal
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: The respondent's employer establishes that it took reasonable precautions and exercised due diligence to avoid reprisal in a recurring manner
premise text: (2) The Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) must not make an order under paragraph (1)(b)
conclusion text: in a recurring manner
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

14(3) Compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-3
part of: 14 Compensation
note: Joint liability for compensation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.28
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Joint liability
premise text: (3) If the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) makes an order...
conclusion text: ...the respondent and the respondent’s employer are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation concerned.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between orders
premise text: (3) If the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) makes an order...
conclusion text: ...the respondent and the respondent’s employer are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation concerned.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring liability for compensation
premise text: (3) If the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) makes an order...
conclusion text: ...the respondent and the respondent’s employer are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation concerned.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of liability
premise text: (3) If the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) makes an order...
conclusion text: ...the respondent and the respondent’s employer are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation concerned.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph
logic summary: Knowledge graph representation of liability
premise text: (3) If the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) makes an order...
conclusion text: ...the respondent and the respondent’s employer are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation concerned.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Injunctions, apologies and other orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-3
has part: 15(1) Injunctions, apologies and other orders
has part: 15(2) Injunctions, apologies and other orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.29

15(1) Injunctions, apologies and other orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-3-ss-1
part of: 15 Injunctions, apologies and other orders
note: Restraining respondent from taking reprisal or requiring them to do something.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.29
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits respondent from taking reprisal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(2) Injunctions, apologies and other orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-3-ss-2
part of: 15 Injunctions, apologies and other orders
note: Prohibits aiding, abetting, counselling, or procuring conduct against an applicant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.29
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
premise text: (2) If the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) has power...
conclusion text: ...the Court may make any other orders (including granting an injunction)...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Orders apply during conduct
premise text: (2) If the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia...
conclusion text: ...the Court may make any other orders (including granting an injunction)...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Orders apply during conduct
premise text: (2) If the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia...
conclusion text: ...the Court may make any other orders (including granting an injunction)...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits aiding, abetting, counselling, or procuring conduct against an applicant.
premise text: (a) aided, abetted, counselled or procured the conduct against the applicant;
conclusion text: ...the Court may make any other orders (including granting an injunction)...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits inducing conduct against an applicant.
premise text: (b) induced the conduct against the applicant, whether through threats or promises or otherwise;
conclusion text: ...the Court may make any other orders (including granting an injunction)...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Reinstatement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16
note: Reinstatement obligation for applicant if respondent takes reprisal against them.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.30
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-cogai-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Reinstatement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to reinstate applicant if conditions are met.
premise text: The respondent has taken reprisal against the applicant.
conclusion text: The applicant must be reinstated.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Reinstatement is contingent on reprisal during employment.
premise text: The applicant was employed by the respondent.
conclusion text: The applicant must be reinstated if the reprisal occurred during employment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Reinstatement is contingent on termination of reprisal.
premise text: The respondent has terminated the applicant's employment.
conclusion text: The applicant must be reinstated if the reprisal terminates.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Reinstatement is contingent on specific conditions being met.
premise text: The respondent has taken reprisal against the applicant.
conclusion text: The applicant must be reinstated if the conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-16-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasProperty
logic summary: Reinstatement is a property of the respondent's actions.
premise text: The respondent has taken reprisal against the applicant.
conclusion text: The respondent has the property of reinstating the applicant.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Multiple orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17
note: May make orders under sections 14, 15 and 16 in respect of the same conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.30
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-17-norm

18 Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18
has part: 18(1) Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
has part: 18(2) Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.30

18(1) Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-1
part of: 18 Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
note: No costs for vexatious proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.30
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-18-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(1) Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on ordering costs in vexatious proceedings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(2) Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-2
part of: 18 Costs only if proceedings instituted vexatiously etc.
note: Pay costs only if instituted vexatiously or without reasonable cause.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.30
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
premise text: Instituting proceedings vexatiously or without reasonable cause
conclusion text: Pay costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Reprisals in relation to disclosures—offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19
has part: 19(1) Reprisals in relation to disclosures—offences
has part: 19(2) Reprisals in relation to disclosures—offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.31

19(1) Reprisals in relation to disclosures—offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-1
part of: 19 Reprisals in relation to disclosures—offences
note: Taking a reprisal—by a threat to cause detriment is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.31
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(1) Reprisals in relation to disclosures—offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of taking a reprisal—by a threat to cause detriment.
premise text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence in relation to another person (the second person)...
conclusion text: Taking a reprisal—by a threat to cause detriment is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(2) Reprisals in relation to disclosures—offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-2
part of: 19 Reprisals in relation to disclosures—offences
note: Reckless conduct towards a person who has made or may have made a public interest disclosure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.31
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(2) Reprisals in relation to disclosures—offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Reckless conduct is an obligation.
premise text: (a) the first person engages in conduct; and (b) engaging in the conduct consists of, or results in, a threat to cause detriment to the second person;
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if they engage in reckless conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Engaging in conduct with reckless disregard is an obligation.
premise text: (d) when the conduct is engaged in, the first person believes or suspects that the second person, or any other person: (i) has made a public interest disclosure; or (ii) may have made a public interest disclosure;
conclusion text: The first person's belief or suspicion of a public interest disclosure is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between conduct and threat is necessary for liability.
premise text: (b) engaging in the conduct consists of, or results in, a threat to cause detriment to the second person;
conclusion text: The temporal relation between conduct and threat is necessary for liability.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of conduct towards persons who have made or may make public interest disclosures is necessary for liability.
premise text: (a) the first person engages in conduct; and (b) engaging in the conduct consists of, or results in, a threat to cause detriment to the second person;
conclusion text: The recurring trace of conduct towards persons who have made or may make public interest disclosures is necessary for liability.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19A Interaction between civil remedies and offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19a
note: A person may bring proceedings under sections 14, 15 or 16 in relation to a reprisal even if prosecution for an offence against section 19 has not been brought.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.33
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19a-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19a-logic-deontic-2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19A Interaction between civil remedies and offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Disclosure or use of identifying information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20
has part: 20(1) Disclosure or use of identifying information
has part: 20(2) Disclosure or use of identifying information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.33

20(1) Disclosure or use of identifying information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-ss-1
part of: 20 Disclosure or use of identifying information
note: Disclosing identifying information after a public interest disclosure is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.33
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(1) Disclosure or use of identifying information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing identifying information after a public interest disclosure.
premise text: (a) another person (the second person) has made a public interest disclosure;
conclusion text: Disclosing information that enables the identification of the second person is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of using disclosing identifying information after a public interest disclosure.
premise text: (c) the disclosure is to a person other than the second person.
conclusion text: Using disclosing identifying information after a public interest disclosure is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of imprisonment for using disclosing identifying information after a public interest disclosure.
premise text: Penalty: Imprisonment for 6 months or 30 penalty units, or both.
conclusion text: Imprisonment for using disclosing identifying information after a public interest disclosure is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of using identifying information after a public interest disclosure.
premise text: Use of identifying information
conclusion text: Using identifying information after a public interest disclosure is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(2) Disclosure or use of identifying information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-ss-2
part of: 20 Disclosure or use of identifying information
note: Using identifying information is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.33
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(2) Disclosure or use of identifying information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of using identifying information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Identifying information not to be disclosed etc. to courts or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21
note: Public officials cannot disclose identifying information to courts or tribunals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.35
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-21-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-21-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 Identifying information not to be disclosed etc. to courts or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of identifying information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Interaction with protections under Part 3-1 of the Fair Work Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22
note: Part 3-1 of the Fair Work Act applies to public interest disclosure by a public official.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.35
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-22-norm

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Interaction with protections under Part 3-1 of the Fair Work Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

22A Interaction with remedies under the Fair Work Act 2009
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22a
note: Prohibition on making applications for certain orders in Federal Court or Family Court of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.35
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-22a-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-22a-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-22a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 22A Interaction with remedies under the Fair Work Act 2009
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-22a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on making applications for certain orders.
premise text: (1) A person is not entitled to make an application...
conclusion text: ...to particular conduct if another application has been made...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Claims for protection
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23
has part: 23(1) Claims for protection
has part: 23(2) Claims for protection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.36

23(1) Claims for protection
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-ss-1
part of: 23 Claims for protection
note: Individual bears onus of adducing evidence, party instituting proceedings bears onus of proving claim is not made out.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.36
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-23-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-23-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(1) Claims for protection
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Individual bears obligation to adduce evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(2) Claims for protection
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-ss-2
part of: 23 Claims for protection
note: Right not to be compelled to give evidence under section 126K of the Evidence Act 1995.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.36
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-23-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-23-ss-2-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(2) Claims for protection
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Right exists
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Protections have effect despite other Commonwealth laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24
note: Protections have effect despite other Commonwealth laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.37
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-24-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-24-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 Protections have effect despite other Commonwealth laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25
note: A public interest disclosure is a disclosure of information that meets certain criteria.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.38
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-25-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: The provision imposes an obligation on public officials.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Meaning of public interest disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26
note: Disclosure of information is a public interest disclosure if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.39
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-cogai-6

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26 Meaning of public interest disclosure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information
premise text: (1) A disclosure of information is a public interest disclosure...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of disclosures into internal and external
premise text: Item Column 1 Type of disclosure Column 2 Recipient Column 3 Further requirements...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosures
premise text: (b) On a previous occasion, the discloser made an internal disclosure of information that consisted of, or included...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inference from conditions to obligation
premise text: (a) The information tends to show, or the discloser believes on reasonable grounds that the information tends to...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagation of obligations through disclosures
premise text: (b) On a previous occasion, the discloser made an internal disclosure of information that consisted of, or included...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of disclosures and recipients
premise text: (b) The recipient of the information is a person of the kind referred to in column 2...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Associated allegations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27
note: Allegations of disclosable conduct must be made in conjunction with a public interest disclosure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.44
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-27-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-27-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-27-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27 Associated allegations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide allegations of disclosable conduct with a public interest disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 How a public interest disclosure may be made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28
has part: 28(1) How a public interest disclosure may be made
has part: 28(2) How a public interest disclosure may be made
has part: 28(3) How a public interest disclosure may be made
has part: 28(4) How a public interest disclosure may be made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.44

28(1) How a public interest disclosure may be made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-1
part of: 28 How a public interest disclosure may be made
note: A public interest disclosure may be made orally or in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.44
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-1-norm

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(1) How a public interest disclosure may be made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

28(2) How a public interest disclosure may be made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-2
part of: 28 How a public interest disclosure may be made
note: Anonymous public interest disclosure allowed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.44
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-2-norm

28(3) How a public interest disclosure may be made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-3
part of: 28 How a public interest disclosure may be made
note: A public interest disclosure may be made without asserting that the disclosure is made for the purposes of this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.44
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to make a public interest disclosure without asserting purpose.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(4) How a public interest disclosure may be made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-4
part of: 28 How a public interest disclosure may be made
note: Exemption from section 28(4) for NACC disclosures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.44
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(4) How a public interest disclosure may be made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Exemption from section 28(4) for NACC disclosures
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Meaning of disclosable conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29
note: Disclosable conduct includes various types of misconduct and abuse of public trust.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.44
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-deontic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-deontic-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-deontic-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes various types of misconduct.
premise text: (a) Conduct that contravenes a law...
conclusion text: Disclosable conduct includes...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes abuse of public trust.
premise text: (d) Conduct that is an abuse of public trust.
conclusion text: Disclosable conduct includes...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Includes conduct resulting in wastage of resources.
premise text: (a) Relevant money (within the meaning...)
conclusion text: Conduct that results in...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, or deception.
premise text: (i) Fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, or deception...
conclusion text: Disclosable conduct includes...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes misconduct relating to scientific analysis.
premise text: (b) Misconduct relating to scientific analysis...
conclusion text: Disclosable conduct includes...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29A Meaning of personal work-related conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29a
note: Public officials must not engage in personal work-related conduct that has implications for another official.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.47
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-deontic-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-deontic-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 29A Meaning of personal work-related conduct
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits personal work-related conduct.
premise text: Public officials must not engage in conduct that has implications for another official.
conclusion text: Personal work-related conduct is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on public officials to avoid personal work-related conduct.
premise text: Public officials must not engage in conduct that has implications for another official.
conclusion text: Public officials have an obligation to avoid personal work-related conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Personal work-related conduct overlaps with the second official's employment or functions.
premise text: The second official's employment or functions are relevant to personal work-related conduct.
conclusion text: Personal work-related conduct overlaps with the second official's employment or functions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits bullying or harassment as personal work-related conduct.
premise text: Bullying or harassment is an example of personal work-related conduct.
conclusion text: Bullying or harassment is prohibited as personal work-related conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits the transfer or promotion of another official as personal work-related conduct.
premise text: The transfer or promotion of another official is an example of personal work-related conduct.
conclusion text: The transfer or promotion of another official is prohibited as personal work-related conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30
has part: 30(1) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
has part: 30(2) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
has part: 30(3) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
has part: 30(4) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.48

30(1) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-1
part of: 30 Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
note: Public official not engaging in conduct unrelated to contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.48
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(1) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Public official obligation
premise text: (a) is an officer or employee of a contracted service provider for a Commonwealth contract;
conclusion text: the individual does not engage in conduct in connection with his or her position as such a public official unless the conduct is in connection with entering into, or giving effect to, the contract.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Contract duration
premise text: (b) provides services for the purposes (whether direct or indirect) of the Commonwealth contract;
conclusion text: the individual does not engage in conduct in connection with his or her position as such a public official unless the conduct is in connection with entering into, or giving effect to, the contract.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Contract services
premise text: (b) provides services for the purposes (whether direct or indirect) of the Commonwealth contract;
conclusion text: the individual does not engage in conduct in connection with his or her position as such a public official unless the conduct is in connection with entering into, or giving effect to, the contract.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Contractor service provision
premise text: (b) provides services for the purposes (whether direct or indirect) of the Commonwealth contract;
conclusion text: the individual does not engage in conduct in connection with his or her position as such a public official unless the conduct is in connection with entering into, or giving effect to, the contract.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(2) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-2
part of: 30 Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
note: A contracted service provider for a Commonwealth contract is responsible for the provision of goods or services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.48
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(2) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of a contracted service provider
premise text: A person is a contracted service provider if they are responsible for the provision of goods or services.
conclusion text: A contracted service provider is defined as someone who is responsible for the provision of goods or services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope of a contracted service provider's responsibility
premise text: A person who is responsible for the provision of goods or services under the Commonwealth contract is also responsible during the duration of the contract.
conclusion text: The temporal scope of a contracted service provider's responsibility is during the duration of the contract.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Global applicability of a contracted service provider's responsibility
premise text: A person who is responsible for the provision of goods or services under the Commonwealth contract is also responsible everywhere during the duration of the contract.
conclusion text: The global applicability of a contracted service provider's responsibility is everywhere during the duration of the contract.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory nature of a contracted service provider's responsibility
premise text: A person who is responsible for the provision of goods or services under the Commonwealth contract must provide those goods or services.
conclusion text: The mandatory nature of a contracted service provider's responsibility is to provide goods or services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: if-then
logic summary: Consequence of a contracted service provider's responsibility
premise text: If a person is responsible for the provision of goods or services under the Commonwealth contract, then they must provide those goods or services.
conclusion text: The consequence of a contracted service provider's responsibility is that they must provide goods or services.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(3) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-3
part of: 30 Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
note: A Commonwealth contract is a contract to which the Commonwealth or an agency is a party.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.48
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(3) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Defines a Commonwealth contract.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(4) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-4
part of: 30 Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
note: Exempts Commonwealth contracts from grants covered by instruments under section 105C of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.48
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(4) Officers or employees of a contracted service provider
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Grants under section 105C are excluded from Commonwealth contracts.
premise text: Section 105C of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013
conclusion text: No grant covered by an instrument made under section 105C applies to a Commonwealth contract.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalExclusion
logic summary: Grants under section 105C are excluded from the temporal scope of Commonwealth contracts.
premise text: Section 105C of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013
conclusion text: A grant covered by an instrument made under section 105C does not apply to a Commonwealth contract at any time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalExclusion
logic summary: Grants under section 105C are excluded from the temporal scope of Commonwealth contracts.
premise text: Section 105C of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013
conclusion text: A grant covered by an instrument made under section 105C does not apply to a Commonwealth contract at any time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: TemporalExclusion
logic summary: Grants under section 105C are excluded from the temporal scope of Commonwealth contracts.
premise text: Section 105C of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013
conclusion text: A grant covered by an instrument made under section 105C does not apply to a Commonwealth contract at any time.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: TemporalExclusion
logic summary: Grants under section 105C are excluded from the temporal scope of Commonwealth contracts.
premise text: Section 105C of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013
conclusion text: A grant covered by an instrument made under section 105C does not apply to a Commonwealth contract at any time.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Disagreements with government policies etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31
note: Disagreements with government policies etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.49
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-31-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-31-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 Disagreements with government policies etc.
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exempts conduct from disclosure if related to government policy or action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Conduct connected with courts or Commonwealth tribunals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32
note: Conduct of judicial officers and certain court staff is not disclosable conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.49
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-32-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-32-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-32-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32 Conduct connected with courts or Commonwealth tribunals
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disclose conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Conduct connected with intelligence agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33
note: Conduct connected with intelligence agencies is not disclosable if it is part of proper performance or exercise of powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.51
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-33-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-33-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33 Conduct connected with intelligence agencies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disclose conduct
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Meaning of authorised internal recipient
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34
note: Defines who is an authorized internal recipient of a disclosure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.51
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-34-norm

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34 Meaning of authorised internal recipient
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

35 When conduct relates to an agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35
has part: 35(1) When conduct relates to an agency
has part: 35(2) When conduct relates to an agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.53

35(1) When conduct relates to an agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-1
part of: 35 When conduct relates to an agency
note: Agency conduct is considered conduct if an agency or public official engages in it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.53
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(1) When conduct relates to an agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Agency conduct is considered conduct.
premise text: (1) Conduct relates to an agency if the agency, or a public official belonging to the agency at the time of the conduct, engages in the conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Conduct by unincorporated subsidiary agencies is also considered conduct.
premise text: Conduct by unincorporated subsidiary agencies
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35(2) When conduct relates to an agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-2
part of: 35 When conduct relates to an agency
note: Agency conduct is attributed to parent agency when subsidiary agency is established.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.53
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(2) When conduct relates to an agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Attribution
logic summary: Agency conduct is attributed to parent agency.
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1), if:...
conclusion text: ...conduct that would, apart from this subsection, relate to the subsidiary agency...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalRelation
logic summary: Agency conduct is attributed to parent agency when subsidiary agency is established.
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1), if:...
conclusion text: ...conduct that would, apart from this subsection, relate to the subsidiary agency...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Agency conduct is attributed to parent agency when subsidiary agency is established.
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1), if:...
conclusion text: ...conduct that would, apart from this subsection, relate to the subsidiary agency...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Agency conduct is attributed to parent agency when subsidiary agency is established.
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1), if:...
conclusion text: ...conduct that would, apart from this subsection, relate to the subsidiary agency...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-35-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Attribution
logic summary: Agency conduct is attributed to parent agency when subsidiary agency is established.
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1), if:...
conclusion text: ...conduct that would, apart from this subsection, relate to the subsidiary agency...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Meaning of authorised officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36
note: Defines an authorised officer for an agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.54
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-36-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-36-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36 Meaning of authorised officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the principal officer or appointed public official.
premise text: An authorised officer is...
conclusion text: ...the principal officer of the agency; or a public official...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

41 Meaning of intelligence information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41
has part: 41(1) Meaning of intelligence information
has part: 41(2) Meaning of intelligence information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.54

41(1) Meaning of intelligence information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41-ss-1
part of: 41 Meaning of intelligence information
note: Defines intelligence information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.54
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-1-norm

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(1) Meaning of intelligence information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

41(2) Meaning of intelligence information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41-ss-2
part of: 41 Meaning of intelligence information
note: Sensitive law enforcement information means information that disclosure is reasonably likely to prejudice Australia's law enforcement interests.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.54
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(2) Meaning of intelligence information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to protect Australia's law enforcement interests.
premise text: (2) Sensitive law enforcement information means information the disclosure of which is reasonably likely to prejudice Australia’s law enforcement interests, including Australia’s interests in the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Defines a class of sensitive law enforcement information.
premise text: (2) Sensitive law enforcement information means information the disclosure of which is reasonably likely to prejudice Australia’s law enforcement interests, including Australia’s interests in the following:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between sensitive law enforcement information and Australia's law enforcement interests.
premise text: (2) Sensitive law enforcement information means information the disclosure of which is reasonably likely to prejudice Australia’s law enforcement interests, including Australia’s interests in the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between sensitive law enforcement information and Australia's law enforcement interests.
premise text: (2) Sensitive law enforcement information means information the disclosure of which is reasonably likely to prejudice Australia’s law enforcement interests, including Australia’s interests in the following:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Describes how sensitive law enforcement information affects Australia's law enforcement interests.
premise text: (2) Sensitive law enforcement information means information the disclosure of which is reasonably likely to prejudice Australia’s law enforcement interests, including Australia’s interests in the following:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-41-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Describes how sensitive law enforcement information can be recognized by artificial agents.
premise text: (2) Sensitive law enforcement information means information the disclosure of which is reasonably likely to prejudice Australia’s law enforcement interests, including Australia’s interests in the following:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42
note: Disclosure must be made to an authorised officer or a supervisor for it to be considered internal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.57
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-42-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-42-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-42-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42 Simplified outline
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide disclosure to an authorised officer or supervisor.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Allocation of disclosure—decision by authorised officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43
note: Discloser must disclose information to an authorised officer of an agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.57
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-43-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-43-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 Allocation of disclosure—decision by authorised officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide disclosure information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44
has part: 44(1) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
has part: 44(2) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
has part: 44(3) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
has part: 44(4) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.62

44(1) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44-ss-1
part of: 44 Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
note: Notice of decision to allocate a disclosure to an agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.62
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-1-norm

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(1) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

44(2) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44-ss-2
part of: 44 Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
note: Authorised officer must provide written notice to persons and agencies covered by subsection (3) of this section.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.62
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(2) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During: reasonably practicable.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(3) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44-ss-3
part of: 44 Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
note: Notice of decision to allocate disclosure must be given to certain persons and agencies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.62
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(3) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice of decision to allocate disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Notice of decision to allocate disclosure is contained in this subsection.
premise text: (3) This subsection covers the following persons and agencies:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(4) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44-ss-4
part of: 44 Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
note: Must provide notice to discloser upon allocation decision.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.62
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(4) Allocation of disclosure—notice of decision to allocate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44A Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44a
has part: 44A(1) Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
has part: 44A(2) Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
has part: 44A(3) Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.63

44A(1) Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44a-ss-1
part of: 44A Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
note: Decision not to allocate disclosure under paragraph 43(3)(b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.63
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44a-ss-1-norm

44A(2) Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44a-ss-2
part of: 44A Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
note: Authorised officer must refer conduct for investigation under another law or power.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.63
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44a-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44A(2) Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must refer conduct
premise text: (2) If the authorised officer is satisfied...
conclusion text: must refer conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44A(3) Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44a-ss-3
part of: 44A Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
note: Authorised officer must give written notice to discloser after decision not to allocate disclosure.
description: written notice with reasons and details of action taken or proposed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.63
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44a-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44A(3) Allocation of disclosure—decision not to allocate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44B Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44b
has part: 44B(1) Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
has part: 44B(2) Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
has part: 44B(3) Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.65

44B(1) Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44b-ss-1
part of: 44B Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
note: Agency must allocate disclosure if stop action direction is lifted
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.65
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44B(1) Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must perform action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44B(2) Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44b-ss-2
part of: 44B Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
note: Authorised officer must give written notice to Ombudsman or IGIS under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.65
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44B(2) Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice to Ombudsman or IGIS
premise text: Authorised officer has a duty to give written notice
conclusion text: Ombudsman or IGIS must receive notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44B(3) Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44b-ss-3
part of: 44B Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
note: List of matters for disclosure purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.65
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-3-norm

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-44b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44B(3) Non-allocation of disclosure subject to stop action direction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

45 Reallocation of disclosures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45
note: Authorised officer may reallocate disclosure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.65
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 45 Reallocation of disclosures
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to reallocate disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45A Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45a
has part: 45A(1) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
has part: 45A(2) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
has part: 45A(3) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
has part: 45A(4) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.66

45A(1) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45a-ss-1
part of: 45A Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
note: Disclose certain information to an authorized officer within 1 business day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.66
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45A(1) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain information.
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) an authorised officer receives a disclosure that is: (i) made to the authorised officer; or (ii) made to a supervisor of a public official and given to the authorised officer;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Requires disclosure within a specific time frame.
premise text: Urgent notice within 1 business day
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

45A(2) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45a-ss-2
part of: 45A Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
note: Authorised officer must provide notice to IGIS within 1 business day after disclosure is received.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.66
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45A(2) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice within 1 business day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

45A(3) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45a-ss-3
part of: 45A Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
note: Authorised officer must give written notice to IGIS within 14 days after disclosure.
description: Notice to IGIS
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.66
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45A(3) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: Authorised officer must give written notice to IGIS.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45A(4) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45a-ss-4
part of: 45A Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
note: Principal officer must provide regular written notice to IGIS about investigation progress and expected completion time.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.66
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45A(4) Conduct related to intelligence agencies and agencies with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between notice and investigation completion
premise text: (c) the likelihood of any extension, or further extension, of the time for completion of the investigation being required under subsection 52(4).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Describes implication between notice and investigation progress
premise text: (a) the progress of the investigation;
conclusion text: The principal officer must provide regular written notice to IGIS about the investigation progress.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Describes information dissemination
premise text: (b) the anticipated time remaining before the investigation is completed;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46
note: Agency must investigate disclosure within set time and in accordance with Division requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.68
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-46-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must investigate disclosure within set time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Principal officer must investigate disclosures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47
has part: 47(1) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
has part: 47(2) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
has part: 47(3) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
has part: 47(4) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.68

47(1) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-1
part of: 47 Principal officer must investigate disclosures
note: Agency principal officer must investigate disclosures allocated to the agency under Division 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.68
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-1-norm

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(1) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

47(2) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-2
part of: 47 Principal officer must investigate disclosures
note: Principal officer must investigate disclosures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.68
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(2) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide investigation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Investigation is a part of disclosure investigation
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(3) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-3
part of: 47 Principal officer must investigate disclosures
note: Agency must investigate disclosures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.68
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(3) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must investigate disclosures
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(4) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-4
part of: 47 Principal officer must investigate disclosures
note: Principal officer must investigate disclosures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.68
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(4) Principal officer must investigate disclosures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must investigate disclosures
premise text: (4) This section has effect subject to any stop action direction under the NACC Act.
conclusion text: must investigate disclosures
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Discretion not to investigate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48
note: Principal officer may decide not to investigate disclosure under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.69
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-48-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-48-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48 Discretion not to investigate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to investigate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49
has part: 49(1) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
has part: 49(2) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
has part: 49(3) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
has part: 49(4) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.71

49(1) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-1
part of: 49 Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
note: Agency may decide not to investigate disclosure under separate investigative power.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.71
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49(1) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Agency has discretion to decide on investigation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

49(2) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-2
part of: 49 Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
note: Separate investigative power for disclosure investigation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.71
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49(2) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Investigative agency has separate power
premise text: (2) A separate investigative power...
conclusion text: ...investigate the disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

49(3) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-3
part of: 49 Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
note: Inform principal officers and discloser of investigation completion
description: Investigation completion information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.71
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49(4) Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-4
part of: 49 Investigative agency using separate investigative powers
note: Exemption from disclosure due to impracticality
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.71
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-49-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted
premise text: Contacting the discloser is not reasonably practicable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Notification to discloser
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50
has part: 50(1) Notification to discloser
has part: 50(1A) Notification to discloser
has part: 50(2) Notification to discloser
has part: 50(3) Notification to discloser
has part: 50(4) Notification to discloser
has part: 50(4A) Notification to discloser
has part: 50(5) Notification to discloser
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.72

50(1) Notification to discloser
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-1
part of: 50 Notification to discloser
note: Principal officer must notify discloser of investigation decision
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.72
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(1) Notification to discloser
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(1A) Notification to discloser
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-1a
part of: 50 Notification to discloser
note: Principal officer must give written notice to discloser of estimated investigation length.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.72
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-1a-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(1A) Notification to discloser
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(2) Notification to discloser
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-2
part of: 50 Notification to discloser
note: Principal officer must give written notice to discloser under certain conditions.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.72
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(2) Notification to discloser
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During certain conditions: referral of conduct under another law or power
premise text: (2) If paragraph (1)(b) applies, the principal officer must give written notice...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implies: referral of conduct under another law or power
premise text: (2) If paragraph (1)(b) applies, the principal officer must give written notice...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses information: referral of conduct under another law or power
premise text: (2) If paragraph (1)(b) applies, the principal officer must give written notice...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes: referral of conduct under another law or power
premise text: (2) If paragraph (1)(b) applies, the principal officer must give written notice...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

50(3) Notification to discloser
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-3
part of: 50 Notification to discloser
note: Delete certain reasons from notification to discloser.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.72
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(3) Notification to discloser
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the principal officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between deletion and notification.
premise text: (3) Despite paragraph (2)(a), the principal officer may delete from the reasons given to the discloser any reasons that would, if contained in a document, cause the document:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between deletion and notification.
premise text: (3) Despite paragraph (2)(a), the principal officer may delete from the reasons given to the discloser any reasons that would, if contained in a document, cause the document:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Describes the effect of deletion on notification.
premise text: (3) Despite paragraph (2)(a), the principal officer may delete from the reasons given to the discloser any reasons that would, if contained in a document, cause the document:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Describes the application of deletion rules.
premise text: (3) Despite paragraph (2)(a), the principal officer may delete from the reasons given to the discloser any reasons that would, if contained in a document, cause the document:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(4) Notification to discloser
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-4
part of: 50 Notification to discloser
note: Discloser may be notified of a matter under this section (other than subsection (4A)) in the copy of the notice given to the discloser under subsection 44(4).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.72
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-4-norm

50(4A) Notification to discloser
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-4a
part of: 50 Notification to discloser
note: Principal officer must notify discloser upon investigation of disclosure no longer subject to stop action direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.72
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-4a-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(4A) Notification to discloser
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification upon investigation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(5) Notification to discloser
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-5
part of: 50 Notification to discloser
note: Exemption from notification if not reasonably practicable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.72
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-5-norm

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(5) Notification to discloser
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

50AA Decision not to investigate—referral for investigation under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50aa
has part: 50AA(1) Decision not to investigate—referral for investigation under
has part: 50AA(2) Decision not to investigate—referral for investigation under
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.73

50AA(1) Decision not to investigate—referral for investigation under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50aa-ss-1
part of: 50AA Decision not to investigate—referral for investigation under
note: Agency cannot investigate disclosure under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.73
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 50AA(1) Decision not to investigate—referral for investigation under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Agency is prohibited from investigating disclosure.
premise text: (a) decides under section 48 not to investigate the disclosure, or (b) does not decide to investigate the disclosure further; and (c) is satisfied, on reasonable grounds, that the conduct disclosed would be more appropriately investigated under another law or power.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Agency's decision not to investigate disclosure must be within a certain time frame.
premise text: (a) decides under section 48 not to investigate the disclosure, or (b) does not decide to investigate the disclosure further; and (c) is satisfied, on reasonable grounds, that the conduct disclosed would be more appropriately investigated under another law or power.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Agency's decision not to investigate disclosure must be part of a recurring pattern.
premise text: (a) decides under section 48 not to investigate the disclosure, or (b) does not decide to investigate the disclosure further; and (c) is satisfied, on reasonable grounds, that the conduct disclosed would be more appropriately investigated under another law or power.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Agency's decision not to investigate disclosure must diffuse through the organization.
premise text: (a) decides under section 48 not to investigate the disclosure, or (b) does not decide to investigate the disclosure further; and (c) is satisfied, on reasonable grounds, that the conduct disclosed would be more appropriately investigated under another law or power.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
logic summary: Agency's decision not to investigate disclosure must be based on sound reasoning.
premise text: (a) decides under section 48 not to investigate the disclosure, or (b) does not decide to investigate the disclosure further; and (c) is satisfied, on reasonable grounds, that the conduct disclosed would be more appropriately investigated under another law or power.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50AA(2) Decision not to investigate—referral for investigation under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50aa-ss-2
part of: 50AA Decision not to investigate—referral for investigation under
note: Principal officer must refer conduct for investigation under other law or power.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.73
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50AA(2) Decision not to investigate—referral for investigation under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide referral
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50A Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50a
has part: 50A(1) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
has part: 50A(2) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
has part: 50A(3) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
has part: 50A(4) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.74

50A(1) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50a-ss-1
part of: 50A Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
note: Principal officer must give written notice to Ombudsman about decision not to investigate disclosure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.74
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50A(1) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50A(2) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50a-ss-2
part of: 50A Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
note: Notification to IGIS about investigation decision
description: Written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.74
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50A(2) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Principal officer must give written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50A(3) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50a-ss-3
part of: 50A Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
note: Must provide details about action taken or proposed under section 50AA.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.74
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50A(3) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide details.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50A(4) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50a-ss-4
part of: 50A Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
note: Principal officer must give written notice of stop action direction to Ombudsman or IGIS.
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.74
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50A(4) Notification to Ombudsman or IGIS about investigation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-50a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Report of investigation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51
has part: 51(1) Report of investigation
has part: 51(2) Report of investigation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.75

51(1) Report of investigation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51-ss-1
part of: 51 Report of investigation
note: Principal officer must prepare report after investigation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.75
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-51-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51(1) Report of investigation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51(2) Report of investigation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51-ss-2
part of: 51 Report of investigation
note: Report must provide specific information about investigation
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.75
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-51-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-51-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51(2) Report of investigation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Time limit for investigations under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52
has part: 52(1) Time limit for investigations under this Division
has part: 52(2) Time limit for investigations under this Division
has part: 52(3) Time limit for investigations under this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.77

52(1) Time limit for investigations under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52-ss-1
part of: 52 Time limit for investigations under this Division
note: Investigations must be completed within 90 days after specific events.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.77
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52(1) Time limit for investigations under this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must complete investigation within time limit
premise text: Investigation must be completed
conclusion text: Within 90 days after specified events
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for investigation completion
premise text: Investigation completion starts at specified event
conclusion text: Investigation completion ends 90 days after specified event
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(2) Time limit for investigations under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52-ss-2
part of: 52 Time limit for investigations under this Division
note: Time limit for investigations under this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.77
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-2-norm

52(3) Time limit for investigations under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52-ss-3
part of: 52 Time limit for investigations under this Division
note: Extension of time limit for investigations under this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.77
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-52-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Granting permission to extend time limit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

53 Conduct of investigations under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53
has part: 53(1) Conduct of investigations under this Division
has part: 53(2) Conduct of investigations under this Division
has part: 53(3) Conduct of investigations under this Division
has part: 53(4) Conduct of investigations under this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.78

53(1) Conduct of investigations under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-1
part of: 53 Conduct of investigations under this Division
note: Agency officer must conduct investigation as they think fit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.78
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(1) Conduct of investigations under this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must conduct investigation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(2) Conduct of investigations under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-2
part of: 53 Conduct of investigations under this Division
note: Principal officer may obtain information from persons and make inquiries as they think fit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.78
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(2) Conduct of investigations under this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Principal officer has the power to obtain information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(3) Conduct of investigations under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-3
part of: 53 Conduct of investigations under this Division
note: Comply with standards under section 74 during investigations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.78
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(3) Conduct of investigations under this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory compliance.
premise text: Section 74 standards apply.
conclusion text: Comply with standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(4) Conduct of investigations under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-4
part of: 53 Conduct of investigations under this Division
note: Must act in accordance with rules relating to fraud made for the purposes of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.78
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(4) Conduct of investigations under this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Must act in accordance with rules
premise text: Rules relating to fraud are made for the purposes of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013.
conclusion text: The principal officer must act accordingly.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-53-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During investigation relating to fraud
premise text: The investigation relates to one or more instances of fraud.
conclusion text: The principal officer must act accordingly during the investigation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Adoption of findings of another investigation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54
note: May adopt findings from another investigation under this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.79
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-54-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-54-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54 Adoption of findings of another investigation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 The Ombudsman and the IGIS—recommendations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55
note: Notification of allocation or non-allocation of disclosure to an agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.80
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-55-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-55-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Notification obligation
premise text: IGIS is notified of allocation or non-allocation
conclusion text: IGIS must investigate disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56
has part: 56(1) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
has part: 56(2) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
has part: 56(3) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
has part: 56(4) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
has part: 56(4A) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.82

56(1) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56-ss-1
part of: 56 Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
note: Disclose information suspected to be evidence of an offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.82
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56(1) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must disclose information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(2) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56-ss-2
part of: 56 Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
note: Duty to give information to police
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.82
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
premise text: Investigator has a duty to give relevant information
conclusion text: Member of police force must receive information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(3) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56-ss-3
part of: 56 Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
note: Investigator must disclose information to a member of an Australian police force under certain circumstances.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.82
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56(3) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information
premise text: Reasonable grounds
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(4) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56-ss-4
part of: 56 Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
note: Exemption from subsection (3) for certain investigations and corruption issues.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.82
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to investigate without subsection (3) applying.
premise text: (4) However, subsection (3) does not apply:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between subsection (3) and exemption.
premise text: (i) to investigate the commission of the offence; and (ii) to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions in gathering evidence and preparing briefs of evidence in relation to the commission of the offence;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Repeating pattern of exemption for certain investigations.
premise text: (a) if the investigator believes on reasonable grounds that the agency to which the investigator belongs has the capacity and the appropriate skills and resources needed:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission for corruption issue referral.
premise text: (b) if the investigator suspects on reasonable grounds that the relevant information raises a corruption issue (within the meaning of the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2022) and:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(4A) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56-ss-4a
part of: 56 Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
note: Disclosure of corruption issue to a member of an Australian police force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.82
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4a-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56(4A) Disclosure to a member of an Australian police force
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-56-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: State has obligation to disclose corruption issue
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58
note: Additional obligations on principal officers, authorised officers, supervisors and public officials.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.85
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-58-norm

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-58-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58 Simplified outline
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

59 Additional obligations of principal officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59
has part: 59(1) Additional obligations of principal officers
has part: 59(2) Additional obligations of principal officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.85

59(1) Additional obligations of principal officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59-ss-1
part of: 59 Additional obligations of principal officers
note: Principal officer must ensure authorised officers are accessible and aware of each other's identity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.85
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59(1) Additional obligations of principal officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must ensure authorised officers are accessible and aware of each other's identity.
premise text: (a) The principal officer of an agency must take reasonable steps to...
conclusion text: (b) public officials who belong to the agency are aware of the identity of each authorised officer of the agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Principal officer must ensure authorised officers are accessible for at least some time.
premise text: (a) The principal officer of an agency must take reasonable steps to...
conclusion text: The principal officer must ensure authorised officers are accessible by public officials who belong to the agency.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Principal officer must ensure authorised officers are accessible for at least some time.
premise text: (a) The principal officer of an agency must take reasonable steps to...
conclusion text: The principal officer must ensure authorised officers are accessible by public officials who belong to the agency.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: >=
logic summary: Principal officer must ensure authorised officers are accessible for at least some time.
premise text: (a) The principal officer of an agency must take reasonable steps to...
conclusion text: The principal officer must ensure authorised officers are accessible by public officials who belong to the agency.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: >=
logic summary: Principal officer must ensure authorised officers are accessible for at least some time.
premise text: (a) The principal officer of an agency must take reasonable steps to...
conclusion text: The principal officer must ensure authorised officers are accessible by public officials who belong to the agency.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59(2) Additional obligations of principal officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59-ss-2
part of: 59 Additional obligations of principal officers
note: Principal officer must encourage and support public interest disclosures.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.85
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59(2) Additional obligations of principal officers
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-59-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide encouragement and support.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Additional obligations of authorised officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60
note: Authorised officer must inform individual about potential internal disclosure.
description: Information to be disclosed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.87
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-logic-diffusion-4

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60 Additional obligations of authorised officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must inform individual
premise text: Authorised officer has reasonable grounds to believe disclosure is disclosable conduct
conclusion text: Inform individual about potential internal disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Authorised officer has reasonable grounds to believe disclosure is disclosable conduct
premise text: Disclosure concerns or could concern disclosable conduct
conclusion text: Disclosure must be made within a reasonable timeframe
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Authorised officer has reasonable grounds to believe disclosure is disclosable conduct
premise text: Individual proposes to disclose information
conclusion text: Disclosure must be made if individual proposes to disclose information
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Disclosable conduct
premise text: Information concerns or could concern disclosable conduct
conclusion text: Disclosure must be made within a reasonable timeframe
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60A Additional obligations of supervisors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60a
has part: 60A(1) Additional obligations of supervisors
has part: 60A(2) Additional obligations of supervisors
has part: 60A(3) Additional obligations of supervisors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.88

60A(1) Additional obligations of supervisors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60a-ss-1
part of: 60A Additional obligations of supervisors
note: Supervisor must explain matters to discloser if they have reasonable grounds to believe information concerns disclosable conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.88
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60A(1) Additional obligations of supervisors
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supervisor must explain matters to discloser.
premise text: Reasonable grounds exist.
conclusion text: Obligation to disclose.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60A(2) Additional obligations of supervisors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60a-ss-2
part of: 60A Additional obligations of supervisors
note: Supervisor must inform and advise discloser about disclosure procedures.
description: information to an authorised officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.88
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supervisor must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure procedures
premise text: (2) The supervisor must: (a) inform the discloser that the disclosure could be treated as an internal disclosure for the purposes of this Act;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
logic summary: Supervisor's obligation to inform and advise
premise text: (2) The supervisor must: (a) inform the discloser that the disclosure could be treated as an internal disclosure for the purposes of this Act;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
logic summary: Supervisor's obligation to explain procedures
premise text: (2) The supervisor must: (b) explain to the discloser the procedures under this Act for such a disclosure to be:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must
logic summary: Supervisor's obligation to provide civil and criminal protections
premise text: (d) explain to the discloser the civil and criminal protections this Act provides to protect disclosers, and those providing assistance in relation to such disclosures, from reprisals.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60A(3) Additional obligations of supervisors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60a-ss-3
part of: 60A Additional obligations of supervisors
note: Supervisor must provide information to authorized officer after disclosure.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.88
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-60a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Additional obligations of public officials
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61
has part: 61(1) Additional obligations of public officials
has part: 61(2) Additional obligations of public officials
has part: 61(3) Additional obligations of public officials
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.89

61(1) Additional obligations of public officials
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-1
part of: 61 Additional obligations of public officials
note: Public officials must use best endeavours to assist principal officers in investigations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.89
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-61-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must use best endeavours
premise text: Public official
conclusion text: Assist principal officer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(2) Additional obligations of public officials
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-2
part of: 61 Additional obligations of public officials
note: Public officials must assist Ombudsman in performance of functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.89
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-61-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide assistance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(3) Additional obligations of public officials
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-3
part of: 61 Additional obligations of public officials
note: Public officials must use their best endeavours to assist the IGIS.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.89
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-61-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must use best endeavours
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Additional functions of the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62
note: The Ombudsman must assist principal officers, authorised officers, public officials, and former public officials in relation to the operation of this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.90
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-62-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-62-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62 Additional functions of the Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Ombudsman has a duty to assist certain individuals.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63 Additional functions of the IGIS
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63
note: The IGIS must assist principal officers of intelligence agencies and public officials who belong to intelligence agencies in relation to the operation of this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.91
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-63-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-63-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-63-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63 Additional functions of the IGIS
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The IGIS must assist principal officers of intelligence agencies and public officials who belong to intelligence agencies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Simplified outline of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64
note: Sharing of information about disclosure between agencies is authorized, but further disclosure or use of such information is prohibited except for providing legal advice and professional assistance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.93
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-64-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-64-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of further disclosure or use of information
premise text: Legal practitioner's duty to maintain confidentiality
conclusion text: No further disclosure or use allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

65 Sharing information and documents between agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65
has part: 65(1) Sharing information and documents between agencies
has part: 65(2) Sharing information and documents between agencies
has part: 65(3) Sharing information and documents between agencies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.93

65(1) Sharing information and documents between agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-1
part of: 65 Sharing information and documents between agencies
note: Sharing information and documents between agencies is required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.93
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-65-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-65-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(1) Sharing information and documents between agencies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires sharing of information and documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65(2) Sharing information and documents between agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-2
part of: 65 Sharing information and documents between agencies
note: Permits sharing of information or documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.93
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-65-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERMITS
logic summary: Allows action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65(3) Sharing information and documents between agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-3
part of: 65 Sharing information and documents between agencies
note: Sharing information and documents between agencies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.93
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-65-ss-3-norm

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-65-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(3) Sharing information and documents between agencies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

67 Secrecy—legal practitioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67
has part: 67(1) Secrecy—legal practitioners
has part: 67(2) Secrecy—legal practitioners
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.94

67(1) Secrecy—legal practitioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67-ss-1
part of: 67 Secrecy—legal practitioners
note: Disclosing legal information without permission is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.94
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-67-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-67-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-67-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-67-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 67(1) Secrecy—legal practitioners
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-67-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing legal information
premise text: (a) the person has obtained information in the person’s capacity as the recipient of a legal practitioner disclosure;
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years or 120 penalty units, or both.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-67-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of using disclosed information
premise text: (b) the person: (i) discloses the information to another person; or (ii) uses the information;
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years or 120 penalty units, or both.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67(2) Secrecy—legal practitioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67-ss-2
part of: 67 Secrecy—legal practitioners
note: Disclosure for legal advice or professional assistance is permitted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.94
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-67-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-67-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-67-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permits disclosure for legal advice or professional assistance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68
note: Simplified outline of Division definitions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.96
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-68-norm

69 Public officials
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69
note: Defines public official for the purposes of the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.96
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-69-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-69-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-69-logic-deontic-2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-69-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69 Public officials
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-69-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies public officials into categories
premise text: Item in table
conclusion text: Public official belongs to agency
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-69-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: in
logic summary: Defines scope of Act
premise text: Section 69
conclusion text: Act applies to public officials and agencies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Individuals taken to be public officials
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70
has part: 70(1) Individuals taken to be public officials
has part: 70(2) Individuals taken to be public officials
has part: 70(3) Individuals taken to be public officials
has part: 70(3A) Individuals taken to be public officials
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.101

70(1) Individuals taken to be public officials
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-1
part of: 70 Individuals taken to be public officials
note: Authorised officer may determine that an individual has been a public official for disclosure purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.101
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(1) Individuals taken to be public officials
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Authorised officer may determine
premise text: Individual has information that concerns disclosable conduct
conclusion text: This Act has effect in relation to the disclosure of the information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must be a public official
logic summary: Individual must be a public official for disclosure purposes
premise text: This Act has effect in relation to the disclosure of the information
conclusion text: In relation to the disclosure of the information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: when the individual obtained the information
logic summary: Time of obtaining information is relevant for public official status
premise text: Individual has disclosed or proposes to disclose information
conclusion text: In relation to the disclosure of the information
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may determine that this Act has effect
logic summary: Authorised officer may determine that this Act has effect
premise text: Individual has disclosed or proposes to disclose information
conclusion text: In relation to the disclosure of the information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is taken always to have had effect
logic summary: This Act is taken always to have had effect in relation to the disclosure of the information
premise text: Individual has disclosed or proposes to disclose information
conclusion text: In relation to the disclosure of the information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(2) Individuals taken to be public officials
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-2
part of: 70 Individuals taken to be public officials
note: Authorized officer may make determination on request or initiative.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.101
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(2) Individuals taken to be public officials
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Authorization to make determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(3) Individuals taken to be public officials
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-3
part of: 70 Individuals taken to be public officials
note: Authorised officer must make determination after considering individual's request.
description: Reasons for refusal (if applicable)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.101
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(3) Individuals taken to be public officials
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must make determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(3A) Individuals taken to be public officials
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-3a
part of: 70 Individuals taken to be public officials
note: Exemption from section 70(3A) for judicial officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.101
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(3A) Individuals taken to be public officials
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
logic summary: Section 70(3A) does not apply to judicial officers
premise text: Individuals taken to be public officials
conclusion text: Judicial officers are exempt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Section 70(3A) does not apply during judicial officer's term
premise text: Individuals taken to be public officials
conclusion text: Judicial officers' terms do not overlap with section 70(3A)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Section 70(3A) does not apply during judicial officer's term
premise text: Individuals taken to be public officials
conclusion text: Judicial officers' terms do not overlap with section 70(3A)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: Section 70(3A) exemption for judicial officers spreads to other public officials
premise text: Individuals taken to be public officials
conclusion text: Other public officials are exempt from section 70(3A)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-70-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Section 70(3A) exemption for judicial officers recognized by AI system
premise text: Individuals taken to be public officials
conclusion text: AI system recognizes judicial officers as exempt from section 70(3A)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71 Meaning of agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71
has part: 71(1) Meaning of agency
has part: 71(2) Meaning of agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.102

71(1) Meaning of agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-1
part of: 71 Meaning of agency
note: Definition of agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.102
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-71-ss-1-norm

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-71-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71(1) Meaning of agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

71(2) Meaning of agency
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-2
part of: 71 Meaning of agency
note: A Royal Commission is not an agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.102
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-71-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-71-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-71-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of agency
premise text: (2) However, a Royal Commission is not an agency.
conclusion text: A Royal Commission is not an agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Meaning of prescribed authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72
has part: 72(1) Meaning of prescribed authority
has part: 72(2) Meaning of prescribed authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.102

72(1) Meaning of prescribed authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72-ss-1
part of: 72 Meaning of prescribed authority
note: Defines prescribed authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.102
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-6

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: (a) a Commonwealth company
conclusion text: prescribed authority means one of following entities:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: (b) the part of the Defence Department known as the Australian Geospatial-Intelligence Organisation
conclusion text: prescribed authority means one of following entities:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: (c) the part of the Defence Department known as the Defence Intelligence Organisation
conclusion text: prescribed authority means one of following entities:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: (d) the High Court or any court created by the Parliament
conclusion text: prescribed authority means one of following entities:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: (e) a body that is established by a law of the Commonwealth and prescribed by the PID rules
conclusion text: prescribed authority means one of following entities:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: (f) the person holding, or performing the duties of, an office that is established by a law of the Commonwealth and prescribed by the PID rules
conclusion text: prescribed authority means one of following entities:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(2) Meaning of prescribed authority
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72-ss-2
part of: 72 Meaning of prescribed authority
note: Entities are prescribed authorities in their own right.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.102
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72(2) Meaning of prescribed authority
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-72-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has-prescribed-authority
logic summary: Prescribed authority definition
premise text: Definition of prescribed authority in subsection (1)
conclusion text: Entities are prescribed authorities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 Meaning of principal officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73
has part: 73(1) Meaning of principal officer
has part: 73(2) Meaning of principal officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.103

73(1) Meaning of principal officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73-ss-1
part of: 73 Meaning of principal officer
note: Defines principal officer for an agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.103
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73(1) Meaning of principal officer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Defines principal officer for an agency
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73(2) Meaning of principal officer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73-ss-2
part of: 73 Meaning of principal officer
note: Definition of principal officer for purposes of the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.103
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73-ss-2-norm

73A Scope of Subdivision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73a
note: Scope of Subdivision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.104
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73a-norm

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73A Scope of Subdivision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

73B Machinery of government changes—conduct relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73b
note: Conduct before change time relates to new agency under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.105
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73b-norm

73C Machinery of government changes—disclosures made before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73c
has part: 73C(1) Machinery of government changes—disclosures made before
has part: 73C(2) Machinery of government changes—disclosures made before
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.105

73C(1) Machinery of government changes—disclosures made before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73c-ss-1
part of: 73C Machinery of government changes—disclosures made before
note: Disclosure of information before government change
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.105
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73c-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73C(1) Machinery of government changes—disclosures made before
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information
premise text: Disclosure made before change time
conclusion text: State must provide disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73C(2) Machinery of government changes—disclosures made before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73c-ss-2
part of: 73C Machinery of government changes—disclosures made before
note: Machinery of government changes—disclosures made before
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.105
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73c-ss-2-norm

73D Machinery of government changes—information transfer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73d
has part: 73D(1) Machinery of government changes—information transfer
has part: 73D(2) Machinery of government changes—information transfer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.106

73D(1) Machinery of government changes—information transfer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73d-ss-1
part of: 73D Machinery of government changes—information transfer
note: Disclosure of information before change time is obligation to report investigation completion.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.106
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73d-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73D(1) Machinery of government changes—information transfer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to report investigation completion.
premise text: Disclosure of information before change time.
conclusion text: Investigation completion must be reported.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73D(2) Machinery of government changes—information transfer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73d-ss-2
part of: 73D Machinery of government changes—information transfer
note: Authorises principal officer to provide information in relation to disclosure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.106
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73d-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73d-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 73D(2) Machinery of government changes—information transfer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-73d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermissionTo
logic summary: Authorisation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74 Ombudsman may determine standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74
has part: 74(1) Ombudsman may determine standards
has part: 74(2) Ombudsman may determine standards
has part: 74(3) Ombudsman may determine standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.107

74(1) Ombudsman may determine standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-1
part of: 74 Ombudsman may determine standards
note: The Ombudsman may determine standards relating to procedures, investigations, reports, and information giving.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.107
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(1) Ombudsman may determine standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to determine standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(2) Ombudsman may determine standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-2
part of: 74 Ombudsman may determine standards
note: Consultation requirement before determining standards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.107
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(2) Ombudsman may determine standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consult
premise text: The Ombudsman must consult the IGIS.
conclusion text: A standard may not be determined without consultation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(3) Ombudsman may determine standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-3
part of: 74 Ombudsman may determine standards
note: Ensure standards are in force at all times after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.107
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(3) Ombudsman may determine standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to ensure standards are in force.
premise text: (3) The Ombudsman must...
conclusion text: ...standards are in force at all times...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Standards must be in force during the commencement period.
premise text: (3) The Ombudsman must ensure that standards are in force under each of paragraphs (1)(a), (b) and (c)...
conclusion text: ...standards are in force at all times after the commencement of this section.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Standards being in force implies their maintenance.
premise text: (3) The Ombudsman must ensure that standards are in force under each of paragraphs (1)(a), (b) and (c)...
conclusion text: ...standards are in force at all times after the commencement of this section.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: mustBe
logic summary: Standards must be maintained through diffusion.
premise text: (3) The Ombudsman must ensure that standards are in force under each of paragraphs (1)(a), (b) and (c)...
conclusion text: ...standards are in force at all times after the commencement of this section.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-74-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: mustBe
logic summary: Standards must be maintained through artificial intelligence.
premise text: (3) The Ombudsman must ensure that standards are in force under each of paragraphs (1)(a), (b) and (c)...
conclusion text: ...standards are in force at all times after the commencement of this section.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75 Restriction on the application of secrecy provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-75
note: Exemptions from secrecy provisions for disclosure investigations and performance of functions/exercise of powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.107
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-75-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-75-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-75-logic-ltl-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-75-logic-deontic-4

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission to disclose information for specific purposes.
premise text: (1) A provision of a law of the Commonwealth that prohibits...
conclusion text: ...does not apply to the disclosure, recording or use of information if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-75-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between disclosure investigations and performance of functions/exercise of powers.
premise text: (c) the disclosure, recording or use is in connection with giving a person access to information for...
conclusion text: ...or (d) the disclosure, recording or use is for the purposes of the performance of the functions, or the exercise of the powers,
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-75-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Recurring trace between disclosure investigations and performance of functions/exercise of powers.
premise text: (b) the disclosure, recording or use is for the purposes of the performance of the functions, or the exercise of the powers,
conclusion text: ...or (c) the disclosure, recording or use is in connection with giving a person access to information for...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-75-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information for specific purposes.
premise text: (a) the disclosure, recording or use is in connection with the conduct of a disclosure investigation;
conclusion text: ...or (b) the disclosure, recording or use is for the purposes of...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 Annual reports by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76
has part: 76(1) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
has part: 76(2) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
has part: 76(3) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
has part: 76(4) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.108

76(1) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76-ss-1
part of: 76 Annual reports by the Ombudsman
note: Annual report by Ombudsman to Minister and Parliament
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.108
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(1) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(2) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76-ss-2
part of: 76 Annual reports by the Ombudsman
note: Annual reports by the Ombudsman must include specific information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.108
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(2) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual reports
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(3) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76-ss-3
part of: 76 Annual reports by the Ombudsman
note: Principal officer must provide information and assistance to the Ombudsman.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.108
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-3-logic-ltl-4

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide information and assistance.
premise text: The Ombudsman reasonably requires such information and assistance.
conclusion text: The principal officer must give the Ombudsman such information and assistance as required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE
logic summary: Principal officer has an obligation to provide information and assistance.
premise text: The principal officer must give the Ombudsman such information and assistance as required.
conclusion text: The principal officer is obligated to provide the required information and assistance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: STARTS AT
logic summary: Starts at a specific point in time.
premise text: The principal officer must give the Ombudsman such information and assistance as required by a specific point in time.
conclusion text: The provision starts at a specific point in time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: STARTS AT
logic summary: Starts at a specific point in time.
premise text: The principal officer must give the Ombudsman such information and assistance as required by a specific point in time.
conclusion text: The provision starts at a specific point in time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(4) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76-ss-4
part of: 76 Annual reports by the Ombudsman
note: Delete material from a document given to the Ombudsman that could identify an individual or result in exemption under Part IV of the Freedom of Information Act 1982.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.108
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(4) Annual reports by the Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (4) Despite subsection (3), the principal officer may delete...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for deletion
premise text: (b) the inclusion of which would...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76A Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76a
has part: 76A(1) Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
has part: 76A(2) Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
has part: 76A(3) Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.110

76A(1) Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76a-ss-1
part of: 76A Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
note: The Ombudsman must prepare and give a report to the Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.110
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76A(1) Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76A(2) Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76a-ss-2
part of: 76A Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
note: Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman must include specific information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.110
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76A(2) Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide reports
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76A(3) Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76a-ss-3
part of: 76A Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
note: Reports must be submitted in accordance with subsections 76(3) and (4)
description: Annual reports
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.110
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76A(3) Six-monthly reports by the Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide annual reports
premise text: Subsections 76(3) and (4)
conclusion text: Annual report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-76a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Reports must be submitted within a six-month period
premise text: Six-monthly reports
conclusion text: Annual report submission
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Delegations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77
has part: 77(1) Delegations
has part: 77(2) Delegations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.110

77(1) Delegations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77-ss-1
part of: 77 Delegations
note: Delegation of functions or powers to a public official
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.110
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-77-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-77-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to delegate
premise text: The principal officer may, by writing, delegate any or all of their functions or powers.
conclusion text: The public official may receive delegated functions or powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-77-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: The delegation is by writing.
conclusion text: The delegation occurs during the principal officer's term.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

77(2) Delegations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77-ss-2
part of: 77 Delegations
note: Comply with principal officer's directions when exercising delegated functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.110
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-77-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-77-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(2) Delegations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with directions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Liability for acts and omissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78
has part: 78(1) Liability for acts and omissions
has part: 78(2) Liability for acts and omissions
has part: 78(3) Liability for acts and omissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.111

78(1) Liability for acts and omissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78-ss-1
part of: 78 Liability for acts and omissions
note: No liability for acts and omissions in good faith
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.111
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(1) Liability for acts and omissions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: interval relation
logic summary: Temporal intervals for good faith
premise text: (d) in the performance, or purported performance, of any function conferred on the person by this Act; (e) in the exercise, or purported exercise, of any power conferred on the person by this Act;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: inference rule
logic summary: Inference to exemption
premise text: (a) the principal officer of an agency or a delegate of the principal officer; (b) an authorised officer of an agency; (c) a supervisor of a person who makes a disclosure;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion operator
logic summary: Diffusion through good faith
premise text: (d) in the performance, or purported performance, of any function conferred on the person by this Act; (e) in the exercise, or purported exercise, of any power conferred on the person by this Act;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive agent
logic summary: Cognitive agent exemption
premise text: (a) the principal officer of an agency or a delegate of the principal officer; (b) an authorised officer of an agency; (c) a supervisor of a person who makes a disclosure;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78(2) Liability for acts and omissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78-ss-2
part of: 78 Liability for acts and omissions
note: Section does not apply to a breach of designated publication restriction.
references: sec-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.111
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-2-norm

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(2) Liability for acts and omissions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

78(3) Liability for acts and omissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78-ss-3
part of: 78 Liability for acts and omissions
note: No effect on rights to seek judicial review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.111
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(3) Liability for acts and omissions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-78-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes rights from this section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79 Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79
note: This Act does not exclude or limit State and Territory laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-79-norm

80 Law relating to legal professional privilege not affected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80
note: No effect on legal professional privilege law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-80-norm

82 Other investigative powers etc. not affected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82
has part: 82(1) Other investigative powers etc. not affected
has part: 82(2) Other investigative powers etc. not affected
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112

82(1) Other investigative powers etc. not affected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82-ss-1
part of: 82 Other investigative powers etc. not affected
note: No implication on Commonwealth laws' investigative powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82-ss-1-norm

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82(1) Other investigative powers etc. not affected
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

82(2) Other investigative powers etc. not affected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82-ss-2
part of: 82 Other investigative powers etc. not affected
note: No obligation imposed by this Act on an agency or public official supersedes obligations under other Commonwealth laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82(2) Other investigative powers etc. not affected
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: supersedes
logic summary: Supersedes obligations
premise text: No obligation imposed by this Act
conclusion text: under other Commonwealth laws
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82A Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82a
has part: 82A(1) Review of operation of Act
has part: 82A(2) Review of operation of Act
has part: 82A(3) Review of operation of Act
has part: 82A(4) Review of operation of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112

82A(1) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82a-ss-1
part of: 82A Review of operation of Act
note: The Minister must cause a review to be undertaken of the operation of this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-1-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to undertake a review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82A(2) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82a-ss-2
part of: 82A Review of operation of Act
note: Review of operation of Act must be conducted after 5 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82A(2) Review of operation of Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to review operation of Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82A(3) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82a-ss-3
part of: 82A Review of operation of Act
note: The Minister must cause a written report about the review to be prepared.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must cause a written report about the review to be prepared.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82A(4) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82a-ss-4
part of: 82A Review of operation of Act
note: The Minister must cause a copy of the report to be laid before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.112
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-4-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-82a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must cause a copy of the report to be laid before each House of Parliament.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83 The PID rules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83
note: The Minister may make rules by legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.113
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-83-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-83-logic-descriptionlogic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-83-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the PID rules as a descriptive clause.
premise text: The text describes the rules as 'prescribing matters'
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 July
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-4
note: Remainder of s 3-83
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.117
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-15-4-norm

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-2
note: Sch 11 (items 84-91), Sch 14: 1 July 2014 (s 2(1) items 6, 14)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.117
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-2-norm

13 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-2
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 2 (items 7-9), Schedule 7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.117
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-2-norm

14 Apr 2015 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-2
note: Amendment by Acts and Instruments (Framework Reform) (Consequential Provisions) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.117
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-2-norm

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-2
note: Legislation history for Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.117
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-2-norm

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-3
note: Conditional commencement of National Security Legislation Amendment Act 2014
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-3-norm

2 Oct 2014
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-2-3-norm

30 Oct 2014 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-3
note: Duty to report certain information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-3-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-2
note: May
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-2-norm

18 June 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-2
note: June 2015 (s 2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-18-2-norm

27 May 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-2
note: Duty to provide information
description: Information about the amalgamation of tribunals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-27-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-27-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-27-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-3
note: Permits item 38 of Schedule 8 and item 9 of Schedule 9.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-26-3-norm

1 July 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-3
note: July 2015 (s 2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-1-3-norm

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-30-4-norm

28 July 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-2
note: Prohibition on Acts and Instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-28-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits Acts and Instruments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-4
note: Conditional commencement of Civil Law and Justice (Omnibus Amendments) Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-4-norm

13 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-3
note: Public Interest Disclosure Act 2015 commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.118
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-3-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-13-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Mandatory provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Dec 2015
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.119
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-2-4-norm

1 July 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-4
note: July 2016 (s 2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.119
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-1-4-norm

18 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.119
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-18-3-norm

1 July 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-5
note: Commencement of legislation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.119
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-1-5-norm

29 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-2
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.119
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-29-2-norm

10 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-5
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.119
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-10-5-norm

1 Mar 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.119
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-1-6-norm

1 Sept 2021 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-7
note: Conditional commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.119
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-1-7-norm

3 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-2
note: Sch 2 (items 96-111): 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.119
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Classifies legislative provisions into a deontic model
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-2
note: Repeal of certain items in Schedule 1 before commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.120
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-12-2-norm

19 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-2
note: Conditional commencement of Public Interest Disclosure Amendment (Review) Act 2023
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.120
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-2-norm

19 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-3
note: Never commenced
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.120
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-3-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-3-logic-alleninterval-2

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Never commenced
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: contains
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: The commencement of this Act is 1 July 2023
conclusion text: Never commenced
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-2
note: Members of Parliament (Staff) Amendment Act 2023
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.120
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11-2-norm

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-11-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Aug
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

19 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-4
note: Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Modernisation) Act 2023
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.120
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-19-4-norm

20 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-2
note: Sch 1 (items 196-198), Sch 3 (item 2): 21 Sept 2023
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.120
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-2-norm
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1

public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-2
note: May
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.121
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-31-2-norm

14 Oct 2024 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-3
note: Conditional commencement of the National Intelligence Community Act 2025
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.121
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-14-3-norm

4 Dec 2025
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-3
note: References schedules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.121
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-4-3-norm

4 June 2026 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-4
note: June 2026 (s 2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013.pdf, p.121
asserts: public-interest-disclosure-act-2013-sec-4-4-norm